The effect of dose and route of oestradiol benzoate administration on plasma concentrations of oestradiol and FSH in long-term ovariectomised heifers

Intravaginal administration of estradiol benzoate capsule for estrus synchronization in goats

Estrus synchronization requires multiple treatments of hormonal drugs, requiring considerable time and cost. The aim of the present study was to develop an estrus synchronization protocol using intravaginal administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) capsules in goats. Two types of capsules were prepared: an EB capsule that melted immediately after administration and a sustained-release (SR) EB capsule that dissolved slowly and reached a peak after 24 h. Goats with functional corpus lutea were intramuscularly treated with prostaglandin F_2α (PG). At 24 h after PG administration, goats were administered 1 mg of EB solution intramuscularly (PG + 24IM; n = 6) or 1 mg of EB capsule intravaginally (PG + 24EB; n = 6). The SR EB capsule was administered intravaginally at the time of PG administration (PG + SR; n = 6). The control group (n = 6) received only PG. All groups showed estrus within 72 h after PG administration. The onset of estrus did not differ significantly between the PG + 24IM and PG + SR groups but was earlier than in the control group. Estradiol concentration in the PG + SR group peaked at 11.5 ± 6.1 h after EB and PG administration. Peak estradiol concentrations were not significantly different between the PG + 24IM and PG + SR groups (78.0 ± 25.8 and 64.0 ± 38.1 pg/ml, respectively), and were higher than the PG + 24EB and control groups (27.3 ± 8.8 and 14.6 ± 6.1 pg/ml, respectively). These results suggest that intravaginal administration of an EB capsule with a sustained-drug release base is applicable for estrus synchronization, as an alternative to intramuscular administration.

Day of prostaglandin F2α administration after natural ovulation affects the interval to ovulation, the type of ovulated follicle, and the failure to induce ovulation in cows

The factors that affect the interval to ovulation, the type of ovulated dominant follicle (DF), and the cause of anovulation after prostaglandin (PG) treatment were investigated. Nine cows were assigned to six groups (54 cows in total) but the group size was later fixed at eight cows (48 in total). They received 25 mg tromethamine dinoprost as dinoprost on Day 6 (Group D6), Day 7 (Group D7), Day 8 (Group D8), Day 9 (Group D9), Day 10 (Group D10), or Day 11 (Group D11) after natural ovulation (Day 0). If the DF did not ovulate, then the cow was assigned to Group NO. In Group D6, the 1st DF ovulated in all cows 4 days after PG treatment, whereas in Groups D9, D10, and D11, the 2nd DF ovulated in all cows 4 to 7 days after PG treatment. In 10 cows, the DF did not ovulate, and late anovulation was significantly higher in Group D6 cows than in Group D11 cows. The progesterone (P₄) levels decreased to less than 1 ng/ml in all groups on the day after PG treatment. The estradiol-17β (E₂) levels began to increase after PG treatment and peaked at 2 days before ovulation in the cows that ovulated. In anovulated cows, E₂ tended to be higher and there was no clear E₂ peak in some cows. These results indicated that the number of days to ovulation, the type of ovulated DF, and anovulation were affected by factors that were associated with the DF when it was producing E₂.

Controlled Breeding Systems for Dairy Cows

The economic consequence of low heat detection rates is the main reason cattle reproduction research programmes continue to focus on developing practical controlled breeding systems for dairy cows. Three approaches can be taken to control the oestrous cycle in cattle: (i) Use of the luteolytic agent prostaglandin F2α alone or one of its potent analogues, (ii) Cycle regulation using short-term progestagen treatments and (Hi) Prior follicle wave synchrony followed by induced luteolysis. Administration of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) to cows after about Day 5 of the oestrous cycle causes immediate regression of the CL with progesterone concentrations declining rapidly to basal concentrations within 24 hours. Because PGF2α is only effective in animals between Days 5 and 17 of the oestrous cycle up to 40% of any group of randomly cyclic animals will not respond to a single administration. A number of PGF2α administration regimens have been developed for dairy cows. A two-injection regimen, with an interval of 9-13 days between successive administrations, elicits a higher response, as all animals possess a susceptible CL the time of the second injection. In general, cyclic heifers respond with good precision of heat onset to two PGF2α injections 11 days apart. Fixed-time AI at 72 and 96 hours after the second injection can result in acceptable pregnancy rates. In post partum dairy cows the slower turnover of follicle waves, contribute to the greater variation in oestrus onset, resulting in more variable and generally lower pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI at 72 and 96 hours. Consequently, intensive oestrous detection and AI on the basis of observed oestrus is more appropriate for lactating cows following PGF2α administration. It is generally accepted that fertility of the cyclic heifer after PGF2α treatment is not impaired or may even be higher when compared with untreated control animals inseminated at a natural oestrus. However, in lactating cows, conception rate following PGF2α treatment have been frequently lower (about l0%) than in cows bred following a natural heat. Recently, aprotocol to synchronise follicular development using GnRH and to induce luteal regression using PGF2α was developed In this protocol (Ovsynch), GnRH is administered to cows at random stages of their cycle 7 days before luteolysis is induced with PGF2α; a second GnRH injection at 36-48 hours later induces ovulation. All cows are inseminated once at 16-20 hours after the second GnRH injection. Ovsynch system is not recommended for use in heifers. The development of progestogen delivery devices, such as the PRID, CIDR and Crestar has facilitated the use ofexogenous progestogens for oestrous cycle synchronisation in cattle. Oestradiol is administered at the start of treatment to (i) shorten the life span of the corpus luteum (CL) and (ii) to induce the emergence a new follicle wave. Generally, a high proportion (up to 85%) of the cows that exhibit oestrus after removal of the progestogen do so between 36 and 60hours ofremoval. This allows for either one (54-56 hours) or two fixed-time AIs (48 & 72 hours) after progestogen withdrawal. Alternatively, cows can be observed and inseminated once at a detected oestrus. While fixed-time AI of all treated cows gives 100% submission rate conception rates tend to be lower than when AI is on the basis of observed heat. However, the overall number of cows becoming pregnant (submission x conception rate) is frequently the same, reflecting submission and conception rate differences for the two AI options. Choice of AI option will depend the herdsman 's ability to accurately detect heat, semen costs and labour availability.

