Nonmyeloablative conditioning to induce bilateral tolerance after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in mice

Depletion of alloreactive T cells for tolerance induction in a recipient of kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantations

The present case report represents a successful attempt to induce transplantation tolerance to organ allograft by combined administration of donor hematopoietic cells and kidney based on in vivo deletion of alloreactive host-vs-graft and graft-vs-host alloreactive T cells following non-myeloablative conditioning. We were able to induce mixed and eventually full donor chimerism and tolerance of kidney allograft in a 15-yr-old male with ESRD after cisplatin treatment and autologous HSCT for mediastinal germ cell tumor. Our approach to induce tolerance was based on preferential depletion of alloreactive T cells induced by exposure to donor's alloantigens and administration of cyclophosphamide at day 2 and day 3 after stem cell infusion. Additional non-specific immunosuppression as part of the conditioning included exposure to two fractions of TLI, treatment with alemtuzumab (monoclonal anti-CD52) and short-term conventional IS treatment to avoid early graft loss, because of request of IRB. Using this approach, with rapid tapering of all conventional IS treatment, the patient maintains good renal functions without evidence of both acute and chronic rejection for 32 months off all medications.

Insights and hopes in umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantations

Over 20.000 umblical cord blood transplantations (UCBT) have been carried out around the world. Indeed, UCBT represents an attractive source of donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and, offer interesting features (e.g., lower graft-versus-host disease) compared to bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Thereby, UCBT often represents the unique curative option against several blood diseases. Recent advances in the field of UCBT, consisted to develop strategies to expand umbilical stem cells and shorter the timing of their engraftment, subsequently enhancing their availability for enhanced efficacy of transplantation into indicated patients with malignant diseases (e.g., leukemia) or non-malignant diseases (e.g., thalassemia major). Several studies showed that the expansion and homing of UCBSCs depends on specific biological factors and cell types (e.g., cytokines, neuropeptides, co-culture with stromal cells). In this review, we extensively present the advantages and disadvantages of current hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs), compared to UBCT. We further describe the importance of cord blood content and obstetric factors on cord blood selection, and report the recent approaches that can be undertook to improve cord blood stem cell expansion as well as engraftment. Eventually, we provide two majors examples underlining the importance of UCBT as a potential cure for blood diseases.

Failure of chimerism formation and tolerance induction from Fas ligand mutant bone marrow donors after nonmyeloablative conditioning

Formation of donor-recipient mixed chimerism after nonmyeloablative conditioning allows co-existence of donor and recipient hematopoietic stem cells, with solid organ allograft tolerance and less likeliness of graft versus host development. Using a post-transplant bronchiolitis obliterans murine model, we aimed to test the hypothesis that allograft preservation after mixed chimerism formation is dependent on the presence of a functional Fas ligand (FasL) on donor hematopoietic cells. To form mixed chimerism, two aliquots of 30 × 10(6) whole bone marrow cells (BMC) from either wild-type C57BL/6 in one group, or transgenic gld mice with mutant FasL (d = 0 and 2+) in the other were used, with both groups receiving intravenous busulfan (10mg/kg) on d-1 and intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide (200mg/kg) on d+1. Tracheal allografts obtained from C57BL/6 mice were implanted into recipient BALB/c mice subcutaneously on d = 0. Tracheal allografts were harvested at d+28 post-transplant and were evaluated by histopathology. Mixed chimerism formation was detected in wild type C57BL/6 whole BMC recipients, which was accompanied by tracheal allograft acceptance with near normal structure at d+28 post implantation. However, in recipients of FasL mutant whole BMC, neither mixed chimerism formation nor tracheal allograft acceptance was obtained. We thus conclude that bone marrow cells lacking functional FasL molecules could not be engrafted in allogeneic recipients to form stable mixed chimerism after nonmyeloablative conditioning, thus not allowing tracheal allograft acceptance.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis: potential role for stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may "reset" the immune reconstitution and induce self tolerance of autoreactive lymphocytes, and has been explored in the treatments for systemic sclerosis. Phase I/II trials have shown a satisfactory risk benefit ratio. The true benefit will be identified by two ongoing prospective, randomized phase III trials. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive properties. The use of MSCs has showed successful responses in patients with severe steroid-resistant acute graft versus host disease in phase II trials, and may be a potentially promising option for patients with systemic sclerosis.

Prevention of acute graft-vs-host disease by a single low-dose cyclophosphamide injection following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Previously, we documented that conditioning based on donor-specific cell transfusion (DST) and subsequent selective depletion of activated donor-reactive cells by cyclophosphamide (CY) facilitates alloengraftment in a murine transplantation model. Transplantation event represents a strong immunogenic stimulus for host-reactive donor T cells that induce graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Therefore, in this study, we addressed the question of whether a single posttransplantation CY administration (CY2) can prevent acute GVHD-related mortality without compromising engraftment of allogeneic transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Splenocyte-enriched C57BL/6 bone marrow was transplanted to BALB/c recipients after mild irradiation, and conditioning with DST and 100 mg/kg CY. Following transplantation, recipients were left untreated or given on a specified day a single CY2 injection (50 mg/kg). All animals were monitored for survival, chimerism, and clinical signs of GVHD. Experimental mice that received BCL1 leukemia cells before transplantation were monitored for leukemia-related mortality as well.

RESULTS

Animals that received no CY2 after transplantation died of acute GVHD. A single low-dose CY2 treatment within the first 5 days after transplantation prevented mortality in most recipients. However, only CY2 administration on days +1 or +5 preserved chimerism. Most chimeras survived GVHD-free for >200 days. Prolonged persistence of host-reactive T cells in mice (CY2 on day +5) permitted a reduction to be made in engraftment-essential irradiation dose and preserved a strong graft-vs-leukemia effect of transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Acute GVHD can be prevented in mice by a single properly timed posttransplantation low-dose CY administration.

