Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP

Application of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis System for the Biosynthesis of l-Theanine

l-Theanine, as an active component of the leaves of the tea plant, possesses many health benefits and broad applications. Chemical synthesis of l-theanine is possible; however, this method generates chiral compounds and needs further isolation of the pure l-isoform. Heterologous biosynthesis is an alternative strategy, but one main limitation is the toxicity of the substrate ethylamine on microbial host cells. In this study, we introduced a cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) system for l-theanine production. The CFPS expressed l-theanine synthetase 2 from Camellia sinensis (CsTS2) could produce l-theanine at a concentration of 11.31 μM after 32 h of the synthesis reaction. In addition, three isozymes from microorganisms were expressed in CFPS for l-theanine biosynthesis. The γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase from Escherichia coli could produce l-theanine at the highest concentration of 302.96 μM after 24 h of reaction. Furthermore, CFPS was used to validate a hypothetical two-step l-theanine biosynthetic pathway consisting of the l-alanine decarboxylase from C. sinensis (CsAD) and multiple l-theanine synthases. Among them, the combination of CsAD and the l-glutamine synthetase from Pseudomonas taetrolens (PtGS) could synthesize l-theanine at the highest concentration of 13.42 μM. Then, we constructed an engineered E. coli strain overexpressed CsAD and PtGS to further confirm the l-theanine biosynthesis ability in living cells. This engineered E. coli strain could convert l-alanine and l-glutamate in the medium to l-theanine at a concentration of 3.82 mM after 72 h of fermentation. Taken together, these results demonstrated that the CFPS system can be used to produce the l-theanine through the two-step l-theanine biosynthesis pathway, indicating the potential application of CFPS for the biosynthesis of other active compounds.

Chaperonin-Based Biolayer Interferometry To Assess the Kinetic Stability of Metastable, Aggregation-Prone Proteins

Stabilizing the folded state of metastable and/or aggregation-prone proteins through exogenous ligand binding is an appealing strategy for decreasing disease pathologies caused by protein folding defects or deleterious kinetic transitions. Current methods of examining binding of a ligand to these marginally stable native states are limited because protein aggregation typically interferes with analysis. Here, we describe a rapid method for assessing the kinetic stability of folded proteins and monitoring the effects of ligand stabilization for both intrinsically stable proteins (monomers, oligomers, and multidomain proteins) and metastable proteins (e.g., low Tm) that uses a new GroEL chaperonin-based biolayer interferometry (BLI) denaturant pulse platform. A kinetically controlled denaturation isotherm is generated by exposing a target protein, immobilized on a BLI biosensor, to increasing denaturant concentrations (urea or GuHCl) in a pulsatile manner to induce partial or complete unfolding of the attached protein population. Following the rapid removal of the denaturant, the extent of hydrophobic unfolded/partially folded species that remains is detected by an increased level of GroEL binding. Because this kinetic denaturant pulse is brief, the amplitude of binding of GroEL to the immobilized protein depends on the duration of the exposure to the denaturant, the concentration of the denaturant, wash times, and the underlying protein unfolding-refolding kinetics; fixing all other parameters and plotting the GroEL binding amplitude versus denaturant pulse concentration result in a kinetically controlled denaturation isotherm. When folding osmolytes or stabilizing ligands are added to the immobilized target proteins before and during the denaturant pulse, the diminished population of unfolded/partially folded protein manifests as a decreased level of GroEL binding and/or a marked shift in these kinetically controlled denaturation profiles to higher denaturant concentrations. This particular platform approach can be used to identify small molecules and/or solution conditions that can stabilize or destabilize thermally stable proteins, multidomain proteins, oligomeric proteins, and, most importantly, aggregation-prone metastable proteins.

Protein folding on biosensor tips: folding of maltodextrin glucosidase monitored by its interactions with GroEL

Protein folding has been extensively studied for the past six decades by employing solution-based methods such as solubility, enzymatic activity, secondary structure analysis, and analytical methods like FRET, NMR, and HD exchange. However, for rapid analysis of the folding process, solution-based approaches are often plagued with aggregation side reactions resulting in poor yields. In this work, we demonstrate that a bio-layer interferometry (BLI) chaperonin detection system can identify superior refolding conditions for denatured proteins. The degree of immobilized protein folding as a function of time can be detected by monitoring the binding of the high-affinity nucleotide-free form of the chaperonin GroEL. GroEL preferentially interacts with proteins that have hydrophobic surfaces exposed in their unfolded or partially folded form, so a decrease in GroEL binding can be correlated with burial of hydrophobic surfaces as folding progresses. The magnitude of GroEL binding to the protein immobilized on bio-layer interferometry biosensor inversely reflects the extent of protein folding and hydrophobic residue burial. We demonstrate conditions where accelerated folding can be observed for the aggregation-prone protein maltodextrin glucosidase (MalZ). Superior immobilized folding conditions identified on the bio-layer interferometry biosensor surface were reproduced on Ni-NTA sepharose bead surfaces and resulted in significant improvement in folding yields of released MalZ (measured by enzymatic activity) compared to bulk refolding conditions in solution.

Regulation of Glutamine Synthetase Activity

Detailed studies of the glutamine synthetase (GS) in Escherichia coli and other bacteria have shown that the activity of this enzyme is regulated by at least five different mechanisms: (i) cumulative feedback inhibition by multiple end products of glutamine metabolism, (ii) interconversion between taut and relaxed protein configurations in response to binding and dissociation of divalent cations at one of its two metal binding sites, (iii) dynamic interconversion of the enzyme between covalently modified (adenylylated) and unmodified forms by a novel bicyclic cascade system, (iv) repression and derepression of glutamine synthetase formation by cyclic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of an RNA factor that governs transcription activities, and (v) regulation of glutamine synthetase turnover by the coupling of site specific metal ion-catalyzed oxidation with proteolytic degradation of the enzyme. Glutamine synthetase activity in E. coli is subject to inhibition by seven different end products of glutamine metabolism, namely, by tryptophan, histidine, carbamyl-phosphate, CTP, AMP, glucose-6-phosphate, and NAD+, and also by serine, alanine, and glycine. The cascade theory predicts that the steady-state level of glutamine synthetase adenylylation and therefore its catalytic activity is determined by the combined effects of all metabolites that affect the kinetic parameters of one or more of the enzymes in the cascade. Furthermore, under conditions where the supplies of ATP and glutamate are not limiting and the production of glutamine exceeds the demand, GS is no longer needed, then it will be converted to the catalytically inactive adenylylated form that is not under protection of ATP and glutamate.

