Interphase cytogenetics reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and intra-tumour heterogeneity in breast cancer

The complex nature of heterogeneity and its roles in breast cancer biology and therapeutic responsiveness

Heterogeneity is a complex feature of cells and tissues with many interacting components. Depending on the nature of the research context, interacting features of cellular, drug response, genetic, molecular, spatial, temporal, and vascular heterogeneity may be present. We describe the various forms of heterogeneity with examples of their interactions and how they play a role in affecting cellular phenotype and drug responses in breast cancer. While cellular heterogeneity may be the most widely described and invoked, many forms of heterogeneity are evident within the tumor microenvironment and affect responses to the endocrine and cytotoxic drugs widely used in standard clinical care. Drug response heterogeneity is a critical determinant of clinical response and curative potential and also is multifaceted when encountered. The interactive nature of some forms of heterogeneity is readily apparent. For example, the process of metastasis has the properties of both temporal and spatial heterogeneity within the host, whereas each individual metastatic deposit may exhibit cellular, genetic, molecular, and vascular heterogeneity. This review describes the many forms of heterogeneity, their integrated activities, and offers some insights into how heterogeneity may be understood and studied in the future.

Chemokines in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: New Challenges for Clinical Implications

Tumor heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer and one of the primary causes of resistance to therapies. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which accounts for 15% to 20% of all breast cancers and is the most aggressive subtype, is very diverse, connected to metastatic potential and response to therapy. It is a very diverse disease at the molecular, pathologic, and clinical levels. TNBC is substantially more likely to recur and has a worse overall survival rate following diagnosis than other breast cancer subtypes. Chemokines, low molecular weight proteins that stimulate chemotaxis, have been shown to control the cues responsible for TNBC heterogeneity. In this review, we have focused on tumor heterogeneity and the role of chemokines in modulating tumor heterogeneity, since this is the most critical issue in treating TNBC. Additionally, we examined numerous cues mediated by chemokine networks that contribute to the heterogeneity of TNBC. Recent developments in our knowledge of the chemokine networks that regulate TNBC heterogeneity may pave the door for developing difficult-to-treat TNBC treatment options.

Tumor Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and differs greatly among different patients (intertumor heterogeneity) and even within each individual tumor (intratumor heterogeneity). Clinical and morphologic intertumor heterogeneity is reflected by staging systems and histopathologic classification of breast cancer. Heterogeneity in the expression of established prognostic and predictive biomarkers, hormone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncoprotein is the basis for targeted treatment. Molecular classifications are indicators of genetic tumor heterogeneity, which is probed with multigene assays and can lead to improved stratification into low- and high-risk groups for personalized therapy. Intratumor heterogeneity occurs at the morphologic, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels, creating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of tumor heterogeneity that are relevant to the development of treatment resistance is a major area of research. Despite the improved knowledge of the complex genetic and phenotypic features underpinning tumor heterogeneity, there has been only limited advancement in diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive strategies for breast cancer. The current guidelines for reporting of biomarkers aim to maximize patient eligibility for targeted therapy, but do not take into account intratumor heterogeneity. The molecular classification of breast cancer is not implemented in routine clinical practice. Additional studies and in-depth analysis are required to understand the clinical significance of rapidly accumulating data. This review highlights inter- and intratumor heterogeneity of breast carcinoma with special emphasis on pathologic findings, and provides insights into the clinical significance of molecular and cellular mechanisms of heterogeneity.

Bias in Whole Genome Amplification: Causes and Considerations

Whole genome amplification (WGA) is a widely used molecular technique that is becoming increasingly necessary in genetic research on a range of sample types including individual cells, fossilized remains and entire ecosystems. Multiple methods of WGA have been developed, each with specific strengths and weaknesses, but with a common defect in that each method distorts the initial template DNA during the course of amplification. The type, extent, and circumstance of the bias vary with the WGA method and particulars of the template DNA. In this review, we endeavor to discuss the types of bias introduced, the susceptibility of common WGA techniques to these bias types, and the interdependence between bias and characteristics of the template DNA. Finally, we attempt to illustrate some of the criteria specific to the analytical platform and research application that should be considered to enable combination of the appropriate WGA method, template DNA, sequencing platform, and intended use for optimal results.

Cancer genomics: one cell at a time

The study of single cancer cells has transformed from qualitative microscopic images to quantitative genomic datasets. This paradigm shift has been fueled by the development of single-cell sequencing technologies, which provide a powerful new approach to study complex biological processes in human cancers.

