Accuracy of stool antigen test in posteradication assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Antigenic proteins of Helicobacter pylori of potential diagnostic value

Helicobacter pylori antigen was prepared from an isolate from a patient with a duodenal ulcer. Serum samples were obtained from culture-positive H. pylori infected patients with duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers and gastritis (n=30). As controls, three kinds of sera without detectable H. pylori IgG antibodies were used: 30 from healthy individuals without history of gastric disorders, 30 from patients who were seen in the endoscopy clinic but were H. pylori culture negative and 30 from people with other diseases. OFF-GEL electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE and Western blots of individual serum samples were used to identify protein bands with good sensitivity and specificity when probed with the above sera and HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG. Four H. pylori protein bands showed good (≥ 70%) sensitivity and high specificity (98-100%) towards anti-Helicobacter IgG antibody in culture- positive patients sera and control sera, respectively. The identities of the antigenic proteins were elucidated by mass spectrometry. The relative molecular weights and the identities of the proteins, based on MALDI TOF/ TOF, were as follows: CagI (25 kDa), urease G accessory protein (25 kDa), UreB (63 kDa) and proline/pyrroline- 5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (118 KDa). These identified proteins, singly and/or in combinations, may be useful for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in patients.

Utility of stool sample-based tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori antigen or DNA in stool are meant to detect the bacteria; however, in children the colonization of the gastric mucosa by H pylori is usually weak and fecal excretion of antigen or DNA varies considerably, challenging the utility of these tests in this age group. The aim of the present study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of stool H pylori DNA and antigen tests for the diagnosis of infection in children.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of stool tests for diagnosis of H pylori infection in children. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases. Selection criteria included participation of at least 30 children and the use of a criterion standard for H pylori diagnosis. In a comprehensive search, we identified 48 studies.

RESULTS

Regarding antigen-detection tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) monoclonal antibodies showed the best performance, with sensitivity and specificity of 97%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 29.9, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03. ELISA polyclonal antibodies had sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 16.2, LR- of 0.09, and high heterogeneity (P < 0.0001). One-step monoclonal antibody tests demonstrated sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 10.6, and LR- of 0.11. For DNA detection, polymerase chain reaction-based test showed sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 98%, LR+ of 17.1, and LR- of 0.18.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of H pylori antigen in stools with ELISA monoclonal antibodies is a noninvasive efficient test for diagnosis of infection in children. One-step tests showed low accuracy and more studies are needed to obtain a useful office-based screening test. The available molecular tests are still unreliable.

Helicobacter pylori: present status and future prospects in Japan

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has already changed the natural history of peptic ulcer disease, with most patients being cured at their first presentation. Similarly, the incidence of gastric cancer and other diseases related to H. pylori are likely to be greatly reduced in the near future. Isolation of the spiral intragastric bacterium H. pylori totally reversed the false dogma that the stomach was sterile, and it taught us that chronic infectious disease can still exist in modern society. Helicobacter pylori's unique location, persistence, and evasion of the immune system offer important insights into the pathophysiology of the gut. Also, the fact that it was overlooked for so long encourages us to think "outside the box" when investigating other diseases with obscure etiologies. We should consider such provocative scientific ideas as bridges to the future disease control.

Evaluation of four different fecal tests for determination of cure after Helicobacter pylori treatment

BACKGROUND

Data evaluating the monoclonal tests for determination of cure after Helicobacter pylori treatment are scarce.

GOALS

This study was aimed to evaluate the usefulness of 4 stool tests-2 new RAPID monoclonal immunochromatographic tests (RAPID Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK and ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA, Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, OH) a monoclonal EIA test (Amplified IDEIA Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK), and a polyclonal EIA test (Premier Platinum HpSA, Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, OH)-to confirm cure of H. pylori infection after eradication treatment.

STUDY

Ninety-seven patients who underwent eradication treatment were included. Cure of H. pylori infection was determined using 2 consecutive reference tests. Fecal tests were performed according to the specifications of the manufacturer. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

After H. pylori eradication, the RAPID Hp StAR test has a sensitivity of 73% for detecting persistent infection, a specificity of 96% to 98%, a positive predictive value of 73% to 80% and a negative predictive value of 96%. For ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA the corresponding values were 91%, 97%, 77%, and 99%, for Amplified IDEIA Hp StAR 73%, 97%, 73%, and 97%, and for Premier Platinum HpSA 91%, 79%, 35%, and 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

All tests except Premier Platinum HpSA were highly accurate confirming eradication after treatment.

