Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations (BELIEF): an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

The role of angiogenesis inhibitors associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFRm) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining TKIs with an angiogenesis inhibitor has shown promise in pre-clinical studies. A systematic search of clinical trials found that combining erlotinib (a first-generation TKI) with bevacizumab or ramucirumab (angiogenesis inhibitors) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients compared to TKI alone. However, no significant benefit in overall survival (OS) was observed in trials. Similar efficacy was seen in patients with specific EGFR mutations. Third generation TKIs were used as second-line therapy for patients with the T790M mutation. The combination treatment was associated with a higher incidence of severe adverse events. Overall, combining erlotinib or another TKI with an angiogenesis inhibitor is a safe and effective alternative for first-line treatment in EGFRm advanced NSCLC, particularly in countries without access to osimertinib and for patients with the EGFR L858R mutation.

Comparing Efficacy of Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Combination with Erlotinib Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and contrast the efficacy and safety of combining erlotinib and bevacizumab with erlotinib alone in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors searched databases such as PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab with erlotinib in NSCLC patients. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were the outcomes of interest. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) were estimated utilizing both fixed- and random-effect models. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Nine studies comprising 1698 patients with NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 850 were treated with erlotinib plus bevacizumab, and 848 with erlotinib. The erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination significantly prolonged PFS (HR, 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.70, p < 0.00001) but did not show any significant improvement in OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.07, p = 0.39) and ORR (HR, 1.10; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.24, p = 0.09). Increased risks of hypertension (RR, 5.15; 95% CI: 3.59, 7.39; p < 0.00001), proteinuria (RR, 10.54; 95% CI: 3.80, 29.20; p < 0.00001) and grade 3 and higher AEs (RR, 2.09; 95% CI: 1.47, 2.97; p < 0.00001) were observed with the erlotinib-plus-bevacizumab combination compared to erlotinib monotherapy. On subgroup analyses, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination improved PFS only. Combining erlotinib and bevacizumab has been shown to improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients but did not show any significant OS and ORR benefits. Furthermore, risks of hypertension, proteinuria, and grade 3 or higher AEs were greater with the erlotinib-and-bevacizumab combination.

Sanikovich V, S. Rusanov A, N. Pirogova Y, Boroda A, Rozhkov A, Kemfang Ngowa JD, N. Bagmet L, I. Sekacheva M. Angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Understanding the Roles of Growth Factors

Research has shown the role of growth factors in lung cancer angiogenesis. Angiogenesis promotes lung cancer progression by stimulating tumor growth, enhancing tumor invasion, contributing to metastasis, and modifying immune system responses within the tumor microenvironment. As a result, new treatment techniques based on the anti-angiogenic characteristics of compounds have been developed. These compounds selectively block the growth factors themselves, their receptors, or the downstream signaling pathways activated by these growth factors. The EGF and VEGF families are the primary targets in this approach, and several studies are being conducted to propose anti-angiogenic drugs that are increasingly suitable for the treatment of lung cancer, either as monotherapy or as combined therapy. The efficacy of the results are encouraging, but caution must be placed on the higher risk of toxicity, outlining the importance of personalized follow-up in the management of these patients.

Optimizing the Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Low-Income Countries: A Review

Introduction

Osimertinib is the treatment of choice for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its high price, many low-income countries, such as Syria, cannot provide osimertinib, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate treatment for these patients. This study aimed to review articles that assessed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced NSCLC and developed an appropriate treatment plan for Syrian patients.

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted of published phase II and III studies that assessed the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for advanced NSCLC between January 2003 and May 2022.

Results

Seventeen articles were reviewed. The results were similar when erlotinib or icotinib was compared with gefitinib. Progression-free survival and overall survival for afatinib and dacomitinib were longer than for gefitinib, with small significant differences. Osimertinib was the only TKI that showed efficacy against the T790M mutation, which showed an improvement over the first- and second-generation TKIs. Osimertinib as a first-line therapy is not cost-effective compared with first- and second-generation TKIs.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is the preferred first-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. First- and second-generation TKIs are still considered good options, especially in low-income countries that cannot cover the costs of osimertinib.

The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies

Almost 17% of Western patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Del19 and L858R are the most-common ones; they are positive predictive factors for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, is the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutations. This drug is also administered as a second-line treatment for those patients with the T790M EGFR mutation and previously treated with first- (erlotinib, gefitinib) or second- (afatinib) generation TKIs. However, despite the high clinical efficacy, the prognosis remains severe due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGRF-TKIs. Various mechanisms of resistance have been reported including the activation of other signalling pathways, the development of secondary mutations, the alteration of the downstream pathways, and phenotypic transformation. However, further data are needed to achieve the goal of overcoming resistance to EGFR-TKIs, hence the necessity of discovering novel genetic targets and developing new-generation drugs. This review aimed to deepen the knowledge of intrinsic and acquired molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome TKIs' resistance.

Clinical efficacy and prognosis analysis of treatment regimens for EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aims of the study were to evaluate potential differences among first-line treatment for EGFR mutant (m+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis in China and to identify the factors influencing survival outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 172 EGFRm + patients with advanced NSCLC who received a 1st generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were divided into 4 groups: A, EGFR-TKI (n = 84); B, EGFR-TKI + pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin chemotherapy (CT) (n = 55); C, EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab (n = 15); and D, EGFR-TKI + pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin CT + bevacizumab (n = 18). Intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), the overall survival (OS), objective remission rates (ORRs) and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Intracranial PFS of groups C + D was longer than for groups A + B (18.9 m vs. 11.0 m, P = 0.027). Extracranial PFS were longer in group B in comparison with group A (13.0 m vs. 11.5 m, P = 0.039) and in groups C + D compared to groups A + B (18.9 m vs. 11.9 m, P = 0.008). Median OS in groups A and B were 27.9 m and 24.4 m, respectively, while groups C and D have not yet achieved median OS. Significant difference was found in intracranial ORR between groups A + B vs. C + D (31.0% vs. 65.2%, P = 0.002). Most patients suffered grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events, which were relieved soon after symptomatic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

First-generation EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab treatment outperformed other regimens in EGFRm + NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. The therapy improved the control and delayed progression of intracranial lesions and prolonged survival times.

Nanotechnology - a robust tool for fighting the challenges of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Genomic and proteomic mutation analysis is the standard of care for selecting candidates for therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR TKI therapies) and further monitoring cancer treatment efficacy and cancer development. Acquired resistance due to various genetic aberrations is an unavoidable problem during EGFR TKI therapy, leading to the rapid exhaustion of standard molecularly targeted therapeutic options against mutant variants. Attacking multiple molecular targets within one or several signaling pathways by co-delivery of multiple agents is a viable strategy for overcoming and preventing resistance to EGFR TKIs. However, because of the difference in pharmacokinetics among agents, combined therapies may not effectively reach their targets. The obstacles regarding the simultaneous co-delivery of therapeutic agents at the site of action can be overcome using nanomedicine as a platform and nanotools as delivery agents. Precision oncology research to identify targetable biomarkers and optimize tumor homing agents, hand in hand with designing multifunctional and multistage nanocarriers that respond to the inherent heterogeneity of the tumors, may resolve the challenges of inadequate tumor localization, improve intracellular internalization, and bring advantages over conventional nanocarriers.

