1
|
Heemsbergen WD, Spampinato S, Dirkx M, Jahreiß MC, Boormans JL, Franckena M, Boersma LJ. Second primary cancer risks in seminoma patients treated with current and previous radiotherapy protocols: a systematic literature review. Radiother Oncol 2025; 209:110955. [PMID: 40419115 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2025] [Revised: 04/22/2025] [Accepted: 05/20/2025] [Indexed: 05/28/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) with para-aortal (PAO) +/- para-iliac (dog-leg) fields in seminoma patients is an effective treatment, associated with a lifetime risk of developing infra-diaphragmatic radiation-induced second primary cancers (SPC). We performed a systematic review to investigate dose to organs at risk (OAR), associated SPC risks, and landmark changes in RT-protocols, with a special interest in proton therapy. METHODS A systematic literature search (1990-2024) was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS We identified eleven cohort studies reporting consistently excess SPC risks for pancreas, kidney, stomach, and (for dog-leg field) bladder, and colorectum after RT. Important RT-landmarks during the past 60 years were: abandoning mediastinal and inguinal RT, PAO only in stage I, prescription-dose reductions from 30-40 Gy to 20-26 Gy, largely abandoning elective PAO for stage I seminoma in favour of active surveillance, and introduction of proton therapy. RT remains an option in stage II (dog-leg with boosting) and high-risk stage I seminoma. Two studies estimated the dose-response-relationship for pancreas and stomach. Five planning studies showed consistent OAR dose reductions with proton versus photon therapy. Similar or higher OAR doses were observed with intensity-modulated versus conventional RT, due to larger low-dose baths. CONCLUSIONS Established SPC risks have changed clinical practice in seminoma patients, and remain relevant for current RT practice. Proton therapy has the potential to reduce dose in relevant OARs at risk for SPCs. Further research on dose-response relationships for SPCs with fractionated RT and protons is needed to improve SPC risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilma D Heemsbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sofia Spampinato
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten Dirkx
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marie C Jahreiß
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Martine Franckena
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Z, Guo M, Liu L, Deng S. Association between postoperative radiotherapy for young-onset nonsmall cell lung cancer and risk of second primary malignancies: comparative study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:4617-4623. [PMID: 38716897 PMCID: PMC11325970 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common form of therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in early stage is surgery-based combination therapy, including radiotherapy and immunotherapy. However, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) of cancer is correlated with increasing risk of second primary malignancy (SPM), especially young-onset cancer cases. The authors aimed to quantify the risks of SPM associated with PORT treatment for young‑onset NSCLC in early stage. METHODS The authors screened for SPM that developed over 5 years since the diagnosis of NSCLC. Using the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, PORT-correlated risks were estimated with multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Moreover, Fine-Gray's competing risk regression analysis was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of SPMs. RESULTS Among the 30 308 young-onset NSCLC patients in early stage undergoing surgery, a total of 3728 patients have received PORT. Logistic regression analyses showed that PORT showed substantial correlation with elevated risks of second solid malignancies [relative risks (RR)=1.31; 95% CI: 1.17-1.46], lung cancer (RR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.07-1.42), breast cancer (RR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.16-2.74), and colon and rectum cancers (RR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.07-2.06) as well as a negligible risk of second hematologic malignancies (RR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.82-1.67). The cumulative incidence of SPMs revealed similar findings. Higher RR was obtained in NSCLC patients aged 60-69 years (RR=1.33), in white race (RR=1.36), diagnosed in 1975-2000 (RR=1.23) and 2001-2015 (RR=1.40), or diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (RR=1.55). CONCLUSION PORT for young-onset NSCLC in early stage was correlated with elevated risks of SPMs (lung cancer, breast cancer, as well as colon and rectum cancers), supporting the need for long-term surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuwei Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Institute of Thoracic Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caramenti L, Gradowska PL, Moriña D, Byrnes G, Cardis E, Hauptmann M. Finite-Sample Bias of the Linear Excess Relative Risk in Cohort Studies of Computed Tomography-Related Radiation Exposure and Cancer. Radiat Res 2024; 201:206-214. [PMID: 38323646 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00187.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
The linear excess relative risk (ERR) is the most commonly reported measure of association in radiation epidemiological studies, when individual dose estimates are available. While the asymptotic properties of the ERR estimator are well understood, there is evidence of small sample bias in case-control studies of treatment-related radiation exposure and second cancer risk. Cohort studies of cancer risk after exposure to low doses of radiation from diagnostic procedures, e.g., computed tomography (CT) examinations, typically have small numbers of cases and risks are small. Therefore, understanding the properties of the estimated ERR is essential for interpretation and analysis of such studies. We present results of a simulation study that evaluates the finite-sample bias of the ERR estimated by time-to-event analyses and its confidence interval using simulated data, resembling a retrospective cohort study of radiation-related leukemia risk after CT examinations in childhood and adolescence. Furthermore, we evaluate how the Firth-corrected estimator reduces the finite-sample bias of the classical estimator. We show that the ERR is overestimated by about 30% for a cohort of about 150,000 individuals, with 42 leukemia cases observed on average. The bias is reduced for higher baseline incidence rates and for higher values of the true ERR. As the number of cases increases, the ERR is approximately unbiased. The Firth correction reduces the bias for all cohort sizes to generally around or under 5%. Epidemiological studies showing an association between radiation exposure from pediatric CT and cancer risk, unless very large, may overestimate the magnitude of the relationship, while there is no evidence of an increased chance for false-positive results. Conducting large studies, perhaps by pooling individual studies to increase the number of cases, should be a priority. If this is not possible, Firth correction should be applied to reduce small-sample bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Caramenti
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane; Neuruppin, Germany
| | - P L Gradowska
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Moriña
- Department of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics, Riskcenter-IREA, Universitat de Barcelona (UB); Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Byrnes
- International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC); Lyon, France
| | - E Cardis
- Institute for Global Health, ISGlobal; Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF); Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Madrid, Spain
