Incidence and clinical importance of perioperative histamine release: randomised study of volume loading and antihistamines after induction of anaesthesia. Trial Group Mainz/Marburg

Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses

Background

Crystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients’ conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than saline can be inferred from sepsis to other patient group is uncertain, and adverse effect profile is not comprehensive. This study aims to compare the survival benefits and adverse effects of seven fluid types with network meta-analysis in sepsis, surgical, trauma, and traumatic brain injury patients.

Methods

Searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles occurred from inception until January 2020. Studies on critically ill adults requiring fluid resuscitation were included. Intervention studies reported on balanced crystalloid, saline, iso-oncotic albumin, hyperoncotic albumin, low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (L-HES), high molecular weight HES, and gelatin. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference. Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) web application was used to rate confidence in synthetic evidence.

Results

Fifty-eight trials (n = 26,351 patients) were identified. Seven fluid types were evaluated. Among patients with sepsis and surgery, balanced crystalloids and albumin achieved better survival, fewer acute kidney injury, and smaller blood transfusion volumes than saline and L-HES. In those with sepsis, balanced crystalloids significantly reduced mortality more than saline (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and L-HES (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.95) and reduced acute kidney injury more than L-HES (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65–0.99). However, they required the greatest resuscitation volume among all fluid types, especially in trauma patients. In patients with traumatic brain injury, saline and L-HES achieved lower mortality than albumin and balanced crystalloids; especially saline was significantly superior to iso-oncotic albumin (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87).

Conclusions

Our network meta-analysis found that balanced crystalloids and albumin decreased mortality more than L-HES and saline in sepsis patients; however, saline or L-HES was better than iso-oncotic albumin or balanced crystalloids in traumatic brain injury patients.

Trial registration

PROSPERO website, registration number: CRD42018115641).

Comparative epidemiology of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions

Suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are rare but contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of surgical procedures. Recent publications have highlighted the differences between countries concerning the respective risk of different drugs, and changes in patterns of causal agents and the emergence of new allergens. This review summarises recent information on the epidemiology of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions, with specific consideration of differences between geographic areas for the most frequently involved offending agents.

Anaphylaxis to Cisatracurium following Negative Skin Testing

General anaesthesia for the patient with a history of anaesthesia-related anaphylaxis is challenging. Precautions against anaphylaxis and the use of skin test negative drugs can reduce but not eliminate the risk. In the majority of such cases, subsequent anaesthesia is uneventful. However, the absence of a clearly identified triggering agent increases the difficulties facing the anaesthetist. We present a case of anaphylaxis to cisatracurium following a negative skin test.

Choice of fluids in critically ill patients

Background

Fluids are by far the most commonly administered intravenous treatment in patient care. During critical illness, fluids are widely administered to maintain or increase cardiac output, thereby relieving overt tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia.

Main text

Until recently, because of their excellent safety profile, fluids were not considered “medications”. However, it is now understood that intravenous fluid should be viewed as drugs. They affect the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal and immune systems. Fluid administration should therefore always be accompanied by careful consideration of the risk/benefit ratio, not only of the additional volume being administered but also of the effect of its composition on the physiology of the patient. Apart from the need to constantly assess fluid responsiveness, it is also important to periodically reconsider the type of fluid being administered and the evidence regarding the relationship between specific disease states and different fluid solutions.

Conclusions

The current review presents the state of the art regarding fluid solutions and presents the existing evidence on routine fluid management of critically ill patients in specific clinical settings (sepsis, Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome, major abdominal surgery, acute kidney injury and trauma).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0669-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Severe hypersensitivity reactions to platinum compounds post-pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): first literature report

BACKGROUND

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) shows encouraging results for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastasis. Several reports demonstrated the safety of the procedure combined with systemic chemotherapy, with a low rate of complication. The aim of this study is to report severe hypersensitivity reactions to platinum compounds (SHRPC) during PIPAC procedures.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PIPAC for non-resectable PC in Lyon Sud University hospital were included in a prospective institutional database. All patients who presented a SHRPC after PIPAC were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two patients underwent 383 PIPAC procedures between December 2015 and December 2017. oxaliplatin's and cisplatin-doxorubicin's protocols were used in 71 and 312 PIPAC, respectively. Four patients (3%) developed SHRPC; two patients (2.8%) after oxaliplatin and two patients (0.6%) after cisplatin-doxorubicin protocols. SHRPC occurred during the 6th PIPAC with cisplatin-doxorubicin protocol and during 2nd and 3rd PIPAC of the oxaliplatin protocol. Three events appeared within 15 min and one event occurred 50 min following nebulization. All the SHRPC have been managed successfully without any complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of SHRPC after PIPAC. The physician must constantly keep this rare but life-threatening complication in mind, especially after repeated PIPAC administration or previous platinum-based systemic chemotherapy.

