1
|
Lansonneur P, Magliari A, Rosa L, Perez J, Niemelä P, Folkerts M. Combined optimization of spot positions and weights for better FLASH proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:125010. [PMID: 38749462 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4c53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Objective.In Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT), the weights of individual pencil-beams or spots are optimized to fulfil dosimetric constraints. Theses spots are usually located on a regular lattice and their positions are fixed during optimization. In many cases, the range of spot weights may however be limited, leading sometimes to sub-optimal plan quality. An emblematic use case is the delivery of a plan at ultra-high dose rate (FLASH-RT), for which the spot weights are typically constrained to high values.Approach. To improve further the quality of IMPT FLASH plans, we propose here a novel algorithm to optimize both the spot weights and positions directly based on the objectives defined by the treatment planner.Main results. For all cases considered, optimizing the spot positions lead to an enhanced dosimetric score, while maintaining a high dose rate.Significance. Overall, this approach resulted in a substantial plan quality improvement compared to optimizing only the spot weights, and in a similar execution time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lansonneur
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - A Magliari
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - L Rosa
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - J Perez
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - P Niemelä
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - M Folkerts
- Varian Medical Systems Inc., 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Takagi M, Hasegawa Y, Tateoka K, Takada Y, Hareyama M. Dosimetric Comparison Study of Proton Therapy Using Line Scanning versus Passive Scattering and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:403. [PMID: 38254892 PMCID: PMC10814771 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proton irradiation modality has transitioned from passive scattering (PS) to pencil beam scanning. Nevertheless, the documented outcomes predominantly rely on PS. METHODS Thirty patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were selected to assess treatment planning across line scanning (LS), PS, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Dose constraints encompassed clinical target volume (CTV) D98 ≥ 73.0 Gy (RBE), rectal wall V65 < 17% and V40 < 35%, and bladder wall V65 < 25% and V40 < 50%. The CTV, rectal wall, and bladder wall dose volumes were calculated and evaluated using the Freidman test. RESULTS The LS technique adhered to all dose limitations. For the rectal and bladder walls, 10 (33.3%) and 21 (70.0%) patients in the PS method and 5 (16.7%) and 1 (3.3%) patients in VMAT, respectively, failed to meet the stipulated requirements. The wide ranges of the rectal and bladder wall volumes (V10-70) were lower with LS than with PS and VMAT. LS outperformed VMAT across all dose-volume rectal and bladder wall indices. CONCLUSION The LS method demonstrated a reduction in rectal and bladder doses relative to PS and VMAT, thereby suggesting the potential for mitigating toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaru Takagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hasegawa
- Department of Radiation Physics, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Kunihiko Tateoka
- Department of Radiation Physics, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Yu Takada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Masato Hareyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tominaga Y, Suga M, Takeda M, Yamamoto Y, Akagi T, Kato T, Tokumaru S, Yamamoto M, Oita M. Dose-volume comparisons of proton therapy for pencil beam scanning with and without multi-leaf collimator and passive scattering in patients with lung cancer. Med Dosim 2023; 49:13-18. [PMID: 37940436 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated the dose distributions of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) with/without a multileaf collimator (MLC) compared to passive scattering (PS) for stage I/II lung cancers. Collimated/uncollimated (PBS+/PBS-) and PS plans were created for 20 patients. Internal-clinical-target-volumes (ICTVs) and planning-target-volumes (PTVs) with a 5 mm margin were defined on the gated CTs. Organs-at-risk (OARs) are defined as the normal lungs, spinal cord, esophagus, and heart. The prescribed dose was 66 Gy relative-biological-effectiveness (RBE) in 10 fractions at the isocenter and 50% volume of the ICTVs for the PS and PBS, respectively. We compared the target and OAR dose statistics from the dose volume histograms. The PBS+ group had a significantly better mean PTV conformity index than the PBS- and PS groups. The mean dose sparing for PBS+ was better than those for PBS- and PS. Only the normal lung doses of PBS- were worse than those of PS. The overall performance of the OAR sparing was in the order of PBS+, PBS-, and PS. The PBS+ plan showed significantly better target homogeneity and OAR sparing than the PBS- and PS plans. PBS requires collimating systems to treat lung cancers with the most OAR sparing while maintaining the target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Tominaga
- Medical Co. Hakuhokai, Osaka Proton Therapy Clinic, Konohana-ku, Osaka 554-0022, Japan.
| | - Masaki Suga
- Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan
| | - Mikuni Takeda
- Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan
| | - Yuki Yamamoto
- Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan
| | - Takashi Akagi
- Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Depertment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima, Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan; Depertment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima 963-8052, Japan
| | - Sunao Tokumaru
- Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan
| | - Michinori Yamamoto
- Medical Co. Hakuhokai, Osaka Proton Therapy Clinic, Konohana-ku, Osaka 554-0022, Japan
| | - Masataka Oita
- Faculty of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Izairi-Bexheti R, Fejzulahi-Izairi M, Ristova M. Uncertainty in the range of the protons and C-ions in particle therapy due to a hydration level of a human body model. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 200:110951. [PMID: 37487427 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Cancer treatment with protons and carbon ions relies on the property of the accelerated charged particles to deposit most of their energy in the vicinity of their range (around the Bragg peak). The level of hydration in a cancer patient's body may vary within hours. Some patients may be heavy to moderately dehydrated, and some may be well and even excessively hydrated. In this research, we aim to estimate the uncertainty of the protons and C-ion ranges because of the different hydration levels of the human body. For the study of the impact of body hydration level on the particle's ranges, we have designed a new phantom model - a homogeneous mixture of an Average HUuman BOdy constituting elements (AHUBO) in three states of hydration: normal (n), dehydrated (d), and excessively hydrated (e) by applying corresponding recalibration in the "atomic-stoichiometry model" due to the water sufficiency/deficiency. The purpose of the study is to estimate the shift in the ranges depending on the hydration level, possibly suggest particle beam energy adjustments to overcome the range uncertainties, to deliver the prescribed dose to the tumour while sparing the healthy tissue. Herein we present the results of the FLUKA-Flair simulations of the therapeutic range of energies of protons (50-105 MeV) and C-ions (30-210 MeV) respectively, into an AHUBO head phantom model at three levels of hydration (normal, dehydrated, and excessively hydrated). The range uncertainty was estimated via the shifts of the Bragg-peaks position for the three different hydration levels. The estimations showed that the range uncertainty (ΔR) due to body hydration for the maximum energy in the range for protons at 105 MeV is about 0.04 mm and for C-ions at 190 MeV/u is about 0.06 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Redona Izairi-Bexheti
- Physics Department, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Arhimedova St. 3, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Mimoza Fejzulahi-Izairi
- Physics Department, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Arhimedova St. 3, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Mimoza Ristova
- Physics Department, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Arhimedova St. 3, Skopje, Macedonia; SEEIIST, Southeast European International Institute for Sustainable Technologies, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clinical outcomes and factors involved in the local control of proton beam therapy for oligometastatic liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:304-312. [PMID: 36446925 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02023-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There are no existing reports on proton beam therapy (PBT) for local control (LC) of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC). We calculated the LC rate of PBT for LMCRC and explored the influence of each factor on the LC rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases in which PBT was performed at our center between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the database. Patients with LMCRC without extrahepatic lesions and no more than three liver metastases were included. Effectiveness was assessed based on LC, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Adverse events (AEs) are described. Factors that may be related to LC were also investigated. RESULTS This study included 23 men and 18 women, with a median age of 66 (range 24-87) years. A total of 63 lesions were included in the study. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness)/22 fractions. The median follow-up period was 27.6 months. The 3‑year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 54.9%, 61.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis identified the distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a factor associated with LC (P = 0.02). No grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed. None of the patients experienced liver failure during the acute or late phase. CONCLUSION Care must be taken with tumors that have reduced planning target volume coverage owing to organs at risk restrictions, especially in tumors near the GI tract.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kato T, Kato M, Takemasa K, Murakami M. Dosimetric Effects of the Supine and Prone Positions in Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. J Med Phys 2022; 47:331-335. [PMID: 36908499 PMCID: PMC9997540 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_85_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To quantitatively evaluate how much the doses to organs at risk are affected in the prone position compared to the supine position in the proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Fifteen consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent treatment planning computed tomography scans in both the supine and prone positions. The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the prostate gland plus the seminal vesicles. The PT plans were designed using the standard lateral opposed fields with passively scattered proton beams for both treatment positions. The prescribed dose for each plan was set to 78 Gy (Relative biological effectiveness)/39 fractions to 50% of the planning target volume. Dose-volume metrics of the rectum and bladder in the two treatment positions were analyzed. Results It was confirmed that all the parameters of D05, D10, D20, D30, Dmean, and V90 examined in the rectum were significantly reduced in the prone position. There was no significant difference between the two positions in the bladder dose except for Dmean. The distance between the CTV and the rectum tended to increase with the patient in the prone position; at the prostate level, however, the maximum change was approximately 5 mm, and there was significant variation between cases. Conclusions We confirmed that the rectal doses were significantly lower in the prone compared with the supine position in PT. Although uncertain, the prone position could be an effective method to reduce the rectal dose in PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masato Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Takemasa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moskvin VP, Pirlepesov F, Yan Y, Ates O, Myers WJ, Uh J, Zhao L, Shapira N, Yagil Y, Merchant TE, Hua CH. Accuracy of stopping power ratio calculation and experimental validation of proton range with dual-layer computed tomography. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:864-868. [PMID: 35502150 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2069477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim P. Moskvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Fakhriddin Pirlepesov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Yue Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ozgur Ates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - William J. Myers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jinsoo Uh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nadav Shapira
- Global Advanced Technology, Philips Medical Systems, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yoad Yagil
- Global Advanced Technology, Philips Medical Systems, Haifa, Israel
