Aetiology, genetics and prevention of secondary neoplasms in adult cancer survivors

Clinical characteristics and survival of breast cancer patients with extramammary malignancies in a single Asian center over the past 23 years

BACKGROUND

The rise of multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) necessitates exploration. MPMNs represent 18% of U.S. cancers. Breast cancer is the predominant malignancy among female Americans. However, most studies on breast cancer with MPMNs are confined to case reports with small sample sizes. Hence, this article scrutinizes 280 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and extramammary primary malignancies via long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed 280 breast cancer cases with extramammary primary malignancies from January 2000 to December 2022 at our institute, excluding those diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer. The double primary malignant neoplasms (DPMNs) were used as focal points and segregated into the first primary breast cancer (FPBC) and second primary breast cancer (SPBC) subgroups. With a median follow-up period of 107 months (8.9 years), we examined the characteristics of these diseases in various patients.

RESULTS

Concerning breast cancer patients with extramammary primary malignancies, DPMNs were predominant, comprising 77.1% (216/280). Among these DPNMs, gynecology, thyroid, and lung were the primary site of extramammary tumors, predominantly. Nearly all (93.9%) of FPBC patients exhibited metachronous cancer whereas 55.9% of SPBC patients experienced this. The median interval between the onset of breast cancer and extramammary malignancy in metachronous FPBC and metachronous SPBC patients was 60 months and 48 months, respectively. Over time, both metachronous FPBC and metachronous SPBC patients demonstrated a diminishing prevalence of second tumors. The distinction lay in that in the metachronous FPBC group, second tumors ceased to occur after 300 months, whereas in the metachronous SPBC group, their emergence persisted. Synchronous cancer, negative ER/PR status, and advanced extramammary malignancy stage portend poor prognosis among patients with DPMNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful monitoring of MPMNs necessitates precise guidelines, differing amongst FPBC and SPBC patients. Synchronous cancer, ER/PR-negative, and advanced extramammary malignancy stage indicate poor prognosis in DPMNs patients.

Risk and survival of third primary cancers in a population-based cohort of patients with a cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Multiple primary cancers are relevant outcomes among survivors of gynecological cancers, contributing to the overall cancer burden and having a potential impact on the management of each primary cancer. This study aimed to estimate the risk and survival of third primary cancers (TPCs) among females with a cervical, endometrial, or ovarian first primary cancer (FPC).

METHODS

Patients with a cervical, endometrial, or ovarian FPC from the Portuguese North Region Cancer Registry, diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 (n = 5846), were followed for a TPC (December 31, 2015) and death from any cause (December 31, 2023). The cumulative incidence of TPCs and mortality was estimated. Patients with a TPC were matched (1:1) to patients without a TPC (FPC + second primary cancer [SPC] only) to compare survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 (0.5% of FPCs and 5.4% of SPCs) TPCs were diagnosed. The most common sites were digestive organs (n = 9) followed by breast and urinary tract cancers (n = 4 each). Among all FPCs, the 10-year cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of a TPC was 0.5% (0.3%-0.7%) and among SPCs, it was 5.8% (3.3%-8.2%). For TPCs, compared to matched patients, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for death was 3.0 (1.39-6.50). The 10-year cumulative mortality of TPCs and matched patients was 75.7% and 42.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In Northern Portugal, TPCs occurred mainly in digestive organs, followed by the breast and urinary tract, with a 10-year cumulative incidence of 0.5% among all FPCs. TPCs had a worse long-term survival compared to patients with an SPC only.

Lines of Therapy for Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: The New Paradigm

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, with urothelial bladder cancer accounting for approximately 90% of cases. Metastatic UC (mUC) is a particularly aggressive subset that presents significant treatment challenges, especially in patients who are often older than 70 years and have multiple comorbidities. For several decades, cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line treatment for locally advanced (LA) mUC. However, its utility has been limited as many patients are ineligible owing to their health status, and overall survival rates remain suboptimal. Recent advancements, including antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapies, have begun to reshape the treatment landscape for LA/mUC. The combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab has shown promising clinical outcomes. The approval of multiple novel drugs and combination therapies not only provides new opportunities for patient care but also creates the need for physicians to adapt to this evolving therapeutic paradigm. This review explores the latest clinical data on the management of LA/mUC and offers insights into sequencing therapies for patients with LA/mUC.

Second primary malignancy for early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by SEER17 registries

OBJECTIVE

Investigating treatment modalities' association with second primary malignancy risk in early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Data of 5-year survivors of early-stage (stages I-II, seventh TNM staging manual) HNSCC from 2000 to 2020 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized incidence ratio and excess absolute risk were used to assess second primary malignancy (SPM) development externally. Relative risk was estimated to compare SPM risk within groups. Fine-Gray's model estimated cumulative incidence of second primary malignancy.

RESULTS

Overall, 8957 5-year survivors with early-stage HNSCC were enrolled. Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy had poorer survival than surgery patients. Surgery correlated with lower risk of second primary malignancy (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99), especially for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). Differences in the risk of second primary malignancy among subgroups based on clinical characteristics were not significant. Treatment modalities did not significantly affect risk of second primary malignancy within each subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery led to better survival and lower risk of second primary malignancy compared to definitive radiotherapy in 5-year survivors. Incidence and sites of second primary malignancy varied by primary sites, emphasizing targeted long-term surveillance's importance.

The risk and distribution of second primary cancers according to subsite of primary stomach cancer: a retrospective cohort population-based study

Background

The development of second primary cancers (SPCs) following a diagnosis of stomach cancer presents a significant clinical challenge, with varying risks depending on the anatomic subsite of the primary tumor, patient demographics, and treatment modalities. This study aims to assess the risk of SPCs in stomach cancer survivors, focusing on differences across anatomic subsites, sex, age, and treatment periods.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from stomach cancer patients, analyzing the incidence of SPCs based on the anatomic location of the primary tumor, with stratifications by sex, age, latency period, and year of diagnosis. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare the observed SPC rates with those expected in the general population.

Results

Elevated stomach SPC risk was observed across most anatomic subsites, particularly in the body (SIR 8.84) and fundus (SIR 7.34). Females exhibited higher SIRs compared to males, especially in the fundus (SIR 13.33 for females vs. 4.55 for males). Younger patients (<50 years) had significantly higher SPC risks, particularly for cancers originating in the fundus (SIR 49.56). Notably, patients diagnosed after 2010 showed the highest SIRs, indicating a potential impact of advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Nonstomach SPCs, including colorectal, lung, and thyroid cancers, were significantly elevated, with distinct patterns based on the primary tumor site.

Conclusions

The study highlights the critical role of primary tumor location, sex, age, and treatment era in determining SPC risk in stomach cancer survivors. These findings underscore the need for tailored surveillance strategies to manage long-term cancer risks in this population.

Bone complications of cancer treatment

With the advancements in conventional treatment modalities such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, as well as the emergence of immunotherapy, the overall cure rate for solid tumor malignancies has experienced a significant increase. However, it is unfortunate that exposure to cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, disturbing bone metabolic homeostasis in patients, as well as causing damage to bone marrow cells and other bone tissues. Consequently, certain tumor treatment options may pose a risk for subsequent bone diseases. Common bone disorders associated with cancer treatment include osteonecrosis, bone loss, and secondary bone tumors. (1)Cancer treatment-related osteonecrosis is primarily linked to the use of radiation therapy and certain chemicals, such as bisphosphonates, denosumab, antiangiogenic agents, and immunomodulators. It has been observed that high-dose radiation therapy is more likely to result in osteonecrosis. (2)Chemicals and hormones, particularly sex hormones, glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormones or thyrotropic hormones, are among the factors that can contribute to cancer treatment-related bone loss. (3)Secondary bone tumors differ from metastases originating from primary tumors, and radiotherapy plays a significant role in their development, while chemotherapy may also exert some influence. Radiogenic secondary bone tumors are predominantly malignant, with osteosarcoma being the most common type. Chemotherapy may be a risk factor for the relatively rare occurrence of secondary Ewing sarcoma of the bone. These treatment-related bone disorders have a considerable adverse impact on the prognosis of cancer patients. Hence, it is imperative to prioritize the bone health of patients undergoing cancer treatment and give it further attention.