Analysis of centromere signal patterns in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability using image cytometry combined with centromere fluorescence in situ hybridization

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromeric probes is a method used to detect chromosomal instability (CIN), a hallmark of most cancers. However, no studies thus far have investigated the relationship between centromeric FISH signals and the cell cycle in cancer cells. In this study, the chromosome content in each cell cycle phase was evaluated with respect to the number of centromeric FISH signals in two breast cancer cell lines and eight surgically resected breast cancer specimens using image cytometry. Variations in chromosome number were detected at each phase of the cell cycle but were not associated with proliferative capacity in the cell lines. Furthermore, the chromosome doubling frequency differed in each cell line and clinical specimen. These results reveal two aspects of centromeric FISH signal variation in breast cancers that exhibit CIN, and suggest that chromosome doubling is a remarkable occurrence that may increase the heterogeneity of tumors.

Comparison of assay methods for detection of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: AdnaGen AdnaTest BreastCancer Select/Detect™ versus Veridex CellSearch™ system

The detection of CTCs prior to and during therapy is an independent and strong prognostic marker, and it is predictive of poor treatment outcome. A major challenge is that different technologies are available for isolation and characterization of CTCs in peripheral blood (PB). We compare the CellSearch system and AdnaTest BreastCancer Select/Detect, to evaluate the extent that these assays differ in their ability to detect CTCs in the PB of MBC patients. CTCs in 7.5 ml of PB were isolated and enumerated using the CellSearch, before new treatment. Two cutoff values of ≥2 and ≥5 CTCs/7.5 ml were used. AdnaTest requires 5 ml of PB to detect gene transcripts of tumor markers (GA733-2, MUC-1, and HER2) by RT-PCR. AdnaTest was scored positive if ≥1 of the transcript PCR products for the 3 markers were detected at a concentration ≥0.15 ng/μl. A total of 55 MBC patients were enrolled. 26 (47%) patients were positive for CTCs by the CellSearch (≥2 cutoff), while 20 (36%) were positive (≥5 cutoff). AdnaTest was positive in 29 (53%) with the individual markers being positive in 18% (GA733-2), 44% (MUC-1), and 35% (HER2). Overall positive agreement was 73% for CTC≥2 and 69% for CTC≥5. These preliminary data suggest that the AdnaTest has equivalent sensitivity to that of the CellSearch system in detecting 2 or more CTCs. While there is concordance between these 2 methods, the AdnaTest complements the CellSearch system by improving the overall CTC detection rate and permitting the assessment of genomic markers in CTCs.

Future medical applications of single-cell sequencing in cancer

Advances in whole genome amplification and next-generation sequencing methods have enabled genomic analyses of single cells, and these techniques are now beginning to be used to detect genomic lesions in individual cancer cells. Previous approaches have been unable to resolve genomic differences in complex mixtures of cells, such as heterogeneous tumors, despite the importance of characterizing such tumors for cancer treatment. Sequencing of single cells is likely to improve several aspects of medicine, including the early detection of rare tumor cells, monitoring of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), measuring intratumor heterogeneity, and guiding chemotherapy. In this review we discuss the challenges and technical aspects of single-cell sequencing, with a strong focus on genomic copy number, and discuss how this information can be used to diagnose and treat cancer patients.

Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity

Cancer progression in humans is difficult to infer because we do not routinely sample patients at multiple stages of their disease. However, heterogeneous breast tumors provide a unique opportunity to study human tumor progression because they still contain evidence of early and intermediate subpopulations in the form of the phylogenetic relationships. We have developed a method we call Sector-Ploidy-Profiling (SPP) to study the clonal composition of breast tumors. SPP involves macro-dissecting tumors, flow-sorting genomic subpopulations by DNA content, and profiling genomes using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Breast carcinomas display two classes of genomic structural variation: (1) monogenomic and (2) polygenomic. Monogenomic tumors appear to contain a single major clonal subpopulation with a highly stable chromosome structure. Polygenomic tumors contain multiple clonal tumor subpopulations, which may occupy the same sectors, or separate anatomic locations. In polygenomic tumors, we show that heterogeneity can be ascribed to a few clonal subpopulations, rather than a series of gradual intermediates. By comparing multiple subpopulations from different anatomic locations, we have inferred pathways of cancer progression and the organization of tumor growth.

The utility of fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Molecular tools are used to refine the diagnosis of malignancy in pleural fluids. This review discusses the rationale and recent findings of the application of one of these tools, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, in pleural effusions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aneuploidy (i.e., pronounced numeric and structural chromosomal changes) is a recurrent finding in cells of solid tumors. Different methods attempt to detect tumor-associated aneuploidy to prove micrometastasis in different compartments, such as urine, cerebrospinal fluid, bone marrow, and body fluids. In recent years, fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis has proved viable for detecting metastasis based on the observation of matching patterns of chromosomal aneusomies in primary tumors and corresponding metastasis.

