Diagnostic importance of 9p21 homozygous deletion in malignant mesotheliomas

CDKN2A Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Separating Benign From Malignant Mesothelial Proliferations

CDKN2A FISH is a standard method for separating mesotheliomas from reactive mesothelial proliferations, but FISH requires specialized equipment and technical expertise for interpretation. Here, we show that a commercially available CDKN2A CISH probe provides equivalent information but can be easily scored using an ordinary light microscope and does not require specialized training.

Correlation of Histologic Features with Gene Alterations in Pleural Mesothelioma

Histologic features, including architectural patterns, cytologic features, and 2021 World Health Organization nuclear grade have been shown to have prognostic significance in epithelioid diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM). Biphasic and sarcomatoid DPM, regardless of morphology, have worse outcomes. These prognostic findings are well established but the correlation of architectural patterns, cytologic features, and nuclear grade with genetic alterations has not been well studied. To investigate relationships between histologic findings and genomic alterations, 128 treatment-naïve DPM specimens (70% epithelioid, 23% biphasic, and 6.3% sarcomatoid) with next-generation sequencing data were retrospectively reviewed. Alterations in BAP1 were the most common genomic alteration (n = 62, 48%), followed by CDKN2A (n = 49, 38%) and NF2 (n = 38, 30%). NF2 alterations were significantly more frequent in biphasic DPM (53% in biphasic vs 25% in sarcomatoid and 22% in epithelioid DPM; P = .005). In epithelioid DPM, TP53 alterations were associated with the presence of prognostically unfavorable histology, including micropapillary or solid architecture, pleomorphic features, and high nuclear grade. Tumors with low tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) had a higher rate of BAP1 alterations than tumors with higher levels of TILs (67% vs 30%; P = .002). The findings of this study enhance our understanding of the relationships among prognostically significant histologic and molecular features of DPM and provide preliminary data to support increased integration of these findings in clinical diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma.

Role of Immunocytochemistry in the Cytological Diagnosis of Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy of the serosal surfaces with very poor prognosis. It traditionally manifests in older patients and at an advanced stage which results in minimal improvement in prognosis despite the recent advances in management. Early detection would therefore significantly impact management and potentially improve survival. Mesothelioma frequently presents with recurrent effusions, posing cytology as the initial procedure in the workup. A definitive diagnosis would not only spare the patients additional diagnostic procedures but also potentially afford them an opportunity for early surgical intervention and therapy.

SUMMARY

In this article, we review the role of immunocytochemistry (ICC) in the workup of mesothelioma. The various ICC markers to confirm or rule out mesothelial lineage are reviewed. In addition, newly introduced molecular surrogates that confirm the malignant nature of the mesothelial cells and support a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma are discussed. We also briefly discuss the theranostic implications of such markers and potential impact of such recent advances on the cytological diagnosis and reporting of mesothelioma.

KEY MESSAGES

The cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma no longer requires the extensive expertise in morphological analysis and can be offered based on supporting ICC that confirms the mesothelial lineage and malignant nature of the cells.

Prevalence of S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine Phosphorylase (MTAP) Deficiency in Human Cancer: A Tissue Microarray Study on 13,067 Tumors From 149 Different Tumor Types

Loss of S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) expression is a common event in cancer leading to a critical vulnerability of cancer cells towards anti-cancer drugs. Homozygous MTAP deletions result in a complete expression loss that can be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this study, a tissue microarray containing 17,078 samples from 149 different tumor entities was analyzed by IHC, and complete MTAP loss was validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. MTAP loss was observed in 83 of 149 tumor categories, including neuroendocrine neoplasms (up to 80%), Hodgkin lymphoma (50.0%), mesothelioma (32.0% to 36.8%), gastro-intestinal adenocarcinoma (4.0% to 40.5%), urothelial neoplasms (10.5% to 36.7%), squamous cell carcinomas (up to 38%), and various types of sarcomas (up to 20%) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (up to 14%). Homozygous MTAP deletion was found in 90% to 100% of cases with MTAP expression loss in most tumor categories. However, neuroendocrine tumors, Hodgkin lymphomas, and other lymphomas lacked MTAP deletions. MTAP deficiency was significantly linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype in selected tumor entities and the presence of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, absence of PD-L1 expression on immune cells, and a low density of CD8 + lymphocytes. In summary, MTAP deficiency can occur in various tumor entities and is linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and noninflamed tumor microenvironment, but is not always related to deletions. MTAP IHC is of considerable diagnostic value for the detection of neoplastic transformation in multiple different applications.

Female Adnexal Tumor of Probable Wolffian Origin (Wolffian Tumor): A Potential Mimic of Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Wolffian tumor and its nosologic relative, the recently defined STK11 adnexal tumor are rare neoplasms thought to arise from mesonephric remnants. These tumors typically arise in the broad ligament, fallopian tube, and ovarian hilum and although most are associated with a good prognosis, up to 50% of STK11 adnexal tumors demonstrate aggressive clinical behavior. The chief differential diagnoses include endometrioid adenocarcinoma and sex cord stromal tumors. However, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of these tumors exhibit considerable overlap with peritoneal mesothelioma. To fully characterize their immunophenotypic signature, we examined a total of 21 cases (18 Wolffian and 3 STK11 adnexal tumors) with standard markers used in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features were reviewed and additional IHC performed for cases with available material. Patient age ranged from 25 to 73 (mean: 51) years. Sites included adnexa/broad ligament (6, 28%), paratubal (5, 24%), ovary/paraovarian (5, 24%), tubal (intraluminal) (2, 9.5%), pelvis (2, 9.5%), and liver (1, 5%). The mean tumor size was 9.3 cm (range: 0.2 to 22 cm). The histomorphology in most cases (14/21, 66%) consisted of tubular to solid sheets of neoplastic cells lined by columnar to cuboidal cells containing uniform round to oval nuclei. Compressed tubules with slit-like lumens and sieve-like pattern were also seen in at least 7 (33%) cases. Three cases demonstrated interanastomosing cords and trabeculae of epithelioid cells with cribriform and microacinar patterns growing within prominent myxoid stroma as described in STK11 adnexal tumors. In the cases with available IHC for 3 mesothelial markers (calretinin, WT1, D2-40), 55.5% (5 of 9) showed reactivity with all 3 markers. In cases with at least 2 available mesothelial markers, 69% (11/16) were positive for 2 markers (mostly calretinin and WT1). Claudin-4, MOC31, and BER-EP4 were negative in most cases tested (78% [7/9], 71.4% [5/7], and 100% [6/6], respectively). Given the resemblance to mesothelioma, there was initial strong consideration and/or actual misdiagnosis of mesothelioma in 3 cases (14%). In summary, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of Wolffian tumor and its recently defined relative, STK11 adnexal tumor, can lead to misdiagnosis of mesothelioma, particularly when encountered in the disseminated or metastatic setting. Wolffian tumor and STK11 adnexal tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all pelvic and peritoneal mesotheliomas.

Concordance between CDKN2A homozygous deletion and MTAP immunohistochemical loss in fluoroedenite-induced pleural mesothelioma: An immunohistochemical and molecular study on a single-institution series

Fluoroedenite-induced pleural mesothelioma (FE-induced-PM) is a rare and small subset of PM that shares with its asbestos-induced counterpart the same aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis, but that differs from it from a pathogenetic point of view as it is associated with exposure to fluoroedenite, a carcinogenic agent that shows similarities with tremolite amphibolic asbestos fibers. Although it has been demonstrated that asbestos-induced PMs frequently harbor CDKN2A homozygous deletion and that the immunohistochemical loss of MTAP may represent a cheap and reliable surrogate marker for this molecular alteration, little is known about the molecular landscape and the reliability of MTAP immunohistochemistry in this peculiar subset of PM. The study herein presented investigated the prevalence of CDKN2A homozygous deletion and its concordance with MTAP immunohistochemical status on a cohort of 10 cases of FE-induced-PM from patients with environmental exposure to FE fibers, who were residents in the small town of Biancavilla (Sicily, Italy) or nearby areas. CDKN2A homozygous deletions were found in 3 out of 10 cases (30%) and all these cases showed concomitant cytoplasmic loss of MTAP with a concordance rate of 100%. Despite the relatively low number of cases included in our series, MTAP immunohistochemistry seemed to represent a reliable immunohistochemical surrogate marker of CDKNA homozygous deletion even in this subset of PMs.

Investigation of MTAP and BAP1 staining loss and P16/CDKN2A deletion in pleural cytology specimens and its role in the diagnosis of mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Mesothelioma is a malignant neoplasm with a poor survival rate. We aimed to investigate the importance of BAP1, MTAP (IHC), and p16/CDKN2A homozygous deletion (FISH) in cytologic material obtained from pleural effusion sampling, which is a less invasive procedure in the diagnosis of mesothelioma.

