1
|
Truong KT, Wambaugh JF, Kapraun DF, Davidson-Fritz SE, Eytcheson S, Judson RS, Paul Friedman K. Interpretation of thyroid-relevant bioactivity data for comparison to in vivo exposures: A prioritization approach for putative chemical inhibitors of in vitro deiodinase activity. Toxicology 2025; 515:154157. [PMID: 40262668 DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2025.154157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2025] [Revised: 04/16/2025] [Accepted: 04/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025]
Abstract
Many ToxCast assay endpoints can be mapped to molecular initiating events (MIEs) within the thyroid adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network. Herein, we provide a framework for interpretation of thyroid-relevant bioactivity data across MIEs. As a proof-of-concept, we used ToxCast data on the inhibition of deiodinase (DIO) enzymes, which convert thyroid hormones between active and inactive forms, and identified substances most likely to inhibit DIO enzymes. Data from 4 relevant cell-free in vitro assays are available for > 2000 chemicals in single concentration screening and 327 chemicals in multi-concentration screening. We filtered to identify chemicals that demonstrated inhibition for each DIO enzyme less likely to be confounded by assay interference, refining the list of putatively active chemicals from 523 to 135. In vitro bioactivity data were then used to estimate administered equivalent doses (AEDs) using a novel high-throughput toxicokinetic (HTTK) model for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of dose. To consider potential thyroid-disrupting activity in an appropriate life-stage and dose context, we extended an existing human maternal-fetal HTTK model to allow for simulations involving the first trimester of pregnancy. For many chemicals, using modeled fetal tissue concentrations produced lower AED estimates than using modeled maternal plasma concentrations alone, at least partially due to conservative assumptions in our HTTK model of complete gestation. This extensible approach for MIE groups of thyroid-related bioactivity data from ToxCast may inform further screening or analyses for potential adverse outcomes during pregnancy and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K T Truong
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - J F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA
| | - D F Kapraun
- Center for Public Health and Environmental AssessmentUS EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - S E Davidson-Fritz
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA
| | - S Eytcheson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - R S Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA
| | - K Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US. Environmental Protection Agency (multiple locations), Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zurek-Ost MA, Phillips KA, Williams AJ, Edelman-Muñoz A, Charest N, Handa S, Isaacs KK. ExpoPath: A method for identifying and annotating exposure pathways from chemical co-occurrence networks. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 979:179465. [PMID: 40286620 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Revised: 03/28/2025] [Accepted: 03/29/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025]
Abstract
Improving risk evaluation for environmental and human health is of paramount concern for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This includes the identification and assessment of chemical transport from commercial and industrial sources to environmental and ecological media, where repeated patterns are often categorized as exposure pathways. Utilizing network analysis techniques paired with graph machine learning tools allows for the construction and analysis of a global chemical co-occurrence network with which to identify sets of overlapping or distinct communities that represent likely exposure pathways. Data from several chemical source databases were aggregated and used to generate a chemical co-occurrence network that encoded linkages between source categories and environmental and receptor categories within the EPA's Multimedia Monitoring Database (MMDB). Multiple algorithms were used to detect communities of chemicals within this network, while enrichment of the resulting communities based on presence-in-media information, physicochemical properties, and functional use information helped to annotate likely exposure pathways. This research identified communities of chemicals associated with various pharmaceutical, consumer, pesticide, and persistent chemical pathways. This novel approach to the study of chemical co-occurrence demonstrates the applicability of network analyses and graph machine learning methods for identifying empirical patterns of connectivity within the domain of exposure science. SYNOPSIS: Network analysis and community detection algorithms help reveal linkages among environmental monitoring data and chemical sources while providing supporting evidence for empirically derived exposure pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Zurek-Ost
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 299 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA; Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Katherine A Phillips
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Antony J Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Adam Edelman-Muñoz
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 210 Badger Rd, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - Nathaniel Charest
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Sakshi Handa
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim L, Huh DA, Park K, Lee J, Hwang SH, Choi HJ, Lim W, Moon KW. Dietary exposure to environmental phenols and phthalates in Korean adults: data analysis of the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2018-2020. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2025; 267:114597. [PMID: 40393172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Revised: 05/07/2025] [Accepted: 05/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
Environmental phenols and phthalates, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, are linked to dietary intake, highlighting the need to identify sources to prevent exposure-related diseases. This study investigates dietary patterns associated with urinary concentrations of environmental phenols and phthalate metabolites in Korean adults using data from 4201 adults in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey Cycle 4 (2018-2020). Exploratory factor analysis identified three dietary patterns: Western-style, traditional Korean, and seafood-rich. We analyzed metabolites with a ≥80 % detection rate, specifically environmental phenols (BPA, BPF, BPS, TCS, MP, EP, BP) and phthalates (MEHHP, MEOHP, MnBP, MECPP, MBzP, MCPP, MEP, MMP). The Western-style or processed food diet showed a significant negative association with MP (β [95 % CI] = -0.14 [-0.24, -0.03]), but no positive association. The traditional Korean diet showed significant positive associations with TCS (β [95 % CI] = 0.09 [0.02, 0.15]), EP (β [95 % CI] = 0.08 [0.01, 0.16]), BP (β [95 % CI] = 0.09 [0.05, 0.12]), MEHHP (β [95 % CI] = 0.04 [0.003, 0.08]), MECPP (β [95 % CI] = 0.06 [0.02, 0.09]), and MMP (β [95 % CI] = 0.11 [0.06, 0.15]). In comparison, it had a significant negative association with BPS (β [95 % CI] = -0.15 [-0.22, -0.09]). The seafood-rich dietary pattern exhibited a significant negative association with BP (β [95 % CI] = -0.07 [-0.11, -0.03]). Certain dietary patterns, including those traditionally regarded as healthy, may be associated with exposure to environmental phenols and phthalates, highlighting the need for further research to understand dietary sources of exposure before drawing implications for public health guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lita Kim
- Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea; L-HOPE Program for Community-Based Total Learning Health Systems, South Korea
| | - Da-An Huh
- Institute of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Kangyeon Park
- Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea; L-HOPE Program for Community-Based Total Learning Health Systems, South Korea
| | - Jiyoun Lee
- Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea; L-HOPE Program for Community-Based Total Learning Health Systems, South Korea
| | - Se-Hyun Hwang
- Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Hyeon Jeong Choi
- School of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woohyun Lim
- School of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyong Whan Moon
- L-HOPE Program for Community-Based Total Learning Health Systems, South Korea; School of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paul Friedman K, Thomas RS, Wambaugh JF, Harrill JA, Judson RS, Shafer TJ, Williams AJ, Lee JYJ, Loo LH, Gagné M, Long AS, Barton-Maclaren TS, Whelan M, Bouhifd M, Rasenberg M, Simanainen U, Sobanski T. Integration of new approach methods for the assessment of data-poor chemicals. Toxicol Sci 2025; 205:74-105. [PMID: 39969258 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2025] Open
Abstract
The use of new approach methods (NAMs), including high-throughput, in vitro bioactivity data, in setting a point-of-departure (POD) will accelerate the pace of human health hazard assessments. Combining hazard and exposure predictions into a bioactivity:exposure ratio (BER) for use in risk-based prioritization and utilizing NAM-based bioactivity flags to indicate potential hazards of interest for further prediction or mechanism-based screening together comprise a prospective approach for management of substances with limited traditional toxicity testing data. In this work, we demonstrate a NAM-based assessment case study conducted via the Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment initiative, a consortium of international research and regulatory scientists. The primary objective was to develop a reusable and adaptable approach for addressing chemicals with limited traditional toxicity data using a NAM-based POD, BER, and bioactivity-based flags for indication of putative endocrine, developmental, neurological, and immunosuppressive effects via data generation and interpretation for 200 substances. Multiple data streams, including in silico and in vitro NAMs, were used. High-throughput transcriptomics and phenotypic profiling data, as well as targeted biochemical and cell-based assays, were combined with generic high-throughput toxicokinetic models parameterized with chemical-specific data to estimate dose for comparison to exposure predictions. This case study further enables regulatory scientists from different international purviews to utilize efficient approaches for prospective chemical management, addressing hazard and risk-based data needs, while reducing the need for animal studies. This work demonstrates the feasibility of using a battery of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic NAMs to provide a NAM-based POD for screening-level assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Russell S Thomas
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Joshua A Harrill
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Richard S Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Timothy J Shafer
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Antony J Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Jia-Ying Joey Lee
- Innovations in Food and Chemical Safety Programme and Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138671, Singapore
| | - Lit-Hsin Loo
- Innovations in Food and Chemical Safety Programme and Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138671, Singapore
| | - Matthew Gagné
- Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Alexandra S Long
- Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Tara S Barton-Maclaren
- Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Maurice Whelan
- Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra (VA) 21047, Italy
| | - Mounir Bouhifd
- Directorate of Prioritisation and Integration, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki 00121, Finland
| | - Mike Rasenberg
- Directorate of Hazard Assessment, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki 00121, Finland
| | - Ulla Simanainen
- Directorate of Prioritisation and Integration, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki 00121, Finland
| | - Tomasz Sobanski
- Directorate of Prioritisation and Integration, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki 00121, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsieh NH, Kwok ESC. Biomonitoring-Based Risk Assessment of Pyrethroid Exposure in the U.S. Population: Application of High-Throughput and Physiologically Based Kinetic Models. TOXICS 2025; 13:216. [PMID: 40137543 PMCID: PMC11945574 DOI: 10.3390/toxics13030216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2025] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Pyrethroid insecticides have been extensively utilized in agriculture and residential areas in the United States. This study evaluated the exposure risk by age using available biomonitoring data. We analyzed pyrethroid metabolite concentrations in urine using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Reverse dosimetry was conducted with a high-throughput model and a physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model integrated with a Bayesian inference framework. We further derived Benchmark Dose (BMD) values and systemic points of departure in rats using Bayesian BMD and PBK models. Margins of exposure (MOE) were calculated to assess neurotoxic risk based on estimated daily oral intake and dose metrics in plasma and brain. Results from both models indicated that young children have higher pyrethroid exposure compared to other age groups. All estimated risk values were within acceptable levels of acute neurotoxic effect. Additionally, MOEs calculated from oral doses were lower than those derived from internal doses, highlighting that traditional external exposure assessments tend to overestimate risk compared to advanced internal dose-based techniques. In conclusion, combining high-throughput and PBK approaches enhances the understanding of human health risks associated with pyrethroid exposures, demonstrating their potential for future applications in exposure tracking and health risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan-Hung Hsieh
- Human Exposure & Health Effects Modeling Section, Human Health Assessment Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang Y, Wang J, Tang S, Qiu J, Luo Y, Yang C, Lai X, Wang Q, Cao H. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Consumer Products: An Overview of the Occurrence, Migration, and Exposure Assessment. Molecules 2025; 30:994. [PMID: 40076219 PMCID: PMC11901761 DOI: 10.3390/molecules30050994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2025] [Revised: 02/12/2025] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been widely used in the production of consumer products globally due to the excellent water and oil resistance and anti-fouling properties. The multiple toxic effects of some PFASs also pose a threat to human health and ecosystem, and the frequent use of certain consumer products increased the risk of human exposure to PFASs. More data on the occurrence, concentration, and migration of PFASs in consumer products is urgently needed to address the possible risks posed by exposure to consumer products. This paper reviews the PFAS concentrations found, the migration characteristics known, and the exposure risks of PFASs arising from several types of consumer products over the last five years. The types of consumer products considered here include food contact materials, textiles, and disposable personal hygiene products. The influence of different factors on the migration process of PFASs from these products are summarized and discussed. Additionally, the main approaches and models of exposure assessment are evaluated and summarized. Current challenges and future research prospects in this field are discussed with a view to providing guidance for the future assessment and regulation of PFASs in consumer products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yang
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
- College of Environment & Resource Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Jin Wang
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Shali Tang
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Jia Qiu
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Yan Luo
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Chun Yang
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Xiaojing Lai
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Qian Wang
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| | - Hui Cao
- National Postdoctoral Research Station, Zhejiang Institute of Quality Sciences, Hangzhou 310018, China; (S.T.); (J.Q.); (Y.L.); (C.Y.); (X.L.); (Q.W.); (H.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rager JE, Koval LE, Hickman E, Ring C, Teitelbaum T, Cohen T, Fragola G, Zylka MJ, Engel LS, Lu K, Engel SM. The environmental neuroactive chemicals list of prioritized substances for human biomonitoring and neurotoxicity testing: A database and high-throughput toxicokinetics approach. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2025; 266:120537. [PMID: 39638029 PMCID: PMC11753932 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
