Effect of a 3-year therapy with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase-inhibitor fluvastatin on endothelial function and distensibility of large arteries in hypercholesterolemic renal transplant recipient

The Influence of Dialytic Modality on Arterial Stiffness, Pulse Wave Reflections, and Vasomotor Function

Background

Measurements of aortic stiffness [aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx)] have been established as powerful predictors of survival on hemodialysis (HD). Abnormal endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular reactivity and increased arterial stiffness are commonly described in HD patients. There is, however, a lack of information on the comparative impact of different renal replacement therapies (RRTs) on PWV and AIx, and how these different methods might influence endothelial-dependent abnormal vasodilatation.

Objective

To describe in a cross-sectional design arterial compliance and distensibility in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus HD versus renal transplant (RTx) patients, compared with age- and blood pressure-matched essential hypertensive controls. The PWV and aortic AIx were determined from contour analysis of arterial waveforms recorded by applanation tonometry in 40 CAPD, 41 HD, 20 RTx patients (with normal serum creatinine), and 20 controls with essential hypertension (all normotensive under treatment). Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular reactivities were assessed by changes in AIx following challenges with inhaled salbutamol and sublingual nitroglycerin respectively.

Results

CAPD patients had significantly stiffer arteries than all other categories. The PWV was 8.29 ± 1.09 m/second in CAPD patients, significantly higher ( p < 0.05) compared to HD subjects (7.19 ± 1.87 m/s). Both dialysis subgroups had significantly higher PWV values compared to RTx patients (6.59 ± 1.62 m/s) and essential hypertensive controls (6.34 ± 1.32 m/s), p < 0.05. The AIx had a profile similar to PWV in different RRTs. All groups with the exception of CAPD subjects had a significant decrease in AIx following salbutamol. Moreover, the vasodilatation induced by either nitroglycerin or salbutamol was significantly blunted compared to HD. Overall, both dialysis categories had more abnormal responses compared to RTx patients and essential hypertensive controls.

Conclusion

CAPD is associated with stiffer arteries and more profoundly abnormal endothelial-dependent vasomotor function, compared to matched HD subjects. These differences in arterial physical properties might explain differences seen in cardiac structure and function between the RRTs.

Renoprotective strategies in lupus nephritis: beyond immunosuppression

Lupus nephritis needs to be diagnosed promptly and treated specifically with appropriate immunosuppression. However, all patients with lupus nephritis have by definition chronic kidney disease (CKD) as they will have proteinuria with varying degrees of renal impairment. CKD requires careful additional management, not only to reduce the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease but also because it is probably the strongest risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the evidence underscoring strategies to prevent progression of CKD beyond the "simple" treatment of the lupus nephritis. The strategies include immaculate control of blood pressure, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system to reduce blood pressure and proteinuria, and the benefits of lifestyle modifications such as tackling smoking, obesity and exercise. We also review the literature on control of dyslipidaemias which, although clearly of cardiovascular benefit, provide less compelling data for offering renoprotection. We touch on the emerging area of the importance of controlling urate levels in protecting against progressive renal impairment. Finally, there is a reminder about the importance of considering the nephrotoxicity of all medications prescribed for patients with lupus nephritis - above all the need to avoid the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Overall, the theme is that there is much more to the management of patients with lupus nephritis than "just" the nephritis - a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists as well as rheumatologists is more likely to provide the appropriate wider care required for all patients with lupus nephritis.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risks of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Specifically, cardiovascular deaths account most deaths in kidney transplant recipients. Statins are a potentially beneficial intervention for kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the benefits (reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and stroke, and progression of CKD to requiring dialysis) and harms (muscle or liver dysfunction, withdrawal, cancer) of statins compared to placebo, no treatment, standard care, or another statin in adults with CKD who have a functioning kidney transplant.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 29 February 2012 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or statins on mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney function and toxicity in kidney transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipids, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria) and relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (major cardiovascular events, mortality, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, elevated muscle or liver enzymes, withdrawal due to adverse events, cancer, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), acute allograft rejection) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 22 studies (3465 participants); 17 studies (3282 participants) compared statin with placebo or no treatment, and five studies (183 participants) compared two different statin regimens.From data generally derived from a single high-quality study, it was found that statins may reduce major cardiovascular events (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 0.84, CI 0.66 to 1.06), cardiovascular mortality (4 studies, 2322 participants: RR 0.68, CI 0.45 to 1.01), and fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 0.70, CI 0.48 to 1.01); although effect estimates lack precision and include the possibility of no effect.Statins had uncertain effects on all-cause mortality (6 studies, 2760 participants: RR 1.08, CI 0.63 to 1.83); fatal or non-fatal stroke (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 1.18, CI 0.85 to 1.63); creatine kinase elevation (3 studies, 2233 participants: RR 0.86, CI 0.39 to 1.89); liver enzyme elevation (4 studies, 608 participants: RR 0.62, CI 0.33 to 1.19); withdrawal due to adverse events (9 studies, 2810 participants: RR 0.89, CI 0.74 to 1.06); and cancer (1 study, 2094 participants: RR 0.94, CI 0.82 to 1.07).Statins significantly reduced serum total cholesterol (12 studies, 3070 participants: MD -42.43 mg/dL, CI -51.22 to -33.65); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11 studies, 3004 participants: MD -43.19 mg/dL, CI -52.59 to -33.78); serum triglycerides (11 studies, 3012 participants: MD -27.28 mg/dL, CI -34.29 to -20.27); and lowered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11 studies, 3005 participants: MD -5.69 mg/dL, CI -10.35 to -1.03).Statins had uncertain effects on kidney function: ESKD (6 studies, 2740 participants: RR 1.14, CI 0.94 to 1.37); proteinuria (2 studies, 136 participants: MD -0.04 g/24 h, CI -0.17 to 0.25); acute allograft rejection (4 studies, 582 participants: RR 0.88, CI 0.61 to 1.28); and GFR (1 study, 62 participants: MD -1.00 mL/min, CI -9.96 to 7.96).Due to heterogeneity in comparisons, data directly comparing differing statin regimens could not be meta-analysed. Evidence for statins in people who have had a kidney transplant were sparse and lower quality due to imprecise effect estimates and provided limited systematic evaluation of treatment harm.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins may reduce cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients, although treatment effects are imprecise. Statin treatment has uncertain effects on overall mortality, stroke, kidney function, and toxicity outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Additional studies would improve our confidence in the treatment benefits and harms of statins on cardiovascular events in this clinical setting.

