SNAP participation and the health and health care utilisation of low-income adults and children

Catastrophic health expenditures and food insecurity among older cancer survivors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients face a costly trade-off between medical care and basic necessities including food. This study aims to explore whether catastrophic health expenditures lead to food insecurity among older cancer survivors in the US.

METHODS

Longitudinal study of individuals aged 50 or older who were diagnosed with cancer during 2000-2020 and their follow-up measurements selected from the Health and Retirement Study. Data consists of 2505 cancer survivors and 11,614 person-year observations for an average of 4.6 observations per participant. Catastrophic health expenditures were defined as out-of-pocket costs exceeding 5%, 10%, or 15% of household income. Participants were classified as food insecure if they experienced insufficient access to food due to financial limitations. This study utilized fixed effects ordered logistic regression to implement a within-subject research design.

RESULTS

Of the 2505 cancer survivors, 77 (3.1%) were moderately food insecure and 73 (2.9%) were severely food insecure. In ordered logistic regression, all three measures of catastrophic health expenses were associated with a higher odds of food insecurity. These associations were more pronounced for males, ethnic minorities, survivors without college education, those in fair or poor health, retirees, and survivors with below-median income.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of food insecurity among older cancer survivors was relatively low, with 6% of the sample experiencing food insecurity. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that a major predictor of food insecurity among older cancer survivors is catastrophic health costs. Given the health benefits of secure food access, older cancer survivors should consult care providers about their financial capacity to afford recommended cancer treatments while maintaining healthy diets. Policymakers should also consider interventions to reduce out-of-pocket financial burden on older cancer survivors, as improved financial security may enhance treatment outcomes and lower cancer-related mortality.

The association between hunger-coping economic tradeoffs and food insecurity among female recipients of charitable food assistance

Food insecurity is an indicator of well-being in the United States. A high proportion of recipients of charitable food assistance (CFA) are women and are often in charge of specific household managerial responsibilities (e.g., childcare, transportation). Consequently, they frequently face choices between paying for food and paying for other basic need(s). This study aims to examine which hunger-coping economic tradeoffs place females with at least one dependent child in the house and females without a dependent child in the house at risk for experiencing food insecurity. Data was collected at 10 Houston-area and 10-Atlanta-area food pantries in 2022 (N = 883). Using USDA cutoff criteria, households were considered food insecure based on ≥3 affirmative responses to the 18-item Food Security Scale Module. Hunger-coping economic tradeoff experiences were based on affirmative responses to whether anyone in the household ever had to choose between food and six basic needs (i.e. childcare, medicine/medical care, utilities, rent/mortgage, transportation, education). Covariate-adjusted logistic regression models were conducted to understand the relationship between six hunger-coping economic tradeoffs and food insecurity for the entire analytic sample and stratified by whether the female participant had a child in house. Standard errors in all regression models were corrected to account for multiple observations within a pantry. Adults, on average, were 55 years old (58% food insecure; 47% Hispanic; 42% black). Four hunger-coping economic tradeoffs were related to experiencing food insecurity. Economic tradeoffs between food and a) medicine/medical care and b) transportation elevated the likelihood of food insecurity, regardless of child status. Tradeoffs between food and childcare increased the risk for experiencing food insecurity among females with a dependent child. Deciding to pay between food and utilities was related to food insecurity experiences among females without a dependent child. Increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and eligibility along with programs to enhance resources related to medical care, transportation, childcare and utilities could help reduce food insecurity, especially among CFA recipients.

The association of increased SNAP benefits during COVID-19 with food insufficiency and anxiety among US adults: a quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent policy response to mitigate disease spread had far-reaching impacts on health and social well-being. In response, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) underwent several pandemic-era modifications, including a 15 % monthly benefit increase on January 1, 2021. Research documenting the health effects of these SNAP modifications among low-income households and minoritized groups who were most impacted by the economic fallout during the first years of the pandemic is lacking. We aimed to estimate the health effects of the 15 % SNAP benefit increase in January 2021, among SNAP-eligible US households.

DESIGN

We estimated the effects of the SNAP increase on food insufficiency, mental health, and financial well-being using a rigorous quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) analysis.

SETTING

August 19, 2020, to March 29, 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were drawn from the national US Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey waves 13-27 (n 44 477).

RESULTS

Compared with SNAP-eligible non-recipients, SNAP-eligible recipients experienced decreased food insufficiency (-1·9 percentage points (pp); 95 % CI -3·7, -0·1) and anxiety symptoms (-0·09; 95 % CI -0·17, -0·01), and less difficulty paying for other household expenses (-3·2 pp; 95 % CI -4·9, -1·5) after the SNAP benefit increase. Results were robust to alternative specifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Expansions of federal nutrition programmes have the potential to improve health and financial well-being. This study provides timely evidence to inform comprehensive safety net nutrition policies during future economic crises and public health preparedness response plans.

