Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

The impact of KRAS mutational status on patient-reported outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cross sectional study in France and Germany

OBJECTIVES

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) studies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to KRAS mutational status are limited. This study aimed to report real-world evidence on HRQoL outcomes based on KRAS mutational status in patients with advanced NSCLC tumors receiving second-line or later (2L+) treatment in France and Germany.

METHODS

In this real-world, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter, patient-reported outcome (PRO) study conducted in France (15 contributing sites) and Germany (8 contributing sites), physicians enrolled adult patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with known KRAS mutation status (KRAS G12C, KRAS non-G12C, or KRAS wildtype [WT]), who received a 2L + treatment. Study outcomes included sociodemographic characteristics; HRQoL evaluations based on EORTC Global Health Status QoL scores (QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L scores. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Of 156 enrolled patients, data from 149 patients were included in the final analysis (France, n = 103; Germany, n = 46). Median (quartile [Q]1, Q3) age was 67.0 (61.0, 71.0) years; 56.4% of patients were male. In total, 38.9% (n = 58), 26.2% (n = 39), and 34.9% (n = 52) of patients had tumors with KRAS G12C mutation, KRAS non-G12C mutation and WT KRAS, respectively. Mean (±SD) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status QoL scores were 56.99 (20.30) for the overall population, and 56.03 (22.55), 58.97 (18.67) and 56.57 (19.05) for KRAS G12C, non-G12C, and WT subpopulations. In the overall population, moderate-to-extreme problems were reported in all EQ-5D-5L dimensions (range: overall population, 15.5%-39.6%; KRAS G12C, 15.6%-46.6%; non-G12C, 7.8%-23.1%; WT, 21.1%-44.2%).

CONCLUSION

HRQoL was broadly similar across KRAS G12C, non-G12C, and WT subpopulations.

Addressing challenges in the implementation of precision oncology: An in-depth examination of limitations and disparities in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS)

Precision oncology (PO) has significantly advanced lung cancer treatment by enabling personalised therapy based on genetic mutations. However, equitable access to molecular testing and targeted therapies remains a challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings such as the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). To identify the challenges faced by SUS in caring for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in terms of access to Precision Oncology. Retrospective study with data from e-medical records of NSCLC treated between 2015-2021. 174 patients with NSCLC were included, of which 56% were females and 63% had non-squamous histology - 80% of early-stage patients and 32% of advanced-stage patients missed access to genomic testing, primarily due to short life expectancy or insufficient sample size. Only one participant underwent testing for all recommended biomarkers. Among patients with actionable mutations, 40% did not receive targeted therapy; however, regarding EGFR mutations, only 8% did not get it. Access to targeted therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes. The study highlights critical challenges and missed opportunities in the implementation of precision oncology for NSCLC management within the SUS and underscores the need for strategies to improve access to genomic testing in the public health setting.

Unravelling key signaling pathways for the therapeutic targeting of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) remains the foremost cause of cancer-related mortality across the globe. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a type of LC that exhibits significant heterogeneity at histological and molecular levels. Genetic alterations in upstream signaling molecules activate cascades affecting apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation. Disruption of these signaling pathways leads to the proliferation of cancer-promoting cells, progression of cancer, and resistance to its treatment. Recent insights into the function of signaling pathways and their fundamental mechanisms in the onset of various diseases could pave the way for new therapeutic approaches. Recently, numerous drug molecules have been created that target these cell signaling pathways and could be used alongside other standard therapies to achieve synergistic effects in mitigating the pathophysiology of NSCLC. Additionally, many researchers have identified several predictive biomarkers, and alterations in transcription factors and related pathways are employed to create new therapeutic strategies for NSCLC. Findings suggest using specific inhibitors to target cellular signaling pathways in tumor progression to treat NSCLC. This review investigates the role of signaling pathways in NSCLC development and explores novel therapeutic strategies to enhance clinical treatment options for NSCLC.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel aminopyrimidine derivatives as EGFR inhibitors

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is significantly challenged by the development of acquired resistance to third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, such as Osimertinib, which limits their therapeutic efficacy. Using the EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S inhibitor Brigatinib as a reference compound, we designed and synthesized 24 target compounds with aminopyrimidine as the core structure. Among these, the representative compound IIB-5 demonstrated potent inhibition of EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S, achieving an IC50 value of 18.81 nM. It also exhibited strong inhibition against Ba/F3-EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S cells with an IC50 of 97.12 nM, showing a five-fold potency increase over Brigatinib. Compound IIB-5 provides a valuable reference for further research on EGFR inhibitors.

Bispecific Antibodies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Targeted Innovation to Real-World Integration

Bispecific antibodies have ushered in a transformative era in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), enabling dual-pathway targeting with promising clinical outcomes in previously refractory disease subsets. Recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals-including amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor-targeting monoclonal antibody for EGFR exon 20 insertions and frontline EGFR-mutant (Exon 19 and 21) NSCLC, and zenocutuzumab for tumors harboring neuregulin 1 fusions-highlight their expanding therapeutic footprint. However, a new spectrum of on-target toxicities and implementation challenges are essential considerations as part of this innovation. This review dissects the evolving clinical data for bispecific antibodies in NSCLC, focusing on amivantamab, and provides a practical framework for managing dermatologic, infusion-related, and class-specific adverse events. We explore quality-of-life outcomes, financial toxicity, and the role of subcutaneous formulations in improving patient adherence and treatment experience. Furthermore, we highlight an emerging PD-1/vascular endothelial growth factor-A bispecific antibody (ivonescimab) and its potential to reshape frontline therapy paradigms in NSCLC. By integrating clinical trial evidence with real-world considerations, this review aims to equip oncologists with the tools to optimize the use of bispecific antibodies in NSCLC and guide future therapeutic integration.

Jaceosidin overcomes osimertinib resistance in lung cancer by inducing G2/M cycle arrest through targeting DDB1

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) widely used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. However, resistance to osimertinib frequently develops, limiting its long-term effectiveness.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish a lung cancer TKI-resistant model and identify Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) components that could reverse TKI resistance, enhancing lung cancer sensitivity to targeted therapies, while exploring the underlying molecular mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Osimertinib-resistant cell lines and organoids were developed using a dose-escalation approach. A screen of 302 traditional Chinese medicine monomers revealed compounds that increased sensitivity to osimertinib. RNA sequencing and limited proteolysis coupled with small molecule mapping were employed to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which jaceosidin reverses resistance. The efficacy of the jaceosidin and osimertinib combination was confirmed in cell lines, organoids, and a mouse model.

RESULTS

The osimertinib-resistant lung cancer model was successfully established, and 12 compounds were identified that enhanced the sensitivity of resistant cells to osimertinib. Among these, Jaceosidin, a flavonoid compound derived from Eupatorium lindleyanum DC., was confirmed to notably increase osimertinib sensitivity. Mechanistic studies, including limited proteolysis and RNA interference analysis, demonstrated that Jaceosidin directly interacts with Damage Specific DNA Binding Protein 1 (DDB1), promoting its protein expression and downregulating CDK1/Cyclin B1 levels. This interaction induced G2/M cell cycle arrest, thereby sensitizing lung cancer cells to osimertinib. Furthermore, both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that the combination of Jaceosidin and osimertinib significantly inhibited tumor growth in osimertinib-resistant models.

