1
|
Melone V, Palumbo D, Palo L, Brusco N, Salvati A, Tarallo A, Giurato G, Rizzo F, Nassa G, Weisz A, Tarallo R. LncRNA PVT1 links estrogen receptor alpha and the polycomb repressive complex 2 in suppression of pro-apoptotic genes in hormone-responsive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis 2025; 16:80. [PMID: 39922814 PMCID: PMC11807188 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-025-07423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/10/2025]
Abstract
RNA-based therapeutics highlighted novel approaches to target either coding or noncoding molecules for multiple diseases treatment. In breast cancer (BC), a multitude of deregulated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified as potential therapeutic targets also in the context of antiestrogen resistance, and the RNA binding activity of the estrogen receptor α (ERα) points additional potential candidates to interfere with estrogenic signaling. A set of lncRNAs was selected among ERα-associated RNAs in BC cell nuclei due to their roles in processes such as transcriptional regulation and epigenetic chromatin modifications. Native immunoprecipitation of nuclear ERα-interacting RNAs coupled to NGS (RIP-Seq) was performed in MCF-7 cells, leading to the identification of essential lncRNAs interacting with the receptor in multi-molecular regulatory complexes. Among these, PVT1, FGD5-AS1 and EPB41L4A-AS1 were selected for further investigation. Functional assays and transcriptome analysis following lncRNA knock-down indicated PVT1 as the master modulator of some of the most relevant BC hallmarks, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and response to hypoxia. In addition, targeted experiments identified PVT1 as a key factor in the composition of PRC2-ERα network involved in downregulation of tumor suppressor genes, including BTG2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Melone
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Domenico Palumbo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Luigi Palo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
- Genome Research Center for Health, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Noemi Brusco
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Annamaria Salvati
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Antonietta Tarallo
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, 80131, Naples, Italy
- Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, 80078, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Giorgio Giurato
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Francesca Rizzo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Giovanni Nassa
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Alessandro Weisz
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
- Genome Research Center for Health, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
- Medical Genomics Program and Division of Oncology, AOU 'S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona' University of Salerno, and Rete Oncologica Campana, 84131, Salerno, Italy.
| | - Roberta Tarallo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DiCiaccio B, Seehawer M, Li Z, Patmanidis A, Bui T, Foidart P, Nishida J, D'Santos CS, Papachristou EK, Papanastasiou M, Reiter AH, Qiu X, Li R, Jiang Y, Huang XY, Simeonov A, Kales SC, Rai G, Lal-Nag M, Jadhav A, Brown M, Carroll JS, Long HW, Polyak K. ZBTB7A is a modulator of KDM5-driven transcriptional networks in basal breast cancer. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114991. [PMID: 39570746 PMCID: PMC11694571 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
We previously described that the KDM5B histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase is an oncogene in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Here, we report that KDM5A is amplified and overexpressed in basal breast tumors, and KDM5 inhibition (KDM5i) suppresses the growth of KDM5-amplified breast cancer cell lines. Using CRISPR knockout screens in a basal breast cancer cell line with or without KDM5i, we found that deletion of the ZBTB7A transcription factor and core SAGA complex sensitizes cells to KDM5i, whereas deletion of RHO-GTPases leads to resistance. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed co-localization of ZBTB7A and KDM5A/B at promoters with high histone H3K4me3 and dependence of KDM5A chromatin binding on ZBTB7A. ZBTB7A knockout altered the transcriptional response to KDM5i at NF-κB targets and mitochondrion-related pathways. High expression of ZBTB7A in triple-negative breast cancer is significantly associated with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our work furthers the understanding of KDM5-mediated gene regulation and identifies mediators of sensitivity to KDM5i.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto DiCiaccio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Marco Seehawer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Zheqi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andriana Patmanidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Triet Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pierre Foidart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jun Nishida
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Clive S D'Santos
- Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew H Reiter
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Xintao Qiu
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Rong Li
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Yijia Jiang
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Xiao-Yun Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Anton Simeonov
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Stephen C Kales
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ganesha Rai
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Madhu Lal-Nag
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ajit Jadhav
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Myles Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Henry W Long
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; The Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Chen F, Chen L, Liu J, Tseng D, Hadi F, Omarjee S, Kishore K, Kent J, Kirkpatrick J, D'Santos C, Lawson M, Gertz J, Sikora MJ, McDonnell DP, Carroll JS, Polyak K, Oesterreich S, Lee AV. The EstroGene2.0 database for endocrine therapy response and resistance in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:106. [PMID: 39702552 PMCID: PMC11659402 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) are the cornerstone to treat ER-positive breast cancers patients, but resistance often limits their effectiveness. Notable progress has been made although the fragmented way data is reported has reduced their potential impact. Here, we introduce EstroGene2.0, an expanded database of its precursor 1.0 version. EstroGene2.0 focusses on response and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer models. Incorporating multi-omic profiling of 361 experiments from 212 studies across 28 cell lines, a user-friendly browser offers comprehensive data visualization and metadata mining capabilities ( https://estrogeneii.web.app/ ). Taking advantage of the harmonized data collection, our follow-up meta-analysis revealed transcriptomic landscape and substantial diversity in response to different classes of ER modulators. Endocrine-resistant models exhibit a spectrum of transcriptomic alterations including a contra-directional shift in ER and interferon signalings, which is recapitulated clinically. Dissecting multiple ESR1-mutant cell models revealed the different clinical relevance of cell model engineering and identified high-confidence mutant-ER targets, such as NPY1R. These examples demonstrate how EstroGene2.0 helps investigate breast cancer's response to endocrine therapies and explore resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheqi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangyuan Chen
- School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Li Chen
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jiebin Liu
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Tseng
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Fazal Hadi
- AstraZeneca, The Discovery Centre, Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Soleilmane Omarjee
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamal Kishore
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joshua Kent
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joanna Kirkpatrick
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clive D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mandy Lawson
- AstraZeneca, The Discovery Centre, Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jason Gertz
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew J Sikora
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Donald P McDonnell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steffi Oesterreich
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian V Lee
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun G, Zhao C, Han J, Wu S, Chen Y, Yao J, Li L. Regulatory mechanisms of steroid hormone receptors on gene transcription through chromatin interaction and enhancer reprogramming. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2024; 47:2073-2090. [PMID: 39543064 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-024-01011-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Regulation of steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) on transcriptional reprogramming is crucial for breast cancer progression. SHRs, including estrogen receptor (ER), androgen receptor (AR), progesterone receptor (PR), and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) play key roles in remodeling the transcriptome of breast cancer cells. However, the molecular mechanisms by which SHRs regulate chromatin landscape in enhancer regions and transcription factor interactions remain largely unknown. In this review, we summarized the regulatory effects of 3 types of SHRs (AR, PR, and GR) on gene transcription through chromatin interactions and enhancer reprogramming. Specifically, AR and PR exhibit bi-directional regulatory effects (both inhibitory and promoting) on ER-mediated gene transcription, while GR modulates the transcription of pro-proliferation genes in ER-positive breast cancer cells. In addition, we have presented four enhancer reprogramming mechanisms (transcription factor cooperation, pioneer factor binding, dynamic assisted loading, and tethering) and the multiple enhancer-promoter contact models. Based on these mechanisms and models, this review proposes that the combination of multiple therapy strategies such as agonists/antagonists of SHRs plus endocrine therapy and the adoption of the latest sequencing technologies are expected to improve the efficacy of ER positive breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Sun
- Gene Regulation and Diseases Lab, College of Life Science and Technology, College of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, PR China
| | - Chunguang Zhao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China
| | - Jing Han
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, P.R. China
| | - Shaoya Wu
- Gene Regulation and Diseases Lab, College of Life Science and Technology, College of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, PR China
| | - Yan Chen
- Gene Regulation and Diseases Lab, College of Life Science and Technology, College of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, PR China
| | - Jing Yao
- Cancer Center, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| | - Li Li
- Gene Regulation and Diseases Lab, College of Life Science and Technology, College of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beck D, Cao H, Tian F, Huang Y, Jiang M, Zhao H, Tai X, Xu W, Kosasih HJ, Kealy DJ, Zhao W, Taylor SJ, Couttas TA, Song G, Chacon-Fajardo D, Walia Y, Wang M, Dowle AA, Holding AN, Bridge KS, Zhang C, Wang J, Mi JQ, Lock RB, de Bock CE, Jing D. PU.1 eviction at lymphocyte-specific chromatin domains mediates glucocorticoid response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Commun 2024; 15:9697. [PMID: 39516193 PMCID: PMC11549222 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54096-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The epigenetic landscape plays a critical role in cancer progression, yet its therapeutic potential remains underexplored. Glucocorticoids are essential components of treatments for lymphoid cancers, but resistance, driven in part by epigenetic changes at glucocorticoid-response elements, poses a major challenge to effective therapies. Here we show that glucocorticoid treatment induces distinct patterns of chromosomal organization in glucocorticoid-sensitive and resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenograft models. These glucocorticoid-response elements are primed by the pioneer transcription factor PU.1, which interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor. Eviction of PU.1 promotes receptor binding, increasing the expression of genes involved in apoptosis and facilitating a stronger therapeutic response. Treatment with a PU.1 inhibitor enhances glucocorticoid sensitivity, demonstrating the clinical potential of targeting this pathway. This study uncovers a mechanism involving PU.1 and the glucocorticoid receptor, linking transcription factor activity with drug response, and suggesting potential therapeutic strategies for overcoming resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Beck
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- Centre for Health Technologies and the School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Honghui Cao
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Tian
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Medical Data Science, Institute of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yizhou Huang
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Miao Jiang
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Han Zhao
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolu Tai
- Department of Orthopedics and Precision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqian Xu
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hansen J Kosasih
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David J Kealy
- Centre for Blood Research, University of York, England, UK
| | - Weiye Zhao
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, England, UK
| | - Samuel J Taylor
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Randwick, NY, USA
| | - Timothy A Couttas
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gaoxian Song
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Diego Chacon-Fajardo
- Centre for Health Technologies and the School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yashna Walia
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics and Precision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Adam A Dowle
- Metabolomics & Proteomics Laboratory, Bioscience Technology Facility, Department of Biology, University of York, England, UK
