1
|
Keyhanian K, Busca A, Howitt B, Hammer P, Kingsley L, Lo B. Dominant Negative PTEN Alterations in Endometrial Carcinoma Are Associated With Retained Immunohistochemical PTEN Expression. Am J Surg Pathol 2025:00000478-990000000-00525. [PMID: 40401766 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2025]
Abstract
PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered complimentary for assessment of PTEN abnormality in endometrial carcinoma (EC), since PTEN IHC staining pattern does not entirely correlate with the presence and absence of mutations on sequencing. A set of functionally defective PTEN variants with stable protein levels are known to act in a dominant-negative manner to suppress wild-type PTEN activity. Our objective was to evaluate PTEN IHC patterns in ECs with dominant-negative (DN) PTEN mutations. ECs with next-generation sequencing (NGS, using Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3) over a 3-year period were enrolled. PTEN IHC was scored as loss, subclonal loss, reduced, and intact (the last 3 considered retained). Of 182 EC cases, 114 (62.6%) were identified to have PTEN mutation(s), the majority of endometrioid histotype (87.7%) from all EC molecular classes. Forty-seven cases (41.2%) harbored DN mutations which were of endometrioid (FIGO 1 [n=15, 31.9%], FIGO 2 [n=23, 48.9%], FIGO 3 [n=3, 6.4%]), dedifferentiated (n=2, 4%), carcinosarcoma (n=3, 6%), mixed endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma (n=1, 2%) histotype; with representatives from all molecular classes. PTEN IHC showed retained expression in 95.8% (45/47) of DN-mutated cases (intact staining in 36 [76.6%], reduced staining in 6 [12.5%], and subclonal loss in 3 [6.4%]) cases. Two cases showed loss of expression (4.2%). In the PTEN wild-type group, loss and subclonal loss of expression were seen in 12.5% and 9.4%, respectively. Our results indicate that DN PTEN mutations are common in EC, and are associated with retained IHC staining (intact, reduced, or subclonal loss). These results highlight that IHC and NGS are both required in capturing the full spectrum of PTEN-abnormal EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kianoosh Keyhanian
- Gynecologic Pathologist, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Aurelia Busca
- Gynecologic Pathologist, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Phoebe Hammer
- Gynecologic Pathology Fellow, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Bryan Lo
- The Ottawa Hospital Molecular Oncology Diagnostics Laboratory, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan Y, Wang Y, Tang J, Liu X, Wang J, Song G, Li H. Comprehensive Analysis of Oncogenic Somatic Alterations of Mismatch Repair Gene in Breast Cancer Patients. Bioengineering (Basel) 2025; 12:426. [PMID: 40281786 PMCID: PMC12025084 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12040426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2025] [Revised: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Recent clinical trials have suggested that solid cancers with mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency are highly responsive to immunotherapy, regardless of cancer types. Previous MMR-related studies on breast cancer have predominantly focused on germline variants. However, the somatic MMR alterations have not been comprehensively characterized in breast cancer. In this study, we integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical data from over 3000 breast cancer cases across six public cohorts. Our findings revealed that 1.2% of breast cancers harbored oncogenic somatic MMR alterations, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) demonstrating the highest mutation rate at 3.1%. Additionally, somatic MMR alterations were significantly associated with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and MMR-related mutational signatures, indicating that somatic MMR alterations led to impaired function of the MMR system. Biallelic inactivation of MMR genes resulted in a more pronounced loss of MMR function compared to monoallelic inactivation. Importantly, these MMR alterations significantly increased the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and neoantigen load in breast cancer, regardless of MSI-H status. These findings indicate that the frequency of MMR alterations is highest in TNBC and that MMR alterations in breast cancer can lead to MMR functional deficiencies, suggesting that some patients harboring such alterations may benefit from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.)
| | - Yang Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Comprehensive Clinical Trial Ward, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China;
| | - Junjie Tang
- The First Clinical Medical School, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China;
| | - Xiaoran Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.)
| | - Jichuan Wang
- Musculoskleletal Tumor Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Musculoskeletal Tumors, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100041, China;
| | - Guohong Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.)
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China; (Y.Y.); (X.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaukat A, Shakeel L, Khan A, Irfan H, Akilimali A. Addressing the challenge of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: the role of mirvetuximab soravtansine. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2025; 87:1-7. [PMID: 40109581 PMCID: PMC11918762 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha Shaukat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Laiba Shakeel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Afsheen Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hamza Irfan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Aymar Akilimali
- Department of Research, Medical Research circle, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Highly Sensitive Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry Assessment in Endometrial Aspirates as a Tool for Cancer Risk Individualization in Lynch Syndrome. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100158. [PMID: 36918055 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
Women with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at increased risk of endometrial cancer (EC), among other tumors, and are characterized by mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI). While risk-reducing gynecological surgeries are effective in decreasing EC incidence, doubts arise regarding the appropriate timing of the surgery. We explored the usefulness of highly-sensitive MSI (hs-MSI) assessment in endometrial aspirates for the individualization of gynecological surveillance in LS carriers. Ninety-three women with LS, 25 sporadic EC patients (9 MMR-proficient and 16 MMR-deficient), and 30 women with benign gynecological disease were included in this study. Hs-MSI was assessed in prospectively collected endometrial aspirates in 67 LS carriers, EC cases, and controls. MMR, PTEN, ARID1A, and PAX2 expression patterns were evaluated in LS samples. Follow-up aspirates from eight LS carriers were also analyzed. Elevated hs-MSI scores were detected in all aspirates from MMR-deficient EC cases (3 LS and 16 sporadic), being negative in aspirates from controls and MMR-proficient EC cases. Positive hs-MSI scores were also detected in all four LS aspirates reported as complex hyperplasia. High hs-MSI was also present in 10 of 49 aspirates (20%) from LS carriers presenting a morphologically normal endometrium, where MMR expression loss was detected in 69% of the samples. Interestingly, the hs-MSI score was positively correlated with MMR-deficient gland density and the presence of MMR-deficient clusters, colocalizing with PTEN and ARID1A expression loss. High hs-MSI scores and clonality were evidenced in two samples collected up to four months before EC diagnosis; hs-MSI scores increased over time in five LS carriers, whereas they decreased in a patient with endometrial hyperplasia after progestin therapy. In LS carriers, elevated hs-MSI scores were detected in aspirates from premalignant and malignant lesions and normal endometrium, correlating with MMR protein loss. Hs-MSI assessment and MMR immunohistochemistry may help individualize EC risk assessment in women with LS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang X, Wang A, Han L, Liang B, Allard G, Diver E, Howitt BE. PTEN Deficiency in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma is Associated with Poor Progression-Free Survival and is Mutually Exclusive with CCNE1 Amplification. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100106. [PMID: 36805789 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
As a critical tumor suppressor, PTEN has gained much attention in cancer research. Emerging evidence suggests an association between PTEN status and clinical outcome in certain tumors, and may be predictive of response to several therapies. However, the significance of PTEN deficiency in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) is still poorly understood. We evaluated PTEN expression in HGSCs and determined its clinical relevance. A cohort of 76 HGSC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of PTEN, ER, PR, AR, CD8, FOXP3, and PD-L1 was performed. Targeted gene panel testing by massively parallel sequencing was performed in 51 cases. PTEN deficiency (complete or subclonal loss) detected by IHC was identified in 13 of the 62 HGSCs (21%) and was significantly correlated with reduced expression of ER and worse first progression-free survival (P < .05) but not with PD-L1 expression, the density of intratumoral T lymphocytes, or overall survival. In our cohort, tumor progression within 1 year of PARP inhibitor therapy was found more frequently in PTEN-deficient cases than in PTEN-intact cases (100% vs 52%). Molecular profiling showed that intragenic mutation or deletion was not the predominant mechanism for PTEN inactivation in HGSCs. In addition, CCNE1 amplification was found to be mutually exclusive with PTEN deficiency at both protein and DNA levels. An analysis of the genomic data from 1702 HGSC samples deposited with The Cancer Genome Atlas database obtained from cBioPortal confirmed the low rate of detection of PTEN gene alterations and the mutually exclusive nature of PTEN loss and CCNE1 amplification in HGSCs. These findings indicate that PTEN deficiency defines a distinct clinically significant subgroup of HGSCs with a tendency for ER negativity, wild-type CCNE1 status, inferior clinical outcomes, and potential drug resistance. These tumors may benefit from PI3K pathway inhibitors in combination with other ovarian cancer regimens, which deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoming Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Aihui Wang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lucy Han
