Are false-positive urine markers for the detection of bladder carcinoma really wrong or do they predict tumor recurrence?

A novel near-infrared fluorescent probe for real-time monitoring of leucine aminopeptidase activity and metastatic tumor progression

This article discusses the importance of early tumor detection, particularly in liver cancer, and the role of leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) as a potential marker for liver cancer diagnosis and prognosis assessment. The article highlights the limitations of current tumor markers and the need for new markers and multi-marker approaches to improve accuracy. The authors introduce a novel near-infrared fluorescent probe, NTAP, designed for LAP detection. They describe the synthesis of the probe and evaluate its spectral properties, including the LOD was 0.0038 U/mL, and QY was 0.32 %. The kinetic properties of NTAP, such as the relationship between LAP concentration (0-0.08 U/mL), reaction time (3 min), and fluorescence excitation spectra (475 nm) and emission spectra (715 nm) are investigated. The article also discusses the stability and selectivity of the probe and its ability to detect LAP in complex samples. Cellular imaging experiments demonstrate the NATP specificity and selectivity in detecting LAP activity and its inhibition. Animal models of liver and lung metastasis are used to evaluate the probe's imaging capabilities, showing its ability to accurately locate and detect metastatic lesions. The article concludes by emphasizing the potential applications of the NTAP probe in early tumor diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and the study of tumor metastasis mechanisms.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the commonest malignancy of the urinary tract. In this review, we look at the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of this condition. Cystoscopy and urine cytology are the most important tools in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer. Various alternatives have been investigated, either to reduce the frequency of cystoscopy, or improve its sensitivity for detection of tumors. These include urine-based markers and point-of-care tests. Narrow-band imaging and photodynamic diagnosis/blue-light cystoscopy have shown promise in improving detection and reducing recurrence of bladder tumors, by improving the completion of bladder resection when compared with standard resection in white light. The majority of patients with a new diagnosis of bladder cancer have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, which requires adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Recent developments in post-resection intravesical regimens are discussed. For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, both laparoscopic radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy have been shown to reduce peri-operative morbidity, while being oncologically equivalent to open radical cystectomy in the medium term. Bladder-preserving strategies entail resection and chemoradiation, and in selected patients give equivalent results to surgery. The development, advantages, and disadvantages of these newer approaches are also discussed.

Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men and the ninth most common cancer in women in Canada. Early detection of tumours is essential for improved prognosis and long-term survival. The standard method for detection and surveillance is cystoscopy together with urine cytology. Cystoscopy is relatively sensitive but is expensive and invasive. Urinary cytology is a noninvasive method that has poor sensitivity but high specificity; it is relied on for the detection of carcinoma in situ. Currently, several urinary-based bladder tumour biomarkers with USFDA/Health Canada approval are available commercially, but none have been widely adopted by urologists despite their offering high sensitivity and/or specificity. We present here a review of recent studies evaluating 7 commercial biomarker assays for the detection and/or surveillance of bladder cancer.

RESULTS

SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY RANGES, RESPECTIVELY, FOR EACH MARKER WERE REPORTED AS FOLLOWS: BTA Stat (Polymedco), 52.5%-78.0% and 69.0%-87.1%; BTA Trak (Polymedco), 51%-100% and 73%-92.5%; cytology, 12.1%-84.6% and 78.0%-100%; hematuria dipstick, 47.0%-92.6% and 51.0%-84.0%; NMP22 Bladder Cancer Test (Matritech), 34.6%-100% and 60.0%-95.0%; NMP22 BladderChek (Matritech), 49.5%-65.0% and 40.0%-89.8%; ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ (DiagnoCure), 63.3%-84.9% and 62.0%-78.1%; ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ and cytology, 81.0%-89.3% and 61.0%-77.7%; and UroVysion (Abbott Molecular)/florescence in situ hybridization, 68.6%-100% and 65.0%-96.0%.

CONCLUSION

We find that no currently available bladder cancer urinary marker is sensitive enough to eliminate the need for cystoscopy. In addition, cytology remains integral to the detection of occult cancer. However, owing to their relatively high sensitivities, these markers may be used to extend the period between cystoscopies in the surveillance of patients with transitional cell carcinoma. Further study is required to determine which markers, alone or in panel, would best accomplish this.

Evaluation of urine N1,N12-Diacetylspermine as potential tumor marker for urinary bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

N1,N12-diacetylspermine, a diacetylpolyamine which was recently identified in urine, appeared to be a useful tumor marker for a number of cancers. No valid data on urine diacetylspermine concentration in patients with urinary bladder cancer exist.

AIM

Evaluation of urine N1,N12-diacetylspermine concentrations in individuals with urinary bladder cancer.

