Autoradiographic localization of vasopressin V1a receptors in the rat kidney using [3H]-SR 49059

Discovery and evaluation of a novel 18F-labeled vasopressin 1a receptor PET ligand with peripheral binding specificity

The arginine-vasopressin (AVP) hormone plays a pivotal role in regulating various physiological processes, such as hormone secretion, cardiovascular modulation, and social behavior. Recent studies have highlighted the V1a receptor as a promising therapeutic target. In-depth insights into V1a receptor-related pathologies, attained through in vivo imaging and quantification in both peripheral organs and the central nervous system (CNS), could significantly advance the development of effective V1a inhibitors. To address this need, we develop a novel V1a-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) ligand, [18F]V1A-2303 ([18F]8), which demonstrates favorable in vitro binding affinity and selectivity for the V1a receptor. Specific tracer binding in peripheral tissues was also confirmed through rigorous cell uptake studies, autoradiography, biodistribution assessments. Furthermore, [18F]8 was employed in PET imaging and arterial blood sampling studies in healthy rhesus monkeys to assess its brain permeability and specificity, whole-body distribution, and kinetic properties. Our research indicated [18F]8 as a valuable tool for noninvasively studying V1a receptors in peripheral organs, and as a foundational element for the development of next-generation, brain-penetrant ligands specifically designed for the CNS.

Metabolic effects of vasopressin in pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease

The diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the major cause of the chronic kidney disease (CKD). Enhanced plasma vasopressin (VP) levels have been associated with the pathophysiology of DKD and CKD. Stimulation of VP release in DKD is caused by glucose-dependent reset of the osmostat leading to secondary pathophysiologic effects mediated by distinct VP receptor types. VP is a stress hormone exhibiting the antidiuretic action in the kidney along with broad adaptive effects in other organs. Excessive activation of the vasopressin type 2 (V2) receptor in the kidney leads to glomerular hyperfiltration and nephron loss, whereas stimulation of vasopressin V1a or V1b receptors in the liver, pancreas, and adrenal glands promotes catabolic metabolism for energy mobilization, enhancing glucose production and aggravating DKD. Increasing availability of selective VP receptor antagonists opens new therapeutic windows separating the renal and extra-renal VP effects for the concrete applications. Improved understanding of these paradigms is mandatory for further drug design and translational implementation. The present concise review focuses on metabolic effects of VP affecting DKD pathophysiology.

Vasopressin Increases Urinary Acidification via V1a Receptors in Collecting Duct Intercalated Cells

BACKGROUND

Antagonists of the V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) are emerging as a strategy for slowing progression of CKD. Physiologically, V1aR signaling has been linked with acid-base homeostasis, but more detailed information is needed about renal V1aR distribution and function.

METHODS

We used a new anti-V1aR antibody and high-resolution microscopy to investigate Va1R distribution in rodent and human kidneys. To investigate whether V1aR activation promotes urinary H⁺ secretion, we used a V1aR agonist or antagonist to evaluate V1aR function in vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro rats, bladder-catheterized mice, isolated collecting ducts, and cultured inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells.

RESULTS

Localization of V1aR in rodent and human kidneys produced a basolateral signal in type A intercalated cells (A-ICs) and a perinuclear to subapical signal in type B intercalated cells of connecting tubules and collecting ducts. Treating vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro rats with a V1aR agonist decreased urinary pH and tripled net acid excretion; we observed a similar response in C57BL/6J mice. In contrast, V1aR antagonist did not affect urinary pH in normal or acid-loaded mice. In ex vivo settings, basolateral treatment of isolated perfused medullary collecting ducts with the V1aR agonist or vasopressin increased intracellular calcium levels in ICs and decreased luminal pH, suggesting V1aR-dependent calcium release and stimulation of proton-secreting proteins. Basolateral treatment of IMCD cells with the V1aR agonist increased apical abundance of vacuolar H⁺-ATPase in A-ICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that activation of V1aR contributes to urinary acidification via H⁺ secretion by A-ICs, which may have clinical implications for pharmacologic targeting of V1aR.

