1
|
Barriere H, Kaulanjan K, Stempfer G, Mollard P, Laguerre M, Senechal C, Gourtaud G, Roux V, Sadreux Y, Blanchet P, Brureau L. Overall and metastasis-free survival of Afro-Caribbean patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38734988 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, for various reasons, certain patients do not benefit from this treatment (OBS) or only at a late stage (LSR). There are few studies on this subject and none on a "high-risk" population, such as patients of African descent. Our objective was to estimate the metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who did not receive salvage radiotherapy, and to identify risk factors of disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study that included 154 patients, 99 in the OBS group and 55 in the LSR group. All were treated by total prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between January 2000 and December 2020 and none received early salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the time to biochemical recurrence. The median follow-up was 10.0 and 11.8 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. The median time from surgery to LSR was 5.1 years. The two groups did not show a significant difference in MFS: 90.6% at 10 years for the OBS group and 93.3% for the LSR group. The median MFS was 19.8 and 19.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups respectively. OS for the OBS group was significantly higher than that for the LSR group (HR: 2.14 [1.07-4.29]; p = 0.03), with 10-year OS of 95.9% for the OBS group and 76.1% for the LSR group. Median OS was 16 and 15.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study, we observed satisfactory metastasis-free and OS rates relative to those reported in the scientific literature. The challenge is not to question the benefit of early salvage radiotherapy, but to improve the identification of patients at risk of progression through the development of molecular and genomic tests for more highly personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Barriere
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Kévin Kaulanjan
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Gautier Stempfer
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Philippe Mollard
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Mélanie Laguerre
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Cédric Senechal
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Gilles Gourtaud
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Virginie Roux
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Yvanne Sadreux
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Service d'Urologie, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Urology Department, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyer MJ, Carpenter DJ, Gingrich JR, Raman SR, Sirohi D, Tabriz AA, Rompre-Broduer A, Lunyera J, Basher F, Bitting RL, Kosinski A, Cantrell S, Gordon AM, Ear B, Gierisch JM, Jacobs M, Goldstein KM. Genomic classifiers and prognosis of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-023-00766-z. [PMID: 38200096 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00766-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refinement of the risk classification for localized prostate cancer is warranted to aid in clinical decision making. A systematic analysis was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic ability of three genomic classifiers, Decipher, GPS, and Prolaris, for biochemical recurrence, development of metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for reports published from January 2010 to April 2022. STUDY SELECTION prospective or retrospective studies reporting prognosis for patients with localized prostate cancer. DATA EXTRACTION relevant data were extracted into a customized database by one researcher with a second overreading. Risk of bias was assessed using a validated tool for prognostic studies, Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by input from a third reviewer. We assessed the certainty of evidence by GRADE incorporating adaptation for prognostic studies. RESULTS Data synthesis: a total of 39 studies (37 retrospective) involving over 10,000 patients were identified. Twenty-two assessed Decipher, 5 GPS, and 14 Prolaris. Thirty-four studies included patients who underwent prostatectomy. Based on very low to low certainty of evidence, each of the three genomic classifiers modestly improved upon the prognostic ability for biochemical recurrence, development of metastases, and prostate cancer-specific mortality compared to standard clinical risk-classification schemes. LIMITATIONS downgrading of confidence in the evidence stemmed largely from bias due to the retrospective nature of the studies, heterogeneity in treatment received, and era in which patients were treated (i.e., prior to the 2000s). CONCLUSIONS Genomic classifiers provide a small but consistent improvement upon the prognostic ability of clinical classification schemes, which may be helpful when treatment decisions are uncertain. However, evidence from current management-era data and of the predictive ability of these tests is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Boyer
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Jeffrey R Gingrich
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sudha R Raman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Deepika Sirohi
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Joseph Lunyera
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fahmin Basher
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rhonda L Bitting
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrzej Kosinski
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Cantrell
- Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Belinda Ear
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer M Gierisch
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Karen M Goldstein