SUMMARY

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis using specific probes for visualizing numeric aberrations in a microscopic evaluation (thus complementing routine cytologic evaluation) has been shown to be relatively simple, very robust, and thus applicable in material of lesser quality and more sensitive than routine cytology. Remarkably, dual-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis allows for an efficient analysis in effusions, and the approach presented in this review proved to be more specific than other molecular procedures applied in effusions to detect malignancy, such as polymerase chain reaction. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate that refinement of staging by fluorescence in-situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction ('molecular upstaging') will translate into meaningful therapeutic consequences.

Combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for human mammaglobin/mammaglobin B expression improves diagnosis of malignant effusions

PURPOSE

The identification of malignant cells in effusions by conventional cytology is hampered by its limited sensitivity. The aim of this study was to improve tumor cell detection in effusions by molecular approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 157 effusions from patients with tumors and 72 effusions from patients without a history or evidence of malignancy were included in this study. All effusion specimens were evaluated in parallel by cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for expression of human mammaglobin (hMAM) and mammaglobin B (hMAM-B).

RESULTS

In effusions from patients with tumors, the sensitivities of tumor cell detection by cytology, FISH, and hMAM and hMAM-B detection were 46.2%, 53.3%, 36.4%, and 57.7%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 94.4%, 97.0%, 87.1%, and 88.6%. Notably, a high percentage of effusions containing malignant cells were in fact transudates, indicating the necessity for molecular diagnostic work-up of transudates collected from patients with tumors. Dependent on the tumor type, the use of appropriate marker combinations improved tumor cell detection in effusions significantly. By combining all four diagnostic tests, a positive test result indicating the presence of malignancy was achieved in 81.1%, with a fairly good specificity of 70.1%.

CONCLUSION

Molecular techniques are definitely useful to detect malignancy in cytologically negative effusions. Tumor cell detection in effusions can be significantly improved by FISH and PCR techniques applying appropriate molecular markers. This finding should help to improve tumor staging, prognostic assessment, and treatment monitoring.

Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH

Structural genetic alterations in cancer often involve gene loss or gene amplification. With the advent of microarray approaches for the analysis of the genome, as exemplified by array-CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization), scanning for gene-dosage alterations is limited only by issues of DNA microarray density. However, samples of interest to the pathologist often comprise small clusters of just a few hundred cells, which do not provide sufficient DNA for array-CGH analysis. We sought to develop a simple method that would permit amplification of the whole genome without the use of thermocycling or ligation of DNA adaptors, because such a method would lend itself to the automated processing of a large number of tissue samples. We describe a method that permits the isothermal amplification of genomic DNA with high fidelity and limited sequence representation bias. The method is based on strand displacement reactions that propagate by a hyperbranching mechanism, and generate hundreds, or even thousands, of copies of the genome in a few hours. Using whole genome isothermal amplification, in combination with comparative genomic hybridization on cDNA microarrays, we demonstrate the ability to detect gene losses in yeast and gene dosage imbalances in human breast tumor cell lines. Although sequence representation bias in the amplified DNA presents potential problems for CGH analysis, these problems have been overcome by using amplified DNA in both control and tester samples. Gene-dosage alterations of threefold or more can be observed with high reproducibility with as few as 1000 cells of starting material.

Patterns of aneusomy for three chromosomes in individual cells from breast cancer tumors

Multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can determine the changes in the copy numbers of several chromosomes simultaneously and can therefore be used to identify aneusomic patterns in individual cells. Aneusomic patterns may be useful for determining the malignant nature of rare epithelial cells in the blood of cancer patients. Touch preparations from 74 primary breast tumors were evaluated for aneusomy of chromosomes 1, 8 and 17 by tri-color-FISH. In the first part of the analysis, percentages of aneusomy for individual chromosomes and their combinations were determined. In the second part of the analysis, aneusomic patterns for these three chromosomes were analyzed in individual tumor cells and compared to aneusomic patterns observed in leukocytes and in individual cells from benign and normal breast tissue to determine aneusomic patterns indicative of malignancy. Ninety-two percentage of the primary breast carcinomas showed aneusomy for one or more enumerator probes. Comparison with benign breast tissue identified six aneusomic patterns in individual carcinoma cells indicative for malignancy by statistical analysis and not observed in leukocytes. Hence, certain patterns of aneusomy in individual cells involving chromosomes 1, 8 and 17 are indicative of malignancy in individual breast tumor cells and may be useful for determining malignancy of rare epithelial cells in the blood of breast cancer patients.

