Regulation of avian fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR-1) gene expression during skeletal muscle differentiation

The role and therapeutic potential of stem cells in skeletal muscle in sarcopenia

Sarcopenia is a common age-related skeletal muscle disorder featuring the loss of muscle mass and function. In regard to tissue repair in the human body, scientists always consider the use of stem cells. In skeletal muscle, satellite cells (SCs) are adult stem cells that maintain tissue homeostasis and repair damaged regions after injury to preserve skeletal muscle integrity. Muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) and SCs are the two most commonly studied stem cell populations from skeletal muscle. To date, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding the complex associations between stem cells in muscle and the occurrence and treatment of sarcopenia. In this review, we first give brief introductions to sarcopenia, SCs and MDSCs. Then, we attempt to untangle the differences and connections between these two types of stem cells and further elaborate on the interactions between sarcopenia and stem cells. Finally, our perspectives on the possible application of stem cells for the treatment of sarcopenia in future are presented. Several studies emerging in recent years have shown that changes in the number and function of stem cells can trigger sarcopenia, which in turn leads to adverse influences on stem cells because of the altered internal environment in muscle. A better understanding of the role of stem cells in muscle, especially SCs and MDSCs, in sarcopenia will facilitate the realization of novel therapy approaches based on stem cells to combat sarcopenia.

Large-scale transcriptome sequencing in broiler chickens to identify candidate genes for breast muscle weight and intramuscular fat content

BACKGROUND

In broiler production, breast muscle weight and intramuscular fat (IMF) content are important economic traits. Understanding the genetic mechanisms that underlie these traits is essential to implement effective genetic improvement programs. To date, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene expression analyses have been performed to identify candidate genes for these traits. However, GWAS mainly detect associations at the DNA level, while differential expression analyses usually have low power because they are typically based on small sample sizes. To detect candidate genes for breast muscle weight and IMF contents (intramuscular fat percentage and relative content of triglycerides, cholesterol, and phospholipids), we performed association analyses based on breast muscle transcriptomic data on approximately 400 Tiannong partridge chickens at slaughter age.

RESULTS

First, by performing an extensive simulation study, we evaluated the statistical properties of association analyses of gene expression levels and traits based on the linear mixed model (LMM) and three regularized linear regression models, i.e., least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), ridge regression (RR), and elastic net (EN). The results show that LMM, LASSO and EN with tuning parameters that are determined based on the one standard error rule exhibited the lowest type I error rates. Using results from all three models, we detected 43 candidate genes with expression levels that were associated with breast muscle weight. In addition, candidate genes were detected for intramuscular fat percentage (1), triglyceride content (2), cholesterol content (1), and phospholipid content (1). Many of the identified genes have been demonstrated to play roles in the development and metabolism of skeletal muscle or adipocyte. Moreover, weighted gene co-expression network analyses revealed that many candidate genes were harbored by gene co-expression modules, which were also significantly correlated with the traits of interest. The results of Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses indicated that these modules are involved in muscle development and contraction, and in lipid metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides valuable insight into the transcriptomic bases of breast muscle weight and IMF contents in Chinese indigenous yellow broilers. Our findings could be useful for the genetic improvement of these traits in broiler chickens.

Sp3 controls fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 gene activity during myogenic differentiation

Fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGF/FGFR) signaling is a critical component in the regulation of myoblast proliferation and differentiation. The transient FGFR4 gene expression during the transition from proliferating myoblasts to differentiated myotubes indicates that FGFR4 regulates this critical phase of myogenesis. The Specificity Protein (SP) family of transcription factors controls FGFR family member gene activity. We sought to determine if members of the Sp family regulate mouse FGFR4 gene activity during myogenic differentiation. RT-PCR and western blot analysis of FGFR4 mRNA and protein revealed transient expression over 72h, with peak expression between 24 and 36h after addition of differentiation medium to C₂C₁₂ myogenic cultures. Sp3 also displayed a transient expression pattern with peak expression occurring after 6h of differentiation. We cloned a 1527bp fragment of the mouse FGFR4 promoter into a luciferase reporter. This FGFR4 promoter contains eight putative Sp binding sites and directed luciferase gene activity comparable to native FGFR4 expression. Overexpression of Sp1 and Sp3 showed that Sp1 repressed FGFR4 gene activity, and Sp3 activated FGFR4 gene activity during myogenic differentiation. Mutational analyses of multiple Sp binding sites within the FGFR4 promoter revealed that three of these sites were transcriptionally active. Electromobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation of the area containing the activator sites showed that Sp3 bound to this promoter location.

