Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Influence of bisphosphonate treatment on bone substitute performance in osteoporotic conditions

OBJECTIVE

Considering the elevated number of osteoporotic patients in need of bone graft procedures, we here evaluated the effect of alendronate (ALN) treatment on the regeneration of bone defects in osteoporotic rats. Bone formation was histologically and histomorphometrically assessed in rat femoral condyle bone defects filled with bone graft (Bio-Oss®) or left empty.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were induced osteoporotic through orchidectomy (ORX) and SHAM-operated. The animals were divided into three groups: osteoporotic (ORX), osteoporotic treated with ALN (ORX + ALN) and healthy (SHAM). Six weeks after ORX or SHAM surgeries, bone defects were created bilaterally in femoral condyles; one defect was filled with Bio-Oss® and the other one left empty. Bone regeneration within the defects was analyzed by histology and histomorphometry after 4 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Histological samples showed new bone surrounding Bio-Oss® particles from week 4 onward in all three groups. At week 12, the data further showed that ALN treatment of osteoporotic animals enhanced bone formation to a 10-fold increase compared to non-treated osteoporotic control. Bio-Oss® filling of the defects promoted bone formation at both implantation periods compared to empty controls.

CONCLUSION

Our histological and histomorphometric results demonstrate that the enteral administration of alendronate under osteoporotic bone conditions leverages bone defect regeneration to a level comparable to that in healthy bone. Additionally, Bio-Oss® is an effective bone substitute, increasing bone formation, and acting as an osteoconductive scaffold guiding bone growth in both healthy and osteoporotic bone conditions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Based on the results of this study, enteral use of ALN mitigates adverse effects of an osteoporotic condition on bone defect regeneration.

Comparing the efficacies of bisphosphonates' therapies for osteoporosis persistence and compliance: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disorder worldwide. This review was undertaken to compare the efficacies of bisphosphonates therapies for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the available reporting items. MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were applied for literature searched up to January 2020. All major studies such as prospective, retrospective and reviews articles that examined patient persistence or compliance to bisphosphonates for osteoporosis were included.

RESULTS

Literature search found 656 relevant published reports, out of which 87 were included. The 10,712,176 osteoporotic patients were studied for patient persistence and 5,875,718 patients were studied for patient compliances. Analysis of all studied bisphosphonates showed almost similar patterns for patient persistence rates as it was decreased over the time following initial prescription but persistence length was found to be significantly high for alendronate therapy as compared to the other studied bisphosphonates (p<0.001), whereas the length of persistence of all other bisphosphonates (other than alendronate) were almost same (p>0.05). Analysis of patient compliances with etidronate therapy showed the highest percent medication possession ratio (MRP) at 12 months, followed by the MRPs of ibandronate, alendronate, risedronate, and clodronate.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review that shows the comparison of the efficiencies of bisphosphonates for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis. The data showed that the length of patient persistence was highest for alendronate therapy, whereas patient compliance was highest for etidronate therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Empowering the Medicinal Applications of Bisphosphonates by Unveiling their Synthesis Details

Bisphosphonates (BPs), well-known medicinal compounds used for osteoporosis management, are currently the target of intensive research, from basic pre-formulation studies to more advanced stages of clinical practice. The high demand by the pharmaceutical industry inherently requires an easy, efficient and quick preparation of BPs. Current synthetic procedures are, however, still far from ideal. This work presents a comprehensive compilation of reports on the synthesis of the commercially available bisphosphonates that are pharmaceutical active ingredients. Current limitations to the conventional synthesis are assessed, and paths towards their improvement are described, either through the use of alternative solvents and/or by selecting appropriate ratios of the reactants. Innovative processes, such as microwave-assisted synthesis, are presented as more environmental-friendly and effective methods. The main advantages and setbacks of all syntheses are provided as a way to clarify and promote the development of simpler and improved procedures. Only in this way one will be able to efficiently respond to the future high demand of BPs, mostly due to the increase in life span in occidental countries.

Effects of local alendronate administration on bone defect healing. Histomorphometric and radiological evaluation in a rabbit model

PURPOSE

To performed a histomorphometric and radiological study to evaluate the effects of alendronate sodium administered locally in mandibular bone defects created in rabbits.

