Effect of secretin on children with autism: a randomized controlled trial

Incidence and Characteristics of Kidney Stones in Patients on Ketogenic Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Very-low-carbohydrate diets or ketogenic diets are frequently used for weight loss in adults and as a therapy for epilepsy in children. The incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets are not well studied. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the databases’ inception through April 2020. Observational studies or clinical trials that provide data on the incidence and/or types of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets were included. We applied a random-effects model to estimate the incidence of kidney stones. Results: A total of 36 studies with 2795 patients on ketogenic diets were enrolled. The estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones was 5.9% (95% CI, 4.6–7.6%, I2 = 47%) in patients on ketogenic diets at a mean follow-up time of 3.7 +/− 2.9 years. Subgroup analyses demonstrated the estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones of 5.8% (95% CI, 4.4–7.5%, I2 = 49%) in children and 7.9% (95% CI, 2.8–20.1%, I2 = 29%) in adults, respectively. Within reported studies, 48.7% (95% CI, 33.2–64.6%) of kidney stones were uric stones, 36.5% (95% CI, 10.6–73.6%) were calcium-based (CaOx/CaP) stones, and 27.8% (95% CI, 12.1–51.9%) were mixed uric acid and calcium-based stones, respectively. Conclusions: The estimated incidence of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets is 5.9%. Its incidence is approximately 5.8% in children and 7.9% in adults. Uric acid stones are the most prevalent kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets followed by calcium-based stones. These findings may impact the prevention and clinical management of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets.

Meta-analysis: Pharmacologic Treatment of Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that examined the efficacy of pharmacological agents in the treatment of ASD and measured RRB as an outcome. Our primary outcome was the standardized mean difference in rating scales of RRB.

RESULTS

We identified 64 randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 3,499 participants with ASD. Antipsychotics significantly improved RRB outcomes compared to placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28, 95% CIs = 0.08-0.49), z = 2.77, p = .01) demonstrating a small effect size. Larger significant positive effects on RRB in ASD were seen in individual studies with fluvoxamine, buspirone, bumetanide, divalproex, guanfacine, and folinic acid that have not been replicated. Other frequently studied pharmacological treatments in ASD including oxytocin, omega-3 fatty acids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), and methylphenidate did not demonstrate significant benefit in reducing RRB compared to placebo (oxytocin: SMD = 0.23, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.47, z = 1.85, p = .06; omega-3 fatty acids: SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.43, z = 1.54, p = .12; SSRI: SMD = 0.09, 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.39, z = 0.60, p = .56; methylphenidate: SMD = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.11 to 0.46, z = 1.23, p = .22).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that currently available pharmacological agents have at best only a modest benefit for the treatment of RRB in ASD, with the most evidence supporting antipsychotic medications. Additional randomized controlled trials with standardized study designs and consistent and specific assessment tools for RRB are needed to further understand how we can best help ameliorate these behaviors in individuals with ASD.

The central mechanisms of secretin in regulating multiple behaviors

Secretin (SCT) was firstly discovered as a gut peptide hormone in stimulating pancreatic secretion, while its novel neuropeptide role has drawn substantial research interests in recent years. SCT and its receptor (SCTR) are widely expressed in different brain regions, where they exert multiple cellular functions including neurotransmission, gene expression regulation, neurogenesis, and neural protection. As all these neural functions ultimately can affect behaviors, it is hypothesized that SCT controls multiple behavioral paradigms. Current findings support this hypothesis as SCT-SCTR axis participates in modulating social interaction, spatial learning, water and food intake, motor coordination, and motor learning behaviors. This mini-review focuses on various aspects of SCT and SCTR in hippocampus, hypothalamus, and cerebellum including distribution profiles, cellular functions, and behavioral phenotypes to elucidate the link between cellular mechanisms and behavioral control.