Intraesophageal MnSOD-plasmid liposome enhances engraftment and self-renewal of bone marrow derived progenitors of esophageal squamous epithelium

We evaluated whether the improved esophageal radiation tolerance following Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (MnSOD)-Plasmid Liposomes was explained by improved engraftment of bone marrow-derived progenitors. C57BL/6NHsd female mice pretreated with intraesophageal MnSOD-PL were irradiated to 29 Gy to the esophagus and intravenously transplanted with marrow from male B6. 129S7-Gt (ROSA) 26S OR/J ROSA (Lac-Z+, G418-resistant) mice. After 14 days, esophagi were removed and side population and non-side population cells evaluated for donor multilineage (endothelin/vimentin/F480) positive esophageal cells. Serial intravenous transplantability was tested in second generation 29 Gy esophagus-irradiated mice. Esophagi from recipients receiving swallowed MnSOD-PL 24 h prior to irradiation demonstrated significantly increased esophageal repopulation with donor bone marrow-derived Lac-Z+, G418+, Y-probe+ multilineage cells (37.8+/-1.8>50 cell Lac-Z+ foci per esophagus) compared to irradiated controls (19.8+/-1.8) P<0.0001. Serial transfer to second-generation irradiated C57BL/6NHsd mice of intravenously injected SP or NSP first generation recipient esophagus cells was also significantly enhanced by MnSOD-PL intraesophageal pretreatment (74.4+/-3.6 SP-derived Lac-Z+ foci per esophagus, 48.6+/-5.4 NSP-derived) compared to irradiation controls (23.4+/-1.8 SP, 6.0+/-3.0 NSP), P<0.0001. Thus, intraesophageal MnSOD-PL administration enhances engraftment of marrow-derived progenitors.

Deletion of Donor-Reactive Cells as a New Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Progress in the development of less toxic conditioning for bone marrow transplantation (BMT) came with the understanding that acceptance of mismatched BM does not require myeloablation of recipients. Lymphocyte deletion by a cocktail of immunosuppressive drugs is generally sufficient to ensure engraftment of compatible BM cells. However, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) protocols available today do not provide robust tolerance to mismatched allogeneic BM. Herein we discuss 2 new experimental approaches to RIC protocols with the aim of facilitating allogeneic BM engraftment. Both conditioning regimens are based on selective deletion/inactivation of donor-reactive cells before BMT. Our data show that the first conditioning protocol, comprising priming of recipients by a donor-specific lymphocyte transfusion (DST) on day -2 and a single injection of cyclophosphamide, a drug that is predominantly toxic for proliferating cells, on day -1, consistently improves engraftment of allogeneic BM (day 0) in all experimental models tested. The second engraftment enhancing approach is based on the blockade by antagonistic reagents of the signaling pathways that govern the antigen-induced immune response. Combining the signaling blockade with the deletion of activated donor-reactive cells by cytoreductive agents provides additional benefits for transplantation across major histocompatibility barriers.

MiHA reactive CD4 and CD8 T-cells effect resistance to hematopoietic engraftment following reduced intensity conditioning

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has shown promise in lowering the incidence of post-transplant complications including infection and graft-versus-host disease. T-cell-mediated graft rejection, however, remains a crucial factor in determining how 'mild' a level of immunosuppression can be administered. Understanding the kinetics of resistance responses as well as the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells underlies the development of protocols to circumvent resistance and support hematopoietic engraftment. In these studies, a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched/minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHA) disparate RIC HCT model was developed in which resistance against donor hematopoietic progenitors as well as mature peripheral blood cells could be assessed. Interestingly, resistance was diminished in the absence of either host CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. However, its impairment was more severe in CD4-/- mice where resistance was not detected. Host CD4+ T cells were required for optimal expansion of specific (H60) T-cell receptor (TCR) expressing host anti-donor MiHA reactive CD8+ T cells following HCT. These observations demonstrate a critical role for host CD4+ T cells in resistance against MiHA disparate HCT. This RIC HCT resistance model will be useful for the analysis of the barrier to engraftment mediated by host T cells and the development of strategies to support engraftment.

Post transplant persistence of host cells augments the intensity of acute graft-versus-host disease and level of donor chimerism, an explanation for graft-versus-host disease and rapid displacement of host cells seen following non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation?

Although the use of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) reduces the severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), GVHD remains a major complication following allogeneic transplantation. Since following NST in comparison with myeloablative conditioning, higher proportions of host immunohematopoietic cells may persist while donor-derived alloreactive lymphocytes are being infused, thus possibly serving as host antigen presentation for continuous stimulation of donor T cells, we speculated that GVHD may be similarly amplified by conditioning followed by intentional administration of host cells. This hypothesis was tested in a preclinical animal model. Increased incidence of GVHD, higher mortality and increased levels of chimerism were observed in recipients reconstituted with host cells, particularly with non-irradiated spleen cells. Graft-versus-leukemia effect was not impaired by post transplant cell administration. These results suggest that GVHD may be amplified by recipient cell infusion using either irradiated or viable stimulatory host cells, thus possibly explaining in part higher than anticipated incidence of GVHD and rapid displacement of host cells and conversion to 100% donor type cells following NST. Administration of irradiated host antigen-presenting cells post transplantation may thus represent a potential approach for amplification of the alloreactive capacity of donor lymphocytes following stem cell transplantation.

