Low-grade oncocytic renal tumor (LOT): mutations in mTOR pathway genes and low expression of FOXI1

Whole exome sequencing identified mutations of forkhead box I 1 (FOXI1), keratin 6 C (KRT6C) and gap junction protein delta 2 (GJD2) in a low-grade oncocytic tumor of the kidney: a case report

BACKGROUND

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of the kidney is an emerging entity among renal oncocytic tumors. While the histological features of LOT of the kidney are similar to those of renal oncocytoma, LOT immunohistochemically expresses keratin 7 (KRT7) but not KIT while renal oncocytoma expresses KIT. Molecular analyses of LOTs of the kidney using next generation sequencing revealed those tumors harbor mutations of mTOR-related genes.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old Japanese man with a history of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and prostatic cancer underwent resection of the tumor of the right kidney, 10 mm in diameter, which was monitored for six years. The tumor was histologically composed of oncocytic cells that expressed KRT7, vimentin, SDHA, SDHB and fumarate hydratase, but not KIT, GATA3 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase. We diagnosed the tumor as LOT of the kidney. Whole-exome sequencing of the LOT revealed single nucleotide variants in the DNA-binding region of forkhead box I1 (FOXI1), the coil 1B domain of keratin 6 C (KRT6C) and the intracytoplasmic region of gap junction delta 2 (GJD2), which encodes connexin 36. However, there was no mutations in mTOR-related genes. No copy number alterations were detected in the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

We report three mutations in genes that have not been previously reported in LOT of the kidney. The genes are not related to the mTOR pathway. Therefore, LOT of the kidney might occur through several mechanisms and/or include several types of renal oncocytic tumors.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor of the kidney: imaging features of a novel tumor entity

PURPOSES

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a rare renal tumor that has emerged from the spectrum of eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors and poses a diagnostic challenge due to its similarity to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CHRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO). The imaging features of this novel tumor entity have not yet been clearly described. The purpose of this study was to describe the imaging features of LOT with radiologic-pathologic correlation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study involving two expert centers. We identified 12 pathologically proven LOT with preoperative imaging available, including at least computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), from the past 12 years. Three experienced radiologists performed the imaging analysis independently.

RESULTS

All tumors presented well-defined borders. Nine of the 12 LOT exhibited an early peripheral enhancement with complete or almost complete centripetal fill-in on nephrographic or delayed phases without any particular shape. Three showed a homogeneous contrast enhancement. Macroscopic fat and calcifications were not observed in any of the tumors.

CONCLUSION

Early peripheral enhancement with complete or almost complete centripetal fill-in on nephrographic or delayed phases without any particular shape suggests a LOT diagnosis. Further analyses involving larger studies are needed to fully confirm these imaging characteristics. To date, a percutaneous biopsy should be performed before considering management.

Acceptance of emerging renal oncocytic neoplasms: a survey of urologic pathologists

Oncocytic renal neoplasms are a major source of diagnostic challenge in genitourinary pathology; however, they are typically nonaggressive in general, raising the question of whether distinguishing different subtypes, including emerging entities, is necessary. Emerging entities recently described include eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP). A survey was shared among 65 urologic pathologists using SurveyMonkey.com (Survey Monkey, Santa Clara, CA, USA). De-identified and anonymized respondent data were analyzed. Sixty-three participants completed the survey and contributed to the study. Participants were from Asia (n = 21; 35%), North America (n = 31; 52%), Europe (n = 6; 10%), and Australia (n = 2; 3%). Half encounter oncocytic renal neoplasms that are difficult to classify monthly or more frequently. Most (70%) indicated that there is enough evidence to consider ESC RCC as a distinct entity now, whereas there was less certainty for LOT (27%), EVT (29%), and PRNRP (37%). However, when combining the responses for sufficient evidence currently and likely in the future, LOT and EVT yielded > 70% and > 60% for PRNRP. Most (60%) would not render an outright diagnosis of oncocytoma on needle core biopsy. There was a dichotomy in the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the evaluation of oncocytoma (yes = 52%; no = 48%). The most utilized IHC markers included keratin 7 and 20, KIT, AMACR, PAX8, CA9, melan A, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)B, and fumarate hydratase (FH). Genetic techniques used included TSC1/TSC2/MTOR (67%) or TFE3 (74%) genes and pathways; however, the majority reported using these very rarely. Only 40% have encountered low-grade oncocytic renal neoplasms that are deficient for FH. Increasing experience with the spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms will likely yield further insights into the most appropriate work-up, classification, and clinical management for these entities.

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Kinase is a Common Convergent Pathway to Renal Neoplasia: A Contemporary Review

Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol-3-hydroxide kinase (PI3 K)-related protein kinase family that functions as a central regulator of cell growth, metabolism, proliferation, and survival. The role of the TSC-mTOR signaling pathway in kidney tumors has been implicated in some hamartoma syndromes; however, with the advent and wide utilization of molecular studies, a growing number of kidney tumors have been linked to somatic or germline mutations involving genes that encode for this pathway, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, low-grade oncocytic tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma and angiomyolipoma, among others. Herein, we review the contemporary developments of mTOR pathway-related renal neoplasia, focusing on the clinicopathologic features of the tumor entities.

