Dapsone N-acetylation, metoprolol alpha-hydroxylation, and S-mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation polymorphisms in an Indonesian population: a cocktail and extended phenotyping assessment trial

Use of Cocktail Probe Drugs for Indexing Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Clinical Pharmacology Studies - Review of Case Studies

BACKGROUND

The cocktail approach of probing drug metabolizing enzymes, in particular cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, is a cornerstone in clinical pharmacology studies. The first report of the famous "Pittsburg cocktail" has led the way for the availability of numerous cocktail substrate mixtures that provide options for indexing of CYP enzymes and/or evaluating the perpetrator capacity of the drug.

OBJECTIVE

The key objectives were: 1) To collate, tabulate, and discuss the various cocktail substrates to determine specific CYP enzyme activity in clinical pharmacology studies with specific case studies; 2) To introspect on how the cocktail approach has withstood the test of time and evolved for enabling key decision(s); 3) To provide some futuristic views on the use of cocktail in drug discovery and development.

METHOD

The review was compiled after consultation with databases such as PubMed (NCBI database) and Google scholar to source various published literature on cocktail approaches in drug development.

RESULTS

In the reviewed case studies, CYP indexing was achieved using a single time point (differing for specific CYP enzyme) plasma determination of the metabolite to parent ratio for all CYP enzymes with the exception of CYP3A4/5, where multiple time points were required for exposure measurement of midazolam and its metabolite. Likewise, a single void of urine, for a specific time duration, has been utilized for the recovery measurements of parent and metabolite for CYP indexing purposes.

CONCLUSION

The review provides a comprehensive list of various types of cocktail approaches and discusses some key considerations including the evolution of the cocktail approaches over time, perspectives and futuristic views for the use of probe drugs to aid the execution of clinical pharmacology studies and data interpretation.

Interethnic variation of CYP2C19 alleles, 'predicted' phenotypes and 'measured' metabolic phenotypes across world populations

The present study evaluates the worldwide frequency distribution of CYP2C19 alleles and CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes ('predicted' from genotypes and 'measured' with a probe drug) among healthy volunteers from different ethnic groups and geographic regions, as well as the relationship between the 'predicted' and 'measured' CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes. A total of 52 181 healthy volunteers were studied within 138 selected original research papers. CYP2C19*17 was 42- and 24-fold more frequent in Mediterranean-South Europeans and Middle Easterns than in East Asians (P<0.001, in both cases). Contrarily, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles were more frequent in East Asians (30.26% and 6.89%, respectively), and even a twofold higher frequency of these alleles was found in Native populations from Oceania (61.30% and 14.42%, respectively; P<0.001, in all cases), which may be a consequence of genetic drift process in the Pacific Islands. Regarding CYP2C19 metabolic phenotype, poor metabolizers (PMs) were more frequent among Asians than in Europeans, contrarily to the phenomenon reported for CYP2D6. A correlation has been found between the frequencies of CYP2C19 poor metabolism 'predicted' from CYP2C19 genotypes (gPMs) and the poor metabolic phenotype 'measured' with a probe drug (mPMs) when subjects are either classified by ethnicity (r=0.94, P<0.001) or geographic region (r=0.99, P=0.002). Nevertheless, further research is needed in African and Asian populations, which are under-represented, and additional CYP2C19 variants and the 'measured' phenotype should be studied.

The basel cocktail for simultaneous phenotyping of human cytochrome P450 isoforms in plasma, saliva and dried blood spots

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Phenotyping cocktails use a combination of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-specific probe drugs to simultaneously assess the activity of different CYP isoforms. To improve the clinical applicability of CYP phenotyping, the main objectives of this study were to develop a new cocktail based on probe drugs that are widely used in clinical practice and to test whether alternative sampling methods such as collection of dried blood spots (DBS) or saliva could be used to simplify the sampling process.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover study, a new combination of commercially available probe drugs (the Basel cocktail) was tested for simultaneous phenotyping of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Sixteen subjects received low doses of caffeine, efavirenz, losartan, omeprazole, metoprolol and midazolam in different combinations. All subjects were genotyped, and full pharmacokinetic profiles of the probe drugs and their main metabolites were determined in plasma, dried blood spots and saliva samples.

