Mechanisms of transcriptional repression

Transcription activation in Escherichia coli and Salmonella

Promoter-specific activation of transcript initiation provides an important regulatory device in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Here, we describe the different mechanisms that operate, focusing on how they have evolved to manage the "housekeeping" bacterial transcription machinery. Some mechanisms involve assisting the bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase or replacing or remodeling one of its subunits. Others are directed to chromosomal DNA, improving promoter function, or relieving repression. We discuss how different activators work together at promoters and how the present complex network of transcription factors evolved.

Application of Quorum Sensing in Metabolic Engineering

Metabolic engineering is widely utilized in the food and other fields and has the benefits of low-cost substrates, eco-friendly fermentation processes, and efficient substrate synthesis. Microbial synthesis by metabolic engineering requires maintaining the productive capacity of the microorganism. Moreover, economic reasons limit the use of inducers in the exogenous synthesis pathway. Most unicellular microorganisms can interact by emitting signaling molecules; this mechanism, known as quorum sensing (QS), is an autoinduced system of microorganisms. With the deepening research on QS systems of different microorganisms, its components are widely used to regulate the metabolic synthesis of microorganisms as a dynamic regulatory system. In this Review, we described the typical bacterial QS mechanisms. Then, we summarized various regulatory strategies for QS and their applications to metabolic engineering. Finally, we underlined the potential for QS modularity in future metabolic engineering and suggested stimulating research on fungal QS systems.

Open chromatin in grapevine marks candidate CREs and with other chromatin features correlates with gene expression

Vitis vinifera is an economically important crop and a useful model in which to study chromatin dynamics. In contrast to the small and relatively simple genome of Arabidopsis thaliana, grapevine contains a complex genome of 487 Mb that exhibits extensive colonization by transposable elements. We used Hi-C, ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq to measure how chromatin features correlate to the expression of 31 845 grapevine genes. ATAC-seq revealed the presence of more than 16 000 open chromatin regions, of which we characterize nearly 5000 as possible distal enhancer candidates that occur in intergenic space > 2 kb from the nearest transcription start site (TSS). A motif search identified more than 480 transcription factor (TF) binding sites in these regions, with those for TCP family proteins in greatest abundance. These open chromatin regions are typically within 15 kb from their nearest promoter, and a gene ontology analysis indicated that their nearest genes are significantly enriched for TF activity. The presence of a candidate cis-regulatory element (cCRE) > 2 kb upstream of the TSS, location in the active nuclear compartment as determined by Hi-C, and the enrichment of H3K4me3, H3K4me1 and H3K27ac at the gene are correlated with gene expression. Taken together, these results suggest that regions of intergenic open chromatin identified by ATAC-seq can be considered potential candidates for cis-regulatory regions in V. vinifera. Our findings enhance the characterization of a valuable agricultural crop, and help to clarify the understanding of unique plant biology.

The bacterial protective armor against stress: The cis-trans isomerase of unsaturated fatty acids, a cytochrome-c type enzyme

Bacteria have evolved several outstanding strategies to resist to compounds or factors that compromise their survival. The first line of defense of the cell against environmental stresses is the membrane with fatty acids as fundamental building blocks of phospholipids. In this review, we focus on a periplasmic heme enzyme that catalyzes the cis-trans isomerization of unsaturated fatty acids to trigger a decrease in the fluidity of the membrane in order to rapidly counteract the danger. We particularly detailed the occurrence of such cis-trans isomerase in Nature, the different stresses that are at the origin of the double bond isomerization, the first steps in the elucidation of the mechanism of this peculiar metalloenzyme and some aspects of its regulation.

Characterization of Gene Repression by Designed Transcription Activator-like Effector Dimer Proteins

Gene regulation by control of transcription initiation is a fundamental property of living cells. Much of our understanding of gene repression originated from studies of the Escherichia coli lac operon switch, in which DNA looping plays an essential role. To validate and generalize principles from lac for practical applications, we previously described artificial DNA looping driven by designed transcription activator-like effector dimer (TALED) proteins. Because TALE monomers bind the idealized symmetrical lac operator sequence in two orientations, our prior studies detected repression due to multiple DNA loops. We now quantitatively characterize gene repression in living E. coli by a collection of individual TALED loops with systematic loop length variation. Fitting of a thermodynamic model allows unequivocal demonstration of looping and comparison of the engineered TALED repression system with the natural lac repressor system.

Modelling and measuring intracellular competition for finite resources during gene expression

Dissecting the competition between genes for shared expressional resources is of fundamental importance for understanding the interplay between cellular components. Owing to the relationship between gene expression and cellular fitness, genomes are shaped by evolution to improve resource allocation. Whereas experimental approaches to investigate intracellular competition require technical resources and human expertise, computational models and in silico simulations allow vast numbers of experiments to be carried out and controlled easily, and with significantly reduced costs. Thus, modelling competition has a pivotal role in understanding the effects of competition on the biophysics of the cell. In this article, we review various computational models proposed to describe the different types of competition during gene expression. We also present relevant synthetic biology experiments and their biotechnological implications, and discuss the open questions in the field.

Guiding Biomolecular Interactions in Cells Using de Novo Protein-Protein Interfaces

An improved ability to direct and control biomolecular interactions in living cells would have an impact on synthetic biology. A key issue is the need to introduce interacting components that act orthogonally to endogenous proteomes and interactomes. Here, we show that low-complexity, de novo designed protein-protein interaction (PPI) domains can substitute for natural PPIs and guide engineered protein-DNA interactions in Escherichia coli. Specifically, we use de novo homo- and heterodimeric coiled coils to reconstitute a cytoplasmic split adenylate cyclase, recruit RNA polymerase to a promoter and activate gene expression, and oligomerize both natural and designed DNA-binding domains to repress transcription. Moreover, the stabilities of the heterodimeric coiled coils can be modulated by rational design and, thus, adjust the levels of gene activation and repression in vivo. These experiments demonstrate the possibilities for using designed proteins and interactions to control biomolecular systems such as enzyme cascades and circuits in cells.