Copeptin in Preeclampsia Development

Background:

Preeclampsia complicates 2-8% of all pregnancies worldwide and is one of the leading causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. It occurs after the 20th week of gestation and is characterized by high blood pressure, proteinuria or end-organ disease. The heterogeneous and multi-systemic nature of this disease has led to the elusive pathophysiology which delays timely diagnoses and the clinical treatment of those affected.

Objective:

Despite the extensive investigations surrounding the inclusion of various potential markers for PE prediction, early diagnosis remains unresolved. Quantification of copeptin, a stable component of the arginine vasopressin (AVP) precursor is shown to be relatively reliable in confirming the circulating levels of AVP.

Conclusion:

Elevated copeptin levels confirmed in pregnant women have also provided clinical support for its role in PE development. However, its clinical use in predicting disease severity in early-onset pre-eclampsia has been debatable. This review thus recapitulates the current literature surrounding copeptin and its potential as a risk indicator for PE development.</P>

Vasopressin: physiology, assessment and osmosensation

Vasopressin (AVP) plays a major role in the regulation of water and sodium homeostasis by its antidiuretic action on the kidney, mediated by V2 receptors. AVP secretion is stimulated by a rise in plasma osmolality, a decline in blood volume or stress. V1a receptors are expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells, but the role of vasopressin in blood pressure regulation is still a matter of debate. AVP may also play a role in some metabolic pathways, including gluconeogenesis, through its action on V1a receptors expressed in the liver. It is now understood that thirst and arginine vasopressin (AVP) release are regulated not only by the classical homeostatic, intero-sensory plasma osmolality negative feedback, but also by novel, extero-sensory, anticipatory signals. AVP measurement is time-consuming, and AVP level in the blood in the physiological range is often below the detection limit of the assays. Recently, an immunoassay has been developed for the measurement of copeptin, a fragment of the pre-provasopressin molecule that is easier to measure. It has been shown to be a good surrogate marker of AVP.

Vasopressin: a novel target for the prevention and retardation of kidney disease?

After several decades during which little attention was paid to vasopressin and/or urine concentration in clinical practice, interest in vasopressin has renewed with the availability of new, potent, orally active vasopressin-receptor antagonists--the vaptans--and with the results of epidemiological studies evaluating copeptin (a surrogate marker of vasopressin) in large population-based cohorts. Several experimental studies in rats and mice had previously shown that vasopressin, acting via vasopressin V2 antidiuretic receptors, contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease; in particular, to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. New epidemiological studies now suggest a role for vasopressin in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and metabolic disorders via activation of hepatic V1a and/or pancreatic islet V1b receptors. The first part of this Review describes the adverse effects of vasopressin, as revealed by clinical and experimental studies in kidney diseases, hypertension, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. The second part provides insights into vasopressin physiology and pathophysiology that may be relevant to the understanding of these adverse effects and that are linked to the excretion of concentrated nitrogen wastes and associated hyperfiltration. Collectively, the studies reviewed here suggest that more attention should be given to the vasopressin-thirst-urine concentration axis in clinical investigations and in patient care. Whether selective blockade of the different vasopressin receptors may provide therapeutic benefits beyond their present indication in hyponatraemia requires new clinical trials.

Renal interstitial hyaluronan: functional aspects during normal and pathological conditions

The glycosaminoglycan (GAG) hyaluronan (HA) is recognized as an important structural component of the extracellular matrix, but it also interacts with cells during embryonic development, wound healing, inflammation, and cancer; i.e., important features in normal and pathological conditions. The specific physicochemical properties of HA enable a unique hydration capacity, and in the last decade it was revealed that in the interstitium of the renal medulla, where the HA content is very high, it changes rapidly depending on the body hydration status while the HA content of the cortex remains unchanged at very low amounts. The kidney, which regulates fluid balance, uses HA dynamically for the regulation of whole body fluid homeostasis. Renomedullary HA elevation occurs in response to hydration and during dehydration the opposite occurs. The HA-induced alterations in the physicochemical characteristics of the interstitial space affects fluid flux; i.e., reabsorption. Antidiuretic hormone, nitric oxide, angiotensin II, and prostaglandins are classical hormones/compounds involved in renal fluid handling and are important regulators of HA turnover during variations in hydration status. One major producer of HA in the kidney is the renomedullary interstitial cell, which displays receptors and/or synthesis enzymes for the hormones mentioned above. During several kidney disease states, such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, tubulointerstitial inflammation, renal transplant rejection, diabetes, and kidney stone formation, HA is upregulated, which contributes to an abnormal phenotype. In these situations, cytokines and other growth factors are important stimulators. The immunosuppressant agent cyclosporine A is nephrotoxic and induces HA accumulation, which could be involved in graft rejection and edema formation. The use of hyaluronidase to reduce pathologically overexpressed levels of tissue HA is a potential therapeutic tool since diuretics are less efficient in removing water bound to HA in the interstitium. Although the majority of data describing the role of HA originate from animal and cell studies, the available data from humans demonstrate that an upregulation of HA also occurs in diabetic kidneys, in transplant-rejected kidneys, and during acute tubular necrosis. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding interstitial HA in the role of regulating kidney function during normal and pathological conditions. It encompasses mechanistic insights into the background of the heterogeneous intrarenal distribution of HA; i.e., late nephrogenesis, its regulation during variations in hydration status, and its involvement during several pathological conditions. Changes in hyaluronan synthases, hyaluronidases, and binding receptor expression are discussed in parallel.