Inherent capacity of the pituitary gland to produce gonadotropins is not influenced by the number of ovarian follicles > or = 3 mm in diameter in cattle

We hypothesised that higher serum FSH concentrations in cattle with low v. high follicle numbers during follicular waves are caused by a different capacity of the pituitary gland to produce gonadotropins. Dairy cows with high (> or = 30; n = 5) and low (< or = 15; n = 5) follicle numbers were selected and serum concentrations of oestradiol and FSH during an oestrous cycle were measured. Cows were ovariectomised at oestrus and bled frequently up to 8 days after ovariectomy. After 33 days, cows were injected with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and bled intensively up to 8 h after GnRH injection. One day later, animals were injected with follicular fluid (FF) from bovine follicles and were bled intensively up to 2 days after the first injection. Serum concentrations of FSH and LH were measured. After 2 days, cows were killed and their pituitary glands collected. Prior to ovariectomy, serum oestradiol concentrations were similar between groups, whereas FSH concentrations were higher in cattle with low v. high numbers of follicles. No differences were detected in serum gonadotropin concentrations after ovariectomy, GnRH injection or FF challenge between groups. The results indicate that the inherent capacity of the pituitary gland to secrete gonadotropins does not differ between cattle with high v. low numbers of follicles during follicular waves.

Oestradiol-17beta plasma concentrations after intramuscular injection of oestradiol benzoate or oestradiol cypionate in llamas (Lama glama)

Background

Llamas (Lama glama) are induced ovulators and the process of ovulation depends on dominant follicular size. In addition, a close relationship between behavioural estrus and ovulation is not registered in llamas. Therefore, the exogenous control of follicular development with hormones aims to predict the optimal time to mate. Oestradiol-17β (E₂) and its esters are currently used in domestic species, including camelids, in synchronization treatments. But, in llamas, there is no reports regarding the appropriate dosages to be used and most protocols have been designed by extrapolation from those recommended for other ruminants. The aim of the present study was to characterize plasma E₂ concentrations in intact female llamas following a single intramuscular (i.m.) injection of two oestradiol esters: oestradiol benzoate (EB) and oestradiol cypionate (ECP).

Methods

Twelve non pregnant and non lactating sexually mature llamas were i.m. injected on day 0 with 2.5 mg of EB (EB group, n = 6) or ECP (ECP group, n = 6). Blood samples were collected immediately before injection, at 1, 6, 12, 24 h after treatment and then daily until day 14 post injection. Changes in hormone concentrations with time were analyzed in each group by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a repeated measures (within-SS) design. Plasma E₂ concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were compared between groups by ANOVA. In all cases a Least-Significant Difference test (LSD) was used to determine differences between means. Hormonal and AUC data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.

Results

Peak plasma E₂ concentrations were achieved earlier and were higher in EB group than in ECP group. Thereafter, E₂ returned to physiological concentrations earlier in EB group (day 5) than in ECP group (day 9). Although plasma E₂ profiles differed over time among groups there were no differences between them on AUC values.

Conclusions

The i.m. injection of a single dose of both oestradiol esters resulted in plasma E₂ concentrations exceeding physiological values for a variable period. Moreover, the plasma E₂ profiles observed depended on the derivative of oestradiol administered. This basic information becomes relevant at defining treatment protocols including oestrogens in llamas.

Steroidogenic changes and steady state amount of messenger RNA encoding steroidogenic enzymes, gonadotropin receptors and cell-death signalling in the dominant ovarian follicle during estradiol-induced atresia in cattle

Changes in steroidogenic function and associated gene expression were characterized in dominant ovarian follicles (DF) of cattle where follicles were induced to become atretic by systemic administration of estradiol benzoate (EB). In experiment 1, follicular fluid (FF) steroid concentrations in the DF were measured at 12-hourly time points for 48 h in heifers treated with 1 mg EB i.m./500 kg body weight (EB; n=20) as compared with untreated controls (C; n=19). Treatment with EB promoted a transient reduction in circulating FSH, a rapid (12 h) and sustained reduction in FF estradiol, a rapid (12 h) but transient reduction in FF progesterone and a delayed (36 h) increase in FF testosterone concentrations. In experiment 2, whole follicular wall tissue was collected from DF of mature non-lactating cows allocated to a 0 h control group (0 HC: n=7), a 24h control group (24 HC; n=7) or an EB-treated group where tissue was collected 24 h after administration of 1 mg EB i.m./500 kg body weight (EB; n=8). As for experiment 1, EB promoted a transient reduction in circulating FSH, a pronounced reduction in FF estradiol and a smaller but significant reduction in FF progesterone concentrations. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR on follicular wall tissue revealed that the loss in estrogen activity at 24 h after EB was associated with two-fold reduction in aromatase mRNA, with an apparent acceleration in loss of 17alpha-hydroxylase mRNA. Expression of genes for gonadotropin receptors (LHR and FSHR) and a cell-death signalling pathway (Fas antigen and Fas ligand) were unchanged during the initial 24h of EB-induced atresia. These results suggest that EB initiates atresia in dominant ovarian follicles through a rapid suppression of follicular estradiol synthesis, an effect associated with down-regulation of the aromatase gene. A transient suppression in circulating FSH following administration of EB appears to have initiated these events, and it is suggested that subsequent processes involved in atresia follow this loss in estrogenic function.

