Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer--10-year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies

Simple Summary

The response to neoadjuvant treatment is strongly associated with the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients, especially in the HER2-positive subtype of the disease. In HER2-positive patients with a residual tumor burden, an escalation of post-neoadjuvant therapy leads to the improvement of survival, while (post)-neoadjuvant treatment de-escalation is currently being discussed in low-risk settings in order to avoid unnecessary toxicities.

Abstract

Patients with high-risk non-metastatic breast cancer are recommended for chemotherapy, preferably in the neoadjuvant setting. Beyond advantages such as a better operability and an improved assessment of individual prognosis, the preoperative administration of systemic treatment offers the unique possibility of selecting postoperative therapies according to tumor response. In patients with HER2-positive disease, both the escalation of therapy in the case of high-risk features and the de-escalation in patients with a low tumor load are currently discussed. Patients with small node-negative tumors receive primary surgery and, upon confirmation of pathological T1 N0 status, de-escalated adjuvant therapy with paclitaxel and trastuzumab. For those with a large tumor and/or nodal involvement, neoadjuvant polychemotherapy with a dual antibody blockade is recommended. Patients with invasive residual disease benefit from switching postoperative therapy to the antibody-drug-conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). In this review, we discuss current evidence and controversies regarding post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Prediction of pathologic complete response on MRI in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to molecular subtypes

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the predictability of breast MRI for pathologic complete response (pCR) by molecular subtype in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and investigate the MRI findings that can mimic residual malignancy.

METHODS

A total of 506 patients with breast cancer who underwent MRI after NAC and underwent surgery between January and December 2018 were included. Two breast radiologists dichotomized the post-NAC MRI findings as radiologic complete response (rCR) and no-rCR. The diagnostic performance of MRI predicting pCR was evaluated. pCR was determined based on the final pathology reports. Tumors were divided according to hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2. Residual lesions on post-NAC MRI were divided into overt and subtle which classified as nodularity or delayed enhancement. Pearson's χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for MRI findings causing false-negative pCR.

RESULTS

The overall pCR rate was 30.04%. The overall accuracy for predicting pCR using MRI was 76.68%. The accuracy was significantly different by subtypes (p < 0.001), as follows in descending order: HR - /HER2 - (85.63%), HR + /HER2 - (82.84%), HR + /HER2 + (69.37%), and HR - /HER2 + (62.38%). MRI in the HR - /HER2 + type showed the highest false-negative rate (18.81%) for predicting pCR. The subtle residual enhancement observed only in the delayed phase was associated with false-negative findings (76.2%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for predicting pCR differed by molecular subtypes. When the residual enhancement on MRI after NAC is subtle and seen only in the delayed phase, overinterpretation of residual tumors should be performed with caution.

KEY POINTS

• In patients with breast cancer after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) differed according to molecular subtype. • When residual enhancement on MRI is subtle and seen only in the delayed phase, this finding could be associated with false-negative pCR results.

Changes in Diffuse Optical Tomography Images During Early Stages of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Correlate with Tumor Response in Different Breast Cancer Subtypes

PURPOSE

This study's primary objective was to evaluate the changes in optically derived parameters acquired with a diffuse optical tomography breast imaging system (DOTBIS) in the tumor volume of patients with breast carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this analysis of 105 patients with stage II-III breast cancer, normalized mean values of total hemoglobin ([Formula: see text]), oxyhemoglobin ([Formula: see text]), deoxy-hemoglobin concentration ([Formula: see text]), water, and oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]) percentages were collected at different timepoints during NAC and compared with baseline measurements. This report compared changes in these optical biomarkers measured in patients who did not achieve a pathologic complete response (non-pCR) and those with a pCR. Differences regarding molecular subtypes were included for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer.

RESULTS

At baseline, [Formula: see text] was higher for pCR tumors (3.97 ± 2.29) compared with non-pCR tumors (3.00 ± 1.72; P = 0.031). At the earliest imaging point after starting therapy, the mean change of [Formula: see text] compared with baseline ([Formula: see text]) was statistically significantly higher in non-pCR (1.23 ± 0.67) than in those with a pCR (0.87 ± 0.61; P < 0.0005), and significantly correlated to residual cancer burden classification (r = 0.448; P < 0.0005). [Formula: see text] combined with HER2 status was proposed as a two-predictor logistic model, with AUC = 0.891; P < 0.0005; and 95% confidence interval, 0.812-0.969.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that DOTBIS measured features change over time according to tumor pCR status and may predict early in the NAC treatment course whether a patient is responding to NAC.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the contralateral non-tumor-bearing breast assessed by diffuse optical tomography

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the changes in optically derived parameters acquired with a diffuse optical tomography breast imager system (DOTBIS) in the contralateral non-tumor-bearing breast in patients administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR).

METHODS

In this retrospective evaluation of 105 patients with stage II-III breast cancer, oxy-hemoglobin (ctO₂Hb) from the contralateral non-tumor-bearing breast was collected and analyzed at different time points during NAC. The earliest monitoring imaging time point was after 2-3 weeks receiving taxane. Longitudinal data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling to evaluate the contralateral breast ctO₂Hb changes across chemotherapy when corrected for pCR status, age, and BMI.

RESULTS

Patients who achieved pCR to NAC had an overall decrease of 3.88 μM for ctO₂Hb (95% CI, 1.39 to 6.37 μM), p = .004, after 2-3 weeks. On the other hand, non-pCR subjects had a non-significant mean reduction of 0.14 μM (95% CI, - 1.30 to 1.58 μM), p > .05. Mixed-effect model results indicated a statistically significant negative relationship of ctO₂Hb levels with BMI and age.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the contralateral normal breast tissue assessed by DOTBIS is modifiable after NAC, with changes associated with pCR after only 2-3 weeks of chemotherapy.