| | - M Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane; Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou B, Zang R, Song P, Zhang M, Bie F, Bai G, Li Y, Huai Q, Han Y, Gao S. Association between radiotherapy and risk of second primary malignancies in patients with resectable lung cancer: a population-based study. J Transl Med 2023; 21:10. [PMID: 36624443 PMCID: PMC9827664 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03857-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common form of treatment for non-metastatic lung cancer is surgery-based combination therapy, which may also include adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are uncommon but significant radiation side effects in patients with resectable lung cancer, and SPMs have not been adequately investigated. Our study aims to assess the correlations of radiotherapy with the development of SPMs in patients with resectable lung cancer. METHODS We screened for any primary malignancy that occurred more than five years after the diagnosis of resectable lung cancer. Based on the large cohort of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, radiotherapy-correlated risks were estimated using the Poisson regression analysis and the cumulative incidence of SPMs was calculated using Fine-Gray competing risk regression analysis. RESULTS Among the 62,435 patients with non-metastatic lung cancer undergoing surgery, a total of 11,341 (18.16%) patients have received radiotherapy. Our findings indicated that radiotherapy was substantially related to a high risk of main second solid malignancies (RR = 1.21; 95%CI, 1.08 to 1.35) and a negligible risk of main second hematologic malignancies (RR = 1.08; 95%CI, 0.84 to 1.37). With the greatest number of patients, the risk of acquiring a second primary gastrointestinal cancer was the highest overall (RR = 1.77; 95 percent CI, 1.44 to 2.15). The cumulative incidence and standardized incidence ratios of SPMs revealed similar findings. Furthermore, the young and the elderly may be more vulnerable, and the highest risk of acquiring most SPMs was seen more than ten years after lung cancer diagnosis. Additionally, more attention should be paid to the second primary gastrointestinal cancer in young individuals with resectable lung cancer. CONCLUSION After receiving radiotherapy, an increased risk of developing second primary solid and gastrointestinal cancers was observed for patients with resectable lung cancer. The prevention of SPMs associated with radiotherapy requires further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bolun Zhou
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ruochuan Zang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Song
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Moyan Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fenglong Bie
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guangyu Bai
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Li
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qilin Huai
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuning Han
- grid.413385.80000 0004 1799 1445Department of General Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China
| | - Shugeng Gao
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kwan ML, Miglioretti DL, Bowles EJA, Weinmann S, Greenlee RT, Stout NK, Rahm AK, Alber SA, Pequeno P, Moy LM, Stewart C, Fong C, Jenkins CL, Kohnhorst D, Luce C, Mor JM, Munneke JR, Prado Y, Buth G, Cheng SY, Deosaransingh KA, Francisco M, Lakoma M, Martinez YT, Theis MK, Marlow EC, Kushi LH, Duncan JR, Bolch WE, Pole JD, Smith-Bindman R. Quantifying cancer risk from exposures to medical imaging in the Risk of Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Associated with Medical Imaging (RIC) Study: research methods and cohort profile. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:711-726. [PMID: 35107724 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01556-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Risk of Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Associated with Medical Imaging (RIC) Study is quantifying the association between cumulative radiation exposure from fetal and/or childhood medical imaging and subsequent cancer risk. This manuscript describes the study cohorts and research methods. METHODS The RIC Study is a longitudinal study of children in two retrospective cohorts from 6 U.S. healthcare systems and from Ontario, Canada over the period 1995-2017. The fetal-exposure cohort includes children whose mothers were enrolled in the healthcare system during their entire pregnancy and followed to age 20. The childhood-exposure cohort includes children born into the system and followed while continuously enrolled. Imaging utilization was determined using administrative data. Computed tomography (CT) parameters were collected to estimate individualized patient organ dosimetry. Organ dose libraries for average exposures were constructed for radiography, fluoroscopy, and angiography, while diagnostic radiopharmaceutical biokinetic models were applied to estimate organ doses received in nuclear medicine procedures. Cancers were ascertained from local and state/provincial cancer registry linkages. RESULTS The fetal-exposure cohort includes 3,474,000 children among whom 6,606 cancers (2394 leukemias) were diagnosed over 37,659,582 person-years; 0.5% had in utero exposure to CT, 4.0% radiography, 0.5% fluoroscopy, 0.04% angiography, 0.2% nuclear medicine. The childhood-exposure cohort includes 3,724,632 children in whom 6,358 cancers (2,372 leukemias) were diagnosed over 36,190,027 person-years; 5.9% were exposed to CT, 61.1% radiography, 6.0% fluoroscopy, 0.4% angiography, 1.5% nuclear medicine. CONCLUSION The RIC Study is poised to be the largest study addressing risk of childhood and adolescent cancer associated with ionizing radiation from medical imaging, estimated with individualized patient organ dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn L Kwan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
| | - Diana L Miglioretti
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.,Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erin J A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sheila Weinmann
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.,Center for Integrated Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Robert T Greenlee
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Natasha K Stout
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alanna Kulchak Rahm
- Center for Health Research, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Susan A Alber
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Lisa M Moy
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
| | - Carly Stewart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Charisma L Jenkins
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Diane Kohnhorst
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Casey Luce
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joanne M Mor
- Center for Integrated Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Julie R Munneke
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
| | - Yolanda Prado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glen Buth
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | | | - Kamala A Deosaransingh
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
| | - Melanie Francisco
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Matthew Lakoma
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mary Kay Theis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily C Marlow
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
| | - James R Duncan
- Interventional Radiology Section, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MI, USA
| | - Wesley E Bolch
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jason D Pole
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rebecca Smith-Bindman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fung C, Travis LB. Testicular Cancer Survivorship: Looking Back to Move Forward. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3531-3534. [PMID: 34591594 PMCID: PMC8577670 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chunkit Fung
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Lois B. Travis
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ottaviano M, Giunta EF, Rescigno P, Pereira Mestre R, Marandino L, Tortora M, Riccio V, Parola S, Casula M, Paliogiannis P, Cossu A, Vogl UM, Bosso D, Rosanova M, Mazzola B, Daniele B, Palmieri G, Palmieri G. The Enigmatic Role of TP53 in Germ Cell Tumours: Are We Missing Something? Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:7160. [PMID: 34281219 PMCID: PMC8267694 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The cure rate of germ cell tumours (GCTs) has significantly increased from the late 1970s since the introduction of cisplatin-based therapy, which to date remains the milestone for GCTs treatment. The exquisite cisplatin sensitivity has been mainly explained by the over-expression in GCTs of wild-type TP53 protein and the lack of TP53 somatic mutations; however, several other mechanisms seem to be involved, many of which remain still elusive. The findings about the role of TP53 in platinum-sensitivity and resistance, as well as the reported evidence of second cancers (SCs) in GCT patients treated only with surgery, suggesting a spectrum of cancer predisposing syndromes, highlight the need for a deepened understanding of the role of TP53 in GCTs. In the following report we explore the complex role of TP53 in GCTs cisplatin-sensitivity and resistance mechanisms, passing through several recent genomic studies, as well as its role in GCT patients with SCs, going through our experience of Center of reference for both GCTs and cancer predisposing syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Ottaviano
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (M.R.); (B.D.)
