Study on the Prevention of Allergy in Children in Europe (SPACE): allergic sensitization at 1 year of age in a controlled trial of allergen avoidance from birth

Unmet needs in asthma

Despite advances in the diagnosis and management of asthma, uncontrolled disease is still associated with a substantial mortality and morbidity burden. Patients often overestimate their level of asthma control while also reporting that asthma symptoms affect their quality of life and ability to work or study. There is some evidence of success with primary prevention measures in high-risk children and the secondary prevention of asthma in sensitized individuals or those at risk of developing occupational asthma. There are challenges with diagnosis – with under- and overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis being common – and in the treatment of asthma, despite clear treatment guidelines. In particular, severe asthma presents a huge challenge to the clinician, and its complex and heterogeneous nature warrants a personalized medicine approach to match therapies to individual patients. However, the tools for this are currently lacking in primary care. This article reviews the current unmet need in the diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, and provides an overview of the limitations of current therapies.

Early-life antibiotic use is associated with wheezing among children with high atopic risk: a prospective European study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the relationship between antibiotic use and asthma in the children with a higher risk of allergic sensitization. We examine the association between the use of specific therapeutic antibiotics in the first year of life and development of wheezing by 36 months among children with a higher risk of allergic sensitization.

METHODS

A multi-center prospective cohort study was conducted among children at high risk for allergic sensitization. A validated questionnaire was used to prospectively collect information on antibiotic use and potential risk factors for wheezing from parents or guardians of 606 children from three European countries at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of age. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders and effect modifiers and to estimate the association of antibiotic use with the development of early childhood wheezing.

RESULTS

Of the antibiotics assessed, only macrolide use in the first year of life was associated with increasing risk for wheezing by 36 months, after adjusting for gender, socioeconomic status, breast feeding >6 months, tobacco smoke exposure, family history of asthma, and respiratory infection (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.05-1.13). To avoid a bias by indication, we analyzed children with and without respiratory infection separately. Similar associations were observed for macrolides use in children who had no respiratory infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In European children with a familial risk for allergic sensitization, we found a positive association between macrolide use in the first year of life and wheezing until 36 months old which was independent of the effect of respiratory infection.

Dust mite avoidance for the primary prevention of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dust mite sensitization plays a controversial role in the development of atopic dermatitis. Despite a lack of evidence for its efficacy, dust mite avoidance is commonly recommended for the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis. We aimed to evaluate whether dust mite avoidance strategies reduce the risk of developing atopic dermatitis in high-risk infants compared to randomized controls.

METHODS

Studies were obtained by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and The Global Resource of Eczema Trials databases. We included randomized, controlled trials of high-risk infants treated with a dust mite avoidance intervention and assessed for atopic dermatitis. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using predefined criteria.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria (total n = 3040). Studies were largely unblinded but otherwise of reasonable quality. Three trials utilizing a dust mite avoidance approach but not additional interventions were combined in a meta-analysis. Dust mite avoidance provided no benefit in the prevention of atopic dermatitis (relative risk (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-1.49, I(2) = 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dust mite avoidance strategies alone or in combination with additional allergen avoidance modalities do not decrease the risk of developing atopic dermatitis and, given the current state of the evidence, should not be recommended for this purpose. The utility of dust mite avoidance for the treatment of atopic dermatitis or for the prevention and treatment of asthma or seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis are outside the scope of this review.

Reprint of: Perinatal and early childhood environmental factors influencing allergic asthma immunopathogenesis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of asthma has increased dramatically over the past several decades. While hereditary factors are highly important, the rapid rise outstrips the pace of genomic variation. Great emphasis has been placed on potential modifiable early life exposures leading to childhood asthma.

METHODS

We reviewed the recent medical literature for important studies discussing the role of the perinatal and early childhood exposures and the inception of childhood asthma.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Early life exposure to allergens (house dust mite (HDM), furred pets, cockroach, rodent and mold), air pollution (nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and particulate matter (PM)) and viral respiratory tract infections (Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human rhinovirus (hRV)) has been implicated in the development of asthma in high risk children. Conversely, exposure to microbial diversity in the perinatal period may diminish the development of atopy and asthma symptoms.

Prevention of asthma: where are we in the 21st century?

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and, in the latter part of the 20th century, reached epidemic proportions. Asthma is generally believed to result from gene-environment interactions. There is consensus that a 'window of opportunity' exists during pregnancy and early in life when environmental factors may influence its development. We review multiple environmental, biologic and sociologic factors that may be important in the development of asthma. Meta-analyses of studies have demonstrated that multifaceted interventions are required in order to develop asthma prevention. Multifaceted allergen reduction studies have shown clinical benefits. Asthma represents a dysfunctional interaction with our genes and the environment to which they are exposed, especially in fetal and early infant life. The increasing prevalence of asthma also may be an indication of increased population risk for the development of other chronic non-communicable autoimmune diseases. This review will focus on the factors which may be important in the primary prevention of asthma. Better understanding of the complex gene-environment interactions involved in the development of asthma will provide insight into personalized interventions for asthma prevention.