[Role of histamine in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction: study using knockout mice of histamine-related genes]

Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients, and its incidence continues to rise. Sepsis is now defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. Histamine assumes a critical role as a major mediator of many pathologic disorders with inflammation and immune reactions. However, direct evidence has not been provided showing the involvement of histamine in the development of multiple organ dysfunction or failure in sepsis. We have found that sepsis-induced major end-organ (lung, liver, and kidney) injury is attenuated in histidine decarboxylase (HDC) gene knockout mice. H1/H2-receptor gene-double knockout mice apparently behave similar to HDC knockout mice in reducing sepsis-related pathologic changes. Here we provide an overview on the role of endogenous histamine as an aggregating mediator that could contribute to the development of major end-organ injury in sepsis.

General anaesthesia-induced anaphylaxis: impact of allergy testing on subsequent anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy to drugs and substances used during general anaesthesia as well as non-allergic drug hypersensitivity reactions may account for anaesthesia-induced anaphylaxis. As IgE-mediated anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening reaction, identification of the culprit allergen is essential to avoid anaphylaxis recurrence during subsequent general anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether preventive recommendations derived from allergy testing after intraoperative anaphylaxis were followed in subsequent general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Results of standardized allergy testing after anaesthesia-induced anaphylaxis and outcome of subsequent general anaesthesia were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 107 patients were diagnosed with IgE-mediated allergy to a drug or substance used during general anaesthesia, and 54 patients were test negative. Twenty-eight of 29 allergy patients tolerated subsequent general anaesthesia uneventfully. One patient with cefazolin allergy suffered from anaphylaxis recurrence due to accidental reapplication of cefazolin. Twenty-two of 24 test-negative patients tolerated subsequent general anaesthesia, whereas two patients again developed anaphylaxis despite pre-medication regimens.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results confirm the practical impact of allergy testing in general anaesthesia-induced anaphylaxis. By identification of the allergen, it is possible to avoid allergic anaphylaxis during subsequent anaesthesia. In most cases, recommended pre-medication seems to prevent the recurrence of non-allergic drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Mesenteric Traction Syndrome or Gut in Distress

The mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) remains, seventeen years after its first designation as a distinct pathologic entity, an aspect of surgical practice that has received limited attention. Apart from its symptomatology, there is mostly speculation about its exact causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Even though full-blown MTS is rather rare, the advent of laparoscopic surgery has indicated that there are different stages of stress associated with open abdominal surgery. Some evidence points to the involvement of mast cell derived vasoactive mediators and suggests possible pharmacologic management.

Addressing the Global Burden of Trauma in Major Surgery

Despite a technically perfect procedure, surgical stress can determine the success or failure of an operation. Surgical trauma is often referred to as the "neglected step-child" of global health in terms of patient numbers, mortality, morbidity, and costs. A staggering 234 million major surgeries are performed every year, and depending upon country and institution, up to 4% of patients will die before leaving hospital, up to 15% will have serious post-operative morbidity, and 5-15% will be readmitted within 30 days. These percentages equate to around 1000 deaths and 4000 major complications every hour, and it has been estimated that 50% may be preventable. New frontline drugs are urgently required to make major surgery safer for the patient and more predictable for the surgeon. We review the basic physiology of the stress response from neuroendocrine to genomic systems, and discuss the paucity of clinical data supporting the use of statins, beta-adrenergic blockers and calcium-channel blockers. Since cardiac-related complications are the most common, particularly in the elderly, a key strategy would be to improve ventricular-arterial coupling to safeguard the endothelium and maintain tissue oxygenation. Reduced O2 supply is associated with glycocalyx shedding, decreased endothelial barrier function, fluid leakage, inflammation, and coagulopathy. A healthy endothelium may prevent these "secondary hit" complications, including possibly immunosuppression. Thus, the four pillars of whole body resynchronization during surgical trauma, and targets for new therapies, are: (1) the CNS, (2) the heart, (3) arterial supply and venous return functions, and (4) the endothelium. This is termed the Central-Cardio-Vascular-Endothelium (CCVE) coupling hypothesis. Since similar sterile injury cascades exist in critical illness, accidental trauma, hemorrhage, cardiac arrest, infection and burns, new drugs that improve CCVE coupling may find wide utility in civilian and military medicine.

[Modified McPeek score in multiple trauma patients. Prospective evaluation of a points system for recording follow-up factors]

BACKGROUND

Many commonly available trauma scores predict mortality, but to evaluate the success of a certain therapy or for difficult scientific and epidemiological purposes this may be insufficient in the face of improved survival rates. For outcome analysis of multiple trauma patients, the extent of medical resources needed could be an additional outcome measurement. McPeek et al. developed a potential scoring system for elective surgery patients, which was recently modified for multiple trauma patients.

