Cutaneous ulcerations and pustular psoriasis flare caused by recombinant interferon beta injections in patients with multiple sclerosis

Cytokines in psoriasis: From pathogenesis to targeted therapy

Psoriasis is a multifactorial disease that affects 0.84% of the global population and it can be associated with disabling comorbidities. As patients present with thick scaly lesions, psoriasis was long believed to be a disorder of keratinocytes. Psoriasis is now understood to be the outcome of the interaction between immunological and environmental factors in individuals with genetic predisposition. While it was initially thought to be solely mediated by cytokines of type-1 immunity, namely interferon-γ, interleukin-2, and interleukin-12 because it responds very well to cyclosporine, a reversible IL-2 inhibitor; the discovery of Th-17 cells advanced the understanding of the disease and helped the development of biological therapy. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the role of cytokines in psoriasis, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying the connection between cytokine imbalance and disease manifestations. It also presents the approved targeted treatments for psoriasis and those currently under investigation.

Reverse causation between multiple sclerosis and psoriasis: a genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study

Observational studies have found a potential bidirectional positive association between multiple sclerosis and psoriasis, but these studies are susceptible to confounding factors. We examined the directionality of causation using Mendelian randomization and estimated the genetic correlation using the linkage disequilibrium score. We performed Mendelian randomization analysis using large-scale genome-wide association studies datasets from the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC, 115,803 individuals of European ancestry) and FinnGen (252,323 individuals of European ancestry). We selected several Mendelian randomization methods including causal analysis using summary effect (CAUSE), inverse variance-weighted (IVW), and pleiotropy-robust methods. According to CAUSE and IVW the genetic liability to MS reduces the risk of psoriasis (CAUSE odds ratio [OR] 0.93, p = 0.045; IVW OR 0.93, p = 2.51 × 10-20), and vice versa (CAUSE OR 0.72, p = 0.001; IVW OR 0.71, p = 4.80 × 10-26). Pleiotropy-robust methods show the same results, with all p-values < 0.05. The linkage disequilibrium score showed no genetic correlation between psoriasis and MS (rg =  - 0.071, p = 0.2852). In summary, there is genetic evidence that MS reduces the risk of psoriasis, and vice versa.

Disease modifying agent related skin reactions in multiple sclerosis: prevention, assessment, and management

Background: The objective for this article is to highlight some of the adverse skin manifestations associated with injectable disease modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). Early identification and intervention can often lead to minimal consequences and prolonged patient tolerance and compliance with these agents. A t the University of Texas Southwestern Medical C enter at Dallas and Texas Neurology in Dallas we actively follow appro ximately 5000 MS patients. The majority of our patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) are treated with one of the currently available disease modifying agents (DMA s). O ur experience with these patients, and the challenges they face in continuing long-term treatment, constitutes the basis of our proposed treatment strategies. Conclusion: Skin reactio ns in response to injectable DMA therapy in MS are generally mild. However, some reactio ns can evolve into potentially serious lesions culminating in infection, necro sis, and in some circumstances requiring surgical repair.

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Neurologic Medications

Life-threatening and benign drug reactions occur frequently in the skin, affecting 8 % of the general population and 2-3 % of all hospitalized patients, emphasizing the need for physicians to effectively recognize and manage patients with drug-induced eruptions. Neurologic medications represent a vast array of drug classes with cutaneous side effects. Approximately 7 % of the United States (US) adult population is affected by adult-onset neurological disorders, reflecting a large number of patients on neurologic drug therapies. This review elucidates the cutaneous reactions associated with medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat the following neurologic pathologies: Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington disease, migraine, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and pseudobulbar affect. A search of the literature was performed using the specific FDA-approved drug or drug classes in combination with the terms 'dermatologic,' 'cutaneous,' 'skin,' or 'rash.' Both PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were utilized, with side effects ranging from those cited in randomized controlled trials to case reports. It behooves neurologists, dermatologists, and primary care physicians to be aware of the recorded cutaneous adverse reactions and their severity for proper management and potential need to withdraw the offending medication.

Severe septal panniculitis in a multiple sclerosis patient treated with interferon-beta

We report a memorable case of severe septal panniculitis in an MS patient following the subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1b, manifesting as a painful, indurated, erythematous lesion of the thigh, which appeared at the injection site.