| | - Thomas E. Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Chia-ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor PA, Lowenstein J, Followill D, Kry SF. The Value of On-Site Proton Audits. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:1004-1011. [PMID: 34780973 PMCID: PMC8863623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to highlight the value and key findings of on-site proton audits. METHODS AND MATERIALS The authors performed 38 on-site measurement-based peer reviews of proton centers participating in National Cancer Institute-funded clinical trials. The reviews covered beam calibration, lateral and depth measurements, mechanical checks, treatment planning and clinical practice, and quality assurance (QA) practices. Program deficiencies were noted, and recommendations were made about ways institutions could improve their practices. RESULTS Institutions received an average of 3 (range, 1-8) recommendations for practice improvements. The number of deficiencies did not decrease over time, highlighting the continued need for this type of peer review. The most common deficiencies were for Task Group-recommended QA compliance (97% of centers), computed tomography number (CTN) to relative linear stopping power conversion (59%), and QA procedures (53%). In addition, 32% of institutions assessed failed at least 1 lateral beam profile measurement (<90% of pixels passing 3% [global]/3 mm; 10% threshold), despite passing internal QA measurements. These failures occurred for several different plan configurations (large, small, shallow, and deep targets) and at different depths in the beam path (proximal to target, central, and distal). CTN to relative linear stopping power conversion curves showed deviations at low, mid, and high CTNs and highlighted areas of inconsistency between proton centers, with many centers falling outside of 2 sigma of the mean curve of their peers. All deficiencies from the peer review were discussed with the institutions, and many implemented dosimetric treatment planning and practice changes to improve the accuracy of their system and consistency with other institutions. CONCLUSIONS This peer review program has been integral in confirming and promoting consistency and best practice across proton centers for clinical trials, minimizing deviations for outcomes data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige A Taylor
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | | | - David Followill
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen F Kry
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knopf AC, Czerska K, Fracchiolla F, Graeff C, Molinelli S, Rinaldi I, Rucincki A, Sterpin E, Stützer K, Trnkova P, Zhang Y, Chang JY, Giap H, Liu W, Schild SE, Simone CB, Lomax AJ, Meijers A. Clinical necessity of multi-image based (4DMIB) optimization for targets affected by respiratory motion and treated with scanned particle therapy – a comprehensive review. Radiother Oncol 2022; 169:77-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
10
|
A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:203-213. [PMID: 35101597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transmission beams have been proposed for ultra-high dose (or FLASH) proton planning, limiting the organ sparing potentials of proton therapy. By pulling back the ranges of the highest energy proton beams and compensating proton ranges to adapt to the target distally, the exit dose of proton beams can be eliminated to better protect organs at risk while still preserving FLASH dose rate delivery. METHOD AND MATERIALS An inverse planning tool was developed to optimize intensity modulated proton therapy using a single-energy layer for FLASH radiation therapy planning. The range pull-backs were calculated to stop single-energy proton beams at the distal edge of the target. The spot map and weights of each field were optimized to achieve a sufficient dose rate using proton beam Bragg peaks. A C-shape target in phantom, along with 6 consecutive lung cancer patients previously treated using proton stereotactic body radiation therapy were planned using this novel Bragg Peak method and also transmission technique. Dosimetry characteristics and 3-dimensional dose rate were investigated. RESULTS The minimum monitor units (MU) for transmission and Bragg peak plans were 400 MU/spot and 1200 MU/spot, respectively, corresponding to spot peak dose rates of 670 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) per second and 1950 GyRBE per second. Bragg peak plans yield a generally comparable target uniformity while significantly reducing dose spillage volume from the low to medium dose level. For all the 6 lung cases delivery of 34 GyRBE in 1 fraction, assessing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0915 constraints, the lung V7GyRBE volume was reduced by up to 32% (P = .001) for Bragg peak plans. The transmission plans tended to generate 2.4% higher FLASH dose rate coverage (V40GyRBE/s) versus Bragg peak plans over the major organs at risk. However, Bragg peak plans could also reach the FLASH radiation therapy threshold of V40GyRBE/s using a higher MU/spot and sophisticated dose-rate optimization algorithm. CONCLUSIONS This first proof-of-concept study has demonstrated this novel method of combining range pull-back and powerful inverse optimization capable of achieving FLASH dose rate based on currently available machine parameters using a single-energy Bragg peak. Similar target coverage and uniformity can be maintained by Bragg peak FLASH plans while substantially improving the sparing of organs at risk compared with transmission plans.
Collapse
|
11
|
Li H, Dong L, Bert C, Chang J, Flampouri S, Jee KW, Lin L, Moyers M, Mori S, Rottmann J, Tryggestad E, Vedam S. Report of AAPM Task Group 290: Respiratory motion management for particle therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:e50-e81. [PMID: 35066871 PMCID: PMC9306777 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose uncertainty induced by respiratory motion remains a major concern for treating thoracic and abdominal lesions using particle beams. This Task Group report reviews the impact of tumor motion and dosimetric considerations in particle radiotherapy, current motion‐management techniques, and limitations for different particle‐beam delivery modes (i.e., passive scattering, uniform scanning, and pencil‐beam scanning). Furthermore, the report provides guidance and risk analysis for quality assurance of the motion‐management procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy, and discusses future development and emerging motion‐management strategies. This report supplements previously published AAPM report TG76, and considers aspects of motion management that are crucial to the accurate and safe delivery of particle‐beam therapy. To that end, this report produces general recommendations for commissioning and facility‐specific dosimetric characterization, motion assessment, treatment planning, active and passive motion‐management techniques, image guidance and related decision‐making, monitoring throughout therapy, and recommendations for vendors. Key among these recommendations are that: (1) facilities should perform thorough planning studies (using retrospective data) and develop standard operating procedures that address all aspects of therapy for any treatment site involving respiratory motion; (2) a risk‐based methodology should be adopted for quality management and ongoing process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joe Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kyung-Wook Jee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael Moyers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Joerg Rottmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Proton Therapy Singapore, Proton Therapy Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Erik Tryggestad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sastry Vedam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chuong MD, Hallemeier CL, Li H, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Tryggestad EJ, Yu J, Yang M, Choi JI, Kang M, Liu W, Knopf A, Meijers A, Molitoris JK, Apisarnthanarax S, Giap H, Hoppe BS, Lee P, Chang JY, Simone CB, Lin SH. Executive Summary of Clinical and Technical Guidelines for Esophageal Cancer Proton Beam Therapy From the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Subcommittees. Front Oncol 2021; 11:748331. [PMID: 34737959 PMCID: PMC8560961 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.748331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of potentially curative management of esophageal cancer (EC). However, RT can cause significant acute and late morbidity due to excess radiation exposure to nearby critical organs, especially the heart and lungs. Sparing these organs from both low and high radiation dose has been demonstrated to achieve clinically meaningful reductions in toxicity and may improve long-term survival. Accruing dosimetry and clinical evidence support the consideration of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the management of EC. There are critical treatment planning and delivery uncertainties that should be considered when treating EC with PBT, especially as there may be substantial motion-related interplay effects. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Subcommittees jointly developed guidelines regarding patient selection, treatment planning, clinical trials, and future directions of PBT for EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Erik J Tryggestad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Smith Apisarnthanarax
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Han D, Hooshangnejad H, Chen CC, Ding K. A Beam-Specific Optimization Target Volume for Stereotactic Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100757. [PMID: 34604607 PMCID: PMC8463829 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigate two margin-based schemes for optimization target volumes (OTV), both isotropic expansion (2 mm) and beam-specific OTV, to account for uncertainties due to the setup errors and range uncertainties in pancreatic stereotactic pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Also, as 2-mm being one of the extreme sizes of margin, we also study whether the plan quality of 2-mm uniform expansion could be comparable to other plan schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We developed 2 schemes for OTV: (1) a uniform expansion of 2 mm (OTV2mm) for setup uncertainty and (2) a water equivalent thickness-based, beam-specific expansion (OTVWET) on beam direction and 2 mm expansion laterally. Six LAPC patients were planned with a prescribed dose of 33 Gy (RBE) in 5 fractions. Robustness optimization (RO) plans on gross tumor volumes, with setup uncertainties of 2 mm and range uncertainties of 3.5%, were implemented as a benchmark. RESULTS All 3 optimization schemes achieved decent target coverage with no significant difference. The OTV2mm plans show superior organ at risk (OAR) sparing, especially for proximal duodenum. However, OTV2mm plans demonstrate severe susceptibility to range and setup uncertainties with a passing rate of 19% of the plans meeting the goal of 95% volume covered by the prescribed dose. The proposed dose spread function analysis shows no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The use of OTVWET mimics a union volume for all scenarios in robust optimization but saves optimization time noticeably. The beam-specific margin can be attractive to online adaptive stereotactic body proton therapy owing to the efficiency of the plan optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Han
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chin-Cheng Chen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kai Ding
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Narita Y, Kato T, Takemasa K, Sato H, Ikeda T, Harada T, Oyama S, Murakami M. Dosimetric impact of simulated changes in large bowel content during proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:90-98. [PMID: 34599856 PMCID: PMC8598140 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric impact of changes in the large bowel content during proton therapy (PT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Materials and methods Fifteen patients with LAPC were included in this study. The SIB method was performed using five fields according to our standard protocol. A total dose of 67.5 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) was prescribed in 25 fractions using the SIB method. A dose of 45 Gy(RBE) was prescribed for the entire planning target volume (PTV) by using four main fields. The remaining 22.5 Gy(RBE) was prescribed to the PTV excluding for the gastrointestinal tract using one subfield. Five simulated doses were obtained by the forward dose calculations with the Hounsfield units (HU) override to the large bowel to 50, 0, −100, −500, and −1000, respectively. The dose‐volume indices in each plan were compared using the 50 HU plan as a reference. Results At D98 of the clinical target volume (CTV) and spinal cord‐D2cc, when the density of the large bowel was close to that of gas, there were significant differences compared to the reference plan (p < 0.05). By contrast, no significant difference was observed in stomach‐D2cc duodenum‐D2cc, small bowel‐D2cc, kidneys‐V18, and liver‐Dmean under any of the conditions. There were no cases in which the dose constraint of organs at risk, specified by our institution, was exceeded. Conclusion Density change in the large bowel was revealed to significantly affect the doses of the CTV and spinal cord during PT with SIB for LAPC. For beam arrangement, it is important to select a gantry angle that prevents the large bowel from passing as much as possible. If this is unavoidable, it is important to carefully observe the gas image on the beam path during daily image guidance and to provide adaptive re‐planning as needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Narita
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan.,School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Takemasa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ikeda
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takaomi Harada
