High incidence of post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning and ineffective prediction by day 28 EBV-specific T lymphocyte counts

Mechanistic Understanding of EBV+Lymphoproliferative Disease Development After Transplantation

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are among the most common malignant complications after transplantation, leading to a drastic reduction in patient survival rates. The majority of PTLDs are tightly linked to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV+PTLDs) and are the result of an uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected cells. However, although EBV infections are a common finding in transplant recipients, most patients with high EBV loads will never develop EBV+PTLD. Natural killer cells and EBV-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes are critical for controlling EBV-infected cells, and the impairment of these cytotoxic immune responses facilitates the unfettered proliferation of EBV-infected cells. Recent years have seen a considerable increase in available literature aiming to describe novel risk factors associated with the development of EBV+PTLD, which may critically relate to the strength of EBV-specific natural killer cell and EBV-CD8+ T lymphocyte responses. The accumulation of risk factors and the increased risk of developing EBV+PTLD go hand in hand. On the one hand, most of these risk factors, such as the level of immunosuppression or the EBV donor and recipient serologic mismatch, and distinct genetic risk factors are host related and affect cytotoxic EBV-specific immune responses. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that distinct EBV variants may have an increased malignant potential and are thus more likely to induce EBV+PTLD. Here, we aim to review, from a mechanistic point of view, the risk factors for EBV+PTLD in the host and the infecting EBV variants that may explain why only a minority of transplant recipients develop EBV+PTLD.

Virus-specific T-cells from third party or transplant donors for treatment of EBV lymphoproliferative diseases arising post hematopoietic cell or solid organ transplantation

EBV+ lymphomas constitute a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplants (SOT). Phase I and II trials have shown that in HCT recipients, adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T-cells from the HCT donor can safely induce durable remissions of EBV+ lymphomas including 70->90% of patients who have failed to respond to treatment with Rituximab. More recently, EBV-specific T-cells generated from allogeneic 3rd party donors have also been shown to induce durable remission of EBV+ lymphomas in Rituximab refractory HCT and SOT recipients. In this review, we compare results of phase I and II trials of 3rd party and donor derived EBV-specific T-cells. We focus on the attributes and limitations of each product in terms of access, safety, responses achieved and durability. The limited data available regarding donor and host factors contributing to T cell persistence is also described. We examine factors contributing to treatment failures and approaches to prevent or salvage relapse. Lastly, we summarize strategies to further improve results for virus-specific immunotherapies for post-transplant EBV lymphomas.

Outcomes for patients with EBV-positive PTLD post-allogeneic HCT after failure of rituximab-containing therapy

Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is an ultra-rare and aggressive condition that may occur following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) due to immunosuppression. Approximately half of EBV+ PTLD cases are relapsed or refractory (R/R) to initial rituximab-containing therapy. There are limited treatment options and no standard of care for patients with R/R EBV+ PTLD, and little is known about their treatment history and outcomes. We performed a multinational, multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients with R/R EBV+ PTLD following HCT to describe patients' demographic and disease characteristics, treatment history, and overall survival (OS) from rituximab failure. Among 81 patients who received initial treatment with rituximab as monotherapy (84.0%) or in combination with chemotherapy (16.0%), median time from HCT to PTLD diagnosis was 3.0 months and median OS was 0.7 months. Thirty-six patients received a subsequent line of treatment. The most frequent causes of death were PTLD (56.8%), graft-versus-host disease (13.5%) and treatment-related mortality (10.8%). In multivariate analysis, early PTLD onset and lack of response to initial treatment were associated with mortality. This real-world study demonstrates that the prognosis of patients with R/R EBV+ PTLD following HCT remains poor, highlighting the urgent unmet medical need in this population.