Baseline factors predicting placebo response to treatment in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a multisite randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

The finding of factors that differentially predict the likelihood of response to placebo over that of an active drug could have a significant impact on study design in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify possible nonspecific, baseline predictors of response to intervention in a large randomized clinical trial of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomized clinical trial of citalopram hydrobromide for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and prominent repetitive behavior. Baseline data at study entry were examined with respect to final outcome to determine if response predictors could be identified. A total of 149 children and adolescents 5 to 17 years of age (mean [SD] age, 9.4 [3.1] years) from 6 academic centers were randomly assigned to citalopram (n = 73) or placebo (n = 76). Participants had autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, or pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified; had illness severity ratings that were moderate or more than moderate on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale; and scored moderate or more than moderate on compulsive behaviors measured with the modified Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.

INTERVENTIONS

Twelve weeks of treatment with citalopram (10 mg/5 mL) or placebo. The mean (SD) maximum dose of citalopram was 16.5 (6.5) mg by mouth daily (maximum dose, 20 mg/d).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A positive response was defined as having a score of at least much improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at week 12. Baseline measures included demographic (sex, age, weight, and pubertal status), clinical, and family measures. Clinical variables included baseline illness severity ratings (the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised, and the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale). Family measures included the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Several baseline predictors of response were identified, and a principal component analysis yielded 3 composite measures (disruptive behavior, autism/mood, and caregiver strain) that significantly predicted response at week 12. Specifically, participants in the placebo group were significantly less likely than participants in the citalopram group to respond at week 12 if they entered the study more symptomatic on each of the 3 composite measures, and they were at least 2 times less likely to be responders.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This analysis suggests strategies that may be useful in anticipating and potentially mitigating the nonspecific response in randomized clinical trials of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00086645.

Intravenous secretin for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

BACKGROUND

In 1998 secretin, a gastrointestinal hormone, was suggested as an effective treatment for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) based on anecdotal evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether intravenous secretin improves the core features of ASD, other aspects of behaviour or function such as self-injurious behaviour, and the quality of life of affected individuals and their carers. We also assessed whether secretin causes harm. This is an updated version of our review of this topic originally published in 2005.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2010 Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2010) , EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 2), PsycINFO (1806 to 2010 Week 2), CINAHL (1938 to January 2010), ERIC (1966 to January 2010), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to January 2010). Sociofile and HealthStar were searched in March 2005 when this review was first published, but were not available for this update. Records were limited to studies published since 1998 as this is when secretin was first proposed as a possible treatment for ASD. We searched reference lists of trials and reviews; we also contacted experts and trialists to find unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of intravenous secretin compared to a placebo treatment in children or adults diagnosed with ASD, where at least one standardised outcome measure was reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria but for two of these, conducted by Repligen, the only available multisite data were reported in press releases. All outcome data from the other 14 trials were continuous. Where trials used cross-over designs, we conducted analysis on results from the first treatment phase. Where mean change from baseline was reported, we used this in preference to post-treatment scores for meta-analyses or forest plots. Meta-analysis was able to be attempted for only one outcome (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). Insufficient data were available to conduct sensitivity or subgroup analyses to assess the impact of study quality, clinical differences in the intervention or clinically relevant differences between groups, such as age or presence of gastrointestinal symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 900 children were recruited for the secretin trials. Twenty-five established standardised outcome measures were reported to assess core features of ASD, communication, behaviour, visuospatial skills, affect and adverse events. One standardised measure of global impression was also used. No more than four studies used any one outcome measure similarly. When duration from the start of the intervention to outcome assessment was known, outcomes were reported at between three and six weeks. Meta-analysis of data was not possible but there is now consistency of findings, with RCTs of the efficacy of secretin in autism not showing improvements for core features of ASD.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that single or multiple dose intravenous secretin is effective and as such currently it should not be recommended or administered as a treatment for ASD. Further experimental assessment of secretin's effectiveness for ASD can only be justified if there is new high-quality and replicated scientific evidence that either finds that secretin has a role in neurotransmission in a way that could benefit all children with ASD or identifies important subgroups of children with ASD who could benefit from secretin because of a proven link between the action of secretin and the known cause of their ASD, or the type of problems they are experiencing.