Frequency and clinicopathologic features of renal low-grade oncocytic tumour and eosinophilic vacuolated tumour: reclassification of 605 eosinophilic tumours including patients managed with active surveillance

AIMS

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) and eosinophilic vacuolated tumour (EVT) are recently described emerging entities, which demonstrate distinct features but are not yet recognised as separate neoplasms in the fifth WHO classification. Published series to date have been largely multi-institutional and based on surgically resected tumours. This study aims to determine the frequency, clinicopathologic features and outcome of LOT and EVT in a single institutional series of oncocytic/eosinophilic renal neoplasms, including patients managed with active surveillance and non-surgical intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cases were identified from a consecutive institutional series of in-house renal tumours diagnosed on biopsy and/or nephrectomy (2003-2023). Tumours with a diagnosis or differential diagnosis of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma or oncocytic neoplasm not otherwise specified (including LOT, EVT and tumours with overlapping hybrid features) were retrospectively reviewed and classified/reclassified.In total, 605 oncocytic/eosinophilic renal neoplasms were reviewed, among which 33 LOT (5.5%) and 5 EVT (0.8%) were identified. LOT were CK7+, CD117- and GATA3+ (94%). EVT were CD117+, CK7 focal+ (80%) and cathepsin K+ (80%). At the median follow-up of 34 months (range 2-253) and 56 months (range 8-90) for LOT and EVT, respectively, there was no evidence of recurrence following ablation/surgical resection, metastasis or death from disease for all patients, including the 22 managed with active surveillance (20 LOT and 2 EVT).

CONCLUSIONS

LOT and EVT comprised a minority of oncocytic renal neoplasms in this series. We report a large institutional series including patients managed non-surgically, with no adverse outcome, adding to the existing literature indicating a benign outcome.

Diagnostic Biomarkers in Renal Cell Tumors According to the Latest WHO Classification: A Focus on Selected New Entities

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for urogenital tumors, released in 2022, introduces some novelties in the chapter on renal epithelial tumors compared to the previous 2016 classification. Significant changes include the recognition of new disease entities and adjustments in the nomenclature for certain pathologies. Notably, each tumor entity now includes minimum essential and desirable criteria for reliable diagnosis. This classification highlights the importance of biological and molecular characterization alongside traditional cytological and architectural features. In this view, immunophenotyping through immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a crucial role in bridging morphology and genetics. This article aims to present and discuss the role of key immunohistochemical markers that support the diagnosis of new entities recognized in the WHO classification, focusing on critical topics associated with single markers, in the context of specific tumors, such as the clear cell capillary renal cell tumor (CCPRCT), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC), and so-called "other oncocytic tumors", namely the eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). Their distinctive characteristics and immunophenotypic profiles, along with insights regarding diagnostic challenges and the differential diagnosis of these tumors, are provided. This state-of-the-art review offers valuable insights in biomarkers associated with novel renal tumors, as well as a tool to implement diagnostic strategies in routine practice.

L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule (L1CAM) Expression and Molecular Alterations Distinguish Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor From Eosinophilic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a recently recognized renal cell neoplasm designated within the "other oncocytic tumors" category in the 2022 World Health Organization classification system. Although the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features reported for LOT have been largely consistent, the data are relatively limited. The morphologic overlap between LOT and other low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, particularly eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (E-chRCC), remains a controversial area in renal tumor classification. To address this uncertainty, we characterized and compared large cohorts of LOT (n = 67) and E-chRCC (n = 69) and revealed notable differences between the 2 entities. Clinically, LOT predominantly affected women, whereas E-chRCC showed a male predilection. Histologically, although almost all LOTs were dominated by a small-nested pattern, E-chRCC mainly showed solid and tubular architectures. Molecular analysis revealed that 87% of LOT cases harbored mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, most frequently in MTOR and RHEB genes; a subset of LOT cases had chromosomal 7 and 19q gains. In contrast, E-chRCC lacked mTORC1 mutations, and 60% of cases displayed chromosomal losses characteristic of chRCC. We also explored the cell of origin for LOT and identified L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a collecting duct and connecting tubule principal cell marker, as a highly sensitive and specific ancillary test for differentiating LOT from E-chRCC. This distinctive L1CAM immunohistochemical labeling suggests the principal cells as the cell of origin for LOT, unlike the intercalated cell origin of E-chRCC and oncocytoma. The ultrastructural analysis of LOT showed normal-appearing mitochondria and intracytoplasmic lumina with microvilli, different from what has been described for chRCC. Our study further supports LOT as a unique entity with a benign clinical course. Based on the likely cell of origin and its clinicopathologic characteristics, we propose that changing the nomenclature of LOT to "Oncocytic Principal Cell Adenoma of the Kidney" may be a better way to define and describe this entity.

Concordance of MTOR Pathway Mutations and the Diagnosis of Renal Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor (LOT)

The differential diagnosis for oncocytic renal tumors spans the spectrum from benign entities to more aggressive renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Recent work has characterized a provisional renal oncocytic neoplasm, namely the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), which demonstrates overlapping morphologic features with oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, but also has a unique immunoprofile (ie, diffusely positive for KRT7, negative for KIT) and a high rate (80% to 100%) of mTOR pathway gene alterations. Given the diagnostic overlap among oncocytic tumors, we looked for concordance between mTOR pathway mutations and LOT. Thirty low-grade renal oncocytic neoplasms underwent histologic review and immunohistochemistry for KRT7 and KIT. Tumors were classified as "determinate" (eg, LOT) for tumors with solid, nested or vaguely tubular growth and diffuse KRT7 staining and negative KIT, or "indeterminate" if the morphology and/or immunostains did not fully support a definitive LOT diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing was performed without any knowledge of the diagnoses, and identified mTOR pathway mutations in 80% (12/15) of the determinate tumors, compared with 7% (1/15) in the indeterminate group. One determinate tumor was reclassified as papillary RCC (MTOR mutation negative) and 6 indeterminate tumors were confirmed to be oncocytoma (N = 4), clear cell RCC or papillary RCC with reverse polarity, respectively. Overall, integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular data enabled a final definitive diagnosis for 70% of tumors (21 of the total 30), with a high concordance (93%) for LOT specifically in the determinate group; the remaining 9 tumors (30%) were classified as renal oncocytic neoplasm, not otherwise specified.