Repression of myoblast proliferation and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 promoter activity by KLF10 protein

BACKGROUND

FGFR1 gene expression regulates myoblast proliferation and differentiation, and its expression is controlled by Krüppel-like transcription factors.

RESULTS

KLF10 interacts with the FGFR1 promoter, repressing its activity and cell proliferation.

CONCLUSION

KLF10 represses FGFR1 promoter activity and thereby myoblast proliferation.

SIGNIFICANCE

A model of transcriptional control of chicken FGFR1 gene regulation during myogenesis is presented. Skeletal muscle development is controlled by regulation of myoblast proliferation and differentiation into muscle fibers. Growth factors such as fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) regulate cell proliferation and differentiation in numerous tissues, including skeletal muscle. Transcriptional regulation of FGFR1 gene expression is developmentally regulated by the Sp1 transcription factor, a member of the Krüppel-like factor (KLF) family of transcriptional regulators. Here, we show that another KLF transcription factor, KLF10, also regulates myoblast proliferation and FGFR1 promoter activity. Expression of KLF10 reduced myoblast proliferation by 86%. KLF10 expression also significantly reduced FGFR1 promoter activity in myoblasts and Sp1-mediated FGFR1 promoter activity in Drosophila SL2 cells. Southwestern blot, electromobility shift, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that KLF10 bound to the proximal Sp factor binding site of the FGFR1 promoter and reduced Sp1 complex formation with the FGFR1 promoter at that site. These results indicate that KLF10 is an effective repressor of myoblast proliferation and represses FGFR1 promoter activity in these cells via an Sp1 binding site.

Bimodal, reciprocal regulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 promoter activity by BTEB1/KLF9 during myogenesis

Expression of FGFR1 controls both myoblast proliferation and differentiation. The Krüppel-like transcription factor BTEB1 demonstrates bimodal, reciprocal activity by activating the FGFR1 promoter in proliferating myoblasts and repressing the same promoter via the same DNA-binding site in differentiated myotubes.

Expression of the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) and subsequent FGFR1-mediated cell signaling controls numerous developmental and disease-related processes. The transcriptional regulation of the FGFR1 gene is central to these developmental events and serves as a molecular model for understanding transcriptional control of growth factor receptor genes. The FGFR1 promoter is activated in proliferating myoblasts via several Sp1-like binding elements. These elements display varying levels of activation potential, suggesting that unique protein-DNA complexes coordinate FGFR1 gene expression via each of these sites. The Krüppel-like factor, BTEB1/KLF9, was expressed in both proliferating myoblasts and differentiated myotubes in vitro. The BTEB1 protein was nuclear-localized in both cell types. BTEB1 activated the FGFR1 promoter via interaction with the Sp1-like binding site located at −59 bp within the FGFR1 promoter. FGFR1 gene expression is down-regulated during myogenic differentiation, and FGFR1 promoter activity is correspondingly reduced. This reduction in FGFR1 promoter activity was attributable to BTEB1 interaction with the same Sp1-like binding site located at −59 bp in the FGFR1 promoter. Therefore, BTEB1 is capable of functioning as a transcriptional activator and repressor of the same promoter via the same DNA-binding element and demonstrates a novel, bimodal role of BTEB1 during myogenesis.

