Differences in the immunological responses in drug- and virus-induced cutaneous reactions in children

Practical Approach to Hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Children

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the real-life prevalence, patient profile, and clinical presentation of drug hypersensitivity to NSAIDs in children after an incidence of an adverse event during treatment, verified by a drug challenge test.

METHODS

We included 56 children, aged 4-18 years, referred to our allergy clinic due to the incidence of adverse reaction during treatment. Skin prick tests and a drug provocation test were performed in all patients. Diagnostics for persistent urticaria were performed.

RESULTS

In 56 patients suspected of drug allergy, we proved NSAID hypersensitivity in 17 patients (30.1%). In 84.9% (n = 47) of patients, the clinical manifestations of hypersensitivity revealed angioedema and urticaria. The most common culprit drug among NSAIDs in children was ibuprofen. Thirty-one (55.4%) reactions were immediate, and 25 (44.6%) were delayed or late. Previous history of allergy was a risk factor for NSAID hypersensitivity (p = 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency in the blood serum was a risk factor for NASID hypersensitivity (OR = 5.76 (95% Cl: 1.42-23.41)).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypersensitivity to NSAIDs is a difficult diagnostic problem in pediatric allergy. The most common manifestation of hypersensitivity to ibuprofen in children is acute urticaria and angioedema. Two important problems in the differential diagnosis are cofactors such as vitamin D levels and viral infections, which require further research.

Drug patch testing in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The data on patch testing (PT) to identify culprit medications in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are limited to scattered case reports and small case series, without analysis of overall trends to inform clinicians of its utility, methodology, and safety.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the practice of PT in SJS/TEN, quantify the positivity rate of common drug classes, and assess safety during testing.

METHODS

PubMed was searched from inception to 2021. Search terms included "patch testing" AND "SJS" OR "TEN" OR "Stevens-Johnson syndrome" OR "toxic epidermal necrolysis" OR "Lyell's syndrome."

RESULTS

There were 58 articles that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 82 patients underwent patch testing for SJS/TEN, resulting in 104 positive reactions to 49 unique medications. Antiepileptic drugs were responsible for 48.1% of the positive reactions; antibiotics, 28.8%; and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 6.7%. The positivity rates of antiepileptics, antibiotics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were 33.1%, 13.1%, and 21.9%, respectively. When accounting for suspected causality, these rates increased to 54.3%, 78.4%, and 54.5%, respectively. Three patients (3.7%), 2 of whom had human immunodeficiency virus infection and active tuberculosis, experienced systemic reactions during PT, which required only conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Published reports suggest that PT in SJS/TEN is useful and safe. Antiepileptic drugs have been tested most frequently and found to have the highest positivity rate. There is a critical need for large-scale studies with standardized methodology to obtain reproducible data on PT in SJS/TEN.

Skin eruptions in children: Drug hypersensitivity vs viral exanthema

Childhood rashes or exanthemas are common and are usually relatively benign. There are many causes of rash in children, including mainly viruses, and less often bacterial toxins, drugs, allergens and other diseases. Viral exanthema often appears while children are taking a medication in the course of a viral infection; it can mimic drug exanthema and is perceived as a drug allergy in 10% of cases. In the vast majority of cases, the distinction between virus-induced and drug-induced skin eruption during the acute phase is not possible. The drugs most commonly implicated are beta-lactams (BL) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Viruses, commonly Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the bacterium, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, may cause exanthema either from the infection itself (active or latent) or because of interaction with drugs that are taken simultaneously. Determination of the exact diagnosis requires a careful clinical history and thorough physical examination. Haematological and biochemical investigations and histology are not always helpful in differentiating between the two types of exanthema. Serological and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be helpful, although a concomitant acute infection does not exclude drug hypersensitivity. A drug provocation test (DPT) is although considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and is not preferred by the patients. Skin tests are not well tolerated, and in vitro tests, such as the basophil activation test and lymphocyte transformation, are of low sensitivity and specificity and their relevance is debatable. Based on current evidence, we propose a systematic clinical approach for timely differential diagnosis and management of rashes in children who present a cutaneous eruption while receiving a drug.