Barriers and Enablers for Equitable Healthy Food Access in Baltimore Carryout Restaurants: A Qualitative Study in Healthy Food Priority Areas

Black neighborhoods in the U.S., historically subjected to redlining, face inequitable access to resources necessary for health, including healthy food options. This study aims to identify the enablers and barriers to promoting equitable healthy food access in small, independently owned carryout restaurants in under-resourced neighborhoods to address health disparities. Thirteen in-depth interviews were conducted with restaurant owners in purposively sampled neighborhoods within Healthy Food Priority Areas (HFPAs) from March to August 2023. The qualitative data were analyzed using inductive coding and thematic analysis with Taguette software (Version 1.4.1). Four key thematic domains emerged: interpersonal, sociocultural, business, and policy drivers. Owners expressed mixed perspectives on customers' preferences for healthy food, with some perceiving a community desire for healthier options, while others did not. Owners' care for the community and their multicultural backgrounds were identified as potential enablers for tailoring culturally diverse menus to meet the dietary needs and preferences of their clientele. Conversely, profit motives and cost-related considerations were identified as barriers to purchasing and promoting healthy food. Additionally, owners voiced concerns about taxation, policy and regulation, information access challenges, and investment disparities affecting small business operations in HFPAs. Small restaurant businesses in under-resourced neighborhoods face both opportunities and challenges in enhancing community health and well-being. Interventions and policies should be culturally sensitive, provide funding, and offer clearer guidance to help these businesses overcome barriers and access resources needed for an equitable, healthy food environment.

ICE Detainer Requests Were Associated With Lower Medicaid And SNAP Enrollment Among Eligible Adults, 2011-19

Legislative policies that criminalize immigrants have a "chilling effect" on public program participation among eligible immigrants. However, little is known about the effect of local enforcement actions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In this study, we linked county-level data on the number of detainer requests (or immigration holds) issued by ICE to individual-level data from the 2011, 2016, and 2019 American Community Surveys. We fit adjusted logistic regression models to assess the association between detainer requests and enrollment in Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among those likely eligible for each program in US-born versus immigrant households. A higher volume of detainer requests was associated with lower enrollment in both Medicaid and SNAP, particularly among adults in households with at least one immigrant relative to US-born households. We observed the most pronounced effects in 2011 and 2019.

Prevalence of financial hardship and health-related social needs among patients with missed radiology appointments

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of financial hardship and Health-Related Social Needs (HRSN) among patients who missed their radiology appointment.

METHODS

English-speaking adult patients, with a missed outpatient imaging appointment at any of a tertiary care imaging centers between 11/2022 and 05/2023 were eligible. We measured self-reported general financial worry using Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), imaging hardship (worry that the current imaging is a financial hardship to patient and their family), material hardship (e.g., medical debt), cost-related care nonadherence, and HRSNs including housing instability, food insecurity, transportation problems, and utility help needs.

RESULTS

282 patients were included (mean age 54.7 ± 15.0 years; 70.7 % female). Majority were non-Hispanic White (52.4 %), followed by Asian (23.0 %) and Hispanic (16.0 %) racial/ethnic background. Most missed appointments were patient-initiated (74.8 %); 13.5 % due to cost or insurance coverage and 6.4 % due to transportation and parking. Mean COST score was 26.8 with 44.4 % and 28.8 % reporting their illness and imaging as a source of financial hardship. 18.3 % and 35.2 % endorsed cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship. 32.7 % had at least one HRSNs with food insecurity the most common (25.4 %). Only 12.5 % were previously screened for financial hardship or HRSNs. Having comorbidity and living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with higher report of financial hardship and HRSNs.

CONCLUSION

Financial hardship and HRSNs are common among those who miss radiology appointments. There needs to be more rigorous screening for financial hardship and HRSNs at every health encounter and interventions should be implemented to address these.

A Scoping Review to Identify Community- and Societal-Level Strategies Evaluated from 2013 to 2023 for Their Potential Impact on Child Well-Being in the United States

There is increased recognition for solutions that address the social determinants of health (SDOHs)-the context in which families are raising children. Unfortunately, implementing solutions that address inequities in the SDOHs has proven to be difficult. Many child and family serving systems and communities do not know where to start or do not have the capacity to identify and implement upstream SDOH strategies. As such, we conducted a scoping review to assess the status of evidence connecting strategies that address the SDOHs and child well-being. A total of 29,079 records were identified using natural language processing with 341 records meeting inclusion criteria (e.g., outcomes focused on child well-being, interventions happening at a population level, and evaluations of prevention strategies in the United States). Records were coded, and the findings are presented by the SDOH domain, such as strategies that addressed economic stability (n = 94), education access and quality (n = 17), food security (n = 106), healthcare access and quality (n = 96), neighborhood and built environment (n = 7), and social and community context (n = 12). This review provides an overview of the associations between population-level SDOH strategies and the impact-good and bad-on child well-being and may be a useful resource for communities and practitioners when considering equitable solutions that promote thriving childhoods.