METHODS

Our study discussed pleural cytology samples of cases with histopathologically proven mesothelioma diagnoses between 2017 and 2022. As the control group, materials that had pleural effusion sampling for other reasons and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia were included in the study. Cell blocks prepared from these materials were subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization for p16/CDKN2A homozygous deletion and immunohistochemistry for BAP1 and MTAP.

RESULTS

The specificity of the P16/CDKN2A homozygous deletion in diagnosing mesothelioma is 100%. Its sensitivity is 68.75%. The specificity of BAP1 immunohistochemical nuclear expression loss is 95%, while the sensitivity is 60%. Loss of nuclear expression of MTAP alone has the lowest specificity and sensitivity, with a specificity of 86% and a sensitivity of 43%. The highest sensitivity is reached when BAP1 loss and p16/CDKN2A homozygous deletion are evaluated together, increasing to 81%. The specificity is 95%.

CONCLUSION

It has been determined that any marker alone cannot be used for a definitive mesothelioma diagnosis in pleural effusion cytological specimens; however, sensitivity increases in some combinations. The combination of BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16/CDKN2A homozygous deletion detected by FISH, which has a higher specificity and sensitivity, can be routinely used in the diagnosis of mesothelioma under the guidance of clinical and radiologic information.

p16 Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for Homozygous CDKN2A Deletions in CNS Tumors

The 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system emphasizes the significance of molecular parameters for an integrated diagnosis. Homozygous deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2a (CDKN2A) has been associated with an adverse prognosis in IDH -mutant gliomas, supratentorial ependymomas, meningiomas, and MPNST. In this study, we examined the value of p16 protein immunohistochemistry as a rapid and cost-effective screening tool for a homozygous CDKN2A deletion. Genetic analyses for CDKN2A in 30 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, 32 IDH -wild-type high-grade gliomas, 40 supratentorial ependymomas with ZFTA-RELA gene fusion, 21 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 24 meningiomas were performed mainly by a molecular inversion probe assay, a high-resolution, quantitative technology for the assessment of chromosomal copy number alterations. Immunohistochemistry for p16 proved to have a high positive predictive value (range 90% to 100%) and an overall low negative predictive value (range 22% to 93%) for a homozygous CDKN2A deletion. In a setting where molecular testing is limited for cost and time reasons, p16 immunohistochemistry serves as a useful and rapid screening tool for identifying cases that should be subjected to further molecular testing for CDKN2A deletions.

New developments in mesothelial pathology

This review article examines some new and some problem areas in mesothelial pathology, four of which are discussed, as follows. (1) The concept of mesothelioma in situ: this lesion is defined as a single layer of bland mesothelial cells without evidence of invasion, but that have lost BAP1 and/or MTAP by immunohistochemistry. Benign reactions can exactly mimic mesothelioma in situ, but a hint to the correct diagnosis is a story of recurrent pleural effusions/ascites of unknown aetiology without radiological or direct visual evidence of tumour. (2) The nature of well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumour (WDPMT): WDPMT has a long history of arguments regarding its behaviour, and this uncertainty can now be seen to arise, in part, from the observation that some forms of mesothelioma in situ microscopically look exactly like WDPMT. Hence, it is recommended to always run at least a BAP1 stain on any lesion that looks like WDPMT. Both flat and WDPMT-like mesothelioma in situ are strongly associated with eventual development of invasive mesothelioma, but this process is relatively slow. (3) New immunostains for separating mesothelioma from other tumours: here, it is proposed that in most cases, and particularly when the differential is epithelioid mesothelioma versus non-small cell lung cancer, one can make this separation with extremely high sensitivity and specificity using just two stains: HEG1 and claudin-4. (4) Markers for separating benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations: this topic is briefly reviewed, with an indication of which markers are generally accepted and the best utilisation and possible limitations of each marker.

Deletions of CDKN2A and MTAP Detected by Copy-Number Variation Array Are Associated with Loss of p16 and MTAP Protein in Pleural Mesothelioma

CDKN2A deletion is a common alteration in pleural mesothelioma (PM) and frequently associated with co-deletion of MTAP. Since the standard detection method for CDKN2A deletion and FISH analysis is relatively expensive, we here investigated the suitability of inexpensive p16 and MTAP IHC by comparing concordance between IHC and OncoScan CNV arrays on samples from 52 PM patients. Concordance was determined using Cohen's kappa statistics. Loss of CDKN2A was associated with co-deletion of MTAP in 71% of cases. CDKN2A-MTAP copy-number normal cases were also IHC positive in 93% of cases for p16 and 100% for MTAP, while homozygous deletion of CDKN2A-MTAP was always associated with negative IHC for both proteins. In cases with heterozygous CDKN2A-MTAP loss, IHC expression of p16 and MTAP was negative in 100% and 71%, respectively. MTAP and p16 IHC showed high sensitivity (MTAP 86.5%, p16 100%) and specificity (MTAP 100%, p16 93.3%) for the detection of any gene loss. Loss of MTAP expression occurred exclusively in conjunction with loss of p16 labeling. Both p16 and MTAP IHC showed high concordance with Oncoscan CNV arrays (kappa = 0.952, p < 0.0001, and kappa = 0.787, p < 0.0001 respectively). We recommend combined MTAP and p16 immunohistochemistry to confirm the diagnosis of PM.

Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology

BACKGROUND

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is typically diagnosed late during the disease. Earlier detection can increase the chance of effective therapy. Recurrent pleural effusions are the earliest symptoms displaying an array of cytomorphological changes from reactive atypia to malignancy. Diagnosis is possible on effusion cytology by applying molecular and immunocytochemical markers, the main difficulty being when to suspect PM and to differentiate PM from metastatic adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferations.

METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two immunocytochemical dual stains (BerEp4/Calretinin and Desmin/Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA)) on 149 ethanol-fixed cytospin preparation as an initial step to solve the mentioned diagnostic difficulty. The immunocytochemical reactivity pattern was evaluated by two independent investigators. The final diagnosis corresponded to PM (n = 20), metastatic adenocarcinoma (n = 83), and mesotheliosis (n = 46) in these cases.

RESULTS

Calretinin had 99% specificity and 98% sensitivity for indicating a mesothelial phenotype, while BerEp4 distinguished the adenocarcinoma cases with 98% specificity and 99% sensitivity. EMA displayed 96% specificity and 99% sensitivity in malignant cases, while Desmin without EMA present showed 99% specificity and 96% sensitivity for indicating benign mesothelial proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of the four immunoreactions is improved when performed as dual stains. The dual staining is a useful tool in the initial handling of atypical effusions and guides the subsequent choice of antibody panels for more detailed subclassification of malignant effusions.

BAP1 and Claudin-4, But Not MTAP, Reliably Distinguish Borderline and Low-grade Serous Ovarian Tumors From Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) and serous neoplasms can be difficult to differentiate, particularly in small biopsies. BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is expressed in benign tissues, but over 50% of PMs demonstrate complete loss of nuclear expression. Claudin-4, a tight junction protein, is expressed in most epithelial tumors but not in mesotheliomas. Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) is frequently co-deleted with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2a in mesotheliomas. These markers have proven useful in separating mesothelioma from its mimics, particularly when tumors are pleural based. In the peritoneum, BAP1 loss has been rarely reported in high-grade serous carcinomas, but overall, these markers have been minimally evaluated in ovarian serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas. Thus, we assessed the utility of BAP1, claudin-4, and MTAP in the differential diagnosis of PM and low-grade serous neoplasms. Eighteen PM (16 epithelioid, 1 biphasic, and 1 sarcomatous), 24 low-grade serous carcinomas, and 25 serous borderline tumors were stained for BAP1, claudin-4, and MTAP. Loss of BAP1 nuclear expression was observed in 12 (67%) PM (11 epithelioid, 1 biphasic) but was retained in all serous tumors. Claudin-4 was positive in all serous tumors and negative in all PM. Complete loss of cytoplasmic MTAP was noted in 3 (17%) PMs and 1 (4%) serous borderline tumor, while all low-grade serous carcinomas showed retained expression. BAP1 loss reliably distinguishes PM from serous tumors, although it lacks sensitivity. Claudin-4 is a reliable marker to exclude PM. MTAP loss may occur in both PM and serous tumors, and thus is not useful in distinguishing these entities.

