Accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi: comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography

Innovative procedure for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction from 18F-FDG first-pass ultra-sensitive digital PET/CT images: evaluation with an anthropomorphic heart phantom

Background

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is usually measured by cine-cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), planar and single-photon emission-computerized tomography (SPECT) equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA), and echocardiography. It would be clinically useful to measure LVEF from first-pass positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radionuclide angiography, but this approach has been limited by fast radiotracer diffusion. Ultra-sensitive digital PET systems can produce high-quality images within 3-s acquisition times. This study determined whether digital PET/CT accurately measured LVEF in an anthropomorphic heart phantom under conditions mimicking radiotracer first-pass into the cardiac cavities.

Methods

Heart phantoms in end-diastole and end-systole were 3D-printed from a patient’s MRI dataset. Reference left ventricle end-diastole volume (EDV), end-systole volume (ESV), and LVEF were determined by phantom weights before/after water filling. PET/CT (3-s acquisitions), MRI, and planar and SPECT ERNA were performed. EDV, ESV, and/or LVEF were measured by manual and automated cardiac cavity delineation, using clinical segmentation softwares. LVEF was also measured from PET images converted to 2D “pseudo-planar” images along the short axis and horizontal long axis. LVEF was also calculated for planar ERNA images. All LVEF, ESV and EDV values were compared to the reference values assessed by weighing.

Results

Manually calculated 3D-PET-CT-based EDV, ESV, and LVEF were close to MRI and reference values. Automated calculations on the 3D-PET-CT dataset were unreliable, suggesting that the SPECT-based tool used for this calculation is not well adapted for PET acquisitions. Manual and automated LVEF estimations from “pseudo-planar” PET images were very close/identical to MRI and reference values.

Conclusions

First-pass “pseudo-planar” PET may be a promising method for estimating LVEF, easy to use in clinical practice. Processing 3D PET images is also a valid method but to date suffers from a lack of well-suited software for automated LV segmentation.

Influences of radionuclides on left ventricular phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography images in ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVE

Phase analysis is expected to improve the accuracy of myocardial ischemia diagnosis in conjunction with myocardial perfusion and wall motion imaging and quantification. Although previous studies have reported perfusion image disagreements in relation to radionuclides, a few reports have examined the influences of radionuclides on phase analysis. We evaluated the influences of different radionuclides on stress-induced left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (MPS) imaging in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

METHODS

A total of 202 patients with suspected or known IHD were investigated retrospectively. All the patients underwent coronary arteriography and were subsequently classified into the following groups: 43 patients without any coronary lesion (0VD), 71 patients with single-vessel disease (1VD), 59 patients with two-vessel disease (2VD), and 29 patients with three-vessel disease (3VD). Both stress and rest gated-MPS were performed using ^99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI)/tetrofosmin (TF) in 118 patients and with ²⁰¹TlCl in 84 patients. Phase analysis was performed to obtain the peak phase, phase standard deviation (SD), and bandwidth. Finally, we investigated potential differences between the phase analysis indices and the respective radionuclides used.

RESULTS

The peak phase did not exhibit any significant differences in the numbers of affected branches in either ^99mTc-MPS or ²⁰¹Tl-MPS during stress or rest MPS. Furthermore, both the phase SD and bandwidth demonstrated a tendency to increase in patients with increased numbers of affected branches. A significant difference was observed in the stress MPS when ^99mTc-MIBI/TF was used (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the stress MPS when ²⁰¹TlCl was used. Both the phase SD and bandwidth of all patients in ^99mTc-MPS during stress were significantly larger than those at rest (p < 0.05). Conversely, both the phase SD and bandwidth of all patients in ²⁰¹Tl-MPS at stress was significantly smaller than that at rest (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Phase analysis using ^99mTc-MPS was considered to be useful for the detection of stress-induced left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, although it is necessary to be careful when using ²⁰¹Tl-MPS.

Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Thallium-201 Myocardial SPECT-CT in Patients with Angina Pectoris: Comparison with 2D Echocardiography

Purpose

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is an important parameter for assessing cardiac systolic function and predicting prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of assessing LVEF by Tl-201 hybrid myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT using two attenuation correction methods in patients with angina pectoris.

Methods

A total of 339 patients with angina pectoris (62.8 ± 12.9 years, male:female = 206:133) were analyzed. All patients underwent Tl-201 myocardial SPECT/CT and transthoracic two-dimensional (2D) echocardiograph. We compared LVEF assessed by SPECT/CT using two attenuation correction methods: CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and non-attenuation correction (non-AC) methods and 2D echocardiography.

Results

LVEF assessed by either of the two attenuation correction techniques and 2D echocardiography showed moderate correlation in all patients with angina pectoris (r = 0.487 for CTAC and r = 0.473 for non-AC, p < 0.001). Results were similar in the subgroup of patients with perfusion abnormalities on myocardial SPECT/CT images. Overall diagnostic performances were similar for the CTAC and non-AC methods for evaluating normal and decreased LVEF by myocardial SPECT/CT.

Conclusion

LVEF measured by the CTAC method of Tl-201-gated myocardial SPECT/CT was comparable with the conventional non-AC method in patients with angina pectoris and in the subgroup of patients with perfusion abnormality. Tl-201-gated myocardial hybrid SPECT/CT can be a reliable tool in the assessment of LVEF in clinic.

Influence of acquisition orbit on phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony

OBJECTIVE

The association between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony parameters, given by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and acquisition orbits is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the dependence of LV dyssynchrony parameters on acquisition orbits.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients who underwent ²⁰¹Tl-gated SPECT MPI were categorized into minor hypoperfusion or major hypoperfusion groups. Forty-four patients who underwent ^99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT MPI were categorized into minor hypoperfusion or major hypoperfusion groups. The major hypoperfusion group with ²⁰¹Tl was divided into inferior or non-inferior wall hypoperfusion subgroups, and anteroseptal or non-anteroseptal wall hypoperfusion subgroups. Gated SPECT MPI data over a 360° acquisition orbit (360° images) and a 180° acquisition orbit (180° images) were reconstructed, and histogram bandwidth (HBW) and phase standard deviation (PSD) were compared.

