1
|
Bogudzińska B, Jaworski A, Zajdel A, Skrzypek K, Misiak B. The experience sampling methodology in psychosis risk states: A systematic review. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 175:34-41. [PMID: 38704979 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
The experience sampling method (ESM) is a structured diary technique, which is used to assess thoughts, mood and appraise subjective experiences in daily life. It has been recognized as a useful tool for understanding the characteristics, dynamics, and underlying mechanisms of prodromal symptoms of psychosis. The present systematic review aimed to provide a qualitative synthesis of findings provided by the ESM studies conducted in people with psychosis risk states. A systematic review of the MEDLINE, ERIC, Academic Search Ultimate, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases, utilizing search terms related to the ESM and the risk of psychosis was conducted. Out of 1069 publication records identified, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Data were synthesized around the following topics: 1) assessment of symptoms dynamics and social functioning; 2) assessment of the mechanisms contributing to the emergence of psychotic experiences and 3) assessment of stress sensitivity. The studies have shown that negative emotions are associated with subsequent development of paranoia. The tendency to draw hasty conclusions, aberrant salience, self-esteem, and emotion regulation were the most frequently reported mechanisms associated with the emergence of psychotic experiences. Studies using the ESM also provided evidence for the role of stress sensitivity, in the development of psychotic symptoms. The ESM has widely been applied to studies investigating psychosis risk states, using a variety of protocols. Findings from this systematic review might inform future studies and indicate potential targets for interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogna Bogudzińska
- Departament of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
| | | | | | | | - Błażej Misiak
- Departament of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Dalen M, Snijders A, Dietvorst E, Bracké K, Nijhof SL, Keijsers L, Hillegers MHJ, Legerstee JS. Applications of the experience sampling method (ESM) in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review. Pediatr Res 2024; 95:887-900. [PMID: 38062256 PMCID: PMC10920184 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02918-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) participants are asked to provide self-reports of their symptoms, feelings, thoughts and behaviours in daily life. This preregistered systematic review assessed how ESM is being used to monitor emotional well-being, somatic health, fatigue and pain in children and adolescents with a chronic somatic illness. METHODS Databases were searched from inception. Studies were selected if they included children or adolescents aged 0-25 years with a chronic somatic illness and used ESM focussing on mental health or psychosocial wellbeing, biopsychosocial factors and/or somatic health. Two reviewers extracted data of the final 47 papers, describing 48 studies. RESULTS Most studies evaluated what factors influence medical or psychological symptoms and how symptoms influence each other. Another common purpose was to study the feasibility of ESM or ESM as part of an app or intervention. Study methods were heterogeneous and most studies lack adequate reporting of ESM applications and results. CONCLUSIONS While ESM holds great potential for providing results and feedback to patients and caregivers, little use is being made of this option. Future studies should consider what they report in their studies, conduct a priori power analyses and how ESM can be embedded in clinical practice. IMPACT While ESM has many clinical applications, it is currently mostly used for research purposes. Current studies using ESM are heterogeneous and lack consistent, high-quality reporting. There is great potential in ESM for providing patients and parents with personalised feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije van Dalen
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne Snijders
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dietvorst
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien Bracké
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne L Nijhof
- Department of Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Keijsers
- Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon H J Hillegers
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen S Legerstee
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adams LM, Miller AB. Mechanisms of Mental-Health Disparities Among Minoritized Groups: How Well Are the Top Journals in Clinical Psychology Representing This Work? Clin Psychol Sci 2022; 10:387-416. [PMID: 35602543 PMCID: PMC9122282 DOI: 10.1177/21677026211026979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
We have known for decades that mental health disparities exist among minoritized groups, including race, ethnicity, sexual identities, gender identity and expression, ability, and others. Theories and frameworks that incorporate stressors unique to the experiences of minoritized groups, such as the biopsychosocial model of racism (Clark et al, 1999) and minority stress model (Meyer, 2003), offer testable mechanisms that may help explain, in part, mental health disparities. However, research addressing mechanisms of these disparities is still scarce and is not well represented in our top clinical psychology journals. This review critically examines the extent to which top tier clinical psychology journals publish work examining mechanisms of mental health disparities among minoritized populations. We find very few studies have been published in top clinical psychology journals that address mechanisms of mental health disparities. We examine potential reasons for this and discuss recommendations for future research.
