Renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease following bone marrow transplantation: a report of six cases, with and without immunosuppression

Review of acute kidney injury and progression to chronic kidney disease in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant

While acute kidney injury (AKI) after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) has been well-described in pediatric patients, literature regarding the long term renal consequences of HCT-related AKI, the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CKD care in pediatric patients post-HCT is limited. CKD affects almost 50% of patients after HCT with multifactorial etiology including infection, nephrotoxic medications, transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, graft-versus-host disease, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. As renal function declines in CKD, eventually progressing to end stage kidney disease (ESKD), mortality increases and is more than 80% among patients requiring dialysis. Using society guidelines and current literature, this review summarizes definitions and etiologies of and management strategies among patients with AKI and CKD post-HCT with an emphasis on albuminuria, hypertension, nutrition, metabolic acidosis, anemia, and mineral bone disease. The goal of this review is to aid early identification and intervention in patients with renal dysfunction prior to development of ESKD, and to discuss ESKD and renal transplant in these patients post-HCT.

Use of Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Assay to Evaluate Immune Tolerance before Kidney Transplantation with an Immunosuppression-Free Protocol following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from the Same Donor

Several cases of kidney transplantation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from the same donor for end-stage renal disease have been reported. In those cases, immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued since immune tolerance was supposed to be induced. Theoretically, the recipient's immune system recognizes the kidney allograft as its own tissue with the same human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile, and the kidney allograft will not be rejected, even without the use of immunosuppressive agents. However, almost all recipients receive immunosuppressants in the early stages after kidney transplantation owing to concerns of acute rejection. Here, we report a successful case of post-HSCT kidney transplantation without the use of immunosuppressive drugs, in which a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay was used to evaluate immune tolerance before kidney transplantation. The patient was a 25-year-old woman. Five years prior, she developed acute myeloid leukemia and underwent HLA-half-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Thereafter, she was in remission of the acute myeloid leukemia, but 1 year later, she developed renal graft-versus-host disease. Subsequently, the patient's renal function gradually deteriorated to end-stage renal failure, and she underwent kidney transplantation with the previous stem cell donor: her mother. HLA typing of donor and recipient showed a complete chimerism in the peripheral blood. The pretransplantation complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch and flow cytometric T-cell crossmatch results were both negative, and HLA antibody measurements were all negative. The MLR assay revealed no T-lymphocyte reaction to the donor; therefore, immunosuppressants were not used. Two years after transplantation, the patient's serum creatinine concentration was around 0.8 mg/dL (down from 4 mg/dL before transplantation). No abnormalities were observed in a renal biopsy performed after 3 months. Our study, along with others, indicates that immune tolerance to a donor develops in post-HSCT kidney transplantation from the same donor.

Establishment of Chimerism and Organ Transplant Tolerance in Laboratory Animals: Safety and Efficacy of Adaptation to Humans

The definition of immune tolerance to allogeneic tissue and organ transplants in laboratory animals and humans continues to be the acceptance of the donor graft, rejection of third-party grafts, and specific unresponsiveness of recipient immune cells to the donor alloantigens in the absence of immunosuppressive treatments. Actively acquired tolerance was achieved in mice more than 60 years ago by the establishment of mixed chimerism in neonatal mice. Once established, mixed chimerism was self-perpetuating and allowed for acceptance of tissue transplants in adults. Successful establishment of tolerance in humans has now been reported in several clinical trials based on the development of chimerism after combined transplantation of hematopoietic cells and an organ from the same donor. This review examines the mechanisms of organ graft acceptance after establishment of mixed chimerism (allo-tolerance) or complete chimerism (self-tolerance), and compares the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and graft versus tumor (GVT) activity in complete and mixed chimerism. GVHD, GVT activity, and complete chimerism are also discussed in the context of bone marrow transplantation to treat hematologic malignancies. The roles of transient versus persistent mixed chimerism in the induction and maintenance of tolerance and organ graft acceptance in animal models and clinical studies are compared. Key differences in the stability of mixed chimeras and tolerance induction in MHC matched and mismatched rodents, large laboratory animals, and humans are examined to provide insights into the safety and efficacy of translation of results of animal models to clinical trials.

Kidney Disease Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) provides a curative option for the treatment of several malignancies. Its growing use is associated with an increased burden of kidney disease. Acute kidney injury is usually seen within the first 100 days of transplantation and has an incidence ranging between 12 and 73%, with the highest rate in myeloablative allogeneic SCT. A large subset of patients after SCT develop chronic kidney disease. They can be broadly classified into thrombotic microangiopathy, nephrotic syndrome, and calcineurin toxicity. Dialysis requirement after SCT is associated with mortality exceeding 80%. Given the higher morbidity and mortality related to development kidney disease, nephrologists need to be aware of the various causes and best treatment options.

