Urticarial vasculitis: response to dapsone and colchicine

Colchicine in Managing Skin Conditions: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Colchicine is a natural alkaloid with anti-inflammatory properties used to treat various disorders, including some skin diseases. This paper aims to incorporate all the available studies proposing colchicine as a treatment alternative in the management of cutaneous conditions. (2) Methods: In this systematic review, the available articles present in various databases (PubMed, Scopus-Embase, and Web of Science), proposing colchicine as a treatment for cutaneous pathological conditions, have been selected. Exclusion criteria included a non-English language and non-human studies. (3) Results: Ninety-six studies were included. Most of them were case reports and case series studies describing colchicine as single therapy, or in combination with other drugs. Hidradenitis suppurativa, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum, erythema induratum, storage diseases, perforating dermatosis, bullous diseases, psoriasis, vasculitis, acne, urticaria, stomatitis, actinic keratosis, and pustular dermatosis were the main diseases discussed in literature. Although the therapeutic outcomes were variable, most of the studies reported, on average, good clinical results (4) Conclusions: Colchicine could be, as a single therapy or in combination with other drugs, a possible treatment to manage several skin diseases.

Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema: a worldwide perspective

: Urticaria and angioedema are common clinical conditions representing a major concern for physicians and patients alike. The World Allergy Organization (WAO), recognizing the importance of these diseases, has contributed to previous guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urticaria. The Scientific and Clinical Issues Council of WAO proposed the development of this global Position Paper to further enhance the clinical management of these disorders through the participation of renowned experts from all WAO regions of the world. Sections on definition and classification, prevalence, etiology and pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are based on the best scientific evidence presently available. Additional sections devoted to urticaria and angioedema in children and pregnant women, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes, and physical urticarias have been incorporated into this document. It is expected that this article will supplement recent international guidelines with the contribution of an expert panel designated by the WAO, increasing awareness of the importance of urticaria and angioedema in medical practice and will become a useful source of information for optimum patient management worldwide.

Urticarial lesions: if not urticaria, what else? The differential diagnosis of urticaria: part II. Systemic diseases

There are a number of systemic disorders that can manifest with urticarial skin lesions, including urticarial vasculitis, connective tissue diseases, hematologic diseases, and autoinflammatory syndromes. All of these conditions may enter into the differential diagnosis of ordinary urticaria. In contrast to urticaria, urticarial syndromes may manifest with skin lesions other than wheals, such as papules, necrosis, vesicles, and hemorrhages. Lesions may have a bilateral and symmetrical distribution; individual lesions have a long duration, and their resolution frequently leaves marks, such as hyperpigmentation or bruising. Moreover, systemic symptoms, such as fever, asthenia, and arthralgia, may be present. The most important differential diagnosis in this group is urticarial vasculitis, which is a small-vessel vasculitis with predominant cutaneous involvement. Systemic involvement in urticarial vasculitis affects multiple organs (mainly joints, the lungs, and the kidneys) and is more frequent and more severe in patients with hypocomplementemia. Clinicopathologic correlation is essential to establishing a correct diagnosis.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing the learning activity, participants should be able to distinguish urticarial lesions suggesting diagnoses other than common urticaria; assess patients with urticarial lesions, and suspect systemic diseases presenting with urticarial skin lesions.

Management of leukocytoclastic vasculitis

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LcV) is the most common form of vasculitis of the skin and usually results from deposition of immune complexes at the vessel wall. It presents in different forms and in association with different diseases. When IgA is the dominant immunoglobulin in immune complexes, systemic involvement is likely in both children and adults (Henoch-Schönlein purpura--HSP). LcV due to IgG- or IgM-containing immune complexes has less systemic involvement and a better prognosis than HSP. Other forms of LcV include cryoglobulinaemic, urticarial and ANCA-associated LcV as well as LcV associated with vasculopathy and coagulopathy in SCLE/SLE or in bacteraemia/sepsis. The aim of diagnostic guidelines is to determine the specific type and systemic involvement of LcV and to identify an underlying cause. Basic work-up should encompass history of drug intake and of preceding infections, biopsy with immunofluorescence, differential blood count, urine analysis and throat swabs. Therapy of immune complex LcV often does not require aggressive therapy due to a usually favourable course. It includes avoidance or treatment of eliciting agents and use of compression stockings to reduce purpura. There are no large prospective randomized controlled studies. Corticosteroids are indicated when there are signs of incipient skin necrosis. In chronic or relapsing LcV we suggest colchicine as a first-line and dapsone as a second-line therapy. Corticosteroids may reduce the incidence of severe renal insufficiency in children according to some studies, but there is no study showing such an effect in adults. Severe systemic vasculitis requires immunosuppressive strategies.