Collapse
|
4
|
Collins MA, Chung Y, Addington J, Bearden CE, Cadenhead KS, Cornblatt BA, Mathalon DH, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, Walker EF, Woods SW, Cannon TD. Discriminatory experiences predict neuroanatomical changes and anxiety among healthy individuals and those at clinical high risk for psychosis. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 31:102757. [PMID: 34273790 PMCID: PMC8283423 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Individuals face discrimination based on characteristics including race/ethnicity, gender, age, and disability. Discriminatory experiences (DE) are associated with poor psychological health in the general population and with worse outcomes among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). Though the brain is sensitive to stress, and brain structural change is a well-documented precursor to psychosis, potential relationships between DE and brain structure among CHR or healthy individuals are not known. This report assessed whether lifetime DE are associated with cortical thinning and clinical outcomes across time, after controlling for discrimination-related demographic factors among CHR individuals who ultimately do (N = 57) and do not convert to psychosis (N = 451), and healthy comparison (N = 208) participants in the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study 2. Results indicate that DE are associated with thinner cortex across time in several cortical areas. Thickness in several right hemisphere regions partially mediates associations between DE and subsequent anxiety symptoms, but not attenuated positive symptoms of psychosis. This report provides the first evidence to date of an association between DE and brain structure in both CHR and healthy comparison individuals. Results also suggest that thinner cortex across time in areas linked with DE may partially explain associations between DE and cross-diagnostic indicators of psychological distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoonho Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - Jean Addington
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Carrie E Bearden
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior & Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel H Mathalon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, USA; San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Diana O Perkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Larry J Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming T Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Elaine F Walker
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Scott W Woods
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tyrone D Cannon
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turton L, Souza P, Thibodeau L, Hickson L, Gifford R, Bird J, Stropahl M, Gailey L, Fulton B, Scarinci N, Ekberg K, Timmer B. Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss. Semin Hear 2020; 41:141-246. [PMID: 33364673 PMCID: PMC7744249 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals with severe to profound hearing loss are likely to present with complex listening needs that require evidence-based solutions. This document is intended to inform the practice of hearing care professionals who are involved in the audiological management of adults with a severe to profound degree of hearing loss and will highlight the special considerations and practices required to optimize outcomes for these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Turton
- Department of Audiology, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Souza
- Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Linda Thibodeau
- University of Texas at Dallas, Callier Center for Communication Disorders, Dallas, Texas
| | - Louise Hickson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - René Gifford
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Judith Bird
- Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Maren Stropahl
- Department of Science and Technology, Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Nerina Scarinci
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Katie Ekberg
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Barbra Timmer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Souza P, Hoover E, Blackburn M, Gallun F. The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 29:764-779. [PMID: 30222545 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. PURPOSE The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. RESEARCH DESIGN A within-subjects design was used. STUDY SAMPLE Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition. RESULTS For speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS The present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Souza
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
| | - Eric Hoover
- Auditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Frederick Gallun
- National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Souza P, Hoover E. The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. Semin Hear 2018; 39:349-363. [PMID: 30443103 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Substantial loss of cochlear function is required to elevate pure-tone thresholds to the severe hearing loss range; yet, individuals with severe or profound hearing loss continue to rely on hearing for communication. Despite the impairment, sufficient information is encoded at the periphery to make acoustic hearing a viable option. However, the probability of significant cochlear and/or neural damage associated with the loss has consequences for sound perception and speech recognition. These consequences include degraded frequency selectivity, which can be assessed with tests including psychoacoustic tuning curves and broadband rippled stimuli. Because speech recognition depends on the ability to resolve frequency detail, a listener with severe hearing loss is likely to have impaired communication in both quiet and noisy environments. However, the extent of the impairment varies widely among individuals. A better understanding of the fundamental abilities of listeners with severe and profound hearing loss and the consequences of those abilities for communication can support directed treatment options in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Souza