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (G.P.)
- IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (R.P.M.); (L.M.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Oncology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Interdisciplinary Group for Translational Research and Clinical Trials, Urological Cancers (GIRT-Uro), Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10160 Turin, Italy;
| | - Ricardo Pereira Mestre
- IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (R.P.M.); (L.M.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Laura Marandino
- IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (R.P.M.); (L.M.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Marianna Tortora
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Vittorio Riccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.R.); (S.P.)
| | - Sara Parola
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.R.); (S.P.)
| | - Milena Casula
- Institute of Genetics and Biomedical Research (IRGB), National Research Council (CNR), 07100 Sassari, Italy; (M.C.); (G.P.)
| | - Panagiotis Paliogiannis
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Medical, Surgical, Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (P.P.); (A.C.)
| | - Antonio Cossu
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Medical, Surgical, Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (P.P.); (A.C.)
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (R.P.M.); (L.M.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Davide Bosso
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (M.R.); (B.D.)
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (M.R.); (B.D.)
| | - Brunello Mazzola
- Department of Urology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6600 Locarno, Switzerland;
| | - Bruno Daniele
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.B.); (M.R.); (B.D.)
| | - Giuseppe Palmieri
- Institute of Genetics and Biomedical Research (IRGB), National Research Council (CNR), 07100 Sassari, Italy; (M.C.); (G.P.)
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Medical, Surgical, Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (P.P.); (A.C.)
| | - Giovannella Palmieri
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gilbert ES, Little MP, Preston DL, Stram DO. Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:176-187. [PMID: 32657345 PMCID: PMC7355296 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This article addresses issues relevant to interpreting findings from 26 epidemiologic studies of persons exposed to low-dose radiation. We review the extensive data from both epidemiologic studies of persons exposed at moderate or high doses and from radiobiology that together have firmly established radiation as carcinogenic. We then discuss the use of the linear relative risk model that has been used to describe data from both low- and moderate- or high-dose studies. We consider the effects of dose measurement errors; these can reduce statistical power and lead to underestimation of risks but are very unlikely to bring about a spurious dose response. We estimate statistical power for the low-dose studies under the assumption that true risks of radiation-related cancers are those expected from studies of Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Finally, we discuss the interpretation of confidence intervals and statistical tests and the applicability of the Bradford Hill principles for a causal relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethel S Gilbert
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel O Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morton LM. Testicular Cancer as a Model for Understanding the Impact of Evolving Treatment Strategies on the Long-Term Health of Cancer Survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa013. [PMID: 32455333 PMCID: PMC7236779 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Morton
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Milano MT, Dinh PC, Yang H, Zaid MA, Fossa SD, Feldman DR, Monahan PO, Travis LB, Fung C. Solid and Hematologic Neoplasms After Testicular Cancer: A US Population-Based Study of 24 900 Survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa017. [PMID: 32455335 PMCID: PMC7236780 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background No large US population-based study focusing on recent decades, to our knowledge, has comprehensively examined risks of second malignant solid and hematological neoplasms (solid-SMN and heme-SMN) after testicular cancer (TC), taking into account initial therapy and histological type. Methods Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) vs the general population and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for solid-SMN and heme-SMN were calculated for 24 900 TC survivors (TCS) reported to the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (1973–2014). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The median age at TC diagnosis was 33 years. Initial management comprised chemotherapy (n = 6340), radiotherapy (n = 9058), or surgery alone (n = 8995). During 372 709 person-years of follow-up (mean = 15 years), 1625 TCS developed solid-SMN and 228 (107 lymphomas, 92 leukemias, 29 plasma cell dyscrasias) developed heme-SMN. Solid-SMN risk was increased 1.06-fold (95% CI = 1.01 to 1.12), with elevated risks following radiotherapy (SIR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.21) and chemotherapy (SIR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.41) but not surgery alone (SIR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.92). Corresponding risks for seminoma were 1.13 (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.21), 1.28 (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.58), and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.74 to 1.01) and for nonseminoma were 1.05 (95% CI = 0.67 to 1.56), 1.25 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.43), and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.92), respectively. Thirty-year cumulative incidences of solid-SMN after radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery alone were 16.9% (95% CI = 15.7% to 18.1%), 10.1% (95% CI = 8.8% to 11.5%), and 8.8% (95% CI = 7.8% to 9.9%), respectively (P < .0001). Increased leukemia risks after chemotherapy (SIR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.70 to 4.01) were driven by statistically significant sevenfold excesses of acute myeloid leukemia 1 to 10 years after TC diagnosis. Risks for lymphoma and plasma cell dyscrasias were not elevated. Conclusions We report statistically significant excesses of solid-SMN affecting 1 in 6 TCS 30 years after radiotherapy, and 2.7-fold risks of leukemias after chemotherapy, mostly acute myeloid leukemia. Efforts to minimize chemotherapy and radiotherapy exposures for TC should continue. TCS should be counseled about cancer prevention and screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Paul C Dinh
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Hongmei Yang
- University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad Abu Zaid
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Patrick O Monahan
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lois B Travis
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chunkit Fung
