1
|
Zhang M, Vimont IJ, Jordaan SM, Hu L, McKain K, Crotwell M, Gaeta DC, Miller SM. U.S. Ethane Emissions and Trends Estimated from Atmospheric Observations. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:15539-15550. [PMID: 39169712 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c00380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Oil and natural gas (O&G) production and processing activities have changed markedly across the U.S. over the past several years. However, the impacts of these changes on air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions are not clear. In this study, we examine U.S. ethane (C2H6) emissions, which are primarily from O&G activities, during years 2015-2020. We use C2H6 observations made by the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory and partner organizations from towers and aircraft and estimate emissions from these observations by using an inverse model. We find that U.S. C2H6 emissions (4.43 ± 0.2 Tg·yr-1) are approximately three times those estimated by the EPA's 2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) platform (1.54 Tg·yr-1) and exhibit a very different seasonal cycle. We also find that changes in U.S. C2H6 emissions are decoupled from reported changes in production; emissions increased 6.3 ± 7.6% (0.25 ± 0.31 Tg) between 2015 and 2020 while reported C2H6 production increased by a much larger amount (78%). Our results also suggest an apparent correlation between C2H6 emissions and C2H6 spot prices, where prices could be a proxy for pressure on the infrastructure across the supply chain. Overall, these results provide insight into how U.S. C2H6 emissions are changing over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyang Zhang
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| | - Isaac J Vimont
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Sarah M Jordaan
- Department of Civil Engineering, McGill Unversity, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C3, Canada
| | - Lei Hu
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Kathryn McKain
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Molly Crotwell
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| | - Dylan C Gaeta
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| | - Scot M Miller
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bansal S, Creed IF, Tangen BA, Bridgham SD, Desai AR, Krauss KW, Neubauer SC, Noe GB, Rosenberry DO, Trettin C, Wickland KP, Allen ST, Arias-Ortiz A, Armitage AR, Baldocchi D, Banerjee K, Bastviken D, Berg P, Bogard MJ, Chow AT, Conner WH, Craft C, Creamer C, DelSontro T, Duberstein JA, Eagle M, Fennessy MS, Finkelstein SA, Göckede M, Grunwald S, Halabisky M, Herbert E, Jahangir MMR, Johnson OF, Jones MC, Kelleway JJ, Knox S, Kroeger KD, Kuehn KA, Lobb D, Loder AL, Ma S, Maher DT, McNicol G, Meier J, Middleton BA, Mills C, Mistry P, Mitra A, Mobilian C, Nahlik AM, Newman S, O’Connell JL, Oikawa P, van der Burg MP, Schutte CA, Song C, Stagg CL, Turner J, Vargas R, Waldrop MP, Wallin MB, Wang ZA, Ward EJ, Willard DA, Yarwood S, Zhu X. Practical Guide to Measuring Wetland Carbon Pools and Fluxes. WETLANDS (WILMINGTON, N.C.) 2023; 43:105. [PMID: 38037553 PMCID: PMC10684704 DOI: 10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Wetlands cover a small portion of the world, but have disproportionate influence on global carbon (C) sequestration, carbon dioxide and methane emissions, and aquatic C fluxes. However, the underlying biogeochemical processes that affect wetland C pools and fluxes are complex and dynamic, making measurements of wetland C challenging. Over decades of research, many observational, experimental, and analytical approaches have been developed to understand and quantify pools and fluxes of wetland C. Sampling approaches range in their representation of wetland C from short to long timeframes and local to landscape spatial scales. This review summarizes common and cutting-edge methodological approaches for quantifying wetland C pools and fluxes. We first define each of the major C pools and fluxes and provide rationale for their importance to wetland C dynamics. For each approach, we clarify what component of wetland C is measured and its spatial and temporal representativeness and constraints. We describe practical considerations for each approach, such as where and when an approach is typically used, who can conduct the measurements (expertise, training requirements), and how approaches are conducted, including considerations on equipment complexity and costs. Finally, we review key covariates and ancillary measurements that enhance the interpretation of findings and facilitate model development. The protocols that we describe to measure soil, water, vegetation, and gases are also relevant for related disciplines such as ecology. Improved quality and consistency of data collection and reporting across studies will help reduce global uncertainties and develop management strategies to use wetlands as nature-based climate solutions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheel Bansal
- U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND USA
| | - Irena F. Creed
- Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Brian A. Tangen
- U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND USA
| | - Scott D. Bridgham
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR USA
| | - Ankur R. Desai
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Ken W. Krauss
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA USA
| | - Scott C. Neubauer
- Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Gregory B. Noe
- U.S. Geological Survey, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, Reston, VA USA
| | | | - Carl Trettin
- U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA USA
| | - Kimberly P. Wickland
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver, CO USA
| | - Scott T. Allen
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV USA
| | - Ariane Arias-Ortiz
- Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA
| | - Anna R. Armitage
- Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX USA
| | - Dennis Baldocchi
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA
| | - Kakoli Banerjee
- Department of Biodiversity and Conservation of Natural Resources, Central University of Odisha, Koraput, Odisha India
| | - David Bastviken
- Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Peter Berg
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Matthew J. Bogard
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB Canada
| | - Alex T. Chow
- Earth and Environmental Sciences Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - William H. Conner
- Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, Georgetown, SC USA
| | - Christopher Craft
- O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| | - Courtney Creamer
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Minerals, Energy and Geophysics Science Center, Menlo Park, CA USA
| | - Tonya DelSontro
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada
| | - Jamie A. Duberstein
- Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, Georgetown, SC USA
| | - Meagan Eagle
- U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal & Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA USA
| | | | | | - Mathias Göckede
- Department for Biogeochemical Signals, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Sabine Grunwald
- Soil, Water and Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Meghan Halabisky
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | | | | | - Olivia F. Johnson
- U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND USA
- Departments of Biology and Environmental Studies, Kent State University, Kent, OH USA
| | - Miriam C. Jones
- U.S. Geological Survey, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, Reston, VA USA
| | - Jeffrey J. Kelleway
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences and Environmental Futures Research Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Sara Knox
- Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kevin D. Kroeger
- U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal & Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA USA
| | - Kevin A. Kuehn
- School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS USA
| | - David Lobb
- Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
| | - Amanda L. Loder
- Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Shizhou Ma
- School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada
| | - Damien T. Maher
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW Australia
| | - Gavin McNicol
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Jacob Meier
- U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND USA
| | - Beth A. Middleton
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA USA
| | - Christopher Mills
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center, Denver, CO USA
| | - Purbasha Mistry
- School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada
| | - Abhijit Mitra
- Department of Marine Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal India
| | - Courtney Mobilian
- O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| | - Amanda M. Nahlik
- Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessments, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR USA
| | - Sue Newman
- South Florida Water Management District, Everglades Systems Assessment Section, West Palm Beach, FL USA
| | - Jessica L. O’Connell
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO USA
| | - Patty Oikawa
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA USA
| | - Max Post van der Burg
- U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND USA
| | - Charles A. Schutte
- Department of Environmental Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ USA
| | - Changchun Song
- Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China
| | - Camille L. Stagg
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA USA
| | - Jessica Turner
- Freshwater and Marine Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Rodrigo Vargas
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE USA
| | - Mark P. Waldrop
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Minerals, Energy and Geophysics Science Center, Menlo Park, CA USA
| | - Marcus B. Wallin
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Zhaohui Aleck Wang
- Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA USA
| | - Eric J. Ward
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA USA
| | - Debra A. Willard
- U.S. Geological Survey, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, Reston, VA USA
| | - Stephanie Yarwood
- Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD USA
| | - Xiaoyan Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Songliao Aquatic Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lopez-Coto I, Ren X, Karion A, McKain K, Sweeney C, Dickerson RR, McDonald BC, Ahn DY, Salawitch RJ, He H, Shepson PB, Whetstone JR. Carbon Monoxide Emissions from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore Metropolitan Area: Recent Trend and COVID-19 Anomaly. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2022; 56:2172-2180. [PMID: 35080873 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
We analyze airborne measurements of atmospheric CO concentration from 70 flights conducted over six years (2015-2020) using an inverse model to quantify the CO emissions from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore metropolitan areas. We found that CO emissions have been declining in the area at a rate of ≈-4.5 % a-1 since 2015 or ≈-3.1 % a-1 since 2016. In addition, we found that CO emissions show a "Sunday" effect, with emissions being lower, on average, than for the rest of the week and that the seasonal cycle is no larger than 16 %. Our results also show that the trend derived from the NEI agrees well with the observed trend, but that NEI daytime-adjusted emissions are ≈50 % larger than our estimated emissions. In 2020, measurements collected during the shutdown in activity related to the COVID-19 pandemic indicate a significant drop in CO emissions of 16 % relative to the expected emissions trend from the previous years, or 23 % relative to the mean of 2016 to February 2020. Our results also indicate a larger reduction in April than in May. Last, we show that this reduction in CO emissions was driven mainly by a reduction in traffic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel Lopez-Coto
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States
- School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
| | - Xinrong Ren
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, 4254 Stadium Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
- Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States
| | - Anna Karion
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States
| | - Kathryn McKain
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| | - Colm Sweeney
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Russell R Dickerson
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, 4254 Stadium Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
| | - Brian C McDonald
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Doyeon Y Ahn
