Local anaesthesia for fibreoptic bronchoscopy: comparison between intratracheal cocaine and lignocaine

Guidelines for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: Joint Indian Chest Society/National College of chest physicians (I)/Indian association for bronchology recommendations

Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is commonly performed by respiratory physicians for diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. However, bronchoscopy practices vary widely across India and worldwide. The three major respiratory organizations of the country supported a national-level expert group that formulated a comprehensive guideline document for FB based on a detailed appraisal of available evidence. These guidelines are an attempt to provide the bronchoscopist with the most scientifically sound as well as practical approach of bronchoscopy. It involved framing appropriate questions, review and critical appraisal of the relevant literature and reaching a recommendation by the expert groups. The guidelines cover major areas in basic bronchoscopy including (but not limited to), indications for procedure, patient preparation, various sampling procedures, bronchoscopy in the ICU setting, equipment care, and training issues. The target audience is respiratory physicians working in India and well as other parts of the world. It is hoped that this document would serve as a complete reference guide for all pulmonary physicians performing or desiring to learn the technique of flexible bronchoscopy.

Complications and discomfort of bronchoscopy: a systematic review

Objective

To identify bronchoscopy-related complications and discomfort, meaningful complication rates, and predictors.

Method

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed on 8 February 2016, using a search strategy including the PICO model, on complications and discomfort related to bronchoscopy and related sampling techniques.

Results

The search yielded 1,707 hits, of which 45 publications were eligible for full review. Rates of mortality and severe complications were low. Other complications, for instance, hypoxaemia, bleeding, pneumothorax, and fever, were usually not related to patient characteristics or aspects of the procedure, and complication rates showed considerable ranges. Measures of patient discomfort differed considerably, and results were difficult to compare between different study populations.

Conclusion

More research on safety aspects of bronchoscopy is needed to conclude on complication rates and patient- and procedure-related predictors of complications and discomfort.

Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?

Objectives

Bronchoscopy is an essential investigative tool in many respiratory complaints. The procedure can be unpleasant for both bronchoscopists and patients. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few studies that correlate the bronchoscopist's satisfaction with that of the patient's during bronchoscopy. The aim of our study is to assess whether or not a bronchoscopist could reliably assess a patient's satisfaction during bronchoscopy.

Design

Cross-sectional, observational study with convenience sampling.

Setting

Patients attending flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy appointments at the bronchoscopy suite, Respiratory Unit, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC), Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between March and September 2006.

Participants

Sixty patients undergoing bronchoscopy over a 6-month period completed a questionnaire after the procedure. All patients received standard pre-medication with intravenous midazolam.

Main outcome measures

Bronchoscopists and patients rated the level of satisfaction of the procedure using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower scores indicated better satisfaction or less discomfort. Patients and bronchoscopists also rated coughing, choking and vomiting perception using the same 10 cm VAS. Reliability analysis (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) was used to analyse the correlation between patients' and bronchoscopists' VAS scores.

Results

All 60 patients answered the questionnaire. The median overall satisfaction scored by bronchoscopists was 2.2 (2.0) with a non-significant (p = 0.880) trend to a better median overall satisfaction of 1.9 (2.3) scored by patients. The VAS scores for cough sensation were 1.9 (2.7) and 1.5 (5.0), respectively. There was positive correlation between bronchoscopists' and patients' VAS scores for coughing sensation (p = 0.047, ICC = 0.233). No significant correlation for overall satisfaction, vomiting sensation and choking sensation was found.

Conclusion

Positive correlation for cough perception suggested that the bronchoscopist could reliably assess the degree of cough discomfort patients experience during bronchoscopy.

[Diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Recommendations of the Endoscopy Working Group of the French Society of Pulmonary Medicine]

These guidelines on flexible bronchoscopy depict important clues to be known and taken into account while practicing flexible bronchoscopy, in adult, except in emergency situations. This is a practical clarification. Safety conditions, complications, anesthesia, infectious risks, cleaning and disinfection are detailed from a review of the literature. Intensive care practice of bronchoscopy requires more attention due to higher risks patients and is discussed extensively. Standards and performances of the various sampling techniques complete this work. Indications for bronchoscopy, therapeutic and paediatric bronchoscopy are not covered in these guidelines.

Nebulized lidocaine in the treatment of severe asthma in children: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids have been used to treat asthma since the 1950s; however, their adverse systemic effects have limited their duration of use and dosage. Unfortunately, many patients with severe asthma often require oral glucocorticoids in addition to inhaled glucocorticoids. Alternatives to glucocorticoids have been sought with mixed success. Recently, lidocaine has been added to the list of potent glucocorticoid sparing agents for the treatment of severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We report the first group of pediatric patients with severe asthma treated with nebulized lidocaine.

METHODS

The study was performed in an open manner with 6 severely asthmatic patients followed in the Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Section, Mayo Clinic. The only intervention was the institution of nebulized lidocaine (0.8 mg/kg/dose to 2.5 mg/kg/dose t.i.d to q.i.d). The average daily steroid requirement was followed during the administration of the nebulized lidocaine.

RESULTS

During a mean of 11.2 months of therapy (range 7 to 16 months) 5 of the 6 patients completely discontinued their oral glucocorticoids within an average time of 3.4 months (range 1 to 7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

After further study, lidocaine may prove to be the first non-toxic, steroid alternative to patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma.

Effect of nebulized lidocaine on severe glucocorticoid-dependent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nebulized lidocaine is a useful therapy in patients with severe glucocorticoid-dependent asthma.

DESIGN

We prospectively conducted an open study of the effects of administration of nebulized lidocaine four times daily in 20 patients with asthma who had side effects of exogenous hypercortisolism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 18 women and 2 men, who were 19 to 71 years of age, all had severe asthma that necessitated both topical and systemic administration of glucocorticoids to control symptoms of airflow obstruction. Treatment consisted of nebulized lidocaine, 40 to 160 mg four times daily. Initially, all topical and systemic glucocorticoid regimens were maintained; if peak flow rates remained stable and symptoms of asthma were well controlled, orally administered glucocorticoid regimens were slowly reduced.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were able to discontinue oral use of glucocorticoids entirely, despite prolonged glucocorticoid dependence (mean 6.6 years and median 3 years for the 20 patients); 4 achieved reduction in their daily glucocorticoid requirement while maintaining control of symptoms of asthma (duration of glucocorticoid dependence for responders, mean 6.2 years and median 3.2 years). Three patients had no apparent response, as determined by their continued severe asthma symptoms and inability to reduce oral glucocorticoid requirements.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that nebulized lidocaine is a useful therapy for chronic asthma, allowing reduction or elimination of oral glucocorticoid therapy.