Risk Factors for the Incidence of and the Mortality due to Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially serious complication that occurs following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), in which B cells transformed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) proliferate uncontrollably. It is unknown whether risk factors for the incidence of PTLD are identical to those for mortality due to PTLD, a clinically more important outcome. We sought to determine the risk factors influencing the incidence of PTLD and those influencing mortality due to PTLD in a cohort of 1184 allogenic HCT recipients. All patients were predisposed to PTLD, because their graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included antithymocyte globulin. The overall PTLD incidence was 9.0%, and mortality due to PTLD was 1.1%. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for PTLD incidence include donor+/recipient- (D+/R-) EBV serostatus (subhazard ratio [SHR], 3.3; P = .002), use of a donor other than an HLA-matched sibling donor (non-MSD) (SHR, 1.7; P = .029), receipt of total body irradiation (TBI; SHR, 3.3; P = .008), and the absence of GVHD (SHR, 3.3; P < .001). The sole risk factor for mortality due to PTLD among all patients was D+/R- serostatus (SHR, 5.8; P = .022). Risk factors for mortality due to PTLD among patients who developed PTLD were use of a bone marrow (BM) graft (compared with peripheral blood stem cells [PBSCs]; SHR, 22.8; P < .001) and extralymphatic involvement (SHR, 14.6; P < .001). Interestingly, whereas the absence of GVHD was a risk factor for PTLD incidence, there was a trend toward the presence of GVHD as a risk factor for PTLD mortality (SHR, 4.2; P = .093). Likewise, whereas use of a BM graft was a risk factor for PTLD mortality, there was a trend toward use of a PBSC graft as a risk factor for PTLD incidence (SHR, 0.44; P = .179). Some risk factors for the incidence of PTLD are identical to the risk factors for mortality due to PTLD (ie, D+/R- serostatus), whereas other risk factors are disparate. Specifically, TBI was identified as a risk factor for PTLD incidence but not for PTLD mortality; the absence of GVHD was a risk factor for PTLD incidence, whereas the presence of GVHD was possibly a risk factor for PTLD mortality; and receipt of a PBSC graft was possibly a risk factor for PTLD incidence, whereas receipt of a BM graft was a risk factor for PTLD mortality.

Addition of Anti-thymocyte Globulin in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Peripheral Stem Cells From Matched Unrelated Donors Improves Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Relapse Free Survival

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). To evaluate the impact of ATG as part of the GvHD prophylaxis in our institution, we report the outcome of 415 patients with matched unrelated donors (MUD) transplanted for hematological malignancies with or without ATG from 2005 to 2019 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. The following groups were compared: (1) 154 patients transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) without ATG 2005-2014. (2) 137 patients transplanted with bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) 2005-2019. (3) 124 patients transplanted with PBSC and ATG (PBSC + ATG) 2014-2019. Three years survival was similar in the groups, 61% following allografting with PBSC, 54% with BMSC, and 59% with PBSC + ATG. Acute GvHD grade III-IV was 14%, 14%, and 7%; chronic GvHD was 81%, 32, and 26%; and extensive cGvHD 44%, 15%, and 6% in the corresponding groups. Both acute and chronic GvHD were significantly reduced in the PBSC + ATG-versus the PBSC group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 respectively).Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 33%, 25%, and 17% (p = 0.18). Graft versus host disease and relapse free survival (GRFS) at 3 years was 43 %, 43%, and 64% in the groups. Adding ATG to the GvHD prophylaxis regimen of MUD allo-HSCT with PBSC resulted in a substantial reduction of both acute and chronic GvHD without compromising the disease control, reflected in a superior 3 years GRFS.

Factors Associated with Post-Transplant Active Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Lymphoproliferative Disease in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review was undertaken to identify risk factors associated with post-transplant Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) active infection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in pediatric and adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published until 30 June 2020. Descriptive information was extracted for each individual study, and data were compiled for individual risk factors, including, when possible, relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and/or p-values. Meta-analyses were planned when possible. The methodological quality and potential for bias of included studies were also evaluated. Of the 3362 titles retrieved, 77 were included (62 for EBV infection and 22 for PTLD). The overall quality of the studies was strong. Several risk factors were explored in these studies, but few statistically significant associations were identified. The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was identified as the most important risk factor positively associated with post-transplant active EBV infection and with PTLD. The pooled relative risks obtained using the random-effect model were 5.26 (95% CI: 2.92-9.45) and 4.17 (95% CI: 2.61-6.68) for the association between ATG and post-transplant EBV infection and PTLD, respectively. Other risk factors for EBV and PTLD were found in the included studies, such as graft-versus-host disease, type of conditioning regimen or type of donor, but results are conflicting. In conclusion, the results of this systematic review indicate that ATG increases the risk of EBV infection and PTLD, but the link with all other factors is either nonexistent or much less convincing.

