Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Design and Synthesis of New pyrazole Hybrids Linked to Oxime and Nitrate Moieties as COX-2, EGFRL858R/T790M Inhibitors and Nitric Oxide Donors with dual Anti-inflammatory/Anti-proliferative Activities

Two new series of pyrazole derivatives 14a-l and 17a-c with oxime/nitrate moieties as EGFRWT, mutant (EGFRL858R/T790M) and COX-2 inhibitors were synthesized and evaluated for anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory activities. Compounds 14c, 14e, 14 g, 14i-l, 17b and 17c exhibited COX-2 selectivity in the range of (S.I. = 17-42) when compared to celecoxib (S.I. = 20.43). Concerning anti-neoplastic activity, screening was carried out against 60 human cancer cell lines by (NCI); Nine compounds (14c, 14e, 14 g, 14i-l, 17b and 17c) showed excellent inhibitory activity against all cancer cell lines especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Further cytotoxicity testing of compounds 14c, 14e, 14 g, 14i-l, 17b and 17c was conducted on established EGFRT790M/L858R-resistant NSCLC (H1975), all tested compounds except 14 l exhibited potent activity (IC50 = 3.02-27.32 μM) which is higher than that of osimertinib (IC50 = 37.29 μM). It was noted that compound 17c, showed cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase of NSCLC (H1975) cells. In addition, compounds 14c, 14e, 14 g, 14i-l, 17b and 17c induced improved selective inhibitory activity against double mutant EGFRL858R/T790M tyrosine kinases with IC50 in the range of (0.031-0.076 μM, with selectivity index range S.I. of 2.5-14.58) which was comparable to that of osimertinib (IC50 = 0.037 μM, with S.I. of 1.89). The most potent anti-cancer compounds 14c, 14e, 14 g, 14i-l, 17b and 17c released NO in a slow rate of (1.45-3.37 %). Finally, applying covalent docking, we identified the covalent binding of 14 g, 14 k, and 17c with Cys797, providing insights into their potential as irreversible inhibitors targeting EGFRL858R/T790M protein.

Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Over the past two decades, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has witnessed encouraging advancements in basic and clinical research. However, substantial unmet needs remain for patients worldwide, as drug resistance persists as an inevitable reality. Meanwhile, the journey towards amplifying the breadth and depth of the therapeutic effect requires comprehending and integrating diverse and profound progress. In this review, therefore, we aim to comprehensively present such progress that spans the various aspects of molecular pathology, encompassing elucidations of metastatic mechanisms, identification of therapeutic targets, and dissection of spatial omics. Additionally, we also highlight the numerous small molecule and antibody drugs, encompassing their application alone or in combination, across later-line, frontline, neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. Then, we elaborate on drug resistance mechanisms, mainly involving targeted therapies and immunotherapies, revealed by our proposed theoretical models to clarify interactions between cancer cells and a variety of non-malignant cells, as well as almost all the biological regulatory pathways. Finally, we outline mechanistic perspectives to pursue innovative treatments of NSCLC, through leveraging artificial intelligence to incorporate the latest insights into the design of finely-tuned, biomarker-driven combination strategies. This review not only provides an overview of the various strategies of how to reshape available armamentarium, but also illustrates an example of clinical translation of how to develop novel targeted drugs, to revolutionize therapeutic landscape for NSCLC.

An allele-specific quantitative PCR strategy for detection of EGFR T790M mutations by liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Detection of mutations conferring resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as T790M, is critical for guiding targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, limitations in accessing tumor tissue have given rise to liquid biopsy approaches necessitating ultrasensitive techniques to identify tumor mutations in a large background of wild-type alleles. We developed a sensitive and cost-effective technique utilizing a 2'3'-dideoxy nucleotide (ddNTP) blocker that selectively blocks wild-type allele amplification, allowing specific detection of mutant alleles in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma. EGFR genomic sequences encompassing T790M were cloned into pMD20-T plasmids and titrated in a background of genomic DNA to test the sensitivity. The assay detected 10 copies of the mutant allele in the presence of 10,000 copies of wild-type alleles, indicating a sensitivity of 0.001 %. Among 74 NSCLC patients, 34 received TKI treatment and were screened for the T790M mutation. The current method would be a sensitive and cost-effective liquid biopsy tool for detecting EGFR T790M mutations in NSCLC cfDNA samples, with strong potential for identifying actionable mutations for targeted therapy, especially in low-resource settings.

Adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of people with resected stage I to III non-small-cell lung cancer and EGFR mutation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor osimertinib is the standard care for stage IB-IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutation, following complete tumour resection, with or without prior platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the role of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in this setting is debated, particularly concerning long-term curative effects versus recurrence delay. Uncertainties persist around treatment duration, harms, and effectiveness across disease stages, prior chemotherapy, or EGFR-sensitising mutation types.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and harms of adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in people with resected stage I to III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring an activating EGFR mutation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched major databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase) to 9 December 2024, along with conference proceedings (from 2019) and clinical trial registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting benefits or harms of adjuvant EGFR TKIs in adults with resected stage I-III NSCLC. Trials compared EGFR TKIs with platinum-based chemotherapy, placebo/best supportive care (BSC), or second-and/or third-generation EGFR TKIs versus first- and/or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Participants were adults with histologically confirmed stage I-III NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed search results, resolving disagreements with a fourth author. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events (AEs); secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), relapse risk during drug-off time, and brain relapse risk. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects and fixed-effect models with hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed heterogeneity with the I² statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs involving 2603 participants, and identified six ongoing trials. Five trials compared EGFR TKIs with placebo/BSC, and four compared them with chemotherapy. We found no trials comparing second-and/or third-generation to first- and/or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Six trials had low selection bias risk; most had unclear or high risk for detection or performance bias; and four were high risk for other biases. The certainty of the evidence (GRADE) ranged from moderate to very low, depending on the outcome. First-, second-, and/or third-generation EGFR TKIs versus placebo/BSC EGFR TKIs probably improve overall survival compared to placebo/BSC (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.73; 3 studies, 864 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). TKIs may improve disease-free survival compared to placebo/BSC, but the evidence is very uncertain (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.41; 5 studies, 1153 participants). We are uncertain if there is a difference between groups in serious adverse events (≥ grade 3) as the evidence is very uncertain, with wide confidence intervals spanning both potential harm and no effect (RR 2.52, 95% CI 0.44 to 14.37; 4 studies, 1134 participants). Mild-to-moderate adverse events (grades 1 and 2) may be more frequent with EGFR TKIs compared to placebo/BSC, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.29; 4 studies, 1134 participants). One study assessed HRQoL, with no clinically meaningful decline compared to placebo/BSC (592 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). First-, second-, and/or third-generation EGFR TKIs versus chemotherapy Overall survival was similar between EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.18; 4 studies, 878 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). TKIs may have improved disease-free survival compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.83; 4 studies, 878 participants; low-certainty evidence). TKIs may have reduced serious adverse events (≥ grade 3) compared to chemotherapy (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.52; 4 studies, 811 participants; low-certainty evidence). TKIs may have increased mild-to-moderate adverse events (grades 1 and 2) (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.78; 4 studies, 811 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two studies assessed HRQoL, showing no clear difference compared to chemotherapy, as assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung instrument (2 studies, 399 participants) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (2 studies, 400 participants), both with moderate-certainty evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant EGFR TKIs may improve disease-free survival compared to both placebo/BSC and chemotherapy. There is moderate-certainty evidence that EGFR TKIs increase overall survival compared to placebo/BSC. However, they likely result in little to no difference in overall survival compared to chemotherapy. We could not rule out a potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in people with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Approximately 50% of participants experienced relapse or death within one year of stopping TKI therapy, indicating that the disease-free survival benefit may wane after withdrawal. This raises the possibility that prolonged adjuvant TKI therapy could be associated with improved long-term outcomes, although further research is needed to clarify this.