Simultaneous Donor Marrow Cell Transplantation With Reduced Intensity Conditioning Prevents Tracheal Allograft Obliteration in a Bronchiolitis Obliterans Murine Model

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Prolonged survival of transplanted kidney or liver allografts has been associated with prolonged chimerism resulting from donor-origin leukocytes carried within the allograft parenchyma. The present study, performed in a murine model, examined whether simultaneous administration of donor bone marrow cells after reduced intensity conditioning allows acceptance of heterotopic tracheal allografts and prevents the formation of the airway fibroproliferative lesion, which mimics bronchiolitis obliterans (BO).

METHODS

Allogeneic tracheal allografts from C57BL/6 mice were grafted subcutaneously into BALB/c mice (n = 6) [day 0]. Conditioning consisted of total lymphoid irradiation (200 cGy) at day - 1, donor marrow cells (3 x 10(7)) administered IV on day 0, intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) on day 1 to eliminate alloreactive marrow cells, followed by a repeated dose of donor marrow cells on day 2. Control groups consisted of one group (n = 4) that underwent similar conditioning without donor marrow cells, and another group (n = 4) that received syngeneic BALB/c marrow cells. None of these groups were administered maintenance immunosuppression. Grafts were harvested and histopathology findings were evaluated semiquantitatively at day 28, day 55, and day 95.

RESULTS

Tracheal allografts from donor marrow cell recipients still maintained a patent airway with intact airway epithelium at 95 days after transplant. However, grafts from control animals not receiving donor marrow cells or mice administered syngeneic marrow cells had lumen obliteration by 28 days after transplant. Chimerism in animals receiving allogeneic bone marrow was confirmed. Graft vs host disease did not develop in animals receiving allogeneic marrow cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation may verify this approach to be applicable for the prevention of posttransplantation BO.

An Irradiation-Free Nonmyeloablative Bone Marrow Transplantation Model: Importance of the Balance between Donor T-cell Number and the Intensity of Conditioning

BACKGROUND

Animal allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) models with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens have so far required irradiation or antibodies in addition to immunosuppressive drugs for engraftment. Moreover, although it is known that the balance between donor T-cell number and the dose of immunosuppressive drugs would be critical for engraftment, it has not been experimentally clarified in a nonmyeloablative regimen.

METHODS

We used C57BL/6 mice as donors and DBA/2 mice as recipients with a nonmyeloablative regimen including fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide (CPA) without irradiation or antibodies. To determine the adequate doses, we injected recipients with various doses of Flu and CPA, and 2x10 bone marrow cells (BMC) and 5x10 splenocytes (SC). Furthermore, using T-cell-depleted BMC and enriched T cells, we investigated the balance between donor T-cell number and the dose of Flu.

RESULTS

Doses of Flu at 150 mg/kg/dayx6 and CPA at 150 mg/kg/dayx2 were most appropriate for engraftment with low mortality. All mice appropriately pretreated and transplanted with both BMC and SC exhibited complete donor chimeras. Donor cell engraftment was not enhanced by any increase of BMC transplanted, and dose escalation of donor T cells but not BMC led to the reduction of Flu dose required for engraftment of donor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established a murine nonmyeloablative BMT model in a fully MHC-mismatched combination for donor cell engraftment with complete donor chimerism. Simultaneously, we have quantitatively demonstrated that the balance between donor T-cell number and the dose of immunosuppressive drugs is critical for stable engraftment.

Successful transplantation of haploidentically mismatched peripheral blood stem cells using CD133+-purified stem cells

OBJECTIVE

For recipients of haploidentically mismatched stem cell allografts, T-cell depletion is mandatory to prevent lethal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Prevention of GVHD can be accomplished by negative selection of T cells or positive selection of stem cells. Recently, a new method for positive selection of stem cells was introduced using monoclonal antibodies against CD133 antigen. We report five cases of successful application of immunomagnetic separation of CD133+ stem cells for haploidentically mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

Five patients with high-risk hematological malignancies, ages 7 to 63 years old (median, 17 years), underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentically mismatched related donors. Conditioning protocol was tailored according to patient clinical situation and included combination of treosulfan/fludarabine/thiotepa/melphalan/Mabcampath. Two patients did not get thiotepa. One of them received a protocol that included infusion of 4.4 x 10(7) blood mononuclear cells from the donor (day -9), followed by a combination of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/busulfex/MabCampath. Separation of CD133+ stem cells was done using CliniMACS with Miltenyi's CD133 reagent.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. Early 3-lineage engraftment was documented and none exhibited immune-mediated rejection. Time to recovery of absolute neutrophils count above 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 1.0 x 10(9)/L was 10 to 15 days (median, 14) and 11 to 29 days (median, 15), respectively. Time for platelet recovery to values greater than 20 x 10(9)/L and greater than 50 x 10(9)/L ranged from 12 to 25 days (median, 13.5), and from 14 to 34 days (median, 16), respectively. Transplant-related mortality did not occur in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our successful pilot trial suggests that positive selection of CD133+ stem cells may be a useful method for safe transplantation with haploidentically mismatched stem cell allografts while avoiding lethal acute and chronic GVHD. Future studies will be required to assess the clinical benefits of stem cell purification with CD133+ in comparison with CD34+ stem cells.