AIM

The current study investigated if the McPeek score could be prospectively used in multiple trauma patients and whether it could become an additional helpful tool in outcome assessment. Applicability was assessed by practical examples.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective single-centre study at the University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria, between December 2008 and November 2010 multiple trauma patients (≥ 18 years) with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 17 were enrolled. Besides demographic data, prehospital vital parameters and diagnoses, all diagnoses from the trauma, mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital were recorded. The commonly used trauma scores ISS, revised trauma score (RTS), a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) were applied and an observed McPeek score was allocated following end of hospitalization. The McPeek scoring system was used according to the latest modifications. A correlation between trauma scores and the McPeek score was performed. The McPeek score was then predicted by a common trauma score using ordinal regression with the polytomous universal model (PLUM method). By subtracting the predicted from the observed McPeek scores the residual McPeek value was calculated and used for practical examples of outcome analysis with the McPeek scoring system.

RESULTS

Out of 406 identified multiple trauma patients during the study phase, 183 had to be excluded due to missing data (mainly prehospital or following transfer). A total of 223 patients (mean ISS 31.2, mean age 47.2 years) were enrolled and assigned to the population-based observed McPeek score (median 4.0). Correlation coefficients were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 0.59, ISS 0.62, RTS 0.65, TRISS 0.74 and ASCOT 0.77 (p < 0.0001). The TRISS predicted the McPeek score best in ordinal regression (pseudo-R(2) = 0.944, p < 0.0001). The residual McPeek score (observed minus predicted) was used to illustrate the influence of the blood glucose level on admission and the influence of head injury on outcome of multiple injury patients in detail.

CONCLUSION

The modified McPeek score is applicable to multiple trauma patients to assess outcome for scientific or epidemiological purposes. Its main advantage is that it quantifies outcome independently of regional or national circumstances.

Flurbiprofen axetil provides a prophylactic benefit against mesenteric traction syndrome associated with remifentanil infusion during laparotomy

PURPOSE

Mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is caused by PGI(2) release during abdominal procedures and is often observed during abdominal surgery. We have demonstrated that MTS occurs more frequently in cases using remifentanil than in those that are not. The aim of this study was to assess the prophylactic benefit of flurbiprofen axetil on MTS in patients undergoing abdominal surgery using remifentanil.

METHODS

Thirty ASA physical status I and II patients were enrolled. They were scheduled to undergo abdominal surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil and were randomly assigned to receive flurbiprofen axetil (group F) or saline (group C) preoperatively (n = 15 each). MTS was defined according to our simplified diagnostic criteria. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded, and the plasma 6-keto-PGF(1α) (a stable metabolite of PGI(2)) concentration was measured just before skin incision and at 20 and 60 min after skin incision (T(0), T(20), T(60)) to confirm the diagnosis of MTS.

RESULTS

Twelve of 15 (80%) patients developed MTS in group C, whereas only 1 of 15 (6.7%) patients in group F developed MTS. At T(20), the group C patients showed significantly lower arterial blood pressure (P < 0.05) and a faster heart rate (P < 0.01) than those in group F. The mean plasma 6-keto-PGF(1α) concentration was significantly elevated in group C at T(20) (P < 0.01), whereas the plasma 6-keto-PGF(1α) level remained low throughout the observation period in group F.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that preoperative administration of flurbiprofen axetil reduced the incidence of MTS during abdominal surgery with remifentanil analgesia.

Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite thousands of papers, the value of quality of life (QoL) in curing disease remains uncertain. Until now, we lacked tools for the diagnosis and specific treatment of diseased QoL. We approached this problem stepwise by theory building, modelling, an exploratory trial and now a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) in breast cancer, whose results we report here.

METHODS

In all, 200 representative Bavarian primary breast cancer patients were recruited by five hospitals and treated by 146 care professionals. Patients were randomised to either (1) a novel care pathway including diagnosis of 'diseased' QoL (any QoL measure below 50 points) using a QoL profile and expert report sent to the patient's coordinating practitioner, who arranged QoL therapy consisting of up to five standardised treatments for specific QoL defects or (2) standard postoperative care adhering to the German national guideline for breast cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in each group with diseased QoL 6 months after surgery. Patients were blinded to their allocated group.

RESULTS

At 0 and 3 months after surgery, diseased QoL was diagnosed in 70% of patients. The QoL pathway reduced rates of diseased QoL to 56% at 6 months, especially in emotion and coping, compared with 71% in controls (P=0.048). Relative risk reduction was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-37), absolute risk reduction 15% (95% CI: 0.3-29), number needed to treat (NNT)=7 (95% CI: 3-37). When QoL therapy finished after successful treatment, diseased QoL often returned again, indicating good responsiveness of the QoL pathway.

CONCLUSION

A three-component outcome system including clinician-derived objective, patient-reported subjective end points and qualitative analysis of clinical relevance was developed in the last 10 years for cancer as a complex intervention. A separate QoL pathway was implemented for the diagnosis and treatment of diseased QoL and its effectiveness tested in a community-based, pragmatic, definitive RCT. While the pathway was active, it was effective with an NNT of 7.