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iwata H, Ogino H, Hattori Y, Nakajima K, Nomura K, Hashimoto S, Hayashi K, Toshito T, Sasaki S, Mizoe JE, Shibamoto Y. A Phase 2 Study of Image-Guided Proton Therapy for Operable or Ablation-Treatable Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:117-126. [PMID: 33798564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Because most previous data on proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were retrospectively collected from inoperable or previously treated cases, our aim was to evaluate the outcome of image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for operable or radiofrequency ablation-treatable primary HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS This phase 2 study prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of IGPT and quality of life (QoL) after IGPT for operable/ablatable HCC. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the secondary endpoints were local control, incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events, and changes in QoL. Toxicities were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. QoL scores were assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 3.0, and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Hepatocellular Carcinoma/Primary Liver Cancer Module. IGPT was performed using respiratory-gated techniques. RESULTS Forty-five patients (median age: 68 years; range, 36-80 years) were enrolled between June 2013 and February 2016; 38 were considered operable and 14 were indicated for radiofrequency ablation. The major underlying liver diseases were hepatitis B (n = 16), hepatitis C (n = 13), alcoholic hepatitis (n = 3), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 13). The Child-Pugh score was A5 in 32 patients, A6 in 9 patients, and B7 in 4 patients. Thirty-seven patients with a peripherally located tumor were given 66 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 10 fractions, and 8 patients with a centrally located tumor received 72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 22 fractions. The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 60 months (range, 42-75 months). Two- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%-95%) and 70% (95% CI, 56%-84%), respectively, and local control rates were 95% (95% CI, 89%-100%) and 92% (95% CI, 84%-100%), respectively. Grade 3 radiation-induced liver disease was observed in 1 patient. No significant changes were noted in QoL scores 1 year after treatment, except for body image. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance as planned in the study design, IGPT is a safe and effective treatment for solitary primary HCC and may become a treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukiko Hattori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Koichiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shingo Hashimoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kensuke Hayashi
- Department of Proton Therapy Technology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Department of Proton Therapy Physics, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sasaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Jun-Etsu Mizoe
- Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Narita Y, Kato T, Ono T, Oyama S, Yamazaki Y, Ouchi H, Takemasa K, Murakami M. Trend analysis of the dosimetric impact of anatomical changes during proton therapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:298-306. [PMID: 34402579 PMCID: PMC8425936 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anatomical changes, such as shrinkage and aeration, can affect dose distribution in proton therapy (PT) for maxillary sinus carcinoma (MSC). These changes can affect the dose to the target and organs at risk (OARs); however, when these changes occur during PT is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the dosimetric impact of anatomical changes during PT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients with MSC were enrolled in this study. Initial PT plans were generated based on initial computed tomography (CT) images. Several repeat CT images were obtained to confirm anatomical changes during PT. Evaluation PT plans were generated by copying initial PT plans to repeat CT images. The dose differences of the target and OARs were evaluated by comparing both the plans. RESULTS At 3-4 weeks after the initiation of PT, the target volume reduced by approximately 10% as compared with the initial volume. Consequently, the target volumes gradually varied until the end of treatment. The value of V95 (volume that received 95% of the prescription dose) in the clinical target volume of the evaluation PT plan was similar to that of the initial PT plan. However, the dose to OARs, such as the contralateral optic nerve, contralateral eyeball, brainstem, and optic chiasm, increased significantly from the middle to the later phases of the treatment course. In contrast, there was a slight dose difference in the ipsilateral optic apparatus. CONCLUSION The trend analysis in this study showed that anatomical changes appeared 3-4 weeks after the start of PT, and the dose to the OARs tended to increase. Therefore, it is recommended to check the status of tumor 3-4 weeks after the start of treatment to avoid the deterioration of dose distribution due to these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Narita
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan.,School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Ono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yamazaki
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Hisao Ouchi
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Takemasa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Omi Y, Yasui K, Shimomura A, Muramatsu R, Iwata H, Ogino H, Furukawa A, Hayashi N. Dosimetric effects of quality assurance-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer. Radiol Phys Technol 2021; 14:328-335. [PMID: 34313911 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00632-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of quality assurance (QA)-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer. We used 20 typical computed tomography (CT) images of prostate cancer: 10 patients with and 10 patients without spacers. The following 12 model errors were assumed: output error ± 2%, range error ± 1 mm, setup error ± 1 mm for three directions, and multileaf collimator (MLC) position error ± 1 mm. We created verification plans with model errors and compared the prostate-rectal (PR) distance and dose indices with and without the spacer. The mean PR distance at the isocenter was 1.1 ± 1.3 mm without the spacer and 12.9 ± 2.9 mm with the spacer (P < 0.001). The mean rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE in the original plan were 2.3%, 4.1%, and 12.1% without the spacer and 0.1%, 0.4%, and 3.3% with the spacer (P = 0.0011, < 0.001, and < 0.001). The effects of the range and lateral setup errors were small; however, the effects of the vertical/long setup and MLC error were significant in the cases without the spacer. The means of the maximum absolute change from original plans across all scenarios in the rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE were 1.3%, 1.5%, and 2.3% without the spacer, and 0.2%, 0.4%, and 1.3% with the spacer (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.0019). This study indicated that spacer injections were also effective in reducing the change in the rectal dose due to setup errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Omi
- Anjo Kosei Hospital, 28 Higashi-Hirokute, Anjo-cho, Anjo, Aichi, 446-8602, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yasui
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Akira Shimomura
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Rie Muramatsu
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Akari Furukawa
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chacko MS, Grewal HS, Wu D, Sonnad JR. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:159-170. [PMID: 34275175 PMCID: PMC8425908 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
A major contributing factor to proton range uncertainty is the conversion of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) to proton relative stopping power (RSP). This uncertainty is elevated with implanted devices, such as silicone breast implants when computed with single energy CT (SECT). In recent years, manufacturers have introduced implants with variations in gel cohesivity. Deriving the RSP for these implants from dual-energy CT (DECT) can result in a marked reduction of the error associated with SECT. In this study, we investigate the validity of DECT calibration of HU to RSP on silicone breast implants of varying cohesivity levels. A DECT capable scanner was calibrated using the stoichiometric method of Bourque et al for SECT and DECT using a tissue substitute phantom. Three silicone breast implants of increasing gel cohesivity were measured in a proton beam of clinical energy to determine ground-truth RSP and water equivalent thickness (WET). These were compared to SECT-derived RSP at three CT spectrum energies and DECT with two energy pairs (80/140 kVp and 100/140 kVp) as obtained from scans with and without an anthropomorphic phantom. The RSP derived from parameters estimates from CT vendor-specific software (syngo.via) was compared. The WET estimates from SECT deviated from MLIC ground truth approximately +11%-19%, which would result in overpenetration if used clinically. Both the Bourque calibration and syngo.via WET estimates from DECT yielded error ≤0.5% from ground truth; no significant difference was found between models of varying gel cohesivity levels. WET estimates without the anthropomorphic phantom were significantly different than ground truth for the Bourque calibration. From these results, gel cohesivity had no effect on proton RSP. User-generated DECT calibration can yield comparably accurate RSP estimates for silicone breast implants to vendor software methods. However, care must be taken to account for beam hardening effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Chacko
- Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Hardev S Grewal
- Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Dee Wu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Jagadeesh R Sonnad
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tendler I, Robertson D, Darne C, Panthi R, Alsanea F, Collins-Fekete CA, Beddar S. Image quality evaluation of projection- and depth dose-based approaches to integrating proton radiography using a monolithic scintillator detector. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34144537 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0cc3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of an integrating proton radiography (PR) system, composed of a monolithic scintillator and two digital cameras, using integral lateral-dose and integral depth-dose image reconstruction techniques. Monte Carlo simulations were used to obtain the energy deposition in a 3D monolithic scintillator detector (30 × 30 × 30 cm3poly vinyl toluene organic scintillator) to create radiographs of various phantoms-a slanted aluminum cube for spatial resolution analysis and a Las Vegas phantom for contrast analysis. The light emission of the scintillator was corrected using Birks scintillation model. We compared two integrating PR methods and the expected results from an idealized proton tracking radiography system. Four different image reconstruction methods were utilized in this study: integral scintillation light projected from the beams-eye view, depth-dose based reconstruction methods both with and without optimization, and single particle tracking PR was used for reference data. Results showed that heterogeneity artifact due to medium-interface mismatch was identified from the Las Vegas phantom simulated in air. Spatial resolution was found to be highest for single-event reconstruction. Contrast levels, ranked from best to worst, were found to correspond to particle tracking, optimized depth-dose, depth-dose, and projection-based image reconstructions. The image quality of a monolithic scintillator integrating PR system was sufficient to warrant further exploration. These results show promise for potential clinical use as radiographic techniques for visualizing internal patient anatomy during proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irwin Tendler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Daniel Robertson
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5881 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, United States of America
| | - Chinmay Darne
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Rajesh Panthi
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Fahed Alsanea
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | | | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.,The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dagan R, Uezono H, Bryant C, Holtzman AL, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM. Long-term Outcomes from Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:200-212. [PMID: 34285947 PMCID: PMC8270098 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00068.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term disease control, survival, and toxicity after proton therapy for sinonasal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed 143 cases of adults with nonmetastatic sinonasal cancers treated with primary (18%; n = 26) or adjuvant (82%; n = 117) proton therapy. The most common histologies were squamous cell carcinoma (29%; n = 42), olfactory neuroblastoma (23%; n = 33), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%; n = 23). Patients had predominantly advanced-stage disease (T3, 24%, n = 35; T4, 66%, n = 94) and high-grade histology (52%; n = 74). Surgery included endoscopic resection alone (50%) with craniotomy (10%) or open resection (40%), and 31% had gross disease present at radiotherapy. Most (91%) received high-dose (median, 73.6 Gy radiobiological equivalent [GyRBE]; 84% >70 GyRBE) passive-scatter proton therapy using accelerated hyperfractionation (1.2 GyRBE twice daily) and concurrent chemotherapy (70%). Univariate and multivariate models assessed prognostic factors. Grade 3+ toxicities were recorded per Common Terminology Criteria, version 4. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (range, 0.1-12.5 years) overall and 4.9 years (range, 0.9-12.5 years) for living patients. RESULTS The 5-year outcomes were as follows: local control (LC), 80%; neck control, 96%; local-regional control, 78%; freedom from distant metastases, 71%; and disease-free survival, 62%; cause-specific survival, 64%; and overall survival, 59%. Surgery improved LC, but only with gross total resection (5-year LC 87% versus subtotal resection 62.9%, and biopsy alone 55% (P < 0.001). Gross residual disease was the only significant prognostic factor for local-regional control on multivariate analysis. High-grade, T4, and local recurrence were associated with decreased overall survival. Late (G3+) toxicity occurred in 22% (32 of 143), including central nervous system necrosis and vision loss in 6% (9 of 143) and 3.5% (5 of 143), respectively. CONCLUSION Proton therapy after gross-total resection provides excellent long-term LC in patients with locally advanced, high-grade sinonasal cancer. Moreover, LC remains strongly associated with long-term survival. With gross disease, about 60% of patients had long-term LC with proton therapy and induction or concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roi Dagan
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Haruka Uezono
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Curtis Bryant