Depletion of donor-reactive cells as a new concept for improvement of mismatched bone marrow engraftment using reduced-intensity conditioning

OBJECTIVE

New nonmyeloablative strategies to improve acceptance of mismatched bone marrow (BM) may compensate for the inadequate supply of compatible grafts. Recently we proposed to facilitate engraftment of mismatched BM by selective depletion of activated donor-reactive host cells with cyclophosphamide (CY). Here we have compared engraftment of allogeneic BM after depletion of antigen-activated host lymphocytes by CY, with BM engraftment following general immunosuppression by the same CY dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Naive or mildly irradiated BALB/c mice were primed with C57BL/6 BM cells (day 0), treated with CY in order to deplete activated T cells (day 1), and transplanted with a second C57BL/6 BM inoculum (day 2) in order to achieve BM engraftment. Alternatively, mice received an equal dose of donor BM cells in a single injection one day after the same CY dose. Treated animals were repeatedly tested for persistence of donor cells in the blood.

RESULTS

Depletion of alloantigen-primed lymphocytes by 200 mg/kg CY provided stable GVHD-free engraftment of allogeneic BM in nonirradiated mice, while immunosuppressive treatment with the same CY dose alone resulted in BM rejection. Low-dose irradiation before priming with donor BM allowed the tolerance-inducing CY dose to be reduced to 100 mg/kg. Alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion (APLD) by a reduced CY dose resulted in engraftment of donor BM after a significantly lower irradiation dose than treatment with irradiation and CY alone.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that conditioning that focuses on APLD has a definite advantage over general immunosuppression with CY and radiation therapy.

Depletion of alloantigen-primed lymphocytes overcomes resistance to allogeneic bone marrow in mildly conditioned recipients

OBJECTIVE

Successful implantation of allogeneic bone marrow (BM) cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning would allow to compensate for the inadequate supply of compatible grafts and to reduce mortality of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). Recently, we proposed to facilitate engraftment of mismatched BM by conditioning for alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion (APLD) with cyclophosphamide (CY). Here we summarize the experimental results obtained by this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Naive or mildly irradiated BALB/c mice were primed with C57BL/6 BM cells (day 0), treated with CY (day 1) to deplete alloantigen-primed lymphocytes, and given a second C57BL/6 BM transplant (day 2) for engraftment. Recipients were repeatedly tested for chimerism in the blood and followed for GVHD and survival. The protocol was also tested for inducing tolerance to donor tissue and organ allografts, and for treatment of leukemia, breast cancer, and autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.

RESULTS

APLD by 200 mg/kg CY provided engraftment of allogeneic BM from the same donor in 100% mildly irradiated recipients. Eighty percent chimeras remained GVHD-free more 200 days. All chimeras accepted permanently donor skin grafts and donor hematopoietic stromal progenitors. Allogeneic BM transplantation (BMT) after APLD had a strong therapeutic potential in BALB/c mice harboring malignant cells and in autoimmune NOD recipients. Tolerance-inducing CY dose could be reduced to 100 mg/kg. Conditioning for APLD resulted in engraftment of allogeneic BM after a significantly lower radiation dose than treatment with radiation and CY alone.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that conditioning for APLD has a definite advantage over general immunosuppression with CY and radiation therapy.

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells for induction of unresponsiveness to organ allografts

Although it has been recognized since the early days of Owen and Medawar that engraftment of donor stem cells, induced in utero spontaneously or intentionally neonatally, results in life-long unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens. However, successful induction of transplantation tolerance in adult life still represents an unsolved problem. Engraftment of donor stem cells using conventional modalities involves intensive myeloablative or lymphoablative immunosuppression, which is associated with toxicity and mortality and such methods are not suitable for organ allograft recipients. In this chapter, we present an innovative approach for induction of donor-specific unresponsiveness to bone marrow and organ allografts without myeloablative conditioning. Our methods is based on cyclophosphamide-induced, alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion. Cyclophosphamide is administered 1 day following infusion of donor hematopoietic cells, thus eliminating predominantly host T lymphocytes reacting against donor cell challenge, and resulting in relative unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens. Subsequently, life-long tolerance to fully mismatched donor skin allografts can be accomplished by a second infusion of stem cells from the same donor, with donor T cells displacing residual alloreactive host cells that may have escaped deletion. Taken together, we believe that induction of true permanent and specific tolerance to organ allografts using donor hematopoietic cells could become a clinical reality in the foreseeable future.

Prevention of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice by nonmyeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice can be prevented by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from diabetes-resistant murine strains. Donor-specific tolerance can also be induced by BMT; however, clinical application of nonmyeloablative conditioning prior to BMT may be essential for reducing transplant-related toxicity and mortality. In this study, we have attempted to treat autoimmunity using a new nonmyeloablative regimen for BMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Naïve NOD were irradiated with 650 cGy and injected intravenously (i.v.) with splenocytes from overtly diabetic NOD mice for induction of diabetes mellitus. Three days later, experimental mice received allogeneic C57BL/6 or (C57BL/6 x BALB/c) F1 bone marrow (BM) cells i.v. for intentional activation of donor-reactive cells, and 24 hours later intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide (CY) for selective depletion of alloreactive cells. In order to induce chimerism, recipients were given a second IV inoculum of donor BM 1 day after CY.

RESULTS

Our method of nonmyeloablative BMT converted recipients to full or to mixed chimeras and prevented development of diabetes. Although NOD mice treated with 200 mg/kg CY died of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), we observed diabetes-free survival for >300 days in 90% of C57BL/6 --> NOD BM chimeras treated with 60 mg/kg CY.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that allogeneic BMT after reduced-intensity conditioning based on deletion of activated donor-reactive host cells by means low-dose CY results in prevention of autoimmune diabetes by converting recipients to stable, GVHD-free BM chimeras.