Perioperative allergy: uncommon agents

Anesthesia may often be considered as a high-risk procedure and anaphylaxis remains a major cause of concern for anesthetists who routinely administer many potentially allergenic agents. Neuromuscular blocking agents, latex and antibiotics are the substances involved in most of the reported reactions. Besides these three agents, a wide variety of substances may cause an anaphylactic reaction during anesthesia. Basically all the administered drugs or substances may be potential causes of anaphylaxis. Among them, those reported the most in literature include hypnotics, opioids, local anesthetics, colloids, dye, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM), antiseptics, aprotinin, ethylene oxyde and formaldehyde, and protamine and heparins. No premedication can effectively prevent an allergic reaction and a systematic preoperative screening is not justified for all patients; nevertheless, an allergy specialist should evaluate those patients with a history of anesthesia-related allergy. Patients must be fully informed of investigation results, and advised to provide a detailed report prior to future anesthesia.

Perioperative anaphylaxis

The incidence of immune-mediated anaphylaxis during anesthesia ranges from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 20,000. Neuromuscular blocking agents are most frequently incriminated, followed by latex and antibiotics, although any drug or substance used may be a culprit. Diagnosis relies on tryptase measurements at the time of the reaction and skin tests, specific immunoglobulin E, or basophil activation assays. Treatment consists of rapid volume expansion and epinephrine administration titrated to symptom severity.

Histamine: metabolism, physiology, and pathophysiology with applications in veterinary medicine

OBJECTIVE

To review the human and veterinary literature on histamine physiology and pathophysiology and potential applications for clinical use in veterinary critical care.

DATA SOURCES

Human and veterinary clinical studies, reviews, texts, and recent research in histamine receptor and antagonist therapy.

HUMAN DATA SYNTHESIS

Recent progress in molecular biology has led to a more complete understanding of the enzymes involved in histamine metabolism and histamine receptor physiology. The past decade of research has confirmed the role of histamine in the classical functions (contraction of smooth muscle, increase in vascular permeability, and stimulation of gastric acid secretion) and has also elucidated newer ones that are now under investigation. Data on the roles of histamine in angiogenesis, circadian rhythm, bone marrow regeneration, bacterial eradication, and cancer are emerging in the literature. Newer histamine antagonists are currently in drug trials and are expected to advance the clinical field in treatment of allergic, gastrointestinal, and cognitive disorders.

VETERINARY DATA SYNTHESIS

Veterinary histamine research is directed at identifying the effects of certain pharmacological agents on blood histamine concentrations and establishing the relevance in clinical disease states. Research demonstrates important species differences in regards to histamine receptor physiology and tissue response. Studies in the area of trauma, sepsis, anaphylaxis, allergy, and gastrointestinal disorders have direct applications to clinical veterinary medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Histamine plays a key role in the morbidity and mortality associated with allergy, asthma, gastric ulcers, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hemorrhagic shock, anesthesia, surgery, cardiovascular disease, cancer, CNS disorders, and immune-mediated disease. Histamine antagonism has been in common use to block its adverse effects. With recent advances in the understanding of histamine receptor physiology, pharmaceutical agents targeting these receptors have increased the therapeutic options.

Perioperative prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in high-risk colorectal cancer patients for an improved recovery: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to improve the postoperative outcome of high-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4) recovering from colorectal cancer surgery by using recombinant human G-CSF (filgrastim) as perioperative prophylaxis.

METHODS

In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were randomized to filgrastim or placebo. Filgrastim (5 mug/kg) or placebo was administered in the afternoon on day -1, 0, and +1 relative to the operation. Primary endpoints were in a hierarchic order: quality of life (QoL) over time (determined at discharge, 2 and 6 months after operation with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire) and the McPeek recovery score, which measures death and duration of stays in the intensive care unit and hospital. Predefined secondary endpoints were global QoL, subdomains of QoL, postoperative recovery, duration of stay, 6-month overall survival, complication rates, and cellular and immunologic parameters.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in both primary endpoints between the treatment groups. A significant improvement (P < .05) was obtained by filgrastim prophylaxis in the QoL subdomain family life /- social functioning,; thus, more patients recovered to their preoperative state (14 vs 4 with placebo) as determined by structured interviews. Duration of hospital stay (14 vs 12 days) and noninfectious complications were decreased from 8% to 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients undergoing major operation for colorectal cancer profited from filgrastim prophylaxis with regard to duration of hospital stay, noninfectious complications, social QoL, and subjective recovery from operation. These endpoints, however, were secondary, and the primary endpoints (overall QoL and the McPeek index) did not show comparable benefits. A new confirmatory trial with the successful endpoints of this trial, as well as a cost analysis, will be needed to confirm the results before a general recommendation for the prophylactic use of G-CSF in high-risk cancer patients can be given.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database

OBJECTIVE

To identify the number of cases of anaphylaxis reported in association with different classes of drugs and compare it with other reports contained in the same database.

