1
|
Avet-Loiseau H, Bahlis NJ. Smoldering multiple myeloma: taking the narrow over the wide path? Blood 2024; 143:2025-2028. [PMID: 38427775 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024023880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Smoldering multiple myeloma (MM) is an asymptomatic clonal plasma cell condition considered as a premalignant entity that may evolve over time to symptomatic MM. Based on a "poorly defined" risk of progression, some well-intended investigators proposed prospective interventional trials for these individuals. We believe this may be a harmful intervention and favor a close "wait and watch" approach and rather enroll these patients in dedicated observational biological studies aiming to better identify patients who will evolve to MM, based on their plasma cells' biology, including genomics, epigenetics, and the immune microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nizar J Bahlis
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdallah N, Witzig TE, Kumar SK, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Dispenzieri A, Roy V, Gertz MA, Bergsagel PL, Rajkumar SV. Phase III randomized trial of Thal+ZLD versus ZLD in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma - updated results after 18-year follow-up. Leukemia 2024; 38:1169-1171. [PMID: 38418610 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02192-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Abdallah
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas E Witzig
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shaji K Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martha Q Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Suzanne R Hayman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Angela Dispenzieri
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vivek Roy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - P Leif Bergsagel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S Vincent Rajkumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghobrial IM, Gormley N, Kumar SK, Mateos MV, Bergsagel PL, Chesi M, Dhodapkar MV, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, Getz G, Kastritis E, Kristinsson SY, Martinez-Climent JA, Manier S, Marinac CR, Maura F, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Nadeem O, Nuvolone M, Paiva B, O'Donnell E, Prosper F, Shah UA, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Sperling AS, Vassiliou GS, Munshi NC, Castle PE, Anderson KC, San Miguel JF. Round Table Discussion on Optimal Clinical Trial Design in Precursor Multiple Myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov 2024; 5:146-152. [PMID: 38441243 PMCID: PMC11061588 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-24-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY While the current approach to precursor hematologic conditions is to "watch and wait," this may change with the development of therapies that are safe and extend survival or delay the onset of symptomatic disease. The goal of future therapies in precursor hematologic conditions is to improve survival and prevent or delay the development of symptomatic disease while maximizing safety. Clinical trial considerations in this field include identifying an appropriate at-risk population, safety assessments, dose selection, primary and secondary trial endpoints including surrogate endpoints, control arms, and quality-of-life metrics, all of which may enable more precise benefit-risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole Gormley
- Division of Hematology, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Shaji K. Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00233, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Marta Chesi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Angela Dispenzieri
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Jose Angel Martinez-Climent
- Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Salomon Manier
- Hematology Department, CHU Lille, Lille University, INSERM UMR-S1277, Lille, France
| | | | - Francesco Maura
- Myeloma Division, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Gareth J. Morgan
- Myeloma Research Program, NYU Langone, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Faith E. Davies
- Myeloma Research Program, NYU Langone, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mario Nuvolone
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Felipe Prosper
- Hematology Service and Cell Therapy Unit and Program of Hematology-Oncology CIMA, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN) and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC) and RICORS TERAV, Madrid, Spain
| | - Urvi A. Shah
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - George S. Vassiliou
- Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Philip E. Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Jesus F. San Miguel
- Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Medina-Herrera A, Vazquez I, Cuenca I, Rosa-Rosa JM, Ariceta B, Jimenez C, Fernandez-Mercado M, Larrayoz MJ, Gutierrez NC, Fernandez-Guijarro M, Gonzalez-Calle V, Rodriguez-Otero P, Oriol A, Rosiñol L, Alegre A, Escalante F, De La Rubia J, Teruel AI, De Arriba F, Hernandez MT, Lopez-Jimenez J, Ocio EM, Puig N, Paiva B, Lahuerta JJ, Bladé J, San Miguel JF, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Calasanz MJ, Garcia-Sanz R. The genomic profiling of high-risk smoldering myeloma patients treated with an intensive strategy unveils potential markers of resistance and progression. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:74. [PMID: 38684670 PMCID: PMC11059156 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01053-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) precedes multiple myeloma (MM). The risk of progression of SMM patients is not uniform, thus different progression-risk models have been developed, although they are mainly based on clinical parameters. Recently, genomic predictors of progression have been defined for untreated SMM. However, the usefulness of such markers in the context of clinical trials evaluating upfront treatment in high-risk SMM (HR SMM) has not been explored yet, precluding the identification of baseline genomic alterations leading to drug resistance. For this reason, we carried out next-generation sequencing and fluorescent in-situ hybridization studies on 57 HR and ultra-high risk (UHR) SMM patients treated in the phase II GEM-CESAR clinical trial (NCT02415413). DIS3, FAM46C, and FGFR3 mutations, as well as t(4;14) and 1q alterations, were enriched in HR SMM. TRAF3 mutations were specifically associated with UHR SMM but identified cases with improved outcomes. Importantly, novel potential predictors of treatment resistance were identified: NRAS mutations and the co-occurrence of t(4;14) plus FGFR3 mutations were associated with an increased risk of biological progression. In conclusion, we have carried out for the first time a molecular characterization of HR SMM patients treated with an intensive regimen, identifying genomic predictors of poor outcomes in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Medina-Herrera
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - I Vazquez
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - I Cuenca
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i + 12), Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - J M Rosa-Rosa
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i + 12), Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Ariceta
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - C Jimenez
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.
| | - M Fernandez-Mercado
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M J Larrayoz
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - N C Gutierrez
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - M Fernandez-Guijarro
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i + 12), Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Gonzalez-Calle
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - P Rodriguez-Otero
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - A Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Institut d'Investigació Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Rosiñol
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Alegre
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud and Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Escalante
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de León, León, Spain
| | - J De La Rubia
- Hematology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Universidad Católica "San Vicente Mártir", CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - A I Teruel
- Hematology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - F De Arriba
- Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - M T Hernandez
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - J Lopez-Jimenez
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - E M Ocio
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - N Puig
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - B Paiva
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J J Lahuerta
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i + 12), Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Bladé
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J F San Miguel
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M V Mateos
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - J Martinez-Lopez
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i + 12), Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Calasanz
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA LAB Diagnostics), IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - R Garcia-Sanz
- Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, (HUSA/IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC/USAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schinke C, Rasche L, Raab MS, Weinhold N. Impact of Clonal Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:461-476. [PMID: 38195308 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is characterized by a highly heterogeneous disease distribution within the bone marrow-containing skeletal system. In this review, we introduce the molecular mechanisms underlying clonal heterogeneity and the spatio-temporal evolution of myeloma. We discuss the clinical impact of clonal heterogeneity, which is thought to be one of the biggest obstacles to overcome therapy resistance and to achieve cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Schinke
- Myeloma Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Leo Rasche
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Mildred Scheel Early Career Center (MSNZ), University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rajkumar SV, Bergsagel PL, Kumar S. Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Observation Versus Control Versus Cure. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:293-303. [PMID: 38158241 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an intermediate clinical stage in the spectrum of monoclonal plasma cell disorders. It represents a heterogeneous clinically defined condition in which some patients (approximately 50%) have monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (premalignancy), and some (approximately 50%) have multiple myeloma (biologic malignancy). Using specific prognostic factors, patients with SMM, in whom malignant transformation has already likely occurred, can be identified. These patients are considered to have high-risk SMM. Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk SMM are candidates for early intervention with lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for 2 years, or enrollment in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vincent Rajkumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - P Leif Bergsagel
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eythorsson E, Rognvaldsson S, Thorsteinsdottir S, Einarsson Long T, Reed ER, Sigurdardottir GA, Vidarsson B, Onundarson PT, Agnarsson BA, Sigurdardottir M, Olafsson I, Thorsteinsdottir I, Sveinsdottir SV, Sigurdsson F, Thordardottir AR, Palsson R, Indridason OS, Jonsson A, Gislason GK, Olafsson A, Sigurdsson J, Steingrimsdottir H, Hultcrantz M, Durie BGM, Harding S, Landgren O, Aspelund T, Love TJ, Kristinsson SY. Development of a Multivariable Model to Predict the Need for Bone Marrow Sampling in Persons With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance : A Cohort Study Nested in a Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:449-457. [PMID: 38560901 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions to multiple myeloma and related disorders. Smoldering multiple myeloma is distinguished from MGUS by 10% or greater bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) on sampling, has a higher risk for progression, and requires specialist management. OBJECTIVE To develop a multivariable prediction model that predicts the probability that a person with presumed MGUS has 10% or greater BMPC (SMM or worse by bone marrow criteria) to inform the decision to obtain a bone marrow sample and compare its performance to the Mayo Clinic risk stratification model. DESIGN iStopMM (Iceland Screens, Treats or Prevents Multiple Myeloma), a prospective population-based screening study of MGUS. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03327597). SETTING Icelandic population of adults aged 40 years or older. PATIENTS 1043 persons with IgG, IgA, light-chain, and biclonal MGUS detected by screening and an interpretable bone marrow sample. MEASUREMENTS Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance isotype; monoclonal protein concentration; free light-chain ratio; and total IgG, IgM, and IgA concentrations were used as predictors. Bone marrow plasma cells were categorized as 0% to 4%, 5% to 9%, 10% to 14%, or 15% or greater. RESULTS The c-statistic for SMM or worse was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88), and calibration was excellent (intercept, -0.07; slope, 0.95). At a threshold of 10% predicted risk for SMM or worse, sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 67%, positive predictive value was 32%, and negative predictive value was 96%. Compared with the Mayo Clinic model, the net benefit for the decision to refer for sampling was between 0.13 and 0.30 higher over a range of plausible low-risk thresholds. LIMITATION The prediction model will require external validation. CONCLUSION This accurate prediction model for SMM or worse was developed in a population-based cohort of persons with presumed MGUS and may be used to defer bone marrow sampling and referral to hematology. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE International Myeloma Foundation and the European Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Eythorsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | - Saemundur Rognvaldsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | - Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland, and Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (S.T.)
| | - Thorir Einarsson Long
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland, and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (T.E.L.)
| | - Elin Ruth Reed
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Gudrun Asta Sigurdardottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Brynjar Vidarsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Pall Torfi Onundarson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | - Bjarni A Agnarsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | - Margret Sigurdardottir
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Isleifur Olafsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Ingunn Thorsteinsdottir
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Signy Vala Sveinsdottir
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Fridbjorn Sigurdsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Asdis Rosa Thordardottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Runolfur Palsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | - Olafur Skuli Indridason
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| | | | - Gauti Kjartan Gislason
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Andri Olafsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Jon Sigurdsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Hlif Steingrimsdottir
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (B.V., M.S., I.O., I.T., S.V.S., F.S., H.S.)
| | - Malin Hultcrantz
- Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (M.H.)
| | - Brian G M Durie
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California (B.G.M.D.)
| | - Stephen Harding
- The Binding Site, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom (S.H.)
| | - Ola Landgren
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (O.L.)
| | - Thor Aspelund
- Center for Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (T.A.)