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, 4254 Stadium Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
| | - Ross J Salawitch
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, 4254 Stadium Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
| | - Hao He
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, 4254 Stadium Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
| | - Paul B Shepson
- School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States
| | - James R Whetstone
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
COS-derived GPP relationships with temperature and light help explain high-latitude atmospheric CO 2 seasonal cycle amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2103423118. [PMID: 34380737 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2103423118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the Arctic and Boreal region (ABR) where warming is especially pronounced, the increase of gross primary production (GPP) has been suggested as an important driver for the increase of the atmospheric CO2 seasonal cycle amplitude (SCA). However, the role of GPP relative to changes in ecosystem respiration (ER) remains unclear, largely due to our inability to quantify these gross fluxes on regional scales. Here, we use atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) measurements to provide observation-based estimates of GPP over the North American ABR. Our annual GPP estimate is 3.6 (2.4 to 5.5) PgC · y-1 between 2009 and 2013, the uncertainty of which is smaller than the range of GPP estimated from terrestrial ecosystem models (1.5 to 9.8 PgC · y-1). Our COS-derived monthly GPP shows significant correlations in space and time with satellite-based GPP proxies, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, and near-infrared reflectance of vegetation. Furthermore, the derived monthly GPP displays two different linear relationships with soil temperature in spring versus autumn, whereas the relationship between monthly ER and soil temperature is best described by a single quadratic relationship throughout the year. In spring to midsummer, when GPP is most strongly correlated with soil temperature, our results suggest the warming-induced increases of GPP likely exceeded the increases of ER over the past four decades. In autumn, however, increases of ER were likely greater than GPP due to light limitations on GPP, thereby enhancing autumn net carbon emissions. Both effects have likely contributed to the atmospheric CO2 SCA amplification observed in the ABR.
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang Y, Kort EA, Gourdji S, Karion A, Mueller K, Ware J. Seasonally Resolved Excess Urban Methane Emissions from the Baltimore/Washington, DC Metropolitan Region. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2019; 53:11285-11293. [PMID: 31486640 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Urban areas are increasingly recognized as an important source of methane (CH4), but we have limited seasonally resolved observations of these regions. In this study, we quantify seasonal and annual urban CH4 emissions over the Baltimore, Maryland, and Washington, DC metropolitan regions. We use CH4 atmospheric observations from four tall tower stations and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to simulate CH4 concentrations at these stations. We directly compare these simulations with observations and use a geostatistical inversion method to determine optimal emissions to match our observations. We use observations spanning four seasons and employ an ensemble approach considering multiple meteorological representations, emission inventories, and upwind CH4 values. Forward simulations in winter, spring, and fall underestimate observed atmospheric CH4 while in summer, simulations overestimate observations because of excess modeled wetland emissions. With ensemble geostatistical inversions, the optimized annual emissions in DC/Baltimore are 39 ± 9 Gg/month (1 δ), 2.0 ± 0.4 times higher than the ensemble mean of bottom-up emission inventories. We find a modest seasonal variability of urban CH4 emissions not captured in current inventories, with optimized summer emissions ∼41% lower than winter, broadly consistent with expectations if emissions are dominated by fugitive natural gas sources that correlate with natural gas usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaoxian Huang
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , United States
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering , Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan 48202 , United States
| | - Eric A Kort
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , United States
| | - Sharon Gourdji
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , United States
- National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg , Maryland 20899 , United States
| | - Anna Karion
- National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg , Maryland 20899 , United States
| | - Kimberly Mueller
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , United States
- National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg , Maryland 20899 , United States
| | - John Ware
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cressie N. Mission CO2ntrol: A Statistical Scientist's Role in Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. J Am Stat Assoc 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1419136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Cressie
- National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller SM, Miller CE, Commane R, Chang RYW, Dinardo SJ, Henderson JM, Karion A, Lindaas J, Melton JR, Miller JB, Sweeney C, Wofsy SC, Michalak AM. A multi-year estimate of methane fluxes in Alaska from CARVE atmospheric observations. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES 2016; 30:1441-1453. [PMID: 28066129 PMCID: PMC5207046 DOI: 10.1002/2016gb005419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Methane (CH4) fluxes from Alaska and other arctic regions may be sensitive to thawing permafrost and future climate change, but estimates of both current and future fluxes from the region are uncertain. This study estimates CH4 fluxes across Alaska for 2012-2014 using aircraft observations from the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) and a geostatistical inverse model (GIM). We find that a simple flux model based on a daily soil temperature map and a static map of wetland extent reproduces the atmospheric CH4 observations at the state-wide, multi-year scale more effectively than global-scale, state-of-the-art process-based models. This result points to a simple and effective way of representing CH4 flux patterns across Alaska. It further suggests that contemporary process-based models can improve their representation of key processes that control fluxes at regional scales, and that more complex processes included in these models cannot be evaluated given the information content of available atmospheric CH4 observations. In addition, we find that CH4 emissions from the North Slope of Alaska account for 24% of the total statewide flux of 1.74 ± 0.44 Tg CH4 (for May-Oct.). Contemporary global-scale process models only attribute an average of 3% of the total flux to this region. This mismatch occurs for two reasons: process models likely underestimate wetland area in regions without visible surface water, and these models prematurely shut down CH4 fluxes at soil temperatures near 0°C. As a consequence, wetlands covered by vegetation and wetlands with persistently cold soils could be larger contributors to natural CH4 fluxes than in process estimates. Lastly, we find that the seasonality of CH4 fluxes varied during 2012-2014, but that total emissions did not differ significantly among years, despite substantial differences in soil temperature and precipitation; year-to-year variability in these environmental conditions did not affect obvious changes in total CH4 fluxes from the state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scot M. Miller
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Charles E. Miller
- Science Division, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Roisin Commane
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Y.-W. Chang
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Steven J. Dinardo
- Science Division, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | - Anna Karion
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Jakob Lindaas
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Joe R. Melton
- Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, Canada
| | | | - Colm Sweeney
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven C. Wofsy
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Anna M. Michalak
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alden CB, Miller JB, Gatti LV, Gloor MM, Guan K, Michalak AM, van der Laan-Luijkx IT, Touma D, Andrews A, Basso LS, Correia CSC, Domingues LG, Joiner J, Krol MC, Lyapustin AI, Peters W, Shiga YP, Thoning K, van der Velde IR, van Leeuwen TT, Yadav V, Diffenbaugh NS. Regional atmospheric CO2 inversion reveals seasonal and geographic differences in Amazon net biome exchange. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2016; 22:3427-43. [PMID: 27124119 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Understanding tropical rainforest carbon exchange and its response to heat and drought is critical for quantifying the effects of climate change on tropical ecosystems, including global climate-carbon feedbacks. Of particular importance for the global carbon budget is net biome exchange of CO2 with the atmosphere (NBE), which represents nonfire carbon fluxes into and out of biomass and soils. Subannual and sub-Basin Amazon NBE estimates have relied heavily on process-based biosphere models, despite lack of model agreement with plot-scale observations. We present a new analysis of airborne measurements that reveals monthly, regional-scale (~1-8 × 10(6) km(2) ) NBE variations. We develop a regional atmospheric CO2 inversion that provides the first analysis of geographic and temporal variability in Amazon biosphere-atmosphere carbon exchange and that is minimally influenced by biosphere model-based first guesses of seasonal and annual mean fluxes. We find little evidence for a clear seasonal cycle in Amazon NBE but do find NBE sensitivity to aberrations from long-term mean climate. In particular, we observe increased NBE (more carbon emitted to the atmosphere) associated with heat and drought in 2010, and correlations between wet season NBE and precipitation (negative correlation) and temperature (positive correlation). In the eastern Amazon, pulses of increased NBE persisted through 2011, suggesting legacy effects of 2010 heat and drought. We also identify regional differences in postdrought NBE that appear related to long-term water availability. We examine satellite proxies and find evidence for higher gross primary productivity (GPP) during a pulse of increased carbon uptake in 2011, and lower GPP during a period of increased NBE in the 2010 dry season drought, but links between GPP and NBE changes are not conclusive. These results provide novel evidence of NBE sensitivity to short-term temperature and moisture extremes in the Amazon, where monthly and sub-Basin estimates have not been previously available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Alden
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - John B Miller
- Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Luciana V Gatti
- Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN)-Comissao Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CNEN)-Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, 2242 Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Manuel M Gloor
- School of Geography, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS9 2JT, UK
| | - Kaiyu Guan
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Anna M Michalak
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Ingrid T van der Laan-Luijkx
- Department of Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle Touma
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Arlyn Andrews
- Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
| | - Luana S Basso
- Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN)-Comissao Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CNEN)-Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, 2242 Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Caio S C Correia
- Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN)-Comissao Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CNEN)-Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, 2242 Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Lucas G Domingues
- Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN)-Comissao Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CNEN)-Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, 2242 Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Joanna Joiner
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
| | - Maarten C Krol
- Department of Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexei I Lyapustin
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
| | - Wouter Peters
- Department of Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yoichi P Shiga
