Autoantibodies in conventional toxicity testing

SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (Vero cells) shows good safety in repeated administration toxicity test of Sprague Dawley rats

The outbreak of COVID-19 has posed a serious threat to global public health. Vaccination may be the most effective way to prevent and control the spread of the virus. The safety of vaccines is the focus of preclinical research, and the repeated dose toxicity test is the key safety test to evaluate the vaccine before clinical trials. The purpose of this study was (i) to observe the toxicity and severity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cells) in rodent Sprague Dawley rats after multiple intramuscular injections under the premise of Good Laboratory Practice principles and (ii) to provide a basis for the formulation of a clinical trial scheme. The results showed that all animals in the experimental group were in good condition, no regular changes related to the vaccine were found in the detection of various toxicological indexes, and no noticeable stimulating reaction related to the vaccine was found in the injected local tissues. The neutralizing antibodies in the low- and high-dose vaccine groups began to appear 14 days after the last administration. In the negative control group, no neutralizing antibodies were observed from the administration period to the recovery period. Therefore, the repeated administration toxicity test of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cells) in Sprague Dawley rats showed no obvious toxic reaction. It was preliminarily confirmed that the vaccine can stimulate production of neutralizing antibodies and is safe in Sprague Dawley rats.

Hep-2 cell based indirect immunofluorescence assay for antinuclear antibodies as a potential diagnosis of drug-induced autoimmunity in nonclinical toxicity testing

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are important biomarkers in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases in humans; however, the diagnostic performance of ANA in nonclinical safety studies are not well understood. Here, we studied the use of ANAs as potential nonclinical biomarkers for drug-induced autoimmunity (DIA) using a Hep-2 based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Initially, MRL-fas(lpr)/J mice and HgCl₂-treated rats were used as SLE-positive models. Serum samples obtained from 94 normal mice or 204 normal rats aged one to four months served as the negative control. The IFA effectively distinguished ANAs-positive samples in both species with a cut-off titer of 1:100. Brown Norway rats were treated with 450 mg/kg D-penicillamine for 30 consecutive days. ANAs were generated and corresponded with DIA development. Human Hep-2 cells, mice Neuro 2A cells, and Chinese Hamster Lung cells served as antigen from different species, which were found cross-reactive with ANA-positive serum samples from mice, rats, and humans without any differences in diagnosis. This methodology showed no species-specificity for ANA detection. Furthermore, we found approximately 20 percentage of the mice aged seven to eight months demonstrated age-related ANAs, which was consistent with humans. Overall, our findings demonstrated the use of ANA detection using IFA in the nonclinical diagnosis of murine drug-induced autoimmunity, and age-related ANAs should be considered when aged animals are used.

Assessment of drug-induced immunotoxicity in animal models

With the growing understanding that drugs might induce immune-mediated adverse reactions in patients, immunotoxicity testing of new pharmaceuticals has become an important topic in drug development. The nonclinical assessment of unexpected immune suppression is based on relatively well-standardized and validated assays and animal models. For the evaluation of direct immune stimulation few animal models are available, whilst the development of animal models to assess drug-induced hypersensitivity and in particular autoimmunity is in its infancy.:

Immunogenicity/hypersensitivity of biologics

This continuing education course was designed to provide an overview of the immunologic mechanisms involved in immunogenicity and hypersensitivity reactions following administration of biologics in nonclinical toxicity studies, the methods used to determine whether such reactions are occurring, and the associated clinical and anatomic pathology findings. Hypersensitivity reactions have classically been divided into type I, II, III, and IV reactions; type I and III reactions are those most often observed following administration of biologics. A variety of methods can be used to detect these reactions. Antemortem methods include hematology; detection of antidrug antibodies, circulating immune complexes and complement fragments, and immunoglobulin E in serum; tests for serum complement activity; and evaluation of complement receptor 1 on erythrocytes. Postmortem methods include routine light microscopy and electron microscopy, which can demonstrate typical findings associated with hypersensitivity reactions, and immunohistochemistry, which can detect the presence of immune complexes in tissues, including the detection of the test article. A final determination of whether findings are related to a hypersensitivity reaction in individual animals or across the entire study should rely on the overall weight of evidence, as findings indicative of these reactions are not necessarily consistent across all affected animals.