New therapeutic approaches for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer on osimertinib era

INTRODUCTION

EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRmut NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying clinical outcomes. Resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is inevitable, with emerging evidence suggesting that concurrent genomic alterations influence treatment efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 58 stage IV EGFRmut NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib across four hospitals in Madrid, Spain, between March 2021 and February 2023. Comprehensive genomic profiling was conducted using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to evaluate co-mutations. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression were applied to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A second co-mutation was identified in 44.1 % of patients, with TP53 (70 %) being the most frequent, followed by EGFR (11.5 %), PI3K (11.5 %), and MET amplifications (7.7 %). Patients with co-mutations exhibited significantly worse PFS compared to those with only EGFR mutations (HR: 8.0, 95 % CI: 1.81-35.4; p = 0.001). Specifically, TP53 co-mutations were associated with reduced PFS (HR: 21.6, 95 % CI: 2.77-169; p < 0.001) and a non-statistically significant trend toward worse OS (HR: 3.10, 95 % CI: 0.89-10.8; p = 0.062).

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the prognostic impact of co-mutations, particularly TP53, in EGFRmut NSCLC treated with osimertinib. These findings underscore the need for novel therapeutic approaches and personalized treatment strategies, especially in subgroups with poor prognoses. Trials such as MARIPOSA and FLAURA-2 provide promising evidence for treatment intensification, but careful patient stratification is essential to balance efficacy and toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The data for dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis was lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis in first-line settings.

METHODS

Eligible patients were treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with ≥1 brain metastasis no less than 5 mm treated with dacomitinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial and extracranial ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The response was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria.

RESULT

Between July 2nd, 2019, and September 30th, 2022, a total of 87 treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis treated with dacomitinib from four hospitals were included. The data cutoff date was March 24th, 2023, and the median duration of follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 1.6-34.7 months). Based on mRECIST criteria, for all the 87 patients with evaluable brain metastasis, the iORR was 89.7% (95%CI, 81.3%-95.2%) and iDCR was 97.7% (95%CI, 91.9-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 36 patients achieving PR, and 7 patients maintaining SD. Based on RANO-BM criteria, the iORR was 71.3% (62/87, 95%CI 60.6%-80.5%) and iDCR was 97.7% (85/87, 95%CI, 91.9%-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 20 patients achieving PR, and 23 patients maintaining SD (Table). Median iPFS was 26.0 (95%CI, 20.7-31.4) months, and the 1-year and 2-year iPFS rate were 68.9% and 51.5%, respectively. Of 75 patients with evaluable extracranial lesions, 2 patients achieved CR (2.7%), the systemic ORR was 73.8% (95%CI 63.1%-82.8%) and DCR was 96.4% (89.9%-99.3%) (Table). Systemic median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI 11.1-16.9) months and median OS was 34.0 (95%CI 28.0-39.9) months. Overall, 86 of 87 (98.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade. The most common (≥20%) AEs including rash (89.7%), oral ulcer (74.2%), diarrhea (67.8%), and paronychia (59.8%). Most of the AEs were grade 1 or grade 2 and no patients died due to severe AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacomitinib showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation in the first-line treatment.

Current treatment landscape for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with common EGFR mutations

Common EGFR mutations including exon-19 deletions and the L858R point mutation in exon 21 constitute predominant actionable genomic alterations in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has fundamentally changed the treatment landscape for such patients by improving both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among EGFR-TKIs, third-generation agents such as osimertinib have shown marked efficacy and favorable safety profiles and have become the standard of care in the first-line setting. The combination of osimertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy has recently been shown to improve PFS compared with osimertinib monotherapy in the FLAURA2 trial. Similarly, the MARIPOSA trial demonstrated clinical benefit of the combination of the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, amivantamab, with the third-generation EGFR-TKI, lazertinib, further supporting the use of combination therapies as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Despite these advances, however, challenges such as brain metastases remain substantial barriers to successful treatment outcomes. Management of patients with such metastases often requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates systemic treatment with local interventions such as radiation therapy. Finally, circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a promising biomarker for real-time monitoring of treatment response and evolution of drug resistance mechanisms. Analysis of such biomarkers can facilitate dynamic and personalized therapeutic adjustments, potentially improving outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest clinical evidence supporting therapeutic advances in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment strategies based on tumor biology, patient-specific factors, and evolving therapeutic options.

Evolving treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring common EGFR activating mutations

A clinically important subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is driven by common mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Over the past decade, first-, second-, and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved clinical outcomes, although acquired resistance inevitably emerges. In particular, the third-generation TKI osimertinib has demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to earlier-generation TKIs in the frontline setting, yet median OS remains approximately three years in pivotal trials. Efforts to extend disease control have led to various upfront intensification strategies, including combining EGFR TKIs with antiangiogenics or chemotherapy (e.g., the FLAURA-2 trial), and pairing novel bispecific antibodies such as amivantamab with third-generation TKIs. Upon progression on third-generation EGFR TKIs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment, albeit with modest response rates. Emerging therapies targeting MET amplification (e.g., savolitinib plus osimertinib), leveraging antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., patritumab deruxtecan), or adding immunotherapy and antiangiogenics have shown preliminary promise in overcoming resistance. Ongoing trials are assessing optimal treatment sequencing and the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide therapy escalation or de-escalation. Ultimately, the evolving landscape of EGFR-mutant NSCLC underscores the need for refined biomarker-driven approaches and personalized regimens to achieve further gains in survival. In this review, we discuss these strategies in detail, highlighting current evidence and future directions for EGFR-mutant NSCLC treatment.

Inter-Ethnic Differences in the Efficacy and Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Used in Oncology: Insights From Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Differences in the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been observed across ethnic/ancestry subpopulations (previously reviewed to 2017). With an expanding number of TKIs approved since that time, an updated review of TKI response across ethnic/ancestry subpopulations in Phase 3 TKI clinical trials was conducted. A total of 73 population subgroup analyses (defined by participant race, ethnicity, ancestry or geographic region) of progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) were identified by a literature search. Twelve (16%) of the analyses investigating the efficacy of afatinib, brigatinib, dacomitinib, gilteritinib, lorlatinib, neratinib, osimertinib, or pazopanib were assessed to report population differences in PFS and/or OS. For 28 (38%) of the analyses that showed suggestions of a potential efficacy difference across subpopulations, limitations in the data available precluded further assessment. There were 17 (23%) analyses assessed to report comparable efficacy outcomes across diverse subpopulations. The majority of clinical trials noted no clinically remarkable differences in safety between subpopulations; however, for brigatinib, crizotinib, pazopanib, and sunitinib, distinct patterns of adverse events were reported in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. The underrepresentation of specific subpopulations, the grouping together of results of diverse subpopulations, as well as inconsistencies in the definition and reporting of participant ethnicity/ancestry are barriers to the meaningful exploration of inter-ethnic differences in TKI response. Therefore, further insight into the associations between ethnicity/ancestry and TKI response will require an increase in the diversity of clinical trial participants and appropriate analysis and reporting of subpopulation results.

Impact of EGFR Mutation Subtypes on Response to Chemoimmunotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After EGFR-TKI Failure

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation subtypes. However, the impact of these subtypes on the clinical outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy (Chemo+ICI) or platinum-based chemotherapy (Chemo) in real-world practice remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of EGFR mutation subtypes on NSCLC treatment outcomes of Chemo and Chemo+ICI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC from 20 institutions between January 2017 and July 2022. Patients received Chemo with or without ICI after failure of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Common EGFR mutations were categorized as exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations.

RESULTS

Among the 403 patients, 205 (50.9%) had exon 19 deletions, and 198 (49.1%) had L858R mutations. For patients with L858R mutations, Chemo+ICI significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with Chemo (7.0 vs 5.3 months; p = 0.04). However, no significant difference in PFS was observed between treatments for patients with exon 19 deletions (6.7 vs 6.0 months; p = 0.96). Multivariate analysis identified Chemo+ICI as an independent predictor of PFS in patients with L858R mutations (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.92; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with common EGFR mutation subtypes, those with L858R mutations demonstrated significantly improved PFS with Chemo+ICI than with Chemo. These findings suggest that Chemo+ICI may offer a more effective treatment option for patients with L858R-mutant NSCLC, warranting further investigation in prospective studies.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Common Mutations: New Strategies

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are described in 10-15% of Caucasian patients and in 50% of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic scenario and has changed the natural history of the disease. Despite the results obtained with osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, most patients experience disease progression. The search for new therapeutic strategies both to enhance first-line treatment and to ensure adequate second-line therapies represents an unmet medical need, towards which all efforts are being concentrated. In this review, we describe the main strategies identified to improve the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Potential biomarkers of primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) significantly improve the prognosis of EGFR-sensitive mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanisms underlying primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs remain unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the biomarkers associated with primary resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs was defined as disease progression within 90 days (3 months) of treatment in patients with EGFR-sensitive mutant adenocarcinoma without any evidence of objective response.