Radiotherapy and increased risk of second primary cancers in breast cancer survivors: An epidemiological and large cohort study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) may raise the risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), a relationship inadequately studied.

METHODS

We analyzed 248268 female BC patients from 9 SEER registries, 1988-2018, identifying SPCs >5 years after initial treatment, comparing SPC risks between RT and non-RT cohorts using Fine-Gray and Poisson regressions.

RESULTS

Of all participants, 55.4 % received surgery and RT. The RT group had a higher SPC incidence, with excess incidence significantly dropped from 6.9 % in 1990 to 0.2 % in 2012. The 30-year SPC incidence was 24.69 % in the RT cohort and 18.11 % in the NRT cohort. RT increased the risk of SPCs(HR, 1.29 [95%CI,1.26-1.33]; P < 0.001), BC(HR, 1.58[1.52-1.64]; P < 0.001), cancer of respiratory system(HR, 1.21[1.13-1.30]; P = 0.013), skin cancer(HR, 1.26[1.10-1.44]; P < 0.001), leukemia(HR, 1.30[1.11-1.54]; P = 0.001), soft tissue cancer(HR, 1.78[1.34-2.37]; P < 0.001), and eye & orbit cancer(HR, 2.21[1.02-4.80]; P = 0.044), except for reducing the risk of multiple myeloma (HR 0.76). Notably, RT-related risks(RR) for BC declined with increasing age and the year of BC diagnosed, increased with longer latency, but the dynamic RR for cancer of respiratory system presented the almost opposite trends. The RT cohort had higher standardized incidence ratios for SPCs compared to both the NRT cohort and the general population overall. Although 15-year overall survival for SPCs was similar between RT and NRT cohorts, SPC presence significantly lowered 30-year survival from 35.64 % to 23.90 %.

CONCLUSIONS

RT might increase susceptibility to SPC in breast, respiratory system, skin, soft tissue, eye and orbit, and leukemia in BC survivors. Efforts should be made to timely diagnose SPCs based on their specific patterns to improve patient's quality of life.

Subsequent malignant neoplasms after primary hematological malignancy in adult patients

Patients with primary hematological malignancy (HM) are at an elevated risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs), which is a common concern after treatment of primary cancer. We identified 45,533 patients aged ≥20 years and diagnosed with primary HM in Finland from 1992 to 2019 from the Finnish Cancer Registry and estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risks per 1000 person-years (EAR) for SMNs. A total of 6076 SMNs were found (4604 solid and 1472 hematological SMNs). The SIRs were higher for hematological SMNs (SIR 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-5.2) compared to solid SMNs (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.5). The SIRs for hematological SMNs were highest in the young HM patients aged 20-39 years (SIR 9.2, 95% CI 6.8-12.2 in males and SIR 10.5, 95% CI 7.2-14.7 in females) and decreased by age of first primary HM. However, EARs for hematological SMNs were highest in the older patients, aged 60-79 years at their first primary HM (EAR 5.7/1000 and 4.7/1000 in male and female patients, respectively). In conclusion, the incidence of both hematological and solid SMNs were increased in hematological cancer patients. The relative risk (SIR) was highest among younger HM patients with hematological SMNs. The absolute second cancer burden reflected by high EAR arises from solid malignancies in older patients. Our results accentuate the need for vigilance in the surveillance of HM patients.

Excess Body Weight and the Risk of Second Primary Cancers Among Cancer Survivors

Importance

Little is known about the causes of second primary cancers among individuals with a history of cancer. Descriptive studies have suggested that lifestyle factors, including excess body weight, may be important.

Objective

To investigate whether excess body weight is associated with the risk of a second primary malignant neoplasm among cancer survivors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study of adults in 21 states in the US used data from the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition cohort, a large prospective study that invited participants to respond to a survey in 1992 and biennial surveys starting in 1997, and who were followed-up through 2017. Eligible participants included those who received a diagnosis of a first primary nonmetastatic invasive cancer between 1992 and 2015. Data analysis occurred from September 2023 to March 2024.

Exposure

Body mass index (BMI), computed from self-reported height and weight at the time of the first primary cancer diagnosis (mean [SD] years to diagnosis, 1.7 [1.5] years).

Main Outcome and Measures

Main outcomes included a second primary cancer or an obesity-related second cancer. Cancer diagnoses were reported on biennial surveys and verified through medical record abstraction or linkage with state cancer registries.

Results

This cohort included 26 894 participants who received a diagnosis of a first nonmetastatic primary cancer (mean [SD] age at first cancer diagnosis, 72.2 [6.5] years; 15 920 male [59.2%]). At the time of first diagnosis, 11 497 participants (42.8%) had overweight and 4684 (17.2%) had obesity. During a median (IQR) follow-up time of 7.9 (3.4-13.6) years, 3749 (13.9%) participants received a diagnosis of a second primary cancer, of which 1243 (33.2%) were obesity-related second primary cancers. Compared with cancer survivors whose BMI was in the normal range (18.5 to <25), there was 15% increased risk of any second primary cancer for those who had overweight (25 to <30; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.25) and a 34% increased risk for those who had obesity (BMI ≥30; aHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.21-1.48), with greater risk for obesity-related second primary cancers, including a 40% increased risk for those with overweight (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22,-1.61) and a 78% increased risk for those with obesity (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.51-2.11).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of older survivors of nonmetastatic cancer, those who had overweight or obesity at the time of their first cancer diagnosis were at higher risk of developing a second cancer, especially an obesity-related second cancer. Given the high prevalence of overweight and obesity among cancer survivors, it is important to promote survivorship care guidelines recommending weight management and increase awareness of second cancers among physicians and cancer survivors.

The contribution of second primary cancers to the mortality of patients with a first primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

Second primary cancers (SPCs) are estimated to affect nearly 5% of patients with breast cancer within 10 years of their diagnosis. This study aimed to estimate the contribution of SPCs to the mortality of patients with a breast first primary cancer (FPC).

METHODS

A population-based cohort of 17,210 patients with a breast FPC diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 was followed for SPCs (31/12/2015) and vital status (30/06/2021). Patients diagnosed with an SPC (265 synchronous and 897 metachronous, ≤ 1 and > 1 year after the FPC, respectively) were matched (1:3, by five-year age group and year of breast FPC diagnosis) to those without an SPC and alive when the corresponding SPC was diagnosed.

RESULTS

Significantly higher hazards of death were found among patients with an SPC [hazard ratio of 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.89 for synchronous SPCs; and 2.85, 95%CI 2.56-3.17 for metachronous SPCs] compared to patients with a breast FPC only. Estimates were higher for synchronous lung, stomach, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast SPCs, and metachronous liver, stomach, ovary, lung, rectum, corpus uteri, colon, breast, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma SPCs. The 15-year cumulative mortality was 59.5% for synchronous SPCs and 68.7% for metachronous SPCs, which was higher than in patients with a breast FPC only (43.6% and 44.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In Northern Portugal, patients with an SPC following a breast FPC have a higher mortality compared with patients with a breast FPC only.

Association between depressive symptoms and second primary cancer in cancer survivors: Insights from a nationally representative study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between depressive symptoms and second primary cancer (SPC) in U.S. cancer survivors.

METHODS

Cancer survivors from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were included in this cross-sectional study, and depressive symptoms were defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). The association between depressive symptoms and SPC was assessed via multiple logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS), sensitivity, and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

This study involved 2315 participants representing >15 million noninstitutionalized U.S. residents. Multivariate logistic regression fully adjusted for confounders revealed that cancer survivors with a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 had a greater risk of developing SPC than those with a PHQ-9 score of 0-4 ([OR] = 1.88, 95% [CI] = 1.20-2.89, p = 0.005). The RCS showed a linear positive correlation between the PHQ-9 score and SPC (p for overall = 0.017). The robustness of this association was subsequently confirmed via multiple interpolation of missing data and different cluster-level methods (namely weighted linear regression) as sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, subgroup analyses confirmed this correlation was stronger in participants with sleep duration <7 h (p for interaction = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Moderate to severe depressive symptoms in cancer survivors were associated with an increased risk of developing SPC, especially at <7 h of sleep.

Second primary non-breast cancers in young breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

We evaluated the incidence, timing, and risk factors for second primary non-breast cancers (SPNBC) among young breast cancer (BC) survivors.

