Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Insights on molecular testing, targeted therapies, and future directions from a multidisciplinary panel

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a histologically and molecularly diverse group of malignancies arising from the gallbladder and the ductal epithelium of the biliary tree. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver malignancy in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins is the only recognized curative treatment option for iCCA; however, most patients will present with advanced or unresectable disease. The clinical presentation is largely non-specific, with the characteristic symptoms of biliary malignancies being less frequent than extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clinical management in iCCA is heavily influenced by the molecular profile of individual tumors. Hence, pathologists must exercise caution to prevent tissue exhaustion during the diagnostic workup of iCCA and ensure the availability of tissue samples for molecular testing. Establishing standardized procedures for obtaining adequate tissue and using molecular testing is vital. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a potential alternative to tissue-based analysis, especially in cases with insufficient tissue samples. Drugs targeting alterations in NTRK, IDH1, BRAF, FGFR2, and HER2 are commonly utilized. Targeting the MDM2-p53 pathway represents an avenue for future investigations in advanced BTCs. Liver transplantation and locoregional therapies are treatment modalities that may represent curative intent treatments for patients with unresectable disease, and larger explorations are warranted. Akin to HCC, a multidisciplinary team-based approach is essential for patients with BTCs. Through this narrative review of literature, we provide an overview of the current management of iCCA with perspectives regarding future directions in the clinical management of iCCA. We also present patient perspectives regarding the importance of patient advocacy and access to advances in clinical research for patients with BTCs.

Recurrence-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Upfront Surgery: An International Multi-institutional Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a validated surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) among patients undergoing upfront surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been defined. We sought to evaluate the correlation between RFS and OS after surgical resection for ICC. We hypothesized that RFS was a reliable surrogate endpoint for OS among patients with ICC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent surgery for ICC between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The correlation between RFS and OS was assessed using rank correlation. Landmark analysis evaluated concordance between survival at 5 years and recurrence status at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 54 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Among 1541 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection, the median RFS and OS were 22.6 months and 41.5 months, respectively. A moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS was identified (ρ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.82). In the landmark analysis, the concordance between 5-year OS after surgery and recurrence status at different time points (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 54 months) was 60.7%, 72.0%, 81.4%, 83.1%, 83.0%, and 82.5%, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated that the prediction of OS based on RFS increased with time and plateaued 3 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ICC, there was a moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS. Three-year RFS may be a reliable surrogate endpoint to predict 5-year OS and should be considered in future trial design.

Identification of metabolites associated with capecitabine‑induced hand‑foot syndrome using untargeted metabolomics in patients with cancer

Hand‑foot syndrome (HFS) is defined as a major adverse reaction to capecitabine; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In total, 85 patients who were taking oral capecitabine were included in the present study and these patients were divided into HFS‑positive and HFS‑negative groups. Serum samples were collected from patients and an untargeted metabolomics analysis was conducted using ultra‑high performance liquid chromatography‑mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of metabolites in the serum of patients that developed HFS in response to capecitabine treatment. A total of 193 differential metabolites were identified, with 134 upregulated and 59 downregulated. Bioinformatics analysis revealed four novel metabolites that may be associated with HFS. Subsequent in vitro experiments were conducted to explore the damaging effects of capecitabine and its associated metabolites on human adult keratinocyte cell line, TPA‑treated (HaCaT) cells. Results of the present study revealed that aciclovir and lamivudine affected cellular damage at the highest level. In conclusion, the present study aimed to systematically and comprehensively describe the metabolites present in patients with capecitabine‑induced HFS and may further the current understanding of the capecitabine pathways that play a key role in HFS.

Durable complete response to sintilimab plus chemotherapy in gallbladder cancer with extensive metastasis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. The prognosis for advanced gallbladder cancer remains poor, with limited options for effective treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 65-year-old male patient presented with a soft tissue mass in the gallbladder. Following laparoscopic exploration, he underwent radical surgery for gallbladder cancer, with the tumor staged as pT2N1M0 (stage III). Post-surgery, the patient received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, one month later, over 60 metastatic lesions were detected in the liver, lungs, and lymph nodes. In response to the widespread metastasis, he underwent six cycles of combination therapy consisting of sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin. After two cycles, a partial response was achieved. Maintenance therapy was initiated with a combination of sintilimab and albumin-bound paclitaxel for four cycles. Monotherapy with sintilimab was continued thereafter until October 2023. Complete remission was confirmed in September 2021. The patient sustained this complete response for more than three years, including an eleven-month period without disease progression following the discontinuation of sintilimab. Genetic analysis revealed a tumor mutational burden of 15.4 mutations/megabase, which indicates a potentially favorable response to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates the potential of combining immunotherapy (sintilimab) with chemotherapy to achieve durable remission in metastatic gallbladder cancer, even in a patient with extensive metastasis. In addition, it indicated the importance of tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy.

Minimally invasive vs. open radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: 30-day NSQIP outcomes analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical cholecystectomy (RC) is the standard procedure for gallbladder cancer (GBC) tumors stage TIb or higher. Advances in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offer the potential for improved outcomes compared to the traditional open surgery. While small series have demonstrated the feasibility of an MIS approach, a detailed comparison of outcomes between the two approaches is lacking.

METHODS

The National Surgeon Quality Improvement Database (2010-2021) was queried to identify patients undergoing RC for GBC. Patients with T1b or higher disease were included. Thirty-day all-cause mortality and morbidity were evaluated. To assess associations between outcomes and covariates, we estimated risk ratios and risk differences using generalized linear models and adjusted the estimates using inverse propensity of treatment weights.

RESULTS

1303 patients were identified (239 MIS, 1064 Open) with 178 excluded due to the need for biliary reconstruction. There was no difference in the primary outcomes of mortality or major morbidity between the groups with four deaths occurring overall and major morbidity rates of MIS = 2.26% and Open = 2.45% (p = 0.7924). Patients who underwent MIS had significantly fewer days in the hospital (3.00 vs.5.00, p < 0.001). After weighting, the MIS group had significantly fewer blood transfusions (2.12% vs. 6.73%, p = 0.009) and superficial surgical site infections (0.45% vs. 3.29%, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting MIS for RC as a potential alternative to open resections.

Biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers comprise a heterogeneous collection of malignancies usually described as cholangiocarcinoma of the intra- or extrahepatic bile duct, including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

A review of pertinent parts of the ESSO core curriculum for the UEMS diploma targets (Fellowships exam, EBSQ), based on updated and available guidelines for diagnosis, surgical treatment and oncological management of cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Following the outline from the ESSO core curriculum we present the epidemiology and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma, as well as the rationale for the current diagnosis, staging, (neo-)adjuvant treatment, surgical management, and short- and long-term outcomes. The available guidelines and consensus reports (i.e. NCCN, BGS and ESMO guidelines) are referred to. Recognition of biliary tract cancers as separate entities of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, the perihilar and distal bile duct as well as the gallbladder is important for proper management, as they each provide distinct clinical, molecular and treatment profiles to consider.

CONCLUSION

Core competencies in knowledge to the diagnosis, management and outcomes of biliary tract cancers are presented.

The Influence of Tumor Burden Score and Lymph Node Metastasis on the Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

While postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is generally recommended for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its benefit remains debated. This study aimed to identify patients that may benefit from AC following liver resection of ICC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for ICC between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Individual multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the interaction between each prognostic factor and the effect of AC on survival.