Transcriptional organization, regulation and functional analysis of flhF and fleN in Pseudomonas putida

The Pseudomonas putida flhA-flhF-fleN-fliA cluster encodes a component of the flagellar export gate and three regulatory elements potentially involved in flagellar biogenesis and other functions. Here we show that these four genes form an operon, whose transcription is driven from the upstream PflhA promoter. A second promoter, PflhF, provides additional transcription of the three distal genes. PflhA and PflhF are σ^N-dependent, activated by the flagellar regulator FleQ, and negatively regulated by FleN. Motility, surface adhesion and colonization defects of a transposon insertion mutant in flhF revealed transcriptional polarity on fleN and fliA, as the former was required for strong surface adhesion and biofilm formation, and the latter was required for flagellar synthesis. On the other hand, FlhF and FleN were necessary to attain proper flagellar location and number for a fully functional flagellar complement. FleN, along with FleQ and the second messenger c-di-GMP differentially regulated transcription of lapA and the bcs operon, encoding a large adhesion protein and cellulose synthase. FleQ positively regulated the PlapA promoter and activation was antagonized by FleN and c-di-GMP. PbcsD was negatively regulated by FleQ and FleN, and repression was antagonized by c-di-GMP. FleN promoted FleQ binding to both PlapA and PbcsD in vitro, while c-di-GMP antagonized interaction with PbcsD and stimulated interaction with PlapA. A single FleQ binding site in PlapA was critical to activation in vivo. Our results suggest that FleQ, FleN and c-di-GMP cooperate to coordinate the regulation of flagellar motility and biofilm development.

Biosensor libraries harness large classes of binding domains for construction of allosteric transcriptional regulators

The ability of bacteria to sense specific molecules within their environment and trigger metabolic responses in accordance is an invaluable biotechnological resource. While many transcription factors (TFs) mediating such processes have been studied, only a handful have been leveraged for molecular biology applications. To expand the repertoire of biotechnologically relevant sensors we present a strategy for the construction and testing of chimeric TF libraries, based on the fusion of highly soluble periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) with DNA-binding domains (DBDs). We validate this concept by constructing and functionally testing two unique sense-and-respond regulators for benzoate, an environmentally and industrially relevant metabolite. This work will enable the development of tailored biosensors for novel synthetic regulatory circuits.

Bacterially encoded environmental sensor proteins are potentially a rich source of transcriptional control but only a few have been harnessed for biotechnological applications. Here the authors develop a general strategy for designing custom-made monogenic synthetic sensors and validate the approach by designing two sense-and-respond regulators for benzoate.

Temporal control of Dickeya dadantii main virulence gene expression by growth phase-dependent alteration of regulatory nucleoprotein complexes

In bacteria, important genes are often controlled at the transcriptional level by several factors, forming a complex and intertwined web of interactions. Yet, transcriptional regulators are often studied separately and little information is available concerning their interactions. In this work, we dissect the regulation of the major virulence gene pelD in D. dadantii by taking into account the effects of individual binding sites for regulatory proteins FIS and CRP, and the impact of a newly discovered divergent promoter div. Using a combination of biochemistry and genetics approaches we provide an unprecedented level of detail on the multifactorial regulation of bacterial transcription. We show that the growth phase dependent regulation of pelD is under the control of changing composition of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes between FIS, CRP, div and pelD during the growth cycle that allow sequential expression of div and pelD in the early and late exponential growth phases, respectively. This work highlights the importance of "orphan" promoters in gene regulation and that the individual binding sites for a regulator can serve several purposes and have different effects on transcription, adding a new level of complexity to bacterial transcriptional regulation.

Mechanism of Antiactivation at the Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP σN-Dependent PatzT Promoter

PatzT is an internal promoter of the atzRSTUVW operon that directs the synthesis of AtzT, AtzU, AtzV, and AtzW, components of an ABC-type cyanuric acid transport system. PatzT is σ(N) dependent, activated by the general nitrogen control regulator NtrC with the assistance of protein integration host factor (IHF), and repressed by the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AtzR. We have used a variety of in vivo and in vitro gene expression and protein-DNA interaction assays to assess the mechanisms underlying AtzR-dependent repression of PatzT Here, we show that repression only occurs when AtzR and NtrC interact simultaneously with the PatzT promoter region, indicating that AtzR acts as an antiactivator to antagonize activation by NtrC. Furthermore, repression requires precise rotational orientation of the AtzR and NtrC binding sites, strongly suggesting protein-protein interaction between the two proteins on the promoter region. Further exploration of the antiactivation mechanism showed that although AtzR-dependent repression occurs prior to open complex formation, AtzR does not alter the oligomerization state of NtrC or inhibit NtrC ATPase activity when bound to the PatzT promoter region. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that PatzT-bound AtzR interacts with NtrC to prevent the coupling of NtrC-mediated ATP hydrolysis with the remodeling of the interactions between E-σ(N) and PatzT that lead to open complex formation.

IMPORTANCE

Here, we describe a unique mechanism by which the regulatory protein AtzR prevents the activation of the σ(N)-dependent promoter PatzT Promoters of this family are always positively regulated, but there are a few examples of overlapping negative regulation. The mechanism described here is highly unconventional and involves an interaction between the repressor and activator proteins to prevent the action of the repressor protein on the RNA polymerase-promoter complex.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transcription Machinery: Ready To Respond to Host Attacks

Regulating responses to stress is critical for all bacteria, whether they are environmental, commensal, or pathogenic species. For pathogenic bacteria, successful colonization and survival in the host are dependent on adaptation to diverse conditions imposed by the host tissue architecture and the immune response. Once the bacterium senses a hostile environment, it must enact a change in physiology that contributes to the organism's survival strategy. Inappropriate responses have consequences; hence, the execution of the appropriate response is essential for survival of the bacterium in its niche. Stress responses are most often regulated at the level of gene expression and, more specifically, transcription. This minireview focuses on mechanisms of regulating transcription initiation that are required by Mycobacterium tuberculosis to respond to the arsenal of defenses imposed by the host during infection. In particular, we highlight how certain features of M. tuberculosis physiology allow this pathogen to respond swiftly and effectively to host defenses. By enacting highly integrated and coordinated gene expression changes in response to stress,M. tuberculosis is prepared for battle against the host defense and able to persist within the human population.

CarD stabilizes mycobacterial open complexes via a two-tiered kinetic mechanism

CarD is an essential and global transcriptional regulator in mycobacteria. While its biological role is unclear, CarD functions by interacting directly with RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme promoter complexes. Here, using a fluorescent reporter of open complex, we quantitate RP_o formation in real time and show that Mycobacterium tuberculosis CarD has a dramatic effect on the energetics of RNAP bound complexes on the M. tuberculosis rrnAP3 ribosomal RNA promoter. The data reveal that Mycobacterium bovis RNAP exhibits an unstable RP_o that is stabilized by CarD and suggest that CarD uses a two-tiered, concentration-dependent mechanism by associating with open and closed complexes with different affinities. Specifically, the kinetics of open-complex formation can be explained by a model where, at saturating concentrations of CarD, the rate of bubble collapse is slowed and the rate of opening is accelerated. The kinetics and open-complex stabilities of CarD mutants further clarify the roles played by the key residues W85, K90 and R25 previously shown to affect CarD-dependent gene regulation in vivo. In contrast to M. bovis RNAP, Escherichia coli RNAP efficiently forms RP_o on rrnAP3, suggesting an important difference between the polymerases themselves and highlighting how transcriptional machinery can vary across bacterial genera.

