Human herpesvirus-6 infection is associated with adhesion molecule induction and lymphocyte infiltration in liver allografts

Efficacy and Safety of a Weight-based Dosing Regimen of Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid-organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir has been widely used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the optimal dosing protocol and target exposure in children are still unclear. Specific data as to the efficacy and safety of low-dose/low-exposure regimens are lacking and urgently needed.

METHODS

During 2010 to 2015, the clinical efficacy and safety of a weight-based regimen of valganciclovir of 17 mg/kg/day, with a stratified dose reduction for impaired creatinine clearance, given as a CMV prophylaxis for 3 to 6 months, was retrospectively evaluated among pediatric kidney and liver transplant recipients, 12 months posttransplantation. Incidence of CMV infection was assessed by periodic measurements of viral load; adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-three children who had undergone 86 transplantations and were treated with 17 mg/kg of valganciclovir were included. Median age was 9.77 years (range, 0.6 to 18.9). Twelve (14%) developed CMV infection: 1 during prophylaxis and 11 during follow-up. These events comprised 6 cases of asymptomatic viremia and 6 cases of a clinically significant disease without occurrences of tissue-invasive disease. Treatment-related adverse effects occurred in 7 patients (8%), mostly hematological, resulting in premature drug cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of 17 mg/kg of valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplanted children as it showed satisfactory long-term efficacy and a good safety profile.

Primary infection with human herpes virus type 6, post-pediatric liver transplantation-A pathogen to remember

BACKGROUND

In recent years, liver transplantation (LT) has become a well-accepted therapeutic modality for children with end-stage liver disease, with transplantation surgery being performed at a younger age. Human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) infection occurs in most children within the first 2 years of life, therefore, data on primary HHV-6 infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the course of primary HHV-6 infection after pediatric LT.

METHODS

Medical files, between the years 2015-2016, of post-LT pediatric patients with suspected primary HHV-6 infection were reviewed. Clinical and laboratory data for enrolled cases were evaluated. Primary infection was defined as DNAemia in children who were seronegative prior to transplantation or seroconversion from negative to positive IgG posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Four cases of primary HHV-6 (type B) infection were identified among the 26 children who had undergone LT at our center during the study period. All patients were <1 year old and presented with fever, hepatitis, and elevated inflammatory markers, most (75%) within a short-period posttransplantation. All were initially treated with empiric antibiotics for a suspected bacterial infection and three underwent liver biopsy, one showing signs of rejection. Three were treated with antiviral therapy with a gradual resolution of symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Primary HHV-6 should be taken into account in young children shortly after LT, especially when presenting with fever and elevated liver enzymes. Treatment with antiviral therapy should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In young infants post-LT, a high index of suspicion may promote early detection of HHV-6 primary infection and prevent serious complications.

Lymphoproliferative Syndromes Associated with Human Herpesvirus-6A and Human Herpesvirus-6B

Human herpesvirus 6A and 6B (HHV-6A and HHV-6B) have been noted since their discovery for their T-lymphotropism. Although it has proven difficult to determine the extent to which HHV-6A and HHV-6B are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases, evidence suggests that primary infection and reactivation of both viruses may induce or contribute to the progression of several lymphoproliferative disorders, ranging from benign to malignant and including infectious mononucleosis-like illness, drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS), and nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma. Herein, we discuss the conditions associated with the lymphoproliferative capacity of HHV-6, as well as the potential mechanisms behind them. Continued exploration on this topic may add to our understanding of the interactions between HHV-6 and the immune system and may open the doors to more accurate diagnosis and treatment of certain lymphoproliferative disorders.

HHV-6 in liver transplantation: A literature review

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6A and HHV-6B) can cause primary infection or reactivate from latency in liver transplant recipients, which can result in a variety of clinical syndromes, including fever, hepatitis, encephalitis and higher rates of graft dysfunction as well as indirect effects including increased risks of mortality, CMV disease, hepatitis C progression and greater fibrosis scores. Although HHV-6 infection is currently diagnosed by quantifying viral DNA in plasma or blood, biopsy to demonstrate histopathological effects of HHV-6 remains the gold standard for diagnosis of end-organ disease. HHV-6 reactivation may be restricted to the infected organ with no evidence of active infection in the blood. HHV-6 infections in liver transplant patients are mostly asymptomatic, but clinically significant tissue-invasive infections have been treated successfully with ganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir. Inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6 (ciHHV-6), in either the recipient or the donor organ, may create confusion about systemic HHV-6 infection. Recipients with inherited ciHHV-6 may have an increased risk of opportunistic infection and graft rejection. This article reviews the current scientific data on the clinical effects, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of HHV-6 infections in liver transplant recipients.

