Bacterial colonization of the donor lower airways is a predictor of poor outcome in lung transplantation☆

Lung donor bronchoalveolar lavage positivity: Incidence, risk factors, and lung transplant recipients' outcome

BACKGROUND

Inconsistent data exists regarding the risk factors for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) positivity in lung donors, the incidence of donor-derived infections (DDI), and the effect of BAL positivity on lung transplant (LuTx) recipients' outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive LuTx at a single center from January 2016 to December 2022. Donors' data, including characteristics, graft function and BAL samples were collected pre-procurement. Recipients underwent BAL before LuTx and about the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after LuTx. A DDI was defined as BAL positivity (bacterial growth ≥104 colony forming units) for identical bacterial species between donor and recipient. Recipients' pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative management, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Two recipient cohorts were identified based on lung colonization status before undergoing LuTx.

RESULTS

Out of 188 LuTx procedures performed, 169 were analyzed. Thirty-six percent of donors' BAL tested positive. Donors' characteristics and graft function at procurement were not associated with BAL positivity. Fourteen DDI were detected accounting for 23% of recipients receiving a graft with a positive BAL. Only among uncolonized recipients, receiving a graft with positive BAL is associated with higher likelihood of requiring invasive ventilation at 72 hours after LuTx on higher positive end-expiratory pressure levels having lower PaO2/FiO2, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU stay. No difference in hospital length of stay was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving a graft with a positive BAL, which is poorly predicted by donors' characteristics, carries the risk of developing a DDI and is associated to a worse early graft function among uncolonized recipients.

Donor respiratory multidrug-resistant bacteria and lung transplantation outcomes

RATIONALE

Respiratory culture screening is mandatory for all potential lung transplant donors. There is limited evidence on the significance of donor multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria on transplant outcomes. Establishing the safety of allografts colonized with MDR bacteria has implications for widening an already limited donor pool.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the prevalence of respiratory MDR bacteria among our donor population and to test for associations with posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included all adult patients who underwent lung-only transplantation for the first time at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre in Riyadh from January 2015 through May 2022. The study evaluated donor bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial swab cultures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven of 181 donors (37%) had respiratory MDR bacteria, most commonly MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 24), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 18), MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 8), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 6). Donor respiratory MDR bacteria were not significantly associated with allograft survival or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in adjusted hazard models. Sensitivity analyses revealed an increased risk for 90-day mortality among recipients of allografts with MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6 with strains resistant to a carbapenem and n = 2 resistant to a third-generation cephalosporin only) compared to those receiving culture-negative allografts (25.0% versus 11.1%, p = 0.04). MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (aHR 3.31, 95%CI 0.95-11.56) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (aHR 5.35, 95%CI 1.26-22.77) were associated with an increased risk for CLAD compared to negative cultures.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the potential safety of using lung allografts with MDR bacteria in the setting of appropriate prophylaxis; however, caution should be exercised in the case of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection with sphingosine in ex vivo perfused and ventilated lungs

BACKGROUND

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has expanded the donor pool for lung transplantation. Pulmonary Staphylococcus aureus infection, especially that caused by multidrug-resistant strains, is a severe threat to posttransplantation outcomes. Sphingosine is a lipid compound that exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of S aureus infection on EVLP and whether sphingosine administration during EVLP prevents infection with S aureus.

METHODS

Eighteen pigs were randomly assigned to 3 groups: uninfected, infected with S aureus with NaCl treatment, or infected with sphingosine treatment. Bacterial numbers were determined before and after treatment. Sphingosine concentrations in the lung tissues were determined using biochemical assays. Lung histology, lung physiological parameters, perfusate content, lung weight, and cell death were measured to analyze the effects of infection and sphingosine administration on EVLP.

RESULTS

Sphingosine administration significantly reduced the bacterial load. The concentration of sphingosine in the bronchial epithelium was elevated after sphingosine administration. S aureus infection increased pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Lung edema, histology scores, lactate and lactate dehydrogenase levels in the perfusate, ΔPO2 in the perfusate, static lung compliance, and lung peak airway pressure did not differ among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection of S aureus did not affect the lung function during EVLP but induced higher pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Administration of sphingosine effectively eliminated S aureus without side effects in isolated, perfused, and ventilated pig lungs.

Evaluation of donor-derived bacterial infections in lung transplant recipients

Background

This study aims to evaluate the etiology and outcomes of donor-derived bacterial infections in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 71 lung transplant recipients (56 males, 15 females; median age: 43.3 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of donor-derived bacterial infection was defined as the isolation of the same bacteria with the same antibiotic susceptibility patterns in a lung sample of donor and in one sample obtained from patients after transplantation and the presence of clinical evidence of infection.

Results

Ten (14%) patients were found to have donor-derived bacterial infection. Acinetobacter baumannii was found in three, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in three, Klebsiella pneumoniae in one, Enterobacter cloacae in one, Staphylococcus aureus in one, and both Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii in one patient. Twenty-four of lung-transplant recipients and four patients with donor-derived infection died.

Conclusion

Lung transplants are usually performed in hospitalized patients or in those admitted to the intensive care unit. These patients commonly experience infection and colonization with resistant microorganisms.