Perinatal and early childhood environmental factors influencing allergic asthma immunopathogenesis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of asthma has increased dramatically over the past several decades. While hereditary factors are highly important, the rapid rise outstrips the pace of genomic variation. Great emphasis has been placed on potential modifiable early life exposures leading to childhood asthma.

METHODS

We reviewed the recent medical literature for important studies discussing the role of the perinatal and early childhood exposures and the inception of childhood asthma.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Early life exposure to allergens (house dust mite (HDM), furred pets, cockroach, rodent and mold), air pollution (nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), ozone (O(3)), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and particulate matter (PM)) and viral respiratory tract infections (Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human rhinovirus (hRV)) has been implicated in the development of asthma in high risk children. Conversely, exposure to microbial diversity in the perinatal period may diminish the development of atopy and asthma symptoms.

EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines. Primary prevention of food allergy

Food allergy can have significant effects on morbidity and quality of life and can be costly in terms of medical visits and treatments. There is therefore considerable interest in generating efficient approaches that may reduce the risk of developing food allergy. This guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on Prevention and is part of the EAACI Guidelines for Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis. It aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for primary prevention of food allergy. A wide range of antenatal, perinatal, neonatal, and childhood strategies were identified and their effectiveness assessed and synthesized in a systematic review. Based on this evidence, families can be provided with evidence-based advice about preventing food allergy, particularly for infants at high risk for development of allergic disease. The advice for all mothers includes a normal diet without restrictions during pregnancy and lactation. For all infants, exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for at least first 4-6 months of life. If breastfeeding is insufficient or not possible, infants at high-risk can be recommended a hypoallergenic formula with a documented preventive effect for the first 4 months. There is no need to avoid introducing complementary foods beyond 4 months, and currently, the evidence does not justify recommendations about either withholding or encouraging exposure to potentially allergenic foods after 4 months once weaning has commenced, irrespective of atopic heredity. There is no evidence to support the use of prebiotics or probiotics for food allergy prevention.

Impermeable dust mite covers in the primary and tertiary prevention of allergic disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Up to 40% of the world's population has been diagnosed with an allergic disease. The most prevalent allergy is to house dust mites. Impermeable mattress covers are often the first treatment in the prevention and decrease of symptoms of allergic disease.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of impermeable mattress covers in the primary prevention of allergic disease and as a single intervention in the tertiary prevention of allergic disease symptoms.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched for relevant publications. Seven primary prevention trials (n = 3,461) and 17 tertiary prevention trials (n = 1,671) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All article reviews and abstractions were performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

No significant pooled relative risks were found for the prevention of allergic disease. The pooled relative risks were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.51) for house dust mite sensitization, 0.92 (95% CI 0.81-1.05) for wheeze, 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-1.02) for asthma, 1.03 (95% CI 0.90-1.19) for allergic rhinitis, and 1.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.32) for allergic dermatitis. Likewise, no significant pooled standardized mean differences were found in the tertiary prevention of symptoms. The pooled standardized mean differences were -0.03 (95% CI -0.15 to 0.09) for peak flow, -0.06 (95% CI -0.32 to 0.20) for asthma symptom score, and -0.39 (95% CI -0.88 to 0.11) for nasal symptom score. A significant effect was seen in the decrease of house mite dust level in the mattress (-0.79, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.60).

CONCLUSION

No evidence was found to support the use of impermeable mattress covers in the primary prevention of allergic disease or in the tertiary prevention of allergic disease symptoms.

Urban tree canopy and asthma, wheeze, rhinitis, and allergic sensitization to tree pollen in a New York City birth cohort

BACKGROUND

Urban landscape elements, particularly trees, have the potential to affect airflow, air quality, and production of aeroallergens. Several large-scale urban tree planting projects have sought to promote respiratory health, yet evidence linking tree cover to human health is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the association of tree canopy cover with subsequent development of childhood asthma, wheeze, rhinitis, and allergic sensitization.

METHODS

Birth cohort study data were linked to detailed geographic information systems data characterizing 2001 tree canopy coverage based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and multispectral imagery within 0.25 km of the prenatal address. A total of 549 Dominican or African-American children born in 1998-2006 had outcome data assessed by validated questionnaire or based on IgE antibody response to specific allergens, including a tree pollen mix.

RESULTS

Tree canopy coverage did not significantly predict outcomes at 5 years of age, but was positively associated with asthma and allergic sensitization at 7 years. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) per standard deviation of tree canopy coverage were 1.17 for asthma (95% CI: 1.02, 1.33), 1.20 for any specific allergic sensitization (95% CI: 1.05, 1.37), and 1.43 for tree pollen allergic sensitization (95% CI: 1.19, 1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Results did not support the hypothesized protective association of urban tree canopy coverage with asthma or allergy-related outcomes. Tree canopy cover near the prenatal address was associated with higher prevalence of allergic sensitization to tree pollen. Information was not available on sensitization to specific tree species or individual pollen exposures, and results may not be generalizable to other populations or geographic areas.

