Zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax with minimal residual disease-driven discontinuation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

First-line venetoclax combinations versus chemoimmunotherapy in fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (GAIA/CLL13): 4-year follow-up from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) rates and progression-free survival compared with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, to our knowledge, no data on direct comparisons of different venetoclax-based combinations are available.

METHODS

GAIA/CLL13 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study conducted at 159 sites in ten countries in Europe and the Middle East. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a life expectancy of at least 6 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status of 0-2, a cumulative illness rating scale score of 6 or lower or a single score of 4 or lower, and no TP53 aberrations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with a computer-generated list stratified by age, Binet stage, and regional study group, to either chemoimmunotherapy, venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. All treatments were administered in 28-day cycles. Patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group received six cycles of treatment, with patients older than 65 years receiving intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m2, days 1-2), whereas patients aged 65 years or younger received intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m2, days 1-3) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2, days 1-3). Intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added to chemotherapy. In the experimental groups, patients received daily venetoclax (400 mg orally) for ten cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase starting on day 22 of cycle 1. In the venetoclax-rituximab group, intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added. In the obinutuzumab-containing groups, obinutuzumab was added (cycle 1: 100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8 and 15; cycles 2-6: 1000 mg on day 1). In the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, daily ibrutinib (420 mg orally, from day 1 of cycle 1) was added until undetectable MRD was reached in two consecutive measurements (3 months apart) or until cycle 36. The planned treatment duration was six cycles in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 12 cycles in the venetoclax-rituximab and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group and between 12 and 36 cycles in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group. Coprimary endpoints were the undetectable MRD rate in peripheral blood at month 15 for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab versus standard chemoimmunotherapy and investigator-assessed progression-free survival for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment) with a split α of 0·025 for each coprimary endpoint. Both coprimary endpoints have been reported elsewhere. Here we report a post-hoc exploratory analysis of updated progression-free survival results after a 4-year follow-up of our study population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950051, recruitment is complete, and all patients are off study treatment.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 13, 2016, and Oct 13, 2019, 1080 patients were screened and 926 were randomly assigned to treatment (chemoimmunotherapy group n=229; venetoclax-rituximab group n=237; venetoclax-obinutuzumab group n=229; and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group n=231); mean age 60·8 years (SD 10·2), 259 (28%) of 926 patients were female, and 667 (72%) were male (data on race and ethnicity are not reported). At data cutoff for this exploratory follow-up analysis (Jan 31, 2023; median follow-up 50·7 months [IQR 44·6-57·9]), patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [97·5% CI 0·32-0·69], p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·57 [0·38-0·84], p=0·0011). The venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group also had a significantly longer progression-free survival than the chemoimmunotherapy group (0·30 [0·19-0·47]; p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·38 [0·24-0·59]; p<0·0001). There was no difference in progression-free survival between the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups (0·63 [0·39-1·02]; p=0·031), and the proportional hazards assumption was not met for the comparison between the venetoclax-rituximab group versus the chemoimmunotherapy group (log-rank p=0·10). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 85·5% (97·5% CI 79·9-91·1; 37 [16%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, 81·8% (75·8-87·8; 55 [24%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 70·1% (63·0-77·3; 84 [35%] events) in the venetoclax-rituximab group, and 62·0% (54·4-69·7; 90 [39%] events) in the chemoimmunotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (114 [53%] of 216 patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 109 [46%] of 237 in the venetoclax-rituximab group, 127 [56%] of 228 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, and 112 [48%] of 231 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment by the investigator occurred in three (1%) patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group (n=1 due to each of sepsis, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and Richter's syndrome), none in the venetoclax-rituximab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups, and four (2%) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (n=1 due to each of acute myeloid leukaemia, fungal encephalitis, small-cell lung cancer, and toxic leukoencephalopathy).

INTERPRETATION

With more than 4 years of follow-up, venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib significantly extended progression-free survival compared with both chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax-rituximab in previously untreated, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thereby supporting their use and further evaluation in this patient group, while still considering the higher toxicities observed with the triple combination.

FUNDING

AbbVie, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Frontline Therapy of CLL-Changing Treatment Paradigms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has undergone a complete makeover following the introduction of highly effective targeted therapies, beginning with ibrutinib which first attained regulatory approval for CLL in 2014.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, we have seen further refinement of therapeutic options with the development of newer-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) including acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib that improve upon the safety of ibrutinib. Additionally, venetoclax-based approaches, combined with anti-CD20 antibodies, have allowed for time-limited targeted therapeutic strategies which are particularly attractive for certain subsets of patients though have demonstrated efficacy across all subgroups. Lastly, there is an ongoing movement toward the development of time-limited strategies inclusive of both a BTKi and venetoclax that may further widen potential options. CLL patients requiring frontline therapy have a unique burden of choice between highly effective therapies that differ substantially with respect to side effect profiles and schedules. This review will focus on the frontline management of CLL in the setting of these rapidly changing options.

Innovative Combinations, Cellular Therapies and Bispecific Antibodies for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Narrative Review

In the last few years, several agents targeting molecules that sustain the survival and the proliferation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells have become clinically available. Most of these drugs target surface proteins, such as CD19 or CD20, via monoclonal or bispecific monoclonal antibodies (BsAbs), CAR T cells, intracellular proteins like BTK by using covalent or non-covalent inhibitors or BCL2 with first or second generation BH3-mimetics. Since the management of CLL is evolving quickly, in this review we highlighted the most important innovative treatments including novel double and triple combination therapies, CAR T cells and BsAbs for CLL. Recently, a large number of studies on novel combinations and newer strategic options for CLL therapy have been published or presented at international conferences, which were summarized and linked together. Although the management of treatment with a single continuous agent is easier, the emergence of protein mutations, long-term toxicities and costs are important concerns that favor the use of a fixed duration therapy. In the future, a measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided treatment cessation and MRD-based re-initiation of targeted therapy seems to be a more feasible approach, allowing identification of the patients who might benefit from continuous therapy or who might need a consolidation with BsAbs or CAR T cells to clear the neoplastic clone.