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Galvan GC, Friedrich NA, Das S, Daniels JP, Pollan S, Dambal S, Suzuki R, Sanders SE, You S, Tanaka H, Lee YJ, Yuan W, de Bono JS, Vasilevskaya I, Knudsen KE, Freeman MR, Freedland SJ. 27-hydroxycholesterol and DNA damage repair: implication in prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1251297. [PMID: 38188290 PMCID: PMC10771304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1251297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We previously reported that cholesterol homeostasis in prostate cancer (PC) is regulated by 27-hydroxycholesterol (27HC) and that CYP27A1, the enzyme that converts cholesterol to 27HC, is frequently lost in PCs. We observed that restoring the CYP27A1/27HC axis inhibited PC growth. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of 27HC-mediated anti-PC effects. Methods We employed in vitro models and human transcriptomics data to investigate 27HC mechanism of action in PC. LNCaP (AR+) and DU145 (AR-) cells were treated with 27HC or vehicle. Transcriptome profiling was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip™ microarray system. Differential expression was determined, and gene set enrichment analysis was done using the GSEA software with hallmark gene sets from MSigDB. Key changes were validated at mRNA and protein levels. Human PC transcriptomes from six datasets were analyzed to determine the correlation between CYP27A1 and DNA repair gene expression signatures. DNA damage was assessed via comet assays. Results Transcriptome analysis revealed 27HC treatment downregulated Hallmark pathways related to DNA damage repair, decreased expression of FEN1 and RAD51, and induced "BRCAness" by downregulating genes involved in homologous recombination regulation in LNCaP cells. Consistently, we found a correlation between higher CYP27A1 expression (i.e., higher intracellular 27HC) and decreased expression of DNA repair gene signatures in castration-sensitive PC (CSPC) in human PC datasets. However, such correlation was less clear in metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). 27HC increased expression of DNA damage repair markers in PC cells, notably in AR+ cells, but no consistent effects in AR- cells and decreased expression in non-neoplastic prostate epithelial cells. While testing the clinical implications of this, we noted that 27HC treatment increased DNA damage in LNCaP cells via comet assays. Effects were reversible by adding back cholesterol, but not androgens. Finally, in combination with olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, we showed additive DNA damage effects. Discussion These results suggest 27HC induces "BRCAness", a functional state thought to increase sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, and leads to increased DNA damage, especially in CSPC. Given the emerging appreciation that defective DNA damage repair can drive PC growth, future studies are needed to test whether 27HC creates a synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors and DNA damaging agents in CSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Cecilia Galvan
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nadine A. Friedrich
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sanjay Das
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - James P. Daniels
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sara Pollan
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shweta Dambal
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ryusuke Suzuki
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sergio E. Sanders
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sungyong You
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Hisashi Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Yeon-Joo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wei Yuan
- Cancer Biomarkers Team, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S. de Bono
- Cancer Biomarkers Team, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group and Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Irina Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael R. Freeman
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rais-Bahrami S, Zhu Y. Disparities in prostate cancer diagnosis and management: recognizing that disparities exist at all junctures along the prostate cancer journey. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:441-442. [PMID: 37117304 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00665-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Padayachee J, Chaudhary S, Shim B, So J, Lim R, Raman S. Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:293-305. [PMID: 36795862 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade. AREAS COVERED This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation. EXPERT OPINION Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simone Chaudhary
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Shim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan So
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Remy Lim
- Mercy PET/CT Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janes JL, Boyer MJ, Bennett JP, Thomas VM, De Hoedt AM, Edwards V DK, Singla PK, Abran JM, Aboushwareb T, Salama JK, Freedland SJ. The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Is Prognostic for Outcomes After Primary External Beam Radiation Therapy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:120-131. [PMID: 36306979 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay has been validated as a strong prognostic indicator of adverse pathology, biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer (PCa)-related death (PCD) in men with localized PCa after radical prostatectomy. However, it has yet to be tested in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), for whom assessing PCa progression risk could inform decisions on treatment intensity. We analyzed whether GPS results are associated with time to biochemical failure (BCF), DM, and PCD after EBRT in men with localized PCa and whether the association is modified by race. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective study of men with localized PCa treated with EBRT at the VA Health Care System in Durham, NC from 2000 to 2016. Study endpoints were time to BCF per the Phoenix criteria, DM, and PCD. The association of GPS results, per 20-unit increase or dichotomous variable (0-40 vs 41-100), was evaluated with each endpoint using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results were then stratified by race. RESULTS A total of 238 patients (69% Black) met the eligibility criteria. Median follow-up for patients who did not experience BCF was 7.6 years. GPS results per 20-unit increase were significantly associated with BCF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.02), DM (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.75-7.38), and PCD (HR, 5.36; 95% CI, 3.06-9.76) in univariable analysis. GPS results remained significant in multivariable models adjusted for baseline clinical and pathological factors, with HRs being similar to the univariable analysis. There was no significant interaction between the GPS assay and race (P = .923). HRs for BCF were similar in Black men (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.40-6.24) versus non-Black men (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.42-6.45). CONCLUSIONS Among men treated with EBRT, the GPS assay is a strong, independent prognostic indicator of time to BCF, DM, and PCD, and performs similarly in Black and non-Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Janes
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew J Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Vanessa M Thomas
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda M De Hoedt
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - John M Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| | | | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Surgery, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu H, Zhang J, Zheng X, Tan P, Xiong X, Yi X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Liao D, Li H, Wei Q, Ai J, Yang L. SR9009 inhibits lethal prostate cancer subtype 1 by regulating the LXRα/FOXM1 pathway independently of REV-ERBs. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:949. [PMID: 36357378 PMCID: PMC9649669 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05392-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Perturbations of the circadian clock are linked to multiple diseases, including cancers. Pharmacological activation of REV-ERB nuclear receptors, the core components of the circadian clock, has antitumor effects on various malignancies, while the impact of SR9009 on prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. Here, we found that SR9009 was specifically lethal to PCa cell lines but had no cytotoxic effect on prostate cells. SR9009 significantly inhibited colony formation, the cell cycle, and cell migration and promoted apoptosis in PCa cells. SR9009 treatment markedly inhibited prostate cancer subtype 1 (PCS1), the most lethal and aggressive PCa subtype, through FOXM1 pathway blockade, while it had no impacts on PCS2 and PCS3. Seven representative genes, including FOXM1, CENPA, CENPF, CDK1, CCNB1, CCNB2, and BIRC5, were identified as the shared genes involved in the FOXM1 pathway and PCS1. All of these genes were upregulated in PCa tissues, associated with worse clinicopathological outcomes and downregulated after SR9009 treatment. Nevertheless, knockdown or knockout of REV-ERB could not rescue the anticancer effect of SR9009 in PCa. Further analysis confirmed that it was LXRα rather than REV-ERBs which has been activated by SR9009. The expression levels of these seven genes were changed correspondingly after LXRα knockdown and SR9009 treatment. An in vivo study validated that SR9009 restrained tumor growth in 22RV1 xenograft models and inhibited FOXM1 and its targeted gene expression. In summary, SR9009 can serve as an effective treatment option for highly aggressive and lethal PCS1 tumors through mediating the LXRα/FOXM1 pathway independently of REV-ERBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Xu
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Jiapeng Zhang
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaonan Zheng
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Ping Tan
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Xingyu Xiong
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Xianyanling Yi
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Yang
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Animal Experimental Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Wang
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Research Core Facility, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Dazhou Liao
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Research Core Facility, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Li
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Jianzhong Ai
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| | - Lu Yang
- grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China ,grid.13291.380000 0001 0807 1581Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Awasthi S, Grass GD, Torres-Roca J, Johnstone PAS, Pow-Sang J, Dhillon J, Park J, Rounbehler RJ, Davicioni E, Hakansson A, Liu Y, Fink AK, DeRenzis A, Creed JH, Poch M, Li R, Manley B, Fernandez D, Naghavi A, Gage K, Lu-Yao G, Katsoulakis E, Burri RJ, Leone A, Ercole CE, Palmer JD, Vapiwala N, Deville C, Rebbeck TR, Dicker AP, Kelly W, Yamoah K. Genomic Testing in Localized Prostate Cancer Can Identify Subsets of African Americans With Aggressive Disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1656-1664. [PMID: 36053178 PMCID: PMC9745424 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personalized genomic classifiers have transformed the management of prostate cancer (PCa) by identifying the most aggressive subsets of PCa. Nevertheless, the performance of genomic classifiers to risk classify African American men is thus far lacking in a prospective setting. METHODS This is a prospective study of the Decipher genomic classifier for National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- and intermediate-risk PCa. Study-eligible non-African American men were matched to African American men. Diagnostic biopsy specimens were processed to estimate Decipher scores. Samples accrued in NCT02723734, a