METHODS

Two circular defects 5 mm in diameter were created bilaterally in the mandibular corpus of 20 New Zealand rabbits (i.e., four defects per animal). Each defect received one of four treatments: no treatment (EC group), alendronate irrigation (AL group), autogenous bone grafting (AG group), or alendronate irrigation with autogenous bone grafting (AL+AG group). Histomorphometric and radiological assessments were conducted at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Between-group comparisons of the new bone area, the value of the AL+AG group was significantly lower thanthe remaining three groups at 4 weeks postoperatively. In all groups, the new bone area was significantly larger at 8 weeks than at 4 weeks. The residual graft area at 4 and 8 weeks was significantly higher in the AL+AG group than in the AG group, although it was significantly smaller at 8 weeks than at 4 weeks in both these groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of alendronate sodium in conjunction with autogenous bone grafting improves the osteoconductive properties of the graft, enhances graft retention in the defect, and improves ossification.

The contribution of the extracellular matrix to the fracture resistance of bone

The likelihood of suffering a bone fracture is not solely predicated on areal bone mineral density. As people age, there are numerous changes to the skeleton occurring at multiple length scales (from millimeters to submicron scales) that reduce the ability of bone to resist fracture. Herein is a review of the current knowledge about the role of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in this resistance, with emphasis on engineering principles that characterize fracture resistance beyond bone strength to include bone toughness and fracture toughness. These measurements of the capacity to dissipate energy and to resist crack propagation during failure precipitously decline with age. An age-related loss in collagen integrity is strongly associated with decreases in these mechanical properties. One potential cause for this deleterious change in the ECM is an increase in advanced glycation end products, which accumulate with aging through nonenzymatic collagen crosslinking. Potential regulators and diagnostic tools of the ECM with respect to fracture resistance are also discussed.

Torg-Winchester syndrome: lack of efficacy of pamidronate therapy

Torg-Winchester syndrome, which includes nodular arthropathy with osteolysis (OMIM 605156), is a condition associated with generalized osteoporosis. On the basis of usefulness of pamidronate in conditions with osteoporosis, we hypothesized that the drug will improve osteolysis and/or osteoporosis in this condition. After obtaining informed consent from the parents, two siblings affected with Torg-Winchester syndrome were administered intravenous pamidronate over a period of 3 years. The clinical status was monitored along with the bone mineral density (using radiographs and X-ray densitometry) to assess the effect of the drug. Clinically there was no improvement. Although the bone mineral density improved in axial skeleton, osteoporosis and osteolysis continued to worsen in the appendicular skeleton. We conclude that pamidronate does not improve peripheral osteolysis in multicentric osteolysis and nodular arthropathy caused by mutation in matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene.

[Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis therapy. Standards and perspectives]

Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption and approved agents for both the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Many clinical studies have shown a consistent reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures with the use of these drugs, while others have shown a clear reduction in the risk of hip and other non-vertebral fractures. The bisphosphonates are divided into three generations based on their potency and chemical structure. In general, as a substance group they are well tolerated and, when applied correctly, the toxicity is low. Alternative dosages, e.g. monthly, three times a month or yearly as an oral drug or i.v. would probably improve patient compliance. Clinical studies have also shown the safety and effectiveness of bisphosphonates over a period of 3-7 years.

Pamidronate distribution in pediatric renal and rheumatologic patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the distribution and elimination of pamidronate in a population of pediatric patients with renal and rheumatologic disease.

METHODS

Pamidronate whole blood levels were collected for the first 4 h after first exposure in 7 patients. The relationship between the rate of urinary excretion of pamidronate and bone formation or resorption was examined in 18 patients while receiving pamidronate at a total dose of 1 mg/kg/dose infused intravenously over a 4-h period. The urinary pamidronate clearances were correlated with renal function, calcium levels and measures of bone formation and resorption.

RESULTS

Pamidronate levels reached steady state concentrations of 0.9-1.5 microg/ml within 30 min and the clearance of the drug (mean+/-SE) from blood was 180.0+/-64.2 ml/kg/h with an elimination half-life of less than 1 h. The mean urinary excretion of 31.5+/-2.2% of the administered dose indicated that about 68% of the drug was incorporated into bone, confirming the uptake of pamidronate into bone was similar in pediatric patients compared to that previously reported for adults. Bone specific alkaline phosphatase, which is a marker for bone growth and formation, had significant correlation with the uptake of pamidronate into bone (p=0.002). No correlation was demonstrated with a marker for bone resorption (urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio), or with creatinine clearance or calciuria when assessed 2 months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Pamidronate at a dose of 1 mg/kg/dose every 2 months appears safe in the short term for pediatric patients, achieves relatively low whole blood pamidronate levels, and has similar skeletal uptake of pamidronate compared to adults.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-month study of once-weekly alendronate oral solution for postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the overall safety and tolerability of once-weekly (OW) alendronate 70 mg oral solution (OS) versus OW placebo OS.

