Hemophilia home treatment. Economic analysis and implications for health policy

On-demand treatment in persons with severe haemophilia

There are two main modes of replacement therapy for haemophilia patients: either to stop bleeding (on-demand) or regular infusions of clotting factor to prevent bleeds (prophylaxis). Fifty yr of clinical experience have provided evidence of the superiority of prophylaxis by showing a reduction in bleeds and development of arthropathy. Prophylaxis has been described extensively in terms of efficacy and health-economic aspects; however, on-demand treatment has received less attention. The aim of this study was to critically review the published literature on PubMed and discuss potential gaps of knowledge in on-demand treatment in persons with severe haemophilia without inhibitors by focusing on two key aspects: how on-demand treatment is provided and what outcome measures have been reported. We identified 134 papers of which 112 were excluded. Of the remaining 22 papers, 16 were comparative studies between prophylaxis and on-demand treatment and six were descriptions of on-demand treatment. The results showed limited reporting on data related to the key aspects of treatment on-demand. Early studies looked at degrees of joint bleeds and different treatment regimens in finding the optimal dose. However, from the late 1980s, there was almost no research into on-demand therapy except efficacy and safety studies of new rFVIII products and studies to prove superiority of prophylaxis over treatment on-demand. The success of on-demand therapy may depend on several factors, for example time to initial dose after a bleed and duration of treatment. Data on these key factors are limited and highlight the necessity of research to optimise replacement therapy.

Central venous access devices in patients with hemophilia

Hemophilia is a hereditary disorder in which the major clinical manifestation is bleeding into the joints, muscles, internal organs and the CNS, often without any obvious trauma. Bleeding can be fatal as in the case of CNS hemorrhage, or severely debilitating following repeated bleeding into joints that results in crippling arthritis. Treatment for hemophilia includes the intravenous administration of clotting factor concentrates to replace the missing or defective protein. Venous access is therefore critical to the treatment of hemophilia and the prevention of complications due to bleeding. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately half of patients less than 16 years of age and one-third of all patients with hemophilia receive regular prophylactic injections of clotting factor concentrates. Prophylaxis, or the regular scheduled administration of antihemophilic factor concentrate, is effective in preventing bleeding. Among those patients with severe disease, in the absence of prophylaxis, approximately 13 bleeds, including nine joint hemorrhages, occur annually. In contrast, when prophylaxis is administered, the annual number of total and joint bleeds decreases to five and three, respectively. One of the major barriers to the more wide-spread use of prophylaxis is venous access. While peripheral venipuncture remains the first choice for venous access, central venous access devices are frequently used to facilitate repeated and/or urgent administration of clotting factor concentrates. The advantages of central venous access devices are well recognized in certain treatment regimens such as prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy, as well as certain patient groups such as young children in whom venipuncture is often difficult and traumatic, and adults with scarred veins. Central venous access devices also allow earlier commencement of both home treatment and prophylaxis. The goal of this review is to discuss the different types of central venous access devices and their role in the management of hemophilia to provide practitioners that care for patients with hemophilia with the necessary information to make sound therapeutic recommendations to their patients.

Inhibitor Economics

The majority of direct costs associated with caring for patients with hemophilia are attributed to replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates (CFC). For patients who develop high-titer inhibitors, CFC are ineffective and bypassing therapy is used to achieve hemostasis, thus changing the direct costs associated with treatment. As bypassing agents are less predictably effective than CFC (often necessitating more frequent dosing) and are more costly on a per-unit basis, treatment costs for patients with inhibitors are usually much higher than those for patients without inhibitors. In addition, the immune tolerance induction protocols used to eradicate inhibitors are costly due to the frequent dosing of CFC over prolonged periods. It is estimated that the cost of hemostatic therapy for patients with inhibitors can be 2.5 times higher than the cost for patients without inhibitors. However, some studies have reported an outlier effect caused by a small percentage of inhibitor patients who require a disproportionate amount of treatment. These outliers magnify overall treatment costs, making cost assessments for hemostatic therapy less predictable in patients with inhibitors than in those without inhibitors.