Transient conformational remodeling of folding proteins by GroES-individually and in concert with GroEL

The commonly accepted dogma of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system entails protein folding mediated by cycles of several ATP-dependent sequential steps where GroEL interacts with the folding client protein. In contrast, we herein report GroES-mediated dynamic remodeling (expansion and compression) of two different protein substrates during folding: the endogenous substrate MreB and carbonic anhydrase (HCAII), a well-characterized protein folding model. GroES was also found to influence GroEL binding induced unfolding and compression of the client protein underlining the synergistic activity of both chaperonins, even in the absence of ATP. This previously unidentified activity by GroES should have important implications for understanding the chaperonin mechanism and cellular stress response. Our findings necessitate a revision of the GroEL/ES mechanism.

Interaction of oxidized chaperonin GroEL with an unfolded protein at low temperatures

The chaperonin GroEL binds to non-native substrate proteins via hydrophobic interactions, preventing their aggregation, which is minimized at low temperatures. In the present study, we investigated the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese at low temperatures, in the presence of ox-GroEL (oxidized GroEL), which contains increased exposed hydrophobic surfaces and retains its ability to hydrolyse ATP. We found that ox-GroEL could efficiently bind the urea-unfolded rhodanese at 4°C, without requiring excess amount of chaperonin relative to normal GroEL (i.e. non-oxidized). The release/reactivation of rhodanese from GroEL was minimal at 4°C, but was found to be optimal between 22 and 37°C. It was found that the loss of the ATPase activity of ox-GroEL at 4°C prevented the release of rhodanese from the GroEL–rhodanese complex. Thus ox-GroEL has the potential to efficiently trap recombinant or non-native proteins at 4°C and release them at higher temperatures under appropriate conditions.

Comparative analysis of the effects of alpha-crystallin and GroEL on the kinetics of thermal aggregation of rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Effects of alpha-crystallin and GroEL on the kinetics of thermal aggregation of rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) have been studied using dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation. The analysis of the initial parts of the dependences of the hydrodynamic radius of protein aggregates on time shows that in the presence of alpha-crystallin or GroEL the kinetic regime of GAPDH aggregation is changed from the regime of diffusion-limited cluster-cluster aggregation to the regime of reaction-limited cluster-cluster aggregation, wherein the sticking probability for the colliding particles becomes lower the unity. In contrast to alpha-crystallin, GroEL does not interfere with formation of the start aggregates which include denatured GAPDH molecules. On the basis of the analytical ultracentrifugation data the conclusion has been made that the products of dissociation of GAPDH and alpha-crystallin or GroEL play an important role in the interactions of GAPDH and chaperones at elevated temperatures.

Strategies for folding of affinity tagged proteins using GroEL and osmolytes

Obtaining a proper fold of affinity tagged chimera proteins can be difficult. Frequently, the protein of interest aggregates after the chimeric affinity tag is cleaved off, even when the entire chimeric construct is initially soluble. If the attached protein is incorrectly folded, chaperone proteins such as GroEL bind to the misfolded construct and complicate both folding and affinity purification. Since chaperonin/osmolyte mixtures facilitate correct folding from the chaperonin, we explored the possibility that we could use this intrinsic binding reaction to advantage to refold two difficult-to-fold chimeric constructs. In one instance, we were able to recover activity from a properly folded construct after the construct was released from the chaperonin in the presence of osmolytes. As an added advantage, we have also found that this method involving chaperonins can enable researchers to decide (1) if further stabilization of the folded product is required and (2) if the protein construct in question will ever be competent to fold with osmolytes.

Effects of divalent cations on encapsulation and release in the GroEL-assisted folding

Chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding in the presence of ATP and magnesium. Recent studies have shown that several divalent cations other than magnesium induce conformational changes of GroEL, thereby influencing chaperonin-assisted protein folding, but little is known about the detailed mechanism for such actions. Thus, the effects of divalent cations on protein encapsulation by GroEL/ES complexes were investigated. Of the divalent cations, not only magnesium, but also manganese ions enabled the functional refolding and release of 5,10-methylenetetrahydroforate reductase (METF) by GroEL. Neither ATP hydrolysis nor METF refolding was observed in the presence of zinc ion, whereas only ATP hydrolysis was induced by cobalt and nickel ions. SDS-PAGE and gel filtration analyses revealed that cobalt, nickel and zinc ions permit the formation of stable substrate-GroEL-GroES cis-ternary complexes, but prevent the release of METF from GroEL.

GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins-constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function-simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.

Agarose isoelectric focusing can improve resolution of membrane proteins in the two-dimensional electrophoresis of bacterial proteins

2-D separation of bacterial membrane proteins is still difficult despite using high-resolution IPG-IEF/SDS-PAGE. We were searching for alternative methods to avoid typical problems such as precipitation, low solubility, and aggregation of membrane proteins in the 1-D separation with IPG-IEF. Blue native electrophoresis (BNE) and agarose IEF (A-IEF) were tested for their separation capacity and their capability of replacing IPG-IEF in the first dimension. SDS-PAGE was chosen for the second dimension on account of its outstanding resolution. We could confirm that only A-IEF was a useful replacement for the IPG-IEF in the first dimension resulting in 2-D protein distributions with additional membrane protein spots not being found after IPG-IEF/SDS-PAGE. A second interesting result was that the agarose IEF mediates the possibility of separation of membrane proteins in a partially native state in the first dimension. This native A-IEF resulted in drastically changed spot patterns with an acidic shift of nearly all spots and divergent distribution of proteins compared to non-native A-IEF and IPG-IEF. We found out that native and non-native A-IEF are powerful tools to supplement IPG-IEF/SDS-PAGE.

Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE

We have identified five structural rearrangements in GroEL induced by the ordered binding of ATP and GroES. The first discernable rearrangement (designated T --> R(1)) is a rapid, cooperative transition that appears not to be functionally communicated to the apical domain. In the second (R(1) --> R(2)) step, a state is formed that binds GroES weakly in a rapid, diffusion-limited process. However, a second optical signal, carried by a protein substrate bound to GroEL, responds neither to formation of the R(2) state nor to the binding of GroES. This result strongly implies that the substrate protein remains bound to the inner walls of the initially formed GroEL.GroES cavity, and is not yet displaced from its sites of interaction with GroEL. In the next rearrangement (R(2).GroES --> R(3).GroES) the strength of interaction between GroEL and GroES is greatly enhanced, and there is a large and coincident loss of fluorescence-signal intensity in the labeled protein substrate, indicating that there is either a displacement from its binding sites on GroEL or at least a significant change of environment. These results are consistent with a mechanism in which the shift in orientation of GroEL apical domains between that seen in the apo-protein and stable GroEL.GroES complexes is highly ordered, and transient conformational intermediates permit the association of GroES before the displacement of bound polypeptide. This ensures efficient encapsulation of the polypeptide within the GroEL central cavity underneath GroES.