METHODS

This study included participants of the Young Women's BC Study (YWS) who were diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006 and 2016 and age 40 or younger at diagnosis (N = 1,230). Patient characteristics, treatment information, and clinical events were collected via serial surveys. Tumor and treatment data were obtained from medical record review. Five- and 10-year risks of SPNBCs were estimated via the cumulative incidence function, considering death, metastasis, or second primary BC as competing events. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SPNBC risk based on risk factors including demographics, germline genetics, primary BC characteristics, and treatments.

RESULTS

Among 1,230 women, over a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 47 patients (4%) developed an SPNBC. Types of malignancy included melanoma (n = 10), thyroid (n = 10), ovarian (n = 4), sarcoma (n = 4), uterine (n = 3), rectal (n = 3), bladder (n = 2), cervical (n = 2), head/neck (n = 2), lung (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 2), and renal (n = 1). Five and 10-year cumulative incidence were 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively. Median time between primary BC and SPNBC was 7.3 years. No patient factors, primary tumor characteristics, or treatments were statistically significantly associated with SPNBC in univariable or multivariable models.

CONCLUSION

In this population, five-year cumulative incidence was higher than that reported among healthy women under 50 years of age, highlighting the importance of long-term surveillance for new non-breast cancers in young adult BC survivors.

Radiation Therapy Technology Advances and Mitigation of Subsequent Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE

In this Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) vision paper, challenges and opportunities in the assessment of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) from radiation therapy (RT) are presented and discussed in the context of technology advancement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The paper discusses the current knowledge of SN risks associated with historic, contemporary, and future RT technologies. Opportunities for research and SN mitigation strategies in pediatric patients with cancer are reviewed.

RESULTS

Present experience with radiation carcinogenesis is from populations exposed during widely different scenarios. Knowledge gaps exist within clinical cohorts and follow-up; dose-response and volume effects; dose-rate and fractionation effects; radiation quality and proton/particle therapy; age considerations; susceptibility of specific tissues; and risks related to genetic predisposition. The biological mechanisms associated with local and patient-level risks are largely unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

Future cancer care is expected to involve several available RT technologies, necessitating evidence and strategies to assess the performance of competing treatments. It is essential to maximize the utilization of existing follow-up while planning for prospective data collection, including standardized registration of individual treatment information with linkage across patient databases.

Triple Primary Cancers: An Analysis of Genetic and Environmental Factors

The occurrence of multiple primary cancers (MPC) is thought to reflect increased cancer susceptibility in patients due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Here we conducted a retrospective review of 2,894 consecutive patients evaluated at a single institution and identified 31 (1.14%) individuals with a history of three or more primary cancers, then analyzed the genetic and environmental influences associated with their propensity for developing malignancies. We found that 35.5% of patients had a hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), with high penetrance HCS in 72.7% of cases, suggesting that monogenic causes underly a significant proportion of triple primary cancer risk. Analysis of cancer frequencies found that the diagnosis of breast cancer was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of HCS, while the diagnosis of colorectal, prostate, and pancreas cancer was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of HCS. Comparison of HCS-positive and HCS-negative patients revealed similar demographic characteristics, mean age at first diagnosis, and family history of cancer. Moreover, no significant differences in lifestyle behaviors, occupational exposures, chronic health conditions, or treatment with chemotherapy and radiation were observed between HCS-positive and -negative groups, though outliers in tobacco smoking, as well as systemic treatment after both first and second primary cancers were observed. These findings indicate a robust contribution of HCS to cancer susceptibility among patients with triple primary cancers while environmental influences were less evident. This emphasizes the need for larger MPC cohorts incorporating additional genetic and environmental factors to more comprehensively characterize drivers of cancer risk.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

In patients with three or more primary cancers, genetic predisposition explained a significant proportion of cases; however, treatment history, lifestyle habits, and other exposures appeared to play a less significant role. This highlights the value of early genetic screening and the need to develop more sensitive markers of cancer susceptibility. See related Spotlight, p. 193.

Cause-specific mortality in a population-level cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following chemotherapy in the early 21st century

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a severe non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Life expectancy has improved with rituximab, but cause-specific mortality data is lacking. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to study 27,449 individuals aged 20-74 years diagnosed with primary DLBCL who received chemotherapy between 2000 and 2019, we calculated standardized mortality rate (SMR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) and examined the connection between age, sex, time after diagnosis, and cause of death. Based on 12,205 deaths, 68.7% were due to lymphoma, 20.1% non-cancer causes, and 11.2% other cancers. Non-cancer mortality rates (SMR 1.2; EAR, 21.5) increased with DLBCL compared to the general population. The leading non-cancer death causes were cardiovascular (EAR, 22.6; SMR, 1.6) and infectious (EAR, 9.0; SMR, 2.9) diseases with DLBCL. Risks for non-cancer death and solid neoplasms are highest within the first diagnosis year, then decrease. Among socioeconomic factors, being white, being married, and having a higher income were favorable factors for reducing non-cancer mortality. To improve survival, close surveillance, assessment of risk factors, and early intervention are needed.

Clinicopathological features, prognostic factor analysis, and survival nomogram of patients with double primary cancers involving lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of double primary cancers (DPCs) involving lung cancer is rising, they have not been studied sufficiently. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of DPC patients with lung cancer and developed a survival nomogram to predict the individual OS rates.

METHODS

We included 103 DPC patients with lung cancer from Shengjing Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Based on the 6-month cancer occurrence interval, the cases were categorized as synchronous DPCs (sDPCs) or metachronous DPCs (mDPCs). Furthermore, the mDPCs were subdivided based on whether the lung cancer occurred first (LCF cohort) or the other cancer occurred first (OCF cohort).

RESULTS

Among the patients, 35 (33.98%) and 68 (66.02%) had sDPCs and mDPCs, respectively. In the mDPCs cohort, 18 (26.47%) belonged to the LCF cohort and 50 (73.53%) to the OCF cohort. The most frequent primary cancer sites were the breast (27.18%), colorectum (22.33%), and urinary system (18.45%). Independent risk factors for progression-free survival were Stage IV lung cancer (p = 0.008) and failure to undergo radical lung cancer surgery (p = 0.028). The risk factors for OS included squamous carcinoma (p = 0.048), Stage IV lung cancer (p = 0.001), single cancer resection plus drug therapy (p < 0.001), drug therapy alone (p = 0.002), failure to undergo radical lung cancer surgery (p = 0.014), and chemotherapy (p = 0.042). The median OS was 37 months, with 3- and 5-year rates of 50.9% and 35.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DPCs involving lung cancer account for 1.11% of cases. The breast, colorectum, and urinary system were the most common extra-pulmonary sites, and mDPCs were more frequent than sDPCs. Radical lung cancer surgery significantly affects prognosis, and drug therapy alone may be preferable when only one tumor is operable. The developed nomogram can accurately predict individual 3-year and 5-year OS rates.

Comparative study between poorly differentiated thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer: real-world pathological distribution, death attribution, and prognostic factor estimation

Background

The clinic-pathological boundary between poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is unclear due to a wide spectrum of histopathological features and the rarity of the disease. In addition to that, with the highest mortality rate and non-standard treatment modality, the PDTC/ATC population has not been subjected to comprehensive description and comparison with the extent of histological characteristics, therapeutic response, prognostic factors, and death attribution analysis.

Method

A total of 4,947 PDTC/ATC patients from 2000 to 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimation and Cox proportional hazard regression were applied.

Results

Overall, the 5- and 10-year DSS for PDTC were 71.9% and 68.0%, respectively, whereas the 5- and 10-year OS are 59.3% and 51.2%, respectively. The median survival time for ATC patients was 3 months with 1-year OS being 26.9% and 1-year DSS being 31.2%. During the follow-up period, 68.1% of the PDTC/ATC cohort were dead, 51.6% of which were attributed to thyroid malignancies and 16.5% to non-thyroid causes. The top three common non-thyroid causes of death were miscellaneous cancers, lower respiratory system disease, and heart disease. The histological feature of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) was the leading pathological category for PDTC patients (51.7%), whereas 76.7% of ATC patients' pathological feature was characterized as unidentifiable. Sarcoma histological characteristics found in ATC cases suffer the highest overall mortality (vs. PTC, HR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.68-4.06, P < 0.001). Older age unidentifiable histology feature, more advanced AJCC N1b, AJCC M1, and SEER stage, tumor size larger than 5 cm, and more invasive tumor extension were independent bad outcome predictors.