Clinical and molecular validation of BAP1, MTAP, P53, and Merlin immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma

BAP1 and MTAP immunostains play an important role in diagnosis of mesothelioma, but additional markers are needed to increase sensitivity. We analyzed 84 pleural mesotheliomas (51 epithelioid, 27 biphasic, 6 sarcomatoid) by a hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including complete coverage of coding and splicing regions for BAP1, CDKN2A/MTAP, NF2, and TP53 and correlated molecular findings with diagnostic immunostains for BAP1, MTAP, Merlin, and p53, respectively. Fifty-seven reactive mesothelial proliferations served as benign comparators. Loss of BAP1, MTAP, and Merlin protein expression were, respectively, 54%, 46%, and 52% sensitive and 100% specific for mesothelioma. Two-marker immunopanels of BAP1 + MTAP, BAP1 + Merlin, and MTAP + Merlin were 79%, 85%, and 71% sensitive for mesothelioma, while a three-marker immunopanel of BAP1 + MTAP + Merlin was 90% sensitive. Diffuse (mutant-pattern) p53 immunostaining was seen in only 6 (7%) tumors but represented the only immunohistochemical abnormality in 2 cases. Null-pattern p53 was not specific for malignancy. An immunopanel of BAP1 + MTAP + Merlin + p53 was 93% sensitive for mesothelioma, and panel NGS detected a pathogenic alteration in BAP1, MTAP, NF2, and/or TP53 in 95%. Together, 83 (99%) of 84 tumors showed a diagnostic alteration by either immunohistochemistry or panel NGS. Adding Merlin to the standard BAP1 + MTAP immunopanel increases sensitivity for mesothelioma without sacrificing specificity. p53 immunohistochemistry and panel NGS with complete coverage of BAP1, CDKN2A/MTAP, TP53, and NF2 may be useful in diagnostically challenging cases.

High prevalence of p16 staining in malignant tumors

p16 (CDKN2A) is a member of the INK4 class of cell cycle inhibitors, which is often dysregulated in cancer. However, the prevalence of p16 expression in different cancer types is controversial. 15,783 samples from 124 different tumor types and 76 different normal tissue types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. p16 was detectable in 5,292 (45.0%) of 11,759 interpretable tumors. Except from adenohypophysis in islets of Langerhans, p16 staining was largely absent in normal tissues. In cancer, highest positivity rates were observed in uterine cervix squamous cell carcinomas (94.4%), non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTaG2 (100%), Merkel cell carcinoma (97.7%), and small cell carcinomas of various sites of origin (54.5%-100%). All 124 tumor categories showed at least occasional p16 immunostaining. Comparison with clinico-pathological data in 128 vulvar, 149 endometrial, 295 serous ovarian, 396 pancreatic, 1365 colorectal, 284 gastric, and 1245 urinary bladder cancers, 910 breast carcinomas, 620 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and 414 testicular germ cell tumors revealed only few statistically significant associations. Comparison of human papilloma virus (HPV) status and p16 in 497 squamous cell carcinomas of different organs revealed HPV in 80.4% of p16 positive and in 20.6% of p16 negative cancers (p<0.0001). It is concluded, that a positive and especially strong p16 immunostaining is a feature for malignancy which may be diagnostically useful in lipomatous, urothelial and possibly other tumors. The imperfect association between p16 immunostaining and HPV infection with high variability between different sites of origin challenges the use of p16 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for HPV positivity, except in tumors of cervix uteri and the penis.

Diagnostic capacity of BAP1 and MTAP in cytology from effusions and biopsy in mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Serous effusion is often the first sign of mesothelioma. Diagnosis based on cytologic material from the effusions remains controversial and complementary biopsy is usually required. However, obtaining representative tissue sample may be challenging, while obtaining cytologic material is a minimally invasive procedure, providing potential for an earlier diagnosis. Loss of BRCA1-associated protein (BAP1), combined with loss of methylthionadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) detected by immunohistochemistry, have shown to be reliable markers in the diagnosis of mesothelioma on histologic sections. Here we evaluate the value of these biomarkers in cytologic specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The BAP1 and MTAP expression in specimens of 162 mesothelioma patients (156 pleural, 6 peritoneal)-71 cytologic, 91 histologic (44 epithelioid, 31 biphasic, 16 sarcomatoid)-and 20 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations were investigated.

RESULTS

The loss of BAP1 and/or MTAP was highly sensitive and specific in differentiating mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations, with no significant difference between pleural effusions and biopsies, specificity of 100% in both and a sensitivity of 78.9% and 80.2%, respectively (P = 0.3). There was a 100% concordance of the expression of BAP1 and MTAP in cytologic and corresponding histopathologic samples. Loss of BAP1 and/or MTAP in histologic sections discriminated sarcomatoid, biphasic, and epithelioid mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations with a sensitivity of 81.2%, 83.9%, and 77.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Loss of expression of BAP1 and/or MTAP differentiated mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations with excellent specificity and high sensitivity in cytologic samples, comparable to histopathologic sections.

Effects of inhalable gene transfection as a novel gene therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma

Gene therapy using vectors has attracted attention in recent years for the treatment of cancers caused by gene mutations. Besides, new treatments are imperative for lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), due to its high mortality. We developed a minimally invasive and orally inhalable tumor suppressor gene drug (SFD-p16 and SFD-p53) with non-viral vectors for lung cancer treatment by combining tumor suppressor genes with an inhalant powder that can deliver active ingredients directly to the lung. We used NSCLC (A549 and H1299) and MPM (H2052) cell lines in an air–liquid interface culture. Transfection of A549 and H2052 cells with SFD-p16 significantly increased p16 mRNA expression levels and decreased cell proliferation in both cell lines. Similar results were obtained with transfection of H1299 with the inhalable gene drug SFD-p53. In an in vivo experiment, a mouse model of lung cancer with orthotopically transplanted luciferase-expressing A549 cells was subjected to intratracheal insufflation of SFD-p16. Consequently, SFD-p16 effectively and directly affected lung cancer. This study suggests that inhalable gene drugs are effective treatments for NSCLC and MPM. We expect inhalable gene drugs to present a novel gene therapy agent for lung cancer that patients can self-administer.

Update of pathological diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma using genomic-based morphological techniques, for both histological and cytological investigations

As more than 80% of pleural mesothelioma (PM) cases start with pleural effusions, diagnosis with effusion smear cytology or pleural biopsy is important. For diagnosing PM, a three-step approach is used: (1) detecting atypical cells; (2) verifying their mesothelial origin using immunohistochemistry (IHC); and (3) discriminating PM from benign mesothelial proliferations (BMP). The third step is critical for diagnosing early lesions. In small biopsy or cytologic specimens in which tumor cell fat invasion cannot be assessed, genomic-based assays, including IHC-detected BAP1 loss and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-detected homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A/p16, are effective for differentiation. Both BAP1 IHC and CDKN2A FISH can equally be applied to histologic and cytologic specimens, with 100% specificity in discriminating PM from BMP. We found that methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) loss as detected by IHC could serve as a feasible alternative in tissue and cytologic preparations for CDKN2A FISH. However, a combination including FISH was still most effective: the addition of NF2 FISH to CDKN2A FISH and BAP1 IHC yielded a greater sensitivity of close to 100% in diagnosing PM tissues. Although IHC is more feasible than FISH, owing to remaining challenges in data interpretation, caution and familiarity are warranted when diagnosing PM.

Analysis of early pleural fluid samples in patients with mesothelioma: A case series exploration of morphology, BAP1, and CDKN2A status with implications for the concept of mesothelioma in situ in cytology

BACKGROUND

The concept of mesothelioma in situ has been revisited and is a new World Health Organization diagnostic entity. The definition centers on ancillary techniques used in pleural mesothelioma (PM) assessment. At the authors' institution, most PM diagnoses are made on cytologic specimens. Effusion samples obtained before definitive PM diagnosis were interrogated using BRCA1-associated protein 1 gene (BAP1), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A gene (CDKN2A) and cytologic evaluation to assess whether early or possible in situ disease could be characterized.

METHODS

All cases of PM diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2019 were identified at a tertiary referral center. Patients who had a pleural fluid sample collected 24 months before the diagnosis were selected, numbering 8 in total. The cytomorphology of each sample was reviewed; and, retrospectively, BAP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on initial and diagnostic samples.

RESULTS

The initial samples were deemed benign in 5 cases and atypical mesothelial proliferations in 3 cases. A spectrum of apparently normal to atypical cytomorphologic changes was identified. BAP1 loss was present in 6 of 8 initial cases, whereas CDKN2A homozygous deletion was identified in 1 of 7 initial cases. Either abnormality was identified in 7 of 8 initial samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Detectable abnormalities of BAP1 IHC and CDKN2A FISH were present in pleural fluid specimens before the development of cytomorphologic features diagnostic of PM. This is the largest series to date describing cytology samples early in the course of PM development, thereby highlighting a possible cytological equivalent for mesothelioma in situ.

