Factor VIII: Perspectives on Immunogenicity and Tolerogenic Strategies

Therapeutic treatment of bleeds with FVIII can lead to an antibody response that effectively inhibits its function. Herein, we review the factors that contribute to this immunogenicity and possible ways to overcome it.

Inhibitors: A Need for Eradication?

The development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates represents a significant treatment complication for hemophilia. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy eradicates inhibitors in 60-80% of patients, resulting in a normal FVIII response. This article, based on presentations at the 6th International Coagulation Meeting, held in Barcelona, Spain, in September 2017, provides an overview of management approaches for patients with inhibitors and briefly tabulates four cases of ITI therapy (first-line or rescue ITI therapy in pediatric and adult patients) with successful outcomes. Switching FVIII product from recombinant FVIII to plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate may be helpful in eradicating inhibitors. The rate of decline of inhibitor titer in the initial stages of ITI therapy is a good indicator of the success or failure of therapy, although prognostic biomarkers are needed. The development of the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab, which was recently shown to reduce bleeding in inhibitor patients, offers a potential alternative therapeutic option. However, the benefits of inhibitor eradication, including a wider choice of cheaper therapeutic products for preventing and treating bleeds, suggest that at least one attempt of ITI therapy should be offered to patients who develop inhibitors.

Tolerance induction in hemophilia: innovation and accomplishments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hemophilia is an X-linked blood coagulation genetic disorder, which can cause significant disability. Replacement therapy for coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B) may result in the development of high-affinity alloantibodies ('inhibitors') to the replacement therapy, thus making it ineffective. Therefore, there is interest in directing immunological responses towards tolerance to infused factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we will discuss latest advancements in the development of potentially less immunogenic replacement clotting factors, optimization of current tolerance induction protocols (ITI), preclinical and clinical data of pharmacological immune modulation, hepatic gene therapy, and the rapidly advancing field of cell therapies. We will also evaluate publications reporting data from preclinical studies on oral tolerance induction using chloroplast-transgenic (transplastomic) plants.

SUMMARY

Until now, no clinical prophylactic immune modulatory protocol exists to prevent inhibitor formation to infused clotting factors. Recent innovative technologies provide hope for improved eradication and perhaps even prevention of inhibitors.

Acquired Inhibitors to Multiple Coagulation Factors (V, IX, and XII) Identified in a Unique Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

An acquired formation of inhibitors to coagulation factors is a rare type of coagulopathy. The development of inhibitors for multiple coagulation factors has never been reported. A 75-year-old Japanese female underwent interventional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Five days after the last intervention, her prothrombin time decreased to 10%, and her activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) lengthened to 265.1 sec. The activities for coagulation factors showed significantly reduced activities (<10%) of factors V, IX, and XII. A cross-mixing test demonstrated an inhibitor pattern, and inhibitory antibodies against factors V, IX, and XII were detected. We discuss our patient's etiology and pathogenesis.

Immune Tolerance Therapy in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia

Acquired hemophilia is a rare disorder with an estimated annual incidence of 0.2-1 cases per million individuals. The etiology of the disorder remains obscure, although approximately half of all cases are associated with other underlying conditions. In acquired hemophilia, the severe hemorrhagic diathesis is caused by the development of autoantibodies directed against a clotting factor, most commonly factor VIII. These autoantibodies inhibit normal coagulation and lead to bleeding complications, which can be life-threatening in a high percentage of cases. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate management of the disorder enable effective control; the short- and long-term aims of therapy are to terminate the acute bleed and eliminate or reduce the inhibitor, respectively. Immune tolerance therapy has been shown to successfully eradicate or suppress inhibitors in patients with congenital hemophilia A and may be applicable to patients with acquired hemophilia. Here we present preliminary data on the use of immune tolerance therapy in patients with acquired hemophilia and discuss possible treatment strategies.

The literature on inhibitors: articles that influence my management of patients with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors

High-titer inhibitors represent the greatest management challenge faced by clinicians who treat patients with hemophilia A, as bleeding episodes no longer respond to standard factor VIII replacement therapy. Over the last seven decades, major strides have been made in inhibitor treatment. This article focuses on the seminal clinical observations and studies that provided the foundation for these advances in hemophilia care.

Inhibitors of factor VIII in black patients with hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Black patients with hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) are twice as likely as white patients to produce inhibitors against factor VIII proteins given as replacement therapy. There are six wild-type factor VIII proteins, designated H1 through H6, but only two (H1 and H2) match the recombinant factor VIII products used clinically. H1 and H2 are found in all racial groups and are the only factor VIII proteins found in the white population to date. H3, H4, and H5 have been found only in blacks. We hypothesized that mismatched factor VIII transfusions contribute to the high incidence of inhibitors among black patients.