| | - Andrew N Holding
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, England, UK
| | | | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics and Precision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Qing Mi
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Richard B Lock
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Charles E de Bock
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Duohui Jing
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li KM, Deng LG, Xue LJ, Tan C, Yao SK. AXL inhibition prevents RPA2/CHK1-mediated homologous recombination to increase PARP inhibitor sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Heliyon 2024; 10:e36283. [PMID: 39281567 PMCID: PMC11399589 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination defects (HRD) render cells fail to repair DNA double-strand break (DSB), which causes synthetic lethality in these cells with punch by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). Here, we reveal a receptor tyrosine kinase, AXL, whose inhibition leads to HRD in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. AXL is upregulated in HCC tumors, which is positively correlated with low survival rates. AXL knockdown or AXL inhibition by bemcentinib reduces HR efficiency in HCC cells, and AXL plays its role in HR repair through its kinase activity. Furthermore, we find that AXL interacts with RPA2, enhancing the recruitment of RPA2 to DNA damage sites. Mechanistically, AXL promotes the tyrosinization of RPA2 at tyrosine 9, promoting the phosphorylation of CHK1, thereby strengthens the HR repair ability in HCC cells to resist DNA damage. In conclusion, our results reveal that AXL is a promising therapeutic biomarker for HCC patients, and present that targeting AXL-RPA2-CHK1 pathway together with PARP inhibitor will be effective therapeutic strategy in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Min Li
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Li-gong Deng
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Li-Jun Xue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250013, Shandong Province, China
| | - Chang Tan
- Graduate School, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Shu-Kun Yao
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Corcoran SR, Phelan JD, Choi J, Shevchenko G, Fenner RE, Yu X, Scheich S, Hsiao T, Morris VM, Papachristou EK, Kishore K, D'Santos CS, Ji Y, Pittaluga S, Wright GW, Urlaub H, Pan KT, Oellerich T, Muppidi J, Hodson DJ, Staudt LM. Molecular Determinants of Sensitivity to Polatuzumab Vedotin in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Cancer Discov 2024; 14:1653-1674. [PMID: 38683128 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola-V) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed to the CD79B subunit of the B-cell receptor (BCR). When combined with conventional immunochemotherapy, Pola-V improves outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To identify determinants of Pola-V sensitivity, we used CRISPR-Cas9 screening for genes that modulated Pola-V toxicity for lymphomas or the surface expression of its target, CD79B. Our results reveal the striking impact of CD79B glycosylation on Pola-V epitope availability on the lymphoma cell surface and on Pola-V toxicity. Genetic, pharmacological, and enzymatic approaches that remove sialic acid from N-linked glycans enhanced lymphoma killing by Pola-V. Pola-V toxicity was also modulated by KLHL6, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is recurrently inactivated in germinal center derived lymphomas. We reveal how KLHL6 targets CD79B for degradation in normal and malignant germinal center B cells, thereby determining expression of the surface BCR complex. Our findings suggest precision medicine strategies to optimize Pola-V as a lymphoma therapeutic. Significance: These findings unravel the molecular basis of response heterogeneity to Pola-V and identify approaches that might be deployed therapeutically to enhance the efficacy of CD79B-specific tumor killing. In addition, they reveal a novel post-translational mechanism used by normal and malignant germinal center B cells to regulate expression of the BCR. See related commentary by Leveille, p. 1577 See related article by Meriranta et al.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R Corcoran
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James D Phelan
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jaewoo Choi
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Galina Shevchenko
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel E Fenner
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Yu
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sebastian Scheich
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Tony Hsiao
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Vivian M Morris
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Kamal Kishore
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Clive S D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yanlong Ji
- Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stefania Pittaluga
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - George W Wright
- Biometrics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Henning Urlaub
- Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Kuan-Ting Pan
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas Oellerich
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jagan Muppidi
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daniel J Hodson
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Louis M Staudt
- Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Capatina AL, Malcolm JR, Stenning J, Moore RL, Bridge KS, Brackenbury WJ, Holding AN. Hypoxia-induced epigenetic regulation of breast cancer progression and the tumour microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol 2024; 12:1421629. [PMID: 39282472 PMCID: PMC11392762 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1421629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The events that control breast cancer progression and metastasis are complex and intertwined. Hypoxia plays a key role both in oncogenic transformation and in fueling the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. Here we review the impact of hypoxia on epigenetic regulation of breast cancer, by interfering with multiple aspects of the tumour microenvironment. The co-dependent relationship between oxygen depletion and metabolic shift to aerobic glycolysis impacts on a range of enzymes and metabolites available in the cell, promoting posttranslational modifications of histones and chromatin, and changing the gene expression landscape to facilitate tumour development. Hormone signalling, particularly through ERα, is also tightly regulated by hypoxic exposure, with HIF-1α expression being a prognostic marker for therapeutic resistance in ER+ breast cancers. This highlights the strong need to understand the hypoxia-endocrine signalling axis and exploit it as a therapeutic target. Furthermore, hypoxia has been shown to enhance metastasis in TNBC cells, as well as promoting resistance to taxanes, radiotherapy and even immunotherapy through microRNA regulation and changes in histone packaging. Finally, several other mediators of the hypoxic response are discussed. We highlight a link between ionic dysregulation and hypoxia signalling, indicating a potential connection between HIF-1α and tumoural Na+ accumulation which would be worth further exploration; we present the role of Ca2+ in mediating hypoxic adaptation via chromatin remodelling, transcription factor recruitment and changes in signalling pathways; and we briefly summarise some of the findings regarding vesicle secretion and paracrine induced epigenetic reprogramming upon hypoxic exposure in breast cancer. By summarising these observations, this article highlights the heterogeneity of breast cancers, presenting a series of pathways with potential for therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jodie R Malcolm
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Stenning
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael L Moore
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine S Bridge
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - William J Brackenbury
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N Holding
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dubois V, Lefebvre P, Staels B, Eeckhoute J. Nuclear receptors: pathophysiological mechanisms and drug targets in liver disease. Gut 2024; 73:1562-1569. [PMID: 38862216 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors required for liver development and function. As a consequence, NRs have emerged as attractive drug targets in a wide range of liver diseases. However, liver dysfunction and failure are linked to loss of hepatocyte identity characterised by deficient NR expression and activities. This might at least partly explain why several pharmacological NR modulators have proven insufficiently efficient to improve liver functionality in advanced stages of diseases such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). In this perspective, we review the most recent advances in the hepatic NR field and discuss the contribution of multiomic approaches to our understanding of their role in the molecular organisation of an intricated transcriptional regulatory network, as well as in liver intercellular dialogues and interorgan cross-talks. We discuss the potential benefit of novel therapeutic approaches simultaneously targeting multiple NRs, which would not only reactivate the hepatic NR network and restore hepatocyte identity but also impact intercellular and interorgan interplays whose importance to control liver functions is further defined. Finally, we highlight the need of considering individual parameters such as sex and disease stage in the development of NR-based clinical strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Dubois
- Basic and Translational Endocrinology (BaTE), Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Lefebvre
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1011-EGID, Lille, France
| | - Bart Staels
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1011-EGID, Lille, France
| | - Jerome Eeckhoute
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1011-EGID, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Z, Chen F, Chen L, Liu J, Tseng D, Hadi F, Omarjee S, Kishore K, Kent J, Kirkpatrick J, D’Santos C, Lawson M, Gertz J, Sikora MJ, McDonnell DP, Carroll JS, Polyak K, Oesterreich S, Lee AV. EstroGene2.0: A multi-omic database of response to estrogens, ER-modulators, and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.28.601163. [PMID: 39005294 PMCID: PMC11244912 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.28.601163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) are the cornerstone to treat ER-positive breast cancers patients, but resistance often limits their effectiveness. Understanding the molecular mechanisms is thus key to optimize the existing drugs and to develop new ER-modulators. Notable progress has been made although the fragmented way data is reported has reduced their potential impact. Here, we introduce EstroGene2.0, an expanded database of its precursor 1.0 version. EstroGene2.0 focusses on response and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer models. Incorporating multi-omic profiling of 361 experiments from 212 studies across 28 cell lines, a user-friendly browser offers comprehensive data visualization and metadata mining capabilities (https://estrogeneii.web.app/). Taking advantage of the harmonized data collection, our follow-up meta-analysis revealed substantial diversity in response to different classes of ER-modulators including SERMs, SERDs, SERCA and LDD/PROTAC. Notably, endocrine resistant models exhibit a spectrum of transcriptomic alterations including a contra-directional shift in ER and interferon signaling, which is recapitulated clinically. Furthermore, dissecting multiple ESR1-mutant cell models revealed the different clinical relevance of genome-edited versus ectopic overexpression model engineering and identified high-confidence mutant-ER targets, such as NPY1R. These examples demonstrate how EstroGene2.0 helps investigate breast cancer's response to endocrine therapies and explore resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheqi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangyuan Chen
- School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | - Li Chen
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | - Jiebin Liu
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Tseng
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | | | - Soleilmane Omarjee
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamal Kishore
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joshua Kent
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joanna Kirkpatrick
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clive D’Santos
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jason Gertz
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew J. Sikora
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Donald P. McDonnell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jason S. Carroll
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steffi Oesterreich
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | - Adrian V. Lee
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, USA
- Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bacabac M, Liu P, Xu W. Protein Arginine Methyltransferase CARM1 in Human Breast Cancer. Endocrinology 2024; 165:bqae068. [PMID: 38878278 PMCID: PMC11220664 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqae068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is a protein arginine methyltransferase that deposits asymmetrical dimethylation marks on both histone and nonhistone substrates. The regulatory role of CARM1 in transcription was first identified in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Since then, the mechanism of CARM1 in activating ER-target genes has been further interrogated. CARM1 is expressed at the highest level in ER negative (ER-) breast cancer and higher expression correlates with poor prognosis, suggesting an oncogenic role of CARM1. Indeed, in ER- breast cancer, CARM1 can promote proliferation and metastasis at least partly through methylation of proteins and activation of oncogenes. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of transcriptional activation by CARM1 in breast cancer. The methyltransferase activity of CARM1 is important for many of its functions; here, we also highlight the nonenzymatic roles of CARM1. We also cover the biological processes regulated by CARM1 that are often deregulated in cancer and the ways to harness CARM1 in cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Bacabac
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- UW Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Peng Liu
- UW Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53726, USA
| | - Wei Xu