The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Pleura: Advances since the 2015 Classification

Significant changes in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Pleura and Pericardium since the 2015 WHO Classification include: 1) Pleural and pericardial tumors have been combined in one chapter whereas in the 2015 WHO, pericardial tumors were classified with cardiac tumors; 2) Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM) has been renamed well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumor (WDPMT) given growing evidence that these tumors exhibit relatively indolent behavior; 3) Localized and diffuse mesothelioma no longer include the term "malignant" as a prefix; 4) Mesothelioma in situ (MIS) has been added to the 2021 classification since these lesions can now be recognized by loss of BAP1 and/or MTAP by immunohistochemistry and/or CDKN2A homozygous deletion by FISH; 5) The three main histologic subtypes (i.e. epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid) remain the same but architectural patterns, cytologic and stromal features are more formally incorporated into the 2021 classification based on their prognostic significance; 6) Nuclear grading for epithelioid diffuse mesothelioma is introduced and it is recommended to record this and other histologically prognostic features in pathology reports; 7) BAP1, EZH2 and MTAP immunohistochemistry have been shown to be useful in separating benign mesothelial proliferations from mesothelioma; 8) Biphasic mesothelioma can be diagnosed in small biopsies showing both epithelioid and sarcomatoid components even if the amount of one component is less than 10%; and 9) The most frequently altered genes in diffuse pleural mesothelioma include BAP 1, CDKN2A, NF2, TP53, SETD2 and SETB1.

Pleural mesothelioma classification-update and challenges

Mesothelial tumors are classified into benign or preinvasive tumors, and mesotheliomas. The benign or preinvasive group includes adenomatoid tumors, well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumors, and mesothelioma in situ. Malignant tumors are mesotheliomas and can be localized or diffuse. Histological classification of invasive mesotheliomas into three major subtypes-epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic is prognostically important. It also plays a significant role in the treatment decisions of patients diagnosed with this deadly disease. Grading and subtyping of epithelioid mesotheliomas have been one of the major changes in the recent WHO classification of pleural tumors. Mesothelioma in situ has emerged as a precisely defined clinico-pathologic entity that for diagnosis requires demonstration of loss of BAP1 or MTAP by immunohistochemistry, or CDKN2A homozygous deletion by FISH. The use of these two biomarkers improves the diagnostic sensitivity of effusion specimens  and limited tissue samples and is valuable in establishing the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma. In this review, recent changes in the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma, importance of ancillary diagnostic studies, and molecular characteristics of mesotheliomas are discussed.

Diagnostic mesothelioma biomarkers in effusion cytology

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis whose development is related to asbestos fiber exposure. An increasing role of genetic predisposition has been recognized recently. Pleural biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, in which the identification of pleural invasion by atypical mesothelial cell is a major criterion. Pleural effusion is usually the first sign of disease; therefore, a cytological specimen is often the initial or the only specimen available for diagnosis. Given that reactive mesothelial cells may show marked atypia, the diagnosis of mesothelioma on cytomorphology alone is challenging. Accordingly, cell block preparation is encouraged, as it permits immunohistochemical staining. Traditional markers of mesothelioma such as glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) are informative, but difficult to interpret when reactive proliferations aberrantly stain positive. BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) nuclear staining loss is highly specific for mesothelioma, but sensitivity is low in sarcomatoid tumors. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A)/p16 homozygous deletion, assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, is more specific for mesothelioma with better sensitivity, even in the sarcomatoid variant. The surrogate marker methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) has been found to demonstrate excellent diagnostic correlation with p16. The purpose of this review is to provide an essential appraisal of the literature regarding the diagnostic value of many of these emerging biomarkers for malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology.

Correlation of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) protein expression with MTAP and CDKN2A copy number in malignant pleural mesothelioma

AIMS

Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) immunohistochemical expression is a specific marker of CDKN2A deletion in malignant mesothelioma. However, the relationship of MTAP expression with MTAP copy number remains unexplored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty malignant pleural mesotheliomas were characterised by targeted next-generation sequencing (29), single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (seven), or both (four). MTAP and CDKN2A copy numbers were correlated with MTAP expression. Twenty-seven (68%) tumours showed CDKN2A deletion (14 heterozygous; 13 homozygous), of which 20 (74%) showed MTAP codeletion (15 heterozygous; five homozygous). No tumours showed MTAP deletion without CDKN2A codeletion. Loss of MTAP expression was seen in 16 (40%) tumours, and was 75% sensitive and 95% specific for MTAP deletion, and 59% sensitive and 100% specific for CDKN2A deletion. Nine of 40 (23%) tumours showed heterogeneous MTAP staining, and the percentage of tumour cells with MTAP loss correlated with molecular detection of MTAP deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

MTAP is frequently codeleted with CDKN2A in pleural mesothelioma. However, homozygous deletion of both genes occurs in a minority of tumours (5/40; 13%); CDKN2A deletion often co-occurs with heterozygous MTAP deletion or neutral MTAP copy number; and MTAP expression correlates inconsistently with heterozygous MTAP deletion. Correspondingly, MTAP immunohistochemistry is a highly specific but only moderately sensitive assay for CDKN2A deletion.

Pathology of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Despite multiple diagnostic toolkits, the diagnosis of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma relies primarily on proper histologic assessment. The definitive diagnosis of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma is based on the pathologic assessment of tumor tissue, which can be obtained from core biopsy sampling, pleurectomy, or other more extensive resections, such as extrapleural pneumonectomy. Given its rarity and overlapping microscopic features with other conditions, the histologic diagnosis of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma is challenging. This review discusses the pathologic features and the differential diagnosis of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma, including select diagnostic pitfalls.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosome 22 monosomy in pleural effusion cytology for the diagnosis of mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is characterized by mutations in several genes, including cyclin-dependent kinase-inhibitor 2A/p16 in the 9p21 locus, BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1), and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) in the 22q12 locus. Recent studies indicate that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detects hemizygous loss of NF2 in tissue specimens of MPM. The authors investigated whether NF2 FISH, either alone or in combination with other diagnostic assays (9p21 FISH, methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [MTAP] immunohistochemistry [IHC], and BAP1 IHC), effectively distinguishes MPM cells from reactive mesothelial cells (RMCs) in cell blocks prepared from pleural effusions.

METHODS

FISH assays were used to examine the deletion status of NF2 and 9p21, and IHC was used to determine the expression of MTAP and BAP1 in cell blocks from 54 cases with MPM and 18 cases with RMCs.

RESULTS

Hemizygous NF2 loss (chromosome 22 monosomy or hemizygous deletion) showed 51.9% sensitivity (48.1% for chromosome 22 monosomy and 3.7% for hemizygous deletion) and 100% specificity in differentiating MPM cells from RMCs. Combinations of NF2 FISH, 9p21 FISH, and BAP1 IHC assays yielded greater sensitivity (98.1%) than any assay alone (9p21 FISH, 61.1%; MTAP IHC, 52.8%; or BAP1 IHC, 60.4%). The level of hemizygous NF2 loss in cell blocks positively correlated with that in corresponding tissues. Furthermore, to overcome cytologic specimen-specific challenges, FISH combined with cytokeratin AE1/AE3 immunofluorescence was necessary in 25.9% of MPM cases for FISH assessment of predominantly scattered MPM cells.

CONCLUSIONS

NF2 FISH alone or in combination with other diagnostic assays effectively differentiates MPM cells from RMCs in cell blocks prepared from pleural effusions.

Pleural mesothelioma classification update

The 2015 WHO classification of pleural mesotheliomas includes three major histologic subtypes-epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic. Recent genomic data has supported the need for a more granular and clinically valid classification beyond the three current subtypes. Because of tumor rarity and overlapping histologic features with other tumor types, diagnostic immunohistochemical work up is essential component in establishing the final diagnosis of mesothelioma. The use of BAP1 and CDKN2A/MTAP improves the diagnostic sensitivity of effusion specimens and are valuable in establishing the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma. The major change in the forthcoming WHO classification is the inclusion of mesothelioma in situ as a diagnostic category. In this review, we discuss recently proposed changes in the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma, differential diagnosis, and importance of ancillary diagnostic studies.

The prognostic significance of p16 expression pattern in diffuse gliomas

Background

CDKN2A is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the cell cycle inhibitor protein p16. Homozygous deletion of the CDK-N2A gene has been associated with shortened survival in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of p16 and to evaluate whether p16 immunohistochemical staining could be used as a prognostic marker to replace CDKN2A genotyping in diffuse gliomas.

Methods

p16 immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of 326 diffuse gliomas with diagnoses that reflected IDH-mutations and 1p/19q codeletion status. The results were divided into three groups (negative, focal expression, overexpression) according to the presence and degree of p16 expression. Survival analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of p16 expression.