CONCLUSION

These findings offer new insights into the role of DDB1 in overcoming osimertinib resistance and suggest that combining jaceosidin with osimertinib may serve as a promising therapeutic strategy to enhance the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs treatment in resistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

A novel MMP-9 inhibitor exhibits selective inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M mutation by blocking EGFR/STAT3 signaling pathway

The T790M secondary mutation in EGFR confers therapeutic resistance to EGFR-TKIs, leading to poor outcomes. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR T790M mutation is incurable and there is an urgent need for improved therapeutics. Here we report the identification of a small compound, MG-3C, that kills NSCLC cells with T790M mutation while sparing lung cancer cells without T790M mutation. We found that MG-3C activity targets EGFR-STAT3 signaling pathway in NSCLC through direct inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), ultimately leading to G2/M phase arrest, growth inhibition and apoptosis. Compared with the reported MMP-9 inhibitor Ilomastat, MG-3C shows high anticancer activity and affinity for targets. MG-3C forms hydrogen bonds with the ASP-113, ASP-201 and HIS-203 amino acid residues of MMP-9 with a docking fraction of -9.04 kcal/mol, while Ilomastat forms hydrogen bonds with the GLN-169, ASP-201 and HIS-203 amino acid residues of MMP-9 with a docking fraction of -5.98 kcal/mol. The spatial structure composed of ASP-113, ASP-201, and HIS-203 of MMP-9 provides a new coordinate for the design of MMP-9 inhibitors. Most importantly, subcutaneous and oral administration of MG-3C elicit dramatic regression of NSCLC xenograft tumors harboring T790M mutation as well as favorable biosafety profile in vivo, suggesting that MG-3C may be a potential candidate for NSCLC harboring T790M mutation.

Basal-shift transformation leads to EGFR therapy-resistance in human lung adenocarcinoma

Although EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), resistance inevitably develops through diverse mechanisms, including secondary genetic mutations, amplifications and as-yet undefined processes. To comprehensively unravel the mechanisms of EGFR-TKI resistance, we establish a biobank of patient-derived EGFR-mutant lung cancer organoids, encompassing cases previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. Through comprehensive molecular profiling including single-cell analysis, here we identify a subgroup of EGFR-TKI-resistant LUAD organoids that lacks known resistance-related genetic lesions and instead exhibits a basal-shift phenotype characterized by the hybrid expression of LUAD- and squamous cell carcinoma-related genes. Prospective gene engineering demonstrates that NKX2-1 knockout induces the basal-shift transformation along with EGFR-target therapy resistance. Basal-shift LUADs frequently harbor CDKN2A/B loss and are sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Our EGFR-mutant lung cancer organoid library not only offers a valuable resource for lung cancer research but also provides insights into molecular underpinnings of EGFR-TKI resistance, facilitating the development of therapeutic strategies.

Palliative and end-of-life care in Asian and White patients with metastatic lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Data on palliative and end-of-life care for Asian patients with metastatic lung cancer in the United States are limited, though this is the leading cause of cancer death in this group. Early palliative care improved quality of life and survival in patients with metastatic lung cancer treated with chemotherapy. We examined palliative and end-of-life care patterns in Asian and White patients with metastatic lung cancer in the era of novel therapy.

METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer from 2014 to 2019 were identified at our institution. Patient and disease characteristics and treatment information were compared between Asian and White patients by Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square tests. Time-to-palliative care involvement was compared via log-rank test.

RESULTS

Both Asian (N = 89) and White (N = 197) patients had low rates of palliative care involvement (38.2% vs 37.6%), with median time from diagnosis to first encounter exceeding a year. The most given frontline systemic therapy was targeted therapy and chemotherapy in Asian and White patients, respectively. Of 22 Asian (24.7%) and 74 White (37.6%) patients who died, Asian patients more often died in-hospital (68.2% vs 32.4%, P = .004), and did not have documented code status discussions with their outpatient oncologists (0% vs 24.3%, P = .010) within 6 months preceding death.

CONCLUSION

Early palliative care appears challenging to implement for Asian and White patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer in a real-world setting. A more patient-centered approach to integrating palliative and end-of-life care communications and interventions alongside precision oncology warrants further study.

Current treatment landscape for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with common EGFR mutations

Common EGFR mutations including exon-19 deletions and the L858R point mutation in exon 21 constitute predominant actionable genomic alterations in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has fundamentally changed the treatment landscape for such patients by improving both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among EGFR-TKIs, third-generation agents such as osimertinib have shown marked efficacy and favorable safety profiles and have become the standard of care in the first-line setting. The combination of osimertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy has recently been shown to improve PFS compared with osimertinib monotherapy in the FLAURA2 trial. Similarly, the MARIPOSA trial demonstrated clinical benefit of the combination of the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, amivantamab, with the third-generation EGFR-TKI, lazertinib, further supporting the use of combination therapies as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Despite these advances, however, challenges such as brain metastases remain substantial barriers to successful treatment outcomes. Management of patients with such metastases often requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates systemic treatment with local interventions such as radiation therapy. Finally, circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a promising biomarker for real-time monitoring of treatment response and evolution of drug resistance mechanisms. Analysis of such biomarkers can facilitate dynamic and personalized therapeutic adjustments, potentially improving outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest clinical evidence supporting therapeutic advances in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment strategies based on tumor biology, patient-specific factors, and evolving therapeutic options.

Evolving treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring common EGFR activating mutations

A clinically important subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is driven by common mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Over the past decade, first-, second-, and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved clinical outcomes, although acquired resistance inevitably emerges. In particular, the third-generation TKI osimertinib has demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to earlier-generation TKIs in the frontline setting, yet median OS remains approximately three years in pivotal trials. Efforts to extend disease control have led to various upfront intensification strategies, including combining EGFR TKIs with antiangiogenics or chemotherapy (e.g., the FLAURA-2 trial), and pairing novel bispecific antibodies such as amivantamab with third-generation TKIs. Upon progression on third-generation EGFR TKIs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment, albeit with modest response rates. Emerging therapies targeting MET amplification (e.g., savolitinib plus osimertinib), leveraging antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., patritumab deruxtecan), or adding immunotherapy and antiangiogenics have shown preliminary promise in overcoming resistance. Ongoing trials are assessing optimal treatment sequencing and the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide therapy escalation or de-escalation. Ultimately, the evolving landscape of EGFR-mutant NSCLC underscores the need for refined biomarker-driven approaches and personalized regimens to achieve further gains in survival. In this review, we discuss these strategies in detail, highlighting current evidence and future directions for EGFR-mutant NSCLC treatment.

A Prospective Phase II Trial of First-Line Osimertinib for Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC and Poor Performance Status (OPEN/TORG2040)

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with NSCLC who have EGFR mutations and favorable performance status (PS). Despite the increasing clinical data on osimertinib, evidence for its use in patients with impaired PS remains limited. Therefore, a multicenter phase II trial (OPEN/TORG2040) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and a poor PS.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations and PS of 2 to 4 were enrolled. Osimertinib (80 mg once daily) was orally administered to eligible patients. The primary end point was objective response rate. The secondary end points were disease control rate, PS improvement rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 2021 and February 2022, 30 patients with poor PS (22 with a PS of 2, six with a PS of 3, and two with a PS of 4) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 41-92) years, and 18 patients had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 63.3% (90% confidence interval, 46.7%-77.9%; one-sided, p = 0.033). Disease control and PS improvement rates were 93.3% and 63.3%, respectively. Global health status/QoL also improved. Median progression-free and overall survival were 8.0 and 25.4 months, respectively. Eight patients (26.7%) experienced serious adverse events leading to discontinuation, and six (20.0%) experienced interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and poor PS, highlighting the need for interstitial lung disease risk management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs041200100.