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- UW Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Theofilatos D, Ho T, Waitt G, Äijö T, Schiapparelli LM, Soderblom EJ, Tsagaratou A. Deciphering the TET3 interactome in primary thymic developing T cells. iScience 2024; 27:109782. [PMID: 38711449 PMCID: PMC11070343 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins are DNA dioxygenases that mediate active DNA demethylation. TET3 is the most highly expressed TET protein in thymic developing T cells. TET3, either independently or in cooperation with TET1 or TET2, has been implicated in T cell lineage specification by regulating DNA demethylation. However, TET-deficient mice exhibit complex phenotypes, suggesting that TET3 exerts multifaceted roles, potentially by interacting with other proteins. We performed liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in primary developing T cells to identify TET3 interacting partners in endogenous, in vivo conditions. We discover TET3 interacting partners. Our data establish that TET3 participates in a plethora of fundamental biological processes, such as transcriptional regulation, RNA polymerase elongation, splicing, DNA repair, and DNA replication. This resource brings in the spotlight emerging functions of TET3 and sets the stage for systematic studies to dissect the precise mechanistic contributions of TET3 in shaping T cell biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitris Theofilatos
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tricia Ho
- Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Greg Waitt
- Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tarmo Äijö
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Erik J. Soderblom
- Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ageliki Tsagaratou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh K, Showalter CA, Manring HR, Haque SJ, Chakravarti A. "Oh, Dear We Are in Tribble": An Overview of the Oncogenic Functions of Tribbles 1. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1889. [PMID: 38791967 PMCID: PMC11120034 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Pseudokinases are catalytically inactive proteins in the human genome that lack the ability to transfer phosphate from ATP to their substrates. The Tribbles family of pseudokinases contains three members: Tribbles 1, 2, and 3. Tribbles 1 has recently gained importance because of its involvement in various diseases, including cancer. It acts as a scaffolding protein that brings about the degradation of its substrate proteins, such as C/EBPα/β, MLXIPL, and RAR/RXRα, among others, via the ubiquitin proteasome system. It also serves as an adapter protein, which sequesters different protein molecules and activates their downstream signaling, leading to processes, such as cell survival, cell proliferation, and lipid metabolism. It has been implicated in cancers such as AML, prostate cancer, breast cancer, CRC, HCC, and glioma, where it activates oncogenic signaling pathways such as PI3K-AKT and MAPK and inhibits the anti-tumor function of p53. TRIB1 also causes treatment resistance in cancers such as NSCLC, breast cancer, glioma, and promyelocytic leukemia. All these effects make TRIB1 a potential drug target. However, the lack of a catalytic domain renders TRIB1 "undruggable", but knowledge about its structure, conformational changes during substrate binding, and substrate binding sites provides an opportunity to design small-molecule inhibitors against specific TRIB1 interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jakobsen ST, Jensen RAM, Madsen MS, Ravnsborg T, Vaagenso CS, Siersbæk MS, Einarsson H, Andersson R, Jensen ON, Siersbæk R. MYC activity at enhancers drives prognostic transcriptional programs through an epigenetic switch. Nat Genet 2024; 56:663-674. [PMID: 38454021 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01676-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
The transcription factor MYC is overexpressed in most cancers, where it drives multiple hallmarks of cancer progression. MYC is known to promote oncogenic transcription by binding to active promoters. In addition, MYC has also been shown to invade distal enhancers when expressed at oncogenic levels, but this enhancer binding has been proposed to have low gene-regulatory potential. Here, we demonstrate that MYC directly regulates enhancer activity to promote cancer type-specific gene programs predictive of poor patient prognosis. MYC induces transcription of enhancer RNA through recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), rather than regulating RNAPII pause-release, as is the case at promoters. This process is mediated by MYC-induced H3K9 demethylation and acetylation by GCN5, leading to enhancer-specific BRD4 recruitment through its bromodomains, which facilitates RNAPII recruitment. We propose that MYC drives prognostic cancer type-specific gene programs through induction of an enhancer-specific epigenetic switch, which can be targeted by BET and GCN5 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon T Jakobsen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rikke A M Jensen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maria S Madsen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tina Ravnsborg
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Majken S Siersbæk
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hjorleifur Einarsson
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Genomic Mechanisms of Disease, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robin Andersson
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Genomic Mechanisms of Disease, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ole N Jensen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Siersbæk
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
MYC activates transcriptional enhancers to drive cancer progression. Nat Genet 2024; 56:567-568. [PMID: 38480925 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01677-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
|
16
|
De Marchi T, Lai CF, Simmons GM, Goldsbrough I, Harrod A, Lam T, Buluwela L, Kjellström S, Brueffer C, Saal LH, Malmström J, Ali S, Niméus E. Proteomic profiling reveals that ESR1 mutations enhance cyclin-dependent kinase signaling. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6873. [PMID: 38519482 PMCID: PMC10959978 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56412-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Three quarters of all breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER, ESR1 gene), which promotes tumor growth and constitutes a direct target for endocrine therapies. ESR1 mutations have been implicated in therapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer, in particular to aromatase inhibitors. ESR1 mutations promote constitutive ER activity and affect other signaling pathways, allowing cancer cells to proliferate by employing mechanisms within and without direct regulation by the ER. Although subjected to extensive genetic and transcriptomic analyses, understanding of protein alterations remains poorly investigated. Towards this, we employed an integrated mass spectrometry based proteomic approach to profile the protein and phosphoprotein differences in breast cancer cell lines expressing the frequent Y537N and Y537S ER mutations. Global proteome analysis revealed enrichment of mitotic and immune signaling pathways in ER mutant cells, while phosphoprotein analysis evidenced enriched activity of proliferation associated kinases, in particular CDKs and mTOR. Integration of protein expression and phosphorylation data revealed pathway-dependent discrepancies (motility vs proliferation) that were observed at varying degrees across mutant and wt ER cells. Additionally, protein expression and phosphorylation patterns, while under different regulation, still recapitulated the estrogen-independent phenotype of ER mutant cells. Our study is the first proteome-centric characterization of ESR1 mutant models, out of which we confirm estrogen independence of ER mutants and reveal the enrichment of immune signaling pathways at the proteomic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso De Marchi
- Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Solvegatan 19, 22362, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Chun-Fui Lai
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Georgia M Simmons
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Isabella Goldsbrough
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Alison Harrod
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Thai Lam
- Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Solvegatan 19, 22362, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lakjaya Buluwela
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Sven Kjellström
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Center for Molecular Protein Science, Lund University, Solvegatan 19, 22362, Lund, Sweden
- Swedish National Infrastructure for Biological Mass Spectrometry - BioMS, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christian Brueffer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, 22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lao H Saal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, 22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Malmström
- Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Klinikgatan 32, 22184, Lund, Sweden
| | - Simak Ali
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Emma Niméus
- Division of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Solvegatan 19, 22362, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Veth TS, Kannegieter NM, de Graaf EL, Ruijtenbeek R, Joore J, Ressa A, Altelaar M. Innovative strategies for measuring kinase activity to accelerate the next wave of novel kinase inhibitors. Drug Discov Today 2024; 29:103907. [PMID: 38301799 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
The development of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) has gained significance owing to their therapeutic potential for diseases like cancer. In addition, there has been a rise in refining kinase activity assays, each possessing unique biological and analytical characteristics crucial for PKI development. However, the PKI development pipeline experiences high attrition rates and approved PKIs exhibit unexploited potential because of variable patient responses. Enhancing PKI development efficiency involves addressing challenges related to understanding the PKI mechanism of action and employing biomarkers for precision medicine. Selecting appropriate kinase activity assays for these challenges can overcome these attrition rate issues. This review delves into the current obstacles in kinase inhibitor development and elucidates kinase activity assays that can provide solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim S Veth
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands; Netherlands Proteomics Center, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik L de Graaf
- Pepscope, Nieuwe Kanaal 7, 6709 PA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jos Joore
- Pepscope, Nieuwe Kanaal 7, 6709 PA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Ressa
- Pepscope, Nieuwe Kanaal 7, 6709 PA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Altelaar
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands; Netherlands Proteomics Center, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hosseinzadeh L, Kikhtyak Z, Laven-Law G, Pederson SM, Puiu CG, D'Santos CS, Lim E, Carroll JS, Tilley WD, Dwyer AR, Hickey TE. The androgen receptor interacts with GATA3 to transcriptionally regulate a luminal epithelial cell phenotype in breast cancer. Genome Biol 2024; 25:44. [PMID: 38317241 PMCID: PMC10840202 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03161-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The androgen receptor (AR) is a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, a role sustained in some ER negative breast cancers. Key factors dictating AR genomic activity in a breast context are largely unknown. Herein, we employ an unbiased chromatin immunoprecipitation-based proteomic technique to identify endogenous AR interacting co-regulatory proteins in ER positive and negative models of breast cancer to gain new insight into mechanisms of AR signaling in this disease. RESULTS The DNA-binding factor GATA3 is identified and validated as a novel AR interacting protein in breast cancer cells irrespective of ER status. AR activation by the natural ligand 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) increases nuclear AR-GATA3 interactions, resulting in AR-dependent enrichment of GATA3 chromatin binding at a sub-set of genomic loci. Silencing GATA3 reduces but does not prevent AR DNA binding and transactivation of genes associated with AR/GATA3 co-occupied loci, indicating a co-regulatory role for GATA3 in AR signaling. DHT-induced AR/GATA3 binding coincides with upregulation of luminal differentiation genes, including EHF and KDM4B, established master regulators of a breast epithelial cell lineage. These findings are validated in a patient-derived xenograft model of breast cancer. Interaction between AR and GATA3 is also associated with AR-mediated growth inhibition in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS AR and GATA3 interact to transcriptionally regulate luminal epithelial cell differentiation in breast cancer regardless of ER status. This interaction facilitates the tumor suppressor function of AR and mechanistically explains why AR expression is associated with less proliferative, more differentiated breast tumors and better overall survival in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Hosseinzadeh
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Zoya Kikhtyak
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Geraldine Laven-Law
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Stephen M Pederson
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Caroline G Puiu
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Clive S D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elgene Lim
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wayne D Tilley
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Amy R Dwyer
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Theresa E Hickey