Taking the Next Step in Double Refractory Disease: Current and Future Treatment Strategies for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a monoclonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disease with a high annual incidence in Western countries. As B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and intrinsic apoptotic resistance play critical roles in the development and survival of CLL cells, therapeutic approaches targeting these pathways have been extensively investigated to tackle this incurable disease. Over the last decade, several Phase 3 trials have confirmed the superior efficacy of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKis) and venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor, over chemoimmunotherapy. This has been demonstrated in both the treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory (RR) settings and includes patients with high-risk molecular features. However, these drugs are not curative, with patients continuing to relapse after treatment with both cBTKis and BCL2is, and the optimal treatment strategy for these patients has not been defined. Several novel agents with distinct mechanisms have recently been developed for CLL which have demonstrated efficacy in patients who have previously received cBTKis and BCL2i. In particular, novel BCR-signaling targeting agents have shown promising efficacy in early-phase clinical trials for RR-CLL. Furthermore, cancer immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have also shown anti-tumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated RR-CLL. Personalised approaches with these novel agents and combination strategies based on the understanding of resistance mechanisms have the potential to overcome the clinical challenge of what to do next for a patient who has already had a cBTKi and venetoclax.

Recent advances in genomics and therapeutics in mantle cell lymphoma

Over the past decades, significant strides have been made in understanding the pathobiology, prognosis, and treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The heterogeneity observed in MCL's biology, genomics, and clinical manifestations, including indolent and aggressive forms, is intricately linked to factors such as the mutational status of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, epigenetic profiling, and Sox11 expression. Several intriguing subtypes of MCL, such as Cyclin D1-negative MCL, in situ mantle cell neoplasm, CCND1/IGH FISH-negative MCL, and the impact of karyotypic complexity on prognosis, have been explored. Notably, recent immunochemotherapy regimens have yielded long-lasting remissions in select patients. The therapeutic landscape for MCL is continuously evolving, with a shift towards nonchemotherapeutic agents like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax. The introduction of BTK inhibitors has brought about a transformative change in MCL treatment. Nevertheless, the challenge of resistance to BTK inhibitors persists, prompting ongoing efforts to discover strategies for overcoming this resistance. These strategies encompass non-covalent BTK inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, BCL2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy, either as standalone treatments or in combination regimens. Furthermore, developing novel drugs holds promise for further improving the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we methodically encapsulate MCL's clinical and pathological attributes and the factors influencing prognosis. We also undertake an in-depth examination of stratified treatment alternatives. We investigate conceivable resistance mechanisms in MCL from a genetic standpoint and offer precise insights into various therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory MCL.

Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Personalized Medicine Era

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is a lymphoproliferative disorder marked by the expansion of monoclonal, mature CD5+CD23+ B cells in peripheral blood, secondary lymphoid tissues, and bone marrow. The disease exhibits significant heterogeneity, with numerous somatic genetic alterations identified in the neoplastic clone, notably mutated TP53 and immunoglobulin heavy chain mutational statuses. Recent studies emphasize the pivotal roles of genetics and patient fragility in treatment decisions. This complexity underscores the need for a personalized approach, tailoring interventions to individual genetic profiles for heightened efficacy. The era of personalized treatment in CLL signifies a transformative shift, holding the potential for improved outcomes in the conquest of this intricate hematologic disorder. This review plays a role in elucidating the evolving CLL treatment landscape, encompassing all reported genetic factors. Through a comprehensive historical analysis, it provides insights into the evolution of CLL management. Beyond its retrospective nature, this review could be a valuable resource for clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders, offering a window into the latest advancements. In essence, it serves as a dynamic exploration of our current position and the promising prospects on the horizon.

MRD-directed therapy in CLL: ready for prime time?

In recent years, the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has moved away from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) toward the use of novel targeted agents. Commercially available drugs, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, often used in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, are now the mainstay of therapy both in the frontline and in relapsed settings. As the landscape for CLL management evolves, therapeutic endpoints need to be redefined. Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive tool to identify disease burden following treatment with several therapeutic regimens in CLL (including CIT, venetoclax-based regimens, and cellular therapies), and it has demonstrated prognostic value. Despite recent advances, the utility of MRD-directed therapy and attempts to eradicate it in routine clinical practice remain debated. There is little comparative data from clinical trials on the best assay to determine undetectable MRD (U-MRD) and whether its monitoring can lead to changes in treatment strategies. Our review discusses the definitions of MRD, assays for its detection, and its impact on long-term survival outcomes for patients with a CLL diagnosis.

Dual-targeted regimens for the frontline treatment of CLL

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved considerably over the past decade due to the development of effective novel agents with varying mechanisms of action, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors. Extrapolating upon the success of anti-CD20-directed chemoimmunotherapy, a dual-targeted approach has been explored in treatment-naive patients with CLL. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody combinations with BTK inhibitors as well as BCL2 inhibitors have demonstrated superiority over traditional cytotoxic chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; bendamustine-rituximab; and obinutuzumab-chlorambucil. Impressive clinical benefit is seen in both younger and older patients, those with comorbidities, and, most importantly, those with poor prognostic features. Given this success, combinations of BTK inhibitors and venetoclax have been explored in clinical trials. These dual-targeted regimens provide remarkable efficacy while allowing for an all-oral approach and fixed duration of treatment. Current investigations under way are evaluating the utility of a triplet approach with the addition of obinutuzumab in comparison to a doublet approach.