Relationship Between T790M Allele Frequency and Therapeutic Effects Before and After EGFR-TKI Administration Using Droplet Digital PCR in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation

Background/Aim

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of sequential treatment with afatinib and osimertinib by clarifying the correlation between therapeutic effects and EGFR T790M mutant allele frequency.

Patients and Methods

From August 2013 to July 2019, tumor samples from before and after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) administration were collected from patients from eight institutions. We measured T790M mutant allele frequency using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction using biopsy specimens from patients mainly treated with afatinib and analyzed the T790M to EGFR-activating mutation ratio (T/A ratio) in pre- and post-biopsy tissue.

Results

Among 36 patients (afatinib group: n=24, first-generation EGFR-TKI group: n=12) with preserved pre- and post-biopsy tissue, the median T/A ratios before (pre-T/A ratio) and after EGFR-TKI administration (post-T/A ratio) in the afatinib group were 0.005 and 0.014, and those in the first-generation EGFR-TKI group were 0.026 and 0.352, respectively. The results of a Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that the difference between the pre-T/A and post-T/A ratios was not higher in the afatinib group than in the first-generation EGFR-TKI (p=0.0372). No significant difference in progression-free or overall survival was found between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, treatment with afatinib did not affect changes in the T/A ratio.

Hybrid Approaches to Local Management of Pulmonary Metastatic Disease

With increasingly effective systemic therapies for stage IV disease, the addition of local control strategies for a subset of patients with limited metastatic disease has contributed to improved disease control and life prolongation. While surgery has been the mainstay strategy for local control, stereotactic ablative body radiation and percutaneous ablation techniques are alternate methods that have been demonstrated to be safe and effective and offer options to those patients who are unresectable, inoperable, or who do not desire surgery. A hybrid approach combining surgery and radiotherapy can maximize the ability to treat more lesions.

Consensus of the Taiwanese dermatological association and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society on the prevention and management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related skin toxicities in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated version incorporating Taiwanese treatment experience

The 2023 consensus from the Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society (TLCS) addresses the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Providing a comprehensive overview, the consensus reflects recent advances in understanding causes and developmental processes of TKI-related skin toxicities. Aimed at guiding clinicians in Taiwan, the consensus integrates new treatment perspectives while incorporating experiences from local dermatology experts. Recommendations underwent a voting process, achieving consensus when 75% or more of experts agreed, leading to their inclusion. Approved by over 90% of participants, the recommended treatment algorithms for major skin toxicities offer valuable insights for clinicians managing TKI-associated effects in NSCLC patients.

Potential biomarkers of primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) significantly improve the prognosis of EGFR-sensitive mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanisms underlying primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs remain unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the biomarkers associated with primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs was defined as disease progression within 90 days (3 months) of treatment in patients with EGFR-sensitive mutant adenocarcinoma without any evidence of objective response.

Design

Retrospective, single-center study.

Methods

This study retrospectively screened patients with NSCLC who received EGFR-TKIs at Hunan Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. According to pre-determined clinical outcomes, we divided the patients into primary resistance and sensitivity groups. Only patients with sufficient samples that passed quality control were included in this study. Tumor tissue and paired peripheral blood samples collected from patients before treatment were subjected to next-generation sequencing using an 825-gene panel. In addition, tumor tissue samples were analyzed for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Results

A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study, with 35 in each of the primary resistant and sensitive groups. Patients with exon 4 mutations in the TP53 gene had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those without the mutation. PTPRD and TACC3 mutation frequencies were substantially higher in the primary resistant group and were associated with shorter PFS and OS. Furthermore, patients in the primary resistant group exhibited substantially higher levels of PD-L1 expression.

Conclusion

The potential mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs are highly heterogeneous. Combining some somatic variants affecting tumor function and high PD-L1 expression may contribute to this resistance.

Molecular characteristics and responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 19 insertions

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 insertions (19ins) represent a unique subclass of exon 19 alterations that has a relatively low frequency. Here, we aimed to elucidate the molecular characteristics and response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in lung cancer patients with EGFR 19ins.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing was performed to profile the molecular characteristics of 83 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR 19ins. Detailed molecular profiling and efficacy analyses were performed on these patients, with comparisons to 68 EGFR 19 deletion (19del) patients. Potential resistance mechanisms were also explored.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EGFR 19ins mutations was 0.17% of all the primary NSCLC patients. EGFR 19ins variants identified were I740_K745dup (86.7%) and K745_E746insVPVAIK (13.3%). Concurrent mutations frequently observed were in TP53 (50.6%), CDKN2A (12.0%), PIK3CA (10.8%), LRP1B (8.4%), and SMAD4 (8.4%). Notably, CTNNB1 was significantly associated with 19ins (p = 0.043). Efficacy analysis showed median progression-free survival (mPFS) for EGFR 19ins patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly shorter than for EGFR 19del patients (hazard ratio (HR) 1.98, p = 0.005). Gefitinib was significantly less effective compared to other first-generation TKIs (HR 19.86, p < 0.001). Furthermore, osimertinib did not generate favorable outcomes as 19dels in the first-line setting either (p = 0.025). Post-treatment samples revealed higher occurrences of TP53 mutations (84.6%) and presence of EGFR T790M (23.1%) at progression, with case studies highlighting osimertinib's limited efficacy post-first-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive analysis of EGFR 19ins in lung cancer patients revealed genomic characteristics and clinical response, helping better inform clinical action and might facilitate the development of more precise therapeutic options for patients with these uncommon driver mutations.

Development of a nomogram for overall survival prediction in primary upper lobe lung cancer patients: A SEER population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The upper lobe is the most common site of primary lung cancer, however, very few reports focus on its prognosis. This study aims to identify prognostic factors of lung cancer in the upper lobe, as well as to establish an effective nomogram for individualized overall survival (OS) prediction.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for the period of 2010-2017,as recorder in the 2021 SEER database release. The demographic characteristics and OS differed in the primary sites of the upper, middle and lower lobes were drawn. The primary upper lobe lung cancer patients were further stratified by the risk indicators including Mets at DX-bone, stage, histology, grade and sex; and their OS differences in stratification were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. The univariate and the multivariate Cox regression were employed to determine the independent prognostic factors for the primary upper lobe lung cancer and to build a nomogram model for its OS prediction.

RESULTS

Depending on the different primary sites of lung cancer occurrence, all the collected patients were divided into three groups of the upper lobe (30295 individuals), the middle lobe (2801 individuals) and the lower lobe (16757 individuals), where the upper lobe group gained our attention with the largest population and an overwhelmingly low OS compared to the middle lobe group (P <0.0001). With the results of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression model analyses, age, sex, grade, histology type, stage, regional lymph nodes removed, bone metastasis and liver metastasis were selected as the prognostic factors and a prediction nomogram model was built. The calibration curves showed no significant bias from the reference line and the concordance index between the survival nomogram prediction and the actual outcome for 2-year and 3-year OS was 0.761 (95% CI, 0.757-0.765). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the areas under curve for 2-year and 3-year OS were 0.840 and 0.836, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A novel nomogram was established which achieved good performance in predicting the probability of OS in the primary upper lobe lung cancer, indicating its potential value in individualized prediction of the clinical outcome in these patients.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio-based prognostic score can predict outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy

BACKGROUD

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy has become the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, reliable efficacy biomarkers of ICI plus chemotherapy are lacking. In this research, we sought to explore efficacy biomarkers and construct robust prognostic models in NSCLC patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 171 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI plus chemotherapy. Clinical characteristics and peripheral blood inflammatory indexes were collected and prognostic models were constructed to explore efficacy and prognosis biomarkers of ICI plus chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In the cohort that received first-line ICI plus chemotherapy, pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3.3 and fibrinogen (FIB) > 3.196 were associated with worse efficacy and were independent risk factors of progression-free survival (PFS). Compared to programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), the derived NLR-FIB (NF) score had significantly improved accuracy in predicting efficacy and prognosis. In advanced NSCLC patients with targetable oncogenic driver alterations receiving second- or post-line ICI plus chemotherapy, pre-treatment NLR > 3.53 was associated with worse efficacy and was an independent risk factor of PFS and OS; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-PFS > 12 months were independent risk factors of overall survival (OS). Secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-T790M mutation, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) > 196.81 and albumin (ALB) < 40.25 were associated with worse PFS. Based on NLR and TKI-PFS, an NLR-TKI-PFS (NTP) score was constructed with three OS risk prognosis categories: favorable, intermediate, and poor (corresponding to a median OS of 21, 12, and 5.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The noninvasive NF score, combining NLR > 3.3 and FIB > 3.196, was superior to PD-L1 estimated from tumor tissue in predicting the efficacy and prognosis of first-line ICI plus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients. The noninvasive NTP score, combining NLR > 3.53 and TKI-PFS > 12 months, is a valuable tool for predicting OS and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients with targetable oncogenic driver alterations receiving second- or post-line ICI combination therapy.

METTL16-dependent miR-146b-5p m6A modification remodeling sensitize NSCLC to osimertinib via activating PI3K/AKT signaling

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, with poor prognosis and increasing osimertinib therapy resistance. Revealing mechanisms of NSCLC progression and therapy resistance remains critical. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanism of miR-146b-5b-5p m6A modification and underlying function in regulating the proliferation and osimertinib resistance of NSCLC.

METHODS

TCGA, GEO datasets were used to analyze the differential expression of miR-146b-5p in NSCLC and adjacent tissues, and its impact on prognosis. Then the effects of miR-146b-5p on the proliferation and osimertinib of A549 and HCC827 cells were investigated through proliferation experiments, colony formation assay and IC50 assay. The regulatory mechanism of miR-146b-5p on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and its interaction in cancer progression were investigated through Western blots, dual-luciferase reporter assay, and rescue experiments.

RESULTS

miR-146b-5p was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissue and represented worse prognosis. miR-146b-5p mimic significantly enhanced proliferation and osimertinib resistance, while miR-146b-5p inhibitor inhibited above phenotype. Through bioinformatic analysis and experimental results, miR-146b-5p interacted directly with PTEN mRNA and activated subsequent signaling pathway activation. PI3K/AKT inhibitor could eliminate the tumorigenic effects of miR-146b-5p mimic on the progression of NSCLC, while PI3K/AKT agonist could rescue the inhibition effect of miR-146b-5p inhibitor group cells. Further, methyltransferase METTL16 is responsible for miR-146b m6A modification. Modified miR-146b-5p promotes osimertinib resistance through downstream PI3K/AKT activation.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we found that METTL16 mediated miR-146b-5p m6A modification promoted the proliferation and osimertinib resistance of NSLCL by activating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Our study is expected to provide a novel insight and potential therapeutic target for NSCLC osimertinib resistance.

Trends in Overall Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma with EFGR Mutation, KRAS Mutation, or No Mutation

BACKGROUND

Treatment of lung adenocarcinoma has changed and now includes checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) or, in the case of an EGFR mutation, third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib. Few data compare the long-term overall survival (OS) of current and historic subgroups.

METHODS

This real-world analysis (KOMPASS study) included stage IV lung-adenocarcinoma patients with either EGFR, KRAS, or no mutation. Patients were assigned to the "current" EGFR, KRAS, or no-mutation cohort if they had mutation testing using NGS (n = 199; median date of diagnosis 2021). If they had an EGFR PCR test only, they were assigned to the "historic" EGFR or no-mutation cohort (n = 127; median date of diagnosis 2014).

RESULTS

Both the current and the historic EGFR cohorts had significantly longer OS than the respective no-mutation cohorts (HR 0.58 and 0.60, respectively). The current no-mutation and EGFR cohorts had a strong trend to longer OS than the respective historic cohorts. In the no-mutation cohorts, the improvement was due to an increase in long-term survivors (HR 0.71), whereas in the EGFR mutation cohorts, the median OS was improved without long-term survivors (HR 0.70). The KRAS cohort showed OS like the no-mutation cohort, with a plateau of long-term survivors around 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of our data with that of the phase III trials KEYNOTE-189 and FLAURA suggests that the improved outcomes are due to the use of CPIs or osimertinib. The clinical trial results are well translated into real-world clinical practice with comparable OS. KRAS patients benefit from CPI treatment like no-mutation patients.

CT-based radiomics: A potential indicator of KRAS mutation in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate a CT-based radiomics signature for predicting Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 815 LADC patients were included. Radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images using Pyradiomics. CT-based radiomics were combined with clinical features to distinguish KRAS mutation status. Four feature selection methods and four deep learning classifiers were employed. Data was split into 70% training and 30% test sets, with SMOTE addressing imbalance in the training set. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, precision, F1 score, and recall.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that 10.4% of patients showed KRAS mutations. The study extracted 1061 radiomics features and combined them with 17 clinical features. After feature selection, two signatures were constructed using top 10, 20, and 50 features. The best performance was achieved using Multilayer Perceptron with 20 features. CECT, it showed 66% precision, 76% recall, 69% F1-score, 84% accuracy, and AUC of 93.3% and 87.4% for train and test sets, respectively. For NECT, accuracy was 85% and 82%, with AUC of 90.7% and 87.6% for train and test sets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based radiomics signature is a noninvasive method that can predict KRAS mutation status of LADC when mutational profiling is unavailable.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of First-line Interventions in Patients With Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, With Particular Focus on Brain Metastatic Status: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AIMS

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to identify the most effective first-line intervention (FLI) for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in patients with varying brain metastasis (BM) status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), either alone or in combination, for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC (EMAN) patients. The sources included EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and relevant conference abstracts from inception until December 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 37 RCTs, encompassing 24 intervention options, were included in the NMA. Osimertinib combined with chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to aumolertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.93), furmonertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), lazertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), osimertinib alone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80), osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.00), befotertinib (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93). Further, amivantamab + lazertinib showed slightly better PFS compared to aumolertinib, furmonertinib, zorifertinib, and osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR <1, but P >0.05). Regarding overall survival (OS), amivantamab + lazertinib demonstrated superior results relative to furmonertinib (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95) and befotertinib (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). No significant OS differences were observed among osimertinib, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib + CT, lazertinib, and amivantamab + lazertinib. In BM patients, osimertinib + CT significantly enhanced PFS compared to osimertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.66), furmonertinib (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90), befotertinib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.89). However, no noticeable PFS differences were observed between osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib or aumolertinib. Lastly, osimertinib + CT and zorifertinib were associated with higher rates of all-grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In EMAN patients, osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Among BM patients, osimertinib + CT offered the best PFS benefits. These findings may assist in clinical decision-making and personalized care for EMAN and BM patients. The study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024506995).