A novel mechanism of sequestering fibroblast growth factor 2 by glypican in lipid rafts, allowing skeletal muscle differentiation

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are critical modulators of growth factor activities. Skeletal muscle differentiation is strongly inhibited by fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2). We have shown that HSPGs present at the plasma membrane are expressed in myoblasts and are downregulated during muscle differentiation. An exception is glypican-1, which is present throughout the myogenic process. Myoblasts that do not express glypican-1 exhibit defective differentiation, with an increase in the receptor binding of FGF-2, concomitant with increased signaling. Glypican-1-deficient myoblasts show decreased expression of myogenin, the master gene that controls myogenesis, myosin, and the myoblast fusion index. Reversion of these defects was induced by expression of rat glypican-1. Glypican-1 is the only HSPG localized in lipid raft domains in myoblasts, resulting in the sequestration of FGF-2 away from FGF-2 receptors (FGFRs) located in nonraft domains. A chimeric glypican-1, containing syndecan-1 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, is located in nonraft domains interacting with FGFR-IV- and enhanced FGF-2-dependent signaling. Thus, glypican-1 acts as a positive regulator of muscle differentiation by sequestering FGF-2 in lipid rafts and preventing its binding and dependent signaling.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene expression is required for cardiomyocyte proliferation and is repressed by Sp3

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is the only high-affinity FGFR in the vertebrate myocardium. FGFR1 is a tyrosine kinase receptor and has a non-redundant role in proliferation and differentiation of cardiomyocytes during embryogenesis. Results presented here demonstrate that FGFR1 gene expression declines as neonatal cardiomyocytes develop into adult cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, silencing FGFR1 gene expression reduced neonatal cardiomyocyte proliferation, indicating that FGFR1 gene expression is required for the optimal proliferative capacity of cardiomyocytes. To determine the mechanism that governs FGFR1 gene expression in cardiomyocytes, sequence analysis of the proximal mouse FGFR1 promoter identified a potential binding site for Sp transcription factors. Mutation of this site increased FGFR1 promoter activity compared to the wild-type promoter, indicating the presence of a negative transcriptional regulator of the FGFR1 promoter at this site in cardiomyocytes. Sp3 expression in neonatal cardiomyocytes and Drosophila SL2 cells reduced FGFR1 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. Western blots and immunocytochemistry indicated that Sp3 was present in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of neonatal cardiomyocytes. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation studies verified that endogenous Sp3 in cardiomyocytes interacts with the FGFR1 promoter. Transient chromatin-immunoprecipitation studies using wild-type and mutated FGFR1 promoter constructs in SL2 cells identified the specific Sp3 binding site within the FGFR1 promoter. These studies implicate Sp3 as a negative transcriptional regulator of FGFR1 promoter activity in cardiomyocytes and as a suppressor of cardiomyocyte proliferation.

Involvement of Sp-1 in the Regulation of the Id-1 Gene during Trophoblast Cell Differentiation

Id-1, a member of the helix-loop-helix transcription factor family, inhibits the differentiation of Rcho-1 cells, which were derived from rat choriocarcinoma and consist of trophoblast stem cells. Id-1 is expressed at a high level in undifferentiated trophoblast stem cells and then down-regulated during early differentiation, and is thought to be a key regulator in the trophoblast giant-cell differentiation pathway. In this study, we analyzed the signaling mechanism regulating the high expression levels of Id-1 in undifferentiated Rcho-1 cells. Promoter deletion analysis revealed that a 31-bp sequence (Box-2 region), located between -200 and -169bp in the Id-1 promoter is necessary for the promoter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNA affinity precipitation assays showed that Box-2-binding activity was decreased during differentiation and that Sp-1 protein bound to this sequence. The protein level of Sp-1 was decreased during the differentiation. These results suggest that the Sp-1 protein level may regulate the Box-2-binding activity and the trophoblast giant-cell differentiation.

FGF signalling in craniofacial development and developmental disorders

The Fgf signalling pathway is highly conserved in evolution and plays crucial roles in development. In the craniofacial region, it is involved in almost all structure development from early patterning to growth regulation. In craniofacial skeletogenesis, the Fgf signal pathway plays important roles in suture and synchondrosis regulation. Mutations of FGF receptors relate to syndromatic and non-syndromatic craniosynostosis. The Fgf10/Fgfr2b signal loop is critical for palatogenesis and submandibular gland formation. Perturbation of the Fgf signal is a possible mechanism of palatal cleft. Fgf10 haploinsufficiency has been identified as the cause of autosomal dominant aplasia of lacrimal and salivary glands. The Fgf signal is also a key regulator of tooth formation: in the absence of Fgfr2b tooth development is arrested at the bud stage. Fgfr4 has recently been identified as the key signal mediator in myogenesis. In this review, these aspects are discussed in detail with a focus on the most recent advances.