Cutaneous Ulcerations Following Subcutaneous Interferon β Injection to a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis

We report a case treated with interferon beta-1b for multiple sclerosis (MS), who developed severe cutaneous ulcers after six months of therapy. Interferon beta-1b had been used in a regimen of 8 million IU administered subcutaneously through oblique direction of the needle, twice a week. The cutaneous ulcers developed at inoculation sites, as a result of penetration of interferon beta into dermis. Other underlying diseases of coagulative or bleeding disorders or secondary infection were excluded. Histological features of non-specific inflammatory reactions including hyperplastic changes of blood vessels without any evidence of vasculitis were the prominent features in this case. Corticosteroid and interferon beta-1b therapy was continued on restricted sites on the extremities with care not to repeat injections at the same sites previously used. The administration of interferon beta into subcutaneous fatty tissues vertically reduced the incidence of dermal penetration of drug and occurrence of ulcerations in this patient. We review other case reports of severe cutaneous reactions associated with interferon beta-1b therapy in MS patients and conclude that local cytokine-mediated, adverse, immune reaction or non-specific cutaneous inflammatory reaction to interferon beta-1b initiated the skin ulceration long after institution of therapy at the injection sites, and the reaction might be related to the depth of injection.

Occurrence of Psoriatic Arthritis during Interferon Beta 1a Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis

Interferon beta (IFN- β ) is the first line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. IFN- β is a cytokine that can contribute to the development of systemic autoimmune disease including psoriasis. The development or the exacerbation of psoriasis during IFN- β treatment has been previously observed. We report the occurrence of arthritis and dactylitis in a multiple sclerosis patient with preexisting psoriasis diagnosed as a psoriatic arthritis. The IL-23/Th17 pathway is involved in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and it has been suggested that IFN- β therapy in patients with Th17-mediated disease may be detrimental. Together with previous similar reports, our case suggests that IFN- β should certainly be used with caution in patients with concomitant systemic autoimmune disease with IL-23/Th17 involvement.

Type I interferons: beneficial in Th1 and detrimental in Th17 autoimmunity

In relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), type I interferon (IFN) is considered immuno-modulatory, and recombinant forms of IFN-β are the most prescribed treatment for this disease. However, within the RRMS population, 30-50% of MS patients are nonresponsive to this treatment, and it consistently worsens neuromyelitis optica (NMO), a disease once considered to be a form of RRMS. In contrast to RRMS, type I IFNs have been shown to have properties that drive the inflammatory pathologies in many other autoimmune diseases. These diseases include Sjögren's syndrome, system lupus erythematosus (SLE), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis. Historically, autoimmune diseases were thought to be driven by a TH1 response to auto-antigens. However, since the discovery of the TH17 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), it is now generally thought that TH17 plays an important role in MS and all other autoimmune diseases. In this article, we will discuss recent clinical and basic research advances in the field of autoimmunity and argue that IFN-β and other type I IFNs are immuno-modulatory in diseases driven predominantly by TH1 but in contrast are inflammatory in diseases that have a predominant Th17 response.

Pro-Inflammatory Signaling by IL-10 and IL-22: Bad Habit Stirred Up by Interferons?

Interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-22 are key members of the IL-10 cytokine family that share characteristic properties such as defined structural features, usage of IL-10R2 as one receptor chain, and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-3 as dominant signaling mode. IL-10, formerly known as cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor, is key to deactivation of monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells. Accordingly, pre-clinical studies document its anti-inflammatory capacity. However, the outcome of clinical trials assessing the therapeutic potential of IL-10 in prototypic inflammatory disorders has been disappointing. In contrast to IL-10, IL-22 acts primarily on non-leukocytic cells, in particular epithelial cells of intestine, skin, liver, and lung. STAT3-driven proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and anti-microbial tissue protection is regarded a principal function of IL-22 at host/environment interfaces. In this hypothesis article, hidden/underappreciated pro-inflammatory characteristics of IL-10 and IL-22 are outlined and related to cellular priming by type I interferon. It is tempting to speculate that an inherent inflammatory potential of IL-10 and IL-22 confines their usage in tissue protective therapy and beyond that determines in some patients efficacy of type I interferon treatment.

Psoriasis during natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis

Beta-interferon therapy is known to trigger psoriasis, but this effect has not been previously reported for other multiple sclerosis treatments, such as natalizumab. The following is a case report. A 31-year-old woman affected by psoriasis and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis suffered a severe worsening of psoriasis symptoms during natalizumab treatment and acquired a drug-resistant course. This case suggests that aggravation of psoriasis might be a rare side effect of natalizumab, and that clinicians should be aware of the possibility of paradoxical activation of autoimmune diseases during its treatment.