RESULTS

The Basel cocktail was well tolerated, and bioequivalence tests showed no evidence of mutual interactions between the probe drugs. In plasma, single timepoint metabolic ratios at 2 h (for CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) or at 8 h (for the other isoforms) after dosing showed high correlations with corresponding area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios (AUC0-24h parent/AUC0-24h metabolite) and are proposed as simple phenotyping metrics. Metabolic ratios in dried blood spots (for CYP1A2 and CYP2C19) or in saliva samples (for CYP1A2) were comparable to plasma ratios and offer the option of minimally invasive or non-invasive phenotyping of these isoforms.

CONCLUSIONS

This new combination of phenotyping probe drugs can be used without mutual interactions. The proposed sampling timepoints have the potential to facilitate clinical application of phenotyping but require further validation in conditions of altered CYP activity. The use of DBS or saliva samples seems feasible for phenotyping of the selected CYP isoforms.

Polymorphisms and the Pocketbook: The Cost-Effectiveness of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotyping in the Eradication ofHelicobacter pyloriInfection Associated with Duodenal Ulcer

The clinical outcome of duodenal ulcer treated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based, anti-Helicobacter pylori (H.p.) regimens varies according to cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype. CYP2C19 genotypes differ markedly in peoples of Pacific Rim descent compared with another ethnicity. The authors sought to determine the specific impact that these factors have on the cost-effectiveness of duodenal ulcer management. Their model consisted of two patient cohorts with Helicobacter pylori and duodenal ulcer, trichotomized into CYP2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs), altering the anti-H.p. regimen in the genotyped cohort only. The authors took the perspective of a third-party payer, and the denominator was ulcer episode prevented. In the reference case, the use of CYP2C19 genotyping prior to initiating anti-H.p. therapy was dominant (costs were saved with each ulcer episode prevented) in all geographic regions of the United States. The subsequent break-even analysis showed a range of 89.20 dollars to 118.96 dollars--from Hawaii to the Midwest, respectively--required to eliminate the cost-savings from each genotype test performed. Using probabilities most unfavorable to genotyping, the variation of peoples with Pacific Rim origins from 0% to 100% altered the cost-effectiveness from 495 dollars to 2125 dollars per ulcer event prevented, respectively. The results suggest that treatment decisions for H.p. infection that are based on a patient's CYP2C19 genotype decreases expenses for health plans implementing testing. This analysis provides an economic basis to support recent calls to expand this technology into routine clinical care to prevent toxicity of narrow therapeutic index drugs.

“Cocktail” Approaches and Strategies in Drug Development: Valuable Tool or Flawed Science?

There is an increasing interest in the simultaneous administration of several probe substrates to characterize the activity of multiple drug-metabolizing enzymes, the so-called "cocktail" approach. However, this method remains controversial and is being investigated more extensively. No general consensus has emerged on the applicability of this approach in clinical investigation and during drug development. The objective of the article is to review this important yet specialized technique, as well as its merits, drawbacks, and potential application in drug development. Among the two-, three-, four-, five-, and six-drug in vivo cocktails previously evaluated in humans, a variety of substrate probe combinations have been studied. Some probe combinations have been validated not to interact in vivo and have been useful in characterizing drug-drug interaction potential and metabolic enzyme induction in humans. For drug candidates that affect two or more in vitro pathways or are potential gene inducers, the use of a cocktail approach may facilitate the rapid delineation of the drug candidate's drug interaction potential. It may also offer the potential of providing clear guidance on safely conducting larger clinical studies and limiting comedication restrictions to only those likely to be clinically relevant.