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.R.R., G.A.S., A.R.T., G.K.G., A.O., J.S., T.J.L.)
| | - Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland (E.E., S.R., P.T.O., B.A.A., R.P., O.S.I., S.Y.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lecat C, Boyle EM, Hughes D, Lee L, Smith D, Bygrave C, Ramasamy K, Yong K. Challenges in designing and running smouldering myeloma interventional clinical trials. EJHAEM 2024; 5:418-420. [PMID: 38633110 PMCID: PMC11020121 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Hughes
- Department of HaematologyUCL Cancer InstituteLondonUK
| | - Lydia Lee
- Department of HaematologyUCL Cancer InstituteLondonUK
| | - Dean Smith
- Department of Clinical HaematologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamUK
| | - Ceri Bygrave
- Department of HaematologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, NDORMSUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Kwee Yong
- Department of HaematologyUCL Cancer InstituteLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmidt T, Gahvari Z, Callander NS. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Diagnosis and Management of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024:S2152-2650(24)00115-0. [PMID: 38641486 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Monoclonal proteins are common, with a prevalence in the United States around 5% and the incidence increases with age. Although most patients are asymptomatic, the vast majority of cases are caused by a clonal plasma cell disorder. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions with variable risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). In recent years, significant progress has been made to better understand the factors that lead to the development of symptoms and progression to myeloma. In this review, we summarize the current diagnosis treatment guidelines for MGUS and SMM and highlight recent advances that underscore a shifting paradigm in the evaluation and management of plasma cell precursor conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Schmidt
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison WI
| | - Zhubin Gahvari
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison WI
| | - Natalie S Callander
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison WI.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giles HV, Karunanithi K. Performance Characteristics and Limitations of the Available Assays for the Detection and Quantitation of Monoclonal Free Light Chains and New Emerging Methodologies. Antibodies (Basel) 2024; 13:19. [PMID: 38534209 DOI: 10.3390/antib13010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Light chain measurements form an essential component of the testing strategy for the detection and monitoring of patients with suspected and/or proven plasma cell disorders. Urine-based electrophoretic assays remain at the centre of the international guidelines for response assessment but the supplementary role of serum-free light chain (FLC) assays in response assessment and the detection of disease progression due to their increased sensitivity has been increasingly recognised since their introduction in 2001. Serum FLC assays have also been shown to be prognostic across the spectrum of plasma cell disorders and are now incorporated into risk stratification scores for patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smouldering multiple myeloma, and light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis), as well as being incorporated into the criteria for defining symptomatic multiple myeloma. There are now multiple different commercially available serum FLC assays available with differing performance characteristics, which are discussed in this review, along with the implications of these for patient monitoring. Finally, newer methodologies for the identification and characterisation of monoclonal FLC, including modifications to electrophoretic techniques, mass spectrometry-based assays and Amylite, are also described along with the relevant published data available regarding the performance of each assay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah V Giles
- Department of Clinical Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK
- Instute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Kamaraj Karunanithi
- Department of Clinical Haematology, University Hospitals North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 5BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gupta R, Jevremovic D, Mathew SJ, Kumar S. Multiparametric Flow Cytometry in the Evaluation of Plasma Cell Proliferative Disorders: Current Paradigms for Clinical Practice. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:e88-e95. [PMID: 38142203 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Diagnosis of plasma cell proliferative disorders (PCPDs) is primarily based on the demonstration of monoclonal protein (M-Protein) in blood and/ or urine which often precedes clinical manifestations of the disease. The basic pathophysiology behind the M-protein presence is the proliferation of clonal plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow or extramedullary sites and is assessed using cytomorphology and immunophenotyping. The role of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) for PC identification is technically the most valuable tool in this context as it characterizes as well as quantifies the clonal PCs based on differential expression of various immunophenotypic (IPT) markers. From a diagnostic perspective, MFC is critical in the definite identification of the clonal PCs and delineates benign and borderline entities at one end of the spectrum (MGUS, SMM) with lower clonal PC% and, malignant diseases at the other end (MM and PCL) with higher clonal PC fraction. The role of MFC in assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) and monitoring of progression in MM and various PCPDs has been validated in multiple clinical studies and is probably one of the most promising tools for predicting treatment outcomes. Furthermore, MFC also plays a crucial role in disease prognostication based on specific IPT profiles. An additional role of MFC in the current clinical scenario is the evaluation of tumor microenvironment based on immune cell repertoire, which is reflecting encouraging results across. Thus, in the current review we concisely describe the role of MFC as a reliable and essential modality in PCPDs, from diagnosis to prediction of treatment outcome and disease monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Gupta
- Department of Laboratory Oncology, Dr. BRAIRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India; Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Dragan Jevremovic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Shaji Kumar
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mellgard G, Gilligan M, Cliff ERS, Bhutani D, Mohyuddin GR, Eisenberger A, Lentzsch S, Chakraborty R. Risk stratification models overestimate progression risk in contemporary patients with smoldering multiple myeloma. Hemasphere 2024; 8:e61. [PMID: 38510991 PMCID: PMC10951870 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- George Mellgard
- Department of MedicineColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Molly Gilligan
- Department of MedicineColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Edward R. Scheffer Cliff
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Divaya Bhutani
- Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Andrew Eisenberger
- Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Suzanne Lentzsch
- Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Emery A, Moore S, Crowe J, Murray J, Peacock O, Thompson D, Betts F, Rapps S, Ross L, Rothschild-Rodriguez D, Arana Echarri A, Davies R, Lewis R, Augustine DX, Whiteway A, Afzal Z, Heaney J, Drayson MT, Turner JE, Campbell JP. The effects of short-term, progressive exercise training on disease activity in smouldering multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a single-arm pilot study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:174. [PMID: 38317104 PMCID: PMC10840198 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11817-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High levels of physical activity are associated with reduced risk of the blood cancer multiple myeloma (MM). MM is preceded by the asymptomatic stages of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) which are clinically managed by watchful waiting. A case study (N = 1) of a former elite athlete aged 44 years previously indicated that a multi-modal exercise programme reversed SMM disease activity. To build from this prior case study, the present pilot study firstly examined if short-term exercise training was feasible and safe for a group of MGUS and SMM patients, and secondly investigated the effects on MGUS/SMM disease activity. METHODS In this single-arm pilot study, N = 20 participants diagnosed with MGUS or SMM were allocated to receive a 16-week progressive exercise programme. Primary outcome measures were feasibility and safety. Secondary outcomes were pre- to post-exercise training changes to blood biomarkers of MGUS and SMM disease activity- monoclonal (M)-protein and free light chains (FLC)- plus cardiorespiratory and functional fitness, body composition, quality of life, blood immunophenotype, and blood biomarkers of inflammation. RESULTS Fifteen (3 MGUS and 12 SMM) participants completed the exercise programme. Adherence was 91 ± 11%. Compliance was 75 ± 25% overall, with a notable decline in compliance at intensities > 70% V̇O2PEAK. There were no serious adverse events. There were no changes to M-protein (0.0 ± 1.0 g/L, P =.903), involved FLC (+ 1.8 ± 16.8 mg/L, P =.839), or FLC difference (+ 0.2 ± 15.6 mg/L, P =.946) from pre- to post-exercise training. There were pre- to post-exercise training improvements to diastolic blood pressure (- 3 ± 5 mmHg, P =.033), sit-to-stand test performance (+ 5 ± 5 repetitions, P =.002), and energy/fatigue scores (+ 10 ± 15%, P =.026). Other secondary outcomes were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS A 16-week progressive exercise programme was feasible and safe, but did not reverse MGUS/SMM disease activity, contrasting a prior case study showing that five years of exercise training reversed SMM in a 44-year-old former athlete. Longer exercise interventions should be explored in a group of MGUS/SMM patients, with measurements of disease biomarkers, along with rates of disease progression (i.e., MGUS/SMM to MM). REGISTRATION https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN65527208 (14/05/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Emery
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - S Moore
- Department for Haematology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - J Crowe
- Department for Haematology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - J Murray
- Department for Haematology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - O Peacock
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - D Thompson
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - F Betts
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - S Rapps
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - L Ross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | | | - R Davies
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - R Lewis
- Department for Physiotherapy, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - D X Augustine
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department for Cardiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - A Whiteway
- Department for Haematology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Z Afzal
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunity and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jlj Heaney
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunity and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunity and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J E Turner
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - J P Campbell
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, WA, Joondalup, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Garfall AL. New Biological Therapies for Multiple Myeloma. Annu Rev Med 2024; 75:13-29. [PMID: 37729027 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-050522-033815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a cancer of bone marrow plasma cells that represents approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. Though it is typically incurable, a remarkable suite of new therapies developed over the last 25 years has enabled durable disease control in most patients. This article briefly introduces the clinical features of multiple myeloma and aspects of multiple myeloma biology that modern therapies exploit. Key current and emerging treatment modalities are then reviewed, including cereblon-modulating agents, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, other molecularly targeted therapies (selinexor, venetoclax), chimeric antigen receptor T cells, T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. For each modality, mechanism of action and clinical considerations are discussed. These therapies are combined and sequenced in modern treatment pathways, discussed at the conclusion of the article, which have led to substantial improvements in outcomes for multiple myeloma patients in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred L Garfall