Renal Cell Carcinoma Associated With TSC/MTOR Genomic Alterations: An Update on its Expanding Spectrum and an Approach to Clinicopathologic Work-up

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)/mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway-related genomic alterations have been classically described in hereditary TSC syndrome setting involving germline mutations, whereby cells with a bi-allelic inactivation of genes originate tumors in a classic tumor-suppressor "two-hit" Knudson paradigm. Initial studies of TSC-associated RCC categorized tumors into 3 broad heterogeneous morphologic groups: RCC with smooth muscle stroma, chromophobe-like, and eosinophilic-macrocytic. Recently, a similar morphologic spectrum has been increasingly recognized in novel and emerging entities characterized by somatic mutations in the TSC1/2 and MTOR in patients who do not suffer from the TSC. Correct recognition of RCC with TSC / MTOR mutations is critical for accurate prognostication because such tumors with aggressive behavior have the potential to be tailored to mTOR inhibitors. Whether TSC/MTOR mutated renal epithelial neoplasms represent a distinct molecular class has been confounded by the fact that TSC1/2 , and the gene encoding the downstream protein MTOR, are mutated secondarily in ∼5% of the more common subtypes of RCC, including the commonest subtype of clear cell RCC. This review summarizes the expanding morphologic spectrum of renal tumors with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations, specifically for sporadically occurring tumors where these genomic alterations likely are primary pathologic events. Finally, a practical surgical pathology approach to handling these tumors, and a conceptual framework of renal epithelial tumors with TSC/MTOR mutations as a "family of tumors", is presented.

Expression of FOXI1 and POU2F3 varies among different salivary gland neoplasms and is higher in Warthin tumor

PURPOSE

Salivary gland tumors are histologically diverse. Ionocytes and tuft cells, rare epithelial cells found in normal salivary glands, might be associated with salivary tumors. Here, we explored the expression of FOXI1 and POU2F3, master regulators of ionocytes and tuft cells, respectively, for common salivary neoplasms using immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

We analyzed normal salivary tissues and nine salivary gland tumors; Warthin tumors (WT), pleomorphic adenomas (PA), basal cell adenomas, and oncocytomas were benign, whereas mucoepidermoid, adenoid cystic, acinic cell, salivary duct carcinomas, and polymorphous adenocarcinomas were malignant.

RESULTS

Normal salivary glands contained a few FOXI1- and POU2F3-positive cells in the ducts instead of the acini, consistent with ionocytes and tuft cells, respectively. Among the benign tumors, only WTs and PAs consistently expressed FOXI1 (10/10 and 9/10, respectively). The median H-score of WTs was significantly higher than that of PAs (17.5 vs. 4, P = 0.01). While WTs and PAs harbored POU2F3-positive cells (10/10 and 9/10, respectively), the median H-score was higher in WTs than in PAs (10.5 vs 4, respectively). Furthermore, WTs exhibited a unique staining pattern of FOXI1- and POU2F3-positive cells, which were present in luminal and abluminal locations, respectively. Whereas none of the malignant tumors expressed FOXI1, only adenoid cystic carcinoma consistently expressed POU2F3 (5/5), with a median H-score of 4.

CONCLUSION

The expression patterns of the characteristic transcription factors found in ionocytes and tuft cells vary among salivary gland tumor types and are higher in WT, which might be relevant for understanding and diagnosing salivary gland neoplasms.

Low grade oncocytic renal tumor (LOT): Clinicopathological characterization of 13 cases

CONTEXT

Low grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a recently recognized renal oncocytic neoplasm with unique morphologic and immunohistochemical pattern (CK7 +, CD117 -) that differentiates them from oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChrRCC).

OBJECTIVE

To further evaluate the histomorphological characteristics as well as the clinical outcome of low grade oncocytic tumors, retrospectively.

DESIGN

Thirteen cases of LOT were identified from 463 cases of renal oncocytic neoplasm in our pathology archive. All tumors were immunostained with CK7, CD117 and other relevant markers. The pathohistological features and follow up data of these cases were recorded.

RESULTS

Median age of patients was 76 years old (range from 36 to 86), with male to female ratio of 2:11. None of the patients had a syndromic association/hereditary condition. Eleven tumors were unifocal in each affected kidney, and two were multifocal with 2 and 3 separated tumors, respectively. On microscopic examination, tumors show variety of growth patterns, namely solid, compact nested, focal tubular/tubuloreticular and trabecular patterns. The stroma can be hypocellular and edematous where the tumor cells are loosely arranged exhibiting cords and scattered single cell arrangement. Immunohistochemically, all thirteen cases displayed strong and diffuse CK7 positivity in tumor cells. Eleven cases were CD117 negative and the other two showed focal and weak CD117 positivity (< 5% of tumor cells). Uniform tumor cell positivity was found for AE1/3, EMA, PAX8, and e-cadherin. Negative staining results include CAIX, AMACR, CD10 and vimentin. All cases in our cohort demonstrate indolent behavior and show no evidence of disease recurrence, progression, or metastases during the follow-up period up to 96 months.

