Kinase inhibitor ibrutinib to prevent cytokine-release syndrome after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for B-cell neoplasms

Long-term remission in a patient with relapsed Richter's transformation treated with CD19-directed chimeric antigen-receptor T-cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Patients with Richter's transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL-RT) face a dismal prognosis. A 51-year-old female patient diagnosed with CLL with deletion (17p) in 2009. CLL treatment included chemoimmunotherapy and targeted substances. DLBCL-RT was diagnosed in November 2016. After receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, she relapsed in September 2019 and tisagenlecleucel was infused in December 2019. Cytokine release syndrome grade 2 was treated with two doses of tocilizumab and the patient was started on 140 mg ibrutinib in February 2020. Our patient remains in remission up to 4 years after CAR T-cell treatment.

Advancing CAR T-cell therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: exploring resistance mechanisms and the innovative strategies to overcome them

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has ushered in substantial advancements in the management of various B-cell malignancies. However, its integration into chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment has been challenging, attributed largely to the development of very effective chemo-free alternatives. Additionally, CAR T-cell responses in CLL have not been as high as in other B-cell lymphomas or leukemias. However, a critical void exists in therapeutic options for patients with high-risk diseases who are resistant to the current CLL therapies, underscoring the urgency for adoptive immunotherapies in these patients. The diminished CAR T-cell efficacy within CLL can be traced to factors such as compromised T-cell fitness due to persistent antigenic stimulation inherent to CLL. Resistance mechanisms encompass tumor-related factors like antigen escape, CAR T-cell-intrinsic factors like T-cell exhaustion, and a suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). New strategies to combat CAR T-cell resistance include the concurrent administration of therapies that augment CAR T-cell endurance and function, as well as the engineering of novel CAR T-cells targeting different antigens. Moreover, the concept of "armored" CAR T-cells, armed with transgenic modulators to modify both CAR T-cell function and the tumor milieu, is gaining traction. Beyond this, the development of readily available, allogeneic CAR T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells presents a promising countermeasure to innate T-cell defects in CLL patients. In this review, we explore the role of CAR T-cell therapy in CLL, the intricate tapestry of resistance mechanisms, and the pioneering methods studied to overcome resistance.

Management of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

In this review we summarize the current evidence describing the management of patients with relapsed/refractory MCL and outline the various novel therapeutics that have been developed over the past two decades. We also describe how overall response rates, complete response rates, duration of responses, and life expectancy have dramatically increased with the introduction of novel therapies, particularly covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The most recent emerging options for patients with progressive disease following BTKi or CAR-T, including non-covalent BTKi, antibody-drug conjugates, Bcl-2 inhibitors, and bispecific antibodies, may further improve response rates and outcomes. Future directions should focus on identifying the best sequencing and/or combinations of the increasingly available treatment options while prioritizing strategies with curative potential.

Transforming CLL management with immunotherapy: Investigating the potential of CAR T-cells and bispecific antibodies

Immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies or T-cell engagers, have revolutionized the treatment landscape for various B-cell malignancies, including B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and many non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Despite their significant impact on these malignancies, their application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) management is still largely under investigation. Although the initial success of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy was observed in 3 multiply relapsed CLL patients, with 2 of them surviving over 10 years without relapse, recent CAR T-cell therapy trials in CLL have shown reduced response rates compared to their efficacy in other B-cell malignancies. One of the challenges with using immunotherapy in CLL is the compromised T-cell fitness from persistent CLL-related antigenic stimulation, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). These challenges underscore a critical gap in therapeutic options for CLL patients intolerant or resistant to current therapies, emphasizing the imperative role of effective immunotherapy. Encouragingly, innovative strategies are emerging to overcome these challenges. These include integrating synergistic agents like ibrutinib to enhance CAR T-cell function and persistence and engineering newer CAR T-cell constructs targeting diverse antigens or employing dual-targeting approaches. Bispecific antibodies are an exciting "off-the-shelf" prospect for these patients, with their investigation in CLL currently entering the realm of clinical trials. Additionally, the development of allogeneic CAR T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells from healthy donors presents a promising solution to address the diminished T-cell fitness observed in CLL patients. This comprehensive review delves into the latest insights regarding the role of immunotherapy in CLL, the complex landscape of resistance mechanisms, and a spectrum of innovative approaches to surmount therapeutic challenges.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapies for cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome due to CAR T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have revolutionized the treatment of multiple hematologic malignancies. Engineered cellular therapies now offer similar hope to transform the management of solid tumors and autoimmune diseases. However, toxicities can be serious and often require hospitalization.

AREAS COVERED

We review the two chief toxicities of CAR T therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the rarer immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. We discuss treatment paradigms and promising future pharmacologic strategies. Literature and therapies reviewed were identified by PubMed search, cited references therein, and review of registered trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of CRS and ICANS has improved, aided by consensus definitions and guidelines that facilitate recognition and timely intervention. Further data will define optimal timing of tocilizumab and corticosteroids, current foundations of management. Pathophysiologic understanding has inspired off-label use of IL-1 receptor antagonism, IFNγ and IL-6 neutralizing antibodies, and janus kinase inhibitors, with data emerging from ongoing clinical trials. Further strategies to reduce toxicities include novel pharmacologic targets and safety features engineered into CAR T cells themselves. As these potentially curative therapies are used earlier in oncologic therapy and even in non-oncologic indications, effective accessible strategies to manage toxicities are critical.

Early predictive factors of failure in autologous CAR T-cell manufacturing and/or efficacy in hematologic malignancies

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown significant benefits in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, such as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-cell lymphoma. Despite the therapeutic advances offered by these innovative treatments, failures are still observed in 15% to 40% of patients with B-ALL and >50% of patients with B-cell lymphoma. Several hypotheses have emerged including CD19-negative or -positive relapses, low CAR T-cell activation and/or expansion in vivo, or T-cell exhaustion. To date, in the European Union, CAR T cells granted with marketing authorization are autologous and thus associated with a strong heterogeneity between products. Indeed, the manufacturing of a single batch requires cellular starting material collection by apheresis for each patient, with variable cellular composition, and then challenging pharmaceutical companies to standardize as much as possible the production process. In addition, these cost and time-consuming therapies are associated with a risk of manufacturing failure reaching 25%. Thus, there is a growing need to identify early risk factors of unsuccessful production and/or therapeutic escape. Quality of the apheresis product, pathology progression, as well as previous treatments have been reported as predictive factors of the variability in clinical response. The aim of this review is to report and discuss predictive factors that could help to anticipate the manufacturing success and clinical response.