Approaches to Establishing Tolerance in Immune Mediated Diseases

The development of rational approaches to restore immune tolerance requires an iterative approach that builds on past success and utilizes new mechanistic insights into immune-mediated pathologies. This article will review concepts that have evolved from the clinical trial experience of the Immune Tolerance Network, with an emphasis on lessons learned from the innovative mechanistic studies conducted for these trials and new strategies under development for induction of tolerance.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Cancer Survivors

As breakthroughs in cancer care are leading to improved long-term outcomes in a subset of advanced cancers, there is a growing population of long-term cancer survivors that are at risk of long-term complications. In this review, we summarize what is known about chronic kidney disease in cancer survivors, focusing on the following high-risk groups: survivors of childhood cancers, stem cell transplant recipients, patients with renal cell carcinoma, patients exposed to cisplatin and other nephrotoxic chemotherapies, and patients receiving immunotherapy for cancer. As new anticancer therapies are developed, more research is needed to understand the long-term risks of kidney function decline and to devise methods to prevent chronic kidney disease.

Long-term Outcomes of Sequential Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Kidney Transplantation: Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Experience with sequential hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients who underwent both HSCT and KT at our center, with a median follow-up of 11 y.

RESULTS

In our 54 patients cohort (94% autologous HSCT), 36 (67%) patients received HSCT first followed by KT, while 18 (33%) received KT before HSCT. In both groups, AL amyloidosis represented 50% of hematologic diagnosis. Only 4 patients expired due to hematologic disease relapse (2 patients in each group) and only 3 allografts were lost due to hematologic disease recurrence (HSCT first n = 1 and KT first n = 2). Overall 1, 5, and 10 y death-censored graft survival rates were 94%, 94%, and 94%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 89%, 89%, and 75%, respectively, for the KT first group. Overall 1, 5, and 10 y patients survival rates were 100%, 97% and 90%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 100%, 76%, and 63%, respectively, for the KT first group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports safety of sequential KT and HSCT, with improved overall patient survival compared to recipients of HSCT remaining on dialysis and good long-term kidney allograft outcome.

Temporal Change in Blood Group after Bone Marrow Transplant: A Case of Successful ABO-Incompatible Deceased Donor Transplant

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has been successfully utilised in a deceased donor and living donor kidney transplantation to improve organ utilisation and decrease waiting times. We describe a case of a successful, unanticipated ABO-incompatible donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplant in a patient who had a previous ABOi haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and had reverted to his original blood group B, after matching as a blood group A recipient with a blood group A donor. The recipient was unsensitized with a cPRA which was 0% and no donor-specific antibodies and zero HLA mismatch. An urgent anti-A titre was 1 : 2. Given the low antibody titres, we proceeded to transplantation. The patient developed delayed graft function and required dialysis on postoperative day 1 and day 2. The creatinine fell spontaneously on day 5, with progressively increased urine output and stable graft function on discharge at day 6. Anti-A titres were 1 : 1 on serial postoperative measurements. There were no rejection episodes, and the patient has a functioning graft at 16 months posttransplant. We describe a rare case in which the blood group can change after stem cell transplant and should be checked. We also demonstrate that a DCD ABOi transplant in the context of low anti-A titres for a patient with previous ABOi stem cell transplant can be performed successfully with standard immunosuppression.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation After Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Case Report

Many studies have been made on ABO-compatible kidney transplants following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, there have been few reports on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We report on the case of a successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with high titers after bone marrow transplantation experienced no infectious episodes. The patient was a 38-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease resulting from interstitial nephritis induced by drug toxicity or graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). He had received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from a human leukocyte antigen-identical unrelated donor to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia. The patient with high anti-B antibody titers (IgM 1:1024 IgG 1:256) received a desensitization protocol consisting of 2 doses of rituximab and 5 courses of plasmapheresis. The patient had prolonged depletion of circulating B cells 2 years after the transplant and was infected with cytomegalovirus viremia, pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, and adenovirus urinary tract infection at 2, 3, and 17 months post-transplant, respectively. Currently, at 6 years after his transplant, the patient has had no rejection and is in good clinical condition with only mild renal insufficiency. Our results suggest that ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation may be an effective renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease after HSCT, but desensitization in combination with immunosuppressants could lead to a state of over-immunosuppression, causing various infections.

Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donor-A multicenter analysis

Tolerance induction through simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but it is hampered by the toxicity of preconditioning therapies and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Moreover, renal function has never been compared to conventionally transplanted patients, thus, whether donor-specific tolerance results in improved outcomes remains unanswered. We collected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same donor and compared patient and transplant kidney survival as well as function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry. Overall, 22 tolerant and 20 control patients were included (median observation period 10 years [range 11 months to 26 years]). In the tolerant group, no renal allograft loss was reported, whereas 3 were lost in the control group. Median creatinine levels were 85 μmol/l (interquartile range [IQR] 72-99) in the tolerant cohort and 118 μmol/l (IQR 99-143) in the control group. Mixed linear-model showed around 29% lower average creatinine levels throughout follow-up in the tolerant group (P < .01). Our data clearly show stable renal graft function without long-term immunosuppression for many years, suggesting permanent donor-specific tolerance. Thus sequential transplantation might be an alternative approach for future studies targeting tolerance induction in renal allograft recipients.