Antimicrobial peptides in the pathogenesis of psoriasis

One characteristic abnormality of lesional skin in psoriasis is the excessive production of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (AMPs). AMPs typically are small (12-50 amino acids), have positive charge and amphipathic structure, and are found in all living organisms including mammals, insects, plants and invertebrates. These peptides are best known for their integral role in killing pathogenic microorganisms; however, in vertebrates, they are also capable of modifying host inflammatory responses by a variety of mechanisms. In psoriatic lesions, many AMPs are highly expressed, and especially the associations between psoriasis and cathelicidin, β-defensins or S100 proteins have been well studied. Among them, a cathelicidin peptide, LL-37, has been highlighted as a modulator of psoriasis development in recent years. AMPs had been thought to worsen psoriatic lesions but recent evidence has also suggested the possibility that the induction of AMPs expression might improve aspects of the disease. Further investigations are needed to uncover a previously underappreciated role for AMPs in modulating the immune response in psoriasis, and to improve disease without the risks of systemic immunosuppressive approaches.

Janus-like effects of type I interferon in autoimmune diseases

In multiple sclerosis, type I interferon (IFN) is considered immune-modulatory, and recombinant forms of IFN-β are the most prescribed treatment for this disease. This is in contrast to most other autoimmune disorders, because type I IFN contributes to the pathologies. Even within the relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) population, 30-50% of MS patients are non-responsive to this treatment, and it consistently worsens neuromyelitis optica, a disease similar to RRMS. In this article, we discuss the recent advances in the field of autoimmunity and introduce the theory explain how type I IFNs can be pro-inflammatory in disease that is predominantly driven by a Th17 response and are therapeutic when disease is predominantly Th1.

Cutaneous adverse events associated with disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Glatiramer acetate and interferon-beta are approved first-line disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). DMTs can be associated with cutaneous adverse events, which may influence treatment adherence and patient quality of life. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide an overview of the clinical spectrum and the incidence of skin reactions associated with DMTs. A systematic literature search was performed up to May 2011 in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases without applying restrictions in study design, language, or publishing date. Eligible for inclusion were articles describing any skin reaction related to DMTs in MS patients. Selection of articles and data extraction were performed by two authors independently. One hundred and six articles were included, of which 41 (39%) were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies reporting incidences of mainly local injection-site reactions. A large number of patients had experienced some form of localized injection-site reaction: up to 90% for those using subcutaneous formulations and up to 33% for those using an intramuscular formulation. Sixty-five case-reports involving 106 MS patients described a wide spectrum of cutaneous adverse events, the most frequently reported being lipoatrophy, cutaneous necrosis and ulcers, and various immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases. DMTs for MS are frequently associated with local injection-site reactions and a wide spectrum of generalized cutaneous adverse events, in particular, the subcutaneous formulations. Although some of the skin reactions may be severe and persistent, most of them are mild and do not require cessation of DMT.

Interferon-β exacerbates Th17-mediated inflammatory disease

Interferon (IFN)-β is the treatment most often prescribed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). 30-50% of MS patients, however, do not respond to IFN-β. In some cases, IFN-β exacerbates MS, and it consistently worsens neuromyelitis optica (NMO). To eliminate unnecessary treatment for patients who are non-responsive to IFN-β, and to avoid possible harm, researchers are identifying biomarkers that predict treatment outcome before treatment is initiated. These biomarkers reveal insights into the mechanisms of disease. Recent discoveries on human samples from patients with RRMS, NMO, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and ulcerative colitis, indicate that IFN-β is ineffective and might worsen clinical status in diverse diseases when a Th17 immune response is prominent.

Psoriasis and Multiple Sclerosis: Is There a Link?

Background:

Psoriasis and multiple sclerosis (MS) are both autoimmune T cell-mediated diseases. Some case series have suggested an association.

Objective:

To investigate the potential relationship between psoriasis and MS based on a systematic review of the literature.

Methods:

Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE searches were performed.

Results:

T-helper 17 cells are involved in the pathogenesis of both psoriasis and MS. Both conditions have been associated with interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) polymorphisms. Studies have reported psoriasis in 0.41 to 7.7% of individuals with MS. A higher rate of psoriasis compared to controls was noted in a few small MS cohorts, but the number of cases was too small to draw any firm conclusions. In two studies, including a large Canadian study of 5,031 patients with MS, there was no increased prevalence of psoriasis in patients over the control population. Family members of individuals with MS do not appear to be at increased risk for psoriasis in these studies. Psoriasis has developed during treatment for MS, and MS has developed during treatment for psoriasis.

Conclusion:

Although there are some common genetic linkages in psoriasis and MS, psoriasis does not appear to be more common in patients with MS or their relatives.

