Perceived benefit after participating in positive or negative/neutral heart failure trials: the patients' perspective

Current Challenges Faced by Cancer Clinical Trials in Addressing the Problem of Under-Representation of Older Adults: A Narrative Review

The number of older adults living with cancer is increasing. There is a clear lack of representation of older adults in clinical trials, including cancer trials. Reasons for this are multifactorial and complex and include protocol, patient and sponsor factors. Potential solutions to overcome issues with trial design include varied methods of recruitment with flexible inclusion criteria. Possible alternatives to randomised trials include prospective cohort studies, pragmatic trials and the use of national population-based data sets. Patient factors may be addressed by integration of geriatric assessment, so patients can be randomised or treated based on their individual needs. Additionally, standard protocols for including older adults with cognitive impairment should be developed, rather than automatic exclusion. Increased effort is needed from sponsors and governing health care bodies to make recruitment of older adults to clinical trials standard.

Perceived Disability and Lifestyle Modification Following Hospitalization for Non-ST Elevation Versus ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Patients' Point of View

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Medical personnel generally believe that non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are less damaging than ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in keeping with the lower morbidity and mortality attributed to these subgroups in randomized clinical trials. We examined whether this concept translates into a difference from the patients' point of view regarding lifestyle modification and return to work following hospitalization for ACS.

METHODS

A structured anonymous self-completed questionnaire was mailed and returned by 160 consecutive patients (age 64+/-11 years; 125 (78%) men) 3-12 months after hospitalization for ACS. In 49 patients, the diagnosis was unstable angina pectoris (UAP), in 34 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and in 73, ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The questionnaire addressed issues relating to demographic data, medical history, occupation, employment and income before the acute event, changes following hospitalization for ACS and questions relating to current perceived health status and return to work.

RESULTS

Most (98/159, 62%) patients saw themselves as "heart patients" after hospitalization for ACS. Quality of life was perceived to have decreased in 70 (44%), self-image in 85 (53%), self-confidence in 78 (49%) and sexual function in 75 (48%), with no differences according to ACS type. Anxiety was reported by 85 (54%) patients and anxiety level (1.47+/-1.25 on the Brief Symptom Inventory scale) was high. Only 38 (49%) of 77 patients who were working prior to the acute event returned to full- or part-time gainful employment. By multivariate analysis, return to work was associated with 3 variables: younger age (p=0.015), shorter duration of hospitalization (p=0.036) and higher income bracket prior to the acute event (p=0.0001), with no relation to gender, in-hospitalization revascularization strategy, rehabilitation program or to underlying cardiac diagnosis (UAP, NSTEMI or STEMI).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization for ACS had a major negative impact on patient lifestyle and return to work, irrespective of the underlying cardiac diagnosis. The experience of hospitalization for an acute heart condition was uniformly traumatic with in many instances a prolonged adverse effect on patient function.

Motivation and frustration in cardiology trial participation: the patient perspective

OBJECTIVE

The participation of humans in clinical cardiology trials remains essential, but little is known regarding participant perceptions of such studies. We examined the factors that motivated participation in such studies, as well as those that led to participant frustration.

METHODS

Patients who had participated in hypertension and coronary arterial disease (phases II, III, and IV) clinical trials were invited to answer a questionnaire. They were divided into two groups: Group I, which included participants in placebo-controlled clinical trials after randomization, and Group II, which included participants in clinical trials in which the tested treatment was compared to another drug after randomization and in which a placebo was used in the washout period.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (47 patients in Group I and 33 patients in Group II) with different socio-demographic characteristics were interviewed. Approximately 60% of the patients were motivated to participate in the trial with the expectation of personal benefit. Nine participants (11.2%) expressed the desire to withdraw, which was due to their perception of risk during the testing in the clinical trial (Group I) and to the necessity of repeated returns to the institution (Group II). However, the patients did not withdraw due to fear of termination of hospital treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study had a small patient sample, the possibility of receiving a benefit from the new tested treatment was consistently reported as a motivation to participate in the trials.