Conclusion

The populational analysis of the PDTC/ATC cohort has provided reliable support for better understanding of the difference between PDTC and ATC cases and the guidance of clinical practice and further studies.

Second Malignant Neoplasms Following Treatment for Hepatoblastoma: An International Report and Review of the Literature

Treatment intensification has improved survival in patients with hepatoblastoma (HB); however, these treatments are associated with an increased risk of late effects, including second malignant neoplasms (SMNs). Data is limited regarding SMNs following HB treatment. Cases of SMNs following treatment for HB reported in the literature and from personal communication were analyzed to further assess this late effect. Thirty-eight patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis of HB was 16 months (range: 3 to 168 mo). All patients had received a platinum agent, and almost all had anthracycline exposure. The SMNs reported were hematopoietic malignancies (n=19), solid tumors (n=12), and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (n=7). Of the 36 patients with outcome data, 19 survived. SMNs following HB treatment were primarily seen in patients with chemotherapy exposure, a history of liver transplantation, hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes, and/or a history of radiation treatment. Hematopoietic malignancies were the most common SMN reported in this cohort and were diagnosed earlier than other SMNs. Prospective collection of data through a companion late effects study or international registry could be used to further evaluate the rates and risks of SMNs as well as tumor predisposition syndromes in patients treated for HB.

Association of radiotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer survivors and second primary malignant cancers: a population-based study

PURPOSE

With life span extending, breast cancer survivors may face the possibility of developing second primary cancers (SPCs). The objective of this research is to investigate the risk factors, risk attribute to radiotherapy and the survivalship for SPCs.

METHODS

A total of 445 523 breast cancer patients were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in 2000-2018. The risk factors for SPCs development were confirmed by competing risk model, and then were integrated to the nomogram establishment. The cumulative incidence of SPCs including SBC (second breast cancer), SGC (second gynecological cancer), and SLC (second lung cancer) were estimated. The radiotherapy-associated risk for SPCs were evaluated by Poisson regression in radiotherapy and no-radiotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce possible bias for survival comparison.

RESULTS

There were 57.63% patients in radiotherapy. The risk factors for developing SPCs were age, year, race, tumor size, stage, radiotherapy, grade, surgery, and histology. The cumulative incidence of SPCs was 7.75% in no-radiotherapy and 10.33% in radiotherapy. SLC, SBC, and SGC also appeared the similar results. The increased risk of developing SPCs were associated with radiotherapy in majority subgroups. The dynamic radiotherapy-associated risk for SPCs by age slightly increased risk was observed. Regardless radiotherapy or no-radiotherapy, the 10-year overall survival for SBC (radiotherapy: 59.41%; no-radiotherapy: 55.53%) and SGC (radiotherapy: 48.61%; no-radiotherapy: 35.53%) were worse than that among matched patients with only primary cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors remained a high radiotherapy-associated risk for developing SPCs. The prognosis in radiotherapy was better than in no-radiotherapy for some specific SPCs. Largely attention should be paid to these patients.

Second Hematologic Malignancies Associated With Primary Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: A Population-based Study

BACKGROUND

Studies addressing second hematologic malignancies (SHMs) in patients with primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCTs) are scarce. To better describe this phenomenon, we analyzed a large case series from a population-based registry.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to report the clinical characteristics and incidence of SHMs in patients with PMGCT.

RESULTS

Among 1297 PMGCTs, 27 cases (2.08%) of SHM were found, with a median latency period of 12 months (95% CI: 5-41). All SHM occurred in males, 20 of whom (74.1%) had a previous nonseminomatous tumor. Acute myeloid leukemia was the most frequent SHM, accounting for 13 cases, 4 of which were acute megakaryoblastic leukemia that occurred within 5 months of diagnosis. The median survival after the diagnosis of SHM was 6 months (95% CI: 2-41). The risk of SHM was significantly higher than expected for the reference population, with a standardized incidence ratio of 6.21 (95% CI: 3.31-10.62) and an absolute excess risk of 19.19 per 10,000 person-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PMGCT are at a higher risk of developing SHMs than the general population, particularly acute myeloid leukemia. This risk ranges from synchronous diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia to the later onset of other hematological disorders that might be related to PMGCT therapies. Our findings may help create follow-up schedules for patients with PMGCT and raise the level of suspicion surrounding this association.

Unbalanced bidirectional causal association between thyroid cancer and ER-positive breast cancer: should we recommend screening for thyroid cancer in breast cancer patients?

BACKGROUND

The association between breast cancer (BC) and thyroid cancer (TC) has been studied in several epidemiological studies. However, the underlying causal relationship between them is not yet clear.

METHODS

The data from the latest large-sample genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of BC and TC were searched in the public GWAS database. The BC GWAS data included estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and negative subgroups. Two-way two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) was used to explore the potential causal relationship between BC and TC. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) and the MR-Egger method were used to combine the estimation of each single nucleotide variation (previous single nucleotide polymorphism). BC was taken as the result, and the effect of TC exposure was analyzed. Then, the effect of BC exposure on the result of TC was analyzed.

RESULTS

Both IVW and MR-Egger results indicated that gene-driven thyroid cancer does not cause estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and is a protective factor (β = -1.203, SE = 4.663*10-4, P = 0.010). However, gene-driven estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer can lead to the development of thyroid cancer (β = 0.516, SE = 0.220, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

From the perspective of gene drive, people with TC are less likely to have ER-positive BC. In contrast, people with ER-positive BC are more likely to have TC. Therefore, it is recommended that patients with BC be screened regularly for TC.

Secondary malignancies among mantle cell lymphoma patients

PURPOSE

With modern treatments, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients more frequently experience long-lasting remission resulting in a growing population of long-term survivors. Follow-up care includes identification and management of treatment-related late-effects, such as secondary malignancies (SM). We conducted a population-based study to describe the burden of SM in MCL patients.

METHODS

All patients with a primary diagnosis of MCL, aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 in Sweden were included along with up to 10 individually matched population comparators. Follow-up was from twelve months after diagnosis/matching until death, emigration, or December 2019, whichever occurred first. Rates of SM among patients and comparators were estimated using the Anderson-Gill method (accounting for repeated events) and presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age at diagnosis, calendar year, sex, and the number of previous events.

RESULTS

Overall, 1 452 patients and 13 992 comparators were followed for 6.6 years on average. Among patients, 230 (16%) developed at least one SM, and 264 SM were observed. Relative to comparators, patients had a higher rate of SM, HRadj= 1.6 (95%CI:1.4-1.8), and higher rates were observed across all primary treatment groups: the Nordic-MCL2 protocol, R-CHOP, R-bendamustine, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and R-CHOP/Cytarabine. Compared to Nordic-MCL2, treatment with R-bendamustine was independently associated with an increased risk of SM, HRadj= 2.0 (95%CI:1.3-3.2). Risk groups among patients were those with a higher age at diagnosis (p < 0.001), males (p = 0.006), and having a family history of lymphoma (p = 0.009). Patients had preferably higher risk of melanoma, other neoplasms of the skin and other hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

MCL survivors have an increased risk of SM, particularly if treated with R-bendamustine. The intensive treatments needed for long-term remissions are a concern, and transition to treatment protocols with sustained efficacy but with a lower risk of SM is needed.

Incidence and mortality of second primary malignancies after lymphoma: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Second primary malignancies (SPMs) account for an increasing proportion of human malignancies. We estimated the incidence, risk factors and outcomes in lymphoma survivors with SPMs.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SPMs after primary lymphoma from 2010 to 2021 were included in this study. The incidence, mortality and clinical characteristics of SPMs in our center and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were delineated and analyzed. Standardized incidence ratio quantified second cancer risk.

RESULTS

A total of 2912 patients of lymphoma were included, 63 cases of SPM met the inclusion criteria, with the prevalence of SPMs after lymphoma was 2.16%. The male-to-female ratio of 2.32:1. The majority of these patients were older (≥60 years old, 61.90%) and previously treated with chemotherapy (68.25%). The common types among SPMs were digestive system tumors (42.86%), respiratory system tumors (20.63%) and urinary system tumors (12.70%). Additionally, cancer risks were significantly elevated after specific lymphoma though calculating the expected incidence. In terms of mortality, the diagnosis of SPMs was significantly associated with an increased risk of death over time. Moreover, although the outcome was favorable in some SPM subtypes (thyroid and breast cancer), other SPMs such as stomach and lung tumors had a dismal prognosis.