Pooling birth cohorts in allergy and asthma: European Union-funded initiatives - a MeDALL, CHICOS, ENRIECO, and GA²LEN joint paper

Long-term birth cohort studies are essential to understanding the life course and childhood predictors of allergy and the complex interplay between genes and the environment (including lifestyle and socioeconomic determinants). Over 100 cohorts focusing on asthma and allergy have been initiated in the world over the past 30 years. Since 2004, several research initiatives funded under the EU Framework Program for Research and Technological Development FP6-FP7 have attempted to identify, compare, and evaluate pooling data from existing European birth cohorts (GA(2)LEN: Global Allergy and European Network, FP6; ENRIECO: Environmental Health Risks in European Birth Cohorts, FP7; CHICOS: Developing a Child Cohort Research Strategy for Europe, FP7; MeDALL: Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy, FP7). However, there is a general lack of knowledge about these initiatives and their potentials. The aim of this paper is to review current and past EU-funded projects in order to make a summary of their goals and achievements and to suggest future research needs of these European birth cohort networks.

Relationships among environmental exposures, cord blood cytokine responses, allergy, and wheeze at 1 year of age in an inner-city birth cohort (Urban Environment and Childhood Asthma study)

BACKGROUND

The Urban Environment and Childhood Asthma study was established to investigate the immunologic and environmental causes of asthma in inner-city children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate potential atopic outcomes in the first 12 months and their relationships to environmental exposures and immune development.

METHODS

A birth cohort of 560 children with at least 1 parent with allergy or asthma was established in Baltimore, Boston, New York, and St Louis. Wheezing is assessed every 3 months, allergen-specific IgE yearly, and mononuclear cell cytokine responses at birth and yearly; environmental assessments include dust allergen and endotoxin, maternal stress, and indoor nicotine and nitrogen dioxide levels.

RESULTS

Key outcomes in the first year include wheeze in 49%, 2 or more episodes of wheeze in 23%, eczema in 30%, and detectable IgE to milk, egg, and/or peanut in 32% and to cockroach in 4%. Household dust revealed levels of greater than 2 μg/g to cockroach in 40%, mite in 19%, cat in 25%, and mouse in 29%, and 66% of homes housed at least 1 smoker. Positive associations were detected between multiple wheeze and cotinine levels, maternal stress, and maternal depression, whereas cytokine responses to a variety of innate, adaptive, and mitogenic stimuli were inversely related to eczema.

CONCLUSIONS

This high-risk cohort of inner-city infants is exhibiting high rates of wheeze, eczema, and allergic sensitization. Low cytokine responses at birth might be a risk factor for eczema, whereas a variety of adverse environmental exposures contribute to the risk of wheezing in infancy. These findings provide evidence of specificity in the interactions between immune development, environmental exposures, and the development of early features that might predict future asthma.

Prevention of allergic sensitization by environmental control

For about 20 years, investigators have been attempting to design studies to reduce exposure to allergens in order to prevent the development of allergic sensitization and thus prevent the onset of allergic disease, particularly asthma. Seven such studies-environmental control studies-have attempted to accomplish this by changing the domestic environment into which a high-risk child is born. Some of these studies also included a dietary intervention aimed at reducing the risk of development of sensitization to food allergens. In this review, we summarize the seven studies, compare study designs, and evaluate the effectiveness of the environmental control measures adopted. We present published results, focusing on the most recent. There is great heterogeneity of results that cannot be explained by the variety of study designs alone. We propose that the next generation of primary prevention studies will be informed by epidemiologic studies of gene-environment interactions and will investigate the effects of tailor-made measures targeting individuals with specific susceptibilities who may benefit from specified interventions.

Mono and multifaceted inhalant and/or food allergen reduction interventions for preventing asthma in children at high risk of developing asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergen exposure is one of the environmental factors seemingly associated with the development of asthma. If asthma is a multi-factorial disease, it is hypothesised that prevention might only prove effective if most or all relevant environmental factors are simultaneously avoided.

OBJECTIVES

To assess effect(s) of monofaceted and multifaceted interventions compared with control interventions in preventing asthma and asthma symptoms in high risk children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register (December 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of allergen exposure reduction for the primary prevention of asthma in children. Interventions were multifaceted (reducing exposure to both inhalant and food allergens) or monofaceted (reducing exposure to either inhalant or food allergens) Follow up had to be from birth (or during pregnancy) up to a minimum of two years of age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We included in the analysis studies assessing the primary outcome (current diagnosis: asthma) and/or one of the secondary outcomes (current respiratory symptoms: wheezing, nocturnal coughing and dyspnoea). We pooled multifaceted and monofaceted intervention trials separately. We made an indirect comparison of their effects using tests for interaction to calculate relative odds ratios.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three multifaceted and six monofaceted intervention studies (3271 children). Physician diagnosed asthma in children less than five years, and asthma as defined by respiratory symptoms and lung function criteria in children aged five years and older, both favoured treatment with a multifaceted intervention compared to usual care (< 5 years: odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.96, and > 5 years: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85). However, there was no significant difference in outcome between monofaceted intervention and control interventions (< 5 years: OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.64, and > 5 years: OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.16). Indirect comparison between these treatments did not demonstrate a significant difference between multiple interventions and mono-interventions in reducing the frequency of asthma diagnosis in children under five years (relative OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.04, P = 0.07) or five years and older (relative OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.13, P = 0.12). There was also no significant difference between either mono- and multifaceted intervention and control in reducing the likelihood of symptoms of nocturnal coughing at follow up. Wheezing, however, showed a significant difference between multifaceted and mono-interventions (relative OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99, P = 0.04), but the significance was lost when data on treatment only was analysed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that the reduction of exposure to multiple allergens compared to usual care reduces the likelihood of a current diagnosis of asthma in children (at ages < 5 years and 5 years and older). Mono-intervention studies have not produced effects which are statistically significant compared with control. In children who are at risk of developing childhood asthma, multifaceted interventions, characterised by dietary allergen reduction and environmental remediation, reduce the odds of a physician diagnosis of asthma later in childhood by half. This translates to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 17. The effect of multi-faceted interventions on parent reported wheeze was inconsistent and had no significant impact on nocturnal coughing or dyspnoea. Data from monofaceted intervention exposed children studies were not significantly different from those of control groups for all outcomes. There remains uncertainty as to whether multiple interventions are more effective than mono-component interventions. The comparisons made were indirect, making the conclusions drawn uncertain. To our knowledge there are no ongoing studies in which both intervention strategies are randomly compared. The findings, however, warrant further direct comparison between multiple- and monofaceted interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of asthma in children.