Folding behavior of chaperonin-mediated substrate protein

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding is complex. There have been diverse results on folding behavior, and the chaperonin molecules have been investigated as enhancing or retarding the folding rate. To understand the diversity of chaperonin-mediated protein folding, we report a study based on simulations using a simplified Gō-type model. By considering effects of affinity between the substrate protein and the chaperonin wall and spatial confinement of the chaperonin cavity, we study the thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of an unfrustrated substrate protein encapsulated in a chaperonin cavity. The affinity makes the hydrophobic residues of the protein bind to the chaperonin wall, and a strong (or weak) affinity results in a large (or small) effect of binding. Compared with the folding in bulk, the folding in chaperonin cavity with different strengths of affinity shows two kinds of behaviors: one with less dependence on the affinity but more reliance on the spatial confinement effect and the other relying strongly on the affinity. It is found that the enhancement or retardation of the folding rate depends on the competition between the spatial confinement and the affinity due to the chaperonin cavity, and a strong affinity produces a slow folding while a weak affinity induces a fast folding. The crossover between two kinds of folding behaviors happens in the case that the favorable effect of confinement is balanced by the unfavorable effect of the affinity, and a critical affinity strength is roughly defined. By analyzing the contacts formed between the residues of the protein and the chaperonin wall and between the residues of the protein themselves, the role of the affinity in the folding processes is studied. The binding of the residues with the chaperonin wall reduces the formation of both native contacts and nonnative contact or mis-contacts, providing a loose structure for further folding after allosteric change of the chaperonin cavity. In addition, 15 single-site-mutated mutants are simulated in order to test the validity of our model and to investigate the importance of affinity. Inspiringly, our results of the folding rates have a good correlation with those obtained from experiments. The folding rates are inversely correlated with the strength of the binding interactions, i.e., the weaker the binding, the faster the folding. We also find that the inner hydrophobic residues have larger effects on the folding kinetics than those of the exterior hydrophobic residues. We suggest that, besides the confinement effect, the affinity acts as another important factor to affect the folding of the substrate proteins in chaperonin systems, providing an understanding of the folding mechanism of the molecular chaperonin systems.

On the chaperonin activity of GroEL at heat-shock temperature

The studies of GroEL, almost exclusively, have been concerned with the function of the chaperonin under non-stress conditions, and little is known about the role of GroEL during heat shock. Being a heat shock protein, GroEL deserves to be studied under heat shock temperature. As a model for heat shock in vitro, we have investigated the interaction of GroEL with the enzyme rhodanese undergoing thermal unfolding at 43 degrees C. GroEL interacted strongly with the unfolding enzyme forming a binary complex. Active rhodanese (82%) could be recovered by releasing the enzyme from GroEL after the addition of several components, e.g. ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES. After evaluating the stability of the GroEL-rhodanese complex, as a function of the percentage of active rhodanese that could be released from GroEL with time, we found that the complex had a half-life of only one and half-hours at 43 degrees C; while, it remained stable at 25 degrees C for more than 2 weeks. Interestingly, the GroEL-rhodanese complex remained intact and only 13% of its ATPase activity was lost during its incubation at 43 degrees C. Further, rhodanese underwent a conformational change over time while it was bound to GroEL at 43 degrees C. Overall, our results indicated that the inability to recover active enzyme at 43 degrees C from the GroEL-rhodanese complex was not due to the disruption of the complex or aggregation of rhodanese, but rather to the partial loss of its ATPase activity and/or to the inability of rhodanese to be released from GroEL due to a conformational change.

Potential Role of Methionine Sulfoxide in the Inactivation of the Chaperone GroEL by Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl) and Peroxynitrite (ONOO–)

GroEL is an Escherichia coli molecular chaperone that functions in vivo to fold newly synthesized polypeptides as well as to bind and refold denatured proteins during stress. This protein is a suitable model for its eukaryotic homolog, heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60), due to the high number of conserved amino acid sequences and similar function. Here, we will provide evidence that GroEL is rather insensitive to oxidants produced endogenously during metabolism, such as nitric oxide (.NO) or hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), but is modified and inactivated by efficiently reactive species generated by phagocytes, such as peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). For the exposure of 17.5 microm GroEL to 100-250 microm HOCl, the major pathway of inactivation was through the oxidation of methionine to methionine sulfoxide, established through mass spectrometric detection of methionine sulfoxide and the reactivation of a significant fraction of inactivated GroEL by the enzyme methionine sulfoxide reductase B/A (MsrB/A). In addition to the oxidation of methionine, HOCl caused the conversion of cysteine to cysteic acid and this product may account for the remainder of inactivated GroEL not recoverable through MsrB/A. In contrast, HOCl produced only negligible yields of 3-chlorotyrosine. A remarkable finding was the conversion of Met(111) and Met(114) to Met sulfone, which suggests a rather low reduction potential of these 2 residues in GroEL. The high sensitivity of GroEL toward HOCl and ONOO(-) suggests that this protein may be a target for bacterial killing by phagocytes.

Hydrogen peroxide induces the dissociation of GroEL into monomers that can facilitate the reactivation of oxidatively inactivated rhodanese

Although, several studies have been reported on the effects of oxidants on the structure and function of other molecular chaperones, no reports have been made so far for the chaperonin GroEL. The ability of GroEL to function under oxidative stress was investigated in this report by monitoring the effects of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) on the structure and refolding activity of this protein. Using fluorescence spectroscopy and light scattering, we observed that GroEL showed increases in exposed hydrophobic sites and changes in tertiary and quaternary structure. Differential sedimentation, gel electrophoresis, and circular dichroism showed that H(2)O(2) treated GroEL underwent irreversible dissociation into monomers with partial loss of secondary structure. Relative to other proteins, GroEL was found to be highly resistant to oxidative damage. Interestingly, GroEL monomers produced under these conditions can facilitate the reactivation of H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese but not urea-denatured rhodanese. Recovery of approximately 84% active rhodanese was obtained with either native or oxidized GroEL in the absence of GroES or ATP. In comparison, urea-denatured GroEL, BSA and the refolding mixture in the absence of proteins resulted in the recovery of 72, 50, and 49% rhodanese activity, respectively. Previous studies have shown that GroEL monomers can reactivate rhodanese. Here, we show that oxidized monomeric GroEL can reactivate oxidized rhodanese suggesting that GroEL retains the ability to protect proteins during oxidative stress.

GTP cyclohydrolase I utilizes metal-free GTP as its substrate

GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH) is the rate-limiting enzyme for the synthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin and its activity is important in the regulation of monoamine neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin. We have studied the action of divalent cations on the enzyme activity of purified recombinant human GCH expressed in Escherichia coli. First, we showed that the enzyme activity is dependent on the concentration of Mg-free GTP. Inhibition of the enzyme activity by Mg2+, as well as by Mn2+, Co2+ or Zn2+, was due to the reduction of the availability of metal-free GTP substrate for the enzyme, when a divalent cation was present at a relatively high concentration with respect to GTP. We next examined the requirement of Zn2+ for enzyme activity by the use of a protein refolding assay, because the recombinant enzyme contained approximately one zinc atom per subunit of the decameric protein. Only when Zn2+ was present was the activity of the denatured enzyme effectively recovered by incubation with a chaperone protein. These are the first data demonstrating that GCH recognizes Mg-free GTP and requires Zn2+ for its catalytic activity. We suggest that the cellular concentration of divalent cations can modulate GCH activity, and thus tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis as well.