Building safety into CAR-T therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is an innovative immunotherapeutic approach that utilizes genetically modified T-cells to eliminate cancer cells using the specificity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) coupled to the potent cytotoxicity of the T-lymphocyte. CAR-T therapy has yielded significant improvements in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Given these successes, CAR-T has quickly spread to other hematologic malignancies and is being increasingly explored in solid tumors. From early clinical applications to present day, CAR-T cell therapy has been accompanied by significant toxicities, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and on-target off-tumor (OTOT) effects. While medical management has improved for CRS and ICANS, the ongoing threat of refractory symptoms and unanticipated idiosyncratic toxicities highlights the need for more powerful safety measures. This is particularly poignant as CAR T-cell therapy continues to expand into the solid tumor space, where the risk of unpredictable toxicities remains high. We will review CAR-T as an immunotherapeutic approach including emergence of unique toxicities throughout development. We will discuss known and novel strategies to mitigate these toxicities; additional safety challenges in the treatment of solid tumors, and how the inducible Caspase 9 "safety switch" provides an ideal platform for continued exploration.

Cellular Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Have We Advanced in the Last Decade?

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous B-cell malignancy, affecting mainly older adults. Despite the recent introduction of multiple targeted agents, CLL remains an incurable disease. Cellular therapy is a promptly evolving area that has developed over the last decades from such standard of care as hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to the novel treatment modalities employing genetically engineered immune cells.

SUMMARY

Tailoring the proper treatment for each patient is warranted and should take into account the disease biology, patient characteristics, and the available treatment modalities. Nowadays, the most broadly applied cellular therapies for CLL management are HCT and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells. However, CAR-T cell therapy is currently not yet approved in CLL, and the appropriate sequencing for the administration of these agents remains to be clarified.

KEY MESSAGES

The current review will discuss various available cellular treatment options, their advances and limitations, as well as the optimal timing for the employment of such therapies in CLL patients.

Bispecific antibody targeting TGF-β and PD-L1 for synergistic cancer immunotherapy

The PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in cancer immune evasion, and the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies represents a significant milestone in cancer immunotherapy. However, the low response rate observed in unselected patients and the development of therapeutic resistance remain major obstacles to their clinical application. Accumulating studies showed that overexpressed TGF-β is another immunosuppressive factor apart from traditional immune checkpoints. Actually, the effects of PD-1 and TGF-β pathways are independent and interactive, which work together contributing to the immune evasion of cancer cell. It has been verified that blocking TGF-β and PD-L1 simultaneously could enhance the efficacy of PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and overcome its treatment resistance. Based on the bispecific antibody or fusion protein technology, multiple bispecific and bifunctional antibodies have been developed. In the preclinical and clinical studies, these updated antibodies exhibited potent anti-tumor activity, superior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapies. In the review, we summarized the advances of bispecific antibodies targeting TGF-β and PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy. We believe these next-generation immune checkpoint inhibitors would substantially alter the cancer treatment paradigm, especially in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-resistant patients.

Strategies for Reducing Toxicity and Enhancing Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies has made great progress, but there are still some problems. First, T cells from tumor patients show an exhaustion phenotype; thus, the persistence and function of the CAR-Ts are poor, and achieving a satisfactory curative effect is difficult. Second, some patients initially respond well but quickly develop antigen-negative tumor recurrence. Thirdly, CAR-T treatment is not effective in some patients and is accompanied by severe side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. The solution to these problems is to reduce the toxicity and enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. In this paper, we describe various strategies for reducing the toxicity and enhancing the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in hematological malignancies. In the first section, strategies for modifying CAR-Ts using gene-editing technologies or combining them with other anti-tumor drugs to enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy are introduced. The second section describes some methods in which the design and construction of CAR-Ts differ from the conventional process. The aim of these methods is to enhance the anti-tumor activity of CAR-Ts and prevent tumor recurrence. The third section describes modifying the CAR structure or installing safety switches to radically reduce CAR-T toxicity or regulating inflammatory cytokines to control the symptoms of CAR-T-associated toxicity. Together, the knowledge summarized herein will aid in designing better-suited and safer CAR-T treatment strategies.

Cellular Therapies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Richter’s Transformation: Recent Developments in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells, Natural Killer Cells, and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Cellular therapies can be viewed as both the newest and oldest techniques for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter’s transformation (RT). On one hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been available for decades, though its use is diminishing with the increasing availability of effective novel targeted agents, especially in CLL. Among newer techniques, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) have demonstrated astounding efficacy in several hematologic malignancies, leading to FDA approval and use in clinical practice. However, though CLL is the earliest disease type for which CAR-T were studied, development has been slower and has yet to lead to regulatory approval. Owing partially to its rarity but also due to the aggressive behavior of RT, CAR-T in RT have only been minimally explored. Here, we will focus on the applications of cellular therapies in CLL and RT, specifically reviewing more recent data related to alloHSCT in the novel-agent era and CAR-T cell development in CLL/RT, focusing on safety and efficacy successes and limitations. We will review strategies to improve upon CAR-T efficacy and discuss ongoing trials utilizing CAR-T in CLL/RT, as well as emerging technologies, such as allogeneic CAR-T and natural killer CAR (CAR NK) cells.

Outcomes of CD19-directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Transformed Non-follicular Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL). Transformed non-follicular lymphomas (tNFLs) (including transformed marginal zone lymphoma [tMZL] and transformed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [tCLL/SLL]) were not included in their respective pivotal studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of axi-cel and tisa-cel in tNFL patients, including those who received ibrutinib concomitantly through apheresis, lymphodepletion, and CAR-T infusion.

STUDY DESIGN

This single-center retrospective study included all patients with tCLL/SLL, tMZL, tFL, and DLBCL/PMBCL treated with CAR-T therapy outside of a clinical trial setting from November 2017 to May 2021 at Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA. We analyzed the outcomes in patients with tCLL/SLL or tMZL and compared that to patients with DLBCL/tFL.