Interventional pulmonology techniques in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a key therapeutic option for several end-stage lung diseases. Interventional pulmonology techniques, mostly bronchoscopy, play a key role throughout the whole path of lung transplantation, from donor evaluation to diagnosis and management of post-transplant complications. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at describing the main indications, contraindications, performance characteristics and safety profile of interventional pulmonology techniques in the context of lung transplantation. We highlighted the role of bronchoscopy during donor evaluation and described the debated role of surveillance bronchoscopy (with bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy) to detect early rejection, infections and airways complications. The conventional (transbronchial forceps biopsy) and the new techniques (i.e. cryobiopsy, biopsy molecular assessment, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy) can detect and grade rejection. Several endoscopic techniques (e.g. balloon dilations, stent placement, ablative techniques) are employed in the management of airways complications (ischemia and necrosis, dehiscence, stenosis and malacia). First line pleural interventions (i.e. thoracentesis, chest tube insertion, indwelling pleural catheters) may be useful in the context of early and late pleural complications occurring after lung transplantation. High quality studies are advocated to define endoscopic standard protocols and thus help improving long-term prognostic outcomes of lung transplant recipients.

Exploring predisposing factors and pathogenesis contributing to injuries of donor lungs

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic strategy for patients with incurable lung diseases. However, its use has been severely limited by the narrow donor pool and potential concerns of inferior quality of donor lungs, which are more susceptible to external influence than other transplant organs. Multiple insults, including various causes of death and a series of perimortem events, may act together on donor lungs and eventually culminate in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after transplantation as well as other poor short-term outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection criteria for eligible donors vary and may be poor discriminators of lung injury. Not all transplanted lungs are in ideal condition. With the rapidly increasing waiting list for LTx, the trend of using marginal donors has become more apparent, underscoring the need to gain a deeper understanding of donor lung injuries and discover more donor resources.

Antimicrobial effects of inhaled sphingosine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs

Background

Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a save way to verify performance of donor lungs prior to implantation. A major problem of lung transplantation is a donor-to-recipient-transmission of bacterial cultures. Thus, a broadspectrum anti-infective treatment with sphingosine in EVLP might be a novel way to prevent such infections. Sphingosine inhalation might provide a reliable anti-infective treatment option in EVLP. Here, antimicrobial potency of inhalative sphingosine in an infection EVLP model was tested.

Methods

A 3-hour EVLP run using pig lungs was performed. Bacterial infection was initiated 1-hour before sphingosine inhalation. Biopsies were obtained 60 and 120 min after infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Aliquots of broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) before and after inhalation of sphingosine were plated and counted, tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Immunostainings were performed.

Results

Sphingosine inhalation in the setting of EVLP rapidly resulted in a 6-fold decrease of P. aeruginosa CFU in the lung (p = 0.016). We did not observe any negative side effects of sphingosine.

Conclusion

Inhalation of sphingosine induced a significant decrease of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the epithelial layer of tracheal and bronchial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated pig lungs.

Bronchial Culture Growth From the Donor and Recipient as Predictive Factors in the Detection of Primary Graft Dysfunction and Pneumonia After Lung Transplant

OBJECTIVES

In this study, our aim was to investigate whether bacterial culture growth from donors and recipients is related to early posttransplant complications and to analyze its role in primary graft dysfunction and posttransplant pneumonia in lung transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with end-stage lung disease who received a lung transplant for treatment. We examined relationships between donor bronchial lavage, pretransplant recipient sputum, and recipient posttransplant serial bronchial lavage culture results, as well as the development of both primary graft dysfunction and pneumonia after lung transplant during the early posttransplant period.

RESULTS

Our study included 77 patients with median age of 48 years (25%-75% IQR, 34-56 years) and who were mostly men (79.2%; n = 61). Donor culture positivity was 62.3% (n = 48), and the positivity of sputum culture from patients before transplant was 20.8% (n = 16). Compared with that shown in those without versus those with primary graft dysfunction, there were significantly more positive sputum cultures from patients before transplant (P = .003). Recipients with donor culture growth had a longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (median of 4 days [IQR, 2-13 days] vs 1 day [IQR, 1-2 days]; P = .001, respectively) than those without. Multivariate logistic analysis identified both donor culture positivity (odds ratio: 3.391; 95% CI, 1.12-20.46; P = .0028) and sputum culture positivity in pretransplant recipient candidates (odds ratio: 6.494; 95% CI, 1.80-36.27; P = .004) as independent predictors of primary graft dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial growth shown in donor bronchial lavage and sputum culture positivity in patients before transplant were found to be independent predictors of primary graft dysfunction in the early posttransplant period. Organism growth in both the donor and the recipient during the pretransplant period are important determinants for the development of primary graft dysfunction.

Infectious Complications in Lung Transplant Recipients

Infection remains a common cause of death throughout the lifespan of a lung transplant recipient. The increased susceptibility of lung transplant recipients is multifactorial including exposure of the graft to the external environment, impaired mucociliary clearance, and high levels of immunosuppression. Long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients remain poor compared with other solid organ transplants largely due to deaths from infections and chronic allograft dysfunction. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis may be used after lung transplantation to target a number of different opportunistic infections for varying durations of time. The first-month posttransplant is most commonly characterized by nosocomial infections and donor-derived infections. Following the first month to the first 6 months after transplant-a period of intense immunosuppression-is associated with opportunistic infections. While immunosuppression is reduced after the first year posttransplant, infection remains a risk with community-acquired and rarer infectious agents. Clinicians should be vigilant for infection at all time points after transplant. The use of patient-tailored prophylaxis and treatments help ensure graft and patient survival.