Health economics of treating haemophilia A with inhibitors

Haemophilia is a rare, inherited blood disorder in which blood clotting is impaired such that patients suffer from excessive internal and external bleeding. At present there is no cure for haemophilia A and patients require expensive, life-long treatment involving clotting factor replacement therapy. Treatment costs are perceived to be higher for patients who have developed inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII, the standard therapy for haemophilia A. However, initial cost analyses suggest that clotting factor therapy with alternative haemostatic agents, such as recombinant activated factor VII or activated prothrombin complex concentrate, is no more expensive for the majority of haemophilia A patients with inhibitors than for those without inhibitors. With the availability of effective alternative haemostatic agents, orthopaedic surgery for haemophilia A patients with inhibitors is now a clinical option, and initial cost analyses suggest this may be a cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with inhibitors whose quality of life (QoL) is severely impaired by joint arthropathy. In an era of finite healthcare resourcing it is important to determine whether new treatments justify higher unit costs compared with standard therapies and whether such higher costs are justified from an individual perspective in terms of improved QoL, and from a societal perspective in terms of improved productivity and reduced overall healthcare costs. This paper examines current data on the health economics of treating haemophilia A patients with inhibitors, focusing on the overall costs of clotting factor replacement therapy and the cost consequences of joint replacement.

Costs of on-demand and prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden

The expected annual cost (in the year 2000 prices) for a 30-year-old patient with average individual and treatment characteristics for on-demand EUR 51,832 (95% CI: 44,324-59,341) and for prophylaxis EUR 146,118 (95% CI: 129,965-162,271), was obtained from panel-data analysis of an 11-year retrospective panel of 156 patients with severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden. Costs included haemophilia-related treatment costs within the health-care sector (factor concentrate, doctors' visits, diagnostic procedures, hospitalisation, invasive procedures, etc.) and cost for haemophilia-related resource use in other sectors (lost production, use of special equipment, adaptation of workplace and domicile, etc). Although costs of lost production, reconstructive surgery and hospitalisation were higher for on-demand, they did not balance out the higher costs of factor-concentrate consumption in prophylaxis. The cut-off risk of premature death, where on-demand and prophylaxis would have been equally costly, was 3.7 percentage units higher for on-demand than for prophylaxis. Such a great risk difference has not been reported elsewhere to our knowledge. Estimated cost-elasticities indicated that annual costs of prophylaxis would increase by approximately the same proportion as a potential increase in the price of factor concentrate and decrease less than proportionately with a reduction in prescribed dose kg(-1). For on-demand, the annual costs would increase by approximately the same proportion as an increase in the prescribed dose kg(-1).

Utilization of care in haemophilia: a resource-based method for cost analysis from the Haemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS)

The Haemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS) was created 10 years ago to examine the annual utilization and cost of haemophilia-related healthcare services. Retrospective chart reviews for 336 patients with haemophilia A receiving treatment in one of five comprehensive haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) during 1995 were completed through interview of the provider. This method provided adequate collection of data from patient charts without the abstractor having direct access to patient health information. Utilization data were used to impute the costs of different components of care (e.g. physician visits, factor VIII concentrate, emergency room, hospitalization). The total annual cost of care was 139,102 dollars (SD $304,033). Factor VIII concentrate costs comprised the largest proportion of these costs; mean factor VIII concentrate use was 128,517 units per patient per year. Unbilled physician utilization accounted for 7.8% of the mean total physician costs per annum, while mean allied healthcare costs accounted for 33.5% of the total annual allied healthcare costs per patient. In the ordinary least-squares regression model, higher costs were associated with severe factor VIII deficiency, arthropathy, more comorbid conditions, an inhibitor to factor VIII concentrate, infusing through a port and prophylaxis. Although factor VIII concentrate is the most costly component, the treatment of haemophilia uses many healthcare resources. HUGS has demonstrated that patient clinical characteristics and physician practices predominantly drive the costs of haemophilia care. Specifically, patients with more severe arthropathy had greater healthcare costs. As future funding decisions are made, it is important to provide for all components of care.

Economic evaluation: what are we looking for and how do we get there?