Bioinformatics Research on Inter-racial Difference in Drug Metabolism I. Analysis on Frequencies of Mutant Alleles and Poor Metabolizers on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19

The enzyme activities of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 show a genetic polymorphism, and the frequency of poor metabolizers (PMs) on these enzymes depends on races. In the present study, the frequencies of mutant alleles and PMs in each race were analyzed based on information from published studies, considering the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 as the causal factors of racial and inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics. As a result, it was shown that there were racial differences in the frequencies of each mutant allele and PMs. The frequencies of PMs on CYP2D6 are 1.9% of Asians and 7.7% of Caucasians, and those of PMs on CYP2C19 are 15.8% of Asians and 2.2% of Caucasians. Based on the results, it was suggested that there would be racial differences in the frequencies of PM subjects whose blood concentrations might be higher for drugs metabolized by these enzymes. Additionally, it was suggested that enzyme activities would vary according to the number of functional alleles even in subjects judged to be extensive metabolizers (EMs). In the bridging study, genetic information regarding CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 of the subjects will help extrapolate foreign clinical data to a domestic population.

Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism

Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is the main (or partial) cause for large differences in the pharmacokinetics of a number of clinically important drugs. On the basis of their ability to metabolise (S)-mephenytoin or other CYP2C19 substrates, individuals can be classified as extensive metabolisers (EMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs). Eight variant alleles (CYP2C19*2 to CYP2C19*8) that predict PMs have been identified. The distribution of EM and PM genotypes and phenotypes shows wide interethnic differences. Nongenetic factors such as enzyme inhibition and induction, old age and liver cirrhosis can also modulate CYP2C19 activity. In EMs, approximately 80% of doses of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole seem to be cleared by CYP2C19, whereas CYP3A is more important in PMs. Five-fold higher exposure to these drugs is observed in PMs than in EMs of CYP2C19, and further increases occur during inhibition of CYP3A-catalysed alternative metabolic pathways in PMs. As a result, PMs of CYP2C19 experience more effective acid suppression and better healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers during treatment with omeprazole and lansoprazole compared with EMs. The pharmacoeconomic value of CYP2C19 genotyping remains unclear. Our calculations suggest that genotyping for CYP2C19 could save approximately 5000 US dollars for every 100 Asians tested, but none for Caucasian patients. Nevertheless, genotyping for the common alleles of CYP2C19 before initiating PPIs for the treatment of reflux disease and H. pylori infection is a cost effective tool to determine appropriate duration of treatment and dosage regimens. Altered CYP2C19 activity does not seem to increase the risk for adverse drug reactions/interactions of PPIs. Phenytoin plasma concentrations and toxicity have been shown to increase in patients taking inhibitors of CYP2C19 or who have variant alleles and, because of its narrow therapeutic range, genotyping of CYP2C19 in addition to CYP2C9 may be needed to optimise the dosage of phenytoin. Increased risk of toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants is likely in patients whose CYP2C19 and/or CYP2D6 activities are diminished. CYP2C19 is a major enzyme in proguanil activation to cycloguanil, but there are no clinical data that suggest that PMs of CYP2C19 are at a greater risk for failure of malaria prophylaxis or treatment. Diazepam clearance is clearly diminished in PMs or when inhibitors of CYP2C19 are coprescribed, but the clinical consequences are generally minimal. Finally, many studies have attempted to identify relationships between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype and susceptibility to xenobiotic-induced disease, but none of these are compelling.

