Significance of dose in postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Factors Influencing Long-Term Local Recurrence, Distant Metastasis, and Survival in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities Treated with Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic factors for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (ESTSs) treated with multimodal surgery and radiotherapy (RT) remain a subject of debate across diverse and heterogeneous studies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed nonmetastatic ESTS patients treated with RT between 2007 and 2020 in Strasbourg, France. We assessed local control (LC), distant control (DC), overall survival (OS), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients diagnosed with localized ESTS were included. The median age was 64 years (range 21-94 years). ESTS primarily occurred proximally (74.6%) and in the lower limbs (71%). Most tumors were grade 2-3 (71.1%), deep-seated (86.4%), and had R0 margins (63.9%). Most patients were treated with helical tomotherapy (79.3%). The median biologically effective dose (BED) prescribed was 75 BEDGy4 (range 45.0-109.9). The median follow-up was 5.5 years. The 5- and 10-year LC, DC, and OS rates were 91.7%, 76.8%, and 83.8% and 84.2%, 74.1%, and 77.6%, respectively. According to the univariate analysis, LC was worse for patients who received less than 75 BEDGy4 (p = 0.015). Deep tumors were associated with worse OS (p < 0.05), and grade 2-3 and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) were linked to both shorter DC and shorter OS (p < 0.05). IMRT was associated with longer LC than 3DRT (p = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with liposarcoma had better OS (p < 0.05) and that patients with distant relapse had shorter OS (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

RT associated with surgical resection was well tolerated and was associated with excellent long-term rates of LC, DC, and OS. Compared with 3DRT, IMRT improved local control. Liposarcoma was a favorable prognostic factor for OS. Intermediate- and high-grade tumors and deep tumors were associated with lower DC and OS.

Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity and abdominal wall. This is the retrospective analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained data base from a single institute. We identified 79 patients with intermediate- to high-grade soft tissue sarcomas who were treated at our institute between Jan 2015 and July 2018. Low-grade tumors were excluded. There were 60 males and 19 females with a mean age of 44.6 years. Of the 79 sarcomas, 50 were in the lower limb and 24 in the upper limb and 5 were in abdominal wall. The commonest subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 21) and synovial sarcoma (n = 19). Only 9 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. All 79 patients underwent surgical resection with an intent to achieve clear margins. Amputation was done in 19 patients while wide excision of the tumor was done in 60 patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 49 patients while adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 35 patients. At last follow-up (73 patients), 48 patients are alive without disease, 9 are alive with disease, 12 patients had died of disease, and 4 patients died due to other causes. Overall survival (OS) for 3 year is 77.6%, and estimated mean survival is 55.05 months. Relapse-free surviva (RFS)l at 3 year is 74.3%, and estimated mean RFS is 51.78. The only independent factor that affected the OS was the dimension of primary tumor (p = 0.02). For disease-free survival, the independent factors that affected outcome were stage at presentation (p = 0.04) and dimension of the tumor (p = 0.04). Short-term results shown by this study shows good outcome in patient with intermediate- to high-grade sarcomas when multidisciplinary approach is utilized for the management. Patients who had metastatic disease at presentation did worse than patients who did not.

Successful Management of Radiation-Associated Insufficiency Fracture of the Tibial Plateau with Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound

Patient: Female, 52-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Fracture

Symptoms: Knee pain

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Oncology

Dosimetric comparison between carbon, proton and photon radiation for renal retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma recurrence or metastasis after radical nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dosimetric difference between various modalities in the radiation treatment for renal retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma recurrence or metastasis (RRSTSRM) after radical nephrectomy, and assess the dosimetric advantage on protecting the organs at risk (OARs) in the carbon and proton radiotherapy for the patients with a single kidney.

METHODS

A total of 12 patients with RRSTSRM who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled in this study. Carbon, proton, and photon radiotherapy were implemented for treatment planning. The prescription dose was fulfilled by simultaneously integrated boosting technique, with giving the planning target volume-1 (PTV-1) 51Gy (RBE) and planning target volume-2 (PTV-2) 60 Gy (RBE). Doses in the patient's spinal cord, stomach, duodenum, bowel, colon, and contralateral kidney were evaluated. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the duodenum, bowel, colon, and contralateral kidney was derived under Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) estimation.

RESULTS

In the carbon plans, the percentage volume of 95% prescription dose (V95%) covering PTV-1 (PTV-2) was 95.93% ± 3.42% (95.61% ± 4.26%). No significant dosimetric difference on the target was obtained between the four radiation modalities (P > .05). The percentage volume of receiving 40 Gy (RBE) [V40Gy (RBE)] in the duodenum could be reduced from 12.94% ± 15.99% in the IMRT plans to 6.36% ± 8.79% (8.44% ± 12.35%) in the carbon (proton) plans (P < .05). The V40Gy (RBE) in the bowel could be reduced from 13.48% ± 13.12% in the IMRT plans to 7.04% ± 9.32% (7.34% ± 9.89%) in the carbon (proton) plans (P < .05). The mean value of NTCP for the duodenum was 0.43 ± 0.47 (0.45 ± 0.48) by using carbon (proton) radiation. The value was 0.05 (0.03) lower than the IMRT plans on average, with a reduction of 0.20 (0.13) for the patients with lesions <5 mm away from the duodenum. The mean doses of the contralateral kidney were 0.28 ± 0.37 Gy (RBE) [0.28 ± 0.40 Gy (RBE)] in the IMCT (IMPT) plans, which was 92.43% (92.43%) lower than the value in the IMRT plans respectively (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the conventional radiation techniques, particle radiotherapy of carbon and proton could significantly spare more OARs in the treatment for RRSTSRM after radical nephrectomy. Patients, especially those whose residuals are close to the duodenum would potentially benefit from the particle radiation therapy for RRSTSRM on the decrease in radiation-related side-effect.

Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.

Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas

Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.