Design

Retrospective, single-center study.

Methods

This study retrospectively screened patients with NSCLC who received EGFR-TKIs at Hunan Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. According to pre-determined clinical outcomes, we divided the patients into primary resistance and sensitivity groups. Only patients with sufficient samples that passed quality control were included in this study. Tumor tissue and paired peripheral blood samples collected from patients before treatment were subjected to next-generation sequencing using an 825-gene panel. In addition, tumor tissue samples were analyzed for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Results

A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study, with 35 in each of the primary resistant and sensitive groups. Patients with exon 4 mutations in the TP53 gene had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those without the mutation. PTPRD and TACC3 mutation frequencies were substantially higher in the primary resistant group and were associated with shorter PFS and OS. Furthermore, patients in the primary resistant group exhibited substantially higher levels of PD-L1 expression.

Conclusion

The potential mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs are highly heterogeneous. Combining some somatic variants affecting tumor function and high PD-L1 expression may contribute to this resistance.

Lysosomal EGFR acts as a Rheb-GEF independent of its kinase activity to activate mTORC1

Oncogenic mutations in EGFR often result in EGF-independent constitutive activation and aberrant trafficking and are associated with several human malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer. A major consequence of EGFR mutations is the activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), which requires EGFR kinase activity and downstream PI3K/AKT signaling, resulting in increased cell proliferation. However, recent studies have elucidated kinase-independent roles of EGFR in cell survival and cancer progression. Here, we report a cis mTORC1 activation function of EGFR that is independent of its kinase activity. Our results reveal that lysosomal localization of EGFR is critical to mTORC1 activation, where EGFR physically binds Rheb, acting as a guanine exchange factor (GEF) for Rheb, with its Glu804 serving as a potential glutamic finger. Genetic knock-in of EGFR-E804K in cells reduces the level of GTP-bound Rheb, and significantly suppresses mTORC1 activation, cell proliferation and tumor growth. Different tyrosine kinase inhibitors exhibit distinct effects on EGFR-induced mTORC1 activation, with afatinib, which additionally blocks EGFR's GEF activity, causing a much greater suppression of mTORC1 activation and cell growth, and erlotinib, which targets only kinase activity, resulting in only a slight decrease. Moreover, a novel small molecule, BIEGi-1, was designed to target both the Rheb-GEF and kinase activities of EGFR, and shows a strong inhibitory effect on the viability of cells harboring EGFR mutants. These findings unveil a fundamental event in cell growth and suggest a promising strategy against cancers with EGFR mutations.

Identification of Novel Fourth-Generation Allosteric Inhibitors Targeting Inactive State of EGFR T790M/L858R/C797S and T790M/L858R Mutations: A Combined Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Approach

Targeted therapy with an allosteric inhibitor (AIs) is an important area of research in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Current treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations using orthosteric inhibitors faces challenges like resistance and stopping over phosphorylation. Notably AIs have been introduced to overcome this resistance and increase inhibitory potency that binds to pockets other than the ATP-binding site (orthosteric site). Recently, fourth-generation AIs, EAI045, have been discovered to potently and selectively inhibit various EGFR mutations but limited antiproliferative effects in the absence of the antibody cetuximab. The purpose of this work is to identify nontoxic, potent small AIs through various screening pipelines and explore their molecular mechanism. In the discovery of AIs, structural similarity search, high-throughput virtual screening, and machine learning-guided QSAR modeling, several candidates were identified. Machine learning was employed to guide the QSAR model based on 2D descriptors and DFT-derived quantum chemical descriptors followed by a PCA reduction technique, which enabled the prediction of the biological activity (IC50) of screened drugs against various EGFR mutations such as T790M/L858R/C797S and T790M/L858R. In addition, multinanosecond (ns) and microsecond (μs) classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations run on protein-ligand binding complex to check the stability of binding dynamics for T790M/L858R/C797S and T790M/L858R mutations with lower IC50 and higher docking score compounds. The molecular mechanics generalized Boltzmann surface area (MM/GBSA) calculation revealed that the five hit allosteric molecules for T790M/C797S/L858R and two for T790M/L858R mutations had a high binding affinity. The results were corroborated further by MM/GBSA employing the normal-mode analysis entropy method to perform additional screening. Furthermore, the compounds' efficacy was confirmed using path-dependent ligand unbinding free energy techniques such as Jarzynski averaged free energy profiles obtained from adaptive steered MD, relative residence time, and umbrella sampling simulations, which were compared to a reference inhibitor. However, path-independent alchemical approaches like streamlined alchemical free energy perturbation and binding free energy estimator 2 (BFEE2) were employed to validate the results and identify potent compounds. These findings pave the way to identification of novel potential fourth-generation AIs, which require further experimental validation.

Discovery and preclinical evaluations of drug candidate DA-0157 capable of overcoming EGFR drug-resistant mutation C797S and EGFR/ALK co-mutations

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are significant oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite several approved EGFR and ALK inhibitors, drug-resistant mutations pose a major challenge. Especially, there is currently no approved EGFR inhibitors targeting the C797S mutation, a refractory mutation resistant to the third-generation EGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, an increasing number of patients with EGFR/ALK co-mutations have been identified in clinical practice, yet there are no effective therapeutic options available for them. In this study, we report the discovery and preclinical evaluations of a new small-molecule drug candidate, DA-0157, which is capable of overcoming EGFR drug-resistant mutation C797S and EGFR/ALK co-mutations. DA-0157 demonstrated excellent in vitro efficacy, significantly inhibiting various EGFRC797S mutants resistant to the third-generation EGFR inhibitors, ALK rearrangements, and EGFR/ALK co-mutations. In vivo studies revealed that DA-0157 substantially inhibited tumor growth in the LD1-0025-200717 EGFRDel19/T790M/C797S PDX model (40 mg/kg/d, TGI: 98.3 %), Ba/F3-EML-4-ALK-L1196 M CDX model (40 mg/kg/d, TGI: 125.2 %), and NCI-H1975 EGFRDel19/T790M/C797S & NCI-H3122 (EML4-ALK) dual-side implantation CDX model (40 mg/kg/d, TGI: 89.5 % & 113.9 %). DA-0157 demonstrates favorable pharmacokinetic properties and safety. Currently, DA-0157 (DAJH-1050766) is undergoing Phase I/II clinical trials.

Rezivertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (REZOR): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) and gefitinib as first-line therapies in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study (REZOR) included eligible patients from 50 hospitals across China. Those who had been histologically or cytologically confirmed as having NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation by central laboratory were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once daily either rezivertinib 180 mg or gefitinib 250 mg, until unacceptable toxicity occurred, disease progression, or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Each cycle lasted for 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival evaluated by masked independent central review (MICR) in the intention-to-treat set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03866499 and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 15, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 695 patients were screened. Among them, 369 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either rezivertinib 180 mg/day plus placebo (n=184) or gefitinib 250 mg/day plus placebo (n=185) in a 1:1 ratio; all of eligible participants were included in the intention-to-treat set. Median MICR-assessed progression-free survival was 19·3 months (95% CI 13·8-22·1) in the rezivertinib group and 9·6 months (8·4-11·3) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·36-0·63; p<0·0001) and the prespecified subgroup efficacy analysis showed consistent results. Median duration of exposure was 16·0 months (95% CI 0·0-29·7) in the rezivertinib group and 11·0 months (0·0-28·9) in the gefitinib group. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (82 [45%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 80 [43%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 43 [23%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 43 [23%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) were similar in both groups. One patient died from a TRAE in the rezivertinib group, due to pneumonia and interstitial lung disease.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggested that rezivertinib is a potential choice for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first-line therapy, owing to the superior overall efficacy and subgroup progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in targeted patients. No new safety signals were identified.