Clinical Operational Tolerance and Immunosuppression Minimization in Kidney Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

The 20th century represents a breakthrough in the transplantation era, since the first kidney transplantation between identical twins was performed. This was the first case of tolerance, since the recipient did not need immunosuppression. However, as transplantation became possible, an immunosuppression-free status became the ultimate goal, since the first tolerance case was a clear exception from the hard reality nowadays represented by rejection.

METHODS

A plethora of studies was described over the past decades to understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for rejection. This review focuses on the most relevant studies found in the literature where renal tolerance cases are claimed. Contrasting, and at the same time, encouraging outcomes are herein discussed and a glimpse on the main renal biomarkers analyzed in this field is provided.

RESULTS

The activation of the immune system has been shown to play a central role in organ failure, but also it seems to induce a tolerance status when an allograft is performed, despite tolerance is still rare to register. Although there are still overwhelming challenges to overcome and various immune pathways remain arcane; the immunosuppression minimization might be more attainable than previously believed.

CONCLUSION

. Multiple biomarkers and tolerance mechanisms suspected to be involved in renal transplantation have been investigated to understand their real role, with still no clear answers on the topic. Thus, the actual knowledge provided necessarily leads to more in-depth investigations, although many questions in the past have been answered, there are still many issues on renal tolerance that need to be addressed.

Kidney transplantation for treatment of end-stage kidney disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

The safety of kidney transplantation (KT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological disease has not been investigated thoroughly.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentre study, we investigated the clinical courses of six ESKD patients that received KT after HSCT for various haematological diseases. Data for six such patients were obtained from three institutions in our consortium.

RESULTS

Two patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, one with refractory aplastic anaemia and another one with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received bone marrow transplantation. One patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received umbilical cord blood transplantation, and one with mantle cell lymphoma received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The patients developed ESKD at a median of 133 months after HSCT. Two patients who received KT and HSCT from the same donor were temporarily treated with immunosuppressive drugs. The other patients received KT and HSCT from different donors and were treated with antibody induction using our standard regimens. For one patient with ABO-incompatible transplantation, we added rituximab, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis. In the observational period at a median of 51 months after KT, only one patient experienced acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Four patients underwent hospitalization because of infection and fully recovered. No patient experienced recurrence of their original haematological disease. All patients survived throughout the observational periods, and graft functions were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high infection frequency, survival rates and graft functions were extremely good in patients compared with previous studies. Therefore, current management contributed to favourable outcomes of these patients.

Prognostic Factors in Lung Transplantation After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is the final lifesaving option for patients with pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients undergoing HSCT for hematologic diseases are thought to be high-risk candidates for lung transplantation; therefore, few lung transplants are performed for these patients, and few studies have been reported. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of lung transplantation in patients with pulmonary complications after HSCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 62 patients who underwent lung transplantation after HSCT. All data were collected from 6 lung transplant centers in Japan.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent cadaveric lung transplantation, whereas 45 underwent living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). In the LDLLT group, 18 patients underwent LDLLT after HSCT in which one of the donors had also served as a donor for HSCT. Seven patients underwent single LDLLT for which the donor was the same as the patient from whom stem cells were obtained for HSCT. Preoperative hypercapnia was observed in 52 patients (84%). Thirteen patients (21%) required mechanical ventilation preoperatively. Fifty-five patients underwent HSCT for hematologic malignancies, and 4 (7%) relapsed after lung transplantation. The 5-year survival rate was 64.2%. In a multivariable analysis, patients younger than 45 years and those with the same donor for both procedures exhibited significantly better survival (P = 0.012 and 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation for pulmonary complications after HSCT was performed safely and yielded better survival, especially in younger recipients for whom both lung transplantation and HSCT involved the same donor.

Solid organ transplantation following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: experience from a referral organ transplantation center and systematic review of literature

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) following haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a rare event. Uncertainty exists whether such recipients are at higher risk of relapse of underlying haematological disease or at increased risk of developing infectious or immunological complications and malignancies following SOT. The experience at our referral organ transplantation center and the present literature of SOT (n = 198) in recipients following previous HCT was systematically reviewed. Outcome analysis of 206 SOT recipients following HCT challenges the validity of the frequently stated comparable outcome with recipients without prior HCT. SOT recipients after HCT are younger and have a higher mortality and morbidity in comparison with "standard" recipients. Rejection rates for SOT recipients following HCT appear to be lower for all organs, except for liver transplantation. In the setting of liver transplantation following HCT, mortality for recipients of deceased donor grafts appears to be exceptionally high, although experience with grafts of living donors are favourable. Morbidity was mostly associated with infectious and malignant complications. Of note some SOT recipients who received solid organ donation from the same HCT donor were able to achieve successful withdrawal of immune suppression. Despite limited follow-up, recipients with prior HCT show a different course after SOT, necessitating attention and closer follow-up.