A safety study of inactivated Enterovirus 71 vaccine

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is one of the major causative agents for hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in childhood. Nowadays, HFMD or EV71 infections have already become an important public health issue throughout the world. Vaccination may be the most effective measure to control the transmission of the virus. Therefore, to pave EV71 vaccine into human clinical trial, in the present study a comprehensive preclinical safety assessment of inactivated EV71 vaccine including single- and repeat-dose toxicity studies were conducted in rats and cynomolgus monkeys. No abnormal findings were observed in rats following single intramuscular administration with EV71 vaccine (640 U). The results also showed no obvious systemic toxicities from four repetitive intramuscular injections, with a 14-d interval, of two dosages of EV71 vaccine in the two animal species. Antinuclear antibody response was not detected after the repeated administrations. Histopathological examination demonstrated the minimal to severe inflammatory changes in muscle tissues of the injection sites in EV71 vaccine-injected animals and most of findings have been improved over time. Furthermore, test article could induce highly EV71-specfic neutralizing antibody response in both animal species. Taken together, these data suggested a favorable safety profile for inactivated EV71 vaccine and supported this product to enter human phase I clinical trial.

Society of Toxicologic Pathology position paper on best practices on recovery studies: the role of the anatomic pathologist

This article reviews the regulatory guidelines that provide for the inclusion of recovery groups in toxicology studies, presents the challenges in the design and interpretation of nonclinical recovery studies, and summarizes the best practices for the role of an anatomic pathologist regarding toxicology studies with recovery groups. Evaluating the potential recovery of histopathologic findings induced by a biopharmaceutical requires the active participation of one or more anatomic pathologists. Their expertise is critical in risk assessment regarding the potential for recovery as well as providing scientific guidance in the design and evaluation of studies with recovery groups.

Translational immunologic safety evaluation: a perspective

Although translational research is a rapidly evolving area of biomedical sciences, translational immunologic safety evaluation has so far attracted only very limited attention. Assays and animal models have been developed to identify immunotoxic hazards related to immunosuppression, but less attention has been paid to immunostimulation, hypersensitivity, and autoimmunity. Some of these assays and models are recommended by regulatory bodies, even though it is as yet unsure to what extent they can predict the potential of, or lack of, new chemical entities and drug candidates for inducing significant immunotoxic effects. A translational approach should attempt to standardize and validate those models, assays, and biomarkers that could be used in regulatory non-clinical safety studies as well as clinical studies. Beyond translational immunologic safety, immune monitoring during clinical studies is intended to identify and evaluate potential immune safety issues not seen in non-clinical studies. Based on this overview of the current knowledge, it can be concluded that much remains to be done to conduct translational studies helpful to enhance the immunologic safety of drugs and chemicals.

Immunodrugs: therapeutic VLP-based vaccines for chronic diseases

Worldwide, the prevalence of noncommunicable chronic diseases is increasing. The use of vaccines to induce autoantibodies that neutralize disease-related proteins offers a means to effectively and affordably treat such diseases. Twenty vaccines designed to induce therapeutic autoantibodies were clinically tested in the past 12 years. Immunodrugs are therapeutic vaccines comprising virus-like particles (VLPs) covalently conjugated with self-antigens that induce neutralizing autoantibody responses. Four such VLP-based vaccines have been clinically tested and one has achieved proof of principle: a reduction of blood pressure in hypertensive patients. To facilitate preliminary clinical testing, novel nonclinical study programs have been developed. Safety study designs have considered the underlying B and T cell immunology and have examined potential toxicities of vaccine components and primary and secondary pharmacodynamic action of the vaccines.