RESULTS

Among 1412 patients, 431 (30.5%) received AC. Both higher tumor burden score (TBS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.00; p = 0.033) and metastatic lymph node status (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89; p = 0.014) demonstrated interactions with the survival benefit from receipt of AC. Interaction plots highlighted how AC was associated with improved survival beyond a TBS of approximately 6. Notably, among 555 (39.3%) patients with TBS <6 and N0 or Nx status, 5-year overall survival (OS) was no different between patients who received AC versus individuals who did not (55.1% [95% CI 48.9-62.1] vs. 58.7% [95% CI 49.8-69.2]; p = 0.900). In contrast, among 857 (60.7%) patients with TBS ≥6 or N1 status, AC was associated with improved 5-year OS (30.7% [95% CI 26.2-36.0] vs. 33.0% [95% CI 26.9-40.5]; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

TBS and lymph node status may be useful in a multidisciplinary setting to inform decisions about AC planning for ICC patients following curative-intent resection.

Prognostic significance of the cachexia index for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the preoperative cachexia index for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 236 patients who underwent radical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from September 2002 to December 2020. The cachexia index was calculated as follows: (skeletal muscle index × albumin level)/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, with sex-specific cutoff values determined via receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of 3-year survival data. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the low-cachexia index (n = 95) and high-cachexia index (n = 141) groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

The low-cachexia index group was characterized by greater carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (56 vs 31 U/mL, P = .024) and greater proportion of preoperative biliary drainage (84% vs 70%, P = .013). The low-cachexia index group underwent vascular resection and reconstruction more frequently (47% vs 29%, P = .006) and had a greater rate of lymph node metastasis (54% vs 35%, P = .005). The median overall survival and relapse-free survival times of the low-cachexia index group were significantly worse than those of the high-cachexia index group (overall survival, 29.0 vs 47.4 months, P < .001; relapse-free survival, 17.2 vs 33.1 months, P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that a preoperative cachexia index (hazard ratio for overall survival, 0.95, P = .008; hazard ratio for relapse-free survival, 0.95, P = .017) and high preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (hazard ratio for overall survival, 1.01, P = .002; hazard ratio for relapse-free survival, 1.01, P = .012) were prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The cachexia index may be a useful biomarker for the prediction of tumor aggressiveness and prognosis before perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection.

Pathological complete response following addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with Lynch syndrome-associated mismatch repair deficiency

A 64-year-old man with a history of surgery for rectal cancer and colon cancer was referred for a hepatic mass identified on computed tomography (CT). He was diagnosed with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with perihilar and para-aortic lymph node metastases. After 4 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy (GC therapy), follow-up CT showed slight enlargement of the primary tumor and a slight increase in carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9. Genetic testing was performed during GC therapy based on the strong family history of cancer. Germline pathogenic variant in MLH1 was identified, leading to the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR: loss of MLH1/PMS2). Durvalumab was added to GC therapy following regulatory approval in Japan. A significant reduction in tumor size and CA19-9 was observed after only two cycles of GC and durvalumab therapy. Continuous improvement was observed, and conversion surgery involving liver resection, partial inferior vena cava resection, and perihilar and para-aortic lymph nodes dissection was performed with curative intent. No malignant cells were found in any of the resected specimens, consistent with pathological complete response.

Neoadjuvant treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer: A systematic review

Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) diagnosed post-histopathological examination of gallbladders removed assuming benign gallstone disease constitutes a significant proportion of GBC patients. Most iGBC patients present with early-stage disease. The standard care for localized (non-metastatic) iGBC includes a reoperation for complete extended (radical) cholecystectomy involving liver resection and lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy. However, a major drawback of this approach is the high recurrence rate within six months post-radical surgery, which undermines the benefits of the extensive procedure; notably, most recurrences are distant, highlighting the efficacy of systemic therapy. Similar to other gastrointestinal cancers, there appears to be a potential for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy) before reoperative surgery in iGBC cases. The premise that neoadjuvant systemic therapy aids in selecting diseases with more favorable biological characteristics and addresses micro-metastatic disease appears applicable to iGBC as well. This systematic review examines the current evidence supporting or refuting neoadjuvant therapy and discusses criteria for selecting patients who would derive significant benefit, along with proposing an optimal chemotherapy regimen for iGBC patients. Improved outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing reoperation after 4 to 14 weeks following the initial cholecystectomy compared to immediate reoperation. Limited, yet promising, evidence supports the use of 3 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to reoperative surgery in select high-risk iGBC cases.

National Cancer Database analysis of gallbladder cancer: Evaluating survival benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

For locally advanced gallbladder cancer, previous clinical studies have demonstrated that chemotherapy results in significant survival benefits when compared to surgery alone. However, data demonstrating a similar survival benefit with early-stage gallbladder cancer is limited. This study seeks to evaluate the impact chemotherapy has on survival in patients with early-stage gallbladder cancer using a large, multi-institution database.

AIM

To investigate the survival benefit of chemotherapy in patients with stage II gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multivariable analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017 to evaluate the effect that chemotherapy has on the survival of patients with stage II gallbladder cancer. Our objective was to determine if there were any statistically significant survival differences between those who received surgery and chemotherapy vs those who only underwent surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 899 patients with stage II gallbladder cancer, 328 patients had undergone chemotherapy and surgery. The average overall survival for those who had surgery and chemotherapy vs only surgery was 52.6 months and 51.1 months, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.2). In the secondary analysis, the surgical group who had a liver resection had better overall survival (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Practitioners should carefully consider chemotherapy for early-stage gallbladder cancer, as risks may outweigh survival benefits, and surgeons should also consider liver resections as part of their surgical management.

Effect of simple vs. extended cholecystectomy on prognosis of T1b gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background & aims

Extended cholecystectomy (EC) is recommended for T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC), but the optimal surgical procedure for T1b GBC remains controversial. This study aims to compare the prognosis of T1b GBC patients who underwent simple cholecystectomy (SC) vs. EC from a long-term survival perspective.

Methods

We performed a systematic search up to August 06, 2024, using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). We evaluated the quality of the studies included and the risk of bias, calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DSS and conducted the sensitivity analysis.

Results

A total of 8 retrospective studies involving 2,097 T1b GBC patients (SC = 1,263, EC = 408) were included. The pooled result of OS showed that the EC group had a significantly better OS than the SC group (pooled HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002). The pooled result of DSS indicated that EC significantly improved DSS of T1b GBC compared to SC (pooled HR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.29-0.77; P = 0.003).

Conclusions

EC should be chosen as the optimal surgical procedure for patients with T1b GBC from the standpoint of long-term postoperative survival. However, further analysis of more comprehensive studies will be necessary in the future to improve the quality of evidence.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023449431, PROSPERO CRD42023449431.

Efficacy and safety of combining tislelizumab with capecitabine compared to capecitabine alone in the adjuvant treatment of biliary tract cancers: rationale and protocol design for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy with capecitabine is recommended to improve survival for resectable biliary tract cancers (BTC) patients. Considering that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit over chemotherapy alone in advanced stage BTC, we aim to evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of tislelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone as an adjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC.