Treating Through Drug-Associated Exanthems in Drug Allergy Management: Current Evidence and Clinical Aspects

In the setting of an acute cutaneous adverse drug reaction there is increasing interest in selected phenotypes and hosts to continue drug therapy, especially in settings in which there are limited therapeutic options. This concept of "treating through," defined as the continued use of a drug in the setting of, in particular maculopapular exanthema, potentially avoids unnecessary drug discontinuation. A review of the recent literature, historical viewpoints, and expert opinion are provided within to form recommendations and algorithms for a "treating-through" approach.

Familial clustering of COVID-19 skin manifestations

The medical community in the past months has seen a flourishing of information related to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus responsible for the COVID‐19 pandemic. From the early days of the pandemic, the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus has been linked to multiple different types of skin involvement. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to report on a case of familial clustering of a maculopapular COVID‐19 rash. Eight persons presented COVID‐19 symptoms, six were confirmed via SAR‐CoV‐2 chemoluminescent immunoassays, and the four related by blood presented skin manifestations. Although, it has not been fully established if the SARS‐CoV‐2 can in fact cause viral exanthems, our observations regarding the familial clustering and the temporal evolution seen in this family seem to present strong evidence of a viral exanthema related to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

Serum soluble Fas ligand levels and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in patients with drug-induced maculopapular rashes, dress, and viral exanthemas

BACKGROUND

Fatty acid synthetase (Fas)/Fas ligand (FasL)-dependent apoptotic pathways have been reported as being involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced maculopapular rashes.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated serum soluble FasL (sFasL) levels and peripheral blood lymphocyte subtypes to discriminate maculopapular drug eruptions (MPDE) from viral exanthema (VE).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Children with confirmed MPDE (group I), VE (group II), and drug rashes with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) (group III) were included. Serum sFasL levels and peripheral blood lymphocyte subtypes were analyzed in groups I-III on admission, and repeated twice (only once for group IV - controls).

RESULTS

There were no significant serum soluble FasL level differences among the groups for all the samples. In the initial samples, CD19⁺ cell numbers in group II were significantly higher than in group IV, and the CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio was higher than groups I and IV. In the second samples, CD4⁺ and CD19⁺ cell numbers were significantly higher in group II than group I. In the final samples, CD4⁺ cell numbers in group II were significantly higher than group I and group III. CD19⁺ cells numbers in group III were significantly lower than the other groups for all samples.

CONCLUSION

Serum sFasL levels were not found to be useful in discriminating viral exanthemas from other drug rashes. The significant differences between MPDE, VE, and DRESS were high CD4⁺ and CD19⁺ cell-count numbers in VE but low B-cell numbers in DRESS. This might be important for discriminating VE from DRESS, and the low B-cell count in early symptoms might be a useful predictor of DRESS development.

T Cell Assessment in Allergic Drug Reactions during the Acute Phase According to the Time of Occurrence

Allergic drug reactions can be classified as immediate, accelerated or delayed. This classification usually correlates with the mechanism involved: immediate reactions are IgE mediated and delayed reactions are T cell dependent. We analyzed lymphocyte involvement in patients with these reactions by determining cell subpopulations, activation state and skin homing receptor expression (CLA) in blood and skin. Patients with immediate, accelerated and delayed reactions were evaluated during the acute phase and after resolution. Controls taking drugs were included. Phenotypic immunofluorescence analysis was done by flow cytometry in peripheral blood, and by immunohistochemistry in skin for delayed reactions. Forty-six patients were included, 17 with immediate reactions, 10 accelerated and 19 delayed. At the acute phase CLA was significantly increased in delayed reactions and HLA-DR in all three types of reaction. In the severest delayed reactions, Steven-Johnson/Lyell syndromes, the CD4 subsets were increased in peripheral blood and skin compared to maculopapular exanthemas and urticaria and HLA-DR when compared with urticaria. In maculopapular exanthemas CLA was significantly increased in peripheral blood and skin compared to urticaria and the severe reactions. We found that T-cells are implicated, besides delayed reactions, in immediate and accelerated reactions. In delayed reactions there is a parallelism between results found in skin and peripheral blood with a higher participation of CD4+ cells the more severe the reaction.