CONCLUSION

LOT is an emerging new entity of renal oncocytic neoplasm and demonstrates indolent clinical behavior. Its unique morphologic features and immunohistochemical patterns (CK7 +, CD117 -) set them apart from oncocytoma and ChrRCC.

Pathology of hereditary renal cell carcinoma syndromes: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease characterized by hamartomatous tumors involving multiple organs such as the brain, skin, heart, lung and kidney. TSC is caused by inactivating mutations in TSC1/TSC2, which encodes hamartin and tuberin, respectively, and forms a complex that regulates mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), resulting in cell overgrowth and oncogenesis. Since a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in TSC relates to chronic kidney disease and the ability to preserve renal function, this review describes the important pathologic findings in TSC-associated renal neoplasms and their correlating sporadic counterparts. The most common renal tumor in TSC patients are AMLs, followed by a heterogeneous spectrum of renal epithelial tumors, which may provide clues to establishing a diagnosis of TSC.

mTOR eosinophilic renal cell carcinoma: a distinctive tumor characterized by mTOR mutation, loss of chromosome 1, cathepsin-K expression, and response to target therapy

In the spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms, a subset of tumors with high-grade-appearing histologic features harboring pathogenic mutations in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and hitherto clinical indolent behavior has been described. Three cases (2F,1 M) with histologically documented metastases (lymph node, skull, and liver) were retrieved and extensively investigated by immunohistochemistry, FISH, and next-generation sequencing. Tumors were composed of eosinophilic cells with prominent nucleoli (G3 by ISUP/WHO) arranged in solid to nested architecture. Additionally, there were larger cells with perinuclear cytoplasmic shrinkage and sparse basophilic Nissl-like granules, superficially resembling the so-called spider cells of cardiac rhabdomyomas. The renal tumors, including the skull and liver metastases, showed immunoexpression PAX8, CK8-18, and cathepsin-K, and negativity for vimentin. NGS identified mTOR genetic alterations in the three cases, including the skull and liver metastases. One patient was then treated with Everolimus (mTOR inhibitors) with clinical response (metastatic tumor shrinkage). We present a distinct renal tumor characterized by high-grade eosinophilic cells, cathepsin-K immunohistochemical expression, and harboring mTOR gene mutations demonstrating a malignant potential and showing responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors.

mTOR Pathway Somatic Pathogenic Variants in Focal Malformations of Cortical Development: Novel Variants, Topographic Mapping, and Clinical Outcomes

Background and Objectives

Somatic and germline pathogenic variants in genes of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway are a common mechanism underlying a subset of focal malformations of cortical development (FMCDs) referred to as mTORopathies, which include focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II, subtypes of polymicrogyria, and hemimegalencephaly. Our objective is to screen resected FMCD specimens with mTORopathy features on histology for causal somatic variants in mTOR pathway genes, describe novel pathogenic variants, and examine the variant distribution in relation to neuroimaging, histopathologic classification, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed ultra-deep sequencing using a custom HaloPlexHS Target Enrichment kit in DNA from 21 resected fresh-frozen histologically confirmed FCD type II, tuberous sclerosis complex, or hemimegalencephaly specimens. We mapped the variant alternative allele frequency (AAF) across the resected brain using targeted ultra-deep sequencing in multiple formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. We also functionally validated 2 candidate somatic MTOR variants and performed targeted RNA sequencing to validate a splicing defect associated with a novel DEPDC5 variant.

Results

We identified causal mTOR pathway gene variants in 66.7% (14/21) of patients, of which 13 were somatic with AAF ranging between 0.6% and 12.0%. Moreover, the AAF did not predict balloon cell presence. Favorable seizure outcomes were associated with genetically clear resection borders. Individuals in whom a causal somatic variant was undetected had excellent postsurgical outcomes. In addition, we demonstrate pathogenicity of the novel c.4373_4375dupATG and candidate c.7499T>A MTOR variants in vitro. We also identified a novel germline aberrant splice site variant in DEPDC5 (c.2802-1G>C).

Discussion

The AAF of somatic pathogenic variants correlated with the topographic distribution, histopathology, and postsurgical outcomes. Moreover, cortical regions with absent histologic FCD features had negligible or undetectable pathogenic variant loads. By contrast, specimens with frank histologic abnormalities had detectable pathogenic variant loads, which raises important questions as to whether there is a tolerable variant threshold and whether surgical margins should be clean, as performed in tumor resections. In addition, we describe 2 novel pathogenic variants, expanding the mTORopathy genetic spectrum. Although most pathogenic somatic variants are located at mutation hotspots, screening the full-coding gene sequence remains necessary in a subset of patients.