There is a diversity of chemicals to which humans are potentially exposed. Few of these chemicals have linked human biomonitoring data, and most have very limited neurotoxicity testing. Of particular concern are environmental exposures impacting children, who constitute a population of heightened susceptibility due to rapid neural growth and plasticity, yet lack biomonitoring data compared to other age/population subgroups. This study set out to develop a prioritized list of neuroactive substances, titled the Environmental NeuRoactIve CHemicals (ENRICH) list, to be used as a defined screening library in the evaluation of human biological samples, with emphasis on early childhood-relevant environmental exposures. In silico database mining approaches were used to prioritize chemicals based upon likelihood of neuroactivity, human exposure, and feasible detection in biological samples. Evidence of neuroactivity was compiled across in vitro high-throughput screening, animal testing, and/or human epidemiological findings. Chemicals were considered for their likelihood of human exposure and detection presence in biological samples (including metabolites), with additional evidence indicating presence within child-relevant products. The resulting list of 1827 chemicals were ranked using a Chemical Prioritization Index. Manual inclusion/exclusion criteria were employed for the top-ranking chemical candidates to ensure that chemicals were within the study's scope (i.e., environmentally relevant) and, for the purposes of biomonitoring, had properties amenable to mass spectrometry methods. These elements were combined to produce the ENRICH list of 250 top-ranking chemicals, spanning pesticides and those used in home maintenance, personal care, cleaning products, vehicles, arts and crafts, and consumer electronics, among other sources. Chemicals were additionally evaluated for high-throughput toxicokinetics to predict how much of a chemical and/or its metabolite(s) may reach urine, as an example biological matrix for practical use in biomonitoring efforts. This novel study couples databases and in silico-based predictions to prioritize chemicals in the environment with potential neurological impacts for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Lauren E Koval
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Elise Hickman
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Caroline Ring
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Drop D143-02, PO Box 12055, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Taylor Teitelbaum
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Todd Cohen
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Giulia Fragola
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark J Zylka
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence S Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Kun Lu
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Stephanie M Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang W, Deng S, Zhang XE, Huang C, Liu Q, Jiang G. Network-Based Identification of Key Toxic Compounds in Airborne Chemical Exposome. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2025; 59:1712-1723. [PMID: 39808486 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Air pollution is a leading contributor to the global disease burden. However, the complex nature of the chemicals to which humans are exposed through inhalation has obscured the identification of the key compounds responsible for diseases. Here, we develop a network topology-based framework to identify key toxic compounds in the airborne chemical exposome. Using cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) as a model disease, we found that toxic network modules of various compounds are closely linked to the modules of CVDs. The proximity of compound target modules to disease modules can indicate the extent of toxicity induced by the compounds. By integrating mass spectrometry-based external exposure concentrations and machine learning-predicted internal exposure concentrations, we established a comprehensive linkage connecting exposure to disease-related risk for the identification of toxic compounds. These findings were subsequently validated using exposure and disease data on the regional scale. This work provides an effective strategy for identifying key compounds within environmental exposomes and establishes a new paradigm for understanding the pathogenicity of air pollution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weican Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Shenxi Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China
| | - Xi-En Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China
| | - Cha Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Qian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- Institute of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
- College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Guibin Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stanfield Z, Favela K, Yau A, Menn C, Edrisi H, Phillips KA, Williams AJ, Isaacs KK, Wambaugh JF. Developing Chemical Signatures for Categories of Household Consumer Products Using Suspect Screening Analysis. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2025; 59:1354-1366. [PMID: 39772632 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Consumer products are a major source of chemicals that may pose a health risk. It is important to understand what chemicals are in these products to evaluate risk and assess new products for uncommon ingredients. Suspect screening analysis (SSA) using two-dimensional gas chromatography-high-resolution-time-of-flight/mass spectrometry (GCxGC-HR-TOF/MS) was applied to 92 consumer products from 5 categories. 485 probable chemical structures were tentatively identified using the NIST 2017 spectral library across all products (109 confirmed). Chemicals were characterized by functional use and structural class. Fabric upholsteries contained the most chemicals (239) identifiable by GCxGC-HR-TOF/MS and silicone kitchen tools the least (64). Use of duplicate samples and repeat purchases of products allowed for a within-product category similarity assessment, which showed highest variability in baby soap and lowest in cotton clothing. Chemical ingredient signatures (including reported sample abundance ranges) for each product type were obtained by identifying chemicals occurring in ≥80% of product samples. These signatures provide a baseline set of chemical ingredients (that is, representative mixtures) across common consumer product types. The chemical signatures will help in evaluating new and existing products. Separating constituent chemicals into typical and atypical might inform exposure assessment, in vitro bioactivity screening, and ultimately the risk related to using such products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Stanfield
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Kristin Favela
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Alice Yau
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Christina Menn
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Hamed Edrisi
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Katherine A Phillips
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Antony J Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu Y, Li H, Fan Y, Cohen Hubal EA, Little JC, Eichler CMA, Bi C, Song Z, Qiu S, Xu Y. Quantifying EDC Emissions from Consumer Products: A Novel Rapid Method and Its Application for Systematic Evaluation of Health Impacts. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:22700-22713. [PMID: 39628321 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are widely used in consumer products and have been associated with adverse public health outcomes and significant economic costs. We developed a rapid chamber method for measuring EDC emissions from consumer products, significantly reducing the time to reach steady state from weeks or months to minutes or hours. Using this method, we quantified EDC emissions from a wide range of products, determined the emission-control parameters, and established their relationship with the EDC content (Wf) and physicochemical properties. By incorporating Wf data from consumer product databases and applying stochastic models, we systematically estimated emissions for 400 EDC-product combinations and assessed the associated exposure and disease burden for the U.S. population. Our results suggest that more than 60% of these combinations could result in carcinogenic disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) above the acceptable threshold. The overall disease burden caused by EDCs in consumer products can be substantial, with DALYs exceeding those associated with other pollutants, such as particulate matter, in a worst-case scenario. This study provides a valuable tool for prioritizing hazardous EDCs in consumer products, evaluating safer alternatives, and formulating effective intervention strategies, thereby supporting policymakers and manufacturers in making informed, sustainable decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yili Wu
- Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Hongwan Li
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
| | - Yujie Fan
- Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Elaine A Cohen Hubal
- Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - John C Little
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
| | - Clara M A Eichler
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Chenyang Bi
- Aerodyne Research Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - Zidong Song
- Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Shuolin Qiu
- Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marciano LPA, Kleinstreuer N, Chang X, Costa LF, Silvério ACP, Martins I. A novel approach to triazole fungicides risk characterization: Bridging human biomonitoring and computational toxicology. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 953:176003. [PMID: 39236816 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
Brazil stands as the world's leading coffee producer, where the extensive use of pesticides is economically critical yet poses health and environmental risks due to their non-selective mechanisms of action. Specifically, triazole fungicides are widely used in agriculture to manage fungal diseases and are known to disrupt mammalian CYP450 and liver microsomal enzymes. This research establishes a framework for risk characterization of human exposure to triazole fungicides by internal-dose biomonitoring, biochemical marker measurements, and integration of high-throughput screening (HTS) data via computational toxicology workflows from the Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE). Volunteers from the southern region of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were divided into two groups: farmworkers and spouses occupationally and environmentally exposed to pesticides from rural areas (n = 140) and individuals from the urban area to serve as a comparison group (n = 50). Three triazole fungicides, cyproconazole, epoxiconazole, and triadimenol, were detected in the urine samples of both men and women in the rural group. Androstenedione and testosterone hormones were significantly reduced in the farmworker group (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001). The data show a significant inverse association of testosterone with cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, triglycerides, and glucose and a direct association with HDL (Spearman's correlation, p < 0.05). In the ICE workflow, active in vitro HTS assays were identified for the three measured triazoles and three other active ingredients from the pesticide formulations. The curated HTS data confirm bioactivities predominantly related to steroid hormone metabolism, cellular stress processes, and CYP450 enzymes impacted by fungicide exposure at occupationally and environmentally relevant concentrations based on the in vitro to in vivo extrapolation models. These results characterize the potentially significant human health risk, particularly from the high frequency and intensity of exposure to epoxiconazole. This study showcases the critical role of biomonitoring and utility of computational tools in evaluating pesticide exposure and minimizing the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz P A Marciano
- Laboratory of Toxicant and Drug Analyses, Department of clinical and toxicological analysis, Federal University of Alfenas - Unifal-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Nicole Kleinstreuer
- National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Luiz F Costa
- Laboratory of Toxicant and Drug Analyses, Department of clinical and toxicological analysis, Federal University of Alfenas - Unifal-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - Isarita Martins
- Laboratory of Toxicant and Drug Analyses, Department of clinical and toxicological analysis, Federal University of Alfenas - Unifal-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Braun G, Herberth G, Krauss M, König M, Wojtysiak N, Zenclussen AC, Escher BI. Neurotoxic mixture effects of chemicals extracted from blood of pregnant women. Science 2024; 386:301-309. [PMID: 39418383 DOI: 10.1126/science.adq0336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
Human biomonitoring studies typically capture only a small and unknown fraction of the entire chemical universe. We combined chemical analysis with a high-throughput in vitro assay for neurotoxicity to capture complex mixtures of organic chemicals in blood. Plasma samples of 624 pregnant women from the German LiNA cohort were extracted with a nonselective extraction method for organic chemicals. 294 of >1000 target analytes were detected and quantified. Many of the detected chemicals as well as the whole extracts interfered with neurite development. Experimental testing of simulated complex mixtures of detected chemicals in the neurotoxicity assay confirmed additive mixture effects at concentrations less than individual chemicals' effect thresholds. The use of high-throughput target screening combined with bioassays has the potential to improve human biomonitoring and provide a new approach to including mixture effects in epidemiological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Braun
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Gunda Herberth
- Department of Environmental Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Martin Krauss
- Department of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Maria König
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Niklas Wojtysiak
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Ana C Zenclussen
- Department of Environmental Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
- Environmental Pediatric Immunology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig 04103, Germany
- German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), partner site Leipzig/Dresden, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Beate I Escher
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
- German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), partner site Leipzig/Dresden, Leipzig 04103, Germany
- Environmental Toxicology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kvasnicka J, Aurisano N, von Borries K, Lu EH, Fantke P, Jolliet O, Wright FA, Chiu WA. Two-Stage Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Points of Departure for Human Noncancer and Developmental/Reproductive Effects. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:15638-15649. [PMID: 38693844 PMCID: PMC11371525 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Chemical points of departure (PODs) for critical health effects are crucial for evaluating and managing human health risks and impacts from exposure. However, PODs are unavailable for most chemicals in commerce due to a lack of in vivo toxicity data. We therefore developed a two-stage machine learning (ML) framework to predict human-equivalent PODs for oral exposure to organic chemicals based on chemical structure. Utilizing ML-based predictions for structural/physical/chemical/toxicological properties from OPERA 2.9 as features (Stage 1), ML models using random forest regression were trained with human-equivalent PODs derived from in vivo data sets for general noncancer effects (n = 1,791) and reproductive/developmental effects (n = 2,228), with robust cross-validation for feature selection and estimating generalization errors (Stage 2). These two-stage models accurately predicted PODs for both effect categories with cross-validation-based root-mean-squared errors less than an order of magnitude. We then applied one or both models to 34,046 chemicals expected to be in the environment, revealing several thousand chemicals of moderate concern and several hundred chemicals of high concern for health effects at estimated median population exposure levels. Further application can expand by orders of magnitude the coverage of organic chemicals that can be evaluated for their human health risks and impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Kvasnicka
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
| | - Nicolò Aurisano
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Kerstin von Borries
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - En-Hsuan Lu
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
| | - Peter Fantke
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Olivier Jolliet
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Fred A Wright
- Departments of Statistics and Biological Sciences and Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States
| | - Weihsueh A Chiu
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Silva M, Capps S, London JK. Community-Engaged Research and the Use of Open Access ToxVal/ToxRef In Vivo Databases and New Approach Methodologies (NAM) to Address Human Health Risks From Environmental Contaminants. Birth Defects Res 2024; 116:e2395. [PMID: 39264239 PMCID: PMC11407745 DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The paper analyzes opportunities for integrating Open access resources (Abstract Sifter, US EPA and NTP Toxicity Value and Toxicity Reference [ToxVal/ToxRefDB]) and New Approach Methodologies (NAM) integration into Community Engaged Research (CEnR). METHODS CompTox Chemicals Dashboard and Integrated Chemical Environment with in vivo ToxVal/ToxRef and NAMs (in vitro) databases are presented in three case studies to show how these resources could be used in Pilot Projects involving Community Engaged Research (CEnR) from the University of California, Davis, Environmental Health Sciences Center. RESULTS Case #1 developed a novel assay methodology for testing pesticide toxicity. Case #2 involved detection of water contaminants from wildfire ash and Case #3 involved contaminants on Tribal Lands. Abstract Sifter/ToxVal/ToxRefDB regulatory data and NAMs could be used to screen/prioritize risks from exposure to metals, PAHs and PFAS from wildfire ash leached into water and to investigate activities of environmental toxins (e.g., pesticides) on Tribal lands. Open access NAMs and computational tools can apply to detection of sensitive biological activities in potential or known adverse outcome pathways to predict points of departure (POD) for comparison with regulatory values for hazard identification. Open access Systematic Empirical Evaluation of Models or biomonitoring exposures are available for human subpopulations and can be used to determine bioactivity (POD) to exposure ratio to facilitate mitigation. CONCLUSIONS These resources help prioritize chemical toxicity and facilitate regulatory decisions and health protective policies that can aid stakeholders in deciding on needed research. Insights into exposure risks can aid environmental justice and health equity advocates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn Silva