FUNDING

Beta Pharma (Shanghai) and the China National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of First-line Interventions in Patients With Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, With Particular Focus on Brain Metastatic Status: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AIMS

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to identify the most effective first-line intervention (FLI) for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in patients with varying brain metastasis (BM) status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), either alone or in combination, for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC (EMAN) patients. The sources included EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and relevant conference abstracts from inception until December 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 37 RCTs, encompassing 24 intervention options, were included in the NMA. Osimertinib combined with chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to aumolertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.93), furmonertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), lazertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), osimertinib alone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80), osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.00), befotertinib (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93). Further, amivantamab + lazertinib showed slightly better PFS compared to aumolertinib, furmonertinib, zorifertinib, and osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR <1, but P >0.05). Regarding overall survival (OS), amivantamab + lazertinib demonstrated superior results relative to furmonertinib (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95) and befotertinib (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). No significant OS differences were observed among osimertinib, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib + CT, lazertinib, and amivantamab + lazertinib. In BM patients, osimertinib + CT significantly enhanced PFS compared to osimertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.66), furmonertinib (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90), befotertinib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.89). However, no noticeable PFS differences were observed between osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib or aumolertinib. Lastly, osimertinib + CT and zorifertinib were associated with higher rates of all-grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In EMAN patients, osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Among BM patients, osimertinib + CT offered the best PFS benefits. These findings may assist in clinical decision-making and personalized care for EMAN and BM patients. The study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024506995).

Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology-A Guiding Compass for Targeted Therapy and Emerging Applications

Multigene sequencing technologies provide a foundation for targeted therapy and precision oncology by identifying actionable alterations and enabling the development of treatments that substantially improve clinical outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of having a molecular compass guiding treatment decision-making through the multitude of alterations and genetic mutations, showcasing why NGS plays a pivotal role in modern oncology.

Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most common type of lung cancer. The majority of patients with lung cancer characterized by activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), benefit from therapies entailing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this regard, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, has greatly improved the outcome for patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. The AURA and FLAURA trials displayed the superiority of the third-generation TKI in both first- and second-line settings, making it the drug of choice for treating patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Unfortunately, the onset of resistance is almost inevitable. On-target mechanisms of resistance include new mutations (e.g., C797S) in the kinase domain of EGFR, while among the off-target mechanisms, amplification of MET or HER2, mutations in downstream signaling molecules, oncogenic fusions, and phenotypic changes (e.g., EMT) have been described. This review focuses on the strategies that are currently being investigated, in preclinical and clinical settings, to overcome resistance to osimertinib, including the use of fourth-generation TKIs, PROTACs, bispecific antibodies, and ADCs, as monotherapy and as part of combination therapies.

Resistance Mutation Profiles Associated with Current Treatments for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review

Treatment resistance due to gene alterations remains a challenge for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe resistance mutation profiles and their impact on clinical outcomes in adults with a/mNSCLC in the United States (US). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase (2018-August 2022) identified 2986 records. Among 45 included studies, osimertinib was the most commonly reported treatment (osimertinib alone: 15 studies; as one of the treatment options: 18 studies), followed by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 5 studies) and non-TKIs (1 study). For first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) osimertinib, the most frequent EGFR-dependent resistance mechanisms were T790M loss (1L: 15.4%; 2L: 20.5-49%) and C797X mutation (1L: 2.9-12.5%; 2L: 1.4-22%). EGFR-independent mechanisms included MET amplification (1L: 0.6-66%; 2L: 7.2-19%), TP53 mutation (1L: 29.2-33.3%), and CCNE1 amplification (1L: 7.9%; 2L: 10.3%). For patients receiving osimertinib, EGFR T790M mutation loss, EGFR/MET/HER2 amplification, RET fusion, and PIK3CA mutation were associated with worse progression-free survival. Resistance mechanisms resulting from current NSCLC treatments in the US are complex, underscoring the need to address such heterogeneous resistance profiles and improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutated a/mNSCLC.

Overcoming cancer therapy resistance: From drug innovation to therapeutics

One of the major limitations of cancer therapy is the emergence of drug resistance. This review amis to provide a focused analysis of the multifactorial mechanisms underlying therapy resistance,with an emphasis on actionable insights for developing novel therapeutic strategies. It concisely outlines key factors contributing to therapy resistance, including drug delivery barriers, cancer stem cells (CSCs), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment (TME), genetic mutations, and alterlations in gene expression. Additionally, we explore how tumors evade targeted therapies through pathway-specific mechanisms that restore disrupted signaling pathways. The review critically evaluates innovative strategies designed to sensitize resistant tumor cells, such as targeted protein dedgradation, antibody-drug conjugates, structure-based drug design, allosteric drugs, multitarget drugs, nanomedicine and others We also highlight the importance of understanding the pharmacological actions of these agents and their integration into treatment regimens. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying gaps in our understanding, this review aims to guide future research and improve patient outcomes in cancer therapy.

Nanomedicine Innovations for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Lung cancer remains a challenge within the realm of oncology. Characterized by late-stage diagnosis and resistance to conventional treatments, the currently available therapeutic strategies encompass surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biological therapy; however, overall patient survival remains suboptimal. Nanotechnology has ushered in a new era by offering innovative nanomaterials with the potential to precisely target cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues. It holds the potential to reshape the landscape of cancer management, offering hope for patients and clinicians. The assessment of these nanotechnologies follows a rigorous evaluation process similar to that applied to chemical drugs, which includes considerations of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology, and clinical effectiveness. However, because of the characteristics of nanoparticles, standard toxicological tests require modifications to accommodate their unique characteristics. Effective therapeutic strategies demand a profound understanding of the disease and consideration of clinical outcomes, physicochemical attributes of nanomaterials, nanobiointeractions, nanotoxicity, and regulatory compliance to ensure patient safety. This review explores the promise of nanomedicine in lung cancer treatment by capitalizing on its unique physicochemical properties. We address the multifaceted challenges of lung cancer and its tumor microenvironment and provide an overview of recent developments in nanoplatforms for early diagnosis and treatment that can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of life.

Treatment Outcomes From Erlotinib and Gefitinib in Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand From 2010 to 2020: Nationwide Whole-of-Patient-Population Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Health care system-wide outcomes from routine treatment with erlotinib and gefitinib are incompletely understood.

Objective

The aim of the study is to describe the effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during the first decade of their routine use for treating advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the entire cohort of patients treated in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Methods

Patients were identified, and data collated from national pharmaceutical dispensing, cancer registration, and mortality registration electronic databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. Time-to-treatment discontinuation and overall survival were measured from the date of first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Associations of treatment outcomes with baseline factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regressions.

Results

Overall, 752 patients were included who started treatment with erlotinib (n=418) or gefitinib (n=334) before October 2020. Median time-to-treatment discontinuation was 11.6 (95% CI 10.8-12.4) months, and median overall survival was 20.1 (95% CI 18.1-21.6) months. Shorter time-to-treatment discontinuation was independently associated with high socioeconomic deprivation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5 compared to the New Zealand Index of Deprivation 1-4 group), EGFR L858R mutations (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6 compared to exon 19 deletion), and distant disease at cancer diagnosis (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7 compared to localized or regional disease). The same factors were independently associated with shorter overall survival. Outcome estimates and predictors remained unchanged in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Outcomes from routine treatment with erlotinib and gefitinib in New Zealand patients with advanced EGFR-mutant nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer are comparable with those reported in randomized trials and other health care system-wide retrospective cohort studies. Socioeconomic status, EGFR mutation subtype, and disease extent at cancer diagnosis were independent predictors of treatment outcomes in that setting.