Effects of the renal medullary pH and ionic environment on vasopressin binding and signaling

The kidney has a cortico-medullary interstitial gradient of decreasing pH and increasing concentrations of sodium chloride and urea, but the influence of these gradients on receptor signaling is largely unknown. Here, we measured G-protein coupled receptor function in LLC-PK1 cells acutely exposed to conditions mimicking different kidney regions. Signaling through the parathyroid hormone receptor, normally expressed in the cortex, was greatly reduced at an acidic pH similar to that of the inner medulla. Parathyroid hormone receptor, tagged with green fluorescent protein, showed no ligand-induced internalization. In contrast, under both acidic and hyperosmotic conditions, vasopressin increased intracellular cAMP, and upon binding to its type 2 receptor (V2R) was internalized and degraded. Dose-displacement binding assays with selective vasopressin/oxytocin receptor ligands under inner medullary conditions indicated a shift in the V2R pharmacological profile. Oxytocin did not bind to the V2R, as it does under normal conditions and the vasopressin type 1 receptor (V1R) had reduced affinity for vasopressin compared to the V2R in low pH and high osmolality. We suggest that the cortico-medullary gradient causes a receptor-specific selectivity in ligand binding that is of functional significance to the kidney. While the gradient is important for urinary concentration, it may also play a substantial role in fine-tuning of the vasopressin response through the V2R.

Sodium excretion in response to vasopressin and selective vasopressin receptor antagonists

The mechanisms by which arginine vasopressin (AVP) exerts its antidiuretic and pressor effects, via activation of V2 and V1a receptors, respectively, are relatively well understood, but the possible associated effects on sodium handling are a matter of controversy. In this study, normal conscious Wistar rats were acutely administered various doses of AVP, dDAVP (V2 agonist), furosemide, or the following selective non-peptide receptor antagonists SR121463A (V2 antagonist) or SR49059 (V1a antagonist). Urine flow and sodium excretion rates in the next 6 h were compared with basal values obtained on the previous day, after vehicle treatment, using each rat as its own control. The rate of sodium excretion decreased with V2 agonism and increased with V2 antagonism in a dose-dependent manner. However,for comparable increases in urine flow rate, the V2 antagonist induced a natriuresis 7-fold smaller than did furosemide. Vasopressin reduced sodium excretion at 1 mug/kg but increased it at doses >5 umg/kg,an effect that was abolished by the V1a antagonist. Combined V2 and V1a effects of endogenous vasopressin can be predicted to vary largely according to the respective levels of vasopressin in plasma,renal medulla (acting on interstitial cells), and urine (acting on V1a luminal receptors). In the usual range of regulation, antidiuretic effects of vasopressin may be associated with variable sodium retention. Although V2 antagonists are predominantly aquaretic, their possible effects on sodium excretion should not be neglected. In view of their proposed use in several human disorders, the respective influence of selective (V2) or mixed (V1a/V2) receptor antagonists on sodium handling in humans needs reevaluation.