- University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Groot HJ, van Leeuwen FE, Lubberts S, Horenblas S, de Wit R, Witjes JA, Groenewegen G, Poortmans PM, Hulshof MCCM, Meijer OWM, de Jong IJ, van den Berg HA, Smilde TJ, Vanneste BGL, Aarts MJB, Jóźwiak K, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Gietema JA, Schaapveld M. Platinum exposure and cause-specific mortality among patients with testicular cancer. Cancer 2019; 126:628-639. [PMID: 31730712 PMCID: PMC7004069 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Although testicular cancer (TC) treatment has been associated with severe late morbidities, including second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and ischemic heart disease (IHD), cause‐specific excess mortality has been rarely studied among patients treated in the platinum era. Methods In a large, multicenter cohort including 6042 patients with TC treated between 1976 and 2006, cause‐specific mortality was compared with general population mortality rates. Associations with treatment were assessed with proportional hazards analysis. Results With a median follow‐up of 17.6 years, 800 patients died; 40.3% of these patients died because of TC. The cumulative mortality was 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5%‐10.7%) 25 years after TC treatment. In comparison with general population mortality rates, patients with nonseminoma experienced 2.0 to 11.6 times elevated mortality from lung, stomach, pancreatic, rectal, and kidney cancers, soft‐tissue sarcomas, and leukemia; 1.9‐fold increased mortality (95% CI, 1.3‐2.8) from IHD; and 3.9‐fold increased mortality (95% CI, 1.5‐8.4) from pneumonia. Seminoma patients experienced 2.5 to 4.6 times increased mortality from stomach, pancreatic, bladder cancer and leukemia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8‐2.5) and 2.5 times higher SMN mortality (95% CI, 2.0‐3.1), respectively, in comparison with the general population. In a multivariable analysis, patients treated with platinum‐containing chemotherapy had a 2.5‐fold increased hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI, 1.8‐3.5) for SMN mortality in comparison with patients without platinum‐containing chemotherapy. The HR for SMN mortality increased 0.29 (95% CI, 0.19‐0.39) per 100 mg/m2 platinum dose administered (Ptrend < .001). IHD mortality was increased 2.1‐fold (95% CI, 1.5‐4.2) after platinum‐containing chemotherapy in comparison with patients without platinum exposure. Conclusions Platinum‐containing chemotherapy is associated with a dose‐dependent increase in the risk of SMN mortality. Platinum‐containing chemotherapy is associated with a dose‐dependent increase in the risk of cancer mortality among patients with testicular cancer. Patients with testicular cancer experience increased mortality from second malignancies as well as causes other than cancer, particularly ischemic heart diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmke J Groot
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje Lubberts
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Groenewegen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Philip M Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Bernard Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Otto W M Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Igle J de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Tineke J Smilde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Department of Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Jourik A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hellesnes R, Kvammen Ø, Myklebust TÅ, Bremnes RM, Karlsdottir Á, Negaard HFS, Tandstad T, Wilsgaard T, Fosså SD, Haugnes HS. Continuing increased risk of second cancer in long-term testicular cancer survivors after treatment in the cisplatin era. Int J Cancer 2019; 147:21-32. [PMID: 31597192 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Using complete information on total treatment burden, this population-based study aimed to investigate second cancer (SC) risk in testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated in the cisplatin era. The Cancer Registry of Norway identified 5,625 1-year TCS diagnosed 1980-2009. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to evaluate the total and site-specific incidence of SC compared to the general population. Cox regression analyses evaluated the effect of treatment on the risk of SC. After a median observation time of 16.6 years, 572 TCS developed 651 nongerm cell SCs. The SC risk was increased after surgery only (SIR 1.28), with site-specific increased risks of thyroid cancer (SIR 4.95) and melanoma (SIR 1.94). After chemotherapy (CT), we observed 2.0- to 3.7-fold increased risks for cancers of the small intestine, bladder, kidney and lung. There was a 1.6- to 2.1-fold increased risk of SC after ≥2 cycles of cisplatin-based CT. Radiotherapy (RT) was associated with 1.5- to 4.4-fold increased risks for cancers of the stomach, small intestine, liver, pancreas, lung, kidney and bladder. After combined CT and RT, increased risks emerged for hematological malignancies (SIR 3.23). TCS treated in the cisplatin era have an increased risk of developing SC, in particular after treatment with cisplatin-based CT and/or RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ragnhild Hellesnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Øivind Kvammen
- Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tor Å Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.,Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Roy M Bremnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ása Karlsdottir
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Torgrim Tandstad
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tom Wilsgaard
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege S Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sadakane A, French B, Brenner AV, Preston DL, Sugiyama H, Grant EJ, Sakata R, Utada M, Cahoon EK, Mabuchi K, Ozasa K. Radiation and Risk of Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreatic Cancers among Atomic Bomb Survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 1958-2009. Radiat Res 2019; 192:299-310. [PMID: 31291162 PMCID: PMC10273724 DOI: 10.1667/rr15341.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The Life Span Study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors has consistently demonstrated significant excess radiation-related risks of liver cancer since the first cancer incidence report. Here, we present updated information on radiation risks of liver, biliary tract and pancreatic cancers based on 11 additional years of follow-up since the last report, from 1958 to 2009. The current analyses used improved individual radiation doses and accounted for the effects of alcohol consumption, smoking and body mass index. The study participants included 105,444 LSS participants with known individual radiation dose and no known history of cancer at the start of follow-up. Cases were the first primary incident cancers of the liver (including intrahepatic bile duct), biliary tract (gallbladder and other and unspecified parts of biliary tract) or pancreas identified through linkage with population-based cancer registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Poisson regression methods were used to estimate excess relative risks (ERRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) associated with DS02R1 doses for liver (liver and biliary tract cancers) or pancreas (pancreatic cancer). We identified 2,016 incident liver cancer cases during the follow-up period. Radiation dose was significantly associated with liver cancer risk (ERR per Gy: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.89; EAR per 10,000 person-year Gy: 5.32, 95% CI: 2.49 to 8.51). There was no evidence for curvature in the radiation dose response (P=0.344). ERRs by age-at-exposure categories were significantly increased among those who were exposed at 0-9, 10-19 and 20-29 years, but not significantly increased after age 30 years, although there was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity in these ERRs (P = 0.378). The radiation ERRs were not affected by adjustment for smoking, alcohol consumption or body mass index. As in previously reported studies, radiation dose was not associated with risk of biliary tract cancer (ERR per Gy: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.30). Radiation dose was associated with a nonsignificant increase in pancreatic cancer risk (ERR per Gy: 0.38, 95% CI: <0 to 0.83). The increased risk was statistically significant among women (ERR per Gy: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.45), but not among men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuko Sadakane