Psoriasis during interferon beta treatment for multiple sclerosis

Previous reports have suggested an increased risk of psoriasis in MS patients. Worsening of dermatologic lesions during interferon therapy has been rarely reported, but activation of psoriatic arthritis has not been described until now. The following is a case report. A 37-year-old woman affected by relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis had severe worsening of cutaneous psoriasis and activation of psoriatic arthritis during interferon beta treatment. The symptoms resolved after therapy discontinuation. This case further supports that activation of psoriasis might be a rare side effect of IFNB therapy and suggests careful evaluation of concomitant morbidity to allow a patient-oriented treatment strategy.

A review of disease-modifying therapies for MS: maximizing adherence and minimizing adverse events

BACKGROUND

In a chronic disabling disorder such as multiple sclerosis (MS), adherence to treatment is of critical importance in maximizing benefits of therapy over the long term. Adverse events (AEs) are often cited by patients who discontinue therapy.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched for literature pertaining to adherence and AEs in MS published between January 1970 and August 2008. Clinical studies and case reports of AEs were included, as were papers that outlined factors that influence adherence. An advisory board with extensive experience in managing patients with MS developed guidelines to assist healthcare providers in maximizing adherence to disease-modifying therapy.

DISCUSSION

Internally based factors such as self-image, and externally based factors such as AEs, may influence patients' willingness and ability to adhere to therapy. Management of AEs associated with disease-modifying therapies and other therapies is reviewed, including intramuscular and subcutaneous interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, IFNbeta-1b, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, methylprednisolone, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective management of MS is an ongoing, dynamic process that can enhance patients' adherence to therapy. Healthcare practitioners may address factors influencing adherence among patients with MS by managing treatment expectations, maintaining good communication with the patient, and managing AEs of treatment. Although the guidelines proposed herein originate from a single advisory board, it seems clear that by addressing patient concerns, healthcare practitioners can work with patients to enhance their ability to continue to adhere to their therapies and thereby gain the benefits of their treatment over the long term.

Managing adverse effects of disease-modifying agents used for treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

First-line agents approved in the United States for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) include intramuscular interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, subcutaneous (SC) IFNbeta-1a, SC IFNbeta-1b, and SC glatiramer acetate. Intravenous mitoxantrone is the only agent approved for secondary progressive MS, progressive relapsing MS, and worsening relapsing MS. Intravenous natalizumab is approved for relapsing forms of MS generally in patients who have an inadequate response to, or are unable to tolerate, first-line therapies. Corticosteroids are commonly used to treat relapses. This paper reviews the incidence and management of common adverse events (AEs) associated with these treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for clinical trials and other publications between 1985 and 2007 reporting AEs associated with MS therapies, using these search terms: multiple sclerosis, interferon, Avonex, Betaseron, Rebif, glatiramer, copolymer 1, Copaxone, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, adverse events.

RESULTS

A class-specific flu-like syndrome associated with IFNbeta can be managed through initial dose escalation and administration of analgesics and antipyretics, prophylactically or symptomatically. Injection-site reactions can occur in patients receiving injectable therapies, particularly SC IFNbeta or glatiramer acetate. The greatest risk to patients receiving mitoxantrone is cardiotoxicity; thus, the cumulative dose is limited. Allergic reactions occur rarely with natalizumab, and there is a potential risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. AEs associated with short-term pulse corticosteroid therapy are usually transient and largely resolve after treatment is completed.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve adherence to therapy, it is important to educate patients regarding AEs and to manage AEs proactively.

Widespread maculopapular rash due to intramuscular interferon beta-1a during the treatment of multiple sclerosis

We describe a 41-year-old woman with multiple sclerosis, who presented erythematous maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities after the second injection of interferon beta-1a. Histopathologic examination of the lesion revealed lymphocytic exocytosis and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis. Oral antihistamine and topical corticosteroid was started. After improvement of the lesions, the third injection was performed. However, the same reaction occurred. A prick test, which was performed 6 weeks after the eruption, also revealed positive reaction. Although injection-site reactions have been observed with interferon beta-1a, to our knowledge there have been no previous reports of interferon beta-1a-induced widespread cutaneous reaction. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 259—261. http://msj.sagepub.com

Long time interval between multiple sclerosis onset and occurrence of primary Sjögren's syndrome in a woman treated with interferon-beta