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Brooke Liang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Grace Allard
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Elisabeth Diver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ImmunoGen, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tian C, Su J, Ma Z, Wu Y, Ma H. lncRNA NBAT1 Inhibits Cell Metastasis and Promotes Apoptosis in Endometrial Cancer by Sponging miR-21-5p to Regulate PTEN. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:9304392. [PMID: 35912140 PMCID: PMC9328976 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9304392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective Long noncoding RNA neuroblastoma-associated transcript 1 (NBAT1) is implicated in the progression of various cancers. Nevertheless, its biological function in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. Methods The levels of NBAT1, miR-21-5p, and PTEN in EC cells and EC tissues were examined by RT-qPCR. Western blot was carried out to assess the protein expression of PTEN. The dual-luciferase reporter assay was conducted to explore the interactions among NBAT1, miR-21-5p, and PTEN. The effect of NBAT1 on EC proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis was evaluated by CCK-8, transwell assays, wound healing, and flow cytometry. miR-21-5p mimics or NBAT1+miR-21-5p were transfected into HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells to investigate whether NBAT1 regulated EC tumorigenesis via sponging miR-21-5p. Results NBAT1 is downregulated, and miR-21-5p is upregulated in EC cells and tumor tissues. Overexpression of NBAT1 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of EC cells and facilitated apoptosis. NBAT1 directly binds and negatively regulates miR-21-5p in EC. miR-21-5p mimics reverses the effect of lncRNA NBAT1 overexpression on the proliferation and migration of EC cells. PTEN is a downstream gene of miR-21-5p. lncRNA NBTA1 elevates PTEN expression via sponging miR-21-5p. Conclusions lncRNA NBAT1 acts as a tumor suppressor in EC via regulating PTEN through sponging miR-21-5p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhua Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002 Ningxia, China
| | - Jing Su
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002 Ningxia, China
| | - Zhao Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002 Ningxia, China
| | - Yang Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002 Ningxia, China
| | - Hongyun Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002 Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hu L, Sun J, Li Z, Qu Z, Liu Y, Wan Q, Liu J, Ding X, Zang F, Zhang J, Yao L, Xu Y, Wang Y, Xie Y. Clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair genes in Chinese breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:52. [PMID: 35449176 PMCID: PMC9023502 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00417-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence and clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes have not been investigated in large series of breast cancers. In this study, we screened the germline variants in MMR genes in 8085 consecutive Chinese breast cancer patients, and investigated the MMR/PD-L1 protein expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) of breast tumors from MMR variant carriers. We found that 15 of 8085 patients (0.19%) carried a pathogenic germline variant in MMR genes. Compared with non-carriers, MMR variant carriers might have worse recurrence-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratios [HR] = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.12-6.49, P = 0.027) and distant recurrence-free survival (unadjusted HR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.45-7.22, P = 0.004). More importantly, some of the breast cancers from MMR carriers displayed MMR protein loss (5/13), TMB-high (2/10), and PD-L1 positive expression (9/13). This study showed that MMR variant carriers were rare in breast cancer. They might have worse survival and part of them might benefit from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Hu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jie Sun
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Zhongwu Li
- Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Ziwei Qu
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China
| | - Yan Liu
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China
| | - Qiting Wan
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jiaming Liu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xinyun Ding
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Fan Zang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lu Yao
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Ye Xu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yin Wang
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China.
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qureshi S, Chan N, George M, Ganesan S, Toppmeyer D, Omene C. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Search for the Optimal Biomarker. Biomark Insights 2022; 17:11772719221078774. [PMID: 35221668 PMCID: PMC8874164 DOI: 10.1177/11772719221078774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a high-risk and aggressive malignancy characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the surface of malignant cells, and by the lack of overexpression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). It has limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. There is now a growing body of evidence on the role of immunotherapy in TNBC, however much of the data from clinical trials is conflicting and thus, challenging for clinicians to integrate the data into clinical practice. Landmark phase III trials using immunotherapy in the early-stage neoadjuvant setting concluded that the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo while others found no significant improvement in pCR. Phase III trials have investigated the utility of immunotherapy in previously untreated metastatic TNBC, and these studies have similarly arrived at inconsistent conclusions. Some studies showed no benefit while others demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in overall survival in the PD-L1 positive population. It is not yet clear which biomarkers are most useful, and assays for these biomarkers have not been standardized. Given the often serious and severe side effects of immunotherapy, it is important and necessary to identify predictive biomarkers of response and resistance in order to enhance patient selection. In this review, we will discuss both the challenges of traditional biomarkers and the opportunities of emerging biomarkers for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaf Qureshi
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nancy Chan
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Mridula George
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Shridar Ganesan
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Deborah Toppmeyer
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Coral Omene
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jumaah AS, Al-Haddad HS, Salem MM, McAllister KA, Yasseen AA. Mismatch repair deficiency and clinicopathological characteristics in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pathol Transl Med 2021; 55:202-211. [PMID: 33845554 PMCID: PMC8141969 DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2021.02.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) occurs frequently in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and is an important prognostic marker. However, the frequency of MMR deficiency (D-MMR) in EC remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed this inconsistency and evaluated related clinicopathology. Methods Electronic databases were searched for articles: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Wiley Online Library. Data were extracted from 25 EC studies of D-MMR to generate a clinical dataset of 7,459 patients. A random-effects model produced pooled estimates of D-MMR EC frequency with 95% confidence interval (CI) for meta-analysis. Results The overall pooled proportion of D-MMR was 24.477% (95% CI, 21.022 to 28.106) in EC. The Lynch syndrome subgroup had 22.907% pooled D-MMR (95% CI, 14.852 to 32.116). D-MMR was highest in type I EC (25.810) (95% CI, 22.503 to 29.261) compared to type II (13.736) (95% CI, 8.392 to 20.144). Pooled D-MMR was highest at EC stage and grades I–II (79.430% and 65.718%, respectively) and lowest in stages III–IV and grade III (20.168% and 21.529%). The pooled odd ratios comparing D-MMR to proficient MMR favored low-stage EC disease (1.565; 0.894 to 2.740), lymphovascular invasion (1.765; 1.293 to 2.409), and myometrial invasion >50% (1.271; 0.871 to 1.853). Conclusions Almost one-quarter of EC patients present with D-MMR tumors. The majority has less aggressive endometrioid histology. D-MMR presents at lower tumor stages compared to MMR-proficient cases in EC. However other metastatic parameters are comparatively higher in the D-MMR disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa Salah Jumaah
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
| | | | - Mais Muhammed Salem
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
| | | | - Akeel Abed Yasseen