METHOD

This multicenter randomized controlled study will include a total of 140 patients who will have undergone curative resection within 4 weeks prior to enrollment and will have been pathologically diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma (including intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) or muscle-invasive gallbladder carcinoma. Those patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to tislelizumab combined with capecitabine or capecitabine alone group. The primary endpoint will be recurrence free survival (RFS), the secondary endpoints will be overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Multi-omics biomarkers will be assessed as exploratory objective.

DISCUSSION

There remains a major unmet need for more effective adjuvant therapies for resectable BTC. If this study demonstrates that adding tislelizumab enhances the therapeutic efficacy of capecitabine, this combined regimen will potentially improve the prognosis of patients with resectable BTC. In addition, we will analyze the relationship between various gene expression profiles and clinical endpoint events to define the ideal patient population receiving adjuvant immunotherapy.

Laparoscopic Extended Segmentectomy 8 with Right Hepatic Vein Resection After Conversion Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed at advanced stages and are thus ineligible for surgery. Recently, a combination of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and lenvatinib has shown promising results for treating advanced ICC.1-3 Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection of segment 8 remains challenging.4,5 We present a case of advanced ICC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX), and lenvatinib, followed by laparoscopic extended segmentectomy 8 using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent staining.

METHODS

A 54-year-old patient was found to have a hepatic tumor in segment 8, with invasion into the right hepatic vein and multiple enlarged lymph nodes, confirmed by abdominal computed tomography (CT). After six cycles of conversion therapy, partial response was achieved. The patient then underwent laparoscopic extended segmentectomy 8 and right hepatic vein resection. Preoperative planning with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, along with intraoperative ultrasonography and ICG-guided fluorescent staining, greatly enhanced the precision and success of the surgery.

RESULTS

The operation lasted 220 min with an estimated blood loss of 800 mL. The Pringle maneuver was performed intermittently six times for a total of 85 min. The patient was discharged on the 12th postoperative day without complications. Postoperatively, the patient received adjuvant therapy with durvalumab and capecitabine, 6 achieving recurrence-free survival for over 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cases of patients with advanced ICC undergoing surgical resection after immunotherapy and chemotherapy are rare. The combination of GEMOX, durvalumab, and lenvatinib showed promising antitumor efficacy and safety, suggesting its potential as a feasible and safe conversion therapy for advanced ICC.

Development and evaluation of solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced peroral bioavailability of capecitabine

This work aimed to improve the peroral bioavailability of capecitabine (CPB) by developing and assessing solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). SLNs were made using the modified nanoprecipitation method. Particle size, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, drug loading, in-vitro drug release, TEM, in-vivo pharmacokinetic study, stability study, histopathological evaluation and cytotoxicity study were assessed. The TEM revealed that the SLNs were transparent, with a mean particle size ranging from 13.06 ± 0.09 to 86.10 ± 0.15 nm. The F-3 formulation demonstrated the highest drug entrapment efficiency at 45.49 ± 0.28. The zeta potential and polydispersity index of all SLNs ranged from -15.53 ± 0.17 to 17.55 ± 0.18 mV and from 0.1356 ± 0.11 to 0.2678 ± 0.13, respectively. The drug entrapment efficiency and drug loading of all SLNs ranged from 18.45 ± 0.36 to 45.49 ± 0.28 and from 21.75 ± 0.64 to 59.49 ± 0.38, respectively. The CPB-SLNs showed sustained drug release with prolonged plasma retention, delayed Tmax, and extended half-life compared to raw CPB. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies suggest that developed SLNs may enhance therapeutic efficacy by maintaining drug concentrations in plasma for longer periods. Toxicity was observed at 200 mg/kg/day, indicated by changes in clinical biochemistry, organ weights, and histopathology, particularly affecting the liver and kidneys. Therefore, it can be said that these developed SLNs may be among the best preparations for the delivery of anti-cancer drugs for improved therapeutic efficacy.

Investigation of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet regimens on biliary tract cancer with possible lymph node metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is rare. The treatment outcomes in patients with lymph node (LN) metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy-who are considered to be 'biologically borderline resectable'-are poor. However, perioperative treatment is still under development. Recently, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC)-based triplet regimens for unresectable BTC have been developed. We applied GC-based triplet therapy in BTC with LN metastasis.

METHODS

We administered GC plus S-1 therapy (GCS) or nab-paclitaxel therapy (GCnP) to 30 patients with LN metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy (GC-based triplet group). A dataset of BTC with FDG-positive LNs, previously used for an analysis of the diagnosis and treatment outcomes according to FDG uptake, was used as a control (upfront surgery group, n = 19).

RESULTS

GCS and GCnP were used by 22 and 8 patients, respectively. The median treatment period was 79 days, the objective response rate was 47 %, the tumor control rate was 87 %, and 22 patients underwent R0 resection (73 %). The groups showed no significant differences with the exception of the FDG uptake by the main tumor. The three-year overall survival (OS) rates in the GC-based triplet and upfront surgery groups were 45.4 % and 15.8 %, respectively (P = 0.0052); there were no significant differences in progression-free or recurrence-free survival. A sub-analysis showed that normalized CA19-9 levels provided better survival than non-normalized CA19-9 levels.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant GC-based triplet regimens could provide survival benefits in BTC with LN metastasis diagnosed by FGD-PET or a biopsy. CA19-9 normalization may be useful for indicating surgery.

Impact of Bone Metastases and Actionable Genetic Alterations in Biliary Tract Cancer

Background: Bone metastasis (BM) prevalence is underreported in biliary tract cancers (BTC). This study aimed to assess BM prevalence in a real-world BTC population, alongside examining its relationship to prognosis and genomic alterations. Methods: Patients with histology-proven BTC as reviewed at a university cancer centre between January 2019 and August 2022 were assessed. Data extracted from records included BTC subtype, molecular profiling and systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) use. Stratification by BTC subtype and metastasis sites occurred. Median overall survival (mOS) was defined as time from relapse or metastases to death. Survival analysis was conducted using the Cox Proportional Hazard model. Results: Of 197 patients, 74 (37.6%) had intrahepatic and 67 (34%) had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty-four patients had BM (17.3%), with 14 identified at initial diagnosis. OS was not influenced by bone (HR 1.15; p = 0.48) or liver metastases (HR 1.09; p = 0.6). Stratifying for age and gender, no significant difference in OS was observed. Actionable alterations were equally likely in patients with (52.4%) and without BM (58.5%). Age of BTC onset (<65 or ≥65) did not significantly influence prevalence of actionable alterations. Patients receiving matched, targeted SACT had a mOS of 29.9 months, compared to 13.3 months in those with actionable alterations but no SACT matching (HR 0.35; p < 0.005). Conclusions: In advanced BTC, BM do not affect OS. Across all cohorts, actionable alterations improved OS when treated with matched SACT.

Adjuvant chemotherapy compared to observation in resected biliary tract cancers: Survival meta-analysis of phase-III randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Recurrences and deaths are common in the first 2 years and survival remains poor despite adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

Phase-III RCTs were included comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and observation in resected BTCs. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazard results were used for trial-based analyses. Patient data was curated from published Kaplan-Meier curves to analyze short-term (2-year) hazards. The Parmar and generic inverse variance methods were used.