Apoptosis, proliferation and gene expression patterns in mouse developing tongue

The Fgf/Fgfr (Fgf receptor) and Bmp signal pathways are critical for embryonic development and postnatal growth. In order to address their roles in tongue development, preliminary study of expression patterns of some important members in the two families, as well as of apoptosis and proliferation, were carried out in mouse developing tongue. Apoptosis in tongue is a very late event in embryogenesis, restricted to the upper layer of the epithelium whereas proliferation is very vigorous at the early stage of tongue development and remains active throughout embryogenesis. Bmp2, -4 and -5 were localized within the mesenchyme at the early embryonic stage of tongue development (E12 to E13), whereas Bmp3 and Bmp7 were mainly expressed in the epithelium. Most of these molecules were also seen in the tongue muscles at postnatal stages. Among Fgfr isoforms, Fgfr1c, -2b, and -2c were detected in embryogenesis with peak expression at E11 to E13. Fgfr1c and Fgfr2c were localized within the mesenchyme, while Fgfr2b was mainly expressed in the epithelium. High expression of Fgf7 and Fgf10 was also detected in the mesenchyme at the early embryonic stage of tongue development, corresponding to the Fgfr expression, suggesting that they are among the principal ligands functioning at the early embryonic expanding stage. Fgf2 was seen in the tongue muscles at the late embryonic and postnatal stages. These results suggest that Bmp and Fgf signalling regulates tongue development at multiple stages, possibly related to proliferation and differentiation.

Dynamic Transcriptional Regulatory Complexes, Including E2F4, p107, p130, and Sp1, Control Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Expression during Myogenesis

Developmentally controlled transcriptional regulation of myogenic cell proliferation and differentiation via expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene is positively regulated by Sp1 and negatively regulated by E2F4-based transcriptional complexes. We report that p107 and p130 formed transcriptional complexes with E2F4 on the FGFR1 promoter and repressed FGFR1 gene transcription in myogenic cells. However, in Drosophila melanogaster SL2 cells, only p107 was able to repress Sp1-mediated transactivation of the FGFR1 promoter. Gel shift assays using transfected myoblast nuclear extracts showed that ectopic p107 reduced Sp1 occupancy of the proximal Sp binding site of the FGFR1 promoter, and coimmunoprecipitation studies indicated that Sp1 interacts with p107 but not with p130. Gel shift assays also demonstrated that Sp1 interacted with p107 in E2F4-p107 transcriptional complexes in myoblasts. The nature of the repressor transcriptional complex was altered in differentiated muscle fibers by the relative loss of the E2F4-p107-Sp1 transcription complex and replacement by the repressor E2F4-p130 complex. These findings demonstrate that activation and repression of FGFR1 gene transcription is governed by interplay between Sp1, p107, p130, and E2F4 in distinct transcriptional complexes during skeletal muscle development.

Sp1-mediated transcriptional control of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 in sarcomas of skeletal muscle lineage