prospective study, were interrogated to determine the genomic risk of reclassification (GrR) between conventional clinical risk classifiers and the Decipher score. RESULTS The final analysis included a clinically balanced cohort of 226 patients with complete genomic information (113 African American men and 113 non-African American men). A higher proportion of African American men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-classified low-risk (18.2%) and favorable intermediate-risk (37.8%) PCa had a higher Decipher score than non-African American men. Self-identified African American men were twice more likely than non-African American men to experience GrR (relative risk [RR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 4.90; P = .04). In an ancestry-determined race model, we consistently validated a higher risk of reclassification in African American men (RR = 5.26, 95% CI = 1.66 to 16.63; P = .004). Race-stratified analysis of GrR vs non-GrR tumors also revealed molecular differences in these tumor subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Integration of genomic classifiers with clinically based risk classification can help identify the subset of African American men with localized PCa who harbor high genomic risk of early metastatic disease. It is vital to identify and appropriately risk stratify the subset of African American men with aggressive disease who may benefit from more targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Daniel Grass
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Julio Pow-Sang
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jasreman Dhillon
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jong Park
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Yang Liu
- Veracyte Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Angelina K Fink
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Amanda DeRenzis
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jordan H Creed
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael Poch
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roger Li
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brandon Manley
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Daniel Fernandez
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arash Naghavi
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kenneth Gage
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Grace Lu-Yao
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joshua D Palmer
- The James Cancer Hospital at Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Adam P Dicker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Kelly
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Correspondence: Kosj Yamoah, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Variation in Molecularly Defined Prostate Tumor Subtypes by Self-identified Race. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 40:19-26. [PMID: 35638091 PMCID: PMC9142751 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Socioeconomic and health care utilization factors are major drivers of prostate cancer (PC) mortality disparities in the USA; however, tumor molecular heterogeneity may also contribute to the higher mortality among Black men. Objective To compare differences in PC subtype frequency and genomic aggressiveness by self-identified race. Design setting and participants Five molecular subtype classifiers were applied for 426 Black and 762 White PC patients in the Decipher Genomics Resource Information Database (GRID). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Differences in subtype frequency and tumor genomic risk (Decipher score >0.6) by race were evaluated using χ2 tests and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. Results and limitations Subtype frequencies differed by race for four classifiers. Subtypes characterized by the presence of SPOP mutations, SPINK1 overexpression, and neuroendocrine differentiation were more common among Black men. ERG and ETS fusion-positive subtypes were more frequent among White men, with no clear differences for subtypes reflecting luminal versus basal lineage. The hypothesized low-risk Kamoun S2 subtype was associated with a lower Decipher score among White men only (p = 0.01 for heterogeneity), while the aggressive You PCS1 subtype was associated with a higher Decipher score among White men only (p = 0.001 for heterogeneity). The Tomlins ERG+ subtype was associated with a higher Decipher score relative to all other subtypes among Black men, with no association among White men (p = 0.007 for heterogeneity). Conclusions The frequency of PC molecular subtypes differed by self-identified race. Additional studies are required to evaluate whether our observations suggest differences in the tumor genomic risk of progression by self-identified race. Patient summary We studied five classifiers that identify subtypes of prostate tumors and found that subtypes differed in frequency between Black and White patients. Further research is warranted to evaluate how differences in tumor subtypes may contribute to disparities in prostate cancer mortality.
Collapse
|
10
|
Farha MW, Salami SS. Biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and risk stratification. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221103988. [PMID: 35719272 PMCID: PMC9201356 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221103988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men, most
patients do not die from the disease. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), the most
widely used oncologic biomarker, has revolutionized screening and early
detection, resulting in reduced proportion of patients presenting with advanced
disease. However, given the inherent limitations of PSA, additional diagnostic
and prognostic tools are needed to facilitate early detection and accurate risk
stratification of disease. Serum, urine, and tissue-based biomarkers are
increasingly being incorporated into the clinical care paradigm, but there is
still a limited understanding of how to use them most effectively. In the
current article, we review test characteristics and clinical performance data