Evaluation of an institutional series of low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of the kidney and review of the mutational landscape of LOT

The 2022 WHO classification of urinary and male genital tumors introduced several novel kidney entities exhibiting eosinophilic/oncocytic features with specific mutational backgrounds. Thus, molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), became more commonly used for their evaluation. We studied 12 low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOT) of the kidney (from 11 patients), identified in a cohort of 210 eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors, diagnosed in our institution between October 2019 and May 2023, which represented 5.7% (12/210) of all eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors during this period. We reviewed their clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features, as well as their mutational profiles. We also reviewed the literature on NGS-derived data of LOT, by selecting papers in which LOT diagnosis was rendered according to the criteria proposed initially. Median age was 65 years (mean: 63.5; range 43-79) and median tumor size was 2.0 cm (mean: 2.2; range: 0.9-3.1). All tumors were positive for PAX8, CK7, and GATA3, and negative or focally positive for CD117/KIT. We found the following gene mutations: MTOR ((6/11), 54.5%)), TSC1 ((2/11), 18.2%)), and 1 had both NOTCH1 and NOTCH4 ((1/11), 9.1%)). Wild-type status was found in 2/11 (18.2%) patients and one tumor was not analyzable. A review of 8 previous studies that included 79 LOTs revealed frequent mutations in the genes that regulate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: MTOR (32/79 (40.5%)), TSC1 (21/79 (26.6%)), and TSC2 (9/79 (11.4%)). Other mutated genes included PIK3CA, NF2, and PTEN, not typically known to affect the mTOR pathway, but potentially acting as upstream and downstream effectors. Our study shows that LOT is increasingly diagnosed in routine practice when applying the appropriate diagnostic criteria. We also confirm that the mTOR pathway is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of this tumor mainly through MTOR, TCS1, and TSC2 mutations, but other genes could also be involved in the pathway activation, especially in LOTs without "canonical" mutations.

Recent Advances in Renal Tumors with TSC/mTOR Pathway Abnormalities in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and in the Sporadic Setting

A spectrum of renal tumors associated with frequent TSC/mTOR (tuberous sclerosis complex/mechanistic target of rapamycin) pathway gene alterations (in both the germline and sporadic settings) have recently been described. These include renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). Most of these entities have characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features that enable their recognition without the need for molecular studies. In this report, we summarize recent advances and discuss their evolving complexity.

Update on classification of oncocytic neoplasms of the kidney

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a summary of recent developments in classification of renal oncocytic neoplasms that were incorporated in the fifth edition WHO classification of renal tumors, released in 2022.

RECENT FINDINGS

Besides the distinct entities of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, the WHO now acknowledges a heterogeneous group of oncocytic tumors of the kidney that can be reported as 'oncocytic renal neoplasms of low malignant potential'. Case series by multiple institutions have revealed recurrent patterns of morphological features, protein marker expression, and genetic alterations within these neoplasms that may permit further subclassification in the future.

SUMMARY

The new classification system provides pathologists with the opportunity to simplify the diagnostic workup and reporting of morphologically equivocal oncocytic neoplasms.

Reprint of: lessons from histopathologic examination of nephrectomy specimens in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: cysts, angiomyolipomas & renal cell carcinoma

Renal manifestations in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) include cysts, angiomyolipoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Unlike many hereditary predisposition syndromes, the spectrum of renal tumors in TSC patients (including both angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma) is broad, with significant morphologic heterogeneity. An improved understanding of histopathologic findings in TSC patients and associated clinicopathologic correlates has significant implications not just in establishing a diagnosis of TSC, but also in the recognition of sporadic tumors occurring secondary to somatic alterations of TSC1/TSC2/MTOR pathway genes and accurate prognostication. In this review, we have discussed issues relevant to clinical management based on histopathologic findings in nephrectomy specimens from patients with TSC. This includes discussions related to screening for TSC, diagnosis of PKD1/TSC2 contiguous gene deletion syndrome, the morphologic spectrum of angiomyolipoma and renal epithelium-derived neoplasia, including the risk of disease progression.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) of the kidney is characterised by GATA3 positivity, FOXI1 negativity and mTOR pathway mutations

Aims: We present a 5-case series of low-grade oncocytic tumour of the kidney to further discuss their clinicopathological characteristics. Methods and results: Five patients were included in this study. There were three females and two males aged 45-66 years, with a median age of 65 years. Four tumours were located in the right kidney, and one was located in the left kidney. Most of the tumour sections were yellow-brown in colour. Tumour sizes ranged from 2.5 to 4.5 cm, with a median size of 3 cm. Microscopically, the tumours were well-circumscribed but lacked a fibrous capsule; the tumours consisted of monomorphous oncocytic cells arranged mainly in solid and nested architectural patterns. The tumour cells had uniformly round to oval nuclei and often had perinuclear halos but lacked significant irregularities. Immunohistochemically, the tumour cells showed a diffuse and strong positivity for CK7 and were negative for CD117. The tumour cells were also positive for GATA3, E-cadherin, Pax-8, Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) and Fumarate hydratase (FH), and negative for vimentin, Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), CD10, P504s, CK20, TFE3, TFEB, HMB45, ALK and Forkhead box protein I1 (FOXI1). Next-generation sequencing identified genetic variations in these tumours, including MTOR gene mutations (4/5) and PIK3CA gene mutation (1/5). All patients were alive without disease progression at a median follow-up of 32 months (range 10-57 months). Conclusion: LOT is an emerging renal entity of indolent behaviour that has morphologic overlap with some renal tumours with eosinophilic cytoplasm, primarily with oncocytoma and eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Familiarity with the distinctive morphological features, immunophenotype and molecular genetics of LOT helps avoid misdiagnosis.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour of the kidney is characterised by genetic alterations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR or PIK3CA and consistent GATA3 positivity