RESULTS

Between 360° and 180° images with ²⁰¹Tl, there were significant differences in HBW and PSD both globally (HBW 34.8 ± 16.6 vs. 29.1 ± 10.2; PSD 8.8 ± 4.9 vs. 7.0 ± 2.3, p < 0.05 for both) and in the inferior wall (HBW 29.5 ± 15.5 vs. 23.3 ± 9.0; PSD 7.6 ± 4.6 vs. 5.6 ± 2.4, p < 0.001 for both) in the major hypoperfusion group, and also in the inferior wall in all subgroups of the major hypoperfusion group. In contrast, no segment had any significant differences in HBW or PSD between 360° and 180° images with ^99mTc.

CONCLUSION

Differences in acquisition orbit had a significant influence on HBW and PSD with ²⁰¹Tl-gated SPECT MPI in the inferior wall in patients with major hypoperfusion myocardium.

Detection of post-exercise stunning by early gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: results from the IAEA multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Transient post-ischemic LV dysfunction due to myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease can be missed by conventional gated SPECT (GSPECT) acquisitions. The aim of this IAEA-sponsored multi-center study was to determine whether early post-exercise imaging is more likely to detect stunning than conventional without adversely affecting image quality or perfusion information.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing exercise/rest GSPECT were enrolled in this international multicenter study. Post-exercise studies were acquired at 15 ± 5 minutes after radiotracer injection (Stress-1) and repeated at 60 ± 15 minutes (Stress-2). Rest studies (R) were acquired at 60 minutes post injection. A core laboratory quantitatively assessed perfusion pattern and LV blinded to the acquisition time. Ischemia was defined as summed stress score (SDS) ≥4, and stunning was defined as the difference between rest and post-stress LVEF (Δ-LVEF). In the 229 patients enrolled into the study, both image quality and perfusion information were similar between Stress-1 and Stress-2. Post-stress LVEF was associated with both ischemia and time of acquisition, with a significant correlation between SDS and Δ-LVEF, which was stronger at Stress-1 than Stress-2 in the ischemic compared to the non-ischemic population (r = 0.23 vs 0.08, P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-exercise imaging is feasible, and can potentially improve the detection of post-ischemic stunning without compromising image quality and perfusion data.

Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the single most important predictor of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV) is considered the most reliable technique for assessing LVEF. Most of these patients undergo two dimensional (2D) echocardiography and myocardial viability study using gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or gated F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET. However, the accuracy of LVEF assessed by these methods is not clear. This study has been designed to assess the correlation and agreement between the LVEF measured by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), Tc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) <35 assessed by 2D echocardiography] were prospectively included in the study. These patients underwent ERNV along with gated blood pool SPECT, Tc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and F-FDG gated PET as per the standard protocol for myocardial viability assessment and LVEF calculation. Spearman's coefficient of correlation (r) was calculated for the different sets of values with significance level kept at a P-value less than 0.05. Bland-Altman plots were inspected to visually assess the between-agreement measurements from different methods.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were prospectively included. LVEF calculated by various radionuclide methods showed good correlation with ERNV as follows: gated blood pool SPECT, r=0.92; MPI gated SPECT, r=0.85; and F-FDG gated PET, r=0.76. However, the correlation between 2D echocardiography and ERNV was poor (r=0.520). The Bland-Altman plot for LVEF measured by all radionuclide methods showed good agreement with ERNV. However, agreement between 2D echocardiography and ERNV is poor, as most of the values in this plot gave a negative difference for low EF and a positive difference for high EF. The mean difference between various techniques [2D echocardiography (a), gated blood pool SPECT (b), MPI gated SPECT (c), F-FDG gated PET (d)] and ERNV (e) was as follows: (a)-(e), 3.3; (b)-(e), 5; (c)-(e), 1.1; and (d)-(e), 2.9. The best possible correlation and agreement was found between MPI gated SPECT and ERNV.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good correlation and agreement between MPI gated SPECT and F-FDG gated PET with ERNV for LVEF calculation in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction. Thus, subjecting patients who undergo viability assessment by MPI gated SPECT or F-FDG gated PET to a separate procedure like ERNV for LVEF assessment may not be warranted. As the gated blood pool SPECT also showed good correlation and agreement with ERNV for LVEF assessment in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction, with better characteristics than ERNV, it can be routinely used whenever accurate LVEF assessment is needed.

Relevance of early poststress variation in left ventricular function studied by gated-SPECT: evaluation in different clinical settings and relationship with angiography results

BACKGROUND

Stress-induced ischemia may cause a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). We evaluated the variation in early postexercise EF (S-EF) compared with rest EF (R-EF) in different clinical settings to detect ventricular dysfunction. We also correlated ventricular dysfunction with an angiographic score, the Syntax score, in a subgroup of ischemic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gated-SPECT images were acquired 12 min after exercise stress and at rest in 1481 patients. Patients were classified as controls, negative for ischemia, mildly ischemic, moderately/severely ischemic, necrotic, and necrotic with ischemia. Mean end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and EF were compared in each group. The ratio between stress to rest EF was indicated as the functional score. Angiography results were collected for 55% of moderately/severely ischemic patients. Sixty-one angiographies were also completed with Syntax score evaluation.

RESULTS

In negative, necrotic, and mildly ischemic patients no differences were found between S-EF and R-EF. An opposite trend was observed in moderately/severely ischemic patients with a decrement of S-EF compared with R-EF (54.80±11.33 vs. 57.79±11.14; P<0.0001). Coronary artery disease was confirmed by angiography in 93% of moderately/severely ischemic patients. In 61 patients who underwent Syntax score evaluation, significant correlation was observed with functional score. Significant decrease in functional score was found in patients with coronary artery bypass graft indication compared with patients with percutaneous coronary intervention or medical indication.

CONCLUSION

Early poststress gated-SPECT acquisition allows the detection of ventricular dysfunction in moderately/severely ischemic disease and provides additional information when directing patients to angiography and revascularization.

Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: an update

Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GSPECT) is a major clinical tool, widely used for performing myocardial perfusion imaging procedures. In this review, we have presented the fundamentals of GSPECT and the ways in which the functional measurements it provides have contributed to the emergence of myocardial perfusion SPECT in its important role as a major tool of modern cardiac imaging. GSPECT imaging has shown unique capability to provide accurate, reproducible and operator-independent quantitative data regarding myocardial perfusion, global and regional systolic and diastolic function, stress-induced regional wall-motion abnormalities, ancillary markers of severe and extensive disease, left ventricular geometry and mass, as well as the presence and extent of myocardial scar and viability. Adding functional data to perfusion provides an effective means of increasing both diagnostic accuracy and reader's confidence in the interpretation of the results of perfusion scans. Assessment of global and regional LV function has improved the prognostic power of myocardial perfusion SPECT and has been shown in a large registry to add to the perfusion assessment in predicting benefit from revascularization.

Left ventricular functional changes after adenosine vasodilator stress evaluated by gated single-photon emission computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging is useful in assessing left ventricular (LV) myocardial perfusion and function. This study evaluated the LV functional changes after adenosine vasodilator stress, using gated SPECT.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 70 patients who underwent adenosine-mediated stress and rest SPECT. All patients underwent coronary angiography. Semi-quantitative assessment of perfusion was analyzed and produced the summed rest score (SRS), the summed stress score (SSS) and the summed difference score (SDS). The global LV function parameters [ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV)] and regional LV function [the summed motion score (SMS) and the summed thickening score (STS)] were quantified by gated SPECT.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 comprised 16 patients with worsening of LVEF (LVEFrest-LVEFado ≥5%), and group 2 comprised the other 54 patients. Compared with group 2, patients in group 1 had a significantly higher SSS and SDS (9.1 ± 6.8 vs. 5.6 ± 4.5 and 6.6 ± 3.8 vs. 3.6 ± 4.0, respectively; p < 0.05) and the severity of coronary artery stenosis was more serious (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Worsening of LVEF after adenosine-induced vasodilator stress, as shown by (99m)Tc-MIBI gated SPECT, is a valuable nonperfusion marker of significant CAD.

Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach

Cedars-Sinai's approach to the automation of gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is based on the identification of key procedural steps (processing, quantitation, reporting), each of which is then implemented, in completely automated fashion, by use of mathematic algorithms and logical rules combined into expert systems. Our current suite of software applications has been designed to be platform- and operating system-independent, and every algorithm is based on the same 3-dimensional sampling scheme for the myocardium. The widespread acceptance of quantitative software by the nuclear cardiology community (QGS alone is used at over 20,000 locations) has provided the opportunity for extensive validation of quantitative measurements of myocardial perfusion and function, in our opinion, helping to make nuclear cardiology the most accurate and reproducible modality available for the assessment of the human heart.

Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes measured at rest and poststress by gated sestamibi SPECT

BACKGROUND

Some studies suggested that the poststress left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) is lower than rest LV EF in patients with stress-induced ischemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

By using a 2-day protocol and 30 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi, LV EF, end-systolic volume (ESV), and end-diastolic volume (EDV) were measured with gated SPECT. Of 99 eligible patients, 91 had technically adequate studies. Poststress LV EF minus rest LV EF was defined as DeltaLV EF. DeltaEDV and DeltaESV were similarly defined. Rest and poststress LV EF (r = 0.89), EDV (r = 0.78), and ESV (r = 0.93) were highly correlated (P <.001). Rest LV EF, EDV, and ESV were not significantly different between patients with and without stress-induced ischemia. DeltaLV EF was significantly lower in patients with stress-induced ischemia (-3.5% +/- 4.5% vs -1.1% +/- 4.7%, P = .02). Mean LV EF poststress in ischemic patients was 55.0% +/- 10.5% vs 61.2% +/- 10.0% in nonischemic patients (P = .008). However, only 1 patient (3%) with ischemia had DeltaLV EF that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of DeltaLV EF for normal patients. Ischemia was significantly associated with increased DeltaEDV and DeltaESV (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress-induced ischemia is associated with poststress reduction in LV EF and increased poststress EDV and ESV. However, the effect of ischemia on the difference between poststress and rest EF measurements is modest and rarely exceeds the confidence limits in normal patients undergoing 2-day protocols. In most patients, poststress LV EF is an accurate reflection of rest LV EF.

Stunning and left ventricular function—How long is the ventricle knocked out?

PURPOSE

Little is known about the relation between severity of ischemia and duration of myocardial stunning. The aim of this study was therefore to characterize the impact of ischemia on myocardial stunning and on its duration.

METHODS

310 patients (pts) who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) were evaluated. MPS acquired with a rest Thallium/stress Technetium-99m sestamibi protocol were scored with respect to % myocardium ischemic. Left ventricular post-stress ejection fraction (psEF) was evaluated by the widely used QGS algorithm. Resting LVEF (rEF) was assessed by invasive ventriculography. Patient groups were then compared with respect to different extents of ischemia and different time intervals between stress and imaging (< or = 60 min and > 60 min after stress).

RESULTS

21% of pts had a normal MPS, 8% had evidence of scar, 37% had evidence of ischemia, and 34% had evidence of scar plus ischemia. Pts with normal MPS had a significantly higher psEF than pts with ischemia, 61+/-8% and 56+/-8%, respectively (p=0.006), whereas rEF was not different. Overall, pts with < or = 10% myocardium ischemic had significantly higher psEF than pts with > 10% myocardium ischemic, 53+/-11% and 49+/-9%, respectively (p=0.006), whereas rEF was not different. In pts with evidence of ischemia who underwent imaging < or = 60 min after stress testing, pts with < or = 10% myocardium ischemic had higher psEF than pts with > 10% myocardium ischemic, 60+/-7% and 53+/-8%, respectively (p=0.037). In contrast, pts with evidence of ischemia who underwent imaging > 60 min after stress testing had similar psEF irrespective of extent of ischemia (53%+/-8 in pts with < or = 10% ischemia and 54%+/-8 in pts with > 10% myocardium ischemic, p=0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemia had a significant impact on psEF in patients who underwent imaging less than 1 h after stress. More than one hour after stress testing stunning seems to be less relevant in the interpretation of psEF.