for both serum [4 K score, prostate health index (phi)] and urine [SelectMDx,
ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, MyProstateScore (MPS), and PCa antigen 3 (PCA3)]
biomarkers to aid decisions regarding initial or repeat biopsies as well as
tissue-based biomarkers (Confirm MDx, Decipher, Oncotype Dx, and Polaris) aimed
at risk stratifying patients and identifying those patients most likely to
benefit from treatment versus surveillance or monotherapy
versus multi-modal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W Farha
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Simpa S Salami
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., 7306 Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5948, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fu W, Zhao MT, Driver LM, Schirmer AU, Yin Q, You S, Freedland SJ, DiGiovanni J, Drewry DH, Macias E. NUAK family kinase 2 is a novel therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog 2021; 61:334-345. [PMID: 34818445 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Current advancements in prostate cancer (PC) therapies have been successful in slowing PC progression and increasing life expectancy; however, there is still no curative treatment for advanced metastatic castration resistant PC (mCRPC). Most treatment options target the androgen receptor, to which many PCs eventually develop resistance. Thus, there is a dire need to identify and validate new molecular targets for treating PC. We found NUAK family kinase 2 (NUAK2) expression is elevated in PC and mCRPC versus normal tissue, and expression correlates with an increased risk of metastasis. Given this observation and because NUAK2, as a kinase, is actionable, we evaluated the potential of NUAK2 as a molecular target for PC. NUAK2 is a stress response kinase that also plays a role in activation of the YAP cotranscriptional oncogene. Combining pharmacological and genetic methods for modulating NUAK2, we found that targeting NUAK2 in vitro leads to reduction in proliferation, three-dimensional tumor spheroid growth, and matrigel invasion of PC cells. Differential gene expression analysis of PC cells treated NUAK2 small molecule inhibitor HTH-02-006 demonstrated that NUAK2 inhibition results in downregulation of E2F, EMT, and MYC hallmark gene sets after NUAK2 inhibition. In a syngeneic allograft model and in radical prostatectomy patient derived explants, NUAK2 inhibition slowed tumor growth and proliferation rates. Mechanistically, HTH-02-006 treatment led to inactivation of YAP and the downregulation of NUAK2 and MYC protein levels. Our results suggest that NUAK2 represents a novel actionable molecular target for PC that warrants further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Fu
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Megan T Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lucy M Driver
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amelia U Schirmer
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Qi Yin
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sungyong You
- Department of Biomedical Science, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Surgery and Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John DiGiovanni
- Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Dell Pediatric Research Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - David H Drewry
- Structural Genomics Consortium and Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Everardo Macias
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Siefert JC, Cioni B, Muraro MJ, Alshalalfa M, Vivié J, van der Poel HG, Schoots IG, Bekers E, Feng FY, Wessels LFA, Zwart W, Bergman AM. The Prognostic Potential of Human Prostate Cancer-Associated Macrophage Subtypes as Revealed by Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Mol Cancer Res 2021; 19:1778-1791. [PMID: 34131070 PMCID: PMC9398107 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Macrophages in the tumor microenvironment are causally linked with prostate cancer development and progression, yet little is known about their composition in neoplastic human tissue. By performing single cell transcriptomic analysis of human prostate cancer resident macrophages, three distinct populations were identified in the diseased prostate. Unexpectedly, no differences were observed between macrophages isolated from the tumorous and nontumorous portions of the prostatectomy specimens. Markers associated with canonical M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes were identifiable, however these were not the main factors defining unique subtypes. The genes selectively associated with each macrophage cluster were used to develop a gene signature which was highly associated with both recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival. These results highlight the relevance of tissue-specific macrophage subtypes in the tumor microenvironment for prostate cancer progression and demonstrates the utility of profiling single-cell transcriptomics in human tumor samples as a strategy to design gene classifiers for patient prognostication. IMPLICATIONS: The specific macrophage subtypes present in a diseased human prostate have prognostic value, suggesting that the relative proportions of these populations are related to patient outcome. Understanding the relative contributions of these subtypes will not only inform patient prognostication, but will enable personalized immunotherapeutic strategies to increase beneficial populations or reduce detrimental populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Siefert
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Cioni
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mauro J Muraro
- Single Cell Discoveries B.V., the Netherlands.,Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Alshalalfa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Judith Vivié