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine and Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abdallah NH, Lakshman A, Kumar SK, Cook J, Binder M, Kapoor P, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Lin Y, Kourelis T, Warsame R, Bergsagel L, Rajkumar SV. Mode of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma: a study of 406 patients. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:9. [PMID: 38228628 PMCID: PMC10791688 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-00980-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The approach to patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) varies among clinicians; while some advocate early intervention, others reserve treatment at progression to multiple myeloma (MM). We aimed to describe the myeloma-defining events (MDEs) and clinical presentations leading to MM diagnosis among SMM patients seen at our institution. We included 406 patients diagnosed with SMM between 2013-2022, seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The 2018 Mayo 20/2/20 criteria were used for risk stratification. Median follow-up was 3.9 years. Among high-risk patients who did not receive treatment in the SMM phase (n = 71), 51 progressed by last follow-up; the MDEs included: bone lesions (37%), anemia (35%), hypercalcemia (8%), and renal failure (6%); 24% met MM criteria based on marrow plasmacytosis (≥60%) and/or free light chain ratio (>100); 45% had clinically significant MDEs (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, and/or bone lesions). MM diagnosis was made based on surveillance labs/imaging(45%), testing obtained due to provider suspicion for progression (14%), bone pain (20%), and hospitalization/ED presentations due to MM complications/symptoms (4%). The presentation was undocumented in 14%. A high proportion (45%) of patients with high-risk SMM on active surveillance develop end-organ damage at progression. About a quarter of patients who progress to MM are not diagnosed based on routine interval surveillance testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shaji K Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joselle Cook
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Moritz Binder
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martha Q Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yi Lin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rögnvaldsson S, Thorsteinsdóttir S, Kristinsson SY. Screening in Multiple Myeloma and Its Precursors: Are We There Yet? Clin Chem 2024; 70:128-139. [PMID: 38175579 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that develops over years from the asymptomatic precursors, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and smoldering multiple myeloma. Recent evidence shows that by initiating treatment at an asymptomatic stage, outcomes in MM can be significantly improved. However, a vast majority of MM patients are diagnosed after the development of symptomatic end-organ damage and cannot reap the benefits of early treatment. The precursors of MM are easily detected by serum protein electrophoresis and free light chain assay of the serum, raising the question of whether population-based screening could detect MM at an asymptomatic stage and significantly expand the availability of early treatment in MM. Screening is a hallmark of care in many malignancies, and there are accepted criteria for when screening is appropriate. CONTENT Here we review the available relevant evidence for the introduction of screening and discuss whether screening for MM and its precursors fulfills these criteria. We also highlight gaps in our current knowledge, most notably a lack of data on the benefits and harms of screening and the lack of a defined target population. There are ongoing studies that may fill these critical gaps in the literature, but their results are still pending. SUMMARY Screening could lead to a paradigm shift in the care of patients with MM, but critical scientific questions need to be answered before screening of healthy individuals can be recommended. In short, we should not screen for MM and its precursors-yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Sigrún Thorsteinsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pérez-Escurza O, Flores-Montero J, Óskarsson JÞ, Sanoja-Flores L, Del Pozo J, Lecrevisse Q, Martín S, Reed ER, Hákonardóttir GK, Harding S, Þorsteinsdóttir S, Rögnvaldsson S, Love TJ, Durie B, Kristinsson SY, Orfao A. Immunophenotypic assessment of clonal plasma cells and B-cells in bone marrow and blood in the diagnostic classification of early stage monoclonal gammopathies: an iSTOPMM study. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:182. [PMID: 38072838 PMCID: PMC10711003 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00944-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the earliest discernible stage of multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Early diagnosis of MG may be compromised by the low-level infiltration, undetectable to low-sensitive methodologies. Here, we investigated the prevalence and immunophenotypic profile of clonal (c) plasma cells (PC) and/or cB-lymphocytes in bone marrow (BM) and blood of subjects with a serum M-component from the iSTOPMM program, using high-sensitive next-generation flow cytometry (NGF), and its utility in the diagnostic classification of early-stage MG. We studied 164 paired BM and blood samples from 82 subjects, focusing the analysis on: 55 MGUS, 12 smoldering MM (SMM) and 8 smoldering WM (SWM). cPC were detected in 84% of the BM samples and cB-lymphocytes in 45%, coexisting in 39% of cases. In 29% of patients, the phenotypic features of cPC and/or cB-lymphocytes allowed a more accurate disease classification, including: 19/55 (35%) MGUS, 1/12 (8%) SMM and 2/8 (25%) SWM. Blood samples were informative in 49% of the BM-positive cases. We demonstrated the utility of NGF for a more accurate diagnostic classification of early-stage MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oihane Pérez-Escurza
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Montero
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Luzalba Sanoja-Flores
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Julio Del Pozo
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Quentin Lecrevisse
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia Martín
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elín Ruth Reed
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | | | | | - Sigrún Þorsteinsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Brian Durie
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bauer F, Sauer S, Weinhold N, Delorme S, Wennmann M. (Smoldering) multiple myeloma: mismatch between tumor load estimated from bone marrow biopsy at iliac crest and tumor load shown by MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:2513-2518. [PMID: 37300710 PMCID: PMC10582145 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04383-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In multiple myeloma and its precursor stages, precise quantification of tumor load is of high importance for diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapy response evaluation. Both whole-body MRI, which allows to investigate the complete bone marrow of a patient, and bone marrow biopsy, which is commonly used to assess the histologic and genetic status, are relevant methods for tumor load assessment in multiple myeloma. We report on a series of striking mismatches between the plasma cell infiltration estimating the tumor load from unguided biopsies of the bone marrow at the posterior iliac crest and the tumor load assessment from whole-body MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Bauer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Medicine V, Multiple Myeloma Section, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Medicine V, Multiple Myeloma Section, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Delorme
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Wennmann
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yadav U, Kumar SK, Baughn LB, Dispenzieri A, Greipp P, Ketterling R, Jevremovic D, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Lacy MQ, Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Ailawadhi S, Roy V, Parrondo R, Sher T, Hayman SR, Kapoor P, Leung N, Cook J, Binder M, Muchtar E, Warsame R, Kourelis TV, Go RS, Lin Y, Seth A, Lester SC, Breen WG, Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Rajkumar SV, Gonsalves WI. Impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on the risk of disease progression in solitary bone plasmacytomas. Blood 2023; 142:1871-1878. [PMID: 37494698 PMCID: PMC10731916 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023021187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Most patients with solitary bone plasmacytomas (SBP) progress to multiple myeloma (MM) after definitive radiation therapy as their primary treatment. Whether the presence of high-risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the clonal plasma cells, obtained either directly from the diagnostic SBP tissue or the corresponding bone marrow examination at the time of diagnosis, is associated with a shorter time to progression (TTP) to MM is unknown. This study evaluated all patients diagnosed with SBP at the Mayo Clinic from January 2012 to July 2022. The presence of del(17p), t(14;16), t(4;14), or +1q (gain or amplification) by FISH in clonal plasma cells was defined as HR. A total of 114 patients were included in this cohort, and baseline FISH was available for 55 patients (48%), of which 22 were classified as HR (40%). The median TTP to MM for patients with SBP and HR FISH was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-26) compared with 42 months (95% CI, 25-not reached [NR]) in patients with SBP without HR FISH (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, only HR FISH was a significant predictor for shorter TTP to MM, independent of minimal marrow involvement and an abnormal serum free light chain ratio at diagnosis. Deletion (17p) and gain 1q abnormalities were the most common FISH abnormalities responsible for the short TTP to MM. Thus, assessing for HR FISH abnormalities in clonal plasma cells derived from either the diagnostic SBP tissue or the staging bone marrow examination of patients with newly diagnosed SBP is feasible and prognostic for a shorter TTP to MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udit Yadav
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Linda B. Baughn
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Patricia Greipp
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rhett Ketterling
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Dragan Jevremovic
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | | | - Vivek Roy
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Ricardo Parrondo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Taimur Sher
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | | | - Nelson Leung
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joselle Cook
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Ronald S. Go
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yi Lin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Scott C. Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cárdenas MC, García-Sanz R, Puig N, Pérez-Surribas D, Flores-Montero J, Ortiz-Espejo M, de la Rubia J, Cruz-Iglesias E. Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part I: Update on laboratory tests for the study of monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:2115-2130. [PMID: 37477188 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies (MG) are characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells that produce identical abnormal immunoglobulins (intact or some of their subunits). This abnormal immunoglobulin component is called monoclonal protein (M-protein), and is considered a biomarker of proliferative activity. The identification, characterization and measurement of M-protein is essential for the management of MG. We conducted a systematic review of the different tests and measurement methods used in the clinical laboratory for the study of M-protein in serum and urine, the biochemistry and hematology tests necessary for clinical evaluation, and studies in bone marrow, peripheral blood and other tissues. This review included literature published between 2009 and 2022. The paper discusses the main methodological characteristics and limitations, as well as the purpose and clinical value of the different tests used in the diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and assessment of treatment response in MG. Included are methods for the study of M-protein, namely electrophoresis, measurement of immunoglobulin levels, serum free light chains, immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pairs, and mass spectrometry, and for the bone marrow examination, morphological analysis, cytogenetics, molecular techniques, and multiparameter flow cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María C Cárdenas
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Protein Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramón García-Sanz
- Hematology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Research Biomedical Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC and Center for Cancer Research-IBMCC (University of Salamanca-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain
- Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), Madrid, Spain
| | - Noemí Puig
- Hematology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Research Biomedical Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC and Center for Cancer Research-IBMCC (University of Salamanca-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain
- Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Pérez-Surribas
- Laboratori Pasteur, Andorra La Vella, Andorra
- Protein Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Montero