- Co-Chair Community Stakeholders' Advisory Committee, University of California (UC Davis), Environmental Health Sciences Center (EHSC), Davis, California, USA
| | - Shosha Capps
- Co-Director Community Engagement Core, UC Davis EHSC, Davis, California, USA
| | - Jonathan K London
- Department of Human Ecology and Faculty Director Community Engagement Core, UC Davis EHSC, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Doris Tsai HH, Ford LC, Burnett SD, Dickey AN, Wright FA, Chiu WA, Rusyn I. Informing Hazard Identification and Risk Characterization of Environmental Chemicals by Combining Transcriptomic and Functional Data from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem-Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Chem Res Toxicol 2024; 37:1428-1444. [PMID: 39046974 PMCID: PMC11691792 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Environmental chemicals may contribute to the global burden of cardiovascular disease, but experimental data are lacking to determine which substances pose the greatest risk. Human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes are a high-throughput cardiotoxicity model that is widely used to test drugs and chemicals; however, most studies focus on exploring electro-physiological readouts. Gene expression data may provide additional molecular insights to be used for both mechanistic interpretation and dose-response analyses. Therefore, we hypothesized that both transcriptomic and functional data in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes may be used as a comprehensive screening tool to identify potential cardiotoxicity hazards and risks of the chemicals. To test this hypothesis, we performed concentration-response analysis of 464 chemicals from 12 classes, including both pharmaceuticals and nonpharmaceutical substances. Functional effects (beat frequency, QT prolongation, and asystole), cytotoxicity, and whole transcriptome response were evaluated. Points of departure were derived from phenotypic and transcriptomic data, and risk characterization was performed. Overall, 244 (53%) substances were active in at least one phenotype; as expected, pharmaceuticals with known cardiac liabilities were the most active. Positive chronotropy was the functional phenotype activated by the largest number of tested chemicals. No chemical class was particularly prone to pose a potential hazard to cardiomyocytes; a varying proportion (10-44%) of substances in each class had effects on cardiomyocytes. Transcriptomic data showed that 69 (15%) substances elicited significant gene expression changes; most perturbed pathways were highly relevant to known key characteristics of human cardiotoxicants. The bioactivity-to-exposure ratios showed that phenotypic- and transcriptomic-based POD led to similar results for risk characterization. Overall, our findings demonstrate how the integrative use of in vitro transcriptomic and phenotypic data from iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes not only offers a complementary approach for hazard and risk prioritization, but also enables mechanistic interpretation of the in vitro test results to increase confidence in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Hsuan Doris Tsai
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | - Lucie C. Ford
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | - Sarah D. Burnett
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | - Allison N. Dickey
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Fred A. Wright
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
- Department of Statistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603, USA
| | - Weihsueh A. Chiu
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | - Ivan Rusyn
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kalyva ME, Vist GE, Diemar MG, López-Soop G, Bozada TJ, Luechtefeld T, Roggen EL, Dirven H, Vinken M, Husøy T. Accessible methods and tools to estimate chemical exposure in humans to support risk assessment: A systematic scoping review. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2024; 352:124109. [PMID: 38718961 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Exposure assessment is a crucial component of environmental health research, providing essential information on the potential risks associated with various chemicals. A systematic scoping review was conducted to acquire an overview of accessible human exposure assessment methods and computational tools to support and ultimately improve risk assessment. The systematic scoping review was performed in Sysrev, a web platform that introduces machine learning techniques into the review process aiming for increased accuracy and efficiency. Included publications were restricted to a publication date after the year 2000, where exposure methods were properly described. Exposure assessments methods were found to be used for a broad range of environmental chemicals including pesticides, metals, persistent chemicals, volatile organic compounds, and other chemical classes. Our results show that after the year 2000, for all the types of exposure routes, probabilistic analysis, and computational methods to calculate human exposure have increased. Sixty-three mathematical models and toolboxes were identified that have been developed in Europe, North America, and globally. However, only twelve occur frequently and their usefulness were associated with exposure route, chemical classes and input parameters used to estimate exposure. The outcome of the combined associations can function as a basis and/or guide for decision making for the selection of most appropriate method and tool to be used for environmental chemical human exposure assessments in Ontology-driven and artificial intelligence-based repeated dose toxicity testing of chemicals for next generation risk assessment (ONTOX) project and elsewhere. Finally, the choice of input parameters used in each mathematical model and toolbox shown by our analysis can contribute to the harmonization process of the exposure models and tools increasing the prospect for comparison between studies and consistency in the regulatory process in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E Kalyva
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Climate and Environmental Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Gunn E Vist
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division for Health Services, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Graciela López-Soop
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Climate and Environmental Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - T J Bozada
- Toxtrack LLC, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Thomas Luechtefeld
- Toxtrack LLC, Baltimore, MD, United States; Insilica LLC, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Erwin L Roggen
- 3Rs Management and Consulting ApS, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Hubert Dirven
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Climate and Environmental Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mathieu Vinken
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Trine Husøy
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Climate and Environmental Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aurisano N, Fantke P, Chiu WA, Judson R, Jang S, Unnikrishnan A, Jolliet O. Probabilistic Reference and 10% Effect Concentrations for Characterizing Inhalation Non-cancer and Developmental/Reproductive Effects for 2,160 Substances. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:8278-8288. [PMID: 38697947 PMCID: PMC11097392 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c00207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Chemicals assessment and management frameworks rely on regulatory toxicity values, which are based on points of departure (POD) identified following rigorous dose-response assessments. Yet, regulatory PODs and toxicity values for inhalation exposure (i.e., reference concentrations [RfCs]) are available for only ∼200 chemicals. To address this gap, we applied a workflow to determine surrogate inhalation route PODs and corresponding toxicity values, where regulatory assessments are lacking. We curated and selected inhalation in vivo data from the U.S. EPA's ToxValDB and adjusted reported effect values to chronic human equivalent benchmark concentrations (BMCh) following the WHO/IPCS framework. Using ToxValDB chemicals with existing PODs associated with regulatory toxicity values, we found that the 25th %-ile of a chemical's BMCh distribution (POD p 25 BMC h ) could serve as a suitable surrogate for regulatory PODs (Q2 ≥ 0.76, RSE ≤ 0.82 log10 units). We applied this approach to derive POD p 25 BMC h for 2,095 substances with general non-cancer toxicity effects and 638 substances with reproductive/developmental toxicity effects, yielding a total coverage of 2,160 substances. From these POD p 25 BMC h , we derived probabilistic RfCs and human population effect concentrations. With this work, we have expanded the number of chemicals with toxicity values available, thereby enabling a much broader coverage for inhalation risk and impact assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Aurisano
- Quantitative
Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource
Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, Kgs., Lyngby 2800, Denmark
| | - Peter Fantke
- Quantitative
Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource
Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, Kgs., Lyngby 2800, Denmark
| | - Weihsueh A. Chiu
- Department
of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine
and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United
States
| | - Richard Judson
- National
Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Suji Jang
- Department
of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine
and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United
States
| | - Aswani Unnikrishnan
- National
Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Olivier Jolliet
- Quantitative
Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource
Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, Kgs., Lyngby 2800, Denmark
- Department
of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simon TW, Ryman J, Becker RA. Commentary: Value of information case study strongly supports use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2024; 149:105594. [PMID: 38555099 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
A Value of Information (VOI) analysis can play a key role in decision-making for adopting new approach methodologies (NAMs). We applied EPA's recently developed VOI framework to the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). Obtaining/deriving a TTC value for use as a toxicity reference value (TRV) for substances with limited toxicity data was shown to provide equivalent or greater health protection, immense return on investment (ROI), greater net benefit, and substantially lower costs of delay (CoD) compared with TRVs derived from either traditional human health assessment (THHA) chronic toxicity testing in lab animals or the 5-day in vivo EPA Transcriptomic Assessment Product (ETAP). For all nine exposure scenarios examined, the TTC was more economical terms of CoD and ROI than the ETAP or the THHA; expected net benefit was similar for the TTC and ETAP with both of these more economical than the THHA The TTC ROI was immensely greater (5,000,000-fold on average) than the ROI for THHA and the ETAP ROI (100,000-fold on average). These results support the use of the TTC for substances within its domain of applicability to waive requiring certain in vivo tests, or at a minimum, as an initial screening step before conducting either the ETAP or THHA in vivo studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Tkalec Ž, Antignac JP, Bandow N, Béen FM, Belova L, Bessems J, Le Bizec B, Brack W, Cano-Sancho G, Chaker J, Covaci A, Creusot N, David A, Debrauwer L, Dervilly G, Duca RC, Fessard V, Grimalt JO, Guerin T, Habchi B, Hecht H, Hollender J, Jamin EL, Klánová J, Kosjek T, Krauss M, Lamoree M, Lavison-Bompard G, Meijer J, Moeller R, Mol H, Mompelat S, Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Oberacher H, Parinet J, Van Poucke C, Roškar R, Togola A, Trontelj J, Price EJ. Innovative analytical methodologies for characterizing chemical exposure with a view to next-generation risk assessment. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2024; 186:108585. [PMID: 38521044 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
The chemical burden on the environment and human population is increasing. Consequently, regulatory risk assessment must keep pace to manage, reduce, and prevent adverse impacts on human and environmental health associated with hazardous chemicals. Surveillance of chemicals of known, emerging, or potential future concern, entering the environment-food-human continuum is needed to document the reality of risks posed by chemicals on ecosystem and human health from a one health perspective, feed into early warning systems and support public policies for exposure mitigation provisions and safe and sustainable by design strategies. The use of less-conventional sampling strategies and integration of full-scan, high-resolution mass spectrometry and effect-directed analysis in environmental and human monitoring programmes have the potential to enhance the screening and identification of a wider range of chemicals of known, emerging or potential future concern. Here, we outline the key needs and recommendations identified within the European Partnership for Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) project for leveraging these innovative methodologies to support the development of next-generation chemical risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Žiga Tkalec
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, Brno, Czech Republic; Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | | | - Nicole Bandow
- German Environment Agency, Laboratory for Water Analysis, Colditzstraße 34, 12099 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Frederic M Béen
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Chemistry for Environment and Health, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; KWR Water Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Lidia Belova
- Toxicological Center, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Jos Bessems
- Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
| | | | - Werner Brack
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH - UFZ, Department of Effect-Directed Analysis, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Evolutionary Ecology and Environmental Toxicology, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 13, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | - Jade Chaker
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France.
| | - Adrian Covaci
- Toxicological Center, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Creusot
- INRAE, French National Research Institute For Agriculture, Food & Environment, UR1454 EABX, Bordeaux Metabolome, MetaboHub, Gazinet Cestas, France.
| | - Arthur David
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France.
| | - Laurent Debrauwer
- Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), INRAE UMR 1331, ENVT, INP-Purpan, Paul Sabatier University (UPS), Toulouse, France.
| | | | - Radu Corneliu Duca
- Unit Environmental Hygiene and Human Biological Monitoring, Department of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 1 Rue Louis Rech, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg; Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Valérie Fessard
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Laboratory of Fougères, Toxicology of Contaminants Unit, 35306 Fougères, France.
| | - Joan O Grimalt
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Thierry Guerin
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Strategy and Programs Department, F-94701 Maisons-Alfort, France.
| | - Baninia Habchi
- INRS, Département Toxicologie et Biométrologie Laboratoire Biométrologie 1, rue du Morvan - CS 60027 - 54519, Vandoeuvre Cedex, France.
| | - Helge Hecht
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Juliane Hollender
- Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology - Eawag, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Emilien L Jamin
- Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), INRAE UMR 1331, ENVT, INP-Purpan, Paul Sabatier University (UPS), Toulouse, France.
| | - Jana Klánová
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Tina Kosjek
- Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Martin Krauss
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH - UFZ, Department of Effect-Directed Analysis, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Marja Lamoree
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Chemistry for Environment and Health, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gwenaelle Lavison-Bompard
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Laboratory for Food Safety, Pesticides and Marine Biotoxins Unit, F-94701 Maisons-Alfort, France.
| | - Jeroen Meijer
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Chemistry for Environment and Health, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ruth Moeller
- Unit Medical Expertise and Data Intelligence, Department of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 1 Rue Louis Rech, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
| | - Hans Mol
- Wageningen Food Safety Research - Part of Wageningen University and Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sophie Mompelat
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Laboratory of Fougères, Toxicology of Contaminants Unit, 35306 Fougères, France.
| | - An Van Nieuwenhuyse
- Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 1 Rue Louis Rech, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
| | - Herbert Oberacher
- Institute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University of Insbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Julien Parinet
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Laboratory for Food Safety, Pesticides and Marine Biotoxins Unit, F-94701 Maisons-Alfort, France.
| | - Christof Van Poucke
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (ILVO), Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
| | - Robert Roškar
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Slovenia.
| | - Anne Togola
- BRGM, 3 avenue Claude Guillemin, 45060 Orléans, France.