Hepatitis due to human herpesvirus 6B after hematopoietic cell transplantation and a review of the literature

Human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B) is an opportunistic pathogen associated with a growing number of complications in immunocompromised patients. Multiple reports of HHV-6B-associated hepatitis following primary HHV-6 infection and liver transplantation have appeared, but this has only been well documented in 1 patient after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This report describes a case of acute hepatitis likely caused by HHV-6B in an HCT recipient who was successfully treated with ganciclovir. HHV-6B DNA was demonstrated in plasma and hepatic tissue using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical stains. Chromosomal integration was ruled out. We review the literature reporting HHV-6B-associated hepatitis, which may be an underappreciated cause of liver disease after HCT.

Human Herpesvirus 6 and Neuroinflammation

Human herpesvirus (HHV-) 6A and HHV-6B are two distinct β-herpesviruses which have been associated with various neurological diseases, including encephalitis, meningitis, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis. Although the reactivation of both viruses is recognized as the cause of some neurological complications in conditions of immunosuppression, their involvement in neuroinflammatory diseases in immunocompetent people is still unclear, and the mechanisms involved have not been completely elucidated. Here, we review the available data providing evidence for the capacity of HHV-6A and -6B to infect the central nervous system and to induce proinflammatory responses by infected cells. We discuss the potential role of both viruses in neuroinflammatory pathologies and the mechanisms which could explain virus-induced neuropathogenesis.

Early HHV-6 replication is associated with morbidity non-related to CMV infection after kidney transplantation

Human herpesvirus type 6-(HHV-6) has been associated with morbidity after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the HHV-6 seroprevalence among donor-recipient pairs, analyze the incidence of early active infection, its clinical manifestation, interaction with CMV, and the related morbidity in the first year after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

46 donor-recipient pairs had IgG evaluated by ELISA before transplantation: HHV-6(Pambio - USA) and CMV-(Roche - USA). A frozen whole blood sample collected weekly (from the 1st to the 6th week) was retrospectively tested for HHV-6 viral load (VL) determination by real time quantitative PCR (qPCR, Nanogen - Italy). Patients were preemptively surveyed for CMV by pp65 antigenemia (Ag, APAAP, immunohistochemistry, Biotest - Germany) from the 4th to the 12th week after transplantation. Active infection was defined as qPCR-HHV6+ (viral-load/mL-VL) and Ag+ (+cells/100.000 granulocytes), for HHV-6 and CMV, respectively. DCMV was defined as simultaneous positive antigenemia and suggestive signs/symptoms. Concerning +qPCR-HHV6, associated factors, clinical manifestation, interaction with CMV and morbidity were searched.

RESULTS

Pre-transplant HHV-6 seroprevalence was significantly higher among kidney recipients compared to their donors (82.6x54.8%; p = 0.005 [3.9 (1.4-10.4)]). Active infection by this virus occurred in 26.1% (12/46), with no association with previous IgG (p = 0.412). Median VL was 125 copies/mL (53-11.264), and the median Ag was 21 +cells (2-740). There was no association between HHV-6 and CMV activation after transplantation (p = 0.441), neither concerning DCMV (p = 0.596). Median highest Ag+ and days of ganciclovir treatment were similar between qPCR-HHV6 + or - (p = 0.206 and p = 0.124, respectively). qPCR-HHV6+ was associated with higher incidence of bacterial (p = 0.009) and fungal (p = 0.001) infections, and higher number (p = 0.001) of hospital admission and longer duration of hospitalization over the first 6 and 12 months post-transplantation (p = 0.033 and p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Latent HHV-6 infection is more common among recipients than donors before transplantation. Early active infection by this pathogen after transplantation does not increase DCMV incidence or severity during the first 3 months of follow-up. However, early HHV-6 replication is associated with other infections and hospitalizations in the first year.

High intrahepatic HHV-6 virus loads but neither CMV nor EBV are associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis, the relevance of herpesviruses is not well defined.