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Benjamin French
- Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Alina V. Brenner
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Hiromi Sugiyama
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Eric J. Grant
- Associate Chief of Research, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ritsu Sakata
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mai Utada
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Elizabeth K. Cahoon
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Kiyohiko Mabuchi
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Kotaro Ozasa
- Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Howell RM, Smith SA, Weathers RE, Kry SF, Stovall M. Adaptations to a Generalized Radiation Dose Reconstruction Methodology for Use in Epidemiologic Studies: An Update from the MD Anderson Late Effect Group. Radiat Res 2019; 192:169-188. [PMID: 31211642 PMCID: PMC8041091 DOI: 10.1667/rr15201.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies that include patients who underwent radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer aim to quantify the relationship between radiotherapy and the risk of subsequent late effects. Because of the long follow-up period required to observe late effects, these studies are conducted retrospectively. The studies routinely include patients treated across numerous institutions using a wide range of technologies and represent treatments over several decades. As a result, determining the dose throughout the patient's body is uniquely challenging. Therefore, estimating doses throughout the patient's body for epidemiologic studies requires special methodologies that are generally applied to a wide range of radiotherapy techniques. Over ten years ago, the MD Anderson Late Effects Group described various dose reconstruction methods for therapeutic and diagnostic radiation exposure for epidemiologic studies. Here we provide an update to the most widely used dose reconstruction methodology for epidemiologic studies, analytical model calculations combined with a 3D age-specific computational phantom. In particular, we describe the various adaptations (and enhancements) of that methodology, as well as how they have been used in radiation epidemiology studies and may be used in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M. Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schaffar R, Pant S, Bouchardy C, Schubert H, Rapiti E. Testicular cancer in Geneva, Switzerland, 1970-2012: incidence trends, survival and risk of second cancer. BMC Urol 2019; 19:64. [PMID: 31291913 PMCID: PMC6621969 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0494-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes the testicular cancer trends for incidence, survival, socio-economic status (SES) disparities and second cancer occurrence in Geneva, Switzerland, a high-risk population. METHODS We included all testicular germ-cell tumors recorded in the population-based Geneva cancer registry during the period 1970-2012. Changes in incidence trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression to calculate the annual percentage change (APC). Overall and cancer-specific survivals (OS, CSS) were estimated by Kaplan Meyer methods. To evaluate the risk of a second cancer we calculated the Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) using the Geneva population incidence rates. RESULTS The average annual testicular cancer rate was 7.32/100 000 men, with a non-significant increasing trend during the study period. The highest rates were observed among men younger than 39 years. Despite a trend toward earlier diagnosis, 14% of patients were diagnosed at a late stage. Patients with non-seminoma tumours and patients with low SES were more often diagnosed with an advanced stage. Both OS and CSS improved during the study period but with strong differences by age, stage, morphology and SES. The risk for developing a second cancer was more than doubled. This risk was particularly high for a contralateral testicular cancer, bladder cancer and pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there was no substantial increase in the incidence of testicular cancer in Geneva in recent decades, however the prognosis has improved. The high risk of developing a second cancer, the differences in stage at diagnosis and survival by SES, require enhanced awareness and surveillance by clinicians, patients and men in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schaffar
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Samaksha Pant
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Bouchardy
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hyma Schubert
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elisabetta Rapiti
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the present review, we summarize the recent developments in the management of germ cell tumors (GCTs). RECENT FINDINGS Treatment-related acute and late-onset toxicity remains a key challenge in the management of GCTs, with recent evidence showing that the adverse health outcomes of etoposide and cisplatin for four cycles in comparison to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for three cycles appear to be similar. Recent data showed that multidisciplinary clinic approach and management in experienced academic centers were associated with improved overall survival in GCT patients. There are currently multiple conventional-dose chemotherapy options for salvage therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent disease. In addition, more efficacious high-dose chemotherapy regimens continue to be developed. The role of salvage conventional-dose chemotherapy versus high-dose chemotherapy is currently being investigated prospectively. Recent reports suggested that brentuximab vedotin could be a potential salvage option for cluster of differentiation 30 positive refractory GCTs. On the other hand the results of the first phase II clinical trial investigating pembrolizumab in refractory GCTs were disappointing showing no clinical activity.Finally, deep exploration of the immune profile of GCTs using immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling has identified that advanced GCT stage was associated with decreased T-cell and Natural killer-cell signatures, whereas T regulatory, neutrophil, mast cell, and macrophage signatures increased with advanced stage. Even though these results indicated that activated T-cell infiltration correlated with seminoma histology and good prognosis, and could be used in the future as a biomarker, this approach needs to be validated in a large cohort. SUMMARY Remaining challenges to be addressed include minimizing therapeutic toxicity, and improving outcomes in patients with refractory/recurrent GCTs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Incidence and Mortality Rates of Second Pancreatic Cancer Among Survivors of Digestive Cancers: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Pancreas 2019; 48:412-419. [PMID: 30768577 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We analyzed the incidence and mortality rates of second pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among survivors of digestive cancers in South Korea. METHODS We evaluated data from the Korea National Health Insurance to identify individuals with digestive cancers in 2005 to 2015. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of second PDACs and survival rates were evaluated. RESULTS Among 772,534 patients with first digestive cancers, 1696 (0.22%) developed second PDACs. The incidence of second PDACs increased until 10 years since the first cancer diagnosis. Patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) showed a higher incidence of second PDACs than did those with gastrointestinal cancers or hepatocellular carcinoma. In ages 20 to 49 years, SIRs (95% confidence interval) were higher in survivors of hepatocellular carcinoma (3.08; 1.04-3.08), gastric cancer (3.40; 1.90-3.40), colorectal cancer (5.00; 2.75-5.00), gallbladder cancer (58.52; 11.81-58.52), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (86.99; 1.73-86.99), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (89.41; 27.42-89.41), and ampulla of Vater cancer (156.78; 48.08-156.78). In ages 50 to 64 years, colorectal cancer (1.42; 1.04-1.42), gastric cancer (1.66; 1.29-1.66), and BTCs revealed higher SIRs. In ages more than 65 years, SIR was increased only in BTCs. Second PDACs revealed a more favorable prognosis than first PDACs. CONCLUSIONS Careful surveillance for second PDACs after curative treatment of BTCs and colorectal cancers should be considered.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lagergren P, Schandl A, Aaronson NK, Adami HO, de Lorenzo F, Denis L, Faithfull S, Liu L, Meunier F, Ulrich C. Cancer survivorship: an integral part of Europe's research agenda. Mol Oncol 2019; 13:624-635. [PMID: 30552794 PMCID: PMC6396379 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer survivorship has traditionally received little prioritisation and attention. For a long time, the treatment of cancer has been the main focus of healthcare providers’ efforts. It is time to increase the amount of attention given to patients’ long‐term well‐being and their ability to return to a productive and good life. This article describes the current state of knowledge and identifies research areas in need of development to enable interventions for improved survivorship for all cancer patients in Europe. The article is summed up with 11 points in need of further focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Anna Schandl
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Francesco de Lorenzo
- European Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium.,Italian Federation of Cancer Patients Organisations, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sara Faithfull
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Lifang Liu
- Fédération of European Academies of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Cornelia Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Risk of diabetes after para-aortic radiation for testicular cancer. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:901-907. [PMID: 30297773 PMCID: PMC6189211 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0248-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While the risk of diabetes is increased following radiation exposure to the pancreas among childhood cancer survivors, its association among testicular cancer (TC) survivors has not been investigated. Methods Diabetes risk was studied in 2998 1-year TC survivors treated before 50 years of age with orchidectomy with/without radiotherapy between 1976 and 2007. Diabetes incidence was compared with general population rates. Treatment-specific risk of diabetes was assessed using a case–cohort design. Results With a median follow-up of 13.4 years, 161 TC survivors were diagnosed with diabetes. Diabetes risk was not increased compared to general population rates (standardised incidence ratios (SIR): 0.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.7–1.1). Adjusted for age, para-aortic radiotherapy was associated with a 1.66-fold (95% CI: 1.05–2.62) increased diabetes risk compared to no radiotherapy. The excess hazard increased with 0.31 with every 10 Gy increase in the prescribed radiation dose (95% CI: 0.11–0.51, P = 0.003, adjusted for age and BMI); restricted to irradiated patients the excess hazard increased with 0.33 (95% CI: −0.14 to 0.81, P = 0.169) with every 10 Gy increase in radiation dose. Conclusion Compared to surgery only, para-aortic irradiation is associated with increased diabetes risk among TC survivors.
Collapse
|
20
|
Huang H, Giorgadze T. Synchronous pancreatic tumors in a patient with history of Wilms tumor: A case of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and lipid-rich neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed by cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2018; 46:864-869. [PMID: 30194916 DOI: 10.1002/dc.23978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Synchronous tumors represent a very small portion of pancreatic tumors. Although there is a higher incidence of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) in patients with history of Wilms tumor (WT), pancreatic tumors are very infrequent SMNs in this population. We report the first case of synchronous pancreatic tumors in a patient with history of WT. Two separated pancreatic lesions were identified by abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan. Fine-needle aspiration of both lesions was performed for cytopathology examination. A pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in the head of pancreas, and the pancreatic body lesion was found to be a neuroendocrine tumor (NET). The NET had characteristic vacuolated lipid-rich cytoplasm. Further molecular testing was done on both tumors, but no common cancer-associated mutation was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiya Huang
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Tamara Giorgadze
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Groot HJ, Lubberts S, de Wit R, Witjes JA, Kerst JM, de Jong IJ, Groenewegen G, van den Eertwegh AJ, Poortmans PM, Klümpen HJ, van den Berg HA, Smilde TJ, Vanneste BG, Aarts MJ, Incrocci L, van den Bergh AC, Jóźwiak K, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Horenblas S, Gietema JA, van Leeuwen FE, Schaapveld M. Risk of Solid Cancer After Treatment of Testicular Germ Cell Cancer in the Platinum Era. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2504-2513. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.77.4174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Testicular cancer (TC) treatment increases risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). It is unknown whether changes in TC treatment over time have affected SMN risk. Methods Solid SMN risk was evaluated in a multicenter cohort comprising 5,848 1-year survivors treated for TC before age 50 years between 1976 and 2007. SMN incidence was compared with cancer incidence in the general population. Treatment-specific risks were assessed using multivariable regression in a case-cohort design. Results After a median follow-up of 14.1 years, 350 solid SMNs were observed, translating into a 1.8-fold (95% CI, 1.6-2.0) increased risk compared with general population rates. Solid SMN risk was increased in patients with seminoma and those with nonseminoma (standardized incidence ratio, 1.52 and 2.21, respectively). Patients with nonseminoma experienced increased risk of SMNs of the thyroid, lung, stomach, pancreas, colon, and bladder and of melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma, whereas those with seminoma experienced increased risk of SMNs of the small intestine, pancreas, and urinary bladder. The 25-year cumulative incidence of solid SMNs was 10.3% (95% CI, 9.0% to 11.6%). In multivariable analysis, platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of a solid SMN (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.58 to 3.62), colorectal SMN (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.67 to 8.92), and noncolorectal GI SMN (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.28 to 10.95). Receipt of platinum 400 to 499 and ≥ 500 mg/m2 increased solid SMN risk compared with surgery only (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.23 and HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.90, respectively), whereas risk was not significantly increased with lower doses (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.43). The HR of a GI SMN increased by 53% (95% CI, 26% to 80%) per 100 mg/m2 of platinum-containing chemotherapy. The HR of an infradiaphragmatic SMN increased by 8% per Gray of radiation dose administered (95% CI, 6% to 9%; P < .001). Conclusion Radiotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy are associated with increased solid SMN risk, specifically with GI SMNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmke J. Groot
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Sjoukje Lubberts
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Johannes A. Witjes
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Jan Martijn Kerst
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Igle J. de Jong
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Gerard Groenewegen
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Philip M. Poortmans
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Hetty A. van den Berg
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Tineke J. Smilde
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Maureen J. Aarts
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Alfons C.M. van den Bergh
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Jourik A. Gietema
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Harmke J. Groot, Jan Martijn Kerst, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout, Simon Horenblas, Flora E. van Leeuwen, and Michael Schaapveld, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center; Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Sjoukje Lubberts, Igle J. de Jong, Alfons C.M. van den Bergh, and Jourik A. Gietema, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Ronald de Wit and Luca Incrocci, Erasmus
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Toxicities Associated with Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Long-Term Testicular Cancer Survivors. Adv Urol 2018; 2018:8671832. [PMID: 29670654 PMCID: PMC5835297 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8671832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Testicular cancer has become the paradigm of adult-onset cancer survivorship, due to the young age at diagnosis and 10-year relative survival of 95%. This clinical review presents the current status of various treatment-related complications experienced by long-term testicular cancer survivors (TCS) free of disease for 5 or more years after primary treatment. Cardiovascular disease and second malignant neoplasms represent the most common potentially life-threatening late effects. Other long-term adverse outcomes include neuro- and ototoxicity, pulmonary complications, nephrotoxicity, hypogonadism, infertility, and avascular necrosis. Future research efforts should focus on delineation of the genetic underpinning of these long-term toxicities to understand their biologic basis and etiopathogenetic pathways, with the goal of developing targeted prevention and intervention strategies to optimize risk-based care and minimize chronic morbidities. In the interim, health care providers should advise TCS to adhere to national guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors, as well as to adopt behaviors consistent with a healthy lifestyle, including smoking cessation, a balanced diet, and a moderate to vigorous intensity exercise program. TCS should also follow national guidelines for cancer screening as currently applied to the general population.
Collapse
|
23
|
Necchi A, Lo Vullo S, Secondino S, Rosti G, Badoglio M, Giannatempo P, Raggi D, Lanza F, Chabannon C, Bonini C, Mariani L, Pedrazzoli P. Secondary malignancies after high-dose chemotherapy in germ cell tumor patients: a 34-year retrospective study of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant 2018; 53:722-728. [PMID: 29367713 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-017-0079-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors of secondary malignancy (SM) in the young adult patients who received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for germ cell tumors (GCT). The EBMT database was interrogated. Criteria for patient selection included adult male GCT and HDCT administered in any line of therapy. Cumulative incidence methods were used to estimate the time-to-SM diagnosis. Univariable Fine and Gray proportional hazard regression evaluated risk factors of SM occurrence. From 1981 to 2015, 9153 autografts were identified. Among 5295 patients, 59 cases of SM, developed after a median follow-up of 3.8 years, were registered. Of these patients, 23 (39%) developed hematologic SM, 34 (57.6%) solid SM (two patients had uncoded SM). Twenty-year cumulative incidence of solid versus hematologic SM was 4.17% (95% CI: 1.78-6.57) versus 1.37% (95% CI: 0.47-2.27). Median overall survival after SM was significantly shorter for patients who developed hematologic SM versus solid SM (8.6 versus 34.4 months, p = 0.003). Age older than 40 years at the time of HDCT was significantly associated with hematologic, but not solid, SM development (p = 0.004 versus p = 0.234). SM occurrence post-HDCT showed different patterns of incidence and mortality in GCT. These data may be important to optimize patient selection, counseling and follow-up after HDCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniele Raggi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Chiara Bonini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
With the favorable trend regarding survival of cancer in the Western world, there is an increasing focus among patients, clinicians, researchers, and politicians regarding cancer survivors' health and well-being. The number of survivors grows rapidly, and more than 3% of the adult populations in Western countries have survived cancer for 5 years or more. Cancer survivors are at increased risk for a variety of late effects after treatment, some life-threatening such as secondary cancer and cardiac diseases, while others mainly have negative impact on daily functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The latter factors include fatigue, anxiety disorders, sexual problems, insomnia, and reduced work ability, while depression does not seem to be more common among survivors than in the general population. Life style factors are highly relevant for cancer survivors concerning risk of relapse and somatic comorbidity. The field of cancer survivorship research has grown rapidly. How to best integrate the knowledge of the field into clinical practice with adequate follow-up of cancer survivors at risk for developing late effects, is still an unresolved question, although several models are under consideration.