The adequacy of resection margin for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas

OBJECTIVES

There remains no consensus on what constitutes an adequate margin of resection for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). We aimed to investigate the role of resection margins in millimetres for non-infiltrative STSs.

METHODS

502 patients who underwent surgical resection for a localized, non-infiltrative, high-grade STSs were studied. The prognostic significance of margin width was analysed and compared with the conventional R- and R+1-classification of surgical margins.

RESULTS

The overall local recurrence (LR) rate was 13%; 9% and 27% with negative and positive margins, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with negative margins, the LR rates were greater than 10% in patients with margins ≤5.0 mm but reduced to less than 4% with margins >5.0 mm. When classified by the R- (or R+1)-classification, the 5-year cumulative LR incidence was 8%, 23% (16%), and 31% for R0, R1, and R2, respectively, which did not stratify the LR risk with negative margins. On the other hand, an accurate risk stratification was possible by metric distance; the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 29%, 10%, and 1% with 0 mm, 0.1-5.0 mm, and >5.0 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). This classification also stratified the LR risk in patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

While a negative margin is essential to optimize local control in patients with non-infiltrative STSs, surgical margin width greater than 5 mm minimises the risk of local failure regardless of the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Prognostic factors for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with postoperative pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a large, single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the prognostic factors in surgical and adjuvant care for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas after surgery followed by high-dose pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT).

METHODS

From 1997 to 2016, 155 patients (61 female patients; median age 55 years) with spinal (cervical, n = 61; thoracic, n = 29; lumbar, n = 13; sacral, n = 46; pelvic, n = 6) classic chordomas (n = 116) and chondrosarcomas (n = 39; most were low grade) were treated with maximal safe resection followed by PBS-PT (median dose prescribed: 74 Gy [relative biological effectiveness], range 48.6-77 Gy). The majority of patients (n = 153, 98.7%) had undergone at least 1 resection prior to PBS-PT (median 1, range 0-5; biopsy only, n = 2). Fewer than half (45.1%) of the surgeries were rated as gross-total resections (GTRs) prior to PBS-PT. Surgical stabilization (SS) was present in 39% of all patients (n = 60). Ninety-one patients (59%) presented with macroscopic tumor at the start of PBS-PT. The median follow-up duration was 64.7 months (range 12.2-204.8 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year local tumor control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were 64.9% (95% CI 56.3%-73.5%), 59.4% (95% CI 50.6%-68.2%), and 77.9% (95% CI 70.6%-85.2%), respectively. In total, 63 patients (40.6%) experienced failure during the follow-up period: local only in 32 (20.6%), distal only in 7 (4.5%), local + distal in 19 (12.3%), surgical pathway failure (SPF) only in 2 (1.3%), local + SPF in 2 (1.3%), and distal + SPF in 1 (< 1%). Univariate analysis identified gross residual disease, the presence of SS, and treatment era prior to 2008 as highly significant for worse outcome, with all 3 remaining significant on multivariate analysis. The type of surgery (GTR or subtotal resection/biopsy) and whether GTR was achieved by en bloc or curettage did not show a significant prognostic effect. Surgical complications prior to PBS-PT were present in 42.5% of all surgically treated patients and were seen more commonly in patients with multiple surgical interventions (p = 0.005) and those operated on with the intent of en bloc resection (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of resection and metallic stabilization substantially influenced clinical outcomes for patients with spinal chordoma or chondrosarcoma despite high-dose adjuvant PBS-PT. Optimal upfront surgical management of these tumors continues to include GTR, as possible, with prompt adjuvant proton therapy.

Multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: An update

Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma, based on complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not substantially changed during the last several decades. Nevertheless, recent advances have contributed to considerable improvement in the management of these patients; for example, new magnetic resonance imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can better assess tumor extension and even estimate its grade. Detection of circulating genetic material (liquid biopsy) and next-generation sequencing are powerful techniques for genetic analysis, which will increase our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and may reveal potential therapeutic targets. The role of chemotherapy in non-metastatic disease is still controversial, and there is a need to identify patients who really benefit from this treatment. Novel chemotherapeutic regimens have entered clinical praxis and can change the outcome of patients with metastatic disease. Advances in radiotherapy have helped decrease local adverse effects and sustain good local control of the disease. The following report provides an updated view of the diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives on the management of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

The radiation dose-response of non-retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins: An NCDB analysis

OBJECTIVES

Positive margins can increase the risk of local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Utilizing a national registry, we investigated patterns of care and overall survival (OS) of patients with margin-positive non-retroperitoneal STS who received preoperative radiation therapy, adjuvant radiation therapy, or both.

METHODS

Adult patients with non-retroperitoneal STS who underwent resection and RT from 2004 to 2015 were included. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 5726 patients. Most had a tumor size >5 cm (60%), grade 3 disease (67%), and microscopically positive margins (57%). Compared to ≤50.4 Gy, a dose of 66 to 69.99 Gy was associated with decreased risk of death on multivariate analysis (HR 0.69, 95%; CI, 0.50-0.94). Receipt of a boost was associated with decreased risk of death on univariate analysis (HR 0.54, 95%; CI, 0.29-0.99). In patients with grade 2 to 3 tumors without the gross disease, there was an OS benefit associated with a boost on multivariate analysis (HR 0.39, 95%; CI, 0.16-0.97).

CONCLUSION

This analysis appears to show an OS benefit of dose escalation to 66 to 69 Gy for margin-positive non-retroperitoneal STS. A Postoperative boost is associated with higher OS in grade 2 to 3 STS without the gross disease.

Adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy for newly diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: outcome and toxicity evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of toxicity and local control (LC) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2016, 109 patients were treated, initially using 3DCRT and subsequently with VMAT. Clinical outcome was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI, thoracic and abdominal CT 3 months after treatments and then every 6 months. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v. 4.3.