Applicability of a progesterone-based timed artificilal insemination protocol after follicular fluid aspiration using the ovum pick-up technique in suckled beef cows

We conducted a progesterone-based timed AI protocol after follicular fluid aspiration using the ovum pick-up (OPU) technique to examine its applicability to the suckled beef cow. A total of 19 beef cows were randomly allocated to one of the following three groups based on the number of days postpartum: 13 to 60 days (Group A: suckled; early postpartum period, n=9), 61 to 150 days (Group B: suckled; mid postpartum period, n=6), or 151 to 281 days (Group C: non-suckled; prolonged open period, n=4) postpartum. These cows were treated with follicular fluid aspiration and insertion of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) on day 0. The PRID was removed and 500 microg of cloprostenol was intramuscularly administered on day 7. A dose (100 microg) of fertirelin acetate was injected intramuscularly 48 hours later, and this was followed by a timed AI (TAI) after another 18 hours (day 10). Serum samples were taken on days 0, 7, 9, 10, 12, 17, 24 and 31 for determination of the estradiol-17beta (E(2)) and progesterone concentrations. Pregnancy diagnosis was made by rectal palpation approximately 60 days after TAI. There was no significant difference in the peripheral E(2) concentrations among the three groups during the period of the hormonal treatment. The average progesterone concentrations in Group A on day 17 were significantly higher than those in Group B and exceeded 1.0 ng/ml on day 17 and thereafter. There was no significant difference in the numbers of collected immature oocytes among the three groups. The pregnancy rates in Groups A, B, and C were 77.8% (7/9), 83.3% (5/6) and 50.0% (2/4), respectively. In conclusion, this timed AI protocol is applicable to suckled beef cows within the period of 60 days postpartum.

Effect of CIDR-based protocols for timed-AI on the conception rate and ovarian functions of Japanese Black beef cows in the early postpartum period

Our objectives were to compare: (1) conception rates (in early postpartum Japanese Black beef cows) to timed-artificial insemination (timed-AI) among Ovsynch and Ovsynch plus CIDR protocols, and a protocol that used estradiol benzoate (EB) in lieu of the first GnRH of the Ovsynch plus CIDR; and (2) the effects of these protocols on blood concentrations of ovarian steroids. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch; n=35) underwent a standard Ovsynch protocol (GnRH analogue on Day 0, PGF(2 alpha) analogue on Day 7 and GnRH analogue on Day 9), with timed-AI on Day 10, approximately 20 h after the second GnRH treatment. Cows in the Ovsynch+CIDR group (n=31) received a standard Ovsynch protocol plus a CIDR for 7 days (starting on Day 0). Cows in the third treatment group (EB+CIDR+GnRH; n=41) received 2mg of EB on Day 0 in lieu of the first GnRH treatment, followed by the same treatment as in the Ovsynch+CIDR protocol. The conception rate tended to be greater in the Ovsynch+CIDR group (67.7%, P<0.15) and was greater in the EB+CIDR+GnRH (73.2%, P<0.05) and CIDR-combined (both CIDR-treated groups were combined) groups (70.8%, P<0.05) than in the Ovsynch group (48.6%). Plasma progesterone concentrations were higher on Day 7 (P<0.01) and lower on Days 14, 17 and 21 (P<0.001) in the CIDR-combined group than in the Ovsynch group. Plasma estradiol-17beta concentrations were higher on Day 7 in the Ovsynch group of non-pregnant cows than in the CIDR-combined group of non-pregnant cows and in an all-combined group (all treatment groups combined) of pregnant cows (P<0.01). Furthermore, estradiol-17beta concentrations were lower on Day 9 in the Ovsynch and CIDR-combined groups of non-pregnant cows than in the all-combined group of pregnant cows (P<0.05). In conclusion, both protocols using CIDR improved conception rates following timed-AI in early postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows relative to the Ovsynch protocol. Treatment with a CIDR may prevent early maturation of follicles observed in non-pregnant cows treated with the Ovsynch protocol, by maintaining elevated blood progesterone concentrations until PGF(2 alpha) treatment.

Histological and steroidogenic changes in dominant ovarian follicles during oestradiol-induced atresia in heifers

Histological and steroidogenic changes within dominant ovarian follicles (DFs) undergoing atresia following systemic administration of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) were characterized in beef heifers. At 5.6 ± 0.1 days after the onset of oestrus, heifers received 1 mg ODB i.m./500 kg body weight (ODB; n = 15) or served as controls (n = 15). Timing of treatment initiation was designated as hour (h) 0 on day (d) 0, and coincided with the presence of the DF of the first follicular wave (DF1). Within treatments, the DF1 was collected following ovariectomy in four animals at h 12, h 36 or after ultrasonic detection of a new wave (NW) of ovarian follicular development. In heifers of the NW groups (n = 7 per treatment), blood samples were collected at intervals of 20 min for 12 h beginning at h − 12, 0, 24 and 48 to characterize circulating LH patterns. Administration of ODB suppressed (P < 0.01) mean concentrations of LH at h 24 and h 48 by preventing (P < 0.05) the increase in LH pulse amplitude observed in controls, but had no effect on FSH. Follicular fluid (FF) concentrations of androgens and oestradiol were reduced at h 36 in the ODB-treated group. The diameter of the DF1 and the number of granulosa cell layers were also reduced in ODB-treated as compared with control heifers. Treatment differences were not observed in the proportion of apoptotic granulosa cells as assessed using the TUNEL assay method, and timing of a new wave of follicular development (d 4.6 ± 0.2) was similar (P > 0.1) among treatments. A prominent characteristic of oestradiol-induced atresia of the DF1 of the oestrous cycle in heifers was a loss in oestrogenic function associated with reduced LH support. However, the timing of new follicular development may be influenced by a factor(s) other than the status of the DF undergoing oestradiol-induced atresia.