Current status of tolerance in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The attainment of tolerance remains a highly desirable goal in recipients of kidney transplants. Achievement of this goal would extend graft survival and eradicate toxicities related to long-term immunosuppression. Understanding mechanisms of tolerance and strategies to induce tolerance - their risk/benefit profiles - is essential for future success.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanistic studies of spontaneously tolerant kidney transplant recipients have uncovered potential roles for B or regulatory T cells, or both, in the maintenance of tolerance. Mixed hematopoietic chimerism has been the most commonly used approach to induce tolerance. Distinct protocols at three major transplant centers have led to successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in a subset of living donor kidney transplant recipients at the expense of complications such as infections and graft versus host disease. The addition of regulatory cell therapies to tolerance induction protocols could enhance success while minimizing complications.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the features of spontaneous tolerance in kidney transplant recipients, the results of clinical trials of tolerance induction in the context of living donor kidney transplant, and potential measures to improve the safety and efficacy of tolerance induction strategies.

Kidney transplant after hematopoietic cell transplant in pediatrics: Infectious and immunosuppressive considerations

Pediatric patients requiring kidney transplant after hematopoietic cell transplant receive multiple courses of immunosuppression placing them at risk for infection. To elucidate potential risk factors for infection, we compared the immunosuppressive regimens and infectious complications of pediatric kidney transplant recipients at a single institution who had previously undergone hematopoietic cell transplant from different donors to similar patients reported in the literature. Among the initial four post-hematopoietic cell transplant kidney transplant patients reviewed, viremia episodes were universal, including BK virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus-6, with one death from presumed BK virus encephalitis. No viremia was reported in five similar cases in the literature. Risk factors for increased infection include use of lymphodepleting serotherapy in HCT conditioning, multiple HCTs, limited immune reconstitution time between transplants, increased pre-KTx viral burden, and use of T-cell-depleting versus -suppressive induction immunosuppression for KTx. These findings suggest that pediatric post-HCT KTx recipients are at increased risk for viral infections, likely benefitting from thorough pre-KTx evaluation of immune reconstitution and preferential use of non-T-cell-depleting induction therapy for KTx. We applied these recommendations to one subsequent post-HCT patient requiring KTx at our institution with excellent outcomes one year post-KTx.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and acute kidney injury in children: A comprehensive review

AKI in the setting of HSCT is commonly investigated among adult patients. In the same way, malignancies requiring treatment with HSCT are not limited to the adult patient population, AKI following HSCT is frequently encountered within pediatric patient populations. However, inadequate information regarding epidemiology and pathophysiology specific to pediatric patients prevents development of appropriate and successful therapeutic strategies for those afflicted. Addressing AKI in the context of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, chemotherapy, thrombotic microangiopathy and hypertension post chemotherapy, glomerulonephritis, and graft versus host disease provides greater insight into renal impairment associated with these HSCT-related ailments. To obtain a better understanding of AKI among pediatric patients receiving HSCT, we investigated the current literature specifically addressing these areas of concern.

Kidney Transplantation With Corticosteroids Alone After Haploidentical HSCT From The Same Donor

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can lead to donor-specific tolerance. Patients reported in the literature that underwent kidney transplantation (KT) after a previous HSCT from the same haploidentical donor typically received short-term immunosuppression, mainly for safety reasons and concerns of triggering graft-versus-host disease.

METHODS

We describe the case of a 22-year-old patient who developed chronic kidney failure after receiving haploidentical HSCT from his father for the treatment of metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Five years after HSCT, he received a preemptive kidney transplant from his father. Steroid treatment, which had been prescribed for the underlying kidney disease, was withdrawn within 2 months posttransplant, and no de novo immunosuppression was given. Donor-specific tolerance was assessed with mixed lymphocyte reaction and INF-γ ELISPOT before (D0) and after KT (D9). Furthermore, the exact level of donor-derived T cells was measured with real-time polymerase chain reaction before and 1 year after KT.

RESULTS

In vitro assays (mixed lymphocyte reaction and ELISPOT) revealed donor-specific tolerance before and after transplantation, respectively. The number of recipient-derived T cells was low before KT and virtually did not change over time (0.0139% ± 0.0039 and 0.0120% ± 0.0067; P = NS). Graft function was excellent throughout the follow-up (36 months post KT: serum creatinine, 1.18 mg/dL). Protocol biopsies performed 1 and 12 months after transplantation confirmed the absence of rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first cases of kidney transplantation from the same donor after previous haploidentical HSCT with a corticosteroid taper alone. Our results suggest that immunosuppression can be avoided in such cases.

Renal pathology associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The kidney is subject to a large variety of injurious factors before, during, and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a high incidence of acute kidney injury in the peritransplant period. Chronic kidney disease is estimated to impact 15% to 20% of HCT recipients. Although renal biopsies may be deferred in the setting of thrombotic microangiopathy, acute self-limited impairment, or slowly progressive functional decline, in many patients renal biopsy yields important diagnostic insight to guide treatment. Light microscopic, immunofluorescence, and ultrastructural analysis often reveals a number of concurrent abnormalities in glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and vessels. Meta-analysis of the literature reveals that membranous nephropathy is the most commonly reported glomerular lesion in the setting of HCT, followed by minimal change disease. Autopsy and biopsy studies show that clinical criteria lack sensitivity and specificity for renal acute and chronic thrombotic microangiopathy. Viral infection and other causes of interstitial nephritis and tubular injury are important findings in HCT renal biopsies, which in many instances may not be clinically suspected. Given the complexity and variability of HCT protocols, clinicopathologic correlation is needed.