The role of antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies combined to EGFR-TKIs in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations: acquired resistance mechanisms and strategies to overcome them

As of today, only two antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies plus epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) combinations are FDA and EMA-approved and are recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network for the first-line treatment of EGFR+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: erlotinib plus bevacizumab and erlotinib plus ramucirumab. However, all treated patients eventually become unresponsive to such drugs, due to several different acquired resistance mechanisms, mainly represented by T790M substitutions and MET amplifications. While osimertinib treatment in T790M+ patients still represents the only approved treatment, MET-TKIs will likely change this status quo in the near future. In fact, existing clinical data strongly support a role for MET-TKI-based combinations in EGFR+ MET-amplified patients, possibly revolutionizing our current treatment algorithm. Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy combinations could also represent another useful addition.

Targeting the tumor stroma for cancer therapy

Tumors are comprised of both cancer cells and surrounding stromal components. As an essential part of the tumor microenvironment, the tumor stroma is highly dynamic, heterogeneous and commonly tumor-type specific, and it mainly includes noncellular compositions such as the extracellular matrix and the unique cancer-associated vascular system as well as a wide variety of cellular components including activated cancer-associated fibroblasts, mesenchymal stromal cells, pericytes. All these elements operate with each other in a coordinated fashion and collectively promote cancer initiation, progression, metastasis and therapeutic resistance. Over the past few decades, numerous studies have been conducted to study the interaction and crosstalk between stromal components and neoplastic cells. Meanwhile, we have also witnessed an exponential increase in the investigation and recognition of the critical roles of tumor stroma in solid tumors. A series of clinical trials targeting the tumor stroma have been launched continually. In this review, we introduce and discuss current advances in the understanding of various stromal elements and their roles in cancers. We also elaborate on potential novel approaches for tumor-stroma-based therapeutic targeting, with the aim to promote the leap from bench to bedside.

The Clinical Impact of Methylated Homeobox A9 ctDNA in Patients with Non-Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer Treated with Erlotinib and Bevacizumab

Methylated homeobox A9 (meth-HOXA9) is tumor specific and has been suggested as a prognostic biomarker in several types of cancer. ctDNA measured as meth-HOXA9 may be a valuable biomarker in the decision-making process about last-line treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical impact of meth-HOXA9 in plasma from patients receiving erlotinib and bevacizumab for late-stage BTC and to investigate the treatment effect and adverse events. Droplet digital PCR was applied to detect meth-HOXA9 in 39 patients. Response rates were registered according to RECIST (1.1) and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE (4.0)). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. A significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with increasing and non-increasing meth-HOXA9 was detected after one treatment cycle, hazard ratio (HR) 12.4 (p < 0.0001) and HR 2.75 (p = 0.04), respectively. The most common adverse events of erlotinib were fatigue, pain, and rash, and those of bevacizumab were bleeding and wounds. This study found meth-HOXA9 to be negatively associated with survival in patients with late-stage BTC. Hence, meth-HOXA9 may guide early discontinuation of ineffective treatment.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Combination treatment with erlotinib plus bevacizumab has the potential to become a standard treatment regimen for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm⁺) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFRm⁺ advanced NSCLC.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched, from inception to 15 January 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), reported in English, assessing the efficacy of erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib monotherapy in patients with EGFRm ⁺ advanced NSCLC.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The main objective was to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used where there was evidence for homogeneous effects.

RESULTS

Four RCTs (reported across six publications) were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 775 patients included in the pooled analyses of PFS, OS and ORR (387 in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab intervention group and 388 in the erlotinib group). Compared with the erlotinib alone group, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group achieved a significantly prolonged PFS (HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.72; p<0.00001; I²=0%), but OS (HR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; p=0.59; I²=0%) and ORR (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.74; p=0.19; I²=0%) were not significantly prolonged. A total of 776 cases were used for a pooled analysis of AEs. Regarding AEs, combined treatment significantly increased the incidence of diarrhoea (51% vs 43%, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.38; p=0.006), haemorrhagic events (41% vs 20%, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.31; p=0.03), proteinuria (25% vs 3%, 95% CI 4.86 to 17.66; p<0.0001) and hypertension (40% vs 8%, 95% CI 3.66 to 7.88; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with EGFRm⁺ advanced NSCLC was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared with erlotinib alone, but the combination did not prolong OS.

Reassessing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in anti-angiogenic cancer therapy

Vascularization is fundamental to the growth and spread of tumor cells to distant sites. As a consequence, angiogenesis, the sprouting of new blood vessels from existing ones, is a characteristic trait of cancer. In 1971, Judah Folkman postulated that tumour growth is angiogenesis dependent and that by cutting off blood supply, a neoplastic lesion could be potentially starved into remission. Decades of research have been devoted to understanding the role that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays in tumor angiogenesis, and it has been identified as a significant pro-angiogenic factor that is frequently overexpressed within a tumor mass. Today, anti-VEGF drugs such as Sunitinib, Sorafenib, Axitinib, Tanibirumab, and Ramucirumab have been approved for the treatment of advanced and metastatic cancers. However, anti-angiogenic therapy has turned out to be more complex than originally thought. The failure of this therapeutic option calls for a reevaluation of VEGF as the major target in anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. The call for reassessment is based on two rationales: first, tumour blood vessels are abnormal, disorganized, and leaky; this not only prevents optimal drug delivery but it also promotes hypoxia and metastasis; secondly, tumour growth or regrowth might be blood vessel dependent and not angiogenesis dependent as tumour cells can acquire blood vessels via non-angiogenic mechanisms. Therefore, a critical assessment of VEGF, VEGFRs, and their inhibitors could glean newer options such as repurposing anti-VEGF drugs as vascular normalizing agents to enhance drug delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Comparison of afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab in untreated stage IIIB/IV epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients: a multicenter clinical analysis study

Background:

Although bevacizumab in combination with afatinib or erlotinib is an effective and safe first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are very few clinical data comparing afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis for the comparison of two combination therapies.

Methods:

Between May 2015 and October 2020, data of 135 stage IIIB/IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib or erlotinib combined with bevacizumab combination therapy in Linkou, Keelung, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

In all, 67 patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab, and 68 patients received erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Afatinib combined with bevacizumab had an objective response rate (ORR) of 82.1% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.0%, and the ORR and DCR were 83.8 and 95.6%, respectively, in the erlotinib combined with bevacizumab group (p = 0.798 and p = 1.000). The median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 20.3 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.891–1.953; p = 0.167). The overall survival was 41.9 and 51.0 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.829–2.436; p = 0.201). The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rates after disease progression were 44% in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and 58.8% in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p = 0.165). Skin toxicity was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both treatment groups. Diarrhea, an AE, occurred significantly more frequently in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group than in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Afatinib combined with bevacizumab was equally as effective as erlotinib combined with bevacizumab for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Prospective clinical studies that explore bevacizumab combined with afatinib or erlotinib for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC are warranted.