The role of indoor allergens in the development of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma prevalence has markedly increased over the past 30 years. Although atopy and exposure to environmental allergens are known to exacerbate asthma, recent literature supports a causal role of indoor allergens in disease development.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-risk birth cohorts continue to point to atopy as the main risk factor for developing asthma. Exposure to perennial allergens has also been linked to the development of asthma, though with less consistency. Intervention at the level of allergen exposure and allergic immune response is promising.

SUMMARY

The current model of atopic asthma, the predominant phenotype, incorporates genetic and environmental factors in the development of disease. Although genetic factors are less malleable, the environmental component lends itself to analysis and modification.For many, the development of asthma starts with allergen exposure leading to atopic sensitization and subsequent disease. Several studies support the progression from exposure to sensitization with the potential of extremely high levels of exposure leading to tolerance. Likewise, the progression from atopy to asthma is well documented,especially in genetically predisposed children. Recent intervention trials confirm these findings and begin to show promise for the prevention of asthma by interrupting the allergen exposure==>allergen sensitization==>atopic asthma pathway.

New visions for basic research and primary prevention of pediatric allergy: an iPAC summary and future trends

Hydrolyzed formula feeding, delayed introduction of solid food, indoor allergen avoidance, smoke and pollutants avoidance have been applied for several decades as primary preventive measures for allergic diseases. Unfortunately, some of these strategies have had no or modest success. Therefore, resources need to be focused on better understanding of the early allergic events and on interventional studies to investigate new strategies of primary and secondary prevention. Accordingly, this review summarizes the state-of-the-art of genetic, immunological and clinical aspects of primary prevention of allergic diseases. Studies investigating gene-by-gene and gene-by-environment interactions suggest that prevention of allergic diseases must be tailored to the individual genetic susceptibilities ('gene profiling') and environmental exposures. The expanding knowledge on new T cell populations (Th17, TSLP (thymic stromal derived lymphopoietin)-dependent 'inflammatory Th2 cells') is also inspiring new concepts on the origins of allergic diseases. The old concept of 'blocking immunoglobulin G antibodies' has been re-appraised and it is likely to generate novel preventive and therapeutic strategies. The major task for future clinical research is to clearly define the timing of optimal exposure to potential allergens. In addition, the role of microbial products such as certain bacteria, or their components, and of helminths or their larvae at different times in early life, alone or with potential allergens, definitely need to be further investigated. The benefit of efficient allergy prevention, based on focusing resources on novel and promising research lines, will be of prime importance to both affluent countries and other parts of the world where allergy is only currently emerging.

Adherence to allergy prevention recommendations in children with a family history of asthma

Allergen avoidance has been a major component of most programs for primary prevention of asthma and allergic diseases in childhood. As a part of the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study, families were provided with written and oral information on measures considered to be helpful in the primary prevention of allergic disease in high-risk infants. Dietary measures included advice to breastfeed for 6 months or longer, to delay the introduction of solid foods until after the infant turned 6 months of age, and to delay giving allergenic foods (egg and peanut butter) until after 12 months of age. In the active group of the randomized controlled trial aimed at reducing house dust mite (HDM) allergen levels, parents were advised to use an HDM-impermeable study mattress cover and an acaricide, to avoid sheep skins, and not to use a pillow before 12 months of age. Families received regular visits from the research nurses at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and phone calls every 6 wk. Only 43.4% of mothers were breastfeeding by 6 months and less than 20% by 12 months. The introduction of solid foods before 6 months was common, 26% by 3 months and 96% by 6 months. Adherence to infant-feeding recommendations was significantly greater in women over 30 yr of age, women who did not smoke during pregnancy, and women who had a tertiary education. Adherence to HDM reduction measures was greater than to those for infant feeding. The presence of symptoms in the form of an itchy rash by 4 wk did not significantly increase adherence. Complete adherence to infant-feeding recommendations in this intervention study of high-risk infants was low despite the provision of written information and reinforcement at home visits. In considering allergy prevention advice offered during clinical care, the likelihood of adherence is a factor which needs to be evaluated in assessing any potential benefits of allergy prevention regimens.