Biological characterization of rodent and human vasopressin V1b receptors using SSR-149415, a nonpeptide V1b receptor ligand

[3H]SSR-149415 is the first tritiated nonpeptide vasopressin V1b receptor (V1bR) antagonist ligand. It was used for studying rodent (mouse, rat, hamster) and human V1bR from native or recombinant origin. Moreover, a close comparison between the human and the mouse V1bR was performed using SSR-149415/[3H]SSR-149415 in binding and functional studies in vitro. [3H]SSR-149415 binding was time-dependent, reversible, and saturable. Scatchard plot analysis gave a single class of high-affinity binding sites with apparent equilibrium dissociation constant ( Kd) ∼1 nM and maximum binding density (Bmax) values from 7,000 to 300,000 sites/cell according to the cell line. In competition experiments, [3H]SSR-149415 binding was stereospecific and dose-dependently displaced by reference peptide and nonpeptide arginine vasopressin (AVP)/OT ligands following a V1b rank order of affinity: SSR-149415 = AVP > dCha > dPen > dPal > dDavp > SSR-126768A > SR-49059 > SSR-149424 > OT > SR-121463B. Species differences between human, rat, mouse, and hamster V1bR were observed. Autoradiography studies with [3H]SSR-149415 on rat and human pituitary showed intense specific labeling confined to corticotroph cells and absence of labeling in the other tissues examined. SSR-149415 potently and stereospecifically antagonized the AVP-induced inositol phosphate production and intracellular Ca2+ increase (EC50 from 1.83 to 3.05 nM) in recombinant cell lines expressing either the mouse or the human V1bR. AVP (10−7 M) exposure of AtT20 cells expressing mouse or human EGFP-tagged V1bR induced their rapid internalization. Preincubation with 10−6 M SSR-149415 counteracted the internalization process. Moreover, recycling of internalized receptors was observed upon 10−6 M SSR-149415 treatment. Thus SSR-149415/[3H]SSR-149415 are unique tools for studying animal and human V1bR.

Mechanism of vasopressin-induced contraction of renal medullary interstitial cells

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Previous studies have identified a contractile function for renomedullary interstitial cells (RMIC). Such studies focused on the mechanism of endothelin-1-induced RMIC contraction; however, vasopressin (AVP) was also noted to contract RMIC. Since AVP-induced RMIC contraction may be relevant to the medullary effects of AVP on urinary concentration, these initial observations have been extended to examination of the mechanism of AVP-induced RMIC contraction.

METHODS

Cultured rat RMIC were exposed to AVP and other agents, and examined using video microscopy.

RESULTS

AVP caused a slowly developing and dose-dependent reduction in RMIC surface area. AVP-induced RMIC contraction was abolished by blockade of V1, but not V2, receptors. Nifedipine and nickel reduced AVP-stimulated RMIC contraction, indicating that this effect is dependent upon dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels. H7, a protein kinase C inhibitor, completely abrogated AVP action, while the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NMMA, had no effect. Indomethacin enhanced AVP-induced RMIC contraction, and addition of PGE2 together with indomethacin reduced AVP action.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that AVP potently contracts RMIC via V1 receptor stimulation of PKC and intracellular calcium accumulation, and that AVP-stimulated prostaglandin production downregulates the contractile effect of AVP on RMIC. AVP modulation of RMIC contraction may be involved in the regulation of urinary concentration.

The effect of AVP-V receptor stimulation on local GFR in the rat kidney

AIM

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) might influence urinary concentration ability by altering the intrarenal distribution of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

METHODS

To study this possibility we have measured the intracortical distribution of GFR following acute AVP-V1 receptor stimulation in anaesthetized female Sprague-Dawley (SPD) rats during euvolemia and water diuresis by the aprotinin method, allowing two consecutive measurements of zonal GFR in the same kidney.