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Eric Hoover
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaya ES, Ascone L, Lincoln TM. A longitudinal mediation analysis of the effect of negative-self-schemas on positive symptoms via negative affect. Psychol Med 2018; 48:1299-1307. [PMID: 28956520 DOI: 10.1017/s003329171700277x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive models postulate that negative-self-schemas (NSS) cause and maintain positive symptoms and that negative affect mediates this link. However, only few studies have tested the temporal mediation claim systematically using an appropriate design. METHODS A longitudinal cohort design in an online community sample (N = 962) from Germany, Indonesia, and the USA was used. NSS, negative affect and positive symptoms were measured at four time-points (T0-T3) over a 1-year period. Cross-lagged panel and longitudinal mediation analyses with structural equation modeling were used to test the temporal mediation. RESULTS Independent cross-lagged panel models showed a significant unidirectional longitudinal path from NSS to positive symptoms (T2-T3, β = 0.18, p < 0.01) and bidirectional longitudinal associations from NSS to negative affect (T0-T1, γ = 0.14, p < 0.01) and vice versa (T0-T1, γ = 0.19, p < 0.01). There was also a significant indirect pathway from NSS at baseline via negative affect at T1 and T2 to positive symptoms at T3 (unstandardized indirect effect coefficient = 0.020, p < 0.05, BCa CI 0.004-0.035), indicating mediation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the postulated affective pathway from NSS to positive symptoms via negative affect. Specifically, our data indicate that NSS and negative affect influence each other and build up over the course of several months before leading on to positive symptoms. We conclude that interrupting this process by targeting NSS and negative affect early in the process could be a promising strategy to prevent the exacerbation of positive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Jaya
- Faculty of Psychology,Universitas Indonesia,Depok,Indonesia
| | - L Ascone
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Institute of Psychology,University of Hamburg,Hamburg,Germany
| | - T M Lincoln
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Institute of Psychology,University of Hamburg,Hamburg,Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pries LK, Guloksuz S, ten Have M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Gunther N, Rauschenberg C, Reininghaus U, Radhakrishnan R, Bak M, Rutten BPF, van Os J. Evidence That Environmental and Familial Risks for Psychosis Additively Impact a Multidimensional Subthreshold Psychosis Syndrome. Schizophr Bull 2018; 44:710-719. [PMID: 29701807 PMCID: PMC6007403 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sby051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The observed link between positive psychotic experiences (PE) and psychosis spectrum disorder (PSD) may be stronger depending on concomitant presence of PE with other dimensions of psychopathology. We examined whether the effect of common risk factors for PSD on PE is additive and whether the impact of risk factors on the occurrence of PE depends on the co-occurrence of other symptom dimensions (affective dysregulation, negative symptoms, and cognitive alteration). METHOD Data from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study 2 were used. Risk factors included childhood adversity, cannabis use, urbanicity, foreign born, hearing impairment, and family history of affective disorders. Logistic regression models were applied to test (1) the additive effect of risk factors (4 levels) on PE and (2) the moderating effects of symptom dimensions on the association between risk factors (present/absent) and PE, using additive interaction, expressed as the interaction contrast ratio. RESULTS Risk factors were additive: the greater the number of risk factors, the greater the odds of PE. Furthermore, concomitant presence of the other symptom dimensions all increased the impact of risk factors on PE. After controlling for age, sex, and education, only affective dysregulation and negative symptoms remained significant moderators; only affective dysregulation remained a significant moderator if all dimensions were adjusted for each other. CONCLUSIONS Risk factors may not be directly associated with PE but additively give rise to a multidimensional subthreshold state anticipating the multidimensional clinical syndrome. Early motivational and cognitive impairments in the context of PE may be reducible to affective dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotta-Katrin Pries
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sinan Guloksuz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Margreet ten Have
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ron de Graaf
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia van Dorsselaer
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Gunther
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands,School of Psychology, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Rauschenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Maarten Bak