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicle dynamics and superovulatory response in progestin-treated cattle

Three experiments evaluated the effects of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular and CL dynamics, intervals to estrus and ovulation, and superovulatory response in cattle. Experiment 1 compared the efficacy of two norgestomet ear implants (Crestar and Syncro-Mate B; SMB) for 9 d (with PGF at implant removal), combined with either 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (EP) or 5 mg EV and 3mg norgestomet (EN) im at the time of implant insertion on CL diameter and follicular wave dynamics. Ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography. There was no effect of norgestomet implant. Diameter of the CL decreased following EN treatment (P < 0.01). Mean (+/- S.D.) day of follicular wave emergence (FWE) was earlier (P < 0.0001) and less variable (P < 0.0001) in EP- (3.6 +/- 0.5 d) than in EN- (5.7 +/- 1.5 d) treated heifers. Intervals from implant removal to estrus (P < 0.001) and ovulation (P < 0.01) were shorter in EN- (45.7 +/- 11.7 and 74.3 +/- 12.6 h, respectively) than in EP- (56.4 +/- 14.1 and 83.3 +/- 17.0 h, respectively) treated heifers. Experiment 2 compared the efficacy of EP versus EN in synchronizing FWE for superovulation in SMB-implanted cows. At random stages of the estrous cycle, Holstein cows (n = 78) received two SMB implants (Day 0) and were randomly assigned to receive EN on Day 0 or EP on Day 1. Folltropin-V treatments were initiated on the evening of Day 5, with PGF in the morning and evening of Day 8, when SMB were removed. Cows were inseminated after the onset of estrus and embryos were recovered 7 d later. Non-lactating cows had more CL (16.7 +/- 11.3 versus 8.3 +/- 4.9) and total ova/embryos (14.7 +/- 9.5 versus 7.9 +/- 4.6) than lactating cows (P < 0.05). EP-treated cows tended (P = 0.09) to yield more transferable embryos (5.6 +/- 5.2) than EN-treated cows (4.0 +/- 3.7). Experiment 3 compared the effect of dose of EV on ovarian follicle and CL growth profiles and synchrony of estrus and ovulation in CIDR-treated beef cows (n = 43). At random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0), cows received a CIDR and no further treatment (Control), or an injection of 1, 2, or 5 mg im of EV. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received PGF. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 Control cows and 31/32 EV-treated cows (P < 0.05). In responding cows, interval from treatment to FWE was longer (P < 0.05) in those treated with 5 mg EV (4.8 +/- 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1 mg (3.2 +/- 0.9 d) or 2 mg (3.4 +/- 0.8 d) EV, while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 +/- 2.0 d). Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.05) at CIDR removal and tended (P = 0.08) to be smaller just prior to ovulation in the 5 mg EV group (8.5 +/- 2.2 and 13.2 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 +/- 4.6 and 15.5 +/- 2.9 mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7 +/- 2.5 and 15.1 +/- 2.2 mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7 +/- 1.5 and 14.3 +/- 1.7 mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group, and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, treatment with 5mg EV resulted in a longer and more variable interval to follicular wave emergence than treatment with 5mg estradiol-17beta, which affected preovulatory dominant follicle size following progestin removal, and may have also affected superstimulatory response in Holstein cows. Additionally, 5 mg EV appeared to induce luteolysis in heifers, reducing the interval to ovulation following norgestomet removal. Conversely, intervals to, and synchrony of, follicular wave emergence, estrus and ovulation following treatment with 1 or 2 mg EV suggested that reduced doses of EV may be more useful for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence in progestogen-treated cattle.

Effects of oestradiol and some of its esters on gonadotrophin release and ovarian follicular dynamics in CIDR-treated beef cattle

Three experiments were conducted to: (1) compare the effect of three oestradiol formulations on gonadotrophin release in ovariectomised cows; (2) compare the effects of either oestradiol-17beta (E-17beta) or oestradiol benzoate (EB), given at two doses, on the synchrony of ovarian follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated beef cattle; and (3) determine the timing of ovulation of the dominant follicle of a synchronised follicular wave following administration of E-17beta or EB 24h after progesterone withdrawal. In Experiment 1, ovariectomised cows (n = 16) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) and were allocated randomly to receive 5mg of E-17beta, EB or oestradiol valerate (EV) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. The CIDR inserts were removed on Day 7. There were effects of time, and a treatment-by-time interaction (P < 0.0001) for plasma concentrations of both oestradiol and FSH. Plasma oestradiol concentrations peaked 12h after treatment, with highest (P < 0.01) peak concentrations in cows given E-17beta; estradiol concentrations subsequently returned to baseline by 36 h in E-17beta-treated cows and by 96 h in EB- and EV-treated cows. Plasma FSH concentrations decreased by 12h after oestradiol treatment in all groups (P < 0.0001), reached a nadir at 24h, and increased by 60 h in all groups; plasma FSH reached higher (P < 0.02) concentrations in E-17beta-treated than in EB- or EV-treated cows. In Experiment 2, non-lactating Hereford cows (n = 29) received a new CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), and were assigned randomly to receive 1 or 5mg of E-17beta or EB i.m. on Day 1. On Day 8, CIDR were removed and PGF was given. Transrectal ultrasonography was done once daily from 2 days before CIDR insertion to 2 days after CIDR removal, and then twice-daily to ovulation. Although there was no difference among groups in the interval from oestradiol treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.2 +/- 0.3 days; P = 0.5), 5mg of E-17beta resulted in the least variable interval to wave emergence (P < 0.005), compared with the other treatment groups which were not different (P = 0.1). For the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation, there were no differences among groups for either means (P = 0.5) or variances (P = 0.1). In Experiment 3, beef heifers (n = 32) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. and were assigned randomly to receive 5mg E-17beta or 1mg EB i.m. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and all heifers received PGF. On Day 8 (24h after CIDR removal), each group was subdivided randomly to receive 1mg of either E-17beta or EB i.m. There was no effect of oestradiol formulation on interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.1 +/- 0.2 days; P = 0.7) or on the median interval (76.6h; P = 0.7) or range (72-120 h; P = 0.08) from CIDR removal to ovulation. In summary, oestradiol treatments suppressed FSH in ovariectomised cows, with the duration of suppression dependent on the oestradiol formulation. Both E-17beta and EB effectively synchronised ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in CIDR-treated cattle, and the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation did not differ in heifers given either E-17beta or EB 24h after CIDR removal.