Solid organ transplantation following end-organ failure in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an accepted treatment modality for various malignant and non-malignant disorders of the lympho-hematopoietic system. Patient survival rate has increased significantly with the use of this procedure. However, with the increase in disease-free patient survival rates, complications including various organ toxicities are also common. Kidney, liver, lung, heart, and skin are among those solid organs that are commonly affected and frequently lead to organ dysfunction and eventually end-organ disease. Conservative measures may or may not be successful in managing the organ failure in these patients. Solid organ transplantation has been shown to be promising in those patients who fail conservative management. This review will summarize the causes of solid organ (kidney, liver, and lung) dysfunction and the available data on transplantation of these solid organs in post-HSCT recipients.

Tolerance--is it worth it?

We are entering an exciting time in the study of immunologic tolerance. Several cellular and molecular strategies have been developed that show promise in nonhuman transplant models and these approaches are just now appearing in clinical trials. Tolerance strategies that prevent immune rejection and obviate the need for immunosuppressive medications (with inherent risk of cancer, infection, and organ toxicity) would improve both graft and patient survival. Each tolerance protocol brings its own set of associated risks. As the results of these trials become available, we must continue to evaluate their successes and failures. The balance of these outcomes will help us answer the question: "Tolerance-Is it worth it?"

The kidney effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients are at risk for acute kidney disease and CKD, which confer excess morbidity and mortality in this patient population. A main cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in stem cell recipients is prerenal azotemia, but acute tubular necrosis (ATN), obstruction, marrow transfusion toxicity, and hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome also contribute. AKI is an important risk factor for death and CKD among HSCT survivors. CKD is a growing complication of HSCT as more patients are transplanted and survival improves. For most patients, the exact etiology of CKD is never identified, but graft vs host disease and thrombotic microangiopathy are important diagnoses to consider. Stem cell transplant patient survival on dialysis is generally poor, but kidney transplantation is a safe and reasonable option for HSCT recipients who progress to ESRD.

Kidney complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) exposes a patient's kidneys to a unique combination of challenges, including high-dose radiation, anemia, chemotherapeutic agents, graft-versus-host disease, opportunistic infections, attenuated and altered immunologic responses, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and extensive courses of antimicrobial agents. Since the inception of HSCT in the 1950s, there has been increasing interest in defining, determining, and managing the kidney complications that accompany this procedure. In this article, we review the common causes of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease that occur with HSCT, including HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, a distinct cause of chronic kidney disease with a multifactorial cause previously known as bone marrow transplant nephropathy or radiation nephropathy. Additionally, we review other kidney complications, including calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity and chronic graft-versus-host disease-associated glomerulonephritis, that develop post-HSCT. Critically, due to its grave prognosis, it is important to identify HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy early, as well as distinguish it from the other causes of chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney diseases in long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: monitoring and management guidelines

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) occurs commonly (prevalence of approximately 20% in a large series) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are three distinct clinical entities that occur after HSCT: thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), nephrotic syndrome (NS), and idiopathic or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-related CKD. Acute renal function decline occurs in the majority of patients in the first months after transplantation. This acute kidney injury can persist and is a risk factor for the later development of CKD. However, the potentially independent role of GVHD, chronic inflammation, and chronic exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in the development and progression of CKD warrants further investigation. Careful monitoring of blood pressure, renal function, and proteinuria is mandatory in patients undergoing HSCT, especially older patients with pre-existent renal impairment. Renal function should be evaluated before HSCT and monitoring should occur at least every 6 to 12 months in these patients. Renal biopsies are indicated in patients with proteinuria and persistent or progressive rises in serum creatinine to determine etiology and prevent progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Evidence for kidney rejection after combined bone marrow and renal transplantation despite ongoing whole-blood chimerism in rhesus macaques

Although there is evidence linking hematopoietic chimerism induction and solid organ transplant tolerance, the mechanistic requirements for chimerism-induced tolerance are not clearly elucidated. To address this, we used an MHC-defined primate model to determine the impact of impermanent, T cell-poor, mixed-chimerism on renal allograft survival. We compared two cohorts: one receiving a bone marrow and renal transplant ("BMT/renal") and one receiving only a renal transplant. Both cohorts received maintenance immunosuppression with CD28/CD40-directed costimulation blockade and sirolimus. As previously demonstrated, this transplant strategy consistently induced compartmentalized donor chimerism, (significant whole-blood chimerism, lacking T cell chimerism). This chimerism was not sufficient to prolong renal allograft acceptance: the BMT/renal mean survival time (MST, 76 days) was not significantly different than the renal transplant alone MST (85 days, p = 0.46), with histopathology documenting T cell mediated rejection. Flow cytometric analysis revealed significant enrichment for CD28-/CD95+ CD4+ and CD8+ Tem cells in the rejected kidney, suggesting a link between CD28-negative Tem and costimulation blockade-resistant rejection. These results suggest that in some settings, transient T cell-poor chimerism is not sufficient to induce tolerance to a concurrently placed renal allograft and that the presence of this chimerism per se is not an independent biomarker to identify tolerance.