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rega C, Kozik Z, Yu L, Tsitsa I, Martin LA, Choudhary J. Exploring the Spatial Landscape of the Estrogen Receptor Proximal Proteome With Antibody-Based Proximity Labeling. Mol Cell Proteomics 2024; 23:100702. [PMID: 38122900 PMCID: PMC10831774 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Estrogen receptor α (ERα) drives the transcription of genes involved in breast cancer (BC) progression, relying on coregulatory protein recruitment for its transcriptional and biological activities. Mutation of ERα as well as aberrant recruitment of its regulatory proteins contribute to tumor adaptation and drug resistance. Therefore, understanding the dynamic changes in ERα protein interaction networks is crucial for elucidating drug resistance mechanisms in BC. Despite progress in studying ERα-associated proteins, capturing subcellular transient interactions remains challenging and, as a result, significant number of important interactions remain undiscovered. In this study, we employed biotinylation by antibody recognition (BAR), an innovative antibody-based proximity labeling (PL) approach, coupled with mass spectrometry to investigate the ERα proximal proteome and its changes associated with resistance to aromatase inhibition, a key therapy used in the treatment of ERα-positive BC. We show that BAR successfully detected most of the known ERα interactors and mainly identified nuclear proteins, using either an epitope tag or endogenous antibody to target ERα. We further describe the ERα proximal proteome rewiring associated with resistance applying BAR to a panel of isogenic cell lines modeling tumor adaptation in the clinic. Interestingly, we find that ERα associates with some of the canonical cofactors in resistant cells and several proximal proteome changes are due to increased expression of ERα. Resistant models also show decreased levels of estrogen-regulated genes. Sensitive and resistant cells harboring a mutation in the ERα (Y537C) revealed a similar proximal proteome. We provide an ERα proximal protein network covering several novel ERα-proximal partners. These include proteins involved in highly dynamic processes such as sumoylation and ubiquitination difficult to detect with traditional protein interaction approaches. Overall, we present BAR as an effective approach to investigate the ERα proximal proteome in a spatial context and demonstrate its application in different experimental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rega
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Zuzanna Kozik
- Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lu Yu
- Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ifigenia Tsitsa
- Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley-Ann Martin
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jyoti Choudhary
- Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carden S, Vitiello E, Rosa E Silva I, Holder J, Quarantotti V, Kishore K, Roamio Franklin VN, D'Santos C, Ochi T, van Breugel M, Gergely F. Proteomic profiling of centrosomes across multiple mammalian cell and tissue types by an affinity capture method. Dev Cell 2023; 58:2393-2410.e9. [PMID: 37852252 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Centrosomes are the major microtubule-organizing centers in animals and play fundamental roles in many cellular processes. Understanding how their composition varies across diverse cell types and how it is altered in disease are major unresolved questions, yet currently available centrosome isolation protocols are cumbersome and time-consuming, and they lack scalability. Here, we report the development of centrosome affinity capture (CAPture)-mass spectrometry (MS), a powerful one-step purification method to obtain high-resolution centrosome proteomes from mammalian cells. Utilizing a synthetic peptide derived from CCDC61 protein, CAPture specifically isolates intact centrosomes. Importantly, as a bead-based affinity method, it enables rapid sample processing and multiplexing unlike conventional approaches. Our study demonstrates the power of CAPture-MS to elucidate cell-type-dependent heterogeneity in centrosome composition, dissect hierarchical interactions, and identify previously unknown centrosome components. Overall, CAPture-MS represents a transformative tool to unveil temporal, regulatory, cell-type- and tissue-specific changes in centrosome proteomes in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Carden
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elisa Vitiello
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - James Holder
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valentina Quarantotti
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamal Kishore
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Clive D'Santos
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Takashi Ochi
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; The Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Mark van Breugel
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; School of Biological & Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Fanni Gergely
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mayayo-Peralta I, Gregoricchio S, Schuurman K, Yavuz S, Zaalberg A, Kojic A, Abbott N, Geverts B, Beerthuijzen S, Siefert J, Severson TM, van Baalen M, Hoekman L, Lieftink C, Altelaar M, Beijersbergen RL, Houtsmuller A, Prekovic S, Zwart W. PAXIP1 and STAG2 converge to maintain 3D genome architecture and facilitate promoter/enhancer contacts to enable stress hormone-dependent transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:9576-9593. [PMID: 37070193 PMCID: PMC10570044 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
How steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) regulate transcriptional activity remains partly understood. Upon activation, SHRs bind the genome together with a co-regulator repertoire, crucial to induce gene expression. However, it remains unknown which components of the SHR-recruited co-regulator complex are essential to drive transcription following hormonal stimuli. Through a FACS-based genome-wide CRISPR screen, we functionally dissected the Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) complex. We describe a functional cross-talk between PAXIP1 and the cohesin subunit STAG2, critical for regulation of gene expression by GR. Without altering the GR cistrome, PAXIP1 and STAG2 depletion alter the GR transcriptome, by impairing the recruitment of 3D-genome organization proteins to the GR complex. Importantly, we demonstrate that PAXIP1 is required for stability of cohesin on chromatin, its localization to GR-occupied sites, and maintenance of enhancer-promoter interactions. In lung cancer, where GR acts as tumor suppressor, PAXIP1/STAG2 loss enhances GR-mediated tumor suppressor activity by modifying local chromatin interactions. All together, we introduce PAXIP1 and STAG2 as novel co-regulators of GR, required to maintain 3D-genome architecture and drive the GR transcriptional programme following hormonal stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Mayayo-Peralta
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Gregoricchio
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karianne Schuurman
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Selçuk Yavuz
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherland
| | - Anniek Zaalberg
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aleksandar Kojic
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Abbott
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Geverts
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherland
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Beerthuijzen
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph Siefert
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tesa M Severson
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn van Baalen
- Flow Cytometry Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Hoekman
- Proteomics Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cor Lieftink
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The NKI Robotics and Screening Centre, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Altelaar
- Proteomics Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roderick L Beijersbergen
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The NKI Robotics and Screening Centre, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan B Houtsmuller
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherland
| | - Stefan Prekovic
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The human genome is organized into multiple structural layers, ranging from chromosome territories to progressively smaller substructures, such as topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromatin loops. These substructures, collectively referred to as long-range chromatin interactions (LRIs), have a significant role in regulating gene expression. TADs are regions of the genome that harbour groups of genes and regulatory elements that frequently interact with each other and are insulated from other regions, thereby preventing widespread uncontrolled DNA contacts. Chromatin loops formed within TADs through enhancer and promoter interactions are elastic, allowing transcriptional heterogeneity and stochasticity. Over the past decade, it has become evident that the 3D genome structure, also referred to as the chromatin architecture, is central to many transcriptional cellular decisions. In this Review, we delve into the intricate relationship between steroid receptors and LRIs, discussing how steroid receptors interact with and modulate these chromatin interactions. Genetic alterations in the many processes involved in organizing the nuclear architecture are often associated with the development of hormone-dependent cancers. A better understanding of the interplay between architectural proteins and hormone regulatory networks can ultimately be exploited to develop improved approaches for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theophilus T Tettey
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lorenzo Rinaldi
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Poulard C, Ha Pham T, Drouet Y, Jacquemetton J, Surmielova A, Kassem L, Mery B, Lasset C, Reboulet J, Treilleux I, Marangoni E, Trédan O, Le Romancer M. Nuclear PRMT5 is a biomarker of sensitivity to tamoxifen in ERα + breast cancer. EMBO Mol Med 2023; 15:e17248. [PMID: 37458145 PMCID: PMC10405064 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202217248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Endocrine therapies targeting estrogen signaling, such as tamoxifen, have significantly improved management of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancers. However, their efficacy is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance to treatment, and there is currently no predictive marker of response to these anti-estrogens to guide treatment decision. Here, using two independent cohorts of breast cancer patients, we identified nuclear PRMT5 expression as an independent predictive marker of sensitivity to tamoxifen. Mechanistically, we discovered that tamoxifen stimulates ERα methylation by PRMT5, a key event for its binding to corepressors such as SMRT and HDAC1, participating in the inhibition of the transcriptional activity of ERα. Although PRMT5 is mainly localized in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, our analyses show that tamoxifen triggers its nuclear translocation in tamoxifen-sensitive tumors but not in resistant ones. Hence, we unveil a biomarker of sensitivity to tamoxifen in ERα-positive breast tumors that could be used to enhance the response of breast cancer patients to endocrine therapy, by fostering its nuclear expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralie Poulard
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
| | - Thuy Ha Pham
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
| | - Youenn Drouet
- Département Prévention et Santé PubliqueCentre Léon BérardLyonFrance
| | - Julien Jacquemetton
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
| | - Ausra Surmielova
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
| | - Loay Kassem
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Benoite Mery
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- Oncology DepartmentCentre Leon BérardLyonFrance
| | - Christine Lasset
- Département Prévention et Santé PubliqueCentre Léon BérardLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR 5558 LBBEUniversité de LyonVilleurbanneFrance
| | | | - Isabelle Treilleux
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- Pathology DepartmentCentre Leon BérardLyonFrance
| | | | - Olivier Trédan
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- Oncology DepartmentCentre Leon BérardLyonFrance
| | - Muriel Le Romancer
- Université de LyonLyonFrance
- Inserm U1052Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
- CNRS UMR5286Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de LyonLyonFrance
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rogerson C, Sciacovelli M, Maddalena LA, Pouikli A, Segarra-Mondejar M, Valcarcel-Jimenez L, Schmidt C, Yang M, Ivanova E, Kent J, Mora A, Cheeseman D, Carroll JS, Kelsey G, Frezza C. FOXA2 controls the anti-oxidant response in FH-deficient cells. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112751. [PMID: 37405921 PMCID: PMC10391629 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is a cancer syndrome caused by inactivating germline mutations in fumarate hydratase (FH) and subsequent accumulation of fumarate. Fumarate accumulation leads to profound epigenetic changes and the activation of an anti-oxidant response via nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NRF2. The extent to which chromatin remodeling shapes this anti-oxidant response is currently unknown. Here, we explored the effects of FH loss on the chromatin landscape to identify transcription factor networks involved in the remodeled chromatin landscape of FH-deficient cells. We identify FOXA2 as a key transcription factor that regulates anti-oxidant response genes and subsequent metabolic rewiring cooperating without direct interaction with the anti-oxidant regulator NRF2. The identification of FOXA2 as an anti-oxidant regulator provides additional insights into the molecular mechanisms behind cell responses to fumarate accumulation and potentially provides further avenues for therapeutic intervention for HLRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Rogerson
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marco Sciacovelli
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucas A Maddalena
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andromachi Pouikli
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD)
| | - Marc Segarra-Mondejar
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD)
| | - Lorea Valcarcel-Jimenez
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD)
| | - Christina Schmidt
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD)
| | - Ming Yang
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD)
| | - Elena Ivanova
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joshua Kent
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ariane Mora
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Molecular Biosciences Building 76, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Danya Cheeseman
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jason S Carroll
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gavin Kelsey
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science - Metabolic Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christian Frezza
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD); University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD).