| | | | - Elliott J Price
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huang L, Aurisano N, Fantke P, Dissanayake A, Edirisinghe LGLM, Jolliet O. Near-field exposures and human health impacts for organic chemicals in interior paints: A high-throughput screening. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2024; 465:133145. [PMID: 38154180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Interior paints contain organic chemicals that might be harmful to painters and building residents. This study aims to develop a high-throughput approach to screen near-field human exposures and health impacts related to organic chemicals in interior paints. We developed mass balance models for both water- and solvent-based paints, predicting emissions during wet and dry phases. We then screened exposures and risks, focusing on Sri Lanka where residential houses are frequently repainted. These models accurately predict paint drying time and indoor air concentrations of organic chemicals. Exposures of both painter and household resident were estimated for 65 organic chemicals in water-based and 26 in solvent-based paints, considering 12 solvents. Chemicals of concerns (CoCs) were identified, and maximum acceptable chemical contents (MACs) were calculated. Water-based paints generally pose lower health risks than solvent-based paints but might contain biocides of high concern. The total human health impact of one painting event on all household adults ranges from 1.5 × 10-3 to 2.1 × 10-2 DALYs for solvent-based paints, and from 4.1 × 10-4 to 9.5 × 10-3 DALYs for water-based paints. The present approach is a promising way to support the formulation of safer paint, and is integrated in the USEtox scientific consensus model for use in life cycle assessment, chemical substitution and risk screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Huang
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicolò Aurisano
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Peter Fantke
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | | | - Olivier Jolliet
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tsai HHD, Ford LC, Chen Z, Dickey AN, Wright FA, Rusyn I. Risk-based prioritization of PFAS using phenotypic and transcriptomic data from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes. ALTEX 2024; 41:363-381. [PMID: 38429992 PMCID: PMC11305846 DOI: 10.14573/altex.2311031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are chemicals with important applications; they are persistent in the environment and may pose human health hazards. Regulatory agencies are considering restrictions and bans of PFAS; however, little data exists for informed decisions. Several prioritization strategies were proposed for evaluation of potential hazards of PFAS. Structure-based grouping could expedite the selection of PFAS for testing; still, the hypothesis that structure-effect relationships exist for PFAS requires confirmation. We tested 26 structurally diverse PFAS from 8 groups using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes, and tested concentration-response effects on cell function and gene expression. Few phenotypic effects were observed in hepatocytes, but negative chronotropy was observed in cardiomyocytes for 8 PFAS. Substance- and cell type-dependent transcriptomic changes were more prominent but lacked substantial group-specific effects. In hepatocytes, we found upregulation of stress-related and extracellular matrix organization pathways, and down-regulation of fat metabolism. In cardiomyocytes, contractility-related pathways were most affected. We derived phenotypic and transcriptomic points of departure and compared them to predicted PFAS exposures. Conservative estimates for bioactivity and exposure were used to derive a bioactivity-to-exposure ratio (BER) for each PFAS; 23 of 26 PFAS had BER > 1. Overall, these data suggest that structure-based PFAS grouping may not be sufficient to predict their biological effects. Testing of individual PFAS may be needed for scientifically-supported decision-making. Our proposed strategy of using two human cell types and considering phenotypic and transcriptomic effects, combined with dose-response analysis and calculation of BER, may be used for PFAS prioritization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Hsuan D Tsai
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, TX, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Lucie C Ford
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, TX, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Zunwei Chen
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, TX, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Current address: Program in Molecular and Integrative Physiological Sciences, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison N Dickey
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Fred A Wright
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, TX, USA
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
- Department of Statistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Ivan Rusyn
- Interdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, College Station, TX, USA
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Phillips KA, Chao A, Church RL, Favela K, Garantziotis S, Isaacs KK, Meyer B, Rice A, Sayre R, Wetmore BA, Yau A, Wambaugh JF. Suspect Screening Analysis of Pooled Human Serum Samples Using GC × GC/TOF-MS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:1802-1812. [PMID: 38217501 PMCID: PMC11459241 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Humans interact with thousands of chemicals. This study aims to identify substances of emerging concern and in need of human health risk evaluations. Sixteen pooled human serum samples were constructed from 25 individual samples each from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' Clinical Research Unit. Samples were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC) × GC/time-of-flight (TOF)-mass spectrometry (MS) in a suspect screening analysis, with follow-up confirmation analysis of 19 substances. A standard reference material blood sample was also analyzed through the confirmation process for comparison. The pools were stratified by sex (female and male) and by age (≤45 and >45). Publicly available information on potential exposure sources was aggregated to annotate presence in serum as either endogenous, food/nutrient, drug, commerce, or contaminant. Of the 544 unique substances tentatively identified by spectral matching, 472 were identified in females, while only 271 were identified in males. Surprisingly, 273 of the identified substances were found only in females. It is known that behavior and near-field environments can drive exposures, and this work demonstrates the existence of exposure sources uniquely relevant to females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A. Phillips
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Alex Chao
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Church
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Clinical Research Unit, Durham, NC 27709, USA
| | - Kristin Favela
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
| | - Stavros Garantziotis
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Clinical Research Unit, Durham, NC 27709, USA
| | - Kristin K. Isaacs
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Brian Meyer
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
- Deceased April 2023
| | - Annette Rice
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Clinical Research Unit, Durham, NC 27709, USA
| | - Risa Sayre
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Barbara A. Wetmore
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Alice Yau
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
| | - John F. Wambaugh
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lin HC, Rusyn I, Chiu WA. Assessing proarrhythmic potential of environmental chemicals using a high throughput in vitro-in silico model with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. ALTEX 2024; 41:37-49. [PMID: 37921411 PMCID: PMC10898275 DOI: 10.14573/altex.2306231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
QT prolongation and the potentially fatal arrhythmia Torsades de Pointes are common causes for withdrawing or restricting drugs; however, little is known about similar liabilities of environmental chemicals. Current in vitro-in silico models for testing proarrhythmic liabilities, using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM), provide an opportunity to address this data gap. These methods are still low- to medium-throughput and not suitable for testing the tens of thousands of chemicals in commerce. We hypothesized that combining high-throughput population- based in vitro testing in hiPSC-CMs with a fully in silico data analysis workflow can offer sensitive and specific predictions of proarrhythmic potential. We calibrated the model with a published hiPSC-CM dataset of drugs known to be positive or negative for proarrhythmia and tested its performance using internal cross-validation and external validation. Additionally, we used computational down-sampling to examine three study designs for hiPSC-CM data: one replicate of one donor, five replicates of one donor, and one replicate of a population of five donors. We found that the population of five donors had the best performance for predicting proarrhythmic potential. The resulting model was then applied to predict the proarrhythmic potential of environmental chemicals, additionally characterizing risk through margin of exposure (MOE) calculations. Out of over 900 environmental chemicals tested, over 150 were predicted to have proarrhythmic potential, but only seven chemicals had a MOE < 1. We conclude that a high-throughput in vitro-in silico approach using population-based hiPSC-CM testing provides a reasonable strategy to screen environmental chemicals for proarrhythmic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsing-Chieh Lin
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Rusyn
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Weihsueh A. Chiu
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Isaacs KK, Wall JT, Paul Friedman K, Franzosa JA, Goeden H, Williams AJ, Dionisio KL, Lambert JC, Linnenbrink M, Singh A, Wambaugh JF, Bogdan AR, Greene C. Screening for drinking water contaminants of concern using an automated exposure-focused workflow. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2024; 34:136-147. [PMID: 37193773 PMCID: PMC11131037 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-023-00552-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of chemicals present in the environment exceeds the capacity of government bodies to characterize risk. Therefore, data-informed and reproducible processes are needed for identifying chemicals for further assessment. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), under its Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) initiative, uses a standardized process to screen potential drinking water contaminants based on toxicity and exposure potential. OBJECTIVE Recently, MDH partnered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) to accelerate the screening process via development of an automated workflow accessing relevant exposure data, including exposure new approach methodologies (NAMs) from ORD's ExpoCast project. METHODS The workflow incorporated information from 27 data sources related to persistence and fate, release potential, water occurrence, and exposure potential, making use of ORD tools for harmonization of chemical names and identifiers. The workflow also incorporated data and criteria specific to Minnesota and MDH's regulatory authority. The collected data were used to score chemicals using quantitative algorithms developed by MDH. The workflow was applied to 1867 case study chemicals, including 82 chemicals that were previously manually evaluated by MDH. RESULTS Evaluation of the automated and manual results for these 82 chemicals indicated reasonable agreement between the scores although agreement depended on data availability; automated scores were lower than manual scores for chemicals with fewer available data. Case study chemicals with high exposure scores included disinfection by-products, pharmaceuticals, consumer product chemicals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pesticides, and metals. Scores were integrated with in vitro bioactivity data to assess the feasibility of using NAMs for further risk prioritization. SIGNIFICANCE This workflow will allow MDH to accelerate exposure screening and expand the number of chemicals examined, freeing resources for in-depth assessments. The workflow will be useful in screening large libraries of chemicals for candidates for the CEC program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA.
| | - Jonathan T Wall
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Jill A Franzosa
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Helen Goeden
- Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St. N, St. Paul, MN, 55155, USA
| | - Antony J Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Kathie L Dionisio
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Jason C Lambert
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Monica Linnenbrink
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Amar Singh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Alexander R Bogdan
- Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St. N, St. Paul, MN, 55155, USA
| | - Christopher Greene
- Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St. N, St. Paul, MN, 55155, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stanfield Z, Setzer RW, Hull V, Sayre RR, Isaacs KK, Wambaugh JF. Characterizing Chemical Exposure Trends from NHANES Urinary Biomonitoring Data. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2024; 132:17009. [PMID: 38285237 PMCID: PMC10824265 DOI: 10.1289/ehp12188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xenobiotic metabolites are widely present in human urine and can indicate recent exposure to environmental chemicals. Proper inference of which chemicals contribute to these metabolites can inform human exposure and risk. Furthermore, longitudinal biomonitoring studies provide insight into how chemical exposures change over time. OBJECTIVES We constructed an exposure landscape for as many human-exposure relevant chemicals over as large a time span as possible to characterize exposure trends across demographic groups and chemical types. METHODS We analyzed urine data of nine 2-y cohorts (1999-2016) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Chemical daily intake rates (in milligrams per kilogram bodyweight per day) were inferred, using the R package bayesmarker, from metabolite concentrations in each cohort individually to identify exposure trends. Trends for metabolites and parents were clustered to find chemicals with similar exposure patterns. Exposure variation by age, gender, and body mass index were also assessed. RESULTS Intake rates for 179 parent chemicals were inferred from 151 metabolites (96 measured in five or more cohorts). Seventeen metabolites and 44 parent chemicals exhibited fold-changes ≥ 10 between any two cohorts (deltamethrin, di-n -octyl phthalate, and di-isononyl phthalate had the greatest exposure increases). Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate intake began decreasing in 2007, whereas both di-isobutyl and di-isononyl phthalate began increasing shortly before. Intake for four parabens was markedly higher in females, especially reproductive-age females, compared with males and children. Cadmium and arsenobetaine exhibited higher exposure for individuals > 65 years of age and lower for individuals < 20 years of age. DISCUSSION With appropriate analysis, NHANES indicates trends in chemical exposures over the past two decades. Decreases in exposure are observable as the result of regulatory action, with some being accompanied by increases in replacement chemicals. Age- and gender-specific variations in exposure were observed for multiple chemicals. Continued estimation of demographic-specific exposures is needed to both monitor and identify potential vulnerable populations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12188.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Stanfield
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - R. Woodrow Setzer
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Victoria Hull
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Risa R. Sayre
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kristin K. Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - John F. Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang Z, Sangion A, Wang S, Gouin T, Brown T, Arnot JA, Li L. Hazard vs. exposure: Does it make a difference in identifying chemicals with persistence and mobility concerns? WATER RESEARCH 2023; 245:120610. [PMID: 37717328 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Persistent and mobile (PM) chemicals are considered emerging threats to the environment and drinking water because they can be transported over long distances, penetrate natural and artificial barriers, and resist removal by traditional water treatment procedures. Current chemical regulatory frameworks raise concerns over PM chemicals due to their potential to cause high human exposure through drinking water contamination. However, the criteria used to screen and identify these chemicals often rely on hazard properties related to stability and sorption, such as biodegradation half-lives and organic-carbon-normalized sorption coefficients as respective measures of P and M. Here, we conduct a model-based assessment to examine the consistency between hazard-based and exposure-based approaches in assessing PM chemicals, by evaluating whether chemicals identified as highly P and M are consistently associated with high drinking water exposure potential (DWEP). We discover that chemicals with the top DWEPs tend to be PM chemicals, but the reverse is not always true, because DWEPs are also impacted by volatilization for air-distributed chemicals and advective particle-bound transport for particle-bound chemicals. Our findings suggest that the hazard metrics are better suited for de-prioritizing, as opposed to prioritizing, chemicals that are unlikely to result in significant human exposure through drinking water, as unfavorable values of hazard metrics are a necessary but not sufficient condition for a high DWEP. We also find that distinct mechanisms determine the DWEP in different sources of drinking water: Sorption and stability are more influential on the DWEP of chemicals in groundwater and surface water, respectively, whereas both sorption and stability equally impact water undergoing riverbank filtration. Future studies should focus on optimizing the identification of persistent and mobile chemicals to ensure that exposure potential is taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhizhen Zhang