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030467. [PMID: 33530449 PMCID: PMC7865821 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific, as most of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Therefore, the identification of MSI/dMMR requires additional diagnostic tools to identify LS. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS and present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with current strategies, which should be taken into account in order to improve the diagnosis of LS. Abstract Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific to it, as approximately 80% of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Methods leading to the diagnosis of LS have considerably evolved in recent years and so have tumoral tests for LS screening and for the discrimination of LS-related to MSI-sporadic tumors. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS, including the clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. We present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with the current strategies, which should be taken into account to improve the diagnosis of LS and avoid inappropriate clinical management.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kunnackal John G, Das Villgran V, Caufield-Noll C, Giardiello FM. Comparison of universal screening in major lynch-associated tumors: a systematic review of literature. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:57-67. [PMID: 33426601 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00226-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased lifetime risk of several cancers including colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC), ovarian (OC), urinary (UT) and sebaceous tumors (ST). The benefit for universal screening in CRC and EC is well known. However, this benefit in other major lynch-associated tumors is unclear. We performed a systematic review of all published articles in the MEDLINE database between 2005 to 2017 to identify studies performing universal screening for LS in unselected CRC, EC, OC, UT and ST. All cases with MSI-H (instability in two or more markers) or missing one or more proteins on IHC testing were considered screening positive. Cases with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation positive were considered to have somatic mutations. A total of 3788 articles were identified in MEDLINE yielding 129 study arms from 113 studies. The overall pooled yield of universal LS screening and germline mismatch gene mutation was significantly different across the major LS-associated tumors (Mann Whitney test, p < 0.001). The pooled screening yield was highest in ST [52.5% (355/676), 95% CI 48.74-56.26%] followed by EC [22.65% (1142/5041), 95% CI 21.54-23.86%], CRC [11.9% (5649/47,545), 95% CI 11.61-12.19%], OC [11.29% (320/2833), 95% CI 10.13-12.47%] and UT [11.2% (31/276), 95% CI 7.48-14.92%]. ST also had the highest pooled germline positivity for mismatch repair gene mutation [18.8%, 33/176, 95%CI 13.03-24.57], followed by EC [2.6% (97/3765), 95% CI 2.09-3.11], CRC [1.8% (682/37,220), 95% CI 1.66-1.94%], UT [1.8%(3/164), 95% CI - 0.24-3.83%] and OC [0.83%(25/2983), 95% CI 0.48-1.12%]. LS screening in EC yielded significantly higher somatic mutations compared to CRC [pooled percentage 16.94% [(538/3176), 95%CI 15.60-18.20%] vs. 5.23% [(1639/26,152), 95% CI 4.93-5.47%], Mann Whitney test, p < 0.0001. Universal LS testing should be routinely performed in OC, UT and STs in addition to CRC and EC. Our findings also support consideration for IHC and somatic mutation testing before germline testing in EC due to higher prevalence of somatic mutations as well as germline testing in all patients with ST. Our results have implications for future design of LS screening programs and further studies are needed to assess the cost effectiveness and burden on genetic counselling services with expanded universal testing for LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Kunnackal John
- Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 511 Idlewild Ave, Easton, MD, 21601, USA.
| | - Vipin Das Villgran
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellow, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | | | - Francis M Giardiello
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carr C, Son J, Yao M, Priyadarshini A, Marquard J, Vargas R, Michener C, AlHilli MM. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of endometrial Cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency in the era of universal Lynch syndrome screening. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:712-720. [PMID: 33046272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and survival impact associated with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroups of endometrial cancer (EC) in patients undergoing universal screening for Lynch Syndrome. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained gynecologic oncology registry of patients who underwent surgery for EC was conducted. All pathology specimens underwent tumor testing using immunohistochemistry for MMR deficiency with reflex MLH1 promotor methylation testing. Tumors were classified as MMR-I (intact MMR expression), MMR-DM (MMR deficient due to MLH1 methylation), and MMR-DU (MMR deficient without MLH1 methylation). Univariate and multivariate analysis performed to determine factors associated with MMR-DM. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed by stage and endometrioid subgroup. RESULTS From 2012 to 2016, 1018 EC patients were identified and screened. Overall, 71.6% were classified as MMR-I, 23.8% MMR-DM, and 4.6% MMR-DU. In comparison to MMR-DU, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, postmenopausal status, lymphovascular space invasion, and pure endometrioid histology. Compared to MMR-I, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and higher grade on multivariable analysis. There was no difference in PFS and OS between the three groups overall. In patients with endometrioid EC, MMR-DM tumors were associated with lower PFS vs. MMR-I (HR:2.51, CI:1.54, 4.10, P < 0.001). This effect persisted for stage I/II endometrioid EC (HR 2.66, CI:1.34, 5.26 p = 0.005). No difference in PFS or OS was noted among stage III/IV endometrioid tumors. CONCLUSION MMR deficiency is associated with adverse prognostic factors and worse PFS among endometrioid tumors, particularly in early stage EC. MMR testing outside of LS screening has prognostic value, warranting consideration for inclusion as a biomarker in prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Carr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America
| | - Jessica Son
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Meng Yao
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Seciton of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Anju Priyadarshini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Jessica Marquard
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Roberto Vargas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Chad Michener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Mariam M AlHilli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dörk T, Hillemanns P, Tempfer C, Breu J, Fleisch MC. Genetic Susceptibility to Endometrial Cancer: Risk Factors and Clinical Management. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092407. [PMID: 32854222 PMCID: PMC7565375 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common cancer affecting the female reproductive organs in higher-income states. Apart from reproductive factors and excess weight, genetic predisposition is increasingly recognized as a major factor in endometrial cancer risk. Endometrial cancer is genetically heterogeneous: while a subgroup of patients belongs to cancer predisposition syndromes (most notably the Lynch Syndrome) with high to intermediate lifetime risks, there are also several common genomic polymorphisms contributing to the spectrum of germline predispositions. Germline variants and somatic events may act in concert to modulate the molecular evolution of the tumor, where mismatch-repair deficiency is common in endometrioid endometrial tumors whereas homologous recombinational repair deficiency has been described for non-endometrioid endometrial tumors. In this review, we will survey the currently known genomic predispositions for endometrial cancer and discuss their relevance for clinical management in terms of counseling, screening and novel treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thilo Dörk
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
- Correspondence:
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Clemens Tempfer
- Department of Gynaecology, Marien-Hospital, Ruhr University of Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany;
| | - Julius Breu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Witten/Herdecke, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany; (J.B.); (M.C.F.)
| | - Markus C. Fleisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Witten/Herdecke, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany; (J.B.); (M.C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fusco N, Sajjadi E, Venetis K, Gaudioso G, Lopez G, Corti C, Rocco EG, Criscitiello C, Malapelle U, Invernizzi M. PTEN Alterations and Their Role in Cancer Management: Are We Making Headway on Precision Medicine? Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:E719. [PMID: 32605290 PMCID: PMC7397204 DOI: 10.3390/genes11070719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Alterations in the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) occur in a substantial proportion of solid tumors. These events drive tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Given its central role as a downregulator of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, PTEN is deeply involved in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. This gene is also implicated in the modulation of the DNA damage response and in tumor immune microenvironment modeling. Despite the actionability of PTEN alterations, their role as biomarkers remains controversial in clinical practice. To date, there is still a substantial lack of validated guidelines and/or recommendations for PTEN testing. Here, we provide an update on the current state of knowledge on biologic and genetic alterations of PTEN across the most frequent solid tumors, as well as on their actual and/or possible clinical applications. We focus on possible tailored schemes for cancer patients' clinical management, including risk assessment, diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (K.V.); (E.G.R.)
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Konstantinos Venetis
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (K.V.); (E.G.R.)
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- Doctoral Program in Translational Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Gaudioso
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20131 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.); (C.C.)
| | - Gianluca Lopez
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20131 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.); (C.C.)
| | - Chiara Corti
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20131 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.); (C.C.)
| | - Elena Guerini Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (K.V.); (E.G.R.)