Dapsona como alternativa no tratamento de urticária crônica não responsiva a anti-histamínicos

FUNDAMENTOS: A urticária crônica é dermatose que interfere negativamente na qualidade de vida de seus portadores. O tratamento clássico com anti-histamínicos muitas vezes é ineficaz. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia e a segurança do uso da dapsona no tratamento da urticária crônica não responsiva a anti-histamínicos. METÓDOS: Realizou-se estudo retrospectivo mediante a revisão de prontuários de pacientes atendidos em ambulatório especializado em urticária entre novembro de 1996 e março de 2007. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 20 pacientes com urticária crônica de difícil controle, que receberam tratamento com dapsona na dose de 100mg/dia. Associados à dapsona, foram mantidos anti-histamínicos em altas doses, que, isoladamente, não controlavam os sintomas. Quatorze pacientes (70%) responderam com melhora do quadro, observada tanto na diminuição ou desaparecimento das lesões quanto na redução do prurido; três (15%) não obtiveram nenhum sucesso com a medicação; e três (15%) tiveram o tratamento suspenso em decorrência de efeitos colaterais. CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, conclui-se que a dapsona é opção segura e eficaz para pacientes com urticária crônica grave não responsiva a anti-histamínicos.

Therapeutic alternatives for chronic urticaria: an evidence-based review, part 1

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of alternative therapies for chronic urticaria refractory to first-line treatments in an evidence-based manner.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE searches were performed cross-referencing urticaria with the names of multiple therapies. Articles were then reviewed for additional citations. Articles published after 1950 were considered.

STUDY SELECTION

All articles, including case reports, were reviewed for soundness and relevance.

RESULTS

Experience has been reported for a wide variety of alternative therapies in the treatment of chronic idiopathic and physical urticarias. Evidence for most agents is limited to anecdotal reports. The second-line therapies reviewed are also categorized based on criteria of safety, efficacy, convenience, and cost, in relation to the first-line antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative agents should be considered in patients with chronic urticaria who are both severely affected and unresponsive to antihistamines. Although monitoring for toxicity is important in management with many alternative agents, safety is favorable compared with corticosteroids.

Advances in the treatment of chronic urticaria

There have been a number of exciting developments in the treatment of allergic diseases in recent years, but the development of new treatments for urticaria has lagged behind. The standard treatment for chronic urticaria (CU) involves the use of H1 antagonists. A number of small but promising studies have found potential benefit with medications that are used less often. This article reviews the established therapies for CU and the experimental evidence for the use of nonstandard and relatively unknown therapies. The potential usefulness of some of the new allergy medications for the treatment of CU also is discussed.

Urticarial vasculitis and hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome

Urticarial vasculitis is a clinicopathologic entity in which episodes of urticaria are accompanied by histopathologic features of cutaneous vasculitis. The histopathologic definition of vasculitis varies from report to report. In this article, vasculitis is defined as histopathologic features of blood vessel damage: There should be evidence of leukocytoclasis and vessel wall destruction, which may or may not be accompanied by fibrinoid deposits. Red blood cell extravasation and perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrate also may be present. The extent to which each of these elements must be present has been debated.

Primary cutaneous small vessel vasculitis

Disorders associated with cutaneous vasculitis include numerous well-described etiologies. Primary cutaneous vasculitis limits discussion to primary leukocytoclastic vasculitis, essential mixed cryoglobulinemia, urticarial vasculitis, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and erythema elevatum diutinum. Although the therapeutics for these disorders are based on limited data, we attempt to construct a consensus opinion on the management of primary cutaneous vasculitis. Therapy of primary cutaneous vasculitis is indicated for symptomatic or systemic involvement, because cutaneous small vessel vasculitis is frequently a self-limited, single episodic disease. Conservative, symptomatic treatment includes leg elevation, warming, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For mild recurrent disease, colchicine, dapsone, and prednisone are first-choice agents. Systemic or severe cutaneous disease requires more potent immunosuppression (eg, prednisone, azathioprine, or mycophenolate mofetil). Plasmapheresis/plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are viable considerations for refractory disease, but are cumbersome and expensive modalities. There is insufficient evidence to advocate the use of new biological or monoclonal antibody therapies in primary cutaneous vasculitis.