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664, N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557-274, United States
| | | | - Shenghong Wang
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664, N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557-274, United States
| | - Todd Gouin
- TG Environmental Research, Sharnbrook, Bedford MK44 1PL, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor Brown
- ARC Arnot Research & Consulting, Toronto, Ontario M4M 1W4, Canada
| | - Jon A Arnot
- ARC Arnot Research & Consulting, Toronto, Ontario M4M 1W4, Canada; Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Li Li
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664, N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557-274, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Martens M, Stierum R, Schymanski EL, Evelo CT, Aalizadeh R, Aladjov H, Arturi K, Audouze K, Babica P, Berka K, Bessems J, Blaha L, Bolton EE, Cases M, Damalas DΕ, Dave K, Dilger M, Exner T, Geerke DP, Grafström R, Gray A, Hancock JM, Hollert H, Jeliazkova N, Jennen D, Jourdan F, Kahlem P, Klanova J, Kleinjans J, Kondic T, Kone B, Lynch I, Maran U, Martinez Cuesta S, Ménager H, Neumann S, Nymark P, Oberacher H, Ramirez N, Remy S, Rocca-Serra P, Salek RM, Sallach B, Sansone SA, Sanz F, Sarimveis H, Sarntivijai S, Schulze T, Slobodnik J, Spjuth O, Tedds J, Thomaidis N, Weber RJ, van Westen GJ, Wheelock CE, Williams AJ, Witters H, Zdrazil B, Županič A, Willighagen EL. ELIXIR and Toxicology: a community in development. F1000Res 2023; 10:ELIXIR-1129. [PMID: 37842337 PMCID: PMC10568213 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.74502.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Toxicology has been an active research field for many decades, with academic, industrial and government involvement. Modern omics and computational approaches are changing the field, from merely disease-specific observational models into target-specific predictive models. Traditionally, toxicology has strong links with other fields such as biology, chemistry, pharmacology and medicine. With the rise of synthetic and new engineered materials, alongside ongoing prioritisation needs in chemical risk assessment for existing chemicals, early predictive evaluations are becoming of utmost importance to both scientific and regulatory purposes. ELIXIR is an intergovernmental organisation that brings together life science resources from across Europe. To coordinate the linkage of various life science efforts around modern predictive toxicology, the establishment of a new ELIXIR Community is seen as instrumental. In the past few years, joint efforts, building on incidental overlap, have been piloted in the context of ELIXIR. For example, the EU-ToxRisk, diXa, HeCaToS, transQST, and the nanotoxicology community have worked with the ELIXIR TeSS, Bioschemas, and Compute Platforms and activities. In 2018, a core group of interested parties wrote a proposal, outlining a sketch of what this new ELIXIR Toxicology Community would look like. A recent workshop (held September 30th to October 1st, 2020) extended this into an ELIXIR Toxicology roadmap and a shortlist of limited investment-high gain collaborations to give body to this new community. This Whitepaper outlines the results of these efforts and defines our vision of the ELIXIR Toxicology Community and how it complements other ELIXIR activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Martens
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Stierum
- Risk Analysis for Products In Development (RAPID), Netherlands Organisation for applied scientific research TNO, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands
| | - Emma L. Schymanski
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, 4367, Luxembourg
| | - Chris T. Evelo
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
- Maastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MaCSBio), Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 EN, The Netherlands
| | - Reza Aalizadeh
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Hristo Aladjov
- Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 1113, Bulgaria
| | - Kasia Arturi
- Department Environmental Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland
| | | | - Pavel Babica
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Karel Berka
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, 77146, Czech Republic
| | | | - Ludek Blaha
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Evan E. Bolton
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios Ε. Damalas
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Kirtan Dave
- School of Science, GSFC University, Gujarat, 391750, India
| | - Marco Dilger
- Forschungs- und Beratungsinstitut Gefahrstoffe (FoBiG) GmbH, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
| | | | - Daan P. Geerke
- AIMMS Division of Molecular Toxicology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Grafström
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Turku, 20520, Finland
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Alasdair Gray
- Department of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Henner Hollert
- Department Evolutionary Ecology & Environmental Toxicology (E3T), Goethe-University, Frankfurt, D-60438, Germany
| | | | - Danyel Jennen
- Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands
| | - Fabien Jourdan
- MetaboHUB, French metabolomics infrastructure in Metabolomics and Fluxomics, Toulouse, France
- Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Kahlem
- Scientific Network Management SL, Barcelona, 08015, Spain
| | - Jana Klanova
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jos Kleinjans
- Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands
| | - Todor Kondic
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, 4367, Luxembourg
| | - Boï Kone
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Malaria Research and Training Center, Bamako, BP:1805, Mali
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Uko Maran
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50411, Estonia
| | | | - Hervé Ménager
- Institut Français de Bioinformatique, Evry, F-91000, France
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Institut Pasteur, Paris, F-75015, France
| | - Steffen Neumann
- Research group Bioinformatics and Scientific Data, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, 06120, Germany
| | - Penny Nymark
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Herbert Oberacher
- Institute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria
| | - Noelia Ramirez
- Institut d'Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili-Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43007, Spain
| | | | - Philippe Rocca-Serra
- Data Readiness Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Reza M. Salek
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation, Lyon, 69372, France
| | - Brett Sallach
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5NG, UK
| | | | - Ferran Sanz
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, 08003, Spain
| | | | | | - Tobias Schulze
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, 04318, Germany
| | | | - Ola Spjuth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-75124, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Tedds
- ELIXIR Hub, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Nikolaos Thomaidis
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Ralf J.M. Weber
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Gerard J.P. van Westen
- Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden, 2333 CC, The Netherlands
| | - Craig E. Wheelock
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm SE-141-86, Sweden
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Antony J. Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | | | - Barbara Zdrazil
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Anže Županič
- Department Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
| | - Egon L. Willighagen
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Martens M, Stierum R, Schymanski EL, Evelo CT, Aalizadeh R, Aladjov H, Arturi K, Audouze K, Babica P, Berka K, Bessems J, Blaha L, Bolton EE, Cases M, Damalas DΕ, Dave K, Dilger M, Exner T, Geerke DP, Grafström R, Gray A, Hancock JM, Hollert H, Jeliazkova N, Jennen D, Jourdan F, Kahlem P, Klanova J, Kleinjans J, Kondic T, Kone B, Lynch I, Maran U, Martinez Cuesta S, Ménager H, Neumann S, Nymark P, Oberacher H, Ramirez N, Remy S, Rocca-Serra P, Salek RM, Sallach B, Sansone SA, Sanz F, Sarimveis H, Sarntivijai S, Schulze T, Slobodnik J, Spjuth O, Tedds J, Thomaidis N, Weber RJ, van Westen GJ, Wheelock CE, Williams AJ, Witters H, Zdrazil B, Županič A, Willighagen EL. ELIXIR and Toxicology: a community in development. F1000Res 2023; 10:ELIXIR-1129. [PMID: 37842337 PMCID: PMC10568213 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.74502.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Toxicology has been an active research field for many decades, with academic, industrial and government involvement. Modern omics and computational approaches are changing the field, from merely disease-specific observational models into target-specific predictive models. Traditionally, toxicology has strong links with other fields such as biology, chemistry, pharmacology and medicine. With the rise of synthetic and new engineered materials, alongside ongoing prioritisation needs in chemical risk assessment for existing chemicals, early predictive evaluations are becoming of utmost importance to both scientific and regulatory purposes. ELIXIR is an intergovernmental organisation that brings together life science resources from across Europe. To coordinate the linkage of various life science efforts around modern predictive toxicology, the establishment of a new ELIXIR Community is seen as instrumental. In the past few years, joint efforts, building on incidental overlap, have been piloted in the context of ELIXIR. For example, the EU-ToxRisk, diXa, HeCaToS, transQST, and the nanotoxicology community have worked with the ELIXIR TeSS, Bioschemas, and Compute Platforms and activities. In 2018, a core group of interested parties wrote a proposal, outlining a sketch of what this new ELIXIR Toxicology Community would look like. A recent workshop (held September 30th to October 1st, 2020) extended this into an ELIXIR Toxicology roadmap and a shortlist of limited investment-high gain collaborations to give body to this new community. This Whitepaper outlines the results of these efforts and defines our vision of the ELIXIR Toxicology Community and how it complements other ELIXIR activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Martens
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Stierum
- Risk Analysis for Products In Development (RAPID), Netherlands Organisation for applied scientific research TNO, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands
| | - Emma L. Schymanski
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, 4367, Luxembourg
| | - Chris T. Evelo
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
- Maastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MaCSBio), Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 EN, The Netherlands
| | - Reza Aalizadeh
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Hristo Aladjov
- Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 1113, Bulgaria
| | - Kasia Arturi
- Department Environmental Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland
| | | | - Pavel Babica
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Karel Berka
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, 77146, Czech Republic
| | | | - Ludek Blaha
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Evan E. Bolton
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios Ε. Damalas
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Kirtan Dave
- School of Science, GSFC University, Gujarat, 391750, India
| | - Marco Dilger
- Forschungs- und Beratungsinstitut Gefahrstoffe (FoBiG) GmbH, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
| | | | - Daan P. Geerke
- AIMMS Division of Molecular Toxicology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Grafström
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Turku, 20520, Finland
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Alasdair Gray
- Department of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Henner Hollert
- Department Evolutionary Ecology & Environmental Toxicology (E3T), Goethe-University, Frankfurt, D-60438, Germany
| | | | - Danyel Jennen
- Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands
| | - Fabien Jourdan
- MetaboHUB, French metabolomics infrastructure in Metabolomics and Fluxomics, Toulouse, France
- Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Kahlem
- Scientific Network Management SL, Barcelona, 08015, Spain
| | - Jana Klanova
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jos Kleinjans
- Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands
| | - Todor Kondic
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, 4367, Luxembourg
| | - Boï Kone
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Malaria Research and Training Center, Bamako, BP:1805, Mali
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Uko Maran
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50411, Estonia
| | | | - Hervé Ménager
- Institut Français de Bioinformatique, Evry, F-91000, France
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Institut Pasteur, Paris, F-75015, France
| | - Steffen Neumann
- Research group Bioinformatics and Scientific Data, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, 06120, Germany
| | - Penny Nymark
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Herbert Oberacher
- Institute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria
| | - Noelia Ramirez
- Institut d'Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili-Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43007, Spain
| | | | - Philippe Rocca-Serra
- Data Readiness Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Reza M. Salek
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation, Lyon, 69372, France
| | - Brett Sallach
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5NG, UK
| | | | - Ferran Sanz
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, 08003, Spain
| | | | | | - Tobias Schulze
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, 04318, Germany
| | | | - Ola Spjuth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-75124, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Tedds
- ELIXIR Hub, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Nikolaos Thomaidis
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 15771, Greece
| | - Ralf J.M. Weber
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Gerard J.P. van Westen
- Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden, 2333 CC, The Netherlands
| | - Craig E. Wheelock
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm SE-141-86, Sweden
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden
| | - Antony J. Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | | | - Barbara Zdrazil
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Anže Županič
- Department Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
| | - Egon L. Willighagen
- Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Buckley TJ, Egeghy PP, Isaacs K, Richard AM, Ring C, Sayre RR, Sobus JR, Thomas RS, Ulrich EM, Wambaugh JF, Williams AJ. Cutting-edge computational chemical exposure research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 178:108097. [PMID: 37478680 PMCID: PMC10588682 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Exposure science is evolving from its traditional "after the fact" and "one chemical at a time" approach to forecasting chemical exposures rapidly enough to keep pace with the constantly expanding landscape of chemicals and exposures. In this article, we provide an overview of the approaches, accomplishments, and plans for advancing computational exposure science within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development (EPA/ORD). First, to characterize the universe of chemicals in commerce and the environment, a carefully curated, web-accessible chemical resource has been created. This DSSTox database unambiguously identifies >1.2 million unique substances reflecting potential environmental and human exposures and includes computationally accessible links to each compound's corresponding data resources. Next, EPA is developing, applying, and evaluating predictive exposure models. These models increasingly rely on data, computational tools like quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models, and machine learning/artificial intelligence to provide timely and efficient prediction of chemical exposure (and associated uncertainty) for thousands of chemicals at a time. Integral to this modeling effort, EPA is developing data resources across the exposure continuum that includes application of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods providing measurement capability at scale with the number of chemicals in commerce. These research efforts are integrated and well-tailored to support population exposure assessment to prioritize chemicals for exposure as a critical input to risk management. In addition, the exposure forecasts will allow a wide variety of stakeholders to explore sustainable initiatives like green chemistry to achieve economic, social, and environmental prosperity and protection of future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Buckley
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States.