The transcriptional repressor EUO regulates both subsets of Chlamydia late genes

The pathogenic bacterium Chlamydia replicates in a eukaryotic host cell via a developmental cycle marked by temporal waves of gene expression. We have previously shown that late genes transcribed by the major chlamydial RNA polymerase, σ(66) RNA polymerase, are regulated by a transcriptional repressor EUO. We now report that EUO also represses promoters for a second subset of late genes that are transcribed by an alternative polymerase called σ(28) RNA polymerase. EUO bound in the vicinity of six σ(28) -dependent promoters and inhibited transcription of each promoter. We used a mutational analysis to demonstrate that the EUO binding site functions as an operator that is necessary and sufficient for EUO-mediated repression of σ(28) -dependent transcription. We also verified specific binding of EUO to σ(66) -dependent and σ(28) -dependent promoters with a DNA immunoprecipitation assay. These findings support a model in which EUO represses expression of both σ(66) -dependent and σ(28) -dependent late genes. We thus propose that EUO is the master regulator of late gene expression in the chlamydial developmental cycle.

Evolved Quorum sensing regulator, LsrR, for altered switching functions

In order to carry out innovative complex, multistep synthetic biology functions, members of a cell population often must communicate with one another to coordinate processes in a programmed manner. It therefore follows that native microbial communication systems are a conspicuous target for developing engineered populations and networks. Quorum sensing (QS) is a highly conserved mechanism of bacterial cell-cell communication and QS-based synthetic signal transduction pathways represent a new generation of biotechnology toolbox members. Specifically, the E. coli QS master regulator, LsrR, is uniquely positioned to actuate gene expression in response to a QS signal. In order to expand the use of LsrR in synthetic biology, two novel LsrR switches were generated through directed evolution: an "enhanced" repression and derepression eLsrR and a reversed repression/derepression function "activator" aLsrR. Protein modeling and docking studies are presented to gain insight into the QS signal binding to these two evolved proteins and their newly acquired functionality. We demonstrated the use of the aLsrR switch using a coculture system in which a QS signal, produced by one bacterial strain, is used to inhibit gene expression via aLsrR in a different strain. These first ever AI-2 controlled synthetic switches allow gene expression from the lsr promoter to be tuned simultaneously in two distinct cell populations. This work expands the tools available to create engineered microbial populations capable of carrying out complex functions necessary for the development of advanced synthetic products.

Quorum sensing-modulated AND-gate promoters control gene expression in response to a combination of endogenous and exogenous signals

We have constructed and characterized two synthetic AND-gate promoters that require both a quorum-sensing (QS) signal and an exogenously added inducer to turn on gene expression. The engineered promoters, LEE and TTE, contain binding sites for the QS-dependent repressor, EsaR, and either LacI or TetR, and they are induced by an acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) signal and IPTG or aTc. Although repression of both LEE and TTE by wild-type EsaR was observed, induction of gene expression at physiologically relevant concentrations of AHL required the use of an EsaR variant with higher signal sensitivity. Gene expression from both LEE and TTE was shown to require both signal molecules, and gene expression above background levels was not observed with either signal alone. We added endogenous production of AHL to evaluate the ability of the promoters to function in a QS-dependent manner and observed that gene expression increased as a function of cell density only in the presence of exogenously added IPTG or aTc. Cell-cell communication-dependent AND-gate behaviors were demonstrated using an agar plate assay, where cells containing the engineered promoters were shown to respond to AHL produced by a second E. coli strain only in the presence of exogenously added IPTG or aTc. The promoters described in this work demonstrate that EsaR and its target DNA sequence can be used to engineer new promoters to respond to cell density or cell-cell communication. Further, the AND-gate promoters described here may serve as a template for new regulatory systems that integrate QS and the presence of key metabolites or other environmental cues to enable dynamic changes in gene expression for metabolic engineering applications.

The transcription factor titration effect dictates level of gene expression

Models of transcription are often built around a picture of RNA polymerase and transcription factors (TFs) acting on a single copy of a promoter. However, most TFs are shared between multiple genes with varying binding affinities. Beyond that, genes often exist at high copy number-in multiple identical copies on the chromosome or on plasmids or viral vectors with copy numbers in the hundreds. Using a thermodynamic model, we characterize the interplay between TF copy number and the demand for that TF. We demonstrate the parameter-free predictive power of this model as a function of the copy number of the TF and the number and affinities of the available specific binding sites; such predictive control is important for the understanding of transcription and the desire to quantitatively design the output of genetic circuits. Finally, we use these experiments to dynamically measure plasmid copy number through the cell cycle.

Directed evolution of the quorum-sensing regulator EsaR for increased signal sensitivity

The use of cell-cell communication or "quorum sensing (QS)" elements from Gram-negative Proteobacteria has enabled synthetic biologists to begin engineering systems composed of multiple interacting organisms. However, additional tools are necessary if we are to progress toward synthetic microbial consortia that exhibit more complex, dynamic behaviors. EsaR from Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii is a QS regulator that binds to DNA as an apoprotein and releases the DNA when it binds to its cognate signal molecule, 3-oxohexanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OC6HSL). In the absence of 3OC6HSL, EsaR binds to DNA and can act as either an activator or a repressor of transcription. Gene expression from P(esaR), which is repressed by wild-type EsaR, requires 100- to 1000-fold higher concentrations of signal than commonly used QS activators, such as LuxR and LasR. Here we have identified EsaR variants with increased sensitivity to 3OC6HSL using directed evolution and a dual ON/OFF screening strategy. Although we targeted EsaR-dependent derepression of P(esaR), our EsaR variants also showed increased 3OC6HSL sensitivity at a second promoter, P(esaS), which is activated by EsaR in the absence of 3OC6HSL. Here, the increase in AHL sensitivity led to gene expression being turned off at lower concentrations of 3OC6HSL. Overall, we have increased the signal sensitivity of EsaR more than 70-fold and generated a set of EsaR variants that recognize 3OC6HSL concentrations ranging over 4 orders of magnitude. QS-dependent transcriptional regulators that bind to DNA and are active in the absence of a QS signal represent a new set of tools for engineering cell-cell communication-dependent gene expression.