Nuclear Cardiology: Present and Future

Nuclear cardiology has made significant advances since the first reports of planar scintigraphy for the evaluation of left ventricular perfusion and function. While the current "state of the art" of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging offers invaluable diagnostic and prognostic information for the evaluation of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in the cellular and molecular biology of the cardiovascular system have helped to usher in a new modality in nuclear cardiology, namely, molecular imaging. In this review, we will discuss the current state of the art in nuclear cardiology, which includes SPECT and positron emission tomographic evaluation of myocardial perfusion, evaluation of left ventricular function by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and gated blood pool SPECT, and the evaluation of myocardial viability with PET and SPECT methods. In addition, we will discuss the future of nuclear cardiology and the role that molecular imaging will play in the early detection of CAD at the level of the vulnerable plaque, the evaluation of cardiac remodeling, and monitoring of important new therapies including gene therapy and stem cell therapy.

Factors Affecting Accuracy of Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Measured by Gated Tl-201 Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

The electrocardiogram-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume and ejection fraction may contain substantial errors. We evaluated whether patient-related factors affect the accuracy of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated Tl-201 SPECT. A total of 518 patients without perfusion defects on Tl-201 SPECT or coronary artery disease were studied. Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction were measured from echocardiography and adenosine stress/redistribution gated Tl-201 SPECT using commercially available software packages (QGS and 4D-MSPECT). We identified factors affecting the accuracy of gated SPECT via multiple linear regression analysis of the differences between echocardiography and gated SPECT. Gated SPECT analyzed with QGS underestimated end-diastolic and end-systolic volume, and overestimated ejection fraction, but 4D-MSPECT overestimated all those values (P<0.001). Independent variables associated with increasing the difference in end-diastolic volume between echocardiography and gated SPECT were decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic wall thickness, decreasing body surface area, female sex and increasing end-diastolic volume (P<0.001). Those for end-systolic volume were decreasing left ventricular end-systolic wall thickness, female sex, and decreasing end-systolic volume (P<0.001). Increasing end-systolic wall thickness, male sex and decreasing age were independent determinants associated with an increased difference in ejection fraction (P<0.001). Adenosine stress SPECT showed significantly higher end-diastolic and end-systolic volume values and a lower ejection fraction than did redistribution SPECT (P<0.001). Patient-related factors affect the accuracy of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated Tl-201 SPECT. Modification of gated SPECT measurements by taking account of these factors would lead to reduce systemic errors.

Worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction induced by dipyridamole on Tl-201 gated myocardial perfusion imaging predicts significant coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator stress on myocardial perfusion imaging has been found to induce ischemic stunning, which may present as transient worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or regional wall motion abnormality. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of stress-induced worsening of LVEF in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) on dipyridamole thallium 201 gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 126 patients who underwent dipyridamole Tl-201 gated SPECT and coronary angiography within 3 months. Poststress and 4-hour rest images were obtained, and LVEF was calculated by use of automated software (QGS 3.0). A decrease in LVEF of 6% or greater from rest to poststress was considered significant, and this threshold was determined by the serial reproducibility assessment of Tl-201 gated SPECT. If worsening of LVEF was used as the criterion for detecting significant CAD (> or = 70% coronary stenoses in > or = 1 vessel), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 35%, 93%, 90%, and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dipyridamole-induced worsening of LVEF, as shown by Tl-201 gated SPECT, is a valuable nonperfusion marker of significant CAD. Although the sensitivity of LVEF worsening in detecting significant CAD is only 35%, the specificity is as high as 93%.

Comparing cardiac ejection fraction estimation algorithms without a gold standard

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Imaging and estimation of left ventricular function have major diagnostic and prognostic importance in patients with coronary artery disease. It is vital that the method used to estimate cardiac ejection fraction (EF) allows the observer to best perform this task. To measure task-based performance, one must clearly define the task in question, the observer performing the task, and the patient population being imaged. In this report, the task is to accurately and precisely measure cardiac EF, and the observers are human-assisted computer algorithms that analyze the images and estimate cardiac EF. It is very difficult to measure the performance of an observer by using clinical data because estimation tasks typically lack a gold standard. A solution to this "no-gold-standard" problem recently was proposed, called regression without truth (RWT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of three different software packages used to analyze gated, cardiac, and nuclear medicine images, each of which uses a different algorithm to estimate a patient's cardiac EF, are compared. The three methods are the Emory method, Quantitative Gated Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic method, and the Wackers-Liu Circumferential Quantification method. The same set of images is used as input to each of the three algorithms. Data were analyzed from the three different algorithms by using RWT to determine which produces the best estimates of cardiac EF in terms of accuracy and precision.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In performing this study, three different consistency checks were developed to ensure that the RWT method is working properly. The Emory method of estimating EF slightly outperformed the other two methods. In addition, the RWT method passed all three consistency checks, garnering confidence in the method and its application to clinical data.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by quantitative gated SPECT: correlation with left ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by quantitative gated SPECT (QGS). We compared the efficacy of LVEF assessment among Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT imaging, contrast left ventriculography (LVG), and first-pass radionuclide angiography (FP).

PATIENTS

One-hundred and seven patients with ischemic heart disease underwent QGS and LVG simultaneously within 3 months, and 92 of the 107 patients also underwent FP at the same time.

RESULTS

QGS progressively overestimated LVEF at the lower range of end-systolic volume (ESV), especially in patients with small hearts. Moreover, the QGS technique systemically tended to underestimate LVEF in comparison with LVG. However, linear regression analysis demonstrated a good correlation between the LVEF values measured by QGS and those measured by both LVG (p<0.0001) and FP (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although QGS has a tendency to overestimate LVEF in patients with small hearts, and to systemically underestimate LVEF compared with LVG, this technique is still a reliable clinical tool for measurement of LVEF.

Ischaemic related transitory left ventricular dysfunction in 201Tl gated SPECT

AIM

To report our data concerning the changes in post-stress and at-rest left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular volumes in patients with thallium gated SPECT.