Efficacy and safety of new-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is a type of mature B lymphocyte clonal proliferative tumor with a specific immunophenotype. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been approved for the treatment of CLL/SLL. However, the efficacy and safety of new-generation BTKi-based regimens have not been systematically studied. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of new-generation BTKi-based regimens for the treatment of patients with CLL/SLL. A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. up to January 31, 2023, was conducted by us. Studies reporting data on CLL/SLL patients treated with new-generation BTKi were included. We assessed the overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and 24-month OS/PFS rates for efficacy analysis. For safety analysis, we evaluated the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). The meta-analysis included twenty studies. The pooled ORR for new-generation BTKi was 92% (95% CI, 89-95%, I2 = 80.68%, P = 0.00), while the pooled CR rate was 10% (95% CI, 6-14%, I2 = 88.11%, P = 0.00). Research has found that the new-generation BTKi-based therapy had higher efficacy under the following treatment conditions: < 65 years old, treatment-naive (TN)-CLL, and BTKi combination therapy. The ORR/CR rates and 24-month OS/PFS rates of BTKi combination therapy were higher than that of BTKi monotherapy. Compared to acalabrutinib monotherapy, zanubrutinib monotherapy demonstrated higher ORR/CR rates and 24-month OS/PFS rates. Common grade ≥ 3 AEs included cytopenia and hypertension. The new-generation BTKi-based therapy has good tolerance and provides incremental benefits for CLL/SLL patients. Despite the superior efficacy of BTKi combination therapy compared to monotherapy, its AEs rates are relatively high. Compared to acalabrutinib, Zanubrutinib may be the preferred monotherapy for CLL. However, randomized-controlled studies are still needed.

Zanubrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab (ZR2 regimen) for HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a real-world analysis from China

Seven patients with HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) who did not derive benefit from traditional first-line or second-line chemotherapy were all eventually treated with zanubrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide (the ZR2 regimen). Three patients had a complete response, three had a partial response, and one showed stable disease. The complete response rate was 42.9%, the overall response rate was 85.7%. Three patients developed either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, and one died of lung infection 3 months after diagnosis.

Final analysis of the CLL2-GIVe trial: obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax for untreated CLL with del(17p)/TP53mut

The final analysis of the open-label, multicenter phase 2 CLL2-GIVe trial shows response and tolerability of the triple combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax (GIVe regimen) in 41 previously untreated patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. Induction consisted of 6 cycles of GIVe; venetoclax and ibrutinib were continued up to cycle 12 as consolidation. Ibrutinib was given until cycle 15 or up to cycle 36 in patients not achieving a complete response and with detectable minimal residual disease. The primary end point was the complete remission rate at cycle 15, which was achieved at 58.5% (95% CI, 42.1-73.7; P < .001). The last patient reached the end of the study in January 2022. After a median observation time of 38.4 months (range, 3.7-44.9), the 36-month progression-free survival was 79.9%, and the 36-month overall survival was 92.6%. Only 6 patients continued ibrutinib maintenance. Adverse events of concern were neutropenia (48.8%, grade ≥3) and infections (19.5%, grade ≥3). Cardiovascular toxicity grade 3 occurred as atrial fibrillation at a rate of 2.4% between cycles 1 and 12, as well as hypertension (4.9%) between cycles 1 and 6. The incidence of adverse events of any grade and grade ≥3 was highest during induction and decreased over time. Progressive disease was observed in 7 patients between cycles 27 and 42. In conclusion, the CLL2-GIVe regimen is a promising fixed-duration, first-line treatment for patients with high-risk CLL with a manageable safety profile.

Advancing Healthcare: Synergizing Biosensors and Machine Learning for Early Cancer Diagnosis

Cancer is a fatal disease and a significant cause of millions of deaths. Traditional methods for cancer detection often have limitations in identifying the disease in its early stages, and they can be expensive and time-consuming. Since cancer typically lacks symptoms and is often only detected at advanced stages, it is crucial to use affordable technologies that can provide quick results at the point of care for early diagnosis. Biosensors that target specific biomarkers associated with different types of cancer offer an alternative diagnostic approach at the point of care. Recent advancements in manufacturing and design technologies have enabled the miniaturization and cost reduction of point-of-care devices, making them practical for diagnosing various cancer diseases. Furthermore, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been employed to analyze sensor data and extract valuable information through the use of statistical techniques. In this review paper, we provide details on how various machine learning algorithms contribute to the ongoing development of advanced data processing techniques for biosensors, which are continually emerging. We also provide information on the various technologies used in point-of-care cancer diagnostic biosensors, along with a comparison of the performance of different ML algorithms and sensing modalities in terms of classification accuracy.

Prognostic Markers in the Era of Targeted Therapies

BACKGROUND

Small molecules targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma-2 have become the standard of care for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), replacing chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in most clinical settings. Ongoing trials explore targeted combinations and minimal residual disease-driven treatment cessation. These dramatic shifts in the current and upcoming treatment landscape of CLL raise the need to reevaluate existing prognostic markers and develop novel ones.

SUMMARY

This review examines prognostic markers in CLL patients treated with standard and investigational targeted therapies. Specifically, initial treatment of TP53 aberrant patients with a BTK inhibitor can achieve 70% progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years, outperforming the 15% 5-year PFS with a CIT regimen containing fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). The prognostic implications of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene (IGHV) mutation status have also changed. Unmutated IGHV is associated with inferior PFS and overall survival after FCR and inferior PFS with fixed-duration therapy with venetoclax and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody but not with continuous BTK inhibitor treatment.