GroEL interacts transiently with oxidatively inactivated rhodanese facilitating its reactivation

When the enzyme rhodanese was inactivated with hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), it underwent significant conformational changes, leading to an increased exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. Thus, this protein seemed to be an ideal substrate for GroEL, since GroEL uses hydrophobic interactions to bind to its substrate polypeptides. Here, we report on the facilitated reactivation (86%) of H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese by GroEL alone. Reactivation by GroEL required a reductant and the enzyme substrate, but not GroES or ATP. Further, we found that GroEL interacted weakly and/or transiently with H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese. A strong interaction with rhodanese was obtained when the enzyme was pre-incubated with urea, indicating that exposure of hydrophobic surfaces alone on oxidized rhodanese was not sufficient for the formation of a strong complex and that a more unfolded structure of rhodanese was required to interact strongly with GroEL. Unlike prior studies that involved denaturation of rhodanese through chemical or thermal means, we have clearly shown that GroEL can function as a molecular chaperone in the reactivation of an oxidatively inactivated protein. Additionally, the mechanism for the GroEL-facilitated reactivation of rhodanese shown here appears to be different than that for the chaperonin-assisted folding of chemically unfolded polypeptides in which a nucleotide and sometimes GroES is required.

New aspects on the mechanism of GroEL-assisted protein folding

The mechanism of assisted protein folding by the chaperonin GroEL alone or in complex with the co-chaperonin GroES and in the presence or absence of nucleotides has been subject to extensive investigations during the last years. In this paper we present data where we have inactivated GroEL by stepwise blocking the nucleotide binding sites using the non-hydrolyzable ATP analogue, (Cr(H2O)4)3+ATP. We correlated the amount of accessible nucleotide binding sites with the residual ATP hydrolysis activity of GroEL as well as the residual refolding activity for two different model substrates. Under the conditions used, folding of the substrate proteins and ATP hydrolysis were directly proportional to the residual, accessible nucleotide binding sites. In the presence of GroES, 50% of the nucleotide binding sites were protected from inactivation by CrATP and the resulting protein retains 50% of both ATPase and refolding activity. The results strongly suggest that under the conditions used in our experiments, the nucleotide binding sites are additive in character and that by blocking of a certain number of binding sites a proportional amount of ATP hydrolysis and refolding activities are inactivated. The experiments including GroES suggest that full catalytic activity of GroEL requires both rings of the chaperonin. Blocking of the nucleotide binding sites of one ring still allows function of the second ring.

Polyols induce ATP-independent folding of GroEL-bound bacterial glutamine synthetase

We have previously assessed the GroE chaperonin requirements for folding of bacterial glutamine synthetase (GS) and established that, at 37 degrees C in 50 mM Tris buffer, ATP binding to the GroEL-GS complex is mandatory for the release and reactivation of dodecameric enzyme. However, we demonstrate here that the addition of 1-4 M glycerol to GroEL-GS complexes resulted in release and reactivation of GS in the absence of nucleotide. Furthermore, the kinetics of refolding and refolding yields of this glycerol-induced refolding were similar to those observed with ATP. Other polyols such as sucrose, 1,2-propanediol, or 1,3-propanediol also facilitated nucleotide-independent refolding of GS from chaperonin complex. The observed phenomenon cannot be attributed to the viscosity or molecular crowding effects because solutions of dextran or Ficoll with the same viscosity as 4 M glycerol failed to reactivate GroEL-bound GS. Like glycerol, other osmolytes such as betaine and sarcosine or high salt (500 mM NaCl) facilitated spontaneous folding of GS. However, no reactivation of GroEL-bound GS was observed with these additives. The presence of glycerol affected binding of fluorescent probe 1,8-anilinonaphthalene to GroEL, suggesting that glycerol may alter the chaperonin structure. Our data suggest that low-molecular-weight polyols affect both GroEL and bound GS monomers to reduce their binding affinity. This results in an increased partitioning of GS toward active, assembly-competent states.

A comparison of the GroE chaperonin requirements for sequentially and structurally homologous malate dehydrogenases: the importance of folding kinetics and solution environment

Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase (EcMDH) and its eukaryotic counterpart, porcine mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (PmMDH), are highly homologous proteins with significant sequence identity (60%) and virtually identical native structural folds. Despite this homology, EcMDH folds rapidly and efficiently in vitro and does not seem to interact with GroE chaperonins at physiological temperatures (37 degrees C), whereas PmMDH folds much slower than EcMDH and requires these chaperonins to fold to the native state at 37 degrees C. Double jump experiments indicate that the slow folding behavior of PmMDH is not limited by proline isomerization. Although the folding enhancer glycerol (<5 m) does not alter the renaturation kinetics of EcMDH, it dramatically accelerates the spontaneous renaturation of PmMDH at all temperatures tested. Kinetic analysis of PmMDH renaturation with increasing glycerol concentrations suggests that this osmolyte increases the on-pathway kinetics of the monomer folding to assembly-competent forms. Other osmolytes such as trimethylamine N-oxide, sucrose, and betaine also reactivate PmMDH at nonpermissive temperatures (37 degrees C). Glycerol jump experiments with preformed GroEL.PmMDH complexes indicate that the shift between stringent (requires ATP and GroES) and relaxed (only requires ATP) complex conformations is rapid (<3-5 s). The similarity in irreversible misfolding kinetics of PmMDH measured with glycerol or the activated chaperonin complex (GroEL.GroES.ATP) suggests that these folding aids may influence the same step in the PmMDH folding reaction. Moreover, the interactions between glycerol-induced PmMDH folding intermediates and GroEL.GroES.ATP are diminished. Our results support the notion that the protein folding kinetics of sequentially and structurally homologous proteins, rather than the structural fold, dictates the GroE chaperonin requirement.

Complex effects of molecular chaperones on the aggregation and refolding of fibroblast growth factor-1

Fibroblast growth factor one (FGF-1) exists in a molten globule (MG)-like state under physiological conditions (neutral pH, 37 degrees C). It has been proposed that this form of the protein may be involved in its atypical membrane transport properties. Macromolecular chaperones have been shown to bind to MG states of proteins as well as to be involved in protein membrane transport. We have therefore examined the effect of such proteins on the aggregation and refolding of FGF-1 to evaluate whether they might play a role in FGF-1 transport. The proposed chaperone alpha-crystallin was found to strongly inhibit the aggregation of the MG state of FGF-1. Curiously, two other proteins of similar size and charge (thyroglobulin and a monoclonal IgM immunoglobulin) with no previously reported chaperone properties were also found to have a related effect. In contrast, the chaperone GroEL/ES induced further aggregation of MG-like FGF-1 but had no effect on the native conformation. Both chaperones stimulated refolding to the native state (25 degrees C) but had no detectable effect when FGF-1 was refolded to the MG state (37 degrees C). This suggests that disordered intermediates are present in the folding pathways of the native and MG-like FGF conformations which differ from the MG-like state induced under physiological conditions. FGF-1 does, therefore, interact with molecular chaperones, although this may involve both the MG and the native states of the protein.