Is allergenic similarity predictable in respiratory allergies?

BACKGROUND

First degree relatives of patients with allergic diseases are at increased risk of having the disorder. However, it is not clear whether two such related patients with allergic diseases are sensitive to the same antigens or not.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study to determine whether or not first degree relatives with respiratory allergies are more likely to be skin test positive to the same allergen extracts as unrelated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Skin test results for 35 common aeroallergens were compared in 264 pairs of genetically related subjects and 264 pairs of age and sex matched, but unrelated, subjects. We calculate the percentages of the concordant and discordant results in each group. Results are compared by using chi2 test.

RESULTS

For all related and unrelated groups combined, there were significant differences with mites (der. pteronyssinus, der. farinae) and some moulds (aspergillus mix and rhizopus nigricans) (p<0.05); When the groups were subdivided into parent-child pairs and same or different sibling pairs, and the same comparisons were made, a significant difference was only found in both sibling pairs (p<0.05), not in parent-child pairs (p>0.05). Since there was no both positivity with aspergillus mix and rhizopus nigricans in the two groups, these two allergens were excluded from the study.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that we could not say that if one or both of parents are atopic to any allergens, their child will be atopic to the same allergens. Besides, when a respiratory allergy occurs in siblings, only the one who has house dust mite allergy sensitivity can possess the similar antigen sensitivity.

Prevention of allergic diseases

The prevalence of asthma and allergic diseases has increased in recent years, particularly in the industrialized world. Allergic disease begins to manifest in the first years of life. The disorder usually manifests initially in the form of food allergy and atopic dermatitis, followed in later stages by respiratory allergy with rhinitis and/or asthma. This has led to the adoption of preventive measures in those children with a high risk of atopy, based on the following considerations: 1) A family history of allergic diseases (asthma, eczema, and/or allergic rhinitis); 2) A personal history of atopy such as atopic dermatitis, particularly when associated to food allergy; and 3) The existence of allergic sensitization, particularly to pneumoallergens, of early or late onset, but persistent during childhood. Prevention is established at three different levels: primary prevention, avoiding sensitization; secondary prevention, avoiding appearance of the disease; and tertiary prevention, avoiding the symptoms. The present study discusses current knowledge of prevention and its efficacy, with mention of the importance of breastfeeding and the use of pre- and probiotics for securing adequate prevention.

Cow's milk exposure and asthma in a newborn cohort: repeated ascertainment indicates reverse causation

The effect of cow's milk consumption on childhood asthma has been debated for several years. This study attempts to provide further insight into this association through the use of a longitudinal study design. Newborns from parents with atopic history were recruited from Germany, Austria, and England (n = 696). For five repeated ascertainments, information was collected on cow's milk exposure, incidence of doctor-diagnosed asthma, and confounders. Generalized estimation equations, incorporating different models (concurrent, delayed, combined, and reverse causation), were used to determine this association. No association between cow's milk consumption and childhood asthma was found for the concurrent effects model (OR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.20). In the delayed effects model, the direction of the association varied with time of follow-up. Thus, we stratified by period, which resulted in a significant protective delayed effect at 36 months (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.49). However, reverse causation negated this finding since the presence of asthma in prior months led to a reduction in further exposure to cow's milk (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.16, 0.99). Hence, cow's milk consumption does not protect against childhood asthma. The apparent protection of cow's milk against asthma may result from parents of asthmatic children avoiding cow's milk, rather than actual prophylaxis.

Dust mite allergen avoidance as a preventive and therapeutic strategy

Asthma is a global health problem with genetic and environmental components. Indoor allergens have a major impact on asthma, and exposure in sensitized subjects can compromise lung function. A reduction in allergen exposure would seem a logical facet to treatment. Methods for reducing mite allergen levels that are effective in the laboratory may not work in the home and may not result in a clinical benefit. Six ongoing studies are investigating the effects of environmental control on the primary prevention of asthma and allergies. Although the Isle of Wight and Canadian studies provide encouraging results at age 8 and 7 years, respectively, it will be some time before a definitive public health message emerges. For secondary prevention, there is little evidence to support the use of mite-proof encasings as a single intervention in adults. In children, however, single or multifaceted interventions appear to be of some benefit.

Mold damage in homes and wheezing in infants

BACKGROUND

In most studies that investigate the association of mold or water damage and respiratory disorders in infants, the analysis is not adjusted for exposure to house dust mite (HDM), which is also a known cause of respiratory illnesses.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between visually observable mold or water damage and HDM (Der f 1) levels and the prevalence of lower respiratory tract symptoms and allergen sensitization in infants of atopic parents as part of a prospective birth cohort study.

METHODS

On-site home visits (at the infants' age of 8 months) were performed to evaluate observable mold or water damage and HDM exposure. At a clinic visit near the infant's first birthday, medical histories, including parent-reported wheezing episodes, and a skin prick test to food and 15 common aeroallergens were conducted in 640 infants.