Primary Sjören's syndrome with central nervous system involvement can clinically mimic multiple sclerosis (MS). However, SS and MS may coexist. We report here a case of a 48-year-old woman affected by relapsing-remitting MS, good responder to interferon (IFN)-beta 1a, developing sicca complex after 29 years from MS onset. At the age of 48, after 5 years successful treatment with i.m. IFN-beta 1a, xerophtalmia and xerostomia with dysphagia occurred. Autoantibody screening for connective tissue diseases, including anti-ENA, was negative. Schirmer's test showed reduced lacrimal gland function and a minor salivary gland biopsy showed chronic inflammatory infiltration with fibrosis, acinar atrophy and ductal ectasia. According to clinical and pathological findings a diagnosis of SS was made. Other cases of connective tissue diseases after IFN-beta treatment have been described. However, this is, to our knowledge, the first report on the development of primary SS after long time interval from MS onset in a woman treated with IFN-beta. Although there are no evidences about a possible role of IFN-beta in triggering SS yet, a screening for clinical and laboratory signs of SS should be assessed in MS patients during IFN-beta treatment.

Long-term experience with interferon beta-1b (Betaferon®) in multiple sclerosis

The interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b, Betaferon/Betaseron) molecule was cloned some 20 years ago. In a pilot dose-finding trial involving 30 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, the 10 MS patients receiving 250 microg (8 MIU) IFNbeta-1b every other day at 6 months showed a reduced attack frequency relative to 6 patients receiving placebo. Based on these extremely preliminary results a Phase III placebo-controlled trial was undertaken. Treatment with IFNbeta-1b was shown to reduce attack frequency and severity and to markedly reduce magnetic resonance imaging-(MRI) measured activity and disease burden. IFNbeta-1b therapy was subsequently shown to reduce MRI activity within 2 weeks of starting treatment. The benefits of treatment with IFNbeta-1b observed in the original pivotal study are maintained in the longer term, with consistent treatment effects seen after 5 years. IFNbeta-1b has subsequently been shown to reduce accumulation of disability in MS patients with early active secondary progressive disease, to increase cerebral metabolism, and to improve cognitive performance.IFNbeta-1b therapy is generally well tolerated. Classical systemic side effects related to all beta interferons can effectively be managed by dose escalation, and the use of an autoinjector minimises injection site reactions. About one-third of MS patients receiving IFNbeta-1b develop anti-interferon antibodies, typically within the first year of therapy. These antibodies have variable titres that fall with time and ultimately disappear in most patients. The clinical consequences of the presence of antibodies are presently unclear and inconsistent-some patients without antibodies respond poorly to treatment, whereas others with high-titre antibodies respond well to treatment. It is possible that immune complexes formed when anti-interferon antibodies encounter IFNbeta may enhance some of the immunomodulatory actions of the drug by improving CD8 cell-mediated suppressor function. Until the clinical relevance of antibodies is better understood, treatment decisions should be based on clinical grounds only.

Subcutaneous interferon-beta injections in patients with multiple sclerosis initiate inflammatory skin reactions by local chemokine induction

Subcutaneous Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) injections for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently cause inflammatory injection site reactions. To study the role of chemokines we obtained skin biopsies from 7 MS patients 24 h after injection. At the IFN-beta but not at the contralateral placebo injection sites, we observed strong IP-10/CXCL10 and moderate MCP-1/CCL2 expression associated with extensive perivascular, highly CXCR3-positive T cell and macrophage infiltrates. Primary human skin cells displayed a comparable pattern of chemokine induction after stimulation with IFN-beta in vitro. IFN-beta may therefore trigger inflammatory skin reactions through local chemokine induction followed by rapid immune cell extravasation.

Dermal fibrosis and cutaneous necrosis after recombinant interferon-beta1a injection in a multiple sclerosis patient

The most commonly reported side-effects of recombinant interferon-beta1a and 1b include local inflammatory injection site reactions, headache, fever, myalgia and a flu-like syndrome. In this case report, we describe the occurrence of cutaneous necrosis and dermal fibrosis following intramuscular interferon-beta1a injections in a multiple sclerosis patient.