RESULTS

Acute i.v. bolus injection of 50 ng V1 receptor agonist ([Phe2, Ile3, Orn8]-vasopressin) followed by a continuous infusion of 5 ng min(-1) in euvolemic rats reduced GFR by 25% in outer cortex (OC), 20% in middle cortex (MC) and 19% in inner cortex (IC) relative to vehicle infusion (all P < 0.05). In water diuretic rats V1 receptor agonist reduced GFR by 22% in OC, 10% in MC and 11% in IC relative to vehicle infusion (P < 0.05). GFR decreased slightly more in OC than in MC and IC in both euvolemic and water diuretic rats (P < 0.05) indicating a distribution of GFR towards MC and IC. Acute infusion of the selective non-peptide V1 receptor antagonist OPC-21268 in euvolemic rats reduced GFR by 14% in OC, 13% in MC and 11% in IC relative to vehicle infusion (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the layers.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in distribution of GFR not only between OC and IC, but also between OC and MC suggests that the afferent/efferent arterioles and not the medullary vasa recta is the main site of resistance change. We conclude that acute i.v. infusion of V1 receptor agonist in high doses reduces GFR more in superficial than in deep cortex in both euvolemic and water diuretic rats and that this may be of some importance for water conservation, adding to the V2- receptor effect on water permeability of the collecting ducts.

Comparative pharmacology of bovine, human and rat vasopressin receptor isoforms

In this study, we characterized the bovine vasopressin V(1a), V(1b), V(2) receptor isoforms and compared their pharmacological properties to those of corresponding rat and human vasopressin receptor subtypes. Specific binding sites of high affinity for vasopressin were found in all bovine tissues tested (kidney, liver and pituitary). Using a large series of recent peptidic and non-peptidic selective vasopressin agonists or antagonists, we demonstrated the presence of vasopressin V(2), V(1a) or V(1b) receptors in the kidney, liver and pituitary bovine tissues, respectively. This extensive characterization of bovine vasopressin receptor isoforms validates the pharmacological vasopressin receptor classification earlier established for the rat and human species. As expected, the bovine vasopressin receptors look much more like human receptors than rat ones. Interestingly, among the three vasopressin receptor isoforms studied, the vasopressin V(1b) receptor subtype is the best conserved for the three species studied.

Characterisation of vasopressin V(1A), angiotensin AT(1) and AT(2) receptor distribution and density in normotensive and hypertensive rat brain stem and kidney: effects of restraint stress

In the present study, we have examined neurochemical correlates that may be involved in the differential cardiovascular responses observed in normotensive and hypertensive rats during stress. Using a restraint stress paradigm, both normotensive Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and Spontaneously Hypertensive rats (SHR) underwent acute (1 h restraint in a perspex tube), chronic (1 h restraint for ten consecutive days) or no restraint (control) stress. Following cessation of restraint, rats were processed by incubating sections of brain stem and kidney with [125I]-HO-LVA (0.03 nM) or [125I]Sar(1)Ile(8)-AngiotensinII (0.5 nM), in the presence of PD123319 (10 microM) or losartan (10 microM), to determine the distribution and density of vasopressin V(1A), angiotensin AT(1) and AT(2) receptors, respectively. Analysis of autoradiograms indicated changes in the density of radioligand binding in acutely and chronically-stressed rats, as compared to controls. For example, V(1A) binding in the medial nucleus tractus solitarius (SolM) decreased in the WKY but increased in the SHR. AT(1) binding in SolM did not significantly change in the WKY but decreased in the SHR with repeated restraint. In kidney slices, AT(1) binding decreased with stress in the WKY (-17%) but increased in SHR (+10-15%). AT(2) binding in the kidney showed a pattern similar to that of AT(1) binding in SHR, but not WKY. Graded increases in V(1A) binding were measured in kidney medulla and cortex of both strains (+50-60% with chronic restraint). These results suggest that physiological adaptation to restraint is associated with specific changes in V(1A), AT(1) and AT(2) receptor density within brain nuclei and kidney.

Binding properties of a selective tritiated vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, [H]-SR 121463

BACKGROUND

[3H]-SR 121463 is the first radiolabeled selective nonpeptide vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist ligand that has been reported to date. In the present work, we studied the binding properties of [3H]-SR 121463 for renal V2 receptors from animal and human origins.

METHODS

Binding studies were performed with [3H]-SR 121463 in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the human V2 receptor and in various kidney preparations expressing the native V2 receptors (rat, rabbit, dog, pig, monkey, and human). Autoradiographies were performed in rat and human kidney sections.