Management of PTLD After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Immunological Perspectives

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are life-threatening complications of iatrogenic immune impairment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the pediatric setting, the majority of PTLDs are related to the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and present as B-cell lymphoproliferations. Although considered rare events, PTLDs have been increasingly observed with the widening application of HSCT from alternative sources, including cord blood and HLA-haploidentical stem cell grafts, and the use of novel agents for the prevention and treatment of rejection and graft-vs.-host disease. The higher frequency initially paralleled a poor outcome, due to limited therapeutic options, and scarcity of controlled trials in a rare disease context. In the last 2 decades, insight into the relationship between EBV and the immune system, and advances in early diagnosis, monitoring and treatment have changed the approach to the management of PTLDs after HSCT, and significantly ameliorated the prognosis. In this review, we summarize literature on the impact of combined viro-immunologic assessment on PTLD management, describe the various strategies for PTLD prevention and preemptive/curative treatment, and discuss the potential of novel immune-based therapies in the containment of this malignant complication.

Off-the-shelf EBV-specific T cell immunotherapy for rituximab-refractory EBV-associated lymphoma following transplantation

BACKGROUNDAdoptive transfer of donor-derived EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) can eradicate EBV-associated lymphomas (EBV-PTLD) after transplantation of hematopoietic cell (HCT) or solid organ (SOT) but is unavailable for most patients.METHODSWe developed a third-party, allogeneic, off-the-shelf bank of 330 GMP-grade EBV-CTL lines from specifically consented healthy HCT donors. We treated 46 recipients of HCT (n = 33) or SOT (n = 13) with established EBV-PTLD, who had failed rituximab therapy, with third-party EBV-CTLs. Treatment cycles consisted of 3 weekly infusions of EBV-CTLs and 3 weeks of observation.RESULTSEBV-CTLs did not induce significant toxicities. One patient developed grade I skin graft-versus-host disease. Complete remission (CR) or sustained partial remission (PR) was achieved in 68% of HCT recipients and 54% of SOT recipients. For patients who achieved CR/PR or stable disease after cycle 1, one year overall survival was 88.9% and 81.8%, respectively. In addition, 3 of 5 recipients with POD after a first cycle who received EBV-CTLs from a different donor achieved CR or durable PR (60%) and survived longer than 1 year. Maximal responses were achieved after a median of 2 cycles.CONCLUSIONThird-party EBV-CTLs of defined HLA restriction provide safe, immediately accessible treatment for EBV-PTLD. Secondary treatment with EBV-CTLs restricted by a different HLA allele (switch therapy) can also induce remissions if initial EBV-CTLs are ineffective. These results suggest a promising potential therapy for patients with rituximab-refractory EBV-associated lymphoma after transplantation.TRIAL REGISTRATIONPhase II protocols (NCT01498484 and NCT00002663) were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the FDA, and the National Marrow Donor Program.FUNDINGThis work was supported by NIH grants CA23766 and R21CA162002, the Aubrey Fund, the Claire Tow Foundation, the Major Family Foundation, the Max Cure Foundation, the Richard "Rick" J. Eisemann Pediatric Research Fund, the Banbury Foundation, the Edith Robertson Foundation, and the Larry Smead Foundation. Atara Biotherapeutics licensed the bank of third-party EBV-CTLs from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in June 2015.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Pathogenesis, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous virus belonging to the human γ-herpes virus subfamily. After primary infection, EBV maintains a life-long latent infection. A major concern is that EBV can cause a diverse range of neoplasms and autoimmune diseases. In addition, patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplantation can experience post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) due to dysfunction or suppression of host’s immune system, or uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected cells. In recent years, the number of EBV-associated PTLD cases has increased. This review focuses on the current understandings of EBV-associated PTLD pathogenesis, as well as the risk factors and clinical outcomes for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Epstein-Barr virus post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viremia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) are severe complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A series of risk factors have been found to predict EBV viremia and PTLD, including the T-cell depletion, reduced intensity conditioning, and alternative donor. The rituximab pre-emptive therapy could improve PTLD prognosis significantly, but the trigger of initiating rituximab pre-emptive therapy has not been well established. Additionally, EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell (CTL) is a promising approach to treat EBV-PTLD.