Structural changes in GroEL effected by binding a denatured protein substrate

In the absence of nucleotides or cofactors, the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL binds select proteins in non-native conformations, such as denatured glutamine synthetase (GS) monomers, preventing their aggregation and spontaneous renaturation. The nature of the GroEL-GS complexes thus formed, specifically the effect on the conformation of the GroEL tetradecamer, has been examined by electron microscopy. We find that specimens of GroEL-GS are visibly heterogeneous, due to incomplete loading of GroEL with GS. Images contain particles indistinguishable from GroEL alone, and also those with consistent identifiable differences. Side-views of the modified particles reveal additional protein density at one end of the GroEL-GS complex, and end-views display chirality in the heptameric projection not seen in the unliganded GroEL. The coordinate appearance of these two projection differences suggests that binding of GS, as representative of a class of protein substrates, induces or stabilizes a conformation of GroEL that differs from the unliganded chaperonin. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the GroEL-GS complex reveals the location of the bound protein substrate, as well as complex conformational changes in GroEL itself, both cis and trans with respect to the bound GS. The most apparent structural alterations are inward movements of the apical domains of both GroEL heptamers, protrusion of the substrate protein from the cavity of the cis ring, and a narrowing of the unoccupied opening of the trans ring.

Classification and reconstruction of a heterogeneous set of electron microscopic images: a case study of GroEL-substrate complexes

Image analysis methods were used to separate images of a large macromolecular complex, the chaperonin GroEL, in a preparation in which it is partially liganded to a nonnative protein substrate, glutamine synthetase. The relatively small difference ( approximately 6%) in size between the chaperonin in its free and complexed forms, and the absence of gross changes in overall conformation, made separation of the two types of particles challenging. Different approaches were evaluated and used for alignment and classification of images, both in two common projections and in three dimensions, yielding 2D averages and a 3D reconstruction. The results of 3D analysis describe the conformational changes effected by binding of this particular protein substrate and demonstrate the utility of 2D analysis as an indicator of structural change in this system.

Chaperonin-assisted folding of glutamine synthetase under nonpermissive conditions: off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the co-chaperonin requirement

One of the proposed roles of the GroEL-GroES cavity is to provide an "infinite dilution" folding chamber where protein substrate can fold avoiding deleterious off-pathway aggregation. Support for this hypothesis has been strengthened by a number of studies that demonstrated a mandatory GroES requirement under nonpermissive solution conditions, i.e., the conditions where proteins cannot spontaneously fold. We have found that the refolding of glutamine synthetase (GS) does not follow this pattern. In the presence of natural osmolytes trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) or potassium glutamate, refolding GS monomers readily aggregate into very large inactive complexes and fail to reactivate even at low protein concentration. Surprisingly, under these "nonpermissive" folding conditions, GS can reactivate with GroEL and ATP alone and does not require the encapsulation by GroES. In contrast, the chaperonin dependent reactivation of GS under another nonpermissive condition of low Mg2+ (<2 mM MgCl2) shows an absolute requirement of GroES. High-performance liquid chromatography gel filtration analysis and irreversible misfolding kinetics show that a major species of the GS folding intermediates, generated under these "low Mg2+" conditions exist as long-lived metastable monomers that can be reactivated after a significantly delayed addition of the GroEL. Our results indicate that the GroES requirement for refolding of GS is not simply dictated by the aggregation propensity of this protein substrate. Our data also suggest that the GroEL-GroES encapsulated environment is not required under all nonpermissive folding conditions.

Stability and release requirements of the complexes of GroEL with two homologous mammalian aminotransferases

The mitochondrial (mAAT) and cytosolic (cAAT) homologous isozymes of aspartate aminotransferase are two relatively large proteins that in their nonnative states interact very differently with GroEL. MgATP alone can increase the rate of GroEL-assisted reactivation of cAAT, yet the presence of GroES is mandatory for mAAT. Addition of an excess of a denatured substrate accelerates reactivation of cAAT in the presence of GroEL, but has no effect on mAAT. These competition studies suggest that the more stringent substrate mAAT forms a thermodynamically stable complex with GroEL, while rebinding affects the slow reactivation kinetics of cAAT with GroEL alone. However, the competitor appears to accelerate the release of cAAT from GroEL, most likely by displacing bound cAAT from the GroEL cavity. Moreover, cAAT, but not mAAT, shows a time-dependent increase in protease resistance while bound to GroEL at low temperature. These results suggest that folding and release of cAAT from GroEL in the absence of cofactors may occur stepwise with certain interactions being broken and reformed until the protein escapes binding. The distinct behavior of these two isozymes most likely results from differences in the structure of the nonnative states that bind to GroEL.

Refolding of target proteins from a "rigid" mutant chaperonin demonstrates a minimal mechanism of chaperonin binding and release

One of the most interesting facets of GroEL-facilitated protein folding lies in the fact that the requirement for a successful folding reaction of a given protein target depends upon the refolding conditions used. In this report, we utilize a mutant of GroEL (GroEL T89W) whose domain movements have been drastically restricted, producing a chaperonin that is incapable of utilizing the conventional cyclic mechanism of chaperonin action. This mutant was, however, still capable of improving the refolding yield of lactate dehydrogenase in the absence of both GroES and ATP hydrolysis. A very rapid interconversion of conformations was detected in the mutant immediately after ATP binding, and this interconversion was inferred to form part of the target release mechanism in this mutant. The possibility exists that some target proteins, although dependent on GroEL for improved refolding yields, are capable of refolding successfully by utilizing only portions of the entire mechanism provided by the chaperonins.

Refolding a glutamine synthetase truncation mutant in vitro: identifying superior conditions using a combination of chaperonins and osmolytes

A new method that uses a combination of bacterial GroE chaperonins and cellular osmolytes for in vitro protein folding is described. With this method, one can form stable chaperonin-protein folding intermediate complexes to prevent deleterious protein aggregation and, using these complexes, screen a large array of osmolyte solutions to rapidly identify the superior folding conditions. As a test substrate, we used GSDelta468, a truncation mutant of bacterial glutamine synthetase (GS) that cannot be refolded to significant yields in vitro with either chaperones or osmolytes alone. When our chaperonin/osmolyte method was employed to identify and optimize GSDelta468 refolding conditions, 67% of enzyme activity was recovered, comparable with refolding yields of wild type GS. This method can potentially be applied to the refolding of a broad spectrum of proteins.