[Standard of care of EGFR mutated metastatic NSCLC in first treatment and beyond progression]

Among the oncogenic alterations of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the EGFR gene mutation is observed in 15% of patients in France, particularly among non-smokers and women. Treatment mainly relies on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR. In first-line metastatic treatment, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, has become the standard, improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to first- or second-generation TKIs. The combination of TKI/chemotherapy (osimertinib/carboplatine-pemetrexed) and TKI/bispecific antibodies (e.g., amivantamab/lazertinib) are alternatives under evaluation, with benefits in PFS but increased toxicity. In case of progression under first- or second-generation TKIs, the most common resistance is the T790M mutation, which can be targeted by osimertinib. For other resistances, platinum-based chemotherapy remains an option. Amivantamab combined with chemotherapy has shown an improvement in PFS in the second line and has early access in France. Other emerging approaches include conjugated antibodies (patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan) and next-generation TKIs. In the future, personalized treatment based on the molecular profile and early response to TKIs could optimize management, particularly by integrating predictive markers such as EGFR clearance under treatment.

Patients with non‑small cell lung cancer with the exon 21 L858R mutation: From distinct mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments (Review)

The most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations, which are more common in Asian (30-50%) than in Caucasian (10-15%) populations. Exon 19 deletion (ex19del) and exon 21 L858R (ex21 L858R) mutations account for ~45 and 40% of all EGFR mutations, respectively. Moreover, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be more effective and improve the quality of life of patients with NSCLC more than chemotherapy regimens. By contrast, patients with the ex21 L858R mutation may have a lower sensitivity and duration of response to EGFR-TKIs as well as a shorter survival compared with those with the ex19del mutation. However, current guidelines classify ex21 L858R and ex19del as the same condition and recommend the same treatment strategy for both. Aiming for precision medicine, the present review introduces and compares different EGFR-TKIs for the ex21 L858R mutation to assess more personalized treatment options for the population with this mutation.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To date, no direct comparisons have been performed to compare the effectiveness of all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) against EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib, befotertinib, furmonertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, and chemotherapy. Pooled estimations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were performed within the Bayesian framework.

Results

Twenty-three trials involving 11 treatments were included. All EGFR-TKIs improved PFS relative to chemotherapy, except for icotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.44). All EGFR-TKIs demonstrated significant ORR benefits over chemotherapy. Osimertinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with icotinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.86), gefitinib (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), and erlotinib (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-1.0). In addition, osimertinib showed favorable superiority in improving OS compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), gefitinib (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83), erlotinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89), and afatinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). Among these regimens, afatinib showed the highest ORR (cumulative probability: 96.96%). Icotinib was associated with minimal toxicity among the EGFR-TKIs, followed by furmonertinib and osimertinib. Moreover, the toxicity spectra differed among the EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses of patients with two common types of EGFR mutations indicated that furmonertinib possessed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with exon 19 deletion, and lazertinib showed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with Leu858Arg mutation. We also identified differences between EGFR-TKIs in prolonging PFS in patients with brain metastasis.

Conclusions

Osimertinib is the first choice of treatment with considerable efficacy and safety for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The treatments associated with the best PFS in patients with exon 19 deletions and Leu858Arg mutations were furmonertinib and lazertinib, respectively.

Nanomaterials for liver cancer targeting: research progress and future prospects

The incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer in China remain elevated. Although early-stage liver cancer is amenable to surgical resection, a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Currently, in addition to surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, the primary treatment modalities predominantly include chemotherapy. The widespread use of chemotherapy, which non-selectively targets both malignant and healthy cells, often results in substantial immunosuppression. Simultaneously, the accumulation of chemotherapeutic agents can readily induce drug resistance upon reaching the physiological threshold, thereby diminishing the efficacy of these treatments. Besides chemotherapy, there exist targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, the development of drug resistance remains an inevitable challenge. To address these challenges, we turn to nanomedicine, an emerging and widely utilized discipline that significantly influences medical imaging, antimicrobial strategies, drug delivery systems, and other related areas. Stable and safe nanomaterials serve as effective carriers for delivering anticancer drugs. They enhance the precision of drug targeting, improve bioavailability, and minimize damage to healthy cells. This review focuses on common nanomaterial carriers used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment over the past five years. The following is a summary of the three drugs: Sorafenib, Gefitinib, and lenvatinib. Each drug employs distinct nanomaterial delivery systems, which result in varying levels of bioavailability, drug release rates, and therapeutic efficacy.

Drug Resistance in Late-Stage Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After First-Line Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for late-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represented a drastic change in the treatment of late-stage lung cancer. Drug resistance develops after a certain period of first-line TKI treatment, which has led to decades of changing treatment guidelines for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This study discussed the potential mechanisms of drug resistance against first-line TKI treatment and potential successive treatment strategies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may play a role in the evaluation of drug resistance in first-line TKI treatment. Emerging combination regimens and ongoing trials were discussed. Potential future strategies for treatment and for the management of drug resistance were proposed in this study.

Targeted treatment and survival in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients - a nationwide and longitudinal study

Objectives

We aimed to describe treatment patterns, time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced non-squamous, EGFR+, ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC in Norway.

Materials and methods

We extracted data on patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with advanced non-squamous NSCLC between 2015 and 2022 from the Cancer Registry of Norway and data on cancer drug therapy from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry. ToT was measured from the date treatment was collected or administered until the last dispensing was depleted or last hospital drug administration. OS was measured from date of diagnosis until death.

Results

In total, 5,279 patients were included, of whom 449 EGFR+, 131 ALK+ and 38 ROS1+. 75% of EGFR+ patients, 88% of ALK+ patients, and 58% of ROS1+ patients received at least one systemic treatment within the first three months after diagnosis. Median follow-up was 13, 19, and 4 months for EGFR+, ALK+, and ROS1+, respectively. The median ToT in first line (1L) for EGFR+ patients was 11 months for osimertinib (CI: 10.1-NA) and 9 months (CI: 8.2-11.2) for afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib and gefitinib. For ALK+ patients, median ToT in 1L was 20 months (CI: 14.7-23.7for alectinib, 11 months (CI: 4.7-NA) for brigatinib, and 7 months (CI: 2.9-21.6) for crizotinib. For the five ROS1+ patients treated with crizotinib in 1L, median ToT was 5 months (CI: 2.4-NA). For all patients with a targetable genomic alteration, unadjusted median OS was higher (p-value = 0.025) for patients diagnosed in 2020-2022 (median OS: 23 months, CI: 19.5-NA) compared to patients diagnosed in 2015-2019 (median: 19 months, CI: 16.5-21.2).

Conclusions

ToT for targeted therapies was shorter than progression-free survival in clinical trials. However, patients eligible for targeted therapy still had a survival improvement during the study period.

The potential of lazertinib and amivantamab combination therapy as a treatment strategy for uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pose therapeutic challenge due to limited response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study presents preclinical evidence and mechanistic insights into the combination of lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI; and amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, for treating NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. The lazertinib-amivantamab combination demonstrates significant antitumor activity in patient-derived models with uncommon EGFR mutations either before treatment or after progressing on EGFR-TKIs. Lazertinib enhances the inhibitory capacity of amivantamab by increasing its on-target expression. Notably, the combination surpasses afatinib, a first-line treatment for uncommon EGFR mutations in NSCLC, in terms of in vivo efficacy. Promising clinical activity is also observed in two case studies of patients treated with this combination (NCT04077463). Our findings highlight the potential of the lazertinib-amivantamab combination as a therapeutic strategy for uncommon EGFR mutations, an area of unmet medical need, and support further clinical investigation.

Osimertinib in the Treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Early and Locally Advanced Stages of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was dramatically revolutionized by the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice, both in advanced and locally advanced/early stages. The present work focuses on osimertinib use in locally advanced and early NSCLC stages. Phase 3 clinical trials have supported the use of osimertinib as the new standard of care, both in the adjuvant setting and in locally advanced disease. The ADAURA study reported an overall survival (OS) advantage for adjuvant osimertinib in completely resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant tumors, while the LAURA study proved a statistically significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and a delay of central nervous system metastasis development in EGFR-mutant patients treated with osimertinib maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, data on osimertinib's efficacy are conflicting; therefore, the Neo-ADAURA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and common EGFR mutations. We discuss several issues that need to be clarified, such as the efficacy of the drug on uncommon mutations, the long-term impact on survival, and the management of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, we report the studies that are trying to identify potential biomarkers of response, such as the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), with the aim of selecting patients who will benefit most from osimertinib.