METHODS

We sequenced the factor VIII gene (F8) in black patients with hemophilia A to identify causative mutations and the background haplotypes on which they reside. Results from previous Bethesda assays and information on the baseline severity of hemophilia, age at enrollment, and biologic relationships among study patients were obtained from review of the patients' medical charts. We used multivariable logistic regression to control for these potential confounders while testing for associations between F8 haplotype and the development of inhibitors.

RESULTS

Of the 78 black patients with hemophilia enrolled, 24% had an H3 or H4 background haplotype. The prevalence of inhibitors was higher among patients with either of these haplotypes than among patients with haplotype H1 or H2 (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 12.3; P=0.04), despite a similar spectrum of hemophilic mutations and degree of severity of illness in these two subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that mismatched factor VIII replacement therapy may be a risk factor for the development of anti-factor VIII alloantibodies.

From theory to practice: applying current clinical knowledge and treatment strategies to the care of hemophilia a patients with inhibitors

Two bypassing agents are currently available to circumvent the need for factor FVIII in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors: the activated prothrombin complex FEIBA VH and recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven. Both products are highly effective in controlling bleeding in the presence of inhibitory alloantibodies, yet their hemostatic efficacy can be unpredictable. As the results of the FEIBA NovoSeven( Comparative (FENOC) study illustrate, patients may respond better to one bypassing agent than the other. Furthermore, guidelines from an expert panel reflect that responsiveness to bypassing therapy may change from one bleed to the next in the same patient and even from hour to hour during the course of a single bleeding event. These findings underscore the need to have both bypassing products available to treat bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients, to frequently evaluate the efficacy of hemostasis during the course of a bleeding event, and to switch products early if the response to treatment is unsatisfactory.

Acquired coagulation factor inhibitors in children after topical bovine thrombin exposure

Acquired inhibitors of coagulation factors, particularly to factor V (FV) and thrombin, after topical bovine thrombin exposure may result in clinically important coagulopathies. While bovine thrombin is commonly used in pediatric patients for surgical hemostasis, the reported cases of acquired inhibitors in children are few. We report two cases of children who developed factor inhibitors after bovine thrombin exposure. One child developed a FV inhibitor at 3 months of age after exposure to bovine thrombin during cardiac surgery. The inhibitor resolved with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and steroids. The other child developed concomitant FV and bovine thrombin inhibitors after cardiac surgery at age 11 years. The presence of these inhibitors complicated post-operative anti-coagulation management, but the inhibitors were transient. In addition to these two cases, we identified all the pediatric patients with bovine thrombin-induced inhibitors who were reported in the world's literature, and reviewed their clinical characteristics. These cases underscore the fact that bovine thrombin can be antigenic in infants and children and can result in significant coagulopathies.

An overview of the history, clinical practice concerns, comparative studies and strategies to optimize therapy of bypassing agents

Despite significant advances in the treatment of haemophilia, including availability of recombinant coagulation factor replacement products and the use of prophylactic infusion regimens, the segment of haemophilic patients who develop inhibitory antibodies remain at higher risk for morbidity and mortality associated with recurrent or uncontrolled bleeding events. Bypassing agents represent the mainstay of treatment and prevention of bleeding. The most commonly used of the currently available therapeutic agents are a plasma-based therapy, factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity, vapour heated, and a recombinant therapy, NovoSeven (recombinant activated factor VIIa). A substantial body of literature exists to document efficacy and adverse event profiles for these two products. There is, however, a paucity of data arising from adequately powered prospective trials to determine optimal treatment and dosing in various clinical situations. Certain clinical circumstances, patient profiles, individual responses, or provider predilection may lead to preferential use of one of these products over the other; however, the continued presence of both agents in the therapeutic armamentarium remains critically important to this fragile population. The historical use, clinical practice concerns, published comparative studies and methods for optimization of these two bypassing agents are reviewed.

Immunological aspects of inhibitor development

The development of inhibitor antibodies is perhaps the most serious complication of coagulation factor replacement therapy. A complex interaction of several variables leads to inhibitor formation in congenital haemophilia, while acquired haemophilia represents a failure of the immune tolerance mechanisms that regulate a normal immune response to factor VIII (FVIII). The immune response to FVIII is dependent upon the interaction of different CD4+ T-cell subsets (Th1, Th2 and Th3) specific for FVIII. Failure to activate regulatory CD4+ cells likely plays a crucial role in the development of FVIII inhibitors. Although the basic mechanisms of the immune response to FVIII in the setting of factor replacement therapy are being elucidated, a clear understanding of the relevance of these mechanisms in the context of successful immune tolerance therapy and ultimately gene therapy, awaits further study.