METHODS

Postmenopausal, osteoporotic women were enrolled at 51 centers in the United States in a 6-month double-blind, randomized trial. Patients were randomized (1:1) to OW alendronate 70 mg OS or placebo OS. The primary end point was the proportion of patients reporting any upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse event (AE) at 6 months. Secondary end points included mean percentage change in urinary N-telopeptide of type I human collagen (NTx) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Initially, 454 women were enrolled; 392 (86.3%) completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 65.2 (10) years, and the mean (SD) time since menopause was 19.1 (12) years. The proportion of patients experiencing any UGI AE was significantly higher with alendronate OS (23.7%) compared with placebo solution (15.3%), with a treatment difference of 8.3% (95% CI, 0.8%-15.8%; P = 0.024). The proportion of patients experiencing any esophageal AE was 4.0% with alendronate and 3.0% with placebo (treatment difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -2.7% to 4.8%]). In addition, 4.5% of alendronate and 8.7% of placebo patients discontinued the study due to any clinical AE, and 3.3% of alendronate and 1.8% of placebo patients discontinued due to a UGI AE (difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -1.5% to 4.4%]). Alendronate OS produced significantly greater reductions in both NTx and BSAP than placebo (differences, -47.5% and -38.7%, respectively [both, P < 0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this 6-month study, patients receiving OW alendronate 70 mg OS had a higher rate of UGI AEs than placebo patients. However, rates of serious UGI AEs, discontinuations due to UGI AEs, and esophageal AEs were similar between groups. UGI AEs in the study were generally mild to moderate in severity and did not result in treatment discontinuation. In addition, OW alendronate 70 mg OS significantly reduced biochemical markers of bone turnover.

Bisfosfonatos intravenosos

Bisphosphonates possess a fundamental role in the treatment of bone metabolic diseases. Yet their main limitations are poor oral absorption and gastrointestinal side effects, mainly esophageal irritation. Indeed, oral administration is unpleasant for many patients, and it is difficult in bed-confined subjects. Therefore, intravenous administration of these agents can be very useful in several clinical scenarios, especially to improve the compliance. Recently, it has been showed that intravenous bisphosphonates are very useful to control hypercalcemia of malignancy, and to prevent bone complications related to metastases. Their use has also been analyzed in the prevention of bone disease after organ transplantation. Thus, their application to control Paget's disease of bone is well-known, and probably they could have an important role as antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal and steroidal osteoporosis. We present here a state of the art of the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for the aforementioned disorders.

Fracture risk with multiple myeloma: a population-based study

Pathologic fractures, especially of the axial skeleton, are extremely common in patients with multiple myeloma and cluster around the time of diagnosis. Osteoporotic fractures seem to be less of a problem in these patients.

INTRODUCTION

It is generally believed that fractures are common in patients with multiple myeloma as a result of lytic bone lesions, generalized bone loss, and/or elevated bone turnover from excessive cytokine production, but the actual risk of pathologic versus osteoporotic fractures has not been quantified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a population-based retrospective cohort study, 165 Olmsted County, MN, residents with myeloma diagnosed from 1945 to 2001 (55% men; mean age, 70.7 +/- 11.1 years) were followed for 537 person-years. The relative risk of fractures was assessed by standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and risk factors were evaluated in proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Altogether, 134 patients experienced 463 fractures. In the year before diagnosis, 16 times more fractures were observed than expected, mostly pathologic fractures of the vertebrae and ribs. Subsequently, there was a 9-fold increase in fracture risk. However, 69% of these fractures were pathologic, and another 11% were found incidentally on myeloma monitoring. With the latter two groups excluded, subsequent fracture risk was elevated 3-fold, with a 2-fold increase in the risk of an osteoporotic fracture. In multivariate analyses, the predictors of overall fracture risk were oral corticosteroid use and elevated serum calcium levels, whereas pathologic fractures were additionally predicted by use of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

There is a dramatic increase in fractures around the time of diagnosis of myeloma, most of which are pathologic fractures. The most important predictor of overall fracture risk is oral corticosteroid use.