Urticarial vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis is a clinico-pathologic entity typified by recurrent episodes of urticaria that have the histopathologic features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. The cutaneous features may include painful, burning or pruritic skin lesions, the persistence of individual lesions greater than 24 hours, palpable purpura, pronounced central clearing of lesions, and residual hyperpigmentation following resolution. However, because clinical characteristics of urticarial vasculitis may overlap with those of allergic urticaria, confirmation of the diagnosis requires a lesional skin biopsy. This condition is idiopathic in many patients but can also occur in the context of autoimmune disorders, infections, drug reactions, or as a paraneoplastic syndrome. In idiopathic urticarial vasculitis common laboratory findings are an elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and reduction of serum complement. An association between urticarial vasculitis and systemic lupus erythematosus has been hypothesized as some clinical manifestations of disease overlap and C1q autoantibodies may be present in both diseases. Normo-complementemic patients usually have minimal or no systemic involvement and often have a better prognosis. On-the-other-hand, hypocomplementemic patients have the propensity to have more severe multi-organ involvement. Response to treatment is variable and a wide variety of therapeutic agents may be efficacious. Initial recommendations for treatment of urticarial vasculitis manifest only as non-necrotizing skin lesions include antihistamines, dapsone, colchicine, hydroxychloroquine or indomethacin, but corticosteroids are often required. With necrotizing skin lesions or visceral involvement, corticosteroids are regularly indicated. Cases of severe corticosteroid resistant urticarial vasculitis or where corticosteroid morbidity is evident [table: see text] may require treatment with other immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, or cyclosporine.

Novel therapies in vasculitis

The vasculitides comprise various clinical and pathological entities which pose a therapeutic challenge in terms of disease control versus drug toxicity. Glucocorticoids are important in most regimens; duration of exposure and dosages can be minimised by the use of cytotoxic drugs and transplant immunosuppressives such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Among alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide has proven to be highly effective; switching to less toxic antimetabolites, typically methotrexate, for maintenance after achieving disease control is an effective strategy. Plasmapheresis may be considered when pharmacological options are maximised. IVIG infusions are of proven benefit in Kawasaki disease and possible benefit in other vasculitides. Targeting infective aetiologies is the basis of therapies such as lamivudine and vidarabine for hepatitis B associated polyarteritis nodosa as well as ribavarin and IFN-alpha for hepatitis C associated cryoglobinaemic vasculitis. IFN-alpha also has immunomodulatory effect even in non-hepatitis C-associated vasculitis. Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole has been used in limited Wegener's granulomatosis. Thalidomide, colchicine and dapsone are miscellaneous agents that have been used in Behcet's disease and cutaneous vasculitis. Anti-lymphocytic monoclonal antibodies have been employed for induction therapy in Wegener's granulomatosis. The tumour necrosis factor inhibitor etanercept is just being explored as a therapeutic agent. Bone marrow and stem cell transplantation may find a role in refractory disease.

Allergists and dermatologists have far more expertise in caring for patients with urticaria than other specialists

BACKGROUND

Urticaria is a common disease for which numerous treatments have been described, yet there is little information about what agents are commonly used to treat urticaria. There may be differences in the way in which urticaria is treated by different medical specialties.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the visits and treatments of urticaria in office-based practices.

METHODS

National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 1990 to 1997 were analyzed to determine patient populations, medications used, and physician specialties for visits of urticaria.