Regulation of noise in gene expression

The biochemical processes leading to the synthesis of new proteins are random, as they typically involve a small number of diffusing molecules. They lead to fluctuations in the number of proteins in a single cell as a function of time and to cell-to-cell variability of protein abundances. These in turn can lead to phenotypic heterogeneity in a population of genetically identical cells. Phenotypic heterogeneity may have important consequences for the development of multicellular organisms and the fitness of bacterial colonies, raising the question of how it is regulated. Here we review the experimental evidence that transcriptional regulation affects noise in gene expression, and discuss how the noise strength is encoded in the architecture of the promoter region. We discuss how models based on specific molecular mechanisms of gene regulation can make experimentally testable predictions for how changes to the promoter architecture are reflected in gene expression noise.

Fur activates the expression of Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island 1 by directly interacting with the hilD operator in vivo and in vitro

Previous studies have established that the expression of Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1), which is essential for epithelial invasion, is mainly regulated by the HilD protein. The ferric uptake regulator, Fur, in turn modulates the expression of the S. enterica hilD gene, albeit through an unknown mechanism. Here we report that S. enterica Fur, in its metal-bound form, specifically binds to an AT-rich region (BoxA), located upstream of the hilD promoter (P_hilD), at position -191 to -163 relative to the hilD transcription start site. Furthermore, in a P_hilD variant with mutations in BoxA, P_hilD*, Fur·Mn²⁺ binding is impaired. In vivo experiments using S. enterica strains carrying wild-type P_hilD or the mutant variant P_hilD* showed that Fur activates hilD expression, while in vitro experiments revealed that the Fur·Mn²⁺ protein is sufficient to increase hilD transcription. Together, these results present the first evidence that Fur·Mn²⁺, by binding to the upstream BoxA sequence, directly stimulates the expression of hilD in S. enterica.

Chronic methamphetamine exposure suppresses the striatal expression of members of multiple families of immediate early genes (IEGs) in the rat: normalization by an acute methamphetamine injection

RATIONALE

Repeated injections of cocaine cause blunted responses to acute cocaine challenge-induced increases in the expression of immediate early genes (IEGs).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to test if chronic methamphetamine (METH) exposure might cause similar blunting of acute METH-induced increases in IEG expression.

RESULTS

Repeated saline or METH injections were given to rats over 14 days. After 1 day of withdrawal, they received a single injection of saline or METH (5 mg/kg). Acute injection of METH increased c-fos, fosB, fra2, junB, Egr1-3, Nr4a1 (Nur77), and Nr4a3 (Nor-1) mRNA levels in the striatum of saline-pretreated rats. Chronic METH treatment alone reduced the expression of AP1, Erg1-3, and Nr4a1 transcription factors below control levels. Acute METH challenge normalized these values in METH-pretreated rats. Unexpectedly, acute METH challenge to METH-pretreated animals caused further decreases in Nr4a2 (Nurr1) mRNA levels. In contrast, the METH challenge caused significant but blunted increases in Nr4a3 and Arc expression in METH-pretreated rats. There were also chronic METH-associated decreases in the expression of cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) which modulates IEG expression via activation of the cAMP/PKA/CREB signal transduction pathway. Chronic METH exposure also caused significant decreases in preprotachykinin, but not in prodynorphin, mRNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the accumulated evidence that chronic administration of psychostimulants is associated with blunting of their acute stimulatory effects on IEG expression. The METH-induced renormalization of the expression of several IEGs in rats chronically exposed to METH hints to a potential molecular explanation for the recurrent self-administration of the drug by human addicts.

XerR, a negative regulator of XccR in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, relieves its repressor function in planta

We previously reported that XccR, a LuxR-type regulator of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc), activates the downstream proline iminopeptidase virulence gene (pip) in response to certain host plant factor(s). In this report, we further show that the expression of the xccR gene was repressed in the culture medium by an NtrC-type response regulator, which we named XerR (XccR expression-related, repressor), and that this repression was relieved when the bacteria were grown in planta. Such a regulatory mechanism is reinforced by the observations that XerR directly bound to the xccR promoter in vitro, and that mutations at the phosphorylation-related residues of XerR resulted in the loss of its repressor function. Furthermore, the expression level of xccR increased even in XerR-overexpressing Xcc cells when they were vacuum infiltrated into cabbage plants. We also preliminarily characterized the host factor(s) involved in the above mentioned interactions between Xcc and the host plant, showing that a plant material(s) with molecular weight(s) less than 1 kDa abolished the binding of XerR to the xccR promoter, while the same material enhanced the binding of XccR to the luxXc box in the pip promoter. Taken together, our results implicate XerR in a new layer of the regulatory mechanism controlling the expression of the virulence-related xccR/pip locus and provide clues to the identification of plant signal molecules that interact with XerR and XccR to enhance the virulence of Xcc.

Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase expression in Pseudomonas putida results from its direct repression by NtrC under nitrogen-limiting conditions

Nitrogen-regulated genes in enterobacteria are positively controlled by the transcriptional activator of σ(N) -dependent promoters NtrC, either directly or indirectly, through the dual regulator Nac. Similar to enterobacteria, gdhA encoding glutamate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas putida is one of the few genes that is induced by excess nitrogen. In P. putida, the binding of NtrC to the gdhA promoter region and in vitro transcription suggest that, unlike its enterobacterial homologue that is repressed by Nac, gdhA is directly repressed by NtrC. Footprinting analyses demonstrated that NtrC binds to four distinct sites in the gdhA promoter. NtrC dimers bind cooperatively, and those bound closer to the promoter interact with the dimers bound further upstream, thus producing a proposed repressor loop in the DNA. The formation of the higher-order complex and the repressor loop appears to be important for repression but not absolutely essential. Both the phosphorylated and the non-phosphorylated forms of NtrC efficiently repressed gdhA transcription in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, NtrC repression of gdhA under nitrogen-limiting conditions does not depend on the phosphorylation of the regulator; rather, it relies on an increase in the repressor concentration under these conditions.

Transcriptional repressor CopR acts by inhibiting RNA polymerase binding

CopR is a transcriptional repressor encoded by the broad-host-range streptococcal plasmid pIP501, which also replicates in Bacillus subtilis. It acts in concert with the antisense RNA, RNAIII, to control pIP501 replication. CopR represses transcription of the essential repR mRNA about 10- to 20-fold. In previous work, DNA binding and dimerization constants were determined and the motifs responsible localized. The C terminus of CopR was shown to be required for stability. Furthermore, SELEX of the copR operator revealed that in vivo evolution was for maximal binding affinity. Here, we elucidate the repression mechanism of CopR. Competition assays showed that CopR-operator complexes are 18-fold less stable than RNA polymerase (RNAP)-pII complexes. DNase I footprinting revealed that the binding sites for CopR and RNAP overlap. Gel-shift assays demonstrated that CopR and B. subtilis RNAP cannot bind simultaneously, but compete for binding at promoter pII. Due to its higher intracellular concentration CopR inhibits RNAP binding. Additionally, KMnO(4) footprinting experiments indicated that prevention of open complex formation at pII does not further contribute to the repression effect of CopR.