Epstein-barr virus DNAemia monitoring for the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation (detectable DNAemia) predisposes to the development of PTLD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 306 patients monitored for EBV DNAemia after Thymoglobulin-conditioned HCT to determine the utility of the monitoring in the management of PTLD. DNAemia was monitored weekly for ≥12 weeks post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Reactivation was detected in 82% of patients. PTLD occurred in 14% of the total patients (17% of patients with reactivation). PTLD was treated with rituximab only when and if the diagnosis was established. This allowed us to evaluate potential DNAemia thresholds for pre-emptive therapy. We suggest 100,000-500,000 IU per mL whole blood as this would result in unnecessary rituximab administration to only 4-20% of patients and near zero mortality due to PTLD. After starting rituximab (for diagnosed PTLD), sustained regression of PTLD occurred in 25/25 (100%) patients in whom DNAemia became undetectable. PTLD progressed or relapsed in 12/17 (71%) patients in whom DNAemia was persistently detectable.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, for pre-emptive therapy of PTLD, we suggest threshold DNAemia of 100,000-500,000 IU/mL. Persistently detectable DNAemia after PTLD treatment with rituximab appears to have 71% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for PTLD progression/relapse.

Inverse correlation of Vδ2+ T-cell recovery with EBV reactivation after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation remains a life-threatening complication in recipients of a haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploHSCT). Reconstitution of adaptive T lymphocytes is generally compromised at the early stages following transplant, suggesting an important role of other effector cells in preventing EBV infection. Our previous studies demonstrated that recovery of CD4^- CD8^- T cells negatively correlated with EBV reactivation after haploHSCT. In this prospective study on 132 adult patients with haematopoietic malignancy, recovery of T-cell subpopulations was characterized post-haploHSCT. We showed that the median counts of peripheral Vδ2 cells were continuously lower in recipients with EBV reactivation compared with controls at 30, 60 and 90 days after haploHSCT (P values: 0·006, <0·001 and 0·019, respectively). Landmark study further indicated that the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was significantly decreased in recipients with higher day-30 Vδ2 counts. Activation of Vδ2 cells upon EBV reactivation was accompanied by an induction of cell apoptosis. Cytotoxic effect of Vδ2 cells on EBV-infected cells was confirmed by in vitro experiments. Together, our findings uncovered a significant correlation of recovered Vδ2 with EBV reactivation following haploHSCT. These results will help to better understand the intrinsic anti-virus immunity and develop γδ T-based therapy strategies after haematopoietic transplantation.

Impact of ATG Dose on the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Conditioning Followed by Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies

Reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is often proposed for patients with comorbidities. To enhance engraftment and limit graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), antithymoglobulin (ATG) is usually used. However, the dose needed remains unclear unlike myeloablative conditioning. In order to clarify this point, we conducted a retrospective study on patients who received a reduced intensity conditioning allo-HSCT based on a 2-day fludarabine and busulfan treatment with either 1 or 2 days of ATG treatment. One hundred and eight patients received 2.5 mg/kg (ATG2.5) and another 60 patients 5 mg/kg (ATG5). The median follow-up was 36 months. The median overall survival was 39 months and the median disease-free survival 45 months. In multivariate analysis, overall nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was independently influenced by the acute GVHD grade III-IV (p < 0.001) and ATG dose (30 vs. 21% for ATG5; p = 0.008). Despite heterogeneity of populations, using proportional-hazard assumptions, we have been able to observe in multivariate analysis a lower NRM in the ATG5 group. This leads to a statistically higher overall survival for the ATG5 group. In conclusion, 2 days of ATG decrease NRM independently without increasing the risk of relapse or infectious disease.