Interactions of GroEL/GroES with a heterodimeric intermediate during alpha 2beta 2 assembly of mitochondrial branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase. cis capping of the native-like 86-kDa intermediate by GroES

We showed previously that the interaction of an alphabeta heterodimeric intermediate with GroEL/GroES is essential for efficient alpha(2)beta(2) assembly of human mitochondrial branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase. In the present study, we further characterized the mode of interaction between the chaperonins and the native-like alphabeta heterodimer. The alphabeta heterodimer, as an intact entity, was found to bind to GroEL at a 1:1 stoichiometry with a K(D) of 1.1 x 10(-)(7) m. The 1:1 molar ratio of the GroEL-alphabeta complex was confirmed by the ability of the complex to bind a stoichiometric amount of denatured lysozyme in the trans cavity. Surprisingly, in the presence of Mg-ADP, GroES was able to cap the GroEL-alphabeta complex in cis, despite the size of 86 kDa of the heterodimer (with a His(6) tag and a linker). Incubation of the GroEL-alphabeta complex with Mg-ATP, but not AMP-PNP, resulted in the release of alpha monomers. In the presence of Mg-ATP, the beta subunit was also released but was unable to assemble with the alpha subunit, and rebound to GroEL. The apparent differential subunit release from GroEL is explained, in part, by the significantly higher binding affinity of the beta subunit (K(D) < 4.15 x 10(-9)m) than the alpha (K(D) = 1.6 x 10(-8)m) for GroEL. Incubation of the GroEL-alphabeta complex with Mg-ATP and GroES resulted in dissociation and discharge of both the alpha and beta subunits from GroEL. The beta subunit upon binding to GroEL underwent further folding in the cis cavity sequestered by GroES. This step rendered the beta subunit competent for reassociation with the soluble alpha subunit to produce a new heterodimer. We propose that this mechanism is responsible for the iterative annealing of the kinetically trapped heterodimeric intermediate, leading to an efficient alpha(2)beta(2) assembly of human branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase.

Lysozyme refolding with immobilized GroEL column chromatography

A refolding chromatography with immobilized molecular chaperonin GroEL was studied for the reactivation of denatured-reduced lysozyme. The effect of denaturant concentration (guanidine hydrochloride, 0.1-1.5 M) in the elution buffer, the elution flow-rate, and the loading concentration and volume of the substrate protein on the reactivation yield was studied. All the operating parameters showed minor effects on the recovery yield of lysozyme mass, which remained at 90-100%, but exhibited relatively notable influences on the specific activity of the recovered lysozyme. For example, there existed an optimum denaturant concentration of about 1 M at which the highest yield of specific activity (up to 97%) was obtained. Using the immobilized GroEL column, 3 ml of the lysozyme (1 mg/ml) per batch could be refolded at an overall yield of 81%, which corresponded to a refolding productivity of 54 mg per 1 gel per h. At comparable reactivation yields (over 80%), this value of productivity was over four-times larger as that of the size-exclusion refolding chromatography reported previously (12 mg per 1 gel per h), indicating the advantage of the present system for producing a high throughput in protein refolding operations.

Tetrameric N(5)-(L-1-carboxyethyl)-L-ornithine synthase: guanidine. HCl-induced unfolding and a low temperature requirement for refolding

Guanidine x HCl (GdnHCl)-induced unfolding of tetrameric N(5)-(L-1-carboxyethyl)-L-ornithine synthase (CEOS; 141,300 M(r)) from Lactococcus lactis at pH 7.2 and 25 degrees C occurred in several phases. The enzyme was inactivated at approximately 1 M GdnHCl. A time-, temperature-, and concentration-dependent formation of soluble protein aggregates occurred at 0.5-1.5 M GdnHCl due to an increased exposure of apolar surfaces. A transition from tetramer to unfolded monomer was observed between 2 and 3.5 M GdnHCl (without observable dimer or trimer intermediates), as evidenced by tyrosyl and tryptophanyl fluorescence changes, sulfhydryl group exposure, loss of secondary structure, size-exclusion chromatography, and sedimentation equilibrium data. GdnHCl-induced dissociation and unfolding of tetrameric CEOS was concerted, and yields of reactivated CEOS by dilution from 5 M GdnHCl were improved when unfolding took place on ice rather than at 25 degrees C. Refolding and reconstitution of the enzyme were optimal at </=15 degrees C and yields of active tetramer increased as the concentration of unfolded subunits decreased. Refolding of unfolded subunits and active tetramer assembly upon 100-fold dilution from 5 M GdnHCl at 0 degrees C also was increased two- or fourfold (to 44 or 28% reactivation for 0.08 or 0.28 microM subunit, respectively) when incubated at 15 degrees C, pH 7.2, for 4 h with the Escherichia coli molecular chaperonin GroEL, ATP, MgCl(2), and KCl.

Cooperative effects of potassium, magnesium, and magnesium-ADP on the release of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase from the chaperonin GroEL

Previous investigation has shown that at 22 degrees C and in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL, the slowest step in the refolding of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (EcDHFR) reflects release of a late folding intermediate from the cavity of GroEL (Clark AC, Frieden C, 1997, J Mol Biol 268:512-525). In this paper, we investigate the effects of potassium, magnesium, and MgADP on the release of the EcDHFR late folding intermediate from GroEL. The data demonstrate that GroEL consists of at least two conformational states, with apparent rate constants for EcDHFR release that differ by four- to fivefold. In the absence of potassium, magnesium, and ADP, approximately 80-90% of GroEL resides in the form with the faster rate of release. Magnesium and potassium both shift the distribution of GroEL forms toward the form with the slower release rate, though cooperativity for the magnesium-induced transition is observed only in the presence of potassium. MgADP at low concentrations (0-50 microM) shifts the distribution of GroEL forms toward the form with the faster release rate, and this effect is also potassium dependent. Nearly identical results were obtained with a GroEL mutant that forms only a single ring, demonstrating that these effects occur within a single toroid of GroEL. In the presence of saturating magnesium, potassium, and MgADP, the apparent rate constant for the release of EcDHFR from wild-type GroEL at 22 degrees C reaches a limiting value of 0.014 s(-1). For the single ring mutant of GroEL, the rate of EcDHFR release under the same conditions reaches a limiting value of 0.024 s(-1), suggesting that inter-ring negative cooperativity exists for MgADP-induced substrate release. The data suggest that MgADP preferentially binds to one conformation of GroEL, that with the faster apparent rate constant for EcDHFR release, and induces a conformational change leading to more rapid release of substrate protein.