Follicular wave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows

This study evaluated the effect of GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular wave emergence and progesterone concentrations, and following a second injection of GnRH, synchrony of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating Holstein cows. Cows received a CIDR device without hormone (controls), with an injection of 100 microg GnRH or with an injection of 4 mg EB. Thereafter, all received PGF(2 alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 19/20 GnRH-treated, 14/20 EB-treated and 5/20 control cows (P < 0.05). The interval to wave emergence was the shorter and less variable (P < 0.01) in the GnRH group (2.9 +/- 0.2 days) than in the EB (4.7 +/- 0.5 days) or control (4.8 +/- 1.0 days) groups. Serum progesterone concentrations from Days 4 to 7 were higher (P < 0.01) in the GnRH-treated cows that ovulated than in those that did not ovulate, or in control and EB-treated cows. The diameters of dominant follicle on Day 7 differed among groups (P < 0.01), and the diameters of the preovulatory follicle on Day 9 were larger (P < 0.01) in the control and GnRH groups than in the EB group. The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations did not differ among groups, but pregnancy rate to TAI was higher (P < 0.05) in the GnRH group (65%; 13/20) than in the control (30%; 6/20) or EB (35%; 7/20) groups. Results suggest that GnRH treatment of CIDR-treated lactating Holstein cows will result in synchronous follicular wave emergence, large preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in an acceptable pregnancy rates to TAI.

Effect of exogenous progesterone and oestradiol on plasma progesterone concentrations and follicle wave dynamics in anovulatory anoestrous post-partum dairy cattle

The effect of exogenous progesterone (P4) and of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on plasma progesterone concentration and follicle dynamics was studied in anovulatory anoestrus (AA) post-partum pasture-fed dairy cattle. Cows (n=32) were defined AA based on not detecting a corpus luteum upon transrectal ultrasonography of the ovaries. Cows were randomly assigned to treatment with an intravaginal P4-releasing device containing 1.56 g of P4 (1Q; Cuemate, Pfizer Animal Health, Auckland, NZ; n=11) or with modified devices with double (2Q; n=11) or triple (3Q; n=10) the normal P4 dose for 8 days. Half of each group received 2 mg ODB at device insertion (Day 0) while the other half did not receive ODB at this time. All cows were treated with 1 mg ODB 1 day after intravaginal device removal (Day 9). Ultrasonography occurred daily until either ovulation or Day 15 whichever occurred sooner. Blood samples were drawn on Days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 15 and 22 for plasma P4 determination. Increasing P4 dose was associated with an increase in plasma P4 concentration during the time of device insertion (P <0.05). The highest P4 dose was associated with a delay in emergence of, but a shorter interval from emergence to maximum diameter and ovulation of, the subsequent dominant follicle (DF2) compared to the lowest P4 dose. Treatment with ODB resulted in a delay in emergence of DF2 (4.2 (0.4) versus 2.0 (0.4) days (S.E.M.) to emergence for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.01), a smaller maximum diameter of DF2 (15.2 (0.5) versus 17.9 (0.6)mm (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P <0.01), a shorter interval to maximum DF2 diameter (5.0 (0.3) versus 6.8 (0.3) days (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.03), a shorter interval from DF2 emergence to ovulation (6.3 (0.4) versus 8.5 (0.4) days (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.02) and a tendency for a lower average plasma P4 concentration post-ovulation (i.e. average of Days 15 and 22; 2.5 (0.4) versus 3.4 (0.4) ng/ml plasma P4 for ODB versus no-ODB, respectively; P=0.08). The DF present at device insertion, was still present at device removal in three (9%) cows of which two were treated with 1Q + no-ODB and one with 3Q + ODB. It is concluded that increasing P4 dose and ODB treatment are associated with a delay in subsequent follicle wave emergence and more rapid follicle growth. Oestradiol benzoate treatment also tends to reduce the plasma P4 concentration in the subsequent luteal phase in post-partum, anoestrous dairy cattle.

The effect of eCG or estradiol at or after norgestomet removal on follicular dynamics, estrus and ovulation in early post-partum beef cows nursing calves