RESULTS

Patients presented Stage III soft tissue sarcoma disease (77%), localized tumor (95%) at the lower extremity (87%), adipocytic histotype (46%). Surgical resection was performed in all patients, followed by adjuvant 3DCRT in 38, and VMAT in 71. The median total dose was 66 Gy/33 fractions (range 60-70 Gy;25-35 fractions). More successful bone sparing was recorded using VMAT (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 61 months, 93 and 58 months for 3DCRT and VMAT group, respectively. The 2- and 5 year LC were 95.3±2.1%, and 87.4±3.4% for the whole cohort, 92.0±4.5%, 82.9±6.4% for 3DCRT, 97.1±2.0%, 89.6±4.1% for VMAT (p = 0.150). On univariate and multivariate analysis the factors recorded as conditioning LC were the status of the surgical resection margins (p = 0.028) and the total dose delivered (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The availability of modern radiotherapy technique permit a better conformity on the target with maximum sparing of normal tissue and acceptable side-effects. VMAT is a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, compared to 3DCRT. Results on LC of VMAT are encouraging.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities can benefit from the use of VMAT, with a reduction of the high dose to bones to avoid radiation osteonecrosis. An adequate total dose of at least 66 Gy and a radical surgical margin allow a good local control.

Using Image-guided Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy on Patients With Head and Neck Soft-tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) is increasingly being used to treat patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the head and neck. Although there is no comparison between IMRT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) concerning their efficacy. In this analysis, we compared CRT and IMRT outcomes for head and neck STS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent radiotherapy between 1994 and 2017 were identified.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31 months. Of the 67 patients, 34% were treated with CRT technique and 66% with IG-IMRT. The locoregional relapse rate following IMRT was 21% versus 70% with CRT (p<0.001) and the 5-year locoregional control was 69% versus 28%, respectively (p=0.01). IG-IMRT was associated with non-significant, less acute, and chronic adverse events. In the multivariate analysis, a significant influence of radiation technique on locoregional control was confirmed (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

IG-IMRT seems to be associated both with higher locoregional control as well as lower acute and chronic toxicities.

LONG-TERM RESULTS OF EXTREMITY SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS LIMB-SPARING SURGERY AND RADIOTHERAPY

Objective:

To assess the prognostic factors and results of limb sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with non-metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities.

Methods:

Between 1980-2007, 114 extremity-located STS treated with PORT were analyzed retrospectively. Tumors were mostly localized in the lower extremities (71,9%). The median radiotherapy (RT) dose was 60.9 Gy. Chemotherapy was administered to 37.7% of the patients. Tumor sizes were between 3-26 cm (median 7 cm). The three most frequent histological types included undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (26.3%), liposarcoma (25.4%), and synovial sarcoma (13.2%). The median follow-up for all patients was 60 months, and 81 months for survivors.

Results:

The 5- and 10-year local control (LC) rates were 77% and 70.4%, respectively; actuarial survival rates for 5 and 10 years were 71.8% and 69.1%, respectively. Increasing the dose above 60 Gy for all patients and the patients with positive margins demonstrated a clear benefit on 5-year LC (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively). Based on multivariate analysis, the addition of chemotherapy and RT dose were independent prognostic factors for LC. A recurrent presentation significantly affects the disease-free survival.

Conclusions:

PORT for STS of the extremities provides good long-term disease control with acceptable toxicity in a multidisciplinary approach. Level of evidence III, Retrospective study.

Primary Epithelioid Sarcoma of Orbit: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare high-grade malignancy identified by Enzinger in 1970. It accounts for 1% of all reported soft tissue sarcomas and presents most commonly in distal upper extremities in young adults with a male predominance. At this time, there are only 5 previously reported cases of primary epithelioid sarcoma of the orbit. We present a primary orbital epithelioid sarcoma case of a patient who underwent orbital exenteration followed by external beam radiation treatment. Because the literature is limited, this is to our knowledge the largest descriptive analysis of cases of orbital epithelioid sarcoma. We also provide a detailed review of all the previously reported primary orbital epithelioid sarcoma cases, as well as a discussion on the use of postoperative radiation therapy for patients with epithelioid sarcoma. Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy appears to be a safe option for local treatment of this rare malignancy, but further future studies are needed of this rare clinical situation in order to better understand and optimize treatment for patients with orbital epithelioid sarcoma.

Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy after Gross Total Resection in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION

We report a pooled analysis evaluating the combination of gross complete limb-sparing surgery, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS

Individual data of 259 patients (median follow-up 63 months) with extremity STS from three European expert centers were pooled. Median age was 55 years and median tumor size was 8 cm. Eighty percent of patients presented with primary disease, mainly located in the lower limb (81%). Union for International Cancer Control 7th edition stage at presentation was as follows: stage I: 9%; stage II: 47%; stage III: 39%; stage IV: 5%. Most patients showed high-grade lesions (91%), predominantly liposarcoma (31%). Median IOERT dose was 12 Gy, preceeded (17%) or followed (83%) by EBRT, with a median dose of 45 Gy.

RESULTS

Surgery resulted in R0 resections in 71% of patients and R1 resections in 29% of patients. The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 86%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were disease status and resection margin. Only margin remained significant in multivariate analysis. The 5-year distant control rate was 69%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were histology, grading, resection margin, and metastases prior to/at IOERT. Only grading and metastases remained significant in multivariate analysis. Actuarial 5-year rates of freedom from treatment failure and OS were 61% and 78%, respectively. Significant factors for OS were grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT (univariate, multivariate). Limb preservation and good functional outcome were achieved in 95% and 81% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis confirmed prior reports of encouraging LC and survival, with excellent rates of preserved limb function with this treatment approach. Resection margin remained the most important factor for LC, while grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT mainly predicted survival.