Non-small cell lung cancer and the tumor microenvironment: making headway from targeted therapies to advanced immunotherapy

Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology and tumor progression mechanisms, resulting in the development of novel strategies for early detection and wide-ranging care approaches. Since their introduction, over 20 years ago, targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for NSCLC. Nowadays, targeted therapies remain the gold standard for many patients, but still they suffer from many adverse effects, including unexpected toxicity and intrinsic acquired resistance mutations, which lead to relapse. The adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 2015, has offered exceptional survival benefits for patients without targetable alterations. Despite this notable progress, challenges remain, as not all patients respond favorably to ICIs, and resistance to therapy can develop over time. A crucial factor influencing clinical response to immunotherapy is the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is pivotal in orchestrating the interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system, influencing tumor growth and treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss how the understanding of this intricate relationship is crucial for the success of immunotherapy and survey the current state of immunotherapy intervention, with a focus on forthcoming and promising chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies in NSCLC. The TME sets major obstacles for CAR-T therapies, creating conditions that suppress the immune response, inducing T cell exhaustion. To enhance treatment efficacy, specific efforts associated with CAR-T cell therapy in NSCLC, should definitely focus TME-related immunosuppression and antigen escape mechanisms, by combining CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint blockades.

Real-world data of dacomitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Dacomitinib demonstrated superior survival benefit compared to gefitinib as a first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with common EGFR mutations through ARCHER 1050. However, there is limited real-world data concerning its efficacy and safety. This study included patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received dacomitinib as a first-line treatment between January 2021 and December 2022 at Samsung Medical Center and St. Vincent's Hospital. This study assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety profile of dacomitinib, and subsequent treatments after dacomitinib failure. In total, 153 patients were included in this study. Exon 19 deletion was observed in 50.3% of patients, while the L858R mutation in exon 21 was observed in 46.4% of patients. 45.1% of patients had brain metastasis. The ORR was 84.3%. The median follow-up duration was 16.9 months, with a median PFS of 16.7 months (95% CI, 14.4 to 25.2). Based on the type of EGFR mutation, the median PFS was 18.1 months (95% CI, 14.5 to NE) in patients with exon 19 deletion, and 15.9 months (95% CI, 12.5 to NE) in patients with L858R mutation. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 7.2% of patients. Initially administered at a dose of 45 mg, dose reduction was necessary for 85.6% of patients, with a final dosage of 30 mg in 49.0% and 15 mg in 36.6% of cases. Out of the 60 patients who experienced disease progression, 31 underwent tissue re-biopsy and 25 underwent liquid biopsy. Overall, T790M mutation was detected in 40.9% of patients who progressed after dacomitinib. The survival benefit of dacomitinib has been demonstrated, indicating its promising efficacy in a real-world setting. The detection rate of the T790M mutation after dacomitinib treatment failure was comparable to that of other second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Targeted therapy for older patients with an oncogene driven non-small cell lung cancer: Recommendations from a SIOG expert group

Lung cancer is mostly a disease of aging with approximately half of newly diagnosed patients being 70 years or older. Treatment decisions in this population pose unique challenges because of their heterogeneity with regards to daily functioning, cognition, organ function, comorbidities and polypharmacy, their underrepresentation in clinical trials and the impact of treatment on patient-centered outcomes, particularly in frail patients. The advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular profiling has allowed for the identification of actionable genomic alterations and targeted therapies have become standard of care for oncogene-driven NSCLC, significantly improving prognosis and quality of life. However, the data on the efficacy and tolerability of these treatments in older patients remain sparse. This review, conducted by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) NSCLC task force, examines the available literature on the use of targeted therapies in patients aged 70 years or older with oncogene-driven NSCLC. The task force's expert recommendations aim to guide treatment decisions for older patients with oncogene driven NSCLC.

Thoracic Radiotherapy Improves the Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Oligo-Organ Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

This multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial (Northern Radiation Oncology Group of China-002) focused on patients with oligo-organ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. We aimed to investigate whether first-line concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), compared with TKIs alone, could achieve better survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients in the TKI plus TRT group received 60 Gy to primary lung tumor and positive regional lymph nodes. Radiotherapy for metastases to other sites was determined by clinicians. The primary end point was the progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The first and second interim analyses were performed in March 2021 and March 2022.

RESULTS

Between April 14, 2016, and February 25, 2022, a total of 118 patients were enrolled. Compared with the TKI alone group, the TKI plus TRT group achieved significantly better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .004) and OS (HR, 0.62; P = .029). The median PFS was 10.6 months in the TKI alone group and 17.1 months in the TKI plus TRT group. The median OS was 26.2 months and 34.4 months in the TKI alone group and TKI plus TRT group, respectively. The TKI plus TRT group showed better local control but was associated with a higher incidence of severe TRAEs (11.9% v 5.1%).

CONCLUSION

For patients with EGFR-mutated oligo-organ metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs, concurrent TRT improves the PFS and OS, and TRAEs are acceptable and tolerable.

The changing treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The discovery of the association between EGFR mutations and the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, third-generation EGFR TKIs, which are often characterized by potent central nervous system penetrance, are the standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Rational combinations of third-generation EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs, chemotherapy, the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody amivantamab or local tumour ablation are being investigated as strategies to delay drug resistance and increase clinical benefit. Furthermore, EGFR TKIs are being evaluated in patients with early stage or locally advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, with the ambitious aim of achieving cancer cure. Despite the inevitable challenge of acquired resistance, emerging treatments such as new TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, new immunotherapeutic approaches and targeted protein degraders have shown considerable promise in patients with progression of EGFR-mutant NSCLC on or after treatment with EGFR TKIs. In this Review, we describe the current first-line treatment options for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, provide an overview of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs and explore novel promising treatment strategies. We also highlight potential avenues for future research that are aimed at improving the survival outcomes of patients with this disease.

First-line treatment for advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

Several head-to-head meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (M+) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation encompassing multiple treatment strategies. Our objective is to conduct a network meta-analysis that includes various treatment modalities, enabling both direct and indirect comparisons for a more thorough assessment.

Methods

We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Stata 15.0 and R 4.3.2 software were utilized for the network meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 30 RCTs, comprising 8654 participants, were included. The study encompassed the following 19 treatments: Chemotherapy; Afatinib; Afatinib + Cetuximab; Apatinib + Gefitinib; Befotertinib; Cetuximab + Chemotherapy; Erlotinib; Erlotinib + Bevacizumab; Erlotinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib; Gefitinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib + Olaparib; Icotinib; Icotinib + Chemotherapy; Lazertinib; Naquotinib; Osimertinib; Osimertinib + Bevacizumab; Osimertinib + Chemotherapy. The network meta-analysis results indicated that, in terms of PFS, Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) were the most effective. Regarding OS, Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) emerged as the top three options. Afatinib (SUCRAs: 92.27%) was associated with the best ORR improvement. For ≥3AEs, Afatinib (SUCRAs: 74.93%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 69.42%) were likely the best choices.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that, considering both survival and safety, Osimertinib stands out as the preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M + advanced or metastatic nsq-NSCLC. Notably, the combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy demonstrated superior survival benefits. However, due to the limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions await further validation through more high-quality research.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024562981, identifier CRD42024562981.

First-line zorifertinib for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases: The phase 3 EVEREST trial

BACKGROUND

Zorifertinib (AZD3759), an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with high blood-brain barrier penetration capability, demonstrated promising intracranial and systemic antitumor activity in phase 1 and 2 studies in central nervous system (CNS)-metastatic patients.

METHODS

In this phase 3 EVEREST trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03653546), patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, advanced treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and non-irradiated symptomatic or asymptomatic CNS metastases were randomized (1:1) to zorifertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; control). The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST1.1.