METHODS

The data were obtained from a database containing all of the spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coming from the Italian regions of Emilia Romagna, Lombardy and the Veneto, which are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. The ADRs reported between January 1990 and December 2003 with a causality assessment of certainly, probably or possibly drug related (according to the WHO criteria) were analysed using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions already coded by the WHO preferred terms of 'anaphylactic shock' or 'anaphylactoid reaction' (this last term also included anaphylactic reaction) and those with a time of event onset that suggested an allergic reaction and involved at least two of the skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, CNS or cardiovascular systems; the non-cases were all of the other ADR reports. The frequency of the association between anaphylaxis and the suspected drug in comparison with the frequency of anaphylaxis associated to all of the other drugs was calculated using the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality.

RESULTS

Our database contained 744 cases (including 307 cases of anaphylactic shock with 10 deaths) and 27 512 non-cases. The percentage of anaphylaxis cases reported in inpatients was higher than that among outpatients (59.1% vs 40.9%). This distribution is significantly different from that of the other ADR reports that mainly refer to outpatients. After intravenous drug administrations, anaphylactic shock cases were more frequent than anaphylactoid reactions or other ADRs, but more than one-third of these reactions were caused by an oral drug. Blood substitutes and radiology contrast agents had the highest RORs. Among the systemic antibacterial agents, anaphylaxis was disproportionally reported more often for penicillins, quinolones, cephalosporins and glycopeptides, but diclofenac was the only NSAID with a significant ROR. As a category, vaccines had a significantly lower ROR, thus indicating that anaphylaxis is reported proportionally less than other ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaphylaxis is a severe ADR that may also occur with commonly used drugs. It represents 2.7% of all of the ADRs reported in an Italian spontaneous reporting database.

Evaluation of the McPeek postoperative outcome score in three trials

BACKGROUND

Postoperative outcome of patients is determined by recovery characteristics and self-reported quality of life. The first can be assessed with the McPeek score which values three aspects of recovery: mortality, postoperative critical care and duration of hospitalization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We calculated the McPeek score of 669 patients in three trials: (1) colorectal cancer surgery, (2) antihistamine/volume loading in various operations, and (3) cholecystectomy. Beforehand, the average of intensive care unit treatment and duration of hospitalization were determined for the different operations to define McPeek score points. The score was tested on reliability, validity, and sensitivity. In addition, clinical applicability was assessed in a survey.

RESULTS

The score was reliable with similarly distributed score points in the three trials at different institutions. Inter-rater reliability was high (97% overlap). Validity was proven by moderate high correlation to convergent criteria such as complications (trial I to III r=0.43, r=0.38, r=0.60), preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists class (ASA) (r=0.24, r=0.28, r=0.57), and age (r=0.23, r=0.32, r=0.31). The score was different between patients with and without neoplasms (P<0.001, trial II) and between elective or emergency patients (P<0.001, trial III). In a survey, investigators reported that the score was easy to assess and more comprehensive than four other scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The McPeek score values the postoperative outcome on a nonlinear scale. A priori, the average duration of hospitalization and critical care for a specific operation has to be defined. Our validation suggests that it is a reliable, valid, sensitive, and practical instrument for outcome analysis after anesthesia and surgery.

Histamine release during adult cardiopulmonary bypass

Histamine, an inflammatory mediator in its own right, may also be a marker for a more widespread systemic inflammatory process. In this study we have examined variations in plasma histamine concentrations produced during the course of cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass, the relationship between these variations and intra-operative events. By assays of serum tryptase and CD-63 expression we have also attempted to identify the source of histamine. Histamine concentrations that were significantly raised from baseline level were demonstrated. These were elevated from the time of aortic cross-clamping and continued to be raised for 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.00625). This was associated with an increase in CD-63 expression (p < 0.025) (but not an increase in tryptase concentration) following aortic cross-clamping and protamine administration, suggesting that basophils are the source of histamine. 41% of patients had arrhythmias in the post bypass period. The rise in histamine levels was not related to the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.

Treatment of refractory mesenteric traction syndrome without cyclooxygenase inhibitors

Mesenteric traction may be necessary for surgical exposure during colonic or aortic surgery. Traction on the mesentery releases prostacyclin, producing variable degrees of hypotension. Numerous cases of severe, life-threatening hypotension have been reported. The published literature suggests that treatment of severe hypotension from mesenteric traction with routine doses of vasoconstrictors may be ineffective, but inhibition of prostacyclin synthesis with cyclooxygenase inhibitors can successfully treat or prevent hypotension. This rationale, while highly beneficial, would place patients with allergies to cyclooxygenase inhibitors at a severe disadvantage, and would also leave no therapeutic options if intravenous cyclooxygenase inhibitors were not immediately available. We report the successful use of high-dose phenylephrine in the treatment of mesenteric traction syndrome.