Management of the Potential Lung Donor

The use of donor management protocols has significantly improved recovery rates; however, the inherent instability of lungs after death results in low utilization rates of potential donor lungs. Donor lungs are susceptible to direct trauma, aspiration, neurogenic edema, ventilator-associated barotrauma, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. After irreversible brain injury and determination of futility of care, the goal of medical management of the donor shifts to maintaining hemodynamic stability and maximizing the likelihood of successful organ recovery.

Inhaled sphingosine has no adverse side effects in isolated ventilated and perfused pig lungs

Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems like XVIVO are more and more common in the setting of lung transplantation, since marginal donor-lungs can easily be subjected to a performance test or be treated with corticosteroids or antibiotics in high dose regimes. Donor lungs are frequently positive in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial cultures (46-89%) which leads to a donor-to-recipient transmission and after a higher risk of lung infection with reduced posttransplant outcome. We have previously shown that sphingosine very efficiently kills a variety of pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis, Escherichia coli or Haemophilus influenzae. Thus, sphingosine could be a new treatment option with broadspectrum antiinfective potential, which may improve outcome after lung transplantation when administered prior to lung re-implantation. Here, we tested whether sphingosine has any adverse effects in the respiratory tract when applied into isolated ventilated and perfused lungs. A 4-h EVLP run using minipig lungs was performed. Functional parameters as well as perfusate measurements where obtained. Biopsies were obtained 30 min and 150 min after inhalation of sphingosine. Tissue samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Hemalaun, TUNEL as well as stainings with Cy3-coupled anti-sphingosine or anti-ceramide antibodies were implemented. We demonstrate that tube-inhalation of sphingosine into ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs results in increased levels of sphingosine in the luminal membrane of bronchi and the trachea without morphological side effects up to very high doses of sphingosine. Sphingosine also did not affect functional lung performance. In summary, the inhalation of sphingosine results in an increase of sphingosine concentrations in the luminal plasma membrane of tracheal and bronchial epithelial cells. The inhalation has no local side effects in ex-vivo perfused and ventilated minipig lungs.

Bacterial products in donor airways prevent the induction of lung transplant tolerance

Although postoperative bacterial infections can trigger rejection of pulmonary allografts, the impact of bacterial colonization of donor grafts on alloimmune responses to transplanted lungs remains unknown. Here, we tested the hypothesis that bacterial products present within donor grafts at the time of implantation promote lung allograft rejection. Administration of the toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) agonist Pam₃ Cys₄ to Balb/c wild-type grafts triggered acute cellular rejection after transplantation into B6 wild-type recipients that received perioperative costimulatory blockade. Pam₃ Cys₄ -triggered rejection was associated with an expansion of CD8⁺ T lymphocytes and CD11c⁺ CD11b^hi MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class II⁺ antigen-presenting cells within the transplanted lungs. Rejection was prevented when lungs were transplanted into TLR2-deficient recipients but not when MyD88-deficient donors were used. Adoptive transfer of B6 wild-type monocytes, but not T cells, following transplantation into B6 TLR2-deficient recipients restored the ability of Pam₃ Cys₄ to trigger acute cellular rejection. Thus, we have demonstrated that activation of TLR2 by a bacterial lipopeptide within the donor airways prevents the induction of lung allograft tolerance through a process mediated by recipient-derived monocytes. Our work suggests that donor lungs harboring bacteria may precipitate an inflammatory response that can facilitate allograft rejection.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.

Effects of Multidrug-resistant Bacteria in Donor Lower Respiratory Tract on Early Posttransplant Pneumonia in Lung Transplant Recipients Without Pretransplant Infection

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in the lower respiratory tracts of allografts may be risk factors for early posttransplant pneumonia (PTP) that causes detrimental outcomes in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). We evaluated the effects of immediate changes in MDR bacteria in allografts on early PTP and mortality rates in LTRs.

METHODS

We reviewed 90 adult bilateral LTRs without pretransplant infections who underwent lung transplantation between October 2012 and May 2018. Quantitative cultures were performed with the bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of the allografts preanastomosis and within 3 days posttransplant. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus defines early PTP as pneumonia acquired within 30 days posttransplant and not associated with acute rejection.

RESULTS

MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (11/34, 32.4%) and Staphylococcus aureus (9/34, 26.5%) were identified in 24.4% (22/90) of the preanastomosis allografts. Four LTRs had the same MDR bacteria in allografts preanastomosis and posttransplant. Allograft MDR bacteria disappeared in 50% of the LTRs within 3 days posttransplant. Early PTP and all-cause in-hospital mortality rates were not different between LTRs with and without preanastomosis MDR bacteria (P = 0.75 and 0.93, respectively). MDR bacteria ≥10 CFU/mL in the lungs within 3 days posttransplant was associated with early PTP (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-27.0; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of preexisting MDR bacteria in allografts did not increase early PTP and mortality rates in LTRs. Despite the small and highly selective study population, lung allografts with MDR bacteria may be safely transplanted with appropriate posttransplant antibiotic therapy.