METHODS

Viral loads of CMV, EBV, and HHV-6 were determined in blood and liver biopsies of 170 liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

HHV-6-, CMV-, and EBV-DNA were detected in 58%, 14%, and 44% of the biopsies, respectively, with coinfections in 34%. High intrahepatic HHV-6 DNA levels (>75th percentile, 11.27 copies/1000 cells) and detection of HHV-6 DNAemia were significantly associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis (p=0.014 and p=0.003, respectively, median follow-up was 23.8 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed high intrahepatic HHV-6 loads as an independent factor associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.61, 95%confidence interval 1.16-5.87). Low concentrations of HHV6 DNA in the liver, indicating latent infection, did not influence graft survival. Neither CMV nor EBV (qualitative detection and high virus loads) nor acute rejection (according to the BANFF score) affected graft survival. However, patients had been treated for CMV reactivations and acute rejections in this retrospective study. High age and high bilirubin levels were the other independent factors associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 3.56CI 1.52-8.34 and 3.23CI 1.50-6.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High intrahepatic HHV-6-DNA levels are associated with decreased graft survival in liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis. The significance of HHV-6 as potential etiology of graft hepatitis needs further evaluation.

Human herpesvirus-6 infections in kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation: review

Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6), which comprises of HHV-6A and HHV-6B, is a common infection after solid organ transplantation. The rate of HHV-6 reactivation is high, although clinical disease is not common. Only 1% of transplant recipients will develop clinical illness associated with HHV-6 infection, and most are ascribable to HHV-6B. Fever, myelosuppression, and end-organ disease, including hepatitis and encephalitis, have been reported. HHV-6 has also been associated with various indirect effects, including a higher rate of CMV disease, acute and chronic graft rejection, and opportunistic infection such as invasive fungal disease. All-cause mortality is increased in solid organ transplant recipients with HHV-6 infection. HHV-6 is somewhat unique among human viruses because of its ability to integrate into the host chromosome. The clinical significance of chromosomally integrated HHV-6 is not yet defined, although a higher rate of bacterial infection and allograft rejection has been suggested. The diagnosis of HHV-6 is now commonly made using nucleic acid testing for HHV-6 DNA in clinical samples, but this can be difficult to interpret owing to the common nature of asymptomatic viral reactivation. Treatment of HHV-6 is indicated in established end-organ disease such as encephalitis. Foscarnet, ganciclovir, and cidofovir have been used for treatment.

Primary HHV 6 infection after liver transplantation with acute graft rejection and multi-organ failure: successful treatment with a 2.5-fold dose of cidofovir and reduction of immunosuppression

HHV type 6 has been reported with enhanced pathogenicity in immunocompromised patients. Herein, we report about a two-yr-old girl who experienced primary HHV 6 infection after liver transplantation. She clinically presented with graft rejection and necrotic hepatitis as well as high fever, pneumonitis with respiratory failure and a rash. Therapy with cidofovir of 5 mg/kg per wk did not show improvement, so that a full pharmacokinetic profile of cidofovir was performed. It demonstrated enhanced body weight normalized clearance of cidofovir and cidofovir dosage was augmented to 12 mg/kg per wk to reach adequate drug exposure. With additional reduction of immunosuppression, the patient dramatically improved and liver function stabilized.

Impact of human herpes virus 6 in liver transplantation

Human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) infects > 95% of humans. Primary infection which occurs mostly during the first 2 years of life in the form of roseola infantum, non-specific febrile illness, or an asymptomatic illness, results in latency. Reactivation of latent HHV-6 is common after liver transplantation. Since the majority of human beings harbor the latent virus, HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are most probably caused by endogenous reactivation or superinfection. In a minority of cases, primary HHV-6 infection may occur when an HHV-6-seronegative individual receives a liver allograft from an HHV-6-seropositive donor. The vast majority of HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are asymptomatic. Only in a minority of cases, when HHV-6 causes a febrile illness associated with rash and myelosuppression, hepatitis, gastroenteritis, pneumonitis, and encephalitis after liver transplantation. In addition, HHV-6 has been implicated in a variety of indirect effects, such as allograft rejection and increased predisposition to and severity of other infections, including cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C virus, and opportunistic fungi. Because of the uncommon nature of the clinical illnesses directly attributed to HHV-6, there is currently no recommended HHV-6-specific approach prevention after liver transplantation. Asymptomatic HHV-6 infection does not require antiviral treatment, while treatment of established HHV-6 disease is treated with intravenous ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir and this should be complemented by a reduction in immunosuppression.