| | - Peter P Egeghy
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Kristin Isaacs
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Ann M Richard
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Caroline Ring
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Risa R Sayre
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Jon R Sobus
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Russell S Thomas
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Elin M Ulrich
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - John F Wambaugh
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Antony J Williams
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Olsen AK, Li D, Li L. Explore the Dosimetric Relationship between the Intake of Chemical Contaminants and Their Occurrence in Blood and Urine. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:9526-9537. [PMID: 37347917 PMCID: PMC10324601 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The dosimetric relationship between the human intake dose of a chemical contaminant (an "external dose") and its concentrations in bodily fluids such as blood and urine (related to an "internal dose"), often characterized by a dose-to-concentration ratio, has critical applications in exposure science, toxicology, and risk assessment, especially in the "new approach methods" era. However, there is a lack of a mechanistic, systematic understanding of how such a dosimetric relationship depends on fundamental chemical properties, such as partition coefficients and biotransformation half-lives. Here, we investigate this issue using a well-evaluated toxicokinetic model, which links external and internal doses by quantifying the absorption and elimination of chemicals. Results are visualized in a series of chemical partitioning space plots, whereby a chemical's dose-to-concentration ratio can be approximately predicted based on its partitioning between air, water, and octanol phases. Our results indicate that when taken in equal doses, chemicals with low volatility and moderate to high hydrophobicity exhibit the highest concentrations in the blood, and chemicals undergoing significant biotransformation tend to exhibit lower concentrations in comparison to their counterparts undergoing negligible biotransformation but possessing similar partitioning properties. Chemicals with high hydrophilicity have the highest concentrations in urine. Such revealed property dependence is similar for both adults and children and for individuals with normal body weights and with obesity. Overall, insights gained from this study are important in predicting blood and urinary concentrations from exposure information and in determining the exposure rate that produces the blood or urinary concentrations observed in biomonitoring studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K. Olsen
- School of Public Health, University
of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557-0274, United States
| | - Dingsheng Li
- School of Public Health, University
of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557-0274, United States
| | - Li Li
- School of Public Health, University
of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557-0274, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sayre RR, Setzer RW, Serre ML, Wambaugh JF. Characterizing surface water concentrations of hundreds of organic chemicals in United States for environmental risk prioritization. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2023; 33:610-619. [PMID: 36446910 PMCID: PMC10619030 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thousands of chemicals are observed in freshwater, typically at trace levels. Measurements are collected for different purposes, so sample characteristics vary. Due to inconsistent data availability for exposure and hazard, it is complex to prioritize which chemicals may pose risks. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the influence of data curation and statistical practices aggregating surface water measurements of organic chemicals into exposure distributions intended for prioritizing based on nation-scale potential risk. METHODS The Water Quality Portal includes millions of observations describing over 1700 chemicals in 93% of hydrologic subbasins across the United States. After filtering to maintain quality and applicability while including all possible samples, we compared concentrations across sample types. We evaluated statistical methods to estimate per-chemical distributions for chosen samples. Overlaps between resulting exposure ranges and distributions representing no-effect concentrations for multiple freshwater species were used to rank estimated chemical risks for further assessment. RESULTS When we apply explicit data quality and statistical assumptions, we find that there are 186 organic chemicals for which we can make screening-level estimates of surface water chemical concentration. Of the original 1700 observed chemicals, this number decreased primarily due to a predominance of censored values (that is, observations indicating concentrations too low to be measured). We further identify 423 chemicals where all measurements were censored but, through consideration of detection limits, risk might still be prioritized based on the detection limits themselves. In the final set of 1.5 million samples, the median environmental concentration of one chemical (acetic acid) exceeded the 5th percentile of no-effect concentrations for the most delicate freshwater species (the highest priority risk condition identified here), and a further 29 chemicals were identified for possible further evaluation based on a small margin between occurrence and toxicity values. SIGNIFICANCE This method shows the broad range of chemical concentrations seen for organic chemicals across the country and identifies methods of determining their central tendency, allowing for researchers to characterize higher-than-normal or lower-than-normal surface water conditions as well as providing an overall indication of the presence of organic chemicals in the United States. The highest chemical concentrations did not always indicate the highest-risk conditions. Even when accounting for the high level of uncertainty in these data due to differences in data collection and reporting across the set, some chemicals may still be categorized as higher environmental risk than others using this method, providing value to chemical safety decision makers and researchers by suggesting avenues for more focused investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa R Sayre
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - R Woodrow Setzer
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Marc L Serre
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nyffeler J, Willis C, Harris FR, Foster MJ, Chambers B, Culbreth M, Brockway RE, Davidson-Fritz S, Dawson D, Shah I, Friedman KP, Chang D, Everett LJ, Wambaugh JF, Patlewicz G, Harrill JA. Application of Cell Painting for chemical hazard evaluation in support of screening-level chemical assessments. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2023; 468:116513. [PMID: 37044265 PMCID: PMC11917499 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2023.116513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
'Cell Painting' is an imaging-based high-throughput phenotypic profiling (HTPP) method in which cultured cells are fluorescently labeled to visualize subcellular structures (i.e., nucleus, nucleoli, endoplasmic reticulum, cytoskeleton, Golgi apparatus / plasma membrane and mitochondria) and to quantify morphological changes in response to chemicals or other perturbagens. HTPP is a high-throughput and cost-effective bioactivity screening method that detects effects associated with many different molecular mechanisms in an untargeted manner, enabling rapid in vitro hazard assessment for thousands of chemicals. Here, 1201 chemicals from the ToxCast library were screened in concentration-response up to ∼100 μM in human U-2 OS cells using HTPP. A phenotype altering concentration (PAC) was estimated for chemicals active in the tested range. PACs tended to be higher than lower bound potency values estimated from a broad collection of targeted high-throughput assays, but lower than the threshold for cytotoxicity. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) was used to estimate administered equivalent doses (AEDs) based on PACs for comparison to human exposure predictions. AEDs for 18/412 chemicals overlapped with predicted human exposures. Phenotypic profile information was also leveraged to identify putative mechanisms of action and group chemicals. Of 58 known nuclear receptor modulators, only glucocorticoids and retinoids produced characteristic profiles; and both receptor types are expressed in U-2 OS cells. Thirteen chemicals with profile similarity to glucocorticoids were tested in a secondary screen and one chemical, pyrene, was confirmed by an orthogonal gene expression assay as a novel putative GR modulating chemical. Most active chemicals demonstrated profiles not associated with a known mechanism-of-action. However, many structurally related chemicals produced similar profiles, with exceptions such as diniconazole, whose profile differed from other active conazoles. Overall, the present study demonstrates how HTPP can be applied in screening-level chemical assessments through a series of examples and brief case studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nyffeler
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Postdoctoral Fellow, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Clinton Willis
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Felix R Harris
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) National Student Services Contractor, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - M J Foster
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) National Student Services Contractor, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Bryant Chambers
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Megan Culbreth
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Richard E Brockway
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) National Student Services Contractor, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of America
| | - Sarah Davidson-Fritz
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Daniel Dawson
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Dan Chang
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Logan J Everett
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Grace Patlewicz
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America
| | - Joshua A Harrill
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ateia M, Buren JV, Barrett W, Martin T, Back GG. Sunrise of PFAS Replacements: A Perspective on Fluorine-Free Foams. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING 2023; 11:7986-7996. [PMID: 37476647 PMCID: PMC10354943 DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
One type of firefighting foam, referred to as aqueous filmforming foams (AFFF), is known to contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The concerns raised with PFAS, and their potential environmental and health impacts, have led to a surge in research on fluorine-free alternatives both in the United States and globally. Particularly, in January 2023, a new military specification (MIL-PRF-32725) for fluorine-free foam was released in accordance with Congressional requirements for the U.S. Department of Defense. This paper provides a critical analysis of the present state of the various fluorine-free options that have been developed to date. A nuanced perspective of the challenges and opportunities of more sustainable replacements is explored by examining the performance, cost, and regulatory considerations associated with these fluorine-free alternatives. Ultimately, this evaluation shows that the transition to fluorine-free replacements is likely to be complex and multifaceted, requiring careful consideration of the trade-offs involved. Yet, the ongoing work will provide valuable insights for future research on alternatives to AFFF and enhancing the safety and sustainability of fire suppression systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ateia
- Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45204, United States; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States
| | - Jean Van Buren
- Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45204, United States
| | - William Barrett
- Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45204, United States
| | - Todd Martin
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45204, United States
| | - Gerard G Back
- Jensen Hughes, Inc., Halethorpe, Maryland 21227, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Minucci JM, Purucker ST, Isaacs KK, Wambaugh JF, Phillips KA. A Data-Driven Approach to Estimating Occupational Inhalation Exposure Using Workplace Compliance Data. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:5947-5956. [PMID: 36995295 PMCID: PMC10100548 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
A growing list of chemicals are approved for production and use in the United States and elsewhere, and new approaches are needed to rapidly assess the potential exposure and health hazard posed by these substances. Here, we present a high-throughput, data-driven approach that will aid in estimating occupational exposure using a database of over 1.5 million observations of chemical concentrations in U.S. workplace air samples. We fit a Bayesian hierarchical model that uses industry type and the physicochemical properties of a substance to predict the distribution of workplace air concentrations. This model substantially outperforms a null model when predicting whether a substance will be detected in an air sample, and if so at what concentration, with 75.9% classification accuracy and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.00 log10 mg m-3 when applied to a held-out test set of substances. This modeling framework can be used to predict air concentration distributions for new substances, which we demonstrate by making predictions for 5587 new substance-by-workplace-type pairs reported in the US EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) industrial use database. It also allows for improved consideration of occupational exposure within the context of high-throughput, risk-based chemical prioritization efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M. Minucci
- Center
for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research
and Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - S. Thomas Purucker
- Center
for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and
Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency, 109 TW Alexander
Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - Kristin K. Isaacs
- Center
for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and
Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency, 109 TW Alexander
Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - John F. Wambaugh
- Center
for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and
Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency, 109 TW Alexander
Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - Katherine A. Phillips
- Center
for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and
Development, US Environmental Protection
Agency, 109 TW Alexander
Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hernandez-Betancur JD, Ruiz-Mercado GJ, Martin M. Predicting Chemical End-of-Life Scenarios Using Structure-Based Classification Models. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING 2023; 11:3594-3602. [PMID: 36911873 PMCID: PMC9993395 DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Analyzing chemicals and their effects on the environment from a life cycle viewpoint can produce a thorough analysis that takes end-of-life (EoL) activities into account. Chemical risk assessment, predicting environmental discharges, and finding EoL paths and exposure scenarios all depend on chemical flow data availability. However, it is challenging to gain access to such data and systematically determine EoL activities and potential chemical exposure scenarios. As a result, this work creates quantitative structure-transfer relationship (QSTR) models for aiding environmental managment decision-making based on chemical structure-based machine learning (ML) models to predict potential industrial EoL activities, chemical flow allocation, environmental releases, and exposure routes. Further multi-label classification methods may improve the predictability of QSTR models according to the ML experiment tracking. The developed QSTR models will assist stakeholders in predicting and comprehending potential EoL management activities and recycling loops, enabling environmental decision-making and EoL exposure assessment for new or existing chemicals in the global marketplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerardo J. Ruiz-Mercado
- Office
of Research & Development, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, United States
- Chemical
Engineering Graduate Program, Universidad
del Atlántico, Puerto Colombia 080007, Colombia
| | - Mariano Martin
- Department
of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Salamanca 37008, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhao F, Li L, Lin P, Chen Y, Xing S, Du H, Wang Z, Yang J, Huan T, Long C, Zhang L, Wang B, Fang M. HExpPredict: In Vivo Exposure Prediction of Human Blood Exposome Using a Random Forest Model and Its Application in Chemical Risk Prioritization. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2023; 131:37009. [PMID: 36913238 PMCID: PMC10010393 DOI: 10.1289/ehp11305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to many substances in the human exposome, there is a dearth of exposure and toxicity information available to assess potential health risks. Quantification of all trace organics in the biological fluids seems impossible and costly, regardless of the high individual exposure variability. We hypothesized that the blood concentration (CB) of organic pollutants could be predicted via their exposure and chemical properties. Developing a prediction model on the annotation of chemicals in human blood can provide new insight into the distribution and extent of exposures to a wide range of chemicals in humans. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict blood concentrations (CBs) of chemicals and prioritize chemicals of health concern. METHODS We curated the CBs of compounds mostly measured at population levels and developed an ML model for chemical CB predictions by considering chemical daily exposure (DE) and exposure pathway indicators (δij), half-lives (t1/2), and volume of distribution (Vd). Three ML models, including random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR) were compared. The toxicity potential or prioritization of each chemical was represented as a bioanalytical equivalency (BEQ) and its percentage (BEQ%) estimated based on the predicted CB and ToxCast bioactivity data. We also retrieved the top 25 most active chemicals in each assay to further observe changes in the BEQ% after the exclusion of the drugs and endogenous substances. RESULTS We curated the CBs of 216 compounds primarily measured at population levels. RF outperformed the ANN and SVF models with the root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.66 and 2.07μM, the mean absolute error (MAE) values of 1.28 and 1.56μM, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.29 and 0.23, and R2 of 0.80 and 0.72 across test and testing sets. Subsequently, the human CBs of 7,858 ToxCast chemicals were successfully predicted, ranging from 1.29×10-6 to 1.79×10-2 μM. The predicted CBs were then combined with ToxCast in vitro bioassays to prioritize the ToxCast chemicals across 12 in vitro assays with important toxicological end points. It is interesting that we found the most active compounds to be food additives and pesticides rather than widely monitored environmental pollutants. DISCUSSION We have shown that the accurate prediction of "internal exposure" from "external exposure" is possible, and this result can be quite useful in the risk prioritization. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11305.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanrong Zhao
- Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Li Li
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Penghui Lin
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Yue Chen
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Shipei Xing
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Huili Du
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Zheng Wang
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Junjie Yang
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Tao Huan
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cheng Long
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Limao Zhang
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Bin Wang
- Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, Peking University/Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Mingliang Fang
- Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Aurisano N, Jolliet O, Chiu WA, Judson R, Jang S, Unnikrishnan A, Kosnik MB, Fantke P. Probabilistic Points of Departure and Reference Doses for Characterizing Human Noncancer and Developmental/Reproductive Effects for 10,145 Chemicals. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2023; 131:37016. [PMID: 36989077 PMCID: PMC10056221 DOI: 10.1289/ehp11524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regulatory toxicity values used to assess and manage chemical risks rely on the determination of the point of departure (POD) for a critical effect, which results from a comprehensive and systematic assessment of available toxicity studies. However, regulatory assessments are only available for a small fraction of chemicals. OBJECTIVES Using in vivo experimental animal data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxicity Value Database, we developed a semiautomated approach to determine surrogate oral route PODs, and corresponding toxicity values where regulatory assessments are unavailable. METHODS We developed a curated data set restricted to effect levels, exposure routes, study designs, and species relevant for deriving toxicity values. Effect levels were adjusted to chronic human equivalent benchmark doses (BMDh). We hypothesized that a quantile of the BMDh distribution could serve as a surrogate POD and determined the appropriate quantile by calibration to regulatory PODs. Finally, we characterized uncertainties around the surrogate PODs from intra- and interstudy variability and derived probabilistic toxicity values using a standardized workflow. RESULTS The BMDh distribution for each chemical was adequately fit by a lognormal distribution, and the 25th percentile best predicted the available regulatory PODs [R2≥0.78, residual standard error (RSE)≤0.53 log10 units]. We derived surrogate PODs for 10,145 chemicals from the curated data set, differentiating between general noncancer and reproductive/developmental effects, with typical uncertainties (at 95% confidence) of a factor of 10 and 12, respectively. From these PODs, probabilistic reference doses (1% incidence at 95% confidence), as well as human population effect doses (10% incidence), were derived. DISCUSSION In providing surrogate PODs calibrated to regulatory values and deriving corresponding toxicity values, we have substantially expanded the coverage of chemicals from 744 to 8,023 for general noncancer effects, and from 41 to 6,697 for reproductive/developmental effects. These results can be used across various risk assessment and risk management contexts, from hazardous site and life cycle impact assessments to chemical prioritization and substitution. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11524.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Aurisano
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Olivier Jolliet
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Weihsueh A. Chiu
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Richard Judson
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Suji Jang
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Aswani Unnikrishnan
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marissa B. Kosnik
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Peter Fantke
- Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Price PS. The Hazard Index at thirty-seven: new science new insights. CURRENT OPINION IN TOXICOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
39
|
Beal MA, Audebert M, Barton-Maclaren T, Battaion H, Bemis JC, Cao X, Chen C, Dertinger SD, Froetschl R, Guo X, Johnson G, Hendriks G, Khoury L, Long AS, Pfuhler S, Settivari RS, Wickramasuriya S, White P. Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of genotoxicity data provides protective estimates of in vivo dose. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 2023; 64:105-122. [PMID: 36495195 DOI: 10.1002/em.22521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Genotoxicity assessment is a critical component in the development and evaluation of chemicals. Traditional genotoxicity assays (i.e., mutagenicity, clastogenicity, and aneugenicity) have been limited to dichotomous hazard classification, while other toxicity endpoints are assessed through quantitative determination of points-of-departures (PODs) for setting exposure limits. The more recent higher-throughput in vitro genotoxicity assays, many of which also provide mechanistic information, offer a powerful approach for determining defined PODs for potency ranking and risk assessment. In order to obtain relevant human dose context from the in vitro assays, in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) models are required to determine what dose would elicit a concentration in the body demonstrated to be genotoxic using in vitro assays. Previous work has demonstrated that application of IVIVE models to in vitro bioactivity data can provide PODs that are protective of human health, but there has been no evaluation of how these models perform with in vitro genotoxicity data. Thus, the Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee, under the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, conducted a case study on 31 reference chemicals to evaluate the performance of IVIVE application to genotoxicity data. The results demonstrate that for most chemicals considered here (20/31), the PODs derived from in vitro data and IVIVE are health protective relative to in vivo PODs from animal studies. PODs were also protective by assay target: mutations (8/13 chemicals), micronuclei (9/12), and aneugenicity markers (4/4). It is envisioned that this novel testing strategy could enhance prioritization, rapid screening, and risk assessment of genotoxic chemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Beal
- Bureau of Chemical Safety, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Audebert
- Toxalim UMR1331, Toulouse University, INRAE, Toulouse, France
| | - Tara Barton-Maclaren
- Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hannah Battaion
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Xuefei Cao
- Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Connie Chen
- Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | | | - Xiaoqing Guo
- Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alexandra S Long
- Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stefan Pfuhler
- Global Product Stewardship, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Raja S Settivari
- Mammalian Toxicology Center, Corteva Agriscience, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Shamika Wickramasuriya
- Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul White
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Eccles KM, Karmaus AL, Kleinstreuer NC, Parham F, Rider CV, Wambaugh JF, Messier KP. A geospatial modeling approach to quantifying the risk of exposure to environmental chemical mixtures via a common molecular target. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 855:158905. [PMID: 36152849 PMCID: PMC9979101 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
In the real world, individuals are exposed to chemicals from sources that vary over space and time. However, traditional risk assessments based on in vivo animal studies typically use a chemical-by-chemical approach and apical disease endpoints. New approach methodologies (NAMs) in toxicology, such as in vitro high-throughput (HTS) assays generated in Tox21 and ToxCast, can more readily provide mechanistic chemical hazard information for chemicals with no existing data than in vivo methods. In this paper, we establish a workflow to assess the joint action of 41 modeled ambient chemical exposures in the air from the USA-wide National Air Toxics Assessment by integrating human exposures with hazard data from curated HTS (cHTS) assays to identify counties where exposure to the local chemical mixture may perturb a common biological target. We exemplify this proof-of-concept using CYP1A1 mRNA up-regulation. We first estimate internal exposure and then convert the inhaled concentration to a steady state plasma concentration using physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling parameterized with county-specific information on ages and body weights. We then use the estimated blood plasma concentration and the concentration-response curve from the in vitro cHTS assay to determine the chemical-specific effects of the mixture components. Three mixture modeling methods were used to estimate the joint effect from exposure to the chemical mixture on the activity levels, which were geospatially mapped. Finally, a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis was performed to quantify the influence of each parameter on the combined effects. This workflow demonstrates how NAMs can be used to predict early-stage biological perturbations that can lead to adverse health outcomes that result from exposure to chemical mixtures. As a result, this work will advance mixture risk assessment and other early events in the effects of chemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Eccles
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Division of the Translational Toxicology, Durham, USA
| | - Agnes L Karmaus
- Integrated Laboratory Systems, an Inotiv Company, Morrisville, NC, USA
| | - Nicole C Kleinstreuer
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Division of the Translational Toxicology, Durham, USA
| | - Fred Parham
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Division of the Translational Toxicology, Durham, USA
| | - Cynthia V Rider
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Division of the Translational Toxicology, Durham, USA
| | - John F Wambaugh
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Durham, USA
| | - Kyle P Messier
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Division of the Translational Toxicology, Durham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Braun G, Escher BI. Prioritization of mixtures of neurotoxic chemicals for biomonitoring using high-throughput toxicokinetics and mixture toxicity modeling. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 171:107680. [PMID: 36502700 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Modern society continues to pollute the environment with larger quantities of chemicals that have also become more structurally and functionally diverse. Risk assessment of chemicals can hardly keep up with the sheer numbers that lead to complex mixtures of increasing chemical diversity including new chemicals, substitution products on top of still abundant legacy compounds. Fortunately, over the last years computational tools have helped us to identify and prioritize chemicals of concern. These include toxicokinetic models to predict exposure to chemicals as well as new approach methodologies such as in-vitro bioassays to address toxicodynamic effects. Combined, they allow for a prediction of mixtures and their respective effects and help overcome the lack of data we face for many chemicals. In this study we propose a high-throughput approach using experimental and predicted exposure, toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to simulate mixtures, to which a virtual population is exposed to and predict their mixture effects. The general workflow is adaptable for any type of toxicity, but we demonstrated its applicability with a case study on neurotoxicity. If no experimental data for neurotoxicity were available, we used baseline toxicity predictions as a surrogate. Baseline toxicity is the minimal toxicity any chemical has and might underestimate the true contribution to the mixture effect but many neurotoxicants are not by orders of magnitude more potent than baseline toxicity. Therefore, including baseline-toxic effects in mixture simulations yields a more realistic picture than excluding them in mixture simulations. This workflow did not only correctly identify and prioritize known chemicals of concern like benzothiazoles, organochlorine pesticides and plasticizers but we were also able to identify new potential neurotoxicants that we recommend to include in future biomonitoring studies and if found in humans, to also include in neurotoxicity screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Braun
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Beate I Escher
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany; Environmental Toxicology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chepelev N, Long AS, Beal M, Barton‐Maclaren T, Johnson G, Dearfield KL, Roberts DJ, van Benthem J, White P. Establishing a quantitative framework for regulatory interpretation of genetic toxicity dose-response data: Margin of exposure case study of 48 compounds with both in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity dose-response data. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 2023; 64:4-15. [PMID: 36345771 PMCID: PMC10107494 DOI: 10.1002/em.22517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative relationships between carcinogenic potency and mutagenic potency have been previously examined using a benchmark dose (BMD)-based approach. We extended those analyses by using human exposure data for 48 compounds to calculate carcinogenicity-derived and genotoxicity-derived margin of exposure values (MOEs) that can be used to prioritize substances for risk management. MOEs for 16 of the 48 compounds were below 10,000, and consequently highlighted for regulatory concern. Of these, 15 were highlighted using genotoxicity-derived (micronucleus [MN] dose-response data) MOEs. A total of 13 compounds were highlighted using carcinogenicity-derived MOEs; 12 compounds were overlapping. MOEs were also calculated using transgenic rodent (TGR) mutagenicity data. For 10 of the 12 compounds examined using TGR data, the results similarly revealed that mutagenicity-derived MOEs yield regulatory decisions that correspond with those based on carcinogenicity-derived MOEs. The effect of benchmark response (BMR) on MOE determination was also examined. Reinterpretation of the analyses using a BMR of 50% indicated that four out of 15 compounds prioritized using MN-derived MOEs based on a default BMR of 5% would have been missed. The results indicate that regulatory decisions based on in vivo genotoxicity dose-response data would be consistent with those based on carcinogenicity dose-response data; in some cases, genotoxicity-based decisions would be more conservative. Going forward, and in the absence of carcinogenicity data, in vivo genotoxicity assays (MN and TGR) can be used to effectively prioritize substances for regulatory action. Routine use of the MOE approach necessitates the availability of reliable human exposure estimates, and consensus regarding appropriate BMRs for genotoxicity endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Chepelev
- Environmental Health Science and Research BureauHealth CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Alexandra S. Long
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Marc Beal
- Existing Substances Risk Assessment BureauHealth CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - George Johnson
- Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | | | | | - Jan van Benthem
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)BilthovenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul White
- Environmental Health Science and Research BureauHealth CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Berthiaume A, Arnot JA, Toose L. Risk-based prioritization of organic substances in the Canadian National Pollutant Release Inventory using an evaluative regional-scale multimedia mass balance model. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 2022; 18:1722-1732. [PMID: 35238162 PMCID: PMC9790719 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) is a Canadian inventory of facility-reported data on releases, transfers, and disposals of over 300 pollutants, but it does not contain information on chemical properties or other characteristics critical to understanding environmental and human health risks. To reconcile this gap, we use the Risk Assessment IDentification And Ranking (RAIDAR) model to integrate NPRI release data with chemical property information in a multimedia mass balance model to combine exposure estimates with toxicity hazard data yielding an estimate of risk for 198 NPRI organic substances reported in 2010-2019. The presented case study further corroborates the hypothesis that risk-based ranking gives rise to different chemical priorities versus ranking based on release quantity alone. Chemicals like propane and hexane (except n-hexane) are in the top 10 highest-ranked organic substances based on emission quantities reported to NPRI but are ranked outside the top 10 based on corresponding regional-scale risk estimates. On the contrary, dioxins and furans are ranked very low based on emissions quantities reported to NPRI but are ranked higher based on corresponding risk estimates. The results also suggest that although quantities of some NPRI organic pollutant releases change over time, the ensuing risk estimates are not always directly proportional to these changes. This can be explained by changes in mode of entry to the environment that can influence the overall fate and exposure of the same chemicals, highlighting the complex dynamics that can occur when simulating fate and risk as opposed to quantity alone. Limitations are discussed and recommendations are provided for improving the priority setting methods, including reducing the uncertainty of the NPRI data and the need for multimedia models to address point source emissions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1722-1732. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Berthiaume
- Science and Risk Assessment DirectorateEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGatineauQuebecCanada
| | - Jon A. Arnot
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc.TorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Physical and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Liisa Toose