A systematic review of secretin for children with autism spectrum disorders

CONTEXT

As many as 1 in every 110 children in the United States has an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Secretin is 1 of many medical treatments studied for treating the symptoms of ASDs, but there is currently no consensus regarding which interventions are most effective.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence regarding the use of secretin in children with ASDs who are aged 12 years and younger.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, PsycINFO, and ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) databases from 2000 to May 2010 and reference lists of included articles. Two reviewers independently assessed each study against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted data regarding participant and intervention characteristics, assessment techniques, and outcomes and assigned overall quality and strength-of-evidence ratings on the basis of predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Evidence from 7 randomized controlled trials supports a lack of effectiveness of secretin for the treatment of ASD symptoms including language and communication impairment, symptom severity, and cognitive and social skill deficits. No studies have resulted in significantly greater improvements in measures of language, cognition, or autistic symptoms when compared with placebo; study authors who reported improvement over time did so equally for both the intervention and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Secretin has been studied extensively in multiple randomized controlled trials, and there is clear evidence that it lacks benefit. The studies of secretin included in this review uniformly point to a lack of significant impact of secretin in the treatment of ASD symptoms. Given the high strength of evidence for a lack of effectiveness, secretin as a treatment approach for ASDs warrants no further study.

Gastrointestinal factors in autistic disorder: a critical review

Interest in the gastrointestinal (GI) factors of autistic disorder (autism) has developed from descriptions of symptoms such as constipation and diarrhea in autistic children and advanced towards more detailed studies of GI histopathology and treatment modalities. This review attempts to critically and comprehensively analyze the literature as it applies to all aspects of GI factors in autism, including discussion of symptoms, pathology, nutrition, and treatment. While much literature is available on this topic, a dearth of rigorous study was found to validate GI factors specific to children with autism.

Class II G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands in neuronal function and protection

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play pivotal roles in regulating the function and plasticity of neuronal circuits in the nervous system. Among the myriad of GPCRs expressed in neural cells, class II GPCRs which couples predominantly to the Gs-adenylate cyclase-cAMP signaling pathway, have recently received considerable attention for their involvement in regulating neuronal survival. Neuropeptides that activate class II GPCRs include secretin, glucagon-like peptides (GLP-1 and GLP-2), growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP), corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and calcitonin-related peptides. Studies of patients and animal and cell culture models, have revealed possible roles for class II GPCRs signaling in the pathogenesis of several prominent neurodegenerative conditions including stroke, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases. Many of the peptides that activate class II GPCRs promote neuron survival by increasing the resistance of the cells to oxidative, metabolic, and excitotoxic injury. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which class II GPCRs signaling modulates neuronal survival and plasticity will likely lead to novel therapeutic interventions for neurodegenerative disorders.

Short report: Autistic gastrointestinal and eating symptoms treated with secretin: a subtype of autism

Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD) are chronic, lifelong disorders for which there is as yet no effective cure, and medical management remains a challenge for clinicians. The current report describes two patients affected by autistic disorder with associated gastrointestinal symptoms. They received multiple doses of intravenous secretin for a six-month period and were assessed with several specific outcome measures to evaluate drug effect. The administration of secretin led to some significant and lasting improvement in only one case. Gastroesophageal reflux may contribute to some of the behavioural problems and explain the effect of secretin since its suppressive effect on gastric secretion is well known. It is also true that autistic children with gastroesophageal reflux and a higher IQ could constitute a subtype which responds to secretin administration and that could be labelled as a "gastrointestinal subtype".

Autismus und Stoffwechselerkrankungen - was ist gesichert?