Evaluation of numeric alterations of chromosomes 1 and 17 by in situ hybridization in invasive breast carcinoma with clinicopathologic parameters

Breast cancer is a genetically complex disease and is frequently associated with nonrandom chromosomal alterations. The occurrence of aberrations involving chromosomes 1 and 17 in malignant tissues of breast cancer patients has not been studied systematically. The numeric aberrations of chromosomes 1 and 17 were detected by nonisotopic in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 44 invasive breast carcinomas (42 cases available for chromosome 17) and were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters, patients' survival, p53, and c-erbB-2 proteins. Chromosome 17 and 1 aneuploidy were observed in the majority of breast carcinomas with equal percentages of polysomy and monosomy for chromosome 17 and predominance of polysomy for chromosome 1. Monosomy of chromosome 17 was significantly associated with positive lymph nodes and negative estrogen receptor (ER) immunohistochemical expression. Patients with chromosome 17 monosomy were at greater risk of death. Ductal carcinoma displayed a greater percentage of chromosome 1 polysomy than lobular ones. A statistically significant association was demonstrated between chromosome 1 polysomy and higher nuclear grade. Patients with chromosome 1 aneuploidy were at greater risk of death, and especially those with ER negativity. Aneuploid patients with c-erbB-2(-)/PR(-) phenotype demonstrated lower survival rates. These data suggest a possible susceptibility of chromosome 17 to losses and gains and chromosome 1 to gains. Chromosome 17 monosomy and chromosome 1 aneuploidy may be useful prognostic markers in breast cancer patients.

Clinicopathologic analysis of breast carcinoma with chromosomal aneusomy detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic characteristics of breast carcinoma with chromosomal aneusomy detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have yet to be clarified.

METHODS

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples were obtained from 113 breast tumors and were subjected to FISH analysis using centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 11, and 17 to study a numerical aberration of these chromosomes and its correlation with various clinicopathologic features of breast tumors.

RESULTS

Polysomy was observed in 77.0%, 50.5%, and 37.2% of breast carcinoma samples for chromosomes 1, 11, and 17, respectively, and monosomy was observed in 1.8%, 8.8%, and 22.1% for chromosomes 1, 11, and 17, respectively. High histologic grade showed a significant correlation (P < 0.05) with polysomy of chromosome 11. Lymph node metastasis showed a significant correlation (P < 0.05) with polysomy of all three chromosomes, and positivity of lymph node metastasis increased as the number of polysomic chromosomes increased. In addition, estrogen receptor negativity was correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with monosomy of chromosome 17, and progesterone receptor negativity was correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with polysomy of chromosomes 11 and 17.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneusomy of chromosome 1, 11, or 17 detected by FISH is correlated significantly with various clinicopathologic features of breast carcinoma. Because FISH analysis of chromosomal aneusomy can be done using FNAB samples, this technique seems to have the potential to be used for a better, preoperative definition of the biologic characteristics of breast tumors.

Evaluation of numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 1 and 17 in proliferative epithelial breast lesions using fluorescence in situ hybridization

Our aim was to investigate the putative role of chromosome abnormalities of chromosomes 1 and 17 in the process of breast carcinogenesis. Numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 1 and 17 were investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in a series of 16 primary invasive breast carcinomas associated with intraductal proliferative epithelial lesions. Chromosome 1 aneusomy was detected in 55.6% of ductal hyperplasia (DH), 81.8% of ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and 87.5% of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC). Chromosome 17 aneusomy was not detected in the cases of DH and was present in 90.9% of DCIS and in 87.5% of IDC. Simultaneous aneusomy of chromosome 1 and 17 was found in 81.8% of DCIS and in 75.0% of IDC. Our results showed that the number of chromosome 1 and 17 copies increases from normal epithelium to invasive cancer. The numerical abnormalities of chromosome 1 were already detected in DH, suggesting that a gain in the copy number of chromosome 1 may be involved early in breast carcinogenesis.

Allelotype analysis of flow-sorted breast cancer cells demonstrates genetically related diploid and aneuploid subpopulations in primary tumors and lymph node metastases

Flow cytometric DNA content measurements have demonstrated extensive DNA ploidy heterogeneity in primary breast carcinomas. However, little is known at the molecular level about the clonal relationship between these tumor cell subpopulations, or about the molecular genetic changes associated with aneuploidization. We have used flow cytometric cell sorting to dissect some of this complexity by isolating clonal subpopulations in breast carcinomas for comparative molecular genetic analysis. Clonal subpopulations were isolated from 12 primary breast carcinomas and 5 lymph node metastases from 4 cases based on DNA content and cytokeratin 8/18 labeling. DNA from these clones was screened for allelic imbalances with 92 polymorphic microsatellite markers mapped to 39 different chromosome arms. Diploid and aneuploid populations were concurrently present in 11 out of 12 primary tumors. The DNA ploidy status of primary tumors was identical to that of the related lymph node metastases. Allelic imbalance was present in 10 out of 11 diploid clones (mean, 3.4 +/- 4.2). All allelic imbalances observed in the diploid clones recurred in the cognate aneuploid clones, but were, in the latter, accompanied by additional allelic imbalances at other loci and/or chromosome arms (mean, 10.9 +/- 5.8). In only two of the four metastatic cases did the allelotypes of metastatic clones show small differences relative to their cognate primary tumors. The primary diploid tumor clone recurred in all lymph node metastases. This study indicates that the majority of allelic imbalances in breast carcinomas are established during generation of DNA ploidy diversity. Recurrence of the allelic imbalances in diploid clones in the aneuploid clones suggests linear tumor progression, whereas the simultaneous presence of early diploid and advanced aneuploid clones in both primary and metastatic tumor sites suggests that acquisition of metastatic propensity can be an early event in the genetic progression of breast cancer.