Total intravenöse Anästhesie mit Propofol und Remifentanil

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy and tolerability of propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium or mivacurium in routine anesthetic practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 6,161 patients scheduled for abdominal or orthopedic surgery were included in this open multicenter phase IV study. Perioperative hemodynamics as well as induction, recovery and discharge times, anesthetics, frequency of PONV and side-effects were studied.

RESULTS

Quality of induction and maintenance of anesthesia were evaluated by anesthesiologists to be good or very good in 88%. 86% of the patients assessed anesthesia as good or very good. Adverse events were reported for 28 patients (0.45%), with hypotension and bradycardia being most frequent. Recovery was evaluated by anesthesiologists to be good or very good in 88%, surgeons and nursing staff assessed the TIVA as good or very good in 90%. Most frequent postoperative complaints were pain (16.7%), nausea (6.1%), shivering (3.1%) and vomiting (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that total intravenous anesthesia using propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium or mivacurium is safe, tolerable and effective and has a high degree of acceptance.

Prevention of anaphylactic reactions to anaesthetic drugs

Although screening tests to prevent anaphylaxis during anaesthesia have been advocated, such tests are unlikely to have significant impact on reducing the incidence of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. This is due to the low prevalence of the disease, the diversity of drugs used in anaesthesia and the incidence of false positive and negative tests. The suggested risk factors of allergy, i.e. atopy, asthma, family history, female sex, previous exposure, vasectomy, use of zinc protamine sulfate insulin and allergy to cosmetics, eggs, fish and non-anaesthetic drugs are not valid. Although all have theoretical or real associations with anaphylaxis during anaesthesia the majority of patients with such a history undergo uneventful anaesthesia. Fruit allergy, anaphylaxis to cephalosporins and penicillin, barbiturate allergy, gelatin allergy and allergy to metabisulphite and eggs require consideration in avoiding particular drugs. The incidence of anaesthetic anaphylaxis can be reduced by avoiding latex exposure in patients with spina bifida or latex allergy, and preventing second reactions in patients with a history of anaphylaxis, or major undiagnosed or undocumented adverse events during anaesthesia. Determining the cause of an adverse event and the drug responsible, and adequately communicating those findings can reduce second reactions. Avoiding neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) in patients who have reacted to an NMBD, and use of non-intravenous techniques should also reduce the incidence of second reactions. Desensitisation, and blocking with monovalent quaternary ammonium compounds may allow improved safety of NMBDs and pretreatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids may block or ameliorate the severity of reactions, but there is currently little evidence to support their routine use.

Checking for interviewer bias in outcome assessment: a method for strengthening the design of prospective, randomised trials in surgery

BACKGROUND

Blind, randomised trials are conceived as the gold standard in clinical research, but this ideal, in its strict sense, can rarely be achieved in surgical settings. One way to strengthen the study design is to check for observer bias in the assessment and evaluation of surgical outcome.

METHOD

In a randomised, prospective trial comparing nasogastric versus gastrostomy tubes the primary endpoint was the subjective inconvenience induced by the tube system and was assessed in the context of a standardised face-to-face interview. These interviews were tape-recorded on a pocket memo. Two independent raters listened to these interviews and judged--on the basis of how the interviewer formulated the questions--which treatment arm they thought the patients were assigned to and how confident they were in their judgement.

RESULTS

The overall proportion of correct judgements was 50.5% for rater 1 and 53.2% for rater 2. In other words, both judgement performances were not greater than chance. Nevertheless, the raters' confidence in their judgements increased significantly ( P<0.05) in the course of the rating procedure, whereas the actual proportion of correct judgements did not. There was no overlap between the two raters [kappa = 0.022, not significant (NS)] and between actual group assignment and both raters' judgements (kappa = 0.012, NS and kappa = 0.110, NS).

CONCLUSION

The two independent raters were not able to detect systematic variations in the interviewing style that were contingent on treatment arm assignment. This gives further credence to the results of the randomised trial showing greater patient-reported discomfort and inconvenience with the nasogastric tube than with the gastrostomy tube. The present report describes a feasible method to monitor subtle biases that may occur in trial settings. This helps to strengthen the design of randomised clinical trials in surgery.

Small-volume resuscitation: from experimental evidence to clinical routine. Advantages and disadvantages of hypertonic solutions

BACKGROUND

The concept of small-volume resuscitation (SVR) using hypertonic solutions encompasses the rapid infusion of a small dose (4 ml per kg body weight, i.e. approximately 250 ml in an adult patient) of 7.2-7.5% NaCl/colloid solution. Originally, SVR was aimed for initial therapy of severe hypovolemia and shock associated with trauma.