Results

A loss of p16 expression predicted a significantly worse outcome in all glioma patients (n = 326, p < .001), in the IDH-mutant glioma patients (n = 103, p = .010), and in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients (n = 73, p = .032). However, loss of p16 expression did not predict the outcome in the IDH-wildtype glioma patients (n = 223, p = .121) or in the oligodendroglial tumor patients with the IDH-mutation and 1p/19q codeletion (n = 30, p = .457). Multivariate analysis showed the association was still significant in the IDH-mutant glioma patients (p = .008; hazard ratio [HR], 2.637; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.295 to 5.372) and in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients (p = .001; HR, 3.586; 95% CI, 1.649 to 7.801). Interestingly, patients who presented with tumors with p16 overexpression also had shorter survival times than did patients with tumors with p16 focal expression in the whole glioma (p < .001) and in IDH-mutant glioma groups. (p = .046).

Conclusions

This study suggests that detection of p16 expression by immunohistochemistry can be used as a useful surrogate test to predict prognosis, especially in IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients.

Malignant pleural neoplasm with both differentiation of epithelioid mesothelioma and squamous-cell carcinoma, a rare phenomena

Malignant mesothelioma, a neoplasm arising within the serosal surfaces, has been linked closely to asbestos exposure. We present a case of 72-year-old male with a 27 year work-related history of asbestos exposure who presented with dyspnea. Chest computed tomography scan showed a large, right pleural effusion with compressive right lung atelectasis. Biopsies, subsequent pleurectomy and lung wedge resections revealed epithelioid malignant mesothelioma with associated focal non-keratinizing squamous-cell carcinoma, supported by extensive immunohistochemical stains and molecular studies. The patient was treated with 6 cycles of carboplatin/pemetrexed, showing no new metastases. Seven months post-treatment, the patient presented with progressive dyspnea and large pleural effusions. Bilateral pleural fluid was collected and showed malignant epithelioid cells, morphologically similar to the patient's pleural neoplastic cells. However, the tumor was positive for squamous cells markers and showed BAP1 loss, while negative for mesothelial markers. The findings support the diagnosis of squamous-cell carcinoma and were consistent with the patient's previously diagnosed pleural neoplastic origin. A malignant mesothelioma associated with squamous-cell carcinoma is a rare phenonmenon. To our knowledge, only two case reports are available in current literature. This unique case shows a single pleura tumor differentiating as both malignant mesothelioma and squamous-cell carcinoma. Squamous-cell carcinoma is the predominating malignancy seen within the bilateral pleural effusions, a potential pitfall for cytology specimen diagnosis.

CDKN2A and MTAP Are Useful Biomarkers Detectable by Droplet Digital PCR in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Potential Alternative Method in Diagnosis Compared to Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation

Background

The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) can be difficult, in part due to the difficulty in distinguishing between MPM and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH). The tumor suppressor gene, CDKN2A, is frequently silenced by epigenetic mechanisms in many cancers; in the case of MPM it is mostly silenced via genomic deletion. Co-deletion of the CDKN2A and methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) genes has been researched extensively and discovered to be a highly specific characteristic of MPM. Most studies have used FISH to detect the deletion of CDKN2A and IHC for MTAP as a surrogate for this. In this study, we aim to investigate and validate droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as an emerging alternative and efficient testing method in diagnosing MPM, by particularly emphasizing on the loss of MTAP and CDKN2A.

Methods

This study included 75 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) MPM tissue, and 12 normal pleural tissue and 10 RMH as control. Additionally, primary MPM cell lines and normal pleural samples were used as biomarker detection controls, as established in our previous publication. All FFPE specimens were processed to isolate the DNA, that was subsequently used for ddPCR detection of CDKN2A and MTAP. FFPE samples were also analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for CDKN2A and MTAP deletion, and for MTAP IHC expression. Concordance of IHC and ddPCR with FISH were studied in these samples.

Results

95% and 82% of cases showed co-deletion of both MTAP and CDKN2A when determined by FISH and ddPCR respectively. ddPCR has a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 100% in detecting CDKN2A homozygous loss in MPM. ddPCR also has a concordance rate of 92% with FISH in detecting homozygous loss of CDKN2A. MTAP IHC was 68% sensitive and 100% specific for detecting CDKN2A homozygous loss in MPM when these losses were determined by ddPCR.

Conclusion

Our study confirms that MTAP is often co-deleted with CDKN2A in MPM. Our in-house designed ddPCR assays for MTAP and CDKN2A are useful in differentiating MPM from RMH, and is highly concordant with FISH that is currently used in diagnosing MPM. ddPCR detection of these genetic losses can potentially be utilized as an alternative method in the diagnosis of MPM and for the future development of a less-invasive MPM-specific detection technique on MPM tumor tissue DNA.

Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma: A CDKN2A molecular analysis of 53 cases with immunohistochemical correlation with BAP1

Fifty-three cases of sarcomatoid pleural mesothelioma were evaluated for CDKN2A (p16) homozygous deletion and correlated with BRCA-associated protein-1 (BAP1) expression by immunohistochemistry. The patients are 45 men and 8 women between the ages of 37 and 79 years (average age: 58 years), who presented with symptoms of chest pain, cough, and weight loss. Diagnostic imaging showed the presence of diffuse pleural thickening with encasement of the lung parenchyma in all the cases. All patients were surgically treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy. Loss of BAP1 reactivity was seen in 49 tumors and p16 homozygous deletion was seen in 41 tumors, while in 16 patients either BAP1 or p16 were noncontributory to the diagnosis of mesothelioma. However, we were able to detect a better survival rate in those patients in whom BAP1 was lost and p16 showed homozygous deletion. Our findings showed that even though the use of BAP1 and p16 are important tools in the diagnosis of mesothelioma, a proportion of cases still remains negative with approximately 30 % of the cases in which the concordance of BAP1 loss and p16 homozygous deletion will not be present. We consider that the final diagnosis of mesothelioma is best accomplished by a global interpretation of clinical, radiographic, and pathological features including immunohistochemistry and molecular studies.

Molecular characterization of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare aggressive tumor that arises from the peritoneal lining. While recurrent BAP1 mutations have been identified in a subset of mesotheliomas, molecular characteristics of peritoneal mesotheliomas, including those lacking BAP1 alterations, remain poorly understood. Using targeted next-generation sequencing, we examined the molecular features of 26 diffuse malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas. As part of an exploratory analysis, we analyzed an additional localized peritoneal mesothelioma and one well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma with invasive foci. Genomic characterization identified categories of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas: The first group included 18 (69%) tumors with recurrent BAP1 alterations, with eight (31%) having more than one BAP1 alterations, and concomitant alterations in PBRM1 (46%) and SETD2 (35%). All tumors with complete loss of BAP1 expression by immunohistochemistry harbored BAP1 molecular alterations. PBRM1 alterations were significantly enriched in the BAP1-altered cohort. Frequent copy number loss of BAP1, ARID1B, PRDM1, PBRM1, SETD2, NF2, and CDKN2A was noted. The second group included eight (31%) BAP1-wild-type tumors: two with TP53 mutations, one with a TRAF7 activating mutation, one with a SUZ12 inactivating mutation, and three with ALK rearrangements that we previously published. One TP53-mutant biphasic mesothelioma showed evidence of genomic near-haploidization showing loss of heterozygosity of all chromosomes except 5, 7, 16, and 20. The localized peritoneal mesothelioma harbored a nonsense CHEK2 mutation, and the well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma with invasive foci harbored no reportable variants. In conclusion, we described the genetic categories of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas, with BAP1-mutant and BAP1-wild-type groups. Our findings implicated DNA repair, epigenetics, and cell cycle regulation in the pathogenesis of peritoneal mesotheliomas, with identification of potential therapeutic targets.

Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A by fluorescence in situ hybridization is prognostic in grade 4, but not grade 2 or 3, IDH-mutant astrocytomas

IDH-mutant astrocytomas have a more indolent natural history and better prognosis than their IDH-wild type counterparts, but are still graded according to schemes developed prior to the recognition of this type of neoplasm as a distinct entity. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A has been proposed as a molecular correlate of aggressive behavior in these tumors, and may be incorporated into future grading systems in an effort to improve prognostic stratification. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a common ancillary testing modality used to assess CDKN2A status, but the specifics of how to best interpret FISH results for prognostication of gliomas have not been clearly defined in the literature. To address this issue, we performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected CDKN2A FISH data from 108 primary and 43 recurrent IDH-mutant astrocytomas diagnosed between 2007-2020 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. High level CDKN2A homozygous deletion was rare in primary tumors and was identified more frequently in recurrent tumors. Multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazards analysis demonstrated that histologic grade and CDKN2A status are independent predictors of survival, and the prognostic value of CDKN2A is maximized by applying a threshold of ≥ 30% of tumor cells with homozygous deletion by FISH to define a positive result. At this threshold, CDKN2A deletion significantly stratified survival of histologic grade 4 tumors, but grade 2 and 3 tumors rarely exceeded this cutoff value and did not show worse survival. Lower thresholds identified additional lower grade tumors, but were not prognostically useful. Compared to prior studies, the lack of prognostic significance of CDKN2A homozygous deletion by FISH in grade 2-3 IDH-mutant astrocytomas may reflect differences in cohort populations or technical differences between testing modalities. Definitive criteria for determining CDKN2A homozygous deletion by various methodologies will be critical if this is to be included in future grading schemes.