The interest in economic evaluation of alternative strategies for haemophilia treatment has increased through the years. Few studies have actually been undertaken, however, and most of them have been simple cost-minimization or cost-effectiveness analyses. From the perspective of the binational project 'Treatment strategies for severe haemophilia-prophylaxis vs. on-demand', the present paper discusses the pros and cons of different methods for economic evaluation and their data requirements. Severe haemophilia is a rare disease that requires lifelong treatment. In addition, treatment has both short- and long-term effects which are likely to differ between strategies. Accordingly, regardless of the chosen evaluation method, data requirements are non-trivial. Hence, the various problems connected to the generation of data, as well as how they may be addressed, are also discussed.

An economic model of haemophilia in Mexico

A model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and outcomes associated with haemophilia in Mexico. A retrospective chart review of 182 type A haemophiliacs was conducted for patients aged 0-34 years receiving one of three treatments: (i) cryoprecipitate at clinic; (ii) concentrate at home; or (iii) concentrate at clinic. Patients treated at home experienced 30% less joint damage, used 13-54% less factor VIII, had four times fewer clinic visits, and utilized half as many hospital days than those treated at a clinic. For cryoprecipitate at clinic patients, the annual incidence rates of HCV and HIV were calculated to be 3.6% and 1.4% respectively. The life expectancy for patients receiving cryoprecipitate and those receiving concentrate was estimated to be 49 years and 69 years respectively, with 58% of cryoprecipitate patients predicted to die of AIDS before age 69. Across the lifespan, the average annual cost of care was US$11,677 (MN$110,464) for cryoprecipitate at clinic patients, US$10,104 (M$95,580) for concentrate at home patients and US$18,819 (MN$178,027) for concentrate at clinic patients. Using a 5% discount rate, the incremental lifetime cost per year of life added for treatment with concentrate at home compared with cryoprecipitate at a clinic was US$738 (MN$6981). Rank order stability analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to the cost of fVIII. These results indicate that treatment with concentrate at home compared with cryoprecipitate at a clinic substantially improves clinical outcomes at reduced annual cost levels.

On-demand vs. prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden: differences in treatment characteristics and outcome

Using an 11-year panel of 156 Norwegian and Swedish patients with severe haemophilia, and including retrospective case-book data from birth, we compared the differences in the haemophilia-related resource use between on-demand and prophylactic treatment. Patients treated on-demand had more surgery (arthrodeses, prostheses implantations and synovectomies) and more days lost from work. Median annual factor-concentrate consumption among adults (18+) was 211,000 IU [interquartile range (IQR) 154,000-268,000] or 3,024 IU kg-1 year(-1) for patients on prophylactic treatment and 55,000 IU (IQR 28,000-91,000) for on-demand patients (780 IU kg(-1) year(-1)). This was partly explained by the fact that the median dose per kg body weight was twice as great 28, (IQR 24-32) for prophylaxis compared with 14 (IQR 12-16) for on-demand. Prescribed dose per kg body weight was found to be an important factor explaining the variation in total annual factor-concentrate consumption per patient for both types of treatment. Other variables included in the panel-data regression analysis were the number of weeks on secondary prophylaxis for on-demand patients and age, body weight and type of haemophilia for children (0-17 years) on prophylaxis. Differences were consistently substantial and will affect both costs and benefits of the two treatment strategies.

Determinants of drug costs in hopitalised patients with haemophilia: impact of recombinant activated factor VII

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the determinants of anti-haemophilic drug costs in hospitalised patients with haemophilia and to estimate the impact of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) therapy on this expenditure.

PERSPECTIVE

The perspective of the study was from the viewpoint of the hospital.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A prospective study was carried out. All patients with haemophilia who were hospitalised in 1999 in Bicêtre public hospital, Paris, France were included in the cohort.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