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Marco Invernizzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
PTEN Expression as a Complementary Biomarker for Mismatch Repair Testing in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21041461. [PMID: 32098071 PMCID: PMC7073136 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) analysis in breast cancer may help to inform immunotherapy decisions but it lacks breast-specific guidelines. Unlike in other neoplasms, MMR protein loss shows intra-tumor heterogeneity and it is not mirrored by microsatellite instability in the breast. Additional biomarkers can improve MMR clinical testing. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) inactivation is an early oncogenic event that is associated with MMR deficiency (dMMR) in several tumors. Here, we sought to characterize the diagnostic utility of PTEN expression analysis for MMR status assessment in breast cancer. A total of 608 breast cancers were profiled for their MMR and PTEN status. Proteins expression and distribution were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays and confirmed on full sections; PTEN copy number alterations were detected using a real-time PCR assay. Overall, 78 (12.8%) cases were MMR-heterogeneous (hMMR), while all patterns of PTEN expression showed no intra-tumor heterogeneity. Wild-type PTEN expression was observed in 15 (18.5%) dMMR tumors (p < 0.0001). Survival analyses revealed significant correlations between MMR-proficient (pMMR), PTEN expression, and a better outcome. The positive predictive value of PTEN-retained status for pMMR ranged from 94.6% in estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- tumors to 100% in HER2-amplified and ER-/HER2- cases. We propose a novel diagnostic algorithm where PTEN expression analysis can be employed to identify pMMR breast cancers.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma has been traditionally divided into type 1 or endometrioid type that is usually moderate to well differentiated and type 2 that is usually poorly differentiated with high histologic grade and aggressive clinical behavior. However, interobserver diagnostic agreement is suboptimal, particularly among the high-grade histotypes. Furthermore, recent data indicate that this histotype assignment does not independently correlate with survival. In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of endometrial carcinoma and extensive molecular studies have been performed under The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) leading to molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma that has been shown to be significantly prognostic. This classification system divides the tumors into 4 subgroups namely, polymerase ε exonuclease (POLE) ultramutated, hypermutated microsatellite instability, copy number low, and copy number high (serous-like). Carcinomas with POLE domain hotspot mutations are highly prognostically favorable; those with copy number alterations and TP53 mutations are highly aggressive; and microsatellite unstable and "copy number low" endometrioid are associated with intermediate prognoses. The TCGA applied methods that are too costly and cumbersome for widespread implementation into routine clinical practice. Several other groups have attempted to identify these categories by using immunohistochemical biomarkers rather than molecular studies. Immunohistochemical biomarkers have been used successfully to identify all the subgroups except for POLE ultramutated, which requires sequencing for proper categorization. It is hoped that future studies will identify a suitable biomarker for POLE mutation so that this classification can be routinely used in all medical centers.
Collapse
|
17
|
Determination of Mismatch Repair Status in Human Cancer and Its Clinical Significance: Does One Size Fit All? Adv Anat Pathol 2019; 26:270-279. [PMID: 30932972 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The clinical management of cancers has progressed rapidly into the immunopathology era, with the unprecedented histology-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab in mismatch repair (MMR) deficient tumors. Despite the significant recent achievements in the treatment of these patients, however, the identification of clinically relevant subclasses of cancers based on the MMR status remains a major challenge. Many investigations have assessed the role of different diagnostic tools, including immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden in both prognostic and therapeutic settings, with heterogenous results. To date, there are no tumor-specific guidelines or companion diagnostic tests for MMR assessment, and this analysis is often performed with locally developed methods. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-knowledge of MMR alterations in syndromic and sporadic tumors and discuss the available armamentarium for MMR pathologic characterization, from morphology to high-throughput molecular tools.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ryan NAJ, Glaire MA, Blake D, Cabrera-Dandy M, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ. The proportion of endometrial cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Genet Med 2019; 21:2167-2180. [PMID: 31086306 PMCID: PMC8076013 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0536-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is often the sentinel cancer in women with Lynch syndrome (LS). However, efforts to implement universal LS screening in EC patients have been hampered by a lack of evidence detailing the proportion of EC patients that would be expected to screen positive for LS. Methods Studies were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science. Proportions of test positivity were calculated by random and fixed-effects meta-analysis models. I2 score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Results Fifty-three studies, including 12,633 EC patients, met the inclusion criteria. The overall proportion of endometrial tumors with microsatellite instability or mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.28, I2: 71%) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.25–0.27, I2: 88%), respectively. Of those women with abnormal tumor testing, 0.29 (95% CI 0.25–0.33, I2: 83%) had LS-associated pathogenic variants on germline testing; therefore around 3% of ECs can be attributed to LS. Preselection of EC cases did increase the proportion of germline LS diagnoses. Conclusion The current study suggests that prevalence of LS in EC patients is approximately 3%, similar to that of colorectal cancer patients; therefore our data support the implementation of universal EC screening for LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A J Ryan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - M A Glaire
- Tumor Genomics and Immunology Group, The Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Blake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - M Cabrera-Dandy
- Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Molecular Modifiers of Hormone Receptor Action: Decreased Androgen Receptor Expression in Mismatch Repair Deficient Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38:44-51. [PMID: 29210800 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma is related to estrogen excess and expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Epidemiological evidence suggests that exposure to elevated androgens, as in polycystic ovarian syndrome, increases the risk of endometrial cancer. Factors impacting androgen receptor (AR) expression are not well studied. Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency due to MLH1 gene methylation is one of the most common molecular alterations in endometrial cancer, occurring in 15% to 20% of cases. MLH1 methylation can be associated with decreased expression of other genes, so we examined the effect of MMR status on AR expression. As NF-κB is known to induce AR, this transcription factor was also examined. Three hundred forty-four unselected endometrial carcinomas were evaluated for DNA MMR. Loss of expression of MLH1 with MLH1 methylation was defined as MMR deficient, and positive expression of MMR proteins was defined as MMR intact. A case-control cohort of 96 grade 2 endometrioid carcinomas was studied from this set (47 MMR deficient, 49 MMR intact). Cases were matched for histotype, grade, and age. AR and NF-κB immunohistochemical expression were evaluated by 2 different scoring systems (CAP/ASCO and Allred) used for estrogen receptor. Despite higher levels of NF-κB, MMR deficiency was associated with a significantly lower mean percentage of AR expression. The MMR deficient group had more variable AR expression, with more cases scoring on the lower end of the spectrum. These findings have implications for clinical trials of AR antagonists in gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
In this review, we highlight the benign and premalignant lesions of the endometrium that the pathologist may encounter in daily practice. We begin by detailing our current understanding of excess estrogen in the progression of endometrial neoplasia. We outline the currently accepted terminology to be used when evaluating proliferative endometrial lesions, while highlighting their key features. Attention is then turned to the molecular underpinnings of neoplastic progression and how this can be exploited with immunohistochemical stains when appropriate. Finally, we discuss types of metaplasia and their associations, including so-called papillary proliferations of the endometrium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley Daniel Mallinger
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 517, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Charles Matthew Quick