Malignant cell detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in effusions from patients with carcinoma

Cytological diagnosis of malignant cells in effusions is hampered by difficulties in the differentiation from reactive mesothelial cells. Because interphase cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) might complement cytological evaluation, we determined the power of tumor cell detection using FISH and cytology in 201 effusions from patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, 9 primary breast tumors were FISH-karyotyped, and chromosomal aberrations were compared with those of corresponding metastatic effusion cells. By using centromeric probes representing chromosomes 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, and 18, a rate of malignancy-associated aneusomy combined for the 6 chromosomes was detected in an overall of 44.8% of effusion specimens (range, 31.8% to 39.3% for the individual chromosome), comparable to cytology (43.3%). The combination of just 2 FISH probes (namely, representing chromosome pairs 8/11 and 8/17) was almost equally efficient in the identification of aneusomy. Approximately one fourth of the cytologically negative effusions were FISH positive and vice versa. From the initially FISH-negative effusions, 18.9% could be subsequently classified positive with dual-color FISH by visualization of intranuclear chromosomal complexity in rare aneuploid cells. Thus, "overall FISH analysis," including dual-color evaluation, identified tumor cells in significantly more effusions (55.2%, P = .001) than conventional cytology, implying greater sensitivity. Finally, our finding that numerical aberration patterns in primary breast tumors and corresponding metastatic effusions are comparable indicates that FISH examination of primary tumors will indicate the centromeric probe(s) best suited for an efficient search for metastasis in the individual case.

Detection of circulating tumour cells in patients with breast or ovarian cancer by molecular cytogenetics

Detection of micrometastases in patients with solid tumours may aid the establishment of prognosis and development of new therapeutic approaches. This study was designed to investigate the presence and frequency of tumour cells in the peripheral blood (PB) of patients with breast or ovarian cancer by using a combination of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Separated tumour cell and PB-samples from 48 patients (35 breast cancers, 12 ovarian tumours, one uterine sarcoma) were analysed for the presence of numerical aberrations of chromosomes 7, 12, 17 and 17 q11.2-q12. Twenty-five patients had primary disease and 23 had relapsed. The technique allows the detection of one tumour cell in 106 normal cells. Circulating tumour cells were detected in 35/48 cases (17 patients had relapsed and 13 primary carcinoma with lymph node or solid metastases) by the expression of anti-cytokeratin and the presence of numerical chromosomal abnormalities. PB-tumour cells of patients with a primary carcinoma and without solid metastases had a significantly lower percentage of chromosomal aberrations, especially for chromosome 12 (P = 0.035; P = 0.038) compared to those with relapsed disease and solid metastases. Detection and quantification of minimal residual disease may monitor the response to cytotoxic or hormonal therapy and may identify women at risk of relapse.

The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer

Development and growth of all organisms involves the faithful reproduction of cells and requires that the genome be accurately replicated and equally partitioned between two cellular progeny. In human cells, faithful segregation of the genome is accomplished by an elaborate macromolecular machine, the mitotic spindle. It is not difficult to envision how defects in components of this complex machine molecules that control its organization and function and regulators that temporally couple spindle operation to other cell cycle events could lead to chromosome missegregation. Recent evidence indicates that the persistent missegregation of chromosomes result in gains and losses of chromosomes and may be an important cause of aneuploidy. This form of chromosome instability may contribute to tumor development and progression by facilitating loss of heterozygocity (LOH) and the phenotypic expression of mutated tumor suppressor genes, and by favoring polysomy of chromosomes that harbor oncogenes. In this review, we will discuss mitotic defects that cause chromosome missegregation, examine components and regulatory mechanisms of the mitotic machine implicated in cancer, and explore mechanisms by which chromosome missegregation could lead to cancer.

Molecular prognostic markers in breast cancer

Based on the scientific literature, there are several molecular markers which might be used for the prognosis of breast cancer. Possible molecular prognostic markers are: BRCA-1, BRCA-2, p53, erbB oncogenes, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), chromosomal aberrations, microsatellite instability, transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), and the multiple drug resistance (MDR) gene. In this chapter, we discuss the possible role of these prognostic markers in breast cancer.