In post-partum anestrous beef cows suckling calves, neither the choice of hormonal regime to ensure the presence of a healthy dominant follicle at the end of a progestagen treatment nor the optimum hormone to induce estrus and ovulation is clear. Twenty-eight beef cows, in good body condition, 25-30 days post-partum, were assigned to one of four treatments: (i) 3mg norgestomet (N) implant with 5mg estradiol valerate (EDV) and 3mg N injection at the time of insertion (Crestar) for 5 days followed by 600 IU eCG at the time of implant removal; (ii) Crestar for 5 days as in (i) followed by 0.75 mg estradiol benzoate (EDB) 24h later; (iii) Crestar for 9 days followed by 600 IU eCG at the time of implant removal; and (iv) Crestar for 9 days followed by 0.75 mg EDB 24h later. Ovarian scanning was preformed from 4 days before implant insertion until ovulation and 4 days postovulation to detect the CL. Daily blood samples were collected from day 20 post-partum until second ovulation for FSH and E(2) assay. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance. There was no effect of the stage of follicle wave at the time of implant insertion on interval to new follicle wave emergence (range 1-7 days; mean 4.7 days). FSH concentrations were decreased to 5.9+/-2.0 and 7.7+/-1.1 ng/ml for pre- and post-selection cows 1 day after start of treatment; thereafter, they increased on Day 2 to 7.9+/-2.0 and 11.0+/-1.1 ng/ml and on Day 3 to 10.3+/-2.7 and 11.4+/-1.7 ng/ml for pre- and post-selection cows, respectively, despite high-estradiol concentrations at that time. There was no effect of treatment on the interval from implant removal to ovulation (3.2-4.0 days) or on the number of cows detected in estrus (26 of 27 cows). The size of the ovulatory follicle in cows given 0.75 mg EDB 24h post implant removal was decreased in animals at the pre-selection stage (12.2+/-0.1mm) of the follicle wave compared with those at the post-selection stage (15.3+/-0.9 mm) at implant removal. Cows given 600 IU eCG at the pre-selection phase of follicular growth had multiple ovulations (4.0+/-1.1). Cows given EDV at the start of a 5-day implant period had higher estradiol concentrations before and on the day of implant removal than those given EDV at the start of a 9-day implant period. The injection of 0.75 mg EDB 1 day after implant removal tended to increase concentrations of estradiol one day later. In conclusion, 5mg EDV and 3mg N at insertion of a 3mg N implant resulted in variable new follicle wave emergence 1-7 days later in post-partum beef cows nursing calves (22 of 27); both eCG and EDB were equally effective at inducing estrus after implant removal in cows in good BCS, but eCG resulted in a significant increase in ovulation rate in cows treated before dominant follicle selection.

Treatment of suckling beef cattle with a progestagen sponge and oestradiol benzoate or equine chorionic gonadotrophin

The ovarian responses of anoestrus beef cows to a combined treatment with medroxy-progesterone acetate (MAP) sponges and oestradiol benzoate or equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) were evaluated. Forty-five suckling Hereford cows were allocated to three equal groups. Group 1 received a MAP sponge for seven days plus an injection of 2 mg oestradiol benzoate when the sponge was inserted (day 0) and 1 mg when the sponge was withdrawn; group 2 received identical treatment until day 7, when a dose of 400 iu of eCG was administered, and group 3 were left untreated as control animals. From day 0 to day 11 the cows' ovaries were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography, and their oestrous behaviour was observed from 24 hours to 96 hours after the sponge was removed. Data from cows that had a corpus luteum present before the sponge was withdrawn were not used in subsequent analyses; there were four in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3. In 19 of the 21 cows in groups 1 and 2 a new follicular wave was observed to emerge at a mean (sd) interval of 3.9 (0.3) days after the insertion of the sponge, whereas in group 3 it occurred in all 11 cows after 3.4 (0.6) days. Only the six cows that had a follicle of 9 mm or larger in diameter ovulated (P < or = 0.001). Nine of the 11 cows in group 1 came into oestrus, compared with two of the 10 in group 2 and none of the control cows (P < or = 0.001). Ovulation was observed in four, two and none of the cows in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

The Therapeutic Effects of a Progesterone-Releasing Intravaginal Device (PRID) with Attached Estradiol Capsule on Ovarian Quiescence and Cystic Ovarian Disease in Postpartum Dairy Cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) containing an estradiol benzoate capsule on ovarian dysfunction, including ovarian quiescence, follicular cyst (FC) and luteal cyst or cystic corpus luteum (LC/CCL), in postpartum dairy cows. These ovarian dysfunctions were examined by palpation per rectum relative to plasma progesterone status. The results of clinical examination and hormone assay determined ovarian quiescence in 13 cows, FC in 15 cows and LC/CCL in 7 cows. These cows were treated with PRID for 12 d and then clinical examination was performed. After PRID removal, the proportion of cows exhibiting estrous signs within 7 d and confirmed formation of CL within 7-14 d (markedly effective) were 69.2 % (n=9) for ovarian quiescence, 46.7 % (n=7) for FC, and 28.6 % (2 cows) for LC/CCL. Two cows (15.4 %) in ovarian quiescence, 5 cows (33.3%) with FC and 4 cows (57.1 %) with LC/CCL did not exhibit estrous signs but were recognized as having formed CL within 12-16 d after removal of PRID (effective). These results suggest that treatments of PRID with estradiol benzoate for 12 d have therapeutic efficacy on ovarian dysfunction including ovarian quiescence, FC and LC/CCL in postpartum dairy cows.

Endocrine regulation of ovarian antral follicle development in cattle

Antral follicle growth in cattle occurs in two distinct phases; the first 'slow' growth phase spans the time from antrum acquisition to a size of approximately 3 mm detectable by transrectal ultrasound, and the second 'fast' phase is gondadotrophin-dependent and includes cohort growth, dominant follicle (DF) selection, and DF growth. This review summarises current concepts of the relative roles FSH and LH, ovarian and metabolic hormones play mainly in the second phase of antral follicle growth in animals of different reproductive and nutritional states. It is proposed that differential FSH response may enable one cohort follicle to become selected, and that follicular secretions, particularly inhibin, suppress FSH and thus are responsible for DF selection and dominance. Acute dependence of the DF on LH pulses will determine DF lifespan, and the LH pulse profile can be influenced by metabolic hormones such as leptin, providing one possible link for nutritional state and reproduction. Direct ovarian effects of acute and chronic changes in growth hormone, insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I have been described on cohort follicles, DF oestrogen activity and on DF growth. Influences of metabolic hormones on early antral follicles undergoing their first 'slow' growth phase are less well described, yet metabolic hormones appear to enhance growth into the cohort available for FSH-induced emergence, and may influence subsequent developmental competence of oocytes.