A novel approach for prevention of lethal GVHD by selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Experiments were designed to investigate a new concept aiming for induction of graft-vs-malignancy (GVM) effect prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT). Mismatched lymphocytes given pre-SCT will be followed by a selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes, thus avoiding lethal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).

METHODS

Recipient mice treated with sublethal total-body irradiation (TBI) received a single injection of allogeneic splenocytes, either naïve or rIL-2 activated (ADL), for induction of GVHD. To prevent lethal GVHD, cyclophosphamide (Cy) (200 mg/kg) or TBI (9 Gy) were given 4 days after cell inoculation. One day later, treated mice were rescued with syngeneic bone marrow cells.

RESULTS

Both Cy and TBI significantly (p < 0.001) prevented GVHD in all recipients inoculated with either naïve cells or ADL and all recipients survived more than 250 days. Control mice not rescued with CY or TBI died of GVHD within 20 to 25 days. A significant proportion of recipients inoculated with 4T1 tumor cells, treated with ADL followed by TBI 9 Gy, survived more than 250 days disease-free in comparison with 22 days in untreated control mice (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Attempting to induce short, yet effective, GVM effects before rather than after SCT, thus avoiding lethal GVHD, may represent an innovative approach for more effective yet safer use of SCT for tumor immunotherapy.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: experimental evidence to rethink the procedures

Acute immunosuppression with lymphocytic agents given at maximally tolerated doses, followed by hematopoietic stem cell rescue achieved by autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT), has proved effective in various experimental models of autoimmunity. The rationale for such an approach in autoimmune diseases is based on the concept of lymphoablation of self-reactive lymphocytes followed by de novo immune system reconstitution, which, in the presence of the autoantigens in the thymus, may reinduce self-tolerance. Our previous work shows that in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), autologous/syngeneic BMT not only prevents the appearance of paralytic signs, but can also partially reverse chronic disease and induce long-term, antigen-specific tolerance. However, there are serious reservations to be considered when interpreting these data and before applying similar protocols in patients with multiple sclerosis. (1) The model of EAE is not a completely reliable model of multiple sclerosis. (2) In animals with chronic EAE, although further relapses were prevented, the established paralysis was usually not reversible. According to recent data, in chronic multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, damage caused by axonal loss/transection and cortical/spinal cord atrophy is irreversible and probably amenable to immunotherapy. (3) Long-term, antigen-specific tolerance may be induced with BMT, but not in all cases; in passively induced CR-EAE, many of the mice relapsed upon challenge with myelin antigens, which may indicate that the presence of the immunizing, myelin antigens (on the site of immunization) during the process of immune reconstitution is critical for induction of tolerance. Finally, one should weigh the procedure-related risks (including mortality of up to 5%) of bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation (SCT). A more radical solution for autoimmunity may involve the use of non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation.

Effect of KRN7000 on induced graft-vs-host disease

OBJECTIVE

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), for which no effective therapy exists. In our study, KRN7000, a synthetic analog of alpha-galactosylceramide, known for its ability to activate natural killer T cells, was tested for its ability to prevent onset of GVHD in a murine model of haploidentical major histocompatible (MHC) mismatched hematopoietic cells.

METHODS

Irradiated (BALB/cXC57BL/6)F1 mice were inoculated with parental C57BL/6 splenocytes with or without SCT. KRN7000 was given intraperitoneally as single or multiple doses at 100 microg/kg/dose and mice were followed up for GVHD clinical symptoms and for survival. The effect of KRN7000 treatment was also tested in vitro for the induction of suppression of alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR).

RESULTS

KRN7000 prevented development of GVHD symptoms in almost all mice and 52/53 mice maintained a healthy profile for more than 235 days. Most vehicle-treated mice or untreated controls died of GVHD within a median of 3 weeks. KRN7000 treatment did not prevent engraftment of donor cells following sublethal total-body irradiation (TBI) and allowed durable persistence of donor cells following lethal TBI and SCT. Splenocytes derived from KRN7000-treated mice suppressed efficiently mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) in vitro.

CONCLUSION

GVHD induced by alloreactive lymphocytes can be prevented by KRN7000. GVHD prevention may be accomplished by regulation of T cell function and might thus provide a new modality for safer SCT and DLI.

Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring for stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity and nonmyeloablative conditioning

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a potentially curative therapy for a variety of hematological malignancies; however, relapse and treatment-related toxicities are major obstacles to cure. Nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were designed not to eradicate the malignancy completely, but rather to be immunosuppressive enough to allow engraftment, and to serve as a platform for additional cellular immunotherapy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) typically persists after SCT, and is gradually eliminated with different kinetics typical of each disease. Significant progress has been achieved with technologies for MRD assessment. Quantitative PCR tests are very sensitive in detecting tumor-associated transcripts, allowing serial monitoring. Threshold levels have been established for some malignancies, above which relapse is imminent. Persistent negative tests, a low level or a decreasing MRD level are consistent with continuous remission, whereas high-level MRD or increasing levels predict an incipient relapse. Patients at high risk of relapse are candidates for additional cellular or targeted therapy. Immunotherapy is more effective for MRD than at frank relapse. Timing and dosing of therapy are not yet well established and depend on aggressiveness of the disease, type of conditioning, level and kinetics of MRD.

The expanding applications of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation

Non-myeloablative preparative strategies for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) have been increasingly utilized for a variety of hematological malignancies, solid tumours, and for tolerance induction. These regimens are associated with less transplant-related morbidity and mortality than conventional transplant conditioning regimens. It is not yet clear whether graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) protection is afforded. Potent antitumour responses have been described in a variety of advanced malignancies. We have utilized a cyclophosphamide/anti-T-cell antibody therapy approach, which has resulted in the uniform induction of mixed chimerism. In many cases, this has served as an immunological platform for adoptive cellular immunotherapy (via donor leukocyte infusions). The results of this experience, as well as the outcomes of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) for other malignant and nonmalignant conditions are described.

Immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors in experimental animals and man

New approaches are needed for maximizing specific responses against tumor cells resistant to chemotherapy. While cytokine therapy may amplify natural resistance against minimal residual disease, more robust anti-leukemia reactivity can be provided by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in conjunction with myeloablative, hence hazardous, conditioning, at the cost of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Documentation of the capacity of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) given late post BMT, when patients were off immunosuppression, in early 1987, with successful reversal of relapse and cure of patients fully resistant to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy, with many patients alive and well >10-15 years later, indicated two important facts. First, resistant tumors are unlikely to be cured with higher doses of chemoradiotherapy that may harm the patient but not eliminate all his clonogenic tumor cells. Second, that under condition of tolerance to donor alloantigens, DLI may provide a cure to otherwise resistant patients. These observations paved the road for clinical application of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), in the early 90s, based on a two-step procedure, first involving induction of transplantation tolerance to donor alloantigens by engraftment of donor stem cells, following safe lymphoablative rather than myeloablative conditioning. Second, use of donor lymphocytes for elimination of residual tumor or otherwise abnormal hematopoietic cells by immune-mediated graft-versus-host effects inducible by mobilized blood stem cell allografts containing larger inocula of donor T cells, or supported by post-grafting DLI when patients were off immunosuppressive modalities.

CD40 ligand-specific antibodies synergize with cyclophosphamide to promote long-term transplantation tolerance across MHC barriers but inhibit graft-vs-leukemia effects of transplanted cells

OBJECTIVES

We previously demonstrated that allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) after low-dose total lymphoid irradiation (200 cGy) and depletion of donor-reactive cells with cyclophosphamide (Cy) converted recipients to graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)-free chimeras tolerant to donor skin grafts. BMT also generated strong graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) response. However, clinical application of the protocol was hampered by the requirement for a relatively high dose of Cy (200 mg/kg). In this study we have tried to minimize the Cy dose by a concomitant blockade of CD40-CD40L interaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mildly irradiated BALB/c mice were primed with C57BL/6 BM cells (BM(1)) and skin graft on day 0, injected with Cy (200 mg/kg or less) on day 1, and transplanted with a second C57BL/6 BM cell inoculum (BM(2)) on day 2. CD40L-specific antibody (MR1) was given with BM(1), BM(2), and 2 days later. Treated animals were monitored for survival, chimerism, and skin allograft rejection. The GVL potential of transplanted cells was examined in mice inoculated with BCL1 leukemia cells before irradiation.

RESULTS

Blocking CD40-CD40L interaction with MR1 mAb allowed the reduction of a tolerance-generating Cy dose by 50%. Unfortunately, adding MR1 to the protocol reduced the GVL potential of the transplanted cells. Neither low-dose Cy nor antibodies alone could downregulate donor or recipient immune response.

CONCLUSIONS

CD40L-specific antibodies synergize with Cy to induce bilateral transplantation tolerance. Therefore, their use may be beneficial for safer allogeneic BMT for nonmalignant indications. However, due to MR1-associated reduction of GVL effects, MR1 should be considered with caution as conditioning for BMT for leukemia-bearing recipients.

Non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NST) in the treatment of human malignancies: from animal models to clinical practice

NST is becoming a widely accepted method for allogeneic HSCT. Much experience has been gained, and the biology, indications and limitations are becoming clearer. Nonmyeloablative conditioning allows consistent engraftment of allografts from matched related, unrelated, and even partially matched donors. NST has been able to reduce the toxicity of allogeneic HSCT. The better immediate outcome produces better overall DFS. NST was feasible in elderly patients with almost no upper age limit, and in patients with organ dysfunction or other comorbidities precluding standard ablative conditioning. NST has also reduced the regimen-related toxicity of allogeneic HSCT in high-risk setting such as HSCT in heavily pretreated patients or following failure of a prior transplant procedure and in the unrelated setting. NST is rapidly becoming the treatment of choice in these indications where toxicity of standard ablative therapy is unacceptable. In certain malignancies such as in NHL, Hodgkin's disease and multiple myeloma, standard ablative NST has been reported to result in exceptionally high treatment related mortality, and NST is being investigated as a more reasonable alternative. NST may reduce the toxicity of the procedure even in younger patients who are eligible for ablative HSCT as well, however the long-term impact on patient outcome in this group is not yet established, and NST merits further investigation in prospective comparative trials. As described above, the known susceptibility of the underlying malignancy to GVT, the response to prior chemotherapy and bulk of residual disease, and the type of donor are other factors to consider when considering NST, and when selecting a regimen. The optimal preparative regimen needs to be defined. Ultimately less chemotherapy will be used and more specific immune-modulation, rather than intense nonspecific immunosuppression, will be used to achieve HVG tolerance. Preliminary animal models using costimulation blockade for specific induction of tolerance are promising steps towards achievement of this goal. Although much progress has been achieved with consistent achievement of engraftment with NST, GVHD and disease recurrence remain major obstacles to successful treatment. Existing clinical data suggest that NST does limit the incidence and severity of GVHD. Limitation of regimen-related toxicity, and bilateral transplantation tolerance afforded by mixed chimerism, are believed to have a major role in limiting GVHD. However GVHD remains the primary cause of treatment-related mortality. The development of techniques to separate GVHD and GVL are essential for further improvement of NST outcome. Better understanding of the biology and targets of GVHD and GVL may allow the elimination of alloreactive T-cells responsible for GVHD from the graft while retaining T-cells with GVL and infection control potential. Recurrence of the underlying malignancy is a major complication when NST is attempted in patients with chemo-refractory diseases and with high tumor bulk. Reduced toxicity regimens such as the FB/ATG regimen have been somewhat more successful in controlling disease progression until a potent GVT effect is established. However novel approaches are urgently required. NST serves as a platform for cellular immunotherapy. Judicious use of pre-emptive DLI needs to be explored. DLI may be amplified by activation of donor lymphocytes with IL-2 or in vivo administration of IL-2. Identification of tumor antigens will lead the way to ex-vivo generation and expansion of tumor specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes to be used as potent immunotherapy without the hazards of GVHD. Allogeneic transplantation is rapidly changing from administration of supralethal doses of chemotherapy and radiation, trying to physically eliminate the 'last tumor cell', to the more subtle and tolerated sophisticated immunotherapy. This effort will focus on specific induction of HVG tolerance followed by induction of tumor-specific GVT effect to cure the underlying malignancy.