Hyperdiploidy and apparent aneusomy in mesothelial cells from non-malignant effusions as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Interphase cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to detect malignant cells characterized by chromosomal aneuploidy. However, apparent aneusomy in normal "control" tissues has to be considered when using FISH as diagnostic tool. In effusions as model tissue exposed to metastasis, the definition of cut-off levels for background aneusomy by FISH was aimed in this study. Using centromeric probes representing chromosomes 7, 8, 11, 12, 17 and 18, extensive chromosome copy number enumeration by single-color FISH analysis was performed in pleural and ascitic effusions derived from 15 patients with various, non-malignant diseases. In all effusions, cells with gain of hybridization signals for several or all chromosomes tested were found (in up to 1.94% of cells). A consistent finding was high grade hyperdiploidy (>4 centromeric signals). Mesothelial elements mainly contributed to hyperdiploidy in effusions, as demonstrated by a combined analysis of FISH and immunocytochemistry with staining for cytokeratin. Dual-color FISH analysis showed that hyperdiploidy was predominantly corresponding to polyploidization; however, there were always minor cell populations classified as aneuploid by dual-color FISH. In conclusion, stringent criteria have to be applied to distinguish malignancy-related aneuploidy from background aneusomy by FISH.

Interphase cytogenetics of chromosomes 11 and 17 in fine needle aspirates of breast cancer

The aims of this investigation were to compare quantitative with qualitative analysis of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) centromere signals in interphase breast cancer cell nuclei and to evaluate the possible clinical utility of detecting numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 11 and 17 by FISH in the preoperative prediction of breast cancer histological grade. Commercial digoxigenin-labeled centromere probes to chromosomes 11 and 17 were hybridized to 69 malignant aspirates with histological follow-up. Aspirates were categorized as disomic or aneusomic for chromosomes 11 and 17 qualitatively; a subset of aspirates was also analyzed quantitatively. The quantitative and qualitative approaches resulted in almost identical categorisation. There was a significant association between the qualitative categorization of aspirates as aneusomic or disomic, the histological grade of the excised tumours (P = .0695, n = 69), and the cytological grade of the clinical aspirates (P = .006, n = 35). Although histological grade III tumors were almost invariably polysomic for one or both chromosomes, polysomy was also detected in grade I and II tumors. Qualitative FISH analysis was shown to be more sensitive than cytological grading in predicting histological grade III but was of lower specificity and was therefore not clinically useful.

Validation of primed in situ labeling (PRINS) for interphase analysis: comparative studies with conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome analyses

Primed in situ labeling (PRINS) is a rapidly developing new technology with wide ranging clinical applications. To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PRINS, we carried out a retrospective study on cultured bone marrow cells to detect aneuploidy for chromosomes 7, 8, and 12. The results were then compared to the results of previous fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosome analyses (CA). In patients who showed aneuploidy with CA, both FISH and PRINS confirmed the aneuploidy in interphase cells. FISH and PRINS also showed excellent correlation with conventional cytogenetic analysis for the detection of mosaic aneuploidies. However, both FISH and PRINS showed significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of abnormal clones compared to CA. In 9 of the 17 cases, there were no significant differences in the detection rates between the two methods. Based on our studies, we conclude that PRINS is as sensitive as FISH in most cases for aneuploidy detection; and that PRINS, like FISH, is more sensitive than conventional CA for aneuploidy detection.

Detection of chromosomal aberrations in tumor cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by molecular cytogenetics in patients with gynecological cancer

Conventional cytogenetic studies of tumor cells from patients with breast or ovarian cancer have shown multiple chromosomal abnormalities including chromosomes 7, 12, and 17. This study was designed to analyze the cytogenetic features of tumor cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) by using a combination of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Tumor cell, peripheral blood (PB), and TIL samples from 37 patients (20 ovarian tumors, 13 breast cancers, 3 uterine sarcoma, 1 carcinoma of the filamentary tube) were analyzed for the presence of numerical aberrations of chromosomes 7, 12, and 17. All of the tumor cells showed a high frequency of numerical aberrations of chromosomes 7, 12, and 17, especially trisomies or tetrasomies. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in tumor tissue and effusions, or between primary and relapsed disease in patients with breast or ovarian tumors. However, tumor cells from patients with solid metastatic disease had significantly higher numbers of aberrations of chromosome 7 in the primary tumor than in tumors from patients without metastases (P = 0.049), suggesting that chromosome 7 is frequently involved in the progression of disease. Monosomies and trisomies of chromosomes 7 and 12 also occurred at a low percentage of TILs without any statistically significant difference between primary and relapsed tumors. The presence of these aneuploidies might be responsible for treatment failures in the immunotherapy of gynecological cancer.