Associations between the manipulation of patterns of follicular development and fertility in cattle

The wave-like patterns of ovarian follicular development in cattle can be manipulated by shortening the luteal phase with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF), lengthening the period of follicle dominance with progesterone or curtailing follicle development with GnRH or oestradiol as 17beta, benzoate or cypionate. These hormones can also be used to synchronise ovulation allowing timed inseminations without detected oestrus. Progesterone, PGF, GnRH and oestradiol benzoate have each been used to increase conception rates in some situations, but their use has reduced them in others. For example, inseminations made within 96 h of a single injection of PGF administered during the luteal phase were associated with increased conception rates in dairy cows whereas double injection protocols reduced conception rates. The three forms of oestradiol and GnRH have greater effects on follicular development following divergence and dominance than following wave emergence. This can mean that follicles of differing maturity will be present about 7 days later and can result in varied intervals to the onset of oestrus following a PGF injection. The consequent variation in ovulation time can be reduced by injecting GnRH or an oestradiol during pro-oestrus. This means that some less mature follicles will ovulate, forming corpus luteum (CL) associated with a slower rise in plasma progesterone and lower mid-luteal concentrations. The lower conception rates recorded with single timed inseminations with synchronised ovulations have been associated with increased prevalences of short cycles in lactating dairy cows (with GnRH), with long luteal phases in cows and heifers (with oestradiol benzoate) and with embryo loss following positive pregnancy diagnosis (as with Ovsynch in lactating Holstein cows). Extensive Canadian studies have demonstrated that these same hormones can be successfully used without these limitations and reliably obtaining conception rates over 50% and up to 70% in beef cattle that have been supplemented with a progestin during the period of ovarian follicle synchronisation. The inherently lower fertility of Holstein cows during early lactation may be contributing to the reduced effectiveness of hormonal treatments for synchronised follicle development and ovulation. The role of reduced dose rates of GnRH in compromising this effectiveness needs to be determined if the potential of these treatments realised with beef cattle is to be achieved with lactating Holstein cows.

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol when starting treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert on ovarian follicular development and hormonal concentrations in Holstein cows

Ovarian follicular development and concentrations of gonadotrophin and steroid hormones were studied in non-lactating Holstein cows following administration of progesterone (P(4)) or oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the start of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) in a 2 by 2 factorial experiment. Cows were treated at random stages of the oestrous cycle with an IVP(4) device (Day 0) and either no other treatment (n=8), 200 mg of P(4) IM (n=9), 2.0 mg of ODB IM (n=8) or both P(4) and ODB (n=9). Seven days later devices were removed and PGF(2alpha) was administered. Twenty-four hours later 1.0mg of ODB was administered IM. Oestrus was detected in 97.1% and ovulation in 64.7% (effect of treatment, P=0.41) of cows within 96 h of removing inserts. In the cows that ovulated, day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle was delayed (P<0.01) and more precise (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to the cows treated with P(4). Interval from wave emergence to ovulation and the diameter of the ovulatory follicle was less (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to cows treated with P(4). Combined treatment with P(4) and ODB at the time of starting treatment with an IVP(4) device did not significantly change the pattern of ovarian follicular development compared to treatment with ODB alone. Concentrations of LH and FSH in plasma were less in cows treated with ODB between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05) while treatment with P(4) increased concentrations of FSH in plasma between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05). When anovulatory cows were compared to ovulatory cows, diameters of follicles (P<0.001) and growth rate of follicles (P<0.01) were less in anovulatory cows between Days 7 and 9, while concentrations of FSH in plasma were greater (P<0.01), concentrations of LH similar (P>0.90) and concentrations of oestradiol were less (P=0.01) in the anovulatory cows between Days 4 and 10. Our findings support a hypothesis that ovarian follicular development following administration of P(4) or ODB at the start of treatment with an IVP(4) device differs. Anovulatory oestrus may have been associated with reduced maturity and/or later emergence of ovarian follicles.

Effect of oestradiol benzoate given after prostaglandin at two stages of follicle wave development on oestrus synchronisation, the LH surge and ovulation in heifers

Oestrus synchronization following prostaglandin-induced luteolysis is variable and dependent on follicle wave status in cattle. Oestradiol benzoate (ODB) has been used following prostaglandin to reduce the interval to oestrus and ovulation, but the effect of follicle wave status at the time of ODB administration is not clear. The aim of this study was to characterize the endocrine and follicular responses following ODB after luteolysis at different stages of the follicle wave. Prostaglandin was administered at either emergence or dominance of the second follicle wave. Twenty-four hours later animals received either 0.5mg ODB in oil or a control oil injection. Follicular development was monitored daily by ultrasonography, oestrous behavior was determined and blood samples were collected. In animals treated with ODB at emergence, there was a reduction (P<0.05) in the maximum diameter of the ovulatory follicle (11.7+/-1.2 mm versus 13.1+/-0.1 mm) and in the interval from prostaglandin to oestrus (52.0+/-2.3 h versus 88.0+/-9.6h), to the LH surge (53.3+/-3.5 h versus 89.1+/-6.5 h) and to ovulation (96+/-0.0 h versus 129.6+/-9.6h), compared with controls. In animals treated with ODB at dominance, there was a reduction (P<0.05) in the interval from prostaglandin to the LH surge (54.0+/-3.1 h versus 70.9+/-4.8 h), but not in the interval from prostaglandin to oestrus (53.3+/-2.7 h versus 65.7+/-4.5 h; P=0.11), to ovulation (96.0+/-0.0 h versus 110.4+/-4.8 h; P=0.12) or the maximum diameter of the ovulatory follicle (12.7+/-0.3 mm versus 13.6+/-0.4 mm; P=0.12), compared with controls. Treatment did not affect (P>0.05) the length of the subsequent oestrous cycle or corpus luteum size. In conclusion, the use of ODB advanced, but did not alter the temporal relationships among oestrus, the LH surge and ovulation, regardless of stage of follicle development at treatment.