METHODS

Urine samples were used from 36 patients with urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder and from 30 patients with benign urological diseases. Urine was collected before cystoscopy. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays (ELISA) were performed for diacetylspermine from urine.

RESULTS

Urine diacetylspermine did not differentiate in individuals with urinary bladder cancer from controls (medians 171.5 vs 143.8, p = 0.64). Its efficacy for urinary bladder cancer detection was not shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine N1,N12-diacetylspermine is probably not a useful marker for urinary bladder cancer.

[DNA methylation on urinalysis and as a prognostic marker in urothelial cancer of the bladder]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Detection of promoter hypermethylation has been proposed as a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and as a prognostic marker in various cancers. We studied the versatility of DNA methylation for noninvasive diagnosis and as a prognostic marker for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Tumor specimens were microdissected and DNA was extracted from 105 paraffin-embedded paraffin specimens from patients undergoing transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Urine specimens were collected from patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer and from healthy volunteers. Methylation status was assessed with the real-time quantitative methylation-sensitive PCR (MethyLight). We checked a panel of 20 cancer-associated genes (p14ARF, p16 CDKN2A, STAT-1, SOCS-1, DR-3, DR-6, PIG-7, BCL-2, H-TERT, BAX, EDNRB, DAPK, RASSF-1A, FADD, TMS-1, E-CADHERIN, ICAM-1, TIMP-3, MLH-1, COX-2) for DNA methylation.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available in 95 of 105 patients (91.4%). A tumor recurrence was observed in 26 patients (27.3%). We could identify six genes (SOCS-1, STAT-1, BCL-2, DAPK, TIMP-3, E-cadherin), where methylation was associated with tumor recurrence. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, TIMP-3 showed a significant association with recurrence-free survival. Methylation of TIMP-3 predicted prolonged disease-free interval. Regarding urinalysis we could identify a pattern of methylation markers including DAPK, BCL-2, and H-TERT that yielded a sensitivity of 81.1% with a specificity of 100% in a cancer-free control population

CONCLUSIONS

We present data on the clinical usefulness of methylation analysis in bladder carcinoma. Our data confirm that methylation analysis is a promising tool for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Defining the role of NMP22 in bladder cancer surveillance

Despite advances in treatment and knowledge of its pathogenesis, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Experience with the natural course of bladder cancer has revealed that early diagnosis of primary and recurrent disease improves patient prognosis. In this regard, cystoscopy (usually in combination with urinary cytology) has long been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer. However, the disadvantages inherent to cystoscopy, including invasiveness and cost, have stimulated a search for alternative methods for detecting urothelial malignancy. The ideal alternative test would duplicate the high accuracy of cystoscopy for detecting bladder tumors while eschewing its invasiveness, attendant morbidity, and high cost. The vast majority of bladder cancers arise from the urothelium, which continually sheds cells as well as intracellular contents into the urine, thereby providing a potential source of cancer-specific markers. Voided cytology and urinalysis are established tests that have been the standard tools for detection of such substances. The last decade has seen the rise of a myriad of novel urine-based bladder tumor markers, including bladder tumor antigen, urinary bladder cancer antigen, fibronectin, telomerase, and nuclear matrix proteins (e.g., NMP22). The NMP22 assay in particular has been the subject of considerable study and has demonstrated some promise as a potential adjunct to cystoscopy and cytology. Through a critical review of the literature, we seek to define the role, if any, of NMP22 in the follow-up of patients with a previous history of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Urinary bladder tumor markers

Bladder cancer is amenable to biomarker development because many tumor-associated molecules are secreted in urine. Tumor cells are shed in urine, and, therefore, tests that detect tumor cell-surface markers have also been developed to diagnose bladder cancer and monitor its recurrence. Several bladder tumor markers show higher sensitivity than cytology, but most have lower specificity. In addition to markers that use conventional technologies such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, point-of-care devices, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and immunocytochemistry, proteomic and gene profiling approaches are being used to find new biomarkers to assist in the molecular profiling of bladder cancer. This review describes both new and well-studied bladder tumor markers.