GroEL/GroES-dependent reconstitution of alpha2 beta2 tetramers of humanmitochondrial branched chain alpha-ketoacid decarboxylase. Obligatory interaction of chaperonins with an alpha beta dimeric intermediate

The decarboxylase component (E1) of the human mitochondrial branched chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase multienzyme complex (approximately 4-5 x 10(3) kDa) is a thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent enzyme, comprising two 45.5-kDa alpha subunits and two 37.8-kDa beta subunits. In the present study, His6-tagged E1 alpha2 beta2 tetramers (171 kDa) denatured in 8 M urea were competently reconstituted in vitro at 23 degrees C with an absolute requirement for chaperonins GroEL/GroES and Mg-ATP. Unexpectedly, the kinetics for the recovery of E1 activity was very slow with a rate constant of 290 M-1 s-1. Renaturation of E1 with a similarly slow kinetics was also achieved using individual GroEL-alpha and GroEL-beta complexes as combined substrates. However, the beta subunit was markedly more prone to misfolding than the alpha in the absence of GroEL. The alpha subunit was released as soluble monomers from the GroEL-alpha complex alone in the presence of GroES and Mg-ATP. In contrast, the beta subunit discharged from the GroEL-beta complex readily rebound to GroEL when the alpha subunit was absent. Analysis of the assembly state showed that the His6-alpha and beta subunits released from corresponding GroEL-polypeptide complexes assembled into a highly structured but inactive 85.5-kDa alpha beta dimeric intermediate, which subsequently dimerized to produce the active alpha2 beta2 tetrameter. The purified alpha beta dimer isolated from Escherichia coli lysates was capable of binding to GroEL to produce a stable GroEL-alpha beta ternary complex. Incubation of this novel ternary complex with GroES and Mg-ATP resulted in recovery of E1 activity, which also followed slow kinetics with a rate constant of 138 M-1 s-1. Dimers were regenerated from the GroEL-alpha beta complex, but they needed to interact with GroEL/GroES again, thereby perpetuating the cycle until the conversion from dimers to tetramers was complete. Our study describes an obligatory role of chaperonins in priming the dimeric intermediate for subsequent tetrameric assembly, which is a slow step in the reconstitution of E1 alpha2 beta2 tetramers.

Purification of chaperonins

The availability of protein samples of sufficient quality and in sufficient quantity is a driving force in biology and biotechnology. Protein samples that are free of critical contaminants are required for specific assays. Large amounts of highly homogeneous and reproducible material are needed for crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of protein structure. Protein-based therapeutic factors used in human medicine must not contain any contaminants that might interfere with treatment. The roles played by molecular chaperones in protein folding and in many cellular processes make these proteins very attractive candidates as biochemical reagents, and the class of chaperones called chaperonins is one of the most important candidates. Methods for successfully purifying chaperonins are needed to advance the field of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. This article outlines the strategies and methods used to obtain pure chaperonin samples from different biological sources. The objective is to help new researchers obtain better quality samples of chaperonins from many new organisms.

The chaperonin GroEL binds to late-folding non-native conformations present in native Escherichia coli and murine dihydrofolate reductases

Dihydrofolate reductases from mouse (MuDHFR) or Escherichia coli (EcDHFR) are shown to refold via several intermediate forms, each of which can bind to the chaperonin GroEL. When stable complexes with GroEL are formed, they consist of late-folding intermediates. In addition, we find that late-folding intermediates that are present in the native enzyme bind to GroEL. For the E. coli and murine proteins, the extent of protein bound increases as the temperature is increased from 8 degreesC to 42 degreesC, at which temperature either protein is completely bound as the last (EcDHFR) or the last two (MuDHFR) folding intermediate(s). Thus for EcDHFR, the binding is transient at low temperature (<30 degreesC) and stable at high temperature (>35 degreesC). For MuDHFR, complex formation appears less temperature dependent. In general, the data demonstrate that the overall binding free energy for the interaction of GroEL with native DHFR is the sum of the free energy for the first step in DHFR unfolding, which is unfavorable, and the free energy of binding the non-native conformation, which is favorable. For EcDHFR, this results in an overall binding free energy that is unfavorable below 30 degreesC. Over the temperature range of 8 degreesC to 42 degreesC, GroEL binds MuDHFR more tightly than EcDHFR, due partially to a small free energy difference between two pre-existing non-native conformations of MuDHFR, resulting in binding to more than one folding intermediate.

Participation of chaperonin GroEL in the folding of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. An approach based on the use of different oligomeric forms of the enzyme immobilized on sepharose

The binding of denatured B. stearothermophilus D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to the E. coli chaperonin GroEL was investigated in two systems: (1) GroEL immobilized on Sepharose via a single subunit was titrated with urea-denatured soluble GAPDH and (2) a Sepharose-bound denatured GAPDH monomer was titrated with soluble GroEL. Similar apparent KD values for the complex GroEL x GAPDH were obtained in both cases (0.04 and 0.03 microM, respectively), the stoichiometry being 1.0 mol chaperonin per GAPDH subunit in the system with the immobilized GroEL and 0.2 mol chaperonin per Sepharose-bound GAPDH monomer. Addition of GroEL and Mg x ATP to a reactivation mixture increased the yield of reactivation of both E. coli and B. stearothermophilus GAPDHs. Incubation of the Sepharose-bound catalytically active tetrameric and dimeric GAPDH forms with the protein fraction of a wild-type E. coli cell extract resulted in the binding of GroEL to the dimer and no interaction with the tetrameric form. These data suggest that GroEL may be capable of interacting with the interdimeric contact regions of the folded GAPDH dimers.

Partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. Chaperonin binds a reversibly oxidized form derived from the native protein

The mammalian mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese, can form stable complexes with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL if it is either refolded from 8 M urea in the presence of chaperonin or is simply added to the chaperonin as the folded conformer at 37 degreesC. In the presence of GroEL, the kinetic profile of the inactivation of native rhodanese followed a single exponential decay. Initially, the inactivation rates showed a dependence on the chaperonin concentration but reached a constant maximum value as the GroEL concentration increased. Over the same time period, in the absence of GroEL, native rhodanese showed only a small decline in activity. The addition of a non-denaturing concentration of urea accelerated the inactivation and partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. These results suggest that the GroEL chaperonin may facilitate protein unfolding indirectly by interacting with intermediates that exist in equilibrium with native rhodanese. The activity of GroEL-bound rhodanese can be completely recovered upon addition of GroES and ATP. The reactivation kinetics and commitment rates for GroEL-rhodanese complexes prepared from either unfolded or native rhodanese were identical. However, when rhodanese was allowed to inactivate spontaneously in the absence of GroEL, no recovery of activity was observed upon addition of GroEL, GroES, and ATP. Interestingly, the partitioning of rhodanese and its subsequent inactivation did not occur when native rhodanese and GroEL were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the inactive intermediate that partitions onto GroEL is the reversibly oxidized form of rhodanese.