Vascular deposition of complement C4d is increased in liver allografts with chronic rejection

BACKGROUND

Complement protein C4d has been used as a marker of antibody mediated rejection in kidney allografts. C4d has been shown to be deposited also in chronic kidney allograft rejection, and frequently in acute liver allograft rejection. In chronic liver allograft rejection there is limited data of C4d positivity.

METHODS

7 liver allografts explanted at retransplantation due to chronic rejection were examined for expression of C4d. Immunoperoxidase technique on frozen sections was used. The "zero" biopsies of the same livers at the first transplantation served as controls.

RESULTS

Expression of C4d was significantly increased in portal and central veins as well as in the portal stroma of the grafts with chronic rejection when compared to the expression at implantation of the graft.

CONCLUSION

The complement system and anti-donor antibodies may contribute to the process of chronic allograft rejection in the liver.

Human herpesvirus 6 infections after liver transplantation

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infections occur in > 95% of humans. Primary infection, which occurs in early childhood as an asymptomatic illness or manifested clinically as roseola infantum, leads to a state of subclinical viral persistence and latency. Reactivation of latent HHV-6 is common after liver transplantation, possibly induced and facilitated by allograft rejection and immunosuppressive therapy. Since the vast majority of humans harbor the virus in a latent state, HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are believed to be mostly due to endogenous reactivation or superinfection (reactivation in the transplanted organ). In a minority of cases, however, primary HHV-6 infection may occur when an HHV-6 negative individual receives a liver allograft from an HHV-6 positive donor. The vast majority of documented HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are asymptomatic. In a minority of cases, HHV-6 has been implicated as a cause of febrile illness with rash and myelosuppression, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and encephalitis after liver transplantation. In addition, HHV-6 has been associated with a variety of indirect effects such as allograft rejection, and increased predisposition and severity of other infections including cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis C virus, and opportunistic fungi. Because of the uncommon nature of the clinical illnesses directly attributed to HHV-6, there is currently no recommended HHV-6-specific approach to prevention. However, ganciclovir and valganciclovir, which are primarily intended for the prevention of CMV disease, are also active against HHV-6 and may prevent its reactivation after transplantation. The treatment of established HHV-6 disease is usually with intravenous ganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet, complemented by reduction in the degree of immunosuppression. This article reviews the current advances in the pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis, and therapeutic modalities against HHV6 in the setting of liver transplantation.

Human herpesvirus-6 infections and infection-preventative measures in transplant recipients

Like the other herpesviruses, human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 is capable of persisting in the host after primary infection and can reactivate under immunosuppressed conditions. In stem cell transplantation recipients, HHV-6 reactivation is observed in 40–50% of patients and is linked to various clinical manifestations, including rash, delayed platelet engraftment and encephalopathy. HHV-6 reactivation is also relatively common in solid organ transplantation recipients, and is associated with graft dysfunction and subsequent development of human cytomegalovirus disease. In particular, HHV-6 has been recognized as a life-threatening pathogen for the development of encephalopathy after stem cell transplantation. Ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir are effective against HHV-6 in vitro. However, success rates are not high for patients who have developed encephalopathy. Plasma HHV-6 DNA-guided pre-emptive approaches have not been successful owing to the dynamic kinetics of HHV-6 reactivation. Establishment of optimal strategies is needed to prevent HHV-6-associated complications, in particular encephalopathy.

HHV-6 DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) infections have been reported after liver transplantation. In this study, the detection of HHV-6 DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was compared with HHV-6 antigenemia in liver transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES

Forty-three adult liver recipients were frequently monitored by HHV-6 antigenemia test, which detects the viral antigens in PBMC, but is rather qualitative than quantitative.

STUDY DESIGN

From the same PBMC specimens HHV-6 DNA was demonstrated by in situ hybridization using a biotinylated probe and quantified as positive cells/10, 000 PBMC. Altogether 330 blood specimens were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the first 6 months (mean 12 days) after transplantation, 35/43 patients developed HHV-6 antigenemia. Concurrently, HHV-6 DNA-positive cells with mean peak number of 661(+/-574)/10, 000 were detected in 33/35 patients. Seven patients received ganciclovir treatment because of concurrent CMV infection with mean peak number of HHV-6 DNA-positive cells 381(+/-336) before and 34(+/-59)/10, 000 after the treatment (p = 0.03). All CMV infections responded to ganciclovir, but HHV-6 DNAemia disappeared slowly, within 79 days (mean 36 days). Without antivirals, HHV-6 DNAemia/antigenemia lasted usually longer.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of HHV-6 DNA in PBMC correlated well with HHV-6 antigenemia, and may be used in the monitoring of transplant patients.