Efficacy and Safety of Third-Generation EGFR-TKIs Combined with Radiotherapy for Advanced NSCLC with Typical EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring typical EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Patients who received treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination with RT were retrospectively enrolled at a single center. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Differences in PFS between the two groups were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted to further explore the effect of thoracic RT combined with EGFR-TKIs.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 260 patients, among whom 81 patients received third-generation EGFR-TKIs and 179 patients received third-generation EGFR-TKIs plus RT. There was a significant difference in median PFS (mPFS) (13.0 versus 18.1 months, P = 0.0003) between the two groups. Moreover, third-generation EGFR-TKIs plus thoracic RT significantly improved the mPFS (13.0 versus 23.7 months, P < 0.0001). We observed that third-generation EGFR-TKIs plus RT increased the incidence of pneumonia, but all the cases were grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

The addition of RT can delay the occurrence of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, thereby significantly prolonging PFS in advanced NSCLC patients. RT for primary lung lesions exhibited a significant synergistic effect with EGFR-TKI treatment, and the adverse events of the combination therapy were acceptable.

Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology-A Guiding Compass for Targeted Therapy and Emerging Applications

Multigene sequencing technologies provide a foundation for targeted therapy and precision oncology by identifying actionable alterations and enabling the development of treatments that substantially improve clinical outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of having a molecular compass guiding treatment decision-making through the multitude of alterations and genetic mutations, showcasing why NGS plays a pivotal role in modern oncology.

Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most common type of lung cancer. The majority of patients with lung cancer characterized by activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), benefit from therapies entailing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this regard, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, has greatly improved the outcome for patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. The AURA and FLAURA trials displayed the superiority of the third-generation TKI in both first- and second-line settings, making it the drug of choice for treating patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Unfortunately, the onset of resistance is almost inevitable. On-target mechanisms of resistance include new mutations (e.g., C797S) in the kinase domain of EGFR, while among the off-target mechanisms, amplification of MET or HER2, mutations in downstream signaling molecules, oncogenic fusions, and phenotypic changes (e.g., EMT) have been described. This review focuses on the strategies that are currently being investigated, in preclinical and clinical settings, to overcome resistance to osimertinib, including the use of fourth-generation TKIs, PROTACs, bispecific antibodies, and ADCs, as monotherapy and as part of combination therapies.

Real-world clinical practice and outcomes in Peruvian patients with advanced EGFR T790M mutation positive NSCLC: A multicenter analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite osimertinib being the standard therapy for advanced EGFR T790M mutation positive NSCLC, in many Latin American countries, access to molecular testing and targeted therapies is limited, directly impacting patient outcomes. This study describes the real-world management and outcomes of Peruvian patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who develop the T790M mutation.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients from nine Peruvian institutions, both public and private, who progressed to first-line EGFR TKI and developed T790M mutation, detected between January 2018 and December 2023. We evaluated demographic, clinico-pathological features and treatment data, including diagnostic pathway, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included; T790M was detected by liquid biopsy in 52.6 % of cases. Median time from progression to T790M detection was 59.5 days (7-244). Osimertinib was administered to 62.8 % of patients after detection, with a median initiation time of 42 days (1-104). Median overall survival (OS) from first-line treatment was 46.6 months for patients who received osimertinib, 23.9 months for those receiving other therapies, and 16.1 months for those without treatment (p = 0.001). Among osimertinib-treated patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 59.2 %, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15.8 months. Median OS from osimertinib initiation was 16.3 months, significantly longer than for patients receiving other treatments after T790M detection (9.7 months; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the real-world effectiveness of osimertinib in Peruvian patients with advanced EGFR T790M positive NSCLC and highlights the importance of timely detection and access to targeted therapies.

The Role of Radiosensitizing Drugs in Osteosarcoma Treatment: Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives

Osteosarcoma is a highly malignant bone tumor that is resistant to radiotherapy and is associated with poor treatment outcomes and prognoses. Understanding the mechanisms of radioresistance and finding strategies to enhance the radiosensitivity is crucial for improving clinical efficacy. The aim of this review was to address the approaches for enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy in osteosarcoma, thereby improving patient outcomes. Specifically, we have focused on the mechanisms of radiosensitization and the relationship between drugs that enhance radiosensitivity and cancer. These mechanisms involve a delay in DNA damage repair, promotion of apoptosis, inhibition of angiogenesis, and regulation of the tumor microenvironment. In addition, we have summarized the effects of these drugs on the proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell lines. Finally, we have discussed the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of these drugs in other cancers, providing valuable guidance for clinical treatment strategies tailored to patients with osteosarcoma.

Identification of TAP2 as a novel immune target in human cancers: insights from integrated bioinformatics and experimental approaches

BACKGROUND

Transporter 2, ATP binding cassette (ABC) subfamily B member (TAP2), encodes a protein within the ABC transporter superfamily. TAP2 plays a role in the progression of cancers, such as cervical, breast, and lung cancers. However, the relationship between TAP2 and cancer prognosis, immune cell infiltration, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of TAP2 expression on its role in predicting tumor prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy.

METHODS

Bioinformatics analyses such as Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, single-cell, and Connectivity Map analyses were used to comprehensively assess TAP2-related genomic alterations, prognostic value, enrichment pathways, single-cell expression patterns, and potential targeting inhibitors. In addition, molecular docking techniques were used to simulate drug binding to TAP2. WB and RT-qPCR were used to detect differences in TAP2 expression in glioma cell lines. The U251MG cell line was established with TAP2 overexpression. The effects of elevated TAP2 expression on GBM cell function was evaluated using various assays, including the Transwell migration, scratch, and clonal formation assays.

RESULTS

TAP2 exhibited aberrantly expression in tumor tissues with genomic alterations. TAP2 significantly correlates with poor prognosis across various cancers. It was also involved in immune-related pathways, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoint regulation, thereby influencing the tumor microenvironment and immune response to cancer. TAP2 was identified as a potential predictor of immunotherapy response and screened for potential targeted inhibitors for future therapeutic interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that TAP2 may serve as a promising prognostic marker and immune target in human cancers, warranting further investigation into its role in tumor immunity.

Adverse event profiles of EGFR-TKI: network meta-analysis and disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database

Background

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in clinical use show promise but can cause AEs, impacting patients' wellbeing and increasing costs.

Methods

This study utilized two methods: network meta-analysis (NMA) and disproportionality analysis (DA). For NMA, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 10 September 2024, for phase II/III RCTs comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with chemotherapy or other EGFR-TKIs. Using STATA 18.0, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed heterogeneity via Chi-squared and I2 tests. Adverse events (AEs) were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). For DA, we analyzed FAERS data (January 2004-June 2024), evaluating AE signals with reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% CIs; signals were considered significant if the ROR and its 95% CI lower bound exceeded 1. Primary outcomes for NMA included all-grade AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, specific AEs, and AE-related mortality. For DA, outcomes included EGFR-TKI as the primary AE cause, time from treatment to AE, and AE-related mortality.

Results

NMA: 48% of EGFR-TKI patients experienced AEs, with 32.7% being severe. Afatinib showed highest toxicity; Icotinib was safest. Osimertinib was associated with highest risks of leukopenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (9%). DA: Osimertinib had strongest links to cardiac diseases and blood/lymphatic disorders. Gefitinib had the strongest signal for interstitial lung diseases; Erlotinib for anorexia. Most AEs occurred within 30 days, but cardiac disorders had a median onset of 41 days. Osimertinib had the highest AE-related mortality, with cardiac disorders leading in fatalities.