METHODS

Post-stress and at-rest thallium gated SPECT was performed in 629 consecutive patients; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular volumes and quantitative perfusion data were obtained. Transitory left ventricular dysfunction was diagnosed when post-stress LVEF did not increase at least 5% from LVEF at-rest.

RESULTS

In all patients post-stress LVEF was 64%+/-17 while at-rest LVEF was 66%+/-15 (P=0.6). Post-stress end diastolic volume (EDV) was 142 ml+/-7, at-rest EDV was 141 ml+/-92 (P=0.57), post-stress end systolic volume (ESV) was 54 ml+/-51 and at-rest ESV was 56 ml+/-59 (P=0.38). Data from the perfusion study were used to divide patients into three groups: normal patients (group I), patients with total or partially reversible defects (group II) and patients with fixed defects (group III). In group I and group III patients LVEF at-rest was lower than post-exercise (LVEF 75%+/-11 vs 81%+/-10 (P<0.001) and 57%+/-16 vs 60%+/-18 (P=0.025)), respectively. Patients in group II had a higher at-rest LVEF than post-exercise (LVEF 66%+/-14 vs 64%+/-16 (P=0.003)). While the left ventriuclar volumes in group I and III patients decreased with exercise, group II patients had increased post-stress ESV.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-stress and at-rest LVEF are similar when all patients are considered but significant differences appear when patients are divided according to the results of the perfusion study. Normal and fixed defect patients have increased post-exercise LVEF. Patients with reversible defects have decreased LVEF, which is largely due to an increased ESV. Transitory left ventricular dysfunction is related to the presence of reversibility and may benefit from revascularization.

Performance of Thallium-201 Electrocardiography-gated Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography to Assess Left Ventricular Function

This study evaluated the performance of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with thallium-201 (201Tl) in assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) in Taiwanese by determining repeatability and correlation with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. A total of 18 patients underwent two sequential gated SPECT acquisitions within 30 minutes in the resting state to assess repeatability. Another 28 patients who underwent gated SPECT and 2D echocardiography within 7 days were included for comparison. The two sequential measurements were well correlated with respect to LVEF, EDV, and ESV (r = 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that two standard deviations of the absolute difference between the two sequential measurements for LVEF, EDV, and ESV were 6.4%, 16.8 mL, and 8.6 mL, respectively. For LVEF, EDV, and ESV, correlations between redistribution 201Tl-gated SPECT and echocardiography were also excellent (all r = 0.83, p < 0.0001). LVEF was similar with 201Tl-gated SPECT and echocardiography, but EDV and ESV were significantly higher with echocardiography (p < 0.05). Our study revealed that 201Tl-gated SPECT has high repeatability and excellent correlation with echocardiography for the assessment of LVEF and volumes in Taiwanese. These results support the clinical application of gated SPECT in routine 201Tl myocardial perfusion imaging in Taiwanese.

Gated SPECT assessment of left ventricular function is sensitive to small patient motions and to low rates of triggering errors: a comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography

BACKGROUND

Patient displacements and errors in R-wave detection are the main causes of inaccurate acquisition for gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (RNA). This study aimed to compare the influences of both factors between gated SPECT and RNA determinations of left ventricular ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

On gated SPECT and RNA acquisitions, recorded in 20 patients with coronary artery disease, we simulated the consequences of (1) 3-dimensional patient displacements of low (6.7 mm), moderate (13.4 mm), and high amplitude (20.1 mm) and (2) an erroneous triggering on T waves in 10% to 40% of recorded beats. Absolute values of left ventricular ejection fraction changes from baseline were higher with gated SPECT compared with RNA for patient displacements of low amplitude (5.0% +/- 3.8% vs 1.2% +/- 0.9%, P < .001) or moderate amplitude (10.0% +/- 6.2% vs 3.0% +/- 2.3%, P = .001) but not for patient displacements of high amplitude (12% +/- 9% vs 9% +/- 7%, P = not significant) and inaccurate triggering (for 20% T-wave triggering, 8.9% +/- 3.6% vs 7.9% +/- 3.0%; P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to RNA, gated SPECT is vulnerable to small patient displacements, and thus, specific efforts might be useful for limiting this potential cause of erroneous results. Both techniques may be affected by low rates of triggering errors, suggesting that small acceptance windows on cycle length should be recommended not only for RNA but also for gated SPECT.

Improved accuracy in estimation of left ventricular function parameters from QGS software with Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated-SPECT: a multivariate analysis

The purpose of this study was to verify whether the accuracy of left ventricular parameters related to left ventricular function from gated-SPECT improved or not, using multivariate analysis.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with cardiovascular diseases were studied. Gated-SPECT with the QGS software and left ventriculography (LVG) were performed to obtain left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Then, multivariate analyses were performed to determine empirical formulas for predicting these parameters. The calculated values of left ventricular parameters were compared with those obtained directly from the QGS software and LVG.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses were able to improve accuracy in estimation of LVEF, EDV and ESV. Statistically significant improvement was seen in LVEF (from r = 0.6965 to r = 0.8093, p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, improvements in correlation coefficients were seen in EDV (from r = 0.7199 to r = 0.7595, p = 0.2750) and ESV (from r = 0.5694 to r = 0.5871, p = 0.4281).

CONCLUSION

The empirical equations with multivariate analysis improved the accuracy in estimating LVEF from gated-SPECT with the QGS software.

Myocardial stunning demonstrated with rest and post-stress measurements of left ventricular function using dual-isotope gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

OBJECTIVES

We have evaluated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest (REF) and after stress (SEF) with dual-isotope gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) with 201Tl injected at rest and 99mTc sestamibi (99mTc-MIBI) injected at peak stress, to assess the occurrence of post-stress stunning.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-six consecutive patients had GMPS at rest and post-stress. The summed stress and rest scores and the summed difference score (SDS) were calculated using a 17-segment model analysis of GMPS. An SDS >3 indicated significant ischaemia. The REF and SEF were automatically generated and the DEF (SEF-REF) was calculated.