A multifunctional nanotheranostic agent potentiates erlotinib to EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as Erlotinib, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mutated EGFR. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in wild-type (wt) EGFR tumours has been shown to be marginal. Methods that can sensitize Erlotinib to EGFR wild-type NSCLC remain rare. Herein, we developed a multifunctional superparamagnetic nanotheranostic agent as a novel strategy to potentiate Erlotinib to EGFR-wt NSCLCs. Our results demonstrate that the nanoparticles can co-escort Erlotinib and a vascular epithermal growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, Bevacizumab (Bev), to EGFR-wt tumours. The nanotheranostic agent exhibits remarkable effects as an inhibitor of EGFR-wt tumour growth. Moreover, Bev normalizes the tumour embedded vessels, further promoting the therapeutic efficacy of Erlotinib. In addition, the tumour engagement of the nanoparticles and the vascular normalization could be tracked by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Collectively, our study, for the first time, demonstrated that elaborated nanoparticles could be employed as a robust tool to potentiate Erlotinib to EGFR-wt NSCLC, paving the way for imaging-guided nanotheranostics for refractory NSCLCs expressing EGFR wild-type genes.

•

A Erlotinib-based nanoagent shows remarkable efficacy to inhibit EGFR-wt NSCLCs.

•

Erlotinib and Bevacizumab show synergistic effects in inhibit EGFR-wt NSCLC.

•

MRI was used to track the tumour engagement of the Erlotinib-based nanoagent.

Effects of miRNA-149-5p and Platelet-Activating Factor-Receptor Signaling on the Growth and Targeted Therapy Response on Lung Cancer Cells

Accumulating evidence indicates that microRNAs (miRs) play critical roles in essentially all biological processes and their altered expression has been documented in various disease conditions, including human malignancies. Although several cellular mechanisms have been identified in mediating the effects of miRs, the involvement of G-protein-coupled, platelet-activating factor-receptor (PAFR) signaling in miR-149-5p-induced effects on lung cancer growth and therapeutic potential has not been studied. To that end, we first evaluated the functional significance of PAFR and miR-149-5p in A549 and H1299 human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. We observed that these tumor lines express endogenous PAFR and miR-149-5p and that PAFR activation by PAF agonist (CPAF) significantly increased, whereas miR-149-5p mimic transfection inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, miR-149-5p mimic significantly attenuated CPAF-mediated increased proliferation of NSCLC cells, as confirmed by miR-149-5p, cyclin D1, and forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) expression analysis via qPCR. Our next studies examined PAFR- and miR-149-5p-mediated effects on targeted therapy (i.e., erlotinib and gefitinib) responses. We observed that erlotinib and gefitinib inhibited A549 and H1299 cell survival in a dose- and time-dependent manner, and CPAF significantly blocked this effect. These findings indicate that miR-149-5p blocks PAFR-mediated increased cell proliferation, and PAFR activation attenuates the cytotoxic effects of targeted therapy.

Impact of smoking status on the relative efficacy of the EGFR TKI/angiogenesis inhibitor combination therapy in advanced NSCLC-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ETOP 10-16 BOOSTER trial failed to demonstrate a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for adding bevacizumab to osimertinib in second line. An exploratory subgroup analysis, however, suggested a PFS benefit of the combination in patients with a smoking history and prompted us to do this study.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differential effect of smoking status on the benefit of adding an angiogenesis inhibitor to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was carried out. All relevant randomized controlled trials appearing in main oncology congresses or in PubMed as of 1 November 2021 were used according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Primarily PFS according to smoking status, and secondarily overall survival (OS) were of interest. Pooled and interaction hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by fixed or random effects models, depending on the detected degree of heterogeneity. Bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB 2).

Results

Information by smoking was available for 1291 patients for PFS (seven studies) and 678 patients for OS (four studies). The risk of bias was low for all studies. Combination treatment significantly prolonged PFS for smokers [n = 502, HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.69] but not for nonsmokers (n = 789, HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.66-1.27; treatment-by-smoking interaction P = 0.02). Similarly, a significant OS benefit was found for smokers (n = 271, HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.93) but not for nonsmokers (n = 407, HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.82-1.42; treatment-by-smoking interaction P = 0.03).

Conclusion

In advanced EGFR-non-small-cell lung cancer patients, the addition of an angiogenesis inhibitor to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy provides a statistically significant PFS and OS benefit in smokers, but not in non-smokers. The biological basis for this observation should be pursued and could determine whether this might be due to a specific co-mutational pattern produced by tobacco exposure.

•

Target population consists of EGFR-non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

•

The relative effect of adding an angiogenesis inhibitor to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor by smoking status was explored.

•

In patients with smoking history, the addition of an angiogenesis inhibitor provides significant PFS and OS benefit.

•

This is not the case in patients with a negative smoking history.

•

The biological basis for this observation should be pursued.

Addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The BEVERLY multicenter randomized phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

Adding bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged PFS of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC in the Japanese JO25567 trial, but limited data were available in non-Asian patients. BEVERLY is an Italian, multicenter, randomized phase III investigating the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib alone. Investigator-assessed PFS (IA-PFS) and blinded-independent centrally-reviewed PFS (BICR-PFS) were co-primary endpoints. With 80% power in detecting a 0.60 HR and 2-sided α error 0.05, 126 events out of 160 patients were needed. The trial was registered as NCT02633189 and EudraCT 2015-002235-17.

RESULTS

From Apr 11, 2016 to Feb 27, 2019, 160 pts were randomized to erlotinib+bevacizumab (80) or erlotinib alone (80). At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, median IA-PFS was 15.4 months (95%CI:12.2-18.6) with erlotinib+bevacizumab and 9.6 months (95%CI:8.2-10.6) with erlotinib (HR 0.66; 95%CI: 0.47-0.92). BICR-PFS analysis confirmed this result. A statistically significant interaction with treatment effect was found for smoking habit (P=0.0323), PFS prolongation being clinically significant only among current or previous smokers. Hypertension (grade≥3: 24% vs 5%), skin rash (grade≥3: 31% vs 14%), thromboembolic events (any grade: 11% vs 4%), and proteinuria (any grade: 23% vs 6%) were more frequent with the combination.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib prolonged PFS in Italian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC; toxicity was increased with the combination but without unexpected safety issues.

Combination of Bevacizumab and Osimertinib in Patients with EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib may improve the prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, to date, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab have not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the additional effect of bevacizumab plus osimertinib compared with osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation.

METHODS

In this study, 32 patients received osimertinib alone, while 20 patients received osimertinib plus bevacizumab. The median follow-up was 12 months. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and adverse events (AEs) were compared.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was higher in the combination group than in the osimertinib-alone group (70.0% vs. 43.8%), and the OS (12.8% ± 7.7% vs. 45.4% ± 12.0%; p = 0.038) and PFS (37.3% ± 11.9% vs. 55.3% ± 14.3%; p = 0.045) were also significantly improved in patients who underwent osimertinib plus bevacizumab. Furthermore, the incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in the combination arm when compared with osimertinib alone (p = 0.003), and the number of other AEs were not significantly increased by adding bevacizumab (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of bevacizumab and osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation may have potential therapeutic effect than osimertinib alone. Further studies with a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm results of this study.