RESULTS

Women accounted for 69% of all patient visits, but an equal gender distribution was observed in patients 18 years of age and younger. There was a bimodal age distribution with peak visits in patients aged birth to 9 years and 30 to 40 years. H(1) antihistamines and systemic corticosteroids were used in 56% and 14% of visits, respectively. Other medications reported as useful in the treatment of urticaria were used in 12% of visits. Allergists and dermatologists had a mean of 47 and 37 visits per physician per year, respectively, compared with all other physicians who averaged fewer than 10 visits per physician per year. Allergists were the least likely to use a corticosteroid agent (6% of visits), whereas internists were the most likely (29% of visits). Dermatology and allergy recorded a relatively large percentage of visits for urticaria that were referred for their condition by other physicians (49% and 25% of visits, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We observed a bimodal utilization curve for age and urticaria not previously described. H(1) antihistamines remain the mainstay in treatment of urticaria, whereas the low use of systemic corticosteroids likely reflects physicians' understanding of their secondary function in the treatment of urticaria.

Colchicine in dermatology

Colchicine is a medication most often used to treat symptoms of gout. This drug has also been shown to have beneficial effects on cutaneous conditions, including leukocytoclastic vasculitis, psoriasis, and Sweet's syndrome. Colchicine inhibits the function of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and dermatoses with a strong presence of these cells may benefit the most from the administration of this medication. A review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and adverse reactions of colchicine is also presented.

Allergic dermatoses

Defining "allergy" and elucidating the immunopathology of what is too often described as allergic rashes is the objective of this article. The differentiation of inflammatory reactions, which at times is indistinguishable from the immunologic dermatoses is outlined. A rationale plan for management, with indications warranting referral to "the specialist" are suggested.

Urticaria and angioedema

Urticaria and angioedema are usually the clinical consequence of vasoactive mediators derived from mast cells in the skin or mucosal tissues. Efforts to classify mast cell-mediated causes of urticaria and angioedema have generally been frustrated by their diverse pathogenesis and clinical course. The term acute is typically used to describe fleeting lesions whose recurrence does not extend beyond 6 weeks. Chronic is the term used to describe lesions that persist for more than a few hours but usually less than a day, and recurrences extend for more than 6 weeks. These definitions do not take histology into account. Skin biopsies of fleeting lesions demonstrate a paucity of inflammatory cells, whereas more persistent lesions display a spectrum of perivascular cuffing by predominantly T cells and monocytes. The presence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in persistent lesions indicates an underlying immune complex disease. Many of the physical urticarias have fleeting lesions that can be induced with the appropriate stimulus for years. This review article has emphasized the clinical course and histology of urticaria and angioedema lesions in an effort to provide a more complete understanding of the pathogenesis and appropriate treatment. Clearly, avoidance of an identifiable inciting stimulus is optimum management, although most patients have no etiology defined or the cause is not realistically avoidable. At present, treatment options for these patients rely on antihistamines to control the immediate consequence of mast cell degranulation. Corticosteroids are reserved for the treatment of patients whose urticaria or angioedema lesions persist, reflecting the increasing involvement of mononuclear cells in the disease process. For leukocytoclastic vasculitis, corticosteroids are indicated, and cytotoxic drugs may be required for adequate treatment. Future treatments of urticaria and angioedema will evolve based on elucidation of the relevant cells and soluble mediators and will include counterregulatory or antagonistic peptides and drugs. C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency is a relatively uncommon cause of angioedema but is important to understand because of its ability to clinically mimic mast cell-mediated angioedemas and its unique pathogenesis and treatment. HAE can be divided into two serologic subtypes that simply reflect the location of the defect in one of the codominantly expressed C1-INH genes on chromosome 11. AAE can be divided into two serologic subtypes. AAE type I is due to massive consumption of C1-INH, presumably by tumor-related immune complexes. AAE type II is due to an anti-C1-INH autoantibody.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome responsive to dapsone

A 45-year-old woman with cutaneous urticaria-like lesions subsequently developed polyarthritis, glomerulonephritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Biopsy of skin showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis of superficial capillaries. Biopsy of the kidney revealed mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis, and lung biopsy revealed severe emphysema and thick-walled blood vessels with immunoglobulin deposition. Therapy with dapsone produced dramatic improvement of the patient's cutaneous vasculitis and arthritis. This case uniquely demonstrates the efficacy of dapsone for both the urticarial vasculitic and the arthritic components of this syndrome and reemphasizes the potentially severe pulmonary and renal complications.