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 517, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Garg K, Karnezis AN, Rabban JT. Uncommon hereditary gynaecological tumour syndromes: pathological features in tumours that may predict risk for a germline mutation. Pathology 2018; 50:238-256. [PMID: 29373116 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The most common hereditary gynaecological tumour syndromes are hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome. However, pathologists also may encounter gynaecological tumours in women with rare hereditary syndromes. Many of these tumours exhibit distinctive gross and microscopic features that are associated with a risk for an inherited gene mutation. The sensitivity and specificity of these tumour pathology features for predicting an inherited mutation vary depending on the syndrome. By recognising these tumour features, pathologists may potentially contribute to the diagnosis of an unsuspected syndrome by recommending referral of the patient for formal risk assessment by genetic counselling. Patients additionally benefit from diagnosis of an inherited syndrome because many also carry a lifetime risk for developing primary malignancies outside of the gynaecological tract. Early diagnosis of an inherited syndrome permits early screening, detection, and management of additional malignancies associated with the syndrome. This review highlights these rare syndromes and their tumour pathology, including Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (gastric type mucinous carcinoma of the cervix; ovarian sex cord tumour with annular tubules); hereditary leiomyoma renal cell carcinoma syndrome (uterine leiomyoma); tuberous sclerosis complex (uterine PEComa; uterine lymphangioleiomyomatosis); DICER1 syndrome (ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour; cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma); rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome 2 (small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type); Cowden syndrome (endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma); naevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (ovarian fibroma); and Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the broad ligament).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna Garg
- University of California San Francisco, Pathology Department, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Joseph T Rabban
- University of California San Francisco, Pathology Department, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) expression correlates with histological grade and survival in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch 2017; 472:623-633. [PMID: 29243125 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2278-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) is involved in initiating DNA replication and is upregulated during licensed G0 phase of the cell cycle. This early expression permits its labeling of more proliferating cells than those by Ki-67. Here using a cohort of 89 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, we report findings made on the prognostic value of MCM6 based on immunohistochemical labeling index (LI) of the protein in comparison with that of Ki67 as no such information is currently available. Additionally, we examined the prognostic values of these markers based on their mRNA expression using a cohort of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC, n = 307) taken from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Our evidence indicated the presence of a positive correlation between the LI of MCM6 and the histological grade of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (grade I, 66.7%; grade II, 75.3%; grade III, 81.4%; p < 0.001) and an inverse correlation between the LI of MCM6 and the overall and progression-free survival (p = 0.02 for both). The LI of Ki-67 correlated with grade (p < 0.001), but not survival. The MCM6 and Ki-67 inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficients were excellent: 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.91) and 0.84 (0.77-0.90), respectively. For in silico analyses of the TCGA cohort, both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03, respectively) revealed high MCM6 mRNA Z-scores associated with reduced overall survival. This association was absent for Ki-67. MCM6 is thus a highly reproducible marker of poor prognosis in endometrial cancer. Evaluation of MCM6 should thus be considered in daily practice for risk stratification.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu RC, Veras E, Lin J, Gerry E, Bahadirli-Talbott A, Baras A, Ayhan A, Shih IM, Wang TL. Elucidating the pathogenesis of synchronous and metachronous tumors in a woman with endometrioid carcinomas using a whole-exome sequencing approach. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2017; 3:a001693. [PMID: 29162652 PMCID: PMC5701312 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a001693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Synchronous endometrial and ovarian (SEO) carcinomas involve endometrioid neoplasms in both the ovary and uterus at the time of diagnosis. Patients were traditionally classified as having independent primary SEO lesions or as having metastatic endometrioid carcinoma. Recent studies have supported that SEO tumors result from the dissemination of cells from one organ site to another. However, whether this can be considered a "metastasis" or "dissemination" remains unclear. In this report, we performed whole-exome sequencing of tumor samples from a woman with well-differentiated endometrioid SEO tumors and a clinical "recurrent" poorly differentiated peritoneal tumor that was diagnosed 8 years after the complete resection of the SEO tumors. Somatic mutation analysis identified 132, 171, and 1214 nonsynonymous mutations in the endometrial, ovarian, and peritoneal carcinomas, respectively. A unique mutation signature associated with mismatch repair deficiency was observed in all three tumors. The SEO carcinomas shared 57 nonsynonymous mutations, whereas the clinically suspected recurrent carcinoma shared only eight nonsynonymous mutations with the SEO tumors. One of the eight shared somatic mutations involved PTEN; these shared mutations represent the earliest genetic alteration in the ancestor cell clone. Based on analysis of the phylogenetic tree, we predicted that the so-called recurrent peritoneal tumor was derived from the same endometrial ancestor clone as the SEO tumors, and that this clone migrated and established benign peritoneal endometriosis where the peritoneal tumor later arose. This case highlights the usefulness of next-generation sequencing in defining the etiology and clonal relationships of synchronous and metachronous tumors from patients, thus providing valuable insight to aid in the clinical management of rare or ambiguous tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ren-Chin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Pathology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| | - Ema Veras
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lin
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Emily Gerry
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Asli Bahadirli-Talbott
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Alexander Baras
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Ayse Ayhan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Pathology, Seirei Mikatahara Hospital, Hamamatsu 3453, Japan
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Endometrium: An Expanded Immunohistochemical Analysis Including PAX-8 and Basal-Like Carcinoma Surrogate Markers. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:410-8. [PMID: 26598976 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium (UCAe) is an aggressive, underrecognized high-grade carcinoma that can occur either in pure form or in conjunction with low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (i.e. dedifferentiated carcinoma). The typical solid growth pattern of UCAe can create a diagnostic dilemma as it is frequently misinterpreted as the solid component of an endometrial carcinoma or as a sarcoma. In addition, the high nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, high mitotic index, and geographic necrosis are reminiscent of basal-like carcinoma of breast (BLCB). This study was undertaken to determine the role of a selected group of immunomarkers in the distinction of UCAe from other endometrial carcinomas, and assess the expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins, and surrogate BLCB immunomarkers in this type of tumor. Cases of UCAe were stained with antibodies against keratin cocktail, CK8/18, PAX-8, and estrogen receptor: 35 cases; progesterone receptor and Her-2/neu: 33 cases; CD44, e-cadherin, p16, and p53: 32 cases; and CK5/6, EGFR, and c-Kit: 18 cases. In addition, mismatch repair protein markers MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were performed in 34 cases. We found that PAX-8 expression was lost in most cases (83%). In addition, estrogen and progesterone receptors were negative in 83% and 82% of cases, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of cases were positive for keratin cocktail and keratin 8/18, whereas only 11% of cases were positive for keratin 5/6. p16 was diffusely positive in 34% of cases, whereas p53 was expressed in >75% of the tumor cells in 31% of cases. MLH1 and PMS2 were concurrently lost in 50% of cases, whereas MSH2 and MSH6 were lost in 1 case (3%). E-cadherin and CD44 were completely lost in 50% of cases, whereas Her-2/neu was negative in all cases. EGFR was negative in 67% of cases, whereas 22% of cases showed diffuse membranous staining for this marker. UCAe is a high-grade carcinoma of Müllerian origin which tends to be negative for PAX-8. The loss of this marker appears to be a more reliable discriminator than the loss of keratin expression in the differential diagnosis with endometrioid carcinoma or serous carcinoma. UCAe tends to be diffusely positive for p53, but patchy positive for p16. Although UCAe appears to share not only some histologic features with BLCB, but also some of its immunohistochemical features (loss of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her-2/neu, a tendency to loose e-cadherin and to express CD44), UCAe appears not to be related to BLCB because it usually lacks the expression EGFR, CK5/6, and c-Kit.