RESULTS

Significant stress induced ischaemia was observed in 103 patients (44%). REF was 54.72%+/-15.75% and SEF was 55.69%+/-16.65% (P<0.0015). DEF was -2.25+/-5.36 and 3.42+/-5.25 in patients with and without ischaemia, respectively (P<0.001). Post-stress stunning (>5% decrease in LVEF) was present in 68 patients (29%) and in 58/103 (56%) patients with ischaemia, after treadmill exercise or dipyridamole infusion and was more common in patients with severe ischaemia. The single significant predictor of DEF in univariate analysis and of stunning using logistic binary regression was stress induced ischaemia (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

LVEF increases post-stress in patients with no ischaemia and may decrease in 56% of patients with ischaemia, possibly due to stunning. The best predictor of post-stress stunning is stress induced ischaemia and its occurrence is related to the degree of ischaemia.

201Tl gated single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function. Would it be favoured over equilibrium radionuclide angiography?

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the clinical performance of routine 201Tl gated single photon emission computed tomographic (201Tl GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) was used as the standard for comparison.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two consecutive patients were submitted to both myocardial 201Tl GSPECT imaging, at stress and in redistribution, and ERNA. Left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) and regional wall motion were assessed from both stress and redistribution 201Tl GSPECT datasets, and from ERNA. Linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between LVEF calculated by ERNA and 201Tl GSPECT (r=0.73 at stress, r=0.75 in redistribution, P<0.0001). However, the 95% prediction intervals of 201Tl GSPECT LVEF from ERNA LVEF were wide (minimum 35.4% at stress and 33.2% in redistribution). Moreover, a difference in LVEF > or =10% between ERNA and 201Tl GSPECT was found in 26.4% of cases at stress and 28.6% of cases in redistribution. A fair agreement between ERNA and 201Tl GSPECT was found in regional wall motion assessment in segments with normal or mildly reduced tracer uptake (kappa=0.32 at stress and kappa=0.33 in redistribution). In segments with moderately to severely reduced tracer uptake, a moderate agreement was found in regional wall motion assessment between ERNA and 201Tl GSPECT (kappa=0.44 at stress and kappa=0.42 in redistribution).

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular function may be misinterpreted in a significant proportion of patients if the calculation of LVEF is based on 201Tl GSPECT. Moreover, the evaluation of regional wall motion by 201Tl GSPECT appears unsatisfactory.

Day-to-day variability of global left ventricular functional and perfusional measurements by quantitative gated SPECT using Tc-99m tetrofosmin in patients with heart failure due to coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Although myocardial gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is routinely used for functional measurements in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure, day-to-day variability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) volumes, and global perfusion scoring has not yet been investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 20 consecutive patients with CAD and an LVEF lower than 40% who routinely underwent a resting tetrofosmin gated SPECT study, we performed an additional gated SPECT study at rest 1 to 5 days later under the same circumstances. LV volumes and LVEF were calculated from the gated SPECT data by commercially available software (QGS). Myocardial perfusion was scored visually by use of a 20-segment, 5-point scoring method. For global LV function and perfusion, agreement between data was investigated by use of Bland-Altman plotting. The 95% limits of agreement found by Bland-Altman analysis were -0.9% +/- 6.0% for LVEF, 3 +/- 20 mL for LV end-diastolic volume, and 4 +/- 20 mL for LV end-systolic volume.

CONCLUSION

In CAD patients with an LVEF lower than 40%, day-to-day variability of measurements of global myocardial function and perfusion is quite similar to interobserver and intraobserver variability. Day-to-day variability of global LV functional parameters obtained by gated cardiac SPECT is fairly small, which indicates that myocardial gated SPECT can be used in daily clinical practice to determine changes in global LV function and perfusion over time in patients with diminished LV function.

Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function

Both electrocardiographically (ECG) gated blood pool SPET (GBPS) and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET (GSPET) are currently used for the measurement of global systolic left ventricular (LV) function. In this study, we aimed to compare the value of GSPET and GBPS for this purpose. The population included 65 patients who underwent rest thallium-201 GSPET imaging at 15 min after (201)Tl injection followed by planar (planar(RNA)) and GBPS equilibrium radionuclide angiography immediately after 4-h redistribution myocardial perfusion SPET imaging. Thirty-five patients also underwent LV conventional contrast angiography (X-rays). LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV volume [end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes] were calculated with GBPS and GSPET and compared with the gold standard methods (planar(RNA) LVEF and X-ray based calculation of LV volume). For both LVEF and LV volume, the inter-observer variability was lower with GBPS than with GSPET. GBPS LVEF was higher than planar(RNA) (P<0.01) and GSPET LVEF (P<0.01). Planar(RNA) LVEF showed a slightly better correlation with GBPS LVEF than with GSPET LVEF: r=0.87 and r=0.83 respectively. GSPET LV volume was lower than that obtained using X-rays and GBPS (P<0.01 for both). LV volume calculated using X-rays showed a slightly better correlation with GBPS LV volume than with GSPET LV volume: r=0.88 and r=0.83 respectively. On stepwise regression analysis, the accuracy of GSPET for the measurement of LVEF and LV volume was correlated with a number of factors, including planar(RNA) LVEF, signal to noise ratio, LV volume calculated using X-rays, summed rest score and acquisition scan distance (i.e. the radius of rotation). The accuracy of GBPS for the measurement of LVEF and LV volume was correlated only with the signal level, the signal to noise ratio and the acquisition scan distance. Both GSPET and GBPS provide reliable estimation of global systolic LV function. The better reliability of GBPS and in particular its lower sensitivity to different variables as compared with GSPET favours its use when precise assessment of global systolic LV function is clinically indicated.

Evaluating Estimation Techniques in Medical Imaging Without a Gold Standard: Experimental Validation

Imaging is often used for the purpose of estimating the value of some parameter of interest. For example, a cardiologist may measure the ejection fraction (EF) of the heart to quantify how much blood is being pumped out of the heart on each stroke. In clinical practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate an estimation method because the gold standard is not known, e.g., a cardiologist does not know the true EF of a patient. An estimation method is typically evaluated by plotting its results against the results of another (more accepted) estimation method. This approach results in the use of one set of estimates as the pseudo-gold standard. We have developed a maximum-likelihood approach for comparing different estimation methods to the gold standard without the use of the gold standard. In previous works we have displayed the results of numerous simulation studies indicating the method can precisely and accurately estimate the parameters of a regression line without a gold standard, i.e., without the x-axis. In an attempt to further validate our method we have designed an experiment performing volume estimation using a physical phantom and two imaging systems (SPECT,CT).