Protective effects of rosuvastatin in experimental renal failure rats via improved endothelial function

Rosuvastatin is a statin (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitor) that also serves as an endothelial dysfunction salvager in many disease models. Endothelial dysfunction is assumed to play a pivotal role in the process of chronic renal failure. The authors tested rosuvastatin on a rat model of renal failure with hypertension. Renal failure was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx). Fisher rats were divided into four groups: sham (n = 10), sham + rosuvastatin (n = 10), Nx (n = 9), and Nx + rosuvastatin (n =10). After 4 weeks, the authors determined renal function, lipid profile, and urine albumin excretion, investigated small renal arteries for endothelium function in response to acetylcholine by perfused juxtamedullary nephron technique, and detected intrarenal inflammatory cytokine expression by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. 5/6 Nx significantly increased blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure, and severe albuminuria developed. The deterioration of renal function, hypertension, and albuminuria were almost normalized by rosuvastatin therapy; in addition, rosuvastatin prevented intrarenal inflammatory cytokine expression and the impaired response to acetylcholine of the renal endothelium. Microscopically, rosuvastatin significantly inhibited the development of progressing renal fibrosis, preserved glomerular structure and tubular integrity, and significantly reduced the degree of tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. In conclusion, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor rosuvastatin can ameliorate markers of endothelium dysfunction and offers a significant protective effect against the development of renal failure caused by 5/6 Nx in rats. Rosuvastatin might, therefore, represent a novel therapeutic agent for chronic kidney disease.

Influence of erythropoietin on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Recent retrospective studies suggest an association of therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and increased mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Large artery structure and function are significantly impaired in RTR which contributes to their high cardiovascular morbidity and could be altered by erythropoietin. We aimed to examine the influence of ESA therapy on large artery stiffness and endothelial function in RTR.

METHODS

63 RTR with chronic allograft dysfunction and renal anemia were randomized to a group receiving darbepoetin alfa (Dar) and a control group (Co). At baseline and after 8 months of treatment (cumulative Dar dose 11.1 µg/kg b.w.) brachial and common carotid artery distensibility coefficients, aortic pulse wave velocity, brachial artery flow-mediated and nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation were measured as well as the following biomarkers of vascular function: vWF, sVCAM, sICAM, E-selectin, t-PA and PAI-1.

RESULTS

23 patients in the Dar group and 17 patients in the Co group were available for per-protocol analysis. Hemoglobin increased significantly from 10.9 to 12.6 g/dl after 8 months in the Dar group, whereas it remained stable at 11.3 g/dl in the Co group. Effects on large artery stiffness, endothelial function and biomarkers of vascular function did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with Dar during 8 months did not significantly impact parameters of large artery stiffness and endothelial function in RTR. These data suggest that therapy with erythropoietin does not deteriorate arterial stiffness and endothelial function in RTR.

Impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review

Patients with chronic kidney disease including renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a markedly higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than the general population. Many trials have established the role of statins in the prevention of cardiovascular mortality, not only by decreasing the low density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels but also by their pleotropic effects. These data from the general population may not be applicable to RTRs as these patients have different cardiovascular risk profiles. Till date, only a few prospective, randomized trials have assessed the use of statins in RTRs with regards to cardiovascular outcomes. The Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplant trial, the largest trial so far, suggested that dyslipidemia management with statins in RTRs is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (although differences in the combined primary end point were not statistically significant). The current guidelines from National Kidney Foundation for managing dyslipidemia in RTRs recommend managing all chronic kidney disease patients as a coronary heart disease equivalent. The task group for drafting these guidelines concluded that based on the currently available evidence, additional studies may be needed in RTRs to confirm and extend the results of Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplant trial.

Use of kidney function end points in kidney transplant trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in kidney transplantation are beginning to include markers of kidney function as end points now that traditional outcomes, such as acute rejection, become increasingly rare events. The frequency and type of kidney function end points used are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & POPULATION

Randomized controlled trials in adult kidney transplant recipients reported in 5 major general medical journals and 5 major subspecialty journals in nephrology and transplantation between January 2003 and November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion of at least one kidney function end point at least 1 month posttransplant.

RESULTS

133 (79%) of 169 randomized trials identified used a kidney function end point. Of these, 37 (28%) used one or more measures of kidney function as the primary end point, and 81 (61%), as a secondary end point. For the primary end point, 21 (57%) trials used a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 18 (49%) used serum creatinine level, and 7 (19%) used measured GFR. Overall, eGFR was an end point in 81 (61%) trials, and measured GFR, in 12 (9%) trials.

LIMITATIONS

This review is limited by the poor quality of the included trials, with many not defining either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of kidney function are used commonly as surrogate end points in kidney transplant trials, with eGFR becoming more frequently used over time. Further data are needed to properly validate these surrogate end points and fully understand their limitations when designing and interpreting randomized trials.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular deaths account for the majority of deaths in kidney transplant recipients and dyslipidaemia contributes significantly to their cardiovascular disease. Statins are widely used in kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in the general population, however evidence favouring their use is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of statin therapy on mortality and renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and hand searched reference lists of articles and scientific proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing statins with placebo, no treatment or other statins in kidney transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model after testing for heterogeneity. Results were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipid parameters) and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (mortality, allograft rejection, liver enzymes, occurrence of rhabdomyolysis and study withdrawal) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies (3229 patients) comparing statins versus placebo (15) or another statin (1) were included. Compared to placebo, statins did not decrease all-cause mortality (14 studies: RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.12). Point estimates favoured statins in terms of cardiovascular mortality (13 studies: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.03) and non-fatal cardiovascular events (1 study: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.01), however the results were not statistically significant. Compared to placebo, the use of statins was associated with a significantly lower end of treatment average total cholesterol (10 studies: MD -42.33 mg/dL (1.26 mmol/L), 95% CI -53.02 to -31.64), LDL cholesterol (10 studies: MD -46.15 mg/dL (1.19 mmol/L), 95% CI -55.97 to -36.33) and triglycerides (10 studies: MD -25.46 mg/dL (0.26 mmol/L), 95% CI -33.95 to 16.9). There was no significant difference in the risk of acute rejection (5 studies: RR 0.61; 95% C.I.0.32 to 1.16.) No data on chronic rejection was available and no major toxicity was noted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins significantly reduced hyperlipidaemia and tended to reduce cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients, but no effect has yet been demonstrated for mortality outcomes. Most of the data was derived from one large long-term study. Considering the significant impact of statins on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general and predialysis populations, more studies are needed in kidney transplant patients.

Progression of kidney disease in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin versus usual care: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease. The role of statin therapy in the progression of kidney disease is unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial, post hoc analyses.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

10,060 participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (lipid-lowering component) stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): less than 60, 60 to 89, and 90 or greater mL/min/1.73 m(2). Mean follow-up was 4.8 years.

INTERVENTION

Randomized; pravastatin, 40 mg/d, or usual care.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; end-stage renal disease (ESRD), eGFR.

RESULTS

Through year 6, total cholesterol levels decreased in the pravastatin (-20.7%) and usual-care groups (-11.2%). No significant differences were seen between groups for rates of ESRD (1.36 v 1.45/100 patient-years; P = 0.9), composite end points of ESRD and 50% or 25% decrease in eGFR, or rate of change in eGFR. Findings were consistent across eGFR strata. In patients with eGFR of 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or greater, the pravastatin arm tended to have a higher eGFR.

LIMITATIONS

Proteinuria data unavailable, post hoc analyses, unconfirmed validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation in normal eGFR range, statin drop-in rate in usual-care group with small cholesterol differential between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive patients with moderate dyslipidemia and decreased eGFR, pravastatin was not superior to usual care in preventing clinical renal outcomes. This was consistent across the strata of baseline eGFR. However, benefit from statin therapy may depend on the degree of the cholesterol level decrease achieved.