KEY MESSAGES

(1) Genetic variables (e.g., TP53 aberration, IGHV mutation, complex karyotype) have a prognostic significance in CLL patients treated with targeted therapy. (2) Understanding the prognostic and predictive values of these markers is critical for the development of a risk-adapted treatment strategy in CLL.

Advancements in the Treatment of CLL: The Rise of Zanubrutinib as a Preferred Therapeutic Option

Ibrutinib, the first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), is a commonly deployed therapeutic option for previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The use of ibrutinib is, however, partially limited by off-target side effects. Zanubrutinib (zanu) is a second-generation BTKi with enhanced target selectivity and occupancy of the kinase binding site. The SEQUOIA study showed that zanu significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in treatment-naive CLL patients. More recently, data from the phase III ALPINE trial, which directly compared zanu with ibrutinib, demonstrated that zanu's advantages include an improved safety profile as well as enhanced clinical efficacy. Based on the results of the SEQUOIA and ALPINE pivotal trials, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) licensed zanu for the treatment of patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in January 2023. The updated (v2.2023) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the most recent German CLL algorithm suggest that zanu may replace first-generation BTKis as a preferred therapeutic option for patients with CLL/SLL due to its increased selectivity for the kinase binding site, improved therapeutic efficacy, and favorable toxicity profile. Some drug class-related characteristics such as drug resistance, low complete remission (CR) rates, and indefinite treatment duration still remain with zanu, and the results from recently completed and ongoing fixed-duration clinical trials, combining zanu with an anti-BCL2 agent, are eagerly awaited with the possible promise of a reduced treatment duration and lower financial burden.

Unresolved questions in selection of therapies for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) continues to undergo considerable evolution. Optimal selection of initial therapy from multiple effective options provides a major challenge for clinicians, who need to consider both disease and patient factors in conjunction with a view to sequencing available therapies in event of disease relapse.

REVIEW

We explore the most topical clinically relevant unresolved questions through discussion of important available pertinent literature and propose expert opinion based on these data. (1) Shrinking role of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT); while novel therapies are generally superior, we highlight the utility of FCR for IGHV-mutated CLL. (2) Choosing between inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKi); while efficacy between agents is likely similar there are important differences in toxicity profiles, including the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia and hypertension. (3) BTKi with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb); while obinutuzumab-acalabrutinib (AO) may confer superior progression-free survival to acalabrutinib (Acala), this is not true of rituximab (Ritux) to ibrutinib (Ib)-we highlight that potential for increased side effects should be carefully considered. (4) Continuous BTKi versus time-limited venetoclax-obinutuzumab (VenO); we propose that venetoclax (Ven)-based therapy is generally preferable to BTKi with exception of TP53 aberrant disease. (5) BTKi-Ven versus VenO as preferred time-limited therapy; we discuss comparable efficacies and the concerns about simultaneous 1L exposure to both BTKi and Ven drug classes. (6) Utility of triplet therapy (BTKi-Ven-antiCD20 mAb) versus VenO; similar rates of complete response are observed yet with greater potential for adverse events. (7) Optimal therapy for TP53 aberrant CLL; while limited data are available, there are likely effective novel therapy combinations for TP53 aberrant disease including BTKi, BTKi-Ven ± antiCD20 mAb.

CONCLUSION

Frontline therapy for CLL should be selected based on efficacy considering the patient specific biologic profile of their disease and potential toxicities, considering patient comorbidities and preferences. With the present paradigm of sequencing effective agents, 1L combinations of novel therapies should be used with caution in view of potential adverse events and theoretical resistance mechanism concerns in the absence of compelling randomized data to support augmented efficacy.

Measurable Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Understanding and Evolving Role in Clinical Practice

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved dramatically during the last decade, from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)-based therapies to newer B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling targeting agents, which are sometimes given as continuous schemes. Response to treatment was traditionally defined according to clinical variables designed to assign a response category. Interest in assessing for deeper responses in CLL by the means of measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has been the subject of research during the last several years. Analyses and sub-analyses of clinical trials have shown that achieving undetectable MRD (uMRD) in CLL is an important prognostic factor. In this review, we summarize the available evidence about MRD in CLL, from the various assays available for measurement, the compartment to test, the impact of reaching uMRD according to the treatment regimen, and the results of fixed duration treatment guided by MRD trials. Finally, we summarize how MRD can be incorporated in clinical practice and how it may guide fixed duration treatment in the future should evidence continue to accumulate in that direction.

First-Line Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials of venetoclax plus anti-CD20 antibodies as first-line treatment in fit patients (i.e., those with a low burden of coexisting conditions) with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been lacking.

METHODS

In a phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, fit patients with CLL who did not have TP53 aberrations to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab or bendamustine-rituximab) or 12 cycles of venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. Ibrutinib was discontinued after two consecutive measurements of undetectable minimal residual disease or could be extended. The primary end points were undetectable minimal residual disease (sensitivity, <10^-4 [i.e., <1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15 and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 926 patients were assigned to one of the four treatment regimens (229 to chemoimmunotherapy, 237 to venetoclax-rituximab, 229 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab, and 231 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib). At month 15, the percentage of patients with undetectable minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group (86.5%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 80.6 to 91.1) and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (92.2%; 97.5% CI, 87.3 to 95.7) than in the chemoimmunotherapy group (52.0%; 97.5% CI, 44.4 to 59.5; P<0.001 for both comparisons), but it was not significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (57.0%; 97.5% CI, 49.5 to 64.2; P = 0.32). Three-year progression-free survival was 90.5% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group and 75.5% in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.32; 97.5% CI, 0.19 to 0.54; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 3 years was also higher with venetoclax-obinutuzumab (87.7%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 97.5% CI, 0.26 to 0.68; P<0.001), but not with venetoclax-rituximab (80.8%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% CI, 0.53 to 1.18; P = 0.18). Grade 3 and grade 4 infections were more common with chemoimmunotherapy (18.5%) and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib (21.2%) than with venetoclax-rituximab (10.5%) or venetoclax-obinutuzumab (13.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Venetoclax-obinutuzumab with or without ibrutinib was superior to chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment in fit patients with CLL. (Funded by AbbVie and others; GAIA-CLL13 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02950051; EudraCT number, 2015-004936-36.).