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Kirk Thoning
- Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
| | - Ivar R van der Velde
- University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs T van Leeuwen
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vineet Yadav
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USA
| | - Noah S Diffenbaugh
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Continued emissions of carbon tetrachloride from the United States nearly two decades after its phaseout for dispersive uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:2880-5. [PMID: 26929368 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522284113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
National-scale emissions of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) are derived based on inverse modeling of atmospheric observations at multiple sites across the United States from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's flask air sampling network. We estimate an annual average US emission of 4.0 (2.0-6.5) Gg CCl4 y(-1) during 2008-2012, which is almost two orders of magnitude larger than reported to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) (mean of 0.06 Gg y(-1)) but only 8% (3-22%) of global CCl4 emissions during these years. Emissive regions identified by the observations and consistently shown in all inversion results include the Gulf Coast states, the San Francisco Bay Area in California, and the Denver area in Colorado. Both the observation-derived emissions and the US EPA TRI identified Texas and Louisiana as the largest contributors, accounting for one- to two-thirds of the US national total CCl4 emission during 2008-2012. These results are qualitatively consistent with multiple aircraft and ship surveys conducted in earlier years, which suggested significant enhancements in atmospheric mole fractions measured near Houston and surrounding areas. Furthermore, the emission distribution derived for CCl4 throughout the United States is more consistent with the distribution of industrial activities included in the TRI than with the distribution of other potential CCl4 sources such as uncapped landfills or activities related to population density (e.g., use of chlorine-containing bleach).
Collapse
|
10
|
Shiga YP, Michalak AM, Gourdji SM, Mueller KL, Yadav V. Detecting fossil fuel emissions patterns from subcontinental regions using North American in situ CO 2 measurements. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 2014; 41:4381-4388. [PMID: 25821266 PMCID: PMC4373169 DOI: 10.1002/2014gl059684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/30/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The ability to monitor fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions from subcontinental regions using atmospheric CO2 observations remains an important but unrealized goal. Here we explore a necessary but not sufficient component of this goal, namely, the basic question of the detectability of FFCO2 emissions from subcontinental regions. Detectability is evaluated by examining the degree to which FFCO2 emissions patterns from specific regions are needed to explain the variability observed in high-frequency atmospheric CO2 observations. Analyses using a CO2 monitoring network of 35 continuous measurement towers over North America show that FFCO2 emissions are difficult to detect during nonwinter months. We find that the compounding effects of the seasonality of atmospheric transport patterns and the biospheric CO2 flux signal dramatically hamper the detectability of FFCO2 emissions. Results from several synthetic data case studies highlight the need for advancements in data coverage and transport model accuracy if the goal of atmospheric measurement-based FFCO2 emissions detection and estimation is to be achieved beyond urban scales. KEY POINTS Poor detectability of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from subcontinental regionsDetectability assessed via attribution of emissions patterns in atmospheric dataLoss in detectability due to transport modeling errors and biospheric signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi P Shiga
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, California, USA ; Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anna M Michalak
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sharon M Gourdji
- Department of Environmental and Earth Systems Science, Stanford University Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kim L Mueller
- Science and Technology Policy Institute Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Vineet Yadav
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tian X, Xie Z, Cai Z, Liu Y, Fu Y, Zhang H. The Chinese carbon cycle data-assimilation system (Tan-Tracker). CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s11434-014-0238-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Applying a dual optimization method to quantify carbon fluxes: recent progress in carbon flux inversion. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11434-013-0016-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
This study quantitatively estimates the spatial distribution of anthropogenic methane sources in the United States by combining comprehensive atmospheric methane observations, extensive spatial datasets, and a high-resolution atmospheric transport model. Results show that current inventories from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research underestimate methane emissions nationally by a factor of ∼1.5 and ∼1.7, respectively. Our study indicates that emissions due to ruminants and manure are up to twice the magnitude of existing inventories. In addition, the discrepancy in methane source estimates is particularly pronounced in the south-central United States, where we find total emissions are ∼2.7 times greater than in most inventories and account for 24 ± 3% of national emissions. The spatial patterns of our emission fluxes and observed methane-propane correlations indicate that fossil fuel extraction and refining are major contributors (45 ± 13%) in the south-central United States. This result suggests that regional methane emissions due to fossil fuel extraction and processing could be 4.9 ± 2.6 times larger than in EDGAR, the most comprehensive global methane inventory. These results cast doubt on the US EPA's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25-30%. Overall, we conclude that methane emissions associated with both the animal husbandry and fossil fuel industries have larger greenhouse gas impacts than indicated by existing inventories.