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Adam L. Holtzman
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu R, Sun B, Zhang T, Williamson JF, O'Sullivan JA, Zhao T. Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:6-14. [PMID: 33797840 PMCID: PMC8130244 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy. Methods A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated. Results Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions. Conclusion The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Baozhou Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeffery F Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joseph A O'Sullivan
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Suzuki S, Kato T, Murakami M. Impact of lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer in proton craniospinal irradiation with vertebral-body-sparing for young pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:186-197. [PMID: 33341899 PMCID: PMC7948862 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We used the method proposed by Schneider et al. Theor Biol Med Model 2011;8:27, to clarify how the radiation-induced secondary cancer incidence rate changes in patients after proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) without and with vertebral-body-sparing (VBS). Eight patients aged 3-15 years who underwent proton CSI were enrolled in the study. For each case, two types of plan without and with VBS in the target were compared. The prescribed doses were assumed to be 23.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and 36 Gy (RBE). Using the dose-volume histograms of the two plans, the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) was calculated by both methods for each patient based on the dose data calculated using an XiO-M treatment planning system. Eight organs were analyzed as follows: lung, colon, stomach, small intestine, liver, bladder, thyroid and bone. When the prescribed dose used was 23.4 Gy (RBE), the average LAR differences and the average number needed to treat (NNT) between proton CSI without and with VBS were 4.04 and 24.8, respectively, whereas the average LAR difference and the average NNT were larger at 8.65 and 11.6, respectively, when the prescribed dose of 36 Gy (RBE) was used. The LAR for radiation-induced secondary cancer was significantly lower in proton CSI with VBS than without VBS in pediatric patients, especially for the colon, lung, stomach and thyroid. The results of this study could serve as reference data when considering how much of vertebral bodies should be included when performing proton CSI according to age in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Suzuki
- Corresponding author. Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, 2-16-1 Miyanosawa, Nishi-ku, Sapporo City, Hokkaido, 063-0052, Japan. Tel: +81-011-665-0020;
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
- Preparing Section for New Faculty of Medical Science, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sato H, Kato T, Motoyanagi T, Takemasa K, Narita Y, Kato M, Matsumoto T, Oyama S, Yamaguchi H, Wada H, Murakami M. Preliminary analysis of prostate positional displacement using hydrogel spacer during the course of proton therapy for prostate cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:294-299. [PMID: 33341901 PMCID: PMC7948841 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, a novel technique has been employed to maintain a distance between the prostate and the rectum by transperineally injecting a hydrogel spacer (HS). However, the effect of HS on the prostate positional displacement is poorly understood, despite its stability with HS in place. In this study, we investigated the effect of HS insertion on the interfraction prostate motion during the course of proton therapy (PT) for Japanese prostate cancer patients. The study population consisted of 22 cases of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with 11 cases with HS insertion and 11 cases without HS insertion. The irradiation position and preparation were similar for both groups. To test for reproducibility, regular confirmation computed tomography (RCCT) was done four times during the treatment period, and five times overall [including treatment planning CT (TPCT)] in each patient. Considering the prostate position of the TPCT as the reference, the change in the center of gravity of the prostate relative to the bony anatomy in the RCCTs of each patient was determined in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. As a result, no significant difference was observed across the groups in the LR and SI directions. Conversely, a significant difference was observed in the AP direction (P < 0.05). The proportion of the 3D vector length ≤5 mm was 95% in the inserted group, but 55% in the non-inserted group. Therefore, HS is not only effective in reducing rectal dose, but may also contribute to the positional reproducibility of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Sato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 172 Yatsuyamada 7 Chome, Koriyama City, Fukushima, 963-8563, Japan. Tel: +81-24-934-3888; Fax: +81-24-934-5393;
| | - Tomoaki Motoyanagi
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Takemasa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuki Narita
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masato Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu R, Lei Y, Wang T, Zhou J, Roper J, Lin L, McDonald MW, Bradley JD, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Synthetic dual-energy CT for MRI-only based proton therapy treatment planning using label-GAN. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:065014. [PMID: 33596558 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
MRI-only treatment planning is highly desirable in the current proton radiation therapy workflow due to its appealing advantages such as bypassing MR-CT co-registration, avoiding x-ray CT exposure dose and reduced medical cost. However, MRI alone cannot provide stopping power ratio (SPR) information for dose calculations. Given that dual energy CT (DECT) can estimate SPR with higher accuracy than conventional single energy CT, we propose a deep learning-based method in this study to generate synthetic DECT (sDECT) from MRI to calculate SPR. Since the contrast difference between high-energy and low-energy CT (LECT) is important, and in order to accurately model this difference, we propose a novel label generative adversarial network-based model which can not only discriminate the realism of sDECT but also differentiate high-energy CT (HECT) and LECT from DECT. A cohort of 57 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT and MRI pairs were used to validate the performance of the proposed framework. The results of sDECT and its derived SPR maps were compared with clinical DECT and the corresponding SPR, respectively. The mean absolute error for synthetic LECT and HECT were 79.98 ± 18.11 HU and 80.15 ± 16.27 HU, respectively. The corresponding SPR maps generated from sDECT showed a normalized mean absolute error as 5.22% ± 1.23%. By comparing with the traditional Cycle GANs, our proposed method significantly improves the accuracy of sDECT. The results indicate that on our dataset, the sDECT image form MRI is close to planning DECT, and thus shows promising potential for generating SPR maps for proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Mark W McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wong SL, Alshaikhi J, Grimes H, Amos RA, Poynter A, Rompokos V, Gulliford S, Royle G, Liao Z, Sharma RA, Mendes R. Retrospective Planning Study of Patients with Superior Sulcus Tumours Comparing Pencil Beam Scanning Protons to Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e118-e131. [PMID: 32798157 PMCID: PMC7883303 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Twenty per cent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present with stage III locally advanced disease. Precision radiotherapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS) protons may improve outcomes. However, stage III is a heterogeneous group and accounting for complex tumour motion is challenging. As yet, it remains unclear as to whom will benefit. In our retrospective planning study, we explored if patients with superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are a select cohort who might benefit from this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with SSTs treated with radical radiotherapy using four-dimensional planning computed tomography between 2010 and 2015 were identified. Tumour motion was assessed and excluded if greater than 5 mm. Photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and PBS proton single-field optimisation plans, with and without inhomogeneity corrections, were generated retrospectively. Robustness analysis was assessed for VMAT and PBS plans involving: (i) 5 mm geometric uncertainty, with an additional 3.5% range uncertainty for proton plans; (ii) verification plans at maximal inhalation and exhalation. Comparative dosimetric and robustness analyses were carried out. RESULTS Ten patients were suitable. The mean clinical target volume D95 was 98.1% ± 0.4 (97.5-98.8) and 98.4% ± 0.2 (98.1-98.9) for PBS and VMAT plans, respectively. All normal tissue tolerances were achieved. The same four PBS and VMAT plans failed robustness assessment. Inhomogeneity corrections minimally impacted proton plan robustness and made it worse in one case. The most important factor affecting target coverage and robustness was the clinical target volume entering the spinal canal. Proton plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose (by 21.9%), lung V5, V10, V20 (by 47.9%, 36.4%, 12.1%, respectively), mean heart dose (by 21.4%) and thoracic vertebra dose (by 29.2%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this planning study, robust PBS plans were achievable in carefully selected patients. Considerable dose reductions to the lung, heart and thoracic vertebra were possible without compromising target coverage. Sparing these lymphopenia-related organs may be particularly important in this era of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-L Wong
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - J Alshaikhi
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Saudi Particle Therapy Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - H Grimes
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R A Amos
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - A Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Gulliford
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Z Liao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - R A Sharma
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - R Mendes
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hu Y, Ding X, Shen J, Bues M, Liu W, Kang Y, Leng S, Yu L. Feasibility of using megavoltage computed tomography to reduce proton range uncertainty: A simulation study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:131-140. [PMID: 33608992 PMCID: PMC7984486 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To demonstrate that variation in chemical composition has a negligible effect on the mapping curve from relative electron density (RED) to proton stopping power ratio (SPR), and to establish the theoretical framework of using Megavoltage (MV) computed tomography (CT), instead of kilovoltage (kV) dual energy CT, to accurately estimate proton SPR. Methods A simulation study was performed to evaluate the effect of chemical composition variation on kVCT number and proton SPR. The simulation study involved both reference and simulated human tissues. The reference human tissues, together with their physical densities and chemical compositions, came from the ICRP publication 23. The simulated human tissues were created from the reference human tissues assuming that elemental percentage weight followed a Gaussian distribution. For all tissues, kVCT number and proton SPR were obtained through (a) theoretical calculation from tissue’s physical density and chemical composition which served as the ground truth, and (b) estimation from RED using the calibration curves established from the stoichiometric method. Deviations of the estimated values from the calculated values were quantified as errors in using RED to estimate kVCT number and proton SPR. Results Given a chemical composition variation of 5% (1σ) of the nominal percentage weights, the total estimation error of using RED to estimate kVCT number was 0.34%, 0.62%, and 0.77% and the total estimation error of using RED to estimate proton SPR was 0.30%, 0.22%, and 0.16% for fat tissues, non‐fat soft tissues and bone tissues, respectively. Conclusion Chemical composition had a negligible effect on the method of using RED to determine proton SPR. RED itself is sufficient to accurately determine proton SPR. MVCT number maintains a superb linear relationship with RED because it is highly dominated by Compton scattering. Therefore, MVCT has great potential in reducing the proton range uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanle Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Xiaoning Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yixiu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Shuai Leng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zou W, Kurtz G, Nakib M, Burgdorf B, Alp M, Li T, Lustig R, Xiao Y, Dong L, Kassaee A, Alonso-Basanta M. A Probability-Based Investigation on the Setup Robustness of Pencil-beam Proton Radiation Therapy for Skull-Base Meningioma. Int J Part Ther 2021; 7:34-45. [PMID: 33604414 PMCID: PMC7886272 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00009.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The intracranial skull-base meningioma is in proximity to multiple critical organs and heterogeneous tissues. Steep dose gradients often result from avoiding critical organs in proton treatment plans. Dose uncertainties arising from setup errors under image-guided radiation therapy are worthy of evaluation. Patients and Methods Fourteen patients with skull-base meningioma were retrospectively identified and planned with proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) single-field uniform dose (SFUD) and multifield optimization (MFO) techniques. The setup uncertainties were assigned a probability model on the basis of prior published data. The impact on the dose distribution from nominal 1-mm and large, less probable setup errors, as well as the cumulative effect, was analyzed. The robustness of SFUD and MFO planning techniques in these scenarios was discussed. Results The target coverage was reduced and the plan dose hot spot increased by all setup uncertainty scenarios regardless of the planning techniques. For 1 mm nominal shifts, the deviations in clinical target volume (CTV) coverage D99% was -11 ± 52 cGy and -45 ± 147 cGy for SFUD and MFO plans. The setup uncertainties affected the organ at risk (OAR) dose both positively and negatively. The statistical average of the setup uncertainties had <100 cGy impact on the plan qualities for all patients. The cumulative deviations in CTV D95% were 1 ± 34 cGy and -7 ± 18 cGy for SFUD and MFO plans. Conclusion It is important to understand the impact of setup uncertainties on skull-base meningioma, as the tumor target has complex shape and is in proximity to multiple critical organs. Our work evaluated the setup uncertainty based on its probability distribution and evaluated the dosimetric consequences. In general, the SFUD plans demonstrated more robustness than the MFO plans in target coverages and brainstem dose. The probability-weighted overall effect on the dose distribution is small compared to the dosimetric shift during single fraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mayisha Nakib