Urgent inhibitor issues: targets for expanded research

Although up to 80% of high-responding inhibitors in patients with severe factor VIII deficiency can be eliminated using heterogeneous regimens for immune tolerance induction, the residual morbidity in this population of haemophilic patients is far from trivial. There is an exigent need for focussed basic, translational and clinical research to extend our understanding of the pathogenesis of haemophilic inhibitor development. In this article, we identify four key research needs, including (i) whether presently available clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have differential antigenicity, giving rise to clinically relevant immunogenicity; (ii) the interplay of quantitative and qualitative (e.g. age at first exposure) influences of CFCs as well as host-environmental factors (e.g. vaccination effects) on inhibitor development; (iii) the therapeutic role (if any) that concurrent immune tolerance with suppressive or immune-competitive therapeutic strategies play in inhibitor eradication and (iv) pending any major therapeutic advances, alternative or enhanced strategies for treating acute haemorrhage and for preventing chronic haemorrhagic events in these patients.

Basic aspects of inhibitors to factors VIII and IX and the influence of non-genetic risk factors

The appearance of polyclonal antibodies inhibiting the function of exogenous factors VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) continues to be a major challenge in the treatment of patients with congenital haemophilia. Why these inhibitors develop in 10-20% of patients with haemophilia A, and in 1-5% of patients with haemophilia B, remains largely unexplained. The antibodies, however, are characterized by several features that may have implications for the immune process by which they occur. The FVIII antibodies are mainly directed towards the A2, A3 and C2 domains, thereby interfering with the function of the factor Xase complex, the binding of FVIII to von Willebrand factor, and the binding of FVIII to phospholipid membranes. The FIX epitopes are localized to the NH(2)-terminal gamma-carboxyglutamic acid region and the serine protease domain. Genetic risk factors are known to be of importance in the development of inhibitors, whereas the impact of non-genetic factors is less clear. However, based on studies of related subjects, it is obvious that non-genetic factors are of importance as well. Putative factors currently debated include age at the start of treatment, treatment in association with immune challenges, the type of product, and the mode of administration. Most of the findings reported to date, however, derive from small cohorts that have not been sufficiently well characterized with respect to genetic risk profile. Therefore, additional studies are required to quantify the impact of non-genetic factors on the pathophysiologic process of inhibitor development.

The epidemiology of factor VIII inhibitors

Risk factors for inhibitor development include specific factor VIII (FVIII) genotypes, a family history of inhibitor development amongst first-degree relatives, certain HLA haplotypes and non-caucasian ethnicity. Patients with major FVIII deletions or rearrangements have a higher risk of inhibitor development than those with small deletions or missense mutations. Studies of HLA-DR amongst northern European patients with the intron 22 inversion indicate that certain HLA haplotypes may also confer either increased or decreased inhibitor risk. However, although brothers of patients with inhibitor have a high risk of inhibitor development, concordance is not 100%, and other constitutional factors must also operate. Disputed risk factors for inhibitor development include early age at first FVIII exposure, the use of recombinant rather than plasma-derived FVIII and product switching. Two studies suggest that inhibitor risk is increased by very early FVIII exposure (P = 0.03), but this is disputed by a third study; larger studies addressing the question are ongoing. Studies investigating the relative inhibitor risk of plasma-derived vs. recombinant FVIII have been similarly inconclusive and will be reviewed. Other environmental or treatment variables such as concomitant infection or vaccination are suspected to influence inhibitor risk but have not yet been fully investigated.

Molecular analysis in a patient with severe factor VII deficiency and an inhibitor: report of a novel mutation (S103G)

Congenital factor VII (FVII) deficiency is an autosomal recessive bleeding disorder with variable phenotypic correlation between FVII activity and bleeding risk. We report a novel mutation of the FVII gene that creates the amino acid change Ser 103 to Gly, which resulted in severe FVII deficiency with reduced FVII antigen. This mutation in the heterozygous form was also present in a mildly affected, unrelated patient. We also report on the natural history of an FVII inhibitor in the patient with severe FVII deficiency.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for acquired coagulation inhibitors: a critical review

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy has been used for autoimmune diseases and disorders involving autoantibodies, including coagulation inhibitors. In this review, we have evaluated the efficacy and safety of IVIG therapy for acquired coagulation inhibitors, including factor VIII inhibitor, and for acquired von Willebrand syndrome on the basis of 44 reports published between 1965 and 2005. Among 35 patients with factor VIII inhibitor, we estimated the efficacy of IVIG therapy alone (which includes complete remissions and partial responses with a clinical benefit) to be 30% (11 cases), whereas the response to combination therapy with IVIG plus immunosuppressive agents (eg, corticosteroid, cyclophosphamide) seemed to be better (approximately 70%, 33/45 cases) than with IVIG therapy alone. In acquired von Willebrand syndrome, the efficacy of IVIG therapy was estimated to be 30%. The response to IVIG therapy appears to occur rapidly, and coagulation inhibitors seem to be neutralized immediately. Moreover, severe complications or side effects rarely occur during IVIG treatment. IVIG therapy thus may be considered one choice for treating acquired coagulation inhibitors, although its efficacy improves when used in combination with immunosuppressive agents.