- Single Cell Discoveries B.V., the Netherlands.,Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Division of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elise Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahal BA, Gerke T, Awasthi S, Soule HR, Simons JW, Miyahira A, Halabi S, George D, Platz EA, Mucci L, Yamoah K. Prostate Cancer Racial Disparities: A Systematic Review by the Prostate Cancer Foundation Panel. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:18-29. [PMID: 34446369 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease that disproportionately impacts Black men in the USA. The structural factors that drive heterogeneous outcomes for patients of differing backgrounds are probably the same ones that result in population-level disparities. The relative contribution of drivers along the PCa disease continuum is an active area of investigation and debate. OBJECTIVE To critically synthesize the available evidence on PCa disparities from a population-level perspective in comparison to data from "equal access and equal care settings" and to provide a consensus summary of the state of PCa disparities. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A plenary panel on PCa disparities presented at the Prostate Cancer Foundation meeting on October 24, 2019 and ensuing discussions are reported here. We used a systematic literature review approach and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses to select the most relevant publications. A total of 3333 publications between 2011 and 2021 were retrieved, of which 52 were included in the review; an additional 13 articles on screening guidelines, seminal clinical trials, and statistical methodology were used in the evidence synthesis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Race disparities in PCa are a result of a complex interaction between socioeconomic factors impacting access to care and ancestral/genetic factors that may influence tumor biology. Black men in the USA continue to have a nearly 1.8 times higher population-level mortality rate than White men. Failure to account for the race-specific incidence burden would continue to lead to residual disparity even after achieving relatively similar outcomes after primary treatment, resulting in a higher long-term mortality burden. Selection bias remains possible in PCa studies, which often rely on highly specific cohorts of Black men with higher use of health care resources that may not represent the average Black patient in the USA. Novel methods including mediation analysis and genetic ancestry rather than self-identified race can optimize analytical models investigating racial disparities and may lead to a better understanding of PCa genomic diversity and behavior. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the importance of racially diverse studies, including precision -omics, prevention, and targeted therapy initiatives, to elucidate mechanisms underlying racial differences in outcomes and response to therapy. We propose novel approaches for studying and addressing PCa disparities. Contemporary methods, particularly in the domain of mediation analysis, can promote scientific rigor in understanding these disparities. PATIENT SUMMARY Inaccurate data interpretation or lack of data altogether for Black men can impact policy and ultimately affect millions of individuals of African origin worldwide. Our review identifies a need to develop and prioritize a strategy for including Black and other men with prostate cancer in intervention studies and randomized clinical trials to halt the widening prostate cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A Mahal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Travis Gerke
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel George
- Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Platz
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology and the James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lorelei Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leo P, Janowczyk A, Elliott R, Janaki N, Bera K, Shiradkar R, Farré X, Fu P, El-Fahmawi A, Shahait M, Kim J, Lee D, Yamoah K, Rebbeck TR, Khani F, Robinson BD, Eklund L, Jambor I, Merisaari H, Ettala O, Taimen P, Aronen HJ, Boström PJ, Tewari A, Magi-Galluzzi C, Klein E, Purysko A, Nc Shih N, Feldman M, Gupta S, Lal P, Madabhushi A. Computer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study. NPJ Precis Oncol 2021; 5:35. [PMID: 33941830 PMCID: PMC8093226 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00174-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Existing tools for post-radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis rely on human pathologist-derived parameters such as tumor grade, with the resulting inter-reviewer variability. Genomic companion diagnostic tests such as Decipher tend to be tissue destructive, expensive, and not routinely available in most centers. We present a tissue non-destructive method for automated BCR prognosis, termed "Histotyping", that employs computational image analysis of morphologic patterns of prostate tissue from a single, routinely acquired hematoxylin and eosin slide. Patients from two institutions (n = 214) were used to train Histotyping for identifying high-risk patients based on six features of glandular morphology extracted from RP specimens. Histotyping was validated for post-RP BCR prognosis on a separate set of n = 675 patients from five institutions and compared against Decipher on n = 167 patients. Histotyping was prognostic of BCR in the validation set (p < 0.001, univariable hazard ratio [HR] = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03-3.93, concordance index [c-index] = 0.68, median years-to-BCR: 1.7). Histotyping was also prognostic in clinically stratified subsets, such as patients with Gleason grade group 3 (HR = 4.09) and negative surgical margins (HR = 3.26). Histotyping was prognostic independent of grade group, margin status, pathological stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (multivariable p < 0.001, HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.40-3.10, n = 648). The combination of Histotyping, grade group, and preoperative PSA outperformed Decipher (c-index = 0.75 vs. 0.70, n = 167). These results suggest that a prognostic classifier for prostate cancer based on digital images could serve as an alternative or complement to molecular-based companion diagnostic tests.