RESULTS

More than half of the homes were found to have mold or water damage, and 5% had major mold or water damage with visible mold at 0.2 m2 or more. Only 16% of homes had a HDM allergen (Der f 1) concentration of more than 2 microg/g. Major mold or water damage increased the risk of recurrent wheezing nearly 2 times in infants, 5 times in food or aeroallergen-sensitized infants, and 6 times in aeroallergen-sensitized infants. Neither visible mold or water damage nor HDM exposure was associated with sensitization to either mold or aeroallergens.

CONCLUSIONS

Visible mold was shown to be a significant risk factor for recurrent wheezing in infants at high risk of developing atopic disorders, whereas HDM exposure did not significantly increase the risk.

The diagnosis and management of egg allergy

Egg allergy is a common food hypersensitivity in children. Atopic dermatitis represents the main clinical manifestation in infancy. On first exposure, many of these infants present with urticaria, angioedema, or anaphylaxis. The role of egg allergy in gastrointestinal conditions is less well understood. The "gold standard" for the diagnosis of egg allergy is the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Diagnostic cut-off levels have been defined for food-specific serum immunoglobulin E antibody level and skin prick test wheal diameter that predict an adverse challenge outcome. This has significantly reduced the need for formal food challenges. Atopy patch testing, in conjunction with immunoglobulin E-based tests, may further improve the accuracy of predicting a positive challenge. The treatment of egg allergy consists of dietary elimination, or a maternal elimination diet in breast-fed infants. Approximately two thirds of infants with egg allergy will become tolerant by 7 years of age.

House dust mite allergen reduction and allergy at 4 yr: follow up of the PIAMA-study

Exposure to high allergen levels in early life is a risk factor for the development of allergy. We previously reported limited effects of mite allergen impermeable mattress covers in the prevention and incidence of asthma and mite allergy (PIAMA) cohort at the age of 1 and 2 yr. We now present the results of follow-up at 4 yr objectives. To examine the effects of early reduction of house dust mite (HDM) allergen exposure by means of mattress covers on the incidence of allergy and asthma symptoms in the PIAMA birth cohort at the age of 4 yr. High-risk children (allergic mother) were prenatally recruited and randomly allocated to three groups; receiving mite allergen impermeable mattress covers (n = 416), placebo covers (n = 394) or no intervention (n = 472). At 4 yr of age, atopy was assessed by questionnaire; specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) to inhalant and food allergens was measured in serum. Dust samples collected from the children's mattresses were analysed for mite allergens. Dermatophagoides farinae1 allergen (Der f 1) levels in dust were reduced in the active group. However, Dermatophagoides pteronissinus 1 (Der p 1) levels, sensitization and atopic symptoms were similar in all groups. We found no effect of mite allergen impermeable mattress covers on sensitization and atopy at 4 yr. Moreover, the allergen reducing effects of the covers had disappeared for one of the two mite allergens that were measured.

New insights in allergen avoidance measures for mite and pet sensitized patients. A critical appraisal

It is widely acknowledged that avoidance of allergens such as those derived from foods, drugs, latex and stinging insects results in a complete disappearance of symptoms. By contrast, although it has been clearly shown that allergens are an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms and that several avoidance measures reduce allergen levels, whether this gives clinical improvement in symptoms is debatable. Many reasons could be invoked to justify this evident discrepancy. Apart from the intrinsic methodological aspects (e.g. single or combined interventions measure, population studied, severity of respiratory symptoms, outcomes, evaluated parameters, etc.), it is important to outline that a successful approach requires that the avoided allergen is the only and real factor responsible for symptoms, the patient's education and the use of a comprehensive protocol to reduce allergen exposure. Other important factors include the involvement of the patient, the relevance of other allergens/non-specific agents, and exposure to sensitizing agents also outside patient's home. It is likely that the clinical phase of allergic airway disease and the degree of bronchial (and also nasal) remodelling, in each individual, represent relevant factors for the clinical outcome of allergen avoidance procedures. Since the management of respiratory allergy is a complex strategy (including drugs, allergen avoidance, immunological and educational interventions), it is difficult in real life to distinguish the efficacy of a single intervention in comparison to the others. A combined strategy is likely to produce better clinical results.

How is the indoor environment related to asthma?: literature review

AIMS

This paper reports a review conducted to identify the factors in the indoor environment that have an evidence-based link with the exacerbation or development of asthma and to identify measures that healthcare professionals can promote to reduce exposure to these risk factors in the home.

BACKGROUND

The indoor environment, particularly at home, has been recognized as a major source of exposure to allergens and toxic chemicals. Exposure to allergens and toxins is thought to exacerbate respiratory conditions, in particular, asthma.

METHODS

Searches were made of health and indoor environment databases, including Cochrane Library, National Health Services Centre for Reviews and Assessment Reports, British Medical Journal, CINAHL and Ovid library, MEDSCAPE/MEDLINE, EMBASE, INGENTA, Science Citation Index, Web of Science. Searches were also made of other Internet-based resources, including those of international and government bodies. The following keywords were used: allergens, allergen avoidance, asthma, asthma prevention, cat, damp, Der p 1, dog, environmental control, house dust mites, indoor air quality, indoor environment, meta analysis, mould, pets, remedial actions, respiratory illnesses and systematic reviews.