Transient postischemic stunning evaluation by stress gated Tl-201 SPECT myocardial imaging: Effect on systolic left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Transient postischemic stunning (TIS) has been reported in images obtained (1/2) to 1 hour after stress with technetium 99m tracers but has not been investigated in images obtained shortly after stress with thallium 201. We also quantified the global extent and severity of TIS, which has not been done previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 82 patients with either treadmill or dobutamine stress Tl-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. Images were semiquantitatively examined with a 20-segment model. The extent and severity of myocardial ischemia and TIS were assessed by the summed difference score from the early and delayed scores of perfusion, wall motion (WM), and wall thickening (WT). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower in early images than in delayed images in patients with ischemia (P <.01), TIS by WM (P <.001), and TIS by WT (P <.001), and the LVEF difference was more significantly different as the summed difference score of perfusion, WM, or WT increased. No significant LVEF difference was seen in patients with ischemia who did not have TIS.

CONCLUSIONS

In stress gated Tl-201 single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging, early TIS is frequently seen in patients with ischemia and is equivalently detected by WM and WT assessments. Significant exercise-induced transient left ventricular global dysfunction is associated with more severe and extensive ischemia and can be predicted by the measurement of the extent and severity of TIS from the same images.

Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard

Imaging is often used for the purpose of estimating the value of some parameter of interest. For example, a cardiologist may measure the ejection fraction (EF) of the heart in order to know how much blood is being pumped out of the heart on each stroke. In clinical practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate an estimation method because the gold standard is not known, e.g., a cardiologist does not know the true EF of a patient. Thus, researchers have often evaluated an estimation method by plotting its results against the results of another (more accepted) estimation method, which amounts to using one set of estimates as the pseudogold standard. In this paper, we present a maximum-likelihood approach for evaluating and comparing different estimation methods without the use of a gold standard with specific emphasis on the problem of evaluating EF estimation methods. Results of numerous simulation studies will be presented and indicate that the method can precisely and accurately estimate the parameters of a regression line without a gold standard, i.e., without the x axis.

Quantitative gated SPECT: the effect of reconstruction filter on calculated left ventricular ejection fractions and volumes

Gated SPECT (GSPECT) offers the possibility of obtaining additional functional information from perfusion studies, including calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The calculation of LVEF relies upon the identification of the endocardial surface, which will be affected by the spatial resolution and statistical noise in the reconstructed images. The aim of this study was to compare LVEFs and ventricular volumes calculated from GSPECT using six reconstruction filters. GSPECT and radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) were performed on 40 patients; filtered back projection was used to reconstruct the datasets with each filter. LVEFs and volumes were calculated using the Cedars-Sinai QGS package. The correlation coefficient between RNVG and GSPECT ranged from 0.81 to 0.86 with higher correlations for smoother filters. The narrowest prediction interval was 111 +/- 2%. There was a trend towards higher LVEF values with smoother filters, the ramp filter yielding LVEFs 2.55 +/- 3.10% (p < 0.001) lower than the Hann filter. There was an overall fall in ventricular volumes with smoother filters with a mean difference of 13.98 +/- 10.15 ml (p < 0.001) in EDV between the Butterworth-0.5 and Butterworth-0.3 filters. In conclusion, smoother reconstruction filters lead to lower volumes and higher ejection fractions with the QGS algorithm, with the Butterworth-0.4 filter giving the highest correlation with LVEFs from RNVG. Even if the optimal filter is chosen the uncertainty in the measured ejection fractions is still too great to be clinically acceptable.

Reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on exercise technetium-99m-gated cardiac single photon emission computed tomography predict high-grade angiographic stenoses

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the level of angiographic stenosis at which reversible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) are present on exercise stress technetium-99m (Tc-99m)- gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and whether assessments of stress and rest RWMA add incremental diagnostic information.

BACKGROUND

Stress and rest gated SPECT MPI enables the detection of post-exercise stunning. Although some studies have correlated RWMA to the severity of MPI defects, only one previous study correlated RWMA on gated MPI to angiographic findings. However, this correlation excluded patients with rest perfusion defects and did not involve gating of rest images.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing angiography within six months of exercise stress Tc-99m (sestamibi)-gated SPECT MPI (in the absence of interim cardiac events or revascularization) were recruited. Images were acquired 15 to 30 min after stress and interpreted without knowledge of the Duke treadmill score, left ventricular ejection fraction and angiographic data.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of reversible RWMA for angiographic stenoses >70% was 53%, with a specificity of 100%. The presence of reversible RWMA was able to stratify patients with angiographic stenoses of 50% to 79% and 80% to 99% with a high positive predictive value. A good correlation was noted between the presence of reversible RWMA and the coronary artery jeopardy score (R = 0.49, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that the post-stress RWMA, Duke treadmill and reversible RWMA scores were significant predictors of angiographic severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-stress and reversible RWMA, as shown by exercise stress Tc-99m-gated SPECT MPI, are significant predictors of angiographic disease and add incremental value to MPI for the assessment of angiographic severity.

Gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial imaging: a new tool in clinical cardiology

BACKGROUND

Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (gated SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging allows the analysis of left ventricular (LV) perfusion and function during the same acquisition.

RESULTS

Gated SPECT provides additional information to myocardial perfusion, which improves test specificity in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and hence diminishes the amount of borderline diagnosis. Because gated SPECT provides reliable information on LV ejection fraction and LV volumes, it is also a valuable tool in risk stratification. In addition, from gated SPECT, images can be reconstructed from which wall motion can be assessed showing a good correlation with wall motion assessed by accepted imaging modalities as echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast angiography. In the future wall motion analysis from gated SPECT may also be used for revascularization stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

Gated SPECT gives important additional information beyond myocardial perfusion imaging alone, which could have major clinical implications for optimal patient management.