An update on the efficacy of Venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax has dramatically changed the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has introduced the concept of time-limited therapy with targeted agents.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the mechanism of action of venetoclax, adverse effects, and the clinical data with this agent as identified by a selective search of clinical trials in the PubMed database. Venetoclax is FDA-approved with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies; however, research is ongoing evaluating its efficacy when given in combination with other agents, such as the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Venetoclax-based therapy is an excellent treatment option for patients interested in time-limited therapy and can be offered in both the front-line and relapsed/refractory settings. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk evaluation, preventative measures, and strict monitoring should be conducted, while these patients ramp up to target dose. Venetoclax-based therapies produce deep and durable responses with patients often achieving undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD). This has led to a discussion of MRD-driven, finite-duration treatment approaches, although longer term data is still needed. While many patients eventually lose uMRD status, re-treatment with venetoclax remains an area of interest with promising results. Mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax are being elucidated, and research is ongoing.

DTRMWXHS-12, a novel Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with everolimus and pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas: An open-label, multicenter, phase 1a/1b study

Preclinical studies have shown augmented activity when combining Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) with inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and immunomodulatory agents (IMiD). We conducted a phase 1, open-label study at five centers in USA to evaluate the safety of triplet BTKi/mTOR/IMiD therapy. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with relapsed/refractory CLL, B cell NHL, or Hodgkin lymphoma. Our dose escalation study used an accelerated titration design and moved sequentially from single agent BTKi (DTRMWXHS-12), doublet (DTRMWXHS-12 + everolimus), and then to triplet therapy (DTRMWXHS-12 + everolimus + pomalidomide). All drugs were dosed once daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. The primary goal was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of the triplet combination. Between September 27, 2016, and July 24, 2019, a total of 32 patients with a median age of 70 years (range 46 to 94 years) were enrolled. No MTD was identified for monotherapy and the doublet combination. The MTD for the triplet combination was determined to be DTRMWXHS-12 200 mg + everolimus 5 mg + pomalidomide 2 mg. Responses across all studied cohorts were seen in 13 of 32 (41.9%). Combining DTRMWXHS-12 with everolimus and pomalidomide is tolerable and shows clinical activity. Additional trials could confirm benefit of this all-oral combination therapy for relapsed/refractory lymphomas.

Zanubrutinib for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies: Current status and future directions

Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111, Brukinsa®, BeiGene) is a next-generation irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), developed by BeiGene in 2012 for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. It was designed to minimize off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. Zanubrutinib is more selective than ibrutinib for BTK versus EGFR, FGR, FRK, HER2, HER4, ITK, JAK3, LCK, BLK and TEC. In addition, compared to ibrutinib, zanubrutinib has improved oral absorption and better target occupancy. Zanubrutinib demonstrated a lower incidence of off-target toxicities and reduced severity than ibrutinib. Moreover, zanubrutinib is similar to acalabrutinib, with less activity against TEC and ITK. The preliminary phase 1 results suggest that zanubrutinib has clinical activity and the drug is well tolerated in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Recent clinical trials have found it to demonstrate excellent efficacy and good tolerability in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In recent phase 3 studies, zanubrutinib was compared with ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MW and RR CLL. In both trials, zanubrutinib was found to demonstrate clinically meaningful advantages in safety and tolerability over ibrutinib; in particular, it was associated with a lower risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter and major bleeding events. In the recent SEQUOIA study, comparing zanubrutinib with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in patients with previously untreated CLL, zanubrutinib significantly improved progression-free survival versus BR, with an acceptable safety profile consistent with previous studies. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated good activity and tolerability in patients with R/R MCL, marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Trials examining the efficacy and safety of the combination of zanubrutinib with obinutuzumab venetoclax and other drugs are ongoing. This review summarizes the clinical efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in lymphoid malignancies.

Next Generation BTK Inhibitors in CLL: Evolving Challenges and New Opportunities

Ibrutinib revolutionized the CLL treatment approach and prognosis demonstrating its efficacy and safety even at extended follow-up. During the last few years, several next-generation inhibitors have been developed to overcome the occurrence of toxicity or resistance in patients on continuous treatment. In a head-to-head comparison of two phase III trials, both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib demonstrated a lower incidence of adverse events in respect to ibrutinib. Nevertheless, resistance mutations remain a concern with continuous therapy and were demonstrated with both first- and next-generation covalent inhibitors. Reversible inhibitors showed efficacy independently of previous treatment and the presence of BTK mutations. Other strategies are currently under development in CLL, especially for high-risk patients, and include BTK inhibitor combinations with BCl2 inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Finally, new mechanisms for BTK inhibition are under investigations in patients progressing with both covalent and non-covalent BTK and BCl2 inhibitors. Here we summarize and discuss results from main experiences on irreversible and reversable BTK inhibitors in CLL.

A History of Targeted Therapy Development and Progress in Novel-Novel Combinations for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Over the last 10 years, the traditional treatment paradigms for CLL have been upended as the use of traditional chemoimmunotherapy regimens has declined in favor of novel targeted therapies. Targeted therapies have become the new standard of care in CLL given their superior progression-free survival (and overall survival, in some cases) when compared with chemoimmunotherapy, as well as their improved toxicity profiles. Targeted agents are FDA approved for the treatment of CLL including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and venetoclax. Importantly, as opposed to traditional chemotherapy regimens, the benefits of these targeted therapies appear to be consistent regardless of high-risk mutational status. In this review, we discuss the pivotal CLL studies of the last decade and the data supporting doublet and triplet novel-novel combinations. We explore the use of new surrogate end points for PFS/OS in targeted therapies such as undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) and their potential role in minimizing toxicity by permitting earlier treatment discontinuation. We also highlight areas that warrant further exploration and future studies that may help address some of these key questions.