Bending the rules of transcriptional repression: tightly looped DNA directly represses T7 RNA polymerase

From supercoiled DNA to the tight loops of DNA formed by some gene repressors, DNA in cells is often highly bent. Despite evidence that transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is affected in systems where DNA is deformed significantly, the mechanistic details underlying the relationship between polymerase function and mechanically stressed DNA remain unclear. Seeking to gain additional insight into the regulatory consequences of highly bent DNA, we hypothesize that tightly looping DNA is alone sufficient to repress transcription. To test this hypothesis, we have developed an assay to quantify transcription elongation by bacteriophage T7 RNAP on small, circular DNA templates approximately 100 bp in size. From these highly bent transcription templates, we observe that the elongation velocity and processivity can be repressed by at least two orders of magnitude. Further, we show that minicircle templates sustaining variable levels of twist yield only moderate differences in repression efficiency. We therefore conclude that the bending mechanics within the minicircle templates dominate the observed repression. Our results support a model in which RNAP function is highly dependent on the bending mechanics of DNA and are suggestive of a direct, regulatory role played by the template itself in regulatory systems where DNA is known to be highly bent.

Evidence that regulatory protein MarA of Escherichia coli represses rob by steric hindrance

The MarA protein of Escherichia coli can both activate and repress the initiation of transcription, depending on the position and orientation of its degenerate 20-bp binding site ("marbox") at the promoter. For all three known repressed genes, the marbox overlaps the promoter. It has been reported that MarA represses the rob promoter via an RNA polymerase (RNAP)-DNA-MarA ternary complex. Under similar conditions, we found a ternary complex for the repressed purA promoter also. These findings, together with the backwards orientation of repressed marboxes, suggested a unique interaction of MarA with RNAP in repression. However, no repression-specific residues of MarA could be found among 38 single-alanine replacement mutations previously shown to retain activation function or among mutants from random mutagenesis. Mutations Thr12Ala, Arg36Ala, Thr95Ile, and Pro106Ala were more damaging for activation than for repression, some up to 10-fold, so these residues may play a specific role in activation. We found that nonspecific binding of RNAP to promoterless regions of DNA was presumably responsible for the ternary complexes seen previously. When RNAP binding was promoter specific, MarA reduced RNAP access to the rob promoter; there was little or no ternary complex. These findings strongly implicate steric hindrance as the mechanism of repression of rob by MarA.

A bacterial antirepressor with SH3 domain topology mimics operator DNA in sequestering the repressor DNA recognition helix

Direct targeting of critical DNA-binding elements of a repressor by its cognate antirepressor is an effective means to sequester the repressor and remove a transcription initiation block. Structural descriptions for this, though often proposed for bacterial and phage repressor–antirepressor systems, are unavailable. Here, we describe the structural and functional basis of how the Myxococcus xanthus CarS antirepressor recognizes and neutralizes its cognate repressors to turn on a photo-inducible promoter. CarA and CarH repress the carB operon in the dark. CarS, produced in the light, physically interacts with the MerR-type winged-helix DNA-binding domain of these repressors leading to activation of carB. The NMR structure of CarS1, a functional CarS variant, reveals a five-stranded, antiparallel β-sheet fold resembling SH3 domains, protein–protein interaction modules prevalent in eukaryotes but rare in prokaryotes. NMR studies and analysis of site-directed mutants in vivo and in vitro unveil a solvent-exposed hydrophobic pocket lined by acidic residues in CarS, where the CarA DNA recognition helix docks with high affinity in an atypical ligand-recognition mode for SH3 domains. Our findings uncover an unprecedented use of the SH3 domain-like fold for protein–protein recognition whereby an antirepressor mimics operator DNA in sequestering the repressor DNA recognition helix to activate transcription.

The transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis uses different repression mechanisms at different promoters

CcpN, a transcriptional repressor from Bacillus subtilis that is responsible for the carbon catabolite repression of three genes, has been characterized in detail in the past 4 years. However, nothing is known about the actual repression mechanism as yet. Here, we present a detailed study on how CcpN exerts its repression effect at its three known target promoters of the genes sr1, pckA, and gapB. Using gel shift assays under non-repressive and repressive conditions, we showed that CcpN and RNA polymerase can bind simultaneously and that CcpN does not prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to the promoter. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of CcpN on open complex formation and demonstrate that CcpN also does not act at this step of transcription initiation at the sr1 and pckA and presumably at the gapB promoter. Investigation of abortive transcript synthesis revealed that CcpN acts differently at the three promoters: At the sr1 and pckA promoter, promoter clearance is impeded by CcpN, whereas synthesis of abortive transcripts is repressed at the gapB promoter. Eventually, we demonstrated with Far Western blots and co-elution experiments that CcpN is able to interact with the RNAP alpha-subunit, which completes the picture of the requirements for the repressive action of CcpN. On the basis of the presented results, we propose a new working model for CcpN action.

Activation and repression of a sigmaN-dependent promoter naturally lacking upstream activation sequences

The Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP protein AtzR is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator required for activation of the atzDEF operon in response to nitrogen limitation and cyanuric acid. Transcription of atzR is directed by the sigma(N)-dependent promoter PatzR, activated by NtrC and repressed by AtzR. Here we use in vivo and in vitro approaches to address the mechanisms of PatzR activation and repression. Activation by NtrC did not require any promoter sequences other than the sigma(N) recognition motif both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that NtrC activates PatzR in an upstream activation sequences-independent fashion. Regarding AtzR-dependent autorepression, our in vitro transcription experiments show that the concentration of AtzR required for repression of the PatzR promoter in vitro correlates with AtzR affinity for its binding site. In addition, AtzR prevents transcription from PatzR when added to a preformed E-sigma(N)-PatzR closed complex, but isomerization to an open complex prevents repression. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprint assays indicate that DNA-bound AtzR and E-sigma(N) are mutually exclusive. Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that AtzR represses transcription from PatzR by competing with E-sigma(N) for their overlapping binding sites. There are no previous reports of a similar mechanism for repression of sigma(N)-dependent transcription.