- Hematology Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Research Biomedical Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC and Center for Cancer Research-IBMCC (University of Salamanca-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain
- Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), Madrid, Spain
| | - María Ortiz-Espejo
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
- Protein Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier de la Rubia
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe & Universidad Católica de Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC CB16/12/00284, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Cruz-Iglesias
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain
- Protein Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mohyuddin GR, Chakraborty R, Cliff ERS, Derman BA. Clinician preferences on treatment of smoldering myeloma: a cross-sectional survey. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102272. [PMID: 38046471 PMCID: PMC10689285 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Smoldering myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor condition to multiple myeloma (MM) with a variable risk of progression. The management of high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) remains controversial, particularly with changes in diagnostic criteria that led to reclassifying of some patients with SMM to MM. This study aimed to assess clinician preferences for whether to treat patients with HR-SMM and/or patients with MM diagnosed solely by SLiM criteria (free light chain ratio >100, bone marrow plasma cell percentage >60, greater than two focal marrow lesions on MRI) through an electronic survey. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey of clinicians, conducted via an anonymous online REDCap survey from May 16th to July 5th, 2023. The survey included questions on demographics, SMM surveillance practices, and management preferences for two clinical scenarios (HR-SMM and MM based solely on the free light chain ratio >100 criterion). Data was analysed descriptively via Microsoft Excel. Findings A total of 146 clinicians completed the full survey, with 92% recommending against routine treatment for a patient with HR-SMM based on a single time point assessment, instead preferring active surveillance. For patients with MM diagnosed solely on the basis of a free light chain ratio >100, 61% recommended active treatment, while 37% recommended active surveillance. The most common reasons recommending against treatment of HR-SMM were toxicity, lack of demonstrated overall survival benefit, and low MM-defining event rates in clinical trials. Interpretation The survey indicates that most clinicians recommend against routine treatment for HR-SMM. Active surveillance is the prevailing standard of care and it is therefore an appropriate control arm in future SMM trials. More randomised trials are needed to determine if early treatment of modern-era SMM offers a net benefit to patients. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, USA
| | - Edward R. Scheffer Cliff
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chakraborty R, Hillengass J, Lentzsch S. How do we image patients with multiple myeloma and precursor states? Br J Haematol 2023; 203:536-545. [PMID: 37217164 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Advances in morphological and functional imaging have led to superior detection of early bone disease, bone marrow infiltration, paramedullary and extramedullary involvement in multiple myeloma. The two functional imaging modalities that are most widely used and standardized are 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (WB DW-MRI). Both prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated that WB DW-MRI is more sensitive than PET/CT in the detection of baseline tumour burden and to assess response after therapy. In patients with smouldering multiple myeloma, WB DW-MRI is now the preferred imaging modality to rule out two or more unequivocal lesions which would be considered a myeloma-defining event by the updated international myeloma working group (IMWG) criteria. In addition to sensitive detection of baseline tumour burden, both PET/CT and WB DW-MRI have been successfully used for monitoring response to therapy and provide information that is complementary to IMWG response assessment and bone marrow minimal residual disease. In this article, we present 3 vignettes illustrating how we approach the use of modern imaging in the management of patients with multiple myeloma and precursor states, with a specific focus on recent data that have emerged since the publication of the IMWG consensus guideline on imaging. We have utilized data from prospective and retrospective studies to provide a rationale for our approach to imaging in these clinical scenarios and highlighted knowledge gaps requiring future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Lentzsch
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hui H, Fuller KA, Eresta Jaya L, Konishi Y, Ng TF, Frodsham R, Speight G, Yamada K, Clarke SE, Erber WN. IGH cytogenetic abnormalities can be detected in multiple myeloma by imaging flow cytometry. J Clin Pathol 2023; 76:763-769. [PMID: 36113967 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Cytogenetic abnormalities involving the IGH gene are seen in up to 55% of patients with multiple myeloma. Current testing is performed manually by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on purified plasma cells. We aimed to assess whether an automated imaging flow cytometric method that uses immunophenotypic cell identification, and does not require cell isolation, can identify IGH abnormalities. METHODS Aspirated bone marrow from 10 patients with multiple myeloma were studied. Plasma cells were identified by CD38 and CD138 coexpression and assessed with FISH probes for numerical or structural abnormalities of IGH. Thousands of cells were acquired on an imaging flow cytometer and numerical data and digital images were analysed. RESULTS Up to 30 000 cells were acquired and IGH chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 5 of the 10 marrow samples. FISH signal patterns seen included fused IGH signals for IGH/FGFR3 and IGH/MYEOV, indicating t(4;14) and t(11;14), respectively. In addition, three IGH signals were identified, indicating trisomy 14 or translocation with an alternate chromosome. The lowest limit of detection of an IGH abnormality was in 0.05% of all cells. CONCLUSIONS This automated high-throughput immuno-flowFISH method was able to identify translocations and trisomy involving the IGH gene in plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Thousands of cells were analysed and without prior cell isolation. The inclusion of positive plasma cell identification based on immunophenotype led to a lowest detection level of 0.05% marrow cells. This imaging flow cytometric FISH method offers the prospect of increased precision of detection of critical genetic lesions involving IGH and other chromosomal defects in multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Hui
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, WA Australia
| | - Kathy A Fuller
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, WA Australia
| | | | | | - Teng Fong Ng
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, WA Australia
| | | | | | | | - Sarah E Clarke
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, WA Australia
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Wendy N Erber
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, WA Australia
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rajkumar S, Abdallah N, Lakshman A, Kumar S, Cook J, Binder M, Kapoor P, Dispenzieri A, Gertz M, Lacy M, Hayman S, Buadi F, Dingli D, Lin Y, Kourelis T, Warsame R, Bergsagel PL. Mode of Progression in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A study of 406 patients. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3378634. [PMID: 37961238 PMCID: PMC10635305 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3378634/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
The approach to patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) varies among clinicians; while some advocate early intervention, others reserve treatment at progression to multiple myeloma (MM). We aimed to describe the myeloma-defining events (MDEs) and clinical presentations leading to MM diagnosis among SMM patients seen at our institution. We included 406 patients diagnosed with SMM between 2013-2022, seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The 2018 Mayo 20/2/20 criteria were used for risk stratification. Median follow-up was 3.9 years. Among high-risk patients who did not receive treatment in the SMM phase (n=71), 51 progressed by last follow-up; the MDEs included: bone lesions(37%), anemia(35%), hypercalcemia(8%), and renal failure(6%); 24% met MM criteria based on marrow plasmacytosis (≥60%) and/or free light chain ratio (>100); 45% had clinically significant MDEs (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, and/or bone lesions). MM diagnosis was made based on surveillance labs/imaging(45%), testing obtained due to provider suspicion for progression(14%), bone pain(20%), and hospitalization/ED presentations due to MM complications/symptoms(4%). The presentation was undocumented in 14%. A high proportion (45%) of patients with high-risk SMM on active surveillance develop end-organ damage at progression. About a quarter of patients who progress to MM are not diagnosed based on routine interval surveillance testing.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sandecka V, Popkova T, Stork M, Maisnar V, Minarik J, Jungova A, Pavlicek P, Stejskal L, Pospisilova L, Heindorfer A, Obernauerova J, Gregora E, Sykora M, Ullrychova J, Wrobel M, Kessler P, Jelinek T, Kunovszki P, Bathija S, Gros B, Wilbertz S, Cai Q, Lam A, Spicka I. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in risk-stratified patients with smoldering multiple myeloma: data from the Czech Republic Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:153. [PMID: 37752128 PMCID: PMC10522616 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00906-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor to active multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with SMM stratified based on their risk of progression to MM using the Mayo 20/2/20 criteria. Data were leveraged from the Czech Myeloma Group Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Key outcomes included progression-free survival from SMM diagnosis to active MM diagnosis or death (PFS), progression-free survival from SMM diagnosis to progression on first line (1 L) MM treatment or death (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Of 498 patients, 174 (34.9%) were classified as high risk and 324 (65.1%) as non-high risk. Median follow-up was approximately 65 months. During follow-up, more patients in the high-risk vs non-high-risk group received 1 L MM treatment (76.4% vs 46.6%, p < 0.001). PFS, PFS2, and OS were significantly shorter in high-risk vs non-high-risk patients (13.2 vs 56.6 months, p < 0.001; 49.9 vs 84.9 months, p < 0.001; 93.2 vs 131.1 months, p = 0.012, respectively). The results of this study add to the growing body of evidence that patients with high-risk vs non-high-risk SMM have significantly worse outcomes, including OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tereza Popkova
- University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - Vladimir Maisnar
- Charles University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Minarik
- University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | - Petr Pavlicek
- University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michal Sykora
- Hospital Ceske Budejovice, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Ullrychova
- KZ, Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Tomas Jelinek
- University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | - Qian Cai
- Janssen Global Services, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | | | - Ivan Spicka
- Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hussain M, Yellapragada S, Al Hadidi S. Differential Diagnosis and Therapeutic Advances in Multiple Myeloma: A Review Article. Blood Lymphat Cancer 2023; 13:33-57. [PMID: 37731771 PMCID: PMC10508231 DOI: 10.2147/blctt.s272703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the abnormal clonal proliferation of plasma cells that may result in focal bone lesions, renal failure, anemia, and/or hypercalcemia. Recently, the diagnosis and treatment of MM have evolved due to a better understanding of disease pathophysiology, improved risk stratification, and new treatments. The incorporation of new drugs, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has resulted in a significant improvement in patient outcomes and QoL. In this review, we summarize differential diagnoses and therapeutic advances in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munawwar Hussain
- Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sarvari Yellapragada
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samer Al Hadidi
- Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Belizaire R, Wong WJ, Robinette ML, Ebert BL. Clonal haematopoiesis and dysregulation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2023; 23:595-610. [PMID: 36941354 DOI: 10.1038/s41577-023-00843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Age-related diseases are frequently linked to pathological immune dysfunction, including excessive inflammation, autoreactivity and immunodeficiency. Recent analyses of human genetic data have revealed that somatic mutations and mosaic chromosomal alterations in blood cells - a condition known as clonal haematopoiesis (CH) - are associated with ageing and pathological immune dysfunction. Indeed, large-scale epidemiological studies and experimental mouse models have demonstrated that CH can promote cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, osteoporosis and gout. The genes most frequently mutated in CH, the epigenetic regulators TET2 and DNMT3A, implicate increased chemokine expression and inflammasome hyperactivation in myeloid cells as a possible mechanistic connection between CH and age-related diseases. In addition, TET2 and DNMT3A mutations in lymphoid cells have been shown to drive methylation-dependent alterations in differentiation and function. Here we review the observational and mechanistic studies describing the connection between CH and pathological immune dysfunction, the effects of CH-associated genetic alterations on the function of myeloid and lymphoid cells, and the clinical and therapeutic implications of CH as a target for immunomodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Belizaire
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Waihay J Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle L Robinette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin L Ebert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Roshal M, Gao Q. Flow Cytometry in Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders. Clin Lab Med 2023; 43:363-375. [PMID: 37481317 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Flow cytometry plays a critical role in the diagnosis, prognostication, therapy response evaluation, and clinical management of plasma cell neoplasms. The review summarizes how flow cytometry is used in the initial evaluation to distinguish primary and secondary clonal plasma cell populations from each other and from reactive plasma cells. We further illustrate the kinds of prognostic information the assessment can provide at diagnosis and disease follow-up of primary plasma cell neoplasms. Technical requirements for MRD assays and their use in therapy efficacy assessment and clinical decision-making in multi-myeloma are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Roshal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
| | - Qi Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chakraborty R, Al Hadidi S, Scheffer Cliff ER, Mohyuddin GR. Is aggressive treatment of smoldering myeloma the path to curing myeloma? Blood Adv 2023; 7:3932-3935. [PMID: 37196639 PMCID: PMC10405196 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Samer Al Hadidi
- Myeloma Section, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Edward R. Scheffer Cliff
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Lightbody ED, Reidy M, Tsuji J, Aranha MP, Heilpern-Mallory D, Huynh D, Chong SJF, Hackett L, Haradhvala NJ, Wu T, Su NK, Berrios B, Alberge JB, Dutta A, Davids MS, Papaioannou M, Getz G, Ghobrial IM, Manier S. Systematic characterization of therapeutic vulnerabilities in Multiple Myeloma with Amp1q reveals increased sensitivity to the combination of MCL1 and PI3K inhibitors. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.01.551480. [PMID: 37577538 PMCID: PMC10418223 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.01.551480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
The development of targeted therapy for patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) is hampered by the low frequency of actionable genetic abnormalities. Gain or amplification of chr1q (Amp1q) is the most frequent arm-level copy number gain in patients with MM, and it is associated with higher risk of progression and death despite recent advances in therapeutics. Thus, developing targeted therapy for patients with MM and Amp1q stands to benefit a large portion of patients in need of more effective management. Here, we employed large-scale dependency screens and drug screens to systematically characterize the therapeutic vulnerabilities of MM with Amp1q and showed increased sensitivity to the combination of MCL1 and PI3K inhibitors. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we compared subclones with and without Amp1q within the same patient tumors and showed that Amp1q is associated with higher levels of MCL1 and the PI3K pathway. Furthermore, by isolating isogenic clones with different copy number for part of the chr1q arm, we showed increased sensitivity to MCL1 and PI3K inhibitors with arm-level gain. Lastly, we demonstrated synergy between MCL1 and PI3K inhibitors and dissected their mechanism of action in MM with Amp1q.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Elizabeth D. Lightbody
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Mairead Reidy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Junko Tsuji
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michelle P. Aranha
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Heilpern-Mallory
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Daisy Huynh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen J. F. Chong
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liam Hackett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Haradhvala
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ting Wu
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nang K. Su
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brianna Berrios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean-Baptiste Alberge
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ankit Dutta
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Matthew S. Davids
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Papaioannou
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Hematology Unit, 1st Internal Medicine Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Gad Getz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irene M. Ghobrial
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Salomon Manier
- INSERM UMRS1277, CNRS UMR9020, Lille University, 59000, France
- Department of Hematology, CHU Lille, Lille University, 59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bong IPN, Esa E. Molecular genetic aberrations in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. ASIAN BIOMED 2023; 17:152-162. [PMID: 37860676 PMCID: PMC10584387 DOI: 10.2478/abm-2023-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common form of blood cancer characterized by clonal expansion of malignant plasma cells within the bone marrow. MM is a complex, progressive, and highly heterogeneous malignancy, which occurs via a multistep transformation process involving primary and secondary oncogenic events. Recent advances in molecular techniques have further expanded our understanding of the mutational landscape, clonal composition, and dynamic evolution patterns of MM. The first part of this review describes the key oncogenic events involved in the initiation and progression of MM, together with their prognostic impact. The latter part highlights the most prominent findings concerning genomic aberrations promoted by gene expression profiling (GEP) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in MM. This review provides a concise understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the MM genome and the importance of adopting emerging molecular technology in future clinical management of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivyna Pau Ni Bong
- Hematology Unit, Cancer Research Center, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia
| | - Ezalia Esa
- Hematology Unit, Cancer Research Center, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kreiniz N, Gertz MA. Understanding high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2023; 64:1361-1372. [PMID: 37229535 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2216818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic condition with heterogeneous biology and various risks of progression to symptomatic disease. The best-known risk stratification models are Mayo-2018, and IWWG based on tumor burden. Recently, the personalized risk assessment tool PANGEA was introduced. New markers of SMM progression, including genomic and immune characteristics of plasma cells (PCs) and tumor microenvironment, are under investigation, and some have been incorporated into traditional scoring systems. Only one phase 3 clinical trial demonstrated an overall survival benefit of lenalidomide for high-risk SMM patients. The study has limitations, and most guidelines recommend observation or participation in clinical trials for high-risk SMM. High-intensity time-limited treatment strategies for high-risk SMM demonstrated deep responses in single-arm studies. But these treatments can cause adverse effects in asymptomatic patients.This review aims to understand better the risk of SMM progression from a clinical and biological point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Kreiniz
- Division of Hematology, Bnai Zion Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schinke C, Weinhold N. The Immune Microenvironment in Multiple Myeloma Progression at a Single-cell Level. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e894. [PMID: 37251913 PMCID: PMC10219691 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Schinke
- Myeloma Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Midha S, Nadeem O, Selamet U. Updates in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Related Monoclonal Immunoglobulin-Mediated Renal Disease. Semin Nephrol 2023; 42:151352. [PMID: 37257390 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Pathogenic roles of monoclonal immunoglobulins in kidney disease have been attributed previously to malignant plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders such as multiple myeloma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or amyloid light chain amyloidosis. Improved technology, advancements in molecular diagnostics, and highly sensitive imaging techniques have established the need to redefine monoclonal gammopathies and the kidney disorders that are associated with monoclonal immunoglobulins regardless of tumor burden. This has led to the establishment of monoclonal gammopathy with renal significance (MGRS). MGRS was defined by the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group in 2012 as a clonal proliferative disorder that produces a nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin and does not meet previously defined hematological criteria for treatment of a specific malignancy. MGRS encompasses a wide array of pathologies with knowledge surrounding its incidence, prognosis, and management continuously increasing. This review examines the current evidence on the diagnosis, prognosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of plasma cell dyscrasias and related MGRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shonali Midha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Umut Selamet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Suzuki K, Yano S. Treatment Strategy for Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myelomas with Chromosomal Aberrations Considering Minimal Residual Disease Status and Bone Marrow Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092418. [PMID: 37173885 PMCID: PMC10177433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the development of anti-myeloma therapeutics, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), multiple myeloma remains incurable. A trial treatment combining four drugs-daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone-followed by ASCT frequently results in minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and prevents progressive disease in patients with standard- and high-risk cytogenetics; however, it is insufficient to overcome the poor outcomes in patients with ultra-high-risk chromosomal aberration (UHRCA). In fact, MRD status in autografts can predict clinical outcomes after ASCT. Therefore, the current treatment strategy might be insufficient to overcome the negative impact of UHRCA in patients with MRD positivity after the four-drug induction therapy. High-risk myeloma cells lead to poor clinical outcomes not only by aggressive myeloma behavior but also via the generation of a poor bone marrow microenvironment. Meanwhile, the immune microenvironment effectively suppresses myeloma cells with a low frequency of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in early-stage myeloma compared to late-stage myeloma. Therefore, early intervention might be key to improving clinical outcomes in myeloma patients. The purpose of this review is to improve clinical outcomes in patients with UHRCA by considering MRD assessment results and improvement of the microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhito Suzuki
- Division of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan
| | - Shingo Yano
