Standardisation of subjectively scored HIV immunoassays: developing a quality assurance program to assist in reproducible interpretation of results using an anti-HIV particle agglutination assay as a model

A rapid ultrasound particle agglutination method for HIV antibody detection: Comparison with conventional rapid HIV tests

We present the results of the feasibility and preliminary studies on analytical performance of a rapid test for detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies in human serum or plasma that is an important advance in detecting HIV infection. Current methods for rapid testing of antibodies against HIV are qualitative and exhibit poor sensitivity (limit of detection). In this paper, we describe an ultrasound particle agglutination (UPA) method that leads to a significant increase of the sensitivity of conventional latex agglutination tests for HIV antibody detection in human serum or plasma. The UPA method is based on the use of: 1) a dual mode ultrasound, wherein a first single-frequency mode is used to accelerate the latex agglutination process, and then a second swept-frequency mode of sonication is used to disintegrate non-specifically bound aggregates; and 2) a numerical assessment of results of the agglutination process. The numerical assessment is carried out by optical detection and analysis of moving patterns in the resonator cell during the swept-frequency mode. The single-step UPA method is rapid and more sensitive than the three commercial rapid HIV test kits analyzed in the study: analytical sensitivity of the new UPA method was found to be 510-, 115-, and 80-fold higher than that for Capillus™, Multispot™ and Uni-Gold™ Recombigen HIV antibody rapid test kits, respectively. The newly developed UPA method opens up additional possibilities for detection of a number of clinically significant markers in point-of-care settings.

Use of rapid HIV antibody testing for controlling the HIV pandemic

The HIV pandemic continues to expand throughout Africa and southern Asia. Despite recent advances in therapy, the primary means of prevention continues to be the identification of infected patients through diagnostic testing, and the provision of counseling services to reduce HIV transmission. In order to facilitate the identification of infected patients, great strides have been made during the past 10 years towards the development of simple, rapid HIV antibody assays that require no specialized equipment, are relatively stable at ambient temperatures and can be easily performed by people who do not have a laboratory background. Evaluations of these assays have shown that when used in multiple assay algorithm strategies, they perform comparably with current laboratory-based methods. Effective global implementation of these tests will require a concerted effort from public and private health agencies, however, expanding the use of these assays can provide a significant opportunity to slow the devastating spread of HIV.

Low specificity of determine HIV1/2 RDT using whole blood in south west Tanzania

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of two rapid detection tests (RDTs) for HIV 1/2 in plasma and in whole blood samples.

Methods

More than 15,000 study subjects above the age of two years participated in two rounds of a cohort study to determine the prevalence of HIV. HIV testing was performed using the Determine HIV 1/2 test (Abbott) in the first (2006/2007) and the HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Dipstick Assay (Chembio) in the second round (2007/2008) of the survey. Positive results were classified into faint and strong bands depending on the visual appearance of the test strip and confirmed by ELISA and Western blot.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of the Determine RDT were 100% (95% confidence interval  = 86.8 to 100%) and 96.8% (95.9 to 97.6%) in whole blood and 100% (99.7 to 100%) and 97.9% (97.6 to 98.1%) in plasma respectively. Specificity was highly dependent on the tested sample type: when using whole blood, 67.1% of positive results were false positive, as opposed to 17.4% in plasma. Test strips with only faint positive bands were more often false positive than strips showing strong bands and were more common in whole blood than in plasma. Evaluation of the STAT-PAK RDT in plasma during the second year resulted in a sensitivity of 99.7% (99.1 to 99.9%) and a specificity of 99.3% (99.1 to 99.4%) with 6.9% of the positive results being false.

Conclusions

Our study shows that the Determine HIV 1/2 strip test with its high sensitivity is an excellent tool to screen for HIV infection, but that – at least in our setting – it can not be recommended as a confirmatory test in VCT campaigns where whole blood is used.

Assessment of the heat stability of seven rapid HIV assays

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Rapid Diagnostic Tests (HIV RDTs) are robust, quick to perform, effective diagnostic tools. The stability of seven commonly used RDTs for detecting antibody to HIV was assessed during exposure to temperatures above 30°C, the usual maximum recommended by manufacturers. The aim of the study was to determine if HIV RDTs retain their testing outcomes after exposure to higher temperatures. At two testing sites, seven RDTs were exposed to a short heat shock (60°C for 72 hours) as might occur during transport. RDTs were exposed to ambient (22 or 30°C), warm (35 or 37°C) or hot (45°C) temperatures for up to 90 days. Testing was performed at five intervals on a panel of seven positive and three negative plasma samples. Results showed no changes consistent with altered testing outcomes over time and/or temperature when test indicators were compared with the control indicators. Only one HIV RDT achieved 100% consensus with reference results at all four storage temperatures (median 97.5%, lowest 74% for RDT5 at 45°C). Testing outcomes in a limited sample panel showed six of seven HIV RDT kits were relatively robust despite exposure to higher than recommended temperatures.

Indeterminate and discrepant rapid HIV test results in couples' HIV testing and counselling centres in Africa

Background

Many HIV voluntary testing and counselling centres in Africa use rapid antibody tests, in parallel or in sequence, to establish same-day HIV status. The interpretation of indeterminate or discrepant results between different rapid tests on one sample poses a challenge. We investigated the use of an algorithm using three serial rapid HIV tests in cohabiting couples to resolve unclear serostatuses.