Relationship between the binding sites for von Willebrand factor, phospholipid, and human factor VIII C2 inhibitor alloantibodies within the factor VIII C2 domain

Some factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor alloantibodies block FVIII binding to von Willebrand factor (VWF) and phospholipid (PL) and recognize a C2 domain epitope that overlaps both binding sites. We previously showed that FVIII peptide 2315-2330 neutralized FVIII inhibitors and that Cys2326 and Glu2327 contributed to the maximum neutralizing effect. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the essential binding sites for VWF, PL, and anti-C2 inhibitors by means of competitive-inhibition assays with overlapping synthetic peptides that span the C terminus of the C2 domain (residues 2288-2332). We identified 2 peptides (residues 2303-2317 and 2315-2330) that specifically blocked FVIII binding to VWF or PL by approximately 80% (50%-inhibitory concentration [IC50], 9.0 microM) and 95% (IC50, 0.12 microM), respectively. To examine in detail the residues responsible for PL binding, we prepared mutants of peptide 2315-2330 in which we sequentially substituted each residue with Gly. Two residues, Ile2317 and Met2321, were shown to be essential for PL binding. Their substitution with Gly reduced the inhibitory effect by >90%. The data suggest that the binding sites for VWF, PL, and anti-C2 inhibitors in the C2 domain are in very close proximity but are not identical.

International workshop on immune tolerance induction: consensus recommendations

Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) has been used for 30 years to eliminate inhibitors and restore normal factor pharmacokinetics in patients with hemophilia, there is a paucity of scientific evidence to guide therapeutic decision-making. In an effort to provide direction for physicians and hemophilia treatment center staff members, an international panel of hemophilia opinion leaders met to develop consensus recommendations for ITI in patients with severe and mild hemophilia A and hemophilia B. These recommendations draw on the available published literature and the collective clinical experience of the group and are rated based on the level of supporting evidence.

In vitro reactivity of factor VIII inhibitors with von Willebrand factor in different commercial factor VIII concentrates

A relevant aspect in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A (HA) presenting inhibitor against factor VIII (FVIII) is the different antigenicity of FVIII used for replacement therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of different products, with variable von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentration, in preventing the binding of inhibitor to FVIII. The reactivity of inhibitors from plasma of 18 patients with HA versus three commercial concentrates containing different amounts of vWF was compared. The results show that increasing amounts of vWF might have a protective effect on the transfused FVIII inactivation.

Acquired factor VIII deficiency associated with a novel primary immunodeficiency suggestive of autosomal recessive hyper IgE syndrome

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) are associated with various autoimmune complications and several manifestations of autoimmunity can be seen in the disorders of T cells, B cells, phagocytes, and complement components. Acquired hemophilia is a rare entity in childhood. Although autoantibodies may develop in various forms of PID, Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors have not been described before. Herein, we present a case of acquired hemophilia resulting from FVIII inhibitors who had underlying undefined PID features suggestive of autosomal recessive hyper IgE syndrome. Our patient responded to corticosteroid treatment rather well and quickly, with an increased FVIII level and decreased FVIII inhibitors. However, FVIII inhibitor reappeared 7 months later, and disappeared spontaneously 4 months ago. Long-term and close follow-up is needed to observe the long-term prognosis in this child.

Inhibitor development in one patient and laboratory discrepancies in several families with both mild haemophilia and Arg531Cys mutation

Certain mutations in mild haemophilia A have been associated with a greater risk of inhibitor development, especially when associated with intense treatment. We present a patient with both mild haemophilia A and Arg531Cys mutation, which developed lowtitre inhibitors and was not seen to be related to the intense substitute treatment. The inhibitor has a greater effect on the exogenous factor VIII, permiting an adequate response to treatment with desmopressin. A discrepancy exists in the factor VIII activity in this our patient and in the haemophiliacs of another two families with the same mutation when determination is performed with one-stage or chromogenic method.

Mechanisms of action of immune tolerance induction against factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors

In its most severe form, haemophilia A is a life-threatening haemorrhagic bleeding disorder that is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene. About 25% of patients who receive replacement therapy with intravenous FVIII products develop neutralising antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) that inhibit the function of substituted FVIII. Long-term application of high or low doses of FVIII has evolved as an effective strategy for eradicating antibodies and inducing long-lasting immune tolerance. Despite clinical experience with the therapy, little is known about the immunological mechanisms that cause the down modulation of FVIII-specific immune responses or the induction of long-lasting immune tolerance against FVIII. This review summarises current knowledge of the immunological mechanisms that might be involved in the induction of immune tolerance against FVIII in patients with haemophilia A who have FVIII inhibitors. In addition to data from patients with haemophilia A, data from patients who have had organ transplants or have immune-related disorders, such as autoimmune diseases, are considered as well as data from animal models.