Collapse
|
14
|
Schuh AE, Lauvaux T, West TO, Denning AS, Davis KJ, Miles N, Richardson S, Uliasz M, Lokupitiya E, Cooley D, Andrews A, Ogle S. Evaluating atmospheric CO2 inversions at multiple scales over a highly inventoried agricultural landscape. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2013; 19:1424-39. [PMID: 23505222 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2012] [Revised: 11/06/2012] [Accepted: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
An intensive regional research campaign was conducted by the North American Carbon Program (NACP) in 2007 to study the carbon cycle of the highly productive agricultural regions of the Midwestern United States. Forty-five different associated projects were conducted across five US agencies over the course of nearly a decade involving hundreds of researchers. One of the primary objectives of the intensive campaign was to investigate the ability of atmospheric inversion techniques to use highly calibrated CO2 mixing ratio data to estimate CO2 flux over the major croplands of the United States by comparing the results to an inventory of CO2 fluxes. Statistics from densely monitored crop production, consisting primarily of corn and soybeans, provided the backbone of a well studied bottom-up inventory flux estimate that was used to evaluate the atmospheric inversion results. Estimates were compared to the inventory from three different inversion systems, representing spatial scales varying from high resolution mesoscale (PSU), to continental (CSU) and global (CarbonTracker), coupled to different transport models and optimization techniques. The inversion-based mean CO2 -C sink estimates were generally slightly larger, 8-20% for PSU, 10-20% for CSU, and 21% for CarbonTracker, but statistically indistinguishable, from the inventory estimate of 135 TgC. While the comparisons show that the MCI region-wide C sink is robust across inversion system and spatial scale, only the continental and mesoscale inversions were able to reproduce the spatial patterns within the region. In general, the results demonstrate that inversions can recover CO2 fluxes at sub-regional scales with a relatively high density of CO2 observations and adequate information on atmospheric transport in the region.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou Y, Obenour DR, Scavia D, Johengen TH, Michalak AM. Spatial and temporal trends in Lake Erie hypoxia, 1987-2007. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2013; 47:899-905. [PMID: 23237424 DOI: 10.1021/es303401b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Hypoxic conditions, defined as dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations below 2 mg/L, are a regular summertime occurrence in Lake Erie, but the spatial extent has been poorly understood due to sparse sampling. We use geostatistical kriging and conditional realizations to provide quantitative estimates of the extent of hypoxia in the central basin of Lake Erie for August and September of 1987 to 2007, along with their associated uncertainties. The applied geostatistical approach combines the limited in situ DO measurements with auxiliary data selected using the Bayesian Information Criterion. Bathymetry and longitude are found to be highly significant in explaining the spatial distribution of DO, while satellite observations of sea surface temperature and satellite chlorophyll are not. The hypoxic extent was generally lowest in the mid-1990s, with the late 1980s (1987, 1988) and the 2000s (2003, 2005) experiencing the largest hypoxic zones. A simple exponential relationship based on the squared average measured bottom DO explains 97% of the estimated variability in the hypoxic extent. The change in the observed maximum extent between August and September is found to be sensitive to the corresponding variability in the hypolimnion thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuntao Zhou
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Miller SM, Kort EA, Hirsch AI, Dlugokencky EJ, Andrews AE, Xu X, Tian H, Nehrkorn T, Eluszkiewicz J, Michalak AM, Wofsy SC. Regional sources of nitrous oxide over the United States: Seasonal variation and spatial distribution. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1029/2011jd016951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
17
|
Winiarek V, Bocquet M, Saunier O, Mathieu A. Estimation of errors in the inverse modeling of accidental release of atmospheric pollutant: Application to the reconstruction of the cesium-137 and iodine-131 source terms from the Fukushima Daiichi power plant. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1029/2011jd016932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
18
|
Wu L, Bocquet M, Lauvaux T, Chevallier F, Rayner P, Davis K. Optimal representation of source-sink fluxes for mesoscale carbon dioxide inversion with synthetic data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1029/2011jd016198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Wu
- CEREA, Joint Laboratory École des Ponts ParisTech - EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est; Marne la Vallée France
- INRIA; Paris-Rocquencourt Research Center; Paris France
| | - Marc Bocquet
- CEREA, Joint Laboratory École des Ponts ParisTech - EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est; Marne la Vallée France
- INRIA; Paris-Rocquencourt Research Center; Paris France
| | - Thomas Lauvaux
- Department of Meteorology; Pennsylvania State University; University Park Pennsylvania USA
| | - Frédéric Chevallier