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brendan Burgdorf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Murat Alp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alireza Kassaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Takemasa K, Kato T, Narita Y, Kato M, Yamazaki Y, Ouchi H, Oyama S, Yamaguchi H, Wada H, Murakami M. The impact of different setup methods on the dose distribution in proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:63-71. [PMID: 33595910 PMCID: PMC7984466 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the impact of different setup methods, vertebral body matching (VM), diaphragm matching (DM), and marker matching (MM), on the dose distribution in proton therapy (PT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods Thirty‐eight HCC lesions were studied retrospectively to assess changes in the dose distribution on two computed tomography (CT) scans. One was for treatment planning (1st‐CT), and the other was for dose confirmation acquired during the course of PT (2nd‐CT). The dose coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV‐D98) and normal liver volume that received 30 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (liver‐V30) were evaluated under each condition. Initial treatment planning on the 1st‐CT was defined as reference, and three dose distributions recalculated using VM, DM, and MM on the 2nd‐CT, were compared to it, respectively. In addition, the relationship between the CTV‐D98 of each method and the distance between the center of mass (COM) of the CTV and the right diaphragm top was evaluated. Results For CTV‐D98, significant differences were observed between the reference and VM and DM, respectively (P = 0.013, P = 0.015). There were also significant differences between MM and VM and DM, respectively (P = 0.018, P = 0.036). Regarding liver‐V30, there was no significant difference in any of the methods, and there were no discernable difference due to the different setup methods. In DM, only two out of 34 cases with a distance from right diaphragm top to COM of CTV of 90 mm or less that CTV‐D98 difference was 5% or more and CTV‐D98 was worse than VM were confirmed. Conclusion Although MM is obviously the most effective method, it is suggested that DM may be particularly effective in cases where the distance from right diaphragm top to COM of CTV of 90 mm or less.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimihiro Takemasa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan.,Preparing Section for New Faculty of Medical Science, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuki Narita
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masato Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yamazaki
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisao Ouchi
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhang Y, Jabbour SK, Zhang A, Liu B, Yue NJ, Biswal NC. Proton beam therapy can achieve lower vertebral bone marrow dose than photon beam therapy during chemoradiation therapy of esophageal cancer. Med Dosim 2021; 46:229-235. [PMID: 33454170 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Chemoradiation therapy plays an important role in both the neoadjuvant and definitive management of esophageal cancer (EC). Prior studies have suggested that advanced planning techniques can better spare organs at risk including the heart. Although multiple toxicities can result from esophageal radiotherapy, one less studied acute toxicity is that of myelosuppression, which can result, in part, from the combination of chemotherapy and incidental radiotherapy administration to the vertebral bodies (VBs), which abut the posterior aspect of the esophagus, especially in the lower thoracic esophagus. Traditionally, VB bone marrow doses are not accounted during EC radiation therapy planning. We sought to compare the doses to VBs between proton and photon radiation therapy as part of chemoradiation therapy for EC treatment. By reducing doses to the vertebrae, radiation therapy can decrease treatment-related myelosuppression, which can avoid delays or chemotherapy dose reductions in therapy, which likely affect long-term patient survival. Dose constraints are not routinely employed for bone marrow in radiation treatment planning. In our previous work, we identified thresholds to avoid grade ≥3 leukopenia, including VB V10Gy, VB V20Gy, and a mean VB dose (MVD) of 18.8 Gy. Herein we perform a retrospective dosimetric planning study comparing passive- or double-scattering proton beam therapy (PS-PBT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (photon-based), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (photon-based) in 25 patients with locally advanced EC who were treated originally with photon RT at our institution between 2011 and 2016. The aforementioned dose constraints were included in the retrospective planning process for PS-PBT, VMAT, and IMRT to determine the feasibility of achieving these VB constraints while maintaining reasonable target coverage and planned, consistent constraints to other organs at risk including lungs, spinal cord, and stomach. PS-PBT plans were found to achieve lower doses for VB V10Gy, V20Gy, and MVD than VMAT and static IMRT plans while achieving the same target coverage. PS-PBT resulted in lower organs at risk dosimetric parameters than the photon plans, with p < 0.0001. Student's paired t-test p-values in favor of proton therapy's ability to spare organs were as follows: for PS-PBT vs VMAT and PS-PBT vs IMRT in mean doses for lung, liver, and VB and VB V10Gy and VB V20Gy were all <0.001 (Bonferroni corrected α=0.017). One-way ANOVA found that VB doses (VB V10Gy, VB V20Gy, and MVD) were significantly lower for proton therapy (p < 0.006) among the 3 planning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Andrew Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Ning J Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Nrusingh C Biswal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Iwata H, Ogino H, Hattori Y, Nakajima K, Nomura K, Hayashi K, Toshito T, Sasaki S, Hashimoto S, Mizoe JE, Shibamoto Y. Image-Guided Proton Therapy for Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: High Local Control and Quality of Life Preservation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020219. [PMID: 33435340 PMCID: PMC7827493 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for elderly (≥80 years old) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Proton therapy was performed using respiratory-gated and image-guided techniques. Seventy-one elderly HCC patients were treated using IGPT. The Child-Pugh score was A5 in 49 patients, A6 in 15, and B7-9 in 7. Forty-seven patients with a peripherally located tumor were administered 66 gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE) in 10 fractions, whereas 24 with a centrally located tumor received 72.6 GyRBE in 22 fractions. The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 33 months (range: 9-68). Two-year overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method were 76% (95% confidence interval: 66-87%) and 88% (80-97%), respectively. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, no grade 2 or higher radiation-induced liver disease was observed, and only 1 patient developed grade 3 dermatitis. The quality of life score (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 version 3.0, QLQ-HCC18, and SF-36) did not change after 1 year, except for the three-mental component summary (SF-36, improvement). IGPT is a safe and effective treatment for HCC in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan; (H.I.); (Y.H.); (K.N.); (K.N.)
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan; (H.I.); (Y.H.); (K.N.); (K.N.)
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-52-991-8577
| | - Yukiko Hattori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan; (H.I.); (Y.H.); (K.N.); (K.N.)
| | - Koichiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan; (H.I.); (Y.H.); (K.N.); (K.N.)
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan; (H.I.); (Y.H.); (K.N.); (K.N.)
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
| | - Kensuke Hayashi
- Department of Proton Therapy Technology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan;
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Department of Proton Therapy Physics, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan;
| | - Shigeru Sasaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan;
| | - Shingo Hashimoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
| | - Jun-etsu Mizoe
- Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo 063-0052, Japan;
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kato T, Fuwa N, Murakami M. Dose-Volume Comparison of IMRT and PSPT Treatment Plans for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:42-50. [PMID: 33274256 PMCID: PMC7707328 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00008.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To clarify the dose distribution characteristics for early-stage glottic cancer by comparing the dose distribution between intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and to examine the usefulness of PSPT for early-stage glottic cancer. Materials and Methods Computed tomography datasets of 8 patients with T1-2 glottic cancer who had been treated by PSPT were used to create an IMRT plan in Eclipse with 7 fields and a PSPT plan in XiO-M with 2 fields. Organs at risk (OARs) included the carotid arteries, arytenoids, inferior constrictor muscles, strap muscles, thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, and spinal cord. The prescription dose was 66 GyRBE in 33 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). All plans were optimized such that 95% of the PTV received 90% of the prescription dose considering that the skin was slightly spared. Results The superiority of the PSPT was confirmed in all OARs. In the PSPT, the dose to the contralateral carotid artery and the spinal cord, which is slightly distant from the PTV, was dramatically reduced while maintaining the dose distribution uniformity of the PTV by comparison with IMRT. Conclusion PSPT for early-stage glottic cancer resulted in good target dose homogeneity and significantly spared the OARs as compared with the IMRT. PSPT is expected to be effective in reducing late effects and particularly useful for young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fuwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Mie, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Iwata H, Akita K, Yamaba Y, Kunii E, Takakuwa O, Yoshihara M, Hattori Y, Nakajima K, Hayashi K, Toshito T, Ogino H, Shibamoto Y. Concurrent Chemo-Proton Therapy Using Adaptive Planning for Unresectable Stage 3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1359-1367. [PMID: 33227444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemo-proton therapy (CCPT) using adaptive planning for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, and changes in quality of life (QOL). Patients received cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (∼40 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1 to 14, q4w, for up to 4 cycles, plus concurrent proton therapy at a total dose of 70 GyRBE for the primary lesion and 66 GyRBE for lymph node metastasis with 2 GyRBE per day. Proton therapy was performed using respiratory-gated and image guided techniques, and adaptive plans were implemented. RESULTS Forty-seven patients were enrolled between August 2013 and August 2018. Four cycles of cisplatin plus S-1 were completed in 34 patients. The mean number of cycles was 4 (range, 1-4). The median follow-up of all and surviving patients was 37 (range, 4-84) and 52 months (range, 26-84), respectively. The mean number of replanning sessions was 2.5 (range, 1-4). The 2- and 5-year OS, LCR, and PFS were 77% (95% confidence interval 64%-89%) and 59% (43%-76%), 84% (73%-95%) and 61% (44%-78%), and 43% (28%-57%) and 37% (22%-51%), respectively. The median OS was not reached. No grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis was observed. There was no significant deterioration in the QOL scores after 24 months except for alopecia. CONCLUSIONS CCPT with adaptive planning was well tolerated and yielded remarkable OS for unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Kenji Akita
- Department of Respiratory Tract Oncology Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yamaba
- Department of Respiratory Tract Oncology Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Eiji Kunii
- Department of Respiratory Tract Oncology Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Osamu Takakuwa
- Department of Respiratory Tract Oncology Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Misuzu Yoshihara
- Department of Respiratory Tract Oncology Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukiko Hattori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Koichiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kensuke Hayashi