Novel therapies for immune tolerance in haemophilia A

Standard treatment for an inhibitory antibody to factor VIII (FVIII) in a patient with severe congenital haemophilia A is to attempt to induce immune tolerance with high-dose FVIII, either alone or in combination with immunosuppression. Patients in whom the inhibitor is not eradicated or who have prognostic features suggestive of a poor response may be suitable for experimental approaches to immune tolerance induction. The two options that are currently under investigation in clinical practice are anti-CD20 antibody therapy using rituximab and the use of von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing FVIII concentrate in immune tolerance regimens. Immunomodulation with rituximab has been reported to eradicate inhibitors in some patients with severe haemophilia A who have previously failed standard immune tolerance. Similarly, some patients who have failed to be tolerized with high-purity FVIII have been successfully treated with VWF-containing concentrates. Neither of these treatment modalities is supported by controlled clinical trial data, and reported observational data require confirmation. Immunomodulation via interference with B-cell/T-cell interactions by blocking CD40/CD40 ligand or a gene therapy approach using FVIII peptides in IgG heavy chain transfected into B-cell blasts has been reported to suppress inhibitors in animal models and may lead to clinically useful therapies. Further understanding of the aetiology of inhibitor formation and how FVIII leads to tolerance in some patients with an inhibitor may suggest further approaches in the future.

Characteristics of inhibitors in mild/moderate haemophilia A

Patients with mild or moderate haemophilia A usually have a mild bleeding disorder requiring only occasional treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. The frequency of inhibitor development in such patients has been the subject of several recent surveys, which significantly modified our appreciation of this complication. Studies of the anti-FVIII antibodies provided an explanation for the different bleeding phenotypes observed in mild/moderate haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Antibodies distinguishing between the patient's mutant FVIII and the normal wild-type FVIII were characterized, in addition to antibodies inhibiting completely or only partially FVIII activity. T lymphocytes recognizing FVIII and likely involved in the development of the immune response to FVIII were successfully identified. The FVIII peptides recognized by those FVIII-specific cells bind to many major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, which may provide an explanation for the lack of strong association between MHC haplotypes and inhibitor development. Although these studies have advanced our understanding of the conditions leading to inhibitor development, further work is required to determine whether the mode of FVIII administration significantly influences inhibitor development. Further studies of the genetic factors are also required to fully understand the mechanisms leading to inhibitor development in patients with mild/moderate haemophilia A.

Polymorphisms in the TNFA gene and the risk of inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A

The HLA class I/II alleles and the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) locus are closely linked in the MHC complex. We have characterized the causative factor VIII mutation, HLA alleles as well as 4 polymorphisms (-827C>T, -308G>A, -238A>G, and 670A>G) in the TNFA gene in 164 patients (124 severe, 26 moderate, and 14 mild) in 78 families with hemophilia A enrolled in the Malmö International Brother Study (MIBS). Inhibitors were identified in 77.8% of patients with a single haplotype (Hap 2) and 72.7% of the patients with the TNFA -308 A/A genotype within this haplotype compared with 39.7% for TNFA -308 G/G patients and 46.9% for TNFA -308 G/A heterozygotes (OR 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5; P = .008). The association between the -308 A/A genotype and inhibitors was enhanced in subgroups of patients with severe hemophilia (OR 19.2; 95% CI 2.4-156.5; P < .001) and with inversions (n = 75; OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 1.3-105.1; P = .013). Associations were found for the HLA A26 and B44 alleles, but these were not consistent in the subgroup analysis. Our data imply that the TNFA -308G>A polymorphism within Hap 2 is a useful marker and potential modulator of the immune response to replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia.

In silico prediction of FVIII epitopes recognised by natural autoantibodies in polyvalent immunoglobulin concentrates