The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for definitive diagnosis. Diagnosis of MPM requires histological evidence of invasion by malignant mesothelial cells often confirmed by various immunohistochemical biomarkers in order to separate it from pleural metastatic carcinoma. Often when invasion of neoplastic mesothelial cells into adjacent tissue is not apparent, further immunohistochemical testing - namely BAP1 and MTAP, as well as FISH testing for loss of p16 (CDKN2A) are used to separate reactive mesothelial proliferation due to benign processes, from MPM. Various combinations of these markers, such as BAP1 and/or MTAP immunohistochemistry alongside FISH testing for loss of p16, have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MPM. Additionally, over the recent years, research into epigenetic marker use in the diagnosis of MPM has gained momentum. Although still in their research stages, various markers in DNA methylation, long non-coding RNA, micro RNA, circular RNA, and histone modifications have all been found to support diagnosis of MPM with generally good sensitivity and specificity. Many of these studies are however, limited by small sample sizes or other study limitations and further research into the area would be beneficial. Epigenetic markers show promise for use in the future to facilitate the diagnosis of MPM.

Malignant mesothelioma in situ: diagnostic and clinical considerations

In situ stages of malignancy have been characterised in various neoplasms. Mesothelioma in situ (MIS) has been a controversial diagnosis, lacking clear diagnostic criteria and understanding as to whether it is truly a premalignant lesion in the progression of malignant mesothelioma (MM). Originally understood as a concept and defined as atypical mesothelial proliferation in the presence of invasion, it has now been suggested that loss of nuclear labelling for BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) in flat, non-invasive mesothelial lesions can define MIS. This study aimed to characterise BAP1 expression in a cohort of 19 patients diagnosed with MIS (either pure MIS, n=3, or MIS-predominant invasive MM, n=16) and to compare survival between MIS, MIS-predominant MM and MM (n=114) in order to gain insight into the characteristics of MIS. We defined pure MIS as any architectural pattern of surface mesothelial cells with loss of BAP1 in the absence of invasion, but in specimens with superficial stromal invasion we also accepted the original definition of cytologically and architecturally atypical mesothelial proliferation, in the absence of inflammatory features, with or without loss of BAP1. We observed that MIS associated with minimal invasion was associated with significantly improved survival compared to MM (8 months vs 22 months). This suggests that MIS is indeed a precursor to MM and that these cases represent earlier stage disease. Loss of BAP1 was present in 60% of mesotheliomas with invasion, so not all early cases can be detected by BAP1 loss, but our study provides evidence that BAP1 loss may be an early molecular alteration in MM pathogenesis in patients that have loss of BAP1. We confirm that BAP1 loss can be useful for diagnosis of pure MIS in surgical specimens, permitting earlier diagnosis. However, identification of a predominant MIS component with minimal invasion has prognostic and conceptual implications. Whilst no approved therapy is available for MIS, close follow up of patients with BAP1 mutation in mesothelial cells and/or diagnosis of MIS is required to monitor for disease progression and potentially investigate earlier treatment interventions.

Putative Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in situ (MPMIS) with Sequential Acquisition of Genomic Alterations on Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) Examination

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and deadly disease. A precursor in situ lesion, malignant pleural mesothelioma in situ (MPMIS), has recently been proposed. On cytological examination, the distinction between reactive and malignant mesothelial cells is often challenging, and sometimes even impossible without ancillary methods. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of 9p21 deletion is a powerful diagnostic tool in this context, both in histological and in cytological specimens. Here, we present a case of MPM with initial presentation as a putative MPMIS with disomic chromosomal pattern and homozygous 9p21 deletion with subsequent development of an aneuploid pattern after whole genome duplication during tumor progression.

Reactive mesothelial hyperplasia mimicking mesothelioma in an African green monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops)

A spontaneous reactive mesothelial hyperplasia occurred in a female, 15.7-year-old African green monkey (grivet; Chlorocebus aethiops). At necropsy, massive effusions were found in the abdomen, the thorax, and the pericardium. Additionally, multiple small, beige-gray nodules were detected on the serosal surfaces of the abdominal organs. Histopathologically, the mesothelial cells resembled the epithelioid subtype of a mesothelioma, but no infiltrative or invasive growth could be demonstrated. The mesothelial cells on the thoracis, liver, and intestinal serosa were accompanied by chronic serositis. Mesothelial cells expressed cytokeratin, vimentin, calretinin, desmin, Wilms Tumor 1 (WT-1) protein, and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Cells were negative for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cluster of differentiation 15 (CD15), and podoplanin. Ultrastructurally, cells revealed a moderate amount of microvilli of medium length, perinuclear tonofilament bundles, and long desmosomes. In fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of characteristic gene loss (p16; CDKN2A), NF2, and MTAP, no deletions were detected. No asbestos fibers and no presence of Simian virus 40 antigen (SV40) could be demonstrated.

Testing for BAP1 loss and CDKN2A/p16 homozygous deletion improves the accurate diagnosis of mesothelial proliferations in effusion cytology

BACKGROUND

A number of ancillary tests have been developed that aid in the diagnosis of mesothelioma in cytology specimens. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether testing for BAP1 and CDKN2A/p16 status in effusion specimens preceding the tissue diagnosis of mesothelioma would improve diagnostic accuracy and allow an earlier diagnosis of malignancy.

METHODS

The study cohort included 99 matched cytology fluid specimens from 74 patients with a surgical specimen diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (67 epithelioid, 7 biphasic, 55 pleural, and 19 peritoneal). BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed retrospectively.

RESULTS

BAP1 or p16 FISH testing revealed a loss in 7 of 18 (39%) samples originally categorized as benign/reactive, 20 of 33 (61%) interpretable samples categorized as atypical, and 10 of 14 (71%) cases suspicious for mesothelioma. In some cases, the diagnosis of mesothelioma could have been made up to 9 months before biopsy. Similarly, loss of BAP1 or p16 was found in 28 of 30 (93%) samples categorized as malignant, with some cases diagnosable up to 6 months before biopsy. Overall, loss of BAP1 and/or CDKN2A/p16 homozygous deletion would change the diagnostic interpretation in 37 of 60 (62%) (P = .07) effusion specimens, particularly in pleural effusions (32 of 48 samples) (P = .002). The sensitivity of morphologic interpretation alone was 30.3%; however, adding testing for BAP1 and p16 resulted in an increase in sensitivity to 68.7%. (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that routine use of BAP1 immunochemistry and p16 FISH as adjunctive tests improves the diagnostic accuracy of cytology specimens and potentially allows an earlier diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

Genomic-based ancillary assays offer improved diagnostic yield of effusion cytology with potential challenges in malignant pleural mesothelioma

BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) or methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) immunohistochemistry (IHC) or 9p21 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the effect of these assays on the diagnostic yield of effusion cytology in MPM cases with suspicious cytomorphology or the diagnostic challenges in BAP1 or MTAP IHC have not been fully elucidated. Two cohorts of cytologic preparations obtained from pleural effusions were examined: MPM cases in cohort 1 were used to evaluate whether BAP1 or MTAP IHC or 9p21 FISH increase the diagnostic yield of effusion cytology; cohort 2 included cases suspicious for MPM, to which BAP1 or MTAP IHC was applied to clarify the challenges in the clinical assessment of these assays. In cohort 1 (n = 28), either assay elevated 62.5% of class II or III cases to class V. In cohort 2 (n = 139), 21.7% of BAP1 immunocytochemistry in smears and 10.6% of BAP1 IHC and 9.4% of MTAP IHC in cell blocks, were identified to be challenging. The application of genomic-based assays increased the diagnostic yield of effusion cytology in the diagnosis of MPM. However, diagnostic challenges limit the application of these assays in some cases.