Greatly reduced risk of EBV reactivation in rituximab-experienced recipients of alemtuzumab-conditioned allogeneic HSCT

EBV-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains an important complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analysed the incidence and risk factors for EBV reactivation in 186 adult patients undergoing consecutive allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion at a single centre. The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was 48% (confidence interval (CI) 41-55%) by 1 year, with an incidence of high-level EBV reactivation of 18% (CI 13-24%); 8 patients were concurrently diagnosed with PTLD. Amongst patients with high-level reactivation 31/38 (82%) developed this within only 2 weeks of first EBV qPCR positivity. In univariate analysis age⩾50 years was associated with significantly increased risk of EBV reactivation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, CI 1.02-2.31; P=0.039). Furthermore, a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was associated with greatly reduced risk of reactivation (HR 0.10, CI 0.03-0.33; P=0.0001) and this was confirmed in multivariate testing. Importantly, rituximab therapy within 6 months prior to allo-HSCT was also highly predictive for lack of EBV reactivation (HR 0.18, CI 0.07-0.48; P=0.001) although confounding with NHL was apparent. Our data emphasise the risk of PTLD associated with alemtuzumab. Furthermore, we report the clinically important observation that rituximab, administered in the peri-transplant period, may provide effective prophylaxis for PTLD.

Correlation of rabbit antithymocyte globulin serum levels and clinical outcomes in children who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an alternative donor

We analyzed the correlation between rabbit ATG (rATG) serum levels and clinical outcomes in 37 children who received rATG at a total dose of 10 or 15 mg/kg during HSCT conditioning from an alternative donor. Fourteen patients had advanced malignant diseases, 13 had severe AA, and 10 had inherited disorders. Complete engraftment was achieved in all patients, and no rejection occurred. The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI, 12.5-39.6%) and 8.1% (95% CI, 0-23.1%), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified lower rATG levels at week 4 as an independent risk factor in the development of grades II-IV acute GVHD (p = 0.037). Serious infections were not observed in any patient following HSCT. No correlation was found between EBV reactivation and rATG levels at week 2 and week 4 after HSCT. Furthermore, no correlation was found between relapse and rATG levels two and four wk post-transplantation. The probability of five-yr OS among patients was 70.3% (95% CI, 59.8-79.2%). Our results suggest that targeted rATG administration may protect patients from severe acute GVHD without increasing the risk of EBV reactivation or relapse.

Impact of Epstein Barr virus-related complications after high-risk allo-SCT in the era of pre-emptive rituximab

We monitored 133 high-risk allo-SCT recipients for 6 months after transplant for EBV reactivation by quantitative real-time PCR. Rituximab was given as pre-emptive therapy for viremia >1000 copies/mL. The 1-year cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was 29.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18-40) in patients monitored due to initial high-risk characteristics (n=93) and 31.8% (95% CI: 19.7-44) in those followed because of the development of refractory GVHD (n=40). Overall response rate to Rituximab was 83%. Nine patients (9.6%) developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) at a median of +62 days after SCT. Eight of them showed a concomitant CMV reactivation. Second SCT was the only risk factor associated with EBV infection and PTLD in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-6.4; P=0.04) and HR 6.4 (95%CI: 1.3-32; P=0.02)). The development of EBV reactivation was not associated with non-relapse mortality or OS (P=0.97 and P=0.84, respectively).

Features of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Korean children living in an area of high seroprevalence against Epstein-Barr virus

The present study was conducted to investigate Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in Korean children living in an area of a high seroprevalence against EBV and to determine the impact of recipient age on EBV reactivation. Medical records of 248 children and adolescents who had received allogeneic HCT were retrospectively reviewed. The trends of EBV reactivation and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) were evaluated and compared between younger (≤10 years old) and older (11-20 years old) groups. EBV reactivation occurred in 177 cases (71.4 %) and high-level EBV reactivation, defined as a virus DNA titer of 300,000 copies/mL or higher, occurred in 21 cases (8.5 %). PTLD was diagnosed in five cases (2.0 %), and one of these patients died. The EBV reactivation rate was not significantly different between the two age groups; however, high-level reactivation and PTLD were more significantly frequent in the older than in the younger group (P = 0.030 and P = 0.026, respectively). In conclusion, older children and adolescents are more likely to experience high-level EBV reactivation and PTLDs, and higher EBV DNA titers than those previously reported may be a predictor of PTLD in areas with a high seroprevalence against EBV.