RESULTS

The study included 134 patients who received a total of 136 CAR-T treatments (111 with axi-cel and 25 with tisa-cel). Ninety patients had de novo DLBCL/PMBCL; 23 had tFL; and 21 had tNFL (12 with tMZL and 9 with tCLL/SLL). The overall response and complete response rates for tCLL/SLL were 66.7% and 55.6%, respectively; and for tMZL they were 92.9% and 71.4%, respectively. The overall response and complete response rates between tNFL and the DLBCL/tFL were not different (P = .92 and .81, respectively). At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for tCLL/SLL was 5.4 months (95% CI, 0.8-not assessable [NA]); for tMZL, the median PFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 2.3-NA), and for DLBCL/tFL the median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 5.6-NA) (P = .58). The estimated 1-year PFS rate for tCLL/SLL was 29.6% (95% CI, 5.2-60.7), and for tMZL was 50.0% (95% CI, 22.9-72.2). The estimated 1-year PFS rate for tNFL was 42.7% (95% CI, 22.4-61.6), and for DLBCL/tFL was 53.0% (95% CI, 42.3-62.5). The median overall survival was NR (95% CI, 9.2-NA) for tCLL/SLL, 27.1 months (95% CI, 8.5-NA) for tMZL, and NR (95% CI, 17.4-NA) for DLBCL/tFL (P = .79). Compared to the DLBCL/tFL cohort, tNFL patients were more likely to develop immune cellular-associated neurologic syndrome and receive tocilizumab (P = .04 and .01, respectively, after controlling for CAR-T product) and with possibly higher incidence of grade 3 or worse cytokine release syndrome (P = .07). Two patients in the tNFL cohort died of treatment related toxicity after receiving axi-cel. Six tNFL patients received ibrutinib concurrently with tisa-cel with one case of grade 3 or higher CRS/ICANS that rapidly resolved and no other severe toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Our case series supports the use of CD19 CAR T cell therapy in r/r tCLL/SLL and tMZL. The use of concurrent ibrutinib with tisa-cel in tNFL was associated with manageable toxicity in tNFL.

Small-Molecule Compounds Boost CAR-T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies

OPINION STATEMENT

Although chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy has been successfully applied in patients with hematological malignancies, several obstacles still need to be overcome, such as high relapse rates and side effects. Overcoming the limitations of CAR-T cell therapy and boosting the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy are urgent issues that must be addressed. The exploration of small-molecule compounds in combination with CAR-T cell therapies has achieved promising success in pre-clinical and clinical studies in recent years. Protein kinase inhibitors, demethylating drugs, HDAC inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, Akt inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitors exhibited potential synergy in combination with CAR-T cell therapy. In this review, we will discuss the recent application of these combination therapies for improved outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy.

Safety evaluation of axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and three CD19 CAR T-cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel) are currently approved for this indication. Despite the clinical benefit of CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy, this treatment is associated with significant morbidity from treatment-emergent toxicities.

AREAS COVERED

This Review discusses the safety considerations of axicabtagene ciloleucel in patients with LBCL. This includes discussion of the frequently observed immune-mediated toxicities of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Additionally, we review CAR T-cell therapy related cytopenias, infection, organ dysfunction and the more recently described hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

EXPERT OPINION

A thorough understanding of the toxicities associated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy will facilitate the optimal selection of patients for this therapy. Furthermore, knowledge of preventative measures of CAR T-cell related complications, and early recognition and appropriate intervention will lead to the safe administration of these therapies, and ultimately improved outcomes for our patients.

The current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors: Mechanisms, research progress, challenges, and counterstrategies

The successful outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in treating hematologic cancers have increased the previously unprecedented excitement to use this innovative approach in treating various forms of human cancers. Although researchers have put a lot of work into maximizing the effectiveness of these cells in the context of solid tumors, few studies have discussed challenges and potential strategies to overcome them. Restricted trafficking and infiltration into the tumor site, hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), antigen escape and heterogeneity, CAR T-cell exhaustion, and severe life-threatening toxicities are a few of the major obstacles facing CAR T-cells. CAR designs will need to go beyond the traditional architectures in order to get over these limitations and broaden their applicability to a larger range of malignancies. To enhance the safety, effectiveness, and applicability of this treatment modality, researchers are addressing the present challenges with a wide variety of engineering strategies as well as integrating several therapeutic tactics. In this study, we reviewed the antigens that CAR T-cells have been clinically trained to recognize, as well as counterstrategies to overcome the limitations of CAR T-cell therapy, such as recent advances in CAR T-cell engineering and the use of several therapies in combination to optimize their clinical efficacy in solid tumors.

Novel pathophysiological insights into CAR-T cell associated neurotoxicity

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a scientific breakthrough in the treatment of advanced hematological malignancies. It relies on cell engineering to direct the powerful cytotoxic T-cell activity toward tumor cells. Nevertheless, these highly powerful cell therapies can trigger substantial toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurological syndrome (ICANS). These potentially fatal side effects are now better understood and managed in the clinic but still require intensive patient follow-up and management. Some specific mechanisms seem associated with the development of ICANS, such as cytokine surge caused by activated CAR-T cells, off-tumor targeting of CD19, and vascular leak. Therapeutic tools are being developed aiming at obtaining better control of toxicity. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of ICANS, novel findings, and current gaps.

Evaluating the Patient with Neurotoxicity after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are now a well-established treatment for hematologic malignancies. Their use in clinical practice has expanded quite rapidly and hospitals have developed CAR T-cell protocols to evaluate patients for associated toxicities, and particularly for neurotoxicity. There are many variables that influence the risk for developing this complication, many of which are not fully understood. The severity can be related to a particular product. Clinical vigilance is critical to facilitate early recognition of neurotoxicity, hence the importance of pre-CAR T-cell neurological evaluation of each patient. While details of such an evaluation may slightly differ between institutions, generally a comprehensive neurological evaluation including assessment of cognitive abilities along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is a gold standard. Management of neurotoxicity requires a well-orchestrated team approach with specialists from oncology, neurology, oftentimes neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care. Diagnostic work-up frequently includes detailed neurologic evaluation with comparison to the baseline assessment, imaging of the brain, electroencephalogram, and lumbar puncture. While steroids are uniformly used for treatment, many patients also receive tocilizumab for an underlying and frequently concomitant cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in addition to symptom-driven supportive care. Novel CAR T-cell constructs and other agents allowing for potentially lower risk of toxicity are being explored. While neurotoxicity is predominantly an early, and reversible, event, a growing body of literature suggests that late neurotoxicity with variable clinical presentation can also occur.

The pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CAR-T cell therapy-related adverse reactions

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is effective in the treatment of refractory/relapsed (r/r) hematological malignancies (r/r B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia, B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma). In addition, it is being explored as a treatment option for solid tumors. As of 31 March 2022, seven CAR-T therapies for hematological malignancies have been approved worldwide. Although CAR-T therapy is an effective treatment for many malignancies, it also causes adverse effects. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the most common adverse reaction after infusion of CAR-T cells, is as high as 93%.CRS, is the leading risk factor of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), as well as cardiovascular, hematological, hepatorenal, skin, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal toxicity. Severe adverse reactions complicated by CRS severely impede the widespread application of CAR-T therapy. The CAR-T product was initially approved in 2017; however, only limited studies have investigated the adverse reactions owing to CAR-T therapy compared to that of clinically approved drugs. Thus, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of toxicities concurrent with CRS, thereby providing a valuable reference for the safe, effective, and widespread application of CAR-T therapy.

Recent Advances and Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy helps a person’s immune system to target tumor cells. Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and cancer vaccination, have changed the landscape of cancer treatment. These approaches have had profound success in certain cancer types but still fail in the majority of cases. This review will cover both successes and current challenges in cancer immunotherapy, as well as recent advances in the field of basic tumor immunology that will allow us to overcome resistance to existing treatments.

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the field of oncology in recent years. Harnessing the immune system to treat cancer has led to a large growth in the number of novel immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and cancer vaccination. In this review, we will discuss the current landscape of immuno-oncology research, with a focus on elements that influence immunotherapeutic outcomes. We will also highlight recent advances in basic aspects of tumor immunology, in particular, the role of the immunosuppressive cells within the tumor microenvironment in regulating antitumor immunity. Lastly, we will discuss how the understanding of basic tumor immunology can lead to the development of new immunotherapeutic strategies.

Novel strategies for the mitigation of cytokine release syndrome induced by T cell engaging therapies with a focus on the use of kinase inhibitors

T cell engaging therapies, like CAR-T cells and T cell engagers, redirect T cells toward tumor cells, facilitating the formation of a cytotoxic synapse and resulting in subsequent tumor cell killing. T cell receptor or CAR-T downstream signaling triggers a release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can induce a Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS). The incidence of CRS is still hardly predictable among individuals and remains one of the major dose-limiting safety liabilities associated with on-target activity of T cell engaging therapies. This emphasizes the need to elaborate mitigation strategies, which reduce cytokine release while retaining efficacy. Here, we review pre-clinical and clinical approaches applied for the management of CRS symptoms in the context of T cell engaging therapies, highlighting the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as an emerging mitigation strategy. In particular, we focus on the effects of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), Src family including Lck, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK) inhibitors on T cell functionality and cytokine release, to provide a rationale for their use as mitigation strategies against CRS in the context of T cell engaging therapies.

Assessment of Salvage Regimens Post CAR-T Cell Therapy for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR19) represents a critical treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the majority of patients will subsequently experience disease progression following CAR19 and there is limited data assessing the best salvage regimen for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes in DLBCL patients with progressive disease post CAR19 and to assess variables that predict response to salvage therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with DLBCL who received CAR19 at our institution from January 2018 to February 2021. Demographics, disease characteristics, best response to CAR19, date of relapse or progression, and first salvage therapy and response to salvage were also collected. We analyzed patients according to whether they responded to CAR19 (responders) or did not (non-responders). Salvage regimens were classified into 6 groups for analysis. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Cox models were fit to evaluate the effect of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients who received CAR19 during the analysis period, 69 patients achieved a CR/PR to CAR19 (responders), 44 patients achieved SD/PD to CAR19, and 7 died before assessment (51 non-responders). 30 responders relapsed and 26 received salvage therapy, while 24 non-responders received salvage. The primary salvage regimens that were utilized included lenalidomide-based regimens (n=17, 34%), BTKi (n=10, 20%), checkpoint inhibitor based (n=7, 14%), chemo-immunotherapy (n=5, 10%), allo (n=5, 10%), and other (n=6, 12%). There was no significant difference in OS based on salvage regimen (p=0.4545). Responders who received salvage had significantly longer OS compared to non-responders (median OS not reached vs. 10.9 months; p=0.0187), and response to CAR19 and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level at time of salvage treatment were the only two statistically significant prognostic factors after accounting for other variables.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes for responders to CAR19 are significantly better with salvage therapy as compared to non-responders to CAR19. There was no significant difference in outcomes seen based on salvage regimen in our study. Future research is needed to assess the best salvage regimen post CAR19 failure.

Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Beyond BTK Inhibitors

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with historically poor outcomes. Virtually all patients will eventually experience refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease, with a virulent course of resistance and serial relapses, making treatment challenging. The available therapies for R/R MCL are not curative with conventional therapy, their goal being to palliate and prolong survival. A variety of agents approved for R/R MCL, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), changed the treatment landscape of R/R MCL. In the pre-BTKi era, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in R/R disease was 4-9 months. With the introduction of ibrutinib, the median PFS improved to 13-14.6 months. Despite these impressive results, the duration of response is limited, and resistance to BTKi inevitably develops in a subset of patients. Outcomes after progression on BTKi are extremely poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 6 to 10 months. Certain therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have shown promising results after BTKi failure. The preferred combination and sequencing of therapies beyond BTKi remain unestablished and are currently being investigated. In this review, we describe the current evidence for the available treatment of R/R MCL after progression on BTKi.

Enhanced Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy through Co-Application of Synergistic Combination Partners

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has achieved remarkable response rates and revolutionized the treatment of patients suffering from defined hematological malignancies. However, many patients still do not respond to this therapy or relapse after an initial remission, underscoring the need for improved efficacy. Insufficient in vivo activity, persistence, trafficking, and tumor infiltration of CAR T cells, as well as antigen escape and treatment-associated adverse events, limit the therapeutic success. Multiple strategies and approaches have been investigated to further improve CAR T cell therapy. Besides genetic modification of the CAR itself, the combination with other treatment modalities has the potential to improve this approach. In particular, combining CAR T cells with clinically approved compounds such as monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors might be a promising strategy. Combination partners could already be applied during the production process to influence the cellular composition and immunophenotype of the final CAR T cell product. Alternatively, simultaneous administration of clinically approved compounds with CAR T cells would be another feasible avenue. In this review, we will discuss current strategies to combine CAR T cells with compounds to overcome recent limitations and further enhance this promising cancer therapy, potentially broadening its application beyond hematology.