Collapse
Grants
- National Cancer Institute under award numbers 1U24CA199374-01, R01CA249992-01A1 R01CA202752-01A1 R01CA208236-01A1 R01CA216579-01A1 R01CA220581-01A1 1U01CA239055-01 1U01CA248226-01 1U54CA254566-01 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute 1R01HL15127701A1, National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering 1R43EB028736-01, National Center for Research Resources 1 C06 RR12463-01, VA Merit Review Award IBX004121A from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Breast Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-19-1-0668), the Prostate Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-15-1-0558, W81XWH-20-1-0851), the Lung Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-18-1-0440, W81XWH-20-1-0595), the Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-18-1-0404), the Kidney Precision Medicine Project Glue Grant, the Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund, the Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland (UL1TR0002548) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH roadmap for Medical Research, The Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Case Western Reserve University,
- Sigrid Jusélius Foundation The Finnish Cancer Foundation
- Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Disparity Award (W81XWH-19-1-0720),
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (CON501692)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Leo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Janowczyk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Robin Elliott
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nafiseh Janaki
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kaustav Bera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rakesh Shiradkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Xavier Farré
- Public Health Agency of Catalonia, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Pingfu Fu
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ayah El-Fahmawi
- Department of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohammed Shahait
- Department of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Kim
- Department of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Lee
- Department of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesca Khani
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian D Robinson
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauri Eklund
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Harri Merisaari
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Hannu J Aronen
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Turku University Hospital, Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Eric Klein
- Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrei Purysko
- Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Section of Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Natalie Nc Shih
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Feldman
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Priti Lal
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jairath NK, Dal Pra A, Vince R, Dess RT, Jackson WC, Tosoian JJ, McBride SM, Zhao SG, Berlin A, Mahal BA, Kishan AU, Den RB, Freedland SJ, Salami SS, Kaffenberger SD, Pollack A, Tran P, Mehra R, Morgan TM, Weiner AB, Mohamad O, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Karnes RJ, Nguyen PL, Michalski JM, Tward JD, Feng FY, Schaeffer EM, Spratt DE. A Systematic Review of the Evidence for the Decipher Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 79:374-383. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
17
|
Dovey ZS, Nair SS, Chakravarty D, Tewari AK. Racial disparity in prostate cancer in the African American population with actionable ideas and novel immunotherapies. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 4:e1340. [PMID: 33599076 PMCID: PMC8551995 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background African Americans (AAs) in the United States are known to have a higher incidence and mortality for Prostate Cancer (PCa). The drivers of this epidemiological disparity are multifactorial, including socioeconomic factors leading to lifestyle and dietary issues, healthcare access problems, and potentially tumor biology. Recent findings Although recent evidence suggests once access is equal, AA men have equal outcomes to Caucasian American (CA) men, differences in PCa incidence remain, and there is much to do to reverse disparities in mortality across the USA. A deeper understanding of these issues, both at the clinical and molecular level, can facilitate improved outcomes in the AA population. This review first discusses PCa oncogenesis in the context of its diverse hallmarks before benchmarking key molecular and genomic differences for PCa in AA men that have emerged in the recent literature. Studies have emphasized the importance of tumor microenvironment that contributes to both the unequal cancer burden and differences in clinical outcome between the races. Management of comorbidities like obesity, hypertension, and diabetes will provide an essential means of reducing prostate cancer incidence in AA men. Although requiring further AA specific research, several new treatment strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors used in combination PARP inhibitors and other emerging vaccines, including Sipuleucel‐T, have demonstrated some proven efficacy. Conclusion Genomic profiling to integrate clinical and genomic data for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment will allow physicians to plan a “Precision Medicine” approach to AA men. There is a pressing need for further research for risk stratification, which may allow early identification of AA men with higher risk disease based on their unique clinical, genomic, and immunological profiles, which can then be mapped to appropriate clinical trials. Treatment options are outlined, with a concise description of recent work in AA specific populations, detailing several targeted therapies, including immunotherapy. Also, a summary of current clinical trials involving AA men is presented, and it is important that policies are adopted to ensure that AA men are actively recruited. Although it is encouraging that many of these explore the lifestyle and educational initiatives and therapeutic interventions, there is much still work to be done to reduce incidence and mortality in AA men and equalize current racial disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Dovey
- The Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sujit S Nair
- The Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dimple Chakravarty
- The Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashutosh K Tewari
- The Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weiner AB, Vidotto T, Liu Y, Mendes AA, Salles DC, Faisal FA, Murali S, McFarlane M, Imada EL, Zhao X, Li Z, Davicioni E, Marchionni L, Chinnaiyan AM, Freedland SJ, Spratt DE, Wu JD, Lotan TL, Schaeffer EM. Plasma cells are enriched in localized prostate cancer in Black men and are associated with improved outcomes. Nat Commun 2021; 12:935. [PMID: 33568675 PMCID: PMC7876147 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21245-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Black men die more often of prostate cancer yet, interestingly, may derive greater survival benefits from immune-based treatment with sipuleucel-T. Since no signatures of immune-responsiveness exist for prostate cancer, we explored race-based immune-profiles to identify vulnerabilities. Here we show in multiple independent cohorts comprised of over 1,300 patient samples annotated with either self-identified race or genetic ancestry, prostate tumors from Black men or men of African ancestry have increases in plasma cell infiltrate and augmented markers of NK cell activity and IgG expression. These findings are associated with improved recurrence-free survival following surgery and nominate plasma cells as drivers of prostate cancer immune-responsiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thiago Vidotto