Progress in the understanding of the pathology and pathogenesis of cutaneous drug eruptions : implications for management

Cutaneous drug eruptions are among the most common adverse reactions to drug therapy. The etiology may reflect immunologic or nonimmunologic mechanisms, the former encompassing all of the classic Gell and Combs immune mechanisms. Cumulative and synergistic effects of drugs include those interactions of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors reflecting the alteration by one drug of the effective serum concentration of another and the functions of drugs and their metabolites that interact to evoke cutaneous and systemic adverse reactions. Recent observations include the role of concurrent infection with lymphotropic viruses and drug effects that, through the enhancement of lymphoid blast transformation and/or lymphocyte survival and the contribution of intercurrent systemic connective tissue disease syndromes, promote enhanced lymphocyte longevity and the acquisition of progressively broadening autoantibody specificities. The latter are particularly opposite to drug-induced lupus erythematosus and to drug reactions in the setting of HIV infection. Specific common types of cutaneous drug eruptions will be discussed in this review. Successful management of cutaneous drug eruptions relies upon the prompt discontinuation of the causative medication; most drug eruptions have a good prognosis after this is accomplished. Oral or topical corticosteroids can be administered to aid in the resolution of some types of eruptions. Antihistamines or anti-inflammatory agents may also be administered for some eruptions.

Clinical research helps elucidate the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathogenesis of T1-mediated immune disorders: use of targeted immunotherapeutics as pathogenic probes

Psoriasis is a life-disabling disorder in which 8-10% of patients aged 18-54 actively contemplate suicide because of their disease. Owing to the toxicity and/or inconvenience of current, FDA-approved treatments far moderate-to-severe psoriasis, they are generally used intermittently so that patients experience cycles of remission-flare-remission-flare, etc. The challenge to drug development for moderate-to-severe psoriasis is to provide safe and effective long-term management. Immunobiologics offer the hope for safe, long-term control of psoriasis because they lack targeted organ toxicity. Thus the treatment paradigm may shift from one of intermittent treatment limited by toxicity with resultant flares of disease, to one similar to that seen in diabetes or hypertension in which disease is controlled continuously. Additionally, immunobiologics may alter the natural history of psoriasis. Etanercept, which targets TNF-alpha, controls signs and symptoms and halts joint destruction in patients with psoriatic arthritis. The long-lived remissions observed after cessation of alefacept or infliximab (anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody) treatment lead this author to speculate that these immunobiologics may actually alter the natural history of the cutaneous manifestations of psoriasis.

Vascular events associated with alpha interferon therapy

Alpha Interferon (IFN) is a biological agent used for the therapy of an increasing number of diseases, either as an established effective therapeutic tool or in the context of clinical trials. The use of IFN may be complicated by serious adverse reactions. We describe here the clinical course of a variety of vasculopathic complications in association with IFN-therapy in 12 patients with the diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia and 1 patient with malignant melanoma treated at our institute. Vascular manifestations in these patients include Raynaud's phenomena, digital ulcerations and gangrene, pulmonary vasculitis, pulmonary hypertension and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS). These reactions occurred after 3 months to 3 years of 3-10 million units (MU) daily IFN therapy. Concomitant administration of hydroxyurea (HU) was noted in 5 patients. Discontinuation of IFN and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy brought about a complete resolution or arrested progression of these reactions. IFN-therapy may be complicated by severe vasculopathic/vasospastic complications that usually improve after its discontinuation. Possible underlying mechanisms for these complications are discussed. The early diagnosis of these complications may be vital and IFN should be immediately discontinued when early signs of these complications become evident.

Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: strategies for optimizing management

BACKGROUND

The objective for this article is to highlight several challenges faced by patients and providers in the utilization of disease-modifying agent (DMA) therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to offer practical management strategies that can effectively mitigate or even prevent limiting adverse reactions and enhance treatment compliance.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Our discussion will be limited to the use of interferon beta1a (Avonex, Rebif), interferon beta1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copoxane) as these are the primary agents used in the United States for primary disease-modifying therapy in relapsing forms of MS. Some of the recommendations contained herein are derived from evidence-based studies, while others are contingent upon our collective clinical experiences. At the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Texas Neurology in Dallas we actively follow approximately 5000 MS patients. The majority of our patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) are treated with one of the currently available DMAs. Our experience with these patients, and the challenges they face in continuing long-term treatment, constitutes the basis of our proposed treatment strategies. As part of this effort we formulated an assessment and intervention instrument that can be used in the clinic and by telephone to enhance compliance and minimize adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive treatment approach to the utilization of disease-modifying therapy in MS can serve to optimize the management of our patients and effectively meet the challenges that arise during the course of treatment.

Five cases of livedo-like dermatitis (Nicolau's syndrome) due to bismuth salts and various other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The authors report five cases of Nicolau's syndrome observed over a period of about 25 years. The disease had occurred after intramuscular injections of different drugs (bismuth, diclofenac and ibuprofen). In all the described cases the clinical aspect was characterized by a livedoid pattern followed by a slow necrotizing evolution with scar formation; in some cases surgical debridement and plastic reconstructive surgery were performed. In the past Nicolau's syndrome was described after intramuscular injections of bismuth salts for the treatment of syphilis; now, although still rare, it is described after injections of various aqueous drug solutions. The pathogenesis of Nicolau's dermatitis appears to be more complex than the previous hypothesized embolism caused by oleous drugs.