RESULTS

1308 patients in 4 trials (BILCAP, ASCOT, BCAT, PRODIGE-12) were included. Capecitabine (BILCAP) and S-1 (ASCOT) were grouped as 5-FU-based, gemcitabine (BCAT) and gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12) were grouped as gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant 5FU-based chemotherapy improved RFS [HR: 0.80 (95 % CI:0.68-0.95), p = 0.012] and OS [HR: 0.78 (95 % CI:0.65-0.94), p = 0.009]. However, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy did not provide benefit in RFS [HR: 0.90 (95 % CI:0.70-1.15), p = 0.428] and OS [HR: 1.03 (95 % CI:0.78-1.36), p = 0.794]. The benefit of 5-FU-based chemotherapy was more apparent in the short-term (2-year hazards) (RFS: [HR: 0.67 (95 %CI:57-0.79), p < 0.001] and OS: [HR: 0.61 (95 % CI:59-0.64), p < 0.001]). However, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy did not provide RFS benefit in the short term either [HR: 0.80 (95 % CI:0.64-0.1.01), p = 0.067] and seemed to be even detrimental for OS [HR: 1.22 (95 % CI:1.14-1.31), p < 0.001] in the first 2 years.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms using 5FU-based monotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of resected BTCs. The more prominent benefit in the first 2 years emphasizes that more effective adjuvant treatments with sustained long-term benefits are needed. Two-year proportional hazards OS and RFS are proposed here as an additional secondary end-point to consider in future clinical trials. in this setting. Registration ID (PROSPERO): CRD42024614444.

Revisiting resectability of biliary tract cancers, in the triplet drug therapy era with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include intrahepatic, perihilar, distal cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and sometimes papillary Vater cancer. The incidence of BTCs varies worldwide (0.3-85.0/100,000 population). In Japan, the incidence is lowest, but it is increasing (22,000 cases/ year). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with localized BTC is approximately 60%, which is better than that in liver or pancreatic cancer, but is < 5% in patients with metastatic cancers. Surgery requires liver and pancreas surgery with vascular reconstruction, and is associated with a high perioperative mortality rate (> 2%) relative to other cancer surgeries (< 1%). As an adjuvant therapy, fluorouracil prodrugs are effective for improving OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69-0.81); however, in patients who receive major hepatectomy, the completion rate is reportedly low (60%). Since 2010, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) has become the first-line therapy for unresectable lesions. Subsequently, in 2023-2024 three triplet regimens were reported: GC + S-1(tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil), GC + durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody), and GC + pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). HRs for OS were 0.79-0.83, objective response rates were 27-42% (GC, 15-29%), and tumor control rates were 75-85% (GC, 62-83%) with small increases in adverse events. In this review, considering the eligibility criteria of currently ongoing neoadjuvant studies, we report two borderline resectable cases with a discussion on resectability. Owing to the high-risk nature of the surgery and to avoid early recurrence due to subclinical metastasis during postoperative recovery, these three triplet regimens for unresectable tumors may change the concept of resectability in BTC.

Molecular Testing and Targeted Therapies in Hepatobiliary Cancers: A Review

Importance

Hepatobiliary cancers are heterogeneous and molecularly complex. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enhanced the understanding of their molecular landscape and enabled deployment of biomarker-based gene- and immune-targeted therapies. This review examines the role of molecular testing and targeted therapies in these malignant neoplasms.

Observations

Patients with hepatobiliary cancers have poor outcomes. Precision oncology studies have shown that while many common molecular alterations are not currently targetable in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a large number of actionable alterations characterize biliary tract cancers (BTCs), with several therapies now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Immunotherapy is increasingly adopted in clinical practice, either as monotherapy or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, for both HCC and BTCs. Moreover, multiple solid cancer tumor-agnostic therapies are approved (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib for NTRK fusions; selpercatinib for RET fusions; dabrafenib and trametinib combination for BRAF V600E mutations; dostarlimab or pembrolizumab for tumors with high microsatellite instability and pembrolizumab for tumor mutation burden ≥10 mutations/megabase), highlighting the need for NGS as well as ERBB2 (formerly HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) (with the recent approval of solid tissue-agnostic deruxtecan trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive [IHC 3+] cancer) across cancers. N-of-1 clinical trials using customized drug combinations matched to the tumor's molecular profile have yielded encouraging results and provide a promising framework for future clinical trial design.

Conclusions and Relevance

Molecular testing and gene- and immune-targeted therapies are transforming hepatobiliary cancer treatment. Tumor-agnostic and N-of-1 clinical trials have challenged traditional clinical trial paradigms and provide the foundation for truly personalized oncology for patients with these aggressive cancers. Further work is needed to determine how to leverage these novel approaches into the management of operable disease.

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: treatment outcomes after curative-intent resection in an Australian tertiary referral hospital

BACKGROUND

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and liver resection offers the best chance of possible cure. This study aimed to assess treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for long-term survival in patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from patients with MF-ICC managed at the Royal North Shore/North Shore Private Hospital from January 1998 to October 2023. Baseline, peri-operative and long-term outcomes have been analysed, including an overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

RESULTS

During the 25-year study period, 47 patients underwent curative-intent liver resection for primary MF-ICC at a median age of 70 years. The median OS was 36 months, with a 5-year OS of 33%. Multiple liver tumours (HR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.24-6.48; P = 0.013) and a positive resection margin (HR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.10-5.52; P = 0.029) were identified as independent predictors of poor long-term OS. Recurrence occurred in 62% of patients after a median DFS of 16 months, with poor tumour differentiation (HR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.62-9.54; P = 0.002) and elevated tumour markers (HR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.53-7.87; P = 0.003) as independent predictors of poor DFS.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection can offer a significant chance for prolonged survival in a highly selected population of patients with MF-ICC. However, the surgical challenges inherent in treating this rare disease are evident, emphasizing the need for a multimodal approach and continued exploration of additional therapies to enhance personalized treatment strategies.

Circulating tumor DNA status and dynamics predict recurrence in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Surgery is the only curative therapeutic option for resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, but recurrence is common, and prognosis is poor. There is an unmet clinical need for improved decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Herein, we evaluated the usefulness of monitoring longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients from the STAMP trial, which compared the efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine (CAP) vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis).

METHODS

Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive GemCis (n = 50) or CAP (n = 51). Efficacy outcomes were analyzed with an extended follow-up of 19 months from the previous report. From a biomarker cohort of 89 patients, longitudinal plasma samples (n = 254) were prospectively collected post-surgery before ACT, and on-ACT at 12 and 24 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1). ctDNA was evaluated using a personalized, tumor-informed, 16-plex PCR next-generation sequencing assay and was correlated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In the extended follow-up analysis, median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival did not significantly differ between the CAP and GemCis groups. Significantly inferior DFS was associated with ctDNA positivity before ACT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; p = 0.029), on-ACT at 12 weeks from C1D1 (HR 7.72; p <0.001), on-ACT at 24 weeks from C1D1 (HR 5.24; p <0.001), and anytime post-surgery (HR 3.81; p <0.001). Analysis of pre-treatment to on-treatment ctDNA dynamics revealed that serially ctDNA-negative patients exhibited a significantly longer DFS compared to those with sustained ctDNA positivity (HR 6.7; p <0.001) or those who turned ctDNA positive (HR 5.8; p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, ctDNA status and dynamics predicted recurrence during adjuvant therapy, and may help optimize clinical decision-making.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

The findings from this study highlight the critical role of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker and monitoring tool for patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. By demonstrating the superiority of ctDNA to predict disease recurrence compared to conventional biomarkers such as cancer antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, this study underscores its potential in guiding decision-making during adjuvant chemotherapy. These results may be crucial to refine post-surgical treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. The practical application of ctDNA monitoring could lead to more personalized treatment approaches, enabling timely interventions based on molecular residual disease status.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03079427.