Emerging viral infections in transplantation

Viral infections are an important complication of transplantation. The introduction of more potent immunosuppressive agents over the past decade correlates with an increase in the rate of hospitalizations of transplant patients with infections. Specifically, viral infections have emerged as a major source of morbidity and mortality in transplantation. There are several potential intervention strategies in the face of emerging infections and it is likely that the approach will differ depending on the virus in question. These include viral surveillance and pre-emptive therapy, intervention of the transplant community, and policy change at the level of government, blood bank and organ procurement organizations. This review focuses on the emergence of the herpesviruses; HHV-6 and HHV-7. In addition, the issue of virus transmission through organ transplant is addressed with a discussion of West Nile virus and the rabies virus.

Expression of β2-integrin on leukocytes in liver cirrhosis

AIM: To analyze β2-integrin expression on blood leukocytes in liver cirrhosis.

METHODS: In 40 patients with liver cirrhosis and 20 healthy individuals, the evaluation of expression of CD11a (LFA-1α), CD11b (Mac-1α), CD11c (αX) and CD49d (VLA-4α) on peripheral blood leukocytes was performed using flow cytometry. The analysis was carried out in groups of patients divided into B and C according to Child-Pugh’s classification.

RESULTS: An increased CD11a, CD11b, CD11c and CD49d integrin expression was observed on peripheral blood leukocytes in liver cirrhosis. The integrin levels were elevated as the advancement of liver failure progressed. The highest expression of integrins occurred predominantly on monocytes. A slight expression of VLA-4 was found on lymphocytes and granulocytes and it increased together with liver failure. A positive correlation was noted between median intensity of fluorescence (MIF) expression on polymorphonuclear cells of CD11a and CD11c and CD49d (r = 0.42, P < 0.01; r = 053, P < 0.01, respectively) in liver cirrhosis stage C. However, no correlation was observed between integrin expression on leukocytes. The concentrations of sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and TNFα, were significantly elevated in liver cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION: β2-integrin expression on leukocytes increases in liver cirrhosis decompensated as the stage of liver failure increases, which is a result of permanent activation of leukocytes circulating through the inflamed liver environment. β2-integrin expression on circulating leukocytes can intensify liver cirrhosis.

Human herpesvirus 6 in bronchalveolar lavage fluid after lung transplantation: a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome?

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the limiting factor to long-term survival after lung transplantation. Previous studies suggested respiratory viral tract infections are associated with the development of BOS. To identify the impact of virus detection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, we analyzed BAL samples from 87 consecutive lung transplant recipients for human herpesvirus (HHV)-6, Epstein-Barr virus, Herpes simplex virus 1/2, Cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytical virus and adenovirus by PCR. Acute rejection, BOS and death were recorded for a mean follow-up time of 3.27 +/- 0.47 years. Results of PCR analysis and other potential risk factors were entered into a Cox regression analysis of BOS predictors and death. Only acute rejection was a distinct risk factor for BOS of all stages, death and death from BOS. HHV-6 was detected in 20 patients. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that HHV-6 was associated with an increased risk to develop BOS > orb = stage 1 and death, separate from the risk attributable to acute rejection. Identification of HHV-6 DNA in BAL fluid is a potential risk factor for BOS. Our results warrant further studies to elucidate a possible causal link between HHV-6 and BOS.

Update on human herpesvirus 6 biology, clinical features, and therapy

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a betaherpesvirus that is closely related to human cytomegalovirus. It was discovered in 1986, and HHV-6 literature has expanded considerably in the past 10 years. We here present an up-to-date and complete overview of the recent developments concerning HHV-6 biological features, clinical associations, and therapeutic approaches. HHV-6 gene expression regulation and gene products have been systematically characterized, and the multiple interactions between HHV-6 and the host immune system have been explored. Moreover, the discovery of the cellular receptor for HHV-6, CD46, has shed a new light on HHV-6 cell tropism. Furthermore, the in vitro interactions between HHV-6 and other viruses, particularly human immunodeficiency virus, and their relevance for the in vivo situation are discussed, as well as the transactivating capacities of several HHV-6 proteins. The insight into the clinical spectrum of HHV-6 is still evolving and, apart from being recognized as a major pathogen in transplant recipients (as exemplified by the rising number of prospective clinical studies), its role in central nervous system disease has become increasingly apparent. Finally, we present an overview of therapeutic options for HHV-6 therapy (including modes of action and resistance mechanisms).