What Is the Effect of High-dose Radiation on Bone in Patients With Sacral Chordoma? A CT Study

BACKGROUND

Effects of high-dose radiation using protons and photons on bone are relatively unexplored, but high rates of insufficiency fractures are reported, and the causes of this are incompletely understood. Imaging studies with pre- and postradiation scans can help one understand the effect of radiation on bone.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of high-dose radiation on the trabecular density of bone in the sacrum using CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2015, we treated 57 patients (older then 18 years) with sacral chordoma. Fourteen (25%) of them were treated with radiation only. The general indication for this approach is inoperability resulting from tumor size. Forty-two (74%) patients were treated with transverse sacral resections and high-dose radiotherapy (using either protons or photons or a combination) before surgery and after surgery. During this time period, our indication for this approach generally was symptomatic sacral chordoma in which resection would prevent further growth and reasonable sacrifice of nerve roots was possible. Of those patients, 21 (50%) had CT scans both before and after radiation treatment. We used HU as a surrogate for bone density. CT uses HU to derive information on tissue and bone quantity. A recent study presented reference HU values for normal (mean 133 ± 38 HU), osteoporotic (101 ± 25 HU), and osteopenic bone (79 ± 32 HU). To adjust for scanning protocol-induced changes in HU, we calculated the ratio between bone inside and outside the radiation field rather than using absolute values. To assess the effect of radiation, we tested whether there was a difference in ratio (sacrum/L1) before and after radiation. A control measurement was performed (L2/L1) and also tested for a difference before and after radiation. Statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

The effects of radiation appeared confined to the intended field, because the bone density outside the treated field was not observed to decrease. The ratio of HU (a surrogate for bone density) in L2 relative to L1 did not change after radiotherapy (preradiation mean: 0.979 ± 0.009, postradiation mean: 0.980 ± 0.009, mean difference outside the radiation field: -0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.009 to 0.007, p = 0.799). The ratio of HU within the radiation field relative to L1 decreased after radiotherapy (preradiation mean: 0.895 ± 0.050, postradiation mean: 0.658 ± 0.050, mean difference inside the radiation field: 0.237, 95% CI, 0.187-0.287, p < 0.001), suggesting the bone density stayed the same outside the radiation field but decreased inside the radiation field.

CONCLUSIONS

Trabecular bone density decreased after high-dose radiation therapy in a small group of patients with sacral chordoma. High-dose radiation is increasingly gaining acceptance for treating sacral malignancies; further long-term prospective studies using calibrated CT scanners and preferably bone biopsies are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The Impact of Perioperative Chemotherapy Timing in Conjunction With Postoperative External-Beam Radiation Therapy on Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Outcome

PURPOSE

The perioperative management of primary extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (ESTS) is multidisciplinary including radiation therapy and chemotherapy (CT). The interplay between these modalities and the relative importance of each remain unclear. Our study aims to determine the relative impact of CT and radiotherapy on the outcome of ESTS patients treated with limb-sparing surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of ESTS registry yielded 97 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and/or adjuvant CT with or without external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2009. The cohort comprised 56 males and 41 females whose age at surgery ranged from 17 to 83 years (median, 56 y). Tumor characteristics included the following: 73 lower ESTS; 70 grade 3 lesions; 63 American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III tumors; and 27 lesions with positive microscopic margins. The following outcome parameters were evaluated for the patients' subgroups: overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

EBRT was delivered postoperatively to 81 patients and 49 received CT. Median EBRT dose was 63 Gy (range, 50 to 72 Gy). At median follow-up of 54.6 months, the 5-year OS, LRC, DFS was 68.9%, 87.1%, 66.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive surgical margins negatively impacted LRC, DFS, and OS (hazard ratio [HR]=10.43, P=0.004), (HR=2.37, P=0.03), (HR=2.26, P=0.038), respectively. EBRT use improved LRC (HR=0.24, P=0.018) and DFS (HR=0.36, P=0.021). The impact of EBRT on DFS was retained (HR=0.28, P=0.006) in the high-grade ESTS subgroup who received CT. The 5-year local failure rate was 6.5%, 28.6%, and 22.2% (P=0.019) for patient receiving NCT, adjuvant chemotherapy, and no CT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the use of NCT followed by limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant EBRT in ESTS for local failure reduction with a trend toward improved DFS.

Chondrosarcoma of the Osseous Spine: An Analysis of Epidemiology, Patient Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors Using the SEER Registry From 1973 to 2012

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the epidemiology and prognostic indicators in patients with chondrosarcoma of the osseous spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chondrosarcoma of the spine is rare, with limited data on its epidemiology, clinicopathologic features, and treatment outcomes. Therapy centers on complete en bloc resection with radiotherapy reserved for subtotal resection or advanced disease.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry was queried for patients with chondrosarcoma of the osseous spine from 1973 to 2012. Study variables included age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, size, grade, extent of disease, and treatment modality.

RESULTS

The search identified 973 cases of spinal chondrosarcoma. Mean age at diagnosis was 51.6 years, and 627% of patients were males. Surgical resection and radiotherapy were performed in 75.2% and 21.3% of cases, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of 53% and 64%, respectively, at 5 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age (OS, P < 0.001; DSS, P = 0.007), grade (OS, P < 0.001; DSS, P < 0.001), surgical resection (OS, P < 0.001; DSS, P < 0.001), and extent of disease (OS, P < 0.001; DSS, P < 0.001) were independent survival determinants; tumor size was an independent predictor of OS (P = 0.006). For confined disease, age (P = 0.013), decade of diagnosis (P = 0.023), and surgery (P = 0.017) were independent determinants of OS. For locally invasive disease, grade (OS, P < 0.001; DSS, P = 0.003), surgery (OS, P = 0.013; DSS, P = 0.046), and size (OS, P = 0.001, DSS, P = 0.002) were independent determinants of OS and DSS. Radiotherapy was an independent indicator of worse OS for both confined (P = 0.004) and locally invasive disease (P = 0.002). For metastatic disease, grade (OS, P = 0.021; DSS, P = 0.012) and surgery (OS, P = 0.007; DSS, P = 0.004) were survival determinants for both OS and DSS, whereas radiotherapy predicted improved OS (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection confers survival benefit in patients with chondrosarcoma of the spine independent of extent of disease. Radiotherapy improves survival in patients with metastatic disease and worsens outcomes in patients with confined and locally invasive disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Prognostic determinants and treatment outcomes analysis of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Osteosarcoma (OGS) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS) are the two classic primary malignant bone tumors. Due to the rarity of these tumors, evidence on demographics, survival determinants, and treatment outcomes for primary disease of the spine are limited and derived from small case series.