Collapse
|
25
|
Eritja N, Yeramian A, Chen BJ, Llobet-Navas D, Ortega E, Colas E, Abal M, Dolcet X, Reventos J, Matias-Guiu X. Endometrial Carcinoma: Specific Targeted Pathways. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2017; 943:149-207. [PMID: 27910068 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43139-0_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the western world with more than 280,000 cases per year worldwide. Prognosis for EC at early stages, when primary surgical resection is the most common initial treatment, is excellent. Five-year survival rate is around 70 %.Several molecular alterations have been described in the different types of EC. They occur in genes involved in important signaling pathways. In this chapter, we will review the most relevant altered pathways in EC, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, Tyrosine kinase, WNT/β-Catenin, cell cycle, and TGF-β signaling pathways. At the end of the chapter, the most significant clinical trials will be briefly discussed.This information is important to identify specific targets for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Eritja
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Andree Yeramian
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Bo-Juen Chen
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY, 10013, USA
| | - David Llobet-Navas
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - Eugenia Ortega
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Eva Colas
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Research Unit in Biomedicine and Translational and Pediatric Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Abal
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Translational Medical Oncology, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Xavier Dolcet
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Jaume Reventos
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Research Unit in Biomedicine and Translational and Pediatric Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
- GEICEN Research Group, Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Av Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khoury JD, Wang WL, Prieto VG, Medeiros LJ, Kalhor N, Hameed M, Broaddus R, Hamilton SR. Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays for Integral Biomarkers in the NCI-MATCH EAY131 Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 24:521-531. [PMID: 28839110 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Biomarkers that guide therapy selection are gaining unprecedented importance as targeted therapy options increase in scope and complexity. In conjunction with high-throughput molecular techniques, therapy-guiding biomarker assays based upon immunohistochemistry (IHC) have a critical role in cancer care in that they inform about the expression status of a protein target. Here, we describe the validation procedures for four clinical IHC biomarker assays-PTEN, RB, MLH1, and MSH2-for use as integral biomarkers in the nationwide NCI-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) EAY131 clinical trial. Validation procedures were developed through an iterative process based on collective experience and adaptation of broad guidelines from the FDA. The steps included primary antibody selection; assay optimization; development of assay interpretation criteria incorporating biological considerations; and expected staining patterns, including indeterminate results, orthogonal validation, and tissue validation. Following assay lockdown, patient samples and cell lines were used for analytic and clinical validation. The assays were then approved as laboratory-developed tests and used for clinical trial decisions for treatment selection. Calculations of sensitivity and specificity were undertaken using various definitions of gold-standard references, and external validation was required for the PTEN IHC assay. In conclusion, validation of IHC biomarker assays critical for guiding therapy in clinical trials is feasible using comprehensive preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic steps. Implementation of standardized guidelines provides a useful framework for validating IHC biomarker assays that allow for reproducibility across institutions for routine clinical use. Clin Cancer Res; 24(3); 521-31. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph D Khoury
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - L Jeffrey Medeiros
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neda Kalhor
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Russell Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Expression of neurotensin receptor 1 in endometrial adenocarcinoma is correlated with histological grade and clinical outcome. Virchows Arch 2017; 471:521-530. [PMID: 28836043 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2215-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 07/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The promalignant effects of neurotensin (NTS) are sustained in many solid tumors, including hormone-dependent cancers. As the endometrium is also subjected to hormonal regulation, we evaluated the contribution of NTS to endometrial carcinogenesis. Neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) expression and NTSR1 promoter methylation (HM450) were analyzed in 385 cases of endometrial carcinoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Additionally, from a series of 100 endometrial carcinomas, and 66 benign endometrium samples, NTS and NTSR1 labeling was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Using TCGA series, NTSR1 messenger RNA (mRNA) level was negatively correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0116, respectively), and positively correlated with the grade (p = 0.0008). When including only endometrioid carcinomas, NTSR1 mRNA level continued to be negatively correlated with OS (log-rank: p < 0.0001) and PFS (log-rank: p = 0.002). A higher NTSR1 mRNA level was significantly associated with a loss of NTSR1 promoter methylation. Immunohistochemical expression of NTS and NTSR1 was significantly increased in adenocarcinoma (n = 100), as compared to benign endometrium (p < 0.001). NTSR1 expression was positively correlated with grade (p = 0.004). High immunohistochemical expression of cytoplasmic NTSR1 was significantly correlated with a shorter OS and PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This correlation remained significant when excluding non-endometrioid subtypes (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the expression of NTSR1 was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.004). NTSR1 overexpression is a poor prognostic factor in endometrial cancer, highlighting the contribution of NTS in endometrial cancer progression and its uses as a prognostic marker, and as a potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
|
28
|
Ritterhouse LL, Howitt BE. Molecular Pathology: Predictive, Prognostic, and Diagnostic Markers in Uterine Tumors. Surg Pathol Clin 2017; 9:405-26. [PMID: 27523969 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2016.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This article focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in uterine malignancies, in the context of morphologic diagnoses. The histologic classification of endometrial carcinomas is reviewed first, followed by the description and molecular classification of endometrial epithelial malignancies in the context of histologic classification. Taken together, the molecular and histologic classifications help clinicians to approach troublesome areas encountered in clinical practice and evaluate the utility of molecular alterations in the diagnosis and subclassification of endometrial carcinomas. Putative prognostic markers are reviewed. The use of molecular alterations and surrogate immunohistochemistry as prognostic and predictive markers is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee SE, Park HY, Shim SH, Kim WY. Dedifferentiated carcinoma with clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A case report. Pathol Int 2017; 67:472-476. [DOI: 10.1111/pin.12557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Pathology; Konkuk University Medical Center; Konkuk University School of Medicine; Seoul Korea
| | - Ha young Park
- Department of Pathology; Busan Paik Hospital; Inje University College of Medicine; Busan Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Shim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Konkuk University School of Medicine; Seoul Korea
| | - Wook Youn Kim
- Department of Pathology; Konkuk University Medical Center; Konkuk University School of Medicine; Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas: predictors of risk and associations with survival and tumor expression profiles. Cancer Causes Control 2017; 28:447-457. [PMID: 28194593 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-017-0855-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors (SEOs) are diagnosed in 10% of ovarian cancer patients. We examined predictors of SEOs, evaluated associations of SEOs with survival and characterized ovarian tumor profiles using immunohistochemistry. METHODS We included patients with endometrioid (n = 180) and clear cell (n = 165) ovarian carcinoma identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry between 1979 and 2010 for whom we abstracted medical records and constructed tumor tissue microarrays (TMAs). A concurrent diagnosis of endometrial cancer was obtained from the medical chart. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Protein expression in ovarian tumors of patients with and without SEOs was evaluated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Comparing 52 patients with SEO tumors to 293 patients with endometrioid or clear cell ovarian carcinomas, endometriosis at the ovary (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87, p = 0.02) was the strongest predictor of decreased risk in multivariable models. Premenopausal status (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 0.92-5.13, p = 0.08) and lower pre-treatment CA125 levels (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.02-1.32, p = 0.09) showed weaker associations. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with or without SEO tumors. More patients with SEO tumors compared to endometrioid ovarian carcinoma were deficient in MLH1, PMS2 and PTEN (p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Endometriosis may not be the mechanism by which SEO cancers arise. Altered tumor oncoprotein expression between women with and without SEOs indicates important biological differences although this did not translate into prognostic differences.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