Analysis of the CYP2C19 polymorphism in a North-eastern Thai population

CYP2C19 is a polymorphically expressed cytochrome P450 responsible for the metabolism of several clinically used drugs, including some barbiturates, diazepam, proguanil, propranolol and several proton pump inhibitors. Genetic polymorphism of this enzyme shows marked interracial differences, with the poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype representing 2-5% of Caucasian and 11-23% of Oriental populations. In the present study, CYP2C19 phenotype and genotype were investigated in 107 North-eastern Thai subjects using the omeprazole hydroxylation index (HI) and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique, respectively. It was found that the distribution of HI in these subjects was bimodal. Seven subjects [6.54%, 95% confidence (CI) 1.86-11.22%] were identified as PM, with an HI > 7. Analysis of CYP2C19 genotypes in these 107 Thai subjects revealed that the allele frequencies for CYP2C19*1, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 were 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.77), 0.27 (95% CI 0.21-0.33) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.05), respectively. The PM phenotype and the frequencies of CYP2C19 defective alleles in Thais, particularly CYP2C19*3, were lower than those observed in other Oriental populations. It is noteworthy that there was a case of nonaccordance between phenotype and genotype in one of the PMs. Whether this PM represents a novel defective allele requires further investigation.

Allele and genotype frequencies of polymorphic cytochromes P4502D6, 2C19 and 2E1 in aborigines from western Australia

The polymorphisms of the important xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 have been studied extensively in a large number of populations and show significant heterogeneity in the frequency of different alleles/genotypes and in the prevalence of the extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes. Understanding of inter-ethnic differences in genotypes is important in prediction of either beneficial or adverse effects from therapeutic agents and other xenobiotics. Since no data were available for Australian Aborigines, we investigated the frequencies of alleles and genotypes for CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 in a population living in the far north of Western Australia. Because of its geographical isolation, this population can serve as a model to study the impact of evolutionary forces on the distribution of different alleles for xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. Twelve CYP2D6 alleles were analysed. The wild-type allele *1 was the most frequent (85.81%) and the non-functional alleles (*4, * 5, * 16) had an overall frequency of less than 10%. Only one subject (0.4%) was a poor metabolizer for CYP2D6 because of the genotype *5/*5. For CYP2C19, the frequencies of the *1 (wild-type) and the non-functional (*2 and *3) alleles were 50.2%, 35.5% and 14.3%, respectively. The combined CYP2C19 genotypes (*2/*2, *2/*3 or *3/*3) correspond to a predicted frequency of 25.6% for the CYP2C19 poor metabolizer phenotype. For CYP2EI, only one subject had the rare c2 allele giving an overall allele frequency of 0.2%. For CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, allele frequencies and predicted phenotypes differed significantly from those for Caucasians but were similar to those for Orientals indicating a close relationship to East Asian populations. Differences between Aborigines and Orientals in allele frequencies for CYP2D6* 10 and CYP2E1 c2 may have arisen through natural selection, or genetic drift, respectively.

Pharmacogenetics and psychopharmacotherapy

Response to drugs can vary between individuals and between different ethnic populations. The biological (age, gender, disease and genetics), cultural and environmental factors which contribute to these variations are considered in this review. The most important aspect is the genetic variability between individuals in their ability to metabolize drugs due to expression of 'polymorphic' enzymes. Polymorphism enables division of individuals within a given population into at least two groups, poor metabolisers (PMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs) of certain drugs. The two most extensively studied genetic polymorphisms are those involving cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and CYP2C19. CYP2D6 metabolizes a number of antidepressants, antipsychotics, beta-adrenoceptor blockers, and antiarrhythmic drugs. About 7% of Caucasians and 1% of Asians are PMs of CYP2D6 substrates. CYP2C19 enzyme participates in the metabolism of omeprazole, propranolol and psychotropic drugs such as hexobarbital, diazepam, citalopram, imipramine, clomipramine and amitriptyline. The incidence of PMs of CYP2C19 substrates is much higher in Asians (15-30%) than in Caucasians (3-6%). Variations in metabolism of psychotropic drugs result in variations in their pharmacokinetic parameters. This may lead to clinically significant intra- and inter-ethnic differences in pharmacological responses. Such variations are discussed in this review. Differential receptor-mediated response may play a role in ethnic differences in responses to antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants, but such pharmacodynamic factors remain to be systematically investigated. The results of studies of ethnic differences in response to psychopharmacotherapy appear to be discrepant, most probably due to limitations of study design, small sample size, inadequately defined study sample, and lack of control of confounding factors. The clinical value of understanding pharmacogenetics is in its use to optimize therapeutic efficacy, to prevent toxicity of those drugs whose metabolism is catalysed by polymorphic isoenzymes, and to contribute to the rational design of new drugs. Finally, applications and impact of pharmacogenetics in the field of psychopharmacotherapy are discussed.