Impact of donor lung colonized bacteria detected by next-generation sequencing on early post-transplant outcomes in lung transplant recipients

Background

The effect of donor lung colonized bacteria on the prognosis of lung transplantation is not clear. We used the technique of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect the colonized bacteria from the lower respiratory tract and analyzed whether the colonized bacteria of donor lung could affect the outcomes of lung transplantation.

Methods

Seventeen patients who underwent lung transplantation from March 2018 to June 2018 at Wuxi People’s Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University were included in this study. Twelve cases of donor lung were obtained, and 17 lung transplants were performed, including 12 single lung transplantation and 5 bilateral lung transplantation. The colonized bacteria in the lower lobe tissue of donor lung were detected by NGS, and the bacteria culture method was used to detect the bacteria in the airway secretion before and after the operation. The information of length of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, mechanical ventilation time, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of fever and length of hospital stay were collected for prognostic analysis.

Results

Compared with bacterial culture methods, the positive rate by using NGS in the lungs were higher (52.9% vs 41.2%). Among the patients who were transplanted with donor lungs with detected bacteria by NGS before surgery, only one patient (1/9) developed the same bacteria after lung transplantation. Based on results of NGS and bacterial culture, there was no association between the colonized bacteria in donor lungs and the patients’ outcomes of immediate posttransplant period.

Conclusion

NGS showed more sensitive than bacterial culture for detection of bacteria. The colonized bacteria in different parts of the lung are inconsistent. There is no association between the colonized bacteria in donor lungs and short-term outcome of lung transplantation patients.

Perioperative antibiotics for preventing post-surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for infections due to the complexity of surgical procedures combined with the impact of immunosuppression. No consensus exists on the role of antibiotics for surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies was searched up to 21 April 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in any language assessing prophylactic antibiotics in preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients at any time point after transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Other outcomes included urinary tract infections, pneumonias and septicaemia, death (any cause), graft loss, graft rejection, graft function, adverse reactions to antimicrobial agents, and outcomes identified by the Standardised Outcomes of Nephrology Group (SONG), specifically graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer and life participation. Summary effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the evidence was assessed using the risk of bias and the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight eligible studies (718 randomised participants). Overall, five studies (248 randomised participants) compared antibiotics versus no antibiotics, and three studies (470 randomised participants) compared extended duration versus short duration antibiotics. Risk of bias was assessed as high for performance bias (eight studies), detection bias (eight studies) and attrition bias (two studies). It is uncertain whether antibiotics reduce the incidence of surgical site infections as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.85; 5 studies, 226 participants; I² = 25%). The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). It is uncertain whether extended duration antibiotics reduces the incidence of surgical site infections in either solid organ transplant recipients (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.48; 2 studies, 302 participants; I² = 0%) or kidney-only transplant recipients (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.48; 1 study, 205 participants) as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). None of the eight included studies evaluated antimicrobial agent adverse reactions, graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer, life participation, biochemical and haematological parameters, intervention cost, hospitalisation length, or overall hospitalisation costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to methodological limitations, risk of bias and significant heterogeneity, the current evidence for the use of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics in transplantation is of very low quality. Further high quality, adequately powered RCTs would help better inform clinical practice.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement for the standardization of bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplantation

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a key clinical and research tool in lung transplantation (LTx). However, BAL collection and processing are not standardized across LTx centers. This International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation-supported consensus document on BAL standardization aims to clarify definitions and propose common approaches to improve clinical and research practice standards. The following 9 areas are covered: (1) bronchoscopy procedure and BAL collection, (2) sample handling, (3) sample processing for microbiology, (4) cytology, (5) research, (6) microbiome, (7) sample inventory/tracking, (8) donor bronchoscopy, and (9) pediatric considerations. This consensus document aims to harmonize clinical and research practices for BAL collection and processing in LTx. The overarching goal is to enhance standardization and multicenter collaboration within the international LTx community and enable improvement and development of new BAL-based diagnostics.

Current techniques and the future of lung preservation

Although lung transplant remains the only option for patients suffering from end-stage lung failure, donor supply is insufficient to meet demand. Static cold preservation is the most common method to preserve lungs in transport to the recipient; however, this method does not improve lung quality and only allows for 8 h of storage. This results in lungs which become available for donation but cannot be used due to failure to meet physiologic criteria or an inability to store them for a sufficient time to find a suitable recipient. Therefore, lungs lost due to failure to meet physiological or compatibility criteria may be mitigated through preservation methods which improve lung function and storage durations. Ex situ lung perfusion (ESLP) is a recently developed method which allows for longer storage times and has been demonstrated to improve lung function such that rejected lungs can be accepted for donation. Although greater use of ESLP will help to improve donor lung utilization, the ability to cryopreserve lungs would allow for organ banking to better utilize donor lungs. However, lung cryopreservation research remains underrepresented in the literature despite its unique advantages for cryopreservation over other organs. Therefore, this review will discuss the current techniques for lung preservation, static cold preservation and ESLP, and provide a review of the cryopreservation challenges and advantages unique to lungs.

Serum Amyloid A in lung transplantation

Background:

Serum Amyloid A (SAA) is an acute phase protein and we analyzed its concentrations in lung transplantated patients (LTX).