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have been implicated in a multitude of differentiating and proliferative actions. FGFR4 is expressed mainly in lung, kidney, pancreas, spleen, and developing muscle. FGFR4 was found to be overexpressed in some human malignancies, where it has been implicated in their pathogenesis. Recently, FGFR4 was found to be overexpressed in pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas, based on cDNA microarray analysis. Using Northern blotting, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and Western blotting, we classified four human rhabdomyosarcoma-derived cell lines based on their relative expression of FGFR4. We defined a 214 bp (-115/+99) promoter that functioned as a minimal promoter and examined cis-DNA elements implicated in the control of expression of the FGFR4 gene in these cells. Overlapping 40- to 50-bp fragments of the minimal promoter were examined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay using nuclear extracts from cell lines with high (HS729-1015) or low (HS729-1016) FGFR4 expression. Fragment C (-65/-26) formed specific complexes with nuclear extracts from both cell lines. Fragment B (-95/-56), however, formed distinct complexes mainly with the high FGFR4-expressing HS729-1015 cells. Both fragments yielded complexes that were competed by an Sp oligonucleotide and supershifted by Sp1 and by Sp3 antibodies. Transfection of Sp1 but not Sp3 efficiently activated FGFR4 promoter activity, an effect that was significantly more pronounced in the HS729-1015 cell line than in the low FGFR4-expressing HS729-1016 cell line. Deletion of each of the two Sp-binding sites in fragments B and C resulted in loss of promoter activity. In particular, deletion of the 5' Sp-binding site in fragment B was associated with the greatest loss of activity. Sp1 protein expression correlated with FGFR4 expression in cell lines and primary human rhabdomyosarcomas. Furthermore, transfection of Sp1 and methylation inhibition was effective in inducing the endogenous FGFR4 gene in HS729-1015 cells. Our findings point to Sp1 as an important contributor to FGFR4 transcriptional control and elucidate a potential mechanism for the heterogeneous expression of FGFR4 in neoplasms derived from the same cell lineage.

Distinct transcriptional control and action of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 in differentiating skeletal muscle cells

Although FGF signaling promotes myoblast proliferation and represses myogenic differentiation, one of the FGF receptors (FGFR), FGFR4, is expressed mainly in mature skeletal muscle. Disruption of FGFR4 signaling interrupts chick limb muscle formation. To determine the developmental regulation of FGFR4 expression, we compared the transcriptional control and action of FGFR4 in myoblasts and myotubes. We identified higher FGFR4 expression in differentiated myotubes than precursor myoblasts. FGFR4 promoter activity was localized within a region 115 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Overlapping fragments of this promoter displayed a distinct difference when compared by electromobility shift assay (EMSA) using nuclear extracts from myoblasts and myotubes. While fragments B (-95/-56) and C (-65/-26) formed specific complexes in both cell types, these complexes were consistently more intense in myotubes than myoblasts. These complexes were efficiently competed by an Sp-type oligonucleotide and were supershifted by Sp1 and by Sp3 antibodies. Deletions of the Sp-binding sites in fragment B (-95/-56) confirmed their critical contribution to promoter activity. Moreover, Sp1 expression correlated with FGFR4-expression in myotubes. To determine whether FGFR4 expression regulates myoblast differentiation, we infected a soluble dominant-negative FGFR4-containing adenovirus into these cells. This significantly impeded Erk1/2 phosphorylation and differentiation of myoblasts into MHC-expressing myotubes. Our findings point to distinct transcriptional regulation and action for FGFR4 in differentiating skeletal muscle cells.

Repression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene expression by E2F4 in skeletal muscle cells

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene expression is positively and negatively regulated during muscle differentiation. We recently reported that FGFR1 gene expression was up-regulated by Sp transcription factors in proliferating myoblasts. However, the mechanism of down-regulation of this gene during differentiation is unknown. We have identified the transcription factor E2F4 as a negative regulator of FGFR1 gene expression. Immunodetection studies revealed that endogenous E2F1 and E2F2 proteins were cytoplasmic in myoblasts and myotubes, whereas E2F4 was abundant in the nuclei of both. Upon overexpression, E2F4 repressed FGFR1 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner in myoblasts and Drosophila SL2 cells, and mutation of the E2F4 binding site increased FGFR1 promoter activity and reduced E2F4-mediated repression. Gel shift assays detected E2F4 binding to a synthetic FGFR1 E2F4 binding site and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays detected E2F4 binding to the endogenous FGFR1 promoter in proliferating myoblasts and myotubes. The results indicate that FGFR1 promoter activity in skeletal muscle cells is repressed by E2F4.