For each of the 96 patients (154 hospital stays), we estimated the costs of anti-haemophilic drugs (coagulation concentrates) used. Costs were then stratified by different variables (severity of the disease, presence of a circulating inhibitor to coagulation factors, etc.) and a multivariate model was developed to determine the relationship between these variables and total anti-haemophilic drug costs, while controlling for potential confounders. Our study revealed: (i) the independent role of the five following variables in contributing to high anti-haemophilic drug expenditure: presence of a circulating inhibitor to coagulation factors, odds ratio (OR) = 16.9 (95% CI: 4.3-66); severity of the disease (factor VIII or factor IX < or =0.01 IU/mL), OR = 3.7 (95% CI: 1.6-8.6); length of hospital stay >4 days, OR = 8 (95% CI: 2.2-29.4); age >18 years old, OR = 6.2 (95% CI: 1.6-24.5); and surgical reasons for hospitalisation (whether surgery was haemophilia related [OR = 35.7 (95% CI: 7.3-175)] or not [OR = 5.4 (95% CI: 1.3-22.5)]); (ii) the large share that rFVIIa represented in this expenditure on medicines: rFVIIa was used in 20.1% of hospital stays and accounted for 56.2% of the total anti-haemophilic drug costs, which were estimated at 4,384,732 Euros (2000 values).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data underline the heavy cost of the treatment of haemophilic patients with an inhibitor to coagulation factors. But, to the question of whether the high expenditure linked to rFVIIa utilisation will be balanced out by later benefits, it is not yet possible to reply with any certainty; further cost-benefit evaluation should be carried out.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatment strategies for severe haemophilia: a comparison of costs and long-term outcome

A multicentre study was performed to compare clotting factor use and outcome between on-demand and prophylactic treatment strategies for patients with severe haemophilia. Data on treatment and outcome of 49 Dutch patients with severe haemophilia, born 1970-80, primarily treated with prophylaxis, were compared with those of 106 French patients, who were primarily treated on demand. Dutch patients received intermediate dose prophylaxis, for a median duration of 12.7 years. Patients primarily treated with prophylaxis had fewer joint bleeds per year (median 2.8 vs. 11.5), a higher proportion of patients without joint bleeds (29% vs. 9%), lower clinical scores (median 2.0 vs. 8.0), and less arthropathy as measured by the Pettersson score (median 7 points vs. 16 points). Mean annual clotting factor use was equal at 1,488 +/- 783 IU kg-1 year-1 (mean +/- standard deviation) for patients primarily treated with prophylaxis and 1,612 +/- 1,442 IU kg-1 year-1 for patients primarily treated on demand. These findings suggest that, compared with a primarily on-demand treatment strategy, a primarily prophylactic treatment strategy leads to better outcome at equal treatment costs in young adults with severe haemophilia.

Haemophilia Utilization Group Study: assessment of functional health status in haemophilia

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between health care and utilization of that health care, and to provide a base measurement of health status in patients with haemophilia. Provider interview and retrospective chart review of 336 patients with haemophilia treated during 1995 at one of five comprehensive haemophilia treatment centres was conducted to measure patient health status characteristics and utilization of health care. Two health status scales were included. The first, the Self-Care Measure, was a four-point single item scale measuring the patient's ability for basic self-care, which was scored by a chart review and an interview with the health-care provider. The second, the Haemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS) Functional Status Measure, is a four-item, 10-point scale developed specifically for patients with haemophilia. Our sample represents 27% of actively treated patients in region IX. The mean score on the HUGS Functional Status Measure was 8.7 (SD=2.4). The HUGS scale exhibited a ceiling effect across all four scales: attitude (n=269, 80.1%), overall wellbeing (n=263, 78.3%), working (n=254, 75.6%) and orthopaedic status (n=195, 58.0%). Both higher total health-care costs and factor VIII annual costs were significantly associated with lower scores on the HUGS Functional Status Measure. Health status is a critical component in the assessment of the utilization and outcomes of care. In the absence of the availability of a patient interview, the HUGS Functional Status Measure can be used as one characteristic that explains the variation in the utilization of health care by patients with haemophilia.

Immune tolerance induction in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: costly can be cheaper

The development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) occurs in approximately 30% to 40% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Management options for patients with inhibitor include eradicating it via immune tolerance induction (ITI) or treating bleeding episodes with large quantities of hemostatic agents. ITI is costly, approaching $1 million for the average 5-year-old, but if successful results in improved clinical outcomes. We constructed a decision analysis using the Markov process to model expected clinical outcomes and costs over a lifetime for a typical 5-year-old hemophiliac with high inhibitor levels. Estimates of relevant variables were based on a thorough review of the medical literature. Outcomes modeled included total lifetime costs as well as life expectancy. The decision analytic model revealed that the ITI strategy was associated with an increase in projected life expectancy of 4.6 years. Total estimated lifetime costs for the ITI strategy were approximately $1.7 million less per patient. Sensitivity analyses over clinically and economically reasonable ranges did not change these findings. The insight that ITI can achieve an improved clinical outcome while being cost-saving is not reflected in many current treatment regimens. This example also illustrates that expensive therapy for patients with a chronic disease may be cost effective when analyzed from a societal perspective over the patient's lifetime. This finding has important policy implications for medical decision makers at many levels and reinforces the need to undertake pharmacoeconomic analyses and choose therapies from a long-term, societal perspective.