Causes and consequences of increased arterial stiffness in chronic kidney disease patients

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality is greatly enhanced in patients with chronic kidney disease, compared to the non-renal population. One key element of this high CV burden appears to be arterial stiffness, as an expression of premature vascular aging. Increased arterial stiffness in renal patients may be a consequence of vascular calcification, chronic volume overload, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and several other factors. The authors review briefly the main pathophysiological mechanisms leading to reduced arterial compliance. Increased arterial stiffness has significant clinical consequences: isolated systolic hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy (and failure), and reduced myocardial perfusion. Better knowledge of the mechanisms of arterial functional and morphologic alteration may help in developing more refined therapeutic strategies aimed to reduce the high CV burden in chronic kidney disease. The potential therapeutic interventions - mainly the use of certain antihypertensive drugs and reduction of vascular calcification - are finally discussed.

Prognostic Associations Between Lipid Markers and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is highly prevalent in kidney transplant recipients, but the prognostic significance for mortality and allograft survival in these patients has not been established sufficiently.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 733 kidney transplant recipients between 1996 and 1998. Clinical information was collected and blood was drawn for laboratory evaluation. Information on the previous transplantation procedures and organ donor were obtained from the Eurotransplant Foundation database. We used the Austrian Dialysis and Transplantation Registry for follow-up. Using multivariate proportional hazard regression, independent relations of fasting plasma triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to risk for death from any cause and risk for kidney allograft loss were examined.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 154 patients died and 260 kidney allografts were lost. After careful multivariate adjustment, there were no significant associations between TG and TC levels and patient mortality. Patients in the highest quartile of TG and TC levels had no difference in risks for mortality compared with patients in the lowest quartile of these parameters (hazards ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 1.28; hazards ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.10, respectively). Similarly, no associations were found with allograft loss. Further analysis of associations between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol categories and patient mortality or kidney allograft loss did not show associations.

CONCLUSION

Elevated levels of TC or its subfractions and elevated TG levels are not associated with increased risk for patient mortality or allograft loss in these kidney transplant recipients.

Arterial stiffness in renal patients: an update

According to recent data, arterial stiffness is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in both the general and renal populations. Because of several factors (vascular calcifications among them), large arteries are stiffer in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with the nonrenal population, contributing to the enormous cardiovascular mortality in renal patients. This review briefly analyzes methods for determination of arterial stiffness, focusing on 2 parameters, pulse wave velocity and the augmentation index, particularly useful in assessing arterial compliance in renal patients. Effects of different methods of renal replacement therapy on arterial wall properties also are discussed. Finally, the most promising novel and/or potential therapies regarding reduction of arterial stiffness in renal patients are reviewed.

Fluvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney failure and renal transplantation

Premature atherosclerotic coronary heart disease driven by multiple risk factors is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among the 6 million patients in the United States with chronic renal failure. Consensus is that kidney failure and renal transplantation patients should be treated aggressively for dyslipidemia. Major medical literature databases were searched for published information about fluvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, used in patients with impaired renal function. This article characterizes the dyslipidemia observed in these clinical settings and reviews the clinical experience with fluvastatin.

A review of the lipid-related effects of fluvastatin

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy has been shown to significantly decrease vascular events and overall mortality in primary and secondary prevention trials. This review considers the pharmacology, nonlipid-lowering effects and clinical trial evidence of fluvastatin based on a survey of PubMed entries.

FINDINGS

Recent clinical data show that treatment with fluvastatin is associated with a variety of benefits in different high-risk populations along with a good safety profile. Fluvastatin exerts non-lipid lowering-associated pleiotropic effects in both clinical and experimental studies. Furthermore, an extended-release formulation of fluvastatin with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile is available.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with fluvastatin offers a convenient, safe and evidence-based approach to managing dyslipidaemias and preventing vascular events.

Fluvastatin and fluvastatin extended release: a clinical and safety profile

Cardiovascular diseases due to atherosclerosis are the leading causes of mortality in the Western world. Cholesterol-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme Areductase inhibitors (statins) has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diverse populations. Fluvastatin (Lescol, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was the first totally synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on the market and has recently become available in an extended-release formulation (Lescol XL, Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Data from several clinical outcome trials have shown substantial benefits from fluvastatin treatment in diverse populations. Fluvastatin exists primarily in its acid form and as inactive metabolites in vivo, while active metabolites as well as the lactone form are only present in small amounts. The demonstration of the safe use of fluvastatin in a wide range of patients may be associated with the predominant acid form of the drug in vivo, as well as its predominant metabolism via the cytochrome P450 2C9 pathway.