Conclusion

This study used NMA and DA to explore EGFR-TKI-related AEs. Drugs varied in AE profiles, mostly mild, but Osimertinib and Dacomitinib were associated with more severe events. Osimertinib carried a high cardiac risk, delayed onset, and high mortality. Thus, comprehensive patient assessment and close monitoring are crucial with EGFR-TKI use.

Nanomedicine Innovations for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Lung cancer remains a challenge within the realm of oncology. Characterized by late-stage diagnosis and resistance to conventional treatments, the currently available therapeutic strategies encompass surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biological therapy; however, overall patient survival remains suboptimal. Nanotechnology has ushered in a new era by offering innovative nanomaterials with the potential to precisely target cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues. It holds the potential to reshape the landscape of cancer management, offering hope for patients and clinicians. The assessment of these nanotechnologies follows a rigorous evaluation process similar to that applied to chemical drugs, which includes considerations of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology, and clinical effectiveness. However, because of the characteristics of nanoparticles, standard toxicological tests require modifications to accommodate their unique characteristics. Effective therapeutic strategies demand a profound understanding of the disease and consideration of clinical outcomes, physicochemical attributes of nanomaterials, nanobiointeractions, nanotoxicity, and regulatory compliance to ensure patient safety. This review explores the promise of nanomedicine in lung cancer treatment by capitalizing on its unique physicochemical properties. We address the multifaceted challenges of lung cancer and its tumor microenvironment and provide an overview of recent developments in nanoplatforms for early diagnosis and treatment that can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of life.

Treatment Outcomes From Erlotinib and Gefitinib in Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand From 2010 to 2020: Nationwide Whole-of-Patient-Population Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Health care system-wide outcomes from routine treatment with erlotinib and gefitinib are incompletely understood.

Objective

The aim of the study is to describe the effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during the first decade of their routine use for treating advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the entire cohort of patients treated in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Methods

Patients were identified, and data collated from national pharmaceutical dispensing, cancer registration, and mortality registration electronic databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. Time-to-treatment discontinuation and overall survival were measured from the date of first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Associations of treatment outcomes with baseline factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regressions.

Results

Overall, 752 patients were included who started treatment with erlotinib (n=418) or gefitinib (n=334) before October 2020. Median time-to-treatment discontinuation was 11.6 (95% CI 10.8-12.4) months, and median overall survival was 20.1 (95% CI 18.1-21.6) months. Shorter time-to-treatment discontinuation was independently associated with high socioeconomic deprivation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5 compared to the New Zealand Index of Deprivation 1-4 group), EGFR L858R mutations (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6 compared to exon 19 deletion), and distant disease at cancer diagnosis (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7 compared to localized or regional disease). The same factors were independently associated with shorter overall survival. Outcome estimates and predictors remained unchanged in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Outcomes from routine treatment with erlotinib and gefitinib in New Zealand patients with advanced EGFR-mutant nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer are comparable with those reported in randomized trials and other health care system-wide retrospective cohort studies. Socioeconomic status, EGFR mutation subtype, and disease extent at cancer diagnosis were independent predictors of treatment outcomes in that setting.

Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant gefitinib in resectable stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II, prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Our previous study has showed the safety and efficacy of preoperative gefitinib in patients with stage II-IIIA resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to report the long-term survival analysis and recurrent patterns.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients with resectable stage II-IIIA NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutations were enrolled. Patients were administrated with preoperative gefitinib (250 mg once daily for 42 days), followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS). MPR was defined as the presence of no more than 10 % viable tumor. Chi-square test was used to assess the differences in CNS recurrence rates and recurrent patterns.

RESULTS

Of the 33 intention-to-treat patients, ORR was 54.5 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 37.7-70.7), and the rate of MPR was 24.2 % (95 % CI, 11.9-40.4). Among the investigated 28 patients, the median follow-up was 108.5 months. The median OS was 89.8 months (95 % CI, 44.37-NC), and the median DFS was 36.4 months (95 % CI, 18.9-NC). In addition, MPR continued to indicate significantly improved DFS, as well as OS (DFS, p = 0.015; OS, p = 0.037). The neoadjuvant gefitinib group showed prolonged DFS and OS than platinum doublet group (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.71, 95 % CI, 1.02-2.85, p = 0.038; and HR = 2.31; 95 % CI, 1.28-4.16, p = 0.0044, respectively). There was a significant difference in the distant recurrence patterns between the two groups (p = 0.032). Moreover, the gefitinib group showed similar overall brain metastasis rate than platinum doublet group (21.4 % versus 27.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

With satisfying prognosis benefits and acceptable brain metastasis rate in long-term follow-up, gefitinib exhibited clinical viability for operable stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant NSCLC over chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. MPR was significantly associated with both prolonged DFS and OS, manifesting its potential as an essential endpoint for future neoadjuvant trials.

Genetic Ancestry-Based Differences in Biomarker-Based Eligibility for Precision Oncology Therapies

Importance

Although differences in the prevalence of key cancer-specific somatic mutations as a function of genetic ancestry among patients with cancer has been well-established, few studies have addressed the practical clinical implications of these differences for the growing number of biomarker-driven treatments.

Objective

To determine if the approval of precision oncology therapies has benefited patients with cancer from various ancestral backgrounds equally over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective analysis of samples from patients with solid cancers who underwent clinical sequencing using the integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. The annual fraction of patients per ancestral group with at least 1 level 1 biomarker was calculated for FDA drug approvals from January 1998 to December 2023. Analysis began in January 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

For each patient, genetic ancestry was quantitatively inferred, and patients were grouped based on predominant reference ancestry. OncoKB was used to identify all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recognized somatic biomarkers associated with FDA-approved therapies (level 1 biomarkers) in each tumor sample.

Results

Overall, the study included 59 433 patients. The approval of the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers in 2013 disproportionately benefited patients of East Asian and South Asian ancestries, leading to higher patient fractions with level 1 biomarkers in these ancestral groups compared with other populations. Although the increase in precision oncology drug approvals from 2019 to 2020 had a notable positive impact on clinical actionability for patients of European ancestry, patients of African ancestry had the lowest fraction of level 1 biomarkers compared with other groups from 2019 onward.

Conclusion and Relevance

This study systematically assessed and compared temporal changes in genomic biomarker-based eligibility for precision oncology therapies as a function of inferred genetic ancestry derived from DNA sequencing data. Despite the accelerated rate of FDA approvals for precision oncology therapies over the past decade, measurable differences in biomarker-based drug eligibility among patient ancestral groups exist. These differences may exacerbate the systemic disparities in clinical outcomes in patients of African ancestry due to existing deficiencies in their access to cancer care.

[Standard of care of EGFR mutated metastatic NSCLC in first treatment and beyond progression]

Among the oncogenic alterations of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the EGFR gene mutation is observed in 15% of patients in France, particularly among non-smokers and women. Treatment mainly relies on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR. In first-line metastatic treatment, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, has become the standard, improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to first- or second-generation TKIs. The combination of TKI/chemotherapy (osimertinib/carboplatine-pemetrexed) and TKI/bispecific antibodies (e.g., amivantamab/lazertinib) are alternatives under evaluation, with benefits in PFS but increased toxicity. In case of progression under first- or second-generation TKIs, the most common resistance is the T790M mutation, which can be targeted by osimertinib. For other resistances, platinum-based chemotherapy remains an option. Amivantamab combined with chemotherapy has shown an improvement in PFS in the second line and has early access in France. Other emerging approaches include conjugated antibodies (patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan) and next-generation TKIs. In the future, personalized treatment based on the molecular profile and early response to TKIs could optimize management, particularly by integrating predictive markers such as EGFR clearance under treatment.