Application of a stool antigen test to evaluate the incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents from Tehran, Iran

Helicobacter pylori infection is acquired mainly in childhood, especially in developing countries, where a low-cost, rapid diagnostic technique which is reliable for all age groups may be useful for the management of H. pylori infection. For this purpose, we used an HpSA test (Equipar) to detect H. pylori infection in children and adolescents from Tehran, Iran. Thirty-five children who were positive or negative for H. pylori infection by endoscopy-based tests were used as positive and negative controls for the HpSA test. Stools were collected from 430 randomly selected children and adolescents (4 to 18 years old) from southwest, near the center, and northwest of Tehran. A questionnaire that included presence of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP), family history of infection and/or peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and income of parents was completed. A good agreement was found between the results of endoscopy-based tests and those of the HpSA test; the sensitivity and specificity of the Equipar-HpSA test were 100% and 83.4%, respectively. Among 430 children and adolescents, 47% were positive by the HpSA test, of whom 82% had RAP. No difference in incidence was observed between the two sexes; the various categories of age showed an increasing incidence, ranging from 24% (ages 4 to 6) to 58% (ages 16 to 18). The rate of infection in children and adolescents from the southwest was significantly higher (70%) than the rate in those from the northwest (32%), and a family history of H. pylori infection or PUD was observed in 59% of the HpSA positive subjects. The HpSA test is a useful test to detect H. pylori infection in children and adolescents from developing countries.

Accuracy of a new monoclonal stool antigen test in post-eradication assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection: comparison with the polyclonal stool antigen test and urea breath test

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The enzyme immunoassay based on polyclonal antibodies (HpSA) represents a valid method for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in stool specimens, but some controversial results were reported in post-eradication setting. A new monoclonal enzyme immunoassay (FemtoLab H. pylori, Connex) has been developed. The present study compares the diagnostic accuracy of the two tests after eradication therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stool samples were collected and urea breath test and endoscopy performed in 325 patients (161 F, 164 M, age 17-78 years), 4-8 weeks after standard triple eradication therapy. The FemtoLab and HpSA tests were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. H. pylori infection was confirmed if culture alone or both urease test and histology were positive and was considered absent if all three tests were negative.

RESULTS

H. pylori was eradicated in 231 patients (71.1%). Urea breath test showed the best performances with sensitivity 98.9% and specificity 99.5%. The sensitivity of FemtoLab was 88.3%, specificity 94.8%, positive and negative predictive values 87.4% and 95.2%. Corresponding HpSA values were 73.4%, 97.8%, 93.2% and 90%. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of FemtoLab were significantly better than HpSA. Adjusting the cut-offs according to a ROC curve improved not significantly the sensitivity of the two tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Urea breath test shows the best accuracy in the assessment of H. pylori infection. Between the stool tests, the FemtoLab due to its higher sensitivity is to prefer in the post-eradication assessment of H. pylori infection.

Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step immunochromatographic assay for detection of monoclonal Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children

A new rapid one-step immunochromatographic test using monoclonal antibodies for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool in children was evaluated on coded stool samples from 159 children (mean age, 9.7 +/- 5.0 years; 118 from Munich, 41 from Vienna): 86 children were H. pylori infected defined by positive culture and/or > or =2 other positive tests ([13C]urea breath test, histology, rapid urease test), and 73 children showed concordant negative results. Seventy-nine patients (12.1 +/- 3.8 years; 42 from Munich; 37 from Vienna) were tested 6 to 8 weeks after anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy with urea breath test and stool test. In Munich, all 160 tests (118 pre- and 42 posttreatment) were independently read by two observers. Equivocal results were excluded for calculation of sensitivity and specificity but were considered as false to assess accuracy. The two observers in Munich agreed in 63 out of 65 positive and 89 out of 95 negative results, while eight times (5.0%) they judged the test as equivocal. Pretreatment and posttreatment results for sensitivity were 88.1% (79.2 to 94.1) and 88.9% (51.8 to 99.7), specificity 88.1% (77.8 to 94.1) and 93.9% (85.2 to 98.3), and accuracy 83.5% and 81.5%, respectively. We conclude that the new monoclonal immunochromatographic quick test shows a good interobserver agreement, but equivocal results occur in 5%. Performance is comparable before and after therapy. The test may become a good alternative in children in settings where a [13C]urea breath test or a reliable enzyme immunoassay stool test are not available.

Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori with a stool antigen assay in frail, elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori infection has not been studied thoroughly in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of stool antigen assay (HpSA) in the assessment of H. pylori infection in hospitalized, frail, elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 85 consecutively recruited elderly patients (> or =65 years old) hospitalized between May 1999 and December 2001 with diagnostic indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Twenty-nine subjects had been receiving treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as omeprazole (10-20 mg/day) for 2-15 days, and 56 were not receiving treatment. HpSA was evaluated versus UBT (urea breath test), serology and histology: patients with at least two positive results out of the latter three tests were considered positive for H. pylori infection, while patients with at least two negative tests out of three were considered negative.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA in the 56 untreated patients were, respectively, 76% (true positives TP = 22; false negatives FN = 7) and 93% (true negatives TN = 25; false positives FP = 2). The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA in the 29 patients on PPI treatment were, respectively, 82% (TP = 9; FN = 2) and 83% (TN = 15; FP = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

HpSA is an accurate, non-invasive and easy method for diagnosing H. pylori infection in elderly patients.

Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis in hospitalised elderly patients: the stool antigen test (HpSA) in comparison with other methods

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection prevalence increases with age. In elderly patients, who often do not collaborate and who are affected by multiple pathologies, worldwide-recognised invasive and non-invasive methods (histology and Urea Breath Test) are not easy to apply. A new test based on the detection of Hp antigens in the stool (HpSA test) is now available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the HpSA test, and the interference of drugs (acid suppression, antibiotics) on test performance.

METHODS

Hp infection was detected by UBT, HpSA and histology in 122 hospitalised elderly subjects, divided into two groups according to therapy in the last month. Subjects were classified as being Hp-positive if two test results (histology and UBT) were positive, and Hp-negative if the same two test results were negative.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the HpSA test compared with two tests (histology and UBT) were respectively 76 and 95%. In the group of patients who had not received drugs, the sensitivity and specificity of the HpSA test were respectively 76 and 96%. Instead, in the group of patients who had received pharmacological therapy, sensitivity and specificity values were respectively 67 and 100%. HpSA-positive patients had received acid suppression for 9.2 +/- 8.9 days, and false-negative patients for 27.2 +/- 9.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The HpSA test is simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive for Hp detection, especially in elderly subjects with no compliance. It is influenced only after several days by therapy common in the elderly.

Review article: clinic-based testing for Helicobacter pylori infection by enzyme immunoassay of faeces, urine and saliva

Enzyme immunoassays have been used to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in human body materials such as faeces, urine and saliva. The stool antigen assay (HpSA), which uses polyclonal anti-H. pylori antibody as a capture reagent, has been widely used in the pre-treatment diagnosis of the infection in adults and children. Although the assay has the potential for monitoring eradication therapy, there are controversies over its use, especially at an early stage after treatment. The efficacy of the stool antigen assay can be modified by using monoclonal antibodies towards well characterized H. pylori faecal antigens. Two types of enzyme immunoassays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and immunochromatography) have been used to detect antibodies to H. pylori in urine. Immunochromatography of urine is a rapid assay well suited for epidemiological studies. The salivary ELISA, used in a number of studies, has shown inconsistent results with less than optimum sensitivity and specificity. Urinary and salivary immunoassays may not distinguish between past and present infections, thus limiting their potential to monitor eradication therapy.

Treatment and management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Clinical and basic mechanisms of interaction between Helicobacter pylori and its host have been the subject of numerous publications in the past year. Two additional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), esomeprazole and rabeprazole, have shown effectiveness in H. pylori eradication when combined with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and esomeprazole has demonstrated its effectiveness with only one daily dose. Other important recent developments worldwide include evidence-based treatment guidelines established at a European consensus meeting, improved accuracy in the urea breath test and the stool antigen test, new recommendations for second-line therapy, and a greater understanding of antimicrobial resistance in treatment failure. In addition, new studies have confirmed that H. pylori infection and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin are the major causes of peptic ulcer disease and ulcer bleeding. This paper reviews the results of these studies and their implications for future research.

Epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

There have been no major breakthroughs in the field of epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection over the last year, thus for this reason, these two topics will be treated in the same chapter. Information on the incidence of infection, as in the study of Malaty et al. are now being published from long-term cohort follow-ups. The route of transmission of H. pylori remains controversial, with circumstantial evidence for infection via exposure to animals, contaminated water supplies and oral reservoirs being reported. The value of citric acid to improve urea breath test (UBT) results has been documented. A novel stool test has been released on the market and we are awaiting more information, while detection of antibodies in urine gave satisfactory results. However, the most interesting data comes from the study of McColl et al. who clearly proved on a large sample and a 1-year follow-up that the 'test and treat' strategy using UBT, as proposed in the Maastricht Consensus Report, is definitely the method to use.

Efficacy of enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in frozen stool specimens: local validation

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of measurement of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) using stored frozen stool specimens, and to assess whether there were factors affecting efficacy in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Patients undergoing upper endoscopy at Tuen Mun Hospital were recruited. Stool samples were saved for HpSA testing and questionnaires were completed. Stool samples were frozen immediately upon receipt and stored at -70 degrees C until tested. HpSA results were compared with rapid urease test and histology.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one patients were recruited. One hundred and seventy-eight patients were suitable for analysis. Eighty-three were H. pylori positive and 95 were H. pylori negative. The mean duration of storage of the stool samples was 120 days (range, 40-225 days). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 84.3%, 97.9%, 97.2% and 88.6%, respectively. In patients with a false negative HpSA test, there was a significant delay in collecting the stool specimen after endoscopy when compared with those with a true positive HpSA test (4.2 vs. 2.3 days; P < 0.05). However, the duration of storage of the specimens was not longer, and consumption of coffee or tea and smoking habits were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

HpSA testing showed good sensitivity and specificity, even with frozen stool samples stored for up to 225 days. The efficacy was not affected by coffee, tea or smoking.