The Tumor-Fat Interface Volume of Breast Cancer on Pretreatment MRI Is Associated with a Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

Contact between a tumor and the adjacent fat is a potential biomarker to predict the therapy response in breast cancer, but it has not been quantitatively explored. In this study, we measured the direct contact between the tumor and adjacent fat using breast magnetic resonance imaging with machine learning and found that patients with a greater volume of contact between tumor and fat were less likely to have a complete pathological response. Our results suggest that the volume of the tumor–fat interface is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker to predict the treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Abstract

Adipocytes are active sources of numerous adipokines that work in both a paracrine and endocrine manner. It is not known that the direct contact between tumor and neighboring fat measured by pretreatment breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) affects treatment outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. A biomarker quantifying the tumor–fat interface volume from pretreatment MRI was proposed and used to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients treated with NAC. The tumor–fat interface volume was computed with data-driven clustering using multiphasic MRI. Our approach was developed and validated in two cohorts consisting of 1140 patients. A high tumor–fat interface volume was significantly associated with a non-pCR in both the development and validation cohorts (p = 0.030 and p = 0.037, respectively). Quantitative measurement of the tumor–fat interface volume based on pretreatment MRI may be useful for precision medicine and subsequently influence the treatment strategy of patients.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with stage II-III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and postmastectomy radiation therapy in the modern treatment era

Purpose

There are no randomized studies on the indication for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by a mastectomy. The aim of this study was to determine clinical outcomes and identify reliable prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with NAC followed by a mastectomy and PMRT.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological factors and outcomes in 351 patients with stage II or III breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by radical mastectomy and PMRT between March 2005 and December 2013.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 81 months (Range, 12-156 months). For all patients, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.3 %, 69.8 %, and 83.4 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, estrogen-receptor positivity, and complete response of cancer in axillary nodes (ypN0) were significant prognostic factors for better LRFS, while lympho-vascular invasion and clinical stage IIIC were independent prognostic factors for worse LRFS. The number of axillary node metastasesafter surgery was an independent prognostic factor of DMFS and OS. Patients with hormone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity had significantly better 5-year LRFS rates.

Conclusions

We identified several prognostic factors in our study. In particular, the number of axillary node metastases is significantly related to OS.

MRI and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast and Axilla after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

In the setting where determining extent of residual disease is key for surgical planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we evaluate the reliability of MRI in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) of the breast primary and axillary nodes after NAC.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who had MRI before and after NAC between June 2014 and August 2015 were identified in a prospective database after IRB approval. Post-NAC MRI of the breast and axillary nodes was correlated with residual disease on final pathology. Pathologic complete response was defined as absence of invasive and in situ disease.

RESULTS

We analyzed 129 breast cancers. Median patient age was 50.8 years (range 27.2 to 80.6 years). Tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplified in 52 of 129 (40%), estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative in 45 of 129 (35%), and triple negative in 32 of 129 (25%), with respective pCR rates of 50%, 9%, and 31%. Median tumor size pre- and post-NAC MRI were 4.1 cm and 1.45 cm, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging had a positive predictive value of 63.4% (26 of 41) and negative predictive value of 84.1% (74 of 88) for in-breast pCR. Axillary nodes were abnormal on pre-NAC MRI in 97 patients; 65 had biopsy-confirmed metastases. The nodes normalized on post-NAC MRI in 33 of 65 (51%); axillary pCR was present in 22 of 33 (67%). In 32 patients with proven nodal metastases and abnormal nodes on post-NAC MRI, 11 achieved axillary pCR. In 32 patients with normal nodes on pre- and post-NAC MRI, 6 (19%) had metastasis on final pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic complete response by MRI does not predict pCR with adequate accuracy to replace pathologic evaluation of the breast tumor and axillary nodes.

Prognostic Significance of a Complete Response on Breast MRI in Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy According to the Molecular Subtype

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between response categories assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or pathology and survival outcomes, and to determine whether there are prognostic differences among molecular subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 174 patients with biopsy-confirmed invasive breast cancer who had undergone MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but before surgery. Pathology findings were classified as a pathologic complete response (pCR) or a non-pCR, and MRI findings were designated as a radiologic CR (rCR) or a non-rCR. We evaluated overall and subtype-specific associations between clinicopathological factors including the assessment categories and recurrence, using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 41 recurrences (9 locoregional and 32 distant recurrences). There were statistically significant differences in recurrence outcomes between patients who achieved a radiologic or a pCR and patients who did not achieve a radiologic or a pCR (recurrence hazard ratio, 11.02; p = 0.018 and recurrence hazard ratio, 3.93; p = 0.022, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curves for recurrence-free survival showed that triple-negative breast cancer was the only subtype that showed significantly better outcomes in patients who achieved a CR compared to patients who did not achieve a CR by both radiologic and pathologic assessments (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis found that patients who achieved a rCR and a pCR did not display significantly different recurrence outcomes (recurrence hazard ratio, 2.02; p = 0.505 and recurrence hazard ratio, 1.12; p = 0.869, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of patients who achieved a rCR were similar to those of patients who achieved a pCR. To evaluate survival difference according to molecular subtypes, a larger study is needed.

Current treatment of early breast cancer: adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. The latest world cancer statistics calculated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) revealed that 1,677,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012 and 577,000 died. The TNM classification of malignant tumor (TNM) is the most commonly used staging system for breast cancer. Breast cancer is a group of very heterogeneous diseases. The molecular subtype of breast cancer carries important predictive and prognostic values, and thus has been incorporated in the basic initial process of breast cancer assessment/diagnosis. Molecular subtypes of breast cancers are divided into human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +), hormone receptor positive (estrogen or progesterone +), both positive, and triple negative breast cancer. By virtue of early detection via mammogram, the majority of breast cancers in developed parts of world are diagnosed in the early stage of the disease. Early stage breast cancers can be completely resected by surgery. Over time however, the disease may come back even after complete resection, which has prompted the development of an adjuvant therapy. Surgery followed by adjuvant treatment has been the gold standard for breast cancer treatment for a long time. More recently, neoadjuvant treatment has been recognized as an important strategy in biomarker and target evaluation. It is clinically indicated for patients with large tumor size, high nodal involvement, an inflammatory component, or for those wish to preserve remnant breast tissue. Here we review the most up to date conventional and developing treatments for different subtypes of early stage breast cancer.

Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Pathological complete response has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint for prediction of long-term clinical benefit, such as disease-free survival, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). We had four key objectives: to establish the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS, to establish the definition of pathological complete response that correlates best with long-term outcome, to identify the breast cancer subtypes in which pathological complete response is best correlated with long-term outcome, and to assess whether an increase in frequency of pathological complete response between treatment groups predicts improved EFS and OS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline for clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. To be eligible, studies had to meet three inclusion criteria: include at least 200 patients with primary breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery; have available data for pathological complete response, EFS, and OS; and have a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We compared the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response--ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is--for their association with EFS and OS in a responder analysis. We assessed the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS in various subgroups. Finally, we did a trial-level analysis to assess whether pathological complete response could be used as a surrogate endpoint for EFS or OS.