Analysis of the lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA Network Reveals a Potential Regulatory Mechanism of EGFR-TKI Resistance in NSCLC

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are widely used for patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Despite its initial therapeutic efficacy, most patients eventually develop drug resistance, which leads to a poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Previous investigations have proved that non-coding RNAs including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs) contribute to drug resistance by various biological functions, whereas how they regulate EGFR-TKI resistance remains unclear. In this study, we examined gene expression using the microarray technology on gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells to obtain differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs and mRNAs. A total of 45 DE-lncRNAs associated with overall survival and 1799 target DE-mRNAs were employed to construct a core lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA network to illustrate underlying molecular mechanisms of how EGFR-TKI resistance occurs in NSCLC. We found that target DE-mRNAs were mainly enriched in pathways involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, especially the target DE-mRNAs regulated by LINC01128 were significantly enriched in the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, where the synergy of these target DE-mRNAs may play a key role in EGFR-TKI resistance. In addition, downregulated LINC01128, acting as a specific miRNA sponge, decreases PTEN via sponging miR-25-3p. Furthermore, signaling reactions caused by the downregulation of PTEN would activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which may lead to EGFR-TKI resistance. In addition, a survival analysis indicated the low expression of LINC01128, and PTEN is closely related to poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Therefore, the LINC01128/miR-25-3p/PTEN axis may promote EGFR-TKI resistance via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which provides new insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of drug resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC. In addition, our study sheds light on developing novel therapeutic approaches to overcome EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC.

The different overall survival between single-agent EGFR-TKI treatment and with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy or with bevacizumab in real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was lacking. 310 patients of advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutation receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy or with bevacizumab were included and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analysed. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab were significantly younger, had better performance status and with high incidence of brain metastasis (55.8%). In the propensity-score matched cohort, PFS (13.5 vs. 13.7 months; log-rank p = 0.700) was similar between the two groups. The OS (61.3 vs. 34.2 months; log-rank p = 0.010) and risk reduction of death (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.20–0.85]; p = 0.017) were significantly improved in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group. Analysis of treatment by brain metastasis status demonstrated EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab in patients with brain metastasis was associated with significant OS benefit compared to other groups (log-rank p = 0.030) and these patients had lower early-CNS and early-systemic progressions. The secondary T790M did not significantly differ between EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI monotherapy groups (66.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.460). Forty-one (31.1%) and 31 (23.5%) patients received subsequent osimertinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The post-progression OS of osimertinib and chemotherapy were 22.1 and 44.9 months in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group and were 10.0 and 14.1 months in EGFR-TKI monotherpay group, respectively. First-generation EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy in real-world patients of NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Patients with brain metastasis received additional OS benefit from this treatment.

MARIPOSA: phase 3 study of first-line amivantamab + lazertinib versus osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer; however, almost all patients will eventually relapse. Amivantamab is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity that targets activating and resistance EGFR mutations and MET mutations and amplifications. In the ongoing CHRYSALIS study (NCT02609776), amivantamab in combination with lazertinib, a potent, brain-penetrant third-generation EGFR TKI, demonstrated antitumor activity in the treatment-naive and osimertinib-relapsed setting. Here the authors present the methodology for the MARIPOSA study (NCT04487080), a phase 3, multicenter, randomized study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy versus single-agent osimertinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer.

Afatinib Treatment Alone or with Bevacizumab in a Real-World Cohort of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation

BACKGROUND

Treatment outcome between afatinib alone or with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation remains insufficiently reported.

METHODS

A total of 405 advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing-EGFR mutation receiving first-line single-agent afatinib or with bevacizumab were grouped and propensity score-matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the original cohort, 367 (90.6%) patients received afatinib treatment alone and 38 (9.4%) patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab combination were significantly younger (54.6 ± 10.9 vs. 63.9 ± 11.5; p < 0.001) compared to the afatinib alone group. After propensity score matching, the afatinib alone and afatinib plus bevacizumab groups contained 118 and 34 patients, respectively. A non-significantly higher objective response was noted in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group (82.4% vs. 67.8%; p = 0.133). In the propensity score-matched cohort, a bevacizumab add-on offered no increased PFS (16.1 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.500), risk reduction of progression (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.52-1.40]; p = 0.528), OS benefit (32.1 vs. 42.0 months; p = 0.700), nor risk reduction of death (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.42-1.74] p = 0.660) compared to the single-agent afatinib. The secondary T790M rate in afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone groups was similar (56.3% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that EGFR L858R (OR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26-0.97]; p = 0.044), EGFR uncommon mutation (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.64]; p = 0.021), and PFS longer than 12 months (OR 2.71 [95% CI, 1.39-5.41]; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of secondary T790M positivity.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab treatment showed moderate efficacy in real-world, afatinib-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation.

Angiogenesis inhibition in lung cancer: emerging novel strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the current review, we will explore the molecular bases that have determined the design of clinical trials exploring the efficacy of antivascular agents in combination with chemotherapy, immune check point inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the synergistic effect of antivascular agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs, despite no molecular marker has been identified yet to select patients.

SUMMARY

Lung cancer remains one of the first causes of cancer-related death. However, thanks to the development of stratified molecular medicine and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients' survival has significantly improved. Due to the critical role of pro-angiogenic factors in cancer progression, antivascular agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) have been developed. Their efficacy has been explored in combination with chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with promising but not definitive conclusions about their impact on prolonging patients' survival.

A Real-World Analysis of Patients with Untreated Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Line Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The clinical features of patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line therapy based on erlotinib combined with bevacizumab are unclear. Here, we sought to analyze the clinical features of this patient group.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for the period from January 2015 to August 2019 for 49 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line erlotinib-and-bevacizumab combination therapy from the Linkou and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals.

RESULTS

The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab showed an 83.7% objective response rate and a 97.9% disease control rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 22.0 [95% CI (19.7-22.33)] and 47.6 [95% CI (38.87-56.37)] months, respectively, for all patients. The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rate in the patients with acquired resistance to the combination was 72.4%. No predictive factor associated with the appearance of secondary EGFR-T790M mutations was found. The most frequent adverse event (AE) caused by the combination therapy was dermatitis (100%), and most of the AEs were manageable and grades 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib combined with bevacizumab is an effective and safe therapy for untreated metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. The combination does not alter secondary EGFR-T790M mutations in patients with acquired resistance and is feasible in real-world clinical practice.