METHODS

The present review focuses on the findings concerning the working mechanisms responsible for the rapid onset of the circulatory effect, the impact of the colloid component on microcirculatory resuscitation, and describes the indications for its application in the preclinical scenario as well as perioperatively and in intensive care medicine.

RESULTS

With respect to the actual data base of clinical trials SVR seems to be superior to conventional volume therapy with regard to faster normalization of microvascular perfusion during shock phases and early resumption of organ function. Particularly patients with head trauma in association with systemic hypotension appear to benefit. Besides, potential indications for this concept include cardiac and cardiovascular surgery (attenuation of reperfusion injury during declamping phase) and burn injury. The review also describes disadvantages and potential adverse effects of SVR:

CONCLUSION

Small-volume resuscitation by means of hypertonic NaCl/colloid solutions stands for one of the most innovative concepts for primary resuscitation from trauma and shock established in the past decade. Today the spectrum of potential indications involves not only prehospital trauma care, but also perioperative and intensive care therapy.

Can conditioned histamine release occur under urethane anesthesia in guinea pigs?

Many clinical and experimental data have shown that learning can occur under general anesthesia. To clarify this possibility with respect to allergic reactions, particularly asthmatic responses, we first established classical conditioned histamine release in response to a neutral odor by using pairings of the odor and an inhaled antigen for five sessions (Experiment 1) and then investigated whether conditioned histamine release into the plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and lung tissue, which followed such a conditioning procedure, would be produced in urethane-anesthetized guinea pigs in the presence or absence of antigen (Experiment 2). Ovalbumin (OA) was used as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and dimethylsulfide (DMS) served as the conditioned stimulus (CS) in both experiments. In Experiment 1, the plasma histamine levels in the conditioned group increased significantly more than those of the unpaired control group in response to the CS during consciousness. In Experiment 2 in the absence of antigen, however, no significant differences in the histamine levels were found regarding the groups (DMS, triethylamine, saline, or unsensitized) or the time course (before, immediately, 5 min, and 10 min after the inhalations) during anesthesia, except for the finding that the histamine levels in the lung tissue specimens from the DMS group were significantly higher than those from the triethylamine group. In Experiment 2 in the presence of antigen, there was a significant increase in the plasma histamine levels after exposure to the US, irrespective of the presence of the CS, however, no significant difference in the histamine levels was observed between the US and the CS+US groups. These results indicated that a classically CS might not induce asthmatic responses under anesthesia.

Potentiation of vancomycin-induced histamine release by muscle relaxants and morphine in rats

The intravenous injection of vancomycin sometimes causes anaphylactoid reactions, in which histamine release may play a major role. These reactions are more frequently manifested when vancomycin is injected into anesthetized patients. We examined the vancomycin-induced histamine release and the interaction of vancomycin with muscle relaxants or opioid in rats. In an in vitro study with rat peritoneal mast cells, treatment with vancomycin at concentrations of greater than 1.25 mM produced significant histamine release. Tubocurarine, vecuronium, pancuronium, succinylcholine, and morphine up to concentrations of 0.25, 1, 5, 30, and 5 mM, respectively, produced no significant histamine release. However, the nonsignificant histamine release induced by 0.5 mM vancomycin was clearly enhanced by combining vancomycin with any of these agents. In the in vivo study, the intravenous injection of vancomycin significantly increased the plasma histamine levels in rats when vancomycin was injected at 200 mg/kg of body weight (63.2 +/- 34.0 ng/ml [mean +/- standard deviation]) but not when it was injected at 100 mg/kg (30.8 +/- 20.2 ng/ml) compared with that in the saline-treated rats (22.5 +/- 11.4 ng/ml). Although the subcutaneous administration of morphine (10 mg/kg) never increased the plasma histamine levels, the intravenous injection of vancomycin (100 mg/kg) 30 min after this morphine treatment markedly increased the plasma histamine levels (56.0 +/- 26.9 ng/ml). These findings provide experimental evidence that the combination of muscle relaxants or an opioid with vancomycin may increase the risk of anaphylactoid reactions by enhancing the release of histamine.

Antihistamine prophylaxis permits rapid vancomycin infusion

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pretreatment with intravenous antihistamines attenuates the symptoms of red-man syndrome associated with rapid vancomycin administration.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of patients undergoing elective arthroplasty.