FINDINGS

We obtained data from 12 identified international trials and 11 955 patients were included in our responder analysis. Eradication of tumour from both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0) was better associated with improved EFS (ypT0 ypN0: hazard ratio [HR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·51; ypT0/is ypN0: 0·48, 0·43-0·54) and OS (0·36, 0·30-0·44; 0·36, 0·31-0·42) than was tumour eradication from the breast alone (ypT0/is; EFS: HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·55-0·66; OS 0·51, 0·45-0·58). We used the ypT0/is ypN0 definition for all subsequent analyses. The association between pathological complete response and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (EFS: HR 0·24, 95% CI 0·18-0·33; OS: 0·16, 0·11-0·25) and in those with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative tumours who received trastuzumab (EFS: 0·15, 0·09-0·27; OS: 0·08, 0·03, 0·22). In the trial-level analysis, we recorded little association between increases in frequency of pathological complete response and EFS (R(2)=0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25) and OS (R(2)=0·24, 0·00-0·70).

INTERPRETATION

Patients who attain pathological complete response defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0 have improved survival. The prognostic value is greatest in aggressive tumour subtypes. Our pooled analysis could not validate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for improved EFS and OS.

FUNDING

US Food and Drug Administration.

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy is Associated with Comparable Outcomes to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Post-Menopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Objectives: We compared outcomes in post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods: We retrospectively identified post-menopausal women who received either NAHT or NACT for non-metastatic, non-inflammatory, ER+, Her2neu negative breast cancer from 2004 to 2011. We compared long-term rates of locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify patient and disease factors significantly associated with these endpoints.

Results: We identified 99 patients in our study, including 27 who received NAHT and 72 who received NACT. There were no differences in 4-year LRFS, DMFS, or OS between groups. On Cox proportional hazards modeling, the type of systemic therapy (NAHT versus NACT) was not associated with OS. However, patients with progesterone receptor (PR) positive disease had a 92% lower risk of death compared to patients with PR negative disease.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that outcomes are not adversely affected by NAHT in post-menopausal women with ER+ breast cancer. Therefore, NAHT is a viable and potentially less toxic option than NACT in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, although PR negative disease appears to be associated with poor prognosis, intensification of systemic treatment with chemotherapy may not be associated with improvement of disease-related outcomes in this patient population.

Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Four hundred and nine patients were identified between January 1999 and December 2011. All patients received NST followed by surgery, adjuvant treatments and radiotherapy, as appropriate.

RESULTS

At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with surgical stage III disease were more likely to develop distant metastasis and die from breast cancer (p < 0.001). Luminal A and luminal B/HER2-negative patients had better prognosis; moreover, patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors had a significantly longer DRFS (p < 0.0049) and OS (p < 0.0001) compared with patients with HR-negative tumors as well as patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (DRFS and OS: p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, HR negativity (p < 0.001 for both DRFS and OS), mastectomy (DRFS: p = 0.009; OS: p = 0.05) and stage III disease (DRFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.003) were associated with shorter DRFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

HR negativity, mastectomy and pathological stage III disease are the variables independently associated with a worse outcome in our cohort of patients. These data are of high interest since they derive from a very heterogeneous group of patients, treated with different neoadjuvant/adjuvant regimens outside of clinical trials and with a long follow-up period.

Stromal matrix protein expression following preoperative systemic therapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Stromal alterations are observed following preoperative systemic therapy in breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the qualitative and quantitative changes of representative tumor stroma proteins in the context of neoadjuvant therapy and the response of patients undergoing preoperative systemic therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Fifty women receiving preoperative systemic therapy were evaluated for clinical and pathologic parameters. Clinical response was defined according to International Union against Cancer (UICC) criteria, whereas pathologic responses to preoperative systemic therapy were defined according to the Chevallier and Sataloff classifications. The expression of tenascin-C, syndecan-1, collagen IV, and smooth muscle actin proteins was investigated using morphometric analysis of immunohistochemical reactions. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR was done to evaluate the mRNA expression level of syndecan-1 and tenascin-C. The data were compared with 20 breast cancer samples of patients not treated with preoperative systemic therapy.

RESULTS

According to UICC criteria, the expression levels of collagen IV were up-regulated in all preoperative systemic therapy-treated patients (P = 0.002). Collagen IV was up-regulated in the preoperative systemic therapy group in both Chevallier and Sataloff classifications compared with the control cases (P = 0.025 and P = 001, respectively). There were no significant differences in the expression of smooth muscle actin between the treated and nontreated groups. The syndecan-1 proteoglycan level was significantly down-regulated in the preoperative systemic therapy group (Chevallier classes P = 0.015, Sataloff classes P = 0.015). Tenascin-C was up-regulated in women with progressive disease (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We have observed that the stromal component of breast carcinomas following preoperative systemic therapy differs from the nontreated tumors, which can be evaluated with the analysis of the above mentioned proteins.

A comparative study of exemestane versus anastrozole in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer with visceral metastases

PURPOSE

Patients developing visceral breast cancer metastases generally receive chemotherapy rather than endocrine therapy. Recent aromatase inhibitor studies have reported activity in such patients; therefore, this study formally evaluated anastrozole and exemestane in postmenopausal patients in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer and > or = 1 visceral (liver or lung) lesion were randomized to anastrozole (1 mg/day orally) or exemestane (25 mg/day orally) for > or = 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response in visceral lesions based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit (objective response plus stable disease > or = 180 days), overall survival, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were enrolled, and 128 patients (64 anastrozole, 64 exemestane) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Accrual delays caused study closure before the target enrollment (N = 200) was reached, limiting the statistical power of the study. Objective response in visceral sites was approximately 15% in both groups. Clinical benefit in visceral sites was 32% of the patients treated with anastrozole and 38% of the patients treated with exemestane. Median survival was 33.3 months and 30.5 months in the anastrozole and exemestane groups, respectively. Toxicities were similar to those previously reported; however, treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with anastrozole (41%) than with exemestane (31%). Both treatments were generally well tolerated in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer with visceral metastases.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy was similar in both treatment groups for all endpoints. Aromatase inhibitors can be considered as a treatment option in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive visceral breast cancer metastases.

Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast

Introduction

To investigate the predictive value of clinical and biological markers for a pathological complete remission after a preoperative dose-dense regimen of doxorubicin and docetaxel, with or without tamoxifen, in primary operable breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of previously untreated, operable, and measurable primary breast cancer (tumour (T), nodes (N) and metastases (M) score: T2-3(≥ 3 cm) N0-2 M0) were treated in a prospectively randomised trial with four cycles of dose-dense (bi-weekly) doxorubicin and docetaxel (ddAT) chemotherapy, with or without tamoxifen, prior to surgery. Clinical and pathological parameters (menopausal status, clinical tumour size and nodal status, grade, and clinical response after two cycles) and a panel of biomarkers (oestrogen and progesterone receptors, Ki-67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), p53, bcl-2, all detected by immunohistochemistry) were correlated with the detection of a pathological complete response (pCR).

Results

A pCR was observed in 9.7% in 248 patients randomised in the study and in 8.6% in the subset of 196 patients with available tumour tissue. Clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, poor tumour differentiation, negative oestrogen receptor status, negative progesterone receptor status, and loss of bcl-2 were significantly predictive for a pCR in a univariate logistic regression model, whereas in a multivariate analysis only the clinical nodal status and hormonal receptor status provided significantly independent information. Backward stepwise logistic regression revealed a response after two cycles, with hormone receptor status and lymph-node status as significant predictors. Patients with a low percentage of cells stained positive for Ki-67 showed a better response when treated with tamoxifen, whereas patients with a high percentage of Ki-67 positive cells did not have an additional benefit when treated with tamoxifen. Tumours overexpressing HER2 showed a similar response to that in HER2-negative patients when treated without tamoxifen, but when HER2-positive tumours were treated with tamoxifen, no pCR was observed.

Conclusion

Reliable prediction of a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy is not possible with clinical and biological factors routinely determined before start of treatment. The response after two cycles of chemotherapy is a strong but dependent predictor. The only independent factor in this subset of patients was bcl-2.

Trial registration number

NCT00543829

Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared primary neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. The need for preoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin or taxanes may be reduced in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive tumors. This randomized, controlled, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (n = 61) or exemestane 25 mg/day (n = 60) for 3 months or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (four 3-week cycles). Study end points included overall objective response determined by palpation, mammography, and ultrasound, and the number of patients who qualified for breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Clinical objective response was 64% in the endocrine therapy and chemotherapy treatment groups. Median time to clinical response was 57 and 51 days with aromatase inhibitors and chemotherapy, respectively (P > .05). Rates of pathological complete response (3% vs 6%) and disease progression (9% vs 9%) did not differ significantly in the endocrine therapy or chemotherapy group, respectively (P > .05). Rates of breast-conserving surgery were slightly higher in the endocrine group (33% vs 24%; P = .058). The most frequent toxicities from chemotherapy were alopecia (79%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (33%), and grade 2 neuropathy (30%). Endocrine treatment was well tolerated. No deaths occurred during the preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors was well tolerated and resulted in rates similar to chemotherapy in overall objective response and breast-conserving surgery in postmenopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive tumors.

The use of an in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay to predict chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer

The adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) has the advantages of standardization, evaluability, reproducibility, and accuracy, and can be performed on relatively small numbers of tumor cells. A total of 43 patients were enrolled in the present study, and chemosensitivity tests were successfully performed in 40 (93.0%) of these patients. Twenty of the 40 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. The chemotherapy regimens used were doxorubicin plus docetaxel (n=9, 45.0%) or doxorubicin plus paclitaxel (n=11, 55.0%). Mean cell death rate, as determined by ATP-CRA, was lower in non-responders than in responders to therapy (P=0.012). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for ATP-CRA were 78.6%, 100%, 100%, 66.7%, and 85.0%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy achieved by immunohistochemistry using estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor was lower than that achieved using ATP-CRA. Expression of p53, erb-B2, Ki67, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and annexin I was not significantly associated with response to chemotherapy. Our results show that ATP-CRA has high specificity and positive predictive value for predicting response to chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer

The use of endocrine therapy is well established as a primary treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. However, despite the current popularity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable tumours, there is relatively little published evidence for pre-operative endocrine therapy in operable disease, particularly outside of the elderly population. The wider use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has encouraged studies that compare the efficacy of AIs with tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, but there remains a lack of comparison of neoadjuvant with adjuvant endocrine therapies. This review discusses the current evidence regarding primary endocrine therapy, along with the factors involved in choosing appropriate patients for neoadjuvant therapy and the current opinions on length of treatment time and measurement of response prior to surgery.

Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response

Primary, preoperative, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the early 1970s as part of an integrated therapeutic approach to treat inoperable locally advanced breast cancer. The approach resulted in high responses, and sufficient downstaging to allow mastectomy in some patients. In addition, a small number of pathological complete responders were reported. Gradually, the idea of preoperative chemotherapy was extended to include patients with large but operable early-stage breast cancer, with the possibility in some cases of downstaging the primary tumour to avoid mastectomy, and to allow breast-conserving surgery to be done. This approach allows the tumour to be used as a measure of treatment response in vivo. More recently, the possibility has opened up for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide information on the use of clinical, pathological, and molecular endpoints, which can be used as surrogate markers to predict long-term outcome in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the anatomical accessibility of the breast provides the potential for serial biopsies to investigate molecular changes during treatment.

The reliability of assessment of oestrogen receptor expression on needle core biopsy specimens of invasive carcinomas of the breast

AIM

To assess the reliability of assessment of oestrogen receptor expression on needle core biopsy specimens of invasive carcinomas of the breast. Previous studies have mostly been small, with a range of agreement from 62% to 100%.

METHODS

Retrospective audit of 338 tumours surgically excised within 60 days of core biopsy, that had had oestrogen receptor assessed on both the core biopsy and tumour specimens. Surgical specimens were incised when fresh to ensure good fixation. External controls including a weakly positive tumour were included in each immunohistochemistry run.

RESULTS

Oestrogen receptor expression was bimodal, with H score in both specimens of either 0 or >50 in 96% of tumours. Using H score cut-off of 10 for positivity, there was an agreement between core and excision in 334 of 338 tumours (98.8%). All discrepancies were between weakly positive and negative tumours. Intratumoral heterogeneity could explain the one tumour that was negative on core and positive on excision. H score tended to be slightly higher on core than excision (means 146 and 136). Better fixation on the core is the most likely explanation for this and for the three tumours that were positive on core and negative on excision. Repeat staining on tumours with discrepant results gave similar results in all except one case. An internal control was present in 97% of excisions and 55% of cores of oestrogen receptor-negative tumours; the internal control stained positively in all except two sections.