Variability in the Performance of Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 for the Detection of Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed variability in the diagnostic performance of NMP22 for detecting recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1, and/or CIS transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in a large international cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NMP22 voided urine levels were measured in 2,871 patients who underwent office cystoscopy for monitoring previous stage Ta, T1 and/or CIS transitional cell carcinoma at 12 participating institutions.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics varied considerably among institutions. Overall 1,045 patients (36.4%) had recurrent transitional cell carcinoma (range across institutions 13.6% to 54.3%). Median NMP22 was 5.5 U/ml (range across institutions 2.5 to 18.8). Of the patients 33.5% had grade III tumors (range across institutions 20.6% to 54.0%) and 22.4% had muscle invasive tumors (range across institutions 3.2% to 38.2%). Area under the ROC curve for bladder TCC detection was 0.735 (95% CI 0.715 to 0.755, range across institutions 0.676 to 0.889). The manufacturer recommended cutoff of 10 U/ml detected 57% of cases with a 19% false-positive rate. AUC for grade III and stage T2 or greater disease was 0.806 (95% CI 0.780 to 831) and 0.864 (95% CI 0.839 to 0.890), respectively. For each NMP22 cutoff NMP22 had higher sensitivity for detecting grade III and stage T2 or greater bladder transitional cell carcinoma than for detecting any cancer. No optimal cutoffs for detecting any or aggressive bladder transitional cell carcinoma could be derived based on NMP22 values.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial degree of heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of NMP22 applied to populations from different institutions. There is no clearly defined NMP22 cutoff but there is a continuum of risk for recurrence and progression.

Early bladder cancer: concept, diagnosis, and management

Recent evidence on molecular pathways helps us to understand the pathogenesis of bladder cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms of recurrence of the disease and progression into muscle-invasive disease are not fully understood. The diagnostic accuracy and specificity of innovative markers for detection of the disease currently available in the clinical setting are still far from the level where cystoscopy would not be needed. Although risk factors for progression to muscle-invasive disease have been identified, we still cannot predict accurately the clinical behavior of superficial bladder cancer. In this review article, we summarize recent evidence on molecular pathogenesis, risk factors for recurrence and progression, urine markers for detection, and treatments in superficial bladder cancer.

Rapid diagnosis and follow up of bladder cancer patients using urinary high molecular weight cytokeratins

We have developed an office-based dot-EIA for the detection of a urinary high molecular weight cytokeratin (CK). Immunohistochemical staining and western blot based on CK1K10 monoclonal antibody were used to identify the CK. Urine of 192 patients with different types, grades, and stages of bladder tumor and 72 controls were evaluated using dot-EIA. An intense and diffuse cytoplasmic reaction was shown in bladder squamous cell carcinoma. The target epitope was identified in urine at 65, 56, and 40-kDa. The CK purified from urine showed single polypeptide at 65-kDa using SDS-PAGE and single peak at 7.4 min using capillary zone electrophoresis. The dot-EIA detected the CK with high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (94%). The CK was not detected in urine of bladder cancer patients showing response to radiotherapy. The sensitive and specific office-based detection of urinary cytokeratin would be helpful in rapid diagnosis and follow up of bladder carcinoma.

Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers

This is the first of 2 articles that summarize the findings of the International Consensus Panel on cytology and bladder tumor markers. The objectives of our panel were to reach a consensus on the areas where markers are needed, to define the attributes of an ideal tumor marker, and to identify which marker(s) would be suitable for diagnosis and/or surveillance of bladder cancer. Our panel consisted of urologists and researchers from Europe, Asia, and the United States who reviewed original articles, reviews, and book chapters on individual bladder tumor markers published in the English language mainly using the PubMed search engine. Panel members also met during 3 international meetings to write recommendations regarding bladder tumor markers. The panel found that the most practical use of noninvasive tests is to monitor bladder cancer recurrence, thereby reducing the number of surveillance cystoscopies performed each year. Markers also may be useful in the screening of high-risk individuals for early detection of bladder cancer. However, more prospective studies are needed to strengthen this argument. Case-control and cohort studies show that several markers have a higher sensitivity to detect bladder cancer. However, cytology is the superior marker in terms of specificity, although some markers in limited numbers of studies have shown specificity equivalent to that of cytology. Our panel believes that several bladder tumor markers are more accurate in detecting bladder cancer than prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in detecting prostate cancer. However, bladder tumor markers are held to a higher standard than PSA. Therefore, use of bladder tumor markers in the management of patients with bladder cancer will require the willingness of both urologists and clinicians to accept them.

An office-based immunodiagnostic assay for detecting urinary nuclear matrix protein 52 in patients with bladder cancer

OBJECTIVE

To report the rapid (5 min) and simple detection of a nuclear matrix protein (NMP) in the urine of patients with bladder cancer, using a newly developed office-based dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Western blot and specific immunoglobulin-G antibody were used to identify the urinary NMP marker. Urine samples from 149 patients with bladder cancer and 72 controls were evaluated using the developed dot-ELISA. The initial responses of 43 patients treated by irradiation were followed using the assay.

RESULTS

The NMP marker was identified in the urine of patients with bladder cancer at 52 kDa (NMP-52) by Western blot. The dot-ELISA detected the urinary NMP-52 marker in 92% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 98% with transitional cell carcinoma, and all six of those with adenocarcinoma of the bladder, with a specificity of 94%. The positive and negative predictive values (97% and 94%, respectively) and efficiency (96%) of the dot-ELISA were high. In addition, the NMP-52 tumour marker was not detected in the urine of patients who showed a response after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Detecting the urinary NMP-52 marker using dot-ELISA would be helpful in the rapid diagnosis and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer.