Methods of evaluating immunotoxicity

Immunotoxicology is an important aspect of the safety evaluation of drugs and chemicals. Immunosuppression, (unspecific) immunostimulation, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity are the four types of immune-mediated adverse effects. However, the nonclinical assessment of immunotoxicity is at present often restricted to animal models and assays to predict unexpected immunosuppression. There is, however, no general consensus that a variety of assays can be considered depending on the compound to be tested. A major issue is whether histological examination of the thymus, spleen, lymphoid organs and Peyer's patches is a reliable predictor of immunosuppression or whether immune function should also be assessed. A T-dependent antibody response assay, either the plaque-forming cell assay or anti-keyhole limpet haemocyanin enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay, is recommended as a first-line assay. A variety of assays, including lymphocyte subset analysis, natural killer-cell activity, lymphocyte proliferation, delayed-type hypersensitivity, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity and macrophage/neutrophil function assays, can also be used. In certain circumstances, host resistance assays can be considered. With the exception of contact sensitisation, very few animal models and assays can reliably predict the potential for (unspecific) immunostimulation, hypersensitivity or autoimmunity. A major limitation of immunotoxicity risk assessment is the lack of human data. Immunological end points and clinical criteria to be included in clinical trials and epidemiological studies have to be carefully standardised and validated.

Immunotoxicology: role in the safety assessment of drugs

The immunotoxic effects of drugs are divided into immunosuppression, immunostimulation, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The major adverse consequences of immunosuppression are infectious complications and virus-induced malignancies. Flu-like reactions, more frequent autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivity reactions to unrelated allergens, and inhibition of drug-metabolising enzymes are the adverse effects related to immunostimulation. Hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent immunotoxic effects of drugs. They include immune-mediated ('allergic') and non immune-mediated ('pseudoallergic') reactions. Drug-induced autoimmune reactions, either systemic or organ-specific, are seemingly rare. A review of drug-induced immunotoxic effects demonstrates that immunotoxicity is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. As immunotoxicologists have long focused on immunosuppression, the nonclinical immunotoxicity safety assessment of unexpected immunosuppression is based on a number of relatively well standardised and validated animal models and assays. However, there is no general consensus regarding the minimal requirement for this assessment. Many different assays can be used to extend the assessment case by case. Few animal models and assays have been validated for use in the nonclinical safety assessment of unexpected immunostimulation. The situation is worse regarding the prediction of hypersensitivity and autoimmune reactions. Our limited understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of immunotoxicity accounts, at least partly, for this situation. Recent guidelines for the immunotoxicity safety assessment of drugs, even though conflicting on several points, will serve as an impetus not only to refine current animal models and assays, but also to search for better alternatives. The new data generated will have to be interpreted and extended to animal species other than just rodents. Likewise, animal results will have to be compared with findings in humans. The search for immunological endpoints that can be used in several animal species and in humans will therefore become essential. Specific endpoints and clinical criteria that can be included in clinical trials to further investigate the potential for immunotoxicity of new drugs will have to be defined. Because immunotoxicity plays a key role in drug-induced adverse effects, the role of immunotoxicology in drug safety assessment is indisputable and the systematic nonclinical as well as clinical immunotoxicity assessment of every new drug is deemed essential.