Zusammenfassung: Die Ursachen für Autismus sind heterogen und ganz überwiegend genetischer Natur. Eine exakte benennbare Ätiologie wird in weniger als 10% der Fälle gefunden. Die Enttäuschung über den geringen Erfolg bei der Ursachenfindung und zahlreiche Berichte über die Assoziation von Autismus mit Stoffwechselerkrankungen sowie über «Wunderheilungen» bei unterschiedlichsten medikamentösen oder diätetischen Therapien haben bei vielen Ärzten und Eltern zu einer zunehmenden Unsicherheit über die sinnvolle Diagnostik und Behandlung geführt. Diese Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über seltene angeborene Stoffwechselerkrankungen («inborn errors of metabolism»), die nachweislich (z.B. Phenylketonurie, Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrom) oder wahrscheinlich (z.B. Succinat-Semialdehyd-Dehydrogenase-Mangel) mit Autismus-spezifischen Symptomen vergesellschaftet sind. In aller Regel weisen betroffene Patienten zusätzliche neurologische Symptome auf. Es werden die zur Diagnostik dieser angeborenen Stoffwechselerkrankungen notwendigen Untersuchungen und mögliche therapeutische Maßnahmen dargestellt. Neben diesen gut definierten Stoffwechselerkrankungen mit der Möglichkeit einer rationalen Therapie wird auch auf Hypothesen über die Entstehung von Autismus durch «Stoffwechselveränderungen» eingegangen, die entweder nicht bewiesen oder nachweislich falsch sind.

Secretin, a known gastrointestinal peptide, is widely expressed during mouse embryonic development

The gastrointestinal functions of the 27-amino acid secretin peptide have been well established. In previous prenatal studies, secretin expression in the rat duodenum was reported after day 17 of gestation while its expression in other organs and its functions in the developing embryos are still unknown. By in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical staining, secretin transcripts and peptides were found to be widely expressed in mouse embryos. Consistent with the idea that secretin is a brain-gut peptide, its expressions are present in several developing brain regions such as cephalic mesenchyme, cerebellar primordium and choroid plexus as well as the epithelial villi lining and inner circular muscle of the developing intestine. Other than these organs, secretin was also detected in the developing heart including the ventricular epicardium and myocardium and certain structures of the developing kidney like ureteric bud, collecting duct and glomerulus. These observations strongly suggest for a functional role of secretin during mouse embryonic development.

Intravenous secretin for autism spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Secretin is a gastro-intestinal hormone which has been presented as an effective treatment for autism based on anecdotal evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if intravenous secretin:1. improves the core features of autism (social interaction, communication and behaviour problems); 2. improves the non-core aspects of behaviour or function such as self injurious behaviour;3. improves the quality of life of affected individuals and their carers; 4. has short term and long term effects on outcome; 5. causes harm.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Results of electronic searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, HealthStar and Sociofile (1998 - March 2005) were independently examined by two authors. Reference lists of trials and reviews were searched; experts and trialists were contacted to find unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of intravenous secretin comparing secretin with a placebo treatment in children or adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, where at least one standardised outcome measure was reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. All outcome data were continuous. Where trials used cross-over designs, analysis was conducted on results from first treatment phase, allowing combined analysis with parallel design trials. Where standardised assessment tools generated scores as outcome measures, comparisons were made between means of these scores. Where baseline means were reported, differences between treatment and control were determined to assess possible bias. Where mean change from baseline was reported, this was used in preference to post-treatment scores for meta-analyses or forest plots. As meta-analysis was possible for only one outcome (Childhood Autism Rating Scale), it was impossible to use sensitivity or subgroup analyses to assess impact of study quality, clinical differences in the intervention, or clinically relevant differences between groups, such as age or presence of gastrointestinal symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five established standardised outcome measures were reported to assess core features of autism, communication, behaviour, visio-spatial skills, affect and adverse events within fourteen included studies. No more than four studies used any one outcome measure similarly. Outcomes were reported between three and six weeks. RCTs of efficacy of secretin in autism have not shown improvements for core features of autism.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that single or multiple dose intravenous secretin is effective and as such it should not currently be recommended or administered as a treatment for autism. Further experimental assessment of secretin's effectiveness for autism can only be justified if methodological problems of existing research can be overcome.

Partial reversal of phencyclidine-induced impairment of prepulse inhibition by secretin

BACKGROUND

Secretin is a "gut-brain" peptide whose neural function is as yet poorly understood. Several clinical studies have reported modestly increased social interaction in autistic children following intravenous secretin administration. Very recently secretin also was administered to schizophrenic patients and found to increase social interaction in some individuals.