Prevention and treatment for Epstein-Barr virus infection and related cancers

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the first herpes virus described as being oncogenic in humans. EBV infection is implicated in post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) and several other cancers in non-immunocompromised patients, with more than 200,000 new cases per year. While prevention of PTLD is improving, mainly based on EBV monitoring and preemptive tapering of immunosuppression, early diagnosis remains the best current option for the other malignancies. Significant progress has been achieved in treatment, with decreased mortality and morbidity, but some challenges are still to face, especially for the more aggressive diseases. Possible prevention by EBV vaccination would be a more global approach of this public health problem, but further active research is needed before this goal could be reached.

Clinicopathologic features of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders arising after pediatric small bowel transplant

Few studies examined the clinicopathologic features of PTLD arising in pediatric SBT patients. Particularly, the association between ATG and PTLD in this population has not been described. Retrospective review of 81 pediatric patient charts with SBT--isolated or in combination with other organs--showed a PTLD incidence of 11%, occurring more frequently in females (median age of four yr) and with clinically advanced disease. Monomorphic PTLD was the most common histological subtype. There was a significant difference in the use of ATG between patients who developed PTLD and those who did not (p < 0.01); a similar difference was seen with the use of sirolimus (p < 0.001). These results suggested a link between the combination of ATG and sirolimus and development of more clinically and histologically advanced PTLD; however, the risk of ATG by itself was not clear. EBV viral loads were higher in patients with PTLD, and median time between detection of EBV to PTLD diagnosis was three months. However, viral loads at the time of PTLD diagnosis were most often lower than at EBV detection, thereby raising questions on the correlation between decreasing viral genomes and risk of PTLD.

Risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a successful treatment for hematologic malignancies and a variety of genetic and metabolic disorders. In the period following stem cell transplantation, the immune-compromised milieu allows opportunistic pathogens to thrive. Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease can be a life-threatening complication for transplanted patients because of suppressed T-cell-mediated immunity. We analyzed possible risk factors associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in a cohort of over 1,000 patients. The incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was 4%. Significant risk factors identified by multivariate analysis were: human leukocyte antigen-mismatch (P<0.001), serological Epstein-Barr virus mismatch recipient-/donor+ (P<0.001), use of reduced intensity conditioning (P=0.002), acute graft-versus-host disease grade II to IV (P=0.006), pre-transplant splenectomy (P=0.008) and infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells (P=0.015). The risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease has increased in more recent years, from less than 2% before 1998 to more than 6% after 2011. Additionally, we show that long-term survival of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease is poor despite initial successful treatment. The 3-year survival rate among the 40 patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was 20% as opposed to 62% among patients without post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (P<0.001). The study identifies patients at risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after transplantation in need of pre-emptive measures.

Allogeneic transplantation in the UK: an aggregation of marginal gains?

A number of advances in clinical practice that are considered routine in modern allogeneic transplant programmes lack definitive supporting evidence, partly because they may offer modest incremental benefits that are difficult to demonstrate in a statistically robust manner given the relatively small cohorts of patients who undergo such procedures. Nevertheless, these marginal gains probably contribute therapeutically meaningful overall benefit, particularly when aggregated. We review the evidence for a number of these practices in terms of impact on transplant outcomes, with particular reference to the setting of T cell depletion as widely practiced in the United Kingdom, including high resolution tissue typing, surveillance for and therapy of infectious complications, chimerism-directed immune modulation and more sensitive monitoring for residual or progressive disease.