Inhibitory antibodies directed against blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) impair FVIII replacement therapy, constituting a serious complication in haemophilic and autoimmune patients. Identifying B-cell FVIII epitopes and mapping them on the molecule remain important challenges. Using a combination of different algorithms, more than 30 hypothetical linear epitopes were predicted on the FVIII molecule surface. We selected several major predicted sequences, spanning all FVIII domains, for specific antibody induction in rabbits. All peptides tested successfully induced production of specific anti-FVIII rabbit antibodies, supporting the relevance of our approach. To investigate the presence of FVIII-reactive antibodies in the healthy donor population, a pooled fraction rich in all IgG subclasses was purified on peptide-Sepharose columns. Substantial amounts of Ig, specific for each FVIII peptide, were purified with yields ranging from 8 to 223 ng/mg immunoglobulins. Our results confirm the diversity of FVIII epitopes recognised by natural human anti-FVIII autoantibodies. All IgG subclasses were found in the affinity-isolated anti-peptide material, with overrepresentation of IgG2 and IgG4. Evidence was also found for new FVIII epitopes. Five human anti-peptide preparations displayed FVIII-neutralising activity, ranging from 1.3 to 5.3 BU/mg. Although the presence of naturally occurring anti-FVIII antibodies in healthy donors has been previously described, our methodology has allowed, for the first time, a fine mapping of several inhibitory and non-inhibitory epitopes. Our observations support the hypothesis that FVIII inhibitors in haemophilia A and autoimmune disease may originate from the proliferation of natural FVIII-specific B-cell clones.

The need for previously untreated patient population studies in understanding the development of factor VIII inhibitors

The presence of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) remains one of the most serious complications of haemophilia therapy. Accordingly, understanding risk factors that may contribute to inhibitor developments in young patients with haemophilia A continues to be an area of great interest. Previously untreated patient (PUP) population studies have been instrumental in understanding the aetiology of inhibitor development. These studies have revealed the importance of risk factors such as clotting factor exposure history, ethnicity, and FVIII genotype in the development of inhibitors, while also providing insights into potential risk factors that may be related to therapeutic practice. However, due to differences in study designs and patient populations among previous PUP studies, there are limitations to the value of these studies in deciphering the role of potential risk factors. Therefore, future PUP studies should be prospective, consistent in their study designs and consider all established parameters and also those that possibly may influence inhibitor formation, thereby facilitating a better understanding of the aetiology of inhibitor formation in haemophilia A patients.

Epidemiology of inhibitor formation with recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

This article reviews the epidemiology of inhibitor formation in patients receiving recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement therapy for haemophilia A. Data from pivotal trial programmes, post-marketing surveillance studies, and pharmacovigilance studies for all available rFVIII products were reviewed. To date, no comparative studies have been performed, and in the non-comparative studies, there were differences in the patient population enrolled and study design (including the number of patient exposure days). In the absence of comparative clinical trials, it is not possible to make comparisons between inhibitor data for the various rFVIII products. This review of the epidemiological data shows that across the pivotal trial programmes for rFVIII products, the observed incidence of inhibitors was in the range of 15-32% in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and 0.9-2.9% in previously treated patients (PTPs). High-titre inhibitors (peak >5 BU) were detected in 10-16% of PUPs and 0-2.3% of PTPs. Several initiatives proposed to help standardize collection and interpretation of inhibitor data for patients receiving rFVIII treatment are described. Such standardization would help to clarify the epidemiology of inhibitor formation across FVIII treatments.

Clinical Evaluation of Recombinant Factor VIII Preparation (Kogenate) in Previously Treated Patients with Hemophilia A: Descriptive Meta-Analysis of Post-Marketing Study Data

The safety and efficacy of Kogenate, a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) preparation for the treatment of bleeding episodes, were studied in a 123-patient meta-analysis population of previously treated patients (PTPs), including 15 enrolled in the registration Phase III trial (PTP-I group), 93 from the post-marketing special investigation (PTP-II group), and 15 from short-term special investigations in surgery or tooth extraction (SI group). These patients (82 severe, 31 moderate, 9 mild, and 1 unknown), aged 11 months to 72 years, were enrolled in 28 centers in Japan. Blood samples taken at the baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the introduction of Kogenate were evaluated for FVIII inhibitor antibodies, antibodies formed against trace proteins derived from the rFVIII production process, and for general changes in laboratory test results. Mean exposure to Kogenate was 1103 days in PTP-I, 86 days in PTP-II, 27 days in patients in surgery, and 2 days in patients with tooth extraction. Assessment of FVIII inhibitor activity was conducted in 115 of the 123 patients by means of the Bethesda assay. Twelve patients were found to have a low titer of FVIII inhibitor (0.5-3.0 BU/mL) prior to any administration of Kogenate, and 103 were inhibitor-negative at the baseline. Among this latter group, 3 patients (2.9%) tested inhibitor-positive, with titers ranging from 1.2 to 2.1 BU/mL, with 4 patients below 1.0 BU/mL. One patient in the 11 PTPs investigated (PTP-I) developed antibodies against baby hamster kidney protein and mouse immunoglobulin G, but these findings were transient and asymptomatic. Hemostasis was achieved (markedly effective or effective) in 3666 of the 3855 bleeding episodes (95.1%) observed in 108 patients. Only 1 infusion was necessary in 3790 (98.3%) of these episodes. These data indicate that Kogenate is safe and very effective for the treatment of bleeding in PTPs with hemophilia A.