Autoimmunity induced by adjuvant hydrocarbon oil components of vaccine

Adjuvant oils such as Bayol F (Incomplete Freund's adjuvant: IFA) and squalene (MF59) have been used in human and veterinary vaccines despite poor understanding of their mechanisms of action. Several reports suggest an association of vaccination and various autoimmune diseases, however, few were confirmed epidemiologically and the risk of vaccination for autoimmune diseases has been considered minimal. Microbial components, not the adjuvant components, are considered to be of primary importance for adverse effects of vaccines. We have reported that a single intraperitoneal injection of the adjuvant oils pristane, IFA or squalene induces lupus-related autoantibodies to nRNP/Sm and -Su in non-autoimmune BALB/c mice. Induction of these autoantibodies appeared to be associated with the hydrocarbon's ability to induce IL-12, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, suggesting a relationship with hydrocarbon's adjuvanticity. Whether this is relevant in human vaccination is a difficult issue due to the complex effects of vaccines and the fact that immunotoxicological effects vary depending on species, route, dose, and duration of administration. Nevertheless, the potential of adjuvant hydrocarbon oils to induce autoimmunity has implications in the use of oil adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines as well as basic research.

Vaccines: predicting the risk of allergy and autoimmunity

The field of vaccines is markedly evolving with the introduction and development of many new concepts and formulations, as well as new indications. Based on the current clinical experience, vaccines can be considered safe in most cases. Nevertheless, allergy and, to a lesser extent, autoimmunity have repeatedly been described or suspected as rare adverse consequences of human vaccines. The mechanisms of these adverse reactions are ill-elucidated, if at all. No animal models have been adequately standardized and validated to predict the risk of allergy and autoimmunity associated with vaccines. However, a number of existing models can be considered for use, but need refinement to be applied to vaccine evaluation. Finally, because the preclinical safety evaluation has not received much attention in the past, efforts should be paid to design specific and cost-effective procedures to meet the current expectations.

Non-clinical vaccine safety assessment

As vaccines are undoubtedly classified as pharmaceuticals, they have to be submitted to strict non-clinical safety evaluation. The context of their prophylactic use requires that every effort is made to ensure their safe use. Their safety evaluation is complex as they act through a multistage mechanism in which the vaccine by itself acts as a pro-drug, antibodies and activated lymphocytes being the actual effectors. Therefore, several potential toxicities must be considered: direct toxicity of the test article, toxicity linked to the pharmacodynamic activity of the vaccine, activation of pre-existing disorders, toxicity of contaminants and impurities and other adverse reactions due to interaction between the various components. Guidelines dealing with vaccines include general guidelines applicable to all pharmaceuticals, such as ICH S6, and also more specific documents which allow some flexibility in study design. Among the various studies, if single-dose studies are generally part of the quality control test battery, repeated dose studies are pivotal. The animal model and treatment schedule selection and the parameters investigated are critical for the relevance of this safety assessment. Immunological and safety pharmacology parameters should be adapted to the specific properties of vaccines and added to this type of study. Vaccines intended for pregnant women or women of child-bearing age require embryo-fetal and post-natal studies with an adapted design to obtain appropriate fetal and maternal exposure during gestation with continuation into the post-natal period. Tests exist to detect hypersensitivity or autoimmune reactions, but require further validation. In addition to this tailor-made approach, any adjuvant or active component added to the vaccine formulation necessitate their own assessment using studies routinely performed for new drugs. From this review, vaccine toxicology would appear to be a separate discipline on its own whose predictivity will be increased by new method development.

The popliteal lymph node assay: results of a preliminary interlaboratory validation study

The popliteal lymph node (PLN) assay was proposed to predict possible autoimmune effects of xenobiotics. A preliminary interlaboratory validation study of the PLN assay was conducted in Wistar rats. Three laboratories tested in blind fashion four compounds, namely chlorpromazine, zimeldine, hydrazine and streptozotocin, which were reported to cause autoimmune-like reactions in humans, and one compound, i.e. barbital, which was not, using strictly the same experimental procedure. All tested substances were injected into the hind footpad of rats on day 1, and PLN weight and cellularity were measured on day 8. Comparison of the controlateral PLN was used to calculate weight and cellularity indices. The results were independently analyzed in a fourth laboratory. All four positive compounds were detected by the three laboratories using both weight and cellularity indices, and the negative compound consistently proved negative. Despite variations in absolute values between laboratories, although not significant, these results provide further evidence of the potential predictive value of the PLN assay.