- Department of Proton Therapy Technology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Department of Proton Therapy Physics, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dumlu HS, Meschini G, Kurz C, Kamp F, Baroni G, Belka C, Paganelli C, Riboldi M. Dosimetric impact of geometric distortions in an MRI-only proton therapy workflow for lung, liver and pancreas. Z Med Phys 2020; 32:85-97. [PMID: 33168274 PMCID: PMC9948883 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In a radiation therapy workflow based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), dosimetric errors may arise due to geometric distortions introduced by MRI. The aim of this study was to quantify the dosimetric effect of system-dependent geometric distortions in an MRI-only workflow for proton therapy applied at extra-cranial sites. An approach was developed, in which computed tomography (CT) images were distorted using an MRI displacement map, which represented the MR distortions in a spoiled gradient-echo sequence due to gradient nonlinearities and static magnetic field inhomogeneities. A retrospective study was conducted on 4DCT/MRI digital phantoms and 18 4DCT clinical datasets of the thoraco-abdominal site. The treatment plans were designed and separately optimized for each beam in a beam specific Planning Target Volume on the distorted CT, and the final dose distribution was obtained as the average. The dose was then recalculated in undistorted CT using the same beam geometry and beam weights. The analysis was performed in terms of Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) parameters. No clinically relevant dosimetric impact was observed on organs at risk, whereas in the target structure, geometric distortions caused statistically significant variations in the planned dose DVH parameters and dose homogeneity index (DHI). The dosimetric variations in the target structure were smaller in abdominal cases (ΔD2%, ΔD98%, and ΔDmean all below 0.1% and ΔDHI below 0.003) compared to the lung cases. Indeed, lung patients with tumors isolated inside lung parenchyma exhibited higher dosimetric variations (ΔD2%≥0.3%, ΔD98%≥15.9%, ΔDmean≥3.3% and ΔDHI≥0.102) than lung patients with tumor close to soft tissue (ΔD2%≤0.4%, ΔD98%≤5.6%, ΔDmean≤0.9% and ΔDHI≤0.027) potentially due to higher density variations along the beam path. Results suggest the potential applicability of MRI-only proton therapy, provided that specific analysis is applied for isolated lung tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatice Selcen Dumlu
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milano, Italy; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Giorgia Meschini
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milano, Italy; Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kharod SM, Nichols RC, Henderson RH, Morris CG, Pham DC, Seeram VK, Jones LM, Antonio-Miranda M, Siragusa DA, Li Z, Flampouri S, Hoppe BS. Image-Guided Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Study. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:1-10. [PMID: 33274252 PMCID: PMC7707327 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Due to the excellent outcomes with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the low treatment-related toxicities using proton therapy (PT), we investigated treatment outcomes and toxicities when delivering hypofractionated PT. Materials and Methods Between 2009 and 2018, 22 patients with T1 to T2 N0M0 NSCLC (45% T1, 55% T2) received image-guided hypofractionated PT. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 58-90). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. Nine patients (41%) were treated with 48 GyRBE in 4 fractions for peripheral lesions, and 13 patients (59%) were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions for central lesions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities with computed tomography imaging for tumor assessment. The primary endpoint was grade 3 to 5 toxicity at 1 year. Results The median follow-up for all patients was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-8.8 years). The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 49%, respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 100% and 75%, respectively. The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 86%, 85%, and 95%, respectively. Four patients experienced in-field recurrences between 18 and 45 months after treatment. One patient (5%) developed a late grade 3 bronchial stricture requiring hospitalization and stent. Conclusion Image-guided hypofractionated PT for early-stage NSCLC provides promising local control and long-term survival with a low likelihood of toxicity. Regional nodal and distant relapses remain a problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivam M Kharod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - R Charles Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Randal H Henderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Dat C Pham
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vandana K Seeram
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Lisa M Jones
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Daniel A Siragusa
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yoshimura T, Shimizu S, Hashimoto T, Nishioka K, Katoh N, Taguchi H, Yasuda K, Matsuura T, Takao S, Tamura M, Tanaka S, Ito YM, Matsuo Y, Tamura H, Horita K, Umegaki K, Shirato H. Quantitative analysis of treatments using real-time image gated spot-scanning with synchrotron-based proton beam therapy system log data. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:10-19. [PMID: 33151643 PMCID: PMC7769392 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A synchrotron-based real-time image gated spot-scanning proton beam therapy (RGPT) system with inserted fiducial markers can irradiate a moving tumor with high accuracy. As gated treatments increase the beam delivery time, this study aimed to investigate the frequency of intra-field adjustments corresponding to the baseline shift or drift and the beam delivery efficiency of a synchrotron-based RGPT system. Data from 118 patients corresponding to 127 treatment plans and 2810 sessions between October 2016 and March 2019 were collected. We quantitatively analyzed the proton beam delivery time, the difference between the ideal beam delivery time based on a simulated synchrotron magnetic excitation pattern and the actual treatment beam delivery time, frequency corresponding to the baseline shift or drift, and the gating efficiency of the synchrotron-based RGPT system according to the proton beam delivery machine log data. The mean actual beam delivery time was 7.1 min, and the simulated beam delivery time in an ideal environment with the same treatment plan was 2.9 min. The average difference between the actual and simulated beam delivery time per session was 4.3 min. The average frequency of intra-field adjustments corresponding to baseline shift or drift and beam delivery efficiency were 21.7% and 61.8%, respectively. Based on our clinical experience with a synchrotron-based RGPT system, we determined the frequency corresponding to baseline shift or drift and the beam delivery efficiency using the beam delivery machine log data. To maintain treatment accuracy within ± 2.0 mm, intra-field adjustments corresponding to baseline shift or drift were required in approximately 20% of cases. Further improvements in beam delivery efficiency may be realized by shortening the beam delivery time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaya Tamura
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Sodai Tanaka
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi M Ito
- Department of Statistical Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuto Matsuo
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamura
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kenji Horita
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Proton Beam Therapy, Research Center for Cooperative Projects, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee HH, Park YK, Duan X, Jia X, Jiang S, Yang M. Convolutional neural network based proton stopping-power-ratio estimation with dual-energy CT: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:215016. [PMID: 32736368 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abab57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has shown a great potential for lowering range uncertainties, which is necessary for truly leveraging the Bragg peak in proton therapy. However, analytical stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation methods have limitations in resolving the influence from the beam-hardening artifact, i.e. CT number variation of the same object scanned under different imaging conditions, such as different patient size and location in the field-of-view (FOV). We present a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework to estimate proton SPR that accounts for patient geometry variation and addresses CT number variation. The proposed framework was tested on both prostate and head-and-neck (HN) patient datasets. Simulated CT images were used in order to have a well-defined ground-truth SPR for evaluation. Two training scenarios were evaluated: training with patient CT images (ideal scenario) and training with computational phantoms (realistic scenario). For the training in ideal scenario, computational phantoms were created based on 120 kVp patient CT images using a custom-defined density and material translation curve. Then, 80 kVp and 150 kVp Sn DECT image pairs were obtained using ray-tracing simulation, and their corresponding SPR was calculated from the known density and elemental compositions. For the training in realistic scenario, computational phantoms were created based on the geometry of calibration phantoms. For both scenarios, evaluation was performed on the phantoms created from patient CT images. Compared to a conventional parametric model, U-net trained with computational phantoms (realistic scenario) reduced the SPR estimation uncertainty (95th percentile) of the prostate patient from 1.10% to 0.71%, and HN patient from 2.11% to 1.20%. With the U-net trained with patient images (ideal scenario) uncertainty values were 0.32% and 0.42% for prostate and HN patients, respectively. These results suggest that CNN has great potential to improve the accuracy of SPR estimation in proton therapy by incorporating individual patient geometry information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Hc Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Teoh S, Fiorini F, George B, Vallis KA, Van den Heuvel F. Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 152:151-162. [PMID: 31431365 PMCID: PMC7707354 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE To use a model-based approach to identify a sub-group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer who would benefit from proton therapy compared to photon therapy for reduction of cardiac toxicity. MATERIAL/METHODS Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and robust-optimised intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated for twenty patients with locally advanced lung cancer to give a dose of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 35 fractions. Cases were selected to represent a range of anatomical locations of disease. Contouring, treatment planning and organs-at-risk constraints followed RTOG-1308 protocol. Whole heart and ub-structure doses were compared. Risk estimates of grade⩾3 cardiac toxicity were calculated based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models which incorporated dose metrics and patients baseline risk-factors (pre-existing heart disease (HD)). RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in target coverage between VMAT and IMPT. IMPT delivered lower doses to the heart and cardiac substructures (mean, heart V5 and V30, P < .05). In VMAT plans, there were statistically significant positive correlations between heart dose and the thoracic vertebral level that corresponded to the most inferior limit of the disease. The median level at which the superior aspect of the heart contour began was the T7 vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference in dose (mean, V5 and V30) to the heart and all substructures (except mean dose to left coronary artery and V30 to sino-atrial node) when disease overlapped with or was inferior to the T7 vertebrae. In the presence of pre-existing HD and disease overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae, the mean estimated relative risk reduction of grade⩾3 toxicities was 24-59%. CONCLUSION IMPT is expected to reduce cardiac toxicity compared to VMAT by reducing dose to the heart and substructures. Patients with both pre-existing heart disease and tumour and nodal spread overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae are likely to benefit most from proton over photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Teoh
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7LE, UK.
| | - F Fiorini
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7LE, UK
| | - B George
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7LE, UK
| | - K A Vallis
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7LE, UK
| | - F Van den Heuvel
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7LE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jie AW, Marignol L. Pro-con of proton: Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulation over passive scatter for thoracic malignancies. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:37-46. [PMID: 32954018 PMCID: PMC7486544 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) results in significant reduction of dose to organ at risk. Improving plan robustness mitigates interplay effects. Blanket use of small spots on a group of patients may severely worsen interplay in selected patients. Hypofractionated regimes have fewer interplay effects in both fractional and overall simulations. Randomised control trials are required before any clinical benefit of IMPT can be confirmed.
The use of passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) or intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) opens the potential for dose escalation or critical structure sparing in thoracic malignancies. While the latter offers greater dose conformality, dose distributions are subjected to greater uncertainties, especially due to interplay effects. Exploration in this area is warranted to determine if there is any dosimetric advantages in using IMPT for thoracic malignancies. This review aims to both compare organs-at-risk sparing and plan robustness between PSPT and IMPT and examine the mitigation strategies for the reduction of interplay effects currently available. Early evidence suggests that IMPT is dosimetrically superior to PSPT in thoracic malignancies. Randomised control trials are required before any clinical benefit of IMPT can be confirmed.