Current opinion on inhibitor treatment options

Inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia complicates hemostatic management. Currently, high doses of factor concentrates are used to override low-titer, low-responding inhibitors during acute bleeding episodes. Bypassing agents, such as the activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity, Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex, Vapor Heated (FEIBA; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria), and activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), are commonly used to treat acute bleeding episodes in patients with high-titer, high-responding inhibitors, whereas long-term therapeutic options include inhibitor eradication using immune tolerance induction. Neither FEIBA nor rFVIIa can be monitored with a laboratory assay, making it difficult to establish optimal dosages. Comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of FEIBA and rFVIIa for bleed control have been sparse, prompting investigators to initiate crossover comparison studies to assess the efficacy and cost of aPCC and rFVIIa in the treatment of joint hemorrhages. Both the cost of therapy and the outcome of therapy will need to be considered in the development of future hemostatic agents for patients with inhibitors.

High Titer of ADAMTS13 Inhibitor Associated with Thrombotic Microangiopathy of the Gut and Skeletal Muscle after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is one of the main complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At the time of onset of gut TMA, a patient developed a high titer of an inhibitor of the non-immunoglobulin G type to ADAMTS13, which physiologically hydrolyzes von Willebrand factor to control spontaneous intravascular thrombus formation. The patient developed symptoms of myositis, a disorder that has occasionally been reported to manifest after HSCT and to resemble some idiopathic autoimmune diseases. However, a muscle biopsy specimen presented pathologic findings of TMA, including microvascular platelet thrombus formation, without inflammatory lymphocyte infiltration. ADAMTS13 activities returned to normal after steroid treatment, and the improvement of TMA symptoms followed. This patient appears to represent a rare case of post-HSCT TMA associated with the development of an ADAMTS13 inhibitor.

Polymorphisms in the IL10 but not in the IL1beta and IL4 genes are associated with inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A

The aim of the Malmö International Brother Study (MIBS) is to evaluate host genetic factors associated with the development of inhibitory antibodies in patients with hemophilia. Factor VIII gene mutations and genetic polymorphisms of the IL1beta, IL4, and IL10 genes, known to influence antibody production in autoimmune diseases, were analyzed in 164 patients (124 with severe, 26 with moderate, and 14 with mild disease) in 78 unrelated families with hemophilia A. Seventy-seven (47%) patients in 54 families had a history of inhibitors (57 high responding, 20 low responding). Inversions were found in 36 families (75 patients). There was no association between the development of inhibitor and the IL1beta Taq I RFLP alleles in exon 5 or the –590 C/T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region of IL4. There was, however, a strong association between an allele with 134 bp in one of the CA repeat microsatellites, IL10G, located in the promoter region of the IL10 gene, and the development of inhibitor (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.1-9.5; P < .001). The association was consistent in the subgroup of families with severe hemophilia and inversions. IL10 is the first gene located outside the causative factor VIII gene mutation to be associated with inhibitor development.

Overview of Inhibitors

Inhibitory antibodies that develop in patients with hemophilia render standard therapy with factor concentrates ineffective. Several factors may influence inhibitor incidence, including genetics, the type of factor concentrate, and environment. A higher incidence of inhibitors in siblings compared to extended relatives, and in African Americans compared to Caucasians, suggests that genetics may play an important role in inhibitor development; however, genetic markers that indicate a predisposition for inhibitor development have yet to be identified. In addition, the appearance of inhibitors in immunologically challenged patients points to the role of the immune response system in the development of inhibitor antibodies, an area that warrants further study. Thus, the medical community faces the difficult task of developing new, improved therapies to combat inhibitors in patients with hemophilia, a task that will require careful consideration of the roles of environmental factors, the immune system, and genetics in inhibitor development.

New approaches in the management of inhibitor patients

The most serious current complication of factor replacement therapy for hemophilia patients is the development of neutralizing antibodies to the factor termed inhibitors. Patients with high-titer inhibitors frequently develop serious bleeding complications which do not respond to standard factor replacement therapy. Therefore, they must be treated with the so-called bypassing agents, recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates, neither of which is as effective as standard factor replacement in patients without inhibitors. Immune tolerance therapy aimed at eradicating inhibitors is successful in a majority of patients; however, a sizable minority will have life-long inhibitors and often develop debilitating joint disease. The ultimate goal is to develop strategies aimed at preventing inhibitor development though these have not been realized yet. Until this is achieved, additional novel approaches are needed to improve the treatment of bleeding episodes and to better treat arthropathy once it develops. Finally, there is no laboratory monitoring device which can predict the clinical response of patients to bypassing agents. Thus another goal of current research is to develop such a tool which will enable the individualization of bypassing agent.