Genetic variations of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) in the Chinese population

Most of phenotyping studies have shown that Chinese populations have a higher incidence of poor metabolizers (PMs) of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation compared with populations of African and European descent. The present study was aimed at defining an exact population frequency of the genetic defect of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) in native and overseas Chinese healthy populations. All the related data were systematically summarized and re-analyzed using meta-analysis method, and consistency between phenotypic and genotypic frequencies of the PM was tested. A statistically significant homogeneity was across all 11 phenotyping studies (chi2 = 15.17, d.f. = 10; P > 0.05) and also across the remaining 4 genotyping studies (chi2 = 2.61, d.f. = 3; P > 0.05) except for a non-randomly selected population analysis. An approximate estimate of the PM phenotypic and genotypic frequencies was 13.6% (212 of 1555; 95% CI: 11.9%-15.3%) and 13.8% (79 of 573; 95%CI: 11.0%-16.6%), respectively. There was a good consistency between phenotyped and genotyped PM frequencies. The half of all genotyped EMs (50.3%, 276 of 549) were heterozygotes. The data estimate that 14% of Chinese would be homozygotes of CYP2C19 defective alleles, and that 176 million Chinese would be slow metabolizers of CYP2C19 substrates.

Comparison of acetylation phenotype with genotype coding for N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) in children

The present study focused on evaluation of the extent to which genotype coding for N-acetyltransferase agrees with acetylation phenotype in children at various ages. In 82 Caucasian children aged from 1 mo to 17 y (57 boys and 25 girls) and including 37 infants, the acetylation phenotype was evaluated from the urinary metabolic ratio of 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil (AFMU) to 1-methylxanthine (1X) after oral administration of caffeine. At the same time, by use of PCR and restriction analysis of amplified fragments of the N-acetyltransferase gene, four nucleotide transitions were identified: 481C-->T (KpnI), 590 G-->A (TaqI), 803 A-->G (DdeI), and 857 G-->A (BamHI). The wild-type allele was detected in 27 (33%) children, and the slow acetylation genotype was found in 55 (67%) children. The results of the study show that the metabolic ratio AFMU/1X could be calculated only in 72 children, because in 10 (14%) infants <20 wk of age, AFMU was not detected. Determination of the relation between the acetylation phenotype and genotype revealed that 18 children (23%) containing at least one wild-type allele had AFMU/1X <0.4 (slow acetylation activity) and 7 (8%) of genotypically slow acetylators presented high metabolic ratio (high acetylation activity). We concluded that the disagreement between the acetylation phenotype and genotype is more often found in the group of children characterized by low AFMU/1X and that in small children only N-acetyltransferase genotype studies enable the detection of genetic acetylation defect.