Reproducibility of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT measurement of myocardial function

BACKGROUND

We compared the reproducibility of thallium 201 and technetium 99m sestamibi (MIBI) gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) measurement of myocardial function using the Germano algorithm (J Nucl Med 1995;36:2138-47).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Gated SPECT acquisition was repeated in the same position in 30 patients who received Tl-201 and in 26 who received Tc-99m-MIBI. The quantification of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF) on Tl-201 and Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT was processed independently with Cedars-Sinai QGS (Quantitative Gated SPECT) software. The reproducibility of the measurement of ventricular function on Tl-201 gated SPECT was compared with that of Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT. Correlation between the 2 measurements for volumes and EF was excellent for the repeated gated SPECT studies of Tl-201 (r = 0.928 to 0.986, P <.05) and Tc-99m-MIBI (r = 0.979 to 0.997, P <.05). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed the 95% limits of agreement (2 SDs) for volumes and EF were narrower by repeated Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT (EDV 14.1 mL, ESV 9.4 mL, EF 5.5%) than by repeated Tl-201 gated SPECT (EDV 24.1 mL, ESV 18.6 mL, EF 10.3%). The root-mean-square values of the coefficient of variation for volumes and EF were smaller by repeated Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT (EDV 2.1 mL, ESV 2.7 mL, EF 2.3%) than by repeated Tl-201 gated SPECT (EDV 3.2 mL, ESV 3.5 mL, EF 5.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

QGS provides an excellent correlation between repeated gated SPECT with Tl-201 and Tc-99m-MIBI. However, Tc-99m-MIBI provides more reproducible volumes and EF than Tl-201. Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT is the preferable method for the clinical monitoring of ventricular function.

Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated with gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with normal exercise test results: influence of tracer, gender, and acquisition camera

BACKGROUND

Myocardial imaging with tracers such as technetium-99m sestamibi or thallium-201 is extensively used as a means of measuring myocardial perfusion. With gated acquisition, these tracers can also be used as a means of measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and end diastolic and end systolic volumes (EDV and ESV, respectively). The objective of this study was to determine the normal range of EF, EDV, and ESV and to evaluate differences caused by either the tracer used, the gender of the patient, or the acquisition camera used.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1513 consecutive patients (mean age, 60+/-12 years [SD]) who had normal results on Bruce exercise tests had either Tc-99m sestamibi (n = 884) or Tl-201 (n = 629) injected at peak stress. Although all patients were referred for the evaluation of chest pain or dyspnea and many had cardiac risk factors, all had normal exercise capacity corrected for age, no electrocardiographic signs of ischemia, normal results on perfusion scans, and normal wall motion determined by means of quantitated gated single photon emission computed tomography (QGS). Scans were acquired on 1 of 3 different cameras. The mean EF for all patients who had gated Tc-99m sestamibi scans was 63% +/- 9%, not different from patients who had gated Tl-201 scans (63% +/- 9%). However, when the gender of the patient was considered, the mean EF for women was 66% +/- 8% with Tc-99m sestamibi (n = 519), higher than the mean EF for men (58% +/- 8%, n = 365, P<.0001). Similarly, the mean EF for women studied with Tl-201 (67% +/- 8%, n = 326) was higher than that of men (59% +/- 7%, n = 303,P<.0001). Patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 153) had a slightly reduced EF (62% +/- 10%, P<.001). In a subset of 240 patients, 140 patients studied with Tc-99m sestamibi and 100 studied with Tl-201, the EDV and ESV for women (n = 124) was estimated by means of QGS to be lower (57 +/- 17 mL and 19 +/- 11 mL, respectively) than those for men (74 +/- 22 mL-and 29 +/- 13 mL, respectively; n = 116; P<.001 for each comparison). No clinically significant differences in EF or volumes were noted based on tracers used or acquisition camera. For patients with normal results on exercise treadmill tests and perfusion imaging, the lower limit of normal for EF with gated perfusion imaging with QGS was 50% for women and 43% for men. For EDV and ESV, the upper limit of normal was 91 mL and 40 mL, respectively, for women and 119 mL and 55 mL, respectively, for men.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences related to either tracer or acquisition camera used were noted for EF, suggesting equivalency for clinical trials for patients with normal results on exercise tests. However, EF, EDV, and ESV determined by means of gated perfusion imaging need to be corrected for gender.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography

BACKGROUND

Quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT [QGS]) software is widely used for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Potentially confounding variables that may affect the accuracy of quantitative analysis of LVEF remain undefined. This study evaluated the accuracy of QGS as a means of determining LVEF in a wide range of LVEF values; evaluated the effect of extracardiac activity, count statistics, heart size, and perfusion defects on the accuracy of QGS LVEF; and compared QGS LVEF obtained at rest with that obtained after stress.

METHODS AND RESULTS

QGS-derived LVEF was compared with rest first-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA) LVEF in 400 electrocardiographic-gated SPECT studies. The overall correlation between QGS and FPRNA LVEF was only fair (r = 0.66, SEE = 11.85%). In 35 of the patient studies (9%) with high extracardiac activity, the automated software failed, and no correlation was obtained. In the remaining 365 patient studies (91%), left ventricular contours were successfully identified. In these studies, correlation was better (r = 0.74, SEE = 9.77%). Agreement was better for images with high counts (r = 0.81, SEE = 8.66%) than for images with low counts (r = 0.61, SEE = 11.17%). Patient studies with abnormal LVEF had better correlation (r = 0.77, SEE = 6.4%) than studies with normal LVEF (r = 0.46, SEE = 10.2%). Agreement between QGS LVEF and FPRNA LVEF was better in hearts with large end diastolic volumes (>104 mL) than in hearts with small volumes. Overall, mean QGS LVEF was lower than mean FPRNA LVEF (54%+/-14% vs. 58%+/-14%, P<.0001). There was no difference between mean rest and stress QGS LVEF in the same patients, even in patients with stress-induced ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

QGS is a valuable method for assessing resting LVEF. However, QGS LVEF is often lower than FPRNA LVEF. Accuracy is affected by high extracardiac activity, low count density, and small size of the left ventricle.