FINDINGS

There is evidence of a link between asthma and a small number of indoor environmental factors. There is currently only reasonable evidence for one causative factor for asthma in the indoor environment and that is house dust mite allergen. Although there are many studies of different remedial actions that can be taken in the home, often these give evidence of reduced risk of exposure but not clinical improvement in asthma. Although there is a lack of medical evidence for the reduction of known sensitizers such as mould, this is because of a dearth of research rather than evidence of no association.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence of a link between the indoor environment and asthma. There are measures, which could be promoted by healthcare professionals to alleviate asthmatic symptoms.

A pilot study to investigate the effects of combined dehumidification and HEPA filtration on dew point and airborne mold spore counts in day care centers

Meteorological factors such as relative humidity directly correlate with airborne fungal levels outdoors and indoors. While dehumidification alone is effective at reducing moisture necessary for mold growth, it is inadequate as a single intervention as it does not remove viable and non-viable fungal spores that are potentially allergenic. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether dehumidification in combination with high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) filtration is effective at reducing airborne mold spore levels in day care centers. Two day care centers within a 2-mile radius of each other were selected. Day care center A was 2 years old with eight rooms while day care center B was 15 years old with six rooms. A high efficiency Santa Fe dehumidification unit equipped with a HEPA filter was installed in half the rooms (intervention) of each day care facility. Electronic HOBO data loggers continuously measured outdoor and indoor room dew point and temperature every 2 h throughout the study. Dew point and airborne fungal spore measurements from selected rooms with controlled air conditions were analyzed by comparing baseline measurements to those obtained at subsequent time periods over 1 year. Regression models accounted for correlations between measurements in the same room over time. Intervention resulted in a lowered average dew point from baseline by 8.8 degrees C compared with a decrease of 7.1 degrees C in non-intervention rooms across all time periods in both facilities (P<0.001). Fungal analyses demonstrated lower baseline (P=0.06) and follow-up means in intervention rooms (P<0.05), however the change from baseline to end of follow-up differed between intervention and non-intervention rooms in the two facilities. Log transformation was applied to approximate normality of fungal measurements. Dehumidification with HEPA filtration was effective at controlling indoor dew point in both facilities and at reducing airborne culturable fungal spore levels in one of the two facilities. These preliminary results provide a scientific rationale for using this intervention in future studies designed to investigate the impact of indoor mold exposure on health outcomes.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Poor indoor air quality is a recognized cause or contributing factor to health effects. Dampness and humidity have been linked to upper and lower respiratory symptoms in children and adults. This study indicates that reducing indoor relative humidity and airborne mold spore levels using high-efficiency dehumidification units equipped with HEPA filtration is feasible even in work facilities such as day care centers where traffic in and out of the building is difficult to regulate. Clinicians should emphasize to their patients the importance of dehumidification and HEPA filtration to improve indoor air quality in the home and workplace.

Possible reasons for lack of effect of allergen avoidance in atopy-prone infants and sensitive asthmatic patients

The basic paradigm that allergen exposure produces atopic sensitization, and that continued exposure leads to clinical asthma throughout the development of airway inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity has been challenged. However, because it was observed that epidemiological evidence suggests that around 40% of asthma cases are attributable to atopy (even using restrictive criteria), the obvious corollary is that if allergen avoidance begins before the onset of sensitization (primary prevention), then it should be associated with a reduced number of new cases of the disease. However, there are conflicting results regarding the effect of allergen avoidance on primary prevention of atopic sensitization and asthma onset. Instead, more uniform and positive results are available from secondary prevention studies. Secondary prevention obviously is an attractive opportunity for pediatricians who may recognize the patients who might benefit from these interventions simply by screening for food allergy in young children with atopic dermatitis. The conflicting results of tertiary prevention are most frequently observed in adult patients and sometimes result from incomplete avoidance of allergens responsible for the sensitization.

Allergen avoidance as primary prevention: con

There has been a dramatic increase in the prevalence of atopic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, and allergic asthma. Because environmental factors such as early allergen exposure to nutritional and inhalant allergens have been suspected as potential environmental factors favoring the development of allergic diseases and asthma, primary prevention studies have begun to investigate the effect on sensitization and wheezing. Designs of the studies are different and, therefore, are not completely comparable. Although no clear primary prevention study is available for pets, mite allergen avoidance during infancy can achieve a reduction of specific sensitization and, in some studies, can also produce a slight effect on respiratory symptoms.

Environment and development of atopy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma and other atopic disorders are the result of complex interactions between genetic predisposition and multiple environmental influences. However, the marked increase in asthma prevalence over recent decades is unlikely to be due to genetic changes, highlighting the contribution of environmental factors to the process of allergic sensitization.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article reviews recent information on environmental influences on the development of atopy in children. Both observational and interventional studies continue to shed new light on the critical influence of early life events--such as events in pregnancy, exposure to allergens and endotoxin, pet ownership, infections, family size--and have highlighted important gene-environment interactions that modify the relationships between environmental exposures and atopic outcomes.