Psoriasis. Immunopathology and immunomodulation

Biologics in development for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis are discussed in this article. Immunomodulators used as therapeutic, pathogenic probes will continue to identify targets that play primary roles in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Cutaneous Reactions to Chemotherapeutic Agents

The task of evaluating a cutaneous eruption in the patient receiving chemotherapy can be quite formidable. Most of the time, these patients are receiving a multitude of agents and have profound immunosuppression. These factors may alter the more common manifestations of cutaneous eruptions. This article presents some of the more common cutaneous eruptions that may occur in an oncology patient receiving chemotherapy. It is hoped we may recognize clinical patterns seen with chemotherapeutic agents in the immunosuppressed population and, by recognizing these cutaneous eruptions, we may avoid the pitfalls of discontinuing medicines that may certainly be needed or altering the treatment course in a patient.

Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris: results of a pilot, multicenter, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

OKTcdr4a (IMUCLONE) is a humanized anti-CD4 IgG4 monoclonal antibody that retains the binding and in vitro immunosuppressive properties of the parent murine antibody. Psoriasis is a chronic disease for which treatment with multiple doses of monoclonal antibodies is likely to be required for adequate control.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to test the efficacy and safety of OKTcdr4a, given in sequential courses over a period of several weeks, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (45.6 +/- 10.1 years of age) were studied, with a mean pretreatment Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 18.3. In the first double-blind phase of the study, patients were randomized to receive OKTcdr4a as a 225 mg/course (low dose), 750 mg/course (high dose), or placebo divided into 3 identical infusions over a 5-day period. After 42 days, patients who met the criteria for re-treatment with OKTcdr4a were re-treated with the 750 mg/course in an open phase of the study.

RESULTS

After the double-blind course of treatment, the mean PASI decreased by 11% in the placebo group, by 4% in the low-dose group, and by 17% in the high-dose group at 15 days. Twenty patients met the criteria for re-treatment (ie, did not experience a decrease in PASI score of 50% at 42 days). They were re-treated with OKTcdr4a at 43 days with the 750 mg/course in the open phase of the study. By day 99, the mean PASI score decreased from 19.9 at baseline to 17 in those patients who had received either placebo or low-dose OKTcdr4a followed by high-dose OKTcdr4a. In contrast, the mean PASI score decreased from 17.4 at baseline to only 7.7 in those patients who had received high-dose OKTcdr4a for both courses. Sustained CD4 saturation was not necessary for sustained clinical response. No patients had significant changes in circulating CD4(+) T-cell counts. The infusions were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Targeting CD4 using sequential treatments with a humanized monoclonal antibody (OKTcdr4a) may offer another therapeutic option for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

[Cutaneous reactions or necrosis from interferon alpha: can interferon be reintroduced after healing? Six case reports]

PURPOSE

Alpha, beta or gamma interferon (INF) are cytokines produced by cells in response to antigenic stimulation. They are used to treat various hepatic, hematological, oncological and neurological diseases. Cutaneous reactions (rash, alopecia, labial herpes, erythema, or induration at the site of injection, and more rarely cutaneous necrosis) represent 5 to 12% of side-effects observed in patients receiving INF. The authors report six cases of local cutaneous reactions to alpha INF, five of which corresponded to cutaneous necrosis. This makes them question the relevance of INF reintroduction.

METHODS

The study included 5 male and 1 female patients (mean age: 59.1 years; range: 42 to 74 years old). Three patients had chronic hepatitis C, while three others presented a blood disease.

RESULTS

Cutaneous necrosis occurred after 1 to 10 months of treatment. The mean time to healing was 16.2 weeks. Reintroduction of the drug including injection in other sites did not lead to recurrence of necrosis in five out of the six cases.

CONCLUSION

INF-induced cutaneous necrosis does not depend on the type of INF, the site of injection, the dose and may occur 2 months to 9 years after treatment implementation. The exact mechanisms involved in cutaneous necrosis remain unknown. Morbidity is due to a very long time to healing (4 to 6 months). Futhermore, healing sometimes requires prior surgery. Physicians should be aware of the potential occurrence of erythema in patients treated by INF, as it is the first sign of necrosis. The site of injection should then be modified. In case of necrosis, risk factors for thrombophilia, factors reducing microcirculation (DHE, beta-blockers, cigarette smoking) should be investigated. INF injections should be cautiously reintroduced in other sites with the help of a nurse in case of self-injections prior to the occurrence of necrosis. Regarding self-injections patients' training should be emphasized.