Investigating the Poverty-Reducing Effects of SNAP on Non-nutritional Family Outcomes: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

Poverty-reduction efforts that seek to support households with children and enable healthy family functioning are vital to produce positive economic, health, developmental, and upward mobility outcomes. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is an effective poverty-reduction policy for individuals and families. This study investigated the non-nutritional effects that families experience when receiving SNAP benefits.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using the PRISMA Guidelines and strategic search terms across seven databases from 01 January 2008 to 01 February 2023 (n=2456). Data extraction involved two researchers performing title-abstract reviews. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility (n=103). Forty articles were included for data retrieval.

RESULTS

SNAP positively impacts family health across the five categories of the Family Stress Model (Healthcare utilization for children and parents, Familial allocation of resources, Impact on child development and behavior, Mental health, and Abuse or neglect).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

SNAP is a highly effective program with growing evidence that it positively impacts family health and alleviates poverty. Four priority policy actions are discussed to overcome the unintentional barriers for SNAP: distributing benefits more than once a month; increasing SNAP benefits for recipients; softening the abrupt end of benefits when wages increase; and coordinating SNAP eligibility and enrollment with other programs.

Association of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation duration with cost-related medication non-adherence and emergency department visits

OBJECTIVE

Administrative requirements could disrupt sustained Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation among income-eligible individuals. To meet their food needs, low-income individuals without consistent SNAP benefits may compromise on medication use, posing a risk to their health. The objective of this study is to examine the association of SNAP participation duration in a given year with cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN) and emergency department (ED) use in income-eligible individuals.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SAMPLE

Non-elderly and elderly adults who used prescription medications and participated in SNAP the previous year in 2016-2018 National Health Interview Survey. Subsamples included individuals with specific chronic conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

CRN and ED usage.

RESULTS

SNAP participation for <12 months in the previous year was related to increased CRN and ED use in nonelderly adults taking prescription medication, as well as in those with hypertension, cardiovascular disease and asthma. Further, <12-month SNAP participation was associated with greater odds of having at least one ED visit in nonelderly and elderly adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained SNAP participation could help income-eligible individuals better adhere to their prescribed medications and reduce health complications requiring ED visits. Findings suggest the importance of addressing SNAP participation gaps among income-eligible individuals in health care settings.

Food insecurity and dental caries prevalence in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Food insecurity (FI) is associated with dietary practices, which can act as a risk factor for dental caries.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between FI and dental caries prevalence in children and adolescents.

DESIGN

MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, SCOPUS, ISI web of knowledge, Cochrane, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database (up to April 19, 2022) as well as reference lists were searched. Eligible studies compared dental caries prevalence in food-secure and food-insecure individuals younger than 19 years. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated at 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Among the 1350 retrieved records, 10 cross-sectional reports were selected for systematic review. Six studies involving 8631 participants were included in the meta-analysis. More than half of the reports were published within the period 2019-2021. All studies except one were judged as low risk of bias. Overall, the prevalence of dental caries was greater among the food-insecure children and adolescents (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.52-2.65, p < .001, I² : 73.5%). Similarly, all three categories of FI were significantly associated with caries experience (marginal FI: OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.56-2.27, p < .001, I² : 0.0%; low FI: OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.42-4.14, p = .001, I² : 74.4%; very low FI: OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.88-3.00, p < .001, I² : 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

The results showed a significant association between FI status and dental caries in both childhood and adolescence; however, there was a lack of longitudinal studies for a better understanding of this association. Health policies leading to reduction in FI may also aim to reduce dental caries.

The 2016 Presidential Election, the Public Charge Rule, and Food and Nutrition Assistance Among Immigrant Households

Objectives. To investigate whether the 2016 US presidential election and the subsequent leak of a proposed change to the public charge rule reduced immigrant families' participation in food and nutrition assistance programs. Methods. We used nationally representative data on n = 57 808 households in the United States from the 2015-2018 Current Population Survey-Food Security Supplement. We implemented difference-in-difference-in-difference analyses to investigate whether the election and proposed rule change produced decreases in immigrant families' participation in food and nutrition assistance programs and whether such decreases varied according to state policy generosity toward immigrants. Results. Findings indicate significant and large decreases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, School Breakfast Program, and National School Lunch Program participation among immigrants in moderately generous states but no changes to receipt of food assistance from nongovernmental sources or to household food insecurity. Conclusions. Both anti-immigrant rhetoric and the perceived threat of policy enactment can be enough to produce chilling effects that have potentially serious implications for the health of immigrant households and thus the health of the nation. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(12):1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307011).