Anti-remodelling effect of canrenone in patients with mild chronic heart failure (AREA IN-CHF study): final results

AIMS

To test whether canrenone, an aldosterone receptor antagonist, improves left ventricular (LV) remodelling in NYHA class II heart failure (HF). Aldosterone receptor antagonists improve outcome in severe HF, but no information is available in NYHA class II.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AREA IN-CHF is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study testing canrenone on top of optimal treatment in NYHA class II HF with low ejection fraction (EF) to assess 12-month changes in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was also measured. Information was available for 188 subjects on canrenone and 194 on placebo. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was similarly reduced (-18%) in both arms, but EF increased more (P = 0.04) in the canrenone (from 40% to 45%) than in the placebo arm (from 40-43%). Brain natriuretic peptide (n = 331) decreased more in the canrenone (-37%) than in the placebo arm (-8%; P < 0.0001), paralleling a significant reduction in left atrial dimensions (-4% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.02). The composite endpoint of cardiac death and hospitalization was significantly lower in the canrenone arm (8% vs. 15%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Canrenone on top of optimal treatment for HF did not have additional effects on LVEDV, but it increased EF, and reduced left atrial size and circulating BNP, with potential beneficial effects on outcome. A large-scale randomized study should be implemented to confirm benefits on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF in NYHA class II.

How to Get Older People Included in??Clinical Studies

Older people are systematically excluded from many clinical research studies. In this review, we examine the reasons for this state of affairs and summarise the current knowledge of strategies to increase the rate of participation of older people in clinical studies. Older people want to participate in clinical research and are driven by a mixture of altruism and self-interest. They are often excluded by overt age cut-offs or covert exclusions based on co-morbidity and frailty. Other barriers to participation include communication and cognitive difficulties, transport difficulties, low income and self-imposed agism. Possible strategies to improve recruitment of older people to clinical studies include abolishing age limits, reducing exclusion criteria, and allowing sufficient study time (to recruit and deal with older patients) and money (for reimbursement of their participation costs) in study protocols. Involving older people and their attending health professionals in the design of study protocols may also be helpful. Providing transportation, easy physical access to research institutions and use of personalised and face-to-face recruitment also pay dividends. A variety of recruitment methods have been found to be effective, but tailoring the strategy to the condition and population under study is necessary. Together, these strategies should improve the representation of older people in clinical research and ensure that the evidence base is relevant and useful to all those caring for older people.

Research in clinical practice

Clinical research in the practice setting can be a rewarding experience. The atmosphere of research is changing, however, with tighter budgets, more oversight, increasing litigation risks, financial pressures, and increased competition. Sites must be increasingly careful to negotiate appropriate study budgets and contract language that is not overly burdensome or risky for the site. The focus on investigator training and use of qualifies personnel is paramount to preserve and improve the quality of clinical research in the United STates. The future may find certification examinations necessary for all research staff, including investigators. Eventually, the number of clinical research sites in the community will decrease, and academic sites, along with international sites, will once again fill the void.

Perceived effects on patients' health of participation in the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management study

BACKGROUND

Patients' views about participation in clinical trials have been explored using end-of-study questionnaires for various disease entities. However, little is known about why individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) choose to participate in clinical trials or how they view their research experience. Understanding these perceptions should provide valuable information for future studies in developing methods to enhance enrollment, optimize adherence to therapies, and maximize patient retention.

METHODS

The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study was a randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control for the management of AF. This descriptive ancillary study used a 7-item questionnaire comprising closed and open-ended items that explored: (1) perceptions of benefits from participation, (2) motivation for enrolling, and (3) satisfaction with research staff and operations.