Neurotoxicity of Tumor Immunotherapy: The Emergence of Clinical Attention

Tumor immunotherapy brings substantial and long-term clinical benefits that can even cure tumors. However, the accumulation of evidence suggests that immunotherapy also induces severe and complex neurologic immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs) and even leads to immunotherapy-related death, which arouses the concern of clinicians. The timely and accurate identification of neurotoxicity helps clinicians detect and treat these complications early, thereby enhancing treatment efficiency and improving the prognosis of patients. At present, the mechanism of neurotoxicity caused by immunotherapy has not been completely elucidated. This paper mainly reviews the clinical features, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies of neurologic ir-AEs.

Mechanisms of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome after CAR-T treatment

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment has revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy with significant efficacy on hematologic malignancy, especially in relapsed and refractory B cell malignancies. However, unexpected serious toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) still hamper its broad application. Clinical trials using CAR-T cells targeting specific antigens on tumor cell surface have provided valuable information about the characteristics of ICANS. With unclear mechanism of ICANS after CAR-T treatment, unremitting efforts have been devoted to further exploration. Clinical findings from patients with ICANS strongly indicated existence of overactivated peripheral immune response followed by endothelial activation-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, which triggers subsequent central nervous system (CNS) inflammation and neurotoxicity. Several animal models have been built but failed to fully replicate the whole spectrum of ICANS in human. Hopefully, novel and powerful technologies like single-cell analysis may help decipher the precise cellular response within CNS from a different perspective when ICANS happens. Moreover, multidisciplinary cooperation among the subjects of immunology, hematology, and neurology will facilitate better understanding about the complex immune interaction between the peripheral, protective barriers, and CNS in ICANS. This review elaborates recent findings about ICANS after CAR-T treatment from bed to bench, and discusses the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms that may promote effective management in the future. This article is categorized under: Cancer > Biomedical Engineering Immune System Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology Neurological Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology.

Cellular Therapy Advances in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Richter's Syndrome

Over the past 10 years, there have been great treatment advances for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the development of small molecule inhibitors. However, there remains an area of unmet need for patients who progress on novel therapies. The development of cellular therapies in CLL has been hindered by CLL induced immunosuppression. Fortunately, recent progress in various methods in immunomodulation may help overcome this limitation in CLL. These advances have spurred ongoing interest in the development of cellular therapies for CLL, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, bi-specific antibodies, and use of natural killer cells. These novel treatment modalities may hold promise for patients with refractory, and potentially transformed disease. Here, we discuss the development of CAR-T cell therapy in CLL and the impact of combining CAR-T and small molecule inhibitors on treatment outcomes, the evolving role of bi-specific antibodies and natural killer cells, and comment on the use of cellular therapies for Richter's syndrome.

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Based on unprecedented response rates and durability of response in high risk B-cell lymphoma patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was rapidly approved by the FDA for a variety of lymphoma subtypes. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is now considered standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) after 2 or more lines of therapy. Three second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products have been FDA approved for R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma and FDA approval has been obtained for Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Follicular lymphoma as well. This has ensured broad access to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with NHL and new real-world trials have helped confirm feasibility of CAR T-cell therapy for a broad patient population. The emergence of CAR T-cell therapy will likely provide a new patient population who is status post anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Investigation of mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and clinical trials to study strategies to address this are thus required. Here we provide a thorough review on the use of the FDA approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and touch on mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and potential approaches which are currently under investigation to address this.

Mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CAR T-cell therapy and associated prevention and management strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has yielded impressive outcomes and transformed treatment algorithms for hematological malignancies. To date, five CAR T-cell products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, some significant toxicities pose great challenges to the development of CAR T-cell therapy, most notably cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Understanding the mechanisms underlying these toxicities and establishing prevention and treatment strategies are important. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying CRS and ICANS and provide potential treatment and prevention strategies.

Management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome: Current and emerging approaches

The most common adverse event associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is cytokine release syndrome, which is characterized by fever, hypoxia, and hypotension in varying degrees of severity. In severe cases, cytokine release syndrome can result in life-threatening symptoms such as multi-organ failure. The widely accepted first-line therapy for cytokine release syndrome management is tocilizumab with or without corticosteroids, but there is very limited guidance on the proper management of patients unresponsive to this regimen. There are emerging strategies that target cytokine release syndrome through novel mechanisms, showing promise in treating or preventing severe cytokine release syndrome. Although further clinical investigation is necessary to assess the applicability of the emerging approaches, these exploratory therapies may shape the future landscape of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome management. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging therapies for the management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome, especially cases that are refractory to tocilizumab and steroids.

Multifaceted Immunomodulatory Effects of the BTK Inhibitors Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Different Immune Cell Subsets - Beyond B Lymphocytes

The clinical success of the two BTK inhibitors, ibrutinib and acalabrutinib, represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has also revolutionized the treatment options for other B cell malignancies. Increasing evidence indicates that in addition to their direct effects on B lymphocytes, both BTK inhibitors also directly impact the homeostasis, phenotype and function of many other cell subsets of the immune system, which contribute to their high efficacy as well as adverse effects observed in CLL patients. In this review, we attempt to provide an overview on the overlapping and differential effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on specific receptor signaling pathways in different immune cell subsets other than B cells, including T cells, NK cells, monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells, osteoclasts, mast cells and platelets. The shared and distinct effects of ibrutinib versus acalabrutinib are mediated through BTK-dependent and BTK-independent mechanisms, respectively. Such immunomodulatory effects of the two drugs have fueled myriad explorations of their repurposing opportunities for the treatment of a wide variety of other human diseases involving immune dysregulation.