METHODS

In light of this finding, we assessed the ability of secretin to reverse phencyclidine- (PCP) induced impairment in prepulse inhibition (PPI), a leading animal model of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia.

RESULTS

Similar to atypical antipsychotics, secretin (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 microg/kg) partially and dose-dependently reversed the PCP-induced deficit in PPI without significantly affecting baseline startle when administered intraperitoneally (IP) 10 minutes following IP administration of PCP (3 mg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

This finding may be relevant to observations of antipsychotic efficacy of secretin in schizophrenic patients as well as our previous report that systemically administered secretin is capable of modulating conditioned fear, even at quite low doses.

Neurologic treatment strategies in autism: an overview of medical intervention strategies

Child neurologists are likely to be caring for an increasing number of patients with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). ASD may occur in as many as 1/100 to 1/200 births. It appears to be a multifactorial disease, with many phenotypes or subgroups. No simple treatment is currently approved for curing or managing core symptoms of autism. We rationally propose a symptom-based review of what treatments may offer relief to specific subtypes of clinical behaviors seen in autism. There is a lack of clinically based evidence on which to universally recommend a rational clinical algorithm for treatment; we suggest that rational pharmacotherapy may offer symptomatic relief to core areas of dysfunction in the autistic population. Future research into rational medical treatment options is desperately needed.

Age-related and regional differences in secretin and secretin receptor mRNA levels in the rat brain

In the present study expression levels of secretin and secretin receptor mRNAs in several brain regions of rats ranging in age from postnatal days 7 to 60 were investigated by quantitative real-time PCR. Expression of secretin and secretin receptor was detected in the central amygdala, hippocampus, area postrema, nucleus of the tractus solitary and cerebellum. The cerebellum expressed secretin receptor at significantly higher levels than that found in other brain regions within all the ages examined. In contrast, secretin mRNA was significantly higher in the nucleus of the tractus solitary than in the other four brain regions examined in postnatal day-21, -30 and -60 rats. Within most brain regions, both secretin and secretin receptor mRNAs were more abundant in postnatal day-7 and -14 rats as compared to postnatal day-21, -30 and -60 rats. Thus, secretin and its receptor are widely expressed in rat brain and the expression of both genes is developmentally regulated during the first few weeks following birth.

Secretin: hypothalamic distribution and hypothesized neuroregulatory role in autism

1. This study aims (1) to determine whether secretin is synthesized centrally, specifically by the HPA axis and (2) to discuss, on the basis of the findings in this and previous studies, secretin's possible neuroregulatory role in autism. 2. An immunocytochemical technique with single-cell resolution was performed in 12 age/weight-matched male rats pretreated with stereotaxic microinjection of colchicine (0.6 microg/kg) or vehicle into the lateral ventricle. Following 2-day survival, rats were anesthetized and perfused for immunocytochemistry. Brain segments were blocked and alternate frozen 30-microm sections incubated in rabbit antibodies against secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucagon, or pituitary-adenylate-cyclase-activating peptide. Adjacent sections were processed for Nissl stain. Preadsorption studies were performed with members of the secretin peptide family to demonstrate primary antibody specificity. 3. Specificity of secretin immunoreactivity (ir) was verified by clear-cut preadsorption control data and relatively high concentrations and distinct topographic localization of secretin ir to paraventricular/supraoptic and intercalated hypothalamic nuclei. Secretin levels were upregulated by colchicine, an exemplar of homeostatic stressors, as compared with low constitutive expression in untreated rats. 4. This study provides the first direct immunocytochemical demonstration of secretinergic immunoreactivity in the forebrain and offers evidence that the hypothalamus, like the gut, is capable of synthesizing secretin. Secretin's dual expression by gut and brain secretin cells, as well as its overlapping central distribution with other stress-adaptation neurohormones, especially oxytocin, indicates that it is stress-sensitive. A neuroregulatory relationship between the peripheral and central stress response systems is suggested, as is a dual role for secretin in conditioning both of those stress-adaptation systems. Colchicine-induced upregulation of secretin indicates that secretin may be synthesized on demand in response to stress, a possible mechanism of action that may underlie secretin's role in autism.