Methods:

26 LTX patients (58.6 ± 11 years) and 11 healthy controls (55 ± 11.3 years). Three groups of LTX patients: acute rejection (AR, 7) bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS, 3), acute infection (INF, 9) and stable patients (NEG, 7).

Results:

In LTX patients SAA concentrations were significantly increased, particularly in AR and INF. In LTX-AR patients were observed a correlation between SAA levels and peripheral CD4+ lymphocyte percentage (r=0.9, p<0.01) and a reverse correlation with FVC percentages (r -0.94, p=0.01).

Conclusions:

SAA may represent a potential biomarker of LTX acute complications, with a prognostic value in AR. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2020; 37 (1): 2-7)

Airway bacteria of the recipient but not the donor are relevant to post-lung transplant pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of early airway infection is essential for the survival of lung transplant (LTx) recipients during the first 12 months after transplantation. This study aimed to explore the main cause of post-lung transplant pneumonia (PLTP) within 30 days after LTx.

METHODS

Forty LTx patients were retrospectively analyzed. Sputum sampling from donors' and recipients' airways was performed pretransplant and posttransplant daily for the first 30 days after LTx. Organisms in the recipient's and donor's original airways were compared to pathogens responsible for PLTP. Patients with and without PLTP were also compared to identify relevant risk factors.

RESULTS

Seventeen (42.5%) patients developed pneumonia (PLTP group) and 23 had no episode of pneumonia (Non-PLTP group) during the first 30 days. In the PLTP group, median time from LTx to PLTP onset was 6 days. A significantly higher incidence of PLTP was caused by recipient's rather than donor's original airway bacteria (62% vs 13%, p < 0.01). Smoking history of the donor and pretransplant airway bacterial colonization of the recipient were independent risk factors of PLTP which was associated with prolonged posttransplant mechanical ventilation with longer intensive care unit stay and worse survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The recipient's original airway microflora rather than the donor's, was highly associated with PLTP. A combination of donor smoking history and recipient airway infection should be avoided, while evidence of donor lung infection is not a contraindication for LTx.

The outcomes of 80 lung transplants in a single center from Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation has become a standard of care for a select group of patients with advanced lung diseases. Lung transplantation has undergone rapid growth in the last few years in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE

Describe five years of experience with lung transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive.

SETTINGS

Major tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent lung transplant surgery between 2010 to 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Indications for lung transplant demographics, body mass index, blood group, type of transplant surgery, morbidity rate using the Clavien-Dindo classification, rate of early- and late-onset bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), bronchiolitis obliterans-free survival, 30- and 90-day mortality rate, and survival (30 days, 90 days, 1-year, 3-years and 5-years) for lung transplant recipients. The duration of mechanical ventilation, colonization by bacteria and need for lung volume reduction surgery for lung donors.

SAMPLE SIZE

80, 45% women and 55% men.

RESULTS

The most common indication for lung transplant in Saudi Arabia is pulmonary fibrosis (45%), followed by non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (25%) and cystic fibrosis-related bronchiectasis (20%). Only 45% of our lung transplant recipients had a normal BMI (18-28 kg/m2). The most frequent blood group was A (40%), followed by blood group O (32.5%). Most (85%) lung transplants were bilateral while 15% were single lung transplants. Postoperative complications developed in 64 patients, 34 (42.5%) had minor grade 1 complications, while 13 (16.5%) had severe complications leading to death (grade V). Early onset BOS developed in 6 (7.5%) patients while 16 (20%) had late onset BOS. The BOS-free survival rate was 72.5%. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation in lung donors was 9 days and most were infected by bacteria. The majority of recipients required lung volume reduction. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.5% and the 90-day mortality rate was 17.5%. Survival rates at our center were 87.5% at 30 days, 82.5% at 90 days, 81.2% at 1 year, 67.9% at 2 years and 62.1% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation has become an invaluable approach for the treatment of end-stage respiratory disease. Our 5-year experience has shown exciting promises for lung transplantation in Saudi Arabia.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, single center experience.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Surgical site infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs) in solid organ transplantation. SSIs are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. Depending on the organ transplanted, SSIs occur in 3%-53% of patients, with the highest rates observed in small bowel/multivisceral, liver, and pancreas transplant recipients. These infections are classified by increasing invasiveness as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space SSIs. The spectrum of organisms implicated in SSIs in SOT recipients is more diverse than the general population due to other important factors such as the underlying end-stage organ failure, immunosuppression, prolonged hospitalizations, organ transportation/preservation, and previous exposures to antibiotics in donors and recipients that could predispose to infections with multidrug-resistant organisms. In this guideline, we describe the epidemiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, potential pathogens, and management. We also provide recommendations for the selection, dosing, and duration of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis to minimize post-operative SSIs.

Single versus bilateral lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation, either single or bilateral, serves as the only effective treatment for end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but their superiority is still being debated, and its application in Chinese patients has not been data analysed.

METHODS

We reviewed 109 IPF patients who received lung transplantation at our centre between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The patients were divided into single lung transplantation (SLT) group and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) group. We compared the two groups' demographic characteristics and clinical indexes (intraoperative conditions, postoperative complications, follow-ups and life qualities).