Collapse
Key Words
- BSPTV, Beam Specific Planning Target Volume
- CT, Computed Tomography
- DIBH, Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold
- Dosimetry
- EUD, Equivalent Uniform Dose
- HI, Homogeneity Index
- IMPT, Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
- IMRT, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
- ITV, Internal Target Volume
- Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT)
- Interplay
- MFO, Multi Field Optimisation
- MU, Monitor Unit
- NSCLC, Non-Small-Cell Lung cancer
- OAR, Organ-At-Risk
- Organ at risks
- PSPT, Passively Scattered Proton Therapy
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- Passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT)
- RT, Radiation Therapy
- SFO, Single Field Optimisation
- SFUD, Single Field Uniform Dose
- Thoracic malignancies
- iCTV, Internal Clinical Target Volume
- iGTV/HU, Internal Gross Tumour Volume/Hounsfield Unit
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ang Wei Jie
- Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laure Marignol
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ieko Y, Kadoya N, Kanai T, Nakajima Y, Arai K, Kato T, Ito K, Miyasaka Y, Takeda K, Iwai T, Nemoto K, Jingu K. The impact of 4DCT-ventilation imaging-guided proton therapy on stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. Radiol Phys Technol 2020; 13:230-237. [PMID: 32537735 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-020-00572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Functional lung avoidance during radiotherapy can help reduce pulmonary toxicity. This study assessed the potential impact of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-ventilation imaging-guided proton radiotherapy (PT) on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) by comparing it with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which employ photon beams. Thirteen lung cancer patients who received SBRT with 3D-CRT were included in the study. 4DCT ventilation was calculated using the patients' 4DCT data, deformable image registration, and a density-change-based algorithm. Three functional treatment plans sparing the functional lung regions were developed for each patient using 3D-CRT, VMAT, and PT. The prescribed doses and dose constraints were based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0618 protocol. We evaluated the region of interest (ROI) and functional map-based dose-function metrics for 4DCT ventilation and the irradiated dose. Using 3D-CRT, VMAT, and PT, the percentages of the functional lung regions that received ≥ 5 Gy (fV5) were 26.0%, 21.9%, and 10.7%, respectively; the fV10 were 14.4%, 11.4%, and 9.0%, respectively; and fV20 were 6.5%, 6.4%, and 6.6%, respectively, and the functional mean lung doses (fMLD) were 5.6 Gy, 5.2 Gy, and 3.8 Gy, respectively. These results indicated that PT resulted in a significant reduction in fMLD, fV5, and fV10, but not fV20. The use of PT reduced the radiation to highly functional lung regions compared with those for 3D-CRT and VMAT while meeting all dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiro Ieko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.,Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
| | - Takayuki Kanai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yujiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Arai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.,Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan.,Preparing Section for New Facility of Medical Science, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Yuya Miyasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.,Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Ken Takeda
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takeo Iwai
- Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cao H, Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Kwong T, Danish SF, Weiner J, Wang X, Yue N, Dai Z, Kuang Y, Bai Y, Nie K. Dosimetric comparisons of different hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy techniques in treating intracranial tumors > 3 cm in longest diameter. J Neurosurg 2020; 132:1024-1032. [PMID: 30901747 DOI: 10.3171/2018.12.jns181578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors sought to compare the dosimetric quality of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in treating sizeable brain tumors across the following treatment platforms: GammaKnife (GK) Icon, CyberKnife (CK) G4, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on the Varian TrueBeam STx, double scattering proton therapy (DSPT) on the Mevion S250, and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) on the Varian ProBeam. METHODS In this retrospective study, stereotactic radiotherapy treatment plans were generated for 10 patients with sizeable brain tumors (> 3 cm in longest diameter) who had been treated with VMAT. Six treatment plans, 20-30 Gy in 5 fractions, were generated for each patient using the same constraints for each of the following radiosurgical methods: 1) GK, 2) CK, 3) coplanar arc VMAT (VMAT-C), 4) noncoplanar arc VMAT (VMAT-NC), 5) DSPT, and 6) IMPT. The coverage; conformity index; gradient index (GI); homogeneity index; mean and maximum point dose of organs at risk; total dose volume (V) in Gy to the normal brain for 2 Gy (V2), 5 Gy (V5), and 12 Gy (V12); and integral dose were compared across all platforms. RESULTS Among the 6 techniques, GK consistently produced a sharper dose falloff despite a greater central target dose. GK gave the lowest GI, with a mean of 2.7 ± 0.1, followed by CK (2.9 ± 0.1), VMAT-NC (3.1 ± 0.3), and VMAT-C (3.5 ± 0.3). The highest mean GIs for the proton beam treatments were 3.8 ± 0.4 for DSPT and 3.9 ± 0.4 for IMPT. The GK consistently targeted the lowest normal brain volume, delivering 5 to 12 Gy when treating relatively smaller- to intermediate-sized lesions (less than 15-20 cm3). Yet, the differences across the 6 modalities relative to GK decreased with the increase of target volume. In particular, the proton treatments delivered the lowest V5 to the normal brain when the target size was over 15-20 cm3 and also produced the lowest integral dose to the normal brain regardless of the target size. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an insightful understanding of dosimetric quality from both photon and proton treatment across the most advanced stereotactic radiotherapy platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbin Cao
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyan Xiao
- 2Proton Therapy Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Yin Zhang
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Tiffany Kwong
- 4Department of Radiological Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Shabbar F Danish
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Joseph Weiner
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Xiao Wang
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Ning Yue
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Zhitao Dai
- 6Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; and
| | - Yu Kuang
- 7Department of Medical Physics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - Yongrui Bai
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Nie
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kato M, Dobashi S, Kato T, Kato R, Masaki K, Arai K, Komori S, Oyama S, Endo H, Wada H, Murakami M, Takeda K. [Influence and Countermeasure of Respiratory Motion on Matchline Profile of Field Matching Technique in Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Esophageal Cancer]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2019; 75:1383-1393. [PMID: 31866636 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_jsrt_75.12.1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of change in respiratory motion on matchline (ML) and reduction of the effect by increasing ML levels of field matching technique in passive scattering proton therapy for esophageal cancer. To evaluate the influence of respiratory motion in terms of stability, we measured relative dose around ML using a respiratory motion phantom. The relative error was -0.5% when the respiratory motion phantom worked stable, whereas there was obvious change that the relative error was -25.5% when the difference of amplitude between upper field and lower field was one side 3 mm on each cranially and caudally direction. In clinical case of the seven esophageal cancer patients simulated by the treatment planning system, assuming the difference of amplitude was 3 mm, the relative error of maximum (minimum) dose in clinical target volume around ML against the original treatment plan were 5.8±1.2% (-6.0±2.7%), 3.3±0.9% (-3.8±1.0%), and 2.4±0.5% (2.6±0.8%) on average (±SD) when ML levels were 2, 4, and 6, respectively. Increasing ML levels can reduce the influence of respiratory motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Kato
- Department of Radiology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience
| | - Suguru Dobashi
- Course of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University School of Medicine
| | - Takahiro Kato
- Department of Radiology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience.,Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences.,Preparing Section for New Faculty of Medical Science, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Ryohei Kato
- Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences
| | - Keita Masaki
- Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences
| | - Kazuhiro Arai
- Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences
| | - Shinya Komori
- Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiotherapy Quality Management, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neurosciences
| | - Hiromitsu Endo
- Department of Radiology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience
| | - Hitoshi Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience
| | - Ken Takeda
- Course of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Baumann KS, Flatten V, Weber U, Lautenschläger S, Eberle F, Zink K, Engenhart-Cabillic R. Effects of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue in proton therapy of lung cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:183. [PMID: 31653229 PMCID: PMC6814996 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1375-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To quantify the effects of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue on treatment plans of lung cancer patients with spot scanning proton therapy and to give a conservative approximation of these effects. Methods and materials Treatment plans of five lung cancer patients (tumors of sizes 2.7–46.4 cm3 at different depths in the lung) were optimized without consideration of the Bragg peak degradation. These treatment plans were recalculated with the Monte Carlo code TOPAS in two scenarios: in a first scenario, the treatment plans were calculated without including the Bragg peak degradation to reproduce the dose distribution predicted by the treatment-planning system (TPS). In a second scenario, the treatment plans were calculated while including the Bragg peak degradation. Subsequently, the plans were compared by means of Dmean, D98% and D2% in the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR). Furthermore, isodose lines were investigated and a gamma index analysis was performed. Results The Bragg peak degradation leads to a lower dose in the CTV and higher doses in OARs distal to the CTV compared to the prediction from the TPS. The reduction of the mean dose in the CTV was − 5% at maximum and − 2% on average. The deeper a tumor was located in the lung and the smaller its volume the bigger was the effect on the CTV. The enhancement of the mean dose in OARs distal to the CTV was negligible for the cases investigated. Conclusions Effects of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue were investigated for lung cancer treatment plans in proton therapy. This study confirms that these effects are clinically tolerable to a certain degree in the current clinical context considering the various more critical dose uncertainties due to motion and range uncertainties in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany. .,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany.