Prognostic Value of Ki67 Percentage, WT-1 Expression and p16/CDKN2A Deletion in Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Single-Centre Cohort Study

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare malignant neoplasm with a poor survival. Although some advances in knowledge have been obtained for the pleural form, much less is known about DMPM. Advantages in terms of prognosis are still limited and strong efforts need to be made. The aim of our study was to correlate several histological and molecular factors with survival in a large cohort of 45 DMPMs. We evaluated histotype, nuclear grade, mitotic count, necrosis, inflammation, desmoplastic reaction, Ki67 percentage, WT-1 expression, p16 protein by immunohistochemistry and CDKN2A deletion by FISH. Our results showed that epithelioid histotype, nuclear grade 2, mitotic count ≤5 x mm², absence of desmoplasia and p16/CDKN2A deletion, low Ki67 value, and high WT-1 expression were correlated with the most prolonged survival (p = 0.0001). Moreover, p16 loss in immunohistochemistry reflected CDKN2A deletion detected with FISH, and both were correlated with the worst survival (p = 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, Ki67 value, WT-1 expression and p16/CDKN2A deletion emerged as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.01, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively). These parameters are easy to analyse at the time of DMPM diagnosis and may support better patient stratification, prediction of treatment effectiveness and therapeutic optimization.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) provides estimates of minute and interstitial BAP1, CDKN2A, and NF2 gene deletions in peritoneal mesothelioma

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in identifying the copy number profiles of the three key peritoneal mesothelioma tumor suppressor genes BAP1, CDKN2A, and NF2, with particular emphasis on minute homozygous deletions, a copy number abnormality recently unveiled at the 3p21 (BAP1) chromosomal region using high-throughput methods. FISH was performed on 75 formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded peritoneal mesotheliomas and recognized two types of monoallelic loss (monosomy, and hemizygous deletion) and two types of biallelic loss (canonical homozygous deletion with a complete loss of FISH signal and homozygous deletion with diminished signal). Diminished FISH signals revealed deletions occurring within the genomic region covered by the gene-specific probe and affected all three tumor suppressors. BAP1 homozygous deletions with diminished signal outnumbered canonical homozygous deletions (13 vs 3): conversely, canonical homozygous deletions were prevalent for CDKN2A (2 vs 14). Diminished signal homozygous deletion was the only pattern of biallelic loss observed for NF2 (2 cases). Hemizygous deletion mainly affected BAP1 (21 vs 6), while monosomy was prevalent for CDKN2A (14 vs 7) and particularly for NF2 where it accounts for all monoallelic losses. FISH/immunohistochemistry (BAP1, CDKN2A, and MTAP) correlation showed that all homozygous deletions, including those with diminished signals, resulted in a null BAP1 and CDKN2A immunophenotype but only canonical CDKN2A homozygous deletions resulted in MTAP loss of expression. BAP1 hemizygous deletion, but not monosomy, was also invariably associated with loss of protein expression whereas neither type of CDKN2A monoallelic loss correlated with p16 or MTAP immunohistochemistry. Array comparative genomic hybridization performed on a spontaneously emerging peritoneal mesothelioma cell line provided support for the interpretation of the FISH patterns and allowed us to extend the number of chromatin remodeling factors involved in mesothelioma to SETD7 and PCGF5, two previously unreported genes.

Malignant mesothelioma in situ: morphologic features and clinical outcome

The existence of an in situ phase of malignant mesothelioma has long been postulated but until recently has been impossible to prove. Here we describe ten patients with mesothelioma in situ, defined by a single layer of surface mesothelial cells showing loss of BAP1 nuclear immunostaining, no evidence of tumor by imaging and/or by direct examination of the pleura/peritoneum, and no invasive mesothelioma developing for at least 1 year. Nine cases were pleural and one peritoneal. Most patients were biopsied for repeated effusions of unknown etiology; in two patients mesothelioma in situ was found incidentally in lung cancer resections. In addition to surface mesothelium with BAP1 loss, one case had a surface papillary proliferation with BAP1 loss, and two cases had a small (few millimeter) nodule with BAP1 loss. CDKN2A was deleted by FISH in one of eight cases. Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase showed partial loss in the surface mesothelium by immunohistochemistry in three cases. Invasive malignant mesothelioma developed in seven patients with time between biopsy and invasive disease from 12 to 92 (median 60) months. Invasive mesothelioma has not developed in the other three patients at 12, 57, and 120 months, but the latter patient, who has pleural plaques, still has repeated pleural effusions, probably representing a so-called "benign asbestos effusion." We conclude that mesothelioma in situ, as diagnosed using the criteria outlined above, is associated with a high risk of developing invasive mesothelioma, but typically over a relatively protracted time, so that curable interventions maybe possible.

Hemizygous loss of NF2 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization is useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) gene, a tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 22q12.2, is frequently abnormal in mesothelioma. Recent studies have revealed the effectiveness of diagnostic assays for differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. These include detection of homozygous deletion of the 9p21 locus by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (9p21 FISH), loss of expression of BAP1 as detected by immunohistochemistry, and loss of expression of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) as detected by immunohistochemistry. However, the application of FISH detection of NF2 gene deletion (NF2 FISH) in differentiation of malignant pleural mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we investigated whether NF2 FISH, either alone or in a combination with other diagnostic assays (9p21 FISH, MTAP immunohistochemistry, and BAP1 immunohistochemistry), is effective for distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. This study cohort included malignant pleural mesothelioma (n = 47) and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia cases (n = 27) from a period between 2001 and 2017. We used FISH to examine deletion status of NF2 and 9p21 and immunohistochemistry to examine expression of MTAP and BAP1 in malignant pleural mesothelioma and in reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. Hemizygous NF2 loss (chromosome 22 monosomy or hemizygous deletion) was detected in 25 of 47 (53.2%) mesothelioma cases. None of the mesothelioma cases showed homozygous NF2 deletion. Hemizygous NF2 loss showed 53.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity in differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. A combination of NF2 FISH, 9p21 FISH, and BAP1 immunohistochemistry yielded greater sensitivity (100%) than that detected for either diagnostic assay alone (53.2% for NF2 FISH, 78.7% for 9p21 FISH, 70.2% for MTAP immunohistochemistry, or 57.4% for BAP1 immunohistochemistry). Thus, NF2 FISH in combination with other diagnostic assays is effective for distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia.

Application of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis and management of malignant mesothelioma

Immunohistochemistry plays an indispensable role in accurate diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, particularly in morphologically challenging cases and in biopsy and cytology specimens, where tumor architecture is difficult or impossible to evaluate. Application of a targeted panel of mesothelial- and epithelial-specific markers permits correct identification of tumor lineage in the vast majority of cases. An immunopanel including two mesothelial markers (calretinin, CK5/6, WT-1, or D2-40) and two epithelial markers (MOC-31 and claudin-4) offers good sensitivity and specificity, with adjustments as appropriate for the differential diagnosis. Once mesothelial lineage is established, malignancy-specific studies can help verify a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. BAP1 loss, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, and MTAP loss are highly specific markers of malignancy in a mesothelial lesion, and they attain acceptable diagnostic sensitivity when applied as a diagnostic panel. Novel markers of malignancy, such as 5-hmC loss and increased EZH2 expression, are promising, but have not yet achieved widespread clinical adoption. Some diagnostic markers also have prognostic significance, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry may predict tumor response to immunotherapy. Application and interpretation of these immnuomarkers should always be guided by clinical history, radiographic findings, and above all histomorphology.

Interobserver variation in the assessment of the sarcomatoid and transitional components in biphasic mesotheliomas

The percentage of sarcomatoid component has an impact on prognosis in patients with biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recent study showed that the transitional pattern similar to sarcomatoid component of malignant mesothelioma has negative prognostic significance. Practice guidelines recommend quantification of sarcomatoid component despite poor diagnostic reproducibility of biphasic mesothelioma among thoracic pathologists. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver agreement in the quantification of sarcomatoid component, and in the diagnosis of a transitional component in the biphasic malignant mesothelioma. Thirteen experts in thoracic pathology reviewed the representative H&E and cytokeratin whole-slide images of the 54 biphasic mesotheliomas, without knowledge of BAP1 or p16 deletion status, and completed the survey of 25 questions. The overall interobserver agreement in the assessment of the percentage of the sarcomatoid component in 25% increments was good (wK = 0.62). Excellent agreement was present in 14 of 54 cases (26%), and 3 cases were unanimously scored. Excellent agreement was reached for the cases with 0-24% and > 75% of the sarcomatoid component.The most commonly used criteria for the diagnosis of sarcomatoid component were malignant spindle cells, frank sarcomatoid features and high N/C ratio. The overall interobserver agreement for transitional pattern was fair (wK = 0.40). Unanimous opinion about the absence of transitional pattern was observed in only one case. At least 70% agreement regarding the presence of transitional pattern was observed in 12 cases, with the rest of the cases showing a wide range of disagreement. Morphologic characteristics that favor transitional pattern over non-transitional include sheet-like growth of cohesive, plump, elongated epithelioid cells with well-defined cell borders and a tendency to transition into spindle cells. Our study defined precise morphologic criteria that may be used in the differential diagnosis between transitional pattern and other mesothelioma subtypes including sarcomatoid and epithelioid.