A randomised phase II study of osimertinib and bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone as second-line targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC with confirmed EGFR and acquired T790M mutations: the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP 10-16) BOOSTER trial

BACKGROUND

While osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitising EGFR and acquired T790M mutations, progression inevitably occurs. The angiogenic pathway is implicated in EGFR TKI resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BOOSTER is an open-label randomised phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combined osimertinib 80 mg daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, versus osimertinib alone, in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and acquired T790M mutations after failure on previous EGFR TKI therapy. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Between May 2017 and February 2019, 155 patients were randomised (combination: 78; osimertinib: 77). At data cut-off of 22 February 2021, median follow-up was 33.8 months [interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-37.6 months] and 129 (83.2%) PFS events were reported in the intention-to-treat population. There was no difference in median PFS between the combination [15.4 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-18.0 months] and osimertinib arm (12.3 months; 95% CI 6.2-17.2 months; stratified log-rank P = 0.83), [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.37]. Median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 17.8-32.1 months) in the combination arm and 24.3 months (95% CI 16.9-37.0 months) in the osimertinib arm (stratified log-rank P = 0.91), (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.67-1.56). Exploratory analysis revealed a significant interaction of smoking history with treatment for PFS (adjusted P = 0.0052) with a HR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.90) for smokers, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.92-2.33) for never smokers. ORR was 55% in both arms and the median time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the combination than in the osimertinib arm, 8.2 months versus 10.8 months, respectively (P = 0.0074). Safety of osimertinib and bevacizumab was consistent with previous reports with grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) reported in 47% and 18% of patients on combination and osimertinib alone, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in PFS was observed between osimertinib plus bevacizumab and osimertinib alone. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more common in patients on combination.

First-line osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and with a coexisting low allelic fraction of Thr790Met

AIM OF THE STUDY

The AZENT (NCT02841579) study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and with a coexisting low allelic fraction of Thr790Met.

METHODS

In this multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase IIa study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring centrally confirmedEGFR Thr790Met mutation received 80 mg osimertinib daily. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end-points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Efficacy was assessed as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. Blood samples collected at baseline, end of week 2 and disease progression were analysed using next-generation sequencing. As osimertinib was approved as a first-line therapy during the trial, this led to early termination of phase II; thus, analysis is considered exploratory.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled and received osimertinib. All 22 patients were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. At the data cutoff, 10 (50%) patients remained on treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 24.4 months (interquartile range 12.9 to 26.0). The ORR was 77.3% (17/22 [95% confidence interval {CI} 54.6 to 89.3]). The DCR was 86.4% (19/22, [95% CI 65.1 to 97.1]). The median PFS was 23.1 months (95% CI 14.1 to NE). The median OS was 28·4 months (95% CI 25.6 to NE).

CONCLUSION

Despite early study termination, osimertinib first-line therapy yields an overall PFS of 23.1 months in EGFR-mutant patients harbouring a coexisting low allelic fraction of EGFR Thr790Met mutation.

Clinical and molecular feature-based nomogram model for predicting benefit from bevacizumab combined with first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The combination of bevacizumab and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) could prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study investigated the clinical and molecular factors that affect the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKI with or without bevacizumab and identify the subset of patients who can benefit from combination therapy.

METHODS

Our study included 318 patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced/advanced NSCLC treated with either first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab (A+T; n = 159) or EGFR-TKI monotherapy (T; n = 159). Two nomogram models to predict PFS and overall survival (OS), respectively, were constructed using two factors that impact EGFR-TKI efficacy: metastatic site and presence of concurrent mutations. The study cohort was stratified into 2 cohorts for training (n = 176) and validation (n = 142) of the nomogram model. Using the median score from the nomogram, the patients were stratified into two groups to analyze their survival outcome.

RESULTS

The A+T group had significantly longer PFS (14.0 vs. 10.5 months; p < 0.001) and OS (37.0 vs. 26.0 months; p = 0.042) than the T group. Among the patients with concurrent mutations in tumor suppressor genes, those in the A+T group had significantly longer PFS and OS than the T group (PFS 14.5 vs. 8.0 months, p < 0.001; OS 39.0 vs. 20.0 months, p = 0.003). The higher scores from the nomograms were associated with the presence of brain/liver/pleural metastasis or concomitant gene mutations, which indicated a higher likelihood of shorter PFS and OS. The validation of the nomogram revealed that patients with lower scores had significantly longer PFS for the T group than those with higher scores (15.0 vs. 9.0 months, p = 0.002), but not for the A+T group (15.9 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.256).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a nomogram, our study demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab may enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of EGFR-TKI by overcoming the negative impact of certain clinical and molecular factors on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI.

The safety and efficacy of erlotinib and ramucirumab combination in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed the natural history of EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, but acquired resistance is inevitable. New strategies are being tested to overcome or prevent the emergence of resistance mechanisms to first-line TKIs, among which combinations of TKIs with antiangiogenic agents.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search for preclinical and clinical data on the interplay and dual inhibition of EGFR/VEGF pathways, particularly in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We then focused on RELAY, a placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluating ramucirumab combined to erlotinib in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. This article aims to summarize efficacy and safety of the ramucirumab-erlotinib combination in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

RELAY confirmed the clinical relevance of combining EGFR and VEGF(R)-targeting therapies, previously investigated in smaller phase 2-3 trials of erlotinib and bevacizumab. However, the meaningful PFS benefit observed in the ramucirumab + erlotinib arm is counterbalanced by the toxicity profile of ramucirumab and the need for bimonthly infusions. Pending OS results are, therefore, critical to assess the real benefit from this combination, especially as first-line osimertinib has improved survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and will probably remain the pivotal EGFR-TKI in this setting. However, its heterogeneous efficacy across subgroups paves the way for osimertinib-based combinations, which are being investigated in ongoing trials.

Molecular Mechanism of EGFR-TKI Resistance in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Application to Biological Diagnostic and Monitoring

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are a positive predictive factor for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For common EGFR mutations (Del19, L858R), the standard first-line treatment is actually third-generation TKI, osimertinib. In the case of first-line treatment by first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- or second-generation (afatinib) TKIs, osimertinib is approved in second-line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR mutation. Despite the excellent disease control results with EGFR TKIs, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and possible drug targets, which vary among the generation/line of EGFR TKIs. Besides EGFR second/third mutations, alternative mechanisms could be involved, such as gene amplification or gene fusion, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of EGFR TKIs and should be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research.

Iterative Upgrading of Small Molecular Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for EGFR Mutation in NSCLC: Necessity and Perspective

Molecular targeted therapy has been reported to have fewer adverse effects, and offer a more convenient route of administration, compared with conventional chemotherapy. With the development of sequencing technology, and research on the molecular biology of lung cancer, especially whole-genome information on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various therapeutic targets have been unveiled. Among the NSCLC-driving gene mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common, and approximately 10% of Caucasian, and more than 50% of Asian, NSCLC patients have been found to have sensitive EGFR mutations. A variety of targeted therapeutic agents for EGFR mutations have been approved for clinical applications, or are undergoing clinical trials around the world. This review focuses on: the indications of approved small molecular kinase inhibitors for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC; the mechanisms of drug resistance and the corresponding therapeutic strategies; the principles of reasonable and precision molecular structure; and the drug development discoveries of next-generation inhibitors for EGFR.