| | - Veronika Flatten
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany
| | - Uli Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Division, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Stefan Lautenschläger
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Eberle
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Zink
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, Germany.,Frankfurt Institute of Advanced Studies - FIAS, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ricardi U, Maraldo MV, Levis M, Parikh RR. Proton Therapy For Lymphomas: Current State Of The Art. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:8033-8046. [PMID: 31632057 PMCID: PMC6781741 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s220730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The combination of brief chemo-radiotherapy provides high cure rates and represents the first line of treatment for many lymphoma patients. As a result, a high proportion of long-term survivors may experience treatment-related toxic events many years later. Excess and unintended radiation dose to organs at risk (particularly heart, lungs and breasts) may translate in an increased risk of cardiovascular events and second cancers after a few decades. Minimizing dose to organs at risk is thus pivotal to restrain the risk of long-term complications. Proton therapy, with its peculiar physic properties, may help to better spare organs at risk and consequently to reduce toxicities especially in patients receiving mediastinal radiotherapy. Herein, we review the physical basis of proton therapy and the rationale for its implementation in lymphoma patients, with a detailed description of the clinical data. We also discuss the potential disadvantages and uncertainties of protons that may limit their application and critically review the dosimetric studies comparing the risk of late complications between proton and photon radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maja V Maraldo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Korevaar EW, Habraken SJM, Scandurra D, Kierkels RGJ, Unipan M, Eenink MGC, Steenbakkers RJHM, Peeters SG, Zindler JD, Hoogeman M, Langendijk JA. Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:267-274. [PMID: 31492443 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A planning target volume (PTV) in photon treatments aims to ensure that the clinical target volume (CTV) receives adequate dose despite treatment uncertainties. The underlying static dose cloud approximation (the assumption that the dose distribution is invariant to errors) is problematic in intensity modulated proton treatments where range errors should be taken into account as well. The purpose of this work is to introduce a robustness evaluation method that is applicable to photon and proton treatments and is consistent with (historic) PTV-based treatment plan evaluations. MATERIALS AND METHODS The limitation of the static dose cloud approximation was solved in a multi-scenario simulation by explicitly calculating doses for various treatment scenarios that describe possible errors in the treatment course. Setup errors were the same as the CTV-PTV margin and the underlying theory of 3D probability density distributions was extended to 4D to include range errors, maintaining a 90% confidence level. Scenario dose distributions were reduced to voxel-wise minimum and maximum dose distributions; the first to evaluate CTV coverage and the second for hot spots. Acceptance criteria for CTV D98 and D2 were calibrated against PTV-based criteria from historic photon treatment plans. RESULTS CTV D98 in worst case scenario dose and voxel-wise minimum dose showed a very strong correlation with scenario average D98 (R2 > 0.99). The voxel-wise minimum dose visualised CTV dose conformity and coverage in 3D in agreement with PTV-based evaluation in photon therapy. Criteria for CTV D98 and D2 of the voxel-wise minimum and maximum dose showed very strong correlations to PTV D98 and D2 (R2 > 0.99) and on average needed corrections of -0.9% and +2.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A practical approach to robustness evaluation was provided and clinically implemented for PTV-less photon and proton treatment planning, consistent with PTV evaluations but without its static dose cloud approximation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven J M Habraken
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Scandurra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel G J Kierkels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mirko Unipan
- Proton Therapy Centre South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roel J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie G Peeters
- Proton Therapy Centre South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap D Zindler
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yock AD, Mohan R, Flampouri S, Bosch W, Taylor PA, Gladstone D, Kim S, Sohn J, Wallace R, Xiao Y, Buchsbaum J. Robustness Analysis for External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans: Describing Uncertainty Scenarios and Reporting Their Dosimetric Consequences. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:200-207. [PMID: 30562614 PMCID: PMC6571070 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With external beam radiation therapy, uncertainties in treatment planning and delivery can result in an undesirable dose distribution delivered to the patient that can compromise the benefit of treatment. Techniques including geometric margins and probabilistic optimization have been used effectively to mitigate the effects of uncertainties. However, their broad application is inconsistent and can compromise the conclusions derived from cross-technique and cross-modality comparisons. METHODS AND MATERIALS Conventional methods to deal with treatment planning and delivery uncertainties are described, and robustness analysis is presented as a framework that is applicable across treatment techniques and modalities. RESULTS This report identifies elements that are imperative to include when conducting a robustness analysis and describing uncertainties and their dosimetric effects. CONCLUSION The robustness analysis approach described here is presented to promote reliable plan evaluation and dose reporting, particularly during clinical trials conducted across institutions and treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam D Yock
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Radhe Mohan
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stella Flampouri
- University of Florida, Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Paige A Taylor
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Gladstone
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hannover, New Hampshire
| | - Siyong Kim
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jason Sohn
- Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ying Xiao
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeff Buchsbaum
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Arjomandy B, Taylor P, Ainsley C, Safai S, Sahoo N, Pankuch M, Farr JB, Yong Park S, Klein E, Flanz J, Yorke ED, Followill D, Kase Y. AAPM task group 224: Comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance. Med Phys 2019; 46:e678-e705. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bijan Arjomandy
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren‐Flint McLaren Proton Therapy Center Flint MI USA
| | - Paige Taylor
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | | | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen Switzerland
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center Warrenville IL USA
| | - Jonathan B. Farr
- Applications of Detectors and Accelerators to Medicine 1217Meyrin Switzerland
| | | | - Eric Klein
- Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI USA
| | - Jacob Flanz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Burr Proton Therapy Center Boston MA
- Harvard Medical School Cambridge MA USA
| | | | - David Followill
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Yuki Kase
- Proton Therapy Division Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Beaton L, Bandula S, Gaze MN, Sharma RA. How rapid advances in imaging are defining the future of precision radiation oncology. Br J Cancer 2019; 120:779-790. [PMID: 30911090 PMCID: PMC6474267 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0412-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging has an essential role in the planning and delivery of radiotherapy. Recent advances in imaging have led to the development of advanced radiotherapy techniques—including image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy and proton beam therapy. The optimal use of imaging might enable higher doses of radiation to be delivered to the tumour, while sparing normal surrounding tissues. In this article, we review how the integration of existing and novel forms of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have transformed tumour delineation in the radiotherapy planning process, and how these advances have the potential to allow a more individualised approach to the cancer therapy. Recent data suggest that imaging biomarkers that assess underlying tumour heterogeneity can identify areas within a tumour that are at higher risk of radio-resistance, and therefore potentially allow for biologically focussed dose escalation. The rapidly evolving concept of adaptive radiotherapy, including artificial intelligence, requires imaging during treatment to be used to modify radiotherapy on a daily basis. These advances have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce radiation-related long-term toxicities. We outline how recent technological advances in both imaging and radiotherapy delivery can be combined to shape the future of precision radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Beaton
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Bandula
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.,NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. .,NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Haas-Kogan D, Indelicato D, Paganetti H, Esiashvili N, Mahajan A, Yock T, Flampouri S, MacDonald S, Fouladi M, Stephen K, Kalapurakal J, Terezakis S, Kooy H, Grosshans D, Makrigiorgos M, Mishra K, Poussaint TY, Cohen K, Fitzgerald T, Gondi V, Liu A, Michalski J, Mirkovic D, Mohan R, Perkins S, Wong K, Vikram B, Buchsbaum J, Kun L. National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 101:152-168. [PMID: 29619963 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning. CONCLUSIONS Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kry Stephen
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanne Kooy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mike Makrigiorgos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kavita Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tina Young Poussaint
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Children's Hospital of Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angles, California
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jeff Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Larry Kun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Potential for Improvements in Robustness and Optimality of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer with 4-Dimensional Robust Optimization. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11010035. [PMID: 30609652 PMCID: PMC6356681 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major challenges in the application of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for lung cancer patients include the uncertainties associated with breathing motion, its mitigation and its consideration in IMPT optimization. The primary objective of this research was to evaluate the potential of four-dimensional robust optimization (4DRO) methodology to make IMPT dose distributions resilient to respiratory motion as well as to setup and range uncertainties; Methods: The effect of respiratory motion, characterized by different phases of 4D computed tomography (4DCT), was incorporated into an in-house 4DRO system. Dose distributions from multiple setup and range uncertainty scenarios were calculated for each of the ten phases of CT datasets. The 4DRO algorithm optimizes dose distributions to achieve target dose coverage and normal tissue sparing for multiple setup and range uncertainty scenarios as well as for all ten respiratory phases simultaneously. IMPT dose distributions of ten lung cancer patients with different tumor sizes and motion magnitudes were optimized to illustrate our approach and its potential; Results: Compared with treatment plans generated using the conventional planning target volume (PTV)-based optimization and 3D robust optimization (3DRO), plans generated by 4DRO were found to have superior clinical target volume coverage and dose robustness in the face of setup and range uncertainties as well as for respiratory motion. In most of the cases we studied, 4DRO also resulted in more homogeneous target dose distributions. Interestingly, such improvements were found even for cases in which moving diaphragms intruded into the proton beam paths; Conclusion: The incorporation of respiratory motion, along with setup and range uncertainties, into robust optimization, has the potential to improve the resilience of target and normal tissue dose distributions in IMPT plans in the face of the uncertainties considered. Moreover, it improves the optimality of plans compared to PTV-based optimization as well as 3DRO.
Collapse
|
50
|
Zhang S, Han D, Williamson JF, Zhao T, Politte DG, Whiting BR, O’Sullivan JA. Experimental implementation of a joint statistical image reconstruction method for proton stopping power mapping from dual-energy CT data. Med Phys 2019; 46:273-285. [PMID: 30421790 PMCID: PMC6519926 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To experimentally commission a dual-energy CT (DECT) joint statistical image reconstruction (JSIR) method, which is built on a linear basis vector model (BVM) of material characterization, for proton stopping power ratio (SPR) estimation. METHODS The JSIR-BVM method builds on the relationship between the energy-dependent photon attenuation coefficients and the proton stopping power via a pair of BVM component weights. The two BVM component images are simultaneously reconstructed from the acquired DECT sinograms and then used to predict the electron density and mean excitation energy (I-value), which are required by the Bethe equation for SPR computation. A post-reconstruction image-based DECT method, which utilizes the two separate CT images reconstructed via the scanner's software, was implemented for comparison. The DECT measurement data were acquired on a Philips Brilliance scanner at 90 and 140 kVp for two phantoms of different sizes. Each phantom contains 12 different soft and bony tissue surrogates with known compositions. The SPR estimation results were compared to the reference values computed from the known compositions. The difference of the computed water equivalent path lengths (WEPL) across the phantoms between the two methods was also compared. RESULTS The overall root-mean-square (RMS) of SPR estimation error of the JSIR-BVM method are 0.33% and 0.37% for the head- and body-sized phantoms, respectively, and all SPR estimates of the test samples are within 0.7% of the reference ground truth. The image-based method achieves overall RMS errors of 2.35% and 2.50% for the head- and body-sized phantoms, respectively. The JSIR-BVM method also reduces the pixel-wise random variation by 4-fold to 6-fold within homogeneous regions compared to the image-based method. The average differences between the JSIR-BVM method and the image-based method are 0.54% and 1.02% for the head- and body-sized phantoms, respectively. CONCLUSION By taking advantage of an accurate polychromatic CT data model and a model-based DECT statistical reconstruction algorithm, the JSIR-BVM method accounts for both systematic bias and random noise in the acquired DECT measurement data. Therefore, the JSIR-BVM method achieves good accuracy and precision on proton SPR estimation for various tissue surrogates and object sizes. In contrast, the experimentally achievable accuracy of the image-based method may be limited by the uncertainties in the image formation process. The result suggests that the JSIR-BVM method has the potential for more accurate SPR prediction compared to post-reconstruction image-based methods in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangyue Zhang
- Department of Electrical and Systems EngineeringWashington UniversitySt. LouisMO63130USA
| | - Dong Han
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVA23298USA
| | | | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisMO63110USA
| | - David G. Politte
- Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisMO63110USA
| | - Bruce R. Whiting
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPA15213USA
| | - Joseph A. O’Sullivan
- Department of Electrical and Systems EngineeringWashington UniversitySt. LouisMO63130USA
| |
Collapse
|