- Division of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ludwig H, Kainz S, Schreder M, Zojer N, Hinke A. SLiM CRAB criteria revisited: temporal trends in prognosis of patients with smoldering multiple myeloma who meet the definition of ‘biomarker-defined early multiple myeloma’—a systematic review with meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 58:101910. [PMID: 36969337 PMCID: PMC10033724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biomarker-defined patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) were included in the diagnostic category of multiple myeloma (MM) by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) in 2014. This includes ≥60% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), free light chain ratio (FLCratio) ≥100, and >1 MRI-defined ≥5 mm focal lesion, also called SLiM CRAB MM. We examined whether the risk of progression of SLiM CRAB MM patients to CRAB positive MM described in recent studies differs from that reported in earlier studies published before the introduction of the new diagnostic criteria. Methods We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, and included studies on Embase and PubMed (01/01/2010-01/11/2022), selecting studies with digitizable progression curves. Inconsistent studies were excluded. We created forest plots using random effects models from digitized and published data and Kaplan-Meier curves. Main outcomes were median time to progression (TTP), 2-year progression risk, and odds ratios (ORs) comparing 2-year progression risks. Findings Our meta-analysis including 11 studies with 3482 patients found an approximately 3-fold longer TTP and 50% lower 2-year progression risk of SliM CRAB MM patients in recent (published after 2014) compared with earlier studies. Median TTP in patients with ≥60% BMPCs was 30.31 months [18.71-62.93] in recent compared with 9.20 months [6.02-15.56] in earlier studies; the 2-year progression risk was 45.45% [20.12-62.75] compared with 86.21% [65.74-94.45] in the respective time periods. In patients with a FLCratio ≥ 100, the median TTP was 48.06 months [40.51-64.91] vs. 15.33 months [9.38-19.10], and the 2-year progression risk was 31.61% [25.30-37.39] vs. 73.00% [62.39-80.62] in recent and earlier studies, respectively. Tests for heterogeneity showed that the two time periods differed significantly in their ORs when comparing patients who met the high-and low risk criteria. No appropriate recent studies on focal lesions have been published. Interpretation Recent studies show significantly improved prognosis of biomarker-defined MM with ≥60% BMPCs and FLCratio ≥ 100. This warrants careful evaluation for signs of progression before treatment initiation. Funding Funding was provided by the Austrian Forum against Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o First Department of Medicine, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
- Corresponding author. Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o 1st Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Care, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Sarah Kainz
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o First Department of Medicine, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Schreder
- First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology, and Palliative Care, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niklas Zojer
- First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology, and Palliative Care, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wennmann M, Neher P, Stanczyk N, Kahl KC, Kächele J, Weru V, Hielscher T, Grözinger M, Chmelik J, Zhang KS, Bauer F, Nonnenmacher T, Debic M, Sauer S, Rotkopf LT, Jauch A, Schlamp K, Mai EK, Weinhold N, Afat S, Horger M, Goldschmidt H, Schlemmer HP, Weber TF, Delorme S, Kurz FT, Maier-Hein K. Deep Learning for Automatic Bone Marrow Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements From Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:273-282. [PMID: 36256790 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly important in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The objective of this study was to train and test an algorithm for automatic pelvic bone marrow analysis from whole-body apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in patients with MM, which automatically segments pelvic bones and subsequently extracts objective, representative ADC measurements from each bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multicentric study, 180 MRIs from 54 patients were annotated (semi)manually and used to train an nnU-Net for automatic, individual segmentation of the right hip bone, the left hip bone, and the sacral bone. The quality of the automatic segmentation was evaluated on 15 manually segmented whole-body MRIs from 3 centers using the dice score. In 3 independent test sets from 3 centers, which comprised a total of 312 whole-body MRIs, agreement between automatically extracted mean ADC values from the nnU-Net segmentation and manual ADC measurements from 2 independent radiologists was evaluated. Bland-Altman plots were constructed, and absolute bias, relative bias to mean, limits of agreement, and coefficients of variation were calculated. In 56 patients with newly diagnosed MM who had undergone bone marrow biopsy, ADC measurements were correlated with biopsy results using Spearman correlation. RESULTS The ADC-nnU-Net achieved automatic segmentations with mean dice scores of 0.92, 0.93, and 0.85 for the right pelvis, the left pelvis, and the sacral bone, whereas the interrater experiment gave mean dice scores of 0.86, 0.86, and 0.77, respectively. The agreement between radiologists' manual ADC measurements and automatic ADC measurements was as follows: the bias between the first reader and the automatic approach was 49 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, 7 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and -58 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and the bias between the second reader and the automatic approach was 12 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, 2 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and -66 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s for the right pelvis, the left pelvis, and the sacral bone, respectively. The bias between reader 1 and reader 2 was 40 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, 8 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and 7 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and the mean absolute difference between manual readers was 84 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, 65 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and 75 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s. Automatically extracted ADC values significantly correlated with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration ( R = 0.36, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a nnU-Net was trained that can automatically segment pelvic bone marrow from whole-body ADC maps in multicentric data sets with a quality comparable to manual segmentations. This approach allows automatic, objective bone marrow ADC measurements, which agree well with manual ADC measurements and can help to overcome interrater variability or nonrepresentative measurements. Automatically extracted ADC values significantly correlate with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration and might be of value for automatic staging, risk stratification, or therapy response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Neher
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
| | | | - Kim-Celine Kahl
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
| | - Jessica Kächele
- Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
| | - Vivienn Weru
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Section Multiple Myeloma
| | | | | | | | - Elias Karl Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Section Multiple Myeloma
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Section Multiple Myeloma
| | - Saif Afat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen
| | - Marius Horger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Burgos L, Tamariz-Amador LE, Puig N, Cedena MT, Guerrero C, Jelínek T, Johnson S, Milani P, Cordon L, Perez JJ, Lasa M, Termini R, Oriol A, Hernandez MT, Palomera L, Martinez-Martinez R, de la Rubia J, de Arriba F, Rios R, Gonzalez ME, Gironella M, Cabañas V, Casanova M, Krsnik I, Perez-Montaña A, González-Calle V, Rodriguez-Otero P, Maisnar V, Hajek R, Van Rhee F, Jimenez-Zepeda V, Palladini G, Merlini G, Orfao A, de la Cruz J, Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Rosiñol L, Blade J, Mateos MV, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B. Definition and Clinical Significance of the Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance-Like Phenotype in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathies. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3019-3031. [PMID: 36930848 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The existence of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis who present with a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)-like phenotype has been hypothesized, but methods to identify this subgroup are not standardized and its clinical significance is not properly validated. PATIENTS AND METHODS An algorithm to identify patients having MGUS-like phenotype was developed on the basis of the percentages of total bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC) and of clonal PC within the BM PC compartment, determined at diagnosis using flow cytometry in 548 patients with MGUS and 2,011 patients with active MM. The clinical significance of the algorithm was tested and validated in 488 patients with smoldering MM, 3,870 patients with active MM and 211 patients with AL amyloidosis. RESULTS Patients with smoldering MM with MGUS-like phenotype showed significantly lower rates of disease progression (4.5% and 0% at 2 years in two independent series). There were no statistically significant differences in time to progression between treatment versus observation in these patients. In active newly diagnosed MM, MGUS-like phenotype retained independent prognostic value in multivariate analyses of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; P = .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.56; P = .039), together with International Staging System, lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic risk, transplant eligibility, and complete remission status. Transplant-eligible patients with active MM with MGUS-like phenotype showed PFS and OS rates at 5 years of 79% and 96%, respectively. In this subgroup, there were no differences in PFS and OS according to complete remission and measurable residual disease status. Application of the algorithm in two independent series of patients with AL predicted for different survival. CONCLUSION We developed an open-access algorithm for the identification of MGUS-like patients with distinct clinical outcomes. This phenotypic classification could become part of the diagnostic workup of MM and AL amyloidosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leire Burgos
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis-Esteban Tamariz-Amador
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria-Teresa Cedena
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Camila Guerrero
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Tomas Jelínek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Myeloma Center/Division of Hematology Oncology/Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Paolo Milani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Jose J Perez
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Marta Lasa
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rosalinda Termini
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Luis Palomera
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Felipe de Arriba
- Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rafael Rios
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mercedes Gironella
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentin Cabañas
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. IMIB-Arrixaca. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Maria Casanova
- Hematology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol Marbella, Marbella, Spain
| | - Isabel Krsnik
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Verónica González-Calle
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Paula Rodriguez-Otero
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Vladimir Maisnar
- 4th Department of Medicine-Haematology, Charles University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Fritz Van Rhee
- Myeloma Center/Division of Hematology Oncology/Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Victor Jimenez-Zepeda
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Giovanni Palladini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Merlini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service, University of Salamanca, CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Javier de la Cruz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan-Jose Lahuerta
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Rosiñol
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit. Department of Hematology. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS., Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Blade
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit. Department of Hematology. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS., Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
A comprehensive regulatory and industry review of modeling and simulation practices in oncology clinical drug development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2023; 50:147-172. [PMID: 36870005 PMCID: PMC10169901 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-023-09850-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are an integral component in the development of oncology products. Characterizing the relationship between drug exposure metrics and response allows the sponsor to use modeling and simulation to address both internal and external drug development questions (e.g., optimal dose, frequency of administration, dose adjustments for special populations). This white paper is the output of an industry-government collaboration among scientists with broad experience in E-R modeling as part of regulatory submissions. The goal of this white paper is to provide guidance on what the preferred methods for E-R analysis in oncology clinical drug development are and what metrics of exposure should be considered.