CONCLUSION

With the improvement of medical standards, the survival of lymphoma patients has been prolonged. However, the incidence of SPM is increasing, particularly among men and older lymphoma survivors. Therefore, more attention should be invested in the SPM to further improve the prognosis of these patients.

Risk prediction of second primary malignant tumor in primary differentiated thyroid cancer patients: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk factors of second primary malignant tumor (SPMT) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and establish a competing risk nomogram to predict the probability of SPMT occurrence.

METHODS

We retrieved data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with DTC between 2000 and 2019. The Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model was employed to identify SPMT risk factors in the training set and develop a competing risk nomogram. Model evaluation was performed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 112,257 eligible patients were included in the study and randomized into a training set (n = 112,256) and a validation set (n = 33,678). The cumulative incidence rate of SPMT was 15% (n = 9528). Age, sex, race, tumor multifocality, and TNM stage were independent risk factors of SPMT. The calibration plots showed good agreement between the predicted and observed SPMT risks. The 10-year AUCs of the calibration plots were 70.2 (68.7-71.6) in the training set and 70.2 (68.7-71.5) in the validation set. Moreover, DCA showed that our proposed model resulted in higher net benefits within a defined range of risk thresholds. The cumulative incidence rate of SPMT differed among risk groups, classified according to nomogram risk scores.

CONCLUSION

The competing risk nomogram developed in this study exhibits high performance in predicting the occurrence of SPMT in patients with DTC. These findings may help clinicians identify patients at distinct levels of risk of SPMT and develop corresponding clinical management strategies.

Risk of second primary cancers in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

Background

While an elevated risk of second primary cancers (SPCs) has been observed in many other cancers, risk of SPCs has not been quantified in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

Methods

Survivors of primary rectal NENs diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 registries. Relative risk of SPCs was estimated as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), which was calculated using SEER*Stat software.

Results

Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 15836 patients diagnosed with rectal NENs, of whom 1436 (9.1%) received diagnosis of SPCs (SIR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.13-1.26). The majority of patients were aged 50-69 and had their first cancer diagnosed at the localized stage. Male survivors had a higher propensity for developing SPCs overall, while female survivors exhibited higher risks of specific SPCs. Age at diagnosis of rectal NENs influenced the risk of SPCs, with younger patients having greater risks. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of SPCs was observed among patients aged 30-64 years. Black patients had higher relative risks of certain SPCs, while White patients had a lower risk of subsequent melanoma. Trend analysis revealed that the highest excess burden of SPCs was observed in the years 2000 to 2002. Risk of SPCs remained elevated within the first four years post-diagnosis for survivors of rectal NENs, but diminished thereafter.

Conclusion

The study revealed that individuals who survived rectal NENs were at an elevated risk of developing SPCs compared to the general population. Our results hold important implications for the formulation of lifelong surveillance recommendations for cancer survivors.

Risk of second primary cancer in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Second primary cancer is a common event in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the incidence and relevant factors vary by studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the incidence and relevant risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2020 that reported the incidence of SPC in HNSCC patients. Per 1000-person-year incidence and odds ratios were used to estimate the incidence and potential risk factors. Due to the high heterogeneity, random-effects models were used to estimate the incidence and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seven thousand seven hundred thirteen articles were identified from the databases, in which 60 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of the total, synchronous, and metachronous SPC in patients with HNSCC were 29.116 per 1000-person-year, 6.960 per 1000-person-year, and 26.025 per 1000-person-year, respectively. The head and neck region was the most common area where SPC occurred, followed by the lung (7.472 per 1000-person-year) and upper digestive tract (2.696 per 1000-person-year). Smoking, alcohol consumption, betel quid chewing, primary cancer of T1-2, and N0 were risk factors, while HPV infection (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72) was the protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

SPC is frequently observed in HNSCC patients and had great impact on the prognosis. The findings could promote a more individualized follow-up strategy for SPC in HNSCC patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systemic review and meta-analysis provide sufficient evidence for the establishment of the follow-up strategy for head and neck squamous cancer patients.

Risk of second primary malignancies in survivors of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from 2000 to 2018

BACKGROUND AND AIM

As a result of improved survival, cancer survivors continue to remain at risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, the association between first primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) and SPMs has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database, patients histologically diagnosed with PanNENs as their first malignancy between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and excess absolute risks per 10 000 person-years of SPMs were calculated to estimate the risk of being diagnosed with subsequent cancers compared with the general population.

RESULTS

A total of 489 (5.7%) PanNENs survivors developed an SPM during the follow up, with a median latency between first and second cancer diagnoses of 32.0 months. The overall SIR of SPMs was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.42) and the excess absolute risk was 35.67 cases per 10 000 person-years in comparison with the general population. Age 25-64 years at PanNENs diagnosis was associated with statistically higher risks for SPMs of all cancers combined. Latency stratification was significant for elevated SPMs risk between 2-23 and 84+ months after diagnosis. White patients were found to have a significantly increased incidence of SPMs (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.35), mainly owing to the higher risk of stomach, small intestine, pancreas, kidney and renal pelvis, and thyroid cancers.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms survivors experience a significant increase in the burden of SPMs compared with the reference population. The heightened relative risk calls for careful long-term scrutiny as part of survivorship care plans.

Identification of risk factors and prediction models for secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs)-free survival and SMNs-specific survival in testicular cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

This research endeavored to determine the key demographic and pathological factors tied to secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in survivors of testicular cancer and to develop a predictive model.

METHOD

A total of 53,309 testicular cancer patients from the SEER national database (1975-2016) were included in our analysis. The primary outcome measured was SMNs-free survival, defined as the duration from testicular cancer diagnosis to the detection of a non-testicular malignancy. The secondary outcome was SMN-specific survival, defined as the period from testicular cancer diagnosis until the patient's death due to SMNs.

FINDINGS

Of the patients in the SEER cohort, 2978 (5.6%) developed non-testicular cancer SMNs. Higher age, receipt of chemotherapy, and radiation treatment were all significantly associated with the development of SMNs in survivors of testicular cancer (all p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a worse SMNs-free survival and poor SMN-specific survival in patients who underwent radiation therapy (both p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, higher age, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy to be significantly associated with worse SMNs-free survival (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively), while lymphoma histology was associated with better SMNs-free survival (p < 0.001). The most common SMN types in patients receiving radiation therapy were prostate, lung, and bladder cancers. Predictive nomograms for SMNs-free survival and SMNs-specific survival were developed, with a C-index of 0.776 and 0.824, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The age of diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, lymphoma histology, and treatment history with chemotherapy and radiation therapy were identified as prognostic factors for SMNs-free survival.

Nomogram for predicting survival of patients with gastric cancer and multiple primary malignancies: a real-world retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database

OBJECTIVES

Gastric cancer combined with multiple primary malignancies (GCM) is increasingly common. This study investigated GCM clinical features and survival time.

METHODS

Patients with GCM and GC only (GCO) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Survival was compared between GCM and GCO groups using propensity score matching. Then, the GCM group was divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. These cohorts were used to establish a nomogram for survival prediction in patients with GCM.

RESULTS

Survival time was significantly longer in the GCM group than in the GCO group. All-subsets regression was used to identify four variables for nomogram establishment: age, gastric cancer sequence, N stage, and surgery. The concordance index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the nomogram had favorable discriminative ability. Calibration plots of predicted and actual probabilities showed good consistency in both the training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis and risk stratification showed that the nomogram was clinically useful; it had favorable discriminative ability to recognize patients with different levels of risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with GCO, GCM is a relatively indolent malignancy. The nomogram developed in this study can help clinicians to assess GCM prognosis.