Changing the nature of the initial chaperonin capture complex influences the substrate folding efficiency

For the chaperonin substrates, rhodanese, malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and glutamine synthetase (GS), the folding efficiencies, and the lifetimes of folding intermediates were measured with either the nucleotide-free GroEL or the activated ATP.GroEL.GroES chaperonin complex. With both nucleotide-free and activated complex, the folding efficiency of rhodanese and MDH remained high over a large range of GroEL to substrate concentration ratios (up to 1:1). In contrast, the folding efficiency of GS began to decline at ratios lower than 8:1. At ratios where the refolding yields were initially the same, only a relatively small increase (1.6-fold) in misfolding kinetics of MDH was observed with either the nucleotide-free or activated chaperonin complex. For rhodanese, no change was detected with either chaperonin complex. In contrast, GS lost its ability to interact with the chaperonin system at an accelerated rate (8-fold increase) when the activated complex instead of the nucleotide-free complex was used to rescue the protein from misfolding. Our data demonstrate that the differences in the refolding yields are related to the intrinsic folding kinetics of the protein substrates. We suggest that the early kinetic events at the substrate level ultimately govern successful chaperonin-substrate interactions and play a crucial role in dictating polypeptide flux through the chaperonin system. Our results also indicate that an accurate assessment of the transient properties of folding intermediates that dictate the initial chaperonin-substrate interactions requires the use of the activated complex as the interacting chaperonin species.

Divalent cations can induce the exposure of GroEL hydrophobic surfaces and strengthen GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions. Novel effects of Zn2+ GroEL interactions

Fluorescent and non-fluorescent probes have been used to show that divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+) significantly increase hydrophobic exposure on GroEL, whereas monovalent cations (K+ and Na+) have little effect. Zn2+ always induced the largest amount of hydrophobic exposure on GroEL. By using a new method based on interactions of GroEL with octyl-Sepharose, it was demonstrated that Zn2+ binding strengthens GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions and increases the efficiency of substrate release upon the addition of MgATP and GroES. The binding of 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) to GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ has a Kd congruent with 1 microM, which is similar to that observed previously for the GroEL 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) complex. Urea denaturation, sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation, and electron microscopy revealed that the quaternary structure of GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ had a stability and morphology equivalent to unliganded GroEL. In contrast, circular dichroism suggested some loss in both alpha-helical and beta-sheet secondary structure in the presence of Zn2+. These data suggest that divalent cations can modulate the amount of hydrophobic surface presented by GroEL. Furthermore, the influence of Zn2+ on GroEL hydrophobic surface exposure as well as substrate binding and release appears to be distinct from the stabilizing effects of Mg2+ on GroEL quaternary structure.

Molecular chaperones, folding catalysts, and the recovery of active recombinant proteins from E. coli. To fold or to refold

The high-level expression of recombinant gene products in the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli often results in the misfolding of the protein of interest and its subsequent degradation by cellular proteases or its deposition into biologically inactive aggregates known as inclusion bodies. It has recently become clear that in vivo protein folding is an energy-dependent process mediated by two classes of folding modulators. Molecular chaperones, such as the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE and GroEL-GroES systems, suppress off-pathway aggregation reactions and facilitate proper folding through ATP-coordinated cycles of binding and release of folding intermediates. On the other hand, folding catalysts (foldases) accelerate rate-limiting steps along the protein folding pathway such as the cis/trans isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl bonds and the formation and reshuffling of disulfide bridges. Manipulating the cytoplasmic folding environment by increasing the intracellular concentration of all or specific folding modulators, or by inactivating genes encoding these proteins, holds great promise in facilitating the production and purification of heterologous proteins. Purified folding modulators and artificial systems that mimic their mode of action have also proven useful in improving the in vitro refolding yields of chemically denatured polypeptides. This review examines the usefulness and limitations of molecular chaperones and folding catalysts in both in vivo and in vitro folding processes.

Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

We propose a mechanism for the role of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL in folding proteins. The principal assumptions of the mechanism are (i) that many unfolded proteins bind to GroEL because GroEL preferentially binds small unstructured regions of the substrate protein, (ii) that substrate protein within the cavity of GroEL folds by the same kinetic mechanism and rate processes as in bulk solution, (iii) that stable or transient complexes with GroEL during the folding process are defined by a kinetic partitioning between formation and dissociation of the complex and the rate of folding and unfolding of the protein, and (iv) that dissociation from the complex in early stages of folding may lead to aggregation but dissociation at a late stage leads to correct folding. The experimental conditions for refolding may play a role in defining the function of GroEL in the folding pathway. We propose that the role of GroES and MgATP, either binding or hydrolysis, is to regulate the association and dissociation processes rather than affecting the rate of folding.

GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases

Using stopped-flow fluorescence techniques, we have examined both the refolding and unfolding reactions of four structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases (murine DHFR, wild-type E. coli DHFR, and two E. coli DHFR mutants) in the presence and absence of the molecular chaperonin GroEL. We show that GroEL binds the unfolded conformation of each DHFR with second order rate constants greater than 3 x 10(7) M(-1)s(-1) at 22 degrees C. Once bound to GroEL, the proteins refold with rate constants similar to those for folding in the absence of GroEL. The overall rate of formation of native enzyme is decreased by the stability of the complex between GroEL and the last folding intermediate. For wild-type E. coli DHFR, complex formation is transient while for the others, a stable complex is formed. The stable complexes are the same regardless of whether they are formed from the unfolded or folded DHFR. When complex formation is initiated from the native conformation, GroEL binds to a pre-existing non-native conformation, presumably a late folding intermediate, rather than to the native state, thus shifting the conformational equilibrium toward the non-native species by mass action. The model presented here for the interaction of these four proteins with GroEL quantitatively describes the difference between the formation of a transient complex and a stable complex as defined by the rate constants for release and rebinding to GroEL relative to the rate constant for the last folding step. Due to this kinetic partitioning, three different mechanisms can be proposed for the formation of stable complexes between GroEL and either murine DHFR or the two E. coli DHFR mutants. These data show that productive folding of GroEL-bound proteins can occur in the absence of nucleotides or the co-chaperonin GroES and suggest that transient complex formation may be the functional role of GroEL under normal conditions.

Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction

Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) folds more rapidly in the presence of GroEL, GroES and ATP than it does unassisted. The increase in folding rate as a function of the concentration of GroEL-ES reaches a maximum at a stoichiometry which is approximately equimolar (mMDH subunits:GroEL oligomer) and with an apparent dissociation constant K' for the GroE acceptor state of at least 1 x 10(-8) M. However, even at chaperonin concentrations which are 4000 x K', i.e. at negligible concentrations of free mMDH, the observed folding rate of the substrate remains at its optimum, showing not only that folding occurs in the chaperonin-mMDH complex but also that this rate is uninhibited by any interactions with sites on GroEL. Despite the ability of mMDH to fold on the chaperonin, trapping experiments show that its dwell time on the complex is only 20 seconds. This correlates with both the rate of ATP turnover and the dwell time of GroES on the complex and is only approximately 5% of the time taken for the substrate to commit to the folded state. The results imply that ATP drives the chaperonin complex through a cycle of three functional states: (1) an acceptor complex in which the unfolded substrate is bound tightly; (2) an encapsulation state in which it is sequestered but direct protein-protein contact is lost so that folding can proceed unhindered; and (3) an ejector state which forces dissociation of the substrate whether folded or not.