Safety and Outcomes of Oral Graded Challenges to Amoxicillin without Prior Skin Testing

BACKGROUND

Unconfirmed penicillin allergy poses substantial public health consequences. The most widely accepted protocol to evaluate penicillin allergy is skin testing followed by an amoxicillin challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of direct oral graded challenges to amoxicillin.

METHODS

A prospective single-blind clinical trial with historical controls of patients ≥7 years old with historical non-life-threatening reactions to penicillin was conducted. Patients received placebo followed by a 2-step graded challenge to amoxicillin. The allergic reaction rate was compared with the rate observed in our previous study that included skin testing and with the currently reported penicillin allergy prevalence in the US population.

RESULTS

Of the 155 participants who completed an amoxicillin challenge, 120 patients (77.4%) experienced no reaction whereas 31 patients (20%) experienced nonallergic reactions to either placebo (n = 16) or amoxicillin (n = 15). Four patients (2.6%) developed mild allergic reactions. Significantly (P = .03) fewer patients (4 of 155, 2.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0%, 6.5%) were determined to be allergic compared with 14 of 170 subjects (8.2%, 95% CI: 5.0%, 13.4%) in our previous study where patients were determined to be allergic based on either positive skin tests (n = 11) or allergic challenge reactions after negative skin tests (n = 3). This 2.6% reaction rate was also significantly less than the 10% reported US prevalence of penicillin allergy (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Placebo-controlled oral graded challenges to amoxicillin without prior skin testing may be safe for patients ≥7 years old with non-life-threatening historical reactions to penicillin. Amoxicillin can be tolerated by the majority of patients with self-reported penicillin allergy.

Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group

When questioned, about 10% of the parents report suspected hypersensitivity to at least one drug in their children. However, only a few of these reactions can be confirmed as allergic after a diagnostic workup. There is still a lack of knowledge on drug hypersensitivity (DH) epidemiology, clinical spectrum, and appropriate diagnostic methods particularly in children. Meanwhile, the tools used for DH management in adults are applied also for children. Whereas this appears generally acceptable, some aspects of DH and management differ with age. Most reactions in children are still attributed to betalactams. Some manifestations, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated angioedema and serum sickness-like reactions, are more frequent among young patients as compared to adults. Risk factors such as viral infections are particularly frequent in children, making the diagnosis challenging. The practicability and validity of skin test and other diagnostic procedures need further assessment in children. This study presents an up-to-date review on epidemiology, clinical spectrum, diagnostic tools, and current management of DH in children. A new general algorithm for the study of these reactions in children is proposed. Data are presented focusing on reported differences between pediatric and adult patients, also identifying unmet needs to be addressed in further research.

Actual drug allergy during childhood: Five years' experience at a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are common in the paediatric population, representing a public health problem. Recent studies have confirmed that the frequency of drug allergy is overestimated by both parents and physicians. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and risk factors of actual drug allergies in children admitted to a tertiary referral allergy centre.

METHODS

Medical records covering the period of 2005-2010 of children with a history of DHR were reviewed. Demographic features of the patients and results of skin and drug provocation tests were noted. The European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) questionnaire was filled by using medical records and making phone calls with parents.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with 140 DHRs were evaluated. Seventeen children had confirmed drug allergy by positive skin tests (n=11) and drug provocation tests (n=5). One patient underwent severe anaphylaxis and subsequent cardiac arrest during infusion of the drug, and therefore diagnostic tests were not performed. Actual drug allergy was more frequent in children with chronic diseases (58.8% vs. 26.5%, p=0.018) and histories of anaphylaxis during DHR (58.8% vs. 24%, p=0.001). The patients' history of anaphylaxis [OR: 5.789, 95%CI: 1.880-17.554, p=0.002], sweating [OR: 7.8, 95%CI: 1.041-58.443, p=0.046] and dyspnoea [OR: 5.230, 95%CI: 1.836-14.894, p=0.002] during suspicious DHRs increased the risk for actual drug allergy.