Gap junctional communication modulates gene transcription by altering the recruitment of Sp1 and Sp3 to connexin-response elements in osteoblast promoters

Loss-of-function mutations of gap junction proteins, connexins, represent a mechanism of disease in a variety of tissues. We have shown that recessive (gene deletion) or dominant (connexin45 overexpression) disruption of connexin43 function results in osteoblast dysfunction and abnormal expression of osteoblast genes, including down-regulation of osteocalcin transcription. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of gap junction-sensitive transcriptional regulation, we systematically analyzed the rat osteocalcin promoter for sensitivity to gap junctional intercellular communication. We identified an Sp1/Sp3 containing complex that assembles on a minimal element in the -70 to -57 region of the osteocalcin promoter in a gap junction-dependent manner. This CT-rich connexin-response element is necessary and sufficient to confer gap junction sensitivity to the osteocalcin proximal promoter. Repression of osteocalcin transcription occurs as a result of displacement of the stimulatory Sp1 by the inhibitory Sp3 on the promoter when gap junctional communication is perturbed. Modulation of Sp1/Sp3 recruitment also occurs on the collagen Ialpha1 promoter and translates into gap junction-sensitive transcriptional control of collagen Ialpha1 gene expression. Thus, regulation of Sp1/Sp3 recruitment to the promoter may represent a potential general mechanism for transcriptional control of target genes by signals passing through gap junctions.

Role of SHP-2 in fibroblast growth factor receptor-mediated suppression of myogenesis in C2C12 myoblasts

Ligand activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) represses myogenesis and promotes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (Erks). The precise mechanism through which the FGFR transmits both of these signals in myoblasts remains unclear. The SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2, has been shown to participate in the regulation of FGFR signaling. However, no role for SHP-2 in FGFR myogenic signaling is known. In this study, we show that stimulation of C2C12 myoblasts with FGF-2 induces SHP-2 complex formation with tyrosyl-phosphorylated FGFR substrate 2 alpha (FRS-2 alpha). Both the catalytic activity and, to a much lesser extent, the Grb2 binding-tyrosyl phosphorylation sites of SHP-2 are required for maximal FGF-2-induced Erk activity and Elk-1 transactivation. When overexpressed in C2C12 myoblasts, wild-type SHP-2, but not a catalytically inactive SHP-2 mutant, potentiates the suppressive effects of FGF-2 on muscle-specific gene expression. In addition, expression of a constitutively active mutant of SHP-2 is sufficient to prevent myogenesis. The constitutively active mutant of SHP-2 induces hyper-tyrosyl phosphorylation of FRS-2 alpha but fails to stimulate or potentiate either FGF-2-induced Erk activation or Elk-1 transactivation. These data suggest that in myoblasts, SHP-2 represses myogenesis via a pathway that is independent of the Erks. We propose that SHP-2 plays a pivotal role in FGFR signaling in myoblasts via both Erk-dependent and Erk-independent pathways.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 is a target for the zinc-finger transcription factor Ikaros in the pituitary

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have been implicated in a multitude of endocrine cell hormonal and proliferative properties, and FGFR4 is differentially expressed in normal and neoplastic pituitary. We therefore examined the functionally important cis-DNA elements and multiprotein complexes implicated in the cooperative control of expression of the human FGFR4 gene in pituitary cells. Using deletional mapping, we defined a 214-bp (-115/+99) promoter that was functional in pituitary GH4 and PRL 235 cells. Overlapping 40- to 50-bp fragments of this minimal promoter were examined by EMSA. Interestingly, fragment C (-64/-26) included potential binding sites for the hematopoietic zinc finger-containing transcription factor Ikaros (Ik) flanked by binding sites for Sp and Ets-type factors. DNA binding by Ik, Sp, and Ets-like factors was confirmed by oligonucleotide competition and supershifting with specific antibodies. Transcriptional regulation of FGFR4 by Ik was demonstrated by cotransfection of Ik1 with or without Sp1 or Ets overexpression and by disruption of the Ik binding site. Although both Ets-1 and Sp1 overexpression stimulated promoter activity, mutation of the Ik-binding site completely eliminated the Ik1 effect. Specific Ik expression was identified by Western blotting of pituitary GH4 and PRL235 cells and localized in primary mouse hormone-producing anterior pituitary cells by immunocytochemistry. Our findings point to a new role for Ik outside the hematopoietic system and suggest a novel transcriptional contribution with Ets and Sp1 in regulation of FGFR4 in the pituitary.