Living related liver transplant following bone marrow transplantation from same donor: long-term survival without immunosuppression

We report long-term (seven yr) immunological tolerance in a 16-yr-old boy, to a liver allograft donated by his father following a bone marrow transplant at age 2.5 yr from the same donor. The bone marrow transplant was complicated by severe GVHD leading to liver failure and the ensuing need for a liver transplant, performed under planned avoidance of immunosuppression. At one wk post-transplant, although a liver biopsy was histologically compatible with acute rejection, favorable clinical and biochemical evolution precluded initiating immunosuppressive therapy, thus highlighting the need for caution when interpreting early histological changes so that administration of unnecessary immunosuppression can be avoided. Induction of tolerance in transplant recipients remains an elusive goal. In those patients who had received conventional bone marrow transplants and had endured the consequences of GVHD, development of macrochimerism may allow immunosuppression-free solid organ transplantation from the same donor.

Hematopoietic chimerism and transplantation tolerance: a role for regulatory T cells

The immunosuppressive regimens currently used in transplantation to prevent allograft destruction by the host's immune system have deleterious side effects and fail to control chronic rejection processes. Induction of donor-specific non-responsiveness (i.e., immunological tolerance) to transplants would solve these problems and would substantially ameliorate patients' quality of life. It has been proposed that bone marrow or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and resulting (mixed) hematopoietic chimerism, lead to immunological tolerance to organs of the same donor. However, a careful analysis of the literature, performed here, clearly establishes that whereas hematopoietic chimerism substantially prolongs allograft survival, it does not systematically prevent chronic rejection. Moreover, the cytotoxic conditioning regimens used to achieve long-term persistence of chimerism are associated with severe side effects that appear incompatible with a routine use in the clinic. Several laboratories recently embarked on different studies to develop alternative strategies to overcome these issues. We discuss here recent advances obtained by combining regulatory T cell infusion with bone-marrow transplantation. In experimental settings, this attractive approach allows development of genuine immunological tolerance to donor tissues using clinically relevant conditioning regimens.

Less maintenance immunosuppression in lung transplantation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same living donor

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is one of the final options for saving patients with pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively investigated 19 patients who had undergone LDLLT after HSCT in Japan. Eight patients underwent LDLLT after HSCT in which one of the donors was the same living donor as in HSCT (SD group), while 11 received LDLLT from relatives who were not the HSCT donors (non-SD group). In the SD group, three patients underwent single LDLLT. The 5-year survival rate was 100% and 58% in the SD and non-SD groups, respectively. In the SD group, postoperative immunosuppression was significantly lower than in the non-SD group. Two patients died of infection and one died of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in the non-SD group, while only one patient died of PTLD 7 years after LDLLT in the SD group. Hematologic malignancy relapsed in two patients in the non-SD group. For the three single LDLLTs in the SD group, immunosuppression was carefully tapered. In our study, LDLLT involving the same donor as for HSCT appeared to have advantages related to lower immunosuppression compared to LDLLT from relatives who were not the HSCT donors.

Finding the right time for weaning off immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) requires lifelong immunosuppression (IS) to prevent rejection and graft loss. The currently adopted immunosuppressive protocols are numerous and are based on the administration of at least two molecules with diverse mechanisms of action. Owing to the fact that the majority of immunosuppressants act non-selectively, the immune system is normally oversuppressed, and as a result is less able to both defend the host against infection and to control the spread of malignant cells. Consequently, long-term IS is burdened by chronic toxicity, which may be highly invalidating and may significantly influence patient's quality of life, compliance to treatment, overall success rate, and patient and graft survival. In an ideal scenario, SOT recipients should initially receive just enough IS to favor the onset of clinical operational tolerance (COT), a condition where the immune system of the host does not attack the graft in the absence of any immunosuppressant. COT has been documented after liver transplantation (LT) and renal transplantation (RT). First, COT was accidentally detected in patients who were nonadherent to treatment and who spontaneously decided to stop all IS without any medical guidance or surveillance. Later, it was described in recipients who required IS withdrawal following the occurrence of malignant diseases. Based on strikingly convincing experimental data, several tolerogenic protocols have recently been applied in patients but overall the results have been disappointing. The current literature demonstrates that COT can be safely achieved in stable LT recipients, with completely different strategies. Importantly, the onset of an episode of acute rejection during the attempt of IS withdrawal would not worsen the clinical outcome. On the contrary, COT remains a major challenge after RT because the onset of acute rejection will substantiate in graft loss. Currently, a major field of investigation aims to define markers of COT, which will allow the selection of individuals who are more prone to develop COT. Preliminary results in both RT and LT have just been announced; however, these markers will require validation in prospective studies.

Chronic kidney disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute and chronic kidney diseases occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These are caused by the transplant itself, and the complications of transplant. Recent estimates show that near 15% of subjects undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation will develop chronic kidney disease, which is a complication rate that can affect outcome and reduce survival. Investigation of the causes of chronic kidney disease is needed, as are ways to prevent, mitigate, and treat it.