Immune tolerance induction in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: costly can be cheaper

The development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) occurs in approximately 30% to 40% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Management options for patients with inhibitor include eradicating it via immune tolerance induction (ITI) or treating bleeding episodes with large quantities of hemostatic agents. ITI is costly, approaching $1 million for the average 5-year-old, but if successful results in improved clinical outcomes. We constructed a decision analysis using the Markov process to model expected clinical outcomes and costs over a lifetime for a typical 5-year-old hemophiliac with high inhibitor levels. Estimates of relevant variables were based on a thorough review of the medical literature. Outcomes modeled included total lifetime costs as well as life expectancy. The decision analytic model revealed that the ITI strategy was associated with an increase in projected life expectancy of 4.6 years. Total estimated lifetime costs for the ITI strategy were approximately $1.7 million less per patient. Sensitivity analyses over clinically and economically reasonable ranges did not change these findings. The insight that ITI can achieve an improved clinical outcome while being cost-saving is not reflected in many current treatment regimens. This example also illustrates that expensive therapy for patients with a chronic disease may be cost effective when analyzed from a societal perspective over the patient's lifetime. This finding has important policy implications for medical decision makers at many levels and reinforces the need to undertake pharmacoeconomic analyses and choose therapies from a long-term, societal perspective.

Pharmaco-economic aspects of inhibitor treatment

The management of bleeding episodes and surgery in haemophilia patients who develop inhibitors is especially difficult. Haemostasis is typically achieved using high doses of factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX to overcome the inhibitor, or by using activated products, or by inhibitor eradication by immune tolerance induction. We assessed the costs of coagulation factors for non-inhibitor haemophilia A and B patients (ACneg; n = 104), patients with low responding inhibitors (LR; n = 24) and patients with high responding inhibitors (HR; n = 17) in our centre between 1988 and 1995. In ACneg and LR patients, > 90% of costs were attributed to home treatment, compared with 54% for HR patients. The costs of treatment were $US 36.8 m total, $US 41,000 mean per patient for ACneg patients; $US 10 m total, $US 46,000 mean per patient for LR patients; and $US 7.6 m total, $US 59,000 mean per patient for HR patients. The mean cost of hospital treatment per HR patient was more than 10 times that for ACneg or LR patients and this was influenced by the occurrence of 4 very severe bleeding episodes in these patients. This analysis highlights the different costs and treatment patterns for inhibitor patients and should enable us to evaluate the impact of new treatments such as recombinant activated rFVII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) on treatment at our centre in the future.

The changing patterns of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) clotting factor usage in a comprehensive care centre between 1980 and 1994

The annual amount of clotting factor used by patients at the Royal Free Haemophilia Centre increased significantly from 4 million iu in 1980 to over 15 million iu by 1994 (P < 0.0001). In order to assess the reasons for this increase, data on concentrate usage over this period were retrospectively collected for patients who had haemophilia or von Willebrand's disease. Only patients who were registered exclusively at the Centre were included in the study. In total, 498 patients met the inclusion criterion. The median age of the cohort on 1 January 1980 was 21 (range < 1-69) years. During the period there were 88 births and 45 deaths. The majority of patients had haemophilia A (55%). The median follow-up period per patient was 2.1 (range 0-14.8) years. Despite adjusting for increases in the number of patients and changes in body weight, statistically significant increases in clotting factor usage were detected for some subgroups of patients, in particularly for those with severe haemophilia A and B and from the late 1980s onwards, for patients with von Willebrand's disease. Two reasons for this increase in clotting factor usage were identified as being the introduction of improved products and prophylaxis. However, the increased cost of clotting factor provision that has resulted from these changes in treatment policy should not be analysed in isolation but should be balanced off against cost decreases in other areas and against increases in the effectiveness of treatment.