Comparison of biologic porcine secretin, synthetic porcine secretin, and synthetic human secretin in pancreatic function testing

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Due to the unavailability of biologic porcine secretin (BPS), 2 synthetic forms of secretin were developed. Our aim is to determine the bioequivalency of the 3 forms of secretin in pancreatic function testing.

METHODS

In a randomized, crossover design, synthetic porcine (SPS) and synthetic human secretin (SHS) were compared in a group of 12 subjects with chronic pancreatitis undergoing secretin stimulation test (SST). The 2 synthetic forms of secretin were then compared with BPS in 12 subjects utilizing a similar design. Finally, 18 healthy subjects underwent secretin stimulation testing with SHS.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation of peak bicarbonate measurements in the comparison of SPS to SHS (R = 0.967) as well as in the comparison of all 3 forms of secretin (P = 0.08, ANOVA for correlated samples). In the SST, each of the synthetic forms of secretin were 100% accurate in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis in disease subjects and in excluding chronic pancreatitis in normal controls. The synthetic forms of secretin were associated with fewer side effects when compared with BPS with the exception of transient tachycardia which occurred in up to 19% of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthetic porcine and human forms of secretin are equivalent to one another and to biologic porcine secretin and can be used interchangeably in pancreatic function testing.

Children with autistic spectrum disorders. I: comparison of placebo and single dose of human synthetic secretin

AIMS

To examine the effect of a single dose of human synthetic secretin (HSS) on behaviour and communication in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using an objective measure of communication and social reciprocity and standardised rating scales.

METHODS

Randomised, crossover, double blind, and placebo controlled trial of a single intravenous dose of human synthetic secretin (HSS) 2 CU/kg. The 62 subjects (3-8 years) were assigned to group 1 (saline placebo/HSS) or group 2 (HSS/saline placebo). Diagnosis was confirmed by ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised) algorithm. Severity of symptoms was rated using the CARS (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). Outcome measures included Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale (CSBS), Ritvo Real-life Rating Scale, weekly Global Rating Scale (GBRS) by parents and teachers, and daily log of gastrointestinal symptoms. The communication subscale of the CSBS, specifying communication function, reciprocity, and social-affective signalling was videotaped and scored by a blinded, trained observer.

RESULTS

Sixty one children completed the study. After randomisation, there were no significant differences in gender, race, age, and parent and teacher GBRS and Ritvo Scale between the two groups. Compared with placebo, secretin treatment was not associated with significant improvement of CSBS standard scores from baseline to 2 or 4 weeks post-infusion. Five children showed clinical improvement in standard scores: two after HSS and three after placebo. There were no significant changes in gastrointestinal symptoms after HSS or saline placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of intravenous human secretin is not effective in changing behaviour and communication in children with ASD when compared to placebo.

Lack of benefit of intravenous synthetic human secretin in the treatment of autism

The objective of this study was to determine if an intravenous infusion of synthetic human secretin improves language and behavioral symptoms in children with autism. Forty-two children with the diagnosis of autism were randomized to one of two groups in this double-blind cross-over trial. One group received 2 IU/kg of intravenous synthetic human secretin at the first visit, followed by an equal volume of intravenous saline placebo at week 6. The other group received treatments in the reverse order. All children were evaluated at weeks 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 with standardized assessments of language, behavior, and autism symptomatology. There were no significant differences in the mean scores on any measure of language, behavior, or autism symptom severity after treatment with secretin compared to treatment with placebo. The results of this study do not support secretin as a treatment for autism.

What may be the anatomical basis that secretin can improve the mental functions in autism?