Clinical operational tolerance after renal transplantation: current status and future challenges

In solid organ transplantation, the achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state [also referred to as clinical operational tolerance (COT)] represents the ultimate goal. Although COT is feasible and safe in selected cases after liver transplantation, it is an exceptional finding after other types of solid organ transplantation. In the field of renal transplantation (RT), approximately 100 cases of COT have been reported to date, mainly in patients who were not compliant with their immunosuppressive regimens or in individuals who had previously received a bone marrow transplant for hematological disorders. On the basis of promising results obtained in animal models, several tolerogenic protocols have been attempted in humans, but most have failed to achieve robust and stable COT after RT. Molecule-based regimens have been largely ineffective, whereas cell-based regimens have provided some encouraging results. In these latter regimens, apart from standard IS, patients usually receive perioperative infusion of donor bone marrow-derived stem cells, which are able to interact with the immune cells of the host and mitigate their response to engraftment. Unfortunately, most renal transplant patients who developed acute rejection-occurring either during the weaning protocol or after complete withdrawal of IS-eventually lost their grafts. Currently, the immune monitoring necessary for predicting the presence and persistence of donor-specific unresponsiveness is not available. Overall, the present review will provide a conceptual framework for COT and conclude that stable and robust COT after RT remains an elusive goal and that the different strategies attempted to date are not yet reproducibly safe or effective.

Solid organ transplants following hematopoietic stem cell transplant in children

SOT may be indicated for a select group of pediatric patients who experience permanent organ failure following HSCT. However, there is limited information available about outcomes. We identified eight children at our center who received an SOT following an HSCT. Patients were six months to 18 yr at HSCT. Diseases for which children underwent HSCT included thalassemia, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, Shwachman-Diamond/bone marrow failure, sickle cell disease (SCD), erythropoietic porphyria (EP), ALL, chronic granulomatous disease, and neuroblastoma. Time from HSCT to SOT was 13 days to seven yr (median, 27 months. Lung SOT was performed for two patients with BO, kidney transplants for three patients, and liver transplants for three patients (VOD, chronic GVHD). Seven patients are alive with functioning allografts 6-180 months from SOT. Advances in organ procurement, operative technique, immunosuppressant therapy, and infection control may allow SOT for a select group of patients post-HSCT. However, scarcity of donor organs available in a timely fashion continues to be a limiting factor. Children who have undergone HSCT and develop single organ failure should be considered for an SOT if there is a high likelihood of cure of the primary disease.

Chronic kidney disease after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant

There are 3 clearly distinct clinical entities that occur after HCT: TMA, idiopathic CKD, and nephrotic syndrome. The potentially independent role of GVHD and chronic inflammation in the development and progression of idiopathic CKD warrants further investigation. CKD after HCT is a relatively common occurrence. As the indications for and number of transplants performed world wide increases, so will the burden of kidney disease. Identifying those patients at risk for the development of CKD will be important for potential intervention and prevention of CKD and progression to end-stage renal disease in this patient population. There are those patients who will develop CKD that is not related to TBI or the conditioning regimen but rather to complications and/or therapy that occur after HCT, specifically aGVHD and cGVHD and prolonged calcinuerin inhibitor use. The burden of management will fall not only to the nephrologists but the oncologist as well to ensure close monitoring of renal function, blood pressure, and urinalyses posttransplant. It may be that our energies have been misdirected in trying to reduce exposure to TBI, and rather we should try to decrease the inflammatory and cytokine effects of GVHD and reduce exposure to calcineurin inhibitors to prevent CKD in this population of patients.

Immunomodulatory effects of mixed hematopoietic chimerism: immune tolerance in canine model of lung transplantation

Long-term survival after lung transplantation is limited by acute and chronic graft rejection. Induction of immune tolerance by first establishing mixed hematopoietic chimerism (MC) is a promising strategy to improve outcomes. In a preclinical canine model, stable MC was established in recipients after reduced-intensity conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation from a DLA-identical donor. Delayed lung transplantation was performed from the stem cell donor without pharmacological immunosuppression. Lung graft survival without loss of function was prolonged in chimeric (n = 5) vs. nonchimeric (n = 7) recipients (p < or = 0.05, Fisher's test). There were histological changes consistent with low-grade rejection in 3/5 of the lung grafts in chimeric recipients at > or =1 year. Chimeric recipients after lung transplantation had a normal immune response to a T-dependent antigen. Compared to normal dogs, there were significant increases of CD4+INFgamma+, CD4+IL-4+ and CD8+ INFgamma+ T-cell subsets in the blood (p < 0.0001 for each of the three T-cell subsets). Markers for regulatory T-cell subsets including foxP3, IL10 and TGFbeta were also increased in CD3+ T cells from the blood and peripheral tissues of chimeric recipients after lung transplantation. Establishing MC is immunomodulatory and observed changes were consistent with activation of both the effector and regulatory immune response.