SUMMARY

The future is likely to see a concerted effort to further define the role that these environmental exposures play in allergic sensitization and the expression of atopic diseases, in order to provide a rational platform on which to develop new methods of allergy prevention that can be targeted at high-risk children.

Gastrointestinal food allergy: new insights into pathophysiology and clinical perspectives

Adverse reactions to food that result in gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the general population; while only a minority of such individuals will have symptoms due to immunologic reactions to foods, gastrointestinal food allergies do exist in both children and adults. These immune reactions are mediated by immunoglobulin E-dependent and -independent mechanisms involving mast cells, eosinophils, and other immune cells, but the complexity of the underlying mechanisms of pathogenesis have yet to be fully defined. Knowledge of the spectrum of adverse reactions to foods that affect the digestive system, including gastrointestinal food allergy, is essential to correctly diagnose and manage the subset of patients with immunologically mediated adverse reactions to foods. Potentially fatal reactions to food necessitate careful instruction and monitoring on the part of health care workers involved in the care of individuals at risk of anaphylaxis. New methods of diagnosis and novel strategies for treatment, including immunologic modulation and the development of hypoallergenic foods, are exciting developments in the field of food allergy.

Allergen avoidance in the primary prevention of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Six primary prevention studies trialing environmental modifications to reduce asthma in children have published results of clinical outcomes. All are still in progress.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the Isle of Wight study, mite and food avoidance were evaluated to age 9 months. At 8 years, children in the active group had less current wheeze, wheeze with bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy (P < or = 0.05). The Canadian Primary Prevention Study examined avoidance of inhalant and food allergens. At 1 year there was a reduction in probable asthma and rhinitis in the active group. The Study on the Prevention of Allergy in Children in Europe tested avoidance of inhalant and food allergens. At 1 year there was less atopy and sensitization to mites in the active group. In the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study both mite avoidance and a dietary supplement of omega 3 fatty acids were analysed in a factorial design. At age 18 months, children in the dietary intervention group had significantly less wheeze. Eczema was more common amongst children using the mite avoidance measures. The Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy Study is a placebo-controlled study of mite avoidance. At 2 years, there was a small reduction in nocturnal cough without a cold in the active group. The Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study included stringent environmental control. At 1 year prescribed medication for wheeze and wheeze with shortness of breath were significantly less common in the active group than the control group.

SUMMARY

Although initial results look promising, further follow up of the ongoing cohorts is required before any recommendations can be made within the public health context.

Allergen immunotherapy in the prevention of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma is a disease causing significant morbidity and mortality. In the recent past, there has been an explosion of pharmacotherapeutic options attempting to control the disease. Unfortunately, none of the current options offers the promise of prevention or a permanent cure. However, there appear to be exciting, new data emerging to support the hypothesis that the prevention or early treatment of allergic rhinitis, such as with the use of allergen immunotherapy, may help mitigate the severity of bronchial symptoms and even prevent the development of asthma. In this paper, we review recent research published proposing immunotherapy as a means of preventing the development of, or at least ameliorating, allergic asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence that the upper and lower airways may be considered a single unit, with the nasal and bronchial mucosa having features in common. Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical studies have shown that they can be affected by similar inflammatory triggers, with interconnected mechanisms amplifying the inflammatory cascade. Allergic rhinitis is interrelated to, and is a risk factor for, the development of asthma. An evidence-based review validates the successful use of allergen immunotherapy in treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. There is promising evidence advocating its use in the prevention of clinical asthma.

SUMMARY

This article explores current research pertaining to the use of immunomodulation, such as by using allergen immunotherapy, to ameliorate and prevent the development of allergic asthma.

Allergen avoidance and prevention of atopy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent increases in the prevalence of atopic disease argue strongly that environmental factors operating primarily in early life play a significant role. Exposure to food and inhalant allergens early in life may constitute a risk factor amenable to manipulation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent observational and interventional studies have produced conflicting data regarding the effectiveness of allergen avoidance in primary and secondary prevention of atopic diseases.

SUMMARY

Exclusive breast feeding for 4-6 months may protect against the development of allergic diseases in early childhood and remains good advice. Convincing proof for the preventive effects of the delayed introduction of solid foods and hydrolyzed formula in formula-fed infants is lacking. There is some evidence to support a preventive effect of house dust mite allergen avoidance before sensitization occurs. The effect of exposure to animal allergen is uncertain, with some studies showing an increase in sensitization while others suggest a protective effect. Therefore, no evidence-based advice can be given at this stage regarding allergen avoidance measures to be adopted by families with infants at high risk of atopy, except perhaps to breast feed exclusively for at least 4 months. Data regarding the secondary prevention of allergic disease by allergen avoidance were more secure until the publication this year of two randomized controlled trials which suggest that mattress impermeable covers, the main dust mite allergen avoidance measure, may not work. Allergen avoidance, however, should remain an essential part of the management of allergic diseases, even if the benefit of mattress covers is in doubt.

Can we prevent allergy?

Allergic conditions continue to increase steeply. The last two decades have seen many prevention trials, studying the effect of dietary and environmental interventions. These trials have yielded invaluable information about the atopic march and also highlighted the need for a clear and commonly used nomenclature as well as a need for better outcome measures. This review discusses primary and secondary prevention studies and their results.