Autism was first described and characterized as a behavioral disorder more than 50 years ago. The major abnormality in the central nervous system is a cerebellar atrophy. The characteristic histological sign is a striking loss or abnormal development in the Purkinje cell count. Abnormalities were also found in the limbic system, in the parietal and frontal cortex, and in the brain stem. The relation between secretin and autism was observed 3 years ago. Clinical observations by Horváth et al. [J. Assoc. Acad. Minor. Physicians 9 (1998) 9] supposed a defect in the role of secretin and its receptors in autism. The aim of the present work was to study the precise localization of secretin immunoreactivity in the nervous system using an immunohistochemical approach. No secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the forebrain structures. In the brain stem, secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, in the superior olivary nucleus, and in scattered cells of the reticular formation. The most intensive secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the Purkinje cells of the whole cerebellum and in some of the neurons of the central cerebellar nuclei. Secretin immunoreactivity was also observed in a subpopulation of neurons in the primary sensory ganglia. This work is the first immunohistochemical demonstration of secretin-immunoreactive elements in the brain stem and in primary sensory ganglia.

Differential transport of a secretin analog across the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers of the mouse

Secretin is a gastrointestinal peptide belonging to the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/glucagon/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) family recently suggested to have therapeutic effects in autism. A direct effect on brain would require secretin to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), an ability other members of the VIP/PACAP family have. Herein, we examined whether a secretin analog (SA) radioactively labeled with (131)I (I-SA) could cross the BBB of 4-week-old mice. We found I-SA was rapidly cleared from serum with fragments not precipitating with acid appearing in brain and serum. Levels of radioactivity were corrected to reflect only intact I-SA as estimated by acid precipitation. After i.v. injection, I-SA was taken up by brain at a modest rate of 0.9 to 1.5 microl/g-mm. Capillary depletion, brain perfusion, and high-performance liquid chromatography were used to confirm the passage of intact I-SA across the BBB. I-SA entered every brain region, with the highest uptake into the hypothalamus and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Unlabeled SA (10 microg/mouse) did not inhibit uptake by brain but did inhibit clearance from blood and uptake by the CSF, colon, kidney, and liver. The decreased clearance of I-SA from blood increased the percentage of the i.v. injected dose taken up per brain (%Inj/g) from about 0.118 to 0.295%Inj/g. In conclusion, SA crosses the vascular barrier by a nonsaturable process and the choroid plexus by a saturable process in amounts that for other members of its family produce central nervous system (CNS) effects. This passage provides a pathway through which peripherally administered SA could affect the CNS.

Secretin as a neuropeptide

The role of secretin as a classical hormone in the gastrointestinal system is well-established. The recent debate on the use of secretin as a potential therapeutic treatment for autistic patients urges a better understanding of the neuroactive functions of secretin. Indeed, there is an increasing body of evidence pointing to the direction that, in addition to other peptides in the secretin/glucagon superfamily, secretin is also a neuropeptide. The purpose of this review is to discuss the recent data for supporting the neurocrine roles of secretin in rodents. By in situ hybridization and immunostaining, secretin was found to be expressed in distinct neuronal populations within the cerebellum and cerebral cortex, whereas the receptor transcript was found throughout the brain. In the rat cerebellum, secretin functions as a retrograde messenger to facilitate GABA transmission, indicating that it can modulate motor and other functions. In summary, the recent data support strongly the neuropeptide role of secretin, although the secretin-autism link remains to be clarified in the future.

Secretin and sleep in children with autism

The objectives of this pilot study were 1) to examine possible effects of secretin infusions on sleep-wake state organization in children with autism, and 2) to assess the feasibility of home recordings using time-lapse videosomnography in children with autism. Participants were a subset of subjects from two double blind, placebo-control, multi-center clinical trials. One trial, the UC Irvine study, assessed the effects of porcine secretin vs. saline infusions on children's behavior, language and IQ. The UC Davis trial assessed the effects of synthetic human secretin vs. saline infusions on behavior, language and gastrointestinal function. The sleep study enrolled some of the children from each of the two trials to observe possible secretin effects on sleep. To examine sleep, the UC Irvine trial used the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire and daily sleep diaries, whereas the UC Davis study used home-recorded time-lapse videosomnography. Because of the small sample size, the results from both trials are preliminary. They suggest that secretin, porcine or synthetic, does not improve sleep-wake state organization dramatically.