Collapse
|
25
|
Chovanec M, Abu Zaid M, Hanna N, El-Kouri N, Einhorn LH, Albany C. Long-term toxicity of cisplatin in germ-cell tumor survivors. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:2670-2679. [PMID: 29045502 PMCID: PMC6246726 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Testicular germ-cell tumors (GCT) are highly curable. A multidisciplinary approach, including cisplatin-based chemotherapy has resulted in cure in the majority of patients with GCT. Thus, the life expectancy of survivors will extend to many decades post-diagnosis. Late treatment toxicities associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy may impact their future health. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the long-term toxicity of cisplatin in GCT survivors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We carried out a critical review of PubMed/Medline in February 2017 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Identified reports were reviewed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria. Eighty-three publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Included reports evaluated long-term toxicities of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in GCT survivors. Studies reporting neuro- and ototoxicity, secondary malignancies, cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary toxicities, hypogonadism and infertility were found. Seven studies (8%) reported genetic underpinnings of long-term toxicities and 3 (4%) and 14 (19%) studies correlated long-term toxicities with circulating platinum levels and cumulative dose of cisplatin, respectively. Significant risks for long-term toxicities associated with cisplatin and platinum-based regimens were reported. The cumulative dose of cisplatin and circulating platinum were reported as risk factors. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified patients susceptible to cisplatin compared with wild-type individuals. CONCLUSIONS GCT survivors cured with cisplatin-based chemotherapy are at risk for long-term side-effects. Detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms could be a valuable tool for predicting long-term toxicities. PATIENT SUMMARY Herein, this article summarizes the available evidence of long-term toxicity of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in GCT survivors and provide insights from Indiana University.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chovanec
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA;; 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia;; National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - M Abu Zaid
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - N Hanna
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - N El-Kouri
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - L H Einhorn
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - C Albany
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA;.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Physical long-term side-effects in young adult cancer survivors: germ cell tumors model. Curr Opin Oncol 2017; 29:229-234. [PMID: 28463858 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW After the important advances in the treatment of germ cell tumors (GCTs) leading to high cure rates, physical long-term side-effects represent an important cause of death in these young adult survivors. Highlighting these physical long-term side-effects, their monitoring and their prevention modalities is necessary for a better management of these cancer survivors. RECENT FINDINGS Impaired fertility, increased risk of developing a second cancer, cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neural toxicity, hearing and vision impairment are the major physical side-effects in young adult cancer survivors. Long-term cardiac toxicity, next to second malignancies, represents life-threatening conditions in testicular cancer survivors. The long-term nephrotoxity in testicular GCTs survivors is most frequently associated to the treatment either in those treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, mainly Bleomycine, Etoposide, Cisplatin, or those receiving infradiaphragmatic radiation therapy, whereas pulmonary toxicity is mainly attributed to bleomycin related toxicities. SUMMARY There are no clear and comprehensive data concerning the monitoring and prevention of long-term side-effects in testicular cancer survivors. Physical activity and interventions in modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyles may reduce the incidence of long-term side-effects in these cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
27
|
Teepen JC, van Leeuwen FE, Tissing WJ, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van der Pal HJ, Loonen JJ, Bresters D, Versluys B, Neggers SJCMM, Jaspers MWM, Hauptmann M, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Visser O, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM. Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Malignant Neoplasms After Treatment of Childhood Cancer in the DCOG LATER Study Cohort: Role of Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2288-2298. [PMID: 28530852 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.6902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) are at increased risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). We evaluated the long-term risk of SMNs in a well-characterized cohort of 5-year CCSs, with a particular focus on individual chemotherapeutic agents and solid cancer risk. Methods The Dutch Childhood Cancer Oncology Group-Long-Term Effects After Childhood Cancer cohort includes 6,165 5-year CCSs diagnosed between 1963 and 2001 in the Netherlands. SMNs were identified by linkages with the Netherlands Cancer Registry, the Dutch Pathology Registry, and medical chart review. We calculated standardized incidence ratios, excess absolute risks, and cumulative incidences. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to evaluate treatment-associated risks for breast cancer, sarcoma, and all solid cancers. Results After a median follow-up of 20.7 years (range, 5.0 to 49.8 years) since first diagnosis, 291 SMNs were ascertained in 261 CCSs (standardized incidence ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 4.6 to 5.8; excess absolute risk, 20.3/10,000 person-years). Cumulative SMN incidence at 25 years after first diagnosis was 3.9% (95% CI, 3.4% to 4.6%) and did not change noticeably among CCSs treated in the 1990s compared with those treated earlier. We found dose-dependent doxorubicin-related increased risks of all solid cancers ( Ptrend < .001) and breast cancer ( Ptrend < .001). The doxorubicin-breast cancer dose response was stronger in survivors of Li-Fraumeni syndrome-associated childhood cancers (leukemia, CNS, and non-Ewing sarcoma) versus survivors of other cancers ( Pdifference = .008). In addition, cyclophosphamide was found to increase sarcoma risk in a dose-dependent manner ( Ptrend = .01). Conclusion The results strongly suggest that doxorubicin exposure in CCSs increases the risk of subsequent solid cancers and breast cancer, whereas cyclophosphamide exposure increases the risk of subsequent sarcomas. These results may inform future childhood cancer treatment protocols and SMN surveillance guidelines for CCSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jop C Teepen
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Wim J Tissing
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Helena J van der Pal
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J Loonen
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Monique W M Jaspers
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Otto Visser
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Jop C. Teepen, Leontien C.M. Kremer, and Cécile M. Ronckers, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Flora E. van Leeuwen and Michael Hauptmann, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center; Helena J. van der Pal and Monique W.M. Jaspers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Wim J. Tissing, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Jacqueline J. Loonen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Dorine Bresters, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Birgitta Versluys, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht; Otto Visser, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht; Sebastian J.C.M.M. Neggers, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; and Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the present review, we summarize the recent developments in the management of germ cell tumors (GCTs). RECENT FINDINGS Treatment-related acute and late-onset toxicity remains a key challenge in the management of GCTs. Recent data show that patients with large retroperitoneal lymph node metastases are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism and may benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation. Predictive models have been developed to identify patients with residual retroperitoneal lymph node masses who are more likely to benefit from surgical resection. However, their clinical use remains hampered by relatively low accuracy. There are currently multiple conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) options for salvage therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent disease. In addition, more efficacious high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) regimens continue to be developed. The role of salvage CDCT versus HDCT is currently being prospectively investigated.Finally, intratumoral heterogeneity is a common finding in cancer and an obvious observation in GCTs. Despite intratumoral heterogeneity, recent studies on nonseminomatous GCT have identified distinct histological subgroups and a potentially lethal clinical phenotype. Importantly, comprehensive molecular profiling so far has not elucidated the biologic basis or the clinical underpinnings of intratumoral heterogeneity in GCTs. SUMMARY Remaining challenges to be addressed include minimizing therapeutic toxicity and improving outcomes in patients with refractory/recurrent GCTs or malignant transformation of teratomas.
Collapse
|
29
|
|