Mucosal irritative and healing impairment action of risedronate in rat stomachs: comparison with alendronate

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We used alendronate and risedronate as bisphosphonates and examined whether or not these agents have a mucosal irritative action in the stomach and impair the healing of pre-existing gastric ulcers in rats.

METHODS

Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were used in the following two studies: (i) the effects of risedronate and alendronate on gastric potential difference (PD), gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) and acid back-diffusion in the stomach mounted on ex vivo chamber under urethane anesthesia and; (ii) the influence of daily treatment with these drugs on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers was examined.

RESULTS

Mucosal application of risedronate produced PD reduction in the saline-perfused stomachs in a dose-dependent manner. Alendronate also produced a marked PD reduction, the effect being more potent than that of risedronate. In the stomach exposed to acid (100 mM HCl), both drugs produced a marked reduction in PD, followed by acid back-diffusion and a small increase in GMBF, resulting in hemorrhagic lesions, and the effects again were more pronounced with alendronate. These irritative effects were dependent on the pH of drug solution and the action was more potent at pH 7 than pH 4. Conversely, the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers was significantly delayed by daily administration of these drugs, yet this effect was less pronounced in the case of risedronate. The healing impairing effect of these bisphosphonates was potentiated by coadministration of indomethacin.

CONCLUSION

Both alendronate and risedronate have mucosal irritative and healing impairing effects in the stomach, yet the effect of risedronate was much less pronounced compared to alendronate. It is assumed that risedronate is safer than alendronate as the antiresorptive agent in patients with diseases related to bone remodeling.

Pain Management in Trauma Patients

Trauma is a major cause of mortality throughout the world. In recent years, major advances have been made in the management of trauma, the end result of which has been reduced mortality and enhanced function. One of these areas is pain control. Improved pain management has not only led to increased comfort in trauma patients, but has also been shown to reduce morbidity and improve long-term outcomes. This review focuses on the treatment of pain in the setting of acute injury and on pain management in trauma patients who go on to develop chronic pain. Emphasis is placed on pharmacologic interventions, invasive and noninvasive pain management techniques, analgesia in challenging patients, and pain control in commonly encountered trauma conditions.

Combining Bisphosphonates with Hormone Therapy for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis affects many women after menopause. It is a major health problem, as fragility fractures create significant morbidity in this population, especially with advancing age. Available therapies include estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, and calcitonin. They all inhibit bone resorption, although through different mechanisms. Several combinations of these agents have been studied in order to determine their effectiveness in comparison with monotherapy. We reviewed eight prospective randomized clinical trials of hormone therapies combined with bisphosphonates (etidronate, alendronate, and risedronate) and one study of a selective estrogen receptor modulator (raloxifene) in combination with a bisphosphonate (alendronate). Bone mineral density change at the lumbar spine was the primary endpoint of all the studies, with one or more measurements of the bone density at the femur as secondary endpoints. None of the studies had the statistical power to determine the relative reduction in fracture risk. All the studies reported greater increases in bone mineral density in patients treated with combination therapies as opposed to single agents. The bone turnover markers were also suppressed to a greater degree in the combination treatment groups, remaining however within normal premenopausal ranges. Four studies reported bone histomorphometry data, indicating no impairment of bone quality by combination therapies. The combination treatments were well tolerated in all the trials and the discontinuation rates did not vary among the groups. However, most patients will not require combination therapy. Combining bisphosphonates with hormone therapy may offer an additional benefit to women who either continue to lose bone mass despite taking estrogen or who need estrogen to control postmenopausal symptoms. The benefit of adding raloxifene to a bisphosphonate is smaller. However, it may be clinically useful if raloxifene reduces the risk of breast cancer.

Zoledronic Acid: Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Off-Label Drug Uses

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label DrugFacts, a quarterly publication available from Facts and Comparisons. Off-Label DrugFacts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific FDA-unapproved drug uses. This new guide to the literature will enable the health care professional/clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and to determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. The most relevant data are provided in tabular form so that the reader can easily identify the scope of information available. A summary of the data—including, background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations—precedes each table of published studies. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information prior to patient care decisions. Direct questions or comments on “Off-Label Drug Uses” to hospitalpharmacy@drugfacts.com .

Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection with potent combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in major improvement in overall survival, immune function and the incidence of opportunistic infections. However, HIV infection and treatment has been associated with the development of metabolic complications, including hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lipodystrophy and osteopenia. Safe pharmacological treatment of these complications requires an understanding of the drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and the drugs used in the treatment of metabolic complications. Since formal studies of most of these interactions have not been performed, predictions must be based on our understanding of the metabolism of these agents. All HIV protease inhibitors are metabolised by and inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. Ritonavir and nelfinavir also induce a host of CYP isoforms as well as some conjugating enzymes. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor delavirdine potently inhibits CYP3A4, whereas nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. Drug interaction studies have been performed with HIV protease inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Coadministration of ritonavir plus saquinavir to HIV-seronegative volunteers resulted in increased exposure to simvastatin acid by 3059%. Atorvastatin exposure increased by 347%, but exposure to active atorvastatin increased by only 79%. Conversely, pravastatin exposure decreased by 50%. Similar results have been obtained with combinations of simvastatin and atorvastatin with other HIV protease inhibitors. Thus, the lactone prodrugs simvastatin and lovastatin should not be used with HIV protease inhibitors. Atorvastatin may be used with caution. Although there are no formal studies available, calcium channel antagonists and repaglinide may have significant interactions and toxicity when used with HIV protease inhibitors because of their metabolism by CYP3A4. Sulfonylurea drugs utilise mainly CYP2C9 for metabolism, and this isoenzyme may be induced by ritonavir and nelfinavir with a resulting decrease in efficacy of the sulfonylurea. Losartan may have increased effect when coadministered with ritonavir and nelfinavir because of the induction of CYP2C9 and the expected increase in formation of the active metabolite, E-3174. Overall, well-designed drug-drug interaction studies at steady state are needed to determine whether antiretroviral drugs may be safely coadministered with many of the drugs used in the treatment of the metabolic complications of HIV infection.

The role of bisphosphonates in the management of metastatic prostate cancer

Most men with advanced prostate cancer have primarily skeletal metastases, which are responsible for most of the morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer. Although bone lesions are osteoblastic in radiographic appearance, recent evidence has demonstrated that anti-osteoclast therapy with bisphosphonates reduces skeletal-related complications in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. This observation may be explained by the demonstration that osteoclast activity is greatly upregulated even in osteoblastic metastases. Furthermore, androgen deprivation therapy, the mainstay of treatment for advanced prostate cancer, leads to increased bone resorption and reduces bone mineral density. These effects can be ameliorated, and potentially completely prevented, by coadministration of bisphosphonates. These findings may point to a role for bisphosphonates in men with prostate cancer even prior to the development of skeletal metastases. Determination of whether such early therapy ultimately results in delayed time to skeletal progression or in improved survival will require large randomized studies.

Response to alendronate in osteoporotic women previously treated with pamidronate

INTRODUCTION

Different bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of fracture in osteoporotic patients. It is unclear how shifting from a treatment with one bisphosphonate to another will influence the evolution of BMD and bone turnover.

METHODS

In the present study, we followed BMD (DXA, Hologic QDR1000) of the lumbar spine (BMDL) and of the total hip (BMDH), bone alkaline phosphatase (Ostase, Hibritech), and urinary collagen cross links (pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, Biorad) in 39 patients treated with IV pamidronate (60 mg/3 months) since at least 2 years and who were shifted to oral alendronate (10 mg/day, n=18) or left to IV pamidronate (n=21) for 2 more years.

RESULTS

BMD increased similarly and significantly in both groups after 2 additional years of treatment as compared to baseline (P<0.05, sign test). BMDL: +3.8% in the alendronate group vs +4.1% in the pamidronate group; BMDH: +4.3% in alendronate group vs +3.6% in pamidronate group, There was no significant change in the biological parameters of bone turnover in any group.

CONCLUSION

The increase of BMD with both bisphosphonates in these previously treated patients was as expected after a 2 more years of treatment. Alendronate administration did not induce a larger gain in BMD as compared to cyclic pamidronate. Bone turnover was no longer affected by switching the bisphosphonate treatment.