On a clinicopathological and molecular level, two distinctive types of endometrial carcinoma, type I and type II, can be distinguished. Endometrioid carcinoma, the typical type I carcinoma, seems to develop through an estrogen-driven "adenoma carcinoma" pathway from atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AEH/EIN). It is associated with elevated serum estrogen and high body mass index and expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. They are mostly low grade and show a favorable prognosis. A subset progresses into high-grade carcinoma which is accompanied by loss of receptor expression and accumulation of TP53 mutations and behaves poorly. Other frequently altered genes in type I carcinomas are K-Ras, PTEN, and ß-catenin. Another frequent feature of type I carcinomas is microsatellite instability mainly caused by methylation of the MLH1 promoter. In contrast, the typical type II carcinoma, serous carcinoma, is not estrogen related since it usually occurs in a small uterus with atrophic endometrium. It is often associated with a flat putative precursor lesion called serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). The molecular pathogenesis of serous carcinoma seems to be driven by TP53 mutations, which are present in SEIC. Other molecular changes in serous carcinoma detectable by immunohistochemistry involve cyclin E and p16. Since many of the aforementioned molecular changes can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, they are useful ancillary diagnostic tools and may further contribute to a future molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma as recently suggested based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz Süd-West, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical University Graz, Göstingerstrasse 22, 8020, Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stoffel EM, Erichsen R, Frøslev T, Pedersen L, Vyberg M, Koeppe E, Crockett SD, Hamilton SR, Sørensen HT, Baron JA. Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study. Gastroenterology 2016; 151:870-878.e3. [PMID: 27443823 PMCID: PMC5159224 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Colonoscopy provides incomplete protection from colorectal cancer (CRC), but determinants of post-colonoscopy CRC are not well understood. We compared clinical features and molecular characteristics of CRCs diagnosed at different time intervals after a previous colonoscopy. METHODS We performed a population-based, cross-sectional study of incident CRC cases in Denmark (2007-2011), categorized as post-colonoscopy or detected during diagnostic colonoscopy (in patients with no prior colonoscopy). We compared prevalence of proximal location and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in CRC tumors, relative to time since previous colonoscopy, using logistic regression and cubic splines to assess temporal variation. RESULTS Of 10,365 incident CRCs, 725 occurred after colonoscopy examinations (7.0%). These were more often located in the proximal colon (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-2.89) and were more likely to have dMMR (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00-1.59), but were less likely to be metastatic at presentation (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89) compared with CRCs diagnosed in patients with no prior colonoscopy. The highest proportions of proximal and/or dMMR tumors were observed in CRCs diagnosed 3-6 years after colonoscopy, but these features were still more frequent among cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after colonoscopy. The relative excess of dMMR tumors was most pronounced in distal cancers. In an analysis of 85 cases detected after colonoscopy, we found BRAF mutations in 23% of tumors and that 7% of cases had features of Lynch syndrome. Colonoscopy exams were incomplete in a higher proportion of cases diagnosed within <1 year (in 38%) than in those diagnosed within 1-10 years after colonoscopy (16%). CONCLUSIONS In a study of incident CRC cases in Denmark, we observed that tumors found in patients who have undergone colonoscopy are more often proximal and have dMMR compared to CRCs detected in patients without previous colonoscopies. The excess of right-sided tumors and the modest independent effects of dMMR reinforce the importance of proper colonoscopic examination of the proximal large bowel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena M. Stoffel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor MI,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Trine Frøslev
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Vyberg
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Erika Koeppe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor MI
| | - Seth D. Crockett
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC
| | - Stanley R. Hamilton
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Henrik T. Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - John A. Baron
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McMeekin DS, Tritchler DL, Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Lankes HA, Geller MA, Powell MA, Backes FJ, Landrum LM, Zaino R, Broaddus RD, Ramirez N, Gao F, Ali S, Darcy KM, Pearl ML, DiSilvestro PA, Lele SB, Goodfellow PJ. Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3062-8. [PMID: 27325856 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.8722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinicopathologic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) defects in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) has not been definitively established. We undertook tumor typing to classify MMR defects to determine if MMR status is prognostic or predictive. METHODS Primary EECs from NRG/GOG0210 patients were assessed for microsatellite instability (MSI), MLH1 methylation, and MMR protein expression. Each tumor was assigned to one of four MMR classes: normal, epigenetic defect, probable mutation (MMR defect not attributable to MLH1 methylation), or MSI-low. The relationships between MMR classes and clinicopathologic variables were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS A total of 1,024 tumors were assigned to MMR classes. Epigenetic and probable mutations in MMR were significantly associated with higher grade and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Epigenetic defects were more common in patients with higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. Overall, there were no differences in outcomes. Progression-free survival was, however, worse for women whose tumors had epigenetic MMR defects compared with the MMR normal group (hazard ratio, 1.37; P < .05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.86). An exploratory analysis of interaction between MMR status and adjuvant therapy showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival for probable MMR mutation cases. CONCLUSION MMR defects in EECs are associated with a number of well-established poor prognostic indicators. Women with tumors that had MMR defects were likely to have higher-grade cancers and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Surprisingly, outcomes in these patients were similar to patients with MMR normal tumors, suggesting that MMR defects may counteract the effects of negative prognostic factors. Altered immune surveillance of MMR-deficient tumors, and other host/tumor interactions, is likely to determine outcomes for patients with MMR-deficient tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Scott McMeekin
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David L Tritchler
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David E Cohn
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David G Mutch
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Heather A Lankes
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Melissa A Geller
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Matthew A Powell
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Floor J Backes
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Richard Zaino
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Russell D Broaddus
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Nilsa Ramirez
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Feng Gao
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shamshad Ali
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Michael L Pearl
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Paul A DiSilvestro
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Djordjevic B, Broaddus RR. Laboratory Assays in Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma. Surg Pathol Clin 2016; 9:289-99. [PMID: 27241109 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2016.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews the main tissue testing modalities for Lynch Syndrome in the pathology laboratory, such as immunohistochemistry and PCR based analyses, and discusses their routine application, interpretation pitfalls, and troubleshooting of common technical performance issues. Discrepancies between laboratory and genetic testing may arise, and are examined in the context of the complexity of molecular abnormalities associated with Lynch Syndrome. The merits of targeted versus universal screening in a changing healthcare climate are addressed. In the absence of comprehensive screening programs, specific tumor topography and histological features that may prompt pathologist-initiated molecular tumor testing are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, Unit 85, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Clinicopathologic implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140:226-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Revised: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
36
|
Goodfellow PJ, Billingsley CC, Lankes HA, Ali S, Cohn DE, Broaddus RJ, Ramirez N, Pritchard CC, Hampel H, Chassen AS, Simmons LV, Schmidt AP, Gao F, Brinton LA, Backes F, Landrum LM, Geller MA, DiSilvestro PA, Pearl ML, Lele SB, Powell MA, Zaino RJ, Mutch D. Combined Microsatellite Instability, MLH1 Methylation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry for Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers From GOG210: An NRG Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:4301-8. [PMID: 26552419 PMCID: PMC4678181 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.9518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The best screening practice for Lynch syndrome (LS) in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. We sought to determine whether tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) typing along with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis can help identify women with LS. PATIENTS AND METHODS ECs from GOG210 patients were assessed for MSI, MLH1 methylation, and mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression. Each tumor was classified as having normal MMR, defective MMR associated with MLH1 methylation, or probable MMR mutation (ie, defective MMR but no methylation). Cancer family history and demographic and clinical features were compared for the three groups. Lynch mutation testing was performed for a subset of women. RESULTS Analysis of 1,002 ECs suggested possible MMR mutation in 11.8% of tumors. The number of patients with a family history suggestive of LS was highest among women whose tumors were classified as probable MMR mutation (P = .001). Lynch mutations were identified in 41% of patient cases classified as probable mutation (21 of 51 tested). One of the MSH6 Lynch mutations was identified in a patient whose tumor had intact MSH6 expression. Age at diagnosis was younger for mutation carriers than noncarriers (54.3 v 62.3 years; P < .01), with five carriers diagnosed at age > 60 years. CONCLUSION Combined MSI, methylation, and IHC analysis may prove useful in Lynch screening in EC. Twenty-four percent of mutation carriers presented with ECs at age > 60 years, and one carrier had an MSI-positive tumor with no IHC defect. Restricting Lynch testing to women diagnosed at age < 60 years or to women with IHC defects could result in missing a substantial fraction of genetic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Goodfellow
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
| | - Caroline C Billingsley
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Heather A Lankes
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Shamshad Ali