RESULTS

A total of 741/1,032 participants (72%) at 34 of 213 participating AFFIRM sites responded, representing 18% of the 4,060 patients enrolled. The mean follow-up of these respondents was 3.8 +/- 1.1 years. Most respondents (91%) felt that they received enough information about AFFIRM before enrolling and that the results would benefit themselves (88%) and others (91%). Most respondents felt study participation improved awareness about AF (90%) and facilitated coordination of their healthcare (89%). Virtually all were satisfied with information received from AFFIRM personnel (96%), and most (98%) reported that they had received "good care." Responses were similar between randomization groups (rate-control or rhythm-control) and between those younger than 65 years and those 65 years or older. Participants in sinus rhythm at last follow-up were more likely to believe that their medical care in AFFIRM was better than what they would otherwise have received, and were more likely to perceive their treatment course as entailing fewer emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and doctor visits. Regularly scheduled appointments and ongoing availability of staff to answer questions appeared to increase participants' confidence and reduce anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients enrolled in a long-term clinical trial for management of AF were overwhelmingly satisfied with participation.

Adherence and perception of medication in patients with chronic heart failure during a five-year randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are thought to be non-adherent to their prescribed medications. The objective was to describe perceptions about and adherence to regular medicines and study medication at baseline and study end in CHF patients participating in a clinical trial.

METHODS

In the carvedilol or metoprolol European trial (COMET), patients (N = 3029) with CHF were randomised and followed during a 58-month period. Patients at some Swedish centres answered a questionnaire at baseline and study end concerning their perception of their regular heart medication and study medication. Adherence was established through estimation of drug usage.

RESULTS

In the Swedish sub-study, 302 patients responded once to the questionnaire while 107 patients responded both at baseline and at follow-up. At baseline, 94% of the patients stated that they believed that the study medication would make them feel better and 82% believed that their regular heart medication would do so. During the study, patients' belief in their regular cardiac medication significantly increased. Lack of belief in medication at the start of the study was a strong predictor of withdrawal from the trial (64% versus 6.8%; p < 0.0001). Those patients with very poor well-being and limited functional ability (classified as NYHA III-IV) at baseline significantly (p = 0.01) increased their belief in the regular cardiac medication but not in their study medication.

CONCLUSION

Belief in medication may be related to how the patient experiences the medication's impact on functional ability, symptoms and well-being.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Early identification of patients' beliefs about medication seem to be an important factor in counselling and information to patients with CHF.

Effect of pneumococcal vaccination on quality of life in children with recurrent acute otitis media: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Limited effectiveness of current treatment strategies for recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) and increasing antibiotic resistance have diverted attention to prevention of AOM by vaccination. Pneumococcal vaccination for AOM seems to have only modest clinical efficacy. Thus far, the effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or functional health status (FHS) have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of vaccination on HRQoL or FHS.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 383 children 1 to 7 years old with RAOM were vaccinated with either heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine followed by pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (pneumococcal group: n = 190) or with hepatitis A or B vaccines (control group: n = 193). Parents completed validated Dutch versions of 8 HRQoL and FHS instruments assessing generic FHS (Rand, Functional Status Questionnaire specific, and Functional Status Questionnaire generic), otitis media-specific FHS (OM-6), otitis media-specific child HRQoL (Numerical Rating Scale for Child), family functioning (Family Functioning Questionnaire), and otitis media-specific caregiver HRQoL (Numerical Rating Scale for Caregiver). Scores were compared at baseline and at 14 and 26 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, the average AOM incidence in the pneumococcal and control group was 5.0 (SD: 2.8) and 4.9 (SD: 2.6) episodes per year, respectively, with 38.4% and 36.8% having suffered from > or =6 episodes per year. AOM frequency decreased 4.4 episodes per year in both groups, with a considerable and comparable improvement in HRQoL and FHS. No substantial differences in HRQoL or FHS were found between the pneumococcal and the control group at baseline or at 14 or 26 months' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Pneumococcal vaccination has no beneficial effect compared with control vaccination on either HRQoL or FHS in children 1 to 7 years old with RAOM.