RESULTS

Patients in BLT group were significantly younger than those in SLT group (P < 0.001), and had more pretransplant infections (P = 0.007). The total ischemic time (P < 0.001) was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was less (P = 0.001) in SLT group. No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients in using anti-fibrosis drugs, pulmonary artery pressure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the surgery; the length of intensive care unit stay; the incidence of complication; and the overall survival rate between two groups. However, the hierarchical analysis found that patients aged > 60 years showed a better survival in SLT group (P = 0.008). Both groups got normal MOS 36-item Short Form (SF-36) scores, and the scores of BLT were higher than those of SLT. The BLT group had better lung function than SLT group 1 year post-lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLT and BLT are effective and SLT is more favourable for the patients of > 60 years.

Experience of the first lung transplantation performed in public sector in India

Lung transplantation is the only modality that offers a long-term solution for end-stage lung diseases. Few centers in India have an active lung transplant program. Preoperative and postoperative considerations in lung transplantation may be different in the developing countries when compared to the developed world. In the early posttransplant period, infection could be the major consideration in developing countries, unlike graft rejection, that is usually the primary concern in the developed world. Herein, we report the first lung transplantation from a public sector hospital in India. The patient was a 33-year-old female, who underwent bilateral lung transplantation at our center, but succumbed to surgical and infectious complications in the early posttransplant period.

Impact of donor lung pathogenic bacteria on patient outcomes in the immediate post-transplant period

BACKGROUND

Patient outcomes post-lung transplant remain inferior to other types of solid organ transplantation. We investigated whether the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria (PPB) in donor lung bronchial cultures was associated with adverse outcomes postoperatively.

METHODS

All patients who underwent lung transplantation between August 2015 and April 2017 at the University of Kentucky Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Retransplants, patients with bronchiectasis (including cystic fibrosis), and individuals who received organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors were excluded. The remaining subjects were separated into two groups: individuals whose donor bronchial cultures grew PPB, and those whose cultures either returned negative for PPB or were sterile. 30-day mortality rates as well as the incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) at both 24 and 72 hours post-transplant were calculated. The duration of mechanical ventilation postoperatively was also recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty two subjects comprised the study population. 20 patients (63%) had growth of PPB on donor cultures, while 12 (37%) did not. Patients with PPB had a significantly greater number of days on the ventilator postoperatively compared to those with no PPB (mean = 11.3 and median = 5.0 vs mean = 5.8 and median = 3.0, respectively, P = 0.0232). Subsequent regression analysis revealed this association to not be influenced by recipient lung allocation score (LAS), donor age, donor smoking history, recipient mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) value, and/or use of cardiopulmonary bypass at the time of transplantation. Neither 30-day survival nor incidence of Grade 3 PGD and AKI at 24 or 72 hours post-transplant differed between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The recovery of PPB in donor lung cultures was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation postoperatively in lung transplant recipients.

Lung transplantation, ex-vivo reconditioning and regeneration: state of the art and perspectives

Lung transplantation is the only therapeutic option for end-stage pulmonary failure. Nevertheless, the shortage of donor pool available for transplantation does not allow to satisfy the requests, thus the mortality on the waiting list remains high. One of the tools to overcome the donor pool shortage is the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to preserve, evaluate and recondition selected lung grafts not otherwise suitable for transplantation. EVLP is nowadays a clinical reality and have several destinations of use. After a narrative review of the literature and looking at our experience we can assume that one of the chances to improve the outcome of lung transplantation and to overcome the donor pool shortage could be the tissue regeneration of the graft during EVLP and the immunomodulation of the recipient. Both these strategies are performed using mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). The results of the models of lung perfusion with MSC-based cell therapy open the way to a new innovative approach that further increases the potential for using of the lung perfusion platform.

Severe infections in critically ill solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Severe infections are among the most common causes of death in immunocompromised patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of these infections has evolved in the last decade.

AIMS

We aim to provide a comprehensive review of these severe infections in this population.

SOURCES

Review of the literature pertaining to severe infections in critically ill solid organ transplant recipients. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for documents published since database inception until November 2017.

CONTENT

The epidemiology of severe infections has changed in the immunocompromised patients. This population is presenting to the intensive care unit with specific transplantation procedure-related infections, device-associated infections, a multitude of opportunistic viral infections, an increasing number of nosocomial infections and bacterial diseases with a more limited therapeutic armamentarium. Both molecular diagnostics and imaging techniques have had substantial progress in the last decade, which will, we hope, translate into faster and more precise diagnoses, as well as more optimal empirical treatment de-escalation.

IMPLICATIONS

The key clinical elements to improve the outcome of critically ill solid organ transplant recipients depend on the knowledge of geographic epidemiology, specific surgical procedures, net state of immunosuppression, hospital microbial ecology, aggressive diagnostic strategy and search for source control, rapid initiation of antimicrobials and minimization of iatrogenic immunosuppression.

How can we improve the quality of transplantable lungs?

INTRODUCTION

Optimization of lungs for organ donation is becoming increasingly important as donation rates stagnate despite growing waiting lists. Improving procurement and utilization of donated lungs has the ability to reduce mortality and time on the lung transplantation (LTx) waiting list. Additionally, assessment and optimization of donor lungs can reduce both early and late post-LTx morbidity and mortality, as well as reduce overall costs and resource utility. Areas covered: Strategies that we will discuss in detail include intensive care management practices, such as targeted ventilation protocols and therapeutic bronchoscopy, as well as the ever expanding possibilities within the arena of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP). Expert commentary: Donor lung quality is currently optimized both in vivo prior to organ procurement, and also via EVLP circuits. Despite good evidence demonstrating the utility of both approaches, data remain elusive as to whether EVLP is beneficial for all donor lungs prior to implantation, or instead as a tool by which we can evaluate and recondition sub-optimal donor lungs.