Tolerability of once-weekly alendronate in patients with osteoporosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tolerability of once-weekly oral alendronate, 70 mg, and placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The first patient initiated treatment on June 5, 2000, and the last patient completed treatment on March 1, 2001. The study enrolled 450 postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis (224 took alendronate, 226 took placebo) who were ambulatory and community dwelling at 48 outpatient study centers in the United States. By design, approximately half of the patients were naive to bisphosphonates. The primary end point was upper GI tract tolerability based on the incidence of any upper GI tract adverse events. Secondary end points included the number of discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events and the change from baseline in bone resorption, assessed by the urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio at 12 weeks. A subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary end points was performed on the patients stratified by prior bisphosphonate use. The safety and tolerability of the weekly alendronate and placebo regimens were captured as clinical and laboratory adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 11% of the alendronate patients and 13% of the placebo patients reported an upper GI tract adverse event. Discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events occurred in 3% of alendronate patients and 1% of placebo patients. The differences between the treatment groups for the primary and secondary end points were not significant. For the primary end point, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference was well within the prespecified 14% comparability bound (-2.2%; 95% confidence interval, -8.3% to 3.9%). The overall incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was lower in the subgroup of patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure (8%) than in those who were bisphosphonate naive (16%). However, regardless of prior bisphosphonate exposure, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was similar between the alendronate and placebo patients. The urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio showed a significant decrease in the alendronate patients (72% of baseline, P<.001) compared with a slight increase in the placebo patients (106% of baseline) at week 12.

CONCLUSION

In this 3-month study, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events in patients treated with once-weekly alendronate, 70 mg, was comparable to that with placebo.

Discoveries, drugs and skeletal disorders

Bone turnover, in which cells of the osteoclast lineage resorb bone and cells of the osteoblast lineage deposit bone, normally occurs in a highly regulated manner throughout life. Perturbations to these processes underlie skeletal disorders, such as osteoporosis, which are common, chronic and disabling, and increase with age. On the basis of empirical observations or on understanding of the endocrinology of the skeleton, excellent bone-resorption inhibitors, but few anabolic agents, have been developed as therapeutics for skeletal disorders. However, powerful new genomic and genetic tools are uncovering new loci that regulate the activity of both osteoclasts and osteoblasts, and these hold great promise for future drug development.

Osteoporosis in men: pathophysiology, evaluation, and therapy

Osteoporosis is a serious health problem for men. An advance in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of this disorder has resulted in the possibility of a gender-specific approach to screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Here we review the data on osteoporosis in men, discuss controversies regarding whom to screen, whom to treat, and how to treat. Recent treatment data as they relate to men are reviewed, and a clinical treatment algorithm is presented.

The gastrointestinal tolerability and safety of oral bisphosphonates

Oral bisphosphonates are effective for osteoporosis and other hyperresorptive bone disorders. Although well-tolerated in efficacy trials, some oral aminobisphosphonates have been associated with upper gastrointestinal intolerance and injury in postmarketing experience. Clinical trials often underestimate the rate of adverse events in clinical practice, and ethics prohibit direct evaluation of toxicity in high-risk patients. Accordingly, animal models and endoscopy studies of oral bisphosphonates provide valuable insight. It is unclear whether variation in ulcerogenic potential reflects differences in dosing, formulation or chemical structure. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of endoscopic lesions is uncertain. Ongoing postmarketing review will determine whether differences in endoscopic damage predict tolerability and safety in clinical practice. However, physicians and patients should consider risk factors for oesophageal injury when initiating therapy.

Identification of a bisphosphonate that inhibits isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase and farnesyl diphosphate synthase

We and others have recently shown that the major molecular target of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate drugs is farnesyl diphosphate synthase, an enzyme in the mevalonate pathway. In an in vitro screen, we discovered a bisphosphonate, NE21650, that potently inhibited farnesyl diphosphate synthase but, unlike other N-BPs investigated, was also a weak inhibitor of isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase. NE21650 was a more potent inhibitor of protein prenylation in osteoclasts and macrophages, and a more potent inhibitor of bone resorption in vitro, than alendronate, despite very similar IC(50) values for inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase. Our observations show that minor changes to the structure of bisphosphonates allow inhibition of more than one enzyme in the mevalonate pathway and suggest that loss of protein prenylation due to inhibition of more than one enzyme in the mevalonate pathway may lead to an increase in antiresorptive potency compared to bisphosphonates that only inhibit farnesyl diphosphate synthase.