Cyclin D1 immunohistochemical staining to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations

The separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations is a morphologically difficult problem. Mutations/deletions of components of the Hippo pathway are frequent in malignant mesotheliomas, and one downstream effect of aberrant Hippo signaling is increased production of cyclin D1. We examined expression of cyclin D1 nuclear staining in two tissue microarrays containing 52 reactive epithelial mesothelial proliferations, 51 reactive spindle cell mesothelial proliferations, 54 epithelial mesotheliomas, and 22 sarcomatous/desmoplastic mesotheliomas. When present, cyclin D1 staining was always strong, hence the arrays were scored as 0, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, and 76-100% staining. Both arrays showed a similar pattern. Reactive epithelial proliferations generally showed no staining (42/52 cases) or 1-25% staining (10/52 cases) with no cases showing >25% staining. Overall for reactive epithelial proliferations the maximum staining was 14.8% and mean 1.1 ± 2.9%. For epithelial mesotheliomas 39/54 (72%) cases demonstrated >25% staining, with 8/54 in the 26-50% staining range, 9/54 in the 51-75% range, and 22/54 in the >75% range. Combinations of staining using cyclin D1 >50% plus BAP1 or MTAP loss in epithelial mesotheliomas produced about a 10% increase in sensitivity. Reactive spindle cell proliferations showed a broader range of staining with 27/51 in the 1-25% range, 5/51 in the 26-50% range, and 1/51 >50%. Eleven of 22 sarcomatous/desmoplastic mesotheliomas scored 50% or greater. We conclude that for epithelial mesothelial proliferations, the finding of >50% of tumor cells staining supports a diagnosis of epithelial mesothelioma with 100% specificity but only modest (57%) sensitivity.

Evaluation of gene expression levels in the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma

Background

This study aims to evaluate gene expression levels in the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma both which have a distinct treatment and prognosis.

Methods

Between January 2012 and January 2014, 12 newly diagnosed patients with a lung adenocarcinoma, 12 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, and eight healthy individuals as the control group were included. After treatment of the fresh samples of lung adenocarcinoma stored at -80°C for ribonucleic acid isolation, and paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were deparaffinized, complementary deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and expression of 84 genes associated with deoxyribonucleic acid repair were analyzed via real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. According to the expression of tumor cells, expression of each fold change was calculated.

Results

The BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK7, MLH3, MSH4, NEIL3, SMUG1, UNG, XRCC2, and XRCC4 genes showed more than five-fold higher expression in the patients with lung adenocarcinomas, compared to the control group. The patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma showed a five-fold higher expression in the APEX2, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK7, MLH1, MLH3, MSH3, MSH4, NEIL3, PARP2, PARP3, PMS1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51D, RAD52, RPA3, SMUG1, UNG, XPA, XRCC2, and XRCC4 genes, compared to the control group. Comparing malignant pleural mesothelioma with lung adenocarcinoma cases, we found that CDK7, MLH1, TREX1, PRKDC, XPA, PMS1, UNG, and RPA3 genes were overexpressed.

Conclusion

Our study results showed differences between expression profiles of deoxyribonucleic acid repair genes in lung adenocarcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma cells. Based on our study results, we suggest that TREX1, PRKDC, and PMS1 genes may play a key role in the differential diagnosis of these two entities.

Frequent Homozygous Deletions of Type I Interferon Genes in Pleural Mesothelioma Confer Sensitivity to Oncolytic Measles Virus

INTRODUCTION

Oncolytic immunotherapy is based on the use of nonpathogenic replicative oncolytic viruses that infect and kill tumor cells exclusively. Recently, we found that the spontaneous oncolytic activity of the Schwarz strain of measles virus (MV) against human malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) depends on defects in the antiviral type I interferon (IFN-I) response in tumor cells.

METHODS

In this study, we studied three independent human MPM bio-collections to identify the defects in the IFN-I responses in tumor cells.

RESULTS

We show that the most frequent defect is the homozygous deletions (HDs) of all the 14 IFN-I genes (IFN-α and IFN-β) that we found in more than half of MV-sensitive MPM cell lines. These HDs occur together with the HDs of the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A also located in the 9p21.3 chromosome region. Therefore, the IFN-I^-/- MPM cell lines develop a partial and weak IFN-I response when they are exposed to the virus compared with that of normal cells and MV-resistant MPM cell lines. This response consists of the expression of a restricted number of IFN-stimulated genes that do not depend on the presence of IFN-I. In addition, the IFN-I^-/- MPM cell lines infected by MV also develop a pro-inflammatory response associated with stress of the endoplasmic reticulum.

CONCLUSION

Our study emphasizes the link between HDs of IFN-I encoding genes and the CDKN2A gene in MPM and sensitivity to MV oncolytic immunotherapy.

A gene-expression-based test can outperform bap1 and p16 analyses in the differential diagnosis of pleural mesothelial proliferations

The demonstration of tissue invasion by histology is an essential criterion for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations. When tissue invasion cannot be identified, the use of ancillary tests is sometimes necessary. Among investigated markers, the loss of BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) protein expression and the homozygous deletion of p16 have shown 100% specificity in separating benign and malignant mesothelial lesions. However, beyond the excellent specificity of these two markers, their low sensitivity limits their clinical utility. In this context, a previous study developed and tested a novel tool for use in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) using the NanoString System and a classification algorithm. In the current study, the performance of gene classifiers were compared using BAP1 and p16 testing. p16 FISH and BAP1 immunohistochemistry were performed on the same series of 34 epithelioid MPM and 20 benign pleural lesions, which were previously analyzed by the system. The diagnostic performance of p16, BAP1 and our classification models were compared using ROC analysis. It was observed that BAP1 loss and p16 deletion were highly specific for MPM, since they were not detected in benign lesions. However, their AUC values were not completely satisfying (BAP1: 0.8235; p16: 0.7647) particularly due to their low sensitivities. As expected, combining BAP1 and p16 tests increased the diagnostic sensitivity, thus improving the AUC (0.8824). In the same series of cases, our MPM tool outperformed BAP1 and p16 tests using the 22 and 40-gene classification models (AUC 22-gene model: 0.9996; AUC 40-gene model: 0.9990). In conclusion, the present gene-expression-based classification exhibited great potential and further validation is required to support these findings in a prospective fashion, in order to provide a solid alternative for pleural proliferation diagnosis.

Primary pleural epithelioid sarcoma of the proximal type: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is an uncommon soft tissue neoplasm first described in 1970. It is a unique soft tissue neoplasm of adolescents and younger adults which usually presents as a subcutaneous and deep dermal mass in the distal portions of the extremities. The proximal-type variant of this rare soft tissue neoplasm was only recently reported. The proximal form typically arise in proximal extremities and in the deep parts of pelvis, perineum and genital tract. The proximal type variant has distinct histological characteristics and aggressive clinical course as compared to the distal ES. Inactivation of INI1 has been reported in both distal and proximal variants and can help to make the diagnosis. Furthermore, the proximal variant has a possible association with malignant rhabdoid neoplasm. We describe here a case of primary pleural ES of the proximal type and highlight its diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

The value of BRCA-1-associated protein 1 expression and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A deletion to distinguish peritoneal malignant mesothelioma from peritoneal location of carcinoma in effusion cytology specimens

OBJECTIVE

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM), represents 30% of all malignant mesothelioma, and is characterised by a difficult diagnosis and different presentations. Immunohistochemistry has improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between metastatic adenocarcinoma and malignant mesothelioma, and loss of BRCA-1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression is correlated with BAP1 somatic or constitutional genetic defects. Furthermore, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) is frequently lost in DMPM. In the present study, we assessed the value of integrating BAP1 in the panel of antibodies used for the diagnosis of DMPM in cytological samples. Since p16 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) assay could constitute an additional useful adjunct, results of BAP1 immunostaining and p16 FISH assays have been compared.

METHODS

Forty-eight DMPM patients and 71 peritoneal carcinomatosis patients were included. BAP1 immunohistochemical and CDKN2A FISH techniques were performed on tissue specimens of DMPM (n = 48) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 71) then on cell-block of DMPM (n = 16), peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 25) and peritoneal benign effusion (n = 5).

RESULTS

Loss of BAP1 expression was observed in 56.3% of DMPM while none of the peritoneal carcinoma specimens showed BAP1 loss of expression. CDKN2A loss was observed in 34.9% DMPM and 2.1% peritoneal carcinoma. Although BAP1 immunostaining was successful in 100% of cytological DMPM samples, CDKN2A deletion status could be obtained for 75% of DMPM cases.

CONCLUSION

BAP1 immunostaining represents an objective and reproducible diagnostic biomarker for peritoneal mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens and should be preferred to CDKN2A FISH analysis on these precious samples.