Repressor CopG prevents access of RNA polymerase to promoter and actively dissociates open complexes

Replication of the promiscuous plasmid pMV158 requires expression of the initiator repB gene, which is controlled by the repressor CopG. Genes repB and copG are co-transcribed from promoter P_cr. We have studied the interactions between RNA polymerase, CopG and the promoter to elucidate the mechanism of repression by CopG. Complexes formed at 0°C and at 37°C between RNA polymerase and P_cr differed from each other in stability and in the extent of the DNA contacted. The 37°C complex was very stable (half-life of about 3 h), and shared features with typical open complexes generated at a variety of promoters. CopG protein repressed transcription from P_cr at two different stages in the process leading to the initiation complex. First, CopG hindered binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. Second, CopG was able to displace RNA polymerase once the enzyme has formed a stable complex with P_cr. A model for the CopG-mediated disassembly of the stable RNA polymerase–P_cr promoter complex is presented.

RNA polymerase: a nexus of gene regulation

In Bacteria, transcription is catalyzed by a single RNA polymerase (RNAP) whose promoter selectivity and activity is governed by a wide variety of transcription factors. The net effect of these transcriptional regulators is to determine which genes are transcribed, and at what levels, under any specific growth condition. RNAP thus serves as a nexus of gene regulation that integrates the information coming from a variety of sensory systems to appropriately modulate gene expression. The techniques presented in this volume provide a set of tools and approaches for investigating the factors controlling RNAP activity at both individual promoters and on a genomic scale. This introductory chapter provides a brief overview of RNAP and the transcription cycle and introduces general principles of how the fundamental steps of transcription are influenced by both DNA (promoter) sequences and trans-acting factors.

Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli melR promoter: repression involves four molecules of MelR

The Escherichia coli MelR protein is a transcription activator that autoregulates its own promoter by repressing transcription initiation. Optimal repression requires MelR binding to a site that overlaps the melR transcription start point and to upstream sites. In this work, we have investigated the different determinants needed for optimal repression and their spatial requirements. We show that repression requires a complex involving four DNA-bound MelR molecules, and that the global CRP regulator plays little or no role.

Isolation and characterization of putative Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis promoters

Novel plasmids were constructed for the analysis of DNA fragments from the rumen bacterium Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis. Five previously unidentified promoters were characterized using a novel primer extension method to identify transcription start sites. The genes downstream of these promoters were not identified, and their activity in expression of genomic traits in wild-type P. ruminis remains putative. Comparison with promoters from this and closely related species revealed a consensus sequence resembling the binding motif for the RNA polymerase sigma(70)-like factor complex. Consensus -35 and -10 sequences within these elements were TTGACA and ATAATATA respectively, interspaced by 15-16 bp. The consensus for the -10 element was extended by one nucleotide upstream and downstream of the standard hexamer (indicated in bold). Promoter strengths were measured by reverse transcription quantitative PCR and beta-glucuronidase assays. No correlation was found between the composition and context of elements within P. ruminis promoters, and promoter strength. However, a mutation within the -35 element of one promoter revealed that transcriptional strength and choice of transcription start site were sensitive to this single nucleotide change.

Architecture of Burkholderia cepacia complex sigma70 gene family: evidence of alternative primary and clade-specific factors, and genomic instability

BACKGROUND

The Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) groups bacterial species with beneficial properties that can improve crop yields or remediate polluted sites but can also lead to dramatic human clinical outcomes among cystic fibrosis (CF) or immuno-compromised individuals. Genome-wide regulatory processes of gene expression could explain parts of this bacterial duality. Transcriptional sigma70 factors are components of these processes. They allow the reversible binding of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase to form the holoenzyme that will lead to mRNA synthesis from a DNA promoter region. Bcc genome-wide analyses were performed to investigate the major evolutionary trends taking place in the sigma70 family of these bacteria.

RESULTS

Twenty sigma70 paralogous genes were detected in the Burkholderia cenocepacia strain J2315 (Bcen-J2315) genome, of which 14 were of the ECF (extracytoplasmic function) group. Non-ECF paralogs were related to primary (rpoD), alternative primary, stationary phase (rpoS), flagellin biosynthesis (fliA), and heat shock (rpoH) factors. The number of sigma70 genetic determinants among this genome was of 2,86 per Mb. This number is lower than the one of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a species found in similar habitats including CF lungs. These two bacterial groups showed strikingly different sigma70 family architectures, with only three ECF paralogs in common (fecI-like, pvdS and algU). Bcen-J2315 sigma70 paralogs showed clade-specific distributions. Some paralogs appeared limited to the ET12 epidemic clone (ecfA2), particular Bcc species (sigI), the Burkholderia genus (ecfJ, ecfF, and sigJ), certain proteobacterial groups (ecfA1, ecfC, ecfD, ecfE, ecfG, ecfL, ecfM and rpoS), or were broadly distributed in the eubacteria (ecfI, ecfK, ecfH, ecfB, and rpoD-, rpoH-, fliA-like genes). Genomic instability of this gene family was driven by chromosomal inversion (ecfA2), recent duplication events (ecfA and RpoD), localized (ecfG) and large scale deletions (sigI, sigJ, ecfC, ecfH, and ecfK), and a phage integration event (ecfE).

CONCLUSION

The Bcc sigma70 gene family was found to be under strong selective pressures that could lead to acquisition/deletion, and duplication events modifying its architecture. Comparative analysis of Bcc and Pseudomonas aeruginosa sigma70 gene families revealed distinct evolutionary strategies, with the Bcc having selected several alternative primary factors, something not recorded among P. aeruginosa and only previously reported to occur among the actinobacteria.

Antirepression as a second mechanism of transcriptional activation by a minor groove binding protein

Competence for genetic transformation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is a bistable differentiation process governed by the minor groove DNA binding protein ComK. No detectable comK transcription occurs in the absence of an intact comK gene, indicating that ComK has auto-activating properties. ComK auto-stimulation, which is dependent on ComK binding to the comK promoter, is a critical step in competence development, ensuring quick and high-level expression of the late-competence genes. Auto-stimulation is also essential for the bistable expression pattern of competence. Here, we demonstrate that ComK acts as an activator at its own promoter by antagonizing the action of two repressors, Rok and CodY. Importantly, antirepression occurs without preventing binding of the repressing proteins, suggesting that ComK and the repressors might bind at distinct surfaces of the DNA helix. DegU, a DNA binding protein known to increase the affinity of ComK for its own promoter, potentiates the antirepression activity of ComK. We postulate that antirepression is primarily achieved through modulation of DNA topology. Although to our knowledge ComK is the only DNA binding protein shown to act in this novel fashion, other minor groove binding proteins may act similarly.