PURPOSE

To use population-level data to determine the epidemiology and prognostic indicators in patients with OGS and EWS of the osseous spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Large-scale retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients diagnosed with OGS and EWS of the spine in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1973 to 2012.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

METHODS

Two separate queries of the SEER registry were performed to identify patients with OGS and EWS of the osseous spine from 1973-2012. Study variables included age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, tumor size, extent of disease (EOD), and treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy. Primary outcome was defined as OS and DSS in months. Univariate survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The search identified 648 patients with primary OGS and 736 patients with primary EWS of the spine from 1973 to 2012. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.1 and 19.9 years for OGS and EWS, respectively, with OGS showing a bimodal distribution. The median OS and DSS were 1.3 and 1.7 years, respectively, for OGS, with OGS in Paget's disease having worse OS (0.7 years) relative to the mean (log-rank p=.006). The median OS and DSS for EWS were 3.9 and 4.3 years, respectively. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that age (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), decade of diagnosis (OS p=.049), surgical resection (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), and EOD (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001) were independent positive prognostic indicators for spinal OGS; radiation therapy predicted worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.10, p=.027) and DSS (HR 1.74, CI 1.13-2.66, p=.012) for OGS. For EWS, age (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), surgical resection (OS p=.030, DSS p=.046), tumor size (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001), and EOD (OS p<.001, DSS p<.001) were independent determinants of improved survival; radiation therapy trended toward improved survival but did not achieve statistical significance for both OS (HR 0.76, CI 0.54-1.07, p=.113) and DSS (0.76, CI 0.54, 1.08, p=.126).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, surgical resection, and EOD are key survival determinants for both OGS and EWS of the spine. Radiation therapy may be associated with worse outcomes in patients with OGS, and is of potential benefit in EWS. Overall prognosis has improved in patients with OGS of the spine over the last four decades.

[Radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: Technical evolution and impact on clinical benefit]

The standard treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas is based on the association of surgery and radiotherapy. This strategy allows local control improvement with the risk of increased toxicity. There is therefore a growing interest to identify those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy and those who will have the same local control with surgery alone. Furthermore, the development of toxicity has been correlated with the extension of the irradiated volume and the volume receiving high doses. Technological development as intensity modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy allows limited irradiated volume improving the protection of the organs at risk leading to clinical benefit improvement. Moreover, efforts are being done to improve local control for the patients at high risk of local relapse. In this paper, we discuss all these mentioned aspects.

The role of margins in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

For extremity soft tissue sarcomas, limb salvage is now standard of care. The extent of surgical margins is balanced with functionality of the resected limb. Although negative margins are the goal, the necessary width is unclear. Additional considerations for margin adequacy include presence of anatomic barriers such as fascia and periosteum, proximity of critical structures, receipt of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, and histologic subtype. Multidisciplinary team discussion is critical for treatment planning.

Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Management of Locally Recurrent Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose. To investigate the efficacy and morbidity of limb-sparing surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for patients with locally recurrent extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). Methods and Materials. Twenty-six consecutively treated patients were identified in a single institution retrospective analysis of patients with locally recurrent ESTS treated with IORT following salvage limb-sparing resection from May 2000 to July 2011. Fifteen (58%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) prior to recurrence (median dose 63 Gy), while 11 (42%) patients received EBRT following IORT (median dose 52 Gy). The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate disease control and survival and subsets were compared using a log rank statistic, Cox's regression model was used to determine independent predictors of disease outcome, and toxicity was reported according to CTCAE v4.0 guidelines. Results. With a median duration of follow-up from surgery and IORT of 34.9 months (range: 4 to 139 mos.), 10 patients developed a local recurrence with 4 subsequently undergoing amputation. The 5-year estimate for local control (LC) was 58% (95% CI: 36–75%), for amputation-free was 81% (95% CI: 57–93%), for metastasis-free control (MFC) was 56% (95% CI: 31–75%), for disease-free survival (DFS) was 35% (95% CI: 17–54%), and for overall survival (OS) was 50% (95% CI: 24–71%). Prior EBRT did not appear to influence disease control (LC, p = 0.74; MFC, p = 0.66) or survival (DFS, p = 0.16; OS, p = 0.58). Grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicities were reported for 6 (23%) and 8 (31%) patients, respectively. The frequency of both acute and late grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred equally between patients who received EBRT prior to or after IORT. Conclusions. IORT in combination with oncologic resection of recurrent ESTS yields good rates of local control and limb-salvage with acceptable morbidity. Within the limitations of small subsets, these data suggest that prior EBRT does not significantly influence disease control or toxicity.

Excellent local control and survival after postoperative or definitive radiation therapy for sarcomas of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