SETTING

Preoperative unit in a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Forty preoperative patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, receiving vancomycin prophylaxis for elective prosthetic joint replacement or revision.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective orthopedic patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous antihistamines (diphenhydramine, 1 mg/kg, and cimetidine, 4 mg/kg) or placebo before rapid vancomycin infusion (1 g over 10 mins). Hemodynamic measurements, symptoms of histamine release, and plasma histamine levels were obtained in each patient during vancomycin administration. Rapid vancomycin infusion was discontinued in cases of decreases in mean blood pressure of > or =20% or intolerable itching.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clinical symptomatology of red-man syndrome and histamine levels were assessed using Fisher's exact test or Student's t-test. Comparison of baseline and peak histamine levels for both the treated (mean +/- SD, 0.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.7 +/- 2.4 ng/mL; p < .0001) and placebo patients (mean +/-SD, 0.2 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.5 +/- 3.4 ng/mL; p = .0002) was statistically significant. Although there was a significant increase in plasma histamine levels during vancomycin infusion, it did not differ between the treatment groups. Only two (11%) of the treated patients developed hypotension, vs. 12 (63%) of the placebo patients (p = .002). Rash was partially attenuated. Twelve (63%) of the treated patients developed rash, compared with 19 (100%) of the placebo patients (p = .008). The rapid infusion was discontinued in two (11%) of the treated patients, compared with 11 (58%) of the placebo patients (p = .005). Four treated patients had no symptoms of histamine release.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with intravenous H1 and H2 antihistamines permitted rapid vancomycin administration in 89% of treated patients. Although protection was incomplete, rash did not predict a need to stop the rapid infusion of vancomycin in our patients.

Combined histamine H1/H2 receptor antagonists: part II. Pharmacological hybrids with pheniramine- and tiotidine-like substructures

Hybrid molecules combining the crucial structural features of both pheniramine-type histamine H1 receptor antagonists and guanidinothiazole-type H2 receptor antagonists have been synthesized and tested for in vitro pharmacological activity at the isolated ileum and the spontaneously beating right atrium of the guinea-pig. In the title compounds the basic side chain nitrogen of the H1 antagonist and the so-called 'polar group' (cyanoguanidine, urea, or nitroethenediamine) of the H2 antagonist moiety have been linked by a polymethylene spacer. The new substances displayed high affinities to both histamine receptor subtypes and a dual type of antagonism (surmountable/insurmountable) characterized by a shift of the concentration response curves to the right accompanied by a depression of the maximal response to the agonist if the antagonist concentration was >/=100 nM. Highest combined histamine antagonist activities were found in the nitroethenediamine series with pKB values ranging from 8.16 to 9.04 in the ileum (H1) and 7.0-8.08 in the atrium (H2)

Hydroxyethyl starch antibodies in humans: incidence and clinical relevance

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is a plasma expander used for perioperative i.v. fluid management, as well as for resuscitation from trauma and shock. HES is very well tolerated, and the incidence of anaphylactic reactions is lower than with dextran or gelatin. Dextran anaphylaxis is caused by circulating dextran-reactive antibodies (ABs) of the immunoglobin G (IgG) class found in most adults. Histamine release from mast cells induces adverse reactions after gelatin infusion. The cause of adverse reactions due to HES is not yet clear. To investigate AB formation due to HES, we collected sera of 1004 patients at least 14 days after starch administration. Using a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay technique, we found one patient with a low 1:10 titer of HES-reactive ABs (immunoglobin M [IgM] class). Despite repeated HES infusions, no clinical reaction could be detected in this patient. On the basis of a binomial distribution, a one-tailed confidence interval (99%) was used to calculate the percentage of the occurrence of ABs in general with maximum of 33 in 10,000 persons (IgM) and 23 in 10,000 persons (IgG). We suggest that HES-reactive ABs are extremely rare and that they do not necessarily induce anaphylaxis. Other mechanisms may be responsible for adverse reactions due to HES.

IMPLICATIONS

The frequency of antibody formation due to hydroxyethyl starch, a commonly used plasma expander, was prospectively investigated in 1004 patients. Only one patient showed transient antibody formation, which was not harmful to the patient. This low antigenicity could explain the excellent tolerance of hydroxyethyl starch compared with other plasma expanders.

Administration of H1 and H2 antagonists for chemoprophylaxis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to establish the duration of action of antihistamines and their ability to attenuate the adverse affects associated with histamine release. Thirty volunteers were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or a combination of the H1 blocker dimetindene maleate (0.1 mg/kg) and the H2 blocker cimetidine (5 mg/kg). A bolus dose of histamine (450 ng/kg) was given 15 minutes after antihistamine or placebo treatment and repeated after 2, 4, and 6 hours. Cardiovascular variables, plasma histamine levels, cutaneous manifestations, and objective and subjective signs and symptoms associated with histamine release were determined before and after each histamine injection. Although many of the signs of histamine release, including erythema and metallic taste, could be attenuated effectively for 6 hours with antihistamine treatment, the protection against histamine-induced flush and headache diminished after 2 hours. Statistically significant protection against histamine-mediated tachycardia persisted for only 2 hours. Antihistamine treatment significantly reduced the increase in plasma histamine levels after the first histamine injection but did not alter the levels after subsequent histamine injections. The currently recommended administration regimen for prophylaxis with antihistamines is insufficient to prevent histamine-mediated side effects, and additional doses may be required after 4 hours to achieve appropriate chemoprophylaxis.