Sp1- and Sp3-mediated transcriptional regulation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in chicken skeletal muscle cells

Expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene in skeletal muscle is positively regulated in proliferating myoblasts and declines during differentiation. We have characterized the cis-regulatory elements in the proximal region of the FGFR1 promoter which render positive transcriptional activity. Multiple elements between -69 and -14 activate the FGFR1 promoter. Myoblast transfections revealed that potential Sp transcription factor binding sites are required for promoter activity. Electromobility shift assays indicated that myoblast nuclear proteins specifically bind to these cis-elements and that differentiated myotube nuclear extracts do not form these same complexes. In addition, Southwestern blot analysis detected binding of the most proximal Sp motif to a Sp1-like protein present in myoblast nuclear extracts but not in myotubes. In corroboration, Sp1 and Sp3 proteins were detected only in myoblasts and not in differentiated myotubes. Finally, transfection of Drosophila SL2 cells showed that Sp1 is a positive regulator of FGFR1 promoter activity and that Sp3 is a coactivator via the proximal Sp binding sites. These studies demonstrate that the FGFR1 promoter is activated by Sp transcription factors in proliferating myoblasts and demonstrate at least part of the mechanism by which FGFR1 gene expression is down-regulated in differentiated muscle fibers.

A competitive PCR-based method to measure human fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4 (FGFR1-4) gene expression

The four members of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family are cell-surface membrane-spanning tyrosine kinase receptors involved in a wide spectrum of biologic processes. Much evidence also indicates that mutations in FGFR genes result in several craniosynostotic disorders and chondrodysplasias, and that changes in qualitative and quantitative FGFR expression profiles are implicated in tumor induction or progression. Here, we describe a precise and reliable competitive PCR-based assay to evaluate human FGFR1-4 gene expression. A single multispecific synthetic competitive template was designed to amplify FGFR1-4 homologous stretches and constructed to contain FGFR1/FGFR2/FGFR3/FGFR4/GAPDH tandemly arranged forward and reverse primers that allow competition for cDNA-specific primer annealing. The housekeeping GAPDH transcript was utilized as a reference for comparing the expression profiles of different RNA pools. The assay herein described allows the comparison of relative FGFR expression levels, both within a single RNA pool and among multiple RNA pool samples. The major advantages of such a PCR-based approach are its ability to obtain unbiased FGFR mRNA expression patterns and to detect transcripts present in low copy number. Qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of the FGFR1-4 transcript repertoire in mesenchymal- and epithelial-derived primary cell cultures and cell lines demonstrated the utility of such a method to investigate the FGFR1-4 functional role in FGF signal transduction.

Two distal Sp1-binding cis-elements regulate fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene expression in myoblasts

Skeletal myoblast cell proliferation and subsequent differentiation are dependent on developmentally regulated expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene. We have previously reported the isolation and initial characterization of the chicken FGFR1 gene (cek1) promoter. Both distal and proximal regions of the promoter were identified as necessary for developmentally regulated transcriptional activity in proliferating myoblasts, including its down-regulation in differentiated muscle fibers in vitro. Here we report detailed characterization of the molecular mechanism regulating FGFR1 promoter activity via the distal promoter region in proliferating myoblasts. This region was identified as a 242 base pair segment located greater than 1 kilobase upstream from the start of transcription that conferred increased transcriptional activity to a minimal thymidine kinase promoter. This segment contains two Sp1 binding sites. Site directed mutagenesis and transfection studies indicated that both Sp1 sites are functional and both are required for FGFR1 promoter activity. Furthermore, Sp1 binding to the two sites was synergistic enhancing FGFR1 promoter activity. The specificity of Sp1 binding to the two distal promoter cis-elements was verified by electromobility shift and transfection assays employing an Sp1 expression construct. Differences in myoblast versus fibroblast-specific protein-DNA complex formation at these sites correlated with high promoter activity in myoblasts and significantly reduced promoter activity in fibroblasts. These studies for the first time establish a molecular mechanism regulating FGFR1 gene expression during myoblast proliferation.