Evolution of first versus next-line targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The expanding armamentarium of targeted therapies has revolutionized treatment for metastatic oncogene-addicted lung cancers. For multiple subsets, such as those harboring EGFR mutations and fusions in ALK or ROS1, successive generation of increasingly potent, selective, and brain-penetrating targeted therapies have shifted the treatment paradigm towards preferential first-line use of next-generation drugs. This evolution in clinical practice provides a lens through which to review the lessons learned from drug development in oncogene-addicted lung cancers, guided by translational insights into tumor biology and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. For oncogenic drivers that are less sensitive to single-agent targeted therapies, rationally designed combination strategies will be needed to enable first-line use of targeted agents.

Debate on first-line treatment strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: An expert panel meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The front-line treatment options and regulatory approval scenario for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rapidly evolved in the recent months, with newly presented positive trial results of novel compounds and combination strategies in the setting of common activating mutations, uncommon mutations, and exon 20 insertions. In this context, international lively debate is emerging on how to choose among the available regimens, based on efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel was held in July 2024 to review data on front-line regimens in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, including common, uncommon and exon 20 insertions. The panel discussed available evidence, and reached common considerations for clinical practice and clinical research.

RESULTS

In the setting of EGFR common activating mutations, all panelists agreed that single agent osimertinib, the combination of osimertinib with platinum-pemetrexed, and the combination of amivantamab and lazertinib, are first-line treatment options. Overall, panelists defined characteristics of patients in which combination treatments should be avoided. Subsequent treatment strategies at disease progression were discussed according to the different front-line options. With regards to uncommon EGFR mutations, panelists agreed that afatinib remains the only drug with phase 3 results available, and that afatinib and osimertinib are the preferred first-line options. In EGFR exon20 insertion positive disease, the combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed and amivantamab has been identified as the preferred front-line treatment, with second-line amivantamab to be used in the second-line setting whenever not available in front-line. The panelists defined priorities in clinical research, with high priority attributed to investigating resistance mechanisms, novel generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and selection biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Different toxicity profiles and sequential strategies were considered, together with efficacy results, to reach common considerations for the front-line treatment strategies in EGFR mutant NSCLC, however clinical research should be prioritized to identify further selection features.

Investigating osimertinib plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, 15-40% of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) have an activating EGFR mutation, treatable with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as osimertinib, recommended as front-line therapy. Despite the efficacy of first-line osimertinib, most patients will experience disease progression. Therefore, combining it with chemotherapy has become an area of interest.

AREAS COVERED

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that has extended survival in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. However, resistance eventually leads to treatment failure. This has driven the advancement of strategies to overcome resistance to osimertinib. In this setting, the FLAURA2 trial yielded positive results by combining osimertinib with chemotherapy. Additionally, a range of other approaches, including the use of bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates alongside third-generation EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy, support the development of novel therapeutic combinations, some of which have already been approved for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Next to osimertinib monotherapy, expanded upfront treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC require patient selection considering disease extent, toxicity and tolerability, dosing schedule and what the patient can expect through shared decision-making. Further studies are needed to identify the patients who will benefit the most from combination therapies and to sequence the new drugs into the treatment algorithm.

Patients with non‑small cell lung cancer with the exon 21 L858R mutation: From distinct mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments (Review)

The most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations, which are more common in Asian (30-50%) than in Caucasian (10-15%) populations. Exon 19 deletion (ex19del) and exon 21 L858R (ex21 L858R) mutations account for ~45 and 40% of all EGFR mutations, respectively. Moreover, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be more effective and improve the quality of life of patients with NSCLC more than chemotherapy regimens. By contrast, patients with the ex21 L858R mutation may have a lower sensitivity and duration of response to EGFR-TKIs as well as a shorter survival compared with those with the ex19del mutation. However, current guidelines classify ex21 L858R and ex19del as the same condition and recommend the same treatment strategy for both. Aiming for precision medicine, the present review introduces and compares different EGFR-TKIs for the ex21 L858R mutation to assess more personalized treatment options for the population with this mutation.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To date, no direct comparisons have been performed to compare the effectiveness of all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) against EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib, befotertinib, furmonertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, and chemotherapy. Pooled estimations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were performed within the Bayesian framework.

Results

Twenty-three trials involving 11 treatments were included. All EGFR-TKIs improved PFS relative to chemotherapy, except for icotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.44). All EGFR-TKIs demonstrated significant ORR benefits over chemotherapy. Osimertinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with icotinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.86), gefitinib (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), and erlotinib (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-1.0). In addition, osimertinib showed favorable superiority in improving OS compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), gefitinib (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83), erlotinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89), and afatinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). Among these regimens, afatinib showed the highest ORR (cumulative probability: 96.96%). Icotinib was associated with minimal toxicity among the EGFR-TKIs, followed by furmonertinib and osimertinib. Moreover, the toxicity spectra differed among the EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses of patients with two common types of EGFR mutations indicated that furmonertinib possessed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with exon 19 deletion, and lazertinib showed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with Leu858Arg mutation. We also identified differences between EGFR-TKIs in prolonging PFS in patients with brain metastasis.

Conclusions

Osimertinib is the first choice of treatment with considerable efficacy and safety for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The treatments associated with the best PFS in patients with exon 19 deletions and Leu858Arg mutations were furmonertinib and lazertinib, respectively.

New Treatment Strategies in Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond Single Agent Osimertinib

Osimertinib has been the standard treatment for advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for many years. However, even with remarkable response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival benefit as compared to the old generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib, treatment outcomes for these subsets of patients remain a challenge. Recently, in order to go beyond osimertinib, new treatment strategies have been developed. In particular, in the FLAURA 2 phase III randomized trial, the combination of platin-based chemotherapy and osimertinib showed impressive PFS benefits as compared to single-agent osimertinib. Furthermore, in the MARIPOSA phase III randomized study, the combination of the anti-EGFR and anti-MET monoclonal antibody amivantamab combined with the new anti-EGFR TKI lazertinib demonstrated remarkable PFS benefit as compared to single agent osimertinib. This paper will discuss these new treatment options and potential selection criteria for personalized treatment of patients.

Drug Resistance in Late-Stage Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After First-Line Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for late-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represented a drastic change in the treatment of late-stage lung cancer. Drug resistance develops after a certain period of first-line TKI treatment, which has led to decades of changing treatment guidelines for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This study discussed the potential mechanisms of drug resistance against first-line TKI treatment and potential successive treatment strategies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may play a role in the evaluation of drug resistance in first-line TKI treatment. Emerging combination regimens and ongoing trials were discussed. Potential future strategies for treatment and for the management of drug resistance were proposed in this study.

The potential of lazertinib and amivantamab combination therapy as a treatment strategy for uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pose therapeutic challenge due to limited response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study presents preclinical evidence and mechanistic insights into the combination of lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI; and amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, for treating NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. The lazertinib-amivantamab combination demonstrates significant antitumor activity in patient-derived models with uncommon EGFR mutations either before treatment or after progressing on EGFR-TKIs. Lazertinib enhances the inhibitory capacity of amivantamab by increasing its on-target expression. Notably, the combination surpasses afatinib, a first-line treatment for uncommon EGFR mutations in NSCLC, in terms of in vivo efficacy. Promising clinical activity is also observed in two case studies of patients treated with this combination (NCT04077463). Our findings highlight the potential of the lazertinib-amivantamab combination as a therapeutic strategy for uncommon EGFR mutations, an area of unmet medical need, and support further clinical investigation.