"Biological R2" resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: identification of patients at risk for poor oncologic outcomes after curative-intent resection

INTRODUCTION

We sought to define a cohort of patients with "biological R2" (bR2) resection, defined as recurrence within 12 weeks, following curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In addition, we sought to identify factors associated with bR2 risk.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent surgery for ICC were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The weighted beta-coefficients of preoperative risk factors were used to construct an online tool to predict bR2.

RESULTS

Among 1138 patients, 106 (9.3 %) patients had a bR2 resection. Patients with bR2 were more likely to be younger (OR 0.97) and non-White (OR 2.19), as well as more often had cirrhosis (OR 2.11), a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.07), a higher tumor burden score (OR 1.16), and metastatic nodal disease on preoperative imaging (OR 1.92). Patients categorized as low-risk had a 3.2 % risk of bR2, intermediate-risk patients had an 11.1 % risk of bR2, whereas patients in the high-risk category had a 27.6 % risk of bR2 (p < 0.001). An online tool was made available at https://junkawashima.shinyapps.io/bR2_ICC/, https://junkawashima.shinyapps.io/CRLMfollwingchemotherapy/.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in ten patients with resectable ICC had a bR2 resection. An online calculator can may help clinicians identify patients with ICC at highest risk of a bR2 resection.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Recent years have witnessed significant advances in the imaging, molecular profiling, and systemic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Despite this progress, the early detection, precise classification, and effective management of CCA remain challenging. Owing to recent developments and the significant differences in CCA subtypes, EASL commissioned a panel of experts to draft evidence-based recommendations on the management of extrahepatic CCA, comprising distal and perihilar CCA. Particular attention is given to the need for accurate classification systems, the integration of emerging molecular insights, and practical strategies for diagnosis and treatment that reflect real-world clinical scenarios.

CXCL6 Reshapes Lipid Metabolism and Induces Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in Cholangiocarcinoma Progression and Immunotherapy Resistance

The chemokine CXCL6 is identified as a pivotal regulator of biological processes across multiple malignancies. However, its function in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is underexplored. Tumor profiling for CXCL6 is performed using a public database. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments are utilized to evaluate the oncogenic effects of CXCL6 on CCA. Additionally, RNA-Seq is employed to detect transcriptomic changes related to CXCL6 expression in CCA cells and neutrophils. Molecular docking, fluorescence colocalization, and Co-IP are used to elucidate a direct interaction between JAKs and CXCR1/2. Additionally, LC-MS lipidomics and explored the impact of CXCL6 on immunotherapy in vivo. CXCL6 is upregulated in CCA tissues and promoted the proliferation and metastasis of CCA. Mechanistically, CXCL6 regulated the CXCR1/2-JAK-STAT/PI3K axis in CCA via autocrine signaling, leading to lipid metabolic reprogramming, and promoted neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation by activating the RAS/MAPK pathway in neutrophils. Eventually, NETs formation induced immunotherapy resistance in CCA by blocking CD8+T cell infiltration. CXCL6 modulates CCA progression through the CXCR1/2-JAK-STAT/PI3K axis and reshaping its lipid metabolism. CXCL6 also mediates immunotherapy resistance through NETs, which may be a potential therapeutic target and biomarker for CCA.

Adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation in patients with resected biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Several randomized controlled trials compared adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with observation in patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) have yielded inconsistent outcomes. In order to assess the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in these patients, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search in various databases, which included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ASCO Abstracts, ESMO Abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov. All relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer were identified. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3. Additionally, publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test in Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 5 randomized controlled trials, involving 1406 patients, were included in this analysis. Compared with observation, adjuvant chemotherapy improved RFS [HR 0.84 (0.73-0.96), p=0.01] (I2=0%, p=0.89) but not OS [HR 0.89 (0.77-1.03), p=0.12] (I2=51%, p=0.09) in the entire population after BTC resection. Subgroup analyses revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy did improve both OS [HR 0.76 (0.62-0.93), p=0.009] (I2=7%, p=0.37) and RFS [HR 0.74 (0.58-0.95), p=0.02] (I2=0%, p=0.39) in patients with lymph node positivity. Furthermore, patients receiving oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy showed benefit from the adjuvant therapy, with longer OS [HR 0.78 (0.65-0.94), p=0.009] (I2=2%, p=0.31) and RFS [HR 0.81 (0.68-0.95), p=0.01] (I2=0%, p=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, adjuvant chemotherapy have the potential to offer advantages in patients with resected BTC. Specifically, patients demonstrating positive lymph node status have a higher likelihood of benefiting from adjuvant therapy. Our analysis supports the current standard of care of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine. However, the recommendation of oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy as the preferred option is not definitive, as it is based on limited studies. Further validation of these outcomes is necessary by conducting extensive randomized controlled trials.

Chemo- and Radiotherapy of Gastrointestinal Tumors during Pregnancy

Background

Gastrointestinal cancers account for approximately one-fourth of all cancer cases and one-third of all tumor-related deaths worldwide. For the most frequent gastrointestinal tumor entities including colorectal, gastric, esophageal, and liver cancer, the incidence is expected to increase by more than 50% until 2040. While most gastrointestinal cancers are diagnosed beyond the age of fertility and predominantly in men, the increasing incidence of gastrointestinal malignancies in patients below the age of fifty suggests a growing importance in women of childbearing age. While localized cancers in pregnant women can either be monitored or treated surgically, more advanced stages might require radio- or chemotherapy to control tumor growth until delivery. Under these circumstances, critical decisions have to be made to preserve maternal health on the one side and minimize harm to the infant on the other side.

Summary

Here we summarize data from case reports, meta-analyses, and registries of women undergoing radio- or chemotherapy during pregnancy and provide guidance for therapeutic decision-making in pregnant women suffering from gastrointestinal cancers.

Key Message

After the first trimester, most chemotherapeutic regimens can be safely administered to pregnant patients with gastrointestinal cancers. With appropriate safety measures, both radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy can be applied to pregnant patients with rectal cancers.

Current status and prospects of targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma based on molecular characteristics

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a serious public health issue due to its insidious onset and dismal prognosis. The past few years have witnessed and highlighted the development of understanding and management of CCA. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy regimen with immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has been considered the new standard first-line treatment alternative for advanced CCA. Notably, the proportion of patients with advanced CCA with targetable genetic mutations is approximately 40 %, and these patients may be considered for molecularly targeted therapy in the second-line treatment. In this review, we highlight the advances and progress in targeted therapies for advanced CCA, with special attention to data from Asian populations, including Chinese. In addition, we present in detail the phosphatase tension homolog (PTEN), a novel biomarker for both of first-line chemotherapy and second-line targeted therapy in advanced CCA, and its ability to forecast prognosis in patients with CCA. The mechanisms of rapid resistance to targeted agents warrant further investigation and address in light of the development of new targeted therapies. Precision medicine is gradually playing an increasing role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes.

T1b gallbladder cancer: is extended resection warranted?

BACKGROUND

Although the prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBCA) improves with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment, the management of patients with muscle layer invasion (T1b) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the optimal surgical approach for these patients.