Collapse
|
40
|
Cowan A, Ferrari F, Freeman SS, Redd R, El-Khoury H, Perry J, Patel V, Kaur P, Barr H, Lee DJ, Lightbody E, Downey K, Argyelan D, Theodorakakou F, Fotiou D, Liacos CI, Kanellias N, Chavda SJ, Ainley L, Sandecká V, Pospíšilová L, Minarik J, Jungova A, Radocha J, Spicka I, Nadeem O, Yong K, Hájek R, Kastritis E, Marinac CR, Dimopoulos MA, Get G, Trippa L, Ghobrial IM. Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e203-e212. [PMID: 36858677 PMCID: PMC9991855 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with precursors to multiple myeloma are dichotomised as having monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma on the basis of monoclonal protein concentrations or bone marrow plasma cell percentage. Current risk stratifications use laboratory measurements at diagnosis and do not incorporate time-varying biomarkers. Our goal was to develop a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma stratification algorithm that utilised accessible, time-varying biomarkers to model risk of progression to multiple myeloma. METHODS In this retrospective, multicohort study, we included patients who were 18 years or older with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma. We evaluated several modelling approaches for predicting disease progression to multiple myeloma using a training cohort (with patients at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; annotated from Nov, 13, 2019, to April, 13, 2022). We created the PANGEA models, which used data on biomarkers (monoclonal protein concentration, free light chain ratio, age, creatinine concentration, and bone marrow plasma cell percentage) and haemoglobin trajectories from medical records to predict progression from precursor disease to multiple myeloma. The models were validated in two independent validation cohorts from National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Athens, Greece; from Jan 26, 2020, to Feb 7, 2022; validation cohort 1), University College London (London, UK; from June 9, 2020, to April 10, 2022; validation cohort 1), and Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (Czech Republic, Czech Republic; Jan 5, 2004, to March 10, 2022; validation cohort 2). We compared the PANGEA models (with bone marrow [BM] data and without bone marrow [no BM] data) to current criteria (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 20/2/20 smouldering multiple myeloma risk criteria). FINDINGS We included 6441 patients, 4931 (77%) with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 1510 (23%) with smouldering multiple myeloma. 3430 (53%) of 6441 participants were female. The PANGEA model (BM) improved prediction of progression from smouldering multiple myeloma to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model, with a C-statistic increase from 0·533 (0·480-0·709) to 0·756 (0·629-0·785) at patient visit 1 to the clinic, 0·613 (0·504-0·704) to 0·720 (0·592-0·775) at visit 2, and 0·637 (0·386-0·841) to 0·756 (0·547-0·830) at visit three in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA model (no BM) improved prediction of smouldering multiple myeloma progression to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model with a C-statistic increase from 0·534 (0·501-0·672) to 0·692 (0·614-0·736) at visit 1, 0·573 (0·518-0·647) to 0·693 (0·605-0·734) at visit 2, and 0·560 (0·497-0·645) to 0·692 (0·570-0·708) at visit 3 in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA models improved prediction of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance progression to multiple myeloma compared with the IMWG rolling model at visit 1 in validation cohort 2, with C-statistics increases from 0·640 (0·518-0·718) to 0·729 (0·643-0·941) for the PANGEA model (BM) and 0·670 (0·523-0·729) to 0·879 (0·586-0·938) for the PANGEA model (no BM). INTERPRETATION Use of the PANGEA models in clinical practice will allow patients with precursor disease to receive more accurate measures of their risk of progression to multiple myeloma, thus prompting for more appropriate treatment strategies. FUNDING SU2C Dream Team and Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Cowan
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Samuel S Freeman
- Bioinformatics Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robert Redd
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Habib El-Khoury
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Vidhi Patel
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Priya Kaur
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hadley Barr
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J Lee
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Katelyn Downey
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Argyelan
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Foteini Theodorakakou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Despina Fotiou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Christine Ivy Liacos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kanellias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Louise Ainley
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Viera Sandecká
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Jiri Minarik
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandra Jungova
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Radocha
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine Hematology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Czech Republic
| | - Ivan Spicka
- First Department of Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kwee Yong
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roman Hájek
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University Hospital in Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gad Get
- Bioinformatics Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irene M Ghobrial
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
The PANGEA model: catching the drift from precursor conditions to myeloma in individual patients. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e162-e163. [PMID: 36858673 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00009-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
|
42
|
Eliyahu L, Yosibash Z, Avivi I, Cohen YC, Ariel G, Sadovnic O, Sternheim A. On the influence of computed tomography's slice thickness on computer tomography based finite element analyses results. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2023; 102:105889. [PMID: 36774735 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-specific autonomous finite element analyses of femurs, based on clinical computed tomography scans may be used to monitor the progression of bone-related diseases. Some CT scan protocols provide lower resolution (slice thickness of 3 mm) that affects the accuracy. To investigate the impact of low-resolution scans on the CT-based finite element analyses results, identical CT raw data were reconstructed twice to generate a 1 mm ("gold standard") and a 3 mm slice thickness scans. METHODS CT-based finite element analyses of twenty-four femurs (twelve patients) under stance and sideways fall loads were performed based on 1 and 3 mm slice thickness scans. Bone volume, load direction, and strains were extracted at different locations along the femurs and differences were evaluated. FINDINGS Average differences in bone volume were 1.0 ± 1.5%. The largest average difference in strains in stance position was in the neck region (11.0 ± 13.4%), whereas in other regions these were much smaller. For sidewise fall loading, the average differences were at most 9.2 ± 16.0%. INTERPRETATION Whole-body low dose CT scans (3 mm-slice thickness) are suboptimal for monitoring strain changes in patient's femurs but may allow longitudinal studies if larger than 5% in all areas and larger than 12% in the upper neck. CT-based finite element analyses with slice thickness of 3 mm may be used in clinical practice for patients with smoldering myeloma to associate changes in strains with progression to active myeloma if above ∼10%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leetal Eliyahu
- Computational Mechanics and Experimental Biomechanics Lab, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Zohar Yosibash
- Computational Mechanics and Experimental Biomechanics Lab, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
| | - Irit Avivi
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hematology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael C Cohen
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hematology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gal Ariel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; National Unit of Orthopaedic Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofer Sadovnic
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Radiology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Sternheim
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; National Unit of Orthopaedic Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thorsteinsdóttir S, Gíslason GK, Aspelund T, Rögnvaldsson S, Óskarsson JÞ, Sigurðardóttir GÁ, Þórðardóttir ÁR, Viðarsson B, Önundarson PT, Agnarsson BA, Sigurðardóttir M, Þorsteinsdóttir I, Ólafsson Í, Eyþórsson E, Jónsson Á, Berlanga O, Hultcrantz M, Durie BGM, Löve TJ, Harding S, Landgren O, Kristinsson SY. Prevalence of smoldering multiple myeloma based on nationwide screening. Nat Med 2023; 29:467-472. [PMID: 36747117 PMCID: PMC11099842 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor to multiple myeloma. Here we define the epidemiological characteristics of SMM in the general population in Iceland. The iStopMM study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03327597 ) is a nationwide screening study for multiple myeloma precursors where all residents in Iceland 40 years or older were invited to participate. SMM was defined as 10-60% bone marrow plasma cells and/or monoclonal (M) protein concentration ≥3 g dl-1, in the absence of myeloma-defining events. Of the 80,759 who gave informed consent to participate, 75,422 (93%) were screened. The prevalence of SMM in the total population was 0.53% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.49-0.57%) in individuals 40 years or older. In men and women, the prevalence of SMM was 0.67% (95% CI = 0.62-0.73%) and 0.39% (95% CI = 0.35-0.43%), respectively; it increased with age in both sexes. For the 193 individuals with SMM, median age was 70 years (range 44-92 years) and 60% were males. The mean M protein concentration of individuals with SMM was 0.62 g dl-1 (range 0.01-3.5 g dl-1) and 73% had 11-20% bone marrow plasma cell infiltration. The high prevalence of SMM has implications for future treatment policies in multiple myeloma as the evidence supporting treatment initiation at the SMM stage is emerging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrún Thorsteinsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Thor Aspelund
- Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian G M Durie
- Cedars-Sinai Samual Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ola Landgren
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sigurður Y Kristinsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
- Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Choon-Quinones M, Hose D, Kaló Z, Zelei T, Harousseau JL, Durie B, Keown P, Barnett M, Jakab I. Patient and Caregiver Experience Decision Factors in Treatment Decision Making: Results of a Systematic Literature Review of Multiple Myeloma Decision Aids. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:39-49. [PMID: 35613958 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision-aids (DAs) may facilitate shared decision-making for patients and caregivers, by providing evidence-based information to assist healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers in making choices about aspects of care, and/or highlighting decision factors to discuss with the potential of altering the treatment decision. These decision factors may not be well integrated in DAs. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in the field of multiple myeloma (MM) on peer-reviewed publications, extended with a gray literature search. Data on whether and how patient and caregiver experience elements, other than survival and physical quality of life, were mentioned as decision factors in the identified MM DAs were extracted and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS Seventy MM DAs were found and analyzed; 51% of DAs mentioned any patient non-routinely assessed experience decision factors and only 17% mentioned any caregiver-related information. One hundred and forty potential decision factors were extracted, deduplicated and categorized into the following categories: 1) financial, 2) mode of administration / transportation issues, 3) personal beliefs and values, 4) emotional and social quality of life, 5) other medical information, 6) availability of social support, 7) caregiver burden. None of the DAs presented a comprehensive framework on all seven categories of decision factors being consider when mapping patient and caregiver experience value elements in MM. CONCLUSIONS Based on available DAs, we recommend a set of patient and caregiver experience decision factors that have the potential to affect treatment choices of patients with MM, which should be included in DAs, including MM clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dirk Hose
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Brian Durie
- International Myeloma Foundation, Studio City, CA, USA
| | - Paul Keown
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mike Barnett