Osimertinib in the Treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Early and Locally Advanced Stages of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was dramatically revolutionized by the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice, both in advanced and locally advanced/early stages. The present work focuses on osimertinib use in locally advanced and early NSCLC stages. Phase 3 clinical trials have supported the use of osimertinib as the new standard of care, both in the adjuvant setting and in locally advanced disease. The ADAURA study reported an overall survival (OS) advantage for adjuvant osimertinib in completely resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant tumors, while the LAURA study proved a statistically significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and a delay of central nervous system metastasis development in EGFR-mutant patients treated with osimertinib maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, data on osimertinib's efficacy are conflicting; therefore, the Neo-ADAURA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and common EGFR mutations. We discuss several issues that need to be clarified, such as the efficacy of the drug on uncommon mutations, the long-term impact on survival, and the management of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, we report the studies that are trying to identify potential biomarkers of response, such as the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), with the aim of selecting patients who will benefit most from osimertinib.

The Role of Clinicopathological Features in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitory Duration in EGFR Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective treatments for EGFR mutant (EGFRm) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, the benefit of EGFR-TKIs varies. We aimed to determine the impact of clinicopathological features on the duration of response to EGFR-TKIs in EGFRm mNSCLC. Method: Patients diagnosed with EGFRm mNSCLC who underwent EGFR-TKI therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Cox regression analyses were employed to determine the association between the PFS rates of EGFR-TKI treatments and the clinicopathological variables. Results: We included 83 patients in this study. The univariate analysis revealed that male gender, de novo metastatic disease, adrenal metastasis, and the absence of intrathoracic metastasis were significantly associated with poor PFS rates. The multivariate analyses revealed that male gender and adrenal metastasis were correlated with poor PFS rates. Conclusions: Male gender, de novo metastatic disease, adrenal metastasis, and the absence of intrathoracic metastasis negatively impact EGFR-TKI response in patients with EGFRm NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer and the tumor microenvironment: making headway from targeted therapies to advanced immunotherapy

Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology and tumor progression mechanisms, resulting in the development of novel strategies for early detection and wide-ranging care approaches. Since their introduction, over 20 years ago, targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for NSCLC. Nowadays, targeted therapies remain the gold standard for many patients, but still they suffer from many adverse effects, including unexpected toxicity and intrinsic acquired resistance mutations, which lead to relapse. The adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 2015, has offered exceptional survival benefits for patients without targetable alterations. Despite this notable progress, challenges remain, as not all patients respond favorably to ICIs, and resistance to therapy can develop over time. A crucial factor influencing clinical response to immunotherapy is the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is pivotal in orchestrating the interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system, influencing tumor growth and treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss how the understanding of this intricate relationship is crucial for the success of immunotherapy and survey the current state of immunotherapy intervention, with a focus on forthcoming and promising chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies in NSCLC. The TME sets major obstacles for CAR-T therapies, creating conditions that suppress the immune response, inducing T cell exhaustion. To enhance treatment efficacy, specific efforts associated with CAR-T cell therapy in NSCLC, should definitely focus TME-related immunosuppression and antigen escape mechanisms, by combining CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint blockades.

Real-world data of dacomitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Dacomitinib demonstrated superior survival benefit compared to gefitinib as a first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with common EGFR mutations through ARCHER 1050. However, there is limited real-world data concerning its efficacy and safety. This study included patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received dacomitinib as a first-line treatment between January 2021 and December 2022 at Samsung Medical Center and St. Vincent's Hospital. This study assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety profile of dacomitinib, and subsequent treatments after dacomitinib failure. In total, 153 patients were included in this study. Exon 19 deletion was observed in 50.3% of patients, while the L858R mutation in exon 21 was observed in 46.4% of patients. 45.1% of patients had brain metastasis. The ORR was 84.3%. The median follow-up duration was 16.9 months, with a median PFS of 16.7 months (95% CI, 14.4 to 25.2). Based on the type of EGFR mutation, the median PFS was 18.1 months (95% CI, 14.5 to NE) in patients with exon 19 deletion, and 15.9 months (95% CI, 12.5 to NE) in patients with L858R mutation. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 7.2% of patients. Initially administered at a dose of 45 mg, dose reduction was necessary for 85.6% of patients, with a final dosage of 30 mg in 49.0% and 15 mg in 36.6% of cases. Out of the 60 patients who experienced disease progression, 31 underwent tissue re-biopsy and 25 underwent liquid biopsy. Overall, T790M mutation was detected in 40.9% of patients who progressed after dacomitinib. The survival benefit of dacomitinib has been demonstrated, indicating its promising efficacy in a real-world setting. The detection rate of the T790M mutation after dacomitinib treatment failure was comparable to that of other second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Blood Sample Collection in Randomized Controlled Trials for Biomarker Discovery and Validation: Experience of the PREOPANC-2 Trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and yield of blood sample collection in an investigator-initiated nationwide randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

In the PREOPANC-2 trial, 375 patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to two neoadjuvant regiments in 19 centers in the Netherlands (2018-2021). Blood sample collection was scheduled at seven time points before, during, and after treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of successfully collected blood samples at each scheduled time point.

RESULTS

Of the 375 randomized patients, 12 were excluded from blood sample collection before any treatment. From the remaining 363 patients, 1513 (87 %) of 1748 blood samples were collected, processed, mailed, and centrally stored. The blood samples were collected before treatment from 347 (96 %) of the 363 patients, after the first neoadjuvant cycle from 322 (94 %) of 343 patients, after neoadjuvant treatment (i.e., before surgery) from 260 (83 %) of 313 patients, and after surgery from 210 (77 %) of 271 patients. During the follow-up visits, blood samples were collected from 147 (82 %) of 179 patients 12 months after randomization and from 83 (77 %) of 108 patients after 24 months. A total of 220 samples (13 %) were missing. The most common causes for missing blood samples were scheduling oversights, unsuccessful blood draw attempts, and mailing failures (151 times, 69 %). Blood sample collection was canceled 69 times (31 %) due to COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Blood sample collection in the PREOPANC-2 trial had a yield of 96 % before treatment and an overall yield of 87 %. Collection of blood samples for biomarker studies is feasible in a nationwide RCT.

Image-Based Phenotypic Profiling Enables Rapid and Accurate Assessment of EGFR-Activating Mutations in Tissues from Lung Cancer Patients

Determining mutations in the kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is critical for the effectiveness of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung cancer. Yet, DNA-based sequencing analysis of tumor samples is time-consuming and only provides gene mutation information on EGFR, making it challenging to design effective EGFR-TKI therapeutic strategies. Here, we present a new image-based method involving the rational design of a quenched probe based on EGFR-TKI to identify mutant proteins, which permits specific and "no-wash" real-time imaging of EGFR in living cells only upon covalent targeting of the EGFR kinase. We also show that the probe enables distinguishing EGFR mutant tumor-bearing mice from wild-type tumor-bearing mice via fluorescence-intensity-based imaging with high signal contrast. More interestingly, the image-based phenotypic approach can be used to predict EGFR mutations in tumors from lung cancer patients with an accuracy of 94%. Notably, when immunohistochemistry analysis is integrated, an improved accuracy of 98% is achieved. These data delineate a drug-based phenotypic imaging approach for in-biopsy visualization and define functional groups of EGFR mutants that can effectively guide EGFR-TKI therapeutic decision-making besides gene mutation analysis.