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) of the kidney has recently emerged as a potential novel tumour type. Despite similarity to oncocytoma or eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, it shows diffuse keratin 7 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and negative KIT (CD117), which differs from both. We aimed to identify the molecular characteristics of these tumours. Seventeen tumours (one male, 16 female, nine previously published) fitting the original description of this entity (solid eosinophilic cell morphology, often with areas of tumour cells loosely stretched in oedematous stroma, and the above IHC features) were analysed with a next-generation sequencing panel of 324 cancer-associated genes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. All tumours harboured at least one alteration in either TSC1 (n = 7, 41%), TSC2 (n = 2, 12%), MTOR (n = 5, 29%) or PIK3CA (n = 4, 24%). Four tumours harboured a second alteration, including two NF2, one each in conjunction with MTOR and TSC2 alterations, one PTEN with TSC1 alteration and one tumour with both MTOR and TSC1 alterations. No other renal cancer-related or recurring gene alterations were identified. In addition to the previously described IHC findings, 16 of 16 were positive for GATA3. Eleven patients with follow-up had no metastases or recurrent tumours. Recurrent tuberous sclerosis/MTOR pathway gene alterations in LOT support its consideration as a distinct morphological, immunohistochemical and genetic entity. PIK3CA is another pathway member that may be altered in these tumours. Further study will be necessary to determine whether tumour behaviour or syndromic associations differ from those of oncocytoma and chromophobe carcinoma, warranting different clinical consideration.

How New Developments Impact Diagnosis in Existing Renal Neoplasms

In recent years, several emerging diagnostic entities have been described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, our understanding of well-known and established entities has also grown. Clear cell papillary RCC is now relabeled as a tumor rather than carcinoma in view of its nonaggressive behavior. Renal tumors with a predominantly infiltrative pattern are very important for recognition, as most of these have aggressive behavior, including fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and metastases from other cancers.

TSC/MTOR -associated Eosinophilic Renal Tumors Exhibit a Heterogeneous Clinicopathologic Spectrum : A Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Gene Expression Profiling Study

BACKGROUND

Several TSC1/2- or MTOR -mutated eosinophilic renal tumor subsets are emerging, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumors (EVTs) and low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOTs). "Unclassified renal tumors with TSC/MTOR mutations" ( TSC -mt RCC-NOS) do not meet the criteria for other histomolecular subtypes. Whether these tumors represent a continuum of 1 TS C/ MTOR -mutation-associated disease is unknown.

DESIGN

We evaluated the clinicopathologic and IHC profiles of 39 eosinophilic renal tumors with targeted DNA sequencing-confirmed TSC/MTOR mutations. Twenty-eight of these, plus 6 ChRCC, 5 RO, 5 ccRCC, 7 MiT RCC and 6 normal renal tissues, were profiled transcriptionally by RNA-seq.

RESULTS

The 39 cases were reclassified based on morphological and IHC features as ESC RCC (12), EVT (9), LOT, (8) and TSC -mt RCC-NOS (10). The mutation profiles demonstrated consistency; ESC RCCs (12/12) had TSC mutations, and most LOTs (7/8) had MTOR mutations. Ten TSC -mt RCC-NOSs exhibited heterogeneous morphology, arising a differential diagnosis with other renal tumors, including MiT RCC, PRCC and epithelioid PEComa. RNA sequencing-based clustering segregated ESC RCC, EVT and LOT from each other and other renal tumors, indicating expression profile-level differences. Most TSC- mt RCC-NOSs (6/7) formed a mixed cluster with ESC RCC, indicating similar expression signatures; one TSC- mt RCC-NOS with unusual biphasic morphology clustered with EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

We expanded the TSC/MTOR -associated eosinophilic renal tumor morphologic spectrum, identified gene mutation characteristics, and highlighted differential diagnosis challenges, especially with MiT RCC. ESC RCC, EVT, and LOT having distinct expression profiles. TSC -mt RCC-NOS may cluster with recognized TSC/MTOR -associated entities.

Lessons from histopathologic examination of nephrectomy specimens in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: cysts, angiomyolipomas, and renal cell carcinoma

Renal manifestations in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) include cysts, angiomyolipoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Unlike many hereditary predisposition syndromes, the spectrum of renal tumors in TSC patients (including both angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma) is broad, with significant morphologic heterogeneity. An improved understanding of histopathologic findings in TSC patients and associated clinicopathologic correlates has significant implications not just in establishing a diagnosis of TSC, but also in the recognition of sporadic tumors occurring secondary to somatic alterations of TSC1/TSC2/MTOR pathway genes and accurate prognostication. In this review, we have discussed issues relevant to clinical management based on histopathologic findings in nephrectomy specimens from patients with TSC. This includes discussions related to screening for TSC, diagnosis of PKD1/TSC2 contiguous gene deletion syndrome, the morphologic spectrum of angiomyolipoma and renal epithelium-derived neoplasia, including the risk of disease progression.

Low grade oncocytic tumors of the kidney: a clinically relevant approach for the workup and accurate diagnosis

Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were accepted as unique renal tumors in the late 1990s. Since their formal description, criteria for diagnosis have evolved and additional distinct tumor subtypes originally considered as one these two entities are now recognized. The last two decades have witnessed unprecedented interest in the spectrum of low grade oncocytic renal neoplasms in three specific areas: (1) histologic characterization of tumors with overlapping morphologic features between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; (2) description of potentially unique entities within this spectrum, such as eosinophilic vacuolated tumor and low-grade oncocytic tumor; and (3) better appreciation of the association between a subset of low grade oncocytic tumors and hereditary renal neoplasia. While this important work has been academically rewarding, the proposal of several histologic entities with overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features (which may require esoteric adjunctive immunohistochemical and/or molecular techniques for confirmation) has created frustration in the diagnostic pathology and urology community as information evolves regarding classification within this spectrum of renal neoplasia. Pathologists, including genitourinary subspecialists, are often uncertain as to the "best practice" diagnostic approach to such tumors. In this review, we present a practical clinically relevant algorithmic approach to classifying tumors within the low grade oncocytic family of renal neoplasia, including a proposal for compressing terminology for evolving categories where appropriate without sacrificing prognostic relevance.