Inducer-modulated cooperative binding of the tetrameric CggR repressor to operator DNA

The central glycolytic genes repressor (CggR) controls the transcription of the gapA operon encoding five key glycolytic enzymes in Bacillus subtilis. CggR recognizes a unique DNA target sequence comprising two direct repeats and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) is the inducer that negatively controls this interaction. We present here analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence anisotropy experiments that demonstrate that CggR binds as a tetramer to the full-length operator DNA in a highly cooperative manner. We also show that CggR binds as a dimer to each direct repeat, the affinity being approximately 100-fold higher for the 3' repeat. In addition, our studies reveal a bimodal effect of FBP on the repressor/operator interaction. At micromolar concentrations, FBP leads to a change in the conformational dynamics of the complex. In the millimolar range, without altering the stoichiometry, FBP leads to a drastic reduction in the affinity and cooperativity of the complex. This bimodal response suggests the existence of two sugar-binding sites in the repressor, a high affinity site at which FBP acts as a structural co-factor and a low affinity site underlying the molecular mechanism of gapA induction.

Toxin-antitoxin regulation: bimodal interaction of YefM-YoeB with paired DNA palindromes exerts transcriptional autorepression

Toxin–antitoxin (TA) complexes function in programmed cell death or stress response mechanisms in bacteria. The YefM–YoeB TA complex of Escherichia coli consists of YoeB toxin that is counteracted by YefM antitoxin. When liberated from the complex, YoeB acts as an endoribonuclease, preferentially cleaving 3′ of purine nucleotides. Here we demonstrate that yefM-yoeB is transcriptionally autoregulated. YefM, a dimeric protein with extensive secondary structure revealed by circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, is the primary repressor, whereas YoeB is a repression enhancer. The operator site 5′ of yefM-yoeB comprises adjacent long and short palindromes with core 5′-TGTACA-3′ motifs. YefM binds the long palindrome, followed sequentially by short palindrome recognition. In contrast, the repressor–corepressor complex recognizes both motifs more avidly, impyling that YefM within the complex has an enhanced DNA-binding affinity compared to free YefM. Operator interaction by YefM and YefM–YoeB is accompanied by structural transitions in the proteins. Paired 5′-TGTACA-3′ motifs are common in yefM-yoeB regulatory regions in diverse genomes suggesting that interaction of YefM–YoeB with these motifs is a conserved mechanism of operon autoregulation. Artificial perturbation of transcriptional autorepression could elicit inappropriate YoeB toxin production and induction of bacterial cell suicide, a potentially novel antibacterial strategy.

Transcriptional regulation by competing transcription factor modules

Gene regulatory networks lie at the heart of cellular computation. In these networks, intracellular and extracellular signals are integrated by transcription factors, which control the expression of transcription units by binding to cis-regulatory regions on the DNA. The designs of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cis-regulatory regions are usually highly complex. They frequently consist of both repetitive and overlapping transcription factor binding sites. To unravel the design principles of these promoter architectures, we have designed in silico prokaryotic transcriptional logic gates with predefined input-output relations using an evolutionary algorithm. The resulting cis-regulatory designs are often composed of modules that consist of tandem arrays of binding sites to which the transcription factors bind cooperatively. Moreover, these modules often overlap with each other, leading to competition between them. Our analysis thus identifies a new signal integration motif that is based upon the interplay between intramodular cooperativity and intermodular competition. We show that this signal integration mechanism drastically enhances the capacity of cis-regulatory domains to integrate signals. Our results provide a possible explanation for the complexity of promoter architectures and could be used for the rational design of synthetic gene circuits.

CovR activation of the dipeptide permease promoter (PdppA) in Group A Streptococcus

CovR, the two-component response regulator of Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus [GAS]) directly or indirectly represses about 15% of the genome, including genes encoding many virulence factors and itself. Transcriptome analyses also showed that some genes are activated by CovR. We asked whether the regulation by CovR of one of these genes, dppA, the first gene in an operon encoding a dipeptide permease, is direct or indirect. Direct regulation by CovR was suggested by the presence of five CovR consensus binding sequences (CBs) near the putative promoter. In this study, we identified the 5' end of the dppA transcript synthesized in vivo and showed that the start of dppA transcription in vitro is the same. We found that CovR binds specifically to the dppA promoter region (PdppA) in vitro with an affinity similar to that at which it binds to other CovR-regulated promoters. Disruption of any of the five CBs by a substitution of GG for TT inhibited CovR binding to that site in vitro, and binding at two of the CBs appeared cooperative. In vivo, CovR activation of transcription was not affected by individual mutations of any of the four CBs that we could study. This suggests that the binding sites are redundant in vivo. In vitro, CovR did not activate transcription from PdppA in experiments using purified GAS RNA polymerase and either linear or supercoiled DNA template. Therefore, we propose that in vivo, CovR may interfere with the binding of a repressor of PdppA.

Transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis compensates asymmetric contact distribution by cooperative binding

Carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis is carried out mainly by the major regulator CcpA. In contrast, sugar-dependent repression of three genes, sr1 encoding a small untranslated RNA, and two genes, gapB and pckA, coding for gluconeogenic enzymes is mediated by the recently identified transcriptional repressor CcpN. Since previous DNase I footprinting yielded only basic information on the operator sequences of CcpN, chemical interference footprinting studies were performed for a precise contact mapping. Methylation interference, potassium permanganate and hydroxylamine footprinting were used to identify all contacted residues in both strands in the three operator sequences. Furthermore, ethylation interference experiments were performed to identify phosphate residues essential for CcpN binding. Here, we show that each operator has two binding sites for CcpN, one of which was always contacted more strongly than the other. The three sites that exhibited close contacts were very similar in sequence, with only a few slight variations, whereas the other three corresponding sites showed several deviations. Gel retardation assays with purified CcpN demonstrated that the differences in contact number and strength correlated well with significantly different K(D) values for the corresponding single binding sites. However, quantitative DNase I footprinting of whole operator sequences revealed cooperative binding of CcpN that, apparently, compensated the asymmetric contact distribution. Based on these data, possible consequences for the repression mechanism of CcpN are discussed.