Comparison of multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization in urine with other noninvasive tests for detecting bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

To present a single-centre study investigating aneuploidy at chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and 9p21 (e.g. loss at 9p21) using a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) system, as identifying genetic alterations in urine specimens is a promising approach for the noninvasive detection of bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Urine samples from 103 patients were evaluated, including those from 46 with histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma, two with other urological malignancies, and 55 who acted as controls. The urine samples were taken before any manipulation. The validity of FISH (Urovision, Vysis, Downers Grove, Ill, USA) was compared with other noninvasive urine tests, including the BTA-Stat test, the nuclear matrix protein (NMP)-22 test, and immunocytology against 486p3/12 and LewisX. Those evaluating the tests were unaware of the clinical and histopathological data. FISH was considered positive if five or more urinary cells had gains of two or more chromosomes. The threshold for the urine tests were 10 U/mL (NMP-22), 30% positive cells (486p3/12), or 5% positive cells, respectively (LewisX).

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 69% (FISH), 67% (BTA-Stat), 69% (486p3/12), 96% (LewisX) and 71% (NMP22), respectively; the respective specificity was 89%, 78%, 76%, 33% and 66%.

CONCLUSION

Multitarget FISH had a better specificity than the other urine markers but because of its inadequate sensitivity it does not seem to be powerful enough to replace endoscopy. Optimizing the marker panel could provide a higher sensitivity.

New diagnostic strategies in the detection and staging of bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder cancer is a very frequent disease and represents the second most common genitourinary neoplasm. The most prevalent form of the disease, superficial bladder cancer, can recur in more than 70% of cases, despite correct management. Any way to improve our disease diagnostic and treatment policy is therefore welcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review covers the following topics: (1). endoscopic tools: standard cystoscopy versus fluorescence cystoscopy and virtual endoscopy; (2). bladder cancer staging: histopathological analysis developments and imaging techniques (positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography); (3). cytology and ancillary procedures (ImmunoCyt and fluorescence in-situ hybridization test, and others); (4). first-generation (bladder tumour antigen, nuclear matrix protein 22, telomerase repeat amplification protocol) and second-generation (loss of heterozygosity, minichromosome maintenance 5, DNA methylation, microsatellite) urine and serum markers.

SUMMARY

New diagnostic and therapeutic (endoscopic) tools in superficial bladder cancer should eventually modify our disease management policy. Fluorescence cystoscopy detects carcinoma in situ with a high accuracy, and seems to have a positive impact on reducing residual tumour and recurrence rate. A more specific staining of tissue specimens facilitates histological analysis and helps achieve better staging, especially in T1 diseases. Improving the sensitivity of cytology for low-grade diseases, ancillary procedures to classic cytology such as fluorescence in-situ hybridization and ImmunoCyt tests, may reduce the number of unpleasant cystoscopies in surveillance protocols of selected groups of patients. Second-generation urine markers such as loss of heterozygosity, microsatellite, minichromosome maintenance 5, with a high level of accuracy, show great potential for influencing bladder cancer detection and screening policy.

How important is urinary cytology in the diagnosis of urological malignancies?

OBJECTIVE

To audit clinical usefulness of urine cytology examination in a subspecialised urological unit setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the hospital information support system on urinary cytology examinations carried out at one centre was audited over a period of 15 months. Source of urine cytology specimens, clinical profile of patients and the findings of urinary cytology were analysed and collated.

RESULTS

A total of 1400 urinary cytology specimen on 900 patients were requested during 15 months study period. Urologists requested 1092 (78%) and non-urologists (general practitioners, physician or general surgeons) requested 318 (22%) specimens. The majority of specimens, 1115 (80%) did not show any cytological evidence of malignancy. 83 specimens (6%) showed cytological evidence of malignant cells consistent with origin from a urothelial malignancy. Among this group 87% (72) were more than 50 years of age and 60 (72%) had history of gross heamaturia. 159 (11.35) cases were reported as being suspicious of malignancy or showing atypical cells requiring further evidence. A total of 43 (3.04%) specimens were poorly preserved or insufficient for diagnosis. The positivity rate amongst urologist and non-urologists request was 56% and 6% respectively (p=0.00001 value). The source in 37 (86%) specimens reported, as poorly preserved or insufficient for diagnosis was non-urologists compared to 6 (14%) from urologists with significant p value (0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary cytology for malignant cells is a contributory investigation in the diagnosis of urological malignancy. It should be only ordered in the proper clinical situation.