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc.TorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stanfield Z, Setzer RW, Hull V, Sayre RR, Isaacs KK, Wambaugh JF. Bayesian inference of chemical exposures from NHANES urine biomonitoring data. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:833-846. [PMID: 35978002 PMCID: PMC9979158 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00459-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowing which environmental chemicals contribute to metabolites observed in humans is necessary for meaningful estimates of exposure and risk from biomonitoring data. OBJECTIVE Employ a modeling approach that combines biomonitoring data with chemical metabolism information to produce chemical exposure intake rate estimates with well-quantified uncertainty. METHODS Bayesian methodology was used to infer ranges of exposure for parent chemicals of biomarkers measured in urine samples from the U.S population by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Metabolites were probabilistically linked to parent chemicals using the NHANES reports and text mining of PubMed abstracts. RESULTS Chemical exposures were estimated for various population groups and translated to risk-based prioritization using toxicokinetic (TK) modeling and experimental data. Exposure estimates were investigated more closely for children aged 3 to 5 years, a population group that debuted with the 2015-2016 NHANES cohort. SIGNIFICANCE The methods described here have been compiled into an R package, bayesmarker, and made publicly available on GitHub. These inferred exposures, when coupled with predicted toxic doses via high throughput TK, can help aid in the identification of public health priority chemicals via risk-based bioactivity-to-exposure ratios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Stanfield
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - R Woodrow Setzer
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Victoria Hull
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA
| | - Risa R Sayre
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sabbioni G, Castaño A, Esteban López M, Göen T, Mol H, Riou M, Tagne-Fotso R. Literature review and evaluation of biomarkers, matrices and analytical methods for chemicals selected in the research program Human Biomonitoring for the European Union (HBM4EU). ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 169:107458. [PMID: 36179646 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Humans are potentially exposed to a large amount of chemicals present in the environment and in the workplace. In the European Human Biomonitoring initiative (Human Biomonitoring for the European Union = HBM4EU), acrylamide, mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1, deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B1), diisocyanates (4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate), and pyrethroids were included among the prioritized chemicals of concern for human health. For the present literature review, the analytical methods used in worldwide biomonitoring studies for these compounds were collected and presented in comprehensive tables, including the following parameter: determined biomarker, matrix, sample amount, work-up procedure, available laboratory quality assurance and quality assessment information, analytical techniques, and limit of detection. Based on the data presented in these tables, the most suitable methods were recommended. According to the paradigm of biomonitoring, the information about two different biomarkers of exposure was evaluated: a) internal dose = parent compounds and metabolites in urine and blood; and b) the biologically effective = dose measured as blood protein adducts. Urine was the preferred matrix used for deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B1, and pyrethroids (biomarkers of internal dose). Markers of the biological effective dose were determined as hemoglobin adducts for diisocyanates and acrylamide, and as serum-albumin-adducts of aflatoxin B1 and diisocyanates. The analyses and quantitation of the protein adducts in blood or the metabolites in urine were mostly performed with LC-MS/MS or GC-MS in the presence of isotope-labeled internal standards. This review also addresses the critical aspects of the application, use and selection of biomarkers. For future biomonitoring studies, a more comprehensive approach is discussed to broaden the selection of compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Sabbioni
- Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Research and Transfer Service, Lugano, Switzerland; Institute of Environmental and Occupational Toxicology, Airolo, Switzerland; Walther-Straub-Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Argelia Castaño
- National Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Marta Esteban López
- National Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Thomas Göen
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (IPASUM), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Hans Mol
- Wageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Margaux Riou
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Santé publique France, The National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
| | - Romuald Tagne-Fotso
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Santé publique France, The National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Arnot JA, Toose L, Armitage JM, Sangion A, Looky A, Brown TN, Li L, Becker RA. Developing an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC). JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:877-884. [PMID: 36347933 PMCID: PMC9731903 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00494-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approaches are used for chemical safety assessment and risk-based priority setting for data poor chemicals. TTCs are derived from in vivo No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) datasets involving an external administered dose from a single exposure route, e.g., oral intake rate. Thus, a route-specific TTC can only be compared to a route-specific exposure estimate and such TTCs cannot be used for other exposure scenarios such as aggregate exposures. OBJECTIVE Develop and apply a method for deriving internal TTCs (iTTCs) that can be used in chemical assessments for multiple route-specific exposures (e.g., oral, inhalation or dermal) or aggregate exposures. METHODS Chemical-specific toxicokinetics (TK) data and models are applied to calculate internal concentrations (whole-body and blood) from the reported administered oral dose NOELs used to derive the Munro TTCs. The new iTTCs are calculated from the 5th percentile of cumulative distributions of internal NOELs and the commonly applied uncertainty factor of 100 to extrapolate animal testing data for applications in human health assessment. RESULTS The new iTTCs for whole-body and blood are 0.5 nmol/kg and 0.1 nmol/L, respectively. Because the iTTCs are expressed on a molar basis they are readily converted to chemical mass iTTCs using the molar mass of the chemical of interest. For example, the median molar mass in the dataset is 220 g/mol corresponding to an iTTC of 22 ng/L-blood (22 pg/mL-blood). The iTTCs are considered broadly applicable for many organic chemicals except those that are genotoxic or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. The new iTTCs can be compared with measured or estimated whole-body or blood exposure concentrations for chemical safety screening and priority-setting. SIGNIFICANCE Existing Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approaches are limited in their applications for route-specific exposure scenarios only and are not suitable for chemical risk and safety assessments under conditions of aggregate exposure. New internal Threshold of Toxicological Concern (iTTC) values are developed to address data gaps in chemical safety estimation for multi-route and aggregate exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon A Arnot
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Liisa Toose
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alessandro Sangion
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Trevor N Brown
- ARC Arnot Research and Consulting Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Li Li
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wambaugh JF, Rager JE. Exposure forecasting - ExpoCast - for data-poor chemicals in commerce and the environment. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:783-793. [PMID: 36347934 PMCID: PMC9742338 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00492-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Estimates of exposure are critical to prioritize and assess chemicals based on risk posed to public health and the environment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for regulating thousands of chemicals in commerce and the environment for which exposure data are limited. Since 2009 the EPA's ExpoCast ("Exposure Forecasting") project has sought to develop the data, tools, and evaluation approaches required to generate rapid and scientifically defensible exposure predictions for the full universe of existing and proposed commercial chemicals. This review article aims to summarize issues in exposure science that have been addressed through initiatives affiliated with ExpoCast. ExpoCast research has generally focused on chemical exposure as a statistical systems problem intended to inform thousands of chemicals. The project exists as a companion to EPA's ToxCast ("Toxicity Forecasting") project which has used in vitro high-throughput screening technologies to characterize potential hazard posed by thousands of chemicals for which there are limited toxicity data. Rapid prediction of chemical exposures and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of ToxCast data allow for prioritization based upon risk of adverse outcomes due to environmental chemical exposure. ExpoCast has developed (1) integrated modeling approaches to reliably predict exposure and IVIVE dose, (2) highly efficient screening tools for chemical prioritization, (3) efficient and affordable tools for generating new exposure and dose data, and (4) easily accessible exposure databases. The development of new exposure models and databases along with the application of technologies like non-targeted analysis and machine learning have transformed exposure science for data-poor chemicals. By developing high-throughput tools for chemical exposure analytics and translating those tools into public health decisions ExpoCast research has served as a crucible for identifying and addressing exposure science knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
- Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Koval LE, Dionisio KL, Friedman KP, Isaacs KK, Rager JE. Environmental mixtures and breast cancer: identifying co-exposure patterns between understudied vs breast cancer-associated chemicals using chemical inventory informatics. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:794-807. [PMID: 35710593 DOI: 10.15139/s3/umpckw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evidence linking environmental chemicals to breast cancer is growing, mixtures-based exposure evaluations are lacking. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify environmental chemicals in use inventories that co-occur and share properties with chemicals that have association with breast cancer, highlighting exposure combinations that may alter disease risk. METHODS The occurrence of chemicals within chemical use categories was characterized using the Chemical and Products Database. Co-exposure patterns were evaluated for chemicals that have an association with breast cancer (BC), no known association (NBC), and understudied chemicals (UC) identified through query of the Silent Spring Institute's Mammary Carcinogens Review Database and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxicity Reference Database. UCs were ranked based on structure and physicochemical similarities and co-occurrence patterns with BCs within environmentally relevant exposure sources. RESULTS A total of 6793 chemicals had data available for exposure source occurrence analyses. 50 top-ranking UCs spanning five clusters of co-occurring chemicals were prioritized, based on shared properties with co-occuring BCs, including chemicals used in food production and consumer/personal care products, as well as potential endocrine system modulators. SIGNIFICANCE Results highlight important co-exposure conditions that are likely prevalent within our everyday environments that warrant further evaluation for possible breast cancer risk. IMPACT STATEMENT Most environmental studies on breast cancer have focused on evaluating relationships between individual, well-known chemicals and breast cancer risk. This study set out to expand this research field by identifying understudied chemicals and mixtures that may occur in everyday environments due to their patterns of commercial use. Analyses focused on those that co-occur alongside chemicals associated with breast cancer, based upon in silico chemical database querying and analysis. Particularly in instances when understudied chemicals share physicochemical properties and structural features with carcinogens, these chemical mixtures represent conditions that should be studied in future clinical, epidemiological, and toxicological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Koval
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- The Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kathie L Dionisio
- Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- The Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Koval LE, Dionisio KL, Friedman KP, Isaacs KK, Rager JE. Environmental mixtures and breast cancer: identifying co-exposure patterns between understudied vs breast cancer-associated chemicals using chemical inventory informatics. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:794-807. [PMID: 35710593 PMCID: PMC9742149 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00451-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evidence linking environmental chemicals to breast cancer is growing, mixtures-based exposure evaluations are lacking. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify environmental chemicals in use inventories that co-occur and share properties with chemicals that have association with breast cancer, highlighting exposure combinations that may alter disease risk. METHODS The occurrence of chemicals within chemical use categories was characterized using the Chemical and Products Database. Co-exposure patterns were evaluated for chemicals that have an association with breast cancer (BC), no known association (NBC), and understudied chemicals (UC) identified through query of the Silent Spring Institute's Mammary Carcinogens Review Database and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxicity Reference Database. UCs were ranked based on structure and physicochemical similarities and co-occurrence patterns with BCs within environmentally relevant exposure sources. RESULTS A total of 6793 chemicals had data available for exposure source occurrence analyses. 50 top-ranking UCs spanning five clusters of co-occurring chemicals were prioritized, based on shared properties with co-occuring BCs, including chemicals used in food production and consumer/personal care products, as well as potential endocrine system modulators. SIGNIFICANCE Results highlight important co-exposure conditions that are likely prevalent within our everyday environments that warrant further evaluation for possible breast cancer risk. IMPACT STATEMENT Most environmental studies on breast cancer have focused on evaluating relationships between individual, well-known chemicals and breast cancer risk. This study set out to expand this research field by identifying understudied chemicals and mixtures that may occur in everyday environments due to their patterns of commercial use. Analyses focused on those that co-occur alongside chemicals associated with breast cancer, based upon in silico chemical database querying and analysis. Particularly in instances when understudied chemicals share physicochemical properties and structural features with carcinogens, these chemical mixtures represent conditions that should be studied in future clinical, epidemiological, and toxicological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Koval
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- The Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kathie L Dionisio
- Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- The Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Isaacs KK, Egeghy P, Dionisio KL, Phillips KA, Zidek A, Ring C, Sobus JR, Ulrich EM, Wetmore BA, Williams AJ, Wambaugh JF. The chemical landscape of high-throughput new approach methodologies for exposure. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:820-832. [PMID: 36435938 PMCID: PMC9882966 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00496-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The rapid characterization of risk to humans and ecosystems from exogenous chemicals requires information on both hazard and exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program and the interagency Tox21 initiative have screened thousands of chemicals in various high-throughput (HT) assay systems for in vitro bioactivity. EPA's ExpoCast program is developing complementary HT methods for characterizing the human and ecological exposures necessary to interpret HT hazard data in a real-world risk context. These new approach methodologies (NAMs) for exposure include computational and analytical tools for characterizing multiple components of the complex pathways chemicals take from their source to human and ecological receptors. Here, we analyze the landscape of exposure NAMs developed in ExpoCast in the context of various chemical lists of scientific and regulatory interest, including the ToxCast and Tox21 libraries and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) inventory. We examine the landscape of traditional and exposure NAM data covering chemical use, emission, environmental fate, toxicokinetics, and ultimately external and internal exposure. We consider new chemical descriptors, machine learning models that draw inferences from existing data, high-throughput exposure models, statistical frameworks that integrate multiple model predictions, and non-targeted analytical screening methods that generate new HT monitoring information. We demonstrate that exposure NAMs drastically improve the coverage of the chemical landscape compared to traditional approaches and recommend a set of research activities to further expand the development of HT exposure data for application to risk characterization. Continuing to develop exposure NAMs to fill priority data gaps identified here will improve the availability and defensibility of risk-based metrics for use in chemical prioritization and screening. IMPACT: This analysis describes the current state of exposure assessment-based new approach methodologies across varied chemical landscapes and provides recommendations for filling key data gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | - Peter Egeghy
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kathie L Dionisio
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Katherine A Phillips
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Angelika Zidek
- Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Caroline Ring
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Jon R Sobus
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Elin M Ulrich
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Barbara A Wetmore
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Antony J Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|