Immunotherapy combinations for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: advantages and disadvantages

In the last few years, BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax have been approved for clinical use against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), both as single agents, and in combination. This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of patients with CLL, and pays special attention to novel targeted drugs and monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Rituximab and obinutuzumab have been combined with chemotherapy, and more recently, with BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax. These agents have demonstrated high activity in treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Immunochemotherapy regimens are currently considered in TN younger patients with IGHV-mutated disease and should not be given in patients without IGHV mutation. BTK inhibitors are more commonly used as monotherapy in TN and RR patients. PI3K inhibitors can be combined with CD20 Mabs, but their use in CLL is limited due to safety concerns. Venetoclax is typically combined with anti-CD20 Mabs in CLL. Generally, the optimal sequencing of therapies remains to be established, and the selection of upfront therapy needs to be tailored to the individual patient.

Selecting initial therapy in CLL

Targeted therapy is a powerful treatment option in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that has outperformed conventional chemoimmunotherapy in most clinical settings. Except for selected young, fit patients with a mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene, most patients benefit from targeted therapy with either a continuous BTK inhibitor or 1-year fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of CLL. Treatment selection is driven by patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors, encompassing patient preference, concomitant medications, comorbidities, safety profile of the regimen, and TP53 aberration. Clinical trials are actively investigating the simultaneous inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) proteins with or without a CD20 monoclonal antibody, which can achieve deep response in most patients (52%-89% undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow).

Beyond ibrutinib: novel BTK inhibitors for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Ibrutinib was the first Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) approved for clinical use, contributing to a dramatic change in the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This review provides an overview of next-generation BTKi that have been recently approved or are being investigated for the treatment of CLL, specifically highlighting differences and similarities compared to ibrutinib.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acalabrutinib presented comparable response rates to ibrutinib with lower rates of adverse events and is currently approved for the treatment of CLL. Zanubrutinib displayed excellent response rates with a lower incidence of BTKi-related adverse events, but major rates of neutropenia, and its approval is awaited. With the aim of overcoming drug resistance, noncovalent BTKi have been developed. Of all the explored agents to date, pirtobrutinib has shown promising results with manageable toxicities.

SUMMARY

For the treatment of CLL, several effective therapeutic strategies to target BTK are or will soon be available: these drugs present different safety profiles, thus making it possible to tailor the treatment choice according to patient's characteristics. Importantly, noncovalent BTKi will provide a therapeutic chance also for those relapsed/refractory CLL patients who are BTKi-resistant and are considered an unmet clinical need.

Management of front line chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Treatment options with targeted agents have changed the treatment landscape of CLL profoundly. Besides chemoimmunotherapy, treatment regimen approved for frontline therapy include continuous treatment with BTK inhibitors like ibrutinib and acalabrutinib or fixed-duration regimen like venetoclax-obinutuzumab with the approval of venetoclax-ibrutinib to be awaited. Although these agents have usually manageable side effects, toxicities might limit choices for the individual patient. We here discuss latest trial data and propose a treatment algorithm for frontline treatment of CLL according to fitness and relevant genetic risk factors like IGHV mutational status and TP53 aberrations.

BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases: mechanisms and clinical studies

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an essential component of multiple signaling pathways that regulate B cell and myeloid cell proliferation, survival, and functions, making it a promising therapeutic target for various B cell malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Five small molecule inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy and have been approved to treat different types of hematological cancers, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, tirabrutinib, and orelabrutinib. The first-in-class agent, ibrutinib, has created a new era of chemotherapy-free treatment of B cell malignancies. Ibrutinib is so popular and became the fourth top-selling cancer drug worldwide in 2021. To reduce the off-target effects and overcome the acquired resistance of ibrutinib, significant efforts have been made in developing highly selective second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and various combination approaches. Over the past few years, BTK inhibitors have also been repurposed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Promising data have been obtained from preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. In this review, we summarized current progress in applying BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory disorders, highlighting available results from clinical studies.

MAJIC: a phase III trial of acalabrutinib + venetoclax versus venetoclax + obinutuzumab in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma

Here we describe the rationale and design of MAJIC, a phase III, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the combination of the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib plus the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax versus the combination of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab as frontline treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. In both treatment arms, disease response (assessed by International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria) and minimal residual disease will be used to guide therapy duration, with all patients ultimately discontinuing treatment after a maximum of 2 years. The primary end point is progression-free survival. Key secondary end points include rates of undetectable minimal residual disease, overall response and overall survival. This study will address key unanswered questions in frontline chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma therapy by investigating the optimal duration of finite treatment and identifying the optimal venetoclax doublet regimen.

Obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax, after an optional debulking with bendamustine in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL2-BAAG): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Although BTK inhibitors provide long-term disease-control in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, they need to be combined with BCL2 inhibitors or antibodies to achieve deep responses with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), which allows for time-limited treatment. This trial aims to evaluate the triple combination of obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax after an optional debulking with bendamustine.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 study evaluates a sequential treatment consisting of a debulking with two cycles of bendamustine for patients with a higher tumour load (70 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 2, repeated after 28 days), followed by an induction and a maintenance with obinutuzumab (1000 mg intravenously on days 1-2, 8, and 15 of the first induction cycle, every 4 weeks in induction cycles 2-6 and every 12 weeks in the maintenance phase), acalabrutinib (100 mg orally twice daily continuously from induction cycle 2 day 1 onwards) and venetoclax (starting in induction cycle 3 with 20 mg per day with a weekly dose ramp-up over 5 weeks to the target dose of 400 mg per day). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an ECOG performance score 0-2 and had relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia requiring treatment according to the 2018 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria. The primary endpoint was uMRD (<10^-4) in peripheral blood at the end of induction treatment assessed centrally at the final restaging, 12 weeks after the start of the last induction cycle. As per protocol, all patients with more than two induction cycles were included in the analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03787264, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 14, 2019, and June 25, 2020, 45 evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were enrolled; 13 (29%) were female, 32 (71%) were male, 21 (47%) had already received a targeted agent, and 14 (32%) had del(17)(p13.1) or TP53 mutation. Ethnicity-race data was not collected. At data cutoff (Feb 25, 2021), all patients had completed the induction treatment. 34 patients (76%; 95% CI 61-87, p=0·26) had uMRD in peripheral blood after 6 months of triple therapy. Until data cutoff, 32 (71%) patients started maintenance and nine (28%) were able to stop with uMRD. After a median observation time of 13·8 months (IQR 10·4-18·4), there were two (4%) Richter transformations, but no progressions and no deaths observed. The most common adverse events of grade 3 and 4 during the entire treatment were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia (12 [27%] of 45 patients each), tumour lysis syndrome and infections (five [11%] of 45 patients each, grade 3 adverse events only), infusion-associated reactions (four [9%] of 45 patients) and anaemia (four [9%] of 45 patients).

INTERPRETATION

With 76% of patients achieving uMRD in peripheral blood, this trial did not reach the prespecified activity threshold. Triple therapy with obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax after an optional debulking with bendamustine regimen requires further evaluation in larger trials to define its value compared with double treatment with a BTK or BCL2 inhibitor combined with obinutuzumab or a combination of the two oral targeted drugs. Until these trials show a clear benefit, the use of the triple combination in routine practice cannot be recommended.

FUNDING

Acerta, AstraZeneca, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and AbbVie.

Adding Umbralisib and Ublituximab (U2) to Ibrutinib in Patients with CLL: A Phase II Study of an MRD-Driven Approach

PURPOSE

Ibrutinib has transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), though its use is limited by toxicity and resistance. In this study, we utilized an "add on" approach for patients who had been treated with ibrutinib in the front-line or relapsed/refractory settings with detectable MRD. Umbralisib and ublituximab (U2) were added on to ibrutinib, patients were treated until achieving undetectable-MRD (U-MRD), and then they entered a period of treatment-free observation (TFO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were eligible if they received ibrutinib in any line of therapy for at least 6 months and had detectable MRD (flow cytometry, <1 cell in 10-4 cutoff for U-MRD). U2 was added to ibrutinib, and patients were monitored serially for MRD. Once U-MRD was achieved or a total of 24 cycles were administered, patients entered a period of TFO. The primary study objective was rate of U-MRD. Secondary endpoints included safety and durability of clinical benefit after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled of whom 27 were evaluable for efficacy. Patients received ibrutinib for a median of 21 months (range 7-67) prior to study enrollment. Fourteen patients (52%) have achieved U-MRD per protocol whereas 78% had at least one U-MRD evaluation. Seventeen patients (63%) have entered TFO after a median of 6.4 months on triplet therapy. Progression-free survival at 12 months was estimated at 95%. Grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension 7%, diarrhea 4%, and increased ALT/AST 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This triplet approach utilizes the addition of U2 to ibrutinib as an MRD-driven time-limited therapy. This therapy was well tolerated and effective. TFO following this therapy appears durable in ongoing follow-up.

Selecting the optimal BTK inhibitor therapy in CLL: rationale and practical considerations

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have dramatically changed the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved BTK inhibitors that have all demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with chemoimmunotherapy. The efficacy of these agents compared to one another is under study; however, current data suggest they provide similar efficacy. Selectivity for BTK confers different adverse effect profiles, and longer follow-up and real-world use have characterized side effects over time. The choice of BTK inhibitor is largely patient-specific, and this review aims to highlight the differences among the agents and guide the choice of BTK inhibitor in clinical practice.

Approved and emerging Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) pathway has proven to be an effective and transformative therapeutic target in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), fueling the growth of BTK inhibitors (BTKis) and landmark approval of first-generation BTKi, ibrutinib. However, ibrutinib's side effect profile left an unmet need for BTKis with improved tolerability thus spurring the subsequent development of second-generation acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. The treatment landscape continues to evolve with studies using BTKi combination therapies, notably with venetoclax, with and without an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody as well as third generation BTKis aimed to overcome BTKi resistance.

AREAS COVERED

This article details the current literature highlighting the efficacy, toxicities, and potential therapeutic combinations of approved and preclinical BTKis.

EXPERT OPINION

BTKis have signaled the start of a new treatment paradigm in CLL and improved clinical outcomes especially for patients with high-risk disease. However, drug resistance, low CR rates, and indefinite treatment necessitate the development of novel BTKis and fixed duration combination therapy. The results from recently completed and ongoing clinical trials are eagerly awaited with the potential promise of reduced treatment durations and financial burden while achieving durable remissions.

Obinutuzumab in the treatment of B-cell malignancies: a comprehensive review

The type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab has structural and mechanistic features that distinguish it from the first anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, which have translated into improved efficacy in phase III trials in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These gains have been shown through improvements in, and/or increased durability of, tumor response, and increases in progression-free survival in patients with CLL or follicular lymphoma (FL). Ongoing research is focusing on the use of biomarkers and the development of chemotherapy-free regimens involving obinutuzumab. phase II trials of such treatment regimens have shown promise for CLL, FL and mantle cell lymphoma, while phase III trials have highlighted obinutuzumab as the antibody partner of choice for novel agents in first-line CLL treatment.