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang J, Hu Z, Chung HH, Tian Y, Lau KW, Ser Z, Lim YT, Sobota RM, Leong HF, Chen BJ, Yeo CJ, Tan SYX, Kang J, Tan DEK, Sou IF, McClurg UL, Lakshmanan M, Vaiyapuri TS, Raju A, Wong ESM, Tergaonkar V, Rajarethinam R, Pathak E, Tam WL, Tan EY, Tee WW. Dependency of NELF-E-SLUG-KAT2B epigenetic axis in breast cancer carcinogenesis. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2439. [PMID: 37117180 PMCID: PMC10147683 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38132-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer cells undergo transcriptional reprogramming to drive tumor progression and metastasis. Using cancer cell lines and patient-derived tumor organoids, we demonstrate that loss of the negative elongation factor (NELF) complex inhibits breast cancer development through downregulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stemness-associated genes. Quantitative multiplexed Rapid Immunoprecipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins (qPLEX-RIME) further reveals a significant rewiring of NELF-E-associated chromatin partners as a function of EMT and a co-option of NELF-E with the key EMT transcription factor SLUG. Accordingly, loss of NELF-E leads to impaired SLUG binding on chromatin. Through integrative transcriptomic and genomic analyses, we identify the histone acetyltransferase, KAT2B, as a key functional target of NELF-E-SLUG. Genetic and pharmacological inactivation of KAT2B ameliorate the expression of EMT markers, phenocopying NELF ablation. Elevated expression of NELF-E and KAT2B is associated with poorer prognosis in breast cancer patients, highlighting the clinical relevance of our findings. Taken together, we uncover a crucial role of the NELF-E-SLUG-KAT2B epigenetic axis in breast cancer carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieqiong Zhang
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117593, Republic of Singapore
| | - Zhenhua Hu
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Hwa Hwa Chung
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Yun Tian
- Department of Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 210004, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kah Weng Lau
- Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - Zheng Ser
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, SingMass National Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Yan Ting Lim
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, SingMass National Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Radoslaw M Sobota
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, SingMass National Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Hwei Fen Leong
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Benjamin Jieming Chen
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Clarisse Jingyi Yeo
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Shawn Ying Xuan Tan
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Jian Kang
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Dennis Eng Kiat Tan
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Ieng Fong Sou
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
| | - Urszula Lucja McClurg
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
| | - Manikandan Lakshmanan
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Thamil Selvan Vaiyapuri
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Anandhkumar Raju
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Esther Sook Miin Wong
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Vinay Tergaonkar
- Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Republic of Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 8 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Republic of Singapore
| | - Ravisankar Rajarethinam
- Advanced Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Elina Pathak
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Drive, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore
| | - Wai Leong Tam
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 8 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Republic of Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Drive, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433, Republic of Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 308232, Republic of Singapore
| | - Wee-Wei Tee
- Chromatin Dynamics and Disease Epigenetics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Republic of Singapore.
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117593, Republic of Singapore.
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Demond H, Hanna CW, Castillo-Fernandez J, Santos F, Papachristou EK, Segonds-Pichon A, Kishore K, Andrews S, D'Santos CS, Kelsey G. Multi-omics analyses demonstrate a critical role for EHMT1 methyltransferase in transcriptional repression during oogenesis. Genome Res 2023; 33:18-31. [PMID: 36690445 PMCID: PMC9977154 DOI: 10.1101/gr.277046.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
EHMT1 (also known as GLP) is a multifunctional protein, best known for its role as an H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 methyltransferase through its reportedly obligatory dimerization with EHMT2 (also known as G9A). Here, we investigated the role of EHMT1 in the oocyte in comparison to EHMT2 using oocyte-specific conditional knockout mouse models (Ehmt2 cKO, Ehmt1 cKO, Ehmt1/2 cDKO), with ablation from the early phase of oocyte growth. Loss of EHMT1 in Ehmt1 cKO and Ehmt1/2 cDKO oocytes recapitulated meiotic defects observed in the Ehmt2 cKO; however, there was a significant impairment in oocyte maturation and developmental competence in Ehmt1 cKO and Ehmt1/2 cDKO oocytes beyond that observed in the Ehmt2 cKO. Consequently, loss of EHMT1 in oogenesis results, upon fertilization, in mid-gestation embryonic lethality. To identify H3K9 methylation and other meaningful biological changes in each mutant to explore the molecular functions of EHMT1 and EHMT2, we performed immunofluorescence imaging, multi-omics sequencing, and mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteome analyses in cKO oocytes. Although H3K9me1 was depleted only upon loss of EHMT1, H3K9me2 was decreased, and H3K9me2-enriched domains were eliminated equally upon loss of EHMT1 or EHMT2. Furthermore, there were more significant changes in the transcriptome, DNA methylome, and proteome in Ehmt1/2 cDKO than Ehmt2 cKO oocytes, with transcriptional derepression leading to increased protein abundance and local changes in genic DNA methylation in Ehmt1/2 cDKO oocytes. Together, our findings suggest that EHMT1 contributes to local transcriptional repression in the oocyte, partially independent of EHMT2, and is critical for oogenesis and oocyte developmental competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Demond
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;,Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Laboratory of Integrative Biology (LIBi), Centro de Excelencia en Medicina Traslacional (CEMT), Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, 4810296, Temuco, Chile
| | - Courtney W. Hanna
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;,Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom;,Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom
| | | | - Fátima Santos
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;,Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom
| | - Evangelia K. Papachristou
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Segonds-Pichon
- Bioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom
| | - Kamal Kishore
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Andrews
- Bioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom
| | - Clive S. D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin Kelsey
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;,Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom;,Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science–Metabolic Research Laboratories, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Martinez P, Patel H, You Y, Jury N, Perkins A, Lee-Gosselin A, Taylor X, You Y, Viana Di Prisco G, Huang X, Dutta S, Wijeratne AB, Redding-Ochoa J, Shahid SS, Codocedo JF, Min S, Landreth GE, Mosley AL, Wu YC, McKinzie DL, Rochet JC, Zhang J, Atwood BK, Troncoso J, Lasagna-Reeves CA. Bassoon contributes to tau-seed propagation and neurotoxicity. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25:1597-1607. [PMID: 36344699 PMCID: PMC9708566 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01191-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Tau aggregation is a defining histopathological feature of Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. However, the cellular mechanisms involved in tau propagation remain unclear. Here, we performed an unbiased quantitative proteomic study to identify proteins that specifically interact with this tau seed. We identified Bassoon (BSN), a presynaptic scaffolding protein, as an interactor of the tau seed isolated from a mouse model of tauopathy, and from Alzheimer's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy postmortem samples. We show that BSN exacerbates tau seeding and toxicity in both mouse and Drosophila models for tauopathy, and that BSN downregulation decreases tau spreading and overall disease pathology, rescuing synaptic and behavioral impairments and reducing brain atrophy. Our findings improve the understanding of how tau seeds can be stabilized by interactors such as BSN. Inhibiting tau-seed interactions is a potential new therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative tauopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Martinez
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Henika Patel
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yanwen You
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nur Jury
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Abigail Perkins
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Audrey Lee-Gosselin
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Xavier Taylor
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yingjian You
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Xiaoqing Huang
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sayan Dutta
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Aruna B Wijeratne
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Javier Redding-Ochoa
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Syed Salman Shahid
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Juan F Codocedo
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sehong Min
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Gary E Landreth
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Amber L Mosley
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yu-Chien Wu
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - David L McKinzie
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jean-Christophe Rochet
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Jie Zhang
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brady K Atwood
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Juan Troncoso
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cristian A Lasagna-Reeves
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Elacestrant demonstrates strong anti-estrogenic activity in PDX models of estrogen-receptor positive endocrine-resistant and fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:125. [PMID: 36446866 PMCID: PMC9709100 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00483-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), fulvestrant, is limited in its use for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) by its poor oral bioavailability. Comparison of the orally bioavailable investigational SERD elacestrant, versus fulvestrant, demonstrates both drugs impact tumour growth of ER+ patient-derived xenograft models harbouring several ESR1 mutations but that elacestrant is active after acquired resistance to fulvestrant. In cell line models of endocrine sensitive and resistant breast cancer both drugs impact the ER-cistrome, ER-interactome and transcription of oestrogen-regulated genes similarly, confirming the anti-oestrogenic activity of elacestrant. The addition of elacestrant to CDK4/6 inhibitors enhances the antiproliferative effect compared to monotherapy. Furthermore, elacestrant inhibits the growth of palbociclib-resistant cells. Lastly, resistance to elacestrant involves Type-I and Type-II receptor tyrosine kinases which are amenable to therapeutic targeting. Our data support the wider clinical testing of elacestrant.
Collapse
|
29
|
Cryo-EM reveals the architecture of the PELP1-WDR18 molecular scaffold. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6783. [PMID: 36351913 PMCID: PMC9646879 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34610-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PELP1 (Proline-, Glutamic acid-, Leucine-rich protein 1) is a large scaffolding protein that functions in many cellular pathways including steroid receptor (SR) coactivation, heterochromatin maintenance, and ribosome biogenesis. PELP1 is a proto-oncogene whose expression is upregulated in many human cancers, but how the PELP1 scaffold coordinates its diverse cellular functions is poorly understood. Here we show that PELP1 serves as the central scaffold for the human Rix1 complex whose members include WDR18, TEX10, and SENP3. We reconstitute the mammalian Rix1 complex and identified a stable sub-complex comprised of the conserved PELP1 Rix1 domain and WDR18. We determine a 2.7 Å cryo-EM structure of the subcomplex revealing an interconnected tetrameric assembly and the architecture of PELP1's signaling motifs, including eleven LxxLL motifs previously implicated in SR signaling and coactivation of Estrogen Receptor alpha (ERα) mediated transcription. However, the structure shows that none of these motifs is in a conformation that would support SR binding. Together this work establishes that PELP1 scaffolds the Rix1 complex, and association with WDR18 may direct PELP1's activity away from SR coactivation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Mangolini M, Maiques-Diaz A, Charalampopoulou S, Gerhard-Hartmann E, Bloehdorn J, Moore A, Giachetti G, Lu J, Roamio Franklin VN, Chilamakuri CSR, Moutsopoulos I, Rosenwald A, Stilgenbauer S, Zenz T, Mohorianu I, D'Santos C, Deaglio S, Hodson DJ, Martin-Subero JI, Ringshausen I. Viral transduction of primary human lymphoma B cells reveals mechanisms of NOTCH-mediated immune escape. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6220. [PMID: 36266281 PMCID: PMC9585083 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33739-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Hotspot mutations in the PEST-domain of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 are recurrently identified in B cell malignancies. To address how NOTCH-mutations contribute to a dismal prognosis, we have generated isogenic primary human tumor cells from patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), differing only in their expression of the intracellular domain (ICD) of NOTCH1 or NOTCH2. Our data demonstrate that both NOTCH-paralogs facilitate immune-escape of malignant B cells by up-regulating PD-L1, partly dependent on autocrine interferon-γ signaling. In addition, NOTCH-activation causes silencing of the entire HLA-class II locus via epigenetic regulation of the transcriptional co-activator CIITA. Notably, while NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 govern similar transcriptional programs, disease-specific differences in their expression levels can favor paralog-specific selection. Importantly, NOTCH-ICD also strongly down-regulates the expression of CD19, possibly limiting the effectiveness of immune-therapies. These NOTCH-mediated immune escape mechanisms are associated with the expansion of exhausted CD8+ T cells in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Mangolini
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Alba Maiques-Diaz
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Johannes Bloehdorn
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of CLL, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andrew Moore
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Giorgia Giachetti
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Junyan Lu
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Ilias Moutsopoulos
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Pathologisches Institut Universität Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Stilgenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of CLL, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thorsten Zenz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Molecular Therapy in Hematology and Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer, Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Irina Mohorianu
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
| | - Clive D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Silvia Deaglio
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniel J Hodson
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Jose I Martin-Subero
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ingo Ringshausen
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK.