CONCLUSION

Oestrogen receptor can be assessed reliably on needle core biopsies of invasive carcinomas of the breast.

Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update

Neoadjuvant (primary systemic) treatment is the standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer and a standard option for primary operable disease. Because of new treatments and new understandings of breast cancer, however, recommendations published in 2003 regarding neoadjuvant treatment for operable disease required updating. Therefore, a second international panel of representatives of a number of breast cancer clinical research groups was convened in September 2004 to update these recommendations. As part of this effort, data published to date were reviewed critically and indications for neoadjuvant treatment were newly defined.

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer: clinical data and biological fall-out

Primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) was first used in early 1970s for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer; in this setting primary chemotherapy was administered to allow for radical surgery and the objective response rates were high with a substantial proportion of patients amenable to surgery. On the basis of this activity, PST was subsequently used to treat operable locally advanced or large primary tumors to increase the rate of conservative surgery. First generation clinical trials demonstrated that breast conservation rates were improved, that a proportion of patients experienced a complete pathologic response and that response to PST was a good predictor of long term outcome. Second generation of clinical trials were designed to compare PST to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy: here again the rate of conservative surgery was significantly improved and the pathologic response rate demonstrated its prognostic value, however no progression free or survival improvement was obtained in comparison with postoperative treatments. Another interesting observation from these trials was that some tumor parameters (histology, grade, hormone receptor status) can predict the likelihood of achieving a pathologic complete response. On the basis of these data, PST can now be considered the standard of care for locally advanced disease, an reasonable option in case of large primary breast tumors not eligible for conservative surgery and an acceptable alternative for all the patients who are candidate to adjuvant treatment. It however clear that PST represents an excellent in vivo model to test new regimens, to evaluate biomarkers with predictive value and to evaluate the treatment induced modifications in tumor biology. Availability of new technologies able to measure the expression of thousands of genes and of new molecularly directed drugs will increase further the interest in this treatment strategy.

Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease

PURPOSE

Our goal was to identify genes undergoing expressional changes shortly after the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The biopsies were taken from patients with primary breast cancer prior to any treatment and 24 hours after the beginning of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression analyses from matched pair samples representing 25 patients were carried out with Clontech filter arrays. A subcohort of those 25 paired samples were additionally analyzed with the Affymetrix GeneChip platform. All of the transcripts from both platforms were queried for expressional changes.

RESULTS

Performing hierarchical cluster analysis, we clustered pre- and posttreatment samples from individual patients more closely to each other than the samples taken from different patients. This reflects the rather low number of transcripts responding directly to the drugs used. Although transcriptional drug response occurring during therapy differed between individual patients, two genes (p21(WAF1/CIP1) and MIC-1) were up-regulated in posttreatment samples. This could be validated by semiquantitative and real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Partial least- discriminant analysis based on approximately 25 genes independently identified by either Clontech or Affymetrix platforms could clearly discriminate pre- and posttreatment samples. However, correlation of certain gene expression levels as well as of differential patterns and clusters as determined by a different platform was not always satisfying.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated the potential of monitoring posttreatment changes in gene expression as a measure of the pharmacodynamics of drugs. As a clinical laboratory model, it can be useful to identify patients with sensitive and reactive tumors and to help for optimized choice for sequential therapy and obviously improve relapse- free and overall survival.

Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future

The first generation of randomised trials assessing the role of primary chemotherapy in breast cancer has failed to demonstrate the expected survival benefit. However, it has established the role of this treatment in 'downstaging' tumours of patients with locally advanced disease and, consequently, in improving breast conservation rates. Also, a number of surrogates of outcome have been identified, which will hopefully lead to earlier results in breast cancer clinical trials. Encouraging results have also been reported in trials investigating a number of novel approaches.

A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen compared with conventional chemotherapy in theneo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy against conventional bolus chemotherapy in the preoperative treatment of patients with large operable early breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and twenty-six women with histologically proven 3 cm invasive early breast cancer were randomised to receive pre-operative infusional 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) by daily 24 h continuous infusion via a Hickman line for 18 weeks with epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on day 1 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (infusional ECisF), or conventional bolus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (AC), both schedules for six courses. Patients subsequently had local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy or both) and tamoxifen 20 mg orally daily as appropriate.

RESULTS

The 5 year results for AC and infusional ECisF, respectively, were as follows: overall response, 75% and 77%; complete clinical remission, 31% and 34%; pathological complete remission (pathCR), 16% for both; and pathCR with residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 25% and 24%. Mastectomy rates were 37% and 34%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 74% for AC and 82% for infusional ECisF (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.13; P = 0.18). Both treatments were well tolerated. Grade III/IV lethargy, vomiting, alopecia and plantar-palmar erythema were significantly greater for infusional ECisF; grade III/IV leucopenia was significantly greater for AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative continuous infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy is no more active than conventional AC for early breast cancer; with a median 5 year follow-up, the infusion-based schedule shows a non-significant trend towards improved survival.

Tamoxifen increases apoptosis but does not influence markers of proliferation in an MCF-7 xenograft model of breast cancer

Twenty-four nude mice bearing MCF-7 breast cancer cells grown as xenografts and treated with tamoxifen (2.5 mg slow-release pellet) were studied for up to 35 days. Tumour size was measured in 2 dimensions at regular time-intervals and tumours were harvested on each of days 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 and 35 after the start of treatment. Control animals (8) received no treatment and the tumours were harvested after 0 or 35 days. Tumour sections were assessed for prevalence of apoptosis and mitosis and examined immunocytochemically for Ki(67)(MIB-1) and bcl-2 expression. Tumours increased in size during tamoxifen-treatment, but at a significantly slower rate (max. 2.6-fold) than in the untreated control animals; thus tumours not actually regressing may, nevertheless, be responding significantly to tamoxifen. MIB-1 and bcl-2 immunostaining and mitosis failed to show any consistent change over the period of study. Apoptosis, however, increased progressively and significantly to day-28 in tamoxifen-treated tumours, reaching approximately a 5-fold increase over day-0 values, then decreasing again to nearly 3-fold by day-35 (P= 0.0002). The apoptosis: mitosis ratio in treated tumours also increased to approximately 10-fold on day-28 over day-0 values, decreasing to nearly 4-fold by day-35 (P= 0.037). Within the treated group, apoptosis was significantly inversely correlated with both mitosis (R = -0.38, P= 0.03) and expression of bcl-2 (R = -0.48, P= 0.0056) and strongly positively correlated with both time on tamoxifen (R = +0.63, P= 0.0003) and the % inhibition of growth by tamoxifen (R = +0.58,P = 0.0012) in the 28 individual, treated tumours (estimated relative to the mean growth rate in the controls). The apoptosis: mitosis ratio was also inversely correlated with bcl-2 expression (R = -0.56, P= 0.0021) and positively correlated with both time on tamoxifen (R = +0.50, P= 0.0068) and % inhibition of growth (R = +0.56, P= 0.0019). In this hormone-sensitive tumour model for breast cancer, in which tamoxifen caused inhibition rather than regression, it was not possible to detect significant changes in the marker proteins Ki(67)and bcl-2, or in the prevalence of mitosis in relation to treatment; these factors may therefore not be accurate indices of response to tamoxifen in all situations. By contrast, however, tamoxifen induced a significant, early increase in the prevalence of apoptosis associated with inhibition of tumour growth and an inverse relationship in both mitosis and bcl-2 expression, suggesting that apoptosis may be an accurate and sensitive early marker of even a moderate response to tamoxifen.

Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer?

The Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), based on tumour size in breast, node involvement and Scarff–Bloom–Richardson (SBR) grading, has been shown to constitute a definitive prognostic factor of primary operable breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic value of this index in 163 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondly, we examined the influence on survival of a revised NPI, only based on residual tumour size in breast and SBR grading in 228 patients, and consequently called breast grading index (BGI). The prognostic value of these two indices was also evaluated by replacing the SBR grade with the MSBR grade, a French modified SBR grading; the modified NPI (MNPI) and modified BGI (MBGI) were, respectively, obtained in 153 and 222 patients. At a median follow-up of 9.3 years, survival was significantly related to these four indices (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that MBGI was the only one which retained a prognostic influence on disease-free survival (P<0.02). In conclusion, the ‘amount’ of residual tumour in breast and/or nodes, as defined by NPI and revised indices, confers a determinant prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, inviting an alternative postsurgical treatment for a subgroup of patients with a decreased survival.

Early changes in apoptosis and proliferation following primary chemotherapy for breast cancer

Patients undergoing primary chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer consented to a core biopsy of the invasive breast primary pre- and 24 h postchemotherapy. The resulting tissue was analysed for apoptosis, Ki67, ER and HER-2 using immunohistochemical techniques. These data were then used to evaluate the relationship between these biological markers and response to chemotherapy and overall survival. Response rate to chemotherapy in this group was 86%, 16 patients (25%) achieved a clinical complete response and 41 (63%) a partial response. Prechemotherapy there was a significant correlation between Ki67 and apoptotic index (AI), r=0.6, (P<0.001). A significant rise in AI (P<0.001), and fall in Ki67 (P=0.002) was seen 24 h following chemotherapy. No relationship was seen between pretreatment AI and clinical response, but higher Ki67 and growth index (Ki67/AI ratio, GI) did correlate with clinical response (both r=0.31, P<0.025). No correlation was seen between the change in AI or Ki67 at 24 h and clinical response or survival. Significant changes in apoptosis and proliferation can be demonstrated 24 h following chemotherapy, but these changes do not relate to clinical response or outcome in this study. Pretreatment proliferation and GI are however predictive of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Prognostic factors for survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. the role of clinical response

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess predictive factors for clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy and prognostic factors for survival. From 1981 to 1992, 936 patients with T2-T3, N0-N1 breast cancer who received 2-6 months (median 4) of preoperative chemotherapy were selected from the Institute Curie database. Preoperative treatment was followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 8.5 years (range 7-211 months). The objective response rate before surgery and/or radiotherapy was 58.3%. In stepwise multivariate analysis (Cox model), favourable prognostic factors for survival were the absence of pathological axillary lymph node involvement (Relative Risk (RR) 1.54; P=0.0004), low histological tumour grade (RR=1.54; P=0.0017), clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy (RR=1.45, P=0.0013), positive progesterone receptor (PR) status (RR=1.56; P=0.0001), smaller tumour size (RR=1.37; P=0.005) and lack of clinical lymph node involvement (RR=1.42; P=0.007). The association of clinical tumour response with survival is independent of the baseline characteristics of the tumour. Clinical response could be used as a surrogate marker for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before assessment of the pathological response.

Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen

Morphological characteristics, grading features, proliferation marker MIB1, apoptosis (by Tdt-mediated duTP-biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL)), Bcl-2 expression, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status were compared in ER-positive breast cancers before and after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Daily treatment was with letrozole 2.5 mg (12 patients) or 10 mg (12 patients), or with tamoxifen 20 mg(24 patients). Letrozole treatment was associated with a pathological response in 17 of 24 (71%) patients. The predominant change in grading features was a decrease in mitosis, and the expression of MIB1 was reduced in all of the 22 evaluable cases. Whilst only marginal changes were observed in ER expression following letrozole therapy, PgR reactivity was reduced in 20 of 21 evaluable cases which were initially PgR-positive, becoming undetectable in 16 patients. Tamoxifen treatment was associated with pathological response in 15 of 24 (63%) tumours. In contrast to letrozole, the dominant change in grading feature was an increase in tubule formation, ER score was markedly reduced in most cases, and the most common effect on PgR was an increased expression. Following treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole, variable effects were observed on the apoptotic index and expression of Bcl-2. These results indicate that both letrozole and tamoxifen have marked influences on the pathological features of breast cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. However, the effects of the two agents varied such that the phenotypes of letrozole- and tamoxifen-treated tumours differ markedly. Effects on clinical, pathological and biological endpoints were frequently disconcordant--future studies will therefore require the evaluation of multiple parameters in order to fully assess tumour response.

Is there still a role for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer?

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer is firmly established. There is now also an emerging role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer. There is good evidence that the chances of breast conserving surgery can be increased with this approach and results of randomised studies indicate that survival is at least as good with neoadjuvant as with adjuvant chemotherapy. Similar clinical data are emerging with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. For the future, there are important potential advantages in having an in vivo measure of chemosensitivity rather than blindly treating micrometastatic disease in the adjuvant setting. Clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment, and in particular complete pathological response, are predictors of subsequent outcome. Pathological involvement of axillary nodes following neoadjuvant therapy portends a poor prognosis. The potential for biological surrogate markers of response to predict for long-term outcome may allow individualisation of systemic treatment and the rapid assessment of new drugs in early breast cancer.