Management of factor VIII inhibitors

The development of inhibitory alloantibodies to factor VIII is arguably one of the most severe and important complications of clotting factor concentrate exposure in haemophilia A. The development of an inhibitor compromises the ability to effectively manage haemorrhage, resulting in a greater rate of disability, complications and costs of therapy. This chapter briefly reviews the epidemiology, immunobiology, and laboratory evaluation of inhibitors. It discusses the therapeutic approach and management of inhibitors in various clinical settings and also focuses on inhibitor eradication practices (immune tolerance) and newer experimental strategies with potential clinical application for inhibitor prevention.

High-dose factor VIII inhibits factor VIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

Hemophilia A in its severe form is a life-threatening hemorrhagic disease that is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene (symbol F8). About 25% of patients who receive replacement therapy develop neutralizing antibodies that inhibit the function of substituted FVIII. Long-term application of high doses of FVIII has evolved as an effective therapy to eradicate the antibodies and to induce long-lasting immune tolerance. Little is known, however, about the immunologic mechanisms that cause the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies by high doses of FVIII. We report that high doses of FVIII inhibit the restimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells and their differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells in vitro and in vivo in a murine model of hemophilia A. The inhibition of memory B-cell responses is irreversible and not mediated by FVIII-specific T cells. Furthermore, it seems to involve the activation of caspases. We conclude that the inhibition of FVIII-specific memory B cells might be an early event in the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies in patients with hemophilia A who receive high doses of FVIII.

Central venous catheters in children with haemophilia

Infections, thrombosis and technical problems are the most frequent complications when using implantable central venous access devices in patients with haemophilia. There seem to be two major experiences concerning infections in non-inhibitor patients, one is approx. 0.2 infections per 1000 days and the other approx. 1.0(0.7-1.6)/1000 days. Infections are more frequent in inhibitor patients and one can expect approx. one infection per 6-12 months of use. The figures are low for clinically apparent thrombosis in the larger series on record, but routine venograms were not done in most of these series. In studies where this has been done, a high frequency of abnormalities on venograms have been seen in some but not in others. The final decision to use a central line has to be a compromise between the medical goal, the patient's bleeding tendency, the social situation and the expected risk of complications at the particular haemophilia center. Some of the complications may be reduced by adequate aseptic measures both during implantation and in the subsequent use and clear basic routines for surveillance of the systems and repeated education of the users.

Environmental and genetic factors influencing inhibitor development

Inhibitor formation occurs at a frequency of 20% to 30% in severe hemophilia A, and 3% in hemophilia B. Today, it represents the major complication in patient care and renders classical substitution therapy ineffective. Genetic factors, such as factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutations and immune response genes, particularly the major histocompatibility complex, have been shown to constitute decisive risk factors for the development of inhibitors. In severe hemophilia A and B, those mutations that result in the absence or severe truncation of the FVIII/factor IX (FIX) proteins are associated with the highest risk for inhibitor formation, indicating that a major driving force in inhibitor development is the presentation of a novel antigen to the patient's immune system. An alternative pathomechanism may underlie inhibitor development in patients with mild hemophilia A. Missense mutations, especially those in the C1/C2 domains, may alter the immunogenicity of the FVIII protein, eliciting an inhibitor response against the mutated epitope. In some patients with hemophilia B, especially those with large deletions to the FIX gene, a severe allergic reaction occurs simultaneously with inhibitor onset. Despite the obviously strong genetic predisposition, discordant inhibitor status in monozygotic hemophilia A twins demonstrates that environmental factors also play a role in the development of inhibitors.

Elective orthopedic surgery for hemophilia patients with inhibitors: new opportunities

We report a series of 108 elective orthopedic surgical procedures in hemophilia patients with inhibitors, comprising 88 cases in which radiosynoviorthesis was performed and 20 cases in which major orthopedic procedures were carried out. Hemostatic cover was provided by recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa, NovoSeven(R), Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in 17 cases, and by FVIII anti-inhibitor product (FEIBA, Baxter Corp, Toronto, Canada) in the remaining three procedures. A total of 51 patients from nine centers worldwide were included. The results of the procedures were characterized as good (82 procedures), fair (15), or poor (11). Postoperative bleeding complications requiring further surgical intervention occurred in three (15%) of the 20 major orthopedic procedures; all three procedures used rFVIIa as a hemostatic agent. Despite these complications, however, our study has shown that rFVIIa allows hemophilic patients with high inhibitor titers to undergo elective orthopedic surgery (EOS) with a greater expectation of success, leading to an improved quality of life. Thorough analysis of each case as part of a multidisciplinary team will help to identify further inhibitor patients in whom EOS can be performed both safely and effectively.