Managing the adverse effects of interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis

Interferon-beta is an established therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Recently, it has also been shown that interferon-beta-1b is effective in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. However, adverse effects of interferon-beta treatment are common, particularly during the first weeks of treatment, and are a major concern. Flu-like symptoms, injection site reactions and laboratory abnormalities are the most common adverse effects, and may result in reduced compliance or even discontinuation of treatment in a number of patients. Therefore, efforts to minimise these reactions, e.g. appropriate comedication with analgesic/antipyretic drugs, use of correct preparation and injection technique and sometimes modification of the dosage of interferon-beta, are of considerable importance. This article provides an overview of the management of clinically relevant adverse effects related to treatment with interferon-beta, based on a literature review and personal experience. Essential aspects of patient information are also stressed. If these recommendations are followed, adverse effects related to interferon-beta may be substantially reduced in the majority of patients.

Interferon-induced cutaneous necrosis

BACKGROUND

Due to advances in recombinant DNA technology, interferons are now readily available and are frequently used in all branches of medicine. These potent biologic response modifiers carry a number of systemic and local side effects. These cytokines are usually administered subcutaneously, and recent studies have described the occurrence of inflammation or necrosis at the site of injection.

OBJECTIVE

We report a case of cutaneous necrosis at the sites of interferon injections in a 35-year-old man treated for chronic myeloid leukemia with high, daily doses of interferon alfa. In addition, we review the existing literature on interferon-induced cutaneous necrosis and discuss preventive strategies.

CONCLUSION

Cutaneous inflammation or necrosis at interferon injection sites is not uncommon. Although interferon beta-1b is most commonly responsible for this complication, it is now increasingly reported with interferon alfa. It appears to be secondary to the proinflammatory effects of these cytokines or to their unmasking of a subtle hypercoagulable state.

Selected drug complications and treatment conflicts in the presence of coexistent diseases

The presence of different coexistent systemic diseases often times complicates the selection of the appropriate treatment of an underlying rheumatologic condition. In this article, some controversial treatment conflicts that are frequently encountered in the daily practice of rheumatology are clarified and guidelines for the best available therapeutic options are provided.

Recent advances in the pathology of cutaneous drug eruptions

Cutaneous reactions to drug therapy may be of either immunologic or nonimmunologic etiology. It is important that the dermatologist and pathologist be familiar with these types of cutaneous reactions. This article discusses the clinical features, pathogenesis, and histopathology of various cutaneous drug eruptions.

Recent developments in drug therapy for multiple sclerosis

Symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) includes a diverse range of drugs intended to relieve the specific symptoms with which a patient may present at a particular point in the progression of the disease. These drugs, not specifically designed for the treatment of MS, may include antispastic agents (e.g. baclofen), drugs to reduce tremor (e.g. clonazepam), anticholinergics (e.g. oxybutynin) which relieve urinary symptoms, anti-epileptics (e.g. carbamazepine) to control neuralgia, stimulants to reduce fatigue (e.g. amantadine), and antidepressants (e.g. fluoxetine) to treat depression. The treatment of acute relapses or exacerbations is dominated by corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone. The most active area of current investigation is the development of drugs which will inhibit the progression of the disease process itself, and in this category the beta- and alpha-interferons are the most effective drugs currently available, although many new treatments are currently in trials, including immunoglobulin, copolymer-1. bovine myelin, T-cell receptor (TCR) peptide vaccines, platelet activating factor (PAF) antagonists, matrix metallo-proteinase inhibitors, campath-1, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF).

Interferons in dermatology. Present-day standard

Since the first clinical trials in the early 1980s with recombinant interferon, it was possible to show for a variety of indications that cytokines, especially interferons, at certain doses and at respective intervals, when applied in combination with other pharmaceutical compounds open new powerful therapeutic possibilities. Worldwide, recombinant interferon is licensed, especially in dermato-oncology, for the indication of HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and recently for adjuvant therapy of high-risk malignant melanoma. Recombinant interferon is at present not licensed for dermatologic indication (septic granulomatosis). At the end of our century the indication spectrum for interferons as monotherapy and as combination therapy will undoubtedly be extended. Larger and controlled studies will prove the importance of interferons in dermato-oncology as well as in inflammatory and infectious dermatoses. The combination of interferons with standard therapies will surely be of the utmost importance in dermatotherapy.