Prognostic value of residual node involvement in operable breast cancer after induction chemotherapy

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of axillary disease on patients' survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to assess patient and tumor characteristics associated with post-chemotherapy axillary involvement. After six induction cycles, 277 patients with operable breast cancer (stage II-III) underwent surgery with axillary dissection, followed by radiotherapy (n = 267) or additional chemotherapy (n = 63) and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (n = 138). At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed as a function of node involvement. The differences in OS and DFS according to the number of positive nodes were highly statistically significant with a decreased survival associated with the increasing number of nodes (p = 5 x 10(-6) and 9 x 10(-7), respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, the node number after chemotherapy appeared as the most significant prognostic factor (p = 7 x 10(-4) for OS and p = 3 x 10(-5) for DFS). All the other classical prognostic factors were insignificant, except post-chemotherapy Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading for OS (p = 8 x 10(-4)) and adjuvant hormonotherapy for DFS (p = 1 x 10(-2)). Although constituting a different parameter from primary surgery data, the number of positive nodes after chemotherapy could still remain a valuable prognostic factor at secondary surgery, raising the question for high risk patients of a second non-cross-resistant adjuvant regimen, or high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells support.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: a surgical perspective

Neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or endocrine agents is being used increasingly to downstage locally advanced and large operable breast cancers. Following these treatments, inoperable breast cancer often becomes fully resectable, and initially operable tumours requiring mastectomy may be successfully removed by breast-conserving surgery. Patient selection is important to optimise neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: only patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich breast cancer are candidates, and postmenopausal women are likely to benefit the most. Such patients can expect a high probability of responses over a 3-month treatment period. Response to therapy should be monitored by clinical examination as well as by ultrasound, mammography, or other imaging procedures. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are more effective than tamoxifen in this treatment setting. In a large randomised trial of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women, letrozole achieved significantly higher response rates than tamoxifen, and a correspondingly higher rate of breast-conserving surgery was possible in the letrozole-treated patients. There is some evidence to suggest that the nature of the tumour response is different for preoperative endocrine therapy compared with chemotherapy. This difference may result in a higher rate of complete tumour excisions following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment. There appears to be a low rate of subsequent local recurrence in patients having breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Outcome after extended follow-up in a prospective study of operable breast cancer: key factors and a prognostic index

In 1990, 215 patients with operable breast cancer were entered into a prospective study of the prognostic significance of five biochemical markers and 15 other factors (pathological/chronological/patient). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, there were 77 recurrences and 77 deaths (59 breast cancer-related). By univariate analysis, patient outcome related significantly to 13 factors. By multivariate analysis, the most important of nine independent factors were: number of nodes involved, steroid receptors (for oestrogen or progestogen), age, clinical or pathological tumour size and grade. Receptors and grade exerted their influence only in the first 3 years. Progestogen receptors (immunohistochemical) and oestrogen receptors (biochemical) were of similar prognostic significance. The two receptors were correlated (r=+0.50, P=0.001) and displaced each other from the analytical model but some evidence for the additivity of their prognostic values was seen when their levels were discordant.

Preoperative/neoadjuvant medical therapy for early breast cancer

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) medical therapy has emerged over the past decade as a new approach for the treatment of early breast cancer. Results show it has high activity, but survival is no better than with conventional adjuvant treatment. The need for mastectomy is reduced but not abolished; in some studies this effect is associated with a small increase in risk of local recurrence, but without any detriment to survival. Predictive factors for improved outcome include clinical response, and especially pathological complete remissions. However, persisting pathological axillary node involvement is associated with poor outcome. Biological changes in apoptosis or proliferation pathways may prove to be more sensitive surrogate markers than clinical or pathological responses for assessing treatment outcome. The main long-term aim of preoperative medical treatment must be to establish such surrogate predictive markers. This would lead to individualised treatment for each patient, and would allow much more rapid assessment of new drugs than is currently possible with adjuvant therapy trials.

Estrogen-receptor-directed neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: results of a randomised trial using formestane and methotrexate, mitozantrone and mitomycin C (MMM) chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We wanted to determine whether neoadjuvant systemic chemoendocrine therapy guided by the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the primary breast cancer, followed by conventional surgery and/or radiotherapy, reduces local and distant recurrence and improves survival compared with adjuvant treatment given conventionally postoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ten patients with primary breast cancer (T1-T4, N0, N1-2) were randomised to receive treatment with neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy or conventional post-operative chemoendocrine therapy. Systemic therapy was based on the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the primary tumour obtained by trucut core biopsy. ER-negative patients received MMM chemotherapy (methotrexate (30 mg/m2), mitozantrone (7 mg/m2) and mitomycin (7 mg/m2) three-weekly for three months and ER-positive patients who were premenopausal received goserelin (3.75 mg monthly), and post menopausal women formestane (250 mg every two weeks) over three months.

RESULTS

With a minimum of five years follow-up, there is no evidence of any survival benefit from the pretreatment neoadjuvant therapy regimen, with five year overall survival being 79% +/- 4.7% (neoadjuvant) and 87% +/- 3.4% (adjuvant). Similarly, there was no apparent benefit in terms of disease-free survival. There was, however, a significant reduction in the incidence of distant metastases in responders (4 of 51; 8%) compared with non-responders (17 of 49; 35%) (P < 0.01). There was a reduction in the need for surgery in responding patients with T1 and T2 tumours, since 10 of 74 (14%) had no detectable residual tumour, without any apparent increase in the risk of local or distant recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In this study neoadjuvant treatment with endocrine or chemotherapy provided no obvious survival benefit to women with breast cancer. However, it does allow avoidance of surgery in some cases. Also, the patients whose tumours respond to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have a lower incidence of distant metastases after five year follow-up compared to those whose tumours fail to respond.

Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is able to reduce the size of the majority of breast tumours and down-stage axillary-node status. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 488 patients with T2-T3, N0-N1 breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tumour excision and axillary lymph-node dissection between 1981 and 1992 were selected from the Institut Curie database. Median follow-up was 7 years. Overall objective response rate before local treatment was 52% and breast tumour size was reduced in 83% of patients. No pathologic nodal involvement was observed in 46. 5% of patients. Patients with > or = eight positive nodes had a very poor median disease-free survival of only 20 months. Their 10-year disease-free survival rate was 7%, while the 10-year disease-free survival rate for patients with no node involvement was 64%. Median survival for patients with > or = eight nodes positive was 48 months and the 10-year survival rate was 26% (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, outcome was strongly correlated with pathological nodal status, tumour grade, hormonal receptor status and clinical response of the tumour. In conclusion, patients with extensive nodal involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a very poor outcome. Second-line treatment should be considered in this population.