CONCLUSION

Actual drug allergy was determined in 17.7% of the patients with a suspicious DHR. Having a history of anaphylaxis during suspected drug reactions as well as symptoms of sweating and dyspnoea increased the risk for actual drug allergy.

Cutaneous drug reactions in children: a multicentric study

Introduction

According to studies conducted in outpatients, it is estimated that 2.5% of children who are treated with a drug will experience a cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR).

Aim

To analyze the CADR reports involving pediatric patients recorded by three different university hospitals for describing common, serious, and interesting cutaneous drug eruption patterns.

Material and methods

For this purpose, the patients’ data from three different universities were reviewed retrospectively. Diagnosis was based on history, clinical findings and laboratory test results. The CADRs were classified into seven categories; urticaria, angioedema, maculopapular eruption, fixed drug eruption, erythema multiforme, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome.

Results

A total of 122 patients who had CADRs were enrolled in the study. The most frequently detected cutaneous drug reactions were urticaria + angioedema. Most of patients had no previous experience with the same drug and the most common causative agent of CADRs was antimicrobials.

Conclusions

Since CADRs are relatively rare, the current multicentric study can provide meaningful information about the cutaneous eruption patterns of commonly used drugs.

Contributions of pharmacogenetics and transcriptomics to the understanding of the hypersensitivity drug reactions

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) represent a large and important health problem, affecting many patients and leading to a variety of clinical entities, some of which can be life-threatening. The culprit drugs include commonly used medications including antibiotics and NSAIDs. Nontherapeutical agents, such as contrast media, are also involved. Because the pathophysiological mechanisms are not well known and the current diagnostic procedures are somewhat insufficient, new approaches are needed for understanding the complexity of HDRs. Histochemical and molecular biology studies have enabled us to classify these reactions more precisely. Pharmacogenetics has led to the identification of several genes, involved mainly in T-cell-dependent responses, with a number of markers being replicated in different studies. These markers are now being considered as potential targets for reducing the number of HDRs. Transcriptomic approaches have also been used to investigate HDRs by identifying genes that show different patterns of expression in a number of clinical entities. This information can be of value for further elucidation of the mechanisms involved. Although first studies were performed using RT-PCR analysis to monitor the acute phase of the reaction, nowadays high-density expression platforms represent a more integrative way for providing a complete view of gene expression. By combining a detailed and precise clinical description with information obtained by these approaches, we will obtain a better understanding and management of patients with HDRs.

Diagnostic evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics in a large population of children

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams (BLs) are often reported in children, with amoxicillin and, to a lesser extent, cephalosporins being the most frequent drugs involved. Although many of these children are considered to be allergic, a careful evaluation only confirms a low percentage.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the clinical data, sensitization profile and diagnostic methods used in a large group of children with a clinical history of hypersensitivity reactions to BLs.

METHODS

The study included children aged 1-14 yr with symptoms suggestive of hypersensitivity to BLs from January 2006-December 2012. Diagnosis was confirmed from a clinical history, specific IgE determination, skin testing and, if necessary, a drug provocation test (DPT).

RESULTS

Of a total of 783 patients studied, only 62 (7.92%) were confirmed as being allergic, 9 (14.52%) with immediate and 53 (85.48%) with non-immediate reactions. In those with immediate reactions, 2 (22.22%) were diagnosed by in vitro test, 2 (22.22%) by skin testing and 5 (55.56%) by DPT; in those with non-immediate reactions, 2 (3.77%) were diagnosed by skin testing and 51 (96.23%) by DPT. In all cases, DPT was positive to the culprit drug (29 AX-CLV, 26 AX, 1 cefixime and 1 cefaclor), and the most usual symptoms were exanthema in 43 cases, urticaria in 12, urticaria-angio-oedema in 1 and erythema in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

After an allergological work-up, over 90% of the children evaluated were finally confirmed as tolerant to BLs. Most reactions were of the non-immediate type, and DPT was an essential tool for diagnosis.