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - David E Cohn
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Russell J Broaddus
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Nilsa Ramirez
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Heather Hampel
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Alexis S Chassen
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Luke V Simmons
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Amy P Schmidt
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Feng Gao
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Louise A Brinton
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Floor Backes
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Melissa A Geller
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Paul A DiSilvestro
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Michael L Pearl
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Richard J Zaino
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - David Mutch
- Paul J. Goodfellow, Caroline C. Billingsley, David E. Cohn, Heather Hampel, Alexis S. Chassen, Luke V. Simmons, and Floor Backes, Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Lankes and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Russell J. Broaddus, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Colin C. Pritchard, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Amy P. Schmidt, Feng Gao, Matthew A. Powell, and David Mutch, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Louise A. Brinton, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC; Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; and Richard J. Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brany D, Dvorska D, Nachajova M, Slavik P, Burjanivova T. Malignant tumors of the uterine corpus: molecular background of their origin. Tumour Biol 2015; 36:6615-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3824-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
38
|
Wong A, Ngeow J. Hereditary Syndromes Manifesting as Endometrial Carcinoma: How Can Pathological Features Aid Risk Assessment? BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:219012. [PMID: 26161390 PMCID: PMC4486295 DOI: 10.1155/2015/219012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological tumor worldwide. It can be the presenting malignancy, acting as the harbinger, of an undiagnosed hereditary syndrome. Up to 50% of females with Lynch syndrome present in this manner. Differentiation between Lynch, Muir-Torre, and Cowden syndromes can at times be challenging due to the overlapping features. Our review emphasizes on the strengths, pitfalls, and limitations of microscopic features as well as immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction- (PCR-) based tests used by laboratories to screen for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and PTEN gene mutations in patients to enable a more targeted and cost effective approach in the use of confirmatory gene mutational analysis tests. This is crucial towards initiating timely and appropriate surveillance measures for the patient and affected family members. We also review the evidence postulating on the possible inclusion of uterine serous carcinoma as part of the spectrum of malignancies seen in hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma syndrome, driven by mutations in BRCA1/2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Wong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore 229899
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore 169857
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Huang HN, Lin MC, Tseng LH, Chiang YC, Lin LI, Lin YF, Huang HY, Kuo KT. Ovarian and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas have distinct profiles of microsatellite instability, PTEN expression, and ARID1A expression. Histopathology 2014; 66:517-28. [PMID: 25195947 DOI: 10.1111/his.12543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To understand the role of and differences in molecular alterations between endometrial and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas. METHODS AND RESULTS We investigated the microsatellite status of 26 ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas (OVEMs), 42 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EMCAs), and 19 concurrent (endometrial and ovarian) endometrioid adenocarcinomas. We evaluated the expression of the mismatch repair proteins, PTEN and ARID1A, and mutations of PTEN, KRAS, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA. High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were present in one of 26 OVEMs, 12 of 42 EMCAs, and four of 19 concurrent endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Only four of 19 concurrent endometrioid adenocarcinomas showed identical molecular alterations in their endometrial and ovarian components. Loss of ARID1A or loss of PTEN expression, and MSI-H, were more common in EMCAs than OVEMs (P = 0.044, P = 0.004, and P = 0.012, respectively). MSI-H in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas was also related to loss of ARID1A expression (P < 0.001). In the cohort of MSI-H endometrioid adenocarcinomas involving the endometrium (n = 16), MSH6-deficient cases showed higher frequencies of CTNNB1 and PIK3CA mutations (P = 0.008 and P = 0.036, respectively), but lower frequencies of KRAS mutation (P = 0.011), than PMS2-deficient cases. CONCLUSIONS The different frequencies of molecular genetic alterations between endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas imply that distinct processes may be involved in their tumorigenesis or tumour progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien-Neng Huang
- Graduate Institute of Pathology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Eritja N, Santacana M, Maiques O, Gonzalez-Tallada X, Dolcet X, Matias-Guiu X. Modeling glands with PTEN deficient cells and microscopic methods for assessing PTEN loss: endometrial cancer as a model. Methods 2014; 77-78:31-40. [PMID: 25461816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Revised: 10/30/2014] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PTEN is an important tumor suppressor gene. Interpreting PTEN deficiency in the appropriate microscopic context of cancer may be important to understand its role in tumor development and progression. This may be particularly relevant in heterogeneous tumors. Here, we discuss the usefulness of 3D cultures in understanding the consequences of PTEN inactivation in tissue architecture. Afterwards, we discuss the role of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization in assessing PTEN loss in tumors. In this review, endometrial carcinoma is used as a model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Eritja
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Oscar Maiques
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Xavier Gonzalez-Tallada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Xavier Dolcet
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Djordjevic B, Broaddus RR. Role of the clinical pathology laboratory in the evaluation of endometrial carcinomas for Lynch syndrome. Semin Diagn Pathol 2014; 31:195-204. [PMID: 24951283 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Molecular diagnostic testing of endometrial carcinomas in the pathology laboratory has recently emerged as a key component of the clinical evaluation of Lynch syndrome in many centers. Testing modalities involve immunohistochemical and PCR-based analyses. This article outlines the routine application of these analyses, provides a practical guide for troubleshooting some of the common technical issues related to their performance, and reviews common pitfalls in their interpretation. Discrepancies between tissue testing and genetic testing results are discussed in the context of the current understanding of endometrial cancer biology. The merits of universal versus targeted tissue testing based on clinical patient history and histological tumor appearance are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6.
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 85, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Minozzi G, Nicolazzi EL, Stella A, Biffani S, Negrini R, Lazzari B, Ajmone-Marsan P, Williams JL.. Genome wide analysis of fertility and production traits in Italian Holstein cattle. PLoS One 2013; 8:e80219. [PMID: 24265800 PMCID: PMC3827211 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 09/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A genome wide scan was performed on a total of 2093 Italian Holstein proven bulls genotyped with 50K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), with the objective of identifying loci associated with fertility related traits and to test their effects on milk production traits. The analysis was carried out using estimated breeding values for the aggregate fertility index and for each trait contributing to the index: angularity, calving interval, non-return rate at 56 days, days to first service, and 305 day first parity lactation. In addition, two production traits not included in the aggregate fertility index were analysed: fat yield and protein yield. Analyses were carried out using all SNPs treated separately, further the most significant marker on BTA14 associated to milk quality located in the DGAT1 region was treated as fixed effect. Genome wide association analysis identified 61 significant SNPs and 75 significant marker-trait associations. Eight additional SNP associations were detected when SNP located near DGAT1 was included as a fixed effect. As there were no obvious common SNPs between the traits analyzed independently in this study, a network analysis was carried out to identify unforeseen relationships that may link production and fertility traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ezequiel L. Nicolazzi
- Parco Tecnologico Padano, Lodi, Italy
- Institute of Zootechnics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Alessandra Stella
- Parco Tecnologico Padano, Lodi, Italy
- Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lodi, Italy
| | - Stefano Biffani
- Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lodi, Italy
- Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Frisona Italiana, Cremona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Negrini
- Institute of Zootechnics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
- Associazione Italiana Allevatori, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Ajmone-Marsan
- Institute of Zootechnics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
- Nutrigenomics Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common form of the hereditary colon cancer syndromes. Because of its high prevalence, a nationwide campaign has begun to screen all colorectal cancers for the genetic abnormalities associated with LS. CONTENT Next to colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer is the most common form of malignancy found in women with LS. Identifying individuals who harbor the well-characterized mismatch-repair gene mutations via immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability analysis, or direct gene sequencing is critical to managing the LS patient and to surveillance for the development of other associated tumor types. SUMMARY Although many institutions have begun screening all colorectal tumors for LS, the evidence is sufficient to warrant the testing of all endometrial cancers for LS as well. Various testing algorithms, along with genetic-counseling efforts, can lead to a cost-efficient and beneficial screening program.
Collapse
|