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gregoricchio S, Polit L, Esposito M, Berthelet J, Delestré L, Evanno E, Diop M, Gallais I, Aleth H, Poplineau M, Zwart W, Rosenbauer F, Rodrigues-Lima F, Duprez E, Boeva V, Guillouf C. HDAC1 and PRC2 mediate combinatorial control in SPI1/PU.1-dependent gene repression in murine erythroleukaemia. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:7938-7958. [PMID: 35871293 PMCID: PMC9371914 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Although originally described as transcriptional activator, SPI1/PU.1, a major player in haematopoiesis whose alterations are associated with haematological malignancies, has the ability to repress transcription. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying gene repression in the erythroid lineage, in which SPI1 exerts an oncogenic function by blocking differentiation. We show that SPI1 represses genes by binding active enhancers that are located in intergenic or gene body regions. HDAC1 acts as a cooperative mediator of SPI1-induced transcriptional repression by deacetylating SPI1-bound enhancers in a subset of genes, including those involved in erythroid differentiation. Enhancer deacetylation impacts on promoter acetylation, chromatin accessibility and RNA pol II occupancy. In addition to the activities of HDAC1, polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) reinforces gene repression by depositing H3K27me3 at promoter sequences when SPI1 is located at enhancer sequences. Moreover, our study identified a synergistic relationship between PRC2 and HDAC1 complexes in mediating the transcriptional repression activity of SPI1, ultimately inducing synergistic adverse effects on leukaemic cell survival. Our results highlight the importance of the mechanism underlying transcriptional repression in leukemic cells, involving complex functional connections between SPI1 and the epigenetic regulators PRC2 and HDAC1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gregoricchio
- Inserm U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus , F- 94800 Villejuif, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Lélia Polit
- CNRS UMR8104, Inserm U1016, Université Paris Cité, Cochin Institute , F-75014 Paris , France
| | - Michela Esposito
- Inserm U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus , F- 94800 Villejuif, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| | | | - Laure Delestré
- Inserm U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus , F- 94800 Villejuif, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| | - Emilie Evanno
- Curie Institute , Inserm U830, F- 75005 Paris, France
| | - M’Boyba Diop
- Inserm U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus , F- 94800 Villejuif, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| | | | - Hanna Aleth
- Institute of Molecular Tumor Biology, University of Münster , Münster, Germany
| | - Mathilde Poplineau
- CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Université Aix Marseille, Paoli-Calmettes Institute , CRCM, F-13009 Marseille , France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Frank Rosenbauer
- Institute of Molecular Tumor Biology, University of Münster , Münster, Germany
| | | | - Estelle Duprez
- CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Université Aix Marseille, Paoli-Calmettes Institute , CRCM, F-13009 Marseille , France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| | - Valentina Boeva
- CNRS UMR8104, Inserm U1016, Université Paris Cité, Cochin Institute , F-75014 Paris , France
- Department of Computer Science and Department of Biology , ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Christel Guillouf
- Inserm U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus , F- 94800 Villejuif, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer , France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hunter AL, Adamson AD, Poolman TM, Grudzien M, Loudon ASI, Ray DW, Bechtold DA. HaloChIP-seq for Antibody-Independent Mapping of Mouse Transcription Factor Cistromes in vivo. Bio Protoc 2022; 12:e4460. [PMID: 35937930 PMCID: PMC9303821 DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.4460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) maps, on a genome-wide scale, transcription factor binding sites, and the distribution of other chromatin-associated proteins and their modifications. As such, it provides valuable insights into mechanisms of gene regulation. However, successful ChIP experiments are dependent on the availability of a high-quality antibody against the target of interest. Using antibodies with poor sensitivity and specificity can yield misleading results. This can be partly circumvented by using epitope-tagged systems ( e.g. , HA, Myc, His), but these approaches are still antibody-dependent. HaloTag ® is a modified dehalogenase enzyme, which covalently binds synthetic ligands. This system can be used for imaging and purification of HaloTag ® fusion proteins, and has been used for ChIP in vitro . Here, we present a protocol for using the HaloTag ® system for ChIP in vivo , to map, with sensitivity and specificity, the cistrome of a dynamic mouse transcription factor expressed at its endogenous locus. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Louise Hunter
- Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| | - Antony D. Adamson
- Genome Editing Unit, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| | - Toryn M. Poolman
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Magdalena Grudzien
- Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew S. I. Loudon
- Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| | - David W. Ray
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Bechtold
- Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Patel SA, Hirosue S, Rodrigues P, Vojtasova E, Richardson EK, Ge J, Syafruddin SE, Speed A, Papachristou EK, Baker D, Clarke D, Purvis S, Wesolowski L, Dyas A, Castillon L, Caraffini V, Bihary D, Yong C, Harrison DJ, Stewart GD, Machiela MJ, Purdue MP, Chanock SJ, Warren AY, Samarajiwa SA, Carroll JS, Vanharanta S. The renal lineage factor PAX8 controls oncogenic signalling in kidney cancer. Nature 2022; 606:999-1006. [PMID: 35676472 PMCID: PMC9242860 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04809-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Large-scale human genetic data1-3 have shown that cancer mutations display strong tissue-selectivity, but how this selectivity arises remains unclear. Here, using experimental models, functional genomics and analyses of patient samples, we demonstrate that the lineage transcription factor paired box 8 (PAX8) is required for oncogenic signalling by two common genetic alterations that cause clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in humans: the germline variant rs7948643 at 11q13.3 and somatic inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor (VHL)4-6. VHL loss, which is observed in about 90% of ccRCCs, can lead to hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF2A) stabilization6,7. We show that HIF2A is preferentially recruited to PAX8-bound transcriptional enhancers, including a pro-tumorigenic cyclin D1 (CCND1) enhancer that is controlled by PAX8 and HIF2A. The ccRCC-protective allele C at rs7948643 inhibits PAX8 binding at this enhancer and downstream activation of CCND1 expression. Co-option of a PAX8-dependent physiological programme that supports the proliferation of normal renal epithelial cells is also required for MYC expression from the ccRCC metastasis-associated amplicons at 8q21.3-q24.3 (ref. 8). These results demonstrate that transcriptional lineage factors are essential for oncogenic signalling and that they mediate tissue-specific cancer risk associated with somatic and inherited genetic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saroor A Patel
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shoko Hirosue
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paulo Rodrigues
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erika Vojtasova
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emma K Richardson
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jianfeng Ge
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Saiful E Syafruddin
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Bandar Tun Razak, Malaysia
| | - Alyson Speed
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David Baker
- Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - David Clarke
- Cambridge Genomics Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephenie Purvis
- Cambridge Genomics Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ludovic Wesolowski
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anna Dyas
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Leticia Castillon
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Veronica Caraffini
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dóra Bihary
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cissy Yong
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mitchell J Machiela
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Purdue
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shamith A Samarajiwa
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sakari Vanharanta
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sigismondo G, Papageorgiou DN, Krijgsveld J. Cracking chromatin with proteomics: From chromatome to histone modifications. Proteomics 2022; 22:e2100206. [PMID: 35633285 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202100206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin is the assembly of genomic DNA and proteins packaged in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, which together are crucial in regulating a plethora of cellular processes. Histones may be the best known class of protein constituents in chromatin, which are decorated by a range of post-translational modifications to recruit accessory proteins and protein complexes to execute specific functions, ranging from DNA compaction, repair, transcription and duplication, all in a dynamic fashion and depending on the cellular state. The key role of chromatin in cellular fitness is emphasized by the deregulation of chromatin determinants predisposing to different diseases, including cancer. For this reason, deep investigation of chromatin composition is fundamental to better understand cellular physiology. Proteomic approaches have played a crucial role to understand critical aspects of this complex interplay, benefiting from the ability to identify and quantify proteins and their modifications in an unbiased manner. This review gives an overview of the proteomic approaches that have been developed by combining mass spectrometry-based with tailored biochemical and genetic methods to examine overall protein make-up of chromatin, to characterize chromatin domains, to determine protein interactions, and to decipher the broad spectrum of histone modifications that represent the quintessence of chromatin function. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Sigismondo
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Proteomics of Stem Cells and Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimitris N Papageorgiou
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Proteomics of Stem Cells and Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Krijgsveld
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Proteomics of Stem Cells and Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jafari H, Hussain S, Campbell MJ. Nuclear Receptor Coregulators in Hormone-Dependent Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2402. [PMID: 35626007 PMCID: PMC9139824 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) function collectively as a transcriptional signaling network that mediates gene regulatory actions to either maintain cellular homeostasis in response to hormonal, dietary and other environmental factors, or act as orphan receptors with no known ligand. NR complexes are large and interact with multiple protein partners, collectively termed coregulators. Coregulators are essential for regulating NR activity and can dictate whether a target gene is activated or repressed by a variety of mechanisms including the regulation of chromatin accessibility. Altered expression of coregulators contributes to a variety of hormone-dependent cancers including breast and prostate cancers. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which coregulators interact with and modulate the activity of NRs provides opportunities to develop better prognostic and diagnostic approaches, as well as novel therapeutic targets. This review aims to gather and summarize recent studies, techniques and bioinformatics methods used to identify distorted NR coregulator interactions that contribute as cancer drivers in hormone-dependent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedieh Jafari
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Shahid Hussain
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Moray J. Campbell
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rogawski R, Sharon M. Characterizing Endogenous Protein Complexes with Biological Mass Spectrometry. Chem Rev 2022; 122:7386-7414. [PMID: 34406752 PMCID: PMC9052418 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Biological mass spectrometry (MS) encompasses a range of methods for characterizing proteins and other biomolecules. MS is uniquely powerful for the structural analysis of endogenous protein complexes, which are often heterogeneous, poorly abundant, and refractive to characterization by other methods. Here, we focus on how biological MS can contribute to the study of endogenous protein complexes, which we define as complexes expressed in the physiological host and purified intact, as opposed to reconstituted complexes assembled from heterologously expressed components. Biological MS can yield information on complex stoichiometry, heterogeneity, topology, stability, activity, modes of regulation, and even structural dynamics. We begin with a review of methods for isolating endogenous complexes. We then describe the various biological MS approaches, focusing on the type of information that each method yields. We end with future directions and challenges for these MS-based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rivkah Rogawski
- Department of Biomolecular
Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Michal Sharon
- Department of Biomolecular
Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
HDACs and the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells: Target the complexity. Pharmacol Ther 2022; 238:108190. [PMID: 35430294 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cancer cells must adapt to the hostile conditions of the microenvironment in terms of nutrition, space, and immune system attack. Mutations of DNA are the drivers of the tumorigenic process, but mutations must be able to hijack cellular functions to sustain the spread of mutant genomes. Transcriptional control is a key function in this context and is controlled by the rearrangement of the epigenome. Unlike genomic mutations, the epigenome of cancer cells can in principle be reversed. The discovery of the first epigenetic drugs triggered a contaminating enthusiasm. Unfortunately, the complexity of the epigenetic machinery has frustrated this enthusiasm. To develop efficient patient-oriented epigenetic therapies, we need to better understand the nature of this complexity. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in understanding the contribution of HDACs to the maintenance of the transformed state and the rational for their selective targeting.