METHODS

A database was queried for patients with early T1b GBCA treated at four Chilean hospitals. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team at each hospital. Clinical outcomes, including survival rates according to the type of surgery, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 1988 and 2023, 129 Chilean patients were pathologically diagnosed with T1b GBCA. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 86 patients (66.7 %), while extended cholecystectomy (EC) was performed in 43 patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83 %, with no significant difference between SC and EC patients.

CONCLUSION

Simple cholecystectomy demonstrated survival rates comparable to extended cholecystectomy for patients with T1b GBCA. More extensive resections did not improve the prognosis.

Adjuvant Cytotoxic Chemotherapy may not be Associated with a Survival Advantage for Resected Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Randomized data suggest improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancers; however, subset analyses of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) show limited survival benefit. This study evaluated the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected IHC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for IHC were identified within a bi-institutional dataset and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were stratified by receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Site of first recurrence was categorized as liver only, regional, distant, or multifocal. Survival outcomes within each dataset were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

In the bi-institutional dataset, 347 patients underwent resection for IHC, and 149 (43%) patients received adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy. Recurrence was observed in 222 (64.0%) patients. OS was similar between groups (adjuvant vs. observation: 42 vs. 49 months; p = 0.13), and did not differ in patients who received capecitabine specifically (p = 0.09) or in a risk-adjusted multivariable analysis. Recurrence-free survival was worse in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.04), although the liver was the most common site of recurrence in both groups (0.63). A similar analysis of 1159 resected IHCs from the NCDB also demonstrated no association between adjuvant chemotherapy and OS (49 vs. 57 months; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be associated with improved OS in IHC and did not have an impact on hepatic recurrence in this retrospective analysis. Future investigation to identify more effective adjuvant systemic regimens and/or explore the potential role of adjuvant liver-directed therapies to reduce hepatic recurrence that may improve OS for IHC is warranted.

The HALP score as a prognostic factor in metastatic biliary cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers are serious diseases and new biomarkers may be useful for the optimal management and prediction of these cases. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, a novel composite marker, in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Patients with biliary tract cancers were analyzed retrospectively. Laboratory values, patient and disease characteristics, and survival rates were evaluated. The diagnostic impact of the HALP score was assessed with regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 106 individuals with metastatic biliary tract cancer. Based on the median HALP score, ≥ 2.22 was considered a high score and < 2.22 was considered low. The overall average survival time was found to be 11.4 months. Patients with low HALP scores had median overall survival of 9.5 months, while those with high HALP scores had median overall survival of 15.9 months. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, CA19-9 level, and HALP score remained significant predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The HALP score appears to be a useful prognostic marker in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Sex-related differences in the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments

Differences between the biological sexes have long been observed in cancer incidence and prevalence, and in treatment outcomes including efficacy and toxicity. Ideally, there should be sufficient information to improve the individualization of cancer treatment by incorporating sex into treatment decisions. Necessary information should include: the nature and source of these differences; whether inherent to the specific cancer (such as molecular profiles, metabolic behaviors, and immune responses); the pathophysiological mechanisms of the specific cancer; or the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of different cancer drugs. The influence of gender, which is defined as the sociocultural construct that determines societal norms for males and females, should also be included in personalized decision-making. This review aimed to describe the current evidence on the impact of sex and gender on treatment effects, outcomes, and toxicity profiles in cancer patients. Data for the influence of gender were negligible, whereas clinical studies and meta-analyses in different cancer types have identified differences between males and females in the effectiveness on survival outcomes of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Similarly, toxicity profiles of different cancer treatments varied between sexes. Based on these observed differences, it seems clear that sex should be included as an important variable when individualizing treatment; however, more research into sex- and gender-related differences in cancer treatment efficacy and toxicity, and the causes for these differences, is required before this can be fully incorporated into individualized treatment programs in real-world clinical practice.

Impact of Resection Margins and Adjuvant Therapy on Survival Outcomes in Lymph Node-Negative Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

The prognostic value of the resection margin (RM) status and the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) in distal cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) are unclear. RM status appears particularly impactful in lymph node-negative distal CCC, representing early-stage disease. The prognostic value of RM status was investigated, and subpopulations of patients with lymph node-negative distal CCC who might benefit from AT were identified. Overall, 139 patients with distal CCC who underwent surgical resection between March 2006 and December 2023 were analyzed. RM status was categorized as wide (>5 mm) in 65 patients (46.8%), close (≤5 mm) in 32 patients (23.0%), or positive in 42 patients (30.2%). AT was administered to 48 patients (34.5%). Patients with close or positive RMs achieved significantly lower locoregional control (LRC) than those with wide RMs. However, overall survival (OS) did not differ across the three RM groups. The impact of RM status was more evident in patients not receiving AT. Patients with wide RMs exhibited better 3-year LRC, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS rates (79.0%, 66.5%, and 69.1%, respectively) than those with close (21.7%, 15.7%, and 34.4%) or positive RMs (44.3%, 25.3%, and 50.2%, respectively). No significant differences were found between close and positive RM groups. AT appears to have improved LRC and PFS in patients with close or positive RMs but not in those with wide RMs. Close RMs were associated with poor outcomes comparable to those with positive RMs. These results indicate that achieving adequate RM width is crucial for improving survival. Moreover, AT may improve survival when adequate RMs cannot be achieved. Nonetheless, larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: role of imaging as a critical component for multi-disciplinary treatment approach

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a unifying title granted to epithelial adenocarcinomas specific to the bile ducts making up 10-25% of all hepatobiliary malignancies. CCA is more appropriately classified based on anatomic site of origin within the biliary tract into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), peri-hilar (pCCA) cholangiocarcinoma, and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma makes up 10-20% of CCA and originates within and/or proximal to the second order bile ducts. The incidence of iCCA has been rising overtime with up to 1.26 per 100,000 persons, per year in the United States and up to 3.3 per 100, 000 persons, per year affected globally. Risk factors include chronic hepatic inflammation secondary to viral hepatitis, alcohol/NASH cirrhosis, biliary cystic lesions, and endemic causes, among other less common genetic drivers. Given its rarity, the recognition and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, iCCA specifically, remains challenging resulting in delays in treatment initiation or any treatment at all. Median overall survival (mOS) for iCCA remains low. Early diagnosis, and stage-based treatment approaches have evolved and are associated with improved survival. To this goal, a multi-disciplinary treatment approach has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes by providing expert evaluation as it pertains to an accurate imaging and histologic diagnosis, staging, radiologic and surgical review for resectability, operative expertise, post operative care, as well as comprehensive knowledge and implementation of systemic/targeted or liver directed therapies. Here, we discuss the central role of imaging in the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to implement a comprehensive treatment plan that frequently involves multiple disciplines to achieve the best outcome for each patient.

Efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer experiencing early vs late disease relapse after surgery: a large real-life worldwide population

BACKGROUND

In the TOPAZ-1, patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) and recurrence within 6 months after surgery were excluded, even if this event is frequently observed in clinical practice. Our study aimed to assess if the efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab (CGD) in this population is comparable to that reported in the phase 3 trial.