Induction of tolerance in autoimmune diseases by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: getting closer to a cure?

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are the earliest cells of the immune system, giving rise to B and T lymphocytes, monocytes, tissue macrophages, and dendritic cells. In animal models, adoptive transfer of HSCs, depending on circumstances, may cause, prevent, or cure autoimmune diseases. Clinical trials have reported early remission of otherwise refractory autoimmune disorders after either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). By percentage of transplantations performed, autoimmune diseases are the most rapidly expanding indication for stem cell transplantation. Although numerous editorials or commentaries have been previously published, no prior review has focused on the immunology of transplantation tolerance or development of phase 3 autoimmune HSCT trials. Results from current trials suggest that mobilization of HSCs, conditioning regimen, eligibility and exclusion criteria, toxicity, outcome, source of stem cells, and posttransplantation follow-up need to be disease specific. HSCT-induced remission of an autoimmune disease allows for a prospective analysis of events involved in immune tolerance not available in cross-sectional studies.

Maternal-fetal relationship, natural chimerism and bilateral transplantation tolerance as the basis for non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) which represents an important clinical tool for treatment of patients with a wide variety of malignant and non-malignant diseases, however, the procedure is associated with procedure-related toxicity and mortality as well as unavoidable late complications. Many of the undesirable consequences of BMT are caused directly or indirectly by the intensive conditioning administered during the pre-transplant period. However, if the main goal of the BMT procedure is to enable immunotherapy by alloreactive donor lymphocytes, the conditioning prior to BMT needs to be reconsidered, because transplantation tolerance across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) occurs spontaneously in nature, as evidenced by the fact that pregnant females do not reject their conceptus. In fact, as shown by Owens in the 1940s, placental parabiosis in utero leads to permanent mixed chimerism and bilateral transplantation tolerance. These observations followed by experiments carried out in the 1950s by Billingham et al. suggested that infusion of parental stem cells into neonates with no exogenous immunosuppressive treatment resulted in mixed chimerism and permanent transplantation tolerance to donor alloantigens. Thus, a window of opportunity provided shortly after delivery, was sufficient for induction of tolerance without the need for heavy conditioning. Tolerant recipients were shown to be chimeras with only a small proportion of donor cells. However, without corroborating evidence that transplantation tolerance could be intentionally induced, the approach could not be applied in clinical practice for immunocompetent recipients. Starting in 70s, we documented the feasibility of establishing bilateral transplantation tolerance by mixed chimerism following non-myeloablative conditioning in immu. nologically mature recipients across MHC in mice, rats and dogs. Several studies have shown that reduced intensity conditioning can be very useful for immunoregulation whereas more intensive the pre-grafting immunosuppression resulted in more aggressive the GVHD. These and other findings suggested that lower intensity conditioning may be sufficient for engraftment of donor stem cells, thus suggesting that immunosuppression without myeloablation may be sufficient for prevention of allograft rejection. Following engraftment of donor stem cells, donor lymphocytes infused with bone marrow or mobilized blood stem cells can eradicate residual hematopoietic cells of host origin, occasionally non-hematopoietic tumor cells of host origin as well. Whenever indicated, donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI) can be used at a later stage post BMT to eradicate residual malignant cells of host origin or for the treatment of residual or recurrent disease. Taken together, ongoing clinical studies suggest that high-dose, myeloablative chemoradiotherapy, could be safely replaced with non-myeloablative conditioning (NST).

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors in preclinical models

OBJECTIVE

We previously demonstrated that a combination of mild total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) with selective depletion of the host's donor-reactive cells allows for stable and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)-free engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow (BM). In this study, we investigated the efficacy of this nonmyeloablative strategy for BM transplantation (BMT) as immunotherapy for minimal residual disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BALB/c mice inoculated with leukemia (BCL1) or breast carcinoma (4T1) cells were conditioned for BMT with TLI (200 cGy) followed by priming with donor (C57BL/6) BM cells on day 1, and by injection with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide on day 2. After conditioning (day 3), recipients were transplanted with BM cells from the same donor. Treated animals were monitored for 230 days for survival, development of leukemia/solid tumor, and GVHD.