Collapse
|
38
|
Collier AJ, Bendall A, Fabian C, Malcolm AA, Tilgner K, Semprich CI, Wojdyla K, Nisi PS, Kishore K, Roamio Franklin VN, Mirshekar-Syahkal B, D’Santos C, Plath K, Yusa K, Rugg-Gunn PJ. Genome-wide screening identifies Polycomb repressive complex 1.3 as an essential regulator of human naïve pluripotent cell reprogramming. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabk0013. [PMID: 35333572 PMCID: PMC8956265 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Uncovering the mechanisms that establish naïve pluripotency in humans is crucial for the future applications of pluripotent stem cells including the production of human blastoids. However, the regulatory pathways that control the establishment of naïve pluripotency by reprogramming are largely unknown. Here, we use genome-wide screening to identify essential regulators as well as major impediments of human primed to naïve pluripotent stem cell reprogramming. We discover that factors essential for cell state change do not typically undergo changes at the level of gene expression but rather are repurposed with new functions. Mechanistically, we establish that the variant Polycomb complex PRC1.3 and PRDM14 jointly repress developmental and gene regulatory factors to ensure naïve cell reprogramming. In addition, small-molecule inhibitors of reprogramming impediments improve naïve cell reprogramming beyond current methods. Collectively, this work defines the principles controlling the establishment of human naïve pluripotency and also provides new insights into mechanisms that destabilize and reconfigure cell identity during cell state transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J. Collier
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam Bendall
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Andrew A. Malcolm
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome–MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katarzyna Tilgner
- Stem Cell Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Kamal Kishore
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Clive D’Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kathrin Plath
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kosuke Yusa
- Stem Cell Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
- Stem Cell Genetics, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Peter J. Rugg-Gunn
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome–MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Robust co-immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry for Caenorhabditis elegans using solid-phase enhanced sample preparation. Biotechniques 2022; 72:175-184. [PMID: 35297663 DOI: 10.2144/btn-2021-0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Studying protein interactions in vivo can reveal key molecular mechanisms of biological processes. Co-immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry detects protein-protein interactions with high throughput. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a powerful genetic model organism for in vivo studies. Yet its rigid and complex tissues require optimization for biochemistry applications to ensure reproducibility. The authors optimized co-immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry by combining a native co-immunoprecipitation procedure with single-pot, solid-phase enhanced sample preparation. The authors' results for the highly conserved chromatin regulator FACT subunits HMG-3 and HMG-4 demonstrated that single-pot, solid-phase enhanced sample preparation-integrated co-immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry procedures for C. elegans samples are highly robust. Moreover, in an accompanying study about the chromodomain factor MRG-1 (MRG15 in humans), the authors demonstrated remarkably high reproducibility for ten replicate experiments.
Collapse
|
40
|
Paul SN, Wingenfeld K, Otte C, Meijer OC. Brain Mineralocorticoid receptor in health and disease: from molecular signaling to cognitive and emotional function. Br J Pharmacol 2022; 179:3205-3219. [PMID: 35297038 PMCID: PMC9323486 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) mediate effects of glucocorticoid hormones in stress adaptation, as well as the effects of aldosterone itself in relation to salt homeostasis. Brain stem MRs respond to aldosterone, whereas forebrain MRs mediate rapid and delayed glucocorticoid effects in conjunction with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). MR‐mediated effects depend on age, gender, genetic variations, and environmental influences. Disturbed MR activity through chronic stress, certain (endocrine) diseases or during glucocorticoid therapy can cause deleterious effects on affective state, cognitive and behavioural function in susceptible individuals. Considering the important role MR plays in cognition and emotional function in health and disease, MR modulation by pharmacological intervention could relieve stress‐ and endocrine‐related symptoms. Here, we discuss recent pharmacological interventions in the clinic and genetic developments in the molecular underpinnings of MR signalling. Further understanding of MR‐dependent pathways may help to improve psychiatric symptoms in a diversity of settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana N Paul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Wingenfeld
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Otte
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Onno C Meijer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dickerson KM, Qu C, Gao Q, Iacobucci I, Gu Z, Yoshihara H, Backhaus EA, Chang Y, Janke LJ, Xu B, Wu G, Papachristou EK, D'Santos CS, Roberts KG, Mullighan CG. ZNF384 fusion oncoproteins drive lineage aberrancy in acute leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov 2022; 3:240-263. [PMID: 35247902 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
ZNF384-rearranged fusion oncoproteins (FO) define a subset of lineage ambiguous leukemias, but their mechanistic role in leukemogenesis and lineage ambiguity is poorly understood. Using viral expression in mouse and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and a Ep300::Znf384 knockin mouse model, we show that ZNF384 FO promote hematopoietic expansion, myeloid lineage skewing, and self-renewal. In mouse HSPCs, concomitant lesions, such as NRASG12D, were required for fully penetrant leukemia, whereas in human HSPCs expression of ZNF384 FO drove B/myeloid leukemia, with sensitivity of a ZNF384-rearranged xenograft to FLT3 inhibition in vivo. Mechanistically, ZNF384 FO occupy a subset of predominantly intragenic/enhancer regions with increased histone 3 lysine acetylation and deregulate expression of hematopoietic stem cell transcription factors. These data define a paradigm for FO-driven lineage ambiguous leukemia, in which expression in HSPCs results in deregulation of lineage-specific genes and hematopoietic skewing, progressing to full leukemia in the context of proliferative stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chunxu Qu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Qingsong Gao
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
| | - Ilaria Iacobucci
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Zhaohui Gu
- City Of Hope National Medical Center, United States
| | | | - Emily A Backhaus
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Yunchao Chang
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Laura J Janke
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Beisi Xu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Gang Wu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
| | | | - Clive S D'Santos
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Krastev DB, Li S, Sun Y, Wicks AJ, Hoslett G, Weekes D, Badder LM, Knight EG, Marlow R, Pardo MC, Yu L, Talele TT, Bartek J, Choudhary JS, Pommier Y, Pettitt SJ, Tutt ANJ, Ramadan K, Lord CJ. The ubiquitin-dependent ATPase p97 removes cytotoxic trapped PARP1 from chromatin. Nat Cell Biol 2022; 24:62-73. [PMID: 35013556 PMCID: PMC8760077 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00807-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors elicit antitumour activity in homologous recombination-defective cancers by trapping PARP1 in a chromatin-bound state. How cells process trapped PARP1 remains unclear. Using wild-type and a trapping-deficient PARP1 mutant combined with rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous proteins and Apex2 proximity labelling, we delineated mass spectrometry-based interactomes of trapped and non-trapped PARP1. These analyses identified an interaction between trapped PARP1 and the ubiquitin-regulated p97 ATPase/segregase. We found that following trapping, PARP1 is SUMOylated by PIAS4 and subsequently ubiquitylated by the SUMO-targeted E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF4, events that promote recruitment of p97 and removal of trapped PARP1 from chromatin. Small-molecule p97-complex inhibitors, including a metabolite of the clinically used drug disulfiram (CuET), prolonged PARP1 trapping and enhanced PARP inhibitor-induced cytotoxicity in homologous recombination-defective tumour cells and patient-derived tumour organoids. Together, these results suggest that p97 ATPase plays a key role in the processing of trapped PARP1 and the response of tumour cells to PARP inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragomir B Krastev
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Shudong Li
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yilun Sun
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew J Wicks
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gwendoline Hoslett
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Weekes
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Luned M Badder
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor G Knight
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Marlow
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Lu Yu
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Tanaji T Talele
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, USA
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Division of Genome Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jyoti S Choudhary
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yves Pommier
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, London, UK.
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Kristijan Ramadan
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Christopher J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, London, UK.
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Varshney D, Cuesta SM, Herdy B, Abdullah UB, Tannahill D, Balasubramanian S. RNA G-quadruplex structures control ribosomal protein production. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22735. [PMID: 34815422 PMCID: PMC8611094 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01847-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Four-stranded G-quadruplex (G4) structures form from guanine-rich tracts, but the extent of their formation in cellular RNA and details of their role in RNA biology remain poorly defined. Herein, we first delineate the presence of endogenous RNA G4s in the human cytoplasmic transcriptome via the binding sites of G4-interacting proteins, DDX3X (previously published), DHX36 and GRSF1. We demonstrate that a sub-population of these RNA G4s are reliably detected as folded structures in cross-linked cellular lysates using the G4 structure-specific antibody BG4. The 5' UTRs of protein coding mRNAs show significant enrichment in folded RNA G4s, particularly those for ribosomal proteins. Mutational disruption of G4s in ribosomal protein UTRs alleviates translation in vitro, whereas in cells, depletion of G4-resolving helicases or treatment with G4-stabilising small molecules inhibit the translation of ribosomal protein mRNAs. Our findings point to a common mode for translational co-regulation mediated by G4 structures. The results reveal a potential avenue for therapeutic intervention in diseases with dysregulated translation, such as cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhaval Varshney
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Sergio Martinez Cuesta
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Data Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbara Herdy
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Ummi Binti Abdullah
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Tannahill
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Shankar Balasubramanian
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
- Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Burton AJ, Hamza GM, Zhang AX, Muir TW. Chemical biology approaches to study histone interactors. Biochem Soc Trans 2021; 49:2431-2441. [PMID: 34709376 PMCID: PMC9785950 DOI: 10.1042/bst20210772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the nucleus play key roles in transcriptional regulation and ensure genomic stability. Critical to this are histone-mediated PPI networks, which are further fine-tuned through dynamic post-translational modification. Perturbation to these networks leads to genomic instability and disease, presenting epigenetic proteins as key therapeutic targets. This mini-review will describe progress in mapping the combinatorial histone PTM landscape, and recent chemical biology approaches to map histone interactors. Recent advances in mapping direct interactors of histone PTMs as well as local chromatin interactomes will be highlighted, with a focus on mass-spectrometry based workflows that continue to illuminate histone-mediated PPIs in unprecedented detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony J. Burton
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA 02451
| | - Ghaith M. Hamza
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA 02451
- Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
| | - Andrew X. Zhang
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA 02451
| | - Tom W. Muir
- Frick Chemistry Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08544
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kumar S, Freelander A, Lim E. Type 1 Nuclear Receptor Activity in Breast Cancer: Translating Preclinical Insights to the Clinic. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4972. [PMID: 34638457 PMCID: PMC8507977 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The nuclear receptor (NR) family of transcription factors is intimately associated with the development, progression and treatment of breast cancer. They are used diagnostically and prognostically, and crosstalk between nuclear receptor pathways and growth factor signalling has been demonstrated in all major subtypes of breast cancer. The majority of breast cancers are driven by estrogen receptor α (ER), and anti-estrogenic therapies remain the backbone of treatment, leading to clinically impactful improvements in patient outcomes. This serves as a blueprint for the development of therapies targeting other nuclear receptors. More recently, pivotal findings into modulating the progesterone (PR) and androgen receptors (AR), with accompanying mechanistic insights into NR crosstalk and interactions with other proliferative pathways, have led to clinical trials in all of the major breast cancer subtypes. A growing body of evidence now supports targeting other Type 1 nuclear receptors such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), as well as Type 2 NRs such as the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Here, we reviewed the existing preclinical insights into nuclear receptor activity in breast cancer, with a focus on Type 1 NRs. We also discussed the potential to translate these findings into improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Kumar
- Faculty of Medicine, St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia; (A.F.); (E.L.)