Complete response to chemoimmunotherapy with bevacizumab in synchronous multiple primary cancers: pulmonary adenocarcinoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma

A small percentage of patients have multiple synchronous primary cancers at presentation. In the last five years, many regimens associated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy were approved for first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors, but the study of immunotherapy when multiple cancers are present in one patient remains incomplete. Next-generation sequencing biomarkers and immunotherapy markers including PD-L1 can be effectively utilized in the diagnosis and treatment plan for multiple synchronous primary cancers. Immune biomarkers and PD-L1 expression warrant individualized treatments in synchronous primary adenocarcinoma and pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. We describe the case of a patient with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, metastatic to brain de novo. The patient achieved a complete response after only three cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab and remains free of any evidence of disease after 18 mo of maintenance therapy.

Secondary osteosarcoma associated with osteofibrous dysplasia: a case report

Secondary osteosarcoma is a rare complication of primary malignancies and benign bone lesions. There are various types of diseases that cause secondary osteosarcoma. A 15-year-old male presented at our medical center complaining of pain and redness in the right lower leg. He had been diagnosed with osteofibrous dysplasia in the right tibia when he was 2 years old and since then had been followed up. Although he had a pathological fracture of the right tibia at the age of 7, his fracture healed with a plaster cast and did not require surgery. At the time of the patient's last visit, a radiograph revealed a periosteal reaction as well as erosion of the bone cortex. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an infiltrative area in the soft tissue surrounding the osteofibrous dysplasia lesion in the tibia. Consequent to pathological examination (through bone biopsy), the patient was diagnosed with secondary osteosarcoma. The patient underwent chemotherapy and extensive resection with liquid nitrogen. He has been progressing satisfactorily after the operation. The present case is the first report of secondary osteosarcoma associated with osteofibrous dysplasia. During the long-term follow-up of osteofibrous dysplasia, oncologists should be aware of the possibility of secondary osteosarcoma.

Colorectal Cancer Risk and Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer

While many organizations have published guidance on the approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk and certain high-risk groups, adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCC) who have a heightened risk of CRC are rarely included as a target group for enhanced CRC surveillance. The population of ASCC continues to grow due to increasingly effective cancer therapies and improved survival. With this increased survival comes an increased risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms, including CRC. Since there is little published guidance for CRC surveillance in ASCC and limited awareness of increased CRC risk among both physicians and patients, the objectives of our paper are to review the incidence of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, describe the clinical phenotypes of colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, review published surveillance strategies based on consensus-based survivorship guidelines, and outline areas for future research to optimize surveillance strategies.

Second malignant neoplasms in lymphomas, secondary lymphomas and lymphomas in metabolic disorders/diseases

With inconsistent findings, evidence has been obtained in recent years that metabolic disorders are closely associated with the development of lymphomas. Studies and multiple analyses have been published also indicating that some solid tumor survivors develop a secondary lymphoma, whereas some lymphoma survivors subsequently develop a second malignant neoplasm (SMN), particularly solid tumors. An interaction between the multiple etiologic factors such as genetic factors and late effects of cancer therapy may play an important role contributing to the carcinogenesis in patients with metabolic diseases or with a primary cancer. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the multiple etiologic factors for lymphomagenesis, focusing on the SMN in lymphoma, secondary lymphomas in primary cancers, and the lymphomas associated to metabolic disorders/diseases, which have been received less attention previously. Further, we also review the data of coexistence of lymphomas and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with infection of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus.

Secondary Malignancies after Ewing Sarcoma-Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of an International Trial Registry

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) represents highly aggressive bone and soft tissue tumors that require intensive treatment by multi-chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. While therapeutic regimens have increased survival rates, EwS survivors face long-term sequelae that include secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs). Consequently, more knowledge about EwS patients who develop SMNs is needed to identify high-risk patients and adjust follow-up strategies. We retrospectively analyzed data from 4518 EwS patients treated in five consecutive EwS trials from the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study (CESS) group. Ninety-six patients developed SMNs after primary EwS, including 53 (55.2%) with solid tumors. The latency period between EwS and the first SMN was significantly longer for the development of solid SMNs (median: 8.4 years) than for hematologic SMNs (median: 2.4 years) (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence (CI) of SMNs in general increased over time from 0.04 at 10 years to 0.14 at 30 years; notably, the specific CI for hematologic SMNs remained stable over the different decades, whereas for solid SMNs it gradually increased over time and was higher for metastatic patients than in localized EwS patients (20 years: 0.14 vs. 0.06; p < 0.01). The clinical characteristics of primary EwS did not differ between patients with or without SMNs. All EwS patients received multi-chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy in 77 of 96 (80.2%) patients, and the use of radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy correlated with the occurrence of SMNs. The survival rate after SMNs was 0.49, with a significantly better outcome for solid SMNs compared with hematologic SMNs (3 years: 0.70 vs. 0.24, respectively; p < 0.001). The occurrence of SMNs after EwS remains a rare event but requires a structured follow-up system because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Impact of coexisting diabetes on survival and risk of developing second primary cancer in diabetes patients receiving drug therapy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer in Japan

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

We investigated the association between coexisting diabetes at the time of cancer diagnosis, and the overall survival and incidence of second primary cancer in patients with cancer and receiving drug therapy for diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used cancer registry and administrative data of patients diagnosed with cancer at designated cancer care hospitals in Osaka Prefecture between 2010 and 2015. The presence of diabetes was identified from the prescription records of antidiabetic drugs in Diagnosis Procedure Combination System data. After adjusting for patient characteristics, we compared overall survival between patients with cancer with coexisting diabetes and those without coexisting diabetes using the Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, the impact of coexisting diabetes on the risk of developing second primary cancer was evaluated using a competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 131,701 patients with cancer included in the analysis, 6,135 (4.7%) had coexisting diabetes. The 5-year survival rates for patients with and without coexisting diabetes were 56.2% (95% confidence interval 54.8-57.6) and 72.7% (95% confidence interval 72.4-73.0), respectively. Coexisting diabetes was associated with a higher risk of developing second primary cancer (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.23; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.41). In site-specific analysis, coexisting diabetes was associated with an increased risk for the development of second primary cancer of multiple myeloma, and cancer of the uterus, pancreas and liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Coexisting diabetes was associated with a higher mortality and risk of developing second primary cancer in Japanese patients with cancer and on drug therapy for diabetes.

Familial risk associated with lung cancer as a second primary malignancy in first-degree relatives

BACKGROUND

Aggregation of lung cancer (LCa) in family members is well-documented. However, little is known on the familial risk of LCa when first-degree relatives (FDRs, parents or siblings) are diagnosed with LCa as a second primary malignancy (LCa-2). We aimed to investigate whether and to what extent a family history of LCa-2 was associated with an increased LCa risk.

METHODS

In this Swedish national cohort we identified 127,865 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa as a first primary cancer (LCa-1) and 15,490 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa-2, respectively. We then estimated relative risk (RR) of LCa using those without cancer family history as reference.

RESULTS

The number of LCa-2 has been increasing annually and rather similarly in men and women in the last decade. Familial RR of LCa was 1.96 (95%, 1.85-2.07) for LCa-1 family history and 1.89 for LCa-2 (1.62-2.21). Risk was especially high when FDR was diagnosed with early-onset LCa-2 and when siblings were affected by LCa-2. The RR was 1.53 (1.10-2.12) when LCa-2 in FDR was diagnosed within 26 months after first primary cancer, and it increased to 2.16 (1.62-2.90) when LCa-2 was diagnosed between 74 to 154 months. Higher risk was observed for first primary cancer of the ovary (4.45, 1.85-10.7), nervous system (3.49, 1.45-8.38), upper aerodigestive tract (2.83, 1.78-4.49) and cervix (2.55, 1.41-4.61), and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (3.13, 1.57-6.27).

CONCLUSIONS

LCa risk is associated with diagnosis of LCa-2 in FDR to a similar degree as LCa-1 in FDRs.

Relationship between metastasis and second primary cancers in women with breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) survivors have an increased risk of developing second primary cancers (SPCs); however, it is still unclear if metastasis is a risk factor for developing SPCs. Usually, long-term cancer survivors face an increased risk of developing SPCs; however, less attention has been paid to SPCs in patients with metastatic cancer as the survival outcomes of the patients are greatly reduced.

Methods

A total of 17,077 American women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and were included in the study. The clinical characteristics, standardized incidence ratio (SIR), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and patterns of SPCs in BC patients with no metastasis, regional lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were investigated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the prognosis of BC patients after developing SPCs with different metastatic status. XGBoost, a high-precision machine learning algorithm, was used to create a prediction model to estimate the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with SPCs.