Immunologic evaluation of drug allergy

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDR) consist of an individual abnormal response with the involvement of the immunological system. In addition to specific immunological mechanisms where specific antibodies or sensitised T cells participate, release of inflammatory mediators by non-specific immunological recognition may also occur. Within this category are one of the most common groups of drugs, the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In addition to chemical drugs new emerging ones with an increasing protagonism are biological agents like humanised antibodies and others. For IgE dependent reactions both in vivo and in vitro tests can be used for the immunological evaluation. Sensitivity of these is not optimal and very often a drug provocation test must be considered for knowing the mechanism involved and/or establishing the diagnosis. For non-immediate reactions also both in vivo and in vitro tests can be used. Sensitivity for in vivo tests is generally low and in vitro tests may be needed for the immunological evaluation. Immunohistochemical studies of the affected tissue enable a more precise classification of non-immediate reactions. The monitorization of the acute response of the reactions has given clues for understanding these reactions and has promising results for the future of the immunological evaluation of HDR.

Role of dendritic cells in drug allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune reactions to drugs can cause a variety of diseases involving organs such as the skin, liver, kidney, and lung. Although the role of T cells in hypersensitivity reactions to drugs (HDRs) have been demonstrated by several studies, little is known about the role of the innate immune system, served mainly by dendritic cells, in the hypersensitivity response.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our knowledge about the mechanisms of HDRs is very superficial, and the hypotheses for the involvement of reactive metabolites in many cases are circumstantial and with no evidence. It is not clear which group of HDRs is due to reactive metabolites, nor is it clear the mechanisms by which reactive metabolites can cause allergic reactions. Several studies support the hypothesis that drugs interact differently with dendritic cells from drug-allergic and nonallergic patients, modifying their maturation level. Dendritic cells are also able to metabolize drugs and to present their metabolites to T lymphocytes eliciting a hypersensitivity response. All these findings show that the innate immune system and mainly dendritic cells might play a critical role in drug allergy.

SUMMARY

The interaction of drugs with dendritic cells is an emerging area of research which can bring new insights in order to have a better understanding about the physiopathology of HDRs.

Diagnosing hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins in children

OBJECTIVES

The goals were to evaluate the usefulness of skin tests, patch tests, serum specific IgE assays, and challenges in diagnosing hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins and to clarify the pathogenic mechanism of such reactions.

METHODS

Children with immediate manifestations (within 1 hour) underwent immediate-reading skin tests with penicillin reagents and any suspect cephalosporins, serum specific IgE assays, and challenges; some children underwent reevaluations. Children with nonimmediate manifestations (after >1 hour) were assessed with patch tests, delayed-reading skin tests, and challenges.

RESULTS

We evaluated 148 children with hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins, mainly cefaclor and ceftriaxone; 105 had experienced nonimmediate manifestations (mostly urticarial eruptions and maculopapular rashes) and 43 immediate manifestations (anaphylactic shock, urticaria and/or angioedema, and erythema). None of the nonimmediate reactors demonstrated positive results in patch tests and/or delayed skin tests; only 1 subject displayed immediate positive responses to penicillin skin-test reagents. Among the 104 patients with negative results, 96 underwent challenges; 95 tolerated the challenges, and 1 reacted to the cefaclor pediatric suspension and tolerated the challenge with a cefaclor capsule. In the first allergologic evaluation, 33 of the 43 children with immediate reactions displayed skin-test positivity. Of the 10 patients with negative results, 7 underwent challenges, followed by therapeutic courses and reevaluations for 4. All challenges and therapeutic courses were tolerated; in the reevaluation, 1 girl demonstrated positive skin-test results for both the responsible cephalosporin and penicillin reagents. Overall, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was diagnosed for 34 (79%) of 43 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely few nonimmediate manifestations associated with cephalosporin therapy are actually hypersensitivity reactions, whereas most immediate reactions to cephalosporins are IgE-mediated. Cephalosporin skin testing is a useful tool for evaluating such reactions.