RESULTS

BMT converted the mice to complete chimeras and prevented development of leukemia in 90% of recipients and locally growing breast carcinoma in 40% of the mice. Immunization of donors of the second BM with 4T1 cells prevented development of breast carcinoma in 80% of 4T1 inoculated mice. Fewer animals treated for malignancy by nonmyeloablative BMT died of GVHD than those treated by myeloablative BMT. However, late GVHD-related mortality in mice treated for leukemia was higher than after nonmyeloablative BMT to naive recipients (p < 0.00001). Infusion of host-type anti-donor immune lymphocytes 8 days after BMT improved the survival of recipients treated for leukemia without affecting engraftment and the graft-vs-leukemia potential of donor BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective eradication of malignant cells can be achieved following allogeneic BMT after nonmyeloablative conditioning.

Immunotherapy of cancer with alloreactive lymphocytes

Immunotherapy of cancer with alloreactive lymphocytes is the mainstay of treatment, especially in haematological malignant disease. With donor lymphocyte infusion for immunotherapy, it is essential to induce host-versus-graft tolerance to ensure that the donor lymphocytes are accepted. Engraftment of haemopoietic cells of donor origin can be accomplished with reduced-intensity conditioning. Reducing transplant-related mortality by simplifing the stem-cell transplant procedure with a reduced-intensity regimen, particularly non-myeloablative conditioning, may have great potential for the treatment of malignant and non-malignant disorders.

New strategies for bone marrow transplantation

Adoptive immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors by donor lymphocyte infusion following induction of host-versus-graft transplantation tolerance against can best be achieved following nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation (NST). Induction of mixed chimerism may represent the best approach for induction of transplantation tolerance to donor alloantigens. Thus NST may become the optimal approach for the treatment of nonmalignant diseases, where replacement of host with donor hematopoietic cells is indicated: for correction of genetic or stem cell deficiency diseases; as a platform for immunotherapy of autoimmune or infectious diseases; or for induction of tolerance to organ allografts.

New Developments in the Therapy of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia

Current conventional treatment for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia results in a high percentage of clinical responses in most patients. However, a high percentage of patients still remain refractory to primary therapy or relapse later. This review examines the search for new agents and new modes of therapy. In Section I, Dr. Estey discusses new agents directed at various targets, such as CD33, angiogenesis, inappropriately methylated (suppressor) genes, cell cycle checkpoints, proteosomes, multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. He also reviews preliminary results of phase I trials with the nucleoside analog troxacitabine and liposomal anthracyclin and suggests new strategies for trials of new agents.

In Section II, Dr. Jones revisits differentiation therapy and presents results of preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate that a variety of clinically applicable cell cycle inhibitors (interferon, phenylbutyrate, vitamin D, retinoids, bryostatin-1) preferentially augments growth factor-mediated induction of myeloid leukemia terminal differentiation, as well as blocks growth factors' effects on leukemia proliferation. The combination of cell cycle inhibition plus myeloid growth factors may offer a potential treatment for resistant myeloid leukemias.

In Section III, Drs. Levitsky and Borrello address the question of tumor vaccination in AML and shows that, although tumor rejection antigens in AML have not been formally identified to date, a growing number of attractive candidates are ripe for testing with defined antigen-specific vaccine strategies. Interestingly, the ability to drive leukemic blasts to differentiate into competent antigen presenting cells such as dendritic cells may be exploited in the creation of cellular vaccines. Ultimately, the successful development of active immunotherapy for AML will require integration with dose-intensive chemotherapy, necessitating a more complete understanding of host immune reconstitution.

In Section IV, Dr. Slavin reviews the concept of delivering non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) and delayed lymphocyte infusion (DLI) to increase tolerance in particular in high risk and older patients, and take advantage of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect.

All these approaches hold promise in reducing morbidity and mortality and differ from the older concepts aiming at delivering the highest possible doses of chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation to reach maximum leukemia cell kill, whatever the toxicity to the patient.

New Developments in the Therapy of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia

Current conventional treatment for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia results in a high percentage of clinical responses in most patients. However, a high percentage of patients still remain refractory to primary therapy or relapse later. This review examines the search for new agents and new modes of therapy. In Section I, Dr. Estey discusses new agents directed at various targets, such as CD33, angiogenesis, inappropriately methylated (suppressor) genes, cell cycle checkpoints, proteosomes, multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. He also reviews preliminary results of phase I trials with the nucleoside analog troxacitabine and liposomal anthracyclin and suggests new strategies for trials of new agents.

In Section II, Dr. Jones revisits differentiation therapy and presents results of preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate that a variety of clinically applicable cell cycle inhibitors (interferon, phenylbutyrate, vitamin D, retinoids, bryostatin-1) preferentially augments growth factor-mediated induction of myeloid leukemia terminal differentiation, as well as blocks growth factors' effects on leukemia proliferation. The combination of cell cycle inhibition plus myeloid growth factors may offer a potential treatment for resistant myeloid leukemias.

In Section III, Drs. Levitsky and Borrello address the question of tumor vaccination in AML and shows that, although tumor rejection antigens in AML have not been formally identified to date, a growing number of attractive candidates are ripe for testing with defined antigen-specific vaccine strategies. Interestingly, the ability to drive leukemic blasts to differentiate into competent antigen presenting cells such as dendritic cells may be exploited in the creation of cellular vaccines. Ultimately, the successful development of active immunotherapy for AML will require integration with dose-intensive chemotherapy, necessitating a more complete understanding of host immune reconstitution.

In Section IV, Dr. Slavin reviews the concept of delivering non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) and delayed lymphocyte infusion (DLI) to increase tolerance in particular in high risk and older patients, and take advantage of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect.

All these approaches hold promise in reducing morbidity and mortality and differ from the older concepts aiming at delivering the highest possible doses of chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation to reach maximum leukemia cell kill, whatever the toxicity to the patient.