Chromosomal imbalances in primary and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma as detected by interphase cytogenetics: basic findings and clinical aspects

To date, cytogenetic studies on pancreatic carcinoma are rare, and little is known about the frequency of cytogenetic aberrations in primary carcinomas compared with metastatic tumour cells. We therefore evaluated the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in 12 primary pancreatic carcinomas and in effusion specimens from 25 patients with pancreatic cancer by using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a panel of four centromeric probes. Hyperdiploidy and chromosomal imbalances, predominantly affecting chromosome 8, were a constant finding in metastatic effusion cells, whereas concordant gain of chromosomes or relative loss of chromosome 18 characterized primary pancreatic carcinomas. The potential role of oncogenes located on chromosome 8 for pancreatic cancer progression was further investigated by double-hybridization studies of aneuploid effusion cells with a probe to 8q24 (MYC) and a centromeric probe to chromosome 8, which demonstrated amplification of the MYC oncogene in two of ten cases (20%). Finally, a potential application of basic findings in the clinical setting was tested by searching for micrometastatic cells in effusions from pancreatic cancer patients primarily negative by FISH. Two-colour FISH in combination with extensive screening (>10,000 nuclei) seems to be a useful tool to unequivocally identify micrometastatic cells by demonstrating hyperdiploidy and intranuclear chromosomal heterogeneity.

Aneuploidy of chromosome 8 as detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization is a recurrent finding in primary and metastatic breast cancer

Previous work from our laboratory demonstrated aneuploidy for several chromosomes by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a high proportion of breast cancer specimens. In the literature, only limited data are available concerning chromosome 8 anomalies in breast cancer. To determine chromosome 8 ploidy status in primary and metastatic specimens from 81 breast cancer patients, FISH analysis with a DNA probe recognizing chromosome 8 centromeres was performed. In all primary tumor specimens (n = 30), significant proportions of cells were aneuploid exhibiting gain of chromosome 8 copy numbers; in 75% of effusion specimens previously classified as malignant by cytology and/or FISH for various chromosomes (n = 40), cell populations aneuploid for chromosome 8 were detected; effusions previously classified non-malignant (n = 11) were diploid in 10 cases, whereas one specimen contained rare hyperdiploid cells. Among these cells complex chromosomal aneuploidy could be demonstrated by two-color FISH, suggesting malignancy. Trisomic and tetrasomic clones were predominant in the majority of samples, but a marked intratumor cytogenetic heterogeneity was observed in most cases. Primary tumors and corresponding positive axillary lymph nodes revealed similar distributions of chromosome 8 copy numbers, analogous to previous findings with other chromosomes. This implies that, by using suitable FISH probes after examination of the respective primary tumor, an efficient search for (micro)metastasis might be feasible.

The cellular basis of tumor progression

Variability in disease presentation and course is a hallmark of cancer. Variability is seen among similarly diagnosed cancers in different patients or animal hosts and in the same cancer at different periods of time. This latter type of variability, termed "tumor progression," was defined by Foulds in a series of six rules that describe the independent behavior of individual cancers and the independent evolution of different cancer characteristics. Tumor progression is believed to result from variability among subpopulations of tumor cells within individual cancers and from selection of these subpopulations by conditions within the cancer environment, such that different subpopulations come to prominence over the course of cancer development and growth. Interactions among subpopulations, however, modulate tumor behavior as well as tumor evolution. The leading hypothesis for the origin of tumor subpopulations is the genetic instability of cancer cells. There are a number of possible mechanisms of genetic instability, some internal to cancer cells (mutation, amplification, mutator phenotypes, DNA repair deficiencies) and some present in the tumor microenvironment (endogenous mutagens). There are also potential epigenetic mechanisms of variability, including alterations in gene regulation, differentiation, adaptation, and cell fusion. Regardless of mechanism, the heterogeneity of tumor subpopulations poses a number of challenges to the practice of cancer research, including the design of reproducible and meaningful experiments. Tumor heterogeneity also has significant consequences for the clinical assessment of tumor prognosis and the development of effective treatment regimens.