Ex Vivo Perfusion Treatment of Infection in Human Donor Lungs

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a platform to treat infected donor lungs with antibiotic therapy before lung transplantation. Human donor lungs that were rejected for transplantation because of clinical concern regarding infection were randomly assigned to two groups. In the antibiotic group (n = 8), lungs underwent EVLP for 12 h with high-dose antibiotics (ciprofloxacin 400 mg or azithromycin 500 mg, vancomycin 15 mg/kg, and meropenem 2 g). In the control group (n = 7), lungs underwent EVLP for 12 h without antibiotics. A quantitative decrease in bacterial counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was found in all antibiotic-treated cases but in only two control cases. Perfusate endotoxin levels at 12 h were significantly lower in the antibiotic group compared with the control group. EVLP with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy significantly improved pulmonary oxygenation and compliance and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance. Perfusate endotoxin levels at 12 h were strongly correlated with levels of perfusates tumor necrosis factor α, IL-1β and macrophage inflammatory proteins 1α and 1β at 12 h. In conclusion, EVLP treatment of infected donor lungs with broad-spectrum antibiotics significantly reduced BAL bacterial counts and endotoxin levels and improved donor lung function.

Lung transplantation after endoscopic lung volume reduction

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) has become an established treatment option in selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. ELVR, however, does not always prevent disease progression, and patients may inevitably be considered for lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

Currently, limited data exist regarding the impact of preceding ELVR on lung transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis of lung transplantation (LTx) waiting list candidates, who had previously undergone ELVR for emphysema between 2010 and 2014, was performed. Outcomes were compared to matched (1:2) controls who underwent LTx for emphysema without previous ELVR. The 12-month survival after LTx represented the primary end point.

RESULTS

In total 23/693 (3%) patients listed for LTx between January 2010 and May 2014 had undergone ELVR, of whom 20/23 (87%) proceeded to LTx (ELVR group). Forty matched non-ELVR emphysema patients acted as controls. Bronchiectasis on CT prior to LTx was more evident in ELVR patients [11/20 (55%) vs. 12/40 (30%); p = 0.04] as well as airway colonization after LTx [10/20 (50%) vs. 6/40 (15%); p = 0.004]. Among ELVR patients, the most prevalent colonizing organism was Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4/10 patients, 40%). No significant differences were observed in LTx waiting list time, duration of LTx procedure, ventilatory support, ICU stay after LTx or time to hospital discharge. One ELVR patient (5%) died 189 days after LTx from pneumonia, compared to 1 non-ELVR patient (3%) who died after 269 days (p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous ELVR treatment was not associated with differing outcomes following LTx. Increased bacterial colonization rates were evident and warrant further investigation.

Incidence of nosocomial pneumonia and risk of recurrence after antimicrobial therapy in critically ill lung and heart-lung transplant patients

Little is known about the resolution of symptoms of nosocomial pneumonia (NosoP) after lung and heart-lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical response to antimicrobial therapy in (ICU) patients with NosoP after lung or heart-lung transplantation. Between January 2008 and August 2010, 79 lung or heart-lung transplantations patients were prospectively studied. NosoPwas confirmed by quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal aspirates. Clinical variables, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and radiologic score were recorded from start of therapy until day 9. Thirty-five patients (44%) experienced 64 episodes of NosoP in ICU. Fourteen patients (40%) had NosoP recurrence. Most frequently isolated organisms were Enterobacteriaceae (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25%), and Staphylococcus aureus (20%). Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score improved significantly at day 6 and C-reactive protein level at day 9. SOFA and radiologic scores differed significantly between patients with and without NosoP recurrence at day 3 and 9. The ICU mortality rate did not differ between patients with and without NosoP recurrence, and free of NosoP (14.3%, 9.5%, 11.4%, respectively) (p = 0.91). Severities of illness and lung injury were the two major risk factors for NosoP recurrence. Occurrence of NosoP has no impact on ICU mortality.

Lung transplant infection

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapeutic procedure for the treatment of end‐stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Despite improved survival rates over the decades, lung transplant recipients have lower survival rates than other solid organ transplant recipients. The morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation is largely due to infection‐ and rejection‐related complications. This article will review the common infections that develop in the lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and the most frequent bacterial, viral, fungal and other less frequent opportunistic infections. The epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and outcomes for the different microbial pathogens will be reviewed. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Late respiratory infection after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Aiming to improve outcome of lung transplantation (LTx) patients, we reviewed risk factors and treatment practices for the LTx recipients who experienced respiratory infection in the late post-LTx period (>1 month after LTx).

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 48 recipients and donors from 61 LTx, who experienced late respiratory infections. Late respiratory infections were classified according to the etiology, time of occurrence, and frequency of donor-to-host transmission or colonization of the recipient prior to transplantation.