Simulect and HHV-6 in pediatric renal transplantation

Herpes virus reactivation is of increasing interest as we aim to decrease morbidity and mortality in the pediatric renal transplant population. We previously reported increased reactivation of HHV-6 and Epstein Barr virus (EBV) with anti-thymocyte globulin/ALG induction therapy. HHV-6 reactivation and de novo infection has been monitored in 31 consecutive pediatric renal transplant patients receiving antibody induction with Simulect. Human Herpes virus-6 (HHV-6) was correlated with EBV reactivation and de novo infection rates, allograft function at 1 year, donor source and number, and patient age and gender. One HHV-6 de novo infection was associated with an early grade II rejection that was steroid resistant but ATG/ALG responsive. Sixteen of 31 (54.8%) patients had HHV-6 reactivation during the first year and eight patients had a prior reactivation profile before transplant. Thirteen patients (41.9%) were naïve to EBV infection prior to transplant with evidence of primary infection in 11 of 13 patients between 6 weeks and 1 year posttransplant. EBV reactivation was noted in four patients with past immunity to EBV. IgM Ab to EBV or HHV-6 during the first year posttransplant did not correlate with risk of rejection during the first year or graft function one year posttransplant. The only patient with positive HHV-6 IgM Ab in the first posttransplant month was a de novo infection in a 2-year-old boy who was naïve for HHV-6 at the time of transplant. Simulect appears safe in pediatric renal transplant with low risk of HHV-6 or EBV infection in the first 1 to 2 months posttransplant.

Human herpesvirus 6 infection of human epidermal cell line: pathogenesis of skin manifestations

In order to elucidate the pathogenesis of variant B human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection in skin tissues, an A431 cell line was inoculated with variant B HHV-6. HHV-6 causes abortive infection in the A431 cells, because neither late antigen (OHV-3 antigen) nor progeny virus is produced. Maximum levels of HHV-6 antigen (IEA/ex3 antigen)-positive cells (36.4%) were observed 48 hr after viral infection. Cocultivation of HHV-6-infected cord blood mononuclear cells with A431 cells was necessary for the establishment of a sufficient level of viral infection. Cell-to-cell contact between the infected cord blood mononuclear cells and A431 cells was crucial for increasing infection efficiency. To determine the biological effect of HHV-6 infection, flow cytometric analysis was carried out in HHV-6- and mock-infected A431 cells. Although no alteration was observed in VCAM-1 and ELAM-1 expression, that of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, and ICAM-1 was upregulated after infection with HHV-6.

Human Herpesvirus-6: A Short Review of Its Biological Behavior

HHV-6 shows a widespread distribution with life-long persistence. The virus is frequently reactivated, yet remains clinically inapparent unless the patient is immunodeficient in some way. Even then, HHV-6 reactivation may simply enhance the pathogenicity of other viruses or existing autoimmune disorders rather than becoming a pathogen itself. Future clinical studies need to focus on such indirect viral influences mediated through molecular mimicry and interference with cell receptor expression, and cytokine and chemokine network regulation. Nevertheless, such disturbances may afford therapeutic intervention to disrupt herpesvirus interference and improve certain disease processes. There are only a few diseases for which an immediate causal relationship to HHV-6 infection has been suggested.

Virus del herpes humano tipo 6 y tipo 7 en receptores de trasplantes

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in the role of human herpesvirus (HHV) type 6 and type 7 as emerging pathogens or copathogens in transplant recipients. Both HHV-6 and HHV-7 belong to the beta-herpesvirus family and are closely related to another member of the family, cytomegalovirus. After the primary infection, these viruses remain latent in the human host and can reactivate after transplantation. Various clinical processes such as fever, rash, pneumonitis, encephalitis, hepatitis, and myelosuppression have been described in association with herpesvirus. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that the major impact of HHV-6 and HHV-7 reactivation in transplantation is related to indirect effects, such as their association with cytomegalovirus disease, increased opportunistic infections, and graft dysfunction and rejection. The pathogenesis of HHV-6 and HHV-7 during the post-transplantation period, the methods used for their diagnosis, and the evaluation of antiviral drugs and strategies for their prevention and treatment are now the subject of extensive research.