Uncoupling of S-phase and mitosis by recombinant cytotoxic necrotizing factor 2 (CNF2)

Cytotoxic necrotizing factor 2 (CNF2) is an exotoxin identified from virulent clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. It has been characterized in adherent cell lines as an inducer of cellular death, hyperploidy (multinucleation), and cytoskeletal reorganization. The molecular mechanism of these actions is unclear. Two cellular mechanisms can be hypothesized to explain the DNA content increase (hyperploidy) induced by the toxin. The first is that the toxin interferes with cytoplasmic division without interfering with normal nuclear cycling, such that DNA is replicated in the absence of cell division. The second is that the toxin drives the nuclear machinery to replicate the DNA multiple times within one cell cycle, without interfering with cytoplasmic division. In order to investigate these phenomena, we have constructed a recombinant CNF2 gene that expresses a toxin with both an epitope tag and a polyhistidine tag. Extracts made from E. coli that express this gene have a high multinucleating activity that colocalizes with the recombinant 115-kDa protein. To distinguish between these hypotheses, we used recombinant CNF2 and several growth conditions (time, partial differentiation, and stage of growth) to establish a relationship between cellular divisions and generation of hyperploidy. It was also determined that the toxin had no effect upon in vitro DNA replication using a Xenopus egg extract system. In aggregate, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that CNF2 is affecting cytoplasmic division and thereby removing the requirement for a completed mitosis before the initiation of another S-phase. These data are discussed in relation to the generation of polyploid cells during megakaryopoeisis and the generation of aneuploid cells during tumorigenesis.

Detection of chromosomal aneuploidy by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in bronchoscopically gained cells from lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Development and progression of human malignancies involve multiple genetic changes. New techniques to distinguish neoplastic from benign diseases unequivocally with small amounts of cells as gained by bronchoscopy are needed to come closer to the goal of an early diagnosis in lung cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to visualize chromosomal aberrations in bronchoscopically gained cells from lung cancer patients and could eventually become a complementary technique to conventional cytology.

METHODS

We examined 20 cancerous specimens (10 primary tumors, 10 malignant effusions) of 18 lung cancer patients by FISH with DNA probes specific for chromosomes 3, 8, 11, 12, 17, and 18. From five additional patients, endobronchial brushings and/or forceps biopsy specimens were subjected to interphase FISH analysis.

RESULTS

In all primary tumors and malignant effusions, highly aneuploid cells were detectable by FISH. Chromosomal aberrations always consisted of gains of chromosomal signal numbers, and all chromosomes were found to be aneuploid to a similar extent. Using chromosomal aneuploidy as a marker of malignancy, material obtained by bronchoscopy was then examined for the presence of malignant cells. In all specimens, evidence for malignancy was obtained by FISH, including three specimens in which cells appeared to be normal or reactively changed by cytologic criteria.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that interphase FISH is useful in detecting aneuploidy associated with malignancy in bronchoscopically gained cells that do not clearly meet the criteria of malignancy by conventional cytologic study.

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the detection of malignant cells in effusions from breast cancer patients

In diagnostic evaluation of effusions, difficulties are encountered when atypical reactive mesothelial cells have to be differentiated from malignant cells. We tested the impact of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify metastatic cells in breast cancer effusions by detection of numerical chromosomal changes. Pleural and ascitic fluid samples (n=57) from 41 breast cancer patients were concomitantly evaluated by routine cytology and FISH, using centromere-specific probes representing chromosomes 7, 11, 12, 17 and 18. After setting stringent cut-off levels deduced from non-malignant control effusions (n=9), the rates of cells with true aneuploidy were determined in each effusion sample from breast cancer patients. The occurrence of aneuploid cells, as detected by FISH and indicative of malignancy, was correlated with the cytological findings. Routine cytology revealed malignancy in 60% of effusions. Using FISH, aneuploid cell populations could be observed in 94% of cytologically positive and in 48% of cytologically negative effusions, thus reverting diagnosis to malignancy. To confirm malignancy in cases with a low frequency of aneuploid cells, two-colour FISH was additionally performed and indeed showed heterogeneous chromosomal aneuploidy within single nuclei. We conclude that FISH is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of malignancy and may serve as an adjunct to routine cytological examination, as demonstrated here for breast cancer effusions.

Genetic heterogeneity of primary and metastatic breast carcinoma defined by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Breast carcinoma is frequently associated with nonrandom chromosomal aberrations, but their identification by standard cytogenetics (SC) is often limited by technical difficulties. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies of interphase nuclei can circumvent some of these difficulties and has the potential to identify nonrandom molecular cytogenetic events occurring in breast cancer. FISH was performed on tumor nuclei isolated from 15 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival breast carcinomas using a panel of chromosome-specific alpha-satellite probes for enumerating chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Freshly isolated cells from these same cases had previously been studied by standard cytogenetics and FISH. In addition to archival primary carcinoma, archival metastases and normal tissue were also studied by FISH. Genetic numerical alterations were identified by standard cytogenetics or FISH in 14 of 15 carcinomas. Numeric alterations initially identified by standard cytogenetics were confirmed by FISH in 9 of 10 cases. Results of FISH performed on nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded material were in agreement with FISH performed on freshly isolated cells. Clonal numeric alterations were observed in the archival primary tumor as well as in metastases. Archival normal tissue was consistently disomic.