RESULTS

[3H]-SR 121463 binding to CHO cells stably transfected with the cloned human renal V2 receptor was specific, highly stable, time dependent, saturable, and reversible. A single population of high-affinity binding sites was identified (Kd = 0.94 +/- 0.34 nmol/L, Bmax = 9876 +/- 317 fmol/mg protein). Of note, [3H]-SR 121463 revealed a higher number (about 40%) of V2 sites than [3H]-AVP in the same preparation. Displacement of [3H]-SR 121463 binding by reference peptide and nonpeptide vasopressin/oxytocin compounds exhibited a typical AVP V2 profile. [3H]-SR 121463 also displayed a high affinity for native V2 receptors in several kidney preparations from rat, pig, dog, rabbit, bovine, monkey, and human. The autoradiographic experiments using rat and human kidney sections showed intense labeling in the medullopapillary region and lower intensity in the cortex, consistent with a main localization of V2 receptors on collecting tubules.

CONCLUSION

[3H]-SR 121463 is a useful ligand for the specific labeling of animal and human V2 receptors and could be a suitable probe for the search and in situ localization of V2 sites.

Renomedullary interstitial cells: a target for endocrine and paracrine actions of vasoactive peptides in the renal medulla

1. The renal medulla plays an important role in regulating body sodium and fluid balance and blood pressure homeostasis through its unique structural relationships and interactions between renomedullary interstitial cells (RMIC), renal tubules and medullary vasculature. 2. Several endocrine and/or paracrine factors, including angiotensin (Ang)II, endothelin (ET), bradykinin (BK), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and vasopressin (AVP), are implicated in the regulation of renal medullary function and blood pressure by acting on RMIC, tubules and medullary blood vessels. 3. Renomedullary interstitial cells express multiple vasoactive peptide receptors (AT1, ETA, ETB, BK B2, NPRA and NPRB and V1a) in culture and in tissue. 4. In cultured RMIC, AngII, ET, BK, ANP and AVP act on their respective receptors to induce various cellular responses, including contraction, prostaglandin synthesis, cell proliferation and/or extracellular matrix synthesis. 5. Infusion of vasoactive peptides or their antagonists systemically or directly into the medullary interstitium modulates medullary blood flow, sodium excretion and urine osmolarity. 6. Overall, expression of multiple vasoactive peptide receptors in RMIC, which respond to various vasoactive peptides and paracrine factors in vitro and in vivo, supports the hypothesis that RMIC may be an important paracrine target of various vasoactive peptides in the regulation of renal medullary function and long-term blood pressure homeostasis.

Characterization of rodent liver and kidney AVP receptors: pharmacologic evidence for species differences

Radioligand binding studies with [3H]vasopressin (AVP) were used to determine the affinities of AVP receptor agonists and antagonists for mouse liver and kidney plasma membrane preparations. Both membrane preparations exhibited one class of high-affinity binding site. AVP ligand binding inhibition studies confirmed that mouse liver binding sites belong to the V1A subtype while kidney binding sites belong to the V2 receptor subtype. The affinity of each ligand for mouse V1A receptors was very similar to that for rat V1A receptors, showing differences in Ki values of less than 3-fold. In contrast, several peptide (d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP) and nonpeptide (OPC-21268 and SR 49059) ligands had different affinities for mouse and rat kidney V2 receptors, with differences in Ki values ranging from 14- to 17-fold. These results indicate that mouse and rat kidney V2 receptors show significant pharmacologic differences.

Vasopressin binding sites in the central nervous system: distribution and regulation

High affinity binding sites for vasopressin (VP) are widely distributed within the rat brain and spinal cord. Since their presence is associated with neuronal sensitivity to VP application, their anatomical distribution maps structures which could be activated by endogenous VP. Interestingly, marked species-related differences of the VP receptor distribution have been revealed. Some evidence has also been provided that mechanisms of receptor regulation may vary among species. In the rat, the expression of VP binding sites in some motor nuclei shows remarkable plasticity, in particular up-regulation after axotomy. These data suggest that VP may, in addition to affecting motoneuronal excitability, act as a trophic factor onto motoneurones.