Influence of race or ethnicity on pharmacokinetics of drugs

Review of the current literature on racial differences in pharmacokinetics of drugs supports the premise that only pharmacokinetic processes which are biologically or biochemically mediated have the potential to exhibit differences between racial or ethnic groups. Thus, the pharmacokinetic factors which can be expected to potentially exhibit racial differences are (1) bioavailability for drugs which undergo gut or hepatic first-pass metabolism, (2) protein binding, (3) volume of distribution, (4) hepatic metabolism, and (5) renal tubular secretion. Absorption (unless active), filtration at the glomerulus, and passive tubular reabsorption would not be expected to exhibit racial differences. As is evident from this review, there are relatively few drugs for which there is information on ethnic or racial differences in pharmacokinetics. Thus it is often necessary to try to predict whether such differences might exist. Taking into consideration the above factors and evaluation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug, it should be possible to identify those drugs most likely to exhibit differences in their pharmacokinetics. For example, a drug which is eliminated entirely by the kidneys through filtration and reabsorption and is not highly bound to plasma proteins (or is bound to albumin) is highly unlikely to exhibit racial differences in its kinetics. Conversely, a drug which undergoes significant gut and/or hepatic first-pass metabolism and is highly bound to AGP is much more likely to exhibit kinetic differences between racial groups. A discussion of the impact of racial differences in kinetics on drug response or racial differences in drug efficacy, toxicity, or pharmacodynamics (concentration-response relationship) is beyond the scope of this review. However, a number of the papers described above also evaluated differences in pharmacodynamics or response. Among the comparisons of Chinese and Caucasians, these include the papers on propranolol, morphine, nifedipine, triazolam, diazepam, and omeprazole. For those studies comparing differences in blacks and Caucasians, responses or pharmacodynamics were also determined in the studies of propranolol, trimazosin, and methylprednisolone. Interested readers are also referred to the review by Wood and a more recent review by Kitler for additional discussion of ethnic/racial differences in pharmacodynamics/drug response.

Validation of the five-drug "Pittsburgh cocktail" approach for assessment of selective regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the probe drugs caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine), and mephenytoin can be simultaneously administered as a metabolic cocktail to estimate in vivo cytochrome P450 (CYP) and N-acetyltransferase enzyme activities.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy nonsmoking male volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 21.6 +/- 2.2 years) received 100 mg caffeine, 250 mg chlorzoxazone, 100 mg dapsone, 10 mg debrisoquin, and 100 mg mephenytoin individually and in four and five-drug combinations in a randomized manner using a 7 x 7 Latin square. Each drug or drug combination was given orally after an overnight fast, with a minimum 1-week washout between administrations. In each session, urine was collected from 0 to 8 hours and plasma was obtained at 4 and 8 hours after drug administration. Plasma and metabolite concentrations were used to estimate phenotypic trait measures for the efficiency of each drug's metabolism.

RESULTS

The phenotypic indexes determined for caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin were not significantly different when given alone than when given in combination. The median percentage change of the trait measures observed during administration of all five compounds compared with individual administration ranged from -10.7% for the 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone plasma ratio to +2.2% for the debrisoquin recovery ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin in low doses can be simultaneously administered without metabolic interaction. This cocktail approach can thus simultaneously provide independent in vivo phenotypic measures for multiple CYP enzymes and N-acetyltransferase.

Steady-state plasma concentrations of imipramine and desipramine in relation to S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation status in Japanese depressive patients

The steady-state plasma concentrations of imipramine and desipramine were measured after a more than 2-week treatment with 0.39 to 1.39 mg/kg/day of imipramine hydrochloride in 28 Japanese patients with major depression who had been phenotyped simultaneously with mephenytoin (for CYP2C19-related status) and with metoprolol (for CYP2D6-related status) before initiating the antidepressant therapy. Patients consisted of five poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP2C19 with an extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotype of CYP2D6, whereas the remainder were EMs for both of the phenotypes. The mean respective concentrations (corrected by mg/kg) of imipramine and the sum of imipramine plus desipramine were 2.4 and 1.8 times greater in the CYP2C19-related PM than in the EM group, and these two variables correlated with the log10 urinary excretion of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin (rs = -0.73 and -0.64, both p < 0.01, respectively), but not with the metabolic ratio (MR) of metoprolol/alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. The mean N-demethylation index (MR of desipramine/imipramine) was significantly (p < 0.01) less in the PM than in the EM group. This index correlated with the 4'-hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin (rs = -0.51, p < 0.01), but not with the alpha-hydroxylation of metoprolol, implying that imipramine N-demethylation is under a coregulatory pharmacogenetic control of CYP2C19, but not of CYP2D6. In conclusion, by taking into account that the incidence of the PMs of CYP2C19 is much greater (18-23%) than that of CYP2D6 (< 1%) in Japanese population, the individually predetermined assessment of the CYP2C19-mediated metabolic capacity of imipramine would be more valuable than that of the CYP2D6-mediated capacity for forecasting the steady-state concentrations of imipramine and desipramine in Japanese depressive patients, thereby attaining an individualized optimization of imipramine therapy. Obviously, a pharmacodynamic assessment study conducted simultaneously with predetermined CYP2C19 status is required for supporting this contention.