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart P F Rutten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Psychiatry, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands,Department of Psychosis Studies, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; tel: +31-88-75-560-25, fax: +31-88-75-560-27, e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reactivity to social stress in ethnic minority men. Psychiatry Res 2016; 246:629-636. [PMID: 27884461 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Repeated exposures to social exclusion, through a process of sensitization, may result in larger responses to experiences of social stress. The current study tested the hypothesis that healthy Moroccan-Dutch men respond stronger to social stress than Dutch controls 1) in daily life, and 2) in an experimental set-up. A general population sample of 50 Moroccan-Dutch and 50 Dutch young adult males were tested with 1) the Experience Sampling Method, a structured diary technique, assessing reactivity to social stress in daily life, and 2) an experimental exposure to social peer evaluation. No group differences were found in affective or psychotic reactivity to daily social stress. When exposed to a negative social evaluation in the lab, a blunted affective response was found in the Moroccan-Dutch compared to the Dutch group, whereas the psychotic response did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, healthy Moroccan-Dutch men are not more sensitive to social stress than healthy Dutch men. Instead, the blunted affective response of Moroccan-Dutch men to peer evaluation may signify habituation rather than sensitization.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jaya ES, Lincoln TM. Social adversities and psychotic symptoms: A test of predictions derived from the social defeat hypothesis. Psychiatry Res 2016; 245:466-472. [PMID: 27636674 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Based on the social defeat (SD) hypothesis, this study examines the postulate that various social adversities converge into one common factor, and whether this factor has an effect on psychotic symptoms while controlling for its effect on depression and anxiety. Competing hypotheses arguing for the reverse effect were also tested. The study was a cross-sectional survey in a community sample (N =2350) from Germany (n=786), Indonesia (n=844), and the United States (n=720). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis with structural equation modeling were used to test the hypotheses. In the CFA two factors reflecting current and past experiences of SD could be identified with acceptable fit. Path analysis indicated acceptable fit for both SD and reverse models, and both the path from current SD to psychotic symptoms and the reverse one were significant, although the former was stronger than the latter. Interestingly, the current but not the past SD factor was significantly associated with psychotic symptoms. Overall, the results indicate that postulates derived from the SD hypothesis fit the data. However, longitudinal research is needed to further confirm the postulated directionality of the associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edo S Jaya
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Tania M Lincoln
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reininghaus U, Gayer-Anderson C, Valmaggia L, Kempton MJ, Calem M, Onyejiaka A, Hubbard K, Dazzan P, Beards S, Fisher HL, Mills JG, McGuire P, Craig TKJ, Garety P, van Os J, Murray RM, Wykes T, Myin-Germeys I, Morgan C. Psychological processes underlying the association between childhood trauma and psychosis in daily life: an experience sampling study. Psychol Med 2016; 46:2799-2813. [PMID: 27400863 PMCID: PMC5358473 DOI: 10.1017/s003329171600146x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence has accumulated that implicates childhood trauma in the aetiology of psychosis, but our understanding of the putative psychological processes and mechanisms through which childhood trauma impacts on individuals and contributes to the development of psychosis remains limited. We aimed to investigate whether stress sensitivity and threat anticipation underlie the association between childhood abuse and psychosis. METHOD We used the Experience Sampling Method to measure stress, threat anticipation, negative affect, and psychotic experiences in 50 first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, 44 At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) participants, and 52 controls. Childhood abuse was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. RESULTS Associations of minor socio-environmental stress in daily life with negative affect and psychotic experiences were modified by sexual abuse and group (all p FWE < 0.05). While there was strong evidence that these associations were greater in FEP exposed to high levels of sexual abuse, and some evidence of greater associations in ARMS exposed to high levels of sexual abuse, controls exposed to high levels of sexual abuse were more resilient and reported less intense negative emotional reactions to socio-environmental stress. A similar pattern was evident for threat anticipation. CONCLUSIONS Elevated sensitivity and lack of resilience to socio-environmental stress and enhanced threat anticipation in daily life may be important psychological processes underlying the association between childhood sexual abuse and psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U. Reininghaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology,
School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht
University, Maastricht, The
Netherlands
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - C. Gayer-Anderson
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - L. Valmaggia
- Psychology Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - M. J. Kempton
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - M. Calem
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - A. Onyejiaka
- Psychology Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - K. Hubbard
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - P. Dazzan
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust and King's College London, London,
UK
| | - S. Beards
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - H. L. Fisher
- MRC Social, Genetic &
Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London,
London, UK
| | - J. G. Mills
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - P. McGuire
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust and King's College London, London,
UK
| | - T. K. J. Craig