To report our results with postoperative or definitive radiation therapy in head and neck sarcomas.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 26 patients suffering from head and neck sarcomas, who received postoperative or definitive radiation therapy between 2003 and 2012. Median age was 64 years (19-88) and 69 % were male. Tumor locations were skull (including skin) in 31 %, paranasal sinus/orbita in 27 % and neck (including pharynx/larynx) in 42 %. Median tumor size was 4.6 cm (1-12 cm). 22 patients (85 %) presented in primary situation. Stage at presentation (UICC 7(th) for soft tissue sarcomas) was as follows: Ia:4 %, IIa:50 %, IIb:15 %, III:31 %. All except one patient suffered from high grade lesions (G2/3 FNCLCC), predominantly angiosarcoma (35 %), MFH (19 %) and synovial sarcoma (15 %). Surgery was performed in 21 pts (81 %), resulting in free margins in 10 (38 %), microscopically positive margins in 6 (23 %) and gross residual disease in 5 (19 %). Median dose to the primary tumor region was 66Gy (45-72Gy) in conventional fractionation, using 3D-CRT in 65 %, IMRT in 27 % and electrons in 8 %. 50 % of the patients also received sequential chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median follow up was 39 months (8-136). We observed three local recurrences, transferring into estimated 3- and 5-year local control rates of 86 %. One additional patient failed distantly, resulting in 3- and 5-year freedom from treatment failure rates of 82 %. Four patients have deceased, transferring into 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of 88 % and 82 %, respectively. Only two of the four deaths were sarcoma related. Maximum acute toxicity (CTCAE 3.0) was grade 1 in 27 % of the patients, grade 2 in 50 % and grade 3 in 23 %. Severe acute toxicity was mainly represented by mucositis and dysphagia. Maximum late toxicity was grade 1 in 31 %, grade 2 in 15 % and grade 3 in 19 % of the patients. Severe late toxicity included skin ulceration (n = 1), dysphagia with persistent tube dependency (n = 1), persistent sinusitis (n = 1) and hearing loss (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Excellent local control and overall survival rates can be achieved with postoperative or definitive radiation therapy with acceptable acute and late toxicities in patients suffering from sarcomas of the head and neck region.

Carbon Ion irradiation in the treatment of grossly incomplete or unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheaths tumors: acute toxicity and preliminary outcome

Background

To report our early experience with carbon ion irradiation in the treatment of gross residual or unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 11 patients (pts) with MPNST, who have been treated with carbon ion irradiation (C12) at our institution between 2010 and 2013. All pts had measurable gross disease at the initiation of radiation treatment. Median age was 47 years (29-79). Tumors were mainly located in the pelvic/sacral (5 pts) and sinunasal/orbital region (5 pts). 5 pts presented already in recurrent situation, 3 pts had been previously irradiated, and in 3 pts MPNST were neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated. Median cumulative dose was 60 GyE. Treatment was carried out either as a combination of IMRT plus C12 boost (4 pts) or C12 only (7 pts).

Results

Median follow-up was 17 months (3-31 months). We observed 3 local progressions, translating into estimated 1- and 2-year local control rates of 65%. One patient developed distant failure, resulting in estimated 1- and 2-year PFS rates of 56%. Two patients have died, therefore the estimated 1- and 2-year OS rates are 75%. Acute radiation related toxicities were generally mild, no grade 3 side effects were observed. Severe late toxicity (grade 3) was scored in 2 patients (trismus, wound healing delays).

Conclusion

Carbon ion irradiation yields very promising short term local control and overall survival rates with low morbidity in patients suffering from gross residual or unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and should be further investigated in a prospective trial.

Role of radiation therapy for non-extremity soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Negative surgical margins are uncommon for non-extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Radiation therapy is usually recommended to improve local control; however, appropriate RT dosing is challenging due to nearby dose-limiting normal structures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comprehensive literature search using PubMed (March 2014).

RESULTS

Data suggest radiation therapy is an important modality in maximizing local tumor control in non-extremity sarcomas.

CONCLUSION

The literature supports the use of RT to improve local control for non-extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Marginal miss or radioresistance? The pattern of local recurrence after operation and 3D planned radiation treatment in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and the limb girdles; an analysis based on image fusion

BACKGROUND

Most local recurrences have developed in the clinical target volume in previously published series after combined modality treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. However, marginal misses were seen in almost 20% of the patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the location of the recurrence and the total dose at the centre point of the local recurrence for future radiation therapy planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included only patients with images in digital form, during 1999-2006 (n = 17), treated for soft tissue sarcoma with combined surgical therapy and radiotherapy at Helsinki University Central Hospital. Image fusion was used to determine the location of the recurrence in relation to radiation therapy target.

RESULTS

In the present study utilising digital image fusion, in patients with 3D CT-based radiation treatment planning the risk of marginal miss was low as only one patient of 17 relapsed outside the target. Estimated mean radiation dose at the site of local recurrence was 49.1 Gy in patients with positive margins and 48.1 Gy in patients with negative margins.

CONCLUSION

The risk of marginal miss in soft tissue sarcoma is low after modern 3D planned radiation treatment combined with surgery. More generous use of boost might improve in-target local control.

Impact of margin status and local recurrence on soft-tissue sarcoma outcomes

BACKGROUND

The impact of local recurrence and surgical resection margin status on survival in extremity soft-tissue sarcomas remains to be clearly defined. Our aim was to conduct a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to determine the prognostic relevance of positive resection margins and local recurrence for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas for survival.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent resection of localized primary extremity soft-tissue sarcomas with curative intent were selected from the United States Department of Defense Automated Central Tumor Registry. Outcomes for local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed according to clinical, pathological, and treatment variables with use of the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) and the multivariate Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Positive margins (hazard ratio, 1.99 [95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 3.45]), local recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.93 [95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 6.23]), and distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 12.13 [95% confidence interval, 5.97 to 24.65]) were significantly associated with overall survival on multivariate Cox regression analysis. However, for disease-specific survival, local recurrence was not significant and tumor size of >10 cm (hazard ratio, 2.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 6.95]), positive margins (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 3.63]), and distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 9.46 [95% confidence interval, 4.37 to 20.47]) were independent adverse prognostic factors. The disease-specific survival rate for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcomas was 89% (95% confidence interval, 85% to 92%) for five years and 75% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 81%) for ten years.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive surgical margins are consistently associated with adverse survival-related outcomes in localized soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Local recurrence had a significant impact on overall survival, but not on disease-specific survival.