Comparison of the interaction potential of a new proton pump inhibitor, E3810, versus omeprazole with diazepam in extensive and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the interaction potential of E3810, [(+/-)-sodium 2-[[4-(3-methoxpropoxy)-3-methylpyridin-2-yl]methylsulfinyl] -1H-benzimidazole] a new proton pump inhibitor, and omeprazole with diazepam in relation to S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation status.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifteen healthy male volunteers consisting of six poor metabolizers and nine extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation participated in the study, where two poor and three extensive metabolizers each as a group were randomly allocated to one of the three different treatment sequences with a 3-week washout period among the three trial phases. Each volunteer received an oral once-daily dose of E3810 (20 mg), omeprazole (20 mg), or placebo for 23 days and an intravenous dose (0.1 mg/kg) of diazepam on posttreatment day 8. Plasma concentrations of diazepam and demethyldiazepam were measured up to 16 days after the administration of diazepam.

RESULTS

Diazepam was more slowly metabolized in the poor metabolizers than in the extensive metabolizers. No significant effects of E3810 and omeprazole on any kinetic parameters of diazepam were observed in the poor metabolizers. In the extensive metabolizers, omeprazole significantly decreased the mean clearance of diazepam and increased its half-life, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and mean residence time compared with E3810 and placebo (p < 0.05 or 0.01), whereas no changes in these kinetic parameters were observed during the treatment with E3810. Omeprazole significantly increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (0-16 days) of demethyldiazepam in the extensive metabolizers compared with placebo (p < 0.01), whereas E3810 significantly increased it in the poor metabolizers compared with omeprazole or placebo (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that E3810 as a substrate goes less toward S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) and has a much weaker, if any, potential to interact with diazepam compared with omeprazole.

Metabolic disposition of proguanil in extensive and poor metabolisers of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation recruited from an Indonesian population

1. The metabolism of proguanil (PG) was studied by measuring PG, cycloguanil (CG) and 4-chlorophenylbiguanide (CPB) in plasma and urine samples after an oral 200 mg dose of PG hydrochloride administered to 14 extensive (EMs) and 10 poor hydroxylators (PMs) of S-mephenytoin of Indonesian origin. 2. The mean ( +/- s.d.) values of the elimination half-life (t 1/2) and AUC of PG were significantly (P < 0.01) greater in the PM than in the EM group (20.6 +/- 3.1 vs 14.6 +/- 3.5 (95% confidence intervals of difference 3.1 to 8.9) h; and 5.43 +/- 1.89 vs 3.68 +/- 0.83 (0.58 to 2.91) micrograms ml-1 h). 3. Plasma concentrations of CG, an active metabolite, could not be detected in all PMs, and those of CPB were sufficiently high to determine a time-course in only four PMs. Mean AUC(0,24 h) values of CPB were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the PM (n = 4) than in the EM group (n = 14) (0.47 +/- 0.13 vs 0.88 +/- 0.50 (-0.14 to 0.96) micrograms ml-1 h). 4. Log10 percentage urinary recovery of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with the t 1/2 (rs = -0.661) and AUC (rs = -0.652) of PG. 5. PG, CG and CPB were detectable in urine at 12 h in all subjects. Log10 percentage urinary recovery of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin correlated significantly (P < 0.01) with urinary PG/CG (rs = -0.876), PG/CPB (rs = -0.833) and PG/(CG + CPB) (rs = -0.831) metabolic ratios.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)