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yang Liu
- Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Adrianna A Mendes
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniela C Salles
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Farzana A Faisal
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sanjana Murali
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew McFarlane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Eddie L Imada
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xin Zhao
- Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ziwen Li
- Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Luigi Marchionni
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Stephen J Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Urology, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer D Wu
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tamara L Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A comparative study of PCS and PAM50 prostate cancer classification schemes. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:733-742. [PMID: 33531653 PMCID: PMC8326303 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00325-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two prostate cancer (PC) classification methods based on transcriptome profiles, a de novo method referred to as the "Prostate Cancer Classification System" (PCS) and a variation of the established PAM50 breast cancer algorithm, were recently proposed. Both studies concluded that most human PC can be assigned to one of three tumor subtypes, two categorized as luminal and one as basal, suggesting the two methods reflect consistency in underlying biology. Despite the similarity, differences and commonalities between the two classification methods have not yet been reported. METHODS Here, we describe a comparison of the PCS and PAM50 classification systems. PCS and PAM50 signatures consisting of 37 (PCS37) and 50 genes, respectively, were used to categorize 9,947 PC patients into PCS and PAM50 classes. Enrichment of hallmark gene sets and luminal and basal marker gene expression were assessed in the same datasets. Finally, survival analysis was performed to compare PCS and PAM50 subtypes in terms of clinical outcomes. RESULTS PCS and PAM50 subtypes show clear differential expression of PCS37 and PAM50 genes. While only three genes are shared in common between the two systems, there is some consensus between three subtype pairs (PCS1 versus Luminal B, PCS2 versus Luminal A, and PCS3 versus Basal) with respect to gene expression, cellular processes, and clinical outcomes. PCS categories displayed better separation of cellular processes and luminal and basal marker gene expression compared to PAM50. Although both PCS1 and Luminal B tumors exhibited the worst clinical outcomes, outcomes between aggressive and less aggressive subtypes were better defined in the PCS system, based on larger hazard ratios observed. CONCLUSION The PCS and PAM50 classification systems are similar in terms of molecular profiles and clinical outcomes. However, the PCS system exhibits greater separation in multiple clinical outcomes and provides better separation of prostate luminal and basal characteristics.
Collapse
|
20
|
Awasthi S, Berglund A, Abraham-Miranda J, Rounbehler RJ, Kensler K, Serna A, Vidal A, You S, Freeman MR, Davicioni E, Liu Y, Karnes RJ, Klein EA, Den RB, Trock BJ, Campbell JD, Einstein DJ, Gupta R, Balk S, Lal P, Park JY, Cleveland JL, Rebbeck TR, Freedland SJ, Yamoah K. Comparative Genomics Reveals Distinct Immune-oncologic Pathways in African American Men with Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:320-329. [PMID: 33037017 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of immune-oncologic mechanisms of racial disparities in prostate cancer remains understudied. Limited research exists to evaluate the molecular underpinnings of immune differences in African American men (AAM) and European American men (EAM) prostate tumor microenvironment (TME). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A total of 1,173 radiation-naïve radical prostatectomy samples with whole transcriptome data from the Decipher GRID registry were used. Transcriptomic expressions of 1,260 immune-specific genes were selected to assess immune-oncologic differences between AAM and EAM prostate tumors. Race-specific differential expression of genes was assessed using a rank test, and intergene correlational matrix and gene set enrichment was used for pathway analysis. RESULTS AAM prostate tumors have significant enrichment of major immune-oncologic pathways, including proinflammatory cytokines, IFNα, IFNγ, TNFα signaling, ILs, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. AAM TME has higher total immune content score (ICSHIGH) compared with 0 (37.8% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.003). AAM tumors also have lower DNA damage repair and are genomically radiosensitive as compared with EAM. IFITM3 (IFN-inducible transmembrane protein 3) was one of the major proinflammatory genes overexpressed in AAM that predicted increased risk of biochemical recurrence selectively for AAM in both discovery [HRAAM = 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-4.34; P = 0.01] and validation (HRAAM = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.52-3.86; P = 0.0001) but not in EAM. CONCLUSIONS Prostate tumors of AAM manifest a unique immune repertoire and have significant enrichment of proinflammatory immune pathways that are associated with poorer outcomes. Observed immune-oncologic differences can aid in a genomically adaptive approach to treating prostate cancer in AAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivanshu Awasthi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anders Berglund
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - Julieta Abraham-Miranda
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - Robert J Rounbehler
- Department of Tumor Biology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kevin Kensler
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amparo Serna
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Sungyong You
- Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Elai Davicioni
- Decipher Bioscience, Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yang Liu
- Decipher Bioscience, Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert B Den
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bruce J Trock
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joshua D Campbell
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Einstein
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raavi Gupta
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Steven Balk
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Priti Lal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jong Y Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - John L Cleveland
- Department of Tumor Biology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institutes, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|