Patterns of local recurrence and dose fractionation of adjuvant radiation therapy in 462 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremity and trunk wall

PURPOSE

To study the impact of dose fractionation of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) on local recurrence (LR) and the relation of LR to radiation fields.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

LR rates were analyzed in 462 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical excision and adjuvant RT at five Scandinavian sarcoma centers from 1998 to 2009. Medical records were reviewed for dose fractionation parameters and to determine the location of the LR relative to the radiation portals.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 462 patients developed a LR (11.9%). Negative prognostic factors included intralesional surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-20.0), high malignancy grade (HR: 5.82, 95% CI: 1.31-25.8), age at diagnosis (HR per 10 years: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor histological subtype (HR: 6.66, 95% CI: 2.56-17.3). RT dose was tailored to margin status. No correlation between RT dose and LR rate was found in multiple Cox regression analysis. The majority (65%) of LRs occurred within the primary RT volume.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant dose-response effect of adjuvant RT was demonstrated. Interestingly, patients given 45-Gy accelerated RT (1.8 Gy twice daily/2.5 weeks) had the best local outcome. A total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions seemed adequate following wide margin surgery. The risk of LR was associated with histopathologic subtype, which should be included in the treatment algorithm of adjuvant RT in soft tissue sarcoma.

Prognostic factors of extremity soft tissue sarcoma in adults. A single institutional analysis

PURPOSE

To analyse the prognostic factors for patients treated with limb sparing surgery and radiation for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (E-STS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 87 patients with limb sparing surgery and radiation for E-STS were reviewed retrospectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated and factors potentially influencing these outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 69months, most recurrences occurred within the first 2years. Extent of resection margin was found to improve DFS (P=0.002) and DSS (P=0.002). Brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) improved DFS (P=0.034) and DSS (P=0.019). Tumor size (<10cm) was related to DSS (P=0.043) and its relation to DFS was almost significant (P=0.057). Short time interval between surgery and radiotherapy (≤50days) had an impact only on DSS (P=0.030).

CONCLUSION

Extent of resection margin and use of brachytherapy combined with EBRT seem to improve the prognosis of E-STS. Small tumor size and short time interval between radiotherapy and surgery seem also to improve the outcome of E-STS. This study was limited by inadequate power and low number of recurrences. Larger randomised studies are needed to confirm these results.

Risk factors for local recurrence and metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed our institution's experience in treating soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity to identify factors associated with local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival, to identify patients who may benefit from intensification of therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent both limb-sparing surgery and external beam radiotherapy for extremity sarcoma. Those who had gross residual disease or who presented with recurrent or metastatic disease were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier product limit and multivariate Cox regression were used to estimate local failure-free probability, distant failure-free probability, and overall survival along with associations with patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-five (13%) and 46 (24%) experienced local and distant recurrence, respectively. Patients with high/intermediate-grade tumors [hazard ratio (HR)=5.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-24.89, P=0.023] or with multifocally positive margins (HR=4.27, 95% CI: 1.20-15.24, P=0.026) were more likely to fail locally. Those with a preceding local recurrence (HR=8.58, 95% CI: 3.87-19.04, P<0.0001), high/intermediate-grade tumors (HR=5.68, 95% CI: 1.28-25.25, P=0.023), or no secondary reexcision (HR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.09-5.74, P=0.031) were more likely to develop metastasis. Patients with local recurrence (HR=3.6, 95% CI: 1.77-7.29, P<0.001), metastasis (HR=16.0, 95% CI: 7.93-32.31, P<0.0001), or without secondary reexcision (HR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.27-8.09, P=0.014) had decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients whose tumor grade or margin status put them at high risk for local failure should be considered for intensification of therapy. Those with a local recurrence should be considered for increased surveillance or systemic therapy, as local failure is associated with subsequent metastasis and decreased survival.

Perioperative irradiation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Adjuvant radiotherapy constitutes an important component of the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Extremity soft tissue sarcomas constitute a large proportion of this rare mesenchymal tumor. Questions regarding timing, techniques and toxicity come into play about optimizing adjuvant radiotherapy. This article will discuss recent trends and outcomes of perioperative, that is, preoperative and postoperative, irradiation.

A unique radiation scheme for the treatment of high-grade non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: the detroit medical center experience

PURPOSE

This is the initial report on the utilization of combined photon irradiation followed by a neutron boost irradiation for the initial management of patients with high-grade non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We present data on local control, complications, disease-free survival and overall survival in patients at high risk for local relapse.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1/1/1995 and 10/31/02, twenty-three patients with high-grade non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Detroit Medical Center. These patients were referred for consultation due to surgical margin status (tumor within 3mm of surgical margin (n=11)), or gross residual disease (n=12). There were 14 males and nine females whose ages ranged from 12 to 75 at the time of diagnosis (med=44 years). The most common histology was malignant fibrous histiocytoma (n=6), followed by liposarcoma (n=5), synovial sarcoma (n=4), and angiosarcoma (n=2). Twenty-one of 23 patients also received multi-agent multi-cyclic cyto-reductive therapy. Treatment consisted of initial daily photon irradiation delivered either using twice daily fractions of 120 cGy (n=10) or once daily 200 cGy/fx (n=13).Total photon dose was 36-39.6 Gy. Neutron irradiation was initiated immediately following the photon irradiation and consisted of fraction sizes of 1.0-1.25NGy to a total dose of 6-10 NGy. The neutrons were given once daily. Follow-up is calculated from the day of last radiation treatment.

RESULTS

No patient has been lost to follow-up, which has ranged from 18 to 82 months (med=36 months). To date there have been two local relapses and three patients with distant disease development without local relapse. Each of the patients with distant disease has died. The local failures occurred at 9 and 12 months. The 36-month local control is 91%. Thirtysix month disease-free survival was 78%. Overall survival at 36 months was 87%. Three patients had unusual complications consisting of delayed wound healing, and in one of these patients a fracture of the tibia has been noted.

CONCLUSION

The use of this unique radiation sequence post-surgically in patients at high risk for local relapse has resulted in an exciting 36-month local control rate of 91%. The 3-year disease-free survival of 78% and overall survival rate of 87% are exciting but need to mature. The low complication rate is similar to that reported in other large institutional series that have not utilized neutrons. We continue to evaluate the role of combined photon and once-off neutron irradiation in the treatment of patients with high-grade STS that are risk for local recurrence.