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - P. Garety
- Psychology Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - J. van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology,
School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht
University, Maastricht, The
Netherlands
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
| | - R. M. Murray
- Psychosis Studies Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust and King's College London, London,
UK
| | - T. Wykes
- Psychology Department,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's
College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust and King's College London, London,
UK
| | - I. Myin-Germeys
- Department of Medicine,
Psychiatry Research Group, Catholic University of
Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C. Morgan
- Health Service and Population Research
Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust and King's College London, London,
UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reininghaus U, Kempton MJ, Valmaggia L, Craig TKJ, Garety P, Onyejiaka A, Gayer-Anderson C, So SH, Hubbard K, Beards S, Dazzan P, Pariante C, Mondelli V, Fisher HL, Mills JG, Viechtbauer W, McGuire P, van Os J, Murray RM, Wykes T, Myin-Germeys I, Morgan C. Stress Sensitivity, Aberrant Salience, and Threat Anticipation in Early Psychosis: An Experience Sampling Study. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42:712-22. [PMID: 26834027 PMCID: PMC4838104 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbv190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
While contemporary models of psychosis have proposed a number of putative psychological mechanisms, how these impact on individuals to increase intensity of psychotic experiences in real life, outside the research laboratory, remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether elevated stress sensitivity, experiences of aberrant novelty and salience, and enhanced anticipation of threat contribute to the development of psychotic experiences in daily life. We used the experience sampling method (ESM) to assess stress, negative affect, aberrant salience, threat anticipation, and psychotic experiences in 51 individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP), 46 individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis, and 53 controls with no personal or family history of psychosis. Linear mixed models were used to account for the multilevel structure of ESM data. In all 3 groups, elevated stress sensitivity, aberrant salience, and enhanced threat anticipation were associated with an increased intensity of psychotic experiences. However, elevated sensitivity to minor stressful events (χ(2)= 6.3,P= 0.044), activities (χ(2)= 6.7,P= 0.036), and areas (χ(2)= 9.4,P= 0.009) and enhanced threat anticipation (χ(2)= 9.3,P= 0.009) were associated with more intense psychotic experiences in FEP individuals than controls. Sensitivity to outsider status (χ(2)= 5.7,P= 0.058) and aberrantly salient experiences (χ(2)= 12.3,P= 0.002) were more strongly associated with psychotic experiences in ARMS individuals than controls. Our findings suggest that stress sensitivity, aberrant salience, and threat anticipation are important psychological processes in the development of psychotic experiences in daily life in the early stages of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Reininghaus
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Matthew J Kempton
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucia Valmaggia
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tom K J Craig
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Philippa Garety
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Adanna Onyejiaka
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Gayer-Anderson
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Suzanne H So
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kathryn Hubbard
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Beards
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paola Dazzan
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Carmine Pariante
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Valeria Mondelli
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Helen L Fisher
- MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John G Mills
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip McGuire
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robin M Murray
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Craig Morgan
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Increased risk of psychosis in patients with hearing impairment: Review and meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 62:1-20. [PMID: 26743858 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Several studies suggest hearing impairment as a risk factor for psychosis. Hearing impairment is highly prevalent and potentially reversible, as it can be easily diagnosed and sometimes improved. Insight in the association between hearing impairment and psychosis can therefore contribute to prevention of psychosis. This paper provides meta-analyses of all epidemiologic evidence on the association between hearing impairment and psychosis and summarizes mechanisms that potentially underlie this relationship. Meta-analyses showed an increased risk of hearing impairment on all psychosis outcomes, such as hallucinations (OR 1.40(95%CI 1.18-1.65; n=227,005)), delusions (OR 1.55(95%CI 1.36-1.78; n=250,470)), psychotic symptoms (OR 2.23(95%CI 1.83-2.72; n=229,647) and delirium (OR 2.67(95%CI 2.05-3.48; n=12,432). Early exposure to hearing impairment elevated the risk of later development of schizophrenia (OR 3.15(95%CI 1.25-7.95; n=50,490)). Potential mechanisms underlying this association include loneliness, diminished theory of mind, disturbances of source monitoring and top-down processing and deafferentiation. Early assessment and treatment of hearing impairment in patients with (high risk of) psychosis may be essential in psychosis treatment and prevention.
Collapse
|