Results

The results reveal that the SIR (1.01; 95% CI, 0.99–1.03, p>0.05) of SPCs in non-metastasis breast cancer (NMBC) patients was similar to the general population. Further, patients with regional lymph node metastasis showed an 8% increased risk of SPCs (SIR=1.08, 95%CI, 1.05–1.11, p<0.05), and patients with distant metastasis had a 26% increased risk of SPCs (SIR=1.26, 95%CI, 1.16–1.37, p<0.05). The SIR of SPCs in all patients below the age of 40 was the highest, which decreased with age. Patients with poorly differentiated cancers, large tumor size, and late N stage had an increased risk of SPCs. However, an increase in SIR of SPCs was observed in distant MBC patients, even at the early T1 (SIR=1.60, 95% CI, 1.22–1.98, p<0.05) and N1 (SIR=1.27, 95% CI, 1.10–1.44, p<0.05) stage. An increase in the SIR of SPCs was observed in patients with triple-negative BC, and the SIR of SPC increased with metastasis development in BC patients with luminal A subtype. The peak of SPCs risk occurrence was earlier in MBC patients (4-6 months and 10 months) compared to NMBC patients (12 months). The effect of metastasis on the prognosis of SPCs patients was dependent on the type of SPCs. Meanwhile, the XGBoost model was created to predict the 3-year (AUC=0.873) and 5-year survival (AUC=0.918) of SPCs in MBC patients.

Conclusions

Our study provides novel insight into the impact of metastasis on SPCs in BC patients. Metastasis could promote the second primary tumorigenesis which further increased cancer-related deaths. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the occurrence of SPCs in MBC patients.

Harvest for Health, a Randomized Controlled Trial Testing a Home-Based, Vegetable Gardening Intervention Among Older Cancer Survivors Across Alabama: An Analysis of Accrual and Modifications Made in Intervention Delivery and Assessment During COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Accelerated functional decline is a concern among older cancer survivors that threatens independence and quality of life. Pilot studies suggest that vegetable gardening interventions ameliorate functional decline through improved diet and physical activity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to describe the rationale, recruitment challenges, and enrollment for the Harvest for Health randomized controlled trial (RCT), which will test the impact of a home-based, vegetable gardening intervention on vegetable and fruit consumption, physical activity, and physical functioning among older cancer survivors. Modifications made to the intervention and assessments to assure safety and continuity of the RCT throughout the COVID-19 pandemic also are reported.

DESIGN

Harvest for Health is a 2-year, 2-arm, single-blinded, wait-list controlled RCT with cross-over.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Medicare-eligible survivors of cancers with ≥60% 5-year survival were recruited across Alabama from October 1, 2016 to February 8, 2021.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to a wait-list control or a 1-year home-based gardening intervention and individually mentored by extension-certified master gardeners to cultivate spring, summer, and fall vegetable gardens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Although the RCT's primary end point was a composite measure of vegetable and fruit consumption, physical activity, and physical functioning, this article focuses on recruitment and modifications made to the intervention and assessments during COVID-19.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

χ2 and t tests (α < .05) were used to compare enrolled vs unenrolled populations.

RESULTS

Older cancer survivors (n = 9,708) were contacted via mail and telephone; 1,460 indicated interest (15% response rate), 473 were screened eligible and consented, and 381 completed baseline assessments and were randomized. Enrollees did not differ from nonrespondents/refusals by race and ethnicity, or rural-urban status, but comprised significantly higher numbers of comparatively younger survivors, those who were female, and survivors of breast cancer (P < .001). Although COVID-19 delayed trial completion, protocol modifications overcame this barrier and study completion is anticipated by June 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This RCT will provide evidence on the effects of a mentored vegetable gardening program among older cancer survivors. If efficacious, Harvest for Health represents a novel, multifaceted approach to improve lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes among cancer survivors-one with capacity for sustainability and widespread dissemination.

Risk and prognosis of secondary bladder cancer after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial modality for the local control of pelvic cancer (PC), but the effect of pelvic RT on the development of secondary malignancy is still unclear. This study aimed to identify the relationship between radiation therapy received for the treatment of primary PC and subsequent secondary bladder cancer (SBC).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (from 1975 to 2015) was queried for PC. Fine-gray competing risk regression and Cox regression analyses were employed to assess the cumulative incidence of SBC. Poisson regression and multiple primary standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were used to evaluate the radiotherapy-associated risk for patients receiving RT. Subgroup analyses of patients stratified by latency time since PC diagnosis, calendar year of PC diagnosis stage, and age at PC diagnosis were also performed. Overall survival (OS) was compared among different treatment groups with SBC by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 318,165 observations showed that the primary cancers were located in pelvic cavity, 256,313 patients did not receive radiation therapy (NRT), 51,347 patients who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and 10,505 patients receiving a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy (EBRT-BRT) who developed SBC. Receiving two types of radiotherapy was strongly consistent with a higher risk of developing SBC for PC patients in Fine-Gray competing risk regression (NRT vs. EBRT, adjusted HR= 1.71, 95% CI: 1.54-1.90, P<0.001; NRT vs. EBRT-BRT, adjusted HR= 2.16, 95% CI: 1.78-2.63, P<0.001). The results of the dynamic SIR and Poisson regression analysis for SBC revealed that a slightly increased risk of SBC was observed after RT in the early latency and was significantly related to the variations of age at PC diagnosis and decreased with time progress. For OS, the SBC after NRT, SBC after EBRT, and SBC after EBRT-BRT of 10-year survival rates were 37.9%, 29.2%, and 22.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for primary PC was associated with higher risks of developing SBC than patients unexposed to radiotherapy. Different pelvic RT treatment modalities had different effects on the risk of SBC.

Colorectal cancer risk in association with colorectal cancer as a second malignancy in relatives: a nationwide cohort study

Background

Increasing number of individuals will have first-degree relatives (FDRs) diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), as a second primary malignancy (CRCa-2) after a non-CRC cancer. We aimed to estimate whether and to what extent a family history of CRCa-2 is associated with an increased CRC risk.

Methods

In this Swedish nationwide cohort study, rate ratio (RR) and cumulative incidence of CRC were estimated among 172,531 individuals with a family history of CRC as a first primary malignancy (CRCa-1) and 17,830 with a family history of CRCa-2, respectively, using individuals without cancer family history as the reference group.

Results

A cumulative incidence of CRC by age 80 was 6.3 and 5.6% for individuals with a parental and a sibling family history of CRCa-2, respectively. RRs of CRC for one FDR diagnosed with CRCa-1 and CRCa-2 were respectively 1.72 (95% CI, 1.65–1.79) and 1.50 (1.32–1.70); the latter RR was lower than the former (P = 0.0356), but no difference was observed after adjusting age of diagnosis of CRC in FDR and family relationship (P = 0.6898). Increased RRs were found to be associated with a CRCa-2 diagnosis in FDR that occured after cancers in upper aerodigestive tract, breast, prostate, kidney and nervous system.

Conclusions

Individuals who have relatives with CRCa-2 have an increased risk of CRC, but the magnitude is lower than those having relatives with CRCa-1, which is related to different ages of diagnosis of CRC in FDR and family relationships.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10000-z.

Risk and Survival of Third Primary Cancers in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients

Introduction

The growing number of women diagnosed with breast cancer (BCa) together with high survival has resulted in an increasing population of survivors at risk of subsequent primary cancers. This study aimed to estimate the long-term risk and survival of third primary cancers (TPCs) among females with a first primary BCa.

Methods

Breast first primary cancers (FPCs) from the Portuguese North Region Cancer Registry, diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 (n = 15,981), were followed for a TPC (December 31, 2015) and death from any cause (June 30, 2021). The cumulative incidence of and mortality among TPCs were estimated. To compare survival, female patients with a TPC were matched (1:1, by age group, years between FPC and second primary cancer [SPC] diagnosis, and SPC location) to FPC + SPC patients without a TPC.

Results

Overall, 67 (0.4% of FPCs and 5.4% of SPCs) TPCs were diagnosed. The most common TPC sites were digestive, breast, and female genital organs. Among all FPCs, the 15-year cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of a TPC was 0.69% (0.47-0.90%) and among SPCs, 7.21% (4.99-9.43%). The 15-year cumulative mortality of TPCs and matched patients was 70.0% and 51.5%, respectively. For TPCs, compared to matched SPC only patients, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for death was 2.86 (1.61-5.07).