Clinical experience with mixed chimerism to induce transplantation tolerance

Lymphohematopoietic chimerism was first shown to be associated with donor-specific allograft tolerance more than 60 years ago. However, early clinical experience with bone marrow transplantation soon revealed that conventional, myeloablative approaches were far too toxic and the risk of graft-versus-host disease too great to justify using this technology for the purpose of organ allograft tolerance induction in the absence of malignant disease. In this review, we discuss a step-wise approach that has been applied by several centers to establish less toxic approaches to using hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for tolerance induction. These steps include (i) feasibility and efficacy data for tolerance induction in large animal models; (ii) safety data in clinical trials for patients with hematologic malignancies; and (iii) pilot trials of combined HCT and kidney transplantation for tolerance induction. Thus far, only one published trial conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston has achieved long-term acceptance of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched kidney allografts without chronic immunosuppressive therapy. Alternative protocols have been successful in large animals, but long-term organ allograft tolerance has not been reported in patients. Thus, proof-of-principle that nonmyeloablative induction of mixed chimerism can be used intentionally to induce organ allograft tolerance has now been achieved. Directions for further research to make this approach applicable for a broader patient population are discussed.

Monitoring of human liver and kidney allograft tolerance: a tissue/histopathology perspective

Several factors acting together have recently enabled clinicians to seriously consider whether chronic immunosuppression is needed in all solid organ allograft recipients. This has prompted a dozen or so centers throughout the world to prospectively wean immunosuppression from conventionally treated liver allograft recipients. The goal is to lessen the impact of chronic immunosuppression and empirically identify occasional recipients who show operational tolerance, defined as gross phenotype of tolerance in the presence of an immune response and/or immune deficit that has little or no significant clinical impact. Rare operationally tolerant kidney allograft recipients have also been identified, usually by single case reports, but only a couple of prospective weaning trials in conventionally treated kidney allograft recipients have been attempted and reported. Pre- and postweaning allograft biopsy monitoring of recipients adds a critical dimension to these trials, not only for patient safety but also for determining whether events in the allografts can contribute to a mechanistic understanding of allograft acceptance. The following is based on a literature review and personal experience regarding the practical and scientific aspects of biopsy monitoring of potential or actual operationally tolerant human liver and kidney allograft recipients where the goal, intended or attained, was complete withdrawal of immunosuppression.

Chronic kidney disease after liver, cardiac, lung, heart-lung, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Patient survival after cardiac, liver, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is improving; however, this survival is limited by substantial pretransplant and treatment-related toxicities. A major cause of morbidity and mortality after transplant is chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although the majority of CKD after transplant is attributed to the use of calcineurin inhibitors, various other conditions such as thrombotic microangiopathy, nephrotic syndrome, and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis have been described. Though the immunosuppression used for each of the transplant types, cardiac, liver and HSCT is similar, the risk factors for developing CKD and the CKD severity described in patients after transplant vary. As the indications for transplant and the long-term survival improves for these children, so will the burden of CKD. Nephrologists should be involved early in the pretransplant workup of these patients. Transplant physicians and nephrologists will need to work together to identify those patients at risk of developing CKD early to prevent its development and progression to end-stage renal disease.

Spontaneous operational tolerance after immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in clinical renal allotransplantation

Tolerance is the so-called "Holy Grail" of transplantation, but achieving this state is proving a major challenge, particularly in the clinical setting. Even in rodents, the definition of true transplant tolerance is not applicable to many models, with late graft damage often occurring despite long-term graft survival. Hence the term "operational tolerance," based more on graft function and absence of exogenous immunosuppression, is being adopted. Although the most sought-after goal in this field is to intentionally induce this state in a controlled manner, translating protocols across species from rodents to the clinic, the current literature demonstrates that this is proving a formidable task. A complementary approach is to address transplant tolerance from a different angle, by studying tolerance-like phenomena that occur "unintentionally" in transplant patients after immunosuppressive drug weaning. Such spontaneous operational tolerance, which can take place after years of immunosuppression, is rare in kidney transplant recipients. However, determining exactly how this state arises and how it can be detected may make it possible to induce it in a greater number of patients and then to return to the drawing board to rationally design protocols that have a greater chance of clinical success. Moreover, the study of such patients should help in the identification of biomarkers of low immunological risk that could be used to select patients for potential weaning. Collaborative efforts through international networks, together with the application of newer and more powerful technologies to diagnostic, prognostic, and mechanistic research, may help transplanters to achieve this goal.

Frontiers in nephrology: immune tolerance to allografts in humans

Vascularized allografts are rejected unless some indefinite modification to the recipient's immune system is made. This modification is typically achieved through the long-term administration of immunosuppressive drugs. Patients thus trade their end-stage organ failure for dependence on daily drug therapy and the accompanying chronic condition of immunodeficiency. However, it is clear from studies in experimental animals that rejection can be prevented through the use of several therapeutic approaches, including donor hematopoietic cell infusion, chimerism, T cell depletion, and/or co-stimulation blockade. Successfully treated animals avoid rejection beyond the period of therapy without a phenotype of chronic immunosuppression and are thus considered to be tolerant of their grafts. Although intriguing, this success in animals has yet to be reproducibly translated to the clinic, and human transplant recipients remain tethered to immunosuppressive drugs with rare exceptions. This article provides an overview of the existing, largely anecdotal, clinical experience with organ allograft tolerance. It reviews the various approaches that are being applied in pilot human trials and suggests avenues for future clinical investigation.