Methods

Heterosexual couples visited the Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group testing centres in Kigali, Rwanda, and Lusaka, Zambia, to assess HIV infection status. Individuals with unclear HIV rapid antibody test results (indeterminate) or discrepant results were asked to return for repeat testing to resolve HIV status. If either partner of a couple tested positive or indeterminate with the screening test, both partners were tested with a confirmatory test. Individuals with indeterminate or discrepant results were further tested with a tie-breaker and monthly retesting. HIV-RNA viral load was determined when HIV status was not resolved by follow-up rapid testing. Individuals were classified based on two of three initial tests as "Positive", "Negative" or "Other". Follow-up testing and/or HIV-RNA viral load testing determined them as "Infected", "Uninfected" or "Unresolved".

Results

Of 45,820 individuals tested as couples, 2.3% (4.1% of couples) had at least one discrepant or indeterminate rapid result. A total of 65% of those individuals had follow-up testing and of those individuals initially classified as "Negative" by three initial rapid tests, less than 1% were resolved as "Infected". In contrast, of those individuals with at least one discrepant or indeterminate result who were initially classified as "Positive", only 46% were resolved as "Infected", while the remainder was resolved as "Uninfected" (46%) or "Unresolved" (8%). A positive HIV serostatus of one of the partners was a strong predictor of infection in the other partner as 48% of individuals who resolved as "Infected" had an HIV-infected spouse.

Conclusions

In more than 45,000 individuals counselled and tested as couples, only 5% of individuals with indeterminate or discrepant rapid HIV test results were HIV infected. This represented only 0.1% of all individuals tested. Thus, algorithms using screening, confirmatory and tie-breaker rapid tests are reliable with two of three tests negative, but not when two of three tests are positive. False positive antibody tests may persist. HIV-positive partner serostatus should prompt repeat testing.

Assessing proficiency of interpretation of rapid human immunodeficiency virus assays in nonlaboratory settings: ensuring quality of testing

Rapid antibody tests for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) offer an effective means of providing a timely result of HIV serostatus to individuals. The increased use of rapid HIV antibody tests outside the laboratory has highlighted the need for new, cost-effective quality assurance methods to be developed for use in nonlaboratory-based and resource-limited settings. Photographed rapid HIV test results were used in a modified external quality assessment scheme to assess the interpretation proficiency and, therefore, to assess the feasibility of using this method as a basis for a quality assessment program for nonlaboratory-based testing. Participants (n = 148), both experienced and inexperienced in the performance and interpretation of rapid HIV testing, interpreted the photographed results of five rapid HIV assays. These were scored according to the degree of technical discordance. Error scores were grouped according to each participant's technical experience. The accuracy of interpretation for four of the five assays was between 80 and 97%, indicating that the photographed results of samples, including those difficult to read or borderline difficult to read, can be used to assess the proficiency of test operators in interpreting results. Participants had greater difficulty in interpreting samples of weak reactivity; this was consistent across the five assays. Experience played an important role in accurate interpretation, with experienced laboratory participants exhibiting greater proficiency (P < 0.05) in interpreting the results of three of the five rapid HIV assays. It was established that photographed results of rapid HIV assays could be interpreted with accuracy and demonstrated that prior experience resulted in a more accurate interpretation performance.

Post-evaluation of rapid HIV kits in the Korean market by an anti-HIV EQAS panel

This study aimed to provide evaluation information about rapid HIV kits by the anti-HIV External Quality Assessment Schemes (EQAS) panel of the Korea National Institute of Health (KNIH) and the rapid HIV test panel of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Each KNIH anti-HIV EQAS panel from 2003 to 2005 consisted of four or five samples of plasma obtained from blood donors with a strong positive or negative reaction to HIV. KNIH delivered each panel to public health centers for analysis of the HIV test results, and the reactivity of the five rapid HIV kits currently used in the Korean market were compared with that of a CDC reference. The analytic sensitivity and specificity of the rapid HIV kits for the KNIH anti-HIV EQAS in 2005 were 99.3 and 99.1%, respectively; in 2004, 98.8 and 97.1%; and in 2003, 94.8 and 95.9%. Five HIV kits from the CDC panel consistently showed positive reactivity for strong positive samples in all kits, but some showed erratic reactivity for weakly positive samples. This is the first report on post-evaluation of rapid HIV kits in the Korean market by an anti-HIV EQAS panel. It was found that the quality of performance of the rapid HIV tests had improved each year but should be interpreted with caution for weakly positive samples.

Reliability of rapid diagnostic tests for HIV variant infection

The sensitivity of one ELISA method, six HIV-1/HIV-2 rapid screening tests, and one confirmatory test was evaluated in comparison with a third-generation EIA method (taken as the 'gold standard') and Western blot on well-characterized panels of sera. HIV diversity was represented by 50 HIV-1 group M subtype A to H, nine HIV-1 group O, 12 HIV-2, two HIV1+2 positive and six indeterminate Western blot profiles. Sensitivity during HIV-1 seroconversion was studied on 39 serial samples collected from six patients during early primary infection. Serial samples obtained from two primates during experimental primary SIV infection were used to mimic HIV-2 seroconversion samples. The sensitivity ranged from 100 to 94.6% according to the test. During seroconversion, rapid tests became positive 2-8 days later than the third-generation EIA. This reveals a major limitation of rapid tests, which are being recommended for use in developing countries. The lack of sensitivity seen during early HIV-1 seroconversion and/or limited specificity in some of the evaluated tests present serious limitations to their use in countries with high HIV incidence and variability. It is suggested that, as soon as possible, less sensitive rapid tests for blood bank screening should be abandoned in favor of highly sensitive rapid tests and/or more robust, more sensitive and cheaper ELISAs. These results stress the need for better screening tools and specific local evaluations.