Visualization of cell surface vasopressin V1a receptors in rat hepatocytes with a fluorescent linear antagonist

To visualize cell surface V1a vasopressin receptors in rat hepatocytes in the absence of receptor-mediated endocytosis, we used a high-affinity fluorescent linear antagonist, Rhm8-PVA. Epifluorescence microscopy (3CCD camera) and fluorescence spectroscopy were used. Rhm8-PVA alone did not stimulate Ca2+ signals and competitively blocked Ca2+ signals (Kinact of 3.0 nM) evoked by arginine vasopressin (vasopressin). When rat hepatocytes were incubated with 10 nM of Rhm8-PVA for 30 min at 4C, the fluorescent antagonist bound to the surface of cells, presumably the plasma membrane. The V1a receptor specificity of Rhm8-PVA binding was confirmed by its displacement by the nonfluorescent antagonist V4253 and by the natural hormone vasopressin at 4C. Prior vasopressin-mediated endocytosis of V1a receptors at 37C abolished binding of the labeled antagonist, whereas in non-preincubated cells, Rhm8-PVA labeled the cell surface of rat hepatocytes. When cells labeled with Rhm8-PVA at 4C were warmed to 37C to initiate receptor-mediated internalization of the fluorescent complex, Rhm8-PVA remained at the cell surface. Incubation temperature at 4C or 37C had little effect on binding of Rhm8-PVA. We conclude that Rhm8-PVA is unable to evoke receptor-mediated endocytosis and can readily be used to visualize cell surface receptors in living cells.

Immunolocalization of V1 vasopressin receptors in the rat kidney using anti-receptor antibodies

By using immunocytochemical techniques we have been able to localize the V1 vasopressin receptor in the rat kidney. Immunoblotting using an antiserum raised against an affinity-purified vasopressin receptor showed a 55,000 daltons protein band that has a molecular mass similar to that of the liver V1 vasopressin receptor, as demonstrated by cross-linking studies. Immunoblotting of the antibody showed a band of 55,000 daltons in A-10 cells, which contains the V1 subtype, whereas it did not stain LLC-PK1 cells, which possess the V2 subtype, showing that the antibody recognizes the V1 vasopressin receptor. The immunostaining of kidney sections with this antiserum showed a strong reaction of the connecting tubules and cortical and medullary collecting ducts. The immunostaining pattern of connecting tubule and collecting duct cells was different, that is, the former showed a staining of both the apical and basal plasma membrane but also in the cytoplasm, whereas the latter showed a strong reaction mainly in the basolateral membrane. Immunostaining of consecutive serial sections with an antiserum raised against tissue kallikrein, an enzyme present exclusively in connecting tubules, and with the anti-receptor serum allowed us to show, for the first time, the presence of the vasopressin receptor in the connecting tubule cells and their absence in intercalated cells, the other cell type present in connecting tubules. These findings support experiments carried in the eighties on the release of renal tissue kallikrein by AVP.

Characterization of SR 121463A, a highly potent and selective, orally active vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist

SR 121463A, a potent and selective, orally active, nonpeptide vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has been characterized in several in vitro and in vivo models. This compound displayed highly competitive and selective affinity for V2 receptors in rat, bovine and human kidney (0.6 < or = Ki [nM] < or = 4.1). In this latter preparation, SR 121463A potently antagonized arginine vasopressin (AVP)-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (Ki = 0.26+/-0.04 nM) without any intrinsic agonistic effect. In autoradiographic experiments performed in rat kidney sections, SR 121463A displaced [3H]AVP labeling especially in the medullo-papillary region and confirmed that it is a suitable tool for mapping V2 receptors. In comparison, the nonpeptide V2 antagonist, OPC-31260, showed much lower affinity for animal and human renal V2 receptors and lower efficacy to inhibit vasopressin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (Ki in the 10 nanomolar range). Moreover, OPC-31260 exhibited a poor V2 selectivity profile and can be considered as a V2/V1a ligand. In normally hydrated conscious rats, SR 121463A induced powerful aquaresis after intravenous (0.003-0.3 mg/kg) or oral (0.03-10 mg/kg) administration. The effect was dose-dependent and lasted about 6 hours at the dose of 3 mg/kg p.o. OPC-31260 had a similar aquaretic profile but with markedly lower oral efficacy. The action of SR 121463A was purely aquaretic with no changes in urine Na+ and K+ excretions unlike that of known diuretic agents such as furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide. In addition, no antidiuretic properties have been detected with SR 121463A in vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro rats. Thus, SR 121463A is the most potent and selective, orally active V2 antagonist yet described and could be a powerful tool for exploring V2 receptors and the therapeutical usefulness of V2 blocker aquaretic agents in water-retaining diseases.