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement; CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, IPSL; Gif-sur-Yvette France
| | - Peter Rayner
- School of Earth Sciences; University of Melbourne; Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Kenneth Davis
- Department of Meteorology; Pennsylvania State University; University Park Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pickett-Heaps CA, Rayner PJ, Law RM, Ciais P, Patra PK, Bousquet P, Peylin P, Maksyutov S, Marshall J, Rödenbeck C, Langenfelds RL, Steele LP, Francey RJ, Tans P, Sweeney C. Atmospheric CO2inversion validation using vertical profile measurements: Analysis of four independent inversion models. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1029/2010jd014887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
20
|
Wofsy SC. HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained, global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2011; 369:2073-86. [PMID: 21502177 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) programme has completed three of five planned aircraft transects spanning the Pacific from 85 ° N to 67 ° S, with vertical profiles every approximately 2.2 ° of latitude. Measurements include greenhouse gases, long-lived tracers, reactive species, O(2)/N(2) ratio, black carbon (BC), aerosols and CO(2) isotopes. Our goals are to address the problem of determining surface emissions, transport strength and patterns, and removal rates of atmospheric trace gases and aerosols at global scales and to provide strong tests of satellite data and global models. HIPPO data show dense pollution and BC at high altitudes over the Arctic, imprints of large N(2)O sources from tropical lands and convective storms, sources of pollution and biogenic CH(4) in the Arctic, and summertime uptake of CO(2) and sources for O(2) at high southern latitudes. Global chemical signatures of atmospheric transport are imaged, showing remarkably sharp horizontal gradients at air mass boundaries, weak vertical gradients and inverted profiles (maxima aloft) in both hemispheres. These features challenge satellite algorithms, global models and inversion analyses to derive surface fluxes. HIPPO data can play a crucial role in identifying and resolving questions of global sources, sinks and transport of atmospheric gases and aerosols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Wofsy
- Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Göckede M, Turner DP, Michalak AM, Vickers D, Law BE. Sensitivity of a subregional scale atmospheric inverse CO2modeling framework to boundary conditions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1029/2010jd014443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Göckede
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon USA
| | - David P. Turner
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon USA
| | - Anna M. Michalak
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; University of Michigan; Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Science; University of Michigan; Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | - Dean Vickers
- College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon USA
| | - Beverly E. Law
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry; Oregon State University; Corvallis Oregon USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Göckede M, Michalak AM, Vickers D, Turner DP, Law BE. Atmospheric inverse modeling to constrain regional-scale CO2budgets at high spatial and temporal resolution. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1029/2009jd012257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
23
|
Zhou Y, Michalak AM. Characterizing attribute distributions in water sediments by geostatistical downscaling. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2009; 43:9267-9273. [PMID: 20000519 DOI: 10.1021/es901431y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Information about attributes such as contaminant concentrations or hydraulic properties in benthic sediments is typically obtained in core sections of varying lengths, and only the average value is measured in each section. However, an estimate of the attribute distribution at a uniform spatial resolution is often required for site characterization and the design of appropriate risk-based remediation alternatives. Because attributes exhibit spatial autocorrelation, geostatistical methods have become an essential tool for estimating their spatial distribution. The purpose of this paper is to optimally infer the spatial distribution of sampled attributes at a uniform resolution from fluvial core sampling data, using a downscaling technique formulated as a geostatistical inverse problem. We compare geostatistical downscaling to the more traditional approach of point-to-point ordinary kriging for a hypothetical case study, and for total organic carbon observations from the Passaic River, New Jersey. Although frequently used to interpolate measurements, ordinary kriging is shown not to be able to estimate the spatial distribution of attributes accurately, because this approach assumes that data are sampled at a uniform resolution. Geostatistical downscaling, on the other hand, is shown to resolve this problem by explicitly accounting for the relationship between the known average measurements and the unknown fine-resolution attribute distribution to be estimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuntao Zhou