METHODS

The study cohort included patients with BTC who underwent surgery on the primary tumor, experienced disease recurrence occurring ≤6 months or >6 months after surgery or after the end of adjuvant therapy and started CGD. The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed between early and late relapse groups in OS (23.4 months vs not reached; HR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.67-2.37; P = .45) and PFS [7.0 months vs 9.8 months; HR 1.3(95% CI, 0.9-2.1) P = .13]. Overall response rate and disease control rate (P = .33 and P = .62) were comparable between the 2 groups, as the overall safety profile. In addition, we compared survival outcomes between the selected population and a historical cohort of patients with BTC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) and found that despite the absence of statistical significance, CGD showed an outcome trend compared with CG regardless of the time of recurrence after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy [(CG ≤ 6 vs CGD ≤ 6 months: HR 0.59, 95%CI, 0.35-1.01, P = .05; HR 0.70; 95%CI, 0.46-1.06, P = .09, OS and PFS, respectively) and (CG > 6 vs. CGD > 6 months: HR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, P = 0.0165; HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.35-0.84, P = .0068, OS and PFS, respectively)].

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that CGD retains its efficacy independently of the timing of relapse after surgery or completion of adjuvant treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

Western and Eastern experience in treating perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective bi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Resection outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma differ between Western and Eastern centres, but reasons behind these disparities remain unclear. This study aimed to compare current outcomes between a Western and an Eastern expert centre to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatobiliary resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2022 at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) and Cancer Institute Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, postoperative complications and 90-day mortality rate.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-nine patients were included (Cancer Institute Hospital n = 159, Karolinska n = 90). Median overall survival was 20.4 months at Karolinska and 52.0 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Median disease-free survival was 11.9 months at Karolinska and 32.4 months at Cancer Institute Hospital (P < 0.001). Advanced tumours, ASA class ≥III, poor differentiation and radial margin positivity were more common in the Western cohort. Treatment centre, T-status, N1-status, resection side, R1-status, age and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were prognostic for overall survival. The Eastern cohort had a lower rate of postoperative complications (24.5%) and a lower mortality rate (2.5%) compared with the Western cohort (51.1% and 10.0%).

CONCLUSION

Advanced tumour stage and radial margin positivity contributed to poor long-term survival in the Western cohort. A higher burden of co-morbidity and a higher rate of extended resections with smaller remnant liver volume influenced the Western postoperative mortality rate.

A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Adjuvant S-1 Chemotherapy Versus Observation Following Major Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is poor even after curative resection, highlighting the need for effective adjuvant chemotherapy. The efficacy of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy following major hepatectomy for PHC is unclear, and thus the aim of this study was to elucidate this.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with PHC who underwent major hepatectomy (hemihepatectomy or trisectionectomy extending to segment 1 with extrahepatic bile duct resection) at three high-volume centers in Japan from 2007 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with Clavien-Dindo grade V complications, pStage 0, I, or IVB disease, and those who underwent adjuvant radiation therapy were excluded from analysis. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients who underwent adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy with those who underwent observation.

RESULTS

Overall, 373/480 patients were eligible, of whom 81 underwent adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy and 146 underwent observation. In the global cohort, DSS was similar in the S-1 and observation groups (p = 0.18), while in the matched cohort (S-1, n = 44; observation, n = 44), DSS was similar between the S-1 and observation groups (p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD), CA19-9 levels of ≥ 300 U/mL at operation, and lymph node (LN) metastasis were independent predictors of poor survival following major hepatectomy for PHC. In subgroup analysis of patients with LN metastasis, DSS was better in the S-1 group than in the observation group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy following major hepatectomy might be effective in PHC patients with LN metastasis.

Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection

PURPOSE

To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Data on patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n = 2,653) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 1,068) was performed.

RESULTS

In the ablation group, patients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than that in the 2000-2009 subgroup (median OS, 32 vs 21 months; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.75; P = .001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3 cm vs >3 cm; P = .049) and tumor stage (P < .001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95% CI, 74.8%-88.4%), 43.5% (95% CI, 33.5%-53.1%), and 23.7% (95% CI, 15.3%-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS, 87.8%; 95% CI, 78.6%-93.3%) demonstrated improved OS compared with patients with regional (1-year OS, 81.3%; 95% CI, 52.5%-93.5%) and distant disease (50.2%; 95% CI, 34.0%-78.8%; P < .001). For tumors ≤3 cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (P = .561), although both were better than radiotherapy (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with iCCA who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3 cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered front-line compared with radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.

Neoadjuvant Multiagent Systemic Therapy Approach to Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) has excellent outcomes following liver transplantation (LT). Neoadjuvant radiation-based locoregional therapy is standard-of-care. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) combination systemic therapies have improved outcomes in advanced settings, but their efficacy pre-LT has not been studied.

Methods

We review our experience following neoadjuvant gem/cis alone versus radiation-based approaches. Patients with phCCA undergoing LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were identified retrospectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was categorized as gem/cis systemic therapy (ST) alone, or any ST and radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes were posttransplant overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), waitlist time, and pathologic tumor response.

Results

During study period, 27 phCCA patients underwent LT. One patient decompensated with neoadjuvant therapy and was excluded. Median age was 61 y (interquartile range, 53-68 y) and 14 (54%) were male. Of 26 patients, 12 (46%) received ST and 14 (54%) RT. Six RT patients received gem/cis ST. Median waitlist time was 199 d (interquartile range, 98-405 d) and did not differ by neoadjuvant regimen. Explanted tumors were predominantly T1 stage, without lymphovascular invasion or nodal involvement. Neither pathologic features nor percent tumor necrosis differed by regimen. OS probabilities at 1 and 3 y were 84% and 55% for the cohort. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS when stratified by regimen.

Conclusions

Post-LT OS, RFS, waitlist time, and tumor response were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with phCCA who do not undergo RT may still be considered for LT under appropriate institution-based protocols that adhere to other established criteria.

Transplantation for Peri-Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With mTOR Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has rising incidence and mortality rates. Outcomes from combination systemic, loco-regional therapy (LRT) and liver transplantation (LT) are improving, but more granular data are needed to inform evidence-based management, including patient selection and immunosuppression.

METHODS

Patients with peri-hilar (PH) and intrahepatic (IH) CCA who underwent LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with significance determined by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

During the study period, 53 patients underwent LT for either PH (n = 27), or IH (26). Cohort had mean age 58.5 years old (IQR, 47.0-63.0), body mass index (BMI) 25.9 (IQR, 22.9-30.0) kg/m2, and mean biologic MELD 9 (IQR, 7-17). Most frequent etiology was PSC (n = 12, 22.6%). Forty-nine patients (92.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy, including systemic (n = 48, 90.6%) and locoregional therapy (LRT) (n = 22, 41.5%), to which PH tumors were both most and least responsive (P = .03). On explant pathology, tumor were a median size of 3.5 cm and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) was present in 13 (24.5%) cases. Median follow-up post-transplant was 910 days (IQR, 407-1509). Probabilities of OS and RFS at 3-years post-LT were 69.2% (95% CI, 56.9%-84.2%) and 57.4% (95% CI, 43.7%-75.4%). In multivariable analysis, OS was associated with tumor type and LVI, and RFS with age, BMI, PSC and LRT. After a median post-LT period of 38 days (IQR, 27-79.5), 39 (71.7%) patients started mTOR inhibition with lowered tacrolimus goal. Cox proportional hazard model showed significant association of OS with mTOR inhibition, though this was not validated by a time-dependent co-variate approach.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center cohort of CCA, post-LT outcomes were significantly greater for patients with IH tumors and no LVI. Immunosuppression with mTOR inhibition was not consistently associated with outcomes.