Current research progress in targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy for osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour with a peak in incidence during adolescence. Delayed patient presentation and diagnosis is common with approximately 15% of OS patients presenting with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. With the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the 1970s, disease prognosis improved from 17% to 60%-70% 5-year survival, but outcomes have not significantly improved since then. Novel and innovative therapeutic strategies are urgently needed as an adjunct to conventional treatment modalities to improve outcomes for OS patients. Angiogenesis is crucial for tumour growth, metastasis and invasion, and its prevention will ultimately inhibit tumour growth and metastasis. Dysregulation of angiogenesis in bone microenvironment involving osteoblasts and osteoclasts might contribute to OS development. This review summarizes existing knowledge regarding pre-clinical and developmental research of targeted anti-angiogenic therapy for OS with the aim of highlighting the limitations associated with this application. Targeted anti-angiogenic therapies include monoclonal antibody to VEGF (bevacizumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Sorafenib, Apatinib, Pazopanib and Regorafenib) and human recombinant endostatin (Endostar). However, considering the safety and efficacy of these targeted anti-angiogenesis therapies in clinical trials cannot be guaranteed at this point, further research is needed to completely understand and characterize targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy in OS.

Efficacy of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients with refractory advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic agents are reported to exert clinical activity in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the outcomes of the combination of docetaxel plus nintedanib in refractory NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 19 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who had progressed to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and platinum-based chemotherapy receiving docetaxel and nintedanib at 14 Spanish institutions from January 2013 to December 2019. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median age was 58.9 years (range 42.8-81), 73.7% were female. All patients were Caucasian, and 73.7% were never or light smokers. The baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0-1 in 94.7% of patients. All patients had adenocarcinoma. Brain and liver metastases were present in 47.4% and 31.6% of patients, respectively. The most common EGFR mutations were exon 19 deletion (52.6%) and exon 21 L858R mutation (36.8%); 47.4% patients presented the EGFR T790M. 94.8% of the patients had received 2-3 previous treatment lines. Docetaxel was administered at 75 mg/m²/3 weeks to 16 patients, at 60 mg/m² to 2 patients and at 45 mg/m² to one patient. Nintedanib was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity at 200 mg twice daily except in 2 patients who received 150 mg twice daily and one patient who received 100 mg/12 h. With a median follow-up of 11.4 months (1-38), the median PFS was 6.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-7.3] and the median OS 10.1 months (95% CI 5.9-14.3). The objective response rate (ORR) was 44.4% (23.7-66.8%) and the disease control rate (DCR) 72.2% (49.4-88.5%). Efficacy tended to be greater in patients with the acquired T790M who had received osimertinib, with a median PFS of 6.3 (95% CI 2.1-10.5) versus (vs.) 4.8 (95% CI 3.5-6.1) and a median OS of 12.3 months (95% CI 8.6-16.0) vs. 6.7 months (95% CI 3.9-9.4), although this tendency was not statistically significant (p = 0.468 and p = 0.159, respectively). Sixteen patients (84.2%) had a total of 34 adverse events (AEs), with a median of two (0-6) AEs per patient. The most frequent AEs were asthenia (20.6%) and diarrhea (20.6%). One treatment-related death due to portal thrombosis was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the combination of docetaxel and nintedanib can be considered to be an effective treatment for EGFR TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Icotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study focused on comparing the safety and therapeutic effects between icotinib monotherapy and icotinib plus bevacizumab combined therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases harboring EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from the Cancer Institute and Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between October 2018 and December 2019, where the NSCLC cases that harbored EGFR mutations underwent first-line therapy with icotinib in the presence or absence of bevacizumab. This study included 90 cases, of which 60 patients were in the icotinib group (I) and 30 in the icotinib plus bevacizumab group (IB).

RESULTS

The follow-up period to evaluate median PFS in our study was 18 months. Median PFS was 18.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7-21.3) with icotinib plus bevacizumab and 11 months (95% CI: 8.9-13.1) with icotinib alone (hazard ratio 0·54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92; p = 0.029). According to the subgroup analyses based on the type of EGFR genomic aberration, a prolonged median PFS was observed in the cases harboring exon 21 point mutation (Ex21.L858R) in the IB group compared to the I group (not reached vs. 11 months [8.8-13.2], p = 0.021). However, the difference between the cases harboring exon 19 deletions in the EGFR gene was not significant. The DCR and ORR were comparable between both groups. Substantially higher incidences of hypertension and proteinuria were observed in the combined group compared to the icotinib monotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to provide further evidence of the benefits of applying icotinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC cases harboring EGFR mutations. However, these findings need to be verified through prospective phase 3 clinical studies.

Potentiating Therapeutic Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subset of breast cancer with aggressive characteristics and few therapeutic options. The lack of an appropriate therapeutic target is a challenging issue in treating TNBC. Although a high level expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been associated with a poor prognosis among patients with TNBC, targeted anti-EGFR therapies have demonstrated limited efficacy for TNBC treatment in both clinical and preclinical settings. However, with the advantage of a number of clinically approved EGFR inhibitors (EGFRis), combination strategies have been explored as a promising approach to overcome the intrinsic resistance of TNBC to EGFRis. In this review, we analyzed the literature on the combination of EGFRis with other molecularly targeted therapeutics or conventional chemotherapeutics to understand the current knowledge and to provide potential therapeutic options for TNBC treatment.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of TKIs Alone or in Combination With Antiangiogenic Agents in Advanced EGFR-Mutated NSCLC as the First-Line Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might benefit from the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with antiangiogenic agents. This study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of first-line TKI plus antiangiogenic agents versus TKIs alone in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed to identify studies published up to Feb. 2020. Abstracts from major international conferences reported over the last 5 years were searched. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity.

RESULTS

In total, 7 relevant trials comprising 1612 patients were identified. TKIs plus antiangiogenic agents led to significant improvements in PFS regardless of the EGFR mutation subtype and presence of brain metastasis. In particular, in the subgroup with the L858R mutation, the hazard ratio (HR) of PFS was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.71, P < .001). The OS following combined treatment was similar to that following TKI monotherapy. The ORR was increased with the use of TKIs plus antiangiogenic agents (HR 1.10, 95% CI, 1.01-1.20, P = .029). In the safety analyses, TKIs plus antiangiogenic agents exhibited a significantly increased incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

The use of TKIs plus antiangiogenic agents is associated with significantly improved PFS and ORR compared with TKIs alone in untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The toxicities of combination therapy should be considered when making treatment choices.

Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Contemporary Lung Cancer Treatments

OPINION STATEMENT

Lung cancer is the most common form of cancer in humans and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Traditionally, lung cancer has been diagnosed as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, recent developments in molecular pathology have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, thus improving patient prognosis and increasing the number of survivors. In advanced NSCLC cases, molecularly targeted drugs for patients with positive driver gene mutation/rearrangement, and immune checkpoint inhibitors for those with a positive biomarker, have changed the standard of care. SCLC is a highly malignant entity. In addition to the chemotherapy and radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently provided some hope for extended-stage SCLC. Smoking cessation is related to decreased morbidity. However, early metastasis remains a significant challenge. Recently, cancer therapy-related cardiovascular disease (CTRCD) has emerged as diverse pathophysiology, including fulminant myocarditis, fatal arrhythmia, pericarditis, hypertension, and thrombosis, that emerged with modern lung cancer therapies. Cardio-oncology is a new interdisciplinary collaboration to develop methodologies to manage cardiovascular risk factors and CTRCDs with the common goal of minimizing unnecessary interruption of cancer treatment and maximizing outcomes of lung cancer survivors.