Discussion/Conclusion

The most common TPC sites were digestive, breast, and female genital organs, with a 15-year cumulative incidence of 0.69% among FPCs. TPCs had a worse long-term survival compared to patients with an SPC only.

The risk of cancer following high, and very high, doses of ionising radiation

It is established that moderate-to-high doses of ionising radiation increase the risk of subsequent cancer in the exposed individual, but the question arises as to the risk of cancer from higher doses, such as those delivered during radiotherapy, accidents, or deliberate acts of malice. In general, the cumulative dose received during a course of radiation treatment is sufficiently high that it would kill a person if delivered as a single dose to the whole body, but therapeutic doses are carefully fractionated and high/very high doses are generally limited to a small tissue volume under controlled conditions. The very high cumulative doses delivered as fractions during radiation treatment are designed to inactivate diseased cells, but inevitably some healthy cells will also receive high/very high doses. How the doses (ranging from <1 Gy to tens of Gy) received by healthy tissues during radiotherapy affect the risk of second primary cancer is an increasingly important issue to address as more cancer patients survive the disease. Studies show that, except for a turndown for thyroid cancer, a linear dose-response for second primary solid cancers seems to exist over a cumulative gamma radiation dose range of tens of gray, but with a gradient of excess relative risk per Gy that varies with the type of second cancer, and which is notably shallower than that found in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors receiving a single moderate-to-high acute dose. The risk of second primary cancer consequent to high/very high doses of radiation is likely to be due to repopulation of heavily irradiated tissues by surviving stem cells, some of which will have been malignantly transformed by radiation exposure, although the exact mechanism is not known, and various models have been proposed. It is important to understand the mechanisms that lead to the raised risk of second primary cancers consequent to the receipt of high/very high doses, in particular so that the risks associated with novel radiation treatment regimens-for example, intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy that deliver high doses to the target volume while exposing relatively large volumes of healthy tissue to low/moderate doses, and treatments using protons or heavy ions rather than photons-may be properly assessed.

Development of Histologically Verified Thyroid Diseases in Women Operated for Breast Cancer: A Review of the Literature and a Case Series

BACKGROUND

The possible relationships between breast and thyroid diseases have been reported in the literature. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the occurrence of histologically verified thyroid pathologies in women who were diagnosed with breast cancer and, after mastectomy/quadrantectomy complemented by oncological treatment, were thyroidectomized based on their periodic thyroid evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our series consist of 31 women with a mean age of 62.9 ± 10.9 years (range, 45-81) treated for breast cancer (18 right-sided, 11 left-sided, and 2 bilateral), of whom 29 were thyroidectomized, since two women who developed Graves' disease refused thyroidectomy. These 31 women belong to a cohort of 889 women who referred to the Breast Surgery Unit of our university hospital during the period January 2010 through December 2020.

RESULTS

The mean time interval between breast cancer and thyroid pathologies was 48.1 ± 23.4 months (range, 12-95). The final diagnosis at histopathology was infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma in 26 women (with 2/26 patients having bilateral carcinoma) and infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma in the other 5 women. Ten of the twenty-nine thyroidectomized women (34.5%) had a thyroid malignancy on histology: five papillary carcinomas, three papillary micro-carcinomas and two follicular carcinomas. Two of the five women with papillary carcinoma also had histological evidence of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis/Hashimoto's thyroiditis, which was also detected in another five women with benign thyroid diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that breast cancer survivors should be made aware of the possible increased risk of thyroid pathologies (including thyroid malignancy) so that they can undergo screening and follow-up.

Neoadjuvant therapy with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients treated in a single center with a median follow-up of 9.5 years

PURPOSE

We analyzed outcomes of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer (BC), in an everyday practice with long-term follow-up of patients.

METHODS

All patients (n = 200) who received the AC-paclitaxel combination as NAC for BC at the Soroka University Medical Center from 2003 to 2012 were included in this retrospective cohort study. AC was administered on an every 3-week schedule (standard dose) until May, 2007 (n = 99); and subsequently every 2-week dose dense (dd) (n = 101). Clinical pathologic features, treatment course, and outcome information were recorded. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was analyzed according to BC subtype, dose regimen, and stage.

RESULTS

Median age was 49 years; 55.5% and 44.5% of patients were clinically stage 2 and 3, respectively. Standard dose patients had more T3 tumors. Subtypes were human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive 32.5% (of whom 82% received trastuzumab), hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative 53%, and triple negative 14.5%. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 48.5% of patients; only 9.5% were deemed suitable for BCS prior to NAC. Toxicity was acceptable. The overall pCR rate was 26.0% and was significantly higher in the dd group and HER2-positive patients. With a median follow-up of 9.51 years median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are 10.85 years and 12.61 years, respectively. Patients achieving pCR had significantly longer EFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

NAC for BC with AC-paclitaxel can be safely administered in the "real-world' setting with high efficacy. Current efforts are aimed at increasing rates of pCR and identifying patients who may benefit from additional therapy or conversely, de-escalated treatment.

[Physical long-term consequences of cancer]

The number of long-term survivors of malignant diseases is steadily increasing, which is due to the further development and optimization of multimodal therapy strategies and the mechanisms of new substance classes. These can now be combined with classical treatment methods or used sequentially. At the same time the number of patients who suffer from physical and psychosocial long-term consequences of cancer therapies or have to live with chronic side effects under the long-term therapies increases. Every therapy, whether radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or operation, has undesirable long-term side effects that contribute to the decrease of one's quality of life. These affect all parts of the body. As a result, patients can be heavily burdened. In oncology and in other disciplines involved in aftercare, these consequences must therefore be increasingly addressed and clarified and treatment strategies further developed. Unfortunately, there is still a considerable need for research in this area; moreover, there is a lack of clinical studies examining the evidence of a wide variety of holistic therapy methods.

Prostate cancer incidence and survival in relation to prostate cancer as second cancer in relatives

Objectives

To investigate if the risk of prostate cancer (PC) differs based on the order of primary PC diagnosed in first‐degree relatives (FDRs) given possibly different risk factors for PC as first primary cancer (PCa‐1) and second primary cancer (PCa‐2).

Subjects and Methods

In this Swedish nationwide cohort, PC diagnosis was followed for among 149,985 men with one FDR affected by PCa‐1, 10,972 with one FDR affected by PCa‐2 and 2,896,561 without any FDRs affected by cancer in a maximum of 57 years. PC patients were further followed for death due to PC since diagnosis. Relative risk (RR) of PC was estimated with Poisson regression and hazard ratio (HR) with Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Compared to men without any FDRs affected by cancer, the RRs of PC in men with one FDR affected by PCa‐1 and PCa‐2 were 2.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.07–2.17) and 1.69 (1.54–1.85), respectively. The risk in men with one FDR affected by PCa‐2 was significantly lower than those with one FDR affected by PCa‐1 after additionally adjusting for family relationship (father‐son and brothers) and age at diagnosis of PC in FDR (RR _{PCa‐2 vs PCa‐1}, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.78–0.94). PC patients with a family history of PCa‐2 were more likely to be detected at late‐stage and less likely to be diagnosed by screening, compared to those with a family history of PCa‐1. Patients whose PC was diagnosed after the diagnosis of PCa‐1 in FDRs had a better survival than those without a family history of cancer (HR, 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80–0.97), but no such association was observed among patients with a family history of PCa‐2.

Conclusion

Our study indicates a discrepancy between PC risks associated with a family history of PCa‐1 and PC‐2 and the reason behind it may be multifactorial.

Risk of second primary malignancies associated with radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: competing risk analysis

Background: The effect of radiotherapy (RT) for second primary malignancies (SPMs) among prostate cancer survivors is controversial. Methods: Applying logistic regression, competing risk analysis and propensity score matching method, this study analyzed clinical data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to compare the risk for SPMs between patients receiving RT and non-RT. Results: In this study, prostate cancer patients treated with RT developed more SPMs in the anus, bladder, rectum, liver, lung and bronchus and lymphoma than non-RT groups. Conclusion: More intensive surveillance should be adopted for these cancers among prostate cancer survivors.