Integrin Signaling Shaping BTK-Inhibitor Resistance

Integrins are adhesion molecules that function as anchors in retaining tumor cells in supportive tissues and facilitating metastasis. Beta1 integrins are known to contribute to cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance in cancer. Very late antigen-4 (VLA-4), a CD49d/CD29 heterodimer, is a beta1 integrin implicated in therapy resistance in both solid tumors and haematological malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A complex inside-out signaling mechanism activates VLA-4, which might include several therapeutic targets for CLL. Treatment regimens for this disease have recently shifted towards novel agents targeting BCR signaling. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a component of B cell receptor signaling and BTK inhibitors such as ibrutinib are highly successful; however, their limitations include indefinite drug administration, the development of therapy resistance, and toxicities. VLA-4 might be activated independently of BTK, resulting in an ongoing interaction of CD49d-expressing leukemic cells with their surrounding tissue, which may reduce the success of therapy with BTK inhibitors and increases the need for alternative therapies. In this context, we discuss the inside-out signaling cascade culminating in VLA-4 activation, consider the advantages and disadvantages of BTK inhibitors in CLL and elucidate the mechanisms behind cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance.

New Directions for Mantle Cell Lymphoma in 2022

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Risk stratification at the time of diagnosis is critical. One of the most powerful prognostic indices is the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index-Combined, which integrates an estimate of proliferation (Ki67 index) with the standard Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index clinical factors. In addition, the presence of TP53 mutation is associated with suboptimal response to intensive chemoimmunotherapy and particularly dismal survival outcomes. Given their excellent activity in the relapsed/refractory setting, increasingly, biologically targeted therapeutics-such as covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, lenalidomide, and venetoclax-are being incorporated into "chemotherapy-free" regimens and in combination with established chemoimmunotherapy backbones for treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma. In addition, risk-adapted treatment programs are increasingly being studied. These programs tailor treatment according to baseline prognostic factors (e.g., presence of TP53 mutation) and may incorporate biomarkers of response such as minimal residual disease assessment. Although still investigational, these studies present an opportunity to move beyond the biology-agnostic, historical fitness-based treatment selection paradigm and toward a more personalized, tailored treatment approach in mantle cell lymphoma. After Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure, many promising standard or investigational therapies exist, including CAR T-cell therapy (including brexucabtagene autoleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel), bispecific antibody therapy targeting CD20-CD3, zilovertamab vedotin (an antibody-drug conjugate that targets ROR1), and the noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor pirtobrutinib. These new therapies show promising efficacy, even among high-risk patients, and will likely translate to improvements in survival outcomes for patients with progressive mantle cell lymphoma following treatment with a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

BTK inhibitor selection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: which drug for which patient?

INTRODUCTION

The development of BTK inhibitors has revolutionized the management of CLL. Currently, there are 3 BTK inhibitors available to treat CLL: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib (the latter not yet approved for this disease but included in the NCCN guidelines). In this review, we will elucidate our approach to the selection of BTK inhibitor and provide insight into the future of BTK directed therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review utilizes data from published prospective trials, specifically RESONATE, RESONATE-2, ELEVATE-TN, ASCEND, ELEVATE-RR, and the ongoing FLAIR, SEQUOIA and ALPINE trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The choice of BTK inhibitor is guided by the setting (frontline vs relapsed) in conjunction with patient disease characteristics and comorbidities. In this review, we will elucidate our approach to the selection of BTK inhibitor and provide insight into the future of BTK directed therapy.

New Treatment Options for Newly-Diagnosed and Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

The better understanding of the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) gained over the past decade has led to the development and introduction of several targeted drugs, with an demonstrable improvement in the prognosis for this currently incurable condition. Currently, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, venetoclax, and CD20 monoclonal antibodies are the key elements in the treatment of both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Ibrutinib was the first BTK inhibitor approved for clinical use, and showed excellent efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Following this, the better-tolerated second-generation irreversible BTK inhibitors acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib have been introduced for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies, and acalabrutinib was approved for CLL. When used as single drugs, BTK inhibitors are given continuously until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression; however, when combined with venetoclax and/or CD20 antibodies, they induce deeper response and can be given for a limited time. Recently, promising new reversible BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib and nemtabrutinib were discovered, and these seem to be more active and better tolerated than their irreversible predecessors. However, they are in an early phase of development and are not currently approved for CLL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors idelalisib and duvelisib are highly effective in patients with relapsed CLL, including high-risk disease. The major limitations for their use are adverse events, mostly of autoimmune origin (hepatitis, enteritis/colitis, and pneumonitis). Otherwise, cellular therapies like allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific monoclonal antibodies offer promise for patients who have failed BTK inhibitors and venetoclax treatment. In the coming years, it is likely that novel targeted therapies will replace immunochemotherapy regimens in most patients.

The Role of Bruton's Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Status and Future Directions

The use of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has changed the management and clinical history of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). BTK is a critical molecule that interconnects B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling. BTKis are classified into two categories: irreversible (covalent) inhibitors and reversible (non-covalent) inhibitors. Ibrutinib was the first irreversible BTK inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2013 as a breakthrough therapy in CLL patients. Subsequently, several studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new agents with reduced toxicity when compared with ibrutinib. Two other irreversible, second-generation BTK inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, were developed to reduce ibrutinib-mediated adverse effects. Additionally, new reversible BTK inhibitors are currently under development in early-phase studies to improve their activity and to diminish adverse effects. This review summarizes the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing, and drug-drug interactions associated with the treatment of CLL with BTK inhibitors and examines their further implications.