Mode of action of the Bordetella BvgA protein: transcriptional activation and repression of the Bordetella bronchiseptica bipA promoter

The Bordetella BvgAS signal transduction system controls the transition among at least three known phenotypic phases (Bvg+, Bvg(i), and Bvg-) and the expression of a number of genes which have distinct phase-specific expression profiles. This complex regulation of gene expression along the Bvg signaling continuum is best exemplified by the gene bipA, which is expressed at a low level in the Bvg+ phase, at a maximal level in the Bvg(i) phase, and at undetectable levels in the Bvg- phase. The bipA promoter has multiple BvgA binding sites which play distinct regulatory roles. We had previously speculated that the expression profile of bipA is a consequence of the differential occupancy of the various BvgA binding sites as a result of variation in the levels of phosphorylated BvgA (BvgA-P) inside the cell. In this report, we provide in vitro evidence for this model and show that bipA expression is activated at low concentrations of BvgA-P and is repressed at high concentrations. By using independent DNA binding assays, we demonstrate that under activating conditions there is a synergistic effect on the binding of BvgA and RNA polymerase (RNAP), leading to the formation of open complexes at the promoter. We further show that, under in vitro conditions, when bipA transcription is minimal, there is competition between the binding of RNAP and BvgA-P to the bipA promoter. Our results show that the BvgA binding site IR2 plays a central role in mediating this repression.

Transcriptional interference--a crash course

The term "transcriptional interference" (TI) is widely used but poorly defined in the literature. There are a variety of methods by which one can interfere with the process or the product of transcription but the term TI usually refers to the direct negative impact of one transcriptional activity on a second transcriptional activity in cis. Two recent studies, one examining Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the other Escherichia coli, clearly show TI at one promoter caused by the arrival of a transcribing complex initiating at a distant promoter. TI is potentially widespread throughout biology; therefore, it is timely to assess exactly its nature, significance and operative mechanisms. In this article, we will address the following questions: what is TI, how important and widespread is it, how does it work and where should we focus our future research efforts?

Stress response gene regulation in Chlamydia is dependent on HrcA-CIRCE interactions

HrcA is a transcriptional repressor that regulates stress response genes in many bacteria by binding to the CIRCE operator. We have previously shown that HrcA regulates the promoter for the dnaK heat shock operon in Chlamydia. Here we demonstrate that HrcA represses a second heat shock promoter that controls the expression of groES and groEL, two other major chlamydial heat shock genes. The CIRCE element of C. trachomatis groEL is the most divergent of known bacterial CIRCE elements, and HrcA had a decreased ability to bind to this nonconsensus operator and repress transcription. We demonstrate that the CIRCE element is necessary and sufficient for transcriptional regulation by chlamydial HrcA and that the inverted repeats of CIRCE are the binding sites for HrcA. Addition of a CIRCE element upstream of a non-heat-shock promoter allowed this promoter to be repressed by HrcA, showing in principle that a chlamydial promoter can be genetically modified to be inducible. These results demonstrate that HrcA is the regulator of the major chlamydial heat shock operons, and we infer that the mechanism of the heat shock response in Chlamydia is derepression. However, derepression is likely to involve more than a direct effect of increased temperature as we found that HrcA binding to CIRCE and HrcA-mediated repression were not altered at temperatures that induce the heat shock response.

Selection of unusual actinomycetal primary sigma70 factors by plant-colonizing Frankia strains

Functional adaptations of sigma70 transcriptional factors led to the emergence of several paralogous lineages, each one being specialized for gene transcription under particular growth conditions. Screening of a Frankia strain EaI-12 gene library by sigma70 DNA probing allowed the detection and characterization of a novel actinomycetal primary (housekeeping) sigma70 factor. Phylogenetic analysis positioned this factor in the RpoD cluster of proteobacterial and low-G+C-content gram-positive factors, a cluster previously free of any actinobacterial sequences. sigma70 DNA probing of Frankia total DNA blots and PCR screening detected one or two rpoD-like DNA regions per species. rpoD matched the conserved region in all of the species tested. The other region was found to contain sigA, an alternative primary factor. sigA appeared to be strictly distributed among Frankia species infecting plants by the root hair infection process. Both genes were transcribed by Frankia strain ACN14a grown in liquid cultures. The molecular phylogeny of the sigma70 family determined with Frankia sequences showed that the alternative actinomycetal factors and the essential ones belonged to the same radiation. At least seven distinct paralogous lineages were observed among this radiation, and gene transfers were detected in the HrdB actinomycetal lineage.

Molecular determinants of the hpa regulatory system of Escherichia coli: the HpaR repressor

The HpaR-mediated regulation of the hpa-meta operon (Pg promoter) of the 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid catabolic pathway of Escherichia coli has been studied. The HpaR regulator was purified to homogeneity showing that it is able to bind selectively to 4-hydroxyphenylacetic, 3-hydroxyphenylacetic and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acids, which act as inducers of the system. The role of HpaR as a repressor and the requirement for cAMP receptor protein for maximal activity have been confirmed by in vitro transcription analyses. Two DNA operators, OPR1 and OPR2, have been identified in the intergenic region located between the hpa-meta operon and the hpaR gene. The OPR1 operator contains a perfect palindromic sequence overlapping the transcriptional +1 start site of the Pg promoter. The OPR2 operator shows a similar but imperfect palindromic sequence and is located far downstream of the +1 start site of the Pr promoter. The binding of HpaR to OPR2 displays a clear cooperativity with OPR1 binding. Based on the above observations and the results of permanganate footprinting experiments, a repression mechanism for HpaR is postulated. A 3-dimensional model of HpaR, generated by comparison with the crystal structures of the homologous regulators, MarR and MexR, suggests that HpaR is a dimer that contains a typical winged-helix DNA binding motif in each subunit.

The Zap1 transcriptional activator also acts as a repressor by binding downstream of the TATA box in ZRT2

The zinc-responsive transcriptional activator Zap1 regulates the expression of both high- and low-affinity zinc uptake permeases encoded by the ZRT1 and ZRT2 genes. Zap1 mediates this response by binding to zinc-responsive elements (ZREs) located within the promoter regions of each gene. ZRT2 has a remarkably different expression profile in response to zinc compared to ZRT1. While ZRT1 is maximally induced during zinc limitation, ZRT2 is repressed in low zinc but remains induced upon zinc supplementation. In this study, we determined the mechanism underlying this paradoxical Zap1-dependent regulation of ZRT2. We demonstrate that a nonconsensus ZRE (ZRT2 ZRE3), which overlaps with one of the ZRT2 transcriptional start sites, is essential for repression of ZRT2 in low zinc and that Zap1 binds to ZRT2 ZRE3 with a low affinity. The low-affinity ZRE is also essential for the ZRT2 expression profile. These results indicate that the unusual pattern of ZRT2 regulation among Zap1 target genes involves the antagonistic effect of Zap1 binding to a low-affinity ZRE repressor site and high-affinity ZREs required for activation.