Reappraisal of carcinoma in situ residue at the bile duct margin: a single-center review of 681 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A histologically involved surgical margin (R1) is often observed after resection for cholangiocarcinoma. Compared with a negative margin (R0), R1 with invasive carcinoma (R1inv) markedly worsens survival, whereas the prognostic effect of R1 with carcinoma in situ (R1cis) remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2002 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. According to the pathological assessment, the duct margin was classified as R0, R1cis, or R1inv; radial margin positivity was treated as R1inv. Recurrence and survival were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 681 patients, 457 had R0, 69 had R1cis, and 155 had R1inv. The overall five-year recurrence rate was 82.8 % with R1inv, 67.8 % with R1cis, and 47.6 % with R0 (P < 0.001); the local recurrence rate also significantly differed among these groups (P < 0.001). The five-year survival rate was significantly worse with R1cis than with R0 (37.3 % vs. 56.7 %, P < 0.001) and better than that with R1inv (20.9 %, P = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that R1cis was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 1.65; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with R0, R1cis significantly deteriorated overall survival in the whole resection subset of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the prognostic impact of R1cis was milder than that of R1inv.

Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: A real world experience from a regional cancer center

Backgrounds/Aims

Given the high mortality associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC), the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. We audited our data over an 11-year period to assess the impact of AT.

Methods

This study included all patients who underwent curative resection for GBC from 2007 to 2017. Analyses were conducted of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative therapeutic records. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) were evaluated against surgery alone using SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis.

Results

The median age of patients (n = 142) was 50 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 93, 34, and 30 months with CT, CTRT, and surgery alone respectively (p = 0.612). Multivariate analysis indicated that only disease stage and microscopically involved margins significantly impacted OS and disease-free survival (DFS). CT showed increased effectiveness across all prognostic subsets, except for stage 4 and margin-positive resections. Following propensity score matching, median DFS and OS were higher in the CT group than in the CTRT group, although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Radically resected GBC patients appear to benefit more from adjuvant CT, while CTRT should be reserved for cases with high-risk features.

Prodrug Approach as a Strategy to Enhance Drug Permeability

Absorption and permeability are critical physicochemical parameters that must be balanced to achieve optimal drug uptake. These key factors are closely linked to the maximum absorbable dose required to provide appropriate plasma levels of drugs. Among the various strategies employed to enhance drug solubility and permeability, prodrug design stands out as a highly effective and versatile approach for improving physicochemical properties and enabling the optimization of biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic parameters while mitigating adverse effects. Prodrugs are compounds with reduced or no activity that, through bio-reversible chemical or enzymatic processes, release an active parental drug. The application of this technology has led to significant advancements in drug optimization during the design phase, and it offers broad potential for further development. Notably, approximately 13% of the drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2012 and 2022 were prodrugs. In this review article, we will explore the application of prodrug strategies to enhance permeability, describing examples of market drugs. We also describe the use of the prodrug approach to optimize PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) permeability by using conjugation technologies. We will highlight some new technologies in prodrugs to enrich permeability properties, contributing to developing new effective and safe prodrugs.

Defining the Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancers: A Site-Specific Propensity-Matched Analysis

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have distinct tumor biology but share a poor prognosis, with a 5-year-survival-rate of 5-19%. Surgical resection is the only potential cure, but recurrences are common. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) remains unclear. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2006-2018), we analyzed resected non-metastatic BTCs. Patients who survived beyond 90 days post-surgery were included, while those with R2 resections or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Propensity matching was performed based on predictors of adjuvant radiation, age, and sex. Survival outcomes were compared between no adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy alone, and XRT ± chemotherapy. Results: Among 21,275 patients, including 5308 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), 2689 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), 3092 distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), and 10,186 gallbladder cancer (GBC) cases, adjuvant XRT did not improve survival for IHC. For PHC and DCC, XRT improved survival over no adjuvant therapy (PHC: 31.2 vs. 26.3 months, p = 0.004; DCC: 33.7 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.015) but not over chemotherapy alone. For GBC, XRT significantly improved survival compared to both no adjuvant therapy and chemotherapy (30.2 vs. 26.6 and 24.6 months; p = 0.05 and p = 0.001). Conclusions: XRT provides a survival benefit for GBC, especially in node-positive and R1-resected patients. For PHC and DCC, XRT improves outcomes compared to no therapy, but its benefit over chemotherapy is uncertain. No benefit was observed for IHC.

Prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: independent external validation of a prognostic model for 3-year overall survival in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

The only treatment with curative potential for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) is radical surgery which can be complemented with adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to perform an independent external validation of a prognostic model for 3-year overall survival based on routine clinicopathological variables for patients treated with pancreatoduodenectomy for dCCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with a histopathological confirmed dCCA that underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in Sweden from 2009 through 2019 were identified in the Swedish National Registry for Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer. Model performance was estimated using the C-index and calibration plots.

RESULTS

In total 220 patients were included in the study. The median survival was 33 months (IQR 26-40) and 3-year survival rate 47% (95% CI 40-53%). The prognostic model had a C-index of 0.69 (95% CI 0.62-0.72). Calibration plots revealed overestimated risk of death across risk groups in the full cohort. Calibration was good in the subgroup of patients that did not receive adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic model showed reasonable discriminative ability but some miscalibration likely since the effect of adjuvant treatment is not included in the model. Given that the model was developed in cohorts treated prior to the current adjuvant standard of care the model can be used to estimate baseline risk prior to risk/benefit decision for adjuvant treatment as well as stratification for clinical trials but with a risk to underestimate 3-year overall survival for patients that receive adjuvant treatment.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for curative resected biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Despite complete resection, the recurrence rate of biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains high, leading to poor prognosis. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) following radical resection may substantially reduce the recurrence risk by eradicating micrometastatic lesions. However, the benefits of postoperative ACT and the optimal ACT strategy are still unclear for BTC. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the prognostic value of ACT and compare the effectiveness of different ACTs among BTC patients after curative resection.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the benefits of ACT versus no intervention or other ACTs in BTC patients after curative resection. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs comprising 1803 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ACT was associated with significant improvements in 5-year all-cause mortality [four RCTs, hazard rate (HR) 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-1.00, marginally significant; low-certainty evidence], RFS (five RCTs, HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; moderate-certainty evidence), and OS (7 studies, HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; low-certainty evidence) compared with observation. ACT had significantly better survival benefits on patients with negative margins (R0), lymph node-positive (N+), and tumor node metastasis classification (TNM) stage I/II ( P < 0.05). Further network meta-analysis demonstrated that fluorouracil-based ACT was significantly inferior to gemcitabine-based ACT (HR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25) in improving RFS. However, both were superior to observation ( P < 0.05). No statistical difference in OS was observed between gemcitabine-based and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.86-1.20). In subgroup analysis, fluorouracil-based ACT but not gemcitabine-based ACT achieved significantly better OS benefits on patients with N+ (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.86) and R0 (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Compared with observation, ACT should be routinely recommended to improve survival outcomes in BTC patients after curative resection, especially for those with R0, N+, and TNM stage I/II. Gemcitabine-based ACT performed better than other chemotherapies in improving RFS. This network meta-analysis provides precise information for determining the best adjuvant treatment for resected BTC. Further thorough and high-quality RCTs are needed.