FINDINGS

Overall, 439 patients were randomized (zorifertinib n = 220; control n = 219). Most patients had the EGFR L858R mutation (55%) or >3 CNS lesions (54%). Median PFS was significantly longer with zorifertinib versus control (9.6 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.719; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.580-0.893; p = 0.0024). Zorifertinib significantly prolonged intracranial PFS versus control (BICR per modified RECIST1.1: HR, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.352-0.619; investigator per RANO-BM: HR, 0.627; 95% CI, 0.466-0.844). Overall survival (OS) was immature; the estimated median OS was 37.3 months with zorifertinib and 31.8 months with control (HR, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.524-1.283) in patients subsequently treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Safety profiles were consistent with previously reported data for zorifertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Zorifertinib significantly improved systemic and intracranial PFS versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs; adverse events were manageable. Sequential use of zorifertinib and third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed the potential to prolong patients' survival. The results favor zorifertinib as a novel, well-validated first-line option for CNS-metastatic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Alpha Biopharma (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd., China.

Coptisine inhibits esophageal carcinoma growth by modulating pyroptosis via inhibition of HGF/c-Met signaling

Esophageal carcinoma is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwide. The present study aimed to investigate the mechanism by which the natural compound coptisine affects pyroptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The expression of c-Met in ESCC patients was assessed by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays. Natural drugs that bind to c-Met were identified by screening and molecular docking. The effect of coptisine on the proliferation of ESCC cells was detected by CCK-8 and colony formation assays. Cell cycle progression and cell apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry. The levels of mRNAs related to pyroptosis and miR-21 after coptisine treatment were assessed via real-time quantitative PCR. The effect of pyroptosis was evaluated by reactive oxygen species level detection and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. The expression of proteins related to pyroptosis and the HGF/c-Met pathway was detected by western blotting. A xenograft tumor model was established, and the inhibitory effect of coptisine was evaluated by observing tumor growth. The results showed that the highly expressed protein c-Met in esophageal cancer could bind with coptisine. Coptisine inhibited c-Met phosphorylation and proliferation in ESCC cells. Furthermore, coptisine inhibited the expression of downstream proteins of the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway and induced ROS generation. Tumor xenograft experiments demonstrated that coptisine effectively inhibited tumor growth by reducing the levels of pyroptosis-associated proteins. In conclusion, these findings indicate that inhibition of the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway suppresses pyroptosis to enhance the antitumor effect of coptisine in ESCC and support the potential use of coptisine for EC treatment.

Matters of the Heart: Cardiotoxicity Related to Target Therapy in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of each one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies, every drug has its own specific safety profile. In addition, this safety profile could not fully emerge from clinical trials data, as patients in clinical practice usually have more comorbidities and frailties. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known and established adverse event of anti-cancer therapies. However, only recently it has become a central topic for targeted therapies in NSCLC, due to the unknown real range and frequency. Management of this toxicity begins with prevention, and must balance the need of continuing an effective anticancer treatment versus low risk of even fatal events and the preservation of long-term quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge focusing on currently used targeted therapies in NSCLC.

Gambogic Acid Induces Ferroptosis via miR-1291/FOXA2 Axis in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, posing a significant threat to human health. Recently, gambogic acid (GA) has garnered attention for its anticancer properties in GC. However, it remains unclear whether GA can regulate other forms of cell death beyond apoptosis. In this study, we found that GA inhibited proliferation and induced ferroptosis in GC cells. Western blot analysis was employed to assess ferroptosis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-related proteins, as well as forkhead box A2 (FOXA2) expression. Additionally, malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels were measured following GA treatment, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to evaluate miR-1291 expression. Our findings revealed that GA treatment elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and promoted intracellular Fe[Formula: see text], MDA, and GSH accumulation. Furthermore, GA upregulated SLC7A11 and ferritin expression while suppressing glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) in AGS and HGC27 cells, suggesting its role in ferroptosis induction. Notably, GA increased miR-1291 levels and downregulated FOXA2 expression. Subsequent analyses showed FOXA2 as a direct target of miR-1291. Functional experiments involving miR-1291 and FOXA2 knockdown or overexpression further suggested that the miR-1291/FOXA2 axis mediates ferroptosis. Finally, tumor xenograft models showed that GA effectively inhibited tumor growth by inducing ferroptosis. In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence that GA induces ferroptosis in GC through the miR-1291/FOXA2 axis, highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy and preventive target for gastric cancer treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs as First-Line Therapy in NSCLC Patients Harboring Non-Ex 20 Ins Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective Study in China

BACKGROUND

Uncommon EGFR mutations are a kind of heterogeneous group of mutations with various responses to EGFR-TKIs and are often excluded from most prospective clinical trials. In this real-world retrospective study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy or various generations of EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC Chinese patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We enrolled 139 NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations in this study retrospectively. Patients' clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of different first-line therapies were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Our data reviewed that for first-line therapy, NSCLC patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations benefited more from EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy. Afatinib performed with great efficacy for the majority of non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5 months, mOS = 20.8 months), especially in L861Q mutation (mPFS = 18.4 months). Osimertinib also demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0 months, mOS = 21.0 months), especially in those without L861Q and G719X mutations (mPFS = 12.1 months). When treated with afatinib, patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations should pay attention to the management of safety, especially for gastrointestinal-related AE and rash, while osimertinib was safer.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account both efficacy and safety, afatinib and osimertinib are better choices than chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations. L861Q showed a trend toward a better response to afatinib, while in those without L861Q and G719X mutations, osimertinib might be a better choice. Safety also should be a concern when choosing EGFR-TKI for treatment, patients should pay attention to the management of safety when using afatinib while osimertinib is safer.

Femoral bone metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in EGFR-TKIs-treated patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) have higher frequencies of bone metastases than those of wild type; however, the metastatic pattern and influence on clinical outcome remain unclear.

Objectives

To analyze the association between bone metastatic sites and the clinical efficacy of the first-, second-, and third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), in these patients.

Design

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with advanced-NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation, who were treated by EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at five medical institutions (N = 411), were retrospectively assessed for bone metastatic sites, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Bone metastases were found in 41.1% of the patients at diagnosis, including 13.1%, 8.0%, and 20.0 for single, double, and multiple lesions (⩾3), respectively. The vertebra (76.3%) and pelvis (60.9%) were the most frequent metastatic sites. Femoral-, sternum-, and scapula-metastases were remarkably increased in the patients with multiple-bone metastases. In the EGFR-mutant NSCLC patient treated with osimertinib, both the OS and the PFS of the patients with femoral bone metastasis were significantly shorter than those of the patients without femoral bone metastasis (OS: not reached vs 12.1 months, p < 0.0001; and PFS: 17.2 vs 9.3 months, p < 0.0018). Furthermore, a multivariable Cox regression analysis, including several poor prognostic factors, such as L858R mutation and liver metastasis, demonstrated that femoral bone metastasis was a statistically independent predictor of OS.

Conclusion

Femoral bone metastasis is associated with poor survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who were treated with EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, and is an independent prognostic factor of OS.

What is the optimal first-line regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There are currently various tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimens available, and it can be challenging for clinicians to determine the most effective and safe option due to the lack of direct comparisons between these regimens. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of distinct regimens to determine the optimal regimen for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and international conference databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to 02 April 2024 for collecting data regarding efficacy and safety from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following literature screening and data extraction, a NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety among 21 regimens with a random-effects consistency model in a Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation technique within the GEMTC package.

RESULTS

A total of 35 RCTs were included, involving 9718 individuals and 21 regimens. Compared with other interventions, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs, especially osimertinib plus ramucirumab, showed the most favorable PFS prolongation in overall patients. Consistently, subgroup analyses showed that third-generation TKIs-based combination regimens were superior to other regimens in most prespecified subgroups with distinct clinicopathological characteristics. In terms of overall survival, despite the combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs also showing relatively superior outcomes, erlotinib plus chemotherapy and gefitinib plus chemotherapy were ranked more favorably. In terms of safety profile, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events compared with other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Our study concluded that combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs (osimertinib plus ramucirumab, osimertinib plus chemotherapy, osimertinib plus bevacizumab, amivantamab plus lazertinib and aumolertinib plus apatinib) could be the new and clinically preferable first-line, standard of care for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023480596).