Novel CAR T therapy is a ray of hope in the treatment of seriously ill AML patients

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a serious, life-threatening, and hardly curable hematological malignancy that affects the myeloid cell progenies and challenges patients of all ages but mostly occurs in adults. Although several therapies are available including chemotherapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), and receptor-antagonist drugs, the 5-year survival of patients is quietly disappointing, less than 30%. alloHSCT is the major curative approach for AML with promising results but the treatment has severe adverse effects such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Therefore, as an alternative, more efficient and less harmful immunotherapy-based approaches such as the adoptive transferring T cell therapy are in development for the treatment of AML. As such, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are engineered T cells which have been developed in recent years as a breakthrough in cancer therapy. Interestingly, CAR T cells are effective against both solid tumors and hematological cancers such as AML. Gradually, CAR T cell therapy found its way into cancer therapy and was widely used for the treatment of hematologic malignancies with successful results particularly with somewhat better results in hematological cancer in comparison to solid tumors. The AML is generally fatal, therapy-resistant, and sometimes refractory disease with a disappointing low survival rate and weak prognosis. The 5-year survival rate for AML is only about 30%. However, the survival rate seems to be age-dependent. Novel CAR T cell therapy is a light at the end of the tunnel. The CD19 is an important target antigen in AML and lymphoma and the CAR T cells are engineered to target the CD19. In addition, a lot of research goes on the discovery of novel target antigens with therapeutic efficacy and utilizable for generating CAR T cells against various types of cancers. In recent years, many pieces of research on screening and identification of novel AML antigen targets with the goal of generation of effective anti-cancer CAR T cells have led to new therapies with strong cytotoxicity against cancerous cells and impressive clinical outcomes. Also, more recently, an improved version of CAR T cells which were called modified or smartly reprogrammed CAR T cells has been designed with less unwelcome effects, less toxicity against normal cells, more safety, more specificity, longer persistence, and proliferation capability. The purpose of this review is to discuss and explain the most recent advances in CAR T cell-based therapies targeting AML antigens and review the results of preclinical and clinical trials. Moreover, we will criticize the clinical challenges, side effects, and the different strategies for CAR T cell therapy.

Combining selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs) with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for CD19‑positive malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against CD19 (CD19.CAR T cells) have yielded impressive clinical responses in the treatment of patients with lymphoid malignancies. However, resistance and/or relapse can limit treatment outcome. Risk of tumor escape can be reduced by combining treatment strategies. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs) directed against nuclear exportin‑1 (XPO1) have demonstrated anti‑tumor efficacy in several hematological malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of CAR T cells with the SINE compounds eltanexor and selinexor. As expected, eltanexor and selinexor were toxic to CD19‑positive malignant cells and the sensitivity of cells towards SINEs correlated with the levels of XPO1‑expression in ALL cell lines. When SINEs and CAR T cells were simultaneously combined, SINEs exerted toxicity towards CAR T cells and impaired their function affecting cytotoxicity and cytokine release ability. Flow cytometry and western blot analysis revealed that eltanexor decreased the cytoplasmic concentration of the transcription factor phosphorylated‑STAT3 in CAR T cells. Due to CAR T‑cell toxicity, sequential use of SINEs and CAR T cells was evaluated: Cytotoxicity of CAR T cells increased significantly when target cells were pre‑treated with the SINE compound eltanexor. In addition, exhaustion of CAR T cells decreased when target cells were pre‑treated with eltanexor. In summary, whereas the concomitant use of SINEs and CAR T cells does not seem advisable, sequential use of SINEs and CAR T cells might improve the anti‑tumor efficacy of CAR T cells.

Current combinatorial CAR T cell strategies with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown high efficacy in patients with refractory B-cell malignancies such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Despite promising results, responses are not durable in most patients. In addition, patients receiving CD19 CAR T cell therapy are at risk of developing severe, potentially life-threatening, adverse events including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Many combinatorial approaches are currently being investigated to improve CAR T cell in vivo function, antitumor effects, and mitigate toxicities. In this review, we discuss the use of ibrutinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with CAR T cell therapy in patients with lymphoid B-cell malignancies.

Making Potent CAR T Cells Using Genetic Engineering and Synergistic Agents

Immunotherapies are emerging as powerful weapons for the treatment of malignancies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells have shown dramatic clinical results in patients with hematological malignancies. However, it is still challenging for CAR T cell therapy to be successful in several types of blood cancer and most solid tumors. Many attempts have been made to enhance the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy by modifying the CAR construct using combination agents, such as compounds, antibodies, or radiation. At present, technology to improve CAR T cell therapy is rapidly developing. In this review, we particularly emphasize the most recent studies utilizing genetic engineering and synergistic agents to improve CAR T cell therapy.

CAR-T Cell Therapy: Mechanism, Management, and Mitigation of Inflammatory Toxicities

Engineered T cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells (CAR-T cells) have great potential to treat many human diseases; however, inflammatory toxicities associated with these therapies present safety risks and can greatly limit its widespread use. This article briefly reviews our current understanding of mechanisms for inflammatory toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy, current strategies for management and mitigation of these risks and highlights key areas of knowledge gap for future research.

Pretreatment with ibrutinib reduces cytokine secretion and limits the risk of obinutuzumab-induced infusion-related reactions in patients with CLL: analysis from the iLLUMINATE study

Anti-CD20 antibody treatments, such as obinutuzumab, have been associated with infusion-related reactions (IRRs). In the phase 3 iLLUMINATE study of ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, IRRs were substantially reduced with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. We prospectively analyzed inflammatory cytokines to evaluate the impact of ibrutinib on circulating cytokine levels following obinutuzumab infusion. In iLLUMINATE, ibrutinib or chlorambucil was given approximately 30-120 min before the first obinutuzumab infusion. Cytokines evaluated were IFNγ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNFα. Changes in peak cytokine levels from baseline (immediately before obinutuzumab) to post-obinutuzumab infusion were compared between arms and between patients with versus without IRRs using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Of 228 treated patients, 95 on ibrutinib-obinutuzumab (15 with IRRs, 80 without) and 88 on chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (45 with IRRs, 43 without) with cytokine data were included. Irrespective of IRR occurrence, median increase in cytokines was lower with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for all cytokines (P < 0.01) except MIP-1β. Across treatment arms, post-obinutuzumab median increase in all cytokines except MIP-1β was greater in patients with versus without IRRs (P < 0.001). IL-6 and IL-8 elevations were associated with IRRs in both treatment arms. Among patients with IRRs, those receiving ibrutinib-obinutuzumab had lower post-obinutuzumab increases in IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MCP-1 (P < 0.04) than patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. For patients in the ibrutinib-treatment arm, we observed a reduction in both the rate of clinically apparent IRRs and the levels of IRR-related cytokines and chemokines. This observation supports an immunomodulatory mechanism of action for ibrutinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02264574.

Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy

A paradigm shift has recently occurred in the field of cancer therapeutics. Traditional anticancer agents, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and small-molecule drugs targeting specific signalling pathways, have been joined by cellular immunotherapies based on T cell engineering. The rapid adoption of novel, patient-specific cellular therapies builds on scientific developments in tumour immunology, genetic engineering and cell manufacturing, best illustrated by the curative potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CD19-expressing malignancies. However, the clinical benefit observed in many patients may come at a cost. In up to one-third of patients, significant toxicities occur that are directly associated with the induction of powerful immune effector responses. The most frequently observed immune-mediated toxicities are cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. This Review discusses our current understanding of their pathophysiology and clinical features, as well as the development of novel therapeutics for their prevention and/or management.

This Review discusses our current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, and how this might be used for the prevention or management of these toxicities.

C(h)AR-ting a new course in incurable lymphomas: CAR T cells for mantle cell and follicular lymphomas

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has transformed the natural history of relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Based on these results, CD19 CAR T cells have since been tested in largely incurable lymphomas, including mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma, with promising early results that raise the question of whether this cellular immunotherapy could have curative potential and change the natural history of these diseases. This article reviews these results and this hypothesis.

Ibrutinib improves the efficacy of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in patients with refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The efficacy and side effects of the second‐time humanized CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19‐CAR) T‐cell therapy after unsuccessful first‐time anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy and subsequent ibrutinib salvage treatment were observed in patients with refractory B‐cell lymphoma. In our study, 3 patients with refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and 4 patients with refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) reached stable disease (SD), partial remission (PR), or progression of disease (PD) after first‐time humanized anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy. They received ibrutinib as a salvage treatment and kept an SD in the following 7‐16 mo, but their disease progressed again during ibrutinib salvage treatment. All 7 patients received a second‐time humanized anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy, which was the same as their first‐time anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy. In total, 3 MCL patients and 3 FL patients reached complete response (CR) with the second‐time anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy combined with ibrutinib, whereas 1 FL patient reached PR. There were no differences in the transduction efficiency and proliferation between the 2 instances of anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy. However, the second‐time anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy led to higher peaks of anti‐CD19‐CAR T cells and anti‐CD19‐CAR gene copies, but also to higher grades of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and more serious hematological toxicity. The successful outcome of the second‐time anti‐CD19‐CAR T‐cell therapy might suggest that the previous ibrutinib treatment improved the activities of anti‐CD19‐CAR T cells.

Bispecific Antibodies: A Review of Development, Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity in B-Cell Lymphomas

The treatment landscape of B-cell lymphomas is evolving with the advent of novel agents including immune and cellular therapies. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are molecules that recognise two different antigens and are used to engage effector cells, such as T-cells, to kill malignant B-cells. Several bispecific antibodies have entered early phase clinical development since the approval of the CD19/CD3 bispecific antibody, blinatumomab, for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Novel bsAbs include CD20/CD3 antibodies that are being investigated in both aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma with encouraging overall response rates including complete remissions. These results are seen even in heavily pre-treated patient populations such as those who have relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Potential toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity and tumour flare, with a number of strategies existing to mitigate these risks. Here, we review the development of bsAbs, their mechanism of action and the different types of bsAbs and how they differ in structure. We will present the currently available data from clinical trials regarding response rates, progression free survival and outcomes across a range of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Finally, we will discuss the key toxicities of bsAbs, their rates and management of these adverse events.

The evolving role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Ibrutinib, the first in class of the oral covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, has profoundly changed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The phase III RESONATE and RESONATE-2 trials first demonstrated the superiority of ibrutinib over ofatumumab in the relapsed/refractory setting and over chlorambucil in older patients with de novo disease. The phase III ECOG–ACRIN trial extended these results to young, fit patients, demonstrating a significant survival advantage to ibrutinib plus rituximab over fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Similarly, the Alliance trial demonstrated the superiority of ibrutinib over bendamustine with rituximab as frontline in elderly patients. Challenges with ibrutinib include toxicity, development of resistance, and need for indefinite therapy. The second generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib may cause less off-target toxicity. The ELEVATE TN trial demonstrated the superiority of acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab over chlorambucil and obinutuzumab as frontline therapy for elderly or comorbid patients. Promising early results from the phase II CAPTIVATE and CLARITY trials, which combined ibrutinib with venetoclax, suggest a future role for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing to determine treatment duration. The ongoing phase III GAIA/CLL13, ECOG EA9161, Alliance A041702, CLL17, and [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03836261] trials will assess various combinations of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and anti-CD20 antibodies. These trials will answer key questions in the treatment of CLL: should novel agents in CLL be used in combination or sequentially? What is the best frontline agent? Can treatment be safely stopped with BTK inhibitors? Can undetectable MRD be used to determine treatment duration? In this review, we will discuss these and other aspects of the evolving role of BTK inhibition in CLL.

Toxicities of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of Experience From Clinical Trials, Pathophysiology, and Management Strategies

In the last few years, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as elotuzumab and daratutumab have brought the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) into the new era of immunotherapy. More recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cell, a novel cellular immunotherapy, has been developed for treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM, and early phase clinical trials have shown promising efficacy of CAR T cell therapy. Many patients with end stage RRMM regard CAR T cell therapy as their “last chance” and a “hope of cure”. However, severe adverse events (AEs) and even toxic death related to CAR T cell therapy have been observed. The management of AEs related to CAR T cell therapy represents a new challenge, as the pathophysiology is not fully understood and there is still no well-established standard of management. With regard to CAR T cell associated toxicities in MM, in this review, we will provide an overview of experience from clinical trials, pathophysiology, and management strategies.

Myeloid cell and cytokine interactions with chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy: implication for future therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a revolutionary tool in the treatment of cancer. CAR-T cells exhibit their effector functions through the recognition of their specific antigens on tumor cells and recruitment of other immune cells. However, this therapy is limited by the development of severe toxicities and modest antitumor activity in solid tumors. The host and tumor microenvironment interactions with CAR-T cells play an important role in orchestrating CAR-T-cell functions. Specifically, myeloid lineage cells and their cytokines critically influence the behavior of CAR-T cells. Here, we review the specific effects of myeloid cell interactions with CAR-T cells, their impact on CAR-T-cell response and toxicities, and potential efforts to modulate myeloid cell effects to enhance CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy and reduce toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Independent studies and correlative science from clinical trials indicate that inhibitory myeloid cells and cytokines contribute to the development of CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and impairment of their effector functions.