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ivett Jakab
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nieto MJ, Hedjar A, Locke M, Caro J, Saif MW. Analysis of Updates in Multiple Myeloma Treatment and Management. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY 2023; 4:35-42. [PMID: 38009096 PMCID: PMC10673627 DOI: 10.33696/haematology.4.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
Introduction During the past two decades, new therapeutic agents have greatly improved the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma (MM). Treatments such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, targeted monoclonal antibody therapy, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have improved outcomes with less toxicity. Advances in laboratory testing have accompanied this change, performing faster and more accurate assessments of treatment response. Despite these advances, however, disparities in MM outcomes persist. Objective The purpose of this study was to review epidemiological trends in MM over the past two decades and to identify disparities that may impact MM identification and survival. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with MM between the years 2000-2019 using the November 2021 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Joinpoint models were used to calculate annual percent changes (APCs) and average annual percent change (AAPC). Results There were a total of 111,328 diagnoses of MM extracted from the SEER database. Most patients were male (55.17%) and white (76.7%). Age-adjusted rate analysis found a significantly higher incidence among black patients compared to white patients. The APC between 2000-2015 was 1.46, and the APC between 2015-2019 was -1.34. Relative survival also increased from 2000 to 2014. The 5-year cancer survival in MM also increased at an average of 1.8% for every year after diagnosis. The annual probability of MM-related mortality at the 1-year mark also decreased from 28.5% in 2000 to 16.7% in 2018. Conclusion Novel advances in MM therapeutic agents and diagnostic testing have paved the way for significant improvements in patient survival outcomes. Disparities persist along racial lines. Further research is needed to evaluate responses to specific MM treatment in the age of newly developed targeted therapies to overcome these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jacqueline Nieto
- Department of Cancer, Northwell Health Cancer Institute & Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Aryles Hedjar
- Department of Cancer, Northwell Health Cancer Institute & Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Locke
- Department of Cancer, Northwell Health Cancer Institute & Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Caro
- Department of Cancer, Northwell Health Cancer Institute & Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ojo AS, Akinyemi O, Araoye MO, Ali A. Early Intervention With a Curative Intent Through an Intensive Therapy Versus Immunologic Disease Control Using a Minimal Intensity Approach in the Management of High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Evidence From Clinical Trials. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:e27-e40. [PMID: 36402701 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
A subset of individuals with smoldering myeloma (SMM) are at a high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma. Current efforts are focused on identifying this high-risk group and intercepting the disease process before its progression. There is no consensus on what the goal of an intervention should be, whether to aim for a cure through a high-intensity intervention or pursue immunologic disease control using the least intense approach. This systematic review summarized current evidence in support of the optimum approach. A database search of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wiley Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and conference proceedings of ASH, EHA, ASCO, ESMO was performed. Results were presented using narrative synthesis of quantitative data. Of the 2088 identified records, a total of 10 eligible studies made up of 6 minimal-intensity clinical trials, 3 moderate-intensity trials, and 1 high-intensity trial were included in this review with a total demographic population of 588 high-risk SMM patients. Minimal intensity lenalidomide-based regimen demonstrated clinical effectiveness in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in high-risk SMM. The single-agent monoclonal antibodies did not have any major impact on improving overall survival, although the studies were not powered to do so. There is a marked increase in the depth of response as the intensity of treatment increases without a proportional improvement in overall survival. Moderate- and high-intensity interventions yielded similar minimal residual disease negativity rates and overall survival. The minimal, moderate, and high-intensity approaches all demonstrated clinical benefits in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in patients with high-risk SMM and increasing intensity of intervention does not necessarily translate to improved overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ademola S Ojo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC.
| | - Oluwasegun Akinyemi
- Clive O Callender, MD Howard-Harvard Outcome Research Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Mojisola O Araoye
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ahmed Ali
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Falini B, Martino G, Lazzi S. A comparison of the International Consensus and 5th World Health Organization classifications of mature B-cell lymphomas. Leukemia 2023; 37:18-34. [PMID: 36460764 PMCID: PMC9883170 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01764-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Several editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of lympho-hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008 and 2017 served as the international standard for diagnosis. Since the 4th WHO edition, here referred as WHO-HAEM4, significant clinico-pathological, immunophenotypic and molecular advances have been made in the field of lymphomas, contributing to refining diagnostic criteria of several diseases, to upgrade entities previously defined as provisional and to identify new entities. This process has resulted in two recent classifying proposals of lymphoid neoplasms, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5). In this paper, we review and compare the two classifications in terms of diagnostic criteria and entity definition, with focus on mature B-cell neoplasms. The main aim is to provide a tool to facilitate the work of pathologists, hematologists and researchers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brunangelo Falini
- Institute of Hematology and CREO, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Martino
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Institute of Hematology and CREO, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefano Lazzi
- grid.9024.f0000 0004 1757 4641Institute of Pathology, Department of Medical Biotechnology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Storti P, Marchica V, Vescovini R, Franceschi V, Russo L, Notarfranchi L, Raimondi V, Toscani D, Burroughs Garcia J, Costa F, Dalla Palma B, Iannozzi NT, Sammarelli G, Donofrio G, Giuliani N. Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and booster dose in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies: impact of Omicron variant on the humoral response. Oncoimmunology 2022; 11:2120275. [PMID: 36105747 PMCID: PMC9467550 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2120275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Storti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Rosanna Vescovini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Luca Russo
- Department of Medical-Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Raimondi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Denise Toscani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Federica Costa
- School of Medicine, “Università del Piemonte Orientale”, Novara, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Gaetano Donofrio
- Department of Medical-Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nicola Giuliani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Hematology, “Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma”, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Agarwal G, Nador G, Varghese S, Getu H, Palmer C, Watson E, Pereira C, Sallemi G, Partington K, Patel N, Soundarajan R, Mills R, Brouwer R, Maritati M, Shah A, Peppercorn D, Oppermann U, Edwards CM, Rodgers CT, Javaid MK, Gooding S, Ramasamy K. Prospective Assessment of Tumour Burden and Bone Disease in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Using DW-MRI and Exploratory Bone Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010095. [PMID: 36612090 PMCID: PMC9817825 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Novel biomarkers for tumour burden and bone disease are required to guide clinical management of plasma cell dyscrasias. Recently, bone turnover markers (BTMs) and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) have been explored, although their role in the prospective assessment of multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is unclear. Here, we conducted a pilot observational cohort feasibility study combining serum BTMs and DW-MRI in addition to standard clinical assessment. Fifty-five patients were recruited (14 MGUS, 15 smouldering MM, 14 new MM and 12 relapsed MM) and had DW-MRI and serum biomarkers (P1NP, CTX-1, ALP, DKK1, sclerostin, RANKL:OPG and BCMA) measured at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Serum sclerostin positively correlated with bone mineral density (r = 0.40-0.54). At baseline, serum BCMA correlated with serum paraprotein (r = 0.42) and serum DKK1 correlated with serum free light chains (r = 0.67); the longitudinal change in both biomarkers differed between International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)-defined responders and non-responders. Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS) scoring of serial DW-MRI correlated with conventional IMWG response criteria for measuring longitudinal changes in tumour burden. Overall, our pilot study suggests candidate radiological and serum biomarkers of tumour burden and bone loss in MM/MGUS, which warrant further exploration in larger cohorts to validate the findings and to better understand their clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Agarwal
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Correspondence: (G.A.); (K.R.)
| | - Guido Nador
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Sherin Varghese
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Hiwot Getu
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Charlotte Palmer
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Edmund Watson
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Claudio Pereira
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Germana Sallemi
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Karen Partington
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Neel Patel
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Rajkumar Soundarajan
- Oxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Rebecca Mills
- Oxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Richard Brouwer
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Marina Maritati
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Aarti Shah
- Department of Radiology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire SO22 5DG, UK
| | - Delia Peppercorn
- Department of Radiology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire SO22 5DG, UK
| | - Udo Oppermann
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Claire M. Edwards
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences (NDS), Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | | | - Muhammad Kassim Javaid
- Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Sarah Gooding
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
- MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
- Correspondence: (G.A.); (K.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Thorsteinsdottir S. The consultant's guide to smoldering multiple myeloma. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2022; 2022:551-559. [PMID: 36485144 PMCID: PMC9821526 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2022000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor condition to multiple myeloma (MM). The prevalence of SMM is 0.5% in persons over 40 years old; it is higher in men than women and increases with age. When SMM is diagnosed, a thorough diagnostic workup is necessary to exclude myeloma-defining events and stratify patients according to risk of progression to MM. While close monitoring for progression remains the best management for most patients with SMM, in this article, we discuss if treatment initiation before myeloma-defining events occur might be relevant in selected high-risk cases. Two randomized clinical trials have shown a clinical benefit of initiating treatment at the SMM stage, whereof 1 showed an overall survival benefit for those receiving treatment. We discuss various risk stratification models in SMM, important treatment trials, and ongoing trials. Finally, we present how to approach the clinical management of patients with SMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|