Rapid, potent, and persistent covalent chemical probes to deconvolute PI3Kα signaling

Chemical probes have gained importance in the elucidation of signal transduction in biology. Insufficient selectivity and potency, lack of cellular activity and inappropriate use of chemical probes has major consequences on interpretation of biological results. The catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase α (PI3Kα) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer, but fast-acting, high-quality probes to define PI3Kα's specific function to clearly separate it from other class I PI3K isoforms, are not available. Here, we present a series of novel covalent PI3Kα-targeting probes with optimized intracellular target access and kinetic parameters. On-target TR-FRET and off-target assays provided relevant kinetic parameters (k chem, k inact and K i) to validate our chemical probes. Additional intracellular nanoBRET tracer displacement measurements showed rapid diffusion across the cell membrane and extremely fast target engagement, while investigations of signaling downstream of PI3Kα via protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and forkhead box O (FOXO) revealed blunted pathway activity in cancer cell lines with constitutively activated PI3Kα lasting for several days. In contrast, persistent PI3Kα inhibition was rapidly bypassed by other class I PI3K isoforms in cells lacking functional phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Comparing the rapidly-diffusing, fast target-engaging chemical probe 9 to clinical reversible PI3Kα-selective inhibitors alpelisib, inavolisib and 9r, a reversible analogue of 9, revealed 9's superior potency to inhibit growth (up to 600-fold) associated with sustained suppression of PI3Kα signaling in breast cancer cell lines. Finally, using a simple washout protocol, the utility of the highly-selective covalent PI3Kα probe 9 was demonstrated by the quantification of the coupling of insulin, EGF and CXCL12 receptors to distinct PI3K isoforms for signal transduction in response to ligand-dependent activation. Collectively, these findings along with the novel covalent chemical probes against PI3Kα provide insights into isoform-specific functions in cancer cells and highlight opportunities to achieve improved selectivity and long-lasting efficacy.

Comparison of treatment regimens for unresectable stage III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to bring survival benefits to patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in PACIFIC study ( evaluating durvalumab in patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC who did not have disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy). We aimed to explore whether locally advanced inoperable patients with EGFR mutations benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the optimal treatment regimen.

METHODS

We screened the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022 and performed a meta-analysis based on a Bayesian framework, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 1156 patients were identified in 16 studies that included 6 treatment measures, including CRT, CRT followed by durvalumab (CRT-Durva), TKI monotherapy, radiotherapy combined with TKI (RT-TKI), CRT combined with TKI (CRT-TKI), and TKI combined with durvalumab (TKI-Durva). The PFS after the TKI-containing treatments was significantly longer than after the TKI-free treatments (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66). The PFS of TKI monotherapy was significantly longer than CRT (HR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.50-0.87) but shorter than RT-TKI (HR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.17-2.67). Furthermore, the PFS of RT-TKI or CRT-TKI were both significantly longer than that of CRT or CRT-Durva. RT-TKI ranked first in the Bayesian ranking, with the longest OS (60.8 months, 95% CI = 37.2-84.3 months) and the longest PFS (21.5 months, 95% CI, 15.4-27.5 months) in integrated analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

For unresectable stage III EGFR mutant NSCLC, RT and TKI are both essential. Based on the current evidence, RT-TKI brings the best survival advantage, while CRT-TKI needs further estimation. Large randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to explore the appropriate application sequences of TKI, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; No. CRD42022298490.

Real-World Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Impact of Genomic Testing and Targeted Therapies in a Latin American Middle-Income Country

PURPOSE

Targeted therapies are indicated for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and driver tumor mutations. However, real-world studies on the survival benefits of these agents are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of targeted therapies matched to a genomic alteration on the survival of patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 446 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent next-generation sequencing between 2016 and 2023 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the PFS and OS were 10.71 months (95% CI, 9.35 to 12.06) and 47.77 months (95% CI, 29.67 to 65.86). PFS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (19.41 months [95% CI, 14.27 to 24.55]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (6.4 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.4]) or not treated with targeted therapies (6.6 months [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.89]). Similarly, OS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (89.69 months [95% CI, 45.54 to 133.84]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (17.11 months [95% CI, 8.65 to 25.57]) or not treated with targeted therapies (22.3 months [95% CI, 12.48 to 32.1]). Survival gains were driven by significant improvements in PFS and OS in patients with EGFR and ALK mutations.

CONCLUSION

This real-world data analysis demonstrated that targeted therapies improve the survival of patients with NSCLC with actionable mutations, which supports a recommendation for widening access to broad-based genomic testing and targeted therapies.

Prognostic Factors in Japanese EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer has improved significantly since the advent of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient characteristics, EGFR genotype, therapeutic agents, and the prognosis of the patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 198 Japanese patients with unresectable EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs at Toho University Sakura Medical Center from April 2006 to December 2021. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who received osimertinib had a significantly longer OS than did those not receiving it (median OS, 36.2 versus 20.7 months; p < 0.001).There were significant differences in OS between patients with EGFR mutation who received osimertinib as first-line treatment, T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib as second- or later-line treatment, and those who did not receive it (median OS, 28.2 versus 40.2 versus 20.7 months; p = 0.003). However, in T790M-negative patients, no significant difference in OS was noted between those who did and did not receive osimertinib as post-treatment (median OS, 28.0 versus 40.0 months; p = 0.619). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that osimertinib treatment was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.480; 95% confidence interval, 0.326-0.707; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The patients who were T790M-positive in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and were given osimertinib as the second or later line treatment had a better prognosis than the patients who were T790M-negative in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and could not receive osimertinib.

Advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR 19-del mutation transforms into squamous cell carcinoma after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

In this editorial we comment on the article by Ji et al. We focus specifically on the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment and the development of drug resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

MDM2 drives resistance to Osimertinib by contextually disrupting FBW7-mediated destruction of MCL-1 protein in EGFR mutant NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Overcoming resistance to Osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is clinically challenging because the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) has been extensively described as a tumor promotor in various malignancies, mainly through a negative regulatory machinery on the p53 tumor suppressor. However, the significance of MDM2 on the sensitivity to Osimertinib has not been described.

METHODS

Osimertinib resistant cells were generated by standard dose escalation strategy and individual resistant clones were isolated for MDM2 testing. The MDM2 and its mutant constructs (ΔPBD, ΔRING, C464A) were introduced into PC-9, HCC827 and H1975 cells and evaluated for the sensitivity to Osimertinib by MTT assay, colony formation, EdU assay and TUNEL assay. MDM2 expression in resistant cells was manipulated by pharmacological and molecular approaches, respectively. Proteins that were implicated in PI3K/Akt, MAPK/Erk and apoptosis signaling were measured by Western blot analysis. Candidate proteins that interacted with MDM2 were captured by immunoprecipitation and probed with indicated antibodies.

RESULTS

In comparison with parental PC-9 cells, the PC-9 OR resistant cells expressed high level of MDM2. Ectopic expression of MDM2 in PC-9, HCC827 and H1975 sensitive cells generated an Osimertinib resistant phenotype, regardless of p53 status. MDM2 promoted resistance to Osimertinib through a PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk-independent machinery, in contrast, MDM2 selectively stabilized MCL-1 protein to arrest Osimertinib-induced cancer cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, MDM2 acted as a E3 ligase to ubiquitinate FBW7, a well-established E3 ligase for MCL-1, at Lys412 residue, which resulted in FBW7 destruction and MCL-1 stabilization. Targeting MDM2 to augment MCL-1 protein breakdown overcame resistance to Osimertinib in vitro and in vivo. Finally, the clinical relevance of MDM2-FBW7-MCL-1 regulatory axis was validated in mouse xenograft tumor model and in NSCLC specimen.

CONCLUSION

Overexpression of MDM2 is a novel resistant mechanism to Osimertinib in EGFR mutant NSCLC. MDM2 utilizes its E3 ligase activity to provoke FBW7 destruction and sequentially leads to MCL-1 stabilization. Cancer cells with aberrant MDM2 state are refractory to apoptosis induction and elicit a resistant phenotype to Osimertinib. Therefore, targeting MDM2 would be a feasible approach to overcome resistance to Osimertinib in EGFR mutant NSCLC.