SUMMARY

These findings illuminate a novel way to reduce CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and enhance their efficacy through the modulation of myeloid lineage cells and inhibitory cytokines.

Cytokine and Chemokine Signals of T-Cell Exclusion in Tumors

The success of cancer immunotherapy in solid tumors depends on a sufficient distribution of effector T cells into malignant lesions. However, immune-cold tumors utilize many T-cell exclusion mechanisms to resist immunotherapy. T cells have to go through three steps to fight against tumors: trafficking to the tumor core, surviving and expanding, and maintaining the memory phenotype for long-lasting responses. Cytokines and chemokines play critical roles in modulating the recruitment of T cells and the overall cellular compositions of the tumor microenvironment. Manipulating the cytokine or chemokine environment has brought success in preclinical models and early-stage clinical trials. However, depending on the immune context, the same cytokine or chemokine signals may exhibit either antitumor or protumor activities and induce unwanted side effects. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the cytokine and chemokine signals is the premise of overcoming T-cell exclusion for effective and innovative anti-cancer therapies.

Triggers, Timescales, and Treatments for Cytokine-Mediated Tissue Damage

Inflammation is an essential cytokine-mediated process for generating a neutralizing immune response against pathogens and is generally protective. However, aberrant or excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with uncontrolled local and systemic inflammation, resulting in cell death and often irreversible tissue damage. Uncontrolled inflammation can manifest over timescales spanning hours to years and is primarily dependent on the triggering event. Rapid and potentially lethal increase in cytokine production, or a 'cytokine storm,' develops in hours to days and is associated with cancer cell-based immunotherapies, such as CAR-T cell therapy. On the other hand, some bacterial and viral infections with high microbial replication or highly potent antigens elicit immune responses that result in supraphysiological systemic cytokine concentrations which manifest over days to weeks. Immune dysregulation in autoimmune diseases can lead to chronic cytokine-mediated tissue damage spanning months to years, which often occurs episodically. While the initiating events and cellular participants may differ in these disease processes, many of the cytokines that drive disease progression are shared. For example, upregulation of IL-1, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF, and GM-CSF frequently coincides with cytokine storm, sepsis, and autoimmune disease. Targeted inhibition of these pro-inflammatory molecules via antagonist monoclonal antibodies has improved clinical outcomes, but the complexity of the underlying immune dysregulation results in high variability. Rather than a "one size fits all" treatment approach, an identification of disease endotypes may permit the development of effective therapeutic strategies that address the contributors of disease progression. Here, we present a literature review of the cytokine-associated etiology of acute and chronic cytokine-mediated tissue damage, describe successes and challenges in developing clinical treatments, and highlight advancements in preclinical therapeutic strategies for mitigating pathological cytokine production.

Are losartan and imatinib effective against SARS-CoV2 pathogenesis? A pathophysiologic-based in silico study

Proposing a theory about the pathophysiology of cytokine storm in COVID19, we were to find the potential drugs to treat this disease and to find any effect of these drugs on the virus infectivity through an in silico study. COVID-19-induced ARDS is linked to a cytokine storm phenomenon not explainable solely by the virus infectivity. Knowing that ACE2, the hydrolyzing enzyme of AngII and SARS-CoV2 receptor, downregulates when the virus enters the host cells, we hypothesize that hyperacute AngII upregulation is the eliciting factor of this ARDS. We were to validate this theory through reviewing previous studies to figure out the role of overzealous activation of AT1R in ARDS. According to this theory losartan may attenuate ARDS in this disease. Imatinib, has previously been elucidated to be promising in modulating lung inflammatory reactions and virus infectivity in SARS and MERS. We did an in silico study to uncover any probable other unconsidered inhibitory effects of losartan and imatinib against SARS-CoV2 pathogenesis. Reviewing the literature, we could find that over-activation of AT1R could explain precisely the mechanism of cytokine storm in COVID19. Our in silico study revealed that losartan and imatinib could probably: (1) decline SARS-CoV2 affinity to ACE2. (2) inhibit the main protease and furin, (3) disturb papain-like protease and p38MAPK functions. Our reviewing on renin-angiotensin system showed that overzealous activation of AT1R by hyper-acute excess of AngII due to acute downregulation of ACE2 by SARS-CoV2 explains precisely the mechanism of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Besides, based on our in silico study we concluded that losartan and imatinib are promising in COVID19.

Current Immunotherapy Approaches in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are lymphoid malignancies of B- or T-cell origin. Despite great advances in treatment options and significant improvement of survival parameters, a large part of NHL patients either present with a chemotherapy-refractory disease or experience lymphoma relapse. Chemotherapy-based salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory NHL is, however, capable of re-inducing long-term remissions only in a minority of patients. Immunotherapy-based approaches, including bispecific antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and genetically engineered T-cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors, single-agent or in combination with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, chemotherapy or targeted agents demonstrated unprecedented clinical activity in heavily-pretreated patients with NHL, including chemotherapy-refractory cases with complex karyotype changes and other adverse prognostic factors. In this review, we recapitulate currently used immunotherapy modalities in NHL and discuss future perspectives of combinatorial immunotherapy strategies, including patient-tailored approaches.

Taming the beast: CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy for ALL

Treatment with CD19 or CD22-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CD19/CD22 CAR-T) cells achieve complete responses in 60-90% of adults and children with refractory or relapsed (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This led to the approval of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) by the FDA and several European regulatory agencies in ALL patients up to 25 years of age. Although CAR T-cell therapy is likely to transform the ALL therapeutic landscape, its development and wide dissemination have been impacted by the occurrence of significant toxicities; namely, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) have been reported at higher rates in ALL patients compared to other B cell malignancies, particularly in the adult population. Here, we review recent data suggesting a significant proportion of ALL patients are at risk of developing severe, sometimes life-threatening, CRS, and ICANS after CD19 and CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. After describing the key clinical and laboratory features of severe CRS and ICANS, we explore the disease and treatment-related factors that may predict the severity of these toxicities. Last, we review strategies under investigation in the prophylactic and therapeutic settings to improve the safety of CAR T-cells for ALL.