99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT and histopathological features of oncocytic renal neoplasia

BACKGROUND

^99mTc-Sestamibi Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) contributes to the non-invasive differentiation of renal oncocytoma (RO) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by characterising renal tumours as Sestamibi positive or Sestamibi negative regarding their ^99mTc-Sestamibi uptake compared to the non-tumoral renal parenchyma.

PURPOSE

To determine whether ^99mTc- Sestamibi uptake in renal tumour and the non-tumoral renal parenchyma measured using Standard Uptake Value (SUV) SPECT, has a beneficial role in differentiating RO from RCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-seven renal tumours from 52 patients were evaluated. In addition to visual evaluation of ^99mTc-Sestamibi uptake, SUV_max measurements were performed in the renal tumour and the ipsilateral non-tumoral renal parenchyma. Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve identified an optimal cut-off value for detecting RO, based on the relative ratio of ^99mTc- Sestamibi uptake.

RESULTS

Semiquantitative evaluation of ^99mTc-Sestamibi uptake did not improve the performance of ^99mTc- Sestamibi SPECT/CT in detecting RO. ^99mTc- Sestamibi SPECT/CT identifies a group of mostly indolent Sestamibi-positive tumours with low malignant potential containing RO, Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumours, Hybrid Oncocytic Tumours, and a subset of chromophobe RCCs.

CONCLUSION

The imaging limitations for accurate differentiation of Sestamibi-positive renal tumours mirror the recognised diagnostic complexities of the histopathologic evaluation of oncocytic neoplasia. Patients with Sestamibi-positive renal tumours could be better suited for biopsy and follow-up, according to the current active surveillance protocols.

Do we need an updated classification of oncocytic renal tumors? : Emergence of low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) as novel renal entities

The category of "oncocytic renal tumors'' includes well-recognized entities, such as renal oncocytoma (RO) and eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (eo-ChRCC), as well as a group of "gray zone" oncocytic tumors, with overlapping features between RO and eo-ChRCC that create ongoing diagnostic and classification problems. These types of renal tumors were designated in the past as "hybrid oncocytoma-chromophobe tumors". In a recent update, the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) proposed the term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified", for such solitary and sporadic, somewhat heterogeneous, but relatively indolent tumors, with equivocal RO/eo-ChRCC features. GUPS also proposed that the term "hybrid oncocytic tumor" be reserved for tumors found in a hereditary setting, typically arising as bilateral and multifocal ones (as in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome). More recent developments in the "gray zone" of oncocytic renal tumors revealed that potentially distinct entities may have been "hidden" in this group. Recent studies distinguished two new entities: "Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor" (EVT) and "Low-grade Oncocytic Tumor" (LOT). The rapidly accumulated evidence on EVT and LOT has validated the initial findings and has expanded the knowledge on these entities. Both are uniformly benign and are typically found in a sporadic setting, but rarely can be found in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Both have readily distinguishable morphologic and immunohistochemical features that separate them from similar renal tumors, without a need for detailed molecular studies. These tumors very frequently harbor TSC/MTOR mutations that are however neither specific nor restricted to these two entities. In this review, we outline a proposal for a working framework on how to classify such low-grade oncocytic renal tumors. We believe that such framework will facilitate their handling in practice and will stimulate further discussions and studies to fully elucidate their spectrum.

Xanthomatous Giant Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Another Morphologic Form of TSC-associated Renal Cell Carcinoma

Over the past decade, several distinct novel renal epithelial neoplasms driven by underlying tuberous sclerosis comples (TSC)/mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway mutations have been described. We report herein two distinctive TSC2-mutated renal cell carcinomas which do not fit any previously described entity. The two renal carcinomas occurred in young patients (ages 10 and 31 y), and were characterized by highly permeative growth within the kidney with metastases to perirenal lymph nodes. The neoplastic cells were predominantly large, multinucleated giant cells having variably eosinophilic to xanthomatous cytoplasm with basophilic stippling and frequent vacuolization. While the discohesive nature of the neoplastic cells, xanthomatous cytoplasm, immunoreactivity for histiocytic markers and minimal immunoreactivity for conventional epithelial markers raised the possibility of a histiocytic neoplasm, multifocal immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 20 helped establish their epithelial nature. Despite the aggressive growth pattern of these neoplasms and lymph node metastases, mitotic figures were rare and Ki-67 indices were low (<1%). One patient with follow-up shows no evidence of disease seven years after nephrectomy with no adjuvant therapy. Next-generation sequencing demonstrated TSC2 mutations in each case. By immunohistochemistry, downstream markers of mTOR pathway activation S6K1, 4EBP1, and glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B were all highly expressed in these neoplasms, suggesting mTOR pathway activation as the neoplastic driver. While the cytokeratin 20 immunoreactivity and focal basophilic cytoplasmic stippling suggest a relationship to eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, and cytoplasmic vacuolization suggests a relationship to eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, these neoplasms appear to be distinctive given their permeative growth patterns and predominant xanthomatous giant cell morphology. Addition of cytokeratin 20 to a panel of epithelial markers helps avoid misdiagnosis in such cases.