Identification of long-term survivors in primary breast cancer by dynamic modelling of tumour response

Although clinical response to primary chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer is associated with a survival advantage, it is the degree of pathological response in the breast and ipsilateral axilla that best identifies patients with a good long-term outcome. A mathematical model of the initial response of 39 locally advanced tumours to anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy has been previously shown to predict subsequent clinical tumour size. This model allows for the possibility of primary resistant disease, the presence of which should therefore be associated with a worse outcome. This study reports the application of this model to an additional five patients with locally advanced breast cancer, as well as to 63 patients with operable breast cancer, and confirms the biological reality of the model parameters for these 100 breast cancers treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The tumours that responded to chemotherapy had higher cell-kill (P < 0.0005), lower resistance (P < 0.0001) and slower tumour regrowth (P < 0.002). Furthermore, ER-negative tumours had higher cell-kill (P < 0.05), as compared with ER-positive tumours. All patients with a pathological complete response had zero resistance according to the model. Furthermore, the long-term implication of chemo-resistant disease was demonstrated by survival analysis of these two groups of patients. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, there was a statistically significantly worse survival for the 37 patients with locally advanced breast cancer identified by the model to have more than 8% primary resistant tumour (P < 0.003). The specificity of this putative prognostic indicator was confirmed in the 63 patients presenting with operable disease where, at a median follow-up of 7.7 years, those women with a resistant fraction of greater than 8% had a significantly worse survival (P < 0.05). Application of this model to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy may allow earlier identification of clinically significant resistance and permit intervention with alternative non-cross-resistant therapies such as taxoids.

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer

PURPOSE

Laboratory studies suggest that primary systemic therapy (PST) could improve control of micrometastatic disease and impact on overall survival (OS). This article examines the rationale for and preclinical and clinical data of PST in operable breast cancer and the potential role of intermediate biomarkers as predictive and/or prognostic factors for response and survival.

DESIGN AND METHOD

We conducted an extensive literative review (including MEDLINE) on preclinical studies, single-arm feasibility studies, large randomized single- and multi-institutional trials, and laboratory correlate studies of PST in breast cancer.

RESULTS

Small trials in locally advanced disease showed high initial rates of response and local control. Six randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of PST for palpable, operable breast cancer have been reported since 1991 (from 204 to 1,523 patients each). These data clearly show a small but significant (less than 10%) absolute increase in the use of breast-conservation treatment (BCT) with similar rates of local control. Although one study showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and another showed better OS, most studies did not show any survival advantage of primary versus adjuvant systemic therapy. Thus far, pathologic complete response seems to be the best predictor of survival, but clinical response assessment correlates poorly with pathologic response. Pilot studies demonstrated feasibility of procuring tissue at diagnosis and after treatment for assays of potential intermediate biomarkers. Initial data suggest a potential correlation between markers of proliferation and apoptosis and in vivo chemotherapy sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Thus far, RCTs of PST versus standard adjuvant therapy have not shown any clear benefit for DFS or OS in early breast cancer. Ongoing trials should determine if specific subsets of patients at risk would benefit from additional systemic therapy and the potential role of intermediate biomarkers in identifying such women. Although PST results in a small increase in the rate of BCT with similar rates of local control, current PST strategies should not replace standard adjuvant approaches. Rather, they represent an acceptable alternative to women with palpable, operable tumors and an excellent arena for clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Primary or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer offers the chance to use the tumour as an in vivo measure of response, with the additional possibility of downstaging and avoidance of mastectomy. Tumour response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with the outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases. Randomized studies have shown that preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, but there has not been a significant increase in the disease-free survival or overall survival in the groups studied. The overall response rates reported have varied between 60% and 100% with complete clinical responses from 10% to almost 50%, avoiding mastectomy in most cases. Clinical responders have a better prognosis than nonresponders; pathological complete remissions at present offer the best prediction of good long-term outcome, but occur in less than 20% of patients. Biological predictors reflecting changes in apoptosis and/or proliferation may in the future offer the best surrogate markers for long-term outcome, and trials have recently begun in this area.

Primary chemotherapy or hormonotherapy for patients with breast cancer

Scientific rationale for primary treatment of breast cancer relies on experimental data showing that the incidence and growth of disease correlate with the primary tumour mass and tumoral angiogenesis. Although the strategy may be applied to both chemotherapy and hormonotherapy, only the first was extensively explored for patients with locally advanced breast cancer in order to improve survival and to avoid mastectomy through the achievement of a downstaging of the tumour. Encouraging results obtained in this clinically advanced setting combined with renewed interest for tumoral angiogenesis brought clinicians to apply this strategy to smaller tumours. Despite high clinical and radiological response rates, only pathologic information, carefully assessed in both the primary and axillae lymph nodes, stands out as the major source of prognostic information on patients' outcome. Recent developments in chemotherapy (dose-intensity, new drugs) do not seem to influence these results, indicating the possible limitations of recent developments in chemotherapy. Of 6 published randomized trials comparing primary vs adjuvant chemotherapy, none showed any significant impact of primary chemotherapy on survival, with a trend towards delayed/less distant recurrences in patients treated by primary chemotherapy in some. Some recent reports suggest that local relapse rate might be increased after conservative treatment following induction chemotherapy in subgroups analyse and this should cause oncologists to revise and define the role for conservative surgery after primary medical treatment without calling into question the global strategy. Through sequential samplings, neoadjuvant medical treatment provides indeed the opportunity (a) to identify molecular mechanisms associated with pathologic response and (b) to study the possibility to guide the choices for induction treatment and patient populations submitted to primary medical treatment.

A Case of Advanced Breast Cancer Successfully Treated with Primary Endocrine Therapy

We present a case of a premenopausal woman with advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer who was successfully treated with primary endocrine therapy consisting of ovarian ablation followed by a combined endocrine regimen of the aromataseinhibitor fadrozole 2 mg daily and tamoxifen 20 mg daily. During the 5 months treatment period, PR evaluation of the loco-regional lesions was performed. The patient then underwent mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection followed byfadrozole and tamoxifen therapy. Throughout the treatment course, no adverse events were encountered and the patient has been enjoying a favorable quality of life. As shown by this case, primary endocrine therapy is a promising treatment option for hormonesensitive breast cancer. However, this modality should be continued to be regarded as experimental.