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia
| | - Allegra Freelander
- Faculty of Medicine, St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia; (A.F.); (E.L.)
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia
| | - Elgene Lim
- Faculty of Medicine, St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia; (A.F.); (E.L.)
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Simeoni F, Romero-Camarero I, Camera F, Amaral FMR, Sinclair OJ, Papachristou EK, Spencer GJ, Lie-A-Ling M, Lacaud G, Wiseman DH, Carroll JS, Somervaille TCP. Enhancer recruitment of transcription repressors RUNX1 and TLE3 by mis-expressed FOXC1 blocks differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep 2021; 36:109725. [PMID: 34551306 PMCID: PMC8480281 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite absent expression in normal hematopoiesis, the Forkhead factor FOXC1, a critical mesenchymal differentiation regulator, is highly expressed in ∼30% of HOXAhigh acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases to confer blocked monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Through integrated proteomics and bioinformatics, we find that FOXC1 and RUNX1 interact through Forkhead and Runt domains, respectively, and co-occupy primed and active enhancers distributed close to differentiation genes. FOXC1 stabilizes association of RUNX1, HDAC1, and Groucho repressor TLE3 to limit enhancer activity: FOXC1 knockdown induces loss of repressor proteins, gain of CEBPA binding, enhancer acetylation, and upregulation of nearby genes, including KLF2. Furthermore, it triggers genome-wide redistribution of RUNX1, TLE3, and HDAC1 from enhancers to promoters, leading to repression of self-renewal genes, including MYC and MYB. Our studies highlight RUNX1 and CEBPA transcription factor swapping as a feature of leukemia cell differentiation and reveal that FOXC1 prevents this by stabilizing enhancer binding of a RUNX1/HDAC1/TLE3 transcription repressor complex to oncogenic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Simeoni
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Isabel Romero-Camarero
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Francesco Camera
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Fabio M R Amaral
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Oliver J Sinclair
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | | | - Gary J Spencer
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Michael Lie-A-Ling
- Stem Cell Biology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Macclesfield SK10 4TG, UK
| | - Georges Lacaud
- Stem Cell Biology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Macclesfield SK10 4TG, UK
| | - Daniel H Wiseman
- Epigenetics of Haematopoiesis Group, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Tim C P Somervaille
- Leukaemia Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kupp R, Ruff L, Terranova S, Nathan E, Ballereau S, Stark R, Sekhar Reddy Chilamakuri C, Hoffmann N, Wickham-Rahrmann K, Widdess M, Arabzade A, Zhao Y, Varadharajan S, Zheng T, Murugesan M, Pfister SM, Kawauchi D, Pajtler KW, Deneen B, Mack SC, Masih KE, Gryder BE, Khan J, Gilbertson RJ. ZFTA Translocations Constitute Ependymoma Chromatin Remodeling and Transcription Factors. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:2216-2229. [PMID: 33741711 PMCID: PMC8918067 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
ZFTA (C11orf95)-a gene of unknown function-partners with a variety of transcriptional coactivators in translocations that drive supratentorial ependymoma, a frequently lethal brain tumor. Understanding the function of ZFTA is key to developing therapies that inhibit these fusion proteins. Here, using a combination of transcriptomics, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing, and proteomics, we interrogated a series of deletion-mutant genes to identify a tripartite transformation mechanism of ZFTA-containing fusions, including: spontaneous nuclear translocation, extensive chromatin binding, and SWI/SNF, SAGA, and NuA4/Tip60 HAT chromatin modifier complex recruitment. Thereby, ZFTA tethers fusion proteins across the genome, modifying chromatin to an active state and enabling its partner transcriptional coactivators to promote promiscuous expression of a transforming transcriptome. Using mouse models, we validate further those elements of ZFTA-fusion proteins that are critical for transformation-including ZFTA zinc fingers and partner gene transactivation domains-thereby unmasking vulnerabilities for therapeutic targeting. SIGNIFICANCE: Ependymomas are hard-to-treat brain tumors driven by translocations between ZFTA and a variety of transcriptional coactivators. We dissect the transforming mechanism of these fusion proteins and identify protein domains indispensable for tumorigenesis, thereby providing insights into the molecular basis of ependymoma tumorigenesis and vulnerabilities for therapeutic targeting.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Kupp
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Lisa Ruff
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Sabrina Terranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Erica Nathan
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Stephane Ballereau
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Rory Stark
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | | | - Nadin Hoffmann
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | | | - Marcus Widdess
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England
| | - Amir Arabzade
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Yanhua Zhao
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Srinidhi Varadharajan
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Tuyu Zheng
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohankumar Murugesan
- Centre for Stem Cell Research, Christian Medical College Campus, Bagayam, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daisuke Kawauchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular Biology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kristian W Pajtler
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Deneen
- Cancer and Cell Biology Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen C Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Katherine E Masih
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Berkley E Gryder
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Javed Khan
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Richard J Gilbertson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, England.
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Paakinaho V, Palvimo JJ. Genome-wide crosstalk between steroid receptors in breast and prostate cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer 2021; 28:R231-R250. [PMID: 34137734 PMCID: PMC8345902 DOI: 10.1530/erc-21-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Steroid receptors (SRs) constitute an important class of signal-dependent transcription factors (TFs). They regulate a variety of key biological processes and are crucial drug targets in many disease states. In particular, estrogen (ER) and androgen receptors (AR) drive the development and progression of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. Thus, they represent the main specific drug targets in these diseases. Recent evidence has suggested that the crosstalk between signal-dependent TFs is an important step in the reprogramming of chromatin sites; a signal-activated TF can expand or restrict the chromatin binding of another TF. This crosstalk can rewire gene programs and thus alter biological processes and influence the progression of disease. Lately, it has been postulated that there may be an important crosstalk between the AR and the ER with other SRs. Especially, progesterone (PR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) can reprogram chromatin binding of ER and gene programs in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, GR can take the place of AR in antiandrogen-resistant prostate cancer cells. Here, we review the current knowledge of the crosstalk between SRs in breast and prostate cancers. We emphasize how the activity of ER and AR on chromatin can be modulated by other SRs on a genome-wide scale. We also highlight the knowledge gaps in the interplay of SRs and their complex interactions with other signaling pathways and suggest how to experimentally fill in these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ville Paakinaho
- Institute of Biomedicine, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jorma J Palvimo
- Institute of Biomedicine, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Correspondence should be addressed to J J Palvimo:
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Liang J, Wang L, Poluben L, Nouri M, Arai S, Xie L, Voznesensky OS, Cato L, Yuan X, Russo JW, Long HW, Brown M, Chen S, Balk SP. Androgen receptor splice variant 7 functions independently of the full length receptor in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2021; 519:172-184. [PMID: 34256096 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
One mechanism for reactivation of androgen receptor (AR) activity after androgen deprivation therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is expression of splice variants such as ARv7 that delete the ligand binding domain and have constitutive activity. Exogenous overexpressed ARv7 can function as a homodimer or heterodimer with full length AR (ARfl), which is highly expressed with ARv7 in CRPC. However, the extent to which endogenous ARv7 function is dependent on heterodimerization with ARfl remains to be determined. We used double-crosslinking to stabilize AR complexes on chromatin in a CRPC cell line expressing endogenous ARfl and ARv7 (LN95 cells), and established that only trace levels of ARfl were associated with ARv7 on chromatin. Consistent with this result, depletion of ARfl with an AR degrader targeting the AR ligand binding domain did not decrease ARv7 binding to chromatin or its association with HOXB13, but did decrease overall AR transcriptional activity. Comparable results were obtained in CWR22RV1 cells, another CRPC cell line expressing ARfl and ARv7. These results indicate that ARv7 function in CRPC is not dependent on ARfl, and that both contribute independently to overall AR activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqian Liang
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China
| | - Liyang Wang
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Shaanxi Normal University School of Life Sciences, Shaanxi 710062, China
| | - Larysa Poluben
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Mannan Nouri
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Seiji Arai
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Urology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Lisha Xie
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China
| | - Olga S Voznesensky
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Laura Cato
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Xin Yuan
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Joshua W Russo
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Henry W Long
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Myles Brown
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Shaoyong Chen
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Steven P Balk
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fabry MH, Falconio FA, Joud F, Lythgoe EK, Czech B, Hannon GJ. Maternally inherited piRNAs direct transient heterochromatin formation at active transposons during early Drosophila embryogenesis. eLife 2021; 10:e68573. [PMID: 34236313 PMCID: PMC8352587 DOI: 10.7554/elife.68573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway controls transposon expression in animal germ cells, thereby ensuring genome stability over generations. In Drosophila, piRNAs are intergenerationally inherited through the maternal lineage, and this has demonstrated importance in the specification of piRNA source loci and in silencing of I- and P-elements in the germ cells of daughters. Maternally inherited Piwi protein enters somatic nuclei in early embryos prior to zygotic genome activation and persists therein for roughly half of the time required to complete embryonic development. To investigate the role of the piRNA pathway in the embryonic soma, we created a conditionally unstable Piwi protein. This enabled maternally deposited Piwi to be cleared from newly laid embryos within 30 min and well ahead of the activation of zygotic transcription. Examination of RNA and protein profiles over time, and correlation with patterns of H3K9me3 deposition, suggests a role for maternally deposited Piwi in attenuating zygotic transposon expression in somatic cells of the developing embryo. In particular, robust deposition of piRNAs targeting roo, an element whose expression is mainly restricted to embryonic development, results in the deposition of transient heterochromatic marks at active roo insertions. We hypothesize that roo, an extremely successful mobile element, may have adopted a lifestyle of expression in the embryonic soma to evade silencing in germ cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin H Fabry
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Federica A Falconio
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Fadwa Joud
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Emily K Lythgoe
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Czech
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Gregory J Hannon
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing CentreCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|