Inside-Out-Oriented Cell Membrane Biomimetic Magnetic Nanoparticles for High-Performance Drug Lead Discovery

Biomimetic cell membrane-coated nanoparticles have been broadly applied because of their superior biochemical properties. The right-side-out cell membrane coating manner provides nanoparticles with an immune-evasive stealth function in vivo. However, this acts as a drag for drug discovery when the drug targets are the intracellular domain of transmembrane receptors. Herein, inside-out-oriented cell membrane-coated nanoparticles were prepared for screening tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which specifically interacted with the intracellular kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Biotinylated human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cell membranes specifically interacted with streptavidin-immobilized Fe₃O₄ magnetic nanoparticles and then formed inside-out-oriented cell membrane-coated magnetic nanoparticles (IOCMMNPs). The cell membrane orientation of the IOCMMNPs was successfully confirmed by immunogold electron microscopy, fluorescently labeled confocal microscopy, sialic acid quantification assay, and the adsorption capacity assay. Moreover, IOCMMNPs possessed satisfactory binding capacity, selectivity, and high sensitivity (limit of detection = 0.4 × 10^-3 μg mL^-1). Ultimately, IOCMMNPs successfully targeted two main compounds from Strychnos nux-vomica whose potential antitumor activities were further validated by pharmacological studies. The application of the inside-out cell membrane coating strategy further enhances the drug screening efficiency and broadens the insight and methodologies for drug lead discovery. This inside-out cell membrane coating concept also provides a method for the future development of engineered cell membrane-coated nanotechnology.

RELAY, ramucirumab plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Europe/United States subset analysis

BACKGROUND

In EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, dual EGFR/VEGFR inhibition compared to EGFR alone increases anti-tumor efficacy. The Phase III RELAY trial demonstrated superior PFS for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) over placebo plus erlotinib (PBO + ERL) (HR 0.591 [95% CI 0.461-0.760], p<0.0001). EGFR mutated NSCLC is less prevalent in Western versus Asian patients. This prespecified analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of RAM + ERL in EU and US patients enrolled in RELAY.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to ERL + RAM (10 mg/kg IV) or PBO Q2W. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Patients were stratified by geographic region (East Asia vs "other" [EU/US and Canada (EU/US)]). Objectives included PFS, ORR, DoR, OS, PFS2, safety and biomarker analysis.

RESULTS

EU/US subset included 113/449 (25.9%) patients (58 RAM + ERL, 55 PBO + ERL). RAM + ERL improved PFS (20.6 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.605 [95% CI: 0.362-1.010]). ORR and DCR were similar, but median DoR was longer with RAM + ERL (18.0 vs 10.1 months, HR 0.527 [95% CI: 0.296-0.939]). OS and PFS2 were immature at data cut-off (censoring rates 81.0-81.8% and 67.3-79.3%, respectively). Most commonly reported Grade ≥3 TEAE for RAM + ERL was hypertension (17 [29.8%]) and for PBO + ERL, dermatitis acneiform (5 [9.1%]).

CONCLUSION

EU/US subset analysis showed improved efficacy outcomes for RAM + ERL and a safety profile consistent with the overall population. Ramucirumab is a safe and effective addition to standard-of-care EGFR-TKI for EGFR mutation-positive metastatic NSCLC.

Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the clinical prospects of patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. Despite prolonged disease control and high tumor response rates, all patients eventually progress on EGFR TKI treatment. Here, we review the mechanisms of acquired EGFR TKI resistance, the methods for monitoring its appearance, as well as current and future efforts to define treatment strategies to overcome resistance.

Efficacy of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab vs Osimertinib in Patients With EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: West Japan Oncology Group 8715L Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although treatment with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus antiangiogenic inhibitor has shown promising efficacies in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, recent single-arm studies have suggested that osimertinib plus antiangiogenic inhibitor might not work synergistically.

Objective

To explore the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab compared with osimertinib alone in patients with lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR T790M mutation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma that progressed with prior EGFR-TKI treatment (other than third-generation TKI) and acquired EGFR T790M mutation were enrolled. This study comprises a lead-in part with 6 patients and a subsequent phase 2 part. In phase 2, patients were randomized to osimertinib plus bevacizumab or osimertinib alone in a 1:1 ratio.

Interventions

The combination arm received oral osimertinib (80 mg, every day) plus intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The control arm received osimertinib monotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by investigators. Secondary end points consisted of overall response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and safety.

Results

From August 2017 through September 2018, a total of 87 patients were registered (6 in the lead-in part and 81 in the phase 2 part [intention-to-treat population]). Among those randomized, the median (range) age was 68 (41-82) years; 33 (41%) were male; 37 (46%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0; and 21 (26%) had brain metastasis. Although the overall response rate was better with osimertinib plus bevacizumab than osimertinib alone (68% vs 54%), median PFS was not longer with osimertinib plus bevacizumab (9.4 months vs 13.5 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.44; 80% CI, 1.00 to 2.08; P = .20). Median time to treatment failure was also shorter in the combination arm vs the osimertinib arm (8.4 months vs 11.2 months; P = .12). Median overall survival was not different in the combination arm vs osimertinib arm (not reached vs 22.1 months; P = .96). In the combination arm, common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were proteinuria (n = 9; 23%), hypertension (n = 8; 20%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial comparing osimertinib plus bevacizumab vs osimertinib alone, the combination arm failed to show prolongation of PFS in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR T790M mutation.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: UMIN000023761.

Phase I Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab in Combination with Osimertinib in Advanced T790M-positive EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

We report the final analysis of JVDL (NCT02789345), which examined the combination of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib plus the VEGFR2-directed antibody ramucirumab in patients with T790M-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, single-arm phase I study enrolled patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC, who had progressed following EGFR TKI but were third-generation EGFR TKI-naïve. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period with as-needed dose deescalation was followed by an expansion cohort. Patients received daily oral osimertinib and intravenous ramucirumab every 2 weeks until progression or discontinuation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled. No DLTs were observed. Median follow-up time was 25.0 months. Common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were hypertension (8%) and platelet count decreased (16%); grade 5 TRAE (subdural hemorrhage) occurred in 1 patient. Patients with (N = 10) and without central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (N = 15) had similar safety outcomes. Five patients remain on treatment. Objective response rate (ORR) was 76%. Median duration of response was 13.4 months [90% confidence interval (CI): 9.6-21.2]. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months (90% CI: 5.5-19.3). Efficacy was observed in patients with and without CNS metastasis (ORR 60% and 87%; median PFS 10.9 and 14.7 months, respectively). Exploratory biomarker analyses in circulating tumor DNA suggested that on-treatment loss of EGFR Exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations, detectable at baseline, correlated with longer PFS, but on-treatment loss of T790M did not. Emergent genetic alterations postprogression included C797S, MET amplification, and EGFR amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramucirumab plus osimertinib demonstrated encouraging safety and antitumor activity in T790M-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC.See related commentary by Garon, p. 905.