Is radical oncosurgery justified for the treatment of primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the urinary bladder? Report of two cases and analyses of disease-specific survival rates based on a review of the literature

Disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were evaluated in 20 patients with primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of the bladder. The most common pathologic finding was the pleomorphic subtype of MFH (55%) with a mean tumor size of 6.8 cm. 10 patients underwent surgery without and 6 patients with adjuvant therapy. Local and systemic rates of progression were 30 and 60% after surgery only compared with 16.7 and 50% after surgery with adjuvant therapy. Although none of the patients showed metastatic dissemination at the time of diagnosis, overall 1- and 2-year DSS rates of only 47.8 and 31.9% were observed. Hence, after the onset of clinical symptoms, the disease runs a very aggressive course regardless of the therapeutic options employed. Although distant dissemination seems to be rare at the time of diagnosis, the prognostic outcome is dismal. The rarity and inconsistency of the currently available case reports on MFH of the bladder hampers the development of therapeutic guidelines. Advanced studies enrolling a larger number of patients with appropriate clinical and pathological data are needed to compare the beneficial effects of various treatment options.

Conditional survival of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma: results beyond the staging system

BACKGROUND

With increasing interest in adult cancer survivorship, currently available prognostic estimates for long-term survivors of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (ESTS) are limited. We assessed determinants of survival in adults surgically treated for nonmetastatic ESTS, conditional on specific survival periods.

METHODS

We identified 6215 persons aged >18 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program who were surgically treated for nonmetastatic ESTS from 1991 to 2006. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to assess demographic, tumor, and treatment factors associated with 10-year sarcoma-specific survival (SSS) at diagnosis and conditional on surviving 3 and 5 years postdiagnosis.

RESULTS

At the time of diagnosis, age, tumor, and treatment factors predicted SSS. Although older age significantly predicted worse SSS for all age groups at diagnosis (HR 3.78 for age >81 vs 18-35; P < .05 for all), the effect of age became nonsignificant as survival time increased, except for the oldest group (>80 years). Tumor size, grade, and histologic subtypes continued to be important predictors of SSS for all periods of conditional survival. Persons who underwent limb amputation were at 3 times the risk of mortality for all conditional survival periods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based experience of ESTS survivors, age >80, tumor, and treatment factors continued to affect long-term survival, whereas the effect of age dampened over time. These estimates provide important counseling information for changing risk factors as survival time increases, help to streamline future surveillance programs, and provide insights into the design of adult survivorship care. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Surgery combined with brachytherapy in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas

Purpose

The primary aim of this work was to analyze feasibility of combined treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RS): surgery (S) and intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBRT). The secondary aim was to analyze results and complications after this treatment.

Material and methods

84 patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas were qualified for combined treatment (S and IOBRT) between June 1998 and September 2006. 65 of the patients (77.4%) had local recurrences. Sarcomas with intermediate and high grade of histological malignancy (G2, G3 – 76.2%) were the most frequent within the all surgically treated patients. Resection ability (R0/R1) in analyzed group of patients was estimated as 85% (74 cases). After intraoperative evaluation, 57 (67.8%) patients were qualified for IOBRT. Since 2000, in 34 patients (60%) an adjuvant postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in dose of 50 Gy was applied. Median follow-up of the surviving patients was 40 months.

Results

On the basis of the univariate analysis, relevant aspects negatively influencing overall survival rate within the RS group treated with IOBRT were as follows: surgery of sarcoma recurrence (p = 0.002), higher grade of histological malignancy (p = 0.05), histological type different than liposarcoma (p = 0.05) as well as no adjuvant EBRT (p = 0.05). On the basis of multivariate analysis one can ascertain that relevant factors negatively influencing LRFS in RS patients treated with IOBRT were: surgery due to recurrence of sarcoma (p = 0.008) and lack of EBRT (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Combined treatment (surgery and brachytherapy) was possible to be carried out on 68% of RS patients. The overall number of complications was quite high, however acceptable, taking into consideration the application of extensive, multi-organ treatments in case of sarcoma recurrences in this localization. The results suggest that the method of treatment will improve the final outcome when most of patients will be qualified for treatment of primary sarcomas in experienced centre.

Proton-beam, intensity-modulated, and/or intraoperative electron radiation therapy combined with aggressive anterior surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcomas

BACKGROUND

We sought to reduce local recurrence for retroperitoneal sarcomas by using a coordinated strategy of advanced radiation techniques and aggressive en-bloc surgical resection.

METHODS

Proton-beam radiation therapy (PBRT) and/or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were delivered to improve tumor target coverage and spare selected adjacent organs. Surgical resection of tumor and adjacent organs was performed to obtain a disease-free anterior margin. Intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) was delivered to any close posterior margin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had primary tumors and eight had recurrent tumors. Tumors were large (median size 9.75 cm), primarily liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas (71%), and were mostly of intermediate or high grade (81%). PBRT and/or IMRT were delivered to all patients, preferably preoperatively (75%), to a median dose of 50 Gy. Surgical resection included up to five adjacent organs, most commonly the colon (n = 7) and kidney (n = 7). Margins were positive for disease, usually posteriorly, in 15 patients (54%). IOERT was delivered to the posterior margin in 12 patients (43%) to a median dose of 11 Gy. Surgical complications occurred in eight patients (28.6%), and radiation-related complications occurred in four patients (14%). After a median follow-up of 33 months, only two patients (10%) with primary disease experienced local recurrence, while three patients (37.5%) with recurrent disease experienced local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas can achieve a disease-negative anterior margin. PBRT and/or IMRT with IOERT may possibly deliver sufficient radiation dose to the posterior margin to control microscopic residual disease. This strategy may minimize radiation-related morbidity and reduce local recurrence, especially in patients with primary disease.