Differential cytokine and transcription factor expression in patients with allergic reactions to drugs

BACKGROUND

Allergic drug reactions (ADR) can be either immediate reaction (IR) (IgE mediated) or delayed reaction (DR) (T-cell mediated). They follow the Th1/Th2 paradigm, with DR expressing interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) with down-regulation of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IR expressing IL-4 with down-regulation of IFN-gamma. We studied the extension of this polarization in DR and IR by examining the cytokine and transcription factor profile in T-cell subpopulations during the acute phase of an ADR.

METHODS

Expressions of cytokines [IL-4, IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)] and transcription factors (c-maf, GATA-3 and T-bet) were analysed by semi-quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in CD4 and CD8 subpopulations from ADR patients.

RESULTS

In DR, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and T-bet increased significantly in both CD4 and CD8 subpopulations, depending on the clinical severity. In IR, IL-4, c-Maf and GATA-3 were increased, but only significantly in CD4. A positive correlation existed between IFN-gamma and T-bet in DR and between IL-4 and c-Maf and GATA-3 in IR. In DR, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and T-bet were increased during the acute phase in CD4 and CD8. In IR, IL-4, c-Maf and GATA-3 were all increased in the acute phase, but only in CD4.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the Th1/Th2 paradigm in ADR, confirming previous findings that include the expression in both CD4 and CD8 T cells, and extending the observation to the transcription factors involved in the polarization of the immune response. Monitoring the reactions in the cell populations implicated, could be an important tool for assessing the mechanisms involved in ADR.

T cell populations propagating in the peripheral blood of patients with drug eruptions

BACKGROUND

In the non-immediate type of drug eruptions, the populations of circulating T cells may be altered as a consequence of T cell responses to a culprit drug.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate differences among the types of drug eruptions in propagating T cell populations of the patients' peripheral blood.

METHODS

The type of eruptions were divided into three categories: (1) generalized maculopapular eruption (MPE), (2) erythema multiforme (EM)/Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and (3) drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) or drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). T cell populations were phenotypically analyzed by flow cytometry in the percentage of T helper (Th) 1 (CXCR3+CD4+), Th2 (CCR4+CD4+), Tc1 (CXCR3+CD8+), and Tc2 (CCR4+CD8+) subsets and their activation states as assessed by CD69, CD25 or HLA-DR positivity.

RESULTS

Upon occurrence of both MPE and EM/SJS, Th2 cells outnumbered Th1 cells, whereas Tc1 and Tc2 cells differentially predominated in EM/SJS and MPE, respectively. An increase of HLA-DR+CD8+ cells in EM/SJS type provided another supportive evidence for Tc1 stimulation. In DIHS, during the development of the second wave of eruption and/or liver dysfunction associated with anti-HHV6 antibody elevation, CD4+ cells were gradually decreased, but CD8+ cells were inversely increased. Tc1 cells were increased as well as Th1 cells. Finally, in all the three groups, there existed a considerable number of CD25+CTLA-4-CD4+ T cells.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that Th2/Tc2 and Th2/Tc1 cells mediate MPE and EM/SJS, respectively, and Tc1 cells are involved in the pathogenesis of DIHS at the late stage.

Immune response to xenobiotics in the skin: from contact sensitivity to drug allergy

Skin is the most frequent target of adverse drug reactions. These cutaneous drug reactions (CDRs) show varied clinical manifestations ranging from mildly discomforting rashes to life-threatening Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Most CDRs appear to be immune mediated, although the mechanism by which they are initiated remains unclear. In this review, current knowledge of the mechanisms by which xenobiotics provoke immune responses in the skin after epicutaneous administration and how similar reactions may occur after systemic routes are summarised. This review also discusses a variety of genetic or environmental factors that may determine the susceptibility of individuals towards immune responses in skin following drug exposure.