The Histologic Diversity of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma With Emphasis on Challenges Encountered in Daily Practice

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is the third most common renal cell carcinoma in adults. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview highlighting the broad morphologic spectrum of ChRCC, and offer a practical approach for handling cases in daily practice. For the purpose of this review, we classify ChRCC subtypes as (1) classic, (2) eosinophilic, (3) sarcomatoid, and (4) other rare patterns. The concept of eosinophilic ChRCC has significantly evolved, yet it still is one of the major diagnostic challenges pathologists face in routine practice due to its morphologic overlap with renal oncocytoma. Rare patterns of ChRCC have been described over the last few decades, showing a wide histologic spectrum including those with adenomatoid microcystic pigmented, multicystic, neuroendocrine, small cell, and papillary features. ChRCC represents a heterogenous group of neoplasms, demonstrating varied but unique morphologic and genetic profiles. Although the field of ChRCC knowledge is still evolving, rare patterns can present diagnostic challenges if they are not known to pathologists and/or clinicians. Proper and generous tumor sampling along with careful histologic examination allow for recognition of these rare morphologies. The role of routine molecular testing appears to be limited. From a clinical management standpoint, the rare patterns of ChRCC seem to have no definite clinical implications at present and likely can be managed similarly to usual ChRCC. Finally, we will discuss distinctive novel/emerging renal neoplasms previously considered under the spectrum of ChRCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, with regard to their current significance and implications for future classification strategies.

What's new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours?

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification of urinary and male genital tumours (5th edition) has significantly improved our understanding of the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of renal tumours. The aim of this review is to outline the most important changes and diagnostic updates in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours. A major change in this edition is the grouping of renal tumours into broader categories that include "clear cell renal tumours", "papillary renal tumours", "oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumours", "collecting duct tumours" as well as adding two categories of "other renal tumours" and "molecularly defined renal carcinomas". Novel entities included in the WHO 2022 classification are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC and ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC. The category of "other renal tumours" includes a group of diverse, unrelated renal tumours that do not fit into other categories. The group of "molecularly defined renal carcinomas" reflects recent discoveries in the renal tumour genomics. These molecularly-defined renal entities demonstrate a set of morphologic features reflecting genotype-phenotype relationships. Final diagnosis of such entities rests on phenotypic and immunohistochemical (IHC) correlation, usually associated with IHC surrogate makers that reflect specific genetic abnormalities.

WHO 2022 Classification of Kidney Tumors: what is relevant? An update and future novelties for the pathologist

Classification systems reflect our technical abilities in the investigation of tumors and our current theories on tumor development. Herein, by providing a historical perspective on the evolution of classifying renal tumors, we assess the current WHO classification highlighting the novelties and the implications of these changes in daily clinical practice.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor of kidney harboring TSC/MTOR mutation: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics support a distinct entity

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) has recently been described as a distinct renal tumor. LOT shows consistent morphologic features and a CK7-positive/CD117-negative immunophenotype. To examine the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of LOT, we searched our institutional archives and identified seven cases of LOT. All patients were female, with a mean age of 66 years (range 44-79 years). The average tumor size was 3.2 cm (range 1.6-5.5 cm). Macroscopically, the tumors showed tan-brown and solid cut surfaces. Microscopically, the tumors showed compact nested to solid growth pattern, three cases with areas of edematous stroma containing loosely connected small clusters, cords or dispersed single tumor cells. The tumor cells had uniformly round to oval nuclei with eosinophilic cytoplasm, and showed perinuclear halos. Two cases focally had nuclear irregularities and binucleated cells were occasionally seen in three cases. Immunohistochemically, diffuse positivity for CK7 and lack of CD117 expression were present in all cases. All of the tumors were negative for CD10, CK20, vimentin, CA9, TFE3, TFEB, HMB45, and Melan-A. All tumors were positive for MTOR and negative for Cathepsin-K. FH and SDHB were retained. Next generation sequencing identified genetic variations in the MTOR pathway related genes: TSC1 (4/7), TSC2 (5/7), and MTOR (1/7). All patients were alive and without disease progression, after a mean follow-up of 43 months (range 6-89 months). LOT is an uncommon eosinophilic renal neoplasm with unique morphological and characteristic immunophenotypic features, and may represent an emerging separate renal entity characterized by mutations in the TSC/MTOR pathway.

TSC/mTOR Pathway Mutation Associated Eosinophilic/Oncocytic Renal Neoplasms: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors with Distinct Morphology, Immunohistochemical Profile, and Similar Genetic Background

A number of recently described renal tumor entities share an eosinophilic/oncocytic morphology, somewhat solid architectural growth pattern, and tendency to present as low-stage tumors. The vast majority of such tumors follow a non-aggressive clinical behavior. In this review, we discuss the morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic profiles of the three most recent novel/emerging renal entities associated with TSC/mTOR pathway mutations. These are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic vacuolated tumors, and low-grade oncocytic tumors, which belong to a heterogeneous group of renal tumors, demonstrating mostly solid architecture, eosinophilic/oncocytic cytoplasm, and overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. All three tumors also share a molecular genetic background with mutations in the mTORC1 pathway (TSC1/TSC2/mTOR/RHEB). Despite the common genetic background, it appears that the tumors with TSC/mTOR mutations represent a diverse group of distinct renal neoplasms.