Effects of trimetazidine on left ventricular function in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure

Congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes have a deleterious prognosis when combined. Trimetazidine, a metabolic agent with anti-ischemic properties, reduces fatty acid beta-oxidation via decreased 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme-A thiolase activity thereby facilitating energy production via the glycolytic pathway.

OBJECTIVES

To assess myocardial function by Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) after one month of trimetazidine (Vastarel) added-on conventional treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure.

METHODS

Twenty diabetic patients with ischemic heart failure (mean age 66 years; NYHA class II-III) were randomized to trimetazidine (60 mg daily) or placebo in a double-blind crossover design. Exercise tolerance, 2-dimensional echocardiograms, and TDI (rest and exercise) were studied before and during treatment.

RESULTS

Changes in exercise tolerance did not differ in the two groups. Ejection fraction at rest and moderate exercise only improved significantly with trimetazidine when analyzed for the first treatment period. TDI velocities did not change significantly during treatment periods.

CONCLUSION

In this early pilot investigation of the effects of trimetazidine in patients with diabetes and heart failure there were only weak signs of improved systolic myocardial function at rest and exercise. The present observations indicate the need of further research to explore the effect of trimetazidine during longer treatment period or with more selected patient population.

Perceived patient comprehension in acute and chronic cardiovascular clinical trials

An anonymous patient perception comprehension and satisfaction questionnaire was sent to 438 patients 1-3 months after they had participated in a clinical cardiovascular trial to examine the level of patient comprehension as perceived by the patient. We compared perceived comprehension in acute (acute myocardial infarction) and chronic (outpatient heart failure) clinical trials. Partially or fully completed questionnaires were received from 220 patients (70 chronic, 150 acute). The findings were similar in the 2 patient groups. Perceived full comprehension (understood most or all) of the trial was reported by 18 (27%) of chronic and 40 (31%) of 129 acute patients, while almost 20% of both groups reported little or no understanding of the trial. The level of comprehension was related to the recollected duration of explanation (p = 0.003 chronic, p < 0.001 acute). Perceived comprehension was not related to the personnel explaining the study (physician or nurse) or to whether the explanation as recollected was oral or written. However, in both acute and chronic patients, the majority (51% chronic; 63% acute) preferentially recalled the oral rather than written explanation of the trial. The very similar findings in the acute and chronic situation suggest that perceived understanding reflects human nature and willingness to be involved in medical issues. Considerable effort should be directed to improve the duration of explanation (particularly oral), if we are to achieve our goal of true informed consent in clinical cardiovascular trials.

Does participation in a long-term clinical trial lead to survival gain for patients with coronary artery disease?

PURPOSE

Little is known about the advantages and disadvantages of participation in a clinical trial for patients with coronary heart disease. We hypothesized that participation itself in a long-term clinical trial with regular clinical evaluation and adjustment of treatments might lead to survival gain among patients with coronary artery disease who agreed or refused to participate in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was performed in 18 university hospitals. There were 3502 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 3122 patients signed informed consent and were included in the study ("participants"), whereas 380 declined to participate ("nonparticipants"). For all participants, routine visits to the clinics were scheduled bimonthly for study medication distribution and compliance assessment, and every 4 months for clinical evaluation and management. Nonparticipants continued with community-based treatment and were followed only for mortality.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and the prevalence of most cardiovascular diseases, risk factors, and medications, except that participants were more likely to have presented with an anginal syndrome (1788 [57%] vs. 190 [50%]) and to have symptomatic heart failure (754 [25%] vs. 66 [18%]). During follow-up (mean [+/- SD], 7.7 +/- 0.8 years), 475 patients died. All-cause mortality was similar in participants (n = 423 [13.6%]) and nonparticipants (n = 52 [13.7%]). In a multivariate analysis, participation in the clinical trial was not associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 1.30) or cardiac mortality (HR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.74).

CONCLUSION

Participation in a long-term clinical trial in a country with readily accessible community-based medicine may not lead to survival gain in patients with coronary artery disease.