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) combined with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKI treatment: A cohort study

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) significantly improve outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance inevitably emerges and remains a major challenge. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs.Advanced non-squamous EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs were administered bevacizumab while EGFR-TKIs were continued until disease progression occurred. Tumor lesions were assessed, and blood samples were collected at the start of the combination treatment and every 6 weeks until disease progression.Among the 15 included patients, there were no grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs). Partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were achieved in 1 and 13 patients, respectively, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 6.7% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 93.3%. The median progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from the initiation of combination treatment to disease progression, was 5.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-6.0) months. Additionally, Spearman correlation analysis revealed that PFS2 was positively correlated with the serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level at baseline (r = 0.7212, P = .0234). Patients with high baseline serum VEGF levels showed a better median PFS2 than those with low baseline serum VEGF levels (5.5 months vs 3.6 months, P = .0333).EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab led to a durable prolongation of PFS in non-squamous NSCLC patients with gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs. This therapeutic regimen was well tolerated and could be a promising strategy for these patients. Serum VEGF could be a potential biomarker to predict a subset of patients who are likely to benefit from EGFR-TKIs combined with bevacizumab.

Central nervous system metastases and oligoprogression during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: how to treat and when?

Up to 70% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases during the course of their disease, especially those with oncogenic drivers treated with a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), because of the relatively poor CNS penetration. CNS metastases are associated with a negative impact on quality of life and survival. As, with the introduction of newer generation TKIs, the survival rates are increasing in this particular population, treatment and/or prevention of CNS metastases becomes even more relevant and the TKI with the best CNS efficacy should be selected. Unfortunately, CNS efficacy data in clinical trials are not fully comparable. Furthermore, oligoprogression to the brain without extracranial progression regularly occurs in the oncogenic driver population and both local therapy and switch of systemic therapy are possible treatment options. However, the best order of systemic and local therapy is still not precisely known. In this narrative review, we will summarize incidence and treatment of CNS metastases in oncogene driven NSCLC, including the optimal treatment of CNS oligometastatic disease (synchronous as well as oligoprogressive).

The Role of the Liquid Biopsy in Decision-Making for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Liquid biopsy is a rapidly emerging tool of precision oncology enabling minimally invasive molecular diagnostics and longitudinal monitoring of treatment response. For the clinical management of advanced stage lung cancer patients, detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is now widely adopted into clinical practice. Still, interpretation of results and validation of ctDNA-based treatment decisions remain challenging. We report here our experience implementing liquid biopsies into the clinical management of lung cancer. We discuss advantages and limitations of distinct ctDNA assay techniques and highlight our approach to the analysis of recurrent molecular alterations found in lung cancer. Moreover, we report three exemplary clinical cases illustrating the complexity of interpreting liquid biopsy results in clinical practice. These cases underscore the potential and current limitations of liquid biopsy, focusing on the difficulty of interpreting discordant findings. In our view, despite all current limitations, the analysis of ctDNA in lung cancer patients is an essential and highly versatile complementary diagnostic tool for the clinical management of lung cancer patients in the era of precision oncology.

Platelet-Activating Factor-Receptor Signaling Mediates Targeted Therapies-Induced Microvesicle Particles Release in Lung Cancer Cells

Microvesicle particles (MVP) secreted by a variety of cell types in response to reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating pro-oxidative stressors have been implicated in modifying the cellular responses including the sensitivity to therapeutic agents. Our previous studies have shown that expression of a G-protein coupled, platelet-activating factor-receptor (PAFR) pathway plays critical roles in pro-oxidative stressors-mediated cancer growth and MVP release. As most therapeutic agents act as pro-oxidative stressors, the current studies were designed to determine the role of the PAFR signaling in targeted therapies (i.e., gefitinib and erlotinib)-mediated MVP release and underlying mechanisms using PAFR-expressing human A549 and H1299 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Our studies demonstrate that both gefitinib and erlotinib generate ROS in a dose-dependent manner in a process blocked by antioxidant and PAFR antagonist, verifying their pro-oxidative stressor’s ability, and the role of the PAFR in this effect. We observed that these targeted therapies induce MVP release in a dose- and time-dependent manner, similar to a PAFR-agonist, carbamoyl-PAF (CPAF), and PAFR-independent agonist, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), used as positive controls. To confirm the PAFR dependency, we demonstrate that siRNA-mediated PAFR knockdown or PAFR antagonist significantly blocked only targeted therapies- and CPAF-mediated but not PMA-induced MVP release. The use of pharmacologic inhibitor strategy suggested the involvement of the lipid ceramide-generating enzyme, acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase) in MVP biogenesis, and observed that regardless of the stimuli used, aSMase inhibition significantly blocked MVP release. As mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; ERK1/2 and p38) pathways crosstalk with PAFR, their inhibition also significantly attenuated targeted therapies-mediated MVP release. These findings indicate that PAFR signaling could be targeted to modify cellular responses of targeted therapies in lung cancer cells.

The Combination of Afatinib and Bevacizumab in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Observational Study

The efficacy of afatinib in combination with bevacizumab in untreated advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma is currently unclear. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this combination through a multicenter observational analysis. Data for 57 patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma who received afatinib combined with bevacizumab as first-line therapy at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Linkou and Kaohsiung and Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital from May 2015 to July 2019 were analyzed. The objective response rate and disease control rate of afatinib combined with bevacizumab therapy were 87.7% and 100%, respectively. In all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) (17.56–29.17)) and 45.9 (95% CI (39.50–53.60)) months, respectively. No statistical significance between exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations was noted in PFS or OS. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (98.2%) and dermatitis (96.5%), and most AEs were grade 2 or lower and manageable. The combination of afatinib and bevacizumab is an effective therapy for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with acceptable safety. Future prospective studies focusing on this combination for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma are warranted.

Combination of gefitinib and olaparib versus gefitinib alone in EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter, randomized phase II study (GOAL)

OBJECTIVES

Progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) varies in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven byEGFR mutations, suggesting that other genetic alterations may influence oncogene addiction. Low BRCA1 mRNA levels correlate with longer PFS in erlotinib-treated EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Since the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib, may attenuate and/or prevent BRCA1 expression, the addition of olaparib to gefitinib could improve outcome in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GOAL was a multicenter, randomized phase IB/II study performed in two countries, Spain and Mexico. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, treatment-naïve, pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC, with centrally confirmed EGFR mutations and measurable disease. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg daily or gefitinib 250 mg daily plus olaparib 200 mg three times daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Between September 2013, and July 2016, 182 patients underwent randomization, 91 received gefitinib and 91 received gefitinib plus olaparib. There were no differences in gender, age, smoking status, performance status, presence of bone and brain metastases or type ofEGFR mutation. Median PFS was 10.9 months (95 % CI 9.3-13.3) in the gefitinib arm and 12.8 months (95 % CI 9.1-14.7) in the gefitinib plus olaparib arm (HR 1.38, 95 % CI 1.00-1.92; p = 0.124). The most common adverse events were anemia, 78 % in gefitinib plus olaparib group, 38 % in gefitinib arm, diarrhea, 65 % and 60 %, and fatigue, 40 % and 32 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The gefitinib plus olaparib combination did not provide significant benefit over gefitinib alone. The combination's safety profile showed an increase in hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, compared to gefitinib alone, however, no relevant adverse events were noted.