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schuh AE, Denning AS, Uliasz M, Corbin KD. Seeing the forest through the trees: Recovering large-scale carbon flux biases in the midst of small-scale variability. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1029/2008jg000842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
25
|
Gourdji SM, Mueller KL, Schaefer K, Michalak AM. Global monthly averaged CO2fluxes recovered using a geostatistical inverse modeling approach: 2. Results including auxiliary environmental data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
26
|
Mueller KL, Gourdji SM, Michalak AM. Global monthly averaged CO2fluxes recovered using a geostatistical inverse modeling approach: 1. Results using atmospheric measurements. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
27
|
Lokupitiya RS, Zupanski D, Denning AS, Kawa SR, Gurney KR, Zupanski M. Estimation of global CO2fluxes at regional scale using the maximum likelihood ensemble filter. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
28
|
Zupanski D, Denning AS, Uliasz M, Zupanski M, Schuh AE, Rayner PJ, Peters W, Corbin KD. Carbon flux bias estimation employing Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter (MLEF). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007. [DOI: 10.1029/2006jd008371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
29
|
Miller CE, Crisp D, DeCola PL, Olsen SC, Randerson JT, Michalak AM, Alkhaled A, Rayner P, Jacob DJ, Suntharalingam P, Jones DBA, Denning AS, Nicholls ME, Doney SC, Pawson S, Boesch H, Connor BJ, Fung IY, O'Brien D, Salawitch RJ, Sander SP, Sen B, Tans P, Toon GC, Wennberg PO, Wofsy SC, Yung YL, Law RM. Precision requirements for space-based data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007. [DOI: 10.1029/2006jd007659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 292] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. E. Miller
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - D. Crisp
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - P. L. DeCola
- Science Mission Directorate; NASA Headquarters; Washington, DC USA
| | - S. C. Olsen
- Los Alamos National Laboratory; Los Alamos New Mexico USA
| | - J. T. Randerson
- Department of Earth System Science; University of California; Irvine California USA
| | - A. M. Michalak
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; The University of Michigan; Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences; The University of Michigan; Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | - A. Alkhaled
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; The University of Michigan; Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | - P. Rayner
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ; Gif-sur-Yvette France
| | - D. J. Jacob
- Division of Engineering and Applied Science; Harvard University; Cambridge Massachusetts USA
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences; Harvard University; Cambridge Massachusetts USA
| | - P. Suntharalingam
- Division of Engineering and Applied Science; Harvard University; Cambridge Massachusetts USA
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences; Harvard University; Cambridge Massachusetts USA
| | - D. B. A. Jones
- Department of Physics; University of Toronto; Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - A. S. Denning
- Atmospheric Science Department; Colorado State University; Fort Collins Colorado USA
| | - M. E. Nicholls
- Atmospheric Science Department; Colorado State University; Fort Collins Colorado USA
| | - S. C. Doney
- Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Woods Hole Massachusetts USA
| | - S. Pawson
- Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center; Baltimore Maryland USA
- Global Modeling and Assimilation Office; Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt Maryland USA
| | - H. Boesch
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - B. J. Connor
- Atmospheric Research; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research; Central Otago, Omakau New Zealand
| | - I. Y. Fung
- Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center; University of California; Berkeley California USA
| | - D. O'Brien
- Atmospheric Science Department; Colorado State University; Fort Collins Colorado USA
| | - R. J. Salawitch
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - S. P. Sander
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - B. Sen
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - P. Tans
- Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division; NOAA; Boulder Colorado USA
| | - G. C. Toon
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - P. O. Wennberg
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - S. C. Wofsy
- Division of Engineering and Applied Science; Harvard University; Cambridge Massachusetts USA
| | - Y. L. Yung
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
| | - R. M. Law
- CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research; Aspendale Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Peters W, Miller JB, Whitaker J, Denning AS, Hirsch A, Krol MC, Zupanski D, Bruhwiler L, Tans PP. An ensemble data assimilation system to estimate CO2surface fluxes from atmospheric trace gas observations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
31
|
Michalak AM, Hirsch A, Bruhwiler L, Gurney KR, Peters W, Tans PP. Maximum likelihood estimation of covariance parameters for Bayesian atmospheric trace gas surface flux inversions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1029/2005jd005970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|