Follicle wave growth in cattle

Ovarian follicle growth in cattle culminates in the selection of a single dominant follicle which attains the ability for final maturation and ovulation once or twice during the luteal phase and at the end of the oestrous cycle, as well as during other reproductive states. This review will describe in detail the first follicle wave of the cycle leading to selection of the first wave dominant follicle, indicating the specific gonadotrophin dependencies of cohort and dominant follicles, and relating follicle fate to steroidogenesis. As a differential gonadotrophin response of growing antral follicles during the follies-stimulating hormone (FSH) decline may determine which follicle becomes selected, first wave follicles are also characterized in relation to intrafollicular growth factors, which may modify the gonadotrophin response, such as inhibins and members of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family. Subsequently, the follicular control of the transient FSH rise and decline so crucial to dominant follicle selection will be discussed. It is concluded that successful hormonal manipulation of follicle wave growth and dominant follicle selection will depend on our detailed understanding of the gonadotrophin requirements of differentiating wave follicles.

Exogenous hormonal manipulation of ovarian activity in cattle

To achieve precise control of the oestrous cycle in cattle it is necessary to control both the life span of the corpus luteum and the follicle wave status at the end of the treatment. Antral follicle growth in cattle occurs in distinct wavelike patterns during the ovarian cycle and the postpartum anoestrous period. The emergence of each new wave is stimulated by a transient increase in FSH. Each follicle wave has an inherent life span of 7-10 days as it progresses through the different stages of development, viz., emergence, selection, dominance and atresia or ovulation. The dominant follicle (DF) is distinguishable from other subordinate follicles by its enhanced capacity to produce oestradiol, maintenance of low intrafollicular concentrations of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins-2, -4 and -5 and follistatin and an increase in free intrafollicular concentrations of IGF-I as well as an increase in size. Three approaches can be taken to control ovarian activity and regulate the oestrous cycle in cattle: (i) use of the luteolytic agent prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) alone or one of its potent analogues, (ii) administration of exogenous progesterone-progestagen treatments combined with the use of exogenous oestradiol or gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) to control new follicle wave emergence and shorten the life span of the corpus luteum, and (iii) prior follicle wave synchrony followed by induced luteolysis. A number of different oestrous synchronisation regimens, viz., PGF2alpha-based only, short-term progesterone with prior follicle wave synchrony using oestradiol or GnRH have been developed but the problem of obtaining good follicle wave synchrony and CL regression limit their widespread application. GnRH-prostaglandin-GnRH regimens have recently been developed for beef and dairy cows. However, their success is variable. A better understanding of the hormonal control of follicle growth is a prerequisite in order to obtain more precise control the oestrous cycle allowing one AI at a predetermined time giving high pregnancy rates without recourse to detection of oestrus.

The effect of timing of administration of oestradiol benzoate on characteristics of oestrus, timing of ovulation and fertility in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with a progesterone releasing intravaginal insert

OBJECTIVE

To compare the timing of onset of oestrus and ovulation, characteristics of oestrus, and fertility in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with a progesterone releasing intravaginal insert (IVP4) and administration of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) either at the time of removal of the insert or 24 h later.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PROCEDURE

Bos indicus and Bos indicus cross heifers were treated on two farms (Farm A, n = 273; Farm B, n = 47) with an IVP4 for 8 days with 1.0 mg of ODB administered at the time of device insertion and 250 mg of cloprostenol at the time of device removal. Heifers in the ODB-0 group were administered 0.75 mg of ODB at the time of device removal while heifers in the ODB-24 group were administered the same dose of ODB 24 h after device removal. Heifers were inseminated once daily after detection of oestrus. Heifers not detected in oestrus by 72 h after removal of inserts were inseminated at that time. Oestrus was detected in heifers on Farm A using heatmount detectors while on Farm B oestrus in heifers was monitored using radiotelemetry of mounting pressure. Ovarian follicular development was monitored daily in 30 heifers on Farm B from the time of administration of inserts until ovulation to a maximum of 96 h after removal of inserts, and again 11 days after removal of inserts (Day 19). A blood sample was collected from all heifers on Farm B on Day 19 and analysed for plasma concentration of progesterone. Pregnancy was diagnosed 6 to 8 weeks after insemination.

RESULTS

Administration of ODB at the time of removal of inserts shortened the time interval to oestrus and ovulation (P < 0.001), increased the number of mounts recorded during oestrus (P = 0.04) and reduced the odds of pregnancy (P = 0.03). The proportion of heifers ovulating on Farm B was 67% and was not affected by treatment group (P = 0.61). The mean diameter of the largest follicle measured in ovaries was greater at the time of removal of inserts (9.1 +/- 0.6 vs 10.7 +/- 0.4; P = 0.03) and at the expected time of the LH surge (8.1 +/- 0.4 vs 11.5 +/- 0.3 mm; P < 0.001) in heifers that ovulated compared to heifers that failed to ovulate, respectively. Emergence of a new follicular wave was not detected during the synchronisation treatment in heifers that failed to ovulate. Concentrations of progesterone in plasma on Day 19 were less in non-pregnant heifers (P = 0.05) compared to heifers subsequently diagnosed as pregnant to insemination and were affected by the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Administration of ODB at the time of removal of inserts can shorten the time interval to oestrus and ovulation and can reduce fertility when insemination is carried out once daily. Further work is needed to determine if prolonged suppression of follicular development, anovulatory oestrus and premature ovulation occuring in some heifers is associated with administration of ODB.