Reduced PTLD-related mortality in patients experiencing EBV infection following allo-SCT after the introduction of a protocol incorporating pre-emptive rituximab

The mortality associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) induced by EBV infection can be reduced by monitoring EBV by polymerase-chain-reaction and rituximab given pre-emptively. We performed a retrospective analysis of the risk factors for the occurrence of EBV infection/disease and EBV-related mortality among 273 consecutive recipients of a T-cell-depleted allo-SCT during two periods: (a) before the implementation of a comprehensive protocol (2006-2008) and (b) afterwards (2009-2011). EBV infection was detected in 61 (22%) cases, and 28 cases were considered to have had EBV disease. Treatment with antithymocyte globulin was the most important risk factor (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.2, P=0.001). After implementation of the protocol, in patients experiencing EBV infection, pre-emptive therapy was started more often and sooner (median 3 vs 6 days, P=0.002). Moreover, there were fewer cases of monomorphic PTLD (4/33 (12%) vs 11/28 (39%), P=0.01), and the EBV-related mortality was lower for patients experiencing EBV infection (2/33 (6%) vs 8/28 (29%), OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05-0.9, P=0.03). The EBV protocol proved feasible and resulted in faster initiation of pre-emptive therapy, the diagnosis in an earlier stage of EBV disease, and decreased EBV-related mortality.

Predicting the Clinical Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Long and Winding Road toward Validated Immune Biomarkers

The clinical outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is strongly influenced from the potential complications arising during the delicate phase of post-transplant immune restoration. The quantitative aspects of immune-cell repopulation after HSCT and the qualitative features their functional restitution have been extensively reported. Nevertheless, measurable immune biomarkers predicting the clinical outcome of HSCT await formal validation. The aim of this review is an appraisal of most studies published so far on the predictive value of different T and NK-cell biomarkers after HSCT with emphasis on defined thresholds endorsed by multivariate analysis.

Distinct clinical features of infectious complications in adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis in the Nagasaki transplant group

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is performed as a curative option in adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) patients, its high transplantation-related mortality raises a serious issue. The clinical features of infectious complications after transplantation are not well known. To analyze the impact of infections after allo-SCT for ATL, we retrospectively compared infectious complications in 210 patients at 3 institutions in Nagasaki prefecture between 1997 and 2009. There were 91 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 51 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LBL), and 68 with ATL. No patient received ganciclovir or foscarvir as prophylaxis, and most patients received antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole or itraconazole. The cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection at 3 years was 69.2% in ATL patients versus 54.4% in AML patients (P = .0255). Cumulative infection-related mortality was significantly higher in ATL patients than in the 2 other groups (ATL versus AML, P = .0496; ATL versus ALL/LBL, P = .0075), and most death-causing pathogens were bacteria and fungus. The appearance of CMV infection was negatively associated with infectious mortality in ATL patients, but the P value for this association was near the borderline of significance (P = .0569). In multivariate analysis, transplantation using unrelated bone marrow and episodes of CMV infection were associated with worse overall survival in ATL patients, but were not in either AML or ALL/LBL patients. Collectively, the impact of infectious complications after transplantation in ATL patients was different from that in AML and ALL/LBL patients, suggesting that a more intensive strategy for infection control in ATL patients is required to reduce infectious mortality.

Immune reconstitution after hematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Successful immune reconstitution is important for decreasing posthematopoietic cell transplant (post-HCT) infections, relapse, and secondary malignancy, without increasing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here we review how different parts of the immune system recover, and the relationship between recovery and clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Innate immunity (e.g., neutrophils, natural killer cells) recovers within weeks, whereas adaptive immunity (B and T cells) recovers within months to years. This has been known for years; however, more recently, the pattern of recovery of additional immune cell subsets has been described. The role of these subsets in transplant complications like infections, GVHD and relapse is becoming increasingly recognized, as gleaned from studies of the association between subset counts or function and complications/outcomes, and from studies depleting or adoptively transferring various subsets.

SUMMARY

Lessons learned from observational studies on immune reconstitution are leading to new strategies to prevent or treat posttransplant infections. Additional knowledge is needed to develop effective strategies to prevent or treat relapse, second malignancies and GVHD.