RESULTS

During the period of observation, 42 episodes of respiratory infections occurred. The organisms most frequently involved were gram (-) bacteria: Acinetobacter baumannii (n=13, 31.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=7, 16.7%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=4, 10.0%). Among the 42 episodes recorded, 14 occurred in the late post-LTx period. These were bacterial (n=6, 42.9%), fungal (n=2, 14.3%), viral (n=4, 28.5%), and mycobacterial (n=2, 14.3%) infections. Of 6 bacterial infections, 2 were from multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii and one from each of MDR P. aeruginosa, extended spectrum β-lactamase (+) K. pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infection-related death occurred in 6 of the 14 episodes (43%).

CONCLUSION

Although the frequency of respiratory infection decreased sharply in the late post-LTx period, respiratory infection was still a major cause of mortality. Gram (-) MDR bacteria were the agents most commonly identified in these infections.

Microbial pattern of bronchoalveolar lavage in brain dead donors

BACKGROUND

We assessed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures of brain dead donors seeking to achieve better donor management and decrease transplant complications. Determining the most common source of some postoperative infections causing morbidity and mortality among lung recipients would help to reach this goal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed on 80 brain dead donors from August 2008 to August 2009. Donors with partial pressure of arterial O2 to the fraction of inspired O2 (PaO2/FIO2)>300 mm Hg and a normal chest x-ray underwent bronchoscopy to obtain a BAL.

FINDINGS

The mean donor age was 30±14 years and 50 (63%) were males with 21 (26%) showing a positive history for smoking and 32 (40%) with turbid tracheal secretions. Chest x-ray was abnormal in 49 (61%). Positive culture BAL results were observed among 30 (38%) patients: there were 17 (90%) bacterial and 6 (22%) fungal. Finally, 16 donors (20%) were considered suitable lung donors, allowing 10 lung transplantations.

CONCLUSION

Only 20% of donors had acceptable lungs for transplantation. The high rates of positive bacterial and fungal BAL cultures in donors suggest the need for more aggressive critical care management and antibiotic therapy which may be beneficial to prevent future infections in recipients. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the correlation between donor BAL results and posttransplant morbidity and mortality.

Lipopolysaccharide pre-conditioning is protective in lung ischemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

The availability of suitable lung donors has remained a significant barrier to lung transplantation. The clinical relevance of an isolated positive Gram stain in potential donor lungs, which occurs in >80%, is unclear. Low doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been protective in several models of ischemia-reperfusion injury through a pre-conditioning response. We sought to demonstrate that low-dose LPS is protective against subsequent lung ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Pathogen-free Long-Evans rats were pre-treated with vehicle or LPS 24 hours before 90 minutes of ischemia and up to 4 hours of reperfusion. Lungs were assessed for vascular permeability, myeloperoxidase content, bronchoalveolar lavage inflammatory cell and cytokine/chemokine content, as well as nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1), and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1) and stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) activation.

RESULTS

Compared with positive controls, LPS pre-treatment resulted in reductions in vascular permeability (70%, p < 0.001), myeloperoxidase content (93%, p < 0.001), bronchoalveolar lavage inflammatory cells (91%, p < 0.001), and inflammatory cytokine/chemokine content (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant, 99%, p = 0.003; interleukin-1beta, 72%, p < 0.0001; tumor necrosis factor-alpha, 76%, p < 0.0001), NFkappaB (86%, p < 0.001) and AP-1 (97%, p < 0.001) nuclear translocation, and IRAK-1 (87%, p < 0.001) and SAPK (80%, p < 0.001) phosphorylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipopolysaccharide pre-treatment reduced lung injury and inflammatory mediator production after subsequent exposure to ischemia-reperfusion. Understanding the clinical significance of lipopolysaccharide in donor lungs has the potential to expand and clarify donor inclusion criteria.

Extended donor criteria in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite improvements in respiratory care and lung transplant organ allocation algorithms, waiting lists continue to grow worldwide. Attempts at improving organ donation rates have generally had little impact on the increase in the number of transplants performed. Improved use of the available pool of cadaveric organ donors, therefore, represents one of few immediately available strategies to alleviate organ shortages.

RECENT FINDINGS

The once-strict lung donor selection criteria have, of necessity, been relaxed and, in many instances, this situation has been to no apparent detrimental effect on posttransplant outcome. There is, however, some evidence that extension of donor acceptability in some respects leads to poorer early outcomes, mainly by increasing the rate of early graft dysfunction. The extension of selection criteria to allow the maximum number of safe lung transplants, coupled with aggressive and appropriate donor management is, therefore, of particular current relevance to the lung transplantation community.

SUMMARY

Although the available evidence for and against the commonly used lung donor selection criteria leaves many questions unanswered, it can help decrease the large number of uncertainties that be falls the practice of lung donor selection and recipient matching.

Management of the pediatric organ donor to optimize lung donation

Lung transplantation in childhood is a highly specialized clinical practice confined to a few centers around the world. Organ availability remains an important limiting factor in extending the application of this procedure to more infants, children and adolescents. The lungs are the organ most vulnerable to injury, infection and dysfunction among transplantable organs in the brain dead deceased donor. In this manuscript, we review the pathophysiology of the most common and important disease states that affect the lungs in potential donors. Furthermore, we herein provide recommendations for optimal management of the pediatric organ donor with an emphasis on strategies to improve the opportunity for the lungs to be placed in candidates on the transplant list.