Plasma MIP-1β levels and skin toxicity in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with the EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib

Gefitinib (Iressa() is an orally active, selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks signal transduction pathways. Skin toxicity has been reported to be the major toxicity observed in patients treated with the EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib. Although the mechanisms underlying the development of the skin toxicity remain to be precisely clarified, immunological mechanisms are considered to be involved. We examined the correlations between the plasma levels of several cytokines and the risk of development of adverse events, especially skin toxicity, induced by the administration of gefitinib as first-line monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Paired plasma samples were obtained from a total 28 patients of non-small cell lung cancer; the first before the initiation of gefitinib administration (250 mg/day) (24 patients) and the second 2 or 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment (23 patients). The plasma concentrations of 17 major cytokines were measured using a bead-based multiplex assay. The median concentrations of eight of these cytokines before the start of treatment ranged from 0.06 (IL-5) to 58.26 (MIP-1beta) (microg/ml). The concentrations of the remaining nine cytokines were under the detectable limit (<0.01 microg/ml) in more than 50% of the samples. Comparisons of the levels before and after treatment showed no significant differences for any of the cytokines measured. The MIP-1beta levels were significantly lower in the patients with skin toxicity (16/24) as compared with those in the patients not showing any skin toxicity (59.1+/-10.5 versus 119.0+/-36.8; p=0.042 by the two-sample t-test). The K-Nearest Neighbor Prediction (K=3) showed the classification rate to be 75% for the prediction sets containing MIP-1beta, IL-4 and IL-8. There were no significant associations between the levels of any of the cytokines measured and any other parameters, including the tumor response to the drug. In conclusion, the plasma MIP-1beta level may be a useful predictor of the development of skin toxicity in patients receiving gefitinib treatment.

Histopathology of drug-induced exanthems: is there a role in diagnosis of drug allergy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous eruptions are among the most common adverse drug reactions and may often represent a challenging diagnostic problem. This review focuses on histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and discusses the value of skin biopsies and consequent histopathological examination in the diagnosis of these reactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from immunohistological studies indicate that CD4+ T cells expressing cytotoxic granule proteins such as perforin and granzyme B are critically involved in the pathogenesis and contribute to the generation of typical histopathological features of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems, i.e. an interface dermatitis with vacuolar alteration and some apoptotic basal keratinocytes. In addition, an upregulation of both type 1 (i.e. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) and type 2 (i.e. IL-5) cytokines has been reported. IL-5 together with other chemokines (i.e. eotaxin/CCL-11) provides an explanation for tissue eosinophilia, which may be suggestive of a drug eruption if present.

SUMMARY

There are no absolute histological or immunohistological criteria for the diagnosis of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and even if the observed histological changes are compatible with a drug-induced eruption, biopsy may not definitely exclude alternative causes since there is considerable overlap with features seen in other entities. In mild cases with no severe signs or symptoms and a clear temporal relationship, clinical information and the morphologic pattern of skin lesions are often sufficient for diagnosis. However, in complex and severe cases or when the precise morphology is unclear, histopathological findings may provide some clues and assist in reaching a correct diagnosis.

Expression of cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen and E-selectin ligand by circulating human memory CD4+ T lymphocytes specific for herpes simplex virus type 2

Virus-specific memory T lymphocytes traffic to sites of viral infection. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes differ with regard to their homing kinetics to infected tissues. We studied the expression of cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA) and E-selectin ligand (ESL) by HSV-2-specific CD4(+) T lymphocytes. Virus-reactive T lymphocytes were identified ex vivo by CD154 or interferon-gamma up-regulation. We detected selective expression of CLA by HSV-2-reactive CD4(+) T lymphocytes, but at levels lower than those we previously observed for CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Short-term HSV-2-reactive CD4(+) lines generated from peripheral-blood mononuclear cells preferentially express CLA, compared with cytomegalovirus- or influenza-specific cells. CLA is expressed by HSV-2-reactive cells that are initially CLA negative before restimulation. Short-term culture-expanded HSV-2-specific CD4(